Back pain during different sequential treatment regimens of teriparatide: results from EUROFORS

Mechanical stimulation-induced purinome priming fosters osteogenic differentiation and osteointegration of mesenchymal stem cells from the bone marrow of post-menopausal women

BACKGROUND

Mechanical stimulation (MS) significantly increases the release of adenine and uracil nucleotides from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) undergoing osteogenic differentiation. Released nucleotides acting via ionotropic P2X7 and metabotropic P2Y6 purinoceptors sensitive to ATP and UDP, respectively, control the osteogenic commitment of BM-MSCs and, thus, bone growth and remodelling. Yet, this mechanism is impaired in post-menopausal (Pm)-derived BM-MSCs, mostly because NTPDase3 overexpression decreases the extracellular accumulation of nucleotides below the levels required to activate plasma membrane-bound P2 purinoceptors. This prompted us to investigate whether in vitro MS of BM-MSCs from Pm women could rehabilitate their osteogenic commitment and whether xenotransplantation of MS purinome-primed Pm cells promote repair of critical bone defects in an in vivo animal model.

METHODS

BM-MSCs were harvested from the neck of femora of Pm women (70 ± 3 years old) undergoing total hip replacement. The cells grew, for 35 days, in an osteogenic-inducing medium either submitted (SS) or not (CTR) to MS (90 r.p.m. for 30 min) twice a week. Increases in alkaline phosphatase activity and in the amount of osteogenic transcription factors, osterix and osteopontin, denoted osteogenic cells differentiation, while bone nodules formation was ascertain by the alizarin red-staining assay. The luciferin-luciferase bioluminescence assay was used to quantify extracellular ATP. The kinetics of the extracellular ATP (100 µM) and UDP (100 µM) catabolism was assessed by HPLC. The density of P2Y6 and P2X7 purinoceptors in the cells was assessed by immunofluorescence confocal microscopy. MS-stimulated BM-MSCs from Pm women were xenotransplanted into critical bone defects drilled in the great trochanter of femora of one-year female Wistar rats; bone repair was assessed by histological analysis 10 days after xenotransplantation.

RESULTS

MS-stimulated Pm BM-MSCs in culture (i) release 1.6-fold higher ATP amounts, (ii) overexpress P2X7 and P2Y6 purinoceptors, (iii) exhibit higher alkaline phosphatase activity and overexpress the osteogenic transcription factors, osterix and osteopontin, and (iv) form larger bone nodules, than CTR cells. Selective blockage of P2X7 and P2Y6 purinoceptors with A438079 (3 µM) and MRS 2578 (0.1 µM), respectively, prevented the osteogenic commitment of cultured Pm BM-MSCs. Xenotransplanted MS purinome-primed Pm BM-MSCs accelerated the repair of critical bone defects in the in vivo rat model.

CONCLUSIONS

Data suggest that in vitro MS restores the purinergic cell-to-cell communication fostering the osteogenic differentiation and osteointegration of BM-MSCs from Pm women, a strategy that may be used in bone regeneration and repair tactics.

Osteoporosis treatments for intervertebral disc degeneration and back pain: a perspective

Low back pain derived from intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is a debilitating spinal condition that, despite its prevalence, does not have any intermediary guidelines for pharmacological treatment between palliative care and invasive surgery. The development of treatments for the IVD is complicated by the variety of resident cell types needed to maintain the regionally distinct structural properties of the IVD that permit the safe, complex motions of the spine. Osteoporosis of the spine increases the risk of vertebral bone fracture that can increase the incidence of back pain. Fortunately, there are a variety of pharmacological treatments for osteoporosis that target osteoblasts, osteoclasts and/or osteocytes to build bone and prevent vertebral fracture. Of particular note, clinical and preclinical studies suggest that commonly prescribed osteoporosis drugs like bisphosphonates, intermittent parathyroid hormone, anti-sclerostin antibody, selective estrogen receptor modulators and anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand inhibitor denosumab may also relieve back pain. Here, we cite clinical and preclinical studies and include unpublished data to support the argument that a subset of these therapeutics for osteoporosis may alleviate low back pain by also targeting the IVD.

Comparative analysis of anti-osteoporosis medications in preventing vertebral body fractures after balloon kyphoplasty

This retrospective study compared the efficacy of anabolic agents (romosozumab and teriparatide) with that of alendronate in preventing subsequent vertebral body fractures (SVBFs) after balloon kyphoplasty (BKP). All anabolic agents significantly reduced SVBFs. Romosozumab was most effective in increasing bone mineral density (BMD) and completely suppressed distant vertebral body fractures.

INTRODUCTION

To determine optimal anti-osteoporosis medications, we compared romosozumab and teriparatide to alendronate as a control from perioperative BKP to the 1st postoperative year for treatment and secondary fracture prevention in osteoporosis.

METHODS

A total of 603 patients who underwent initial BKP for osteoporotic vertebral fractures were evaluated and categorized into five groups based on drug administration: romosozumab (group R, 155 patients), twice-weekly teriparatide (group TW, 48), weekly teriparatide (group W, 151), daily teriparatide (group D, 138), and alendronate (control) (group C, 111). The 1-year incidence of SVBFs, BMD change rate, and probability of requiring BKP were compared among the groups.

RESULTS

SVBF incidence was 3.9%, 6.5%, 8.3%, 6.0%, and 14.4% in groups R, D, TW, W, and C, respectively, with all other groups exhibiting significantly lower rates than group C. The groups that administered the anabolic agents had a notably lower incidence of distant fractures than group C. Compared with group C, group R showed significantly higher BMD change rates in lumbar vertebral bodies at 4, 8, and 12 months and group D at 12 months. Anabolic agent groups exhibited significantly higher improvement rates than group C after conservative treatment alone.

CONCLUSION

The anabolic agents were found to be more effective at reducing the incidence of SVBF (especially distant vertebral fractures) than alendronate. These agents decreased the rate of repeat BKP even after the occurrence of a fracture. Overall, the use of an anabolic agent for the treatment of osteoporosis after BKP is better than the use of alendronate, even when treatment is initiated in the perioperative stage.

Osteoporosis treatment and pain relief: A scoping review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Anti-osteoporosis (OP) drugs have been suggested to contribute to pain reduction during OP management. This scoping review aimed at mapping the literature on pain relief with anti-OP drugs in OP treatment.

DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT

Medline, Pubmed and Cochrane databases were searched by two reviewers with keywords combinations. Randomized controlled and real-life English studies, pain as an endpoint, antiosteoporosis drugs were inclusion criteria. Case reports, surveys, comment letters, conference abstracts, animal studies and grey literature were excluded. Predetermined data were extracted by two reviewers and disagreement solved through discussion.

RESULTS

A total of 130 articles were identified, 31 publications were included, 12 randomized clinical trials and 19 observational studies. Pain reduction was assessed by different tools: Visual Analogue Scale, Verbal Rating Scale, Facial Scale or as a domain of quality of life questionnaires including Short form 8, 36, mini-OP, Japanese OP, Qualeffo, Roland Morris Disability questionnaires. Collective data show that anti-OP drugs may display an analgesic effect that may be linked to the local mode of action of drugs on bone and consecutive modulation of pain sensitization. The methodology of the studies showed a heterogeneity of endpoints, comparators, statistical approaches and follow-up duration.

CONCLUSION

Considering the limitations of the literature, there is a need for more rigorous trials and larger real-life studies taking into account the recommendations published for research in rheumatology and in pain medicine. The identification of responders, patient subtypes, and of analgesic-effect doses would allow optimization and individualization for pain relief in patients with OP.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This scoping review shows that anti-OP drugs may improve pain and quality of life of patients with OP. The heterogeneity in design, choice of endpoints, methodology, comparators and follow-up duration of included randomized clinical trials and real-life studies does not allow so far to identify a predominant antiosteoporosis drug or an optimal dosage for pain relief. These gaps need to be addressed and warrant further research in the future for optimizing pain improvement in the course of OP drug treatment.

Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)-Related Peptides Family: An Intriguing Role in the Central Nervous System

Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) plays a crucial role in the maintenance of calcium homeostasis directly acting on bone and kidneys and indirectly on the intestine. However, a large family of PTH-related peptides exists that exerts other physiological effects on different tissues and organs, such as the Central Nervous System (CNS). In humans, PTH-related peptides are Parathyroid Hormone (PTH), PTH-like hormones (PTHrP and PTHLH), and tuberoinfundibular peptide of 39 (TIP39 or PTH2). With different affinities, these ligands can bind parathyroid receptor type 1 (PTH1R) and type 2 (PTH2R), which are part of the type II G-protein-coupled-receptors (GPCRs) family. The PTH/PTHrP/PTH1R system has been found to be expressed in many areas of the brain (hippocampus, amygdala, hypothalamus, caudate nucleus, corpus callosum, subthalamic nucleus, thalamus, substantia nigra, cerebellum), and literature data suggest the system exercises a protective action against neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration, with positive effects on memory and hyperalgesia. TIP39 is a small peptide belonging to the PTH-related family with a high affinity for PTH2R in the CNS. The TIP39/PTH2R system has been proposed to mediate many regulatory and functional roles in the brain and to modulate auditory, nociceptive, and sexual maturation functions. This review aims to summarize the knowledge of PTH-related peptides distribution and functions in the CNS and to highlight the gaps that still need to be filled.

The efficacy of teriparatide (Cinnopar®) on bone repair in mandibular fractures: A single blinded randomized clinical trial

This study focused on the effects of teriparatide (CinnoPar) on healing and postoperative complications in mandibular bone fractures. In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, 30 patients with a mandibular fracture hospitalized for open reduction internal fixation were randomly assigned to the intervention (I) (n = 15) and control (C) (n = 15) groups. Both groups received daily acetaminophen and cephalexin for 1 week. For 1 month, Group I received daily subcutaneous teriparatide injections. The Radiographic Union Scale of the Mandible (RUSM) was used to assess mandibular bone fusion subjectively, and the Hounsfield unit (HU) was used to objectively assess radiodensity in a computed tomography (CT) scan. In both groups, the visual analog scale (VAS) score was used to assess postoperative complications such as pain, swelling, wound opening, pus secretion, and bitter taste. There was no significant difference in bone repair between the two groups in this study (P > 0.05). Teriparatide also had no effect on the postoperative complication rate in the control group (P > 0.05). Within the limitations of the study it seems that in mandibular fractures, teriparatide did not affect bone fusion or postoperative complications, so its use is not recommended for better bone fusion and fewer postoperative complications of mandibular fracture during the first month.

Raloxifene Stimulates Estrogen Signaling to Protect Against Age- and Sex-Related Intervertebral Disc Degeneration in Mice

Estrogen agonist raloxifene is an FDA-approved treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, which may also be a promising prophylactic for painful intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration. Here, we hypothesized that 1) aging and biological sex contribute to IVD degeneration by reducing estrogen signaling and that 2) raloxifene stimulates estrogen signaling to protect against age- and sex-related IVD degeneration in mice. 2.5-month-old (male and female) and 22.5-month-old (female) C57Bl/6J mice were subcutaneously injected with raloxifene hydrochloride 5x/week for 6 weeks (n = 7-9/grp). Next, female mice were ovariectomized (OVX) or sham operated at 4 months of age and tissues harvested at 6 months (n = 5-6/grp). Advanced aging and OVX increased IVD degeneration score, weakened IVD strength, reduced estrogen receptor-α (ER-α) protein expression, and increased neurotransmitter substance P (SP) expression. Similar to aging and compared with male IVDs, female IVDs were more degenerated, mechanically less viscoelastic, and expressed less ER-α protein, but unlike the effect induced by aging or OVX, IVD mechanical force was greater in females than in males. Therapeutically, systemic injection of raloxifene promoted ER-α protein to quell these dysregulations by enlarging IVD height, alleviating IVD degeneration score, increasing the strength and viscoelastic properties of the IVD, and reducing IVD cell expression of SP in young-adult and old female mice. Transcriptionally, injection of raloxifene upregulated the gene expression of ER-α and extracellular matrix-related anabolism in young-adult and old IVD. In vertebra, advanced aging and OVX reduced trabecular BV/TV, whereas injection of raloxifene increased trabecular BV/TV in young-adult and old female mice, but not in young-adult male mice. In vertebra, advanced aging, OVX, and biological sex (females > males) increased the number of SP-expressing osteocytes, whereas injection of raloxifene reduced the number of SP-expressing osteocytes in young-adult female and male mice and old female mice. Overall, injection of estrogen agonist raloxifene in mice normalized dysregulation of IVD structure, IVD mechanics, and pain-related SP expression in IVD cells and osteocytes induced by aging and biological sex. These data suggest that, in addition to bone loss, raloxifene may relieve painful IVD degeneration in postmenopausal women induced by advanced age, biological sex, and estrogen depletion.

Teriparatide improves pain-related behavior and prevents bone loss in ovariectomized mice

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to examine the inhibitory effect of teriparatide (TPTD) on pain and on bone loss in ovariectomized (OVX) mice. The mechanism of osteoporotic pain in OVX mice was evaluated through an examination of pain-related behavior as well as immunohistochemical examinations.

METHODS

Eight-week-old female ddY mice were OVX and assigned to one of three groups: (1) OVX mice treated with vehicle (OVX), (2) OVX mice treated with teriparatide (OVX-TPTD), or (3) SHAM-operated mice treated with vehicle (SHAM). Starting immediately after surgery, vehicle or TPTD was injected subcutaneously. After a 4-week treatment, mechanical sensitivity was tested using von Frey filaments. The proximal tibial metaphyses were analyzed three-dimensionally by microcomputed tomography (μCT). Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and transient receptor potential channel vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) expressions in L3-5 dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons were examined using immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Ovariectomy induced bone loss and mechanical hyperalgesia in the hind limbs with upregulation of CGRP and TRPV1 expressions in DRG neurons innervating the hind limbs. Bone loss was prevented more effectively in the OVX-TPTD mice than in the OVX mice. Furthermore, mechanical hyperalgesia and upregulation of CGRP and TRPV1 expressions were significantly lower in the OVX-TPTD mice than in the OVX mice.

CONCLUSION

TPTD treatment prevented ovariectomy-induced bone loss and ovariectomy-induced mechanical hyperalgesia in hind limbs, and it suppressed CGRP and TRPV1 expressions in DRG neurons. These results suggest that TPTD is useful for the treatment of osteoporotic pain in postmenopausal women.

Prevention of bone loss and improvement of pain-related behavior in hind limb-unloaded mice by administration of teriparatide and bisphosphonate

OBJECTIVES

There are few reports on the comparison between teriparatide (PTH) and bisphosphonate (BP) in terms of osteoporosis pain-related behavior and immunohistochemical findings. The aims of this study were to evaluate skeletal pain associated with osteoporosis and to examine the inhibitory effect of PTH and BP on pain and bone loss in hind limb-unloaded (HU) mice. The mechanism of osteoporotic pain in HU mice was evaluated by examining pain-related behavior and immunohistochemical findings. The effects of PTH and alendronate (ALN), a potent osteoclast inhibitor, on these parameters were also assessed.

METHODS

Eight-week-old male ddY mice were tail-suspended for 2 weeks and assigned to four groups: hind limb-loaded (HL) mice with only tail suspension treated with vehicle; HU mice with tail suspension treated with vehicle; HU mice treated with PTH; and HU mice treated with ALN. Starting immediately after reloading, vehicle, PTH, or ALN was injected subcutaneously. After a 2-week treatment, mechanical sensitivity was examined using von Frey filaments. Bilateral hind limbs were removed for micro-computed tomography, immunohistochemical analysis, and messenger RNA (mRNA) expression analysis.

RESULTS

HU mice with tail suspension developed bone loss and mechanical hyperalgesia in the hind limbs. The HU mice showed an increased osteoclasts and sclerostin-positive cells in the hind limb bone. Furthermore, PTH and ALN both prevented HU-induced bone loss and mechanical hyperalgesia in the osteoporotic animal models. Histological examination of the hind limb bone revealed that, similar to ALN, PTH inhibited the osteoclasts and sclerostin-positive cells. The mRNA levels of TNFα and IL-6 tended to decrease with ALN or PTH treatment compared with those without any treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with PTH as well as BP prevented bone loss, mechanical hyperalgesia, osteoclast increase, and osteocyte increase. Similar to BP, the inhibitory effect of PTH on osteoclasts might contribute to the improvement of skeletal pain.

Teriparatide relieves ovariectomy-induced hyperalgesia in rats, suggesting the involvement of functional regulation in primary sensory neurons by PTH-mediated signaling

Clinical studies have reported that teriparatide (TPTD), a human parathyroid hormone analog, reduces back pain in osteoporotic patients. However, the mechanistic insights of this pharmacological action remain elusive. This study investigated the antinociceptive effect of TPTD mainly on primary sensory neurons in ovariectomized (OVX) rats. The plantar test showed thermal hyperalgesia in the OVX rats, which was significantly, but not fully, recovered immediately after the initial TPTD administration. The von Frey test also demonstrated reduced withdrawal threshold in the OVX rats. This was partially recovered by TPTD. Consistently, the number and size of spinal microglial cells were significantly increased in the OVX rats, while TPTD treatment significantly reduced the number but not size of these cells. RNA sequencing-based bioinformatics of the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) demonstrated that changes in neuro-protective and inflammatory genes were involved in the pharmacological effect of TPTD. Most neurons in the DRG expressed substantial levels of parathyroid hormone 1 receptor. TPTD treatment of the cultured DRG-derived neuronal cells reduced the cAMP level and augmented the intracellular calcium level as the concentration increased. These findings suggest that TPTD targets neuronal cells as well as bone cells to exert its pharmacological action.

Effects of teriparatide compared with risedronate in the treatment of osteoporosis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effects and safety of teriparatide with risedronate in the treatment of osteoporosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane library database were systematically reviewed for studies published up to February 24, 2019. Eligible studies that compared the effects of teriparatide with risedronate in osteoporosis were included in this meta-analysis. The outcomes included percentage change in bone mineral density (BMD) of lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip, the incidence of clinical fractures, serum bone markers, and adverse events. A random-effects or fixed-effects model was used to pool the estimate, according to the heterogeneity among the included studies.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with risedronate, teriparatide was associated with a significant increase in lumbar spine BMD [weight mean difference (WMD)=4.24, 95%CI: 3.11, 5.36; P < .001], femoral neck BMD (WMD=2.28, 95%CI: 1.39, 3.18; P < .001), and total hip BMD (WMD = 1.19, 95%CI: 0.47, 1.91; P = .001). Moreover, patients in teriparatide group had significantly lower incidences of clinical fracture (risk ratio [RR] = 0.48, 95%CI: 0.32, 0.72; P < .001), new vertebral fracture (RR = 0.45, 95%CI: 0.32, 0.63; P < .001), and non-vertebral fracture (RR = 0.63, 95%CI: 0.40, 0.98; P = .042) than those in risedronate group. There were significant differences between the 2 groups in serum change, including P1NP (WMD = 122.34, 95%CI: 68.89, 175.99; P < .001), CTx (WMD = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.29, 0.96; P < .001), and iPTH (WMD = -13.18, 95%CI: -15.04, -11.33; P < .001). The incidence of adverse events was similar between the 2 groups (RR = 0.93, 95%CI: 0.69, 1.25; P = .610).

CONCLUSION

This study suggested that teriparatide was more effective than risedronate for increasing the BMD in lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip, as well as reducing the incidences of clinical fracture, new vertebral fracture and non-vertebral fracture. There was no significant difference in incidence of adverse events between the 2 drugs. Considering the potential limitations in the present study, further large-scale, well-performed randomized trials are needed to verify our findings.

Impact of patient background factors on the treatment efficacy of once-weekly teriparatide

Objectives

The impact of patient background factors on changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolic markers after treatment with once-weekly teriparatide (W-TPTD) has not been fully elucidated. To clarify the impact, I performed stratified analysis in addition to the efficacy and safety assessments to analyze treatment data with W-TPTD.

Methods

The primary endpoint of the efficacy was the rate of change of the lumbar spine BMD at 18 months after treatment. In the exploratory analysis, bone metabolic markers at baseline were used to divide the patients into 3 groups, by the first tertile and the second tertile. The rate of change in the lumbar spine/femoral neck BMD and bone metabolic markers in each group were analyzed by stratification.

Results

The rate of change in the lumbar spine BMD at 18 months was 9.0%, which represented a significant increase. The rate of change in the lumbar spine/femoral neck BMD in each group classified into tertiles by their baseline bone metabolic markers significantly increased, regardless of the type of bone metabolic markers and baseline value. For markers, all groups remained within the range of reference values at 18 months after treatment.

Conclusions

I demonstrated that W-TPTD significantly increased the BMD of the lumbar spine and femur, regardless of baseline values of the bone metabolic markers. In addition, W-TPTD was able to normalize bone metabolic markers. I considered that W-TPTD would be useful, independent of bone metabolic markers in patients, as an agent to improve BMD, and be a useful option for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Effects of Teriparatide in Patients with Osteoporosis in Clinical Practice: 42-Month Results During and After Discontinuation of Treatment from the European Extended Forsteo® Observational Study (ExFOS)

This study aimed to describe clinical outcomes in patients prescribed teriparatide and followed up for 18 months after stopping the drug in real-life conditions. The Extended Forsteo® Observational Study analysed incident clinical fractures in 6-month intervals using logistic regression with repeated measures. Changes in back pain (visual analogue scale) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; EQ-5D questionnaire) were analysed using mixed models for repeated measures. Patients were analysed if they had a post-baseline visit, regardless of whether and for how long they took teriparatide. Of 1531 patients analysed (90.7% female, mean age: 70.3 years), 76 (5.0%) never took teriparatide. Median treatment duration was 23.6 months. The adjusted odds of clinical fracture decreased by 47% in the > 12- to 18-month treatment period (p = 0.013) compared with the first 6-month period, with no statistically significant reduction in the > 18- to 24-month interval. The clinical fracture rate remained stable during the 18 months' post-teriparatide, when approximately 98% of patients took osteoporosis medication (51% bisphosphonates). Clinical vertebral fractures were reduced at every time period compared with the first 6 months. Adjusted mean back pain scores decreased and EQ-5D scores increased significantly at each post-baseline observation. In a real-life clinical setting, the risk of clinical fractures declined during 24 months of teriparatide treatment. This reduction was maintained 18 months after stopping teriparatide. In parallel, patients reported significant improvements in back pain and HRQoL. The results should be interpreted in the context of the non-controlled design of this observational study.

Teriparatide rapidly improves pain-like behavior in ovariectomized mice in association with the downregulation of inflammatory cytokine expression

Recent studies have indicated that teriparatide, an anti-osteoporosis agent, significantly improves back pain regardless of the presence of vertebral fracture in osteoporosis patients. The aims of this study were to examine whether teriparatide improves pain-like behavior in an ovariectomized (OVX) mouse model, and to evaluate changes in osteoclast marker levels and inflammatory cytokine expression levels induced by teriparatide treatment in bone tissue in association with improvements in pain-like behavior. OVX and sham operations were performed in 8-week-old mice, followed by teriparatide treatment for 2 weeks. Pain-like behavior tests (von Frey, paw flick and spontaneous pain test), and the measurement of serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAP5b) level and inflammatory cytokine (interleukin [IL]-1β, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α) expression levels in the bone tissue were conducted after teriparatide treatment in OVX mice. Pain-like behavior in the von Frey test was significantly improved by teriparatide treatment in OVX mice. With regard to the early phase (within the first 7 days of treatment), teriparatide significantly improved pain-like behavior in the von Frey test, the paw flick test and the spontaneous pain test. Teriparatide significantly inhibited the expression of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α in OVX mice in the early phase of the treatment, while the TRAP5b level in OVX mice was not significantly affected. We demonstrated that the teriparatide-induced rapid improvement effect on pain-like behavior in OVX mice was associated with the downregulation of inflammatory cytokine expression, including IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α.

Fracture Rate, Quality of Life and Back Pain in Patients with Osteoporosis Treated with Teriparatide: 24-Month Results from the Extended Forsteo Observational Study (ExFOS)

We describe the pre-planned interim analysis of fracture outcomes, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and back pain in patients with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide for up to 24 months in the Extended Forsteo (Forsteo(®) is a registered trade name of Eli Lilly and Company) Observational Study (ExFOS), a prospective, multinational, observational study. Data on incident clinical fractures, HRQoL (EQ-5D questionnaire) and back pain [100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS)] were collected. The number of patients with fractures was summarised in 6-month intervals and fracture rate over each 6-month period was assessed using logistic regression for repeated measures. Changes from baseline in EQ-5D and back pain VAS were analysed using mixed models for repeated measures. Of 1454 patients in the active treatment cohort, 90.6 % were female and 14.4 % were taking glucocorticoids. During teriparatide treatment (median duration 23.7 months), 103 patients (7.1 %) sustained a total of 122 incident clinical fractures (21 % vertebral, 79 % non-vertebral). A 49 % decrease in the odds of fractures and a 75 % decrease in the odds of clinical vertebral fractures were observed in the >18- to 24-month period versus the first 6-month period (both p < 0.05). EQ-5D scores and back pain VAS scores were significantly improved from baseline at each post-baseline observation during teriparatide treatment. In conclusion, patients with severe osteoporosis showed a significant reduction in the incident fracture rate during 24 months of teriparatide treatment in routine clinical practice, accompanied by a significant improvement in HRQoL and reduction in back pain. Results should be interpreted in the context of the non-controlled design of this observational study.

Management of chronic pain in osteoporosis: challenges and solutions

Osteoporosis (OP) is a pathological condition that manifests clinically as pain, fractures, and physical disability, resulting in the loss of independence and the need for long-term care. Chronic pain is a multidimensional experience with sensory, affective, and cognitive aspects. Age can affect each of these dimensions and the pain that is experienced. In OP, chronic pain appears to have sensory characteristics and properties of nociceptive and neuropathic pain. Its evaluation and treatment thus require a holistic approach that focuses on the specific characteristics of this population. Pain management must therefore include pharmacological approaches, physiotherapy interventions, educational measures, and, in rare cases, surgical treatment. Most rehabilitative treatments in the management of patients with OP do not evaluate pain or physical function, and there is no consensus on the effects of rehabilitation therapy on back pain or quality of life in women with OP. Pharmacological treatment of pain in patients with OP is usually insufficient. The management of chronic pain in patients with OP is complicated with regard to its diagnosis, the search for reversible secondary causes, the efficacy and duration of oral bisphosphonates, and the function of calcium and vitamin D. The aim of this review is to discuss the most appropriate solutions in the management of chronic pain in OP.

Bone pain: current and future treatments

Skeletal conditions are common causes of chronic pain and there is an unmet medical need for improved treatment options. Bone pain is currently managed with disease modifying agents and/or analgesics depending on the condition. Disease modifying agents affect the underlying pathophysiology of the disease and reduce as a secondary effect bone pain. Antiresorptive and anabolic agents, such as bisphosphonates and intermittent parathyroid hormone (1-34), respectively, have proven effective as pain relieving agents. Cathepsin K inhibitors and anti-sclerostin antibodies hold, due to their disease modifying effects, promise of a pain relieving effect. NSAIDs and opioids are widely employed in the treatment of bone pain. However, recent preclinical findings demonstrating a unique neuronal innervation of bone tissue and sprouting of sensory nerve fibers open for new treatment possibilities.

The effect of teriparatide to alleviate pain and to prevent vertebral collapse after fresh osteoporotic vertebral fracture

Vertebral fracture is often seen in osteoporotic patients. Teriparatide is expected to promote bone union. Therefore, we evaluated the action of vertebral collapse prevention by administering teriparatide to vertebral fracture patients. Thirty-four patients with fresh vertebral fracture (48 vertebrae) participated in this study. They were administered either teriparatide (daily 20 µg/day or weekly 56.5 µg/week) or risedronate (17.5 mg/week): ten patients (20 vertebrae) received teriparatide daily (Daily group), 11 patients (15 vertebrae) received teriparatide weekly (Weekly group), and 13 patients (14 vertebrae) received risedronate (RIS group). We compared some laboratory examination items, visual analogue scale (VAS) of low back pain, vertebral collapse rate and local kyphotic angle, and the cleft frequency. In addition, we evaluated 22 vertebral fracture patients (24 vertebrae) who did not take any osteoporotic medicines (Control group). There was no significant difference in any of the scores at the start of treatment. At 8 and 12 weeks after the initial visit, VAS scores in the Daily and Weekly groups were significantly lower than in the RIS group (p < 0.05). At 8 and 12 weeks, the vertebral collapse rate and local kyphotic angle in the Daily group were significantly lower than in the RIS and Control groups (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively), and those in the Weekly group were significantly lower than in the Control group (p < 0.05). The cleft frequency in the Daily group was significantly lower than in the RIS group (p < 0.05). Teriparatide is promising for the prevention of vertebral collapse progression after vertebral fracture.

Back pain in patients with severe osteoporosis on teriparatide or antiresorptives: a prospective observational study in a multiethnic population

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated reduced back pain in a multiethnic population treated with teriparatide and/or antiresorptives in real-life clinical settings over 12 months.

METHODS

This prospective observational study comprised 562 men and postmenopausal women (mean age 68.8 years) receiving either teriparatide (n = 230), antiresorptives (raloxifene or bisphosphonates; n = 322), or both (n = 10) for severe osteoporosis. The primary endpoint was the relative risk of new/worsening back pain at six months.

RESULTS

At baseline, a higher proportion of teriparatide-treated than antiresorptive-treated patients had severe back pain (30.9% vs. 17.7%), extreme pain/discomfort (25.3% vs. 16.8%), extreme anxiety/depression (16.6% vs. 7.8%) and were confined to bed (10.0% vs. 5.3%). Teriparatide-treated patients had higher visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain (5.8 ± 2.42 vs. 5.1 ± 2.58) and lower mean European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) scores (37.7 ± 29.15 vs. 45.5 ± 31.42) than antiresorptive-treated patients. The incidence of new/worsening back pain at six months for patients on teriparatide and antiresorptives was 9.8% and 10.3% (relative risk 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.80-1.23), respectively. The incidence of severe back pain at 12 months was 1.3% and 1.6% in the teriparatide and antiresorptive treatment groups, respectively. Teriparatide-treated patients had lower mean VAS (2.71 ± 2.21 vs. 3.30 ± 2.37) and EQ‑5D (46.1 ± 33.18 vs. 55.4 ± 32.65) scores at 12 months. More teriparatide-treated patients felt better (82.7% vs. 71.0%) and were very satisfied with treatment (49.4% vs. 36.8%) compared to antiresorptive-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with either teriparatide or antiresorptives had similar risk of new/worsening back pain at six months.

An observational study to assess back pain in patients with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide versus antiresorptives: An Indian subpopulation analysis

BACKGROUND

One year, prospective, observational study in an Indian subpopulation to assess back pain in patients with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide or antiresorptives in a clinical setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and nineteen teriparatide-naοve Indian men and postmenopausal women (mean age 68.0 years) with previous osteoporotic vertebral fracture participated. Patients were assessed at baseline, 6-and 12-months to evaluate relative risk (RR) of new/worsening back pain using the Back Pain Questionnaire. The incidence of back pain and changes in back pain severity were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS); Health outcomes were assessed using the euroquol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire. All tests were conducted with a two-sided alpha of 0.05.

RESULTS

Of 562 overall patients, 57, 60, and 2 Indian patients received teriparatide, antiresorptive, or teriparatide and antiresorptive, respectively. Baseline disease characteristics were slightly worse for antiresorptive-treated patients, whereas teriparatide-treated patients were older with more comorbidities. At 6-months, the incidence of new/worsening back pain was 5.3% for teriparatide-treated patients versus 4.4% for antiresorptive-treated patients (RR: 1.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.68, 1.48); the incidence of severe back pain was 0% versus 12.5% (P = 0.017); in these treatment groups, respectively. Mean VAS change scores (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) were - 1.9 ± 1.73 versus - 1.4 ± 1.77, and mean EQ-5D change scores were 4.2 ± 27.20 versus 9.9 ± 26.23 at 6-months. At 6 months, more teriparatide-treated patients felt better (89% vs. 61%; P = 0.001) and were at least very satisfied with their treatment (30% vs. 9%; P = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Teriparatide-treated Indian patients had similar new/worsening back pain risk and minimal risk of severe back pain compared with antiresorptive-treated patients at 6-months.

Japan Fracture Observational Study (JFOS): patient characteristics and interim data on the use of daily teriparatide in Japanese patients with osteoporosis

OBJECTIVES

This report from the Japan Fracture Observational Study (JFOS) describes the design of the study, baseline characteristics of the patients, and interim results.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This is an interim analysis from an ongoing observational study of male and female patients with osteoporosis initiating daily teriparatide treatment observed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. There was no control group. Baseline data were collected on demographic characteristics, medical and osteoporosis history, prior use of medications and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This interim analysis includes preliminary information concerning incidence of clinical fractures, bone mineral density (BMD), procollagen type 1 aminoterminal propeptide (P1NP), back pain, HRQoL, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Baseline observations were completed for 1810 patients; 90.1% were female. Compared with osteoporotic patients treated with teriparatide in other observational studies, those in JFOS were older but had fewer osteoporosis risk factors. The incidence of clinical fractures was 2.9% at 6 months and 3.7% at 12 months. At 12 months, mean BMD was 8.9% higher at the lumbar spine and 0.8% higher at the total hip compared to baseline. At 6 months, the median serum concentration of P1NP was 187.7% higher than at baseline. At 12 months, back pain scores assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) were lower and HRQoL scores were higher than at baseline. No new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report from an observational study of daily teriparatide in Japanese osteoporotic patients at high risk of fractures. Patients in JFOS were older but had fewer osteoporosis risk factors than those treated with teriparatide in other observational studies. The interim analysis suggests that the clinical profile of teriparatide in the real world is similar to that observed in clinical trials and observational studies conducted in Europe and the United States.

Study description and baseline characteristics of the population enrolled in a multinational observational study of extended teriparatide use (ExFOS)

OBJECTIVE

To better characterize patients who are currently being prescribed teriparatide in Europe, this article describes the study design and baseline characteristics of participants of the Extended Forsteo * Observational Study (ExFOS).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

ExFOS is a noninterventional, multicenter, prospective, observational study in men and women with osteoporosis treated with teriparatide during the course of normal clinical practice for up to 24 months and with a post-treatment follow-up of at least 18 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Baseline characteristics, including history of fracture and back pain, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL, assessed using the EuroQol-5 Dimension [EQ-5D]).

RESULTS

Of 1607 patients enrolled, 90.9% were women. At baseline, mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 70.3 (9.8) years, and 85.8% of patients had a history of fracture (64.7% with ≥2 fragility fractures). Of those with historic fractures, 90.8% had vertebral fractures (67.8% had thoracic fractures). The mean (SD) of reported bone mineral density T-scores were -3.0 (1.2), -2.4 (1.0), and -2.5 (0.9) for lumbar spine, total hip (left), and femoral neck (left), respectively. Overall, 39.3% of patients had experienced ≥1 fall during the 12 months before enrollment. At baseline, 11.4% of patients were osteoporosis-treatment naïve and 15% were currently using glucocorticoids. The mean (SD) visual analog scale score for back pain during the last month was 50.7 (26.9), and 62.1% of patients experienced daily or almost daily back pain. The median EQ-5D health state value at baseline was 0.62 (first and third quartiles: 0.19, 0.74).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline characteristics of the ExFOS study cohort indicate that patients prescribed teriparatide in Europe have severe osteoporosis with highly prevalent vertebral fractures, frequent and disabling back pain, and a poor HRQoL, despite previous pharmacotherapy for osteoporosis. Limitations include non-randomization, lack of a comparator group, and patient self-report for data on prior medication and fracture history.

Effective osteoporosis treatment with teriparatide is associated with enhanced quality of life in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: the European Forsteo Observational Study

Background

To describe changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with teriparatide for up to 18 months and followed-up for a further 18 months, and to assess the influence of recent prior and incident fractures.

Methods

The European Forsteo Observational Study (EFOS) is an observational, prospective, multinational study measuring HRQoL using the EQ-5D. The primary objective was to assess changes in HRQoL during 36 months in the whole study population. A secondary post-hoc analysis examined fracture impact on HRQoL in four subgroups classified based on recent prior fracture 12 months before baseline and incident clinical fractures during the study. Changes from baseline were analysed using a repeated measures model.

Results

Of the 1581 patients, 48.4% had a recent prior fracture and 15.6% of these patients had an incident fracture during follow-up. 10.9% of the 816 patients with no recent prior fracture had an incident fracture. Baseline mean EQ-VAS scores were similar across the subgroups. In the total study cohort (n = 1581), HRQoL (EQ-VAS and EQ-5D index scores) improved significantly from baseline to 18 months and this improvement was maintained over the 18-month post-teriparatide period. Improvements were seen across all five EQ-5D domains during teriparatide treatment that were maintained after teriparatide was discontinued. Subjects with incident clinical fractures had significantly less improvement in EQ-VAS than those without incident fractures. Recent prior fracture did not influence the change in EQ-VAS during treatment.

Conclusions

EFOS is the first longitudinal study in women with severe postmenopausal osteoporosis in the real world setting to show a substantial improvement in HRQoL during teriparatide treatment that was sustained during subsequent treatment with other medications. The increase in HRQoL was lower in the subgroups with incident fracture but was not influenced by recent prior fracture. The results should be interpreted in the context of the design of an observational study.

The effect of teriparatide compared with risedronate on reduction of back pain in postmenopausal women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures

The effect of teriparatide and risedronate on back pain was tested, and there was no difference in the proportion of patients experiencing a reduction in back pain between groups after 6 or 18 months. Patients receiving teriparatide had greater increases in bone mineral density and had fewer vertebral fractures.

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to understand the effect of teriparatide in reducing back pain in patients with prevalent back pain and vertebral fracture compared to risedronate.

METHODS

In an 18-month randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial, we investigated the effects of teriparatide (20 μg/day) vs. risedronate (35 mg/week) in postmenopausal women with back pain likely due to vertebral fracture. The primary objective was to compare the proportion of subjects reporting ≥30% reduction in worst back pain severity from baseline to 6 months as assessed by a numeric rating scale in each treatment group. Pre-specified secondary and exploratory outcomes included assessments of average and worst back pain at additional time points, disability and quality of life, bone mineral density, incidence of fractures, and safety.

RESULTS

At 6 months, 59% of teriparatide and 57% of risedronate patients reported ≥30% reduction in worst back pain and there were no differences between groups in the proportion of patients experiencing reduction in worst or average back pain at any time point, disability, or quality of life. There was a greater increase from baseline in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine (p = 0.001) and femoral neck (p = 0.02) with teriparatide compared to risedronate and a lower incidence of vertebral fractures at 18 months (4% teriparatide and 9% risedronate; p = 0.01). Vertebral fractures were less severe (p = 0.04) in the teriparatide group. There was no difference in the overall incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there were no differences in back pain-related endpoints, patients receiving teriparatide had greater skeletal benefit than those receiving risedronate.

Effects of teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis pre-treated with bisphosphonates: 36-month results from the European Forsteo Observational Study

OBJECTIVES

To describe fracture rates, back pain, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and prior bisphosphonate therapy, treated with teriparatide for up to 18 months and followed up for a further 18 months.

DESIGN

Prospective, multinational, and observational study.

METHODS

Data on prior bisphosphonate use, clinical fractures, back pain visual analog scale (VAS), and HRQoL (EQ-5D) were collected over 36 months. Fracture data were summarized in 6-month intervals and analyzed using logistic regression with repeated measures. Changes from baseline in back pain VAS and EQ-VAS were analyzed using a repeated measures model.

RESULTS

Of the 1581 enrolled patients with follow-up data, 1161 (73.4%) had a history of prior bisphosphonate use (median duration: 36 months). Of them, 169 (14.6%) sustained ≥1 fracture during 36-month follow-up. Adjusted odds of fracture were significantly decreased at each 6-month interval compared with the first 6 months of teriparatide treatment: 37% decrease in the 12 to <18 months period during teriparatide treatment (P=0.03) and a 76% decrease in the 12- to 18-month period after teriparatide was discontinued (P<0.001). Significant reductions in back pain and improvement in HRQoL were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis previously treated with bisphosphonates had a significant reduction in the incidence of fractures compared with the first 6 months of therapy, a reduction in back pain and an improvement in HRQoL during up to 18 months of teriparatide treatment. These outcomes were still evident for at least 18 months after teriparatide was discontinued. The results should be interpreted in the context of an uncontrolled, observational study in a routine clinical setting.

Parathyroid hormone analogues in the treatment of osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is characterized by the occurrence of fragility fractures. Over the past years, various treatment options have become available, mostly antiresorptive agents such as bisphosphonates. However, antiresorptive therapy cannot restore bone mass and structure that has been lost due to increased remodeling. In this case, recombinant human parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogues-the full-length PTH(1-84) or the shortened molecule PTH(1-34), which is also known as teriparatide-present the possibility of increasing the formation of new bone substance by virtue of their anabolic effects. The bone formation induced by PTH analogues not only increases BMD or bone mass but also improves the microarchitecture of the skeleton, thereby leading to improved strength of bone and increased mechanical resistance. Controlled trials have shown that both analogues significantly reduce the incidence of vertebral fractures, and PTH(1-34) also reduces the risk of nonvertebral fractures. The need for daily self-injection and the higher cost compared with other forms of treatment limit the widespread use of PTH analogues. Nevertheless, treatment with PTH analogues should be considered in postmenopausal women and men with severe osteoporosis, as well as in patients on established glucocorticoid treatment with a high fracture risk. Concurrent therapy with antiresorptive agents should be avoided, but sequential therapy with these agents might consolidate the beneficial effects on the skeleton.

Sequential therapy in the treatment of osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinical data in the sequential use of antiresorptive and anabolic agents for the treatment of osteoporosis.

METHODS

The US National Library of Medicine was used to obtain the relevant information on osteoporosis management involving antiresorptive and anabolic bone agents.

RESULTS

Antiresorptive and anabolic therapies are the two main types of medications approved for osteoporosis treatment. The efficacy of these agents in fracture risk reduction is well established. Many patients with osteoporosis are first treated with an antiresorptive agent, most commonly a bisphosphonate. Osteoporotic patients who fail to respond to antiresorptive therapy or patients with severe osteoporosis may require anabolic therapy at some point during their disease. Recombinant human parathyroid hormone (PTH) is an anabolic agent with proven benefits on bone strength. Sequential therapy using PTH after antiresorptive agents has been found beneficial for bone health. Recent research suggests that the speed and magnitude of PTH effect can differ, depending on the previous antiresorptive therapy. Upon PTH cessation, subsequent antiresorptive therapy may help maintain or increase gains in bone mass.

CONCLUSIONS

Although further research is needed to determine the long-term significance of prior antiresorptive therapies and their differing effects on fracture risk reduction with subsequent PTH therapy, patients with severe osteoporosis should be considered for this treatment option, regardless of prior osteoporosis treatment.

Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: experience when treated with teriparatide in clinical practice

OBJECTIVE

To observe and compare back pain and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in postmenopausal women with a prior unsatisfactory response to antiresorptive therapy, treated with teriparatide (TPTD) or alternative treatments in normal clinical practice.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Prospective, observational, multicentre, 24-month study of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. A back pain and HRQoL questionnaire (European Quality of Life Questionnaire, EQ-5D) including visual analogue scale (VAS) was completed at each visit.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients were enrolled, 105 patients started TPTD treatment during the study (TPTD cohort) and 48 patients did not take TPTD treatment at any time during the study (non-TPTD cohort). Four patients did not meet the inclusion criteria for the study. Of the patients in the non-TPTD cohort, 31 (68.9%) took antiresorptives during the study. The patients selected by the investigator for teriparatide treatment were distinctly different from those not selected. At baseline, the mean back pain VAS was greater in the TPTD than the non-TPTD cohort, 64  mm and 42 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). During the study, compared with baseline, the mean back pain VAS decreased in the TPTD cohort at all visits (p < 0.001). In the non-TPTD cohort, a transitory decrease in the mean after 12 months was observed (-10 mm, p = 0.023) only. After 24 months, the mean back pain VAS improved in the TPTD cohort (-36 mm, p < 0.001) while no change was observed in the non-TPTD cohort (-4 mm, p = 0.467). At baseline, the mean EQ-VAS was lower in the TPTD than in the non-TPTD cohort, 40.8 and 55.2, respectively (p < 0.001). After 24 months, EQ-VAS improved in both cohorts (TPTD 34, p < 0.001 and non-TPTD 9, p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

TPTD-treated patients had more back pain and lower HRQoL at baseline. In the TPTD cohort the mean value was consistently and significantly improved in back pain and quality of life. In the non-TPTD cohort, the mean improvement in back pain and QoL was inconsistent possibly due to the initially higher QoL and lower back pain leaving less room for improvement. These results should be interpreted in the context of limitations related to a non-randomised observational study.

Fracture Incidence, Quality of Life, and Back Pain during 18-Months Treatment with Teriparatide in Greek Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis: Results from the European Forsteo Observational Study

Objective. To evaluate fracture incidence, effects on health-related quality of life(QoL), back pain (BP) occurrence and treatment compliance in Greek post-menopausal osteoporotic women treated with teriparatide (TPTD) for up to 18 months, in a naturalistic setting. Methods. 301 patients provided baseline information on demographic characteristics, fracture history, osteoporosis-related medication and risk factors. During treatment, QoL and BP severity were evaluated. Results. Mean (SD) age was 69.5 (±8.5) years. Fracture history was reported by 92.5% of patients. Incidence of fractures (per 10,000 patients/years) ranged from 402 during 0-6 months of treatment, to 346 during 12-18 months. All 5 dimensions of QoL showed improvement. At baseline and 18 months, BP was reported by 93.2% and 64.2% of patients, respectively. BP and limitation of activities were quantified as moderate or severe by 89.9% and 62.3% of patients at baseline versus 32.4% and 14.8% at 18 months. Patients on treatment at 6, 12, 17, and 18 months were 92.6%, 88.3%, 79.6%, and 36.5%, respectively. Conclusions. In the Greek EFOS study cohort, patients prescribed TPTD were severely osteoporotic, with considerable health-related problems. Significant improvements in QoL and BP together with low fracture rates and high compliance have been recorded during treatment.