Breast density and mode of detection in relation to breast cancer specific survival: a cohort study

Low breast density and peritumoral edema on MR predict worse overall survival of breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the relationship of pre-treatment MR image features (including breast density) and clinical-pathologic characteristics with overall survival (OS) in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

This retrospective study obtained an approval of the institutional review board and the written informed consents of patients were waived. From October 2013 to April 2019, 130 patients (mean age, 47.6 ± 9.4 years) were included. The univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied to analyze factors associated with OS, including MR image parameters and clinical-pathologic characteristics.

RESULTS

Among the 130 included patients, 11 (8.5%) patients (mean age, 48.4 ± 11.8 years) died of breast cancer recurrence or distant metastasis. The median follow-up length was 70 months (interquartile range of 60-85 months). According to the Cox regression analysis, older age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.769, 95% confidence interval [CI]): 1.330, 2.535), higher T stage (HR = 2.490, 95%CI:2.047, 3.029), higher N stage (HR = 1.869, 95%CI:1.507, 2.317), low breast density (HR = 1.693, 95%CI:1.391, 2.060), peritumoral edema (HR = 1.408, 95%CI:1.078, 1.840), axillary lymph nodes invasion (HR = 3.118, 95%CI:2.505, 3.881) on MR were associated with worse OS (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-treatment MR features and clinical-pathologic parameters are valuable for predicting long-time OS of breast cancer patients after NAC followed by surgery. Low breast density, peritumoral edema and axillary lymph nodes invasion on pre-treatment MR images were associated with worse prognosis.

Investigating the prognostic value of mammographic breast density and mammographic tumor appearance in women with invasive breast cancer: The Malmö Diet and cancer study

BACKGROUND

High breast density is a risk factor for breast cancer. However, whether density is a prognostic factor is debatable. Also, tumor appearances are related to tumor characteristics. Here we investigate the relationship between breast cancer-specific survival and mammographic breast density and mammographic tumor appearances.

METHODS

Women in the Malmö Diet and Cancer study with invasive breast cancer 1991-2014 were included (n = 1116). Mammographic information, patient and tumor characteristics, vital status, and causes of death were collected through 2018. Breast cancer-specific survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard models. Analyses were adjusted for established prognostic factors and stratified by detection mode.

RESULTS

High breast density did not significantly impact breast cancer-specific survival. However, there may be increased risk in women with dense breasts and screening-detected tumors (HR 1.45, CI 0.87-2.43). Neither did tumor appearance impact breast cancer-specific survival at long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer prognosis in women with high breast density on mammography does not seem impaired compared to women with less dense breasts, once the cancer is established. Neither does mammographic tumor appearance seem to inflict on prognosis, findings that can be of value in the management of breast cancer.

Mammographic breast density and survival in women with invasive breast cancer

PURPOSE

We explored the under-debate association between mammographic breast density (MBD) and survival.

METHODS

From the Piedmont Cancer Registry, we identified 693 invasive breast cancer (BC) cases. We analyzed the overall survival in strata of MBD through the Kaplan-Meier method. Using the Cox proportional hazards model, we estimated the hazard ratios (HRs) of death; using the cause-specific hazards regression model, we estimated the HRs of BC-related and other causes of death. Models included term for Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) MBD (categorized as BI-RADS 1 and BI-RADS 2-4) and were adjusted for selected patient and tumour characteristics.

RESULTS

There were 102 deaths, of which 49 were from BC. After 5 years, the overall survival was 69% in BI-RADS 1 and 88% in BI-RADS 2-4 (p < 0.01). Compared to BI-RADS 2-4, the HRs of death for BI-RADS 1 were 1.65 (95% CI 1.06-2.58) in the crude model and 1.35 (95% CI 0.84-2.16) in the fully adjusted model. Compared to BI-RADS 2-4, the fully adjusted HRs for BI-RADS 1 were 1.52 (95% CI 0.74-3.13) for BC-related death and 1.83 (95% CI 0.84-4.00) for the other causes of death.

CONCLUSION

Higher MBD is one of the strongest independent risk factors for BC, but it seems not to have an unfavorable impact on survival.

Association of mammography and ultrasound features with MammaPrint in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive invasive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

MammaPrint is a 70-gene signature microarray assay that predicts the likelihood of recurrence of breast cancer and chemotherapeutic benefits.

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between mammography and ultrasound (US) features and MammaPrint results in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive invasive breast cancer, and to identify the predictive factors for high risk of recurrence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 251 patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, 1-3 node-positive invasive breast cancer. Mammography and US findings were reviewed according to the BI-RADS criteria. The association between MammaPrint results and the clinicopathological and imaging features was evaluated. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors for high risk of recurrence.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 143 (57.0%) and 108 (43.0%) had low and high risks for recurrence on MammaPrint, respectively. Young age (odds ratio [OR] 1.08; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.12; P<0.001), posterior enhancement on US (OR 2.45; 95% CI 1.16-5.20; P = 0.019), absence of posterior shadowing on US (OR 3.19; 95% CI 1.17-8.62; P = 0.023), high histologic grade (OR 113.36; 95% CI 6.79-1893.53; P = 0.001), and high Ki-67 level (OR 4.90; 95% CI 2.62-9.17; P<0.001) were independently associated with high risk of recurrence on multivariate logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Posterior features in US may predict a high risk of recurrence in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive invasive breast cancer, which may be useful in enhancing the diagnostic value of MammaPrint and aid in the decision-making process regarding treatment.

"Association of mammographic features with molecular breast tumor profiles"

PURPOSE

Mammographic density and tumor appearance are breast cancer prognostic factors. Conceivably, mammographic features are macroscopic reflections of tumor´s molecular composition, but to an unknown extent. Our aim was to study associations of mammographic features with molecular tumor profiles.

METHODS

Invasive breast cancers (2007-2016) in Malmö Diet and Cancer Study (MDCS) for which there were tumor RNA-sequencing analyses within Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network - Breast (SCAN-B) (n=102) or All Breast Cancer in Malmö (ABIM) (n=50) were identified. Density (fatty vs. dense), tumor appearance (mass vs. spiculation), and intrinsic subtypes were registered. Differences in gene/metagene expression and Microenvironment Cell Population Counter were analyzed with R. Overall survival was used as endpoint.

RESULTS

No gene expression differences between density groups was observed. In one cohort (but not the other), Luminal A tumors associated with fatty breasts. For spiculation vs. mass, (p<0.01, t-test) 86 genes were differentially expressed; only one gene was differentially expressed comparing density. Gene set enrichment analysis showed genes highly expressed in spiculated tumors were enriched for extracellular matrix-associated genes whereas genes highly expressed with masses were associated with proliferation. A spiculation metagene, based on differentially expressed genes, showed association with estrogen receptor positivity, lower grade, and improved survival, but it was not an independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSION

There are clear differences in molecular composition between breast tumors with a spiculated appearance vs. a mass as the dominant tumor appearance. However, there are no apparent molecular differences related to the density of the breast in which the tumor has arisen.

Association between Oncotype DX recurrence score and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI features in patients with estrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative invasive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Oncotype DX is a multigene assay used in breast cancer, and the result provided as a 'recurrence score (RS)' corresponds to the risk of a cancer recurrence and the chemotherapeutic benefit in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2-negative invasive breast cancer. However, its accessibility is limited.

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could be used to predict Oncotype DX RS in patients with ER-positive HER2-negative invasive breast cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We enrolled 473 patients with ER-positive HER2-negative invasive breast cancer who underwent a preoperative MRI and Oncotype DX assay between January 2015 and December 2018. The MRI was reviewed and associations between Oncotype DX RS values were evaluated. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of high and low RS.

RESULTS

Of the 485 cancers, 288 (59.4%) had low (<18), 155 (31.9%) had intermediate (18-30), and 42 (8.7%) had high (≥31) RS. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that a round shape (odds ratio [OR] = 2.554, P = 0.089) and low proportion of washout component (OR = 1.011, P = 0.014) were associated with low RS and that heterogeneously dense (OR = 3.205, P = 0.007) or scattered fibroglandular (OR = 3.776, P = 0.005) breast tissue, a non-spiculated margin (OR = 5.435, P = 0.007), and low proportion of persistent component (OR = 1.012, P = 0.036) were associated with high RS.

CONCLUSION

MRI features showed the potential for the discrimination of Oncotype DX RS in patients with ER-positive HER2-negative invasive breast cancer.

10-Year Survival after Breast-Conserving Surgery Compared with Mastectomy in Louisiana Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Louisiana has the third highest breast cancer mortality in the US, despite ranking 30th in incidence. Whether surgical approach contributes to such a poor outcome is unknown. We compared outcomes of breast-conserving surgery plus radiation (BCT) vs mastectomy (MST) for Louisiana women with early-stage breast cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Data on women diagnosed with Stage I-II breast cancer from 2004 to 2016 were analyzed from the Louisiana Tumor Registry. Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared between BCT and MST. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare survival curves, and logistic regression was used to examine the association of sociodemographic and clinical factors with the type of breast cancer surgery. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Of the 18,260 patients, 9,968 patients (54.6%) had BCT and 8,292 patients (45.4%) had MST. Compared with BCT, the MST group tended to be underinsured/Medicare/Medicaid, more impoverished, had higher stage 2 disease, were more likely to reside in rural regions, travel ≥25 miles to radiation treatment facility, be treated at low volume centers, and have T3, node positive, and poorly differentiated tumors. Ten-year OS and CSS were significantly better among those who had BCT (OS: 80.0%; 95% CI: 79.0%-81.1%; CSS: 92.7%; 95% CI: 92.1%-93.4%) than those having MST (OS: 69.3%; 95% CI: 68.0%-70.5%; CSS: 88.8%:95% CI: 87.9%-89.7%) (p < 0.05). Even after controlling for sociodemographic and clinical variables, MST was associated with a 28.6% increased risk of death from all causes (hazard ratio [HR]:1.286; 95% CI:1.197-1.380) and a 29.8% increased risk of breast-cancer specific death (HR:1.298; 95% CI: 1.150-1.465).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical approach, a factor that is within the control of the surgeon, has an impact on mortality for Louisiana women with early-stage breast cancer.

Breast cancer risk factors and their effects on survival: a Mendelian randomisation study

BACKGROUND

Observational studies have investigated the association of risk factors with breast cancer prognosis. However, the results have been conflicting and it has been challenging to establish causality due to potential residual confounding. Using a Mendelian randomisation (MR) approach, we aimed to examine the potential causal association between breast cancer-specific survival and nine established risk factors for breast cancer: alcohol consumption, body mass index, height, physical activity, mammographic density, age at menarche or menopause, smoking, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

We conducted a two-sample MR analysis on data from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) and risk factor summary estimates from the GWAS Catalog. The BCAC data included 86,627 female patients of European ancestry with 7054 breast cancer-specific deaths during 15 years of follow-up. Of these, 59,378 were estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and 13,692 were ER-negative breast cancer patients. For the significant association, we used sensitivity analyses and a multivariable MR model. All risk factor associations were also examined in a model adjusted by other prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Increased genetic liability to T2DM was significantly associated with worse breast cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-1.17, P value [P] = 0.003). There were no significant associations after multiple testing correction for any of the risk factors in the ER-status subtypes. For the reported significant association with T2DM, the sensitivity analyses did not show evidence for violation of the MR assumptions nor that the association was due to increased BMI. The association remained significant when adjusting by other prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

This extensive MR analysis suggests that T2DM may be causally associated with worse breast cancer-specific survival and therefore that treating T2DM may improve prognosis.

The association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with breast density and breast cancer survival: the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study

Background

Genetic factors are important in determining breast density, and heritable factors account for 60% of the variation. Certain single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are associated with density and risk of breast cancer but the association with prognosis is not clear.

Purpose

To investigate associations between selected SNPs and breast cancer survival in the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study (MDCS).

Material and Methods

A total of 724 unrelated women with breast cancer and registered radiological and pathological data were identified in MDCS 1991–2007, with genotyping available for 672 women. Associations among 15 SNPs, density, and breast cancer-specific survival were analyzed using logistic/Cox regression, adjusted for factors affecting density and survival. Variants significantly associated with either density or survival were validated in a large independent breast cancer cohort (LIBRO-1).

Results

Minor homozygotes of SNPs rs9383589, CCDC170 and rs6557161, ESR1 were associated with high breast density (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 8.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35–59.57; AOR 2.08, 95% CI 1.19–3.65, respectively) and poorer breast cancer survival (adjusted hazard ratio [HR_adj] 6.46, 95% CI 1.95–21.39; HR_adj 2.30, 95% CI 1.33–3.96, respectively) compared to major homozygotes. For SNP rs3757318, ESR1, minor homozygotes (HR_adj 7.46, 95% CI 2.28–24.45) were associated with poorer survival. We confirmed that rs6557161, ESR1 was significantly associated with both density and survival in the LIBRO-1 study.

Conclusion

These findings support a shared genetic basis for density and breast cancer survival. The SNP significantly associated with both density and survival in both cohorts may be of interest in future research investigating polygenic risk scores for breast cancer risk and screening stratification purposes.

Hormone replacement therapy and mammographic density: a systematic literature review

PURPOSE

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is used to reduce climacteric symptoms of menopause and prevent osteoporosis; however, it increases risk of breast cancer. Mammographic density (MD) is also a strong risk factor for breast cancer. We conducted this review to investigate the association between HRT use and MD and to assess the effect of different HRT regimens on MD.

METHODS

Two of authors examined articles published between 2002 and 2019 from PubMed, Embase, and OVID using Covidence systematic review platform. Any disagreements were discussed until consensus was reached. The protocol used in this review was created in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Quality of each eligible study was assessed using the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) hierarchy.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Six studies showed that using estrogen plus progestin (E + P) HRT was associated with higher MD than estrogen alone. Four studies reported that continuous estrogen plus progestin (CEP) users had higher MD than sequential estrogen plus progestin (SEP) and estrogen alone users. However, two studies showed that SEP users had slightly higher MD than CEP users and estrogen alone users.

CONCLUSIONS

Epidemiological evidence is rather consistent suggesting that there is a positive association between HRT use and MD with the highest increase in MD among current users, and CEP users. Our results suggest that due to increase in MD and masking effect, current E + P users may require additional screening procedures, shorter screening intervals, or using advanced imaging techniques.

Ovarian cancer subtypes and survival in relation to three comprehensive imaging parameters

Background

Ovarian cancer (OC) is usually detected in late clinical stages, and imaging at diagnosis is crucial. Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and cardio phrenic lymph nodes (CPLN) are pathological findings of computed tomography (CT) and are relevant for surgical planning. Furthermore, mammographic breast density (BD) has shown an association with OC risk and might be prognostically relevant. However, it is not known if PC, CPLN, and BD are associated with aggressive OC subtypes and impaired OC survival. Herein, we investigated associations between three comprehensive image parameters and OC subtypes and survival.

Methods

The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study is a prospective study that included 17,035 women (1991–1996). Tumor information on 159 OC and information on OC specific survival (last follow-up, 2017-12-31) was registered. The CT and mammography closest to diagnosis were evaluated (Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index PCI, CPLN, and BD). Associations between CT-PCI, CPLN, and BD vs. clinical stage [stage I vs. advanced stage (II-IV), histological type/grade (high grade serous and endometrioid vs. other subtypes], and OC-specific survival were analyzed by logistic and Cox regression.

Results

There was a significant association between higher CT-PCI score and advanced clinical stage (adjusted OR 1.26 (1.07–1.49)), adjusted for age at diagnosis and histological type/grade. Increasing CT-PCI was significantly associated with impaired OC specific survival (adjusted HR 1.04 (1.01–1.07)), adjusted for age at diagnosis, histological type/grade, and clinical stage. There was no significant association between PCI and histological type/grade, nor between BD or CPLN vs. the studied outcomes.

Conclusions

Image PCI score was significantly associated with advanced clinical stages and impaired OC survival. An objective approach (based on imaging) to scoring peritoneal carcinomatosis in ovarian cancer could help surgeons and oncologists to optimize surgical planning, treatment, and care.

Exploring the Role of Breast Density on Cancer Prognosis among Women Attending Population-Based Screening Programmes

Background

Our aim was to assess the role of breast density on breast cancer mortality and recurrences, considering patient and tumour characteristics and the treatments received among women attending population-based screening programmes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study among women aged 50-69 years attending population-based screening programmes, diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 2000 and 2009, and followed up to 2014. Breast density was categorised as low density (≤25% dense tissue), intermediate density (25-50%), and high density (≥50%). Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for death and recurrences, adjusting by patient characteristics, mode of detection (screen-detected vs. interval cancer), and tumour features.

Results

The percentage of deaths and recurrences was higher among women with intermediate- and high-density breasts than among women with low-density breasts (p=0.011 for death; p=0.037 for recurrences). Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models revealed that women with intermediate- and high-density breasts had a higher risk of death than women with low-density breasts, being statistically significant for intermediate densities (aHR = 2.19 [95% CI: 1.16-4.13], aHR = 1.44 [95% CI: 0.67-3.1], respectively). No association was found between breast density and recurrences.

Conclusions

Breast density was associated with a higher risk of death, but not of recurrences, among women participating in breast cancer screening. These findings reinforce the need to improve screening sensitivity among women with dense breasts and to routinely assess breast density, not only for its role as a risk factor for breast cancer but also for its potential influence on cancer prognosis.

Mammographic density: intersection of advocacy, science, and clinical practice

Purpose

Here we aim to review the association between mammographic density, collagen structure and breast cancer risk.

Findings

While mammographic density is a strong predictor of breast cancer risk in populations, studies by Boyd show that mammographic density does not predict breast cancer risk in individuals. Mammographic density is affected by age, parity, menopausal status, race/ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI).New studies normalize mammographic density to BMI may provide a more accurate way to compare mammographic density in women of diverse race and ethnicity. Preclinical and tissue-based studies have investigated the role collagen composition and structure in predicting breast cancer risk. There is emerging evidence that collagen structure may activate signaling pathways associated with aggressive breast cancer biology.

Summary

Measurement of film mammographic density does not adequately capture the complex signaling that occurs in women with at-risk collagen. New ways to measure at-risk collagen potentially can provide a more accurate view of risk.

Are mammographic density phenotypes associated with breast cancer treatment response and clinical outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mammographic density (MD) increases breast cancer (BC) risk, however, its association with patient outcomes is unclear. We examined the association of baseline MD (BMD), and MD reduction (MDR) following BC treatment with patient outcomes. Six databases (CINAHL, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Embase) were used to identify relevant articles. The PRISMA strategy was used to extract relevant details. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the "Quality In Prognosis Studies" (QUIPS) tool. A Meta-analysis and pooled risk estimates were performed. Results showed that BMD is associated with contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk (HR = 1.9; 95%CI: 1.3-3.0, p = 0.0007), recurrence (HR = 2.0; 95%CI: 1.0-4.0, p = 0.04), and mortality (HR = 1.4; 95%CI: 1.1-1.9, p = 0.003). No association was found between BMD and prognosis (HR = 3.2; 95%CI: 0.9-11.2, p = 0.06). Data on risk estimates (95%CI) from BMD for survival [RR: 1.75; 0.99-3.1 to 2.4; 1.4-4.1], ipsilateral BC [HR: 1; 0.6-1.6 to 3; 1.2-7.5], and treatment response (OR, 1.8; 0.98-3.3) are limited. MDR showed no association with mortality (HR = 0.5; 95%CI: 0.2-1.2, p = 0.13). MDR is associated with a reduced risk of recurrence [HR/RR: 0.35; 0.17-0.68 to 1.33; 0.67-2.65)], however data on MDR and outcomes such as mortality [HR/RR: 0.5; 0.27-0.93 to 0.59; 0.22-0.88], and CBC risk [RR/HR: 0.53; 0.24-0.84 to 1.3; 0.6-2.7] are limited. Evidence, although sparse, demonstrates that high BMD is associated with an increased risk of recurrence, CBC, and mortality. Conversely, MDR is associated with a reduced risk of BC recurrence, CBC, and BC-related mortality.

A review of the influence of mammographic density on breast cancer clinical and pathological phenotype

PURPOSE

It is well established that high mammographic density (MD), when adjusted for age and body mass index, is one of the strongest known risk factors for breast cancer (BC), and also associates with higher incidence of interval cancers in screening due to the masking of early mammographic abnormalities. Increasing research is being undertaken to determine the underlying histological and biochemical determinants of MD and their consequences for BC pathogenesis, anticipating that improved mechanistic insights may lead to novel preventative or treatment interventions. At the same time, technological advances in digital and contrast mammography are such that the validity of well-established relationships needs to be re-examined in this context.

METHODS

With attention to old versus new technologies, we conducted a literature review to summarise the relationships between clinicopathologic features of BC and the density of the surrounding breast tissue on mammography, including the associations with BC biological features inclusive of subtype, and implications for the clinical disease course encompassing relapse, progression, treatment response and survival.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

There is reasonable evidence to support positive relationships between high MD (HMD) and tumour size, lymph node positivity and local relapse in the absence of radiotherapy, but not between HMD and LVI, regional relapse or distant metastasis. Conflicting data exist for associations of HMD with tumour location, grade, intrinsic subtype, receptor status, second primary incidence and survival, which need further confirmatory studies. We did not identify any relationships that did not hold up when data involving newer imaging techniques were employed in analysis.

Comparison between software volumetric breast density estimates in breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography images in a large public screening cohort

OBJECTIVES

To compare software estimates of volumetric breast density (VBD) based on breast tomosynthesis (BT) projections to those based on digital mammography (DM) images in a large screening cohort, the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST).

METHODS

DM and BT images of 9909 women (enrolled 2010-2015) were retrospectively analysed with prototype software to estimate VBD. Software calculation is based on a physics model of the image acquisition process and incorporates the effect of masking in DM based on accumulated dense tissue areas. VBD (continuously and categorically) was compared between BT [central projection (mediolateral oblique view (MLO)] and two-view DM, and with radiologists' BI-RADS density 4^th ed. scores. Agreement and correlation were investigated with weighted kappa (κ), Spearman's correlation coefficient (r), and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

There was a high correlation (r = 0.83) between VBD in DM and BT and substantial agreement between the software breast density categories [observed agreement, 61.3% and 84.8%; κ = 0.61 and ĸ = 0.69 for four (a/b/c/d) and two (fat involuted vs. dense) density categories, respectively]. There was moderate agreement between radiologists' BI-RADS scores and software density categories in DM (ĸ = 0.55) and BT (ĸ = 0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large public screening setting, we report a substantial agreement between VBD in DM and BT using software with special focus on masking effect. This automated and objective mode of measuring VBD may be of value to radiologists and women when BT is used as the primary breast cancer screening modality.

KEY POINTS

• There was a high correlation between continuous volumetric breast density in DM and BT. • There was substantial agreement between software breast density categories (four groups) in DM and BT; with clinically warranted binary software breast density categories, the agreement increased markedly. • There was moderate agreement between radiologists' BI-RADS scores and software breast density categories in DM and BT.

Survival and Disease-Free Survival by Breast Density and Phenotype in Interval Breast Cancers

Background: We aimed to evaluate survival and disease-free survival in different subtypes of interval cancers by breast density, taking into account clinical and biological characteristics.Methods: We included 374 invasive breast tumors (195 screen-detected cancers; 179 interval cancers, classified into true interval, false-negatives, occult tumors and minimal-sign cancers) diagnosed in women ages 50-69 years undergoing biennial screening from 2000-2009, followed up to 2014. Breast density was categorized into non-dense (<25% dense tissue) and mixed dense breasts (≥25%). Survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression models were computed to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for death and recurrences by comparing women with interval and true interval cancers versus women with screen-detected cancers, controlling for tumor and patient characteristics. All analyses were stratified by breast density.Results: Interval cancers were detected in younger women, at more advanced stages, in denser breasts and showed a higher proportion of triple-negative cancers, especially among true interval cancers. Women with interval cancer and non-dense breasts had an aHR for death of 3.40 (95% CI, 0.92-12.62). Women with true interval cancers detected in non-dense breasts had the highest adjusted risk of death (aHR, 6.55; 95% CI, 1.37-31.39).Conclusions: Women with true interval cancer in non-dense breasts had a higher risk of death than women with screen-detected cancers.Impact: These results support the advisability of routinely collecting information on breast density, both for further tailoring of screening strategies and as a prognostic factor for diagnosed breast cancers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 27(8); 908-16. ©2018 AACR.

Breast density and breast cancer-specific survival by detection mode

Background

Breast density is known to affect breast cancer risk and screening sensitivity, but it may also be associated with breast cancer survival. The interpretation of results from previous studies on breast density and survival is complicated by the association between detection mode and survival. Here, we studied the effect of breast density on breast cancer-specific survival for different detection modes (screen-detected, interval ≤ 24 or > 24 months, non-participant).

Methods

Data from the Nijmegen (Dutch) breast cancer screening programme were used. Women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 1975 and 2011 were included. Breast density was assessed visually, based on a dichotomized Wolfe scale: ‘fatty breasts’ (≤25%) and ‘dense breasts’ (> 25%). Cox proportional hazard regression was used to obtain hazard ratios (HR).

Results

We identified 2742 eligible women, with a breast pattern available for 2233 women. A diagnosis of interval cancer (HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.62–2.61) led to a significantly increased risk of breast cancer death compared with screen-detected cancer. No significant cause-specific survival difference between women with dense and fatty breasts was observed (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.77–1.15). The hazard was only higher for women with dense breasts among interval cancers ≤24 m (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.74–1.56). The hazard appeared to be lower for women with dense breasts than for women with fatty breasts among screen-detected (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.53–1.11) and interval cancers > 24 m (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.53–1.20). None of the effects were statistically significant.

Conclusions

Detection mode is strongly associated with breast cancer death. No clear association is apparent between breast density and breast cancer death, regardless of detection mode.

Breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy: overall and relative survival-a population based study by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG)

BACKGROUND

Observational studies have pointed at a better survival after breast conserving surgery (BCS) compared with mastectomy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether this remains true when more extensive tumor characteristics and treatment data were included.

METHODS

The cohort included patients registered after primary surgery for early invasive breast cancer in the database of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, in the period 1995-2012. The cohort was divided into three groups: (i) patients who primarily had a mastectomy, (ii) patients treated by BCS, and (iii) patients who primarily had BCS and then mastectomy [intention to treat (ITT) by BCS]. The association between overall mortality and standard mortality ratio (SMR) and risk factors was analyzed in univariate and multivariate Poisson regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 58,331 patients were included: 27,143 in the mastectomy group, 26,958 in the BCS group, and 4230 in the BCS-ITT group. After adjusting for patient and treatment characteristics, the relative risk (RR) was 1.20 (95% CI: 1.15-1.25) after mastectomy and 1.08 (95% CI: 1.01-1.15) after BCS first and then mastectomy, as compared to BCS. Statistically significant interactions were not observed for age, period of treatment, and nodal status, but patients with Charlson's Comorbidity Index (CCI) score 2+ had no increased mortality after mastectomy, as opposed to patients with CCI 0-1. Loco-regional radiation therapy (RT) in node positive patients did not reduce the increased risk associated with mastectomy [RR = 1.28 (95% CI 1.19-1.38)].

CONCLUSION

Patients assigned to BCS have a better survival than patients assigned to mastectomy. Residual confounding after adjustment for registered characteristics presumably explained the different outcomes, thus consistent with selection bias. Diversities in RT did not appear to explain the observed difference in survival after BCS and mastectomy.

Thyroid function and survival following breast cancer

Background

Thyroid function has been associated with breast cancer risk, and breast cancer cell growth and proliferation. It is not clear whether thyroid function affects prognosis following breast cancer but, if so, this could have an important clinical impact. The present study analysed prospectively collected measurements of free tri-iodothyronine (T3), free thyroxine (T4), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPO-Ab) in relation to breast cancer survival.

Methods

The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study is a prospective cohort study of 17 035 women in Sweden. Study enrolment was conducted between 1991 and 1996. Patients with incident breast cancer were identified through record linkage with cancer registries until 31 December 2006. Information on vital status was collected from the Swedish Cause of Death Registry, with the endpoint breast cancer mortality (31 December 2013). Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals (c.i.) were obtained by Cox proportional hazards analysis.

Results

Some 766 patients with incident breast cancer were identified, of whom 551 were eligible for analysis. Compared with patients in the first free T4 tertile, breast cancer mortality was lower among those in the second tertile (HR 0·49, 95 per cent c.i. 0·28 to 0·84). There was an indication, although non-significant, of lower breast cancer mortality among patients in the second TSH tertile (HR 0·63, 0·37 to 1·09) and in those with positive TPO-Ab status (HR 0·61, 0·30 to 1·23). Free T3 showed no clear association with mortality.

Conclusion

In the present study, there was a positive association between free T4 levels and improved breast cancer survival.

Association of breast cancer risk loci with breast cancer survival

The survival of breast cancer patients is largely influenced by tumor characteristics, such as TNM stage, tumor grade and hormone receptor status. However, there is growing evidence that inherited genetic variation might affect the disease prognosis and response to treatment. Several lines of evidence suggest that alleles influencing breast cancer risk might also be associated with breast cancer survival. We examined the associations between 35 breast cancer susceptibility loci and the disease over-all survival (OS) in 10,255 breast cancer patients from the National Cancer Institute Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium (BPC3) of which 1,379 died, including 754 of breast cancer. We also conducted a meta-analysis of almost 35,000 patients and 5,000 deaths, combining results from BPC3 and the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) and performed in silico analyses of SNPs with significant associations. In BPC3, the C allele of LSP1-rs3817198 was significantly associated with improved OS (HRper-allele =0.70; 95% CI: 0.58-0.85; ptrend  = 2.84 × 10(-4) ; HRheterozygotes  = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.55-0.92; HRhomozygotes  = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.31-0.76; p2DF  = 1.45 × 10(-3) ). In silico, the C allele of LSP1-rs3817198 was predicted to increase expression of the tumor suppressor cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1C (CDKN1C). In the meta-analysis, TNRC9-rs3803662 was significantly associated with increased death hazard (HRMETA =1.09; 95% CI: 1.04-1.15; ptrend  = 6.6 × 10(-4) ; HRheterozygotes  = 0.96 95% CI: 0.90-1.03; HRhomozygotes  = 1.21; 95% CI: 1.09-1.35; p2DF =1.25 × 10(-4) ). In conclusion, we show that there is little overlap between the breast cancer risk single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified so far and the SNPs associated with breast cancer prognosis, with the possible exceptions of LSP1-rs3817198 and TNRC9-rs3803662.

Mammographic density in relation to tumor biomarkers, molecular subtypes, and mode of detection in breast cancer

PURPOSE

Mammographic density is an established risk factor for breast cancer; however, the relation to tumor pathological parameters including the androgen receptor and molecular subtypes has not been extensively studied.

METHODS

In the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study, 733 invasive breast cancers were diagnosed from 1991 to 2007. Mammographic density was defined qualitatively. Tumor biomarker information including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor, androgen receptor (AR), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), and Ki67 was collected. Surrogate molecular subtypes were defined as luminal A, luminal B, HER2 positive and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

RESULTS

Among the 632 tumors with mammographic and pathological information, 352 tumors were screening-detected and 280 clinically detected. Higher mammographic density was associated with ER-negative tumors [ORadj 1.93 (1.04-3.59)] and TNBC [ORadj 2.44 (1.01-5.89), luminal A reference], in clinically detected breast cancer. Similarly, higher mammographic density was associated with AR-negative tumors [ORadj 1.77 (0.80-3.93)] in clinically detected breast cancer, though the evidence for this association was weak.

CONCLUSIONS

In clinically detected breast cancer, but not in screening-detected, higher mammographic density was associated with ER-negative tumors including TNBC. This study highlights the need for taking mode of detection into consideration when addressing mammographic density and tumor biomarkers.

BMI and breast cancer prognosis benefit: mammography screening reveals differences between normal weight and overweight women

OBJECTIVES

Few studies are available on the potential impact of body weight on breast cancer prognosis in screen-detected patients. Moreover, it is not known whether body mass index (BMI) could have a different prognostic impact in screen-detected versus symptomatic breast cancer patients. To investigate these unsolved issues, we carried out a retrospective study evaluating the effect of BMI on breast cancer prognosis in screen-detected vs symptomatic breast cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a follow-up study on 448 women diagnosed with incident, histologically-confirmed breast cancer. Patients were categorized according to their BMI as normal weight, overweight and obese. Disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and BMI curves were compared according to mode of cancer detection.

RESULTS

Among screen-detected patients, higher BMI was associated with a significant lower DFS, whereas no significant difference was observed among symptomatic patients. OS showed similar results. In the multivariate analysis adjusting for age, education, tumor size, nodal status, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and menopausal status, the risk for high level of BMI among screen-detected patients did not reach the statistical significance for either recurrence or survival.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights the potential impact of high bodyweight in breast cancer prognosis, the findings confirm that obesity plays a role in women breast cancer prognosis independently from diagnosis mode.

Do pathological parameters differ with regard to breast density and mode of detection in breast cancer? The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study

Our aim was to study how breast density relates to tumor characteristics in breast cancer with emphasis on mode of detection. Among 17,035 women in the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study 826 incident cases have been diagnosed (1991-2007). Data on tumor characteristics, mode of detection, and density at diagnosis were collected. Associations between density and tumor characteristics were analyzed using logistic and ordinal logistic regression models yielding OR and 95% CI. Adjustments for age at diagnosis, BMI at baseline, and the mode of detection, were performed. In denser breasts, large tumor size was more frequent (ORadj 1.59 (1.26-2.01)) as was lymph node involvement (ORadj 1.32 (1.00-1.74)). Further, the higher the density, the lower the grade (ORadj 0.73 (0.53-1.02) for having higher grade), in screening-detected invasive breast cancer. Our findings stress the importance of considering the impact of density in mammography image interpretation and the possible associations with tumor aggressiveness.