1
|
Osler TS, Brandenburg JT, Schoeman M, Chen WC, Urban MF, Mathew CG. Prevalence and Reclassification of Genetic Variants in South African Populations with Breast Cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2024; 63:e23275. [PMID: 39324485 DOI: 10.1002/gcc.23275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2024] [Accepted: 09/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Concurrent testing of numerous genes for hereditary breast cancer (BC) is available but can result in management difficulties. We evaluated use of an expanded BC gene panel in women of diverse South African ancestries and assessed use of African genomic data to reclassify variants of uncertain significance (VUS). A total of 331 women of White, Black African, or Mixed Ancestry with BC had a 9-gene panel test, with an additional 75 genes tested in those without a pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant. The proportion of VUS reclassified using ClinGen gene-specific allele frequency (AF) thresholds or an AF > 0.001 in nonguidelines genes in African genomic data was determined. The 9-gene panel identified 58 P/LP variants, but only two of the P/LP variants detected using the 75-gene panel were in confirmed BC genes, resulting in a total of 60 (18.1%) in all participants. P/LP variant prevalence was similar across ancestry groups, but VUS prevalence was higher in Black African and Mixed Ancestry than in White participants. In total, 611 VUS were detected, representing 324 distinct variants. 10.8% (9/83) of VUS met ClinGen AF thresholds in genomic data while 10.8% (26/240) in nonguideline genes had an AF > 0.001. Overall, 27.0% of VUS occurrences could potentially be reclassified using African genomic data. Thus, expanding the gene panel yielded few clinically actionable variants but many VUS, particularly in participants of Black African and Mixed Ancestry. However, use of African genomic data has the potential to reclassify a significant proportion of VUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tabitha S Osler
- Sydney Brenner Institute for Molecular Bioscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Division of Human Genetics, National Health Laboratory Service and School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Jean-Tristan Brandenburg
- Sydney Brenner Institute for Molecular Bioscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Strengthening Oncology Services Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Mardelle Schoeman
- Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Stellenbosch and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, Parow, South Africa
| | - Wenlong Carl Chen
- Sydney Brenner Institute for Molecular Bioscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Strengthening Oncology Services Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- National Cancer Registry, National Institute for Communicable Diseases a Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Michael F Urban
- Division of Human Genetics, National Health Laboratory Service and School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Stellenbosch and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, Parow, South Africa
| | - Christopher G Mathew
- Sydney Brenner Institute for Molecular Bioscience, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Division of Human Genetics, National Health Laboratory Service and School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kumar P, Benjamin DJ, Darabi S, Kloecker G, Rezazadeh Kalebasty A. Implications of genetic testing and informed consent before and after genetic testing in individuals with cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2024; 15:975-981. [PMID: 39193166 PMCID: PMC11346064 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i8.975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Revised: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Recent advancements in next generation sequencing have allowed for genetic information become more readily available in the clinical setting for those affected by cancer and by treating clinicians. Given the lack of access to geneticists, medical oncologists and other treating physicians have begun ordering and interpreting genetic tests for individuals with cancer through the process of "mainstreaming". While this process has allowed for quicker access to genetic tests, the process of "mainstreaming" has also brought several challenges including the dissemination of variants of unknown significance results, ordering of appropriate tests, and accurate interpretation of genetic results with appropriate follow-up testing and interventions. In this editorial, we seek to explore the process of informed consent of individuals before obtaining genetic testing and offer potential solutions to optimize the informed consent process including categorization of results as well as a layered consent model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priyanka Kumar
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90502, United States
| | - David J Benjamin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Newport Beach, CA 92663, United States
| | - Sourat Darabi
- Department of Precision Medicine, Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Newport Beach, CA 92663, United States
| | - Goetz Kloecker
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, United States
| | - Arash Rezazadeh Kalebasty
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of California-Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McCarthy-Leo C, Baughan S, Dlugas H, Abraham P, Gibbons J, Baldwin C, Chung S, Feldman GL, Dyson G, Finley RL, Tainsky MA. Germline variant profiling of CHEK2 sequencing variants in breast cancer patients. Cancer Genet 2024; 288-289:10-19. [PMID: 39208550 DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2024.08.081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Revised: 07/17/2024] [Accepted: 08/18/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
The cell cycle checkpoint kinase 2 (CHEK2) is a tumor suppressor gene coding for a protein kinase with a role in the cell cycle and DNA repair pathways. Variants within CHEK2 are associated with an increased risk of developing breast, colorectal, prostate and several other types of cancer. Comprehensive genetic risk assessment leads to early detection of hereditary cancer and provides an opportunity for better survival. Multigene panel screening can identify the presence of pathogenic variants in hereditary cancer predisposition genes (HCPG), including CHEK2. Multigene panels, however, also result in large quantities of genetic data some of which cannot be interpreted and are classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS). A VUS provides no information for use in medical management and leads to ambiguity in genetic counseling. In the absence of variant segregation data, in vitro functional analyses can be used to clarify variant annotations, aiding in accurate clinical management of patient risk and treatment plans. In this study, we performed whole exome sequencing (WES) to investigate the prevalence of germline variants in 210 breast cancer (BC) patients and conspicuously among the many variants in HCPGs that we found, we identified 16 individuals with non-synonymous or frameshift CHEK2 variants, sometimes along with additional variants within other BC susceptibility genes. Using this data, we investigated the prevalence of these CHEK2 variants in African American (AA) and Caucasian (CA) populations identifying the presence of two novel frameshift variants, c.1350delA (p.Val451Serfs*18) and c.1528delC (p.Gln510Argfs*3) and a novel missense variant, c262C>T (p.Pro88Ser). Along with the current clinical classifications, we assembled available experimental data and computational predictions of function for these CHEK2 variants, as well as explored the role these variants may play in polygenic risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire McCarthy-Leo
- Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Scott Baughan
- Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Hunter Dlugas
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Core, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Prisca Abraham
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Janice Gibbons
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Carolyn Baldwin
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Sarah Chung
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Gerald L Feldman
- Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Gregory Dyson
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Core, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, United States; Department of Oncology, Molecular Therapeutics Program, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Russell L Finley
- Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Michael A Tainsky
- Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States; Department of Oncology, Molecular Therapeutics Program, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Militello AM, Orsi G, Cavaliere A, Niger M, Avallone A, Salvatore L, Tortora G, Rapposelli IG, Giordano G, Noventa S, Giommoni E, Bozzarelli S, Macchini M, Peretti U, Procaccio L, Puccini A, Cascinu S, Montagna C, Milella M, Reni M. Clinical outcomes and response to chemotherapy in a cohort of pancreatic cancer patients with germline variants of unknown significance (VUS) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2023; 92:501-510. [PMID: 37725113 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-023-04585-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The clinical outcome and the efficacy of chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer patients with BRCA1/2 Variants of Unknown Significance (VUS) is unknown. We explored the effects of chemotherapy with or without Platinum in non metastatic and metastatic pancreatic cancer patients with BRCA1/2 VUS. METHODS A retrospective analysis of non-metastatic or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients with gBRCA1/2 VUS treated in 13 Italian centers between November 2015 and December 2020 was performed. All patients were assessed for toxicity and RECIST 1.1 response. Metastatic patients were evaluated for survival outcome. RESULTS 30 pancreatic cancer patients with gBRCA1/2 VUS were considered: 20 were M+ and 10 were non-M+. Pl-CT was recommended to 16 patients: 10 M+ (6 FOLFIRINOX and 4 PAXG) and 6 non-M+ (3 FOLFIRINOX and 3 PAXG); 11 patients received Nabpaclitaxel-Gemcitabine (AG; 8 M+) and 3 patients (2 M+) were treated with Gemcitabine (G). The RECIST 1.1 response rate was 27% for AG and 44% for Pl-CT (22% for (m) FOLFIRINOX and 71% PAXG). 1 year Progression-Free Survival was 37.5% for patients treated with AG and 33% in the Pl-CT subgroup. Median Overall Survival (OS) was 23.5 months for patients treated with AG and 14 months for the Pl-CT subgroup. 1 Year and 2 Year OS were numerically better for AG (1 Year OS: 75% vs 60% and 2 Year OS: 50% and 20% in AG and Pl-CT subgroups, respectively) as well. CONCLUSIONS Pl-CT does not seem to be associated with a better outcome compared to AG chemotherapy in PDAC patients with BRCA 1/2 VUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Maria Militello
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20123, Milan, Italy
- Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Orsi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20123, Milan, Italy
- Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cavaliere
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Candiolo, Italy
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS Candiolo, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Monica Niger
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori Di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Avallone
- Biologia Cellulare e Bioterapie, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori ''Fondazione Giovanni Pascale'' - IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Lisa Salvatore
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilario Giovanni Rapposelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) ''Dino Amadori'', Meldola, Italy
| | - Guido Giordano
- Unit of Medical Oncology and Biomolecular Therapy, Policlinico Riuniti, Foggia, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Silvia Noventa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - Elisa Giommoni
- Medical Oncology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Silvia Bozzarelli
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Marina Macchini
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20123, Milan, Italy
- Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Peretti
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20123, Milan, Italy
- Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia Procaccio
- Medical Oncology 1 Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Alberto Puccini
- University of Genoa, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
| | - Stefano Cascinu
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20123, Milan, Italy
- Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Montagna
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Genomic Instability and Cancer Genetics, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Michele Milella
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Reni
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20123, Milan, Italy.
- Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Coad B, Joekes K, Rudnicka A, Frost A, Openshaw MR, Tatton-Brown K, Snape K. Evaluation of two Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in genomic variant interpretation for the NHS workforce. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2023; 23:540. [PMID: 37507729 PMCID: PMC10386229 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04406-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The implementation of the National Genomic Medicine Service in the UK has increased patient access to germline genomic testing. Increased testing leads to more genetic diagnoses but does result in the identification of genomic variants of uncertain significance (VUS). The rigorous process of interpreting these variants requires multi-disciplinary, highly trained healthcare professionals (HCPs). To meet this training need, we designed two Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) for HCPs involved in germline genomic testing pathways: Fundamental Principles (FP) and Inherited Cancer Susceptibility (ICS). METHODS An evaluation cohort of HCPs involved in genomic testing were recruited, with additional data also available from anonymous self-registered learners to both MOOCs. Pre- and post-course surveys and in-course quizzes were used to assess learner satisfaction, confidence and knowledge gained in variant interpretation. In addition, granular feedback was collected on the complexity of the MOOCs to iteratively improve the resources. RESULTS A cohort of 92 genomics HCPs, including clinical scientists, and non-genomics clinicians (clinicians working in specialties outside of genomics) participated in the evaluation cohort. Between baseline and follow-up, total confidence scores improved by 38% (15.2/40.0) (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.4-18.0) for the FP MOOC and 54% (18.9/34.9) (95%CI 15.5-22.5) for the ICS MOOC (p < 0.0001 for both). Of those who completed the knowledge assessment through six summative variant classification quizzes (V1-6), a mean of 79% of respondents classified the variants such that correct clinical management would be undertaken (FP: V1 (73/90) 81% Likely Pathogenic/Pathogenic [LP/P]; V2 (55/78) 70% VUS; V3 (59/75) 79% LP/P; V4 (62/72) 86% LP/LP. ICS: V5 (66/91) 73% VUS; V6 (76/88) 86% LP/P). A non-statistically significant higher attrition rate was seen amongst the non-genomics workforce when compared to genomics specialists for both courses. More participants from the non-genomics workforce rated the material as "Too Complex" (FP n = 2/7 [29%], ICS n = 1/5 [20%]) when compared to the specialist genomics workforce (FP n = 1/43 [2%], ICS n = 0/35 [0%]). CONCLUSIONS After completing one or both MOOCs, self-reported confidence in genomic variant interpretation significantly increased, and most respondents could correctly classify variants such that appropriate clinical management would be instigated. Genomics HCPs reported higher satisfaction with the level of content than the non-genomics clinicians. The MOOCs provided foundational knowledge and improved learner confidence, but should be adapted for different workforces to maximise the benefit for clinicians working in specialties outside of genetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth Coad
- St George's University of London, London, UK.
| | | | | | - Amy Frost
- National Genomics Education, NHS England, London, UK
| | | | | | - Katie Snape
- St George's University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stein Q, Westemeyer M, Darwish T, Pitman T, Hager M, Tabriziani H, Curry K, Collett K, Raible D, Hendricks E. Genetic Counseling in Kidney Disease: A Perspective. Kidney Med 2023; 5:100668. [PMID: 37334143 PMCID: PMC10276256 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
As genetic testing is increasingly integrated into nephrology practice there is a growing need for partnership with genetic experts. Genetic counselors are ideally suited to fill this role. The value of genetic counseling is born out of the clinical value of genetic test results against the backdrop of the complexity of genetic testing. Genetic counselors who specialize in nephrology are trained to understand and explain the potential effects of genes on kidney disease, which can enable patients to make informed decisions about proceeding with genetic testing, navigating variants of uncertain significance, educating on extrarenal features of hereditary kidney disease, facilitating cascade testing, providing post-test education about testing results, and assisting with family planning. Genetic counselors can partner with the nephrologist and provide the knowledge needed to maximize the use of genetic testing for patients for nephrology consultation. Genetic counseling is more than an element or extension of genetic testing; it is a dynamic, shared conversation between the patient and the genetic counselor where concerns, sentiments, information, and education are exchanged, and value-based decision making is facilitated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Darbey Raible
- St. Elizabeth Healthcare Precision Medicine, Edgewood, KY
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gunawardena K, Sirisena ND, Anandagoda G, Neththikumara N, Dissanayake VHW. Germline variants of uncertain significance, their frequency, and clinico-pathological features in a cohort of Sri Lankan patients with hereditary breast cancer. BMC Res Notes 2023; 16:95. [PMID: 37277882 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-023-06365-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)-based testing in cancer patients has led to increased detection of variants of uncertain significance (VUS). VUS are genetic variants whose impact on protein function is unknown. VUS pose a challenge to clinicians and patients due to uncertainty regarding their cancer predisposition risk. Paucity of data exists on the pattern of VUS in under-represented populations. This study describes the frequency of germline VUS and clinico-pathological features in Sri Lankan hereditary breast cancer patients. METHODS Data of 72 hereditary breast cancer patients who underwent NGS-based testing between January 2015 and December 2021 were maintained prospectively in a database and analyzed retrospectively. Data were subjected to bioinformatics analysis and variants were classified according to international guidelines. RESULTS Germline variants were detected in 33/72(45.8%) patients, comprising 16(48.5%) pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants and 17(51.5%) VUS. Distribution of VUS in breast cancer predisposing genes were :APC:1(5.8%), ATM:2(11.7%), BRCA1:1(5.8%), BRCA2:5(29.4%), BRIP1:1(5.8%), CDKN2A:1(5.8%), CHEK2:2(11.7%), FANC1:1(5.8%), MET:1(5.8%), STK11:1(5.8%), NF2:1(5.8%). Mean age at cancer diagnosis in patients with VUS was 51.2 years. Most common tumour histopathology was ductal carcinoma 11(78.6%). 50% of tumours in patients having VUS in BRCA1/2 genes were hormone receptor negative. 73.3% patients had family history of breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS A significant portion of patients had a germline VUS. Highest frequency was in BRCA2 gene. Majority had family history of breast cancer. This highlights the need to undertake functional genomic studies to determine the biological effects of VUS and identify potentially clinically actionable variants that would be useful for decision-making and patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kawmadi Gunawardena
- Department of Anatomy, Genetics and Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka
| | - Nirmala D Sirisena
- Department of Anatomy, Genetics and Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka.
| | - Gayani Anandagoda
- Department of Anatomy, Genetics and Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka
| | - Nilaksha Neththikumara
- Department of Anatomy, Genetics and Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka
| | - Vajira H W Dissanayake
- Department of Anatomy, Genetics and Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo 8, Sri Lanka
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Makhnoon S, Davidson E, Shirts B, Arun B, Shete S. Practices and Views of US Oncologists and Genetic Counselors Regarding Patient Recontact After Variant Reclassification: Results of a Nationwide Survey. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2300079. [PMID: 37384863 PMCID: PMC10581618 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Over a 5-year or 10-year period, between 6% and 15% of germline cancer genetic variants undergo reclassification. Up-to-date interpretation can clarify a variant's clinical significance and guide patient management. As the frequency of reclassifications increase, the issue of whether, how, when, and which providers should recontact patients with information about reclassification becomes important. However, the field lacks research evidence and definitive guidance from professional organizations about how providers should recontact patients. We compared the perspectives of US oncologists and cancer genetic counselors (GCs) to describe their practices and views regarding recontact. MATERIALS AND METHODS We developed a survey using themes identified from semistructured interviews with oncologists and GCs and administered it in a national sample of oncologists and GCs between July and September 2022. RESULTS In total, 634 respondents completed the survey including 349 oncologists and 285 GCs. On frequency of recontacting patients with reclassified results, 40% of GCs reported recontacting often compared with 12.5% of oncologists. Neither group reported recording patient preference for recontact on electronic medical record (EMR). Both groups agreed that all reclassified variants, even those that do not affect clinical management, should be returned to patients. They also reported that recontact via EMR messages, mailed letters, and phone calls from GC assistants were more suitable for downgrades. By contrast, face-to-face meetings and phone calls were preferred for upgrades. Remarkably, oncologists were more likely to endorse face-to-face return of results and were more likely to endorse return through a nongenetics provider compared to GCs. CONCLUSION These data on current recontact practices and opinions provide a foundation for developing guidelines with explicit recommendations on patient recontact that can help maximize clinical effect while considering provider preferences for recontact within resource-constrained genomic practice settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sukh Makhnoon
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Elenita Davidson
- Department of Behavioral Science, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TTX
| | - Brian Shirts
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Banu Arun
- Clinical Cancer Genetics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sanjay Shete
- Department of Epidemiology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kablan A, Silan F, Ozdemir O. Re-evaluation of Genetic Variants in Parkinson's Disease Using Targeted Panel and Next-Generation Sequencing. Twin Res Hum Genet 2023; 26:164-170. [PMID: 37139776 DOI: 10.1017/thg.2023.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex disorder with a significant genetic component. Genetic variations associated with PD play a crucial role in the disease's inheritance and prognosis. Currently, 31 genes have been linked to PD in the OMIM database, and the number of genes and genetic variations identified is steadily increasing. To establish a robust correlation between phenotype and genotype, it is essential to compare research findings with existing literature. In this study, we aimed to identify genetic variants associated with PD using a targeted gene panel with next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology. Our objective was also to explore the idea of re-analyzing genetic variants of unknown significance (VUS). We screened 18 genes known to be related to PD using NGS in 43 patients who visited our outpatient clinic between 2018-2019. After 12-24 months, we re-evaluated the detected variants. We found 14 different heterozygous variants classified as pathogenic, likely pathogenic, or VUS in 14 individuals from nonconsanguineous families. We re-evaluated 15 variants and found changes in their interpretation. Targeted gene panel analysis with NGS can help identify genetic variants associated with PD with confidence. Re-analyzing certain variants at specific time intervals can be especially beneficial in selected situations. Our study aims to expand the clinical and genetic understanding of PD and emphasizes the importance of re-analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmet Kablan
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale, Turkey
- Department of Medical Genetics, Sanliurfa Training and Research Hospital, Sanliurfa, Turkey
| | - Fatma Silan
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale, Turkey
| | - Ozturk Ozdemir
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Colombo M, Mondini P, Minenza E, Foglia C, Mosconi A, Molica C, Pistola L, Ludovini V, Radice P. A novel BRCA1 splicing variant detected in an early onset triple-negative breast cancer patient additionally carrying a pathogenic variant in ATM: A case report. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1102184. [PMID: 37025588 PMCID: PMC10072264 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1102184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The widespread adoption of gene panel testing for cancer predisposition is leading to the identification of an increasing number of individuals with clinically relevant allelic variants in two or more genes. The potential combined effect of these variants on cancer risks is mostly unknown, posing a serious problem for genetic counseling in these individuals and their relatives, in whom the variants may segregate singly or in combination. We report a female patient who developed triple-negative high grade carcinoma in the right breast at the age of 36 years. The patient underwent bilateral mastectomy followed by combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy (IMpassion030 clinical trial). Two years later she developed a skin recurrence on the right anterior chest wall. Despite intensive treatment, the patient died at 40-year-old due to disease progression. Gene panel testing of patient's DNA revealed the presence of a protein truncating variant in ATM [c.1672G>T; p.(Gly558Ter)] and of a not previously reported variant in the BRCA1 exon 22 donor splice site [c.5406+6T>C], whose clinical significance was unknown. The analysis of patient's RNA revealed the up-regulation of two alternative BRCA1 mRNA isoforms derived from skipping of exon 22 and of exons 22-23. The corresponding predicted protein products, p.(Asp1778GlyfsTer27) and p.(Asp1778_His1822del) are both expected to affect the BRCA1 C Terminus (BRCT) domain. The two variants were observed to co-occur also in the proband's brother who, in addition, was heterozygous for a common variant (c.4837A>G) mapped to BRCA1 exon 16. This allowed to ascertain, by transcript-specific amplification, the lack of functional mRNA isoforms expressed by the c.5406+6T>C allele and provided evidence to classify the BRCA1 variant as pathogenic, according to the guidelines of the Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) consortium. To our knowledge, excluding two cases detected following the screening of population specific recurrent variants, only one ATM/BRCA1 double heterozygote has been reported in the literature, being the case here described the one with the youngest age at cancer onset. The systematic collection of cases with pathogenic variants in more than one cancer predisposition gene is needed to verify if they deserve ad hoc counseling and clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara Colombo
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizia Mondini
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Minenza
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Claudia Foglia
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Annamaria Mosconi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Carmen Molica
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Lorenza Pistola
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Vienna Ludovini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bokkers K, Bleiker EMA, Aalfs CM, van Dalen T, Velthuizen ME, Duijveman P, Sijmons RH, Koole W, Schoenmaeckers EJP, Ausems MGEM. Surgical Oncologists and Nurses in Breast Cancer Care are Ready to Provide Pre-Test Genetic Counseling. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:3248-3258. [PMID: 36853565 PMCID: PMC10175452 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13229-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pre-test genetic counseling for patients with breast cancer is increasingly being provided by nongenetic healthcare professionals. We evaluated the attitudes, knowledge, and self-efficacy of surgeons, oncologists, and nurses regarding mainstream genetic testing and the feasibility to incorporate pre-test genetic counseling into routine care. METHODS We offered an online training to healthcare professionals from 13 hospitals and implemented a mainstream genetic testing pathway in 11/13 (85%) hospitals. Questionnaires were sent before (T0) and 6 months after (T1) completing the training. Those who did not complete the training received a questionnaire to assess their motivations. RESULTS In 11 hospitals, 80 (65%) healthcare professionals completed the training, of whom 70 (88%) completed both questionnaires. The attitudes, (perceived) knowledge and self-efficacy of healthcare professionals were high both at baseline and 6 months after completing the training. After 6 months, their perceived knowledge about the advantages and disadvantages of a genetic test and implications for family members had significantly improved (p = 0.012 and p = 0.021, respectively). For the majority (89%), the time investment for pre-test genetic counseling was less than 15 min per patient and as expected or better. Healthcare professionals considered the total time investment feasible to incorporate mainstream genetic testing into their daily practice. The main barrier to complete the training was lack of time. The online training was considered useful, with a rating of 8/10. CONCLUSION Surgical oncologists and nurses in breast cancer care feel well-equipped and motivated to provide pre-test genetic counseling after completion of an online training module.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Bokkers
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E M A Bleiker
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C M Aalfs
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - T van Dalen
- Department of surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M E Velthuizen
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P Duijveman
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R H Sijmons
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - W Koole
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - M G E M Ausems
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bertozzi S, Londero AP, Xholli A, Azioni G, Di Vora R, Paudice M, Bucimazza I, Cedolini C, Cagnacci A. Risk-Reducing Breast and Gynecological Surgery for BRCA Mutation Carriers: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041422. [PMID: 36835955 PMCID: PMC9967164 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
This narrative review aims to clarify the role of breast and gynecological risk-reduction surgery in BRCA mutation carriers. We examine the indications, contraindications, complications, technical aspects, timing, economic impact, ethical issues, and prognostic benefits of the most common prophylactic surgical options from the perspectives of a breast surgeon and a gynecologist. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and EMBASE databases. The databases were explored from their inceptions to August 2022. Three independent reviewers screened the items and selected those most relevant to this review's scope. BRCA1/2 mutation carriers are significantly more likely to develop breast, ovarian, and serous endometrial cancer. Because of the Angelina effect, there has been a significant increase in bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM) since 2013. BRRM and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) significantly reduce the risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer. RRSO has significant side effects, including an impact on fertility and early menopause (i.e., vasomotor symptoms, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, cognitive impairment, and sexual dysfunction). Hormonal therapy can help with these symptoms. Because of the lower risk of developing breast cancer in the residual mammary gland tissue after BRRM, estrogen-only treatments have an advantage over an estrogen/progesterone combined treatment. Risk-reducing hysterectomy allows for estrogen-only treatments and lowers the risk of endometrial cancer. Although prophylactic surgery reduces the cancer risk, it has disadvantages associated with early menopause. A multidisciplinary team must carefully inform the woman who chooses this path of the broad spectrum of implications, from cancer risk reduction to hormonal therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Bertozzi
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, UD, Italy
- Ennergi Research (Non-Profit Organisation), 33050 Lestizza, UD, Italy
| | - Ambrogio P. Londero
- Ennergi Research (Non-Profit Organisation), 33050 Lestizza, UD, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Infant Health, University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, GE, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Anjeza Xholli
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale San Martino, 16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Azioni
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale San Martino, 16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Roberta Di Vora
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, UD, Italy
| | - Michele Paudice
- Anatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
- Anatomic Pathology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale San Martino, 16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
| | - Ines Bucimazza
- Department of Surgery, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa
| | - Carla Cedolini
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, UD, Italy
- Ennergi Research (Non-Profit Organisation), 33050 Lestizza, UD, Italy
| | - Angelo Cagnacci
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Infant Health, University of Genoa, 16132 Genova, GE, Italy
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale San Martino, 16132 Genoa, GE, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Musacchio L, Boccia S, Marchetti C, Minucci A, Camarda F, Cassani C, Ventriglia J, Salutari V, Ghizzoni V, Giudice E, Perri MT, Carbone MV, Ricci C, Pignata S, Fagotti A, Scambia G, Lorusso D. Survival outcomes in patients with BRCA mutated, variant of unknown significance, and wild type ovarian cancer treated with PARP inhibitors. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023:ijgc-2022-003903. [PMID: 36759000 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Correlation between BRCA1/2 (BRCA) pathogenic variants and the response to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) has been recognized in patients with ovarian cancer. Moreover, data on the clinical implications of variants of unknown significance are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in survival outcomes in patients with BRCA variants of unknown significance, mutated, and wild type relapsed ovarian cancer treated with PARPi. METHODS Patients with ovarian cancer whose somatic BRCA testing was available and who were receiving PARPi as maintenance treatment at the first recurrence between January 2014 and January 2021 were included in the present study and analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups according to BRCA mutational status (variant of unknown significance, mutated, and wild type). Progression-free survival was assessed in each study group. RESULTS Of 67 patients identified, 20 (29.9%), 24 (35.8%), and 23 (34.3%) had BRCA variant of unknown significance, mutated, and wild type, respectively. Patients received PARPi as maintenance treatment at the time of the first relapse after a complete response or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy without differences in the previous platinum-free interval among the analyzed groups. The median progression-free survival of patients with BRCA mutation was significantly longer than for those with BRCA wild type or variant of unknown significance (not reached vs 4 months vs 7 months, respectively; p<0.001). Additionally, no significant difference was found between patients with BRCA wild type and BRCA variant of unknown significance (p=0.50). CONCLUSION Our study suggests that carriers of BRCA variant of unknown significance have survival outcomes comparable to patients with BRCA wild type and shorter progression-free survival than women harboring BRCA pathogenic variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Musacchio
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Serena Boccia
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudia Marchetti
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Minucci
- Departmental Unit of Molecular and Genomic Diagnostic, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Floriana Camarda
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Cassani
- Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Jole Ventriglia
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G.Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Vanda Salutari
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Viola Ghizzoni
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Giudice
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Perri
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Vittoria Carbone
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Caterina Ricci
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Sandro Pignata
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G.Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Department of Life Science and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Department of Life Science and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy .,Department of Life Science and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Carvalho CMD, Braga LDC, Silva LM, Chami AM, Silva Filho ALD. Germline Mutations Landscape in a Cohort of the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil, in Patients Who Underwent Genetic Counseling for Gynecological and Breast Cancer. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRÍCIA 2023; 45:74-81. [PMID: 36977404 PMCID: PMC10078886 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The present study evaluated the profile of germline mutations present in patients who underwent genetic counseling for risk assessment for breast cancer (BC), ovarian cancer (OC), and endometrial cancer (EC) with a possible hereditary pattern. METHODS Medical records of 382 patients who underwent genetic counseling after signing an informed consent form were analyzed. A total of 55.76% of patients (213/382) were symptomatic (personal history of cancer), and 44.24% (169/382) were asymptomatic (absence of the disease). The variables analyzed were age, sex, place of birth, personal or family history of BC, OC, EC, as well as other types of cancer associated with hereditary syndromes. The Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) nomenclature guidelines were used to name the variants, and their biological significance was determined by comparing 11 databases. RESULTS We identified 53 distinct mutations: 29 pathogenic variants, 13 variants of undetermined significance (VUS), and 11 benign. The most frequent mutations were BRCA1 c.470_471delCT, BRCA1 c.4675 + 1G > T, and BRCA2 c.2T> G. Furthermore, 21 variants appear to have been described for the first time in Brazil. In addition to BRCA1/2 mutations, variants in other genes related to hereditary syndromes that predispose to gynecological cancers were found. CONCLUSION This study allowed a deeper understanding of the main mutations identified in families in the state of Minas Gerais and demonstrates the need to assess the family history of non-gynecological cancer for risk assessment of BC, OC, and EC. Moreover, it is an effort that contributes to population studies to evaluate the cancer risk mutation profile in Brazil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camila Martins de Carvalho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
| | - Letícia da Conceição Braga
- OncoTag Desenvolvimento de Produtos e Serviços para Saúde Humana, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
- Translational Research Laboratory in Oncology, Instituto Mário Penna-Ensino, Pesquisa e Inovação, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
| | - Luciana Maria Silva
- OncoTag Desenvolvimento de Produtos e Serviços para Saúde Humana, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
- Cell Biology Service, Diretoria de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, Fundação Ezequiel Dias, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
| | - Anisse Marques Chami
- School of Medicine, Campus Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
| | - Agnaldo Lopes da Silva Filho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
- School of Medicine, Campus Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
De Paolis E, Paris I, Tilocca B, Roncada P, Foca L, Tiberi G, D’Angelo T, Pavese F, Muratore M, Carbognin L, Garganese G, Masetti R, Di Leone A, Fabi A, Scambia G, Urbani A, Generali D, Minucci A, Santonocito C. Assessing the pathogenicity of BRCA1/2 variants of unknown significance: Relevance and challenges for breast cancer precision medicine. Front Oncol 2023; 12:1053035. [PMID: 36741700 PMCID: PMC9891372 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1053035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide. Pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes account for approximately 50% of all hereditary BC, with 60-80% of patients characterized by Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) at an early stage phenotype. The identification of a pathogenic BRCA1/2 variant has important and expanding roles in risk-reducing surgeries, treatment planning, and familial surveillance. Otherwise, finding unclassified Variants of Unknown Significance (VUS) limits the clinical utility of the molecular test, leading to an "imprecise medicine". Methods We reported the explanatory example of the BRCA1 c.5057A>C, p.(His1686Pro) VUS identified in a patient with TNBC. We integrated data from family history and clinic-pathological evaluations, genetic analyses, and bioinformatics in silico investigations to evaluate the VUS classification. Results Our evaluation posed evidences for the pathogenicity significance of the investigated VUS: 1) association of the BRCA1 variant to cancer-affected members of the family; 2) absence of another high-risk mutation; 3) multiple indirect evidences derived from gene and protein structural analysis. Discussion In line with the ongoing efforts to uncertain variants classification, we speculated about the relevance of an in-depth assessment of pathogenicity of BRCA1/2 VUS for a personalized management of patients with BC. We underlined that the efficient integration of clinical data with the widest number of supporting molecular evidences should be adopted for the proper management of patients, with the final aim of effectively guide the best prognostic and therapeutic paths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa De Paolis
- Clinical Chemistry, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Operations (UOC), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,Department of Basic Biotechnological Sciences, Intensivological and Perioperative Clinics, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Ida Paris
- Division of Oncological Gynecology, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,*Correspondence: Ida Paris,
| | - Bruno Tilocca
- Department of Health Science, University “Magna Graecia” of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Paola Roncada
- Department of Health Science, University “Magna Graecia” of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Laura Foca
- Clinical Chemistry, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Operations (UOC), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giordana Tiberi
- Division of Oncological Gynecology, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Tatiana D’Angelo
- Division of Oncological Gynecology, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Pavese
- Division of Oncological Gynecology, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Margherita Muratore
- Division of Oncological Gynecology, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luisa Carbognin
- Division of Oncological Gynecology, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgia Garganese
- Gynaecology and Breast Care Center, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy,Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Sezione di Ginecologia ed Ostetricia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Masetti
- Division of Oncological Gynecology, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alba Di Leone
- Division of Oncological Gynecology, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Fabi
- Unit of Precision Medicine in Breast Cancer, Scientific Directorate, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Division of Oncological Gynecology, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Urbani
- Clinical Chemistry, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Operations (UOC), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,Department of Basic Biotechnological Sciences, Intensivological and Perioperative Clinics, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Generali
- Department of Medical, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Angelo Minucci
- Departmental Unit of Molecular and Genomic Diagnostics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Concetta Santonocito
- Clinical Chemistry, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Operations (UOC), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,Department of Basic Biotechnological Sciences, Intensivological and Perioperative Clinics, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tutika RK, Bennett JA, Abraham J, Snape K, Tatton-Brown K, Kemp Z, Copson E, Openshaw MR. Mainstreaming of genomics in oncology: a nationwide survey of the genomics training needs of UK oncologists. Clin Med (Lond) 2023; 23:9-15. [PMID: 36697012 PMCID: PMC11046524 DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2022-0372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Genomics is rapidly changing treatment paradigms for cancers, obligating oncologists to have good genomics knowledge. Through this survey, we aimed to assess the current understanding of cancer genomics among UK oncologists. METHODS We conducted a web-based nation-wide self-assessment survey of the cancer genomics knowledge of UK clinical and medical oncology trainees and consultants. RESULTS In total, 150 oncologists (81 consultants and 69 trainees) responded, representing 10% of UK oncologists.Formal training in genomics had not been received by 38.7% of oncologists and 92.7% identified a need for additional genomics training.In total, 71.3% self-reported to have good knowledge of defining somatic and germline mutations, falling to 35.3% for understanding principles of gene expression and regulation. Knowledge of cancer-predisposing syndromes was highest for Lynch syndrome (40.7% good knowledge) and lowest for multiple endocrine neoplasia (14.0% good knowledge).Overall, 49.0% of respondents had consented patients for germline testing, but 80.7% reported a lack of training in genetic counselling. CONCLUSION Large knowledge gaps have been identified through this survey, highlighting the need for incorporation of improved formal training in cancer genomics for consultants and trainees, with an aim to equip oncologists for advances in clinical practice and to take up genetic mainstreaming confidently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Katie Snape
- St George's Hospital, London UK, and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Katrina Tatton-Brown
- St George's Hospital, London, UK, and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Zoe Kemp
- Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Mark R Openshaw
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK, and Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
McCarthy-Leo C, Darwiche F, Tainsky MA. DNA Repair Mechanisms, Protein Interactions and Therapeutic Targeting of the MRN Complex. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:5278. [PMID: 36358700 PMCID: PMC9656488 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Repair of a DNA double-strand break relies upon a pathway of proteins to identify damage, regulate cell cycle checkpoints, and repair the damage. This process is initiated by a sensor protein complex, the MRN complex, comprised of three proteins-MRE11, RAD50, and NBS1. After a double-stranded break, the MRN complex recruits and activates ATM, in-turn activating other proteins such as BRCA1/2, ATR, CHEK1/2, PALB2 and RAD51. These proteins have been the focus of many studies for their individual roles in hereditary cancer syndromes and are included on several genetic testing panels. These panels have enabled us to acquire large amounts of genetic data, much of which remains a challenge to interpret due to the presence of variants of uncertain significance (VUS). While the primary aim of clinical testing is to accurately and confidently classify variants in order to inform medical management, the presence of VUSs has led to ambiguity in genetic counseling. Pathogenic variants within MRN complex genes have been implicated in breast, ovarian, prostate, colon cancers and gliomas; however, the hundreds of VUSs within MRE11, RAD50, and NBS1 precludes the application of these data in genetic guidance of carriers. In this review, we discuss the MRN complex's role in DNA double-strand break repair, its interactions with other cancer predisposing genes, the variants that can be found within the three MRN complex genes, and the MRN complex's potential as an anti-cancer therapeutic target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire McCarthy-Leo
- Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
| | - Fatima Darwiche
- Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
| | - Michael A. Tainsky
- Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
- Molecular Therapeutics Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute at Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Miller RE, Elyashiv O, El-Shakankery KH, Ledermann JA. Ovarian Cancer Therapy: Homologous Recombination Deficiency as a Predictive Biomarker of Response to PARP Inhibitors. Onco Targets Ther 2022; 15:1105-1117. [PMID: 36217436 PMCID: PMC9547601 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s272199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have revolutionised the management of patients with high-grade serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer demonstrating significant improvements in progression-free survival. Whilst the greatest benefit is seen with BRCA1/2 mutant cancers, it is clear that the benefit extends beyond this group. This sensitivity is thought to be due to homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), which is present in up to 50% of the high-grade serous cancers. Several different HRD assays exist, which fall into one of three main categories: homologous recombination repair (HRR)-related gene analysis, genomic "scars" and/or mutational signatures, and real-time HRD functional assessment. We review the emerging data on HRD as a predictive biomarker for PARP inhibitors and discuss the merits and disadvantages of different HRD assays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rowan E Miller
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, UK
| | - Osnat Elyashiv
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Jonathan A Ledermann
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Saule C, Menu-Hespel S, Carton M, Malhaire C, Cherel P, Reyal F, Le Mentec M, Guillot E, Donnadieu A, Callet N, Frank S, Coussy F, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Mouret-Fourme E. Prevalent versus incident breast cancers: benefits of clinical and radiological monitoring in women with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:1060-1066. [PMID: 35217802 PMCID: PMC9436925 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01049-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Women with pathogenic germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants have a higher risk of breast cancer than in the general population. International guidelines recommend specific clinical and radiological breast follow-up. This specific breast screening program has already been shown to be of clinical benefit, but no information is available concerning the use of prognostic factors or specific survival to guide follow-up decisions. We evaluated "high-risk" screening in a retrospective single-center study of 520 women carrying pathogenic germline variants of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene treated for breast cancer between January 2000 and December 2016. We compared two groups of women: the incidental breast cancer group (IBCG) were followed before breast cancer diagnosis (N = 103), whereas the prevalent breast cancer group (PBCG) (N = 417) had no specific follow-up for high risk before breast cancer diagnosis. Breast cancers were diagnosed at an earlier stage in the IBCG than in the PBCG: T0 in 64% versus 19% of tumors, (p < 0.00001), and N0 in 90% vs. 75% (p < 0.00001), respectively. Treatment differed significantly between the 2 groups: less neoadjuvant chemotherapy (7.1% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.00001), adjuvant chemotherapy (47.7% vs. 61.9%, p = 0.004) and more mastectomies (60% vs. 42% p < 0.0001) in the IBCG vs PBCG groups respectively. Overall and breast cancer-specific mortality were similar between the two groups. However, the patients in the IBCG had a significantly longer metastasis-free survival than those in the PBCG, at three years (96.9% [95% CI 93.5-100] vs. 92.30% [95% CI 89.8-94.9]; p = 0.02), suggesting a possible long-term survival advantage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Saule
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| | | | - Matthieu Carton
- Institut Curie, Department of Biometry, DRCI, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Caroline Malhaire
- Institut Curie, Department of Medical Imaging, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, INSERM, LITO Laboratory, 91401, Orsay, France
| | - Pascal Cherel
- Institut Curie, Department of Medical Imaging, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Fabien Reyal
- Institut Curie, Department of Surgery, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Residual Tumour & Response to Treatment Laboratory (RT2Lab), INSERM, U 932 Immunity and Cancer, Paris, France
| | - Marine Le Mentec
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | | | - Anne Donnadieu
- Institut Curie, Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Nasrine Callet
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Sophie Frank
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Department of Medical Oncology, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Florence Coussy
- Institut Curie, Department of Medical Oncology, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, INSERM U830, Paris, France
- Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Copson E, McVeigh T, Frost A, Tatton-Brown K. GeNotes: a new online 'just in time' genomics resource for healthcare professionals. Future Healthc J 2022; 9:68-69. [PMID: 36310986 PMCID: PMC9601014 DOI: 10.7861/fhj.9-2-s68] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Amy Frost
- CHealth Education England, London, UK
| | - Kate Tatton-Brown
- DSt George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK and Health Education England, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
McHugh JK, Offiah G, Daly S, El Beltagi N, Barry MK, O'Reilly S, McVeigh TP. Postgraduate training in Cancer Genetics-a cross-specialty survey exploring experience of clinicians in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci 2022; 191:1427-1434. [PMID: 34195919 PMCID: PMC8244677 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-021-02637-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As genomic profiling of constitutional and tumour-derived DNA becomes increasingly critical in cancer risk estimation, prognostication and treatment, there is a growing need for clinicians involved in cancer care to up-skill in Cancer Genetics. In the Republic of Ireland (ROI), this is particularly crucial, given a paucity of vocationally trained Clinical Geneticists per capita compared to other European countries. AIMS We aimed to assess the self-reported confidence of postgraduate medical/surgical trainees in ROI in requesting, interpreting, and managing genomic data in patients with cancer, and to assess their selfreported experience, and demand for future training in this area. METHODS A cross-sectional survey of postgraduate trainees in four specialties (Medical and Radiation Oncology, Surgery, and Obstetrics and Gynaecology (O&G)), training in ROI, was undertaken. A bespoke electronic questionnaire was designed to capture data regarding preceding experience, and confidence across several hypothetical clinical scenarios involving genomic testing. The survey was circulated to eligible participants by training programme administrators, after relevant institutional ethical approval. Data was collected anonymously. RESULTS The study cohort included 62 respondents. A paucity of cancer genetics training at every level was demonstrated, with "hardly any" or "none at all" reported by 47(76%), 62(100%), and 50(81%) during undergraduate, core specialty, and higher specialist training, respectively. A relative lack of confidence in all clinical scenarios was apparent, particularly among Surgery/O&G trainees. Most respondents would value more training in Cancer Genetics. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates an unmet need in dedicated Cancer Genetics training for postgraduate specialty trainees in ROI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana K McHugh
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Gozie Offiah
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sean Daly
- Rotunda Hospital, Parnell Square E, Rotunda, Dublin 1, D01 P5W9, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | | | - Terri P McVeigh
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kwong A, Ho CYS, Shin VY, Au CH, Chan TL, Ma ESK. How does re-classification of variants of unknown significance (VUS) impact the management of patients at risk for hereditary breast cancer? BMC Med Genomics 2022; 15:122. [PMID: 35641994 PMCID: PMC9158111 DOI: 10.1186/s12920-022-01270-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The popularity of multigene testing increases the probability of identifying variants of uncertain significance (VUS). While accurate variant interpretation enables clinicians to be better informed of the genetic risk of their patients, currently, there is a lack of consensus management guidelines for clinicians on VUS. Methods Among the BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations screening in 3,544 subjects, 236 unique variants (BRCA1: 86; BRCA2: 150) identified in 459 patients were being reviewed. These variants consist of 231 VUS and 5 likely benign variants at the initial classification. Results The variants in 31.8% (146/459) patients were reclassified during the review, which involved 26 unique variants (11.0%). Also, 31 probands (6.8%) and their family members were offered high-risk surveillance and related management after these variants were reclassified to pathogenic or likely pathogenic. At the same time, 69 probands (15%) had their VUS downgraded to cancer risk equivalent to the general population level. Conclusion A review of archival variants from BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing changed the management for 31.8% of the families due to increased or reduced risk. We encourage regular updates of variant databases, reference to normal population and collaboration between research laboratories on functional studies to define the clinical significances of VUS better. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12920-022-01270-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ava Kwong
- Chief of Breast Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong and University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR. .,Department of Surgery, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR. .,Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Shau Kei Wan, Hong Kong SAR.
| | - Cecilia Yuen Sze Ho
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Vivian Yvonne Shin
- Chief of Breast Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong and University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Chun Hang Au
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Tsun-Leung Chan
- Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Shau Kei Wan, Hong Kong SAR.,Department of Molecular Pathology, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Edmond Shiu Kwan Ma
- Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Shau Kei Wan, Hong Kong SAR.,Department of Molecular Pathology, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong SAR
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Dettwyler SA, Thull DL, McAuliffe PF, Steiman JG, Johnson RR, Diego EJ, Mai PL. Timely cancer genetic counseling and testing for young women with breast cancer: impact on surgical decision-making for contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 194:393-401. [PMID: 35596825 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06619-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Genetic testing (GT) can identify individuals with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PV/LPVs) in breast cancer (BC) predisposition genes, who may consider contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM). We report on CRRM rates in young women newly diagnosed with BC who received GT through a multidisciplinary clinic. METHODS Clinical data were reviewed for patients seen between November 2014 and June 2019. Patients with non-metastatic, unilateral BC diagnosed at age ≤ 45 and completed GT prior to surgery were included. Associations between surgical intervention and age, BC stage, family history, and GT results were evaluated. RESULTS Of the 194 patients, 30 (15.5%) had a PV/LPV in a BC predisposition gene (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, NBN, NF1), with 66.7% in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Of 164 (84.5%) uninformative results, 132 (68%) were negative and 32 (16.5%) were variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Overall, 67 (34.5%) had CRRM, including 25/30 (83.3%) PV/LPV carriers and 42/164 (25.6%) non-carriers. A positive test result (p < 0.01) and significant family history were associated with CRRM (p = 0.02). For the 164 with uninformative results, multivariate analysis showed that CRRM was not associated with age (p = 0.23), a VUS, (p = 0.08), family history (p = 0.10), or BC stage (p = 0.11). CONCLUSION In this cohort of young women with BC, the identification of a PV/LPV in a BC predisposition gene and a significant family history were associated with the decision to pursue CRRM. Thus, incorporation of genetic services in the initial evaluation of young patients with a new BC could contribute to the surgical decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shenin A Dettwyler
- UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital (Cancer Genetics Program), Pittsburgh, PA, USA. .,Currently at NYU Langone Health (The Pancreatic Cancer Center), New York, NY, USA.
| | - Darcy L Thull
- UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital (Cancer Genetics Program), Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Jennifer G Steiman
- UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital (Magee-Womens Surgical Associates), Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ronald R Johnson
- UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital (Magee-Womens Surgical Associates), Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Emilia J Diego
- UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital (Magee-Womens Surgical Associates), Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Phuong L Mai
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (Center for Clinical Genetics and Genomics), Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Recchia G, Lawrence ACE, Capacchione L, Freeman ALJ. Making BRCA1 genetic test reports easier to understand through user-centered design: A randomized trial. Genet Med 2022; 24:1684-1696. [PMID: 35522238 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Our objective was to apply a user-centered design process to identify phrases, graphics, and ways of communicating numerical risks that could be used to help patients understand their cancer risk and next steps on receiving BRCA1 genetic test results (positive, negative, and variants of uncertain significance). METHODS The first phase of the study, a user-centered design process, consisted of 4 rounds of interviews (N = 42, including 13 health care professionals and 16 patients having undergone BRCA testing). The second was a randomized, between-participants experimental study of 456 United Kingdom residents that compared the resulting reports to reports used in a United Kingdom national genomic laboratory hub. Outcomes were subjective and objective comprehension, communication efficacy, actionability, and perceived risk. RESULTS Subjective comprehension, communication efficacy, and actionability were all higher for the user-centered reports, with no difference in perceived risk. Comprehension of participants viewing user-centered reports was significantly better on 2 items, directionally (but not significantly) better on 6 items, and directionally (but not significantly) worse on 2 items. CONCLUSION Our results imply that user-centered design is a promising approach for developing materials about complex genetic risks. We suggest wordings that are likely to lead to improved comprehension when communicating BRCA-associated risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Recchia
- Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication, Department of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | - Alice C E Lawrence
- Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication, Department of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alexandra L J Freeman
- Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication, Department of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kong D, Yu H, Sim X, White K, Tai ES, Wenk M, Teo AKK. Multidisciplinary Effort to Drive Precision-Medicine for the Future. Front Digit Health 2022; 4:845405. [PMID: 35585913 PMCID: PMC9108202 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.845405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
In the past one or two decades, countries across the world have successively implemented different precision medicine (PM) programs, and also cooperated to implement international PM programs. We are now in the era of PM. Singapore's National Precision Medicine (NPM) program, initiated in 2017, is now entering its second phase to generate a large genomic database for Asians. The National University of Singapore (NUS) also launched its own PM translational research program (TRP) in 2021, aimed at consolidating multidisciplinary expertise within the Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine to develop collaborative projects that can help to identify and validate novel therapeutic targets for the realization of PM. To achieve this, appropriate data collection, data processing, and results interpretation must be taken into consideration. There may be some difficulties during these processes, but with the improvement of relevant rules and the continuous development of omics-based technologies, we will be able to solve these problems, eventually achieving precise prediction, diagnosis, treatment, or even prevention of diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dewei Kong
- Stem Cells and Diabetes Laboratory, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore
- Dean's Office, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Haojie Yu
- Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Precision Medicine Translational Research Programme (TRP), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Xueling Sim
- Precision Medicine Translational Research Programme (TRP), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kevin White
- Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Precision Medicine Translational Research Programme (TRP), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Genome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR, Singapore, Singapore
| | - E. Shyong Tai
- Precision Medicine Translational Research Programme (TRP), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Genome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Markus Wenk
- Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Precision Medicine Translational Research Programme (TRP), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Adrian Kee Keong Teo
- Stem Cells and Diabetes Laboratory, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Precision Medicine Translational Research Programme (TRP), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- *Correspondence: Adrian Kee Keong Teo
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lee YQ, Yoon SY, Hassan T, Padmanabhan H, Yip CH, Keng WT, Thong MK, Ahmad Annuar MA, Mohd Taib NA, Teo SH. Attitudes and training needs of oncologists and surgeons in mainstreaming breast cancer genetic counseling in a low-to-middle income Asian country. J Genet Couns 2022; 31:1080-1089. [PMID: 35481858 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
With the advent of poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) therapies, the focus of genetic testing for breast, ovarian, and other cancers has shifted from risk management to treatment decision-making in high-resource settings. Due to the shortage of genetic counselors worldwide, alternative ways of delivering genetic counseling have been explored, including training nongenetics healthcare professionals (NGHPs) to provide genetic counseling. However, little is known about the feasibility of adopting such models in healthcare settings with insufficient specialists, where population health literacy is low and where access to new therapies may be limited. In this study, we evaluated the attitudes, considerations, and self-efficacy of oncologists, breast surgeons, and general surgeons in mainstreaming breast cancer genetic counseling in Malaysia, a middle-income Asian country with a universal healthcare system. We developed a 32-item survey via a modified Delphi method, which was then distributed via a purposive and network sampling approach. While 77% of respondents expressed interest in providing breast cancer genetic counseling, 85% preferred to refer patients directly to genetic services for genetic counseling and testing. The main considerations for mainstreaming were the cost of genetic testing and PARPi therapy, as well as the availability of support from genetics professionals. Respondents reported a lack of confidence in communicating genetic risk, particularly to patients with poor health literacy, and in the clinical management of patients with variants of uncertain significance. Our results highlight the urgent need to train more NGHPs in providing genetic counseling and testing in low-to-middle income countries, and suggest that the mainstay for genetic counseling in this setting may be for risk management rather than access to PARPi therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Wee-Teik Keng
- Genetics Department, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Meow-Keong Thong
- Department of Paediatrics, Genetic Medicine Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | - Nur Aishah Mohd Taib
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abdel-Razeq H, Tamimi F, Abujamous L, Abdel-Razeq R, Abunasser M, Edaily S, Abdulelah H, Khashabeh RA, Bater R. Rates of Variants of Uncertain Significance Among Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Genetic Testing: Regional Perspectives. Front Oncol 2022; 12:673094. [PMID: 35402282 PMCID: PMC8989924 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.673094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Contrary to BRCA pathogenic variants, recommendations for management of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are not clear and focus more on the patient’s family and personal history of cancer. Local and regional data on VUS are scarce. In this paper, we study patterns and frequency of VUS among breast cancer patients undergoing genetic testing. Patients and Methods Patients with breast cancer at high risk for pathogenic variants, as per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, were tested at reference laboratories. Related surgical interventions were reviewed. Results Among a group of 1,197 patients with breast cancer who underwent genetic testing and counseling, 110 (9.2%) had VUS; most (n = 79, 71.8%) were in BRCA2. Median age (range) was 39 (25–66) years with 65 (59.1%) patients who were 40 years or younger at diagnosis. Among 103 patients with non-metastatic disease, 48 (46.6%) had breast-conserving surgery (BCS) while only 5 (4.9%) had bilateral mastectomies; all were due to bilateral disease and not prophylactic. VUS diagnosis was known prior to initial surgery in 34 (33.0%) patients; 11 (32.4%) of them had BCS only. Over the study period, only one VUS variant was upgraded to “likely positive.” The recent introduction of multiple-gene panel testing had resulted in a surge in VUS rate (22.2%) in genes other than BRCA1 or BRCA2, like PALB2, CHEK2, and ATM. Conclusions Rates of VUS are relatively high and increasing, mostly in non-BRCA1 or BRCA2, and this had no impact on the therapeutic or prophylactic surgical decisions. Adherence to guidelines is extremely important to avoid unnecessary procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hikmat Abdel-Razeq
- Department of Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.,School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Faris Tamimi
- Department of Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Lama Abujamous
- Department of Cell Therapy & Applied Genomic, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | | | | | - Sara Edaily
- Department of Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Hazem Abdulelah
- Department of Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Razan Abu Khashabeh
- Department of Cell Therapy & Applied Genomic, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Rayan Bater
- Department of Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Menko FH, Monkhorst K, Hogervorst FB, Rosenberg EH, Adank M, Ruijs MW, Bleiker EM, Sonke GS, Russell NS, Oldenburg HS, van der Kolk LE. Challenges in breast cancer genetic testing. A call for novel forms of multidisciplinary care and long-term evaluation. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 176:103642. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
29
|
Andoni T, Wiggins J, Robinson R, Charlton R, Sandberg M, Eeles R. Half of germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants found on panel tests do not fulfil NHS testing criteria. Sci Rep 2022; 12:2507. [PMID: 35190596 PMCID: PMC8861039 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06376-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic testing for cancer predisposition has been curtailed by the cost of sequencing, and testing has been restricted by eligibility criteria. As the cost of sequencing decreases, the question of expanding multi-gene cancer panels to a broader population arises. We evaluated how many additional actionable genetic variants are returned by unrestricted panel testing in the private sector compared to those which would be returned by adhering to current NHS eligibility criteria. We reviewed 152 patients referred for multi-gene cancer panels in the private sector between 2014 and 2016. Genetic counselling and disclosure of all results was standard of care provided by the Consultant. Every panel conducted was compared to current eligibility criteria. A germline pathogenic / likely pathogenic variant (P/LP), in a gene relevant to the personal or family history of cancer, was detected in 15 patients (detection rate of 10%). 46.7% of those found to have the P/LP variants (7 of 15), or 4.6% of the entire set (7 of 152), did not fulfil NHS eligibility criteria. 46.7% of P/LP variants in this study would have been missed by national testing guidelines, all of which were actionable. However, patients who do not fulfil eligibility criteria have a higher Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) burden. We demonstrated that the current England NHS threshold for genetic testing is missing pathogenic variants which would alter management in 4.6%, nearly 1 in 20 individuals. However, the clinical service burden that would ensue is a detection of VUS of 34%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tala Andoni
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | | | - Rachel Robinson
- Leeds Genetics Laboratory, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Ruth Charlton
- Leeds Genetics Laboratory, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Fanale D, Pivetti A, Cancelliere D, Spera A, Bono M, Fiorino A, Pedone E, Barraco N, Brando C, Perez A, Guarneri MF, Russo TDB, Vieni S, Guarneri G, Russo A, Bazan V. BRCA1/2 variants of unknown significance in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome: looking for the hidden meaning. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 172:103626. [PMID: 35150867 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome is caused by germline mutations in BRCA1/2 genes. These genes are very large and their mutations are heterogeneous and scattered throughout the coding sequence. In addition to the above-mentioned mutations, variants of uncertain/unknown significance (VUSs) have been identified in BRCA genes, which make more difficult the clinical management of the patient and risk assessment. In the last decades, several laboratories have developed different databases that contain more than 2000 variants for the two genes and integrated strategies which include multifactorial prediction models based on direct and indirect genetic evidence, to classify the VUS and attribute them a clinical significance associated with a deleterious, high-low or neutral risk. This review provides a comprehensive overview of literature studies concerning the VUSs, in order to assess their impact on the population and provide new insight for the appropriate patient management in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Fanale
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Alessia Pivetti
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Daniela Cancelliere
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Antonio Spera
- Department of Radiotherapy, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, ASP of Agrigento, Agrigento, Italy
| | - Marco Bono
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Alessia Fiorino
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Erika Pedone
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Nadia Barraco
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Chiara Brando
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Alessandro Perez
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Tancredi Didier Bazan Russo
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Salvatore Vieni
- Division of General and Oncological Surgery, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Italy
| | - Girolamo Guarneri
- Gynecology Section, Mother - Child Department, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
| | - Viviana Bazan
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Reid S, Spalluto LB, Lang K, Weidner A, Pal T. An overview of genetic services delivery for hereditary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 191:491-500. [PMID: 35079980 PMCID: PMC8789372 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06478-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women worldwide, with approximately 5-10% of cases attributed to high penetrance hereditary breast cancer (HBC) genes. The tremendous advances in precision oncology have broadened indications for germline genetic testing to guide both systemic and surgical treatment, with increasing demand for cancer genetic services. The HBC continuum of care includes (1) identification, access, and uptake of genetic counseling and testing; (2) the delivery of genetic counseling and testing services; and (3) initiation of guideline-adherent follow-up care and family communication of results. Challenges to delivering care on the HBC care continuum include factors such as access to services, cost, discrimination and bias, and lack of education and awareness, which can be mitigated through implementing a multi-level approach. This includes strategies such as increasing awareness and utilization of genetic counseling and testing, developing new methods to meet the growing demand for genetic services, and improving the uptake of follow-up care by increasing patient and provider awareness of the management recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonya Reid
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC)/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center (VICC), 2220 Pierce Ave. 777 PRB, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
| | - Lucy B Spalluto
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC)/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center (VICC), 2220 Pierce Ave. 777 PRB, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Medicine/Division of Genetic Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Veterans Health Administration-Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - Katie Lang
- Department of Medicine/Division of Genetic Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Anne Weidner
- Department of Medicine/Division of Genetic Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Tuya Pal
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC)/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center (VICC), 2220 Pierce Ave. 777 PRB, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
- Department of Medicine/Division of Genetic Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC)/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center (VICC), 1500 21st Avenue South. Suite 2810, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Dharwadkar P, Greenan G, Stoffel EM, Burstein E, Pirzadeh-Miller S, Lahiri S, Mauer C, Singal AG, Murphy CC. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Germline Genetic Testing of Patients With Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:353-361.e3. [PMID: 33359728 PMCID: PMC8222407 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Up to 20% of younger patients (age <50 years) diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) have germline mutations in cancer susceptibility genes. Germline genetic testing may guide clinical management and facilitate earlier intervention in affected relatives. Few studies have characterized differences in genetic testing by race/ethnicity. METHODS We identified young adults (age 18-49 years) diagnosed with CRC between 2009 and 2017 in 2 health systems in Dallas, TX. We evaluated referral to genetic counseling, attendance at genetic counseling appointments, and receipt of germline genetic testing by race/ethnicity. RESULTS Of 385 patients with young-onset CRC (median age at diagnosis 44.4 years), 176 (45.7%) were Hispanic, 98 (25.4%) non-Hispanic Black, and 111 (28.8%) non-Hispanic White. Most patients (76.9%) received immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair proteins, and there was no difference in receipt of IHC by race/ethnicity. However, a lower proportion of Black patients were referred to genetic counseling (50.0% vs White patients 54.1% vs Hispanic patients 65.9%; P = .02) and attended genetic counseling appointments (61.2% vs 81.7% White patients vs 86.2% Hispanic patients; P < .01). Of 141 patients receiving genetic testing, 38 (27.0%) had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in a cancer susceptibility gene. An additional 33 patients (23.4%) had variants of uncertain significance, of which 84.8% occurred in racial/ethnic minorities. CONCLUSIONS In a diverse population of patients diagnosed with young-onset CRC, we observed racial/ethnic differences in referral to and receipt of germline genetic testing. Our findings underscore the importance of universal genetic testing to address racial/ethnic disparities in young-onset CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pooja Dharwadkar
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Garrett Greenan
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Elena M Stoffel
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Ezra Burstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Sayoni Lahiri
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Caitlin Mauer
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Amit G Singal
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Caitlin C Murphy
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Li J, Wang P, Zhang C, Han S, Xiao H, Liu Z, Wang X, Liu W, Wei B, Ma J, Li H, Guo Y. Characterization of Synonymous BRCA1:c.132C>T as a Pathogenic Variant. Front Oncol 2022; 11:812656. [PMID: 35087763 PMCID: PMC8789006 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.812656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer gene 1 (BRCA1) and BRCA2 are tumor suppressors involved in DNA damage response and repair. Carriers of germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 have significantly increased lifetime risks of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and other cancer types; this phenomenon is known as hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome. Accurate interpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants is important not only for disease management in patients, but also for determining preventative measures for their families. BRCA1:c.132C>T (p.Cys44=) is a synonymous variant recorded in the ClinVar database with “conflicting interpretations of its pathogenicity”. Here, we report our clinical tests in which we identified this variant in two unrelated patients, both of whom developed breast cancer at an early age with ovarian presentation a few years later and had a family history of relevant cancers. Minigene assay showed that this change caused a four-nucleotide loss at the end of exon 3, resulting in a truncated p.Cys44Tyrfs*5 protein. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction identified two fragments (123 and 119 bp) using RNA isolated from patient blood samples, in consistency with the results of the minigene assay. Collectively, we classified BRCA1:c.132C>T (p.Cys44=) as a pathogenic variant, as evidenced by functional studies, RNA analysis, and the patients’ family histories. By analyzing variants recorded in the BRCA Exchange database, we found synonymous changes at the ends of exons could potentially influence splicing; meanwhile, current in silico tools could not predict splicing changes efficiently if the variants were in the middle of an exon, or in the deep intron region. Future studies should attempt to identify variants that influence gene expression and post-transcription modifications to improve our understanding of BRCA1 and BRCA2, as well as their related cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Li
- Department of Molecular Pathology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.,Henan Key Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Zhengzhou, China.,Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Genetics, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ping Wang
- Department of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Cuiyun Zhang
- Department of Molecular Pathology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.,Henan Key Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Zhengzhou, China.,Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Genetics, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Sile Han
- Department of Molecular Pathology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Han Xiao
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Zhiyuan Liu
- Amoy Diagnostics Co., Ltd. (AmoyDx), Xiamen, China
| | - Xiaoyan Wang
- Department of Molecular Pathology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.,Henan Key Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Zhengzhou, China.,Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Genetics, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Weiling Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzou, China
| | - Bing Wei
- Department of Molecular Pathology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.,Henan Key Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Zhengzhou, China.,Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Genetics, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jie Ma
- Department of Molecular Pathology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.,Henan Key Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Zhengzhou, China.,Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Genetics, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Hongle Li
- Department of Molecular Pathology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yongjun Guo
- Department of Molecular Pathology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.,Henan Key Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Zhengzhou, China.,Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Genetics, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rahman B, McEwen A, Phillips JL, Tucker K, Goldstein D, Jacobs C. Genetic and genomic learning needs of oncologists and oncology nurses in the era of precision medicine: a scoping review. Per Med 2022; 19:139-153. [PMID: 35060769 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2021-0096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Genetic and genomic data are increasingly guiding clinical care for cancer patients. To meet the growing demand for precision medicine, patient-facing oncology staff will be a part of leading the provision of genomic testing. A scoping review was undertaken to identify the range of genetic and genomic learning needs of oncologists and oncology nurses. Learning needs were reported relating to interpretation of genomic data, clinical decision-making, patient communication and counseling, and fundamentals of genetics and genomics. There was a lack of empirical research specific to oncology nurses and their learning needs in tumor sequencing. Our findings suggest that oncologists and oncology nurses need tailored support, education and training to improve their confidence and skills in adopting genomic testing into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belinda Rahman
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alison McEwen
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jane L Phillips
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, QLD, Australia.,IMPACCT, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Katherine Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, NSW, Australia.,Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia
| | - David Goldstein
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia
| | - Chris Jacobs
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kharel S, Shrestha S, Yadav S, Shakya P, Baidya S, Hirachan S. BRCA1/ BRCA2 mutation spectrum analysis in South Asia: a systematic review. J Int Med Res 2022; 50:3000605211070757. [PMID: 35000471 PMCID: PMC8753086 DOI: 10.1177/03000605211070757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Breast cancer (BC) is the most common form of cancer among Asian females. Mutations in the BRCA1/BRCA2 genes are often observed in BC cases and largely increase the lifetime risk of having BC. Because of the paucity of high-quality data on the molecular spectrum of BRCA mutations in South Asian populations, we aimed to explore these mutations among South Asian countries. Methods A systematic literature search was performed for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation spectrum using electronic databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Twenty studies were selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results The 185delAG (c.68_69del) mutation in exon 2 of BRCA1 was the most common recurrent mutation and founder mutation found. Various intronic variants, variants of unknown significance, large genomic rearrangements, and polymorphisms were also described in some studies. Conclusions The South Asian population has a wide variety of genetic mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 that differ according to countries and ethnicities. A stronger knowledge of various population-specific mutations in these cancer susceptibility genes can help provide efficient strategies for genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjeev Kharel
- Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Suraj Shrestha
- Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | | | - Prafulla Shakya
- Department of Surgery, National Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Harisiddhi, Lalitpur, Nepal
| | - Sujita Baidya
- Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Panauti, Nepal
| | - Suzita Hirachan
- Department of Surgery, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Fibroadenoma in vulval ectopic breast tissue in a patient with PTEN Hamartoma Tumour Syndrome. Fam Cancer 2021; 21:363-368. [PMID: 34524588 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-021-00275-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PTEN is a tumour suppressor gene involved in regulating cell division. Pathogenic germline variants in PTEN predispose to benign and malignant growths of numerous organs, including of the breast. In the following report, we describe the first documented case of a fibroadenoma developing in ectopic breast tissue of the vulva in a patient with a germline pathogenic variant in PTEN. This highlights the risk of hyperplasia developing in any breast tissue, including rare ectopic sites, particularly in patients with underlying germline variants in cancer susceptibility genes.
Collapse
|
37
|
Wu H, Xu B, Gao Q, Zhou X, Shao J, Liang Z, Ma D. Discrepancies in Genetic Testing Procedures of BRCA1/2 Mutations: A National Survey Across China. Mol Diagn Ther 2021; 24:715-721. [PMID: 32970304 DOI: 10.1007/s40291-020-00489-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
International guidelines recommend BRCA testing for patients with breast and ovarian cancer. Little is known about the genetic testing practices of BRCA1/2 mutations in laboratories across China. This study was designed to assess the discrepancies in genetic testing procedures of BRCA1/2 mutations across China. An online survey was developed for depicting the BRCA1/2 testing landscape in China. Our results show that there were several variations among the laboratories in technologies adopted, large genomic rearrangement detection, probe design, quality control, variant of uncertain significance interpretation, and disposition of variants in public databases. The discrepancies observed in our study would affect the authenticity of results, thus necessitating the formulation of proper national and international guidelines for optimal BRCA1/2 testing clinical practice for efficient management and patient care of this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huanwen Wu
- Department of Pathology, Molecular Pathology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Binghe Xu
- National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qinglei Gao
- Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaoyan Zhou
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College; Institute of Pathology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianyong Shao
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiyong Liang
- Department of Pathology, Molecular Pathology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| | - Ding Ma
- Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Saied MH, Elkaffash D, Fadl R, Haleem RA, Refeat A, Ibrahim I, Tahoun M, Elkayal A, Tayae E. Preliminary results of targeted sequencing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a cohort of breast cancer families: New insight into pathogenic variants in patients and at‑risk relatives. Mol Med Rep 2021; 24:678. [PMID: 34296289 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2021.12317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide and a major health concern in Egypt. There is a known association between pathogenic variants identified in breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA)1 and 2 and the risk of developing BC. However, the number of studies investigating mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Egypt remains limited. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate the frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants in patients with BC and their relatives. For this purpose, 11 families (11 patients and 16 relatives) were included in the present study. BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants were investigated using the Ion S5 next‑generation sequencer. It was found that pathogenic variants were more frequent in patients with familial BC (FBC) than in those with sporadic BC, with 71% of variants in BRCA2, including the first reported identification of c.9089del, c.5583_5584dup, c.8243G>A and c.7976G>A pathogenic variants in Egyptian patients with BC. Pathogenic variants in relatives were confined to FBC c.1278delA, c.1960_1961del, and c.1224delT, with a higher incidence of variants of uncertain significance (VUS), such as BRCA2 intron 2 c.68‑16delT. Of note, two cold spot benign variants, c.3113A>G and c.4837A>G, were repeatedly found (67%) in patients and relatives. In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, novel pathogenic variants and VUS in Egyptian patients with BC and their high‑risk relatives were identified for the first time in the present study. These findings should be integrated with other genomic data concerning Egyptian families and carefully interpreted during genetic counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marwa H Saied
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21131, Egypt
| | - Dalal Elkaffash
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21131, Egypt
| | - Reham Fadl
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21131, Egypt
| | - Reham Abdel Haleem
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21131, Egypt
| | - Amal Refeat
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21131, Egypt
| | - Inas Ibrahim
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21131, Egypt
| | - Mona Tahoun
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21131, Egypt
| | - Alyaa Elkayal
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21131, Egypt
| | - Eman Tayae
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21131, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Zicari RV, Ahmed S, Amann J, Braun SA, Brodersen J, Bruneault F, Brusseau J, Campano E, Coffee M, Dengel A, Düdder B, Gallucci A, Gilbert TK, Gottfrois P, Goffi E, Haase CB, Hagendorff T, Hickman E, Hildt E, Holm S, Kringen P, Kühne U, Lucieri A, Madai VI, Moreno-Sánchez PA, Medlicott O, Ozols M, Schnebel E, Spezzatti A, Tithi JJ, Umbrello S, Vetter D, Volland H, Westerlund M, Wurth R. Co-Design of a Trustworthy AI System in Healthcare: Deep Learning Based Skin Lesion Classifier. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN DYNAMICS 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fhumd.2021.688152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
This paper documents how an ethically aligned co-design methodology ensures trustworthiness in the early design phase of an artificial intelligence (AI) system component for healthcare. The system explains decisions made by deep learning networks analyzing images of skin lesions. The co-design of trustworthy AI developed here used a holistic approach rather than a static ethical checklist and required a multidisciplinary team of experts working with the AI designers and their managers. Ethical, legal, and technical issues potentially arising from the future use of the AI system were investigated. This paper is a first report on co-designing in the early design phase. Our results can also serve as guidance for other early-phase AI-similar tool developments.
Collapse
|
40
|
George S, Ragin C, Ashing KT. Black Is Diverse: The Untapped Beauty and Benefit of Cancer Genomics and Precision Medicine. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 17:279-283. [PMID: 33974833 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia George
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA.,African Caribbean Cancer Consortium
| | - Camille Ragin
- African Caribbean Cancer Consortium.,Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sahin I, Saat H. A novel BRCA1 duplication and new insights on the spectrum and frequency of germline large genomic rearrangements in BRCA1/BRCA2. Mol Biol Rep 2021; 48:5057-5062. [PMID: 34146199 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-021-06499-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Heritable breast cancers account for 5% to 10% of all breast cancers, and monogenic, highly penetrant genes cause them. Around 90% of pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are observed using gene sequencing, with another 10% identified through gene duplication/deletion analysis, which differs across various communities. In this study, we performed a next-generation sequencing panel and MLPA on 1484 patients to explain the importance of recurrent germline duplications/deletions of BRCA1-2 and their clinical results and determine how often BRCA gene LGRs were seen in people suspected of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. The large genomic rearrangements (LGRs) frequency was approximately 1% (14/1484). All 14 mutations were heterozygous and detected in patients with breast cancer. BRCA1 mutations were more predominant (n = 8, 57.1%) than BRCA2 mutations (6, 42.9%). The most common recurrent mutations were BRCA2 exon three and BRCA1 exon 24 (23) deletions. To the best of our knowledge, BRCA1 5'UTR-exon11 duplication has never been reported before. Testing with MLPA is essential to identify patients at high risk. Our data demonstrate that BRCA1-2 LGRs should be considered when ordering genetic testing for individuals with a personal or family history of cancer, particularly breast cancer. Further research could shed light on BRCA1-2 LGRs' unique carcinogenesis roles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Sahin
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Health Sciences, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Hanife Saat
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Health Sciences, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Fanale D, Fiorino A, Incorvaia L, Dimino A, Filorizzo C, Bono M, Cancelliere D, Calò V, Brando C, Corsini LR, Sciacchitano R, Magrin L, Pivetti A, Pedone E, Madonia G, Cucinella A, Badalamenti G, Russo A, Bazan V. Prevalence and Spectrum of Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants of Uncertain Significance in Breast/Ovarian Cancer: Mysterious Signals From the Genome. Front Oncol 2021; 11:682445. [PMID: 34178674 PMCID: PMC8226162 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.682445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
About 10–20% of breast/ovarian (BC/OC) cancer patients undergoing germline BRCA1/2 genetic testing have been shown to harbor Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUSs). Since little is known about the prevalence of germline BRCA1/2 VUS in Southern Italy, our study aimed at describing the spectrum of these variants detected in BC/OC patients in order to improve the identification of potentially high-risk BRCA variants helpful in patient clinical management. Eight hundred and seventy-four BC or OC patients, enrolled from October 2016 to December 2020 at the “Sicilian Regional Center for the Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Rare and Heredo-Familial Tumors” of University Hospital Policlinico “P. Giaccone” of Palermo, were genetically tested for germline BRCA1/2 variants through Next-Generation Sequencing analysis. The mutational screening showed that 639 (73.1%) out of 874 patients were BRCA-w.t., whereas 67 (7.7%) were carriers of germline BRCA1/2 VUSs, and 168 (19.2%) harbored germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants. Our analysis revealed the presence of 59 different VUSs detected in 67 patients, 46 of which were affected by BC and 21 by OC. Twenty-one (35.6%) out of 59 variants were located on BRCA1 gene, whereas 38 (64.4%) on BRCA2. We detected six alterations in BRCA1 and two in BRCA2 with unclear interpretation of clinical significance. Familial anamnesis of a patient harboring the BRCA1-c.3367G>T suggests for this variant a potential of pathogenicity, therefore it should be carefully investigated. Understanding clinical significance of germline BRCA1/2 VUS could improve, in future, the identification of potentially high-risk variants useful for clinical management of BC or OC patients and family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Fanale
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Alessia Fiorino
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Lorena Incorvaia
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Alessandra Dimino
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Clarissa Filorizzo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Marco Bono
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Daniela Cancelliere
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Valentina Calò
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Chiara Brando
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Lidia Rita Corsini
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Roberta Sciacchitano
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Luigi Magrin
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Alessia Pivetti
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Erika Pedone
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giorgio Madonia
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Alessandra Cucinella
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Badalamenti
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Viviana Bazan
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Galbraith LN, Preys CL, Rehm HL, Scheuner MT, Hajek C, Green RC, Christensen KD. Primary care providers' responses to unsolicited Lynch syndrome secondary findings of varying clinical significance. Genet Med 2021; 23:1977-1983. [PMID: 34113000 PMCID: PMC8487923 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01225-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: How primary care providers (PCPs) respond to genomic secondary findings (SFs) of varying clinical significance (pathogenic, uncertain significance (VUS), or benign) is unknown. Methods: We randomized 148 American Academy of Family Physicians members to review three reports with varying significance for Lynch syndrome. Participants provided open-ended responses about the follow-up they would address and organized the SF reports and five other topics in the order they would prioritize responding to them (1=highest priority, 6=lowest priority). Results: PCPs suggested referrals more often for pathogenic variants or VUSs than benign variants (72% vs 16%, p<0.001). PCPs were also more likely to address further workup, like a colonoscopy or EGD, in response to pathogenic variants or VUSs than benign variants (43% vs 4%, p<0.001). The likelihoods of addressing referrals or further workup were similar when PCPs reviewed pathogenic variants and VUSs (both p>0.46). SF reports were prioritized highest for pathogenic variants (2.7 for pathogenic variants, 3.6 for VUSs, 4.3 for benign variants, all p≤0.014). Conclusions: Results suggest that while PCPs appreciated the differences in clinical significance, disclosure of VUSs as SFs would substantially increase downstream health care utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren N Galbraith
- PRecisiOn Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Charlene L Preys
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Heidi L Rehm
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.,Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maren T Scheuner
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, and Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Catherine Hajek
- Sanford Health Imagenetics, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.,Sanford School of Medicine, University of South Dakota, Sioux Falls, SD, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kurt D Christensen
- PRecisiOn Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA. .,Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA. .,Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Menke C, Nagaraj CB, Dawson B, He H, Tawde S, Wakefield EG. Understanding and interpretation of a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) genetic test result by pediatric providers who do not specialize in genetics. J Genet Couns 2021; 30:1559-1569. [PMID: 33969574 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The advancement of genetic testing technologies has allowed for better diagnosis and management of patients, but also results in more variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) due to the increased number of genes being analyzed. There are more genetic tests available and more providers who do not specialize in genetics ordering genetic testing, but few studies examining how providers who do not specialize in genetics interpret VUSs. This study surveyed pediatric providers at a midwestern pediatric care center who do not specialize in genetics about their understanding of a mock genetic test report with a VUS result and whether their understanding of the result was associated with experience ordering genetic tests. Participants' preferences about content of the report and steps taken to understand the result were also examined. Of the 51 participants, 33% correctly answered both knowledge questions about the VUS result: one asking them to interpret the result and one asking them how they would explain the result to the patient. There was no association between answering both knowledge questions correctly and types of previous genetic tests ordered (p > .1 for 8 types of genetic tests), having received a genetic test report with a VUS result (p = .58), having referred patients to a genetics professional (p = .74), or feeling comfortable discussing a positive, negative, or VUS genetic test result (p > .4). This suggests that having previous experience ordering genetic tests does not contribute to the participants' knowledge about a variant of uncertain significance. Most participants reported that the amount of information in each section of the mock report was adequate. Participants were likely to reference multiple resources to better understand a VUS result, including published literature (82%), gene-specific databases (67%), and colleagues (63%). While these results cannot be generalized to all institutions, institutions can use the two knowledge questions to determine participants' understanding of genetic test results. This will help healthcare institutions determine methods that will best aide their providers who order genetic testing but do not specialize in genetics in learning more about the genetic testing process and better utilize results to improve patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea Menke
- Department of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Chinmayee B Nagaraj
- Department of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Brian Dawson
- Department of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Hua He
- Department of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Sanjukta Tawde
- Department of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Emily G Wakefield
- Department of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Thai patients who fulfilled NCCN criteria for breast/ovarian cancer genetic assessment demonstrated high prevalence of germline mutations in cancer susceptibility genes: implication to Asian population testing. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 188:237-248. [PMID: 33649982 PMCID: PMC8233261 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06152-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Germline genetic mutation plays a significant role in breast cancer susceptibility. The strength of such predisposition varies among ethnic groups across the globe, and clinical data from Asian population to develop a strategic approach to who should undergo a genetic test are lacking. METHODS We performed a multigene test with next generation sequencing in Thai patients whose clinical history fulfilled NCCN criteria for breast/ovarian cancer genetic assessment, consists of 306 breast cancer patients, 62 ovarian cancer patients, 14 pancreatic cancer patients and 7 prostate cancer patients. Genetic test result and clinical history were then checked with each NCCN criteria to determined detection rate for each indication. RESULTS There were 83 pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants identified in 104 patients, 44 of these P/LP variants were novel. We reported a high rate of germline P/LP variants in breast cancer (24%), ovarian cancer (37%), pancreatic cancer (14%), and prostate cancer (29%). Germline P/LP variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 accounted for 80% of P/LP variants found in breast cancer and 57% of P/LP variants found in ovarian cancer. The detection rate of patients who fulfilled NCCN 2019 guideline for genetic/familial high-risk assessment of breast and ovarian cancers was 22-40%. CONCLUSION Overall, the data from this study strongly support the consideration of multigene panel test as a diagnostic tool for patients with inherited cancer susceptibility in Thailand and Asian population. Implementation of the NCCN guideline is applicable, some modification may be needed to be more suitable for Asian population.
Collapse
|
46
|
Greve V, Garner M, Odom K, Cooper SJ, East KM. Experiences and attitudes of hereditary cancer screening patients in a consumer directed testing model. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:473-479. [PMID: 33715773 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Revised: 09/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 2015, the Information is Power initiative has offered free and reduced cost hereditary cancer screening to the North Alabama population with a consumer-initiated model. Patients received pre-test and post-test education through a genetic counseling video. Positive results also received a call from a genetic counselor. OBJECTIVE We surveyed past Information is Power patients to assess if video education and electronic result delivery addressed the needs of a hereditary cancer screening population. METHODS An electronic survey was sent out to Information is Power patients who opted into research contact. The survey assessed participant knowledge, satisfaction with result delivery, and perceived uncertainty after receiving test results. RESULTS 213 participants completed the survey. Eighteen percent of participants would have preferred individual communication with a genetics specialist about their results. Over 99 % of survey participants correctly interpreted a positive result, while 73 % correctly interpreted a negative result. Overall, participants were certain about the impact of their genetic test results. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS These findings support a model of population genetic testing and genetic counseling that is sustainable while meeting the educational needs of most participants. Observed misconceptions surrounding a negative result should be highlighted in future population screening patient resources to meet patient needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Greve
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, 800 Hudson Way, Huntsville, AL, 35806, United States.
| | - M Garner
- The Univeristy of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
| | - K Odom
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, 800 Hudson Way, Huntsville, AL, 35806, United States
| | - S J Cooper
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, 800 Hudson Way, Huntsville, AL, 35806, United States
| | - K M East
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, 800 Hudson Way, Huntsville, AL, 35806, United States
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Using patient perspectives to inform communication training materials for health care professionals discussing BRCA mutation testing. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 184:491-498. [PMID: 32812179 PMCID: PMC7599138 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05871-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose As demand for genetic testing grows and a wide range of health care professionals (HCPs) are potentially involved in discussions about testing and delivering results, we developed an educational package to help HCPs with these conversations. Methods To inform the content of training materials, we conducted interviews with 11 women four of whom had BRCA1 and seven with BRCA2 mutations. Five women had or were currently receiving breast cancer treatment. Ages ranged from 38 to 77 years. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Framework approach to thematic analysis. Results We identified 18 themes and 12 subthemes across the interviews, encompassed by six overarching themes: risk, decision-making, information and understanding, communication and improvement, accessing the system: process and frustration, emotional and social drivers. Conclusions The findings informed the didactic components of an educational communication workshop and a summary document for attendees. Qualitative interviews provide an important way of incorporating the patient perspective into communication training materials for HCPs by highlighting key issues that matter most to the patient.
Collapse
|
48
|
A systematic review of communication interventions to help healthcare professionals discuss genetic testing for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 183:9-21. [PMID: 32577939 PMCID: PMC7376076 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05741-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Purpose This systematic review examined educational training interventions for healthcare professionals (HCPs) discussing genetic testing and risk for hereditary breast cancer. There was a particular focus on the presence, and content, of communication elements within these packages. Methods Searches were run via CINAHL, EMBASE, PUBMED, and PsychInfo in February 2019 to identify training interventions available to HCPs with reference to communication skills. Studies were assessed for quality, with relevant intervention and outcome data extracted and synthesized. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and was registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42019124010). Results Of 3,988 items, seven papers, two of which were linked, were eligible for inclusion. There was a mix of randomized and single arm studies with web-based and face-to-face interventions. Content included an overview of genetics, hereditary and familial background, and recommended practice techniques. Outcomes focused on communication, self-efficacy, knowledge, and satisfaction. Interventions were designed for genetic counselors, physicians, primary care physicians (PCPs), medical students, and nurses. None of the papers featured oncologists or surgeons. Conclusions This review revealed an overall lack of publications which evaluated interventions to assist HCPs discussing hereditary breast cancer risk and testing. Studies failed to operationalize which ‘communication skills’ they included, nor did they consistently report randomization, outcome measures, or analysis. Discussing the need for, and management of, genetic testing for inherited cancer risk with individuals and their families can be challenging. As genetic testing in breast cancer becomes more common, the provision of specific communication-based training programs, with reference to genetic testing, risk assessments, and counseling skills is warranted. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-020-05741-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
49
|
Schienda J, Stopfer J. Cancer Genetic Counseling-Current Practice and Future Challenges. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2020; 10:cshperspect.a036541. [PMID: 31548230 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a036541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Cancer genetic counseling practice is rapidly evolving, with services being provided in increasingly novel ways. Pretest counseling for cancer patients may be abbreviated from traditional models to cover the elements of informed consent in the broadest of strokes. Genetic testing may be ordered by a cancer genetics professional, oncology provider, or primary care provider. Increasingly, direct-to-consumer testing options are available and utilized by consumers anxious to take control of their genetic health. Finally, genetic information is being used to inform oncology care, from surgical decision-making to selection of chemotherapeutic agent. This review provides an overview of the current and evolving practice of cancer genetic counseling as well as opportunities and challenges for a wide variety of indications in both the adult and pediatric setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaclyn Schienda
- Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
| | - Jill Stopfer
- Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Halverson CME, Connors LM, Wessinger BC, Clayton EW, Wiesner GL. Patient perspectives on variant reclassification after cancer susceptibility testing. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2020; 8:e1275. [PMID: 32329193 PMCID: PMC7336756 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the impact of reclassification on patients' perception of medical uncertainty or trust in genetics-based clinical care. METHODS Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with 20 patients who had received a reclassified genetic test result related to hereditary cancer. All participants had undergone genetic counseling and testing for cancer susceptibility at Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center Hereditary Cancer Clinic within the last six years. RESULTS Most of the participants did not express distress related to the variant reclassification and only a minority expressed a decrease in trust in medical genetics. However, recall of the new interpretation was limited, even though all participants were recontacted by letter, phone, or clinic visit. CONCLUSION Reclassification of genetic tests is an important issue in modern healthcare because changes in interpretation have the potential to alter previously recommended management. Participants in this study did not express strong feelings of mistrust or doubt about their genetic evaluation. However, there was a low level of comprehension and information retention related to the updated report. Future research can build on this study to improve communication with patients about their reclassified results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin M E Halverson
- Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.,Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | - Ellen W Clayton
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.,School of Law, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Georgia L Wiesner
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.,Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.,Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|