1
|
Chen C, Shi H, Yang J, Bao X, Sun Y. The risk of breast cancer and gynecologic malignancies after ovarian stimulation: Meta-analysis of cohort study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 197:104320. [PMID: 38479585 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The effects of ovarian stimulation on breast and gynecological tumor incidence remain controversial. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis was to study the risk of cancer in ovarian stimulation. Of the 22713 studies initially identified, 28 were eligible for inclusion. The results revealed that the impact of ovarian cancer (RR = 1.33, [1.05; 1.69]) and cervical cancer (RR = 0.67, [0.46; 0.97]) is significant among the overall effects. In subgroup analysis, in the nulliparous population (RR = 0.81 [0.68; 0.96]) was the protective factor for the breast cancer. In the Caucasians subgroup (RR = 1.45, [1.12; 1.88]), the ovarian cancer incidence was statistically significant. In the Asian subgroup (RR = 1.51, [1.00; 2.28]), the endometrial cancer incidence was statistically significant. In the subgroup of Asians (RR = 0.55 [0.44; 0.68]) and the multiparous population (RR = 0.31, [0.21; 0.46]), them can be the statistically protective factor for the cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuanju Chen
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China; Henan Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Cenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China; Henan Provincial Obstetrical and Gynecological Diseases (Reproductive Medicine) Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China; Henan Engineering Laboratory of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Screening, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
| | - Hao Shi
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China; Henan Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Cenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China; Henan Provincial Obstetrical and Gynecological Diseases (Reproductive Medicine) Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China; Henan Engineering Laboratory of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Screening, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
| | - Jingya Yang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China; Henan Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Cenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China; Henan Provincial Obstetrical and Gynecological Diseases (Reproductive Medicine) Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China; Henan Engineering Laboratory of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Screening, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
| | - Xiao Bao
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China; Henan Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Cenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China; Henan Provincial Obstetrical and Gynecological Diseases (Reproductive Medicine) Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China; Henan Engineering Laboratory of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Screening, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
| | - Yingpu Sun
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China; Henan Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Cenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China; Henan Provincial Obstetrical and Gynecological Diseases (Reproductive Medicine) Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China; Henan Engineering Laboratory of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Screening, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anakwenze CP, Ewongwo A, Onyewadume L, Oyekan A, Chigbo CO, Valle L, Geng Y, Olapade P, Okwunze K, Lasebikan N, Jhingran A, Balogun OD, Ntekim A. A systematic review of endometrial cancer clinical research in Africa. Infect Agent Cancer 2024; 19:2. [PMID: 38217018 PMCID: PMC10787484 DOI: 10.1186/s13027-023-00563-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women in Africa are experiencing a rising burden of endometrial cancer. Research and investment to improve treatment and outcomes are critically needed. We systematically reviewed and characterized endometrial cancer-related research within a clinically relevant context to help organize and assess existing endometrial cancer research in Africa. METHODS According to PRISMA guidelines, we searched online databases for published endometrial cancer articles from African countries from January 1, 2011, to July 20, 2021. Based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria, independent reviewers documented the study design, country/region, human development index, focus of research, type of interventions performed, and histologic and molecular type to illustrate the breadth of research coverage in each region. RESULTS A total of 18 research articles were included. With an average Human Development Index (HDI) in Africa of 0.536, the average HDI of the represented countries in this study was 0.709. The majority (88.9%) of prospective endometrial cancer research articles in Africa were from North Africa, with Egypt encompassing 83.3% of the papers. Most of these studies focused on endometrial cancer diagnosis. Research on the treatment of endometrial cancer is still emerging (33% of papers). Of all included articles, only 11.1% represented Sub-Saharan Africa, where the majority population of black Africans reside. CONCLUSIONS Endometrial cancer research in Africa is extremely limited, with the majority being concentrated in African countries with higher HDIs. As the incidence of endometrial cancer rises in Sub-Saharan Africa, there is a pressing need for more prospective clinical research to tackle the growing disease burden and improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Agnes Ewongwo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | | | - Ademola Oyekan
- Department of Radiation and Clinical Oncology, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria
| | - Chinelo Onwualu Chigbo
- Department of Radiation and Clinical Oncology, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria
| | - Luca Valle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yimin Geng
- Research Medical Library, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul Olapade
- College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria
| | | | - Nwamaka Lasebikan
- Department of Radiation and Clinical Oncology, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria
| | - Anuja Jhingran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Onyinye D Balogun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Atara Ntekim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Saggu RK, Barlow P, Butler J, Ghaem-Maghami S, Hughes C, Lagergren P, McGregor AH, Shaw C, Wells M. Considerations for multimodal prehabilitation in women with gynaecological cancers: a scoping review using realist principles. BMC Womens Health 2022; 22:300. [PMID: 35854346 PMCID: PMC9294794 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01882-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is increasing recognition that prehabilitation is important as a means of preparing patients physically and psychologically for cancer treatment. However, little is understood about the role and optimal nature of prehabilitation for gynaecological cancer patients, who usually face extensive and life-changing surgery in addition to other treatments that impact significantly on physiological and psychosexual wellbeing.
Review question This scoping review was conducted to collate the research evidence on multimodal prehabilitation in gynaecological cancers and the related barriers and facilitators to engagement and delivery that should be considered when designing a prehabilitation intervention for this group of women.
Methods Seven medical databases and four grey literature repositories were searched from database inception to September 2021. All articles, reporting on multimodal prehabilitation in gynaecological cancers were included in the final review, whether qualitative, quantitative or mixed-methods. Qualitative studies on unimodal interventions were also included, as these were thought to be more likely to include information about barriers and facilitators which could also be relevant to multimodal interventions. A realist framework of context, mechanism and outcome was used to assist interpretation of findings.
Results In total, 24 studies were included in the final review. The studies included the following tumour groups: ovarian only (n = 12), endometrial only (n = 1), mixed ovarian, endometrial, vulvar (n = 5) and non-specific gynaecological tumours (n = 6). There was considerable variation across studies in terms of screening for prehabilitation, delivery of prehabilitation and outcome measures. Key mechanisms and contexts influencing engagement with prehabilitation can be summarised as: (1) The role of healthcare professionals and organisations (2) Patients’ perceptions of acceptability (3) Factors influencing patient motivation (4) Prehabilitation as a priority (5) Access to prehabilitation. Implications for practice A standardised and well evidenced prehabilitation programme for women with gynaecological cancer does not yet exist. Healthcare organisations and researchers should take into account the enablers and barriers to effective engagement by healthcare professionals and by patients, when designing and evaluating prehabilitation for gynaecological cancer patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-022-01882-z.
Collapse
|
4
|
McGuinness S, Hughes L, Moss‐Morris R, Hunter M, Norton S, Moon Z. Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy among White British and ethnic minority breast cancer survivors in the United Kingdom. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13722. [PMID: 36255032 PMCID: PMC9787781 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Around half of women do not take adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) as prescribed. Research suggests that adherence rates vary across ethnic groups. This study compared AET adherences rates in White British women and women from minority ethnic groups in the United Kingdom. METHODS This is an observational study with 2001 breast cancer survivors recruited from outpatient clinics. Eligible women were diagnosed with primary breast cancer and prescribed AET within the last 3 years. Adherence was measured using the Medication Adherence Rating Scale. Eligible women were asked to complete a questionnaire pack that collected sociodemographic data such as age, relationship status and ethnicity. Independent samples t tests and χ2 tests were used to compare White British women and women from minority ethnic groups on self-reported adherence to AET. RESULTS Of White British women, 27.8% were classed as non-adherent, compared to 44.4% of women from minority ethnic groups. A logistic regression controlling for relevant demographics indicated that women from minority ethnic groups had a significantly higher risk of non-adherence than women who were White British (odds ratio = 1.50, p = 0.03) CONCLUSION: Rates of non-adherence to AET are higher in women from minority ethnic groups, which may contribute towards racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes. Research with larger and more diverse samples is needed to explore this further and to investigate the psychosocial factors driving differences in adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena McGuinness
- Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative CareKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Lyndsay Hughes
- Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College London, Guy's HospitalLondonUK
| | - Rona Moss‐Morris
- Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College London, Guy's HospitalLondonUK
| | - Myra Hunter
- Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College London, Guy's HospitalLondonUK
| | - Sam Norton
- Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College London, Guy's HospitalLondonUK,Centre for Rheumatic DiseasesKing's College London, Weston Education CentreLondonUK
| | - Zoe Moon
- Centre for Behavioural Medicine, School of PharmacyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Delon C, Brown KF, Payne NWS, Kotrotsios Y, Vernon S, Shelton J. Differences in cancer incidence by broad ethnic group in England, 2013-2017. Br J Cancer 2022; 126:1765-1773. [PMID: 35233092 PMCID: PMC9174248 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01718-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer incidence variation between population groups can inform public health and cancer services. Previous studies have shown cancer incidence rates vary by ethnic group in England. Since their publication, the completeness of ethnicity recording in cancer data has improved, and relevant inequalities (e.g. risk factor prevalence and healthcare access) may have changed. METHODS Age-standardised incidence rates were calculated for Asian, Black, Mixed/Multiple and White ethnic groups in England in 2013-2017, using almost 3 million diagnoses across 31 cancer sites. Rate ratios were calculated with the White ethnic group as reference. Sensitivity analyses used imputed ethnicity for cases with missing data and perturbed population estimates. RESULTS Incidence rates for most cancer sites and ethnic group and sex combinations were lower in non-White minority ethnic groups compared with the corresponding White group, with particularly low rate ratios (below 0.5) for melanoma skin cancer and some smoking-related cancers (lung, bladder and oesophageal cancers). Exceptions included prostate cancer (2.1 times higher in males of Black ethnicity), myeloma (2.7-3.0 times higher in people of Black ethnicity), several gastrointestinal cancers (1.1-1.9 times higher in people of Black ethnicity, 1.4-2.2 times higher in people of Asian ethnicity), Hodgkin lymphoma (1.1 times higher in males of Asian ethnicity, 1.3 times higher in males of Black ethnicity) and thyroid cancers (1.4 times higher in people of Asian ethnicity, 1.2 times higher in people of Black ethnicity). Sensitivity analyses did not materially alter these results (rate ratios changed by a maximum of 12 percentage points, the direction and significance of results were unchanged in all but two cancer site/sex/ethnic group combinations). CONCLUSIONS People of non-White minority ethnicity in England generally have lower cancer risk than the White population, though there are a number of notable exceptions. These results should galvanise efforts to better understand the reasons for this variation, and the possible impact on cancer services, patient experiences and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Delon
- Cancer Intelligence Team, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ, UK.
| | - Katrina F Brown
- Cancer Intelligence Team, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ, UK
| | - Nick W S Payne
- Cancer Intelligence Team, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ, UK
| | - Yannis Kotrotsios
- Cancer Intelligence Team, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ, UK
| | - Sally Vernon
- National Disease Registration Service, NHS Digital, 7 and 8 Wellington Place, Leeds, LS1 4AP, UK
| | - Jon Shelton
- Cancer Intelligence Team, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abraham S, Foreman N, Sidat Z, Sandhu P, Marrone D, Headley C, Akroyd C, Nicholson S, Brown K, Thomas A, Howells LM, Walter HS. Inequalities in cancer screening, prevention and service engagement between UK ethnic minority groups. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NURSING (MARK ALLEN PUBLISHING) 2022; 31:S14-S24. [PMID: 35648663 DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2022.31.10.s14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
More people in the UK are living with cancer than ever before. With an increasingly ethnically diverse population, greater emphasis must be placed on understanding factors influencing cancer outcomes. This review seeks to explore UK-specific variations in engagement with cancer services in minority ethnic groups and describe successful interventions. The authors wish to highlight that, despite improvement to engagement and education strategies, inequalities still persist and work to improve cancer outcomes across our communities still needs to be prioritised. There are many reasons why cancer healthcare inequities exist for minority communities, reported on a spectrum ranging from cultural beliefs and awareness, through to racism. Strategies that successfully enhanced engagement included language support; culturally-sensitive reminders; community-based health workers and targeted outreach. Focusing on the diverse city of Leicester the authors describe how healthcare providers, researchers and community champions have worked collectively, delivering targeted community-based strategies to improve awareness and access to cancer services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shalin Abraham
- F2 Academic Foundation Doctor, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Nalini Foreman
- Quality Assistant, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Zahirah Sidat
- Senior Research Practitioner, Hope Clinical Trials Facility, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester
| | - Pavandeep Sandhu
- Research Technician, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Domenic Marrone
- Research Technician, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Catherine Headley
- Senior Cancer Services Manager, Leicester City Clinical Commissioning Group, Leicester
| | - Carol Akroyd
- Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Equality and Diversity Theme Manager, Centre for Ethnic Health Research, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Sarah Nicholson
- Hope Clinical Trials Facility Manager/Cancer, Haematology, Urology, Gastroenterology, General Surgery Research Lead, Hope Clinical Trials Facility, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester
| | - Karen Brown
- Professor in Translational Cancer Research, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Anne Thomas
- Professor of Cancer Therapeutics, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Lynne M Howells
- Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre Translational Research Manager, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Harriet S Walter
- Associate Professor of Medical Oncology, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Comparing Characteristics of Endometrial Cancer in Women of South Asian and White Ethnicity in England. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13236123. [PMID: 34885232 PMCID: PMC8657185 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13236123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Differences in patient demographic and tumour characteristics between patients of South Asian and White ethnicity diagnosed with an endometrial cancer (EC) and currently living in England are not well described. We undertook a retrospective study of EC cases diagnosed at the University Hospitals of Leicester, UK. A total of 1884 cases were included, with 13% of the patients being of South Asian ethnicity. South Asian women were diagnosed at a significantly younger age (mean age of 60.3 years) compared to women of White ethnicity (mean age of 66.9 years) with a mean difference of 6.6 years (95% CI 5.1 to 8.1, p < 0.001). Rising body mass index (BMI) in the White patient group was significantly correlated with younger age at diagnosis (p < 0.001); however, this association was not seen in South Asian patients. A linear regression that adjusted for diabetes status, BMI, and the interaction terms of diabetes status with BMI and ethnicity with BMI, highlighted a younger age of diagnosis in South Asian patients with a BMI less than 45 kg/m2. The difference was greatest at lower BMIs for both non-diabetics and diabetics. Further investigation is needed to explain these differences and to determine their impact on suspected cancer referral criteria.
Collapse
|
8
|
Moon Z, Zuchowski M, Moss-Morris R, Hunter MS, Norton S, Hughes LD. Disparities in access to mobile devices and e-health literacy among breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:117-126. [PMID: 34236506 PMCID: PMC8264175 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06407-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background The number of e-health interventions developed for breast cancer survivors continues to increase. However, issues with engagement and retention are common. This study aimed to explore e-health literacy rates and access to smartphones and tablets in a large sample of breast cancer survivors. Methods In study 1, women were recruited from outpatient breast clinics across England and Wales. Eligible women were asked to complete a questionnaire pack to assess their access to devices and their e-health literacy. Multiple regression analyses were run to assess the relationship between technology access and e-health literacy with sociodemographic variables such as age, social deprivation, and education. Study 2 presents a smaller sample recruited through social media who answered a questionnaire relating to use of mobile devices and e-health, and apps. Results Two thousand nine women participated in the study. Seventy-one percent had access to a smartphone, 54% had access to a tablet, and 20% did not have access to either device. Multiple logistic regressions showed that women who were younger, had higher levels of education, and who were from less deprived areas were more likely to have access to either device. Poorer e-health literacy was associated with being older, having less education, and not having access to a mobile device. Conclusions Whilst the results show relatively widespread access to mobile devices, there is evidence of a digital divide across some groups. Online interventions should be developed with consideration of individuals who are less e-health-literate and less technologically adept in order to increase the likelihood of engagement. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-021-06407-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe Moon
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, 5th Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Mira Zuchowski
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, 5th Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Rona Moss-Morris
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, 5th Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Myra S Hunter
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, 5th Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Sam Norton
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, 5th Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Lyndsay D Hughes
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, 5th Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Affar S, Morrison DS, Campbell C. Cervical cancer incidence by ethnic group in Scotland from 2008 to 2017: A population-based study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2021; 30:e13441. [PMID: 33715256 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited information on cervical cancer incidence among different ethnic groups. This study used a name classification system to describe recent patterns of cervical cancer by ethnic group in Scotland. METHODS Data on incident cases of cancer of the cervix and carcinoma in situ diagnosed in Scotland from 2008 to 2017 were extracted from the Scottish Cancer Registry. Onomap was applied to ascribe ethnicity to each patient. Ethnic groups were categorised as White, Black, South-Asian, Chinese and Other. Age-standardised rates (ASRs) were calculated for each year, as well as cumulatively for the 10-year time period. RESULTS The Cumulative Age-standardised rate (CASR) of invasive cancer was 2.45 times higher in the White ethnic group (CASR 125.45 (95% CI 121.2-129.8) per 1,00,000) compared to the non-white ethnic groups combined (CASR 51.16 (95% CI 31.05-77.36) per 1,00,000). The highest age-specific rates within the White patients were in the 30-34 age group (18.34 per 1,00,000), whereas the highest age specific rates for the non-white patients were in the 60-64 age group (9.59 per 1,00,000). CONCLUSION Ethnic minority populations in Scotland had lower incidence of cervical cancer compared to the White population between 2008 and 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saba Affar
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.,ARHAI, NHS National Services Scotland, Meridian Court, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - David S Morrison
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.,Public Health Scotland, Meridian Court, Glasgow, Scotland
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yang S, Varghese AM, Sood N, Chiattone C, Akinola NO, Huang X, Gale RP. Ethnic and geographic diversity of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Leukemia 2020; 35:433-439. [PMID: 33077870 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-01057-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
East Asians, Asian Indians and Amerindians have a five to ten-fold lower age-adjusted incidence rate (AAIR) of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) compared with persons of predominately European descent. The data we review suggest a genetic rather than environmental basis for this discordance. All these populations arose from a common African Black ancestor but different clades have different admixture with archaic hominins including Neanderthals, Denisovans and Homo erectus, which may explain different CLL incidences. There are also some differences in clinical laboratory and molecular co-variates of CLL between these populations. Because the true age-adjusted incidence rate in African Blacks is unknown it is not possible to determine whether modern Europeans acquired susceptibility to CLL or the other populations lost susceptibility and/or developed resistance to developing CLL. We also found other B-cell lymphomas and T- and NK-cell cancers had different incidences in the populations we studied. These data provide clues to determining the cause(s) of CLL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shenmiao Yang
- Peking University Peoples Hospital; Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China
| | - Abraham M Varghese
- Little Flower Hospital and Research Centre, Kerala, India.,St James University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Nitin Sood
- Clinical Haematology and Stem Cell Transplant, Medanta-Medicity, Gurgaon, India
| | - Carlos Chiattone
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Santa Casa Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Norah O Akinola
- Department of Haematology and Immunology, Obafemi Awolowo University and Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
| | - Xiaojun Huang
- Peking University Peoples Hospital; Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China
| | - Robert Peter Gale
- Haematology Research Centre, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Francies FZ, Marima R, Hull R, Molefi T, Dlamini Z. Genomics and splicing events of type II endometrial cancers in the black population: racial disparity, socioeconomic and geographical differences. Am J Cancer Res 2020; 10:3061-3082. [PMID: 33163258 PMCID: PMC7642673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer, also known as uterine cancer, is the most common gynaecological malignancy with burgeoning incidence and mortality rates globally. Racial disparity, socioeconomic and geographical differences are important determinants of endometrial cancer incidence and mortality. Endometrial cancer is mainly categorised as type I and type II. Although less prevalent, type II is the most aggressive form of the disease and typically diagnosed at a late stage, contributing to higher mortality. Black women are at higher risk of developing aggressive, type II disease. Type I tumours are related to higher levels of circulating estrogen with lower-grade tumours that have a good prognosis and frequently related to PTEN mutations. In comparison, type II tumours are estrogen-independent, typically have poor prognosis and associated with the p53, HER2, PPP2R1A, FBXW7 and PIK3R1 mutations. The risk of developing type II malignancy is higher in women with Lynch syndrome as a result of mutations in the MMR gene family. Genetic modifications contribute to aberrant alternative splicing events that are related to tumour development, progression and resistance to therapy. Alternative splicing events are rapidly emerging as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Type II endometrial cancer lacks targeted therapy and biomarkers for novel therapeutic strategies. Recent advances have illustrated a number of molecular targets that are currently explored for the treatment of advanced, late-stage endometrial cancer. The aim of this review is to outline 1) the epidemiology of type II endometrial cancer in black women, 2) discuss the correlated risk factors that contribute to the development of type II endometrial cancer and 3) the associated molecular mechanisms and genetic factors underlying the disease, and 4) aberrant splicing events and biomarkers with therapeutic potential as novel drug targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavia Zita Francies
- SAMRC/UP Precision Prevention & Novel Drug Targets for HIV-Associated Cancers (PPNDTHAC) Extramural Unit, Pan African Cancer Research Institute (PACRI), University of Pretoria, Faculty of Health SciencesHatfield 0028, South Africa
| | - Rahaba Marima
- SAMRC/UP Precision Prevention & Novel Drug Targets for HIV-Associated Cancers (PPNDTHAC) Extramural Unit, Pan African Cancer Research Institute (PACRI), University of Pretoria, Faculty of Health SciencesHatfield 0028, South Africa
| | - Rodney Hull
- SAMRC/UP Precision Prevention & Novel Drug Targets for HIV-Associated Cancers (PPNDTHAC) Extramural Unit, Pan African Cancer Research Institute (PACRI), University of Pretoria, Faculty of Health SciencesHatfield 0028, South Africa
| | - Thulo Molefi
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Pretoria, Faculty of Health SciencesHatfield 0028, South Africa
| | - Zodwa Dlamini
- SAMRC/UP Precision Prevention & Novel Drug Targets for HIV-Associated Cancers (PPNDTHAC) Extramural Unit, Pan African Cancer Research Institute (PACRI), University of Pretoria, Faculty of Health SciencesHatfield 0028, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Differences in the molecular profile of endometrial cancers from British White and British South Asian women. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0233900. [PMID: 32520976 PMCID: PMC7286498 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To identify differences in the mutational profile of endometrial tumours between British White (BW) and South Asian (BSA) women. Methods We analysed primary tumours from matched cohorts of British White (BW) and British South Asian (BSA) women resident in Leicestershire diagnosed with EC. Next Generation Sequencing was performed to investigate mutational differences in a panel of 10 genes previously identified as being commonly mutated in EC. The presence of somatic Mismatch Repair (MMR) gene deficiencies was determined by immunohistochemistry. Results In total, 57 tumours (27 BSA and 30 BW) were sequenced. There was no significant difference in the overall mutation frequency of the 10 genes analysed; however, numerous differences were observed between the groups. There was a positive association between PIK3CA and PTEN mutations in the BSA group, with 78% of PIK3CA-mutant tumours harbouring a PTEN mutation, whereas only 11% of PIK3CA wild-type (wt) tumours were PTEN mutant positive (p = 0.0012). In BW women, 90% of ARID1A mutant tumours had co-existent PI3K pathway mutations versus 50% of wild-type (wt) ARID1A patients (p = 0.0485). This trend was not significant in the BSA group (p = 0.66). The age at diagnosis was significantly higher in the BW group with a somatic MMR gene deficiency compared to those with no deficiency (72.8 years versus 59.6 years, p = 0.007), whereas this difference was not seen in the BSA group (64 years versus 60 years, p = 0.37). Conclusion We have identified differences in the mutational profile of primary EC tumours from BW and BSA women. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and to explore their potential implications for early detection, treatment response and prognosis.
Collapse
|
13
|
Ghoubara A, Sundar S, Ewies AAA. Black women with postmenopausal bleeding have lower prevalence of endometrial cancer than other ethnic groups. Climacteric 2019; 22:632-636. [PMID: 31104512 DOI: 10.1080/13697137.2019.1606794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: Modern medical practice strives for a personalized approach to patient care. The evidence regarding the prevalence of endometrial cancer in various ethnic groups is scarce and conflicting. This study was conducted to determine this prevalence in postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) women. Methods: Data for 1995 women attending PMB clinics over a 4-year period were prospectively collected. Women were grouped according to self-assigned ethnicity into 'White', 'Black', 'South Asian' and 'Others', and according to investigation results into group 1 (benign findings) and group 2 (hyperplasia or cancer). Results: The adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for Black ethnicity was 0.35 (0.17-72; p = 0.001). This means that Black women had 65% (28-83%) less odds for developing endometrial hyperplasia and cancer compared to White women, independent of other predictors. Compared to White ethnicity, women in all ethnic groups were significantly younger at presentation with PMB, had shorter duration since last menstrual period, and were less likely to be diabetic (p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study found significantly lower prevalence of endometrial cancer in the Black race in a population of PMB women, a finding that cannot be readily explained by other known risk factors. Further research is warranted to confirm the results and explore the underlying etiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Ghoubara
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK.,Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Aswan University , Aswan , Egypt.,Gynaecology Department, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust , Birmingham , UK
| | - S Sundar
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK.,Gynaecology Department, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust , Birmingham , UK
| | - A A A Ewies
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK.,Gynaecology Department, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust , Birmingham , UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lawrenson K, Song F, Hazelett DJ, Kar SP, Tyrer J, Phelan CM, Corona RI, Rodríguez-Malavé NI, Seo JH, Adler E, Coetzee SG, Segato F, Fonseca MAS, Amos CI, Carney ME, Chenevix-Trench G, Choi J, Doherty JA, Jia W, Jin GJ, Kim BG, Le ND, Lee J, Li L, Lim BK, Adenan NA, Mizuno M, Park B, Pearce CL, Shan K, Shi Y, Shu XO, Sieh W, Thompson PJ, Wilkens LR, Wei Q, Woo YL, Yan L, Karlan BY, Freedman ML, Noushmehr H, Goode EL, Berchuck A, Sellers TA, Teo SH, Zheng W, Matsuo K, Park S, Chen K, Pharoah PDP, Gayther SA, Goodman MT. Genome-wide association studies identify susceptibility loci for epithelial ovarian cancer in east Asian women. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 153:343-355. [PMID: 30898391 PMCID: PMC6754211 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2018] [Revised: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have focused largely on populations of European ancestry. We aimed to identify common germline variants associated with EOC risk in Asian women. METHODS Genotyping was performed as part of the OncoArray project. Samples with >60% Asian ancestry were included in the analysis. Genotyping was performed on 533,631 SNPs in 3238 Asian subjects diagnosed with invasive or borderline EOC and 4083 unaffected controls. After imputation, genotypes were available for 11,595,112 SNPs to identify associations. RESULTS At chromosome 6p25.2, SNP rs7748275 was associated with risk of serous EOC (odds ratio [OR] = 1.34, P = 8.7 × 10-9) and high-grade serous EOC (HGSOC) (OR = 1.34, P = 4.3 × 10-9). SNP rs6902488 at 6p25.2 (r2 = 0.97 with rs7748275) lies in an active enhancer and is predicted to impact binding of STAT3, P300 and ELF1. We identified additional risk loci with low Bayesian false discovery probability (BFDP) scores, indicating they are likely to be true risk associations (BFDP <10%). At chromosome 20q11.22, rs74272064 was associated with HGSOC risk (OR = 1.27, P = 9.0 × 10-8). Overall EOC risk was associated with rs10260419 at chromosome 7p21.3 (OR = 1.33, P = 1.2 × 10-7) and rs74917072 at chromosome 2q37.3 (OR = 1.25, P = 4.7 × 10-7). At 2q37.3, expression quantitative trait locus analysis in 404 HGSOC tissues identified ESPNL as a putative candidate susceptibility gene (P = 1.2 × 10-7). CONCLUSION While some risk loci were shared between East Asian and European populations, others were population-specific, indicating that the landscape of EOC risk in Asian women has both shared and unique features compared to women of European ancestry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Lawrenson
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Suite 290W, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Fengju Song
- National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
| | - Dennis J Hazelett
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Siddhartha P Kar
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jonathan Tyrer
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
| | - Catherine M Phelan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Rosario I Corona
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Suite 290W, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Norma I Rodríguez-Malavé
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ji-Hei Seo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emily Adler
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, 1450 Biggy Street, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Simon G Coetzee
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Felipe Segato
- Department of Genetics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, 14049-900, Brazil
| | - Marcos A S Fonseca
- Department of Genetics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, 14049-900, Brazil
| | - Christopher I Amos
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor School of Medicine, Houston,TX, USA
| | - Michael E Carney
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- Genetics and Computational Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Jiyeob Choi
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- Jon M. and Karen Huntsman Endowed Associate Professor in Cancer Research Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, USA
| | - Weihua Jia
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China
| | - Gang J Jin
- ShanghaiBio Corporation, Shanghai, China; CloudHealth Genomics Ltd, Shanghai, China
| | - Byoung-Gie Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| | - Nhu D Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Juyeon Lee
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Seoul National University, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-799, Republic of Korea
| | - Lian Li
- National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
| | - Boon K Lim
- The Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Noor A Adenan
- The Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Mika Mizuno
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Japan
| | - Boyoung Park
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Celeste L Pearce
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kang Shan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Hebei Medical University, Fourth Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Yongyong Shi
- Bio-X Institutes, Key Laboratory for the Genetics of Developmental and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Ministry of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Ou Shu
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pamela J Thompson
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lynne R Wilkens
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, HI, USA
| | - Qingyi Wei
- Cancer Institute, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Yin L Woo
- The Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Li Yan
- Department of Molecular Biology, Hebei Medical University, Fourth Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Suite 290W, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Matthew L Freedman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Houtan Noushmehr
- Department of Genetics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, 14049-900, Brazil; Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Thomas A Sellers
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Soo-Hwang Teo
- Cancer Research Initiatives Foundation, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Keitaro Matsuo
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Epidemiology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Japan
| | - Sue Park
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kexin Chen
- National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK; Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge, UK
| | - Simon A Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Community and Population Health Research Institute, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Retrospective Observational Study of Surgically Treated Gynaecological Malignancies at a Tertiary Care Centre in Bihar. INDIAN JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40944-019-0257-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
16
|
Sayeed S, Barnes I, Ali R. Childhood cancer incidence by ethnic group in England, 2001-2007: a descriptive epidemiological study. BMC Cancer 2017; 17:570. [PMID: 28841853 PMCID: PMC5574126 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3551-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2016] [Accepted: 08/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND After the first year of life, cancers are the commonest cause of death in children. Incidence rates vary between ethnic groups, and recent advances in data linkage allow for a more accurate estimation of these variations. Identifying such differences may help identify potential risk or protective factors for certain childhood cancers. This study thus aims to ascertain whether such differences do indeed exist using nationwide data across seven years, as have previously been described in adult cancers. METHODS We obtained data for all cancer registrations for children (aged 0-14) in England from January 2001 to December 2007. Ethnicity (self-assigned) was established through record linkage to the Hospital Episodes Statistics database or cancer registry data. Cancers were classified morphologically according to the International Classification of Childhood Cancer into four groups - leukaemias; lymphomas; central nervous system; and other solid tumours. Age standardised incidence rates were estimated for each ethnic group, as well as incidence rate ratios comparing each individual ethnic group (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Black African, Black Carribean, Chinese) to Whites, adjusting for sex, age and deprivation. RESULTS The majority of children in the study are UK born. Black children (RR = 1.18, 99% CI: 1.01-1.39), and amongst South Asians, Pakistani children (RR = 1.19, 99% CI: 1.02-1.39) appear to have an increased risk of all cancers. There is an increased risk of leukaemia in South Asians (RR = 1.31, 99% CI: 1.08-1.58), and of lymphoma in Black (RR = 1.72, 99% CI: 1.13-2.63) and South Asian children (RR = 1.51, 99% CI: 1.10-2.06). South Asians appear to have a decreased risk of CNS cancers (RR = 0.71, 99% CI: 0.54-0.95). CONCLUSIONS In the tradition of past migrant studies, such descriptive studies within ethnic minority groups permit a better understanding of disease incidence within the population, but also allow for the generation of hypotheses to begin to understand why such differences might exist. Though a major cause of mortality in this age group, childhood cancer remains a relatively rare disease; however, the methods used here have permitted the first nationwide estimation of childhood cancer by individual ethnic group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shameq Sayeed
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Isobel Barnes
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Raghib Ali
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK. .,Public Health Research Center, New York University Abu Dhabi , Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Harbeck N, Gascon P, Jones CM, Nixon A, Krendyukov A, Nakov R, Li Y, Blackwell K. Proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim (LA-EP2006) compared with reference pegfilgrastim in Asian patients with breast cancer: an exploratory comparison from two Phase III trials. Future Oncol 2017; 13:1385-1393. [DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: This is a pooled subgroup analysis of Asian patients enrolled in two Phase III confirmatory studies comparing proposed biosimilar LA-EP2006 with reference pegfilgrastim in women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer. Patients & methods: Women were randomized to LA-EP2006 (n = 90) or reference (n = 84) pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®, Amgen, Inc., CA, USA) for ≤6 cycles of TAC chemotherapy. Primary end point was duration of severe neutropenia during Cycle 1 (number of consecutive days with absolute neutrophil count <0.5 × 109/l) with equivalence confirmed if 95% CIs were within a ±1-day margin. Results: Mean duration of severe neutropenia (days) in Cycle 1 was 1.36 ± 0.98 (LA-EP2006) versus 1.35 ± 1.06 (reference) (difference 0.01 days; 95% CI: -0.30–0.32, indicating equivalence). Conclusion: LA-EP2006 showed similar clinical efficacy and safety compared with reference pegfilgrastim.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Frauenklinik & CCCLMU der Universität München (LMU), Munich, 81337, Germany
| | - Pere Gascon
- Servicio de Oncologia Médica, Fundacio Clinic, Barcelona, 08036, Spain
| | | | - Allen Nixon
- Fowler Family Center for Cancer Care, Jonesboro, AR, 72401, USA
| | | | | | - Yuhan Li
- Sandoz Inc, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
García-Pérez J, Pérez-Abad N, Lope V, Castelló A, Pollán M, González-Sánchez M, Valencia JL, López-Abente G, Fernández-Navarro P. Breast and prostate cancer mortality and industrial pollution. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION (BARKING, ESSEX : 1987) 2016; 214:394-399. [PMID: 27108043 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2016] [Revised: 04/07/2016] [Accepted: 04/07/2016] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
We investigated whether there might be an excess of breast and prostate cancer mortality among the population residing near Spanish industries, according to different categories of industrial groups. An ecologic study was designed to examine breast and prostate cancer mortality at a municipal level (period 1997-2006). Population exposure to pollution was estimated by means of distance from town of residence to industrial facilities. Using Besag-York-Mollié regression models with Integrated Nested Laplace approximations for Bayesian inference, we assessed the relative risk of dying from these tumors in 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-km zones around installations, and analyzed the effect of category of industrial group. For all sectors combined, no excess risk was detected. However, excess risk of breast cancer mortality (relative risk, 95% credible interval) was detected near mines (1.10, 1.00-1.21 at 4 km), ceramic industries (1.05, 1.00-1.09 at 5 km), and ship building (1.12, 1.00-1.26 at 5 km), and excess risk of prostate cancer was detected near aquaculture for all distances analyzed (from 2.42, 1.53-3.63 at 2 km to 1.63, 1.07-2.36 at 5 km). Our findings do not support that residing in the vicinity of pollutant industries as a whole (all industrial sectors combined) is a risk factor for breast and prostate cancer mortality. However, isolated statistical associations found in our study with respect to specific industrial groups warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier García-Pérez
- Cancer and Environmental Epidemiology Unit, National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Avda. Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública - CIBERESP), Spain.
| | - Natalia Pérez-Abad
- Faculty of Statistical Studies, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Virginia Lope
- Cancer and Environmental Epidemiology Unit, National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Avda. Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública - CIBERESP), Spain.
| | - Adela Castelló
- Cancer and Environmental Epidemiology Unit, National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Avda. Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública - CIBERESP), Spain.
| | - Marina Pollán
- Cancer and Environmental Epidemiology Unit, National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Avda. Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública - CIBERESP), Spain.
| | - Mario González-Sánchez
- Cancer and Environmental Epidemiology Unit, National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Avda. Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública - CIBERESP), Spain.
| | - José Luis Valencia
- Faculty of Statistical Studies, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Gonzalo López-Abente
- Cancer and Environmental Epidemiology Unit, National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Avda. Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública - CIBERESP), Spain.
| | - Pablo Fernández-Navarro
- Cancer and Environmental Epidemiology Unit, National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Avda. Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública - CIBERESP), Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Beaver K, Williamson S, Sutton C, Hollingworth W, Gardner A, Allton B, Abdel-Aty M, Blackwood K, Burns S, Curwen D, Ghani R, Keating P, Murray S, Tomlinson A, Walker B, Willett M, Wood N, Martin-Hirsch P. Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up for patients treated for stage-I endometrial cancer (ENDCAT trial): a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. BJOG 2016; 124:150-160. [PMID: 27062690 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-led telephone follow-up (TFU) for patients with stage-I endometrial cancer. DESIGN Multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial. SETTING Five centres in the North West of England. SAMPLE A cohort of 259 women treated for stage-I endometrial cancer attending hospital outpatient clinics for routine follow-up. METHODS Participants were randomly allocated to receive traditional hospital based follow-up (HFU) or nurse-led TFU. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcomes were psychological morbidity (State Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI-S) and patient satisfaction with the information provided. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction with service, quality of life, and time to detection of recurrence. RESULTS The STAI-S scores post-randomisation were similar between groups [mean (SD): TFU 33.0 (11.0); HFU 35.5 (13.0)]. The estimated between-group difference in STAI-S was 0.7 (95% confidence interval, 95% CI -1.9 to 3.3); the confidence interval lies above the non-inferiority limit (-3.5), indicating the non-inferiority of TFU. There was no significant difference between groups in reported satisfaction with information (odds ratio, OR 0.9; 95% CI 0.4-2.1; P = 0.83). Women in the HFU group were more likely to report being kept waiting for their appointment (P = 0.001), that they did not need any information (P = 0.003), and were less likely to report that the nurse knew about their particular case and situation (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS The TFU provides an effective alternative to HFU for patients with stage-I endometrial cancer, with no reported physical or psychological detriment. Patient satisfaction with information was high, with similar levels between groups. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT ENDCAT trial shows effectiveness of nurse-led telephone follow-up for patients with stage-I endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Beaver
- School of Health Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - S Williamson
- School of Health Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - C Sutton
- Lancashire Clinical Trials Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - W Hollingworth
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - A Gardner
- Women's Health Research Department, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK
| | - B Allton
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster, UK
| | - M Abdel-Aty
- Gynaecology Department, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Burnley General Hospital, Burnley, UK
| | - K Blackwood
- Women's Healthcare Unit, Wrightington, Wigan & Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Hanover Diagnostic and Treatment Centre, Wigan, UK
| | - S Burns
- Women's Healthcare Unit, Wrightington, Wigan & Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Hanover Diagnostic and Treatment Centre, Wigan, UK
| | - D Curwen
- Gynaecological Unit, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackpool, UK
| | - R Ghani
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster, UK
| | - P Keating
- Women's Health Directorate, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK
| | - S Murray
- Women's Health Directorate, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK
| | - A Tomlinson
- Corporate Cancer Team, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK
| | - B Walker
- Gynaecology Department, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Burnley General Hospital, Burnley, UK
| | - M Willett
- Gynaecology Department, East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Burnley General Hospital, Burnley, UK
| | - N Wood
- Women's Health Directorate, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK
| | - P Martin-Hirsch
- Women's Health Directorate, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Maruthappu M, Barnes I, Sayeed S, Ali R. Incidence of prostate and urological cancers in England by ethnic group, 2001-2007: a descriptive study. BMC Cancer 2015; 15:753. [PMID: 26486598 PMCID: PMC4618465 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1771-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2015] [Accepted: 10/10/2015] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The aetiology of urological cancers is poorly understood and variations in incidence by ethnic group may provide insights into the relative importance of genetic and environmental risk factors. Our objective was to compare the incidence of four urological cancers (kidney, bladder, prostate and testicular) among six ‘non-White’ ethnic groups in England (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Black African, Black Caribbean and Chinese) to each other and to Whites. Methods We obtained Information on ethnicity for all urological cancer registrations from 2001 to 2007 (n = 329,524) by linkage to the Hospital Episodes Statistics database. We calculated incidence rate ratios adjusted for age, sex and income, comparing the six ethnic groups (and combined ‘South Asian’ and ‘Black’ groups) to Whites and to each other. Results There were significant differences in the incidence of all four cancers between the ethnic groups (all p < 0.001). In general, ‘non-White’ groups had a lower incidence of urological cancers compared to Whites, except prostate cancer, which displayed a higher incidence in Blacks. (IRR 2.55) There was strong evidence of differences in risk between Indians, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis for kidney, bladder and prostate cancer (p < 0.001), and between Black Africans and Black Caribbeans for all four cancers (p < 0.001). Conclusions The risk of urological cancers in England varies greatly by ethnicity, including within groups that have traditionally been analysed together (South Asians and Blacks). In general, these differences are not readily explained by known risk factors, although the very high incidence of prostate cancer in both black Africans and Caribbeans suggests increased genetic susceptibility. g. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1771-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Isobel Barnes
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
| | - Shameq Sayeed
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
| | - Raghib Ali
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK. .,New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, PO Box 129188, United Arab Emirates.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
García-Pérez J, Lope V, López-Abente G, González-Sánchez M, Fernández-Navarro P. Ovarian cancer mortality and industrial pollution. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION (BARKING, ESSEX : 1987) 2015; 205:103-110. [PMID: 26046426 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2014] [Revised: 04/14/2015] [Accepted: 05/21/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
We investigated whether there might be excess ovarian cancer mortality among women residing near Spanish industries, according to different categories of industrial groups and toxic substances. An ecologic study was designed to examine ovarian cancer mortality at a municipal level (period 1997-2006). Population exposure to pollution was estimated by means of distance from town to facility. Using Poisson regression models, we assessed the relative risk of dying from ovarian cancer in zones around installations, and analyzed the effect of industrial groups and pollutant substances. Excess ovarian cancer mortality was detected in the vicinity of all sectors combined, and, principally, near refineries, fertilizers plants, glass production, paper production, food/beverage sector, waste treatment plants, pharmaceutical industry and ceramic. Insofar as substances were concerned, statistically significant associations were observed for installations releasing metals and polycyclic aromatic chemicals. These results support that residing near industries could be a risk factor for ovarian cancer mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier García-Pérez
- Cancer and Environmental Epidemiology Unit, National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Avda. Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; IIS Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain.
| | - Virginia Lope
- Cancer and Environmental Epidemiology Unit, National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Avda. Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; IIS Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain.
| | - Gonzalo López-Abente
- Cancer and Environmental Epidemiology Unit, National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Avda. Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; IIS Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain.
| | - Mario González-Sánchez
- Cancer and Environmental Epidemiology Unit, National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Avda. Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; IIS Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain.
| | - Pablo Fernández-Navarro
- Cancer and Environmental Epidemiology Unit, National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Avda. Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain; IIS Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|