Care provided by general practitioners to patients with psychotic disorders: a cohort study

Impact of the mental health reform in Israel on health care and mortality among people with severe mental illness

OBJECTIVE

Reports show disparities in the health care of people with severe mental illness (SMI). Yet, the moderating effect of mental health reforms on the health care disparities remain unexplored. The current study aimed to investigate the outcomes of the mental health reform in Israel on the use of health services among people with SMI.

METHOD

A case-control epidemiological study comparing the use of health services 3.5 years before and after the mental health reform for service users diagnosed with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder. Data on health services included: blood cholesterol test (LDL), hemogalobin-A1C test, and visits to general practitioners (GPs) and specialists. Mortality was recorded.

RESULTS

Following the reform the number of visits to GPs was decreased among service users of the three SMI groups, as well as visits to specialists among service users with a schizoaffective or bipolar disorder. Following the reform service users of the three SMI groups showed no-change in the performance of LDL test. Complex findings were noted with regard to the performance of Hemoglobin-A1C test. Mortality rates were higher among service users with SMI and the relative risk were similar before and after the reform.

CONCLUSIONS

Users of the three SMI groups showed no benefits of the mental health reform in terms of use of health services. Improved health care can be attained by a closer collaboration between the primary physicians and community mental health services.

Comparison of medical treatment of patients with schizophrenia in general practitioners' clinics versus mental health clinics: A cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Individuals with schizophrenia have more cardiometabolic comorbidities than the general population, live about twenty years less and consume more medical services. They are treated at general practitioners' clinics (GPCs) or at mental health clinics (MHCs). In this cohort study we investigated the association between patients' main treatment setting, cardiometabolic comorbidities and medical services utilization.

METHODS

Demographics, healthcare services utilization, cardiometabolic comorbidities and medication prescriptions of patients with schizophrenia were retrieved from an electronic database for the period 1.1.2011 to 31.12.2012 and compared between patients treated mostly in MHCs (N = 260) and those treated mostly in GPCs (N = 115).

RESULTS

GPC patients tended to be older (mean age 39.8 ± 13.7 vs. 34.6 ± 12.3 yrs., p < 0.0001), of lower socioeconomic status (42.6% vs 24.6%, p = 0.001) and have more cardiometabolic diagnoses (hypertension: 19.1% vs 10.8%, diabetes mellitus: 25.2% vs 17.0%, p < 0.05) than MHC patients. The former received more cardiometabolic disorder medications and utilized more secondary and tertiary medical services. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was higher in the GPC group than in the MHC group (1.8 ± 1.9 vs.1.2 ± 1. 6, p < 0.0001). A multivariate binary logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age, sex, SES and CCI found lower adjusted odds ratio for the MHC group versus the GPC group, of visiting an EMD, a specialist or to be hospitalized.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study highlights the critical importance of integrating GPCs and MHCs, thus offering patients combined physical and mental care at a single location. More studies on the potential benefits of such integration to patients' health are warranted.

The association of medical resource utilization with physical morbidity and premature mortality among patients with schizophrenia: An historical prospective population cohort study

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia patients have shorter life expectancy often owing to preventable physical illnesses and sub-optimal utilization of medical services. However, the association between service-utilization and mortality has not been explored.

AIM

To assess whether medical service-utilization moderates the association between physical morbidity and premature mortality in a nation-wide cohort.

METHODS

A population representative database of the largest health provider in Israel was analyzed. All electronic health records of patients with schizophrenia diagnosis (ICD code F.20) (n = 24,679) were followed-up between 2012 and 2015, and compared to the general population (n = 2,232,804), in terms of metabolic and cardiovascular morbidity, all-cause mortality, primary medical and specialist health service-utilization and general hospitalizations.

RESULTS

Schizophrenia was associated with increased mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 3.52, 95%CI 3.35-3.72). Most deaths were related to physical illnesses. Metabolic syndrome components, except chronic hypertension, were more prevalent among patients. They were referred more frequently to primary and less to secondary services (aHR = 1.05, 95%CI 1.04-1.06, aHR = 0.95, 95%CI 0.94-0.97, respectively), with higher hospitalization rates (0.23 ± 0.90 vs 0.10 ± 0.50 per year), and longer mean duration of hospitalization (2.02 ± 10.24 vs 0.68 ± 5.51 days, P < 0.001). More contacts with primary care physicians or specialists positively moderated the association between mortality and metabolic disturbances in patients with schizophrenia; more contacts were associated with better outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

An association between premature mortality and metabolic syndrome was found among schizophrenia patients while utilization of primary/secondary medical services moderated the lethal effects of metabolic dysregulation. Increased integrative primary care and a national monitoring system are warranted to reduce mortality rate in this population.

Mind-Body Connection: Cardiovascular Sequelae of Psychiatric Illness

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the world. Mental health disorders are associated with the onset and progression of cardiac disease. The adverse sequelae of this association include worsened quality of life, adverse cardiovascular outcomes, and heightened mortality. The increased prevalence of CVD is partly explained by increased rates of traditional cardiovascular risk factors including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and smoking, but mental illness is an independent risk factor for CVD and mortality. Given the association between mental health disorders and poor cardiovascular health, it is vital to have an early and accurate identification and treatment of these disorders. Our review article shares the current literature on the adverse cardiovascular events associated with psychiatric disorders. We present a review on depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, type A and D personality disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and stress.

Barriers and Possible Solutions to Providing Physical Health Care in Mental Health Care: A Qualitative Study of Danish Key Informants' Perspectives

Provision of physical health care to people diagnosed with severe mental illness is widely reported as inadequate. This interview study explored perspectives of a group of key informants on current practices of providing physical health care within two mental health care settings in Denmark. Thematic analysis of their accounts provided insights into 1) barriers to the provision of physical health care in mental health settings, and 2) possible solutions to overcome existing barriers. Negative attitudes and limited specialist health care knowledge among mental health care professionals constituted serious barriers. To effectively address these barriers, mental health services need to be reoriented towards the prioritisation of physical health alongside mental health. This will require equipping mental health professionals with relevant knowledge and skills and organisational resources, to effectively work with people experiencing or at risk of physical comorbidities.

Cardiovascular risk screening of patients with serious mental illness or use of antipsychotics in family practice

Background

Patients with serious mental illness (SMI) and patients on antipsychotics (AP) have an elevated risk for cardiovascular diseases. In the Netherlands, the mental healthcare for these patients is increasingly taken care of by family practitioners (FP) as a result of a shift from secondary to primary care. Therefore, it is essential to increase our knowledge regarding the characteristics of this patient group and the (somatic) care provided by their FPs. The aim was to examine the rate of cardiovascular risk screening in patients with SMI or the use of AP in family practice.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 151.238 patients listed in 24 family practices in the Netherlands.

From electronic medical records we extracted data concerning diagnoses, measurement values of CVR factors, medication and frequency of visits over a 2 year period. Primary outcome was the rate of patients who were screened for CVR factors. We compared three groups: patients with SMI/AP without diabetes or CVD (SMI/AP-only), patients with SMI/AP and diabetes mellitus (SMI/AP + DM), patients with SMI/AP and a history of cardiovascular disease (SMI/AP + CVD). We explored factors associated with adequate screening using multilevel logistic regression.

Results

We identified 1705 patients with SMI/AP, 834 with a SMI diagnosis, 1150 using AP. The screening rate for CVR in the SMI/AP-only group (n = 1383) was adequate in 8.5%. Screening was higher in the SMI/AP − +DM (n = 206, 68.4% adequate, OR 24.6 (95%CI, 17.3–35.1) and SMI/AP + CVD (n = 116, 26.7% adequate, OR 4.2 (95%CI, 2.7–6.6). A high frequency of visits, age, the use of AP and a diagnosis of COPD were associated with a higher screening rate. In addition we also examined differences between patients with SMI and patients using AP without SMI.

Conclusion

CVR screening in patients with SMI/AP is performed poorly in Dutch family practices. Acceptable screening rates were found only among SMI/AP patients with diabetes mellitus as comorbidity. The finding of a large group of AP users without a SMI diagnosis may indicate that FPs often prescribe AP off-label, lack information about the diagnosis, or use the wrong code.

Disparities in the Use of General Somatic Care among Individuals Treated for Severe Mental Disorders and the General Population in France

Individuals with severe mental illnesses (SMI) face a striking excess and premature mortality which has been demonstrated in several national contexts. This phenomenon, which constitutes a red-flag indicator of public health inequities, can be hypothesized to result from healthcare access issues which have been insufficiently documented so far. In this context, our objective was to explore patterns of general somatic healthcare use of individuals treated for SMI in comparison to those of the general population in France using national health administrative data and a matched case-control study. Differences in the use of general and specific somatic preventive care services, primary care, routine specialized somatic care and admissions to non-psychiatric hospital departments for somatic causes were described between cases and controls after adjustment on differing clinical needs, socio-economic status, and living environment. Our results show a lower use of general preventive care services and of routine specialized somatic care in the SMI population, despite more frequent comorbidities, and a higher occurrence of avoidable hospitalizations, despite higher contacts with primary care physicians. These findings suggest that the health system fails to address the specific needs of this vulnerable population and support the development of measures aimed at reducing this gap.

Mortality, morbidity and medical resources utilization of patients with schizophrenia: A case-control community-based study

Patients with schizophrenia have higher level of mortality and physical comorbidity compared to control population. However the association to primary-, secondary- and tertiary-medical resources utilization is not clear. We used a retrospective community-based cohort of patients with schizophrenia (n=1389; age 37.53 years, 64.3% males) and, age-, gender-, and socioeconomic status-matched controls (n=4095; age 37.34 years; 64.3% males) who were followed-up for nine years. Mortality rate of patients was almost twice as high as that of matched controls (7% versus 3.8%). Diagnoses of ischemic heart disease and hypertension were more prevalent among controls than patients (8.2% versus 5%, and 21.6% versus 15.8%, respectively). Tertiary medical resources utilization was higher among patients with schizophrenia than control population (mean hospital admissions per year: 0.2 versus 0.12, emergency department visits: 0.48 versus 0.36). Patients that died were more likely to have cardiovascular disease, to be admitted to general hospital and to spend more days in hospital than patients that did not die. There is a discrepancy between lower rates of cardiovascular disease diagnoses but higher rates of mortality and tertiary medical resources utilization among patients with schizophrenia when compared to control population. This may stem from an under-diagnosis and, eventually, under-treatment of these patients.

Somatic Care with a Psychotic Disorder. Lower Somatic Health Care Utilization of Patients with a Psychotic Disorder Compared to Other Patient Groups and to Controls Without a Psychiatric Diagnosis

Patients with non-affective psychotic disorders (NAPD) face higher risk of somatic problems and early natural death compared to the general population. Therefore, treatment guidelines for schizophrenia and psychosis stress the importance of monitoring somatic risk factors. This study examined somatic Health Care utilization (HCu) of patients with NAPD compared to non-psychiatric controls and patients with depression, anxiety or bipolar disorders using a large Health Insurance database. Results show lower specialist somatic HCu of patients with NAPD compared to matched controls and also lower percentages for prescribed somatic medication and general practitioner consultations for patients aged ≥60 years and after longer illness duration.

Effects of the diagnostic label 'schizophrenia', actively used or passively accepted, on general practitioners' views of this disorder

BACKGROUND

General practitioners (GPs) play a key role in the care of somatic and psychiatric problems in people diagnosed with schizophrenia (PWS). It is probable that, like other health professionals, GPs are not all free of prejudices toward PWS. In clinical practice, GPs sometimes interact with clients diagnosed with schizophrenia by specialists, passively accepting this diagnosis. Other times, GPs interact with clients having symptoms of schizophrenia but who have not been diagnosed. In this case, GPs are expected to actively make a diagnosis. Giving the key role of GPs in the process of care, it is worthwhile examining whether passive acceptance and active usage of the diagnosis schizophrenia have differential effects on GPs' attitudes toward people with this disorder.

AIMS

To investigate GPs' views of schizophrenia and whether they were influenced by a 'schizophrenia' label, passively accepted or actively used.

METHODS

A total of 430 randomly selected GPs were invited to complete a questionnaire about their views of schizophrenia, either after reading a description of this disorder and making a diagnosis, or without being provided with a description but passively accepting the label 'schizophrenia' given in the questionnaire.

RESULTS

The GPs who passively accepted the label schizophrenia ( n = 195) and those who actively identified schizophrenia from the description ( n = 127) had similar views. Compared to the GPs who did not identify schizophrenia in the description ( n = 65), those who used the diagnosis, actively or passively: more frequently reported heredity and less frequently psychosocial factors as causes of the disorder; were more skeptical about recovery; were more convinced of the need for long-term pharmacotherapies; believed more strongly that PWS should be discriminated against when in medical hospital; and perceived PWS as more dangerous and as kept at greater social distance.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis 'schizophrenia', however used, is associated with pessimistic views. Stigma education should be provided to GPs.

The epidemiology of diabetes in psychotic disorders

Diabetes is highly prevalent in people with psychotic disorders, including schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders. Exact prevalence is difficult to estimate, since diabetes is often underdiagnosed in people with psychosis. Results of several studies show that the prevalence of diabetes exceeds that in the general population, with documented prevalence in those with psychosis ranging from 1·26% to 50% across studies (median 13%). The association between diabetes and psychosis is complex and multifactorial. Many of the traditional risk factors for disease have increased prevalence in patients with psychotic disorders. In addition to these traditional risk factors, people with psychosis have unique risks that might have additive or even synergistic effects. These risks include the use of antipsychotic medication, the effects of adverse social determinants of health, and genetic loading. Despite evidence that rates of diabetes are increased in individuals with psychosis, many of these patients are not diagnosed or treated, resulting in increased diabetes-associated morbidity and mortality. Specific patient factors, provider issues, and systems-level factors contribute to the treatment gap. Interventions at both the clinical and public health levels are needed to successfully address this problem.

Use of GP services by patients with schizophrenia: a national cross-sectional register-based study

Background

Reform of health services has given primary care facilities increased responsibility for patients with serious mental disorders (SMD). There has also been a growing awareness of the high somatic morbidity among SMD patients, an obvious challenge for general practitioners (GPs). The aim of this study was to assess the utilisation of GP services by patients with schizophrenia.

Methods

The Norwegian list patient system is based on fee-for-service (FFS). For each contact, the GPs send a claim to National Health Insurance detailing the diagnosis, the type of contact, procedures performed, and the personal identifier of the patient. In this study complete GP claims data from 2009 for schizophrenia patients aged 25–60 years were used to assess their utilisation of GP services. Regression models were used to measure the association between patient, GP and practice characteristics, with FFS per patient used as a measure of service utilisation. Data on patients with diabetes (DM) and population means were used for comparison.

Results

The mean annual consultation rate was 5.0 and mean FFS was 2,807 Norwegian Kroner (NOK) for patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. Only 17% had no GP consultation, 26.2% had one or two, 25.3% had three to five, and 16.1% more than five consultations. GPs participated in multidisciplinary meetings for 25.7% of these patients. In schizophrenia patients, co-morbid DM increased the FFS by NOK 1400, obstructive lung disease by NOK 1699, and cardiovascular disease by NOK 863. The FFS for schizophrenia patients who belonged to a GP practice with a high proportion of mental health-related consultations increased by NOK 115 per percent point increase in proportion of consultations. Patients with schizophrenia living in municipalities with < 10,000 inhabitants had a mean increase in FFS of NOK 1048 compared with patients living in municipalities with > 50,000 inhabitants. Diagnostic tests were equally or more frequent used among patients with schizophrenia and comorbid somatic conditions than among similar patients without a SMD.

Conclusion

This study showed that most patients diagnosed with schizophrenia had regular contact with their GP, providing opportunities for the GP to care for both mental and somatic health problems.

Is schizophrenia associated with an increased risk of chronic kidney disease? A nationwide matched-cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The impact of schizophrenia on vital diseases, such as chronic kidney disease (CKD), has not as yet been verified. This study aims to establish whether there is an association between schizophrenia and CKD.

DESIGN

A nationwide matched cohort study.

SETTING

Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2338 patients with schizophrenia, and 7014 controls without schizophrenia (1:3), matched cohort for sex, age group, geography, urbanisation and monthly income, between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2007, based on the International Classifications of Disease Ninth Edition (ICD-9), Clinical Modification codes.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

After making adjustments for confounding risk factors, a Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the risk of developing CKD during a 3-year follow-up period from the index date.

RESULTS

Of the 2338-subject case cohort, 163 (6.97%) developed a CKD, as did 365 (5.20%) of the 7014 control participants. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that patients with schizophrenia were more likely to develop CKD (HR=1.36, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.63; p<0.001). After adjusting for gender, age group, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia, heart disease and non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) usage, the HR for patients with schizophrenia was 1.25 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.50; p<0.05). Neither typical nor atypical antipsychotics was associated an increased risk of CKD in patients with schizophrenia.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this population-based retrospective cohort study suggest that schizophrenia is associated with a 25% increase in the risk of developing CKD within only a 3-year follow-up period.

Primary care reform and service use by people with serious mental illness in Ontario

PURPOSE

To examine service use by adults with serious mental illness (SMI) rostered in new primary care models: enhanced fee-for-service (FFS), blended-capitation (CAP) and team-based capitation (TBC) models with and without mental health workers (MHW) in Ontario.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used administrative health service databases to compare use of mental health and general health services among persons with SMI enrolled in new models (n = 125,233).

RESULTS

Relative to persons rostered in enhanced FFS, those in CAP and TBC had fewer mental health primary care visits (adjusted rate ratios and 95% confidence limits: CAP: 0.77 [0.74, 0.81]; TBC with MHW: 0.72 [0.68, 0.76]; TBC with no MHW: 0.81 [0.72, 0.93]). Compared to patients in enhanced FFS, those in TBC models also had more mental health hospital admissions (TBC with MHW: 1.12 [1.05, 1.20]; TBC with no MHW: 1.22 [1.05, 1.41]). Patterns of use of general services were similar.

CONCLUSION

Further attention to financial incentives in capitation that influence care of persons with SMI is necessary to determine if they are aligned with aims of primary care reform.

Improvement of care for the physical health of patients with severe mental illness: a qualitative study assessing the view of patients and families

Background

Patients with severe mental illness (SMI) experience more physical comorbidity than the general population. Multiple factors, including inadequate seeking of healthcare and health care related factors such as lack of collaboration, underlie this undesirable situation. To improve this situation, the logistics of physical health care for patients with SMI need to be changed. We asked both patients and their families about their views on the current organization of care, and how this care could be improved.

Methods

Group and individual interviews were conducted with patients and family of patients to explore their needs and preferences concerning the care for the physical health of patients with SMI, and to explore the shortcomings they had experienced. Using thematic analysis, responses were firstly divided into common topics, after which these topics were grouped into themes.

Results

Three major themes for the improvement of the physical care of patients with SMI were found. Firstly, the reduced ability of patients with SMI to survey their own physical health interests requires health care that is tailored to these needs. Secondly, the lack of collaboration amongst mental health care professionals and general practitioners (GPs) hinders optimal care. Thirdly, concerns were expressed regarding the implementation of monitoring and supporting a healthy lifestyle. Patients with SMI welcome this implementation, but the logistics of providing this care can be improved.

Conclusions

An optimal approach for caring for the physical health of patients with SMI requires a professional approach, which is different to the routine care provided to the general public. This approach can and should be accomplished within the usual organizational structure. However, this requires tailoring of the health care to the needs of patients with SMI, as well as structural collaboration between mental health care professionals and GPs.

Increasing mortality gap for patients diagnosed with schizophrenia over the last three decades--a Danish nationwide study from 1980 to 2010

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to describe secular trends in the average age of death in patients with schizophrenia and to compare these with the general population.

METHODS

This is a longitudinal linkage study from 1 January 1980 to 31 December 2010 using the Danish Psychiatric Research Register and the Danish Cause of Death Register. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and survival analysis.

RESULTS

The average age of death in the schizophrenia population (62.2 years; 95% CI, 61.9-62.5) was lower compared to the general population (73.4 years; 95% CI, 73.4-73.4), P<0.001. In the general population we found, for men, an average increase in the age of death of 0.28 years (95% CI, 0.27-0.28) per calendar year, and for women an increase in age of death of 0.31 years (95% CI, 0.31-0.32) per calendar year (both P<0.001). In contrast, age of death decreased in the schizophrenia population: the change in average age of death for males was 0.04 years (95% CI, -0.09 to 0.00) per calendar year (P<0.05), and the comparable estimate for females was -0.05 years (95% CI, -0.09 to 0.01) per calendar year (P<0.05). A similar pattern existed after acts of self-harm as cause of death were excluded from the analyses. Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia had an increased mortality rate compared with the general population (hazard ratio, 2.05; 95% CI, 2.01-2.09).

CONCLUSIONS

On average, patients with schizophrenia die younger than the general population, independent of intentional self-harm as cause of death.

Mental healthcare staff's knowledge and experiences of diabetes care for persons with psychosis--a qualitative interview study

AIM

This paper aims to explore and analyse mental healthcare staff's (MHCS) knowledge and experiences of diabetes care for persons with psychosis.

BACKGROUND

There are a range of studies concerning the increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus among persons with psychosis, and the need for healthy lifestyle interventions to prevent the illness. MHCS are often trusted and have regular follow-ups with the patients, and their attitudes and actions often play an important role for the person's care behaviour. There is still little documentation of their experiences of diabetes care.

METHODS

A qualitative, explorative design was used, collecting data through semi-structured interviews with 12 MHCS working in psychosis outpatient care in Sweden. Data were analysed with qualitative content analysis. Findings Three categories emerged and provide a deeper understanding of how staff were aware of the risks of type 2 diabetes among their patients and therefore performed lifestyle interventions to promote these. Nevertheless, they lacked knowledge of diabetes care and simultaneously felt a lack of training among diabetes nurses to adapt diabetes care to suit persons with cognitive dysfunctions. Patients who were overconfident in their ability to manage diabetes care reported to have experienced most difficulties. Cooperation among those involved in these persons' health was considered necessary. Implications Diabetes care for persons with psychosis could improve if knowledge of type 2 diabetes was increased among MHCS and training in how to adapt diabetes care to persons with cognitive dysfunctions was enlarged among diabetes nurses. A challenge for nurses is to see how the care of different illnesses and support given by the family and others affect the persons total life situation and health. Healthcare plans and cooperation among all those involved in these persons' health is necessary for this.

Incident somatic comorbidity after psychosis: results from a retrospective cohort study based on Flemish general practice data

BACKGROUND

Psychotic conditions and especially schizophrenia, have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Many studies are performed in specialized settings with a strong focus on schizophrenia. Somatic comorbidity after psychosis is studied, using a general practice comorbidity registration network.

METHODS

Hazard ratios are presented resulting from frailty models to assess the risk of subsequent somatic disease after a diagnosis of psychosis compared to people without psychosis matched on practice, age and gender. Diseases studied are cancer, physical trauma, diabetes mellitus, gastrointestinal disorders, joint disorders, irritable bowel syndrome, general infections, metabolic disorders other than diabetes, hearing and vision problems, anemia, cardiovascular disease, alcohol abuse, lung disorders, mouth and teeth problems, sexually transmitted diseases.

RESULTS

Significant higher risks after a diagnosis of psychosis were found for the emergence of diabetes, physical trauma, gastrointestinal disorders, alcohol abuse, chronic lung disease and teeth and mouth problems. With regard to diabetes, by including the type of antipsychotic medication it is clear that the significant overall effect was largely due to the use of atypical antipsychotic medication. No significant higher risk was seen for cancer, joint conditions, irritable bowel syndrome, general infections, other metabolic conditions, hearing/vision problems, anaemia, cardiovascular disease or diabetes, in case no atypical antipsychotic medication was used.

CONCLUSION

Significantly higher morbidity rates for some somatic conditions in patients with psychosis are apparent. People with a diagnosis of psychosis benefit from regular assessments for the emergence of somatic disorders and risk factors, including diabetes in case of atypical antipsychotic medication.