Weekly oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (OXALF) as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer: results of a phase II trial

Advanced oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma in older patients in the era of immunotherapy. A review of the literature

Gastric (G) and gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas are of the most common and deadly cancers worldwide and affect mainly patients over 70 years at diagnosis. Older age has been associated in gastric cancers with distal tumour location, well-differentiated adenocarcinoma and microsatellite instability and is not identified itself as an independent prognostic factor. As immune checkpoint inhibitors recently changed the landmark of advanced G and GEJ adenocarcinomas treatment, we decided to perform a literature review to define the evidence-level of clinical data in older patients. This work underlined the lasting low -inclusion rate of older patients and -implementation rate of frailty screening tools in clinical trials in G/GEJ carcinomas. In the first-line metastatic setting, two prospective randomized phase III studies have specifically assessed the efficacy of chemotherapy in older patients with HER2-negative gastric cancers, demonstrating the feasibility of reduced dose oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimen in this population. Only few data are available in HER2-positive tumors, or in the second-line setting. Furthermore, no specific trial with immune checkpoint inhibitors was performed in older frail patients whereas their benefit/adverse events ratio make them attractive candidates in this patient's population. We conclude that older fit patients can be treated in the same way as younger ones and included in clinical trials. Improving the outcome of older frail patients should be the oncology community next focus by implementing targeted interventions before initiating cancer therapy and designing specific clinical trials. Frailty screening tools and geriatric data collection have to be implemented in routine-practice and clinical trials.

Real‑world challenge for clinicians treating advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (Review)

Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GOA) is a disease of older people. Incidence is rising in the developed world and the majority of patients present with advanced disease. Based on clinical trial data, systemic chemotherapy in the advanced setting is associated with improvements in quality of life and survival. However, there is a recognised mismatch between trial populations and the patients encountered in clinical practice in terms of age, comorbidity and fitness. Appropriate patient selection is essential to safely deliver effective treatment. In this narrative review, we discuss the challenges faced by clinicians when assessing real‑world patients with advanced GOA for systemic therapy. We also highlight the importance of frailty screening and the current available evidence we can use to guide our management.

Two postoperative chemotherapies for gastric cancer: FOLFOX4 vs. TPF

Clinical effects of FOLFOX4 and TPF chemotherapy regimen on postoperative gastric cancer patients were investigated. A total of 60 patients admitted to the First People's Hospital of Changzhou receiving gastric cancer operation were selected and they were divided into two groups at random. Thirty patients in the FOLFOX4 group were treated with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin, while 30 patients in the TPF group were treated with paclitaxel, fluorouracil and cisplatin. The therapeutic effects, adverse reactions, quality of life and survival time of patients in the two groups were observed. The total effective rate of the FOLFOX4 group was 73.3%, which was significantly higher than that of the TPF group (43.3%), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The proportions of neurotoxicity and thrombocytopenia in the FOLFOX4 group were 56.7 and 33.3%, while those in the TPF group were 26.7 and 60%, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The increasing proportion of postoperative scores of the FOLFOX4 group was 46.7%, which was significantly higher than that of the TPF group (20%), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The 2- and 3-year survival rates of the FOLFOX4 group were 63.3 and 50%, which were significantly higher than those of the TPF group (36.7 and 23.3%), and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Therefore, the effective rate of FOLFOX4 regimen is high in the treatment of gastric cancer with relatively fewer adverse reactions, which has a certain advantage.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine monotherapy versus capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

There is no single standard chemotherapy regimen for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). A phase III trial has confirmed that both capecitabine monotherapy and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin are well tolerated for elderly patients with AGC, but their economic influence in China is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this cost-effectiveness analysis was to estimate the effects of capecitabine monotherapy and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in elderly patients with AGC on health and economic outcomes in China.

METHODS

We created a Markov model based on data from a Korean clinical phase III trial to analyze the cost-effectiveness of the treatment of elderly patients in the capecitabine monotherapy (X) group and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) group. The costs were obtained from published reports and the local health system. The utilities were assumed on the basis of the published literature. Costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were estimated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (Monte Carlo simulations) were performed.

RESULTS

In the cost-effectiveness analysis, X had a lower total cost ($45,731.68) and cost-effectiveness ratio ($65,918.93/QALY). The one-way sensitivity analysis suggested that the most influential parameter was the risk of requiring second-line chemotherapy in XELOX group. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis predicted that the X regimen was cost-effective 100% of the time, given a willingness-to-pay threshold of $26,598.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that the XELOX regimen is less cost-effective compared to the X regimen for elderly patients with AGC in China from a Chinese healthcare perspective.

A phase II study of combination therapy with oral S-1 and cisplatin in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

A combination of S-1 and cisplatin is recognized as one of the standard first-line chemotherapy regimens for patients with advanced gastric cancer. However, demographic analyses of pivotal phase III studies have showed that only a minority of treated patients were aged 76 years or older. The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with S-1 and cisplatin in elderly patients with chemotherapy-naive advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients aged 76 years or older received S-1 40 mg/m² orally twice daily for 21 days and cisplatin 60 mg/m² intravenously infused at day 8 of each 35-day cycle. Dose modification was performed according to creatinine clearance. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were enrolled. Median OS was 12.3 months, PFS was 7.8 months, and TTF was 4.3 months. The response rate was 54%. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were anorexia (25%), neutropenia (23%), hyponatremia (20%), anemia (18%), and febrile neutropenia (8%). No treatment-related death occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin is an effective and well-tolerated regimen for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer when the dose is adjusted according to renal function.

Tolerance to Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Cancer

Background

Due to demographic changes, the number of elderly people with cancer will increase in the next decades. In the past, elderly patients with cancer were often excluded from clinical trials. Chronological age has been considered a risk factor for increased toxicity and reduced tolerance to chemotherapy.

Methods

We present a review on toxicity of chemotherapy and factors associated with toxicity in elderly patients with cancer, and we discuss chemotherapeutic agents and treatment options in treating this patient population.

Results

Age is a risk factor for increased toxicity to chemotherapy and decreased tolerance. However, few trials have been reported with adjustment for age-associated changes such as impairment of functional status and increased comorbidity, which also show an independent association with increased toxicity. Published data may include several biases, such as referral and publication bias.

Conclusions

Decision making in elderly cancer patients should be based on the results of a geriatric assessment. Patients with few or no limitations should be treated as younger patients are treated. Data with a high level of evidence are unavailable for patients showing moderate or severe limitations in a geriatric assessment.

Safety and Efficacy of Dose-dense Chemotherapy with TCF Regimen in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dose-dense TCF in elderly (≥65 years) compared to younger patients.

Methods

Safety and efficacy data relative to 119 consecutive patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer treated at our institution and enrolled in different phase II trials were retrospectively collected. All patients were treatment-naive and received docetaxel 70 mg/m2 day 1, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 day 1, l-folinic acid 100 mg/m2 days 1-2, followed by 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus days 1-2, and then 600 mg/m2 as a 22-hour continuous infusion days 1-2, every 14 days, plus pegfilgrastim 6 mg on day 3. Sixty patients (50%) aged ≥65 years received the same schedule with a dose reduction by 30%.

Results

A total of 86% of patients were evaluable for response and all for toxicity. In patients aged ≥65 years, we observed an overall response rate of 51%. Median overall survival was 11.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.3-15.1) and 11.8 months (95% CI 9.2-16.2) in elderly and younger patients, respectively. In the elderly patients, the most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (13%), leukopenia (7%), thrombocytopenia (18%), anemia (3%), and febrile neutropenia (8%); in the younger patients, neutropenia (56%), leucopenia (31%), thrombocytopenia (22%), anemia (15%), and febrile neutropenia (15%).

Conclusions

Elderly patients can be safely treated with a dose-dense TCF regimen with a 30% dose reduction achieving similar efficacy results as younger patients with lesser toxicity.

Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most frequent malignant diseases in the elderly. Systemic chemotherapy showed an improvement of quality of life and survival benefit compared to supportive care alone in patients with advanced GC. Because comorbidities or age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may lead to higher toxicity, however, many oncologists hesitate to recommend elderly patients to receive chemotherapy.

Available data suggest that elderly patients with GC are able to tolerate and benefit from systemic chemotherapy to the same extent as younger patients. The age alone should not be the only criteria to preclude effective chemotherapy. However, proper patient selection is extremely important to deliver effective treatment safely. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a useful method to assess life expectancy and risk of morbidity in older patients and to guide providing optimal treatment. Treatment should be personalized based on the nature of the disease, the life expectancy, the risk of complication, and the patient's preference. Combination chemotherapy can be considered for older patients with metastatic GC who are classified as non-frail patients by CGA. For frail or vulnerable patients, however, monotherapy or only symptomatic treatment may be desirable. Targeted agents seem to be promising treatment options for elderly patients with GC considering their better efficacy and less toxicity.

Chemotherapy for Late-Stage Cancer Patients: Meta-Analysis of Complete Response Rates

Complete response (CR) rates reported for cytotoxic chemotherapy for late-stage cancer patients are generally low, with few exceptions, regardless of the solid cancer type or drug regimen. We investigated CR rates reported in the literature for clinical trials using chemotherapy alone, across a wide range of tumour types and chemotherapeutic regimens, to determine an overall CR rate for late-stage cancers. A total of 141 reports were located using the PubMed database. A meta-analysis was performed of reported CR from 68 chemotherapy trials (total 2732 patients) using standard agents across late-stage solid cancers—a binomial model with random effects was adopted. Mean CR rates were compared for different cancer types, and for chemotherapeutic agents with different mechanisms of action, using a logistic regression. Our results showed that the CR rates for chemotherapy treatment of late-stage cancer were generally low at 7.4%, regardless of the cancer type or drug regimen used. We found no evidence that CR rates differed between different chemotherapy drug types, but amongst different cancer types small CR differences were evident, although none exceeded a mean CR rate of 11%. This remarkable concordance of CR rates regardless of cancer or therapy type remains currently unexplained, and motivates further investigation.

The potential predictive role of nuclear NHERF1 expression in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with epirubicin/oxaliplatin/capecitabine first line chemotherapy

Cellular resistance in advanced gastric cancer (GC) might be related to function of multidrug resistance (MDR) proteins. The adaptor protein NHERF1 (Na(+)/H(+) exchanger regulatory factor) is an important player in cancer progression for a number of solid malignancies, even if its role to develop drug resistance remains uncertain. Herein, we aimed to analyze the potential association between NHERF1 expression and P-gp, sorcin and HIF-1α MDR-related proteins in advanced GC patients treated with epirubicin/oxaliplatin/capecitabine (EOX) chemotherapy regimen, and its relation to response. Total number of 28 untreated patients were included into the study. Expression and subcellular localization of all proteins were assessed by immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumor samples. We did not found significant association between NHERF1 expression and the MDR-related proteins. A trend was observed between positive cytoplasmic NHERF1 (cNHERF1) expression and negative nuclear HIF-1α (nHIF-1α) expression (68.8% versus 31.3% respectively, P = 0.054). However, cytoplasmic P-gp (cP-gp) expression was positively correlated with both cHIF-1α and sorcin expression (P = 0.011; P = 0.002, respectively). Interestingly, nuclear NHERF1 (nNHERF1) staining was statistically associated with clinical response. In detail, 66.7% of patients with high nNHERF1 expression had a disease control rate, while 84.6% of subjects with negative nuclear expression of the protein showed progressive disease (P = 0.009). Multivariate analysis confirmed a significant correlation between nNHERF1 and clinical response (OR 0.06, P = 0.019). These results suggest that nuclear NHERF1 could be related to resistance to the EOX regimen in advanced GC patients, identifying this marker as a possible independent predictive factor.

A phase II study of modified FOLFOX as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer in elderly patients with associated diseases

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients are generally underrepresented in the study populations of combination chemotherapy trials. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a modified FOLFOX regimen in elderly patients with metastatic gastric cancer and presenting associated disease(s).

METHODS

A total of 43 patients aged ≥70 years received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) together with 6S-leucovorin 200 mg/m(2) on day 1, followed by a 46-h infusion of 5-fluorouracil 2,400 mg/m(2), every 2 weeks. Assessment of response was performed every four cycles according to RECIST criteria.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 74 years (range, 70-83 years). Overall response rate was 34.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 20.6-49.1, with 3 complete responses and 12 partial responses. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 4 patients (9.3%), fatigue in 3 patients (7.0%), and vomiting in 2 patients (4.6%). Grade 2 and 3 peripheral neuropathy was observed in 5 patients (11.6%) and 1 patient (2.3%), respectively. No treatment-related death was observed. Median progression-free and overall survival were 6.8 and 10.5 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This modified FOLFOX regimen is an active and well-tolerated treatment for elderly patients with metastatic gastric cancer and also represents a good therapeutic option in patients with associated disease(s).

Advanced or metastatic gastric cancer in elderly patients: clinicopathological, prognostic factors and treatments

PURPOSE

To analyze the clinicopathological features, prognostic factors, treatment efficacy and safety among elderly patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.

METHODS

Three hundred and nineteen patients aged 65 years and older, diagnosed with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, were followed and data were retrospectively collected, reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

The elderly patients carried specific clinicopathological characteristics. Body mass index (BMI), number of metastatic lesions, ascites, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), tumor differentiation grade, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, local treatment, and chemotherapy were the independent prognostic factors. Serum LDH level was superior to the serum CEA level in the prognosis of advanced or metastatic gastric cancer in older patients. Cisplatin-based regimen, chemotherapy cycles, metastatic lesions, LDH level, and supraclavicular lymph node metastasis were the independent prognostic factors in 220 patients receiving chemotherapy. The toxicity was mild and tolerable.

CONCLUSION

KPS, BMI and a well-differentiated histopathology were factors favoring longer survival, whereas elevated serum LDH and a greater number of metastatic lesions were associated with poor prognosis among those elderly patients. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy provided survival benefits and mild toxicity.

Advanced or metastatic gastric cancer in elderly patients: clinicopathological, prognostic factors and treatments

PURPOSE

To analyze the clinicopathological features, prognostic factors, treatment efficacy and safety among elderly patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.

METHODS

Three hundred and nineteen patients aged 65 years and older, diagnosed with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, were followed and data were retrospectively collected, reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

The elderly patients carried specific clinicopathological characteristics. Body mass index (BMI), number of metastatic lesions, ascites, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), tumor differentiation grade, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, local treatment, and chemotherapy were the independent prognostic factors. Serum LDH level was superior to the serum CEA level in the prognosis of advanced or metastatic gastric cancer in older patients. Cisplatin-based regimen, chemotherapy cycles, metastatic lesions, LDH level, and supraclavicular lymph node metastasis were the independent prognostic factors in 220 patients receiving chemotherapy. The toxicity was mild and tolerable.

CONCLUSION

KPS, BMI and a well-differentiated histopathology were factors favoring longer survival, whereas elevated serum LDH and a greater number of metastatic lesions were associated with poor prognosis among those elderly patients. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy provided survival benefits and mild toxicity.

Complete pathologic response with combination oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in an older patient with advanced gastric cancer

Management of gastric cancer in older adults is challenging. Perioperative treatment with epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil combination chemotherapy and surgery is considered the standard treatment of locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. However, this chemotherapy regimen is not well tolerated in older adults. Here, we report a case of an older patient with locally advanced gastric cancer who was treated with modified FOLFOX-6 (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil) regimen and achieved a complete pathological response.

Comparison of safety and efficacy of S-1 monotherapy and S-1 plus cisplatin therapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Although S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) therapy is recognized as the standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in Japan, its safety and efficacy in elderly patients have not been investigated sufficiently.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 58 patients with AGC selected from 82 consecutive patients who were ≥70 years old and were treated with SP or S-1 monotherapy as the first-line therapy. In SP, S-1 (40 mg/m(2), bid) was administered for 3 weeks and cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) on day 8, every 5 weeks. In S-1 monotherapy, S-1 (40 mg/m(2), bid) was administered for 4 weeks, every 6 weeks.

RESULTS

SP and S-1 was administered in 21 and 37 patients, respectively. There were some differences in patient characteristics between the treatment groups, such as histological type (P = 0.16); the presence of liver metastasis (P = 0.07); and the presence of peritoneal metastasis (P = 0.02). The incidences of grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were 57% (12/21) in the SP and 35% (13/37) in the S-1 group (P = 0.17). Those of non-hematological toxicities were 14% (3/21) and 14% (5/37) for anorexia, 10% (2/21) and 14% (5/37) for fatigue, and 5% (1/21) and 5% (2/37) for nausea in the SP and S-1 groups, respectively. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival in the SP and S-1 groups were 5.0 and 5.2 months, and 14.4 and 10.9 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

SP and S-1 therapy were both feasible in elderly patients, though there is the risk of a high incidence of hematological toxicities.

Efficacy of lobaplatin plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a report of 30 cases

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lobaplatin (LBP) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (CF) in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS: The clinical data for 30 patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with LBP plus 5-FU and CF from March 2004 to September 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients received at least two cycles of chemotherapy, each lasting 21 days and consisting of LBP 30 mg/m² IV d 1, 5-FU 300 mg/m² IV d 1-5, and CF 100 mg/m² IV d 1-5.

RESULTS: Thirty patients received 2 to 6 cycles of chemotherapy, with a median of three cycles. All patients were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. No patients obtained a complete response. Partial response was achieved in 12 patients, stable disease in 5 patients, and progressive disease in 13 patients. The objective response rate was 40% (12/30). The tumor control rate was 56.7% (17/30). Therapy was generally well tolerated. Major toxicity was myelosuppression and gastrointestinal sensitivity, including anaemia, thrombocytopenia, leukocytopenia, and nausea and vomiting. No chemotherapy-related death occurred.

CONCLUSION: LBP plus 5-FU and CF regimen is effective and safe for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Advances in the pharmacological treatment of gastro-oesophageal cancer

Despite a sharp decline in the incidence of gastric cancer during the second half of the 20th century, this malignancy remains the second leading cause of cancer mortality in the world. The incidence and mortality rate of gastric cancer increase with age; at present, the median ages at diagnosis are 67 years for men and 72 years for women in the US. This article reviews and discusses current medical treatment options for both the general population and elderly gastric cancer patients. Management of localized gastric cancer has changed significantly over recent years. Adjuvant chemoradiation is not generally recommended outside the US. After decades of trials of adjuvant chemotherapy with inconclusive results, a significant survival benefit for perioperative combination chemotherapy - as compared with surgery alone - in patients with resectable or locally advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer was recently demonstrated in the UK MAGIC trial. A further large, randomized trial from Japan demonstrated a significant survival benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 after D2 resection for gastric cancer. However, both trials are applicable only to the population in which the trials were conducted. Specific data on elderly patients are missing. For patients with metastatic disease, oral fluoropyrimidines, such as capecitabine, have been developed. In Asian patients, treatment with the oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 is safe and effective. Docetaxel, oxaliplatin and irinotecan have demonstrated activity against gastric cancer in appropriately designed, randomized, phase III trials and have increased the available treatment options significantly. In addition, according to preliminary data, trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy has significantly improved activity when compared to chemotherapy alone in patients with human epidermal receptor (HER)-2-positive gastric and gastro-oesophageal cancers. Thus, therapeutic decisions in patients with advanced gastric cancer may be adapted to the molecular subtype and co-morbidities of the individual patient. Data from retrospective analyses suggest that oxaliplatin seems to be better tolerated than cisplatin in elderly patients.

Phase II study of S-1 as first-line treatment for elderly patients over 75 years of age with advanced gastric cancer: the Tokyo Cooperative Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

This prospective multicenter phase II study was carried out to investigate the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of S-1 monotherapy in elderly patients over 75 years of age, with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients had measurable or evaluable lesions according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. S-1 (25-60 mg determined by the body surface area and creatinine clearance) was given orally, twice daily. A course of treatment consisted of 4-week administration followed by a 2-week rest period, and the patients received repeated courses.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were enrolled. Pharmacokinetics of S-1 was studied in six patients, and the maximum plasma concentrations of respective metabolites after S-1 administration were found to be similar to those reported for younger cancer patients. The overall response rate in 33 patients was 21.2% (95% CI, 10.7-37.8%), and median progression-free survival was 3.9 months, with a median overall survival of 15.7 months. Frequently noted adverse events include leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, anorexia, and fatigue. As for serious adverse events, relatively higher frequencies of anemia (9%) and anorexia (12%) of grade 3 severity were found, but there were no grade 4 episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that S-1 monotherapy is safe and useful for elderly patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer when the dose is selected with caution, taking into account renal function.

A phase II study of modified FOLFOX as first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biweekly oxaliplatin in combination with continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (modified FOLFOX regimen) in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Forty-six eligible patients older than 65 years with previously untreated AGC received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m intravenously over a 2-h period on day 1, together with leucovorin 400 mg/m over 2 h, followed by a 46-h infusion of 5-fluorouracil 2600 mg/m every 2 weeks. All patients were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. A median of seven cycles (range 1-12) was administered. The overall response rate was 45.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 31-61%] with two complete responses, 19 partial responses, 15 stable diseases, and 10 progressions. Median time to progression was 6.2 months (95% CI: 4.6-7.8) and median overall survival was 9.8 months (95% CI: 8.2-11.4). Toxicity was fairly mild. Grade 3 toxicities included neutropenia (8.7%), nausea (4.3%), vomiting (4.3%), diarrhea (2.2%); and grade 4 toxicities occurred in none of the patients. Grades 1-2 peripheral neuropathy was reported in 43.5% of patients. The modified FOLFOX regimen is active, well tolerated as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients aged above 65 years with AGC.

Oxaliplatin, 5-FU, folinic acid as first-line palliative chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer

PURPOSE

We investigated the efficacy and safety of a combination of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid (FA) as first-line palliative chemotherapy for elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study patients were chemotherapy-naïve patients (> 65 years old) with histologically confirmed, metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer. Chemotherapy consisted of oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) and FA 100 mg/m(2) (2-hour infusion), and then 5-FU 2400 mg/m(2) (46-hour continuous infusion) every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients were studied between April 2004 and October 2006. Of the 34 evaluable patients, none achieved a complete response (CR) and 14 achieved a partial response (PR), resulting in an overall response rate of 41.2%. The median time to progression (TTP) was 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.2~6.3 months) and the median overall survival (OS) was 9.8 months (95% CI: 4.4~12.0 months). The main hematologic toxicities were anemia and neutropenia, which were observed in 56.7% and 32.4% of the patients, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 8.1% of the patients. None of the patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 35.1% of the patients and all were grade 1/2.

CONCLUSION

This oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA regimen showed good efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile in elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer.

International Society of Geriatric Oncology Chemotherapy Taskforce: evaluation of chemotherapy in older patients--an analysis of the medical literature

The elderly comprise the majority of patients with cancer and are the recipients of the greatest amount of chemotherapy. Unfortunately, there is a lack of data to make evidence-based decisions with regard to chemotherapy. This is due to the minimal participation of older patients in clinical trials and that trials have not systematically evaluated chemotherapy. This article reviews the available information with regard to chemotherapy and aging provided by a task force of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG). Due to the lack of prospective data, the conclusions and recommendations made are a consensus of the participants. Extrapolation of data from younger to older patients is necessary, particularly to those patients older than 80 years, for which data is almost entirely lacking. The classes of drugs reviewed include alkylators, antimetabolites, anthracyclines, taxanes, camptothecins, and epipodophyllotoxins. Clinical trials need to incorporate an analysis of chemotherapy in terms of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of aging. In addition, data already accumulated need to be reanalyzed by age to aid in the management of the older cancer patient.