1
|
Vilmun BM, Napolitano G, Lauritzen A, Lynge E, Lillholm M, Nielsen MB, Vejborg I. Clinical Significance of Combined Density and Deep-Learning-Based Texture Analysis for Stratifying the Risk of Short-Term and Long-Term Breast Cancer in Screening. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:1823. [PMID: 39202310 PMCID: PMC11353655 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14161823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2024] [Revised: 08/14/2024] [Accepted: 08/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Assessing a woman's risk of breast cancer is important for personalized screening. Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer, but parenchymal texture patterns offer additional information which cannot be captured by density. We aimed to combine BI-RADS density score 4th Edition and a deep-learning-based texture score to stratify women in screening and compare rates among the combinations. This retrospective study cohort study included 216,564 women from a Danish populations-based screening program. Baseline mammograms were evaluated using BI-RADS density scores (1-4) and a deep-learning texture risk model, with scores categorized into four quartiles (1-4). The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for screen-detected, interval, and long-term cancer were adjusted for age, year of screening and screening clinic. Compared with subgroup B1-T1, the highest IRR for screen-detected cancer were within the T4 category (3.44 (95% CI: 2.43-4.82)-4.57 (95% CI: 3.66-5.76)). IRR for interval cancer was highest in the BI-RADS 4 category (95% CI: 5.36 (1.77-13.45)-16.94 (95% CI: 9.93-30.15)). IRR for long-term cancer increased both with increasing BI-RADS and increasing texture reaching 5.15 (4.31-6.16) for the combination of B4-T4 compared with B1-T1. Deep-learning-based texture analysis combined with BI-RADS density categories can reveal subgroups with increased rates beyond what density alone can ascertain, suggesting the potential of combining texture and density to improve risk stratification in breast cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bolette Mikela Vilmun
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Breast Examinations, Copenhagen University Hospital—Herlev and Gentofte, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 1, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - George Napolitano
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Andreas Lauritzen
- Department of Breast Examinations, Copenhagen University Hospital—Herlev and Gentofte, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 1, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
- Biomediq A/S, Strandlinien 59, 2791 Dragør, Denmark
| | - Elsebeth Lynge
- Nykøbing Falster Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Fjordvej 15, 4300 Nykøbing Falster, Denmark
| | - Martin Lillholm
- Biomediq A/S, Strandlinien 59, 2791 Dragør, Denmark
- Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 1, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael Bachmann Nielsen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ilse Vejborg
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Breast Examinations, Copenhagen University Hospital—Herlev and Gentofte, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 1, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ye Z, Nguyen TL, Dite GS, MacInnis RJ, Hopper JL, Li S. Mammographic Texture versus Conventional Cumulus Measure of Density in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction: A Literature Review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024; 33:989-998. [PMID: 38787323 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-1365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Mammographic textures show promise as breast cancer risk predictors, distinct from mammographic density. Yet, there is a lack of comprehensive evidence to determine the relative strengths as risk predictor of textures and density and the reliability of texture-based measures. We searched the PubMed database for research published up to November 2023, which assessed breast cancer risk associations [odds ratios (OR)] with texture-based measures and percent mammographic density (PMD), and their discrimination [area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC)], using same datasets. Of 11 publications, for textures, six found stronger associations (P < 0.05) with 11% to 508% increases on the log scale by study, and four found weaker associations (P < 0.05) with 14% to 100% decreases, compared with PMD. Risk associations remained significant when fitting textures and PMD together. Eleven of 17 publications found greater AUCs for textures than PMD (P < 0.05); increases were 0.04 to 0.25 by study. Discrimination from PMD and these textures jointly was significantly higher than from PMD alone (P < 0.05). Therefore, different textures could capture distinct breast cancer risk information, partially independent of mammographic density, suggesting their joint role in breast cancer risk prediction. Some textures could outperform mammographic density for predicting breast cancer risk. However, obtaining reliable texture-based measures necessitates addressing various issues. Collaboration of researchers from diverse fields could be beneficial for advancing this complex field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhoufeng Ye
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Tuong L Nguyen
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Gillian S Dite
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Genetic Technologies Limited, Fitzroy, Australia
| | - Robert J MacInnis
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, East Melbourne, Australia
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Shuai Li
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Edmonds CE, O'Brien SR, Conant EF. Mammographic Breast Density: Current Assessment Methods, Clinical Implications, and Future Directions. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2023; 44:35-45. [PMID: 36792272 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2022.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Mammographic breast density is widely accepted as an independent risk factor for the development of breast cancer. In addition, because dense breast tissue may mask breast malignancies, breast density is inversely related to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Given the risks associated with breast density, as well as ongoing efforts to stratify individual risk and personalize breast cancer screening and prevention, numerous studies have sought to better understand the factors that impact breast density, and to develop and implement reproducible, quantitative methods to assess mammographic density. Breast density assessments have been incorporated into risk assessment models to improve risk stratification. Recently, novel techniques for analyzing mammographic parenchymal complexity, or texture, have been explored as potential means of refining mammographic tissue-based risk assessment beyond breast density.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine E Edmonds
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Sophia R O'Brien
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Emily F Conant
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hernández A, Miranda DA, Pertuz S. Algorithms and methods for computerized analysis of mammography images in breast cancer risk assessment. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE 2021; 212:106443. [PMID: 34656014 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The computerized analysis of mammograms for the development of quantitative biomarkers is a growing field with applications in breast cancer risk assessment. Computerized image analysis offers the possibility of using different methods and algorithms to extract additional information from screening and diagnosis images to aid in the assessment of breast cancer risk. In this work, we review the algorithms and methods for the automated, computerized analysis of mammography images for the task mentioned, and discuss the main challenges that the development and improvement of these methods face today. METHODS We review the recent progress in two main branches of mammography-based risk assessment: parenchymal analysis and breast density estimation, including performance indicators of most of the studies considered. Parenchymal analysis methods are divided into feature-based methods and deep learning-based methods; breast density methods are grouped into area-based, volume-based, and breast categorization methods. Additionally, we identify the challenges that these study fields currently face. RESULTS Parenchymal analysis using deep learning algorithms are on the rise, with some studies showing high-performance indicators, such as an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of up to 90. Methods for risk assessment using breast density report a wider variety of performance indicators; however, we can also identify that the approaches using deep learning methods yield high performance in each of the subdivisions considered. CONCLUSIONS Both breast density estimation and parenchymal analysis are promising tools for the task of breast cancer risk assessment; deep learning methods have shown performance comparable or superior to the other considered methods. All methods considered face challenges such as the lack of objective comparison between them and the lack of access to datasets from different populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Said Pertuz
- Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. Our previous work showed that variation measures, which represent breast architecture derived from mammograms, were significantly associated with breast cancer. For replication purposes, we examined the association of three variation measures (variation [V], which is measured in the image domain, and P1 and p1 [a normalized version of P1], which are derived from restricted regions in the Fourier domain) with breast cancer risk in an independent population. We also compared these measures to volumetric density measures (volumetric percent density [VPD] and dense volume [DV]) from a commercial product. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We examined 514 patients with breast cancer and 1377 control patients from a screening practice who were matched for age, date of examination, mammography unit, facility, and state of residence. Spearman rank-order correlation was used to evaluate the monotonic association between measures. Breast cancer associations were estimated using conditional logistic regression, after adjustment for age and body mass index. Odds ratios were calculated per SD increment in mammographic measure. RESULTS. These variation measures were strongly correlated with VPD (correlation, 0.68-0.80) but not with DV (correlation, 0.31-0.48). Similar to previous findings, all variation measures were significantly associated with breast cancer (odds ratio per SD: 1.30 [95% CI, 1.16-1.46] for V, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.35-1.77] for P1, and 1.51 [95% CI, 1.33-1.72] for p1). Associations of volumetric density measures with breast cancer were similar (odds ratio per SD: 1.54 [95% CI, 1.33-1.78] for VPD and 1.34 [95% CI, 1.20-1.50] for DV). When DV was included with each variation measure in the same model, all measures retained significance. CONCLUSION. Variation measures were significantly associated with breast cancer risk (comparable to the volumetric density measures) but were independent of the DV.
Collapse
|
6
|
Kanbayti IH, Rae WID, McEntee MF, Gandomkar Z, Ekpo EU. Clinicopathologic breast cancer characteristics: predictions using global textural features of the ipsilateral breast mammogram. Radiol Phys Technol 2021; 14:248-261. [PMID: 34076829 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-021-00622-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Radiomic features from mammograms have been shown to predict breast cancer (BC) risk; however, their contribution to BC characteristics has not yet been explored. This study included 184 women with BC between January 2012 and April 2017. A set of 33 global radiomic features were extracted from the ipsilateral breast mammogram. Associations between radiomic features and BC characteristics were investigated by univariate logistic regression analysis, and receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was employed to evaluate the predictive performance of radiomic features. Histogram-based features (mean, 70th percentile, and 30th percentile) weakly differentiated progesterone status and tumor size (AUC range: 0.627-0.652, p ≤ 0.007). One gray level run length matrix (GLRLM)-based feature achieved an AUC of 0.68 in discriminating lymph-node status, and the fractal dimension achieved an AUC of 0.65 in predicting tumor size. After stratifying by age at BC diagnosis and baseline percent density (PD), the average predictive performance of the abovementioned features improved from 0.652 to 0.707 for baseline PD adjustment, and from 0.652 to 0.674 for age at BC diagnosis. Higher predictive performances were found for GLRLM-based features in predicting lymph-node status among younger women with high baseline PD (AUC range: 0.710-0.863), and for fractal features in predicting tumor size among patients with low PD (AUC: 0.704). Global radiomic features from the ipsilateral breast mammogram can predict lymph-node status and tumor size among certain categories of women and should be considered as a non-invasive tool for clinical decision-making in BC-affected women and for forecasting disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahem H Kanbayti
- Diagnostic Radiography Technology Department, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdul-Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
- Medical Image Optimization and Perception Group (MIOPeG), Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Campus C4 75 East Street, Sydney, NSW 2141, Australia.
| | - William I D Rae
- Medical Image Optimization and Perception Group (MIOPeG), Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Campus C4 75 East Street, Sydney, NSW 2141, Australia
| | - Mark F McEntee
- Medical Image Optimization and Perception Group (MIOPeG), Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Campus C4 75 East Street, Sydney, NSW 2141, Australia
- Department of Medicine Roinn Na Sláinte, Brookfield Health Sciences, UG 12 Áras Watson, Galway, T12 AK54, Ireland
| | - Ziba Gandomkar
- Medical Image Optimization and Perception Group (MIOPeG), Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Campus C4 75 East Street, Sydney, NSW 2141, Australia
| | - Ernest U Ekpo
- Medical Image Optimization and Perception Group (MIOPeG), Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Campus C4 75 East Street, Sydney, NSW 2141, Australia
- Orange Radiology, Laboratories and Research Centre, Calabar, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Warner ET, Rice MS, Zeleznik OA, Fowler EE, Murthy D, Vachon CM, Bertrand KA, Rosner BA, Heine J, Tamimi RM. Automated percent mammographic density, mammographic texture variation, and risk of breast cancer: a nested case-control study. NPJ Breast Cancer 2021; 7:68. [PMID: 34059687 PMCID: PMC8166859 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00272-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Percent mammographic density (PMD) is a strong breast cancer risk factor, however, other mammographic features, such as V, the standard deviation (SD) of pixel intensity, may be associated with risk. We assessed whether PMD, automated PMD (APD), and V, yielded independent associations with breast cancer risk. We included 1900 breast cancer cases and 3921 matched controls from the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and the NHSII. Using digitized film mammograms, we estimated PMD using a computer-assisted thresholding technique. APD and V were determined using an automated computer algorithm. We used logistic regression to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Median time from mammogram to diagnosis was 4.1 years (interquartile range: 1.6-6.8 years). PMD (OR per SD:1.52, 95% CI: 1.42, 1.63), APD (OR per SD:1.32, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.41), and V (OR per SD:1.32, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.40) were positively associated with breast cancer risk. Associations for APD were attenuated but remained statistically significant after mutual adjustment for PMD or V. Women in the highest quartile of both APD and V (OR vs Q1/Q1: 2.49, 95% CI: 2.02, 3.06), or PMD and V (OR vs Q1/Q1: 3.57, 95% CI: 2.79, 4.58) had increased breast cancer risk. An automated method of PMD assessment is feasible and yields similar, but somewhat weaker, estimates to a manual measure. PMD, APD and V are each independently, positively associated with breast cancer risk. Women with dense breasts and greater texture variation are at the highest relative risk of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica T Warner
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Megan S Rice
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Oana A Zeleznik
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Erin E Fowler
- Division of Population Sciences, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Divya Murthy
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Celine M Vachon
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Bernard A Rosner
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John Heine
- Division of Population Sciences, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Rulla M Tamimi
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shu H, Chiang T, Wei P, Do KA, Lesslie MD, Cohen EO, Srinivasan A, Moseley TW, Chang Sen LQ, Leung JWT, Dennison JB, Hanash SM, Weaver OO. A Deep Learning Approach to Re-create Raw Full-Field Digital Mammograms for Breast Density and Texture Analysis. Radiol Artif Intell 2021; 3:e200097. [PMID: 34350403 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021200097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2020] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To develop a computational approach to re-create rarely stored for-processing (raw) digital mammograms from routinely stored for-presentation (processed) mammograms. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, pairs of raw and processed mammograms collected in 884 women (mean age, 57 years ± 10 [standard deviation]; 3713 mammograms) from October 5, 2017, to August 1, 2018, were examined. Mammograms were split 3088 for training and 625 for testing. A deep learning approach based on a U-Net convolutional network and kernel regression was developed to estimate the raw images. The estimated raw images were compared with the originals by four image error and similarity metrics, breast density calculations, and 29 widely used texture features. Results In the testing dataset, the estimated raw images had small normalized mean absolute error (0.022 ± 0.015), scaled mean absolute error (0.134 ± 0.078) and mean absolute percentage error (0.115 ± 0.059), and a high structural similarity index (0.986 ± 0.007) for the breast portion compared with the original raw images. The estimated and original raw images had a strong correlation in breast density percentage (Pearson r = 0.946) and a strong agreement in breast density grade (Cohen κ = 0.875). The estimated images had satisfactory correlations with the originals in 23 texture features (Pearson r ≥ 0.503 or Spearman ρ ≥ 0.705) and were well complemented by processed images for the other six features. Conclusion This deep learning approach performed well in re-creating raw mammograms with strong agreement in four image evaluation metrics, breast density, and the majority of 29 widely used texture features.Keywords: Mammography, Breast, Supervised Learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Deep learning algorithms, Machine Learning AlgorithmsSee also the commentary by Chan in this issue.Supplemental material is available for this article.©RSNA, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai Shu
- Departments of Biostatistics (H.S., P.W., K.A.D.), Diagnostic Radiology (T.C., M.D.L., E.O.C., A.S., T.W.M., L.Q.C.S., J.W.T.L., O.O.W.), and Clinical Cancer Prevention (J.B.D., S.M.H.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; and Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (H.S.)
| | - Tingyu Chiang
- Departments of Biostatistics (H.S., P.W., K.A.D.), Diagnostic Radiology (T.C., M.D.L., E.O.C., A.S., T.W.M., L.Q.C.S., J.W.T.L., O.O.W.), and Clinical Cancer Prevention (J.B.D., S.M.H.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; and Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (H.S.)
| | - Peng Wei
- Departments of Biostatistics (H.S., P.W., K.A.D.), Diagnostic Radiology (T.C., M.D.L., E.O.C., A.S., T.W.M., L.Q.C.S., J.W.T.L., O.O.W.), and Clinical Cancer Prevention (J.B.D., S.M.H.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; and Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (H.S.)
| | - Kim-Anh Do
- Departments of Biostatistics (H.S., P.W., K.A.D.), Diagnostic Radiology (T.C., M.D.L., E.O.C., A.S., T.W.M., L.Q.C.S., J.W.T.L., O.O.W.), and Clinical Cancer Prevention (J.B.D., S.M.H.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; and Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (H.S.)
| | - Michele D Lesslie
- Departments of Biostatistics (H.S., P.W., K.A.D.), Diagnostic Radiology (T.C., M.D.L., E.O.C., A.S., T.W.M., L.Q.C.S., J.W.T.L., O.O.W.), and Clinical Cancer Prevention (J.B.D., S.M.H.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; and Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (H.S.)
| | - Ethan O Cohen
- Departments of Biostatistics (H.S., P.W., K.A.D.), Diagnostic Radiology (T.C., M.D.L., E.O.C., A.S., T.W.M., L.Q.C.S., J.W.T.L., O.O.W.), and Clinical Cancer Prevention (J.B.D., S.M.H.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; and Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (H.S.)
| | - Ashmitha Srinivasan
- Departments of Biostatistics (H.S., P.W., K.A.D.), Diagnostic Radiology (T.C., M.D.L., E.O.C., A.S., T.W.M., L.Q.C.S., J.W.T.L., O.O.W.), and Clinical Cancer Prevention (J.B.D., S.M.H.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; and Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (H.S.)
| | - Tanya W Moseley
- Departments of Biostatistics (H.S., P.W., K.A.D.), Diagnostic Radiology (T.C., M.D.L., E.O.C., A.S., T.W.M., L.Q.C.S., J.W.T.L., O.O.W.), and Clinical Cancer Prevention (J.B.D., S.M.H.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; and Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (H.S.)
| | - Lauren Q Chang Sen
- Departments of Biostatistics (H.S., P.W., K.A.D.), Diagnostic Radiology (T.C., M.D.L., E.O.C., A.S., T.W.M., L.Q.C.S., J.W.T.L., O.O.W.), and Clinical Cancer Prevention (J.B.D., S.M.H.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; and Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (H.S.)
| | - Jessica W T Leung
- Departments of Biostatistics (H.S., P.W., K.A.D.), Diagnostic Radiology (T.C., M.D.L., E.O.C., A.S., T.W.M., L.Q.C.S., J.W.T.L., O.O.W.), and Clinical Cancer Prevention (J.B.D., S.M.H.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; and Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (H.S.)
| | - Jennifer B Dennison
- Departments of Biostatistics (H.S., P.W., K.A.D.), Diagnostic Radiology (T.C., M.D.L., E.O.C., A.S., T.W.M., L.Q.C.S., J.W.T.L., O.O.W.), and Clinical Cancer Prevention (J.B.D., S.M.H.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; and Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (H.S.)
| | - Sam M Hanash
- Departments of Biostatistics (H.S., P.W., K.A.D.), Diagnostic Radiology (T.C., M.D.L., E.O.C., A.S., T.W.M., L.Q.C.S., J.W.T.L., O.O.W.), and Clinical Cancer Prevention (J.B.D., S.M.H.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; and Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (H.S.)
| | - Olena O Weaver
- Departments of Biostatistics (H.S., P.W., K.A.D.), Diagnostic Radiology (T.C., M.D.L., E.O.C., A.S., T.W.M., L.Q.C.S., J.W.T.L., O.O.W.), and Clinical Cancer Prevention (J.B.D., S.M.H.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030; and Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY (H.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vilmun BM, Vejborg I, Lynge E, Lillholm M, Nielsen M, Nielsen MB, Carlsen JF. Impact of adding breast density to breast cancer risk models: A systematic review. Eur J Radiol 2020; 127:109019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Revised: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
|
10
|
Wang C, Brentnall AR, Mainprize J, Yaffe M, Cuzick J, Harvey JA. External validation of a mammographic texture marker for breast cancer risk in a case-control study. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2020; 7:014003. [PMID: 32064299 PMCID: PMC7013151 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.7.1.014003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The pattern of dense tissue on a mammogram appears to provide additional information than overall density for risk assessment, but there has been little consistency in measures of texture identified. The purpose of this study is thus to validate a mammographic texture feature developed from a previous study in a new setting. Approach: A case–control study (316 invasive cases and 1339 controls) of women in Virginia, USA was used to validate a mammographic texture feature (MMTEXT) derived in a independent previous study. Analysis of predictive ability was adjusted for age, demographic factors, questionnaire risk factors (combined through the Tyrer-Cuzick model), and optionally BI-RADS breast density. Odds ratios per interquartile range (IQ-OR) in controls were estimated. Subgroup analysis assessed heterogeneity by mode of cancer detection (94 not detected by mammography). Results: MMTEXT was not a significant risk factor at 0.05 level after adjusting for classical risk factors (IQ-OR=1.16, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.46), nor after further adjustment for BI-RADS density (IQ-OR=0.92, 95%CI 0.76 to 1.10). There was weak evidence that MMTEXT was more predictive for cancers that were not detected by mammography (unadjusted for density: IQ-OR=1.46, 95%CI 0.99 to 2.15 versus 1.03, 95%CI 0.79 to 1.35, Phet 0.10; adjusted for density: IQ-OR=1.11, 95%CI 0.70 to 1.77 versus 0.76, 95%CI 0.55 to 1.05, Phet 0.21). Conclusions: MMTEXT is unlikely to be a useful imaging marker for invasive breast cancer risk assessment in women attending mammography screening. Future studies may benefit from a larger sample size to confirm this as well as developing and validating other measures of risk. This negative finding demonstrates the importance of external validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Wang
- Kingston University and St. George's, University of London, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, London, United Kingdom
| | - Adam R Brentnall
- Queen Mary University of London, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Centre for Cancer Prevention, London, United Kingdom
| | - James Mainprize
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Department of Medical Biophysics, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martin Yaffe
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Department of Medical Biophysics, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Queen Mary University of London, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Centre for Cancer Prevention, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer A Harvey
- University of Virginia, Health Sciences Center, Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pertuz S, Sassi A, Arponen O, Holli-Helenius K, Laaperi AL, Rinta-Kiikka I. Do Mammographic Systems Affect the Performance of Computerized Parenchymal Analysis? ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2020; 2019:4863-4866. [PMID: 31946950 DOI: 10.1109/embc.2019.8856948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Early identification of women at high risk of developing breast cancer is fundamental for timely diagnosis and treatment. Recently, researchers have demonstrated that the computerized analysis of parenchymal (breast tissue) patterns in mammograms can be utilized to assess the risk level of patients. However, parenchymal analysis being an image-based biomarker, its performance may be affected by the acquisition parameters of the mammogram. Unfortunately, research on the effect of the mammographic system on the performance of parenchymal analysis is very scarce. In this paper, we implement a parenchymal analysis algorithm and study the effect of different mammographic systems on its performance. We show in a setting of 286 women that the use of different mammographic systems can yield differences of up to 24% in the area under the ROC curve. Results suggest the the construction of models for risk assessment based on parenchymal analysis should incorporate the imaging technologies into the analysis.
Collapse
|
12
|
Pertuz S, Sassi A, Karivaara-Mäkelä M, Holli-Helenius K, Lääperi AL, Rinta-Kiikka I, Arponen O, Kämäräinen JK. Micro-parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2019. [DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ab42f4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
13
|
Pérez-Benito FJ, Signol F, Pérez-Cortés JC, Pollán M, Pérez-Gómez B, Salas-Trejo D, Casals M, Martínez I, LLobet R. Global parenchymal texture features based on histograms of oriented gradients improve cancer development risk estimation from healthy breasts. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE 2019; 177:123-132. [PMID: 31319940 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Revised: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The breast dense tissue percentage on digital mammograms is one of the most commonly used markers for breast cancer risk estimation. Geometric features of dense tissue over the breast and the presence of texture structures contained in sliding windows that scan the mammograms may improve the predictive ability when combined with the breast dense tissue percentage. METHODS A case/control study nested within a screening program covering 1563 women with craniocaudal and mediolateral-oblique mammograms (755 controls and the contralateral breast mammograms at the closest screening visit before cancer diagnostic for 808 cases) aging 45 to 70 from Comunitat Valenciana (Spain) was used to extract geometric and texture features. The dense tissue segmentation was performed using DMScan and validated by two experienced radiologists. A model based on Random Forests was trained several times varying the set of variables. A training dataset of 1172 patients was evaluated with a 10-stratified-fold cross-validation scheme. The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC) was the metric for the predictive ability. The results were assessed by only considering the output after applying the model to the test set, which was composed of the remaining 391 patients. RESULTS The AUC score obtained by the dense tissue percentage (0.55) was compared to a machine learning-based classifier results. The classifier, apart from the percentage of dense tissue of both views, firstly included global geometric features such as the distance of dense tissue to the pectoral muscle, dense tissue eccentricity or the dense tissue perimeter, obtaining an accuracy of 0.56. By the inclusion of a global feature based on local histograms of oriented gradients, the accuracy of the classifier was significantly improved (0.61). The number of well-classified patients was improved up to 236 when it was 208. CONCLUSION Relative geometric features of dense tissue over the breast and histograms of standardized local texture features based on sliding windows scanning the whole breast improve risk prediction beyond the dense tissue percentage adjusted by geometrical variables. Other classifiers could improve the results obtained by the conventional Random Forests used in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Francois Signol
- Institute of Computer Technology, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n, València, 46022 Spain.
| | - Juan-Carlos Pérez-Cortés
- Institute of Computer Technology, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n, València, 46022 Spain.
| | - Marina Pollán
- National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Monforte de lemos, 5, Madrid, 28029 Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública - CIBERESP), Carlos III Institute of Health, Monforte de Lemos, 5, Madrid, 28029 Spain.
| | - Beatriz Pérez-Gómez
- National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Monforte de lemos, 5, Madrid, 28029 Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública - CIBERESP), Carlos III Institute of Health, Monforte de Lemos, 5, Madrid, 28029 Spain.
| | - Dolores Salas-Trejo
- Valencian Breast Cancer Screening Program, General Directorate of Public Health, València, Spain; Centro Superior de Investigación en Salud Pública CSISP, FISABIO, València, Spain.
| | - María Casals
- Valencian Breast Cancer Screening Program, General Directorate of Public Health, València, Spain; Centro Superior de Investigación en Salud Pública CSISP, FISABIO, València, Spain.
| | - Inmaculada Martínez
- Valencian Breast Cancer Screening Program, General Directorate of Public Health, València, Spain; Centro Superior de Investigación en Salud Pública CSISP, FISABIO, València, Spain.
| | - Rafael LLobet
- Institute of Computer Technology, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n, València, 46022 Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mao N, Yin P, Wang Q, Liu M, Dong J, Zhang X, Xie H, Hong N. Added Value of Radiomics on Mammography for Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Feasibility Study. J Am Coll Radiol 2019; 16:485-491. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.09.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 09/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
15
|
Fowler EEE, Smallwood A, Miltich C, Drukteinis J, Sellers TA, Heine J. Generalized breast density metrics. Phys Med Biol 2018; 64:015006. [PMID: 30523909 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaf307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Mammograms represent data that can inform future risk of breast cancer. Data from two case-control study populations were analyzed. Population 1 included women (N = 180 age matched case-control pairs) with mammograms acquired with one indirect x-ray conversion mammography unit. Population 2 included women (N = 319 age matched case-control pairs) with mammograms acquired from 6 direct x-ray conversion units. The Fourier domain was decomposed into n concentric rings (radial spatial frequency bands). The power in each ring was summarized giving a set of measures. We investigated images in raw, for presentation (processed) and calibrated representations and made comparison with the percentage of breast density (BD) determined with the operator assisted Cumulus method. Breast cancer associations were evaluated with conditional logistic regression, adjusted for body mass index and ethnicity. Odds ratios (ORs), per standard deviation increase derived from the respective breast density distributions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. A measure from a lower radial frequency ring, corresponding 0.083-0.166 cycles mm-1 and BD had significant associations with risk in both populations. In Population 1, the Fourier measure produced significant associations in each representation: OR = 1.76 (1.33, 2.32) for raw; OR = 1.43 (1.09, 1.87) for processed; and OR = 1.68 (1.26, 2.25) for calibrated. BD also provided significant associations in Population 1: OR = 1.72 (1.27, 2.33). In Population 2, the Fourier measure produced significant associations for each representation as well: OR = 1.47 (1.19, 1.80) for raw; OR = 1.38 (1.15, 1.67) for processed; and OR = 1.42 (1.15, 1.75) for calibrated. BD provided significant associations in Population 2: OR = 1.43 (1.17, 1.76). Other coincident spectral regions were also predictive of case-control status. In sum, generalized breast density measures were significantly associated with breast cancer in both FFDM technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E E Fowler
- Cancer Epidemiology Department, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Incorporating Breast Anatomy in Computational Phenotyping of Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns for Breast Cancer Risk Estimation. Sci Rep 2018; 8:17489. [PMID: 30504841 PMCID: PMC6269457 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35929-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Accepted: 11/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
We retrospectively analyzed negative screening digital mammograms from 115 women who developed unilateral breast cancer at least one year later and 460 matched controls. Texture features were estimated in multiple breast regions defined by an anatomically-oriented polar grid, and were weighted by their position and underlying dense versus fatty tissue composition. Elastic net regression with cross-validation was performed and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to evaluate ability to predict breast cancer. We also compared our anatomy-augmented features to current state-of-the-art in which parenchymal texture was assessed without considering breast anatomy and evaluated the added value of the extracted features to breast density, body-mass-index (BMI) and age as baseline predictors. Our anatomy-augmented texture features resulted in higher discriminatory capacity (AUC = 0.63 vs. AUC = 0.59) when breast anatomy was not considered (p = 0.021), with dense tissue regions and the central breast quadrant being more heavily weighted. Texture also improved baseline models (from AUC = 0.62 to AUC = 0.67, p = 0.029). Our findings suggest that incorporating breast anatomy information could augment imaging markers of breast cancer risk with the potential to improve personalized breast cancer risk assessment.
Collapse
|
17
|
Spjuth O, Karlsson A, Clements M, Humphreys K, Ivansson E, Dowling J, Eklund M, Jauhiainen A, Czene K, Grönberg H, Sparén P, Wiklund F, Cheddad A, Pálsdóttir Þ, Rantalainen M, Abrahamsson L, Laure E, Litton JE, Palmgren J. E-Science technologies in a workflow for personalized medicine using cancer screening as a case study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 24:950-957. [PMID: 28444384 PMCID: PMC7651972 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocx038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2016] [Accepted: 03/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective We provide an e-Science perspective on the workflow from risk factor discovery and classification of disease to evaluation of personalized intervention programs. As case studies, we use personalized prostate and breast cancer screenings. Materials and Methods We describe an e-Science initiative in Sweden, e-Science for Cancer Prevention and Control (eCPC), which supports biomarker discovery and offers decision support for personalized intervention strategies. The generic eCPC contribution is a workflow with 4 nodes applied iteratively, and the concept of e-Science signifies systematic use of tools from the mathematical, statistical, data, and computer sciences. Results The eCPC workflow is illustrated through 2 case studies. For prostate cancer, an in-house personalized screening tool, the Stockholm-3 model (S3M), is presented as an alternative to prostate-specific antigen testing alone. S3M is evaluated in a trial setting and plans for rollout in the population are discussed. For breast cancer, new biomarkers based on breast density and molecular profiles are developed and the US multicenter Women Informed to Screen Depending on Measures (WISDOM) trial is referred to for evaluation. While current eCPC data management uses a traditional data warehouse model, we discuss eCPC-developed features of a coherent data integration platform. Discussion and Conclusion E-Science tools are a key part of an evidence-based process for personalized medicine. This paper provides a structured workflow from data and models to evaluation of new personalized intervention strategies. The importance of multidisciplinary collaboration is emphasized. Importantly, the generic concepts of the suggested eCPC workflow are transferrable to other disease domains, although each disease will require tailored solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ola Spjuth
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Andreas Karlsson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mark Clements
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Keith Humphreys
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Emma Ivansson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jim Dowling
- School of Information and Communication Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Eklund
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alexandra Jauhiainen
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Early Clinical Biometrics, AstraZeneca AB R&D, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Henrik Grönberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pär Sparén
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Wiklund
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Abbas Cheddad
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden
| | - Þorgerður Pálsdóttir
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Nordic Information for Action e-Science Center, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mattias Rantalainen
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Linda Abrahamsson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Erwin Laure
- School of Computer Science and Communication, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan-Eric Litton
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure-European Research Infrastructure Consortium, Graz, Austria
| | - Juni Palmgren
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Swedish e-Science Research Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Vinnicombe SJ. Breast density: why all the fuss? Clin Radiol 2017; 73:334-357. [PMID: 29273225 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2017] [Accepted: 11/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
The term "breast density" or mammographic density (MD) denotes those components of breast parenchyma visualised at mammography that are denser than adipose tissue. MD is composed of a mixture of epithelial and stromal components, notably collagen, in variable proportions. MD is most commonly assessed in clinical practice with the time-honoured method of visual estimation of area-based percent density (PMD) on a mammogram, with categorisation into quartiles. The computerised semi-automated thresholding method, Cumulus, also yielding area-based percent density, is widely used for research purposes; however, the advent of fully automated volumetric methods developed as a consequence of the widespread use of digital mammography (DM) and yielding both absolute and percent dense volumes, has resulted in an explosion of interest in MD recently. Broadly, the importance of MD is twofold: firstly, the presence of marked MD significantly reduces mammographic sensitivity for breast cancer, even with state-of-the-art DM. Recognition of this led to the formation of a powerful lobby group ('Are You Dense') in the US, as a consequence of which 32 states have legislated for mandatory disclosure of MD to women undergoing mammography. Secondly, it is now widely accepted that MD is in itself a risk factor for breast cancer, with a four-to sixfold increased relative risk in women with PMD in the highest quintile compared to those with PMD in the lowest quintile. Consequently, major research efforts are underway to assess whether use of MD could provide a major step forward towards risk-adapted, personalised breast cancer prevention, imaging, and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J Vinnicombe
- Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Level 7, Mailbox 4, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wang C, Brentnall AR, Cuzick J, Harkness EF, Evans DG, Astley S. A novel and fully automated mammographic texture analysis for risk prediction: results from two case-control studies. Breast Cancer Res 2017; 19:114. [PMID: 29047382 PMCID: PMC5648465 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-017-0906-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2017] [Accepted: 09/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The percentage of mammographic dense tissue (PD) is an important risk factor for breast cancer, and there is some evidence that texture features may further improve predictive ability. However, relatively little work has assessed or validated textural feature algorithms using raw full field digital mammograms (FFDM). METHOD A case-control study nested within a screening cohort (age 46-73 years) from Manchester UK was used to develop a texture feature risk score (264 cases diagnosed at the same time as mammogram of the contralateral breast, 787 controls) using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method for 112 features, and validated in a second case-control study from the same cohort but with cases diagnosed after the index mammogram (317 cases, 931 controls). Predictive ability was assessed using deviance and matched concordance index (mC). The ability to improve risk estimation beyond percent volumetric density (Volpara) was evaluated using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS The strongest features identified in the training set were "sum average" based on the grey-level co-occurrence matrix at low image resolutions (original resolution 10.628 pixels per mm; downsized by factors of 16, 32 and 64), which had a better deviance and mC than volumetric PD. In the validation study, the risk score combining the three sum average features achieved a better deviance than volumetric PD (Δχ2 = 10.55 or 6.95 if logarithm PD) and a similar mC to volumetric PD (0.58 and 0.57, respectively). The risk score added independent information to volumetric PD (Δχ2 = 14.38, p = 0.0008). CONCLUSION Textural features based on digital mammograms improve risk assessment beyond volumetric percentage density. The features and risk score developed need further investigation in other settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Wang
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ UK
| | - Adam R. Brentnall
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ UK
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ UK
| | - Elaine F. Harkness
- Centre for Imaging Science, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT UK
| | - D. Gareth Evans
- Department of Genomic Medicine, University of Manchester, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester, M13 9WL UK
| | - Susan Astley
- Centre for Imaging Science, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ali MA, Czene K, Eriksson L, Hall P, Humphreys K. Breast Tissue Organisation and its Association with Breast Cancer Risk. Breast Cancer Res 2017; 19:103. [PMID: 28877713 PMCID: PMC5586066 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-017-0894-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2017] [Accepted: 08/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Mammographic percentage density is an established and important risk factor for breast cancer. In this paper, we investigate the role of the spatial organisation of (dense vs. fatty) regions of the breast defined from mammographic images in terms of breast cancer risk. Methods We present a novel approach that provides a thorough description of the spatial organisation of different types of tissue in the breast. Each mammogram is first segmented into four regions (fatty, semi-fatty, semi-dense and dense tissue). The spatial relations between each pair of regions is described using so-called forces histograms (FHs) and summarised using functional principal component analysis. In our main analysis, association with case–control status is assessed using a Swedish population-based case–control study (1,170 cases and 1283 controls), for which digitised mammograms were available. We also carried out a small validation study based on digital images. Results For our main analysis, we obtained a global p value of 2×10−7 indicating a significant association between the spatial relations of the four segmented regions and breast cancer status after adjustment for percentage density and other important breast cancer risk factors. Our (spatial relations) score had a per standard deviation odds ratio 1.29, after accounting for overfitting (percentage density had a per standard deviation odds ratio of 1.34). The spatial relations between the fatty and semi-fatty tissue and the spatial relations between the fatty and dense tissue were the most significant. The spatial relations between the fatty and semi-fatty tissue were associated with parity and age at first birth (p=6×10−4). Using digital images, we were able to verify that the same characteristics of tissue organisation can be identified and we validated the association for the spatial relations between the fatty and semi-fatty tissue. Conclusions Our findings are consistent with the notion that fibroglandular and adipose tissue plays a role in breast cancer risk and, more specifically, they suggest that fatty tissue in the lower quadrants and the absence of density in the retromammary space, as shown in mediolateral oblique images, are protective against breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya Alsheh Ali
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Swedish eScience Research Centre (SeRC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Louise Eriksson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Oncology and Pathology, Cancer Centre Karolinska, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Keith Humphreys
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. .,Swedish eScience Research Centre (SeRC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Winkel RR, Euler-Chelpin MV, Lynge E, Diao P, Lillholm M, Kallenberg M, Forman JL, Nielsen MB, Uldall WY, Nielsen M, Vejborg I. Risk stratification of women with false-positive test results in mammography screening based on mammographic morphology and density: A case control study. Cancer Epidemiol 2017; 49:53-60. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2017.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2016] [Revised: 05/10/2017] [Accepted: 05/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
22
|
Gastounioti A, Conant EF, Kontos D. Beyond breast density: a review on the advancing role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk assessment. Breast Cancer Res 2016; 18:91. [PMID: 27645219 PMCID: PMC5029019 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-016-0755-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The assessment of a woman's risk for developing breast cancer has become increasingly important for establishing personalized screening recommendations and forming preventive strategies. Studies have consistently shown a strong relationship between breast cancer risk and mammographic parenchymal patterns, typically assessed by percent mammographic density. This paper will review the advancing role of mammographic texture analysis as a potential novel approach to characterize the breast parenchymal tissue to augment conventional density assessment in breast cancer risk estimation. MAIN TEXT The analysis of mammographic texture provides refined, localized descriptors of parenchymal tissue complexity. Currently, there is growing evidence in support of textural features having the potential to augment the typically dichotomized descriptors (dense or not dense) of area or volumetric measures of breast density in breast cancer risk assessment. Therefore, a substantial research effort has been devoted to automate mammographic texture analysis, with the aim of ultimately incorporating such quantitative measures into breast cancer risk assessment models. In this paper, we review current and emerging approaches in this field, summarizing key methodological details and related studies using novel computerized approaches. We also discuss research challenges for advancing the role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk stratification and accelerating its clinical translation. CONCLUSIONS The objective is to provide a comprehensive reference for researchers in the field of parenchymal pattern analysis in breast cancer risk assessment, while indicating key directions for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimilia Gastounioti
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Emily F Conant
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Despina Kontos
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Winkel RR, von Euler-Chelpin M, Nielsen M, Petersen K, Lillholm M, Nielsen MB, Lynge E, Uldall WY, Vejborg I. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:414. [PMID: 27387546 PMCID: PMC4936245 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2450-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2016] [Accepted: 06/21/2016] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Mammographic density is a well-established risk factor for breast cancer. We investigated the association between three different methods of measuring density or parenchymal pattern/texture on digitized film-based mammograms, and examined to what extent textural features independently and jointly with density can improve the ability to identify screening women at increased risk of breast cancer. Methods The study included 121 cases and 259 age- and time matched controls based on a cohort of 14,736 women with negative screening mammograms from a population-based screening programme in Denmark in 2007 (followed until 31 December 2010). Mammograms were assessed using the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density classification, Tabár’s classification on parenchymal patterns and a fully automated texture quantification technique. The individual and combined association with breast cancer was estimated using binary logistic regression to calculate Odds Ratios (ORs) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs). Results Cases showed significantly higher BI-RADS and texture scores on average than controls (p < 0.001). All three methods were individually able to segregate women into different risk groups showing significant ORs for BI-RADS D3 and D4 (OR: 2.37; 1.32–4.25 and 3.93; 1.88–8.20), Tabár’s PIII and PIV (OR: 3.23; 1.20–8.75 and 4.40; 2.31–8.38), and the highest quartile of the texture score (3.04; 1.63–5.67). AUCs for BI-RADS, Tabár and the texture scores (continuous) were 0.63 (0.57–0–69), 0.65 (0.59–0–71) and 0.63 (0.57–0–69), respectively. Combining two or more methods increased model fit in all combinations, demonstrating the highest AUC of 0.69 (0.63-0.74) when all three methods were combined (a significant increase from standard BI-RADS alone). Conclusion Our findings suggest that the (relative) amount of fibroglandular tissue (density) and mammographic structural features (texture/parenchymal pattern) jointly can improve risk segregation of screening women, using information already available from normal screening routine, in respect to future personalized screening strategies. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2450-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rikke Rass Winkel
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
| | - My von Euler-Chelpin
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, DK-1014, Copenhagen K, Denmark
| | - Mads Nielsen
- Department of Computer Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, DK-2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.,Biomediq, Fruebjergvej 3, DK-2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Kersten Petersen
- Department of Computer Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, DK-2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | | | - Michael Bachmann Nielsen
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Elsebeth Lynge
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, DK-1014, Copenhagen K, Denmark
| | - Wei Yao Uldall
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Ilse Vejborg
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kallenberg M, Petersen K, Nielsen M, Ng AY, Igel C, Vachon CM, Holland K, Winkel RR, Karssemeijer N, Lillholm M. Unsupervised Deep Learning Applied to Breast Density Segmentation and Mammographic Risk Scoring. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING 2016; 35:1322-1331. [PMID: 26915120 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2016.2532122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 199] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
Mammographic risk scoring has commonly been automated by extracting a set of handcrafted features from mammograms, and relating the responses directly or indirectly to breast cancer risk. We present a method that learns a feature hierarchy from unlabeled data. When the learned features are used as the input to a simple classifier, two different tasks can be addressed: i) breast density segmentation, and ii) scoring of mammographic texture. The proposed model learns features at multiple scales. To control the models capacity a novel sparsity regularizer is introduced that incorporates both lifetime and population sparsity. We evaluated our method on three different clinical datasets. Our state-of-the-art results show that the learned breast density scores have a very strong positive relationship with manual ones, and that the learned texture scores are predictive of breast cancer. The model is easy to apply and generalizes to many other segmentation and scoring problems.
Collapse
|
25
|
Hruska CB, Scott CG, Conners AL, Whaley DH, Rhodes DJ, Carter RE, O’Connor MK, Hunt KN, Brandt KR, Vachon CM. Background parenchymal uptake on molecular breast imaging as a breast cancer risk factor: a case-control study. Breast Cancer Res 2016; 18:42. [PMID: 27113363 PMCID: PMC4845425 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-016-0704-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2015] [Accepted: 04/13/2016] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Molecular breast imaging (MBI) is a functional test used for supplemental screening of women with mammographically dense breasts. Additionally, MBI depicts variable levels of background parenchymal uptake (BPU) within nonmalignant, dense fibroglandular tissue. We investigated whether BPU is a risk factor for breast cancer. METHODS We conducted a retrospective case-control study of 3027 eligible women who had undergone MBI between February 2004 and February 2014. Sixty-two incident breast cancer cases were identified. A total of 179 controls were matched on age, menopausal status, and MBI year. Two radiologists blinded to case status independently assessed BPU as one of four categories: photopenic, minimal to mild, moderate, or marked. Conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the associations (OR) of BPU categories (moderate or marked vs. minimal to mild or photopenic) and breast cancer risk, adjusted for other risk factors. RESULTS The median age was 60.2 years (range 38-86 years) for cases vs. 60.2 years (range 38-88 years) for controls (p = 0.88). Women with moderate or marked BPU had a 3.4-fold (95 % CI 1.6-7.3) and 4.8-fold (95 % CI 2.1-10.8) increased risk of breast cancer, respectively, compared with women with photopenic or minimal to mild BPU, for two radiologists. The results were similar after adjustment for BI-RADS density (OR 3.3 [95 % CI 1.6-7.2] and OR 4.6 [95 % CI 2.1-10.5]) or postmenopausal hormone use (OR 3.6 [95 % CI 1.7-7.7] and OR 5.0 [95 % CI 2.2-11.4]). The association of BPU with breast cancer remained in analyses limited to postmenopausal women only (OR 3.8 [95 % CI 1.5-9.3] and OR 4.1 [95 % CI 1.6-10.2]) and invasive breast cancer cases only (OR 3.6 [95 % CI 1.5-8.8] and OR 4.4 [95 % CI 1.7-11.1]). Variable BPU was observed among women with similar mammographic density; the distribution of BPU categories differed across density categories (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS This study provides the first evidence for BPU as a risk factor for breast cancer. Among women with dense breasts, who comprise >40 % of the screening population, BPU may serve as a functional imaging biomarker to identify the subset at greatest risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie B. Hruska
- />Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | - Christopher G. Scott
- />Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | - Amy Lynn Conners
- />Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | - Dana H. Whaley
- />Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | - Deborah J. Rhodes
- />Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | - Rickey E. Carter
- />Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | - Michael K. O’Connor
- />Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | - Katie N. Hunt
- />Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | - Kathleen R. Brandt
- />Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | - Celine M. Vachon
- />Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cheddad A, Czene K, Hall P, Humphreys K. Pectoral muscle attenuation as a marker for breast cancer risk in full-field digital mammography. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015; 24:985-91. [PMID: 25870223 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-1362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2014] [Accepted: 03/31/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mammographic percent density is an established marker of breast cancer risk. In a study of screen film mammograms, we recently reported a novel feature from the pectoral muscle region to be associated with breast cancer risk independently of area percent density (APD). We now investigate whether our novel feature is associated with risk in a study based on full-field digital mammography (FFDM). METHODS We carried out a breast cancer risk analysis using a data set of 3,552 healthy controls and 278 cases. We included three image-based measures in our analyses: volumetric percent density (VPD), APD, and the mean intensity of the pectoral muscle (MIP). The datasets comprised different machine vendors and models. In addition, the controls dataset was used to test for the association of our measures against rs10995190, in the ZNF365 gene, a genetic variant known to be associated with mammography density and breast cancer risk. RESULTS MIP was associated with breast cancer risk [per SD OR, 0.811; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.707-0.930; P = 0.0028] after adjusting for conventional covariates and VPD. It was also associated with the genetic variant rs10995190 after adjusting for VPD and other covariates (per allele effect = 0.111; 95% CI, 0.053-0.170; P = 1.8 × 10(-4)). Results were similar when adjusting for APD instead of VPD. CONCLUSION MIP is a novel mammographic marker, which is associated with breast cancer risk and the genetic variant rs10995190 independently of PD measures. IMPACT Inclusion of MIP in risk models should be considered for studies using PD from FFDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbas Cheddad
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Keith Humphreys
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Stanko JP, Easterling MR, Fenton SE. Application of Sholl analysis to quantify changes in growth and development in rat mammary gland whole mounts. Reprod Toxicol 2014; 54:129-35. [PMID: 25463529 DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2014.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2014] [Revised: 10/07/2014] [Accepted: 11/07/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Studies that utilize the rodent mammary gland (MG) as an endpoint for assessing the developmental toxicity of chemical exposures typically employ either basic dimensional measurements or developmental scoring of morphological characteristics as a means to quantify MG development. There are numerous means by which to report these developmental changes, leading to inconsistent translation across laboratories. The Sholl analysis is a method historically used for quantifying neuronal dendritic patterns. The present study describes the use of the Sholl analysis to quantify MG branching characteristics. Using this method, we were able to detect significant differences in branching density in MG of peripubertal female Sprague Dawley rats that had been exposed to vehicle or a potent estrogen. These data suggest the Sholl analysis can be an effective tool for quantitatively measuring an important characteristic of MG development and for examining associations between MG growth and density and adverse effects in the breast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason P Stanko
- National Toxicology Program Laboratory, Division of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, United States
| | | | - Suzanne E Fenton
- National Toxicology Program Laboratory, Division of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, United States.
| |
Collapse
|