1
|
Larrosa-García M, Garcia-Garcia S, Louro J, Sánchez-Montalvá A, Sampol Sirvent J, Augustín Recio S, Guillén Del Castillo A, Riera-Arnau J, Gorgas MQ, Miarons M. Use of chronic medications and risk of death due to COVID-19 in hospitalised patients. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2024; 31:247-252. [PMID: 36302612 DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-003186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the potential association between chronic exposure to medication and death related to COVID-19. METHODS This is a retrospective cross-sectional study that included all patients hospitalised due to COVID-19 from 11 March to 4 June 2020 in our centre. Chronic patient medication was classified by the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification; demographic and clinical data were analysed. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of death for each drug exposure; each aOR represents an independent model adjusted by clinical factors related to COVID-19 mortality. RESULTS The study included 978 patients with a mean (SD) age of 64.5 (17.7) years who were predominantly male (531, 54.3%). Of all 978 patients, 182 (18.61%) died during the follow-up of the study. The most common Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 0, 4.2% were smokers, 16.7% were obese, 47.4% had hypertension, and 19.4% were diabetic. Most patients (70.8%) were prescribed at least one treatment, 32.5% used >5 treatments, and 8.6% >10. Our data suggest that COVID-19 hospitalised patients taking trimethoprim and analogues, leukotriene receptor antagonists, calcineurin inhibitors, aldosterone antagonists, selective immunosuppressants, propulsives, insulins and analogues, and benzodiazepine derivatives have a higher risk of death. CONCLUSIONS This study investigated the association between chronic exposure to drugs and the risk of death in COVID-19 patients. Our results have shed some light on the impact of chronic drug exposure on the risk of severe COVID-19; however, further research is needed to increase the understanding about its relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Javier Louro
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM, Hospital del Mar INAD, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Judit Riera-Arnau
- Pharmacology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Marta Miarons
- Pharmacy Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jørgensen SF, Sagstad S, Louro J, Román M, Castells X, Hofvind S, Njor S. Comparisons of assessment pathways after abnormal mammography screening in Denmark, Norway, and Spain. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024:10.1007/s10549-023-07219-0. [PMID: 38285110 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07219-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To ensure high-quality screening programmes and effective utilization of resources, it is important to monitor how cancer detection is affected by different strategies performed at recall assessment. This study aimed to describe procedures performed at recall assessment and compare and evaluate the performance of the assessment in Denmark, Norway, and Spain in terms of screen-detected cancer (SDC) and interval cancer (IC) rates. METHODS We included women aged 50-69 years from Denmark, Norway, and Spain, who were recalled for assessment after screening mammography, and recorded all procedures performed during six months after diagnosis, and the timing of the procedures. Women were followed for two years and screen-detected and interval cancer, and sensitivity of recall was calculated and compared. RESULTS In total, data from 24,645 Danish, 30,050 Norwegian, and 41,809 Spanish women were included in the study. Most of the women had some assessment within 2 months in all three countries. SDC rates were higher in Denmark (0.57) and Norway (0.60) compared to Spain (0.38), as were the IC rates, i.e. 0.25 and 0.18 vs. 0.12, respectively. The sensitivity of the diagnostic follow-up was somewhat higher in Denmark (98.3%) and Norway (98.2%), compared to Spain (95.4%), but when excluding non-invasive assessment pathways, the sensitivities were comparable. CONCLUSION This comparison study showed variation in the assessment procedures used in the three countries as well as the SDC and IC rates and the sensitivity of recall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Fogh Jørgensen
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Skovlyvej 15, 8930, Randers NE, Denmark.
- Department of Data, Innovation and Research, Lillebaelt Hospital, Beriderbakken 4, 7100, Vejle, Denmark.
| | - Silje Sagstad
- Section for Breast Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Javier Louro
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Research Network on Chronicity, Primary Care and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Román
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Research Network on Chronicity, Primary Care and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Castells
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Research Network on Chronicity, Primary Care and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Solveig Hofvind
- Section for Breast Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsö, Norway
| | - Sisse Njor
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Skovlyvej 15, 8930, Randers NE, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Data, Innovation and Research, Lillebaelt Hospital, Beriderbakken 4, 7100, Vejle, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Louro J, Román M, Moshina N, Olstad CF, Larsen M, Sagstad S, Castells X, Hofvind S. Personalized Breast Cancer Screening: A Risk Prediction Model Based on Women Attending BreastScreen Norway. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4517. [PMID: 37760486 PMCID: PMC10526465 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to develop and validate a model predicting breast cancer risk for women targeted by breast cancer screening. METHOD This retrospective cohort study included 57,411 women screened at least once in BreastScreen Norway during the period from 2007 to 2019. The prediction model included information about age, mammographic density, family history of breast cancer, body mass index, age at menarche, alcohol consumption, exercise, pregnancy, hormone replacement therapy, and benign breast disease. We calculated a 4-year absolute breast cancer risk estimates for women and in risk groups by quartiles. The Bootstrap resampling method was used for internal validation of the model (E/O ratio). The area under the curve (AUC) was estimated with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS The 4-year predicted risk of breast cancer ranged from 0.22-7.33%, while 95% of the population had a risk of 0.55-2.31%. The thresholds for the quartiles of the risk groups, with 25% of the population in each group, were 0.82%, 1.10%, and 1.47%. Overall, the model slightly overestimated the risk with an E/O ratio of 1.10 (95% CI: 1.09-1.11) and the AUC was 62.6% (95% CI: 60.5-65.0%). CONCLUSIONS This 4-year risk prediction model showed differences in the risk of breast cancer, supporting personalized screening for breast cancer in women aged 50-69 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Louro
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; (J.L.); (M.R.); (X.C.)
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 48902 Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Marta Román
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; (J.L.); (M.R.); (X.C.)
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 48902 Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Nataliia Moshina
- Section for Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, 0304 Oslo, Norway; (N.M.); (C.F.O.); (M.L.); (S.S.)
| | - Camilla F. Olstad
- Section for Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, 0304 Oslo, Norway; (N.M.); (C.F.O.); (M.L.); (S.S.)
| | - Marthe Larsen
- Section for Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, 0304 Oslo, Norway; (N.M.); (C.F.O.); (M.L.); (S.S.)
| | - Silje Sagstad
- Section for Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, 0304 Oslo, Norway; (N.M.); (C.F.O.); (M.L.); (S.S.)
| | - Xavier Castells
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; (J.L.); (M.R.); (X.C.)
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 48902 Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Solveig Hofvind
- Section for Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, 0304 Oslo, Norway; (N.M.); (C.F.O.); (M.L.); (S.S.)
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Louro J, Posso M, Perez-Leon D, Ejarque B, Arranz M, Arenas N, Román M, Alcántara R, Castells X. Patient-assisted versus standard compression in mammography screening: A randomized trial. Eur J Cancer 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(22)01433-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
5
|
Arenas N, Alcantara R, Posso M, Louro J, Perez-Leon D, Ejarque B, Arranz M, Maiques J, Castells X, Macià F, Román M, Rodríguez-Arana A. Comparison of technical parameters and women's experience between self-compression and standard compression modes in mammography screening: a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:7480-7487. [PMID: 35536390 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08835-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We compared the compression force, breast thickness, and glandular dose, as well as the severity of discomfort and women's experience between the patient-assisted compression (PAC) and standard compression (SC) modes. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a prospective randomized controlled study at Hospital del Mar in Barcelona, Spain. We included 448 asymptomatic women aged 50 to 69 years old, attending their screening round from December 2017 to December 2019. Mammograms included the two bilateral views. In each woman, one breast was studied with SC and the other with PAC. The mode used in each breast was selected following a randomized list. Compression force, breast thickness, and average glandular dose were obtained for each of the 1792 images. We also recorded the degree of discomfort and women's experience, after mammogram acquisitions, using a predefined survey. RESULTS Higher compression forces were obtained with PAC than with SC (99.27 N vs 83.25 N, p < 0.001). Breast thickness mode (56.11 mm vs 57.52 mm, p = 0.015) and glandular dose (1.34 mGy vs 1.37 mGy, p = 0.018) were lower in PAC. The discomfort score was slightly higher with PAC (mean 3.94 vs 3.69, p = 0.042), but in the satisfaction survey, more women reported that PAC caused less discomfort. Additionally, 63.2% of women (289/448) preferred PAC. CONCLUSION PAC achieved higher compression forces without impairing the other technical imaging parameters and enhanced women's experience of screening mammography. We believe there were no clinically significant differences in the severity of discomfort between the two modes. KEY POINTS • Self-compression allows higher compression forces than the standard compression mode. • Self-compression does not affect technical imaging parameters. • Self-compression improved women's experience of screening mammography when standard compression was used on one breast and self-compression on the other.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Arenas
- Radiology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Margarita Posso
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Maritím 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Javier Louro
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Maritím 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Daniela Perez-Leon
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Maritím 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
- Preventive Medicine and Public Health Training Unit PSMar-ASPB-UPF, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Belén Ejarque
- Radiology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mónica Arranz
- Radiology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jose Maiques
- Radiology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Castells
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Maritím 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Macià
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Maritím 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Román
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Maritím 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Rodríguez-Arana
- Radiology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Roman M, Louro J, Vázquez I, Saladié F, Peñalva L, Bargalló X, Quintana M, Del Riego J, Vidal C, Castells X. Long-term breast cancer risk after benign breast disease in population-based screening. Eur J Cancer 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(22)01360-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
7
|
Bosch G, Posso M, Louro J, Roman M, Porta M, Castells X, Macià F. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening indicators in a Spanish population-based program: a cohort study. eLife 2022; 11:77434. [PMID: 35686727 PMCID: PMC9212994 DOI: 10.7554/elife.77434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: To assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on performance indicators in the population-based breast cancer screening program of Parc de Salut Mar (PSMAR), Barcelona, Spain. Methods: We conducted a before-and-after, study to evaluate participation, recall, false positives, the cancer detection rate, and cancer characteristics in our screening population from March 2020 to March 2021 compared with the four previous rounds (2012–2019). Using multilevel logistic regression models, we estimated the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of each of the performance indicators for the COVID-19 period, controlling by type of screening (prevalent or incident), socioeconomic index, family history of breast cancer, and menopausal status. We analyzed 144,779 invitations from 47,571women. Results: During the COVID-19 period, the odds of participation were lower in first-time invitees (aOR = 0.90 [95% CI = 0.84–0.96]) and in those who had previously participated regularly and irregularly (aOR = 0.63 [95% CI = 0.59–0.67] and aOR = 0.95 [95% CI = 0.86–1.05], respectively). Participation showed a modest increase in women not attending any of the previous rounds (aOR = 1.10 [95% CI = 1.01–1.20]). The recall rate decreased in both prevalent and incident screening (aOR = 0.74 [95% CI = 0.56–0.99] and aOR = 0.80 [95% CI = 0.68–0.95], respectively). False positives also decreased in both groups (prevalent aOR = 0.92 [95% CI = 0.66–1.28] and incident aOR = 0.72 [95% CI = 0.59–0.88]). No significant differences were observed in compliance with recall (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.76–2.23), cancer detection rate (aOR = 0.91 [95% CI = 0.69–1.18]), or cancer stages. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected screening attendance, especially in previous participants and newcomers. We found a reduction in recall and false positives and no marked differences in cancer detection, indicating the robustness of the program. There is a need for further evaluations of interval cancers and potential diagnostic delays. Funding: This study has received funding by grants PI19/00007 and PI21/00058, funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and cofunded by the European Union and Grant RD21/0016/0020 funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III and by the European Union NextGenerationEU, Mecanismo para la Recuperación y la Resiliencia (MRR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillermo Bosch
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Preventive Medicine and Public Health Training Unit PSMar-ASPB-UPF, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Margarita Posso
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Research Network on Chronicity, Primary Care and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Louro
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Research Network on Chronicity, Primary Care and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Roman
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Research Network on Chronicity, Primary Care and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miquel Porta
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Hospital del Mar Institute of Medical Research (IMIM PSMar), Barcelona, Spain.,Spanish Consortium for Research on Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Xavier Castells
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Research Network on Chronicity, Primary Care and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Macià
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Research Network on Chronicity, Primary Care and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
García M, Redondo M, Zarcos I, Louro J, Rivas-Ruiz F, Téllez T, Pérez D, Medina Cano F, Machan K, Domingo L, del Mar Vernet M, Padilla-Ruiz M, Castells X, Sala M. Impact of Detection Mode in a Large Cohort of Women Taking Part in a Breast Screening Program. Eur J Breast Health 2022; 18:182-189. [DOI: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-11-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
9
|
Román M, Louro J, Posso M, Vidal C, Bargalló X, Vázquez I, Quintana MJ, Alcántara R, Saladié F, del Riego J, Peñalva L, Sala M, Castells X. Long-Term Risk of Breast Cancer after Diagnosis of Benign Breast Disease by Screening Mammography. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:ijerph19052625. [PMID: 35270331 PMCID: PMC8909630 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Assessing the long-term risk of breast cancer after diagnosis of benign breast disease by mammography is of utmost importance to design personalised screening strategies. We analysed individual-level data from 778,306 women aged 50–69 years with at least one mammographic screening participation in any of ten breast cancer screening centers in Spain from 1996 to 2015, and followed-up until 2017. We used Poisson regression to compare the rates of incident breast cancer among women with and without benign breast disease. During a median follow-up of 7.6 years, 11,708 (1.5%) women had an incident of breast cancer and 17,827 (2.3%) had a benign breast disease. The risk of breast cancer was 1.77 times higher among women with benign breast disease than among those without (95% CI: 1.61 to 1.95). The relative risk increased to 1.99 among women followed for less than four years, and remained elevated for two decades, with relative risk 1.96 (95% CI: 1.32 to 2.92) for those followed from 12 to 20 years. Benign breast disease is a long-term risk factor for breast cancer. Women with benign breast disease could benefit from closer surveillance and personalized screening strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Román
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), 08003 Barcelona, Spain; (J.L.); (M.P.); (M.S.)
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), 08003 Barcelona, Spain
- Correspondence: (M.R.); (X.C.)
| | - Javier Louro
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), 08003 Barcelona, Spain; (J.L.); (M.P.); (M.S.)
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), 08003 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Margarita Posso
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), 08003 Barcelona, Spain; (J.L.); (M.P.); (M.S.)
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), 08003 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carmen Vidal
- Cancer Prevention and Monitoring Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), 08908 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Xavier Bargalló
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clinic, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Ivonne Vázquez
- Pathology Department, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), 08003 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - María Jesús Quintana
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, University Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, 08025 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Rodrigo Alcántara
- Radiology Department, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), 08003 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Francina Saladié
- Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention Service, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, IISPV, 43204 Reus, Spain;
| | - Javier del Riego
- Department of Radiology, Parc Taulí University Hospital-UAB, 08208 Sabadell, Spain;
| | - Lupe Peñalva
- Breast Cancer Screening Technical Office, Private Foundation Asil Hospital, 08402 Granollers, Spain;
| | - Maria Sala
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), 08003 Barcelona, Spain; (J.L.); (M.P.); (M.S.)
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), 08003 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Castells
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), 08003 Barcelona, Spain; (J.L.); (M.P.); (M.S.)
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), 08003 Barcelona, Spain
- Correspondence: (M.R.); (X.C.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jansana A, Domingo L, Ibañez B, Prados A, Del Cura I, Padilla-Ruiz M, Sanz T, Poblador B, Tamayo I, Gimeno A, Alberquilla A, Abizanda M, Comas M, Lanzuela M, Burgui R, Holgado AD, Duarte-Salles T, Moreno C, Louro J, Baquedano J, Molina C, Del Carmen Martinez M, Gorricho J, Redondo M, Castells X, Sala M. Use of health services among long-term breast cancer survivors in Spain: longitudinal study based on real-world data. J Cancer Surviv 2021; 16:132-141. [PMID: 33759086 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-021-01011-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate health service utilization in Spain among long-term breast cancer survivors and to compare it with that among women with no history of breast cancer. METHODS Study based on the SURBCAN cohort includes a sample of long-term breast cancer survivors and a sample of women without breast cancer from 5 Spanish regions. Healthcare utilization was assessed through primary care, hospital visits, and tests during the follow-up period (2012 to 2016) by using electronic health records. Annual contact rates to healthcare services were calculated, and crude and multivariate count models were fitted to estimate the adjusted relative risk of healthcare services use. RESULTS Data were obtained from 19,328 women, including 6512 long-term breast cancer survivors. Healthcare use was higher among breast cancer survivors (20.9 vs 16.6; p < 0.0001) and decreased from >10 years of survival. Breast cancer survivors who underwent a mastectomy were more likely to have a primary care visit (RR = 3.10 95% CI 3.08-3.11). Five to ten years survivors were more likely to have hospital inpatient visits and imaging test compared to women without breast cancer (RRa = 1.35 95% CI 1.30-1.39 and RRa = 1.27 95% CI 1.25-1.29 respectively). CONCLUSION This study shows higher use of health services in long-term breast cancer survivors than in women without breast cancer regardless of survival time. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS These results help to estimate the health resources needed for the growing group of breast cancer survivors and to identify risk factors that drive higher use of health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Jansana
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.,European Higher Education Area Doctoral Program in Methodology of Biomedical Research and Public Health in Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.,Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laia Domingo
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.,Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Berta Ibañez
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Navarrabiomed-Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra-Universidad Pública de Navarra, IdiSNA, Irunlarrea, s/n, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Alexandra Prados
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,IIS Aragon, Miguel Servet University Hospital, EpiChron Research Group, Aragon Health Sciences Institute (IACS), Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Isabel Del Cura
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Madrid Health Service, Primary Care Research Unit, Calle San Martín de Porres, 6-5ª planta, 28035, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University Rey Juan Carlos, Avenida de Atenas, 28922, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Padilla-Ruiz
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Research Unit, Costa del Sol Hospital, University of Málaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Marbella, Spain
| | - Teresa Sanz
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Madrid Health Service, Primary Care Research Unit, Calle San Martín de Porres, 6-5ª planta, 28035, Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Poblador
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,IIS Aragon, Miguel Servet University Hospital, EpiChron Research Group, Aragon Health Sciences Institute (IACS), Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Ibai Tamayo
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Navarrabiomed-Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra-Universidad Pública de Navarra, IdiSNA, Irunlarrea, s/n, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Antonio Gimeno
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Navarrabiomed-Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra-Universidad Pública de Navarra, IdiSNA, Irunlarrea, s/n, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Angel Alberquilla
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Madrid Health Service, Primary Care Research Unit, Calle San Martín de Porres, 6-5ª planta, 28035, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mercè Abizanda
- Department of Organization and Communication, Parc Sanitari Pere Virgili, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mercè Comas
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.,Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuela Lanzuela
- Radiotherapy Department, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Saragossa, Spain
| | - Rossana Burgui
- Instituto de Salud Pública y Laboral de Navarra (ISPLN), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Antonio Diaz Holgado
- Madrid Health Service, Technical Direction of Sanitary Information System, Calle San Martín de Porres, 6- 5ª planta, 28035, Madrid, Spain
| | - Talita Duarte-Salles
- Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Conchi Moreno
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Salud Pública y Laboral de Navarra (ISPLN), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Javier Louro
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.,Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Baquedano
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Servicio Navarro de Salud-Osasunbidea, Gerencia de Atención Primaria, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Cristobal Molina
- Research Unit, Costa del Sol Hospital, University of Málaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Marbella, Spain
| | - Maria Del Carmen Martinez
- Research Unit, Costa del Sol Hospital, University of Málaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Marbella, Spain
| | - Javier Gorricho
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Servicio de Evaluación y Difusión de resultados en Salud, Servicio Navarro de Salud-Osasunbidea, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Maximino Redondo
- Research Unit, Costa del Sol Hospital, University of Málaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Marbella, Spain
| | - Xavier Castells
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.,Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.,Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Sala
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. .,Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Louro J, Román M, Posso M, Vázquez I, Saladié F, Rodriguez-Arana A, Quintana MJ, Domingo L, Baré M, Marcos-Gragera R, Vernet-Tomas M, Sala M, Castells X. Developing and validating an individualized breast cancer risk prediction model for women attending breast cancer screening. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0248930. [PMID: 33755692 PMCID: PMC7987139 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies have proposed personalized strategies based on women's individual breast cancer risk to improve the effectiveness of breast cancer screening. We designed and internally validated an individualized risk prediction model for women eligible for mammography screening. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of 121,969 women aged 50 to 69 years, screened at the long-standing population-based screening program in Spain between 1995 and 2015 and followed up until 2017. We used partly conditional Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and individual risks for age, family history of breast cancer, previous benign breast disease, and previous mammographic features. We internally validated our model with the expected-to-observed ratio and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS During a mean follow-up of 7.5 years, 2,058 women were diagnosed with breast cancer. All three risk factors were strongly associated with breast cancer risk, with the highest risk being found among women with family history of breast cancer (aHR: 1.67), a proliferative benign breast disease (aHR: 3.02) and previous calcifications (aHR: 2.52). The model was well calibrated overall (expected-to-observed ratio ranging from 0.99 at 2 years to 1.02 at 20 years) but slightly overestimated the risk in women with proliferative benign breast disease. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 58.7% to 64.7%, depending of the time horizon selected. CONCLUSIONS We developed a risk prediction model to estimate the short- and long-term risk of breast cancer in women eligible for mammography screening using information routinely reported at screening participation. The model could help to guiding individualized screening strategies aimed at improving the risk-benefit balance of mammography screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Louro
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
- Servei d’Epidemiologia i Avaluació, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- European Higher Education Area (EHEA) Doctoral Programme in Methodology of Biomedical Research and Public Health in Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Román
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
- Servei d’Epidemiologia i Avaluació, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- * E-mail:
| | - Margarita Posso
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
- Servei d’Epidemiologia i Avaluació, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Francina Saladié
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Service, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain
| | | | - M. Jesús Quintana
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, University Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, IIB Sant Pau, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laia Domingo
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
- Servei d’Epidemiologia i Avaluació, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marisa Baré
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
- Clinical Epidemiology and Cancer Screening, Parc Taulí University Hospital, Sabadell, Spain
| | - Rafael Marcos-Gragera
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Health, Epidemiology Unit and Girona Cancer Registry, Oncology Coordination Plan, Autonomous Government of Catalonia, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Girona, Spain
| | | | - Maria Sala
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
- Servei d’Epidemiologia i Avaluació, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Castells
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
- Servei d’Epidemiologia i Avaluació, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vernet-Tomás M, Louro J, Román M, Saladié F, Posso M, Prieto M, Vázquez I, Baré M, Peñalva L, Vidal C, Bargalló X, Sánchez M, Ferrer J, A Espinàs J, Quintana MJ, Rodríguez-Arana A, Castells X. Risk of breast cancer two years after a benign biopsy depends on the mammographic feature prompting recall. Maturitas 2020; 144:53-59. [PMID: 33358209 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to explore whether the type of mammographic feature prompting a false-positive recall (FPR) during mammography screening influences the risk and timing of breast cancer diagnosis, particularly if assessed with invasive procedures. STUDY DESIGN We included information on women screened and recalled for further assessment in Spain between 1994 and 2015, with follow-up until 2017, categorizing FPRs by the assessment (noninvasive or invasive) and mammographic feature prompting the recall. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Breast cancer rates in the first two years after FPR (first period) and after two years (second period). RESULTS The study included 99,825 women with FPRs. In both periods, the breast cancer rate was higher in the invasive assessment group than in the noninvasive group (first period 12 ‰ vs 1.9 ‰, p < 0.001; second period 4.4‰ vs 3.1‰, p < 0.001). During the first period, the invasive assessment group showed diverse breast cancer rates for each type of mammographic feature, with a higher rate for asymmetric density (31.9‰). When the second period was compared with the first, the breast cancer rate decreased in the invasive assessment group (from 12‰ to 4.4‰, p < 0.001) and increased in the noninvasive assessment group (from 1.9‰ to 3.1‰, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION In the context of mammography screening, the risk of breast cancer diagnosis during the first two years after FPR was particularly high for women undergoing invasive assessment; importantly, the risk was modified by type of mammographic feature prompting the recall. This information could help to individualize follow-up after exclusion of malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Vernet-Tomás
- Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM). Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Javier Louro
- Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM). Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain; Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Román
- Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM). Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain; Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francina Saladié
- Fundació Lliga per a La Investigació i Prevenció del Càncer (FUNCA), Avinguda Josep Laporte, 2, 43204, Reus, Spain
| | - Margarita Posso
- Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM). Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain; Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miguel Prieto
- Consejería de Sanidad, Gobierno de Asturias. Calle Ciriaco Miguel Vigil, 9, 33005, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Ivonne Vázquez
- Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM). Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marisa Baré
- Consorci Corporació Sanitaria Parc Taulí, Parc Taulí, 1, 08208, Sabadell, Spain
| | - Lupe Peñalva
- Hospital General de Granollers, Av. Francesc Ribas, s/n, 08402, Granollers, Spain
| | - Carmen Vidal
- Programa de Prevenció i Control del Càncer de l'Institut Català d'Oncologia, Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, 199-203, 08908, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Xavier Bargalló
- Centro de Diagnóstico por la Imagen Clínic (CDIC) del Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. Calle Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mar Sánchez
- Dirección General de Salud Pública del Gobierno de Cantabria, C/ Federico Vial 13, 39009, Santander, Spain
| | - Joana Ferrer
- Hospital de Santa Caterina, Carrer del Dr. Castany, s/n, 17190, Salt, Girona, Spain
| | - Josep A Espinàs
- Pla Director d'Oncologia del Departament de Salut de la Generalitat de Catalunya, Travessera de les Corts, 131-159, 08028, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Jesús Quintana
- Departament d'Epidemiologia de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, c/ San Antoni M. Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Rodríguez-Arana
- Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM). Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Castells
- Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM). Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain; Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Posso M, Comas M, Román M, Domingo L, Louro J, González C, Sala M, Anglès A, Cirera I, Cots F, Frías VM, Gea J, Güerri-Fernández R, Masclans JR, Noguès X, Vázquez O, Villar-García J, Horcajada JP, Pascual J, Castells X. Comorbidities and Mortality in Patients With COVID-19 Aged 60 Years and Older in a University Hospital in Spain. Arch Bronconeumol 2020; 56:756-758. [PMID: 33994638 PMCID: PMC7657606 DOI: 10.1016/j.arbr.2020.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Margarita Posso
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mercè Comas
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Román
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laia Domingo
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Louro
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina González
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
- Infection Control Program, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Sala
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Albert Anglès
- Medical Documentation Department, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabel Cirera
- Emergency Department, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Cots
- Management Control Department, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Víctor-Manuel Frías
- Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addictions (INAD), Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joaquim Gea
- Respiratory Medicine Department, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, DCEXS, UPF, CIBERES, ISCiii, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Xavier Noguès
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital del Mar. IMIM, CIBERFES, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olga Vázquez
- Department of Geriatrics, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Juan Pablo Horcajada
- Infection Control Program, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Julio Pascual
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Castells
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Louro J, Román M, Posso M, Comerma L, Vidal C, Saladié F, Alcantara R, Sanchez M, Quintana MJ, Del Riego J, Ferrer J, Peñalva L, Bargalló X, Prieto M, Sala M, Castells X. Differences in breast cancer risk after benign breast disease by type of screening diagnosis. Breast 2020; 54:343-348. [PMID: 33023825 PMCID: PMC7770442 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Revised: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction We aimed to assess differences in breast cancer risk across benign breast disease diagnosed at prevalent or incident screens. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study with data from 629,087 women participating in a long-standing population-based breast cancer screening program in Spain. Each benign breast disease was classified as non-proliferative, proliferative without atypia, or proliferative with atypia, and whether it was diagnosed in a prevalent or incident screen. We used partly conditional Cox hazard regression to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios of the risk of breast cancer. Results Compared with women without benign breast disease, the risk of breast cancer was significantly higher (p-value = 0.005) in women with benign breast disease diagnosed in an incident screen (aHR, 2.67; 95%CI: 2.24–3.19) than in those with benign breast disease diagnosed in a prevalent screen (aHR, 1.87; 95%CI: 1.57–2.24). The highest risk was found in women with a proliferative benign breast disease with atypia (aHR, 4.35; 95%CI: 2.09–9.08, and 3.35; 95%CI: 1.51–7.40 for those diagnosed at incident and prevalent screens, respectively), while the lowest was found in women with non-proliferative benign breast disease (aHR, 2.39; 95%CI: 1.95–2.93, and 1.63; 95%CI: 1.32–2.02 for those diagnosed at incident and prevalent screens, respectively). Conclusion Our study showed that the risk of breast cancer conferred by a benign breast disease differed according to type of screen (prevalent or incident). To our knowledge, this is the first study to analyse the impact of the screening type on benign breast disease prognosis. Breast cancer risk after a benign breast disease varied with the screening type. Incident benign breast disease had a higher breast cancer risk than prevalent. The risk remained increased regardless of benign breast disease subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Louro
- IMIM (Hospital Del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain; Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain; Servei D'Epidemiologia I Avaluació, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; European Higher Education Area (EHEA) Doctoral Programme in Methodology of Biomedical Research and Public Health in Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Román
- IMIM (Hospital Del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain; Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain; Servei D'Epidemiologia I Avaluació, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Margarita Posso
- IMIM (Hospital Del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain; Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain; Servei D'Epidemiologia I Avaluació, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Comerma
- Servei de Patologia, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carmen Vidal
- Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francina Saladié
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Service, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Institut D'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Reus, Spain
| | - Rodrigo Alcantara
- Servei de Diagnòstic per La Imatge, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mar Sanchez
- Direction General of Public Health, Cantabria, Spain
| | - M Jesús Quintana
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, University Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, IIB Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Spain
| | - Javier Del Riego
- Women's Imaging, Department of Radiology, UDIAT Centre Diagnòstic, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joana Ferrer
- Radiology Department, Hospital de Santa Caterina, Salt, Girona, Spain
| | - Lupe Peñalva
- Vallés Oriental Breast Cancer Early Detection Program, Spain
| | | | - Miguel Prieto
- Breast Cancer Screening Program, Principality of Asturias, Spain
| | - María Sala
- IMIM (Hospital Del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain; Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain; Servei D'Epidemiologia I Avaluació, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Castells
- IMIM (Hospital Del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain; Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain; Servei D'Epidemiologia I Avaluació, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Louro J, Román M, Posso M, Vidal C, Prieto M, Saladié F, Baré M, Sánchez M, Quintana M, Bargalló X, Ferrer J, Peñalva L, Sala M, Castells X. Differences in breast cancer risk after a benign breast disease according to the screening type. Eur J Cancer 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(20)30552-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
16
|
Posso M, Comas M, Román M, Domingo L, Louro J, González C, Sala M, Anglès A, Cirera I, Cots F, Frías VM, Gea J, Güerri-Fernández R, Masclans JR, Noguès X, Vázquez O, Villar-García J, Horcajada JP, Pascual J, Castells X. Comorbidities and Mortality in Patients With COVID-19 Aged 60 Years and Older in a University Hospital in Spain. Arch Bronconeumol 2020; 56:756-758. [PMID: 32782092 PMCID: PMC7365099 DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2020.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Margarita Posso
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain; Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mercè Comas
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain; Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Román
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain; Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laia Domingo
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain; Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Louro
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain; Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina González
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain; Infection Control Program, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Sala
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain; Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Albert Anglès
- Medical Documentation Department, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabel Cirera
- Emergency Department, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Cots
- Management Control Department, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Víctor-Manuel Frías
- Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addictions (INAD), Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joaquim Gea
- Respiratory Medicine Department, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, DCEXS, UPF, CIBERES, ISCiii, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Xavier Noguès
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital del Mar. IMIM, CIBERFES, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olga Vázquez
- Department of Geriatrics, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Juan Pablo Horcajada
- Infection Control Program, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Julio Pascual
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Castells
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain; Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Román M, Sala M, Domingo L, Posso M, Louro J, Castells X. Personalized breast cancer screening strategies: A systematic review and quality assessment. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0226352. [PMID: 31841563 PMCID: PMC6913984 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of breast cancer screening is still under debate. Our objective was to systematically review studies assessing personalized breast cancer screening strategies based on women's individual risk and to conduct a risk of bias assessment. METHODS We followed the standard methods of The Cochrane Collaboration and PRISMA declaration and searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Clinical Trials databases for studies published in English. The quality of the studies was assessed using the ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Questionnaire and The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Two independent reviewers screened full texts and evaluated the risk of bias. RESULTS Out of the 1533 initially retrieved citations, we included 13 studies. Three studies were randomized controlled trials, while nine were mathematical modeling studies, and one was an observational pilot study. The trials are in the recruitment phase and have not yet reported their results. All three trials used breast density and age to define risk groups, and two of them included family history, previous biopsies, and genetic information. Among the mathematical modeling studies, the main risk factors used to define risk groups were breast density, age, family history, and previous biopsies. Six studies used genetic information to define risk groups. The most common outcome measures were the gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALY), absolute costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), while the main outcome in the observational study was the detection rate. In all models, personalized screening strategies were shown to be effective. The randomized trials were of good quality. The modeling studies showed moderate risk of bias but there was wide variability across studies. The observational study showed a low risk of bias but its utility was moderate due to its pilot design and its relatively small scale. CONCLUSIONS There is some evidence of the effectiveness of screening personalization in terms of QUALYs and ICER from the modeling studies and the observational study. However, evidence is lacking on feasibility and acceptance by the target population. REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO: CRD42018110483.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Román
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Spain
| | - Maria Sala
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Spain
| | - Laia Domingo
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Spain
| | - Margarita Posso
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Spain
| | - Javier Louro
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Spain
| | - Xavier Castells
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Miret C, Domingo L, Louro J, Barata T, Baré M, Ferrer J, Carmona-García MC, Castells X, Sala M. Factors associated with readmissions in women participating in screening programs and treated for breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:940. [PMID: 31805926 PMCID: PMC6896282 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4789-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We aimed to identify the risk factors associated with early, late and long-term readmissions in women diagnosed with breast cancer participating in screening programs. Methods We performed a multicenter cohort study of 1055 women aged 50–69 years participating in Spanish screening programs, diagnosed with breast cancer between 2000 and 2009, and followed up to 2014. Readmission was defined as a hospital admission related to the disease and/or treatment complications, and was classified as early (< 30 days), late (30 days-1 year), or long-term readmission (> 1 year). We used logistic regression to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (aOR), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) to explore the factors associated with early, late and long-term readmissions, adjusting by women’s and tumor characteristics, detection mode, treatments received, and surgical and medical complications. Results Among the women included, early readmission occurred in 76 (7.2%), late readmission in 87 (8.2%), long-term readmission in 71 (6.7%), and no readmission in 821 (77.8%). Surgical complications were associated with an increased risk of early readmissions (aOR = 3.62; 95%CI: 1.27–10.29), and medical complications with late readmissions (aOR = 8.72; 95%CI: 2.83–26.86) and long-term readmissions (aOR = 4.79; 95%CI: 1.41–16.31). Conclusion Our results suggest that the presence of surgical or medical complications increases readmission risk, taking into account the detection mode and treatments received. Identifying early complications related to an increased risk of readmission could be useful to adapt the management of patients and reduce further readmissions. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.govIdentifier: NCT03165006. Registration date: May 22, 2017 (Retrospectively registered).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carme Miret
- Preventive Medicine and Public Health Training Unit PSMar-UPF-ASPB, Parc de Salut Mar, Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laia Domingo
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. .,Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Av. de Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Javier Louro
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.,Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Av. de Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - Teresa Barata
- General Directorate of Health Care Programs, Canary Islands Health Service, C/ Juan XXIII,13, 35005, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Marisa Baré
- Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.,Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Av. de Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain.,Cancer Screening and Clinical Epidemiology, Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, 08208, Sabadell, Spain
| | - Joana Ferrer
- Department of Radiology, Hospital de Santa Caterina, C/ Dr. Castany, s/n, 17190 Salt, Girona, Spain
| | - Maria Carmen Carmona-García
- Epidemiology Unit and Girona Cancer Registry, Oncology Coordination Plan, Department of Health, Catalan Institute of Oncology, C/ Sol, 15, 17004, Girona, Spain.,Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), C/ Dr Castany s/n, 17190 Salt, Girona, Spain.,Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Av. França, S/N, 17007, Girona, Spain
| | - Xavier Castells
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.,Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Av. de Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Sala
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Marítim, 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.,Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Av. de Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zarcos-Pedrinaci I, Redondo M, Louro J, Rivas-Ruiz F, Téllez T, Pérez D, Medina Cano F, Machan K, Domingo L, Mar Vernet M, Padilla-Ruiz M, Castells X, Rueda A, Sala M. Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on the survival of patients with breast cancer diagnosed by screening. Cancer Med 2019; 8:6662-6670. [PMID: 31549794 PMCID: PMC6825992 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Revised: 07/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study is to determine the survival of patients with breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (ACh) after the diagnosis by screening, taking comorbidity into account. This multicenter cohort study examined a population of patients taking part in four national screening programs for the early detection of breast cancer (localized or locally advanced), during the period 2000‐2008. Of the 1248 cancers detected, 266 were prevalent (21.3%), 633 were incident (50.7%), and 349 were interval (27.9%). No significant differences were detected between the three groups in terms of the distribution of comorbidity according to the CCI. After a median follow‐up of 102 months, 22.1% of the patients with interval cancer had died. The corresponding figures for the incident and prevalent cancers were 10.4% and 7.9%, respectively (P < .001). The adjusted Cox regression analysis by the stage, CCI and group revealed no differences in the risk of recurrence between the different groups according to the ACh performed. However, there were significant differences in the overall survival; for the interval cancer group without ACh, the risk of death was higher (Hazard ratio: 2.5 [1.0‐6.2]) than for the other two groups. However, for the prevalent and incident groups that did not receive ACh, there was no greater risk of death. This study shows that adjuvant chemotherapy seems to benefit patients with interval breast cancer, who have a poorer prognosis than those with prevalent or incident cancer. However, the role of ACh is unclear with respect to prevalent and incident cancers when comorbidity is taken into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Zarcos-Pedrinaci
- Research Unit, Costa del Sol Hospital, Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), University of Málaga, Marbella, Spain.,Department of Oncohaematology, Costa del Sol Hospital, Marbella, Spain
| | - Maximino Redondo
- Research Unit, Costa del Sol Hospital, Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), University of Málaga, Marbella, Spain
| | - Javier Louro
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar, Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francisco Rivas-Ruiz
- Research Unit, Costa del Sol Hospital, Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), University of Málaga, Marbella, Spain
| | - Teresa Téllez
- Research Unit, Costa del Sol Hospital, Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), University of Málaga, Marbella, Spain
| | - Diego Pérez
- Department of Oncohaematology, Costa del Sol Hospital, Marbella, Spain
| | - Francisco Medina Cano
- Department of Surgery, Costa del Sol Hospital, Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), University of Málaga, Marbella, Spain
| | - Kenza Machan
- Department of Radiology, Costa del Sol Hospital, Marbella, Spain
| | - Laia Domingo
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar, Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Maria Padilla-Ruiz
- Research Unit, Costa del Sol Hospital, Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), University of Málaga, Marbella, Spain
| | - Xavier Castells
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar, Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Rueda
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Regional Universitario Carlos Haya, Málaga, Spain
| | - María Sala
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, Hospital del Mar, Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Martin-Sanchez M, Comas M, Posso M, Louro J, Domingo L, Tebé C, Castells X, Espallargues M. Cost-Effectiveness of the Screening for the Primary Prevention of Fragility Hip Fracture in Spain Using FRAX ®. Calcif Tissue Int 2019; 105:263-270. [PMID: 31172231 DOI: 10.1007/s00223-019-00570-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
To assess the cost-effectiveness of the primary prevention of fragility hip fractures through opportunistic risk-based screening using FRAX® among women aged 70 to 89 years, and the subsequent treatment with alendronate in women at high-risk, from the Spanish national health system perspective. We performed a discrete-event simulation model. Women were categorized in low, intermediate and high-risk of fragility hip fracture through screening based on the FRAX® risk assessment tool score (Spanish version). Low-risk women received lifestyle recommendations whereas the high-risk group was assigned to alendronate treatment. For women at intermediate-risk, treatment decision was based on a recalculated score considering bone mineral density (BMD). The cost-effectiveness analysis tested six scenarios defined by different FRAX® cut-off values assessing the incremental costs per averted fracture in 20 years. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed. We included a random sample of 5146 women obtained from a Spanish cohort of women referred for BMD. The most cost-effective intervention had an Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of 57,390 € per averted hip fracture and consisted of using the FRAX® score without BMD and treating women with a score higher than 5%. The ICER exceeded the acceptability threshold of 25,000 € in all the scenarios. Sensitivity analysis based on time to fracture, treatment efficacy, adherence to treatment and cost of dependence resulted in ICERs ranging from 39,216 € to 254,400 €. An ICER of 24,970 € was obtained when alendronate cost was reduced to 1.13 € per month. The use of FRAX® as screening tool followed by alendronate treatment is not cost-effective in senior women in Spain. Other primary preventions strategies are advisable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Martin-Sanchez
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Preventive Medicine and Public Health Training Unit PSMAR-UPF-ASPB (Parc de Salut Mar - Pompeu Fabra University-Public Health Agency of Barcelona), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mercè Comas
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Margarita Posso
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Louro
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laia Domingo
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristian Tebé
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Castells
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mireia Espallargues
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
- Agència de Qualitat i Avaluació Sanitàries de Catalunya (AQuAS), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Buron A, Román M, Augé JM, Macià F, Grau J, Sala M, Louro J, Martinez-Alonso M, Alvarez-Urturi C, Andreu M, Bessa X, Zaffalon D, Castells A, Pellisé M, Aldea M, Rivero L, Hernández C, Torá-Rocamora I, Castells X. Changes in FIT values below the threshold of positivity and short-term risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia: Results from a population-based cancer screening program. Eur J Cancer 2019; 107:53-59. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2018] [Revised: 10/28/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
22
|
Blay L, Louro J, Barata T, Baré M, Ferrer J, Abad JM, Castells X, Sala M. Variability of breast surgery in women participating in breast cancer screening programs. Cir Esp 2018; 97:89-96. [PMID: 30541660 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2018.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Revised: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Currently, variability in surgical practice is a problem to be solved. The aim of this study is to describe the variability in the surgical treatment of breast cancer and to analyze the factors associated with it. METHODS The study population included 1057 women diagnosed with breast cancer and surgically treated. Our data were from the CaMISS retrospective cohort. RESULTS The mean age at diagnosis was 59.3 ± 5 years. A total of 732 patients were diagnosed through screening mammograms and 325 patients as interval cancers. The mastectomy surgery was more frequent in the tumors detected between intervals (OR=2.5; [95%CI: 1.8-3.4]), although this effect disappeared when we adjusted for the rest of the variables. The most important factor associated with performing a mastectomy was TNM: tumors in stage III-IV had an OR of 7.4 [95%CI: 3.9-13.8], increasing in adjusted OR to 21.7 [95%CI: 11.4-41.8]. Histologically, infiltrating lobular carcinoma maintains significance in adjusted OR (OR=2.5; [95%CI: 1.4-4.7]). According to the screening program, there were significant differences in surgical treatment. Program 3 presented an OR of non-conservative surgery of 4.0 [95%CI: 1.8-8.9]. This program coincided with the highest percentage of reconstruction (58.3%). CONCLUSIONS This study shows that, despite taking into account patient and tumor characteristics, there is great variability in the type of surgery depending on the place of diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidia Blay
- Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, España; EAHE (European Area of Higher Education), Programa de Doctorado en Salud Pública, Departamento de Pediatría, Obstetricia y Ginecología, Medicina y Salud Pública, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Barcelona, España.
| | - Javier Louro
- Servicio de Epidemiología y Evaluación, IMIM-Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, España; Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), España
| | - Teresa Barata
- Dirección General de Programas de Salud. Servicio Canario de Salud., Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, España
| | - Marisa Baré
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), España; Servicio de Epidemiología clínica y detección de cáncer, Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí-UAB, Sabadell, Barcelona, España
| | - Joana Ferrer
- Servicio de Radiología, Hospital de Santa Caterina, Girona, España
| | - Josep Maria Abad
- Servicio de Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, CSA Hospital de Igualada, Igualada, Barcelona, España
| | - Xavier Castells
- Servicio de Epidemiología y Evaluación, IMIM-Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, España; Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), España
| | - Maria Sala
- Servicio de Epidemiología y Evaluación, IMIM-Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, España; Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), España
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sala M, Domingo L, Louro J, Torá-Rocamora I, Baré M, Ferrer J, Carmona-Garcia MC, Barata T, Román M, Macià F, Castells X. Survival and Disease-Free Survival by Breast Density and Phenotype in Interval Breast Cancers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018; 27:908-916. [PMID: 29853482 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-17-0995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2017] [Revised: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 05/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: We aimed to evaluate survival and disease-free survival in different subtypes of interval cancers by breast density, taking into account clinical and biological characteristics.Methods: We included 374 invasive breast tumors (195 screen-detected cancers; 179 interval cancers, classified into true interval, false-negatives, occult tumors and minimal-sign cancers) diagnosed in women ages 50-69 years undergoing biennial screening from 2000-2009, followed up to 2014. Breast density was categorized into non-dense (<25% dense tissue) and mixed dense breasts (≥25%). Survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression models were computed to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for death and recurrences by comparing women with interval and true interval cancers versus women with screen-detected cancers, controlling for tumor and patient characteristics. All analyses were stratified by breast density.Results: Interval cancers were detected in younger women, at more advanced stages, in denser breasts and showed a higher proportion of triple-negative cancers, especially among true interval cancers. Women with interval cancer and non-dense breasts had an aHR for death of 3.40 (95% CI, 0.92-12.62). Women with true interval cancers detected in non-dense breasts had the highest adjusted risk of death (aHR, 6.55; 95% CI, 1.37-31.39).Conclusions: Women with true interval cancer in non-dense breasts had a higher risk of death than women with screen-detected cancers.Impact: These results support the advisability of routinely collecting information on breast density, both for further tailoring of screening strategies and as a prognostic factor for diagnosed breast cancers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 27(8); 908-16. ©2018 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Sala
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain. .,Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Spain
| | - Laia Domingo
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Spain
| | - Javier Louro
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Spain
| | - Isabel Torá-Rocamora
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marisa Baré
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Spain.,Cancer Screening and Clinical Epidemiology, Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Catalonia, Spain.,Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Joana Ferrer
- Department of Radiology, Hospital de Santa Caterina, Salt, Girona, Spain
| | - Maria Carmen Carmona-Garcia
- Girona Cancer Registry, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.,Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI).,Emergency Department, University Hospital Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Teresa Barata
- General Directorate of Health Care Programs, Canary Islands Health Service, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Marta Román
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Spain
| | - Francesc Macià
- Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ferrández O, Casañ B, Grau S, Louro J, Salas E, Castells X, Sala M. [Analysis of drug-related problems in a tertiary university hospital in Barcelona (Spain)]. Gac Sanit 2018; 33:361-368. [PMID: 29747941 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Revised: 01/07/2018] [Accepted: 01/12/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe drug-related problems identified in hospitalized patients and to assess physicians' acceptance rate of pharmacists' recommendations. METHODS Retrospective observational study that included all drug-related problems detected in hospitalized patients during 2014-2015. Statistical analysis included a descriptive analysis of the data and a multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the association between pharmacists' recommendation acceptance rate and the variable of interest. RESULTS During the study period 4587 drug-related problems were identified in 44,870 hospitalized patients. Main drug-related problems were prescription errors due to incorrect use of the computerized physician order entry (18.1%), inappropriate drug-drug combination (13.3%) and dose adjustment by renal and/or hepatic function (11.5%). Acceptance rate of pharmacist therapy advice in evaluable cases was 81.0%. Medical versus surgical admitting department, specific types of intervention (addition of a new drug, drug discontinuation and correction of a prescription error) and oral communication of the recommendation were associated with a higher acceptance rate. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study allow areas to be identified on which to implement optimization strategies. These include training courses for physicians on the computerized physician order entry, on drugs that need dose adjustment with renal impairment, and on relevant drug interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Borja Casañ
- Servicio de Epidemiología y Evaluación, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, España; Unidad Docente UDIMAS Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, España; Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas REDISSEC, España; Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques IMIM, Barcelona, España
| | - Santiago Grau
- Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, España
| | - Javier Louro
- Servicio de Epidemiología y Evaluación, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, España; Unidad Docente UDIMAS Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, España; Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas REDISSEC, España; Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques IMIM, Barcelona, España
| | - Esther Salas
- Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, España
| | - Xavier Castells
- Servicio de Epidemiología y Evaluación, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, España; Unidad Docente UDIMAS Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, España; Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas REDISSEC, España; Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques IMIM, Barcelona, España
| | - Maria Sala
- Servicio de Epidemiología y Evaluación, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, España; Unidad Docente UDIMAS Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, España; Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas REDISSEC, España; Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques IMIM, Barcelona, España
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pedrinaci IZ, Romero A, Louro J, Banqué M, Vernet M, Serrano L, Funez R, Medina F, Perez D, Rueda A, Sala M, Redondo M. Survival impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in screening breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw364.63] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
26
|
Louro J, Correia V, Rebelo-de-Andrade H. A cost-efficient solution: Reagent comparison guide for neuraminidase inhibition assay. J Clin Virol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2016.08.240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
27
|
Pons I, Louro J, Espinosa G, Azqueta M, Paré C, Sitjes M, Cervera R. FRI0403 Heart Valvular Involvement in the Antiphospholipid Syndrome. An Echocardiographic Descriptive Study. Ann Rheum Dis 2015. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.4054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
28
|
Louro J, Villanueva T, Freire J, Passos M. Intracardiac Metastatic Sarcoma. Case Rep Oncol 2010; 3:434-438. [PMID: 21151638 PMCID: PMC2999738 DOI: 10.1159/000322726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Even though intracardiac sarcoma metastases are rare, they have been previously reported in the literature. We report the case of a 60-year-old man who had a synovial sarcoma with metastasis in the right ventricle. These findings were associated with the presence of a new cardiac murmur and severe thrombocytopenia. The treatment with systemic chemotherapy resulted in a normalization of the patient's hematologic profile and in a reduction of the intracardiac mass. The patient subsequently underwent intracardiac tumor resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Louro
- Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalar Oeste Norte, Caldas da Rainha, Lisbon, Portugal
- *J. Louro, Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalar Oeste Norte, PT-2500-212 Caldas da Rainha (Portugal), E-Mail
| | - T. Villanueva
- Algueirao, Rio de Mouro Health Centre Group, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - J. Freire
- Medical Oncology Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - M.J. Passos
- Medical Oncology Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Mechanical trauma to the spinal cord is often accompanied by irreversible tissue damage, limited endogenous repair and permanent loss of motor, sensory and autonomic function. The implantation of exogenous cells or the stimulation of endogenous cells, to repopulate and replace or to provide a conducive environment for repair, offers a promising therapeutic direction for overcoming the multitude of obstacles facing successful recovery from spinal cord injury. Although relatively new to the scene of cell based therapies for reparative medicine, stem cells and their progenitors have been labeled as the 'cell of the future' for revolutionizing the treatment of CNS injury and neurodegenerative disorders. The following review examines the different types of stem cells and their progenitors, their utility in experimental models of spinal cord injury and explores the outstanding issues that still need to be addressed before they move towards clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Louro
- The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|