Predictors and one-year outcomes of patients with delayed graft function after deceased donor kidney transplantation

Association of Pre-Existing Type 2 Diabetes on Kidney Transplant Outcomes and Factors Correlating With Survival: A Single-Center Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease. Diabetes mellitus is the most common indication for KT, with most recipients having type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Previous studies have shown inferior patient survival in T2DM KT recipients. This single-center study aimed to understand the individual factors associated with negative long-term outcomes.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective analysis of adult KT recipients, with and without T2DM from 2012 to 2017 with a follow-up through December 2022. Primary Outcomes were graft loss and patient survival. Univariate, Multivariate Cox regression, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess KT outcomes.

RESULTS

We analyzed 1185 patients, 288 (24.3%) with T2DM. T2DM patients tended to be older, 56.6 ± 9.8 versus 47.1 ± 13.7 y. (P < 0.01), male (66.3% versus 58.2% P < 0.001) had a higher body mass index, 31.3 ± 5.4 versus 27.4 ± 5.7 P < 0.01) and less likely to get a living donor transplant (46.5% versus 58.4%, P < 0.01). T2DM patients after KT had a 50% higher risk for graft loss (hazard ratio 1.509, 95% CI 1.15-1.95, P < 0.001) and a 106% higher risk of death (hazard ratio 2.06 (95% CI 1.48-2.87, P < 0.0001). Among the T2DM patients, the most common cause of death was infection (39.9%). The average HbA1c at 1 y after transplant was 7.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that T2DM is strongly associated with an increased risk of graft loss and death after KT, particularly in older recipients of deceased donor transplants with longer cold ischemia time that experience delayed graft function. This underscores the importance of avoiding delayed graft function in older, type 2 diabetic kidney transplant recipients and prioritizing living donors.

Association of Intraoperative Hypotension With Delayed Graft Function Following Kidney Transplant: A Single Centre Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative hypotension is associated with acute kidney injury after surgery. However, the definition (duration and magnitude) of hypotension during kidney transplantation (KT) surgery on early graft function remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of KT recipients from December 1, 2009, to December 31, 2019. Exposure to intraoperative hypotension was characterized as the duration (minutes) of mean arterial pressure (MAP) <55, <65, <75, and <85 mmHg. Our co-primary outcomes were DGF-creatinine reduction ratio (DGF-CRR, <30% creatinine reduction, postoperative days 1 and 2), and DGF-dialysis (DGF-D, required dialysis within the week of KT for deceased donor recipients). Logistic regression models were fitted to assess this relationship between MAP and DGF.

RESULTS

We included 1602 KT (939 deceased donors, 663 living donors) and 23 were excluded. DGF-CRR occurred in 33% of patients. DGF-CRR was associated with MAP < 65 (>5 min: OR 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39-2.30; 6-10 min: OR 1.67, 95% CI: 0.97-2.86; 11-20 min: OR 2.18, 95% CI: 1.31-3.63) in unadjusted and <55 mmHg (5 min: OR 1.85, 95% CI: 1.47-2.32; 5-10 min: OR 2.41, 95% CI: 1.65-3.53; 11-20 min: OR 2.36, 95% CI: 1.60, 3.48) in adjusted models. There was also a signal for increased risk of DGF-CRR at MAP < 75 (>5 min: OR 1.69, 95% CI: 1.02-2.80). DGF-D (incidence 35%) in deceased donor KT was not associated with hypotension.

CONCLUSIONS

We found an association between intraoperative hypotension and DGF-CRR at a threshold MAP of 55 mmHg, with a consistent signal toward increased risk at both 65 and 75 mmHg, as indicated by unadjusted models.

Perfusion Techniques in Kidney Allograft Preservation to Reduce Ischemic Reperfusion Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The limited supply and rising demand for kidney transplantation has led to the use of allografts more susceptible to ischemic reperfusion injury (IRI) and oxidative stress to expand the donor pool. Organ preservation and procurement techniques, such as machine perfusion (MP) and normothermic regional perfusion (NRP), have been developed to preserve allograft function, though their long-term outcomes have been more challenging to investigate. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the benefits of MP and NRP compared to traditional preservation techniques. PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus databases were queried, and of 13,794 articles identified, 54 manuscripts were included (n = 41 MP; n = 13 NRP). MP decreased the rates of 12-month graft failure (OR 0.67; 95%CI 0.55, 0.80) and other perioperative outcomes such as delayed graft function (OR 0.65; 95%CI 0.54, 0.79), primary nonfunction (OR 0.63; 95%CI 0.44, 0.90), and hospital length of stay (15.5 days vs. 18.4 days) compared to static cold storage. NRP reduced the rates of acute rejection (OR 0.48; 95%CI 0.35, 0.67) compared to in situ perfusion. Overall, MP and NRP are effective techniques to mitigate IRI and play an important role in safely expanding the donor pool to satisfy the increasing demands of kidney transplantation.

Delayed graft function post renal transplantation: a review on animal models and therapeutics

The incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has been increasing worldwide. Its treatment involves renal replacement therapy, either by dialyses or renal transplantation from a living or deceased donor. Although the initial mortality rates for patients on dialysis are comparable with kidney transplant recipients, the quality of life and long-term prognosis are greatly improved in transplanted patients. However, there is a large gap between availability and need for donor kidneys. This has led to the increase in the use of expanded kidney donor criteria. Allograft dysfunction immediately after transplant sets it up for many complications, such as acute rejection and shorter allograft survival. Delayed graft function (DGF) is one of the immediate posttransplant insults to the kidney allograft, which is increasing in prevalence due to efforts to maximize the available donor pool for kidneys and use of expanded kidney donor criteria. In this review, we discuss the risk factors for DGF, its implications for long-term allograft survival, animal models of DGF, and the therapeutic options currently under evaluation for prevention and management of DGF.

Reno-protective effects of perioperative dexmedetomidine in kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

There is currently no FDA-approved medical therapy for delayed graft function (DGF). Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has multiple reno-protective effects preventing ischemic reperfusion injury, DGF, and acute kidney injury. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the reno-protective effects of perioperative DEX during renal transplantation.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from WOS, SCOPUS, EMBASE, PubMed, and CENTRAL until June 8th, 2022. We used the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and the mean difference for continuous outcomes; both presented with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We registered our protocol in PROSPERO with ID: CRD42022338898.

RESULTS

We included four RCTs with 339 patients. Pooled risk ratio found no difference between DEX and placebo in reducing DGF (RR: 0.58 with 95% CI [0.34, 1.01], p = 0.05) and acute rejection (RR: 0.88 with 95% CI [0.52, 1.49], p = 0.63). However, DEX improved short-term creatinine on day 1 (MD: - 0.76 with 95% CI [- 1.23, - 0.3], p = 0.001) and day 2 (MD: - 0.28 with 95% CI [- 0.5, - 0.07], p = 0.01); and blood urea nitrogen on day 2 (MD: - 10.16 with 95% CI [- 17.21, - 3.10], p = 0.005) and day 3 (MD: - 6.72 with 95% CI [- 12.85, - 0.58], p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Although there is no difference between DEX and placebo regarding reducing DGF and acute rejection after kidney transplantation, there may be some evidence that it has reno-protective benefits because we found statistically significant improvement in the short-term serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels. More trials are required to investigate the long-term reno-protective effects of DEX.

Dual Kidney Transplantation: Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Dual and en bloc kidney transplantation are strategies used to mitigate the disparity between a reduced organ pool and an ever-increasing need for organ procurement. En bloc refers to the implantation of 2 kidneys from a pediatric donor, compensating for small renal mass, whereas dual expanded criteria donor (DECD) transplantation refers to older donors with grafts otherwise rejected for single transplant, including expanded. This study describes one center's experience with dual and en bloc transplantation.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of dual kidney transplants (en bloc and DECD) from 1990 through 2021. The analysis included demographic, clinical, and survival analysis.

RESULTS

Of 46 patients who underwent dual kidney transplantation, 17 (37 %) received en-bloc transplantation. The overall mean recipient age was 49.4 ± 13.9 years old, younger in the en-bloc subgroup (39.2 vs 59.8 years old, P < .01). The mean time on dialysis was 37 ± 25 months. Delayed graft function was present in 17.4 % and primary nonfunction in 6.4 %, all from the DECD group. The estimated glomerular filtration rates at 1 and 5 years were 76.7 ± 28.7 and 80.4 ± 24.8 mL/min/1.73 m2, lower in the DECD group (65.9 vs 88.7 mL/min/1.73 m2, P = 0.02). Eleven recipients lost their graft during the study period: 63.6% from death with a functioning graft, 27.3% due to chronic graft dysfunction (a mean of 76.3 months after transplantation), and 9.1% due to vascular complications. Subgroup comparison found no differences regarding cold ischemia time or length of hospitalization. Kaplan-Meier estimates, censored for death with a functioning graft, resulted in a mean graft survival of 21.3 ± 1.3 years, with survival rates of 93.5, 90.5, and 84.1% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively, without significant differences between subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both DECD and en bloc strategies provide safe and effective options to further expand the use of otherwise rejected kidneys. Neither of the 2 techniques was superior to the other.

The Impact of Intraoperative Graft Blood Flow Measurement on Early Graft Function

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of intraoperative allograft vascular flow on early kidney graft function.

METHODS

A total of 159 patients underwent kidney transplantation from January 2017 to March 2022 at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Graft arterial and venous blood flow was measured separately with a transient time flowmeter (Transonic HT353; Transonic Systems, Inc, Ithaca, NY, United States) after ureteroneocystostomy. The early outcomes, including the postoperative creatinine level, were analyzed accordingly.

RESULTS

There were 83 males and 76 females, with a mean age of 44.5 years. The mean graft arterial flow measured was 480.6 mL/min, and the mean venous flow was 506.2 mL/min. Delayed graft function (DGF) incidence was 36.5%, 32.5%, and 40.8% in total, living, and deceased donor groups, respectively. Living donor and deceased donor kidney transplantation were analyzed separately. In the DGF subgroup, there were lower graft venous flows, higher body mass index (BMI), and more male patients in the living kidney transplant group. Similarly, the deceased donor kidney transplantation group with delayed graft function tended to have higher body height, higher body weight, higher BMI, and more diabetes mellitus. The multivariate analysis showed that lower graft venous blood flow (odds ratio [OR] = 0.995, P = .008) and higher BMI (OR = 1.144, P = .042) were significantly correlated with delayed graft function in living donor kidney transplantations. In the deceased donor group, a multivariate analysis of risk factors showed that BMI had a significant correlation with delayed graft function (OR = 1.41, P = .039).

CONCLUSIONS

Graft venous blood flow was significantly associated with delayed graft function in living donor kidney transplantation, and high BMI was correlated with DGF in all patients receiving kidney transplantation.

External pressure dynamics promote kidney viability and perfusate filtration during ex vivo kidney perfusion

Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) has not yet been established as a technique for preserving organs for a day. A key contributing factor to the same is that the perfusing solutions cannot circulate continuously and evenly in the organs. Here, we conceived a method of applying intermittent air pressure from outside the organ to assist its circulatory distribution during perfusion. We used a perfusion culture system while applying external pressure to culture rat kidneys and compared the circulatory distribution in the kidneys, changes in tissue morphology due to injury, and perfusate filtration. The intermittent pressurization (IMP) (-) group showed markedly poorer circulation on the upper side compared with that in the lower side, alongside histological damage. On the other hand, the IMP (+) group showed improved circulation in the upper side and had lesser histological damage. Furthermore, the IMP (+) group maintained the ability to filter perfusate for 24 h. In transplantation medicine and regenerative medicine research, this method has the potential to contribute to more efficient organ preservation and more functional tissue regeneration in the future.

Surgical Approaches and Outcomes in Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

The use of living kidney donors is increasing and there are several surgical approaches for donor nephrectomy but it remains unknown which procedure is optimal for the patient and the graft.

OBJECTIVE

To review different surgical techniques for living donor nephrectomy and compare complication rates, warm ischemia time, and delayed graft function.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review of prospective studies involving surgical complications following living donor nephrectomy was conducted in the MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). Baseline data, perioperative and postoperative parameters, and postoperative complications are reported. Overall complication rates between surgical techniques were compared via analysis of variance with post hoc analysis. We included 35 studies involving 6398 patients and representing six different surgical procedures for living donor nephrectomy.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy had a significantly higher overall complication rate compared to open, laparoscopic, retroperitoneoscopic, and laparoendoscopic single-site techniques (p < 0.005). The complication rates were low and no mortality was observed. The main limitation was varying reporting of complications, with only one-third of the studies using the Clavien-Dindo classification.

CONCLUSIONS

No specific surgical approach seems superior in terms of complications, which were generally low. Different factors such as warm ischemia time, blood loss, and surgeon expertise define which surgical approach should be chosen.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We looked at the different surgical methods for removing the kidney from a living kidney donor. Overall, the different surgical techniques were similar in terms of complications and no donors died in the studies we reviewed. The choice of procedure depends on multiple factors such as the expertise of the surgeon and the surgical center.

Clinical indicators of slow graft function and outcome after pediatric kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Lesser degrees of perioperative ischemia-reperfusion injury that does not require dialysis may nonetheless influence allograft outcomes, necessitating evaluation of suitable surrogate indicators of perioperative allograft injury.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of pediatric kidney transplants evaluated two indicators representing pace and completeness of recovery, for association with 12-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and first-year rate of eGFR decline: time to creatinine nadir (TTN) and ratio of recipient/donor unadjusted GFR (uGFR_R/D ) at 1-month post-transplant. Donor, recipient, and perioperative risk factors were tested further for association with these 2 indicators.

RESULTS

179 patients (190 transplants) aged 13 (IQR 7-17) years and 56% male were included. Twelve-month eGFR was strongly associated with unadjusted GFR at 1 month (uGFR_1M , p < .001) and uGFR_R/D (p = .003), but not with TTN. None of the indicators was associated with the rate of subsequent eGFR decline after 1-month post-transplant. As a potential surrogate indicator, uGFR_1M is effectively modeled by TTN and uGFR_R/D (adjusted R²  = 0.57) and is associated with 12-month eGFR (β = 0.81 ± 0.08; p < .001). Clinical factors associated with uGFR_R/D included donor uGFR (p < .001), BSA (p = .026), age (p = .074), and recipient BSA (p < .001). Factors associated with pace of recovery (TTN) included donor uGFR (p = .018), type (p = .019), and recipient BSA (p = .022).

CONCLUSIONS

The uGFR_R/D ratio, but not TTN, is a useful indicator of perioperative allograft damage that is associated with one-year functional outcome; and uGFR_1M is a potential early surrogate outcome. Donor, recipient, and perioperative factors that are associated with slow allograft function are identified.

Short-term outcome of kidney transplantation from deceased donors with nephrolithiasis

OBJECTIVES

Shortage of kidney allografts is a major barrier to end-stage renal disease patients receiving kidney transplantation, and it is necessary to enlarge the donor pool and find better ways of using available allografts. The global incidence of nephrolithiasis is increasing, nephrolithiasis affects approximately 10% of adults worldwide, and it also affects the kidney donors. However, there is little information about the use of cadaveric kidney allografts with nephrolithiasis. This study aims to evaluate the safety and outcome of kidney transplantation with allografts from the deceased donors with nephrolithiasis.

METHODS

A total of 520 deceased donors who was at least 10 years old, and 945 adult recipients with single kidney transplantation at the Department of Kidney Transplantation, the Second Xiangya Hospital from 2016 to 2020 were included in this study. The donors were divided into 2 groups according to nephrolithiasis diagnoses: The donors with nephrolithiasis (D + ) and the donors without nephrolithiasis (D - ). The recipients were assigned into 3 groups according to their donors and the allografts they received: The allografts from donors without nephrolithiasis (D - K - ), the allografts without nephrolithiasis from donors with nephrolithiasis (D + K - ), and the allografts with nephrolithiasis (D + K + ). The demographic and clinical data of enrolled subjects were retrospectively analyzed. The allograft discard ratio between different donors were analyzed. The one-year survival of allografts and recipients, as well as the allograft function and the complications of kidney transplantation were compared.

RESULTS

Fifty out of 520 donors had nephrolithiasis, and the nephrolithiasis incidence was 9.6%. We recovered 1 040 kidneys, and total discard rate was 4.4% (46/1 040). The D + group had a rate of 7% discard. The donors with kidney discard accounted for 12% in the D + group, and this was higher than that of donors in the D - group (5.1%, P <0.05). The total incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) was 7.5%, and there were no significant differences in the incidence of DGF in recipients among the D - K - , D + K - , and D + K + group (7.5% vs 6.5% vs 8.2%, P> 0.05). During the one-year follow-up, 8 allografts lost function and 19 recipients died with a functional allograft. Recipients in the D - K - , D + K - ,and D + K + groups also had no significant difference between a one-year allograft and patient survival rate ( P >0.05). However, recipients in the D + K + group had a higher level of serum creatinine [(139.2±62.46) μmol/L vs (117.19±51.22) μmol/L, P <0.05] and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR; (56.67±23.31) mL/(min·1.73 m -2 ) vs (66.86±21.90) mL/(min·1.73 m -2 ), P <0.05] compared with recipients in the D - K - group at 12 months after transplantation. During the first year after transplantation, 4 recipients developed urolithiasis, and recipients who received allografts from the D + group donors had a higher incidence of urolithiasis than those who received allografts from the D - group donors (2.2% vs 0.2%, P <0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of urinary tract infections and ureteral strictures at 1 year between recipients of D + and D - donors (both P >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The cadaveric kidney allografts with nephrolithiasis could be safely used for transplantation, and the short-term outcome is acceptable. However, nephrolithiasis in donors may increase the rate of kidney discard, disturb the short-term function of allografts, and increase the risk of urolithiasis in recipients. Further research with a long-term study is needed to verify the long-term outcome of kidney transplantation using cadaveric kidney allografts with nephrolithiasis.

Prediction model of delayed graft function based on clinical characteristics combined with serum IL-2 levels

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is an effective treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication after kidney transplantation and exerts substantial effects on graft function and long-term graft survival. Therefore, the construction of an effective model to predict the occurrence of DGF is particularly important.

METHODS

Seventy-one patients receiving their first kidney transplant at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from October 2020 to October 2021 were enrolled in the discovery cohort. Based on clinical characteristics and serum markers, a logistic regression model was used to simulate the risk of DGF in the discovery cohort. The DGF prediction model was named the prediction system and was composed of risk factors related to DGF. Thirty-two patients receiving a kidney transplant at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from October 2021 to February 2022 were enrolled in the validation cohort. The validation cohort was used to verify the accuracy and reliability of the prediction model.

RESULTS

Cold ischemia time (CIT), donor history of diabetes mellitus, donor interleukin-2 (IL-2) level and donor terminal creatinine level constitute the prediction system. In the validation test, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.867 for the prediction system, and good calibration of the model was confirmed in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This study constructed a reliable and highly accurate prediction model that provides a practical tool for predicting DGF. Additionally, IL-2 participates in the kidney injury process and may be a potential marker of kidney injury.

Postoperative day 1 serum cystatin C level predicts postoperative delayed graft function after kidney transplantation

Background

Delayed graft function (DGF) commonly occurs after kidney transplantation, but no clinical predictors for guiding post-transplant management are available.

Materials and methods

Data including demographics, surgery, anesthesia, postoperative day 1 serum cystatin C (S-CysC) level, kidney functions, and postoperative complications in 603 kidney transplant recipients who met the enrollment criteria from January 2017 to December 2018 were collected and analyzed to form the Intention-To-Treat (ITT) set. All perioperative data were screened using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical effectiveness of the predictor were verified with area under curve (AUC), calibration plot, clinical decision curve, and impact curve. The predictor was trained in Per-Protocol set, validated in the ITT set, and its stability was further tested in the bootstrap resample data.

Result

Patients with DGF had significantly higher postoperative day 1 S-CysC level (4.2 ± 1.2 vs. 2.8 ± 0.9 mg/L; P < 0.001), serum creatinine level (821.1 ± 301.7 vs. 554.3 ± 223.2 μmol/L; P < 0.001) and dialysis postoperative (74 [82.2%] vs. 25 [5.9%]; P < 0.001) compared with patients without DGF. Among 41 potential predictors, S-CysC was the most effective in the parsimonious model, and its diagnostic cut-off value was 3.80 mg/L with the risk score (OR, 13.45; 95% CI, 8.02–22.57; P < 0.001). Its specificity and sensitivity indicated by AUC was 0.832 (95% CI, 0.779–0.884; P < 0.001) with well fit calibration. S-CysC yielded up to 50% of clinical benefit rate with 1:4 of cost/benefit ratio.

Conclusion

The postoperative day 1 S-CysC level predicts DGF and may be used as a predictor of DGF but warrants further study.

Effect of Perioperative Dexmedetomidine on Delayed Graft Function Following a Donation-After-Cardiac-Death Kidney Transplant: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a risk factor for acute rejection and graft failure after kidney transplant. Previous studies have suggested that dexmedetomidine may be renoprotective, but whether the use of dexmedetomidine would improve kidney allograft function is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of perioperative dexmedetomidine on DGF following a donation-after-cardiac-death (DCD) kidney transplant.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted at The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University in Suzhou, China. Adults (18 years or older) who were scheduled for DCD kidney transplant were enrolled between September 1, 2019, and January 28, 2021, and then randomized to receive either dexmedetomidine or normal saline (placebo). One-year postoperative outcomes were recorded. All analyses were based on the modified intention-to-treat population.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients who were randomized to the dexmedetomidine group received a 24-hour perioperative dexmedetomidine intravenous infusion (0.4 μg/kg/h intraoperatively and 0.1 μg/kg/h postoperatively). Patients who were randomized to the normal saline group received an intravenous infusion of the placebo with the same dose regimen as the dexmedetomidine.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the incidence of DGF, defined as the need for dialysis in the first posttransplant week. The prespecified secondary outcomes were in-hospital repeated dialysis in the first posttransplant week, in-hospital acute rejection, and serum creatinine, serum cystatin C, estimated glomerular filtration rate, need for dialysis, and patient survival on posttransplant day 30.

RESULTS

Of the 114 patients enrolled, 111 completed the study (mean [SD] age, 43.4 [10.8] years; 64 male patients [57.7%]), of whom 56 were randomized to the dexmedetomidine group and 55 to the normal saline group. Dexmedetomidine infusion compared with normal saline reduced the incidence of DGF (17.9% vs 34.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17-0.98; P = .04) and repeated dialysis (12.5% vs 30.9%; OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.13-0.88; P = .02, which was not statistically significant after multiple testing corrections), without significant effect on other secondary outcomes. Dexmedetomidine vs normal saline infusion led to a higher median (IQR) creatinine clearance rate on postoperative days 1 (9.9 [4.9-21.2] mL/min vs 7.9 [2.0-10.4] mL/min) and 2 (29.6 [9.7-67.4] mL/min vs 14.6 [3.8-45.1] mL/min) as well as increased median (IQR) urine output on postoperative days 2 (106.5 [66.3-175.6] mL/h vs 82.9 [27.1-141.9] mL/h) and 7 (126.1 [98.0-151.3] mL/h vs 107.0 [82.5-137.5] mL/h) and at hospital discharge discharge (110.4 [92.8-121.9] mL/h vs 97.1 [77.5-113.8] mL/h). Three patients (5.5%) from the normal saline group developed allograft failure by the post hoc 1-year follow-up visit.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This randomized clinical trial found that 24-hour perioperative dexmedetomidine decreased the incidence of DGF after DCD kidney transplant. The findings support the use of dexmedetomidine in kidney transplants.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR1900025493.

Duration of delayed graft function and its impact on graft outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

There is controversy regarding the impact of delayed graft function (DGF) on kidney transplant outcomes. We hypothesize that the duration of DGF, rather than DGF itself, is associated with long-term kidney graft function.

METHODS

We analyzed all deceased donor kidney transplants (DDKT) done at our center between 2008 to 2020. We determined factors associated with DGF duration. DGF duration was assessed at three 14-day intervals: < 14 DGF days, 14-27 DGF days, > 28 DGF days. We studied the impact of DGF duration on survival and graft function and resource utilization, including hospital length of stay and readmissions.

RESULTS

1714 DDKT recipients were included, 59.4% (n = 1018) had DGF. The median DGF duration was 10 days IQR (6,15). The majority of recipients (95%) had resolution of DGF within 28 days. Donor factors associated with DGF days were longer cold ischemia time, donor on inotropes, older age, donation after circulatory death, higher terminal creatinine, and hypertension. Recipient factors associated with increased DGF duration included male sex, length on dialysis before transplant, and higher body mass index. There were no differences in acute rejection events or interstitial fibrosis progression by 4 months when comparing DGF days. The median length of stay was 3 days. However, readmissions increased with increasing DGF duration. Death-censored graft survival was not associated with the length of DGF except when DGF lasted > 28 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Inferior graft survival was observed only in recipients of DDKT with DGF lasting beyond 28 days. DGF lasting < 28 days had no impact on graft survival. Duration of DGF, rather than DGF itself, is associated with graft survival.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospective study approved by Mayo Clinic IRB number ID: 20-011561.

The value of cystatin C in predicting perioperative and long-term prognosis of renal transplantation

This study aimed to evaluate the value of cystatin C (Cys C) in predicting the perioperative and long-term prognosis of renal transplantation (RT). The clinical data of 198 RT recipients were collected. Blood samples were obtained daily until 7 d after transplantation and then discharge day to determine the serum levels of Cys C. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of Cys C for delayed graft function (DGF). The presence of shrunken pore syndrome (SPS) with a cystatin C-based estimate of glomerular filtration rate less than 70% of a creatinine-based estimate, was also evaluated as a prognostic factor for the development of DGF. The serum Cys C levels of patients with DGF were higher than those of the non-DGF group. Cys C showed a higher AUC (0.928) in the ROC analysis than did sCr (0.862). Compared to the non-SPS group, there were more patients diagnosed with SPS in the DGF group (p < .05). The follow-up data showed that patients diagnosed with SPS had higher levels of sCr and Cys C compared to other patients, suggesting a poor long-term prognosis. Our findings suggest that Cys C is a sensitive indicator of renal function during the perioperative period. Cys C at a concentration of 4.9 mg/L had the highest sum of sensitivity and specificity for prediction of DGF, with a sensitivity of 0.889 and a specificity of 0.8. SPS is associated with the development of DGF and the poor long-term prognosis of RT.

Intra-Organ Delivery of Nanotherapeutics for Organ Transplantation

Targeted delivery of therapeutics through the use of nanoparticles (NPs) has emerged as a promising method that increases their efficacy and reduces their side effects. NPs can be tailored to localize to selective tissues through conjugation to ligands that bind cell-specific receptors. Although the vast majority of nanodelivery platforms have focused on cancer therapy, efforts have begun to introduce nanotherapeutics to the fields of immunology as well as transplantation. In this review, we provide an overview from a clinician's perspective of current nanotherapeutic strategies to treat solid organ transplants with NPs during the time interval between organ harvest from the donor and placement into the recipient, an innovative technology that can provide major benefits to transplant patients. The use of ex vivo normothermic machine perfusion (NMP), which is associated with preserving the function of the organ following transplantation, also provides an ideal opportunity for a localized, sustained, and controlled delivery of nanotherapeutics to the organ during this critical time period. Here, we summarize previous endeavors to improve transplantation outcomes by treating the organ with NPs prior to placement in the recipient. Investigations in this burgeoning field of research are promising, but more extensive studies are needed to overcome the physiological challenges to achieving effective nanotherapeutic delivery to transplanted organs discussed in this review.

Multiplex gene analysis reveals T-cell and antibody-mediated rejection-specific upregulation of complement in renal transplants

In renal transplantation, complement is involved in ischemia reperfusion injury, graft rejection and dysfunction. However, it is still unclear how induction of complement and its activation are initiated. Using allograft biopsies of a well-characterized cohort of 28 renal transplant patients with no rejection (Ctrl), delayed graft function (DGF), acute T-cell-mediated (TCMR) or antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) we analyzed differences in complement reaction. For that mRNA was isolated from FFPE sections, quantified with a multiplex gene expression panel and correlated with transplant conditions and follow-up of patients. Additionally, inflammatory cells were quantified by multiplex immunohistochemistry. In allograft biopsies with TCMR and ABMR gene expression of C1QB was 2-4 fold elevated compared to Ctrl. In TCMR biopsies, mRNA counts of several complement-related genes including C1S, C3, CFB and complement regulators CFH, CR1 and SERPING1 were significantly increased compared to Ctrl. Interestingly, expression levels of about 75% of the analyzed complement related genes correlated with cold ischemia time (CIT) and markers of inflammation. In conclusion, this study suggest an important role of complement in transplant pathology which seems to be at least in part triggered by CIT. Multiplex mRNA analysis might be a useful method to refine diagnosis and explore new pathways involved in rejection.