First-cycle absolute neutrophil count can be used to improve chemotherapy-dose delivery and reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving adjuvant therapy: a validation study

The occurrence and risk factors of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with breast cancer not receiving primary G-CSF prophylaxis

Background

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) is a substantial side effect in chemotherapy of breast cancer patients. Administration of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) that may reduce CIN occurrence is not commonly available to many local cases.

Objectives

To investigate the occurrence of grade 4 CIN and the influencing factors in breast cancer patients not receiving G-CSF prophylaxis.

Methods

One-hundred and eighty-six newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who received a 3-weekly (neo)adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy without primary G-CSF prophylaxis were included. Grade 4 CIN was defined as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <0.5 × 103/mm3 during any chemotherapy cycle. We used logistic regression to explore the association of clinical, pathological and treatment factors with the risk of grade 4 CIN in the first cycle and in any given cycle.

Results

Fifty-seven (30.6%) patients experienced grade 4 CIN in the first cycle and 145 (78%) had it at least once during chemotherapy. In the first cycle, haemoglobin, ANC, and albumin levels were associated with grade 4 CIN (OR = 1.48, p = 0.031; OR = 0.68, p = 0.006; and OR = 2.07, p = 0.042). In any cycle, pre-treatment ANC levels and anthracycline-taxane combination regimen were associated with grade 4 CIN (OR = 0.78, p = 0.032 and OR = 3.64, p = 0.012).

Conclusions

A significant proportion of the local breast cancer cases undergoing chemotherapy without primary G-CSF prophylaxis experienced grade 4 CIN. Haemoglobin, ANC, and albumin levels are the risk factors for first cycle CIN, while pre-treatment ANC levels and anthracycline-taxane chemotherapy regimen are associated with CIN in any given cycle. These risk factors may be used to direct a recommendation of G-CSF prophylaxis to the most at-risk individuals in the local setting or other settings in similar situations.

Novel Treatment Approach for Aspergilloses by Targeting Germination

Germination of conidia is an essential process within the Aspergillus life cycle and plays a major role during the infection of hosts. Conidia are able to avoid detection by the majority of leukocytes when dormant. Germination can cause severe health problems, specifically in immunocompromised people. Aspergillosis is most often caused by Aspergillus fumigatus (A. fumigatus) and affects neutropenic patients, as well as people with cystic fibrosis (CF). These patients are often unable to effectively detect and clear the conidia or hyphae and can develop chronic non-invasive and/or invasive infections or allergic inflammatory responses. Current treatments with (tri)azoles can be very effective to combat a variety of fungal infections. However, resistance against current azoles has emerged and has been increasing since 1998. As a consequence, patients infected with resistant A. fumigatus have a reported mortality rate of 88% to 100%. Especially with the growing number of patients that harbor azole-resistant Aspergilli, novel antifungals could provide an alternative. Aspergilloses differ in defining characteristics, but germination of conidia is one of the few common denominators. By specifically targeting conidial germination with novel antifungals, early intervention might be possible. In this review, we propose several morphotypes to disrupt conidial germination, as well as potential targets. Hopefully, new antifungals against such targets could contribute to disturbing the ability of Aspergilli to germinate and grow, resulting in a decreased fungal burden on patients.

Association between the genetic polymorphisms of the pharmacokinetics of anthracycline drug and myelosuppression in a patient with breast cancer with anthracycline-based chemotherapy

AIMS

Exploring the genetic polymorphisms involved in the metabolism of anthracyclines can explain the causes of individual differences in myelosuppression during anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

MAIN METHODS

By PCR and Sanger sequencing, SNP of candidate genes participating into the pharmacokinetics of anthracycline, including chemotherapeutic drug intake (SLC22A16 rs6907567), metabolism (AKR1A1 rs2088102, CBR1 rs20572) and transfer (ABCG2 rs2231142) are detected in 194 breast cancer patients undergoing anthracycline-based postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

KEY FINDINGS

The CBR1 rs20572 (C>T) polymorphic allele, the ABCG2 rs2231142 (G>T) polymorphic allele, or the two polymorphic allele in combination significantly reduced the risk of leukopenia (OR 0.412, 95% CI 0.187-0.905, p = 0.025) and neutropenia (OR 0.354, 95% CI 0.148-0.846, p = 0.018). Either polymorphic allele T of CBR1 rs20572, or polymorphic allele C of AKR1A1 rs2088102 combined with the presence of both ABCG2 rs2231142(G>T) and SLC22A16 rs6907567(A>G) mutations were at extremely low risk of severe anemia of grades 3 and 4 (OR 0.058, 95% CI 0.006-0.554, p = 0.008, OR 0.065, 95% CI 0.006-0.689, p = 0.022, OR 0.037, 95% CI 0.004-0.36, p = 0.015, respectively).

SIGNIFICANCE

These results suggested CBR1 rs20572, ABCG2 rs2231142, SLC22A16 rs6907567 and AKR1A1 rs2088102 might be potential protective factors for the reduction of hematologic toxicity incidence during anthracycline-based chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Preoperative Nutritional Status Contributes to the Development of Neutropenia Event in Patients With Gastric Cancer Receiving CAPEOX Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk factors for ≥ grade 3 neutropenia in gastric cancer patients receiving postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: This is a retrospective study from a single tertiary referral hospital. Patients diagnosed with gastric cancer who met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. Baseline and clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were collected. Patients were followed-up for 12 months and the incidence of neutropenia were recorded. Factors associated with neutropenia of chemotherapy in cycle 1 were investigated. Results: A total of 202 patients with gastric cancer were included. All patients received oxaliplatin plus oral capecitabine (CAPEOX) as the adjuvant chemotherapy. The incidence of ≥ grade 3 neutropenia is 11.9% (24/202) in cycle 1 among all patients. In multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for ≥ grade 3 neutropenia were serum prealbumin level (p = 0.041), prognostic nutritional index (PNI) (p = 0.049) and pre-cycle neutrophil count (p = 0.007). Conclusions: Our findings for the first time showed that nutritional parameter as prealbumin level and PNI are independent risk factors for neutropenia in gastric cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. This may provide evidence for further investigation on prophylaxis use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in selected high-risk patients to prevent sever neutropenia in cycle 1 of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Does Older Age Lead to Higher Risk for Neutropenia in Patients Treated with Paclitaxel?

PURPOSE

There is ongoing concern regarding increased toxicity from paclitaxel in elderly patients, particularly of severe neutropenia. Yet, data so far is controversial and this concern is not supported by a clinically relevant age-dependent difference in pharmacokinetics (PK) of paclitaxel. This study assessed whether age is associated with increased risk for paclitaxel-induced neutropenia.

METHODS

Paclitaxel plasma concentration-time data, pooled from multiple different studies, was combined with available respective neutrophil count data during the first treatment cycle. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) data was modeled using a non-linear mixed effects approach and a semiphysiological neutropenia model, where systemic paclitaxel exposure was linked to reduced proliferation of neutrophils. The impact of age was evaluated on relevant variables in the model, using a significance threshold of p < 0.005.

RESULTS

Paclitaxel PK-PD data was evaluated from 300 patients, with a median age of 65 years (range 23-84 years), containing 116 patients ≥70 years (39%). First cycle neutrophil counts were adequately described by a threshold effect model of paclitaxel on the proliferation rate of neutrophils. Age as a continuous or dichotomous variable (≥70 versus <70 years) did not significantly impact sensitivity of the bone marrow to paclitaxel nor the average maturation time of neutrophils (both p > 0.005), causing a decline in the respective interindividual variability of <1%.

CONCLUSION

Results from this large retrospective patient cohort do not suggest elderly patients to be at an increased risk of developing paclitaxel-associated neutropenia during the first treatment cycle. Reflexive dose reductions of paclitaxel in elderly patients are unlikely to improve the risk of severe neutropenia and may be deleterious.

Patient factors and their impact on neutropenic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neutropenia is associated with an increased risk of mortality and hospitalisation. Strategies, including the prescribing of colony-stimulating growth factors (CSFs), are adopted when a high risk (> 20%) of neutropenic complications are seen in the clinical trial setting. With a diverse treatment population that may differ from the patient groups recruited to studies, appropriate prescribing decisions by clinicians are essential. At present, results are conflicting from studies evaluating the risks of certain patient attributes on neutropenic events; we aimed to aggregate these associations to guide future management.

DESIGN

A systematic review with a meta-analysis was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Studies were identified through a literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases from inception to December 1, 2017. Studies were included into a meta-analysis if they adjusted for confounders; analyses were conducted in STATA v 15.1 SE.

RESULTS

A total of 4415 articles were retrieved by the search with 37 meeting the inclusion criteria and 12 eligible for meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted for increasing age and yielded a pooled odds ratio of 1.39 (1.11, 1.76, I2 = 24.1%), in our subgroup analysis of 4814 patients. Odds ratios for studies were pooled that reported associations for one co-morbidity compared to none and resulted in an overall odds of 1.54 (CI 1.09-2.09, I2 = 13.1%), including 9189 patients in total.

CONCLUSIONS

Results can enhance current guidance in prescribing primary prophylaxis for treatments that either fall marginally under the internationally recognised 20% neutropenia risk.

Treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving biosimilar filgrastim for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced/febrile neutropaenia: Results from the MONITOR-GCSF study

Objective

Real‐world evidence data on the use of granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are limited. MONITOR‐GCSF is a pan‐European, multicentre, prospective, non‐interventional study designed to describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients receiving biosimilar filgrastim in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy‐induced neutropaenia (CIN) and febrile neutropaenia (FN).

Methods

In this subanalysis, patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes are described for 345 patients with stage 3 or 4 NSCLC, receiving up to six chemotherapy cycles. Patients were treated with biosimilar filgrastim as per their treating physician's best judgement.

Results

CIN (any grade) occurred in 13.6% of patients in Cycle 1 and in 36.5% of patients in all cycles. FN occurred in 1.4% of patients in Cycle 1 and in 5.2% of patients in all cycles. Grade 3–4 FN occurred in 1.2% of patients in Cycle 1 and in 3.8% of patients in all cycles.

Conclusion

Results show that in real‐life practice in patients with NSCLC, biosimilar filgrastim has similar effectiveness and safety to the known effectiveness and safety profile of reference filgrastim, supporting the use of biosimilar filgrastim for the real‐world treatment of neutropaenia in patients with NSCLC.

Discovering Associations of Adverse Events with Pharmacotherapy in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Modified Apriori Algorithm

AIM

To explore the associations between adverse events and pharmacotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

16,527 patients with non-small cell lung cancer admitted to the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2016, were included in the study. Their medication and laboratory examinations data were extracted from the medical records. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 were utilized for adverse events reporting. A new association algorithm was developed based on Apriori algorithm and used to investigate the associations between drugs and adverse events. In addition, a statistical comparison was conducted to compare the modified Apriori algorithm with the conventional Apriori algorithm.

RESULTS

Different types and levels of adverse events were identified from the abnormal laboratory findings. The three most common adverse events were hypocalcemia, elevated creatine phosphokinase, and hypertriglyceridemia. In addition, using the modified Apriori algorithm, 380 association rules were found between adverse events and chemotherapy. Moreover, the statistical comparison of the two methods demonstrated that the modified Apriori algorithm was more advantageous in analyzing the correlation between drugs and adverse events than the conventional Apriori algorithm.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified Apriori algorithm can be used to more efficiently associate pharmacotherapy with adverse events. Based on the modified Apriori algorithm, meaningful association rules between drugs and adverse events were found, demonstrating a promising way to reveal the risk factors of adverse events during cancer treatment.

In Silico Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Optimization for Antimitogram-Based Clinical Trials

Antimitograms are prototype in vitro tests for evaluating chemotherapeutic efficacy using patient-derived primary cancer cells. These tests might help optimize treatment from a pharmacodynamic standpoint by guiding treatment selection. However, they are technically challenging and require refinements and trials to demonstrate benefit to be widely used. In this study, we performed simulations aimed at exploring how to validate antimitograms and how to complement them by pharmacokinetic optimization. A generic model of advanced cancer, including pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic monitoring, was used to link dosing schedules with progression-free survival (PFS), as built from previously validated modules. This model was used to explore different possible situations in terms of pharmacokinetic variability, pharmacodynamic variability, and antimitogram performance. The model recapitulated tumor dynamics and standalone therapeutic drug monitoring efficacy consistent with published clinical results. Simulations showed that combining pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic optimization should increase PFS in a synergistic fashion. Simulated data were then used to compute required clinical trial sizes, which were 30% to 90% smaller when pharmacokinetic optimization was added to pharmacodynamic optimization. This improvement was observed even when pharmacokinetic optimization alone exhibited only modest benefit. Overall, our work illustrates the synergy derived from combining antimitograms with therapeutic drug monitoring, permitting a disproportionate reduction of the trial size required to prove a benefit on PFS. Accordingly, we suggest that strategies with benefits too small for standalone clinical trials could be validated in combination in a similar manner.Significance: This work offers a method to reduce the number of patients needed for a clinical trial to prove the hypothesized benefit of a drug to progression-free survival, possibly easing opportunities to evaluate combinations. Cancer Res; 78(7); 1873-82. ©2018 AACR.

Trajectory of absolute neutrophil counts in patients treated with pegfilgrastim on the day of chemotherapy versus the day after chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Risk of infection increases with severity and duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN). Pegfilgrastim is approved for use on the day after chemotherapy to reduce incidence of infection, as manifested by febrile neutropenia (FN), in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. In this study, we compared severity and duration of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) suppression in patients who received pegfilgrastim on the same day as chemotherapy versus the next day.

METHODS

We combined individual patient data from four Amgen-sponsored clinical trials in which patients with cancer were randomized to receive pegfilgrastim either the same day as chemotherapy or the next day. Severity and duration of ANC suppression were calculated using area over the curve (AOC, the area over the ANC-time response curve and below a given clinical threshold). AOC of ANC and incidences of CIN and FN were compared by day of pegfilgrastim use.

RESULTS

The analysis included 95 same-day patients and 97 next-day patients. Despite similar ANC at baseline, ANC at nadir was higher among next-day patients than same-day patients. Mean AOC of ANC (cutoff 0.5 × 10(9)/L) among next-day patients was lower by 0.30 (95 % confidence interval: 0.16, 0.43) 10(9)/L × day than same-day patients in cycle 1. Next-day patients had lower incidences of CIN than same-day patients, but there were no significant differences in incidences of FN.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who received pegfilgrastim the day after chemotherapy had less severe and shorter suppression of ANC than patients who received pegfilgrastim the same day as chemotherapy.

Comparison of absolute neutrophil to CD4 lymphocyte values as a marker of immunosuppression in cancer patients on cytotoxic chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The absolute neutrophil count (ANC) is currently used to assess immune status of patients on cytotoxic therapy. The CD4 lymphocytes have also been shown to be of importance in protection against opportunistic infections. In people of African descent a low baseline ANC has been recorded and the currently accepted neutropaenic threshold may not be appropriate.

OBJECTIVE

This study was aimed at comparing the change in ANC to CD4 lymphocyte count in adult cancer patients following chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty chemotherapy-naive patients with various malignancies had their ANC and CD4 lymphocyte counts done at days 0 and 12 of the first cycle of various chemotherapeutic regimens. The paired sample t-test was done to assess the significance between these values. Socio-demographic data was obtained using questionnaires.

RESULTS

ANC and CD4 pre-chemotherapy differed significantly from their post-chemotherapy values (p=0.001) for both parameters). The CD4 count showed significant reduction in patients with Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (p=0.043), colorectal carcinoma (p=0.037) and other malignancies (p=0.030), while the ANC did not. Patients who had received COPP for Hodgkin's lymphoma also had significant CD4 depletion (p=0.037).

CONCLUSION

The CD4 lymphocyte count may be a more suitable parameter than ANC, for monitoring immuno-depletion in cancer patients on cytotoxic chemotherapy. Further studies are required to validate these findings, especially in the Negroid population.

Predictive factors for neutropenia after docetaxel-based systemic chemotherapy in Korean patients with castration- resistant prostate cancer

The aim of this study was to determine predictive factors for neutropenia after docetaxel-based systemic chemotherapy in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The study included 40 Korean CRPC patients who were treated with several cycles of docetaxel plus prednisolone from May 2005 to May 2012. Patients were evaluated for neutropenia risk factors and for the incidence of neutropenia. In this study, nine out of forty patients (22.5%) developed neutropenia during the first cycle of docetaxel-based systemic chemotherapy. Four experienced grade 2, three grade 3, and one grade 4 neutropenia. Multivariate analysis showed that pretreatment white blood cell (WBC) count (p=0.042), pretreatment neutrophil count (p=0.015), pretreatment serum creatinine level (p=0.027), and pretreatment serum albumin level (p=0.017) were significant predictive factors for neutropenia. In conclusion, pretreatment WBC counts, neutrophil counts, serum creatinine levels, and serum albumin levels proved to be significant independent risk factors for the development of neutropenia induced by docetaxel-based systemic chemotherapy in patients with CRPC.

Risk factors for febrile neutropenia among patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy: A systematic review

Neutropenia with fever (febrile neutropenia [FN]) is a serious consequence of myelosuppressive chemotherapy that usually results in hospitalization and the need for intravenous antibiotics. FN may result in dose reductions, delays, or even discontinuation of chemotherapy, which, in turn, may compromise patient outcomes. It is important to identify which patients are at high risk for developing FN so that patients can receive optimal chemotherapy while their risk for FN is appropriately managed. A systematic review of the literature was performed to gain a comprehensive and updated understanding of FN risk factors. Older age, poor performance status, advanced disease, certain comorbidities, low baseline blood cell counts, low body surface area/body mass index, treatment with myelosuppressive chemotherapies, and specific genetic polymorphisms correlated with the risk of developing FN. Albeit many studies have analyzed FN risk factors, there are several limitations, including the retrospective nature and small sample sizes of most studies.

Docetaxel and cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer: primary prophylaxis with G-CSF is required

SUMMARY Aim: To determine the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) associated with the use of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) as adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer (EBC) and also the grade of neutropenia after cycle 1 of TC. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective audit of women with EBC treated with TC between January 2010 and July 2011, recruited from seven Australian centers. Results: Of a total of 368 previously untreated women with EBC who received TC, 300 were evaluable for FN and 304 were evaluable for neutropenia after cycle 1 of TC. Overall, 73 (24.3%) patients developed FN. The incidence of FN was highest after cycle 1 of TC and was significantly higher in women under 65 years of age (p = 0.007). There was significant variation in the incidence of FN between participating sites (p < 0.001). Eight patients (2.6%) developed grade 3 neutropenia and 191 patients (62.8%) developed grade 4 neutropenia. Conclusion: TC as adjuvant chemotherapy for EBC is associated with a 24.3% incidence of FN and a 65.4% incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. The high incidence of FN and severe neutropenia warrant the use of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis.

Neutropenia Prediction Based on First-Cycle Blood Counts Using a FOS-3NN Classifier

Background. Delivery of full doses of adjuvant chemotherapy on schedule is key to optimal breast cancer outcomes. Neutropenia is a serious complication of chemotherapy and a common barrier to this goal, leading to dose reductions or delays in treatment. While past research has observed correlations between complete blood count data and neutropenic events, a reliable method of classifying breast cancer patients into low- and high-risk groups remains elusive. Patients and Methods. Thirty-five patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer under the care of a single oncologist are examined in this study. FOS-3NN stratifies patient risk based on complete blood count data after the first cycle of treatment. All classifications are independent of breast cancer subtype and clinical markers, with risk level determined by the kinetics of patient blood count response to the first cycle of treatment. Results. In an independent test set of patients unseen by FOS-3NN, 19 out of 21 patients were correctly classified (Fisher's exact test probability P < 0.00023 [2 tailed], Matthews' correlation coefficient +0.83). Conclusions. We have developed a model that accurately predicts neutropenic events in a population treated with adjuvant chemotherapy in the first cycle of a 6-cycle treatment.

Ocorrência de neutropenia em mulheres com câncer de mama durante tratamento quimioterápico

OBJETIVO: Analisar a ocorrência de neutropenia induzida por drogas utilizadas no tratamento quimioterápico de mulheres com câncer de mama. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo, com avaliação de 72 prontuários, durante 2003-2006. RESULTADOS: Dos 558 ciclos de quimioterapia realizados, foram registrados 152 eventos adversos nos períodos de neoadjuvância e adjuvância, totalizando 43 casos por toxicidade hematológica. Quanto à ocorrência de neutropenia, 43% apresentaram, pelo menos, um episódio durante o tratamento. Testes de hipótese para comparar as médias dos valores de glóbulos brancos entre as mulheres que apresentaram ou não neutropenia apontaram para valores estatisticamente significantes, nos ciclos dois e três da neoadjuvância e nos ciclos dois, três e quatro da adjuvância. CONCLUSÃO: A neutropenia, tanto na neoadjuvância como na adjuvância ocorreu a partir do segundo ciclo e manteve-se durante o tratamento e foi estatisticamente significante quando foram compadas as mulheres que tiveram ou não esta ocorrência.

Risk assessment model for first-cycle chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with solid tumours

LÓPEZ-POUSA A., RIFÀ J., CASAS DE TEJERINA A., GONZÁLEZ-LARRIBA J.L., IGLESIAS C., GASQUET J.A. & CARRATO A. (2010) European Journal of Cancer CareRisk assessment model for first-cycle chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with solid tumours

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, the major dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy, is directly associated with concomitant morbidity, mortality and health-care costs. The use of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors may reduce the incidence and duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, and is recommended in high-risk patients. The objective of this study was to develop a model to predict first-cycle chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (defined as neutropenia grade ≥3, with or without body temperature ≥38°C) in patients with solid tumours. A total of 1194 patients [56% women; mean age 58 ± 12 years; 94% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status ≤1] with solid tumours were included in a multi-centre non-interventional prospective cohort study. A predictive logistic regression model was developed. Several factors were found to influence chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Higher ECOG status values increased toxicity (ECOG 2 vs. 0, P= 0.003; odds ratio 3.12), whereas baseline lymphocyte (P= 0.011; odds ratio 0.67) and neutrophil counts (P= 0.026; odds ratio 0.90) were inversely related to neutropenia occurrence. Sex and treatment intention also significantly influenced chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (P= 0.012). The sensitivity and specificity of the model were 63% and 67% respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 17% and 94% respectively. Once validated, this model should be a useful tool for clinical decision making.

A general chemotherapy myelotoxicity score to predict febrile neutropenia in hematological malignancies

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is the most common adverse effect of chemotherapy and is often complicated by febrile neutropenia (FN). The objective of this study is to validate a classification of aggressiveness of a chemotherapy regimen and to evaluate its usefulness in a risk prediction model of FN in patients with hematological cancer at the beginning of a chemotherapy cycle.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred and sixty-six patients were prospectively enrolled and followed during 1053 cycles. Relevant patient informations were collected at the beginning of the first cycle and the number of days of FN were counted in the follow-up [dichotomized (no FN versus >or= 1 day of FN)].

RESULTS

Aggressive chemotherapy regimen is the major predictor of FN [odds ratio 5.2 (3.2-8.4)]. The other independent predictors are the underlying disease, an involvement of bone marrow, body surface <or= 2 m(2), a baseline monocyte count <150/microl and the interaction between the first cycle in the same treatment line and a baseline hemoglobin dosage. A rule of prediction of FN was computed with these characteristics: sensitivity 78.6%, specificity 62.3%, positive predictive value 42.7% and negative predictive value 89.1%.

CONCLUSION

Further studies are needed to validate this score.

Impact of neutropenia on delivering planned chemotherapy for solid tumours

The ability to deliver the planned dose and intensity of chemotherapy (the amount of drug administered/unit of time) is important for tumour control and survival. In clinical practice, neutropenic events are the main limiting factors towards achieving this aim. We assessed the impact of neutropenic events [defined as either hospital admission due to febrile neutropenia (FN), dose delay > or =7 days due to neutropenia or dose reduction of > or =15% due to neutropenia] on dose intensity (DI) in a random sample of 50 patients with various solid tumours. Fifty patients who received systemic chemotherapy for solid tumours were assessed as part of this study. Using a pre-programmed data collection tool via computer, retrospective data were collected. The neutropenic events were defined before data collection. The patient characteristics are as follows: breast 26 patients (stage I-6; II-3; III-17), colorectal 16 patients (stage I-6; II-3; III-7) and others 8 patients [small cell lung cancer (SCLC), ovarian, peritoneal and oesophageal cancers]. The chemotherapy regimens used are Flourouracil, Epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC) 14 patients (28%); 5 Flourouracil/folinic acid (5FU/FA) 12 patients (24%); Adriamycin, cyclophosphamide (AC) 11 patients (22%); other 13 patients (26%). Neutropenic events occurred in a significant proportion of patients (overall 40%; breast 26%; colorectal 56%; others 25% of patients) and in a significant number (21%) of chemotherapy cycles. Overall, dose delay was the most common neutropenic event, occurring in 30% of patients (breast 32%; colorectal 31%; others 25%% of patients). Dose reduction due to neutropenia was noted in 20% of patients (breast 12% colorectal 38% others 13%% of patients). Hospitalizations due to FN affected 8% of patients. Only two patients had granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) as treatment for two cycles. Relative dose intensity (RDI) in patients with neutropenic events was 81% compared with 92% in patients without an event and the results were consistent for different cancers. In total, 65% of patients who experienced one neutropenic event were likely to experience subsequent events. In conclusion neutropenic events have a significant impact on the ability to deliver planned DI. Hence, proactive use of GCSF has the potential to improve adherence to the planned schedule of chemotherapy.

Canadian supportive care recommendations for the management of neutropenia in patients with cancer

Hematologic toxicities of cancer chemotherapy are common and often limit the ability to provide treatment in a timely and dose-intensive manner. These limitations may be of utmost importance in the adjuvant and curative intent settings. Hematologic toxicities may result in febrile neutropenia, infections, fatigue, and bleeding, all of which may lead to additional complications and prolonged hospitalization. The older cancer patient and patients with significant comorbidities may be at highest risk of neutropenic complications. Colony-stimulating factors (csfs) such as filgrastim and pegfilgrastim can effectively attenuate most of the neutropenic consequences of chemotherapy, improve the ability to continue chemotherapy on the planned schedule, and minimize the risk of febrile neutropenia and infectious morbidity and mortality. The present consensus statement reviews the use of csfs in the management of neutropenia in patients with cancer and sets out specific recommendations based on published international guidelines tailored to the specifics of the Canadian practice landscape. We review existing international guidelines, the indications for primary and secondary prophylaxis, the importance of maintaining dose intensity, and the use of csfs in leukemia, stem-cell transplantation, and radiotherapy. Specific disease-related recommendations are provided related to breast cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, lung cancer, and gastrointestinal cancer. Finally, csf dosing and schedules, duration of therapy, and associated acute and potential chronic toxicities are examined.

Does chemotherapy-induced neutropaenia result in a postponement of adjuvant or neoadjuvant regimens in breast cancer patients? Results of a retrospective analysis

In 2005, 224 patients received adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in a single institution according to daily practices. Regimens consisted of epirubicin-based chemotherapy (FEC100, four or six cycles), or three cycles of FEC100 followed by three cycles of docetaxel. An absolute blood count was carried out every 3 weeks, 1–3 days before planned chemotherapy cycle. Overall, 1238 cycles were delivered. An absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1.5 × 10⁹ l⁻¹ before planned chemotherapy was found in 171 cycles. Of these, 130 cycles (76%) were delivered as planned regardless of whether ANC levels recovered, and 41 (24%) were delayed. None of these patients developed a febrile neutropaenia. Haematopoietic support (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)) was required in 12 cycles. We found that the majority of patients with an ANC <1.5 × 10⁹ l⁻¹ before planned chemotherapy received planned doses, without complications and need for G-CSF.

Contribution of modelling chemotherapy-induced hematological toxicity for clinical practice

Anticancer chemotherapies are responsible for numerous adverse events. Among these, hematological toxicity is one of the main causes for ending treatment. These toxicities decrease production of red blood cells (anemia), production of white blood cells (neutropenia or granulocytopenia), and production of platelets (thrombocytopenia), which may be life-threatening to the patient. Preventing such discontinuation would be valuable for treating patients more effectively. In order to achieve this goal, numerous mathematical and physiological or semiphysiological models have been developed. The complexity of models has increased over the years, from empiric E(max) models to mechanistic models including physiological mechanisms such as feedback control. This review discusses several approaches of modelling hematological toxicities illustrated with some examples: pharmacodynamic models for the hematological toxicity of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, melphalan, paclitaxel, topotecan, and indisulam.

Chemotherapy Dosing Part II: Alternative Approaches and Future Prospects

This overview follows on from part I, which described the current practices used in chemotherapy dosing and the paucity of scientific evidence to support them. In part II, alternative approaches are discussed, both in terms of scientific rationale and practical application. These include therapeutic drug monitoring, the use of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships, flat-fixed dosing, Bayesian modelling and dose banding.

Chemotherapy Dosing Part I: Scientific Basis for Current Practice and Use of Body Surface Area

Cytotoxic chemotherapy is characterised by a low therapeutic index and significant variability in therapeutic and toxic effects. In an attempt to reduce this variability, most chemotherapy doses are individualised according to patient body surface area (BSA). This practice, which was introduced almost 50 years ago, clearly has practical and economic implications for the healthcare system. Furthermore, the clinical value of this approach has, in recent years, been questioned. Despite established practice, chemotherapy dose selection remains complicated, partly because treatment effects are difficult to measure, partly because drugs are used in combination with other treatment modalities, and also because the patient's condition may change with disease progression. Various patient-related factors can affect drug pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), for example organ function, expression and activity of metabolising enzymes, drug resistance, body size, gender, age, concomitant disease and co-administration of other drugs. These factors may be of clinical significance in chemotherapy dose determination and measures of PK, PD or both feature in attempts to devise more rigorous methods for chemotherapy dosing. Part I of this series of two reviews describes the history and clinical impact of BSA-based chemotherapy, and examines the scientific evidence to support BSA dosing. It evaluates the factors affecting PK and PD for specific drugs that could inform and refine dose determination.

Testing the effects of treatment complications on a cognitive-behavioral intervention for reducing symptom severity

Patients (n = 231) diagnosed with solid tumors and undergoing chemotherapy were randomly assigned to the experimental arm (n = 114) or to conventional care (n = 117). A symptom severity index based on summed severity scores across 15 symptoms was the primary outcome. Building on previously published work, an analysis was undertaken to determine the effects of patient characteristics and treatment complications on reductions in symptom severity achieved by a trial of a cognitive-behavioral intervention (CBI). The impact of the intervention on symptom severity differed by the occurrence of neutropenic events, chemotherapy dose delays or dose reductions, and number of comorbid conditions. Patients with more comorbid conditions, as well as those who did not experience neutropenia or dose delay/reduction, who received the intervention reported lower severity at 20 weeks compared to those who received conventional care. This research begins to specify the clinical conditions under which CBIs are effective in lowering symptom severity.

G-CSF in the Prevention of Febrile Neutropenia in Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients

The most common chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of breast cancer are anthracyclines and taxanes. The major dose-limiting toxicities associated with these agents are myelosuppression and associated febrile neutropenia (FN). FN can significantly impact the ability to deliver full-dose chemotherapy on schedule and as a result may increase the risk of disease recurrence and eventual disease-related mortality. The use of granulocyte colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs) significantly improves the management of FN, both in a therapeutic and in a prophylactic approach. Nevertheless, the high cost of these agents limits their widespread prophylactic use. Therefore, the identification of patients who are at a higher risk of developing FN and who will benefit from the prophylactic use of G-CSFs has become the subject of several clinical and cost-effectiveness studies. Recently, new data have been accumulated concerning the risk of FN in different chemotherapy regimens, and different risk models have been developed to assess the neutropenic risk with all its complications. This article reviews and summarizes cutting-edge, disease-specific data as well as national and international guidelines regarding the use of G-CSFs to prevent chemotherapy-induced FN, with focus on the treatment of breast cancer.

Chemotherapy-induced anaemia during adjuvant treatment for breast cancer: development of a prediction model

BACKGROUND

At present, oncologists prescribe chemotherapy according to standard dose schedules, and as a result many patients develop serious, dose-limiting toxic effects such as anaemia. We aimed to develop a prediction model for anaemia in patients with breast cancer who were receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records of 331 patients who had received adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Patients were divided randomly into a derivation sample (n=221) and internal-validation sample (n=110). An external sample of 119 patients enrolled onto the control group of a randomised trial of epoetin alfa was used to validate the model further. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to develop the initial model. We then developed a risk-scoring system, ranging from 0 (low risk) to 50 (high risk), based on the final regression variables. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was done to measure the accuracy of the scoring system when applied to both validation samples.

FINDINGS

The risk of anaemia increased as the pretreatment haemoglobin concentration decreased and was reduced with successive chemotherapy cycles. Risk was also predicted by a platelet count of 200x10(9) cells/L or less before chemotherapy, age 65 years or older, type of adjuvant chemotherapy, and use of prophylactic antibiotics. ROC analysis had acceptable areas under the curve of 0.88 for the internal-validation sample and 0.84 for the external validation sample. A risk score of > or = 24 to < 25 before chemotherapy was identified as the optimum cut-off for maximum sensitivity (83.5%) and specificity (92.3%) of the prediction model.

INTERPRETATION

The application and continued refinement of this prediction model will help oncologists to identify patients at risk of developing anaemia during chemotherapy for breast cancer, and might enhance patient-centred care by the application of anaemia treatment in a proactive and appropriate way.

Pegfilgrastim -- rational drug design for the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia

Neutropenia is the most important dose-limiting toxicity of myelotoxic chemotherapy. Current guidelines recommend primary prophylactic use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) with chemotherapy regimens associated with an incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) of at least 40% and in patients at high risk of infections, such as the elderly. Using prophylactic G-CSF support, planned chemotherapy doses are administered on time more frequently. Pegfilgrastim is a rationally designed recombinant human G-CSF with a sustained duration of action. A once-per-cycle 6-mg fixed dose of pegfilgrastim reduced the duration of severe neutropenia and the incidence of FN as efficiently as daily filgrastim in standard or dose-dense chemotherapy regimens in young and elderly patients with breast cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer and lymphomas. The safety profile of onceper- cycle pegfilgrastim is comparable with that of daily filgrastim. In conclusion, a fixed-dose of pegfilgrastim given once per cycle is a suitable substitute for body weight-based daily dosing of G-CSF, an improvement which should be particularly beneficial for outpatients receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy.

Incidence of febrile neutropenia and neutropenic infections in elderly patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy for breast cancer without primary prophylaxis with colony-stimulating factors

There is concern about the potential increase of hematological toxicity in elderly patients treated with chemotherapy. Recently, primary prophylaxis with colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) was proposed for elderly patients receiving moderately toxic chemotherapy. However, evidence for the benefits of this primary prophylaxis for elderly breast cancer patients is currently lacking. We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) and neutropenic infections in elderly breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy without primary prophylaxis with colony-stimulating factors. In addition, we assessed the direct costs of hospitalization for these complications. Febrile neutropenia or neutropenic infection occurred in 13% of the 46 patients. Further studies are needed to adequately evaluate the risk of neutropenic complications (NC) in elderly patients receiving standard-dose chemotherapy for breast cancer and the potential benefits of primary prophylaxis with colony-stimulating factors.