Neoadjuvant anti-programmed Death-1 immunotherapy by Pembrolizumab in resectable nodal positive stage II/IIIa non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): the NEOMUN trial

Prognostic Analysis of Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Abutting Adjacent Structures on Preoperative Computed Tomography

Background

Early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that abuts adjacent structures requires careful evaluation due to its potential impact on postoperative outcomes and prognosis. We examined stage I NSCLC with invasion into adjacent structures, focusing on the prognostic implications after curative surgical resection.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the records of 796 patients who underwent curative surgical resection for pathologic stage IA/IB NSCLC (i.e., visceral pleural invasion only) at a single center from 2008 to 2017. Patients were classified based on tumor abutment and then reclassified by the presence of visceral pleural invasion. Clinical characteristics, pathological features, and survival rates were compared.

Results

The study included 181 patients with abutting NSCLC (22.7% of all participants) and 615 with non-abutting tumors (77.3%). Those with tumor abutment exhibited higher rates of non-adenocarcinoma (26.5% vs. 9.9%, p<0.01) and visceral/lymphatic/vascular invasion (30.4%/33.1%/12.7% vs. 8.5%/22.4%/5.7%, respectively; p<0.01) compared to those without abutment. Multivariable analysis identified lymphatic invasion and male sex as risk factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in stage I NSCLC measuring 3 cm or smaller. Age, smoking history, vascular invasion, and recurrence emerged as risk factors for OS, whereas the presence of non-pure ground-glass opacity was a risk factor for DFS.

Conclusion

NSCLC lesions 3 cm or smaller that abut adjacent structures present higher rates of various risk factors than non-abutting lesions, necessitating evaluation of tumor invasion into adjacent structures and lymph node metastasis. In isolation, however, the presence of tumor abutment without visceral pleural invasion does not constitute a risk factor.

Neoadjuvant therapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stages I-III were previously predominantly treated with surgery and chemotherapy. With the advent of Checkmate-816, neoadjuvant nivolumab and chemotherapy was FDA approved for the treatment of resectable NSCLC. There are several ongoing trials evaluating other neoadjuvant combinations of chemotherapy and immunotherapy as well as targeted therapies towards driver mutations. Here, we review previous clinical trials and discuss current ongoing trials' potential benefits and challenges.

Efficacy evaluation of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: comparison of PET/CT with postoperative pathology

OBJECTIVES

To assess the value of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the efficacy evaluation of patients undergoing neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy, and to analyze its correlation with postoperative pathology.

METHODS

The PET/CT metabolic parameters and CT size were retrospectively analyzed before and after neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in 67 patients with resectable stage II/IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). CT assessment based on immune response evaluation criteria in solid tumor criteria ((i)RECIST) was compared with PET/CT assessment based on the response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST). The correlations between PET/CT metabolic parameters and postoperative pathology were analyzed. The value of PET/CT in the efficacy evaluation was assessed.

RESULTS

The PET/CT assessment showed high consistency with postoperative pathological evaluation, yet the CT assessment showed low consistency with postoperative pathological evaluation. The (i)RECIST and PERCIST criteria showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.001). The postoperative pathological response was negatively associated with ΔSUVmax (%) (r =  - 0.812, p < 0.001), ΔSUVmean (%) (r =  - 0.805, p < 0.001), and ΔSUVpeak (%) (r =  - 0.800, p < 0.001). The cut-off values of 75.8 for ΔSUVmax (%), 67.8 for ΔSUVmean (%), and 74.6 for ΔSUVpeak (%) had the highest sensitivity and specificity.

CONCLUSION

The PERCIST criteria are more sensitive and accurate than (i)RECIST criteria to identify more responders when evaluating the response of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy for NSCLC. PET/CT shows high accuracy in predicting postoperative pathological response. Our study shows the important role PET/CT plays in the efficacy evaluation of NSCLC patients undergoing neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy, as well as in predicting the prognosis and guiding postoperative treatment.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy is highly effective in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. And PET/CT played an important role in the efficacy evaluation following neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.

KEY POINTS

• Neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy is highly effective in the treatment of NSCLC. • The PERCIST criteria are more sensitive and accurate than (i)RECIST criteria to identify more responders when evaluating the response of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy for NSCLC. • PET/CT played an important role in the efficacy evaluation; ΔSUVmax (%), ΔSUVmean (%), and ΔSUVpeak (%) following neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy for NSCLC had high consistency and strong correlations with postoperative pathology.

Evolving Landscape in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Stage Migration to Immunotherapy Revolution

Liver transplantation (LT) represents the primary curative option for HCC. Despite the extension of transplantation criteria and conversion with down-staging loco-regional treatments, transplantation is not always possible. The introduction of new standards of care in advanced HCC including a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies led to an improvement in response rates and could represent a promising strategy for down-staging the tumor burden. In this review, we identify reports and series, comprising a total of 43 patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors as bridging or down-staging therapies prior to LT. Overall, treated patients registered an objective response rate of 21%, and 14 patients were reduced within the Milan criteria. Graft rejection was reported in seven patients, resulting in the death of four patients; in the remaining cases, LT was performed safely after immunotherapy. Further investigations are required to define the duration of immune checkpoint inhibitors, their minimum washout period and the LT long-term safety of this strategy. Some randomized clinical trials including immunotherapy combinations, loco-regional treatment and/or tyrosine kinase inhibitors are ongoing and will likely determine the appropriateness of immune checkpoint inhibitors' administration before LT.

Immunotherapy through the Lens of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Immunotherapy has revolutionised anti-cancer treatment in solid organ malignancies. Specifically, the discovery of CTLA-4 followed by PD-1 in the early 2000s led to the practice-changing clinical development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Patients with lung cancer, including both small cell (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), benefit from the most commonly used form of immunotherapy in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), resulting in increased survival and quality of life. In NSCLC, the benefit of ICIs has now extended from advanced NSCLC to earlier stages of disease, resulting in durable benefits and the even the emergence of the word 'cure' in long term responders. However, not all patients respond to immunotherapy, and few patients achieve long-term survival. Patients may also develop immune-related toxicity, a small percentage of which is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. This review article highlights the various types of immunotherapeutic strategies, their modes of action, and the practice-changing clinical trials that have led to the widespread use of immunotherapy, with a focus on ICIs in NSCLC and the current challenges associated with advancing the field of immunotherapy.

Treatment Decisions for Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Balancing Less With More?

For patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the outcomes for patients with resectable disease are historically poor compared with other solid organ malignancies. In recent years, there have been significant advances in multidisciplinary care, which have resulted in improved outcomes. Innovations in surgical oncology include the use of limited resection and minimally invasive techniques. Recent data in radiation oncology have suggested refinements in pre- and postoperative radiation therapy, resulting in optimization of techniques in the curative setting. Finally, the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies in the advanced setting has paved the way for inclusion in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, resulting in recent regulatory approvals for four regimens (CheckMate-816, IMpower010, PEARLS, ADAURA). In this review, we will provide an overview of the seminal studies informing advancements in optimal surgical resection, radiation treatment, and systemic therapy for resectable NSCLC. We will summarize the key data on survival outcomes, biomarker analyses, and future directions for perioperative studies.

Targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) for treatment of non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC); the recent advances

The immune system uses various immune checkpoint axes to adjust responses, support homeostasis, and deter self-reactivity and autoimmunity. Nevertheless, non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) can use protective mechanisms to facilitate immune evasion, which leads to potentiated cancer survival and proliferation. In this light, many blocking anti-bodies have been developed to negatively regulate checkpoint molecules, in particular, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) / PD-ligand 1 (L1), and bypass these immune suppressive mechanisms. Meanwhile, anti-PD-1 anti-bodies such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab, and sintilimab have shown excellent competence in successfully inspiring immune responses versus NSCLC. Accordingly, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently approved nivolumab (alone or in combination with ipilimumab) and pembrolizumab (alone or in combination with chemotherapy) as first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC patients. However, PD-1 blockade monotherapy remains inefficient in more than 60% of NSCLC patients, and many patients don't respond or acquire resistance to this modality. Also, toxicities related to anti-PD-1 anti-body have been progressively identified in clinical trials and oncology practice. Herein, we will outline the clinical benefits of PD-1 blockade therapy alone or in combination with other treatments (e.g., chemotherapy, radiotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy) in NSCLC patients. Moreover, we will take a glimpse into the recently identified predictive biomarkers to determine patients most likely to suffer serious adverse events to decrease untoward toxicity risk and diminish treatment costs.

Major pathological response exhibited distinct prognostic significance for lung adenocarcinoma post different modalities of neoadjuvant therapy

AIMS

For non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy, the major pathological response (MPR) is defined as the percentage of residual viable tumour cells (%RVT) in the tumour bed of no more than 10%. It has been proposed as a predictor of survival in neoadjuvant therapy-treated cohorts. Nonetheless, the significance of %RVT in the pathological assessment of lung adenocarcinoma cohorts remains undetermined.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Overall, 152 lung adenocarcinoma patients were included in this retrospective study, among whom 67 received neoadjuvant targeted therapy and 85 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clinicopathological characteristics, neoadjuvant treatment response and survival status were investigated. The routinely adopted standard for MPR (%RVT ≤ 10%) failed to differentiate prognosis in the lung adenocarcinoma population. For the neoadjuvant chemotherapy cohort, the optimal %RVT cut-off value of RFS was 60%. However, this cut-off value was clinically insignificant in the neoadjuvant targeted-therapy cohort. Hence, for these patients, we built a nomogram model including high-grade patterns and ypN stage to predict disease recurrence, demonstrating high efficacy (a bootstrap-corrected C-index of 0.731).

CONCLUSIONS

%RVT served as a strong indicator of the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy but not neoadjuvant targeted therapy. Residual high-grade pathological patterns might substitute MPR in prognostic evaluation of lung adenocarcinoma post-targeted therapy.

Immunotherapy in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Current Evidence and Perspectives

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the world. Surgery is the most potentially curative therapeutic option for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The five-year survival for these patients remains poor and variable, depending on the stage of disease at diagnosis, and the risk of recurrence following tumor resection is high. During the last 20 years, there has been a modest improvement in the therapeutic strategies for resectable NSCLC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), alone or in combination with chemotherapy, have become the cornerstone for the treatment of metastatic NSCLC patients. Recently, their clinical development has been shifted in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings where they have demonstrated remarkable efficacy, leading to improved clinical outcomes. Based on the positive results from phase III trials, ICIs have become a therapeutic option in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. On October 2021 the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved atezolizumab as an adjuvant treatment following surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with NSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1 ≥ 1%. In March 2022, nivolumab in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy was approved for adult patients with resectable NSCLC in the neoadjuvant setting. The current review provides an updated overview of the clinical trials exploring the role of immunotherapy in patients with early-stage NSCLC, focusing on the biological rationale for their use in the perioperative setting. We will also discuss the role of potential predictive biomarkers to personalize therapy and optimize the incorporation of immunotherapy into the multimodality management of stage I-III NSCLC.

Prognostic impact of lymph node spreading pattern in N2 NSCLC patients

BACKGROUND

One-third of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are diagnosed with locally advanced disease. Long-term survival in stage IIIA/B-N2 remains poor; this may also be due to lymph node spreading pattern. Therefore, we compared the overall survival of stage IIIA/B-N2 patients with superior mediastinal lymph nodes (SML) with infracarinal- or inferior mediastinal lymph nodes (IML) and with multilevel disease (MLD).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

One-, three-and five-year survival rates were measured. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards model assessed survival and were used to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

We reviewed data of stage IIIA/B-N2 patients (n = 129) who underwent surgery for NSCLC between 2012 and 2020. Patients with SML (n = 62) were compared to ILM (n = 37) and MLD (n = 30). SML patients showed significantly better one- (SML: 95.2% vs. IML: 78.6% vs. MLD: 69.4%, p = 0.03), three- (78.8% vs. 27.7 vs. 13.3%; p = <0.001) and five-year (61.1% vs. 17.1 vs. 3%; p < 0.001) survival rates, than IML and MLD patients. Kaplan-Meier curves showed prolonged overall survival for SML patients (log-rank SML, ILM, MLD p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed significantly better long-term survival of SML patients than IML and MLD patients. The long-term survival of ILM and MLD patients was equally poor.

Progress on neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer and potential biomarkers

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are highly concerned in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), represented by inhibitors of programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), and inhibitors of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4). The introduction of immunotherapy in the treatment of perioperative NSCLC has improved the prognosis to a great extent, as demonstrated by several phase II and III clinical trials. The target population for immunotherapy in early-stage NSCLC is still under discussion, and the biomarkers for neoadjuvant immunotherapy population selection are the next pending problem. The predictive efficacy of many potential makers is still being explored, including PD-L1 expression levels, tumor mutation burden, circulating tumor DNA, components of the tumor microenvironment, and several clinical factors. We summarize key findings on the utility of ICIs in clinical trials of preoperative NSCLC patients and conclude analyses of relevant biomarkers to provide a better understanding of potentially predictive biomarkers in neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition in the management of glioblastoma: Exploring a new frontier

Brain tumors are one of the leading causes of cancer related death in both the adult and pediatric patient population. Gliomas represent a cohort of brain tumors derived from glial cell lineages which include astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas and glioblastomas (GBMs). These tumors are known to grow aggressively and have a high lethality with GBM being the most aggressive tumor in this group. Currently, few treatment options exist for GBM outside of surgical resection, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. While these measures have been shown to marginally improve patient survival, patients, especially those diagnosed with GBM, often experience a recurrence of their disease. Following disease recurrence, treatment options become more limited as additional surgical resections can pose life threatening risk to the patient, patients may be ineligible for additional radiation, and the recurrent tumor may be resistant to chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the field of cancer immunotherapy as many patients with cancers residing outside the central nervous system (CNS) have experienced a survival benefit from this treatment modality. It has often been observed that this survival benefit is increased following neoadjuvant administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors as tumor antigen is still present in the patient which enables a more robust anti-tumor immune response. Interestingly, results for ICI-based studies for patients with GBM have been largely disappointing which is a stark contrast from the success this treatment modality has had in non-central nervous system cancers. In this review, we will discuss the various benefits of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition such as how this approach reduces tumor burden and allows for a greater induction of an anti-tumor immune response. Additionally, we will discuss several non-CNS cancers where neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition has been successful and discuss why we believe this approach may provide a survival benefit for GBM patients. We hope this manuscript will foster future studies aimed at exploring whether this approach may be beneficial for patients diagnosed with GBM.

Systematic review of the perioperative immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: evidence mapping and synthesis

Objectives

This study aimed to use evidence mapping to provide an overview of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as perioperative treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to identify areas of this field where future research is most urgently needed.

Methods

Multiple databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched to identify clinical trials published up to November 2021 that examined the effect of perioperative ICIs for perioperative treatment of NSCLC. Study design, sample size, patient characteristics, therapeutic regimens, clinical stages, short-term and long-term therapeutic outcomes, surgery associated parameters, and therapeutic safety were examined.

Results

We included 66 trials (3564 patients) and used evidence mapping to characterize the available data. For surgery associated outcomes, sixty-two studies (2480 patients) provided complete information regarding the use of surgery after neoadjuvant immunotherapy and data on R0 resection were available in 42 studies (1680 patients); for short-term clinical outcomes, 57 studies (1842 patients) evaluated pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant immunotherapy and most of included studies achieved pCR in the range of 30 to 40%; for long-term clinical outcomes, 15 studies (1932 patients) reported DFS, with a median range of 17.9-53.6 months; and only a few studies reported the safety profiles of perioperative immunotherapies.

Conclusion

Our evidence mapping systematically summarized the results of all clinical trials and studies that examined ICIs as perioperative treatments for NSCLC. The results indicated more studies that evaluate long-term patient outcomes are needed to provide a stronger foundation for the use of these treatments.

Preoperative immunochemotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: an analysis of the clinical outcomes, optimal number of cycles, and peripheral immune markers

Background

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the real-world efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in locally advanced stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with a particular focus on analyzing the optimal treatment cycle and peripheral immune markers.

Methods

Eligible patients with biopsy-confirmed stage III NSCLC who underwent neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy between January 1st, 2018 and March 30th, 2021 were identified, and their oncological outcomes were collected.

Results

A total of 115 patients were identified, among whom 61, 51, and three cases were classified as clinical stage IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC at presentation, respectively. The objective response rate was 61.7% (71/115) after immunochemotherapy. The most frequent surgical procedure was lobectomy, performed in 91 (79.1%) cases, and all patients had microscopic-free margins. Major pathological response (MPR) was observed in 64 (55.7%) patients, among whom 44 (38.3%) achieved a complete pathological response; pathological-confirmed lymph node downstage (cN2-3 to ypN0-1) was described in 73.6% (67/91) of patients with cN2-3 diseases. The median disease-free survival (DFS) of all enrolled patients was 23.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): 15.9-31.3] months, while for patients with residual tumors of more than 10%, the median DFS was 18.1 (95% CI: 12.5-23.8) months. The post-hoc multivariable analysis showed that three [odds ratio (OR), 4.78; 95% CI: 1.17-19.55] and four (OR: 6.50; 95% CI: 1.12-37.54) cycles of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy were prone to higher MPR rates compared to two cycles in patients that were classified as complete/partial response (CR/PR). However, adding over five cycles was not associated with a higher MPR rate (OR, 0.91; 95% CI: 0.15-5.47). The pretreatment lymphocyte count level (1.89±0.68 vs. 1.59±0.63, P=0.019) and monocyte count level (0.71±0.32 vs. 0.59, P=0.020) were significantly higher in MPR patients compared to non-MPR patients.

Conclusions

The present study confirmed a favorable real-world tumor downstage efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in locally advanced NSCLC. Even though CR/PR was achieved, it is still beneficial when extended into 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.

Development of a Nomogram for Predicting Surgical Site Infection in Patients with Resected Lung Neoplasm Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background: Predictive models are necessary to target high-risk populations and provide precision interventions for patients with lung neoplasm who suffer from surgical site infections (SSI). Patients and Methods: This case control study included patients with lung neoplasm who underwent minimally invasive surgeries (MIS). Logistic regression was used to generate the prediction model of SSI, and a nomogram was created. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to examine the predictive value of the model. Results: A total of 151 patients with SSI were included, and 604 patients were randomly selected among the patients without SSI (ratio 4:1). Male gender (odds ratio [OR], 2.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57-4.15; p < 0.001), age >60 years (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.29-3.44, p = 0.003), operation time >60 minutes (all categories, p < 0.05), treatments for diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.75-4.98l; p < 0.001), and best forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁)/forced vital capacity (FVC; OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99; p = 0.008) were independently associated with SSI. The model based on these variables showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.813 for predicting SSI. Conclusions: A nomogram predictive model was successfully established for predicting SSI in patients receiving MIS, with good predictive value.

[Progress of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy, including neoadjuvant single- or dual-drug immunotherapy or combined immunotherapy with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, has witnessed a rapid development in non-small cell lung cancer. Clinical trials exhibited the encouraging pathological responses and certain clinical benefits in selected patients, with tolerable toxicity. Nivolumab with chemotherapy has been approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as the first immunotherapy-based treatment for non-small cell lung cancer in the neoadjuvant treatment setting. There is the need for further evaluation of long-term efficacy, side effects or surgical issues for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.
.

Novel Inflammasome-Based Risk Score for Predicting Survival and Efficacy to Immunotherapy in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been approved to improve outcomes and reduce recurrence. Biomarkers for patient selection are needed. In this paper, we proposed an inflammasome-based risk score (IRS) system for prognosis and prediction of ICI response for early-stage NSCLC. Cox regression analysis was used to identify significant genes (from 141 core inflammasome genes) for overall survival (OS) in a microarray discovery cohort (n = 467). IRS was established and independently validated by other datasets (n = 1320). We evaluated the inflammasome signaling steps based on five gene sets, which were IL1B-, CASP-1-, IL18-, GSDMD-, and inflammasome-regulated genes. Gene set enrichment analysis, the Kaplan–Meier curve, receiver operator characteristic with area under curve (AUC) analysis, and advanced bioinformatic tools were used to confirm the ability of IRS in prognosis and classification of patients into ICI responders and non-responders. A 30-gene IRS was developed, and it indicated good risk stratification at 10-year OS (AUC = 0.726). Patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups based on optimal cutoff points, and high-risk IRS had significantly poorer OS and relapse-free survival. In addition, the high-risk group was characterized by an inflamed immunophenotype and higher proportion of ICI responders. Furthermore, expression of SLAMF8 was the key gene in IRS and indicated good correlation with biomarkers associated with immunotherapy. It could serve as a therapeutic target in the clinical setting of immunotherapy.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety Analysis of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor vs. Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab (PD-1/PD-L inhibitor) and adjuvant chemotherapy to treat NSCLC and provide evidence-based reference for clinical use.

Methods

By searching the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science, according to the inclusion criteria, literature selection, data extraction, and quality evaluation were carried out for the included literature. The I ² test was used to evaluate heterogeneity between studies, and the meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software provided by Cochrane.

Results

Finally, 14 relevant documents meeting the standards were included. It is a statistical difference in one-year survival rate [OR = 1.50, 95% CI (1.28, 1.76), P < 0.00001, I ² = 0%, Z = 4.99]; overall response rate[OR =1.57, 95% CI (1.29, 1.90), P < 0.00001, I ² = 0%, Z = 4.58]; progression-free survival [OR = 2.99, 95% CI (2.29, 3.91), P < 0.00001, I ² = 26%, Z = 8.00]; and overall survival [OR = 1.38, 95% CI (1.07, 1.78), P = 0.01, I ² = 46%, Z = 2.50] and reduces the incidence of adverse drug reactions [OR = 2.54, 95% CI (1.99, 3.25), P < 0.00001, I ² = 69%, Z = 7.43].

Conclusion

Pembrolizumab adjuvant chemotherapy is effective in the treatment of advanced NSCLC, but attention should be paid to the occurrence of adverse reactions in clinical. Due to the limitations of the methodology included in the study, this conclusion required more validation of large-sample RCT.

Neoadjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Review of the Literature

Non-small cell lung cancer accounts for approximately 80–85% of all lung cancers and at present represents the main cause of cancer death among both men and women. To date, surgery represents the cornerstone; nevertheless, around 40% of completely resected patients develop disease recurrence. Therefore, combining neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy and surgery might lead to improved survival. Immunotherapy is normally well tolerated, although significant adverse reactions have been reported in certain patients treated with inhibitors of immune checkpoints. In this review, we explore the current literature on the use of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy followed by surgery for treatment of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, with particular attention to the histological aspects, ongoing trials, and the most common surgical approaches. In conclusion, neoadjuvant immunotherapy whether combined or not with chemotherapy reveals a promising survival benefit for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer; nevertheless, more data remain necessary to identify the best candidates for neoadjuvant regimens.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is superior to chemotherapy alone in surgically treated stage III/N2 non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective single-center cohort study

Background

There is lack of consensus whether neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CHT/RT) is superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CHT) alone in patients with potentially resectable stage III/N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Patients and methods

We retrospectively evaluated clinical parameters and outcomes in patients with clinical stage III/N2 NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant CHT/RT versus CHT followed by surgery. Nearest-neighbor propensity score (PS) matching was used to correct for pretreatment differences.

Results

A total of 84 patients were enrolled. Thirty-four (40%) and 50 (60%) patients received CHT/RT or CHT followed by curative-intent surgery, respectively. Overall 90-day mortality and morbidity were 0% versus 0.04% and 21% versus 18%, respectively, with no significant difference between the CHT/RT and the CHT-alone cohorts (P = 0.51 and P = 0.70). In the PS-matched cohort, complete pathological response was recorded in 25% after CHT/RT versus 0% after CHT at the time of surgery. Patients receiving neoadjuvant CHT/RT exhibited significantly better 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) [45% versus 16% CHT group; hazard ratio (HR) 0.43, P = 0.04]; 5-year overall survival (OS) was 75% after CHT/RT and 21% after CHT (HR 0.37, P = 0.001). CHT/RT more often induced pathological mediastinal downstaging (P = 0.007), but CHT/RT remained the only independent factor for DFS and OS and did not depend on mediastinal downstaging.

Conclusions

In this retrospective PS-matched long-term analysis, neoadjuvant CHT/RT conferred improved DFS and OS compared with CHT alone in stage III/N2 NSCLC. These highly challenging results require confirmation in well-designed randomized controlled trials conducted at highly specialized thoracic oncology centers.

•

Neoadjuvant CHT/RT yielded survival advantage in stage III/N2 NSCLC patients undergoing curative-intent pulmonary resection.

•

PS matching.

•

Pneumonectomy is safe after neoadjuvant CHT/RT without increased peri- or post-operative morbidity or mortality.

Initial experience of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus toripalimab in a patient with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a case report

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors were used for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) more and more frequently and the effects were thrilling. Toripalimab as a new immune checkpoint inhibitor has been shown to be effective in patients with advanced NSCLC. However, data regarding the safety and feasibility of surgical resection after treatment with toripalimab for NSCLC remain scarce. Here, we present a case with locally advanced NSCLC that received video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy after treatment with toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy.

Case presentation

A 62-year-old male patient with a history of coronary artery stenting operation for two times was found a 3.4 × 3.2 cm cavity mass in the upper lobe of the left lung and enlarged left hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes. Pathological results identified squamous cell carcinoma. The patient was diagnosed with a locally advanced NSCLC and received VATS left upper lobectomy and lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus toripalimab for 3 cycles. The postoperative pathological results showed complete tumor remission. Short-term follow-up results were excellent, and long-term results remain to be revealed.

Conclusions

Our preliminary results showed that the use of neoadjuvant toripalimab and chemotherapy for the locally advanced NSCLC before surgical resection is safe and feasible.

Solid histological component of adenocarcinoma might play an important role in PD-L1 expression of lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

In this study we aimed to clarify the PD-L1 positive expression in lung adenocarcinoma, including various adenocarcinoma subtypes paying particular attention to its component.

METHODS

A total of 307 lung adenocarcinoma patients who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy, as well as systematic lymph node dissection (ND2a), from February 2008 to March 2020 at our hospital, were enrolled into the study. A final diagnosis of adenocarcinoma was obtained from the resected lung specimens of all 307 patients to determine the histological type, adenocarcinoma subtype, and component of adenocarcinoma by ethics of 5%. PD-L1 was immunohistochemically stained using the murine monoclonal antibody clone 22C3.

RESULTS

When PD-L1 expression-positive was defined by tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥1%, the positive cases were 6/33 in adenocarcinoma (Ad) in situ (AIS), 2/26 in minimally invasive Ad (MIA), 12/60 in lepidic predominant Ad (LPA), 44/91 in papillary predominant Ad (PPA), 24/49 in acinar predominant Ad (APA), 23/28 in solid predominant Ad (SPA), 4/7 in micropapillary predominant Ad (MPA), and 0/13 in invasive mucinous Ad (IMA). In the high proportion group (APA, PPA, SPA, and MPA) of PD-L1 expression, SPA was the only subtype which was statistically significant when both PD-L1 expression-positive was defined by TPS ≥ 1% (p < 0.0001) and TPS ≧ 50% (p < 0.0001). We then considered the solid component. We investigated 279 cases of the other subtype group excluding SPA. The group containing a solid component (≥5%) tended to be PD-L1 expression-positive both when defined by TPS ≥1% (p < 0.0001) and TPS ≧50% (p = 0.0049).

CONCLUSIONS

The PD-L1 expression tended to be positive when a solid component was confirmed (≥5%) in specimens of lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-Clinical Trials Experience

Simple Summary

Surgical resection remains the gold standard of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. However, only a minority of resected patients remain recurrence-free at 5 years. Systemic treatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy after surgical resection has been shown to improve survival in this setting. In the last few years, immunotherapy has established its position in treatment of metastatic lung cancer patients. Can the phenomenal results of this treatment be directly transferred to early NSCLC patients? Clinical trials with immunotherapy in this indication are ongoing, some with already promising results. In order to immediately prove the efficacy of immunotherapy in preoperative use, the surrogates of overall and progression free survival have to be validated. In this article, we review the data in support of immunotherapy in adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of early NSCLC patients together with new definitions of primary end points of these studies.

Abstract

Across all tumor types, we observe that the role of immunotherapy has increased rapidly. Due to a number of potential advantages, it is considered in neoadjuvant treatment of localized tumors. In neoadjuvant settings, immunotherapy addresses micrometastatic diseases at the moment of their formation. However, some issues concerning neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy still has to be covered. The choice of drug and use of monotherapy or combination regimens remains unclear. The timing of surgery and preoperative evaluation of neoadjuvant immunotherapy efficacy is challenging. Although there is currently limited confirmed clinical data to support the use of immune checkpoint blockade in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, there are many studies exploring this strategy in NSCLC patients.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. A Narrative Review

Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors and it is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. For early-stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), surgical resection is the treatment of choice, but the 5-year survival is still unsatisfying, ranging from 60% to 36% depending on the disease stage. Multimodality treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy did not lead to clinically relevant results, improving survival rates by only 5%. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are being studied as neoadjuvant treatment for resectable NSCLC too, after the satisfactory results obtained in stage IV disease. Several clinical trials are evaluating the safety and feasibility of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and their early findings suggest that ICIs could be better tolerated than standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy and more effective in reducing cancer local recurrence and metastasis. The aim of this review is to retrace the most relevant results of the completed and the ongoing clinical trials, in terms of efficacy and safety, but also to face the open challenges regarding ICIs in neoadjuvant setting for resectable NSCLC.

Treatment patterns and survival outcomes for patients with non-small cell lung cancer in the UK in the preimmunology era: a REAL-Oncology database analysis from the I-O Optimise initiative

OBJECTIVES

To report characteristics, treatment and overall survival (OS) trends, by stage and pathology, of patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust in 2007-2018.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study based on electronic medical records.

SETTING

Large NHS university hospital in Leeds.

PARTICIPANTS

3739 adult patients diagnosed with incident NSCLC from January 2007 to August 2017, followed up until March 2018.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient characteristics at diagnosis, treatment patterns and OS.

RESULTS

34.3% of patients with NSCLC were clinically diagnosed (without pathological confirmation). Among patients with known pathology, 45.2% had non-squamous cell carcinoma (NSQ) and 33.3% had squamous cell carcinoma (SQ). The proportion of patients diagnosed at stage I increased (16.4%-27.7% in 2010-2017); those diagnosed at stage IV decreased (57.0%-39.1%). Surgery was the most common initial treatment for patients with pathologically confirmed stage I NSCLC. Use of radiotherapy alone increased over time in patients with clinically diagnosed stage I NSCLC (39.1%-60.3%); chemoradiation increased in patients with stage IIIA NSQ (21.6%-33.3%) and SQ (24.2%-31.9%). Initial treatment with systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) increased in patients with stages IIIB-IV NSQ (49.0%-67.5%); the proportion of untreated patients decreased (30.6%-15.0%). Median OS improved for patients diagnosed with stage I NSQ and SQ and stage IIIA NSQ over time. Median OS for patients with stages IIIB-IV NSQ and SQ remained stable, <10% patients were alive 3 years after diagnosis. Median OS for clinically diagnosed stages IIIB-IV patients was 1.2 months in both periods.

CONCLUSIONS

OS for stage I and IIIA patients improved over time, likely due to increased use of stereotactic ablative radiation, surgery (stage I) and chemoradiation (stage IIIA). Conversely, OS outcomes remained poor for stage IIIB-IV patients despite increasing use of SACT for NSQ. Many patients with advanced-stage disease remained untreated.

Lung Cancer Surgery after Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy

In early-stage lung cancer, recurrences are observed even after curative resection. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy might be a promising approach to eliminate micrometastasis and to potentially reduce recurrence rates and improve survival. Early trials have shown encouraging rates of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy and have demonstrated that surgery can be safely performed after neoadjuvant immunotherapy with various agents and in combination with chemo-(radio)therapy. However, whether these response rates translate into improved disease-free survival rates and overall survival rates remains to be determined by ongoing phase III studies.

Immunotherapy and Vaccination in Surgically Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Early-stage NSCLC (stages I and II, and some IIIA diseases) accounts for approximately 30% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases, with surgery being its main treatment modality. The risk of disease recurrence and cancer-related death, however, remains high among NSCLC patients after complete surgical resection. In previous studies on the long-term follow-up of post-operative NSCLC, the results showed that the five-year survival rate was about 65% for stage IB and about 35% for stage IIIA diseases. Platinum-based chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy has been used as a neoadjuvant therapy or post-operative adjuvant therapy in NSCLC, but the improvement of survival is limited. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have effectively improved the 5-year survival of advanced NSCLC patients. Cancer vaccination has also been explored and used in the prevention of cancer or reducing disease recurrence in resected NSCLC. Here, we review studies that have focused on the use of immunotherapies (i.e., ICIs and vaccination) in surgically resectable NSCLC. We present the results of completed clinical trials that have used ICIs as neoadjuvant therapies in pre-operative NSCLC. Ongoing clinical trials investigating ICIs as neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies are also summarized.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: right drugs, right patient, right time?

Standard curative treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involves surgery in combination with postoperative (adjuvant) platinum-based chemotherapy where indicated. Preoperative (neoadjuvant) therapies offer certain theoretical benefits compared with adjuvant approaches, including the ability to assess on-treatment response, reduce the tumor bulk prior to surgery, and enhance tolerability in the preoperative setting. Indeed, the use of neoadjuvant therapies are well established in other cancers such as breast and rectal cancers to debulk the tumor and guide ongoing therapy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy has similar efficacy but less toxicity in NSCLC. More recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting programmed death-1 (PD1)/PD1-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have transformed the treatment of advanced NSCLC; the unique mechanisms of action of ICI offer additional rationale for assessment in the neoadjuvant setting. Preclinical studies in mouse cancer models support the proof of concept of neoadjuvant ICI (NAICI) through improvement of T-cell effector function and long-term memory induction. Preliminary early-phase human trial data support the proposition that NAICI in NSCLC may provide an feasible and potentially efficacious future treatment strategy and large, randomized phase III trials are currently recruiting to assess this approach. However, outstanding issues include defining optimal treatment combinations which balance high efficacy with acceptable toxicity, validating biomarkers to aid in patient selection, and avoiding potential pitfalls such as missing a window for successful surgery, that is, choosing the right drugs, for the right patient, at the right time. Predictive biomarkers to direct selection of therapy are required, and the validation of major pathological response (MPR) as a surrogate for survival will be important in the uptake of the neoadjuvant approach.

Surgery after Induction Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy for Lung Cancer

Multimodality therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a complex and controversial issue, especially regarding optimal treatment regimens for patients with ipsilateral positive mediastinal nodes (N2 disease). Many trials investigating neoadjuvant immunotherapy and targeted therapy in this subpopulation have shown promising results, although concerns have risen regarding surgical feasibility. A thorough literature review was performed, analyzing all recent studies regarding surgical morbidity and mortality. Despite the fact that two major trials investigating this subject were terminated early, the overall consensus is that surgical management seems feasible. However, dissection of hilar vessels may be challenging due to hilar fibrosis. Further research is necessary to identify the role of surgery in these multimodality treatment regimens, and to define matters such as the optimal treatment regimen, the dosage of the different agents used, the interval between induction therapy and surgery, and the role of adjuvant therapy.

Safety and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Resectable Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for most new diagnoses of lung cancer, with high morbidity and mortality worldwide. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has transformed the treatment of metastatic and advanced NSCLC. For resectable NSCLC, while surgery is the cornerstone of standard treatment, a number of clinical trials of neoadjuvant immunotherapy have been conducted.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review on the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant ICI therapy in patients with resectable NSCLC.

METHODS

This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We undertook a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and abstracts and posters from annual meetings of the major oncology societies, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) up until 29 April 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 399 patients were identified from six articles and four meeting abstracts. 229, 140, and 30 patients received anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 therapy (anti-PD-L1, atezolizumab and durvalumab), anti-programmed cell death 1 therapy (anti-PD-1, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab), and anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 combination therapy (nivolumab and ipilimumab), respectively. 255 patients received only ICI therapy before surgery, and 144 patients received ICI and chemotherapy. While ICI therapy was generally well tolerated, grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse events were observed in 13 of 144 patients (9.0%) in the five studies that reported such adverse events data. Patients displayed an overall mean surgical resection rate of 87.5% (349/399, range, 66.7-100%), a surgical delay rate of 1.4%, and an incidence of surgical complications of 21%. On average, 45.6% (159/349), (range 17-83%) of patients exhibited major pathological response (MPR), while 76/349 (21.8%) patients achieved pathological complete response (pCR). In the studies with patients undergoing ICI and chemotherapy, the MPR rate was 66.7% and pCR rate was 35.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

ICI neoadjuvant therapy may be a safe and efficacious treatment option in patients with resectable NSCLC. Combined with chemotherapy, ICI appears to be more efficacious, but displays more adverse events. More ongoing clinical trials will shed further light on the safety and efficacy of ICI neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable NSCLC.

miRNAs in lung cancer. A systematic review identifies predictive and prognostic miRNA candidates for precision medicine in lung cancer

Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide and miRNAs play a key role in LC development. To better diagnose LC and to predict drug treatment responses we evaluated 228 articles encompassing 16,697 patients and 12,582 healthy controls. Based on the criteria of ≥3 independent studies and a sensitivity and specificity of >0.8 we found blood-borne miR-20a, miR-10b, miR-150, and miR-223 to be excellent diagnostic biomarkers for non-small cell LC whereas miR-205 is specific for squamous cell carcinoma. The systematic review also revealed 38 commonly regulated miRNAs in tumor tissue and the circulation, thus enabling the prediction of histological subtypes of LC. Moreover, theranostic biomarker candidates with proven responsiveness to checkpoint inhibitor treatments were identified, notably miR-34a, miR-93, miR-106b, miR-181a, miR-193a-3p, and miR-375. Conversely, miR-103a-3p, miR-152, miR-152-3p, miR-15b, miR-16, miR-194, miR-34b, and miR-506 influence programmed cell death-ligand 1 and programmed cell death-1 receptor expression, therefore providing a rationale for the development of molecularly targeted therapies. Furthermore, miR-21, miR-25, miR-27b, miR-19b, miR-125b, miR-146a, and miR-210 predicted response to platinum-based treatments. We also highlight controversial reports on specific miRNAs. In conclusion, we report diagnostic miRNA biomarkers for in-depth clinical evaluation. Furthermore, in an effort to avoid unnecessary toxicity we propose predictive biomarkers. The biomarker candidates support personalized treatment decisions of LC patients and await their confirmation in randomized clinical trials.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: State of the art

Lung cancer mortality has decreased over the past decade and can be partly attributed to advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have rapidly evolved from investigational drugs to standard of care for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In particular, antibodies that block inhibitory immune checkpoints, such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1), have revolutionized the treatment of advanced NSCLC, when administered alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Immunotherapy is associated with higher response rates, improved overall survival (OS), and increased tolerability compared with conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. These benefits may increase the utility of immunotherapy and its combinational use with chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with NSCLC. Early findings from various ongoing clinical trials suggest that neoadjuvant ICIs alone or combined with chemotherapy may significantly reduce systemic recurrence and improve long-term OS or cure rates in resectable NSCLC. Here we further summarize the safety and efficacy of various neoadjuvant treatment regimens including immunotherapy from ongoing clinical trials and elaborate the role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with resectable NSCLC. In addition, we discuss several unresolved challenges, including the evaluations to assess neoadjuvant immunotherapy response, the role of adjuvant treatment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy, the efficacy of treatment for oncogenic-addicted tumors, and predictive biomarkers. We also provide our perspective on ways to overcome current obstacles and establish neoadjuvant immunotherapy as a standard of care.

Role of surgery in a novel multimodal therapeutic approach to complete cure of advanced lung cancer: current and future perspectives

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is considered potentially curable by multimodal therapy in a subset of patients, including those with locally advanced (LA) disease or nodal spread, who would otherwise have a poor prognosis. Guidelines recommend perioperative chemotherapy with platinum-based regimens, with or without radiotherapy, as the standard treatment modality for high-risk resectable LA-NSCLC. Although the classical regimens of adjuvant chemotherapy have been platinum-based doublet or oral agents such as tegafur/uracil, some molecular targeted therapeutic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been developed recently with an expected favorable effect. Recent trials of perioperative therapy using these agents have demonstrated favourable anticancer efficacy for LA-NSCLC with an acceptable adverse events profile. The ideal timing of perioperative therapy administration, before or after surgery, is still controversial. Because some speculation and concepts have arisen from basic research, several trials are ongoing to clarify the efficacy of newly developed agents in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting. This review discusses the role of surgery in the new era and analyzes when and which optimal perioperative multimodal therapy, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, molecular-targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, should be administered for resectable or potentially resectable NSCLC to provide possible complete cure.

Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab with chemotherapy for the treatment of stage IIB-IIIB resectable lung squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Researches on programmed cell death (PD-1) as neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer is underway, which brings hope for individuals with the disease. However, a study dedicated to lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) specifically has yet to be conducted. Now, data from our pilot prospective research neoadjuvant study provide new insights in the field of neoadjuvant regimen for LUSC.

Methods

Between June 2019 and July 2020, 37 adults with untreated, surgically resectable stage IIB–IIIB LUSC were enrolled into this prospective study. Patients received 2 cycles of pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg) with chemotherapy (albumin-bound paclitaxel 100 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 + carboplatin AUC 5) via intravenous administration every 3 weeks, and underwent surgical treatment 3–4 weeks after the second cycle. The primary endpoint of the study was the tumor pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. The toxicity profile, tumor major pathological remission, complete resection rate, response rate, and operative and postoperative complications were also evaluated.

Results

The postoperative pathological specimens of 17 (45.9%) patients suggested pCR. Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab with chemotherapy had an acceptable side-effect profile, and no patients withdrew from the study preoperatively due to disease progression or toxicity. A major pathological response occurred in 24 (64.9%) resected tumors. All tumors were completely resected (R0, 100%). According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RESIST), a response was evaluated before surgery in 32 (86.5%) patients by computed tomography. Twenty-five (67.6%) patients underwent thoracoscopic surgery. No deaths or postoperative major complications requiring reoperation occurred. Recurrence or metastasis was found in 2 patients during follow-up of 2–14 months.

Conclusions

The early outcomes of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting as a novel treatment for resectable stage IIB–IIIB LUSC showed a high pCR rate that has not been seen previously, as well as a high R0 resection rate and a low toxicity profile. The long-term efficacy of this novel treatment and the validity of the present findings should be confirmed with longer follow-up and prospective comparative trials.

The surgical perspective in neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The recent novel conception of neoadjuvant immunotherapy has generated interest among surgeons worldwide, especially the lack of experience involving surgical treatment for the neoadjuvant immunotherapy population.

Methods

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who underwent neoadjuvant immunotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy, were retrospectively collected between September 2018 and April 2020. Demographic data, pathological and clinical features, therapeutic regimens and outcome data of all individuals were collected by retrospective chart review. Operative details, information of neoadjuvant therapy, were also abstracted.

Results

In total, 31 patients were included in the final analysis. The patients’ median age was 61 years. In total, 29 of the patients were males, while 2 were females. Patients received a median of 3 doses before resection. The median duration from final treatment to surgery was 34 days. After neoadjuvant treatment, post-treatment computed tomography scan showed that 24 patients had partial response. In total, 12 of 31 patients had a major pathological response, 15 pathological downstaging. Three patients had no residual viable tumor. A positive surgical margin was identified in 7 cases. One or more postoperative complications occurred in 18 of all 31 patients. In total, 26 patients underwent next-generation sequencing before surgery in total. Among them, 2 patients were detected STK11 mutations, none of whom had a major pathological response by final pathological examination.

Conclusions

Pulmonary resection after neoadjuvant immunotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy for resectable NSCLC appears to be safe with low operative mortality and morbidity rate in the current population.

Neoadjuvant anti-programmed death-1 immunotherapy by pembrolizumab in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: First clinical experience

OBJECTIVES

A phase II trial investigating the therapeutic effect of neoadjuvant programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor pembrolizumab (MK-3475, KEYTRUDA®) administered prior to surgery for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been conducted (NCT03197467). We report the first clinical results of a planned interim safety analysis after 15 patients were enrolled.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with resectable NSCLC stage II/IIIA were included. Two cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks) were administered prior to surgery. The primary objectives were to assess the feasibility and safety of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab therapy and to evaluate antitumor activity. We analyzed the clinical parameters as well as pathological and radiological tumor response data.

RESULTS

The NSCLC histology was adenocarcinoma for 13 patients and squamous cell carcinoma for 2 patients. All patients but two underwent 2 cycles of pembrolizumab prior to surgery. Four patients (27 %) presented a major pathologic response. Significant tumor target response in positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT) was detected in all 4 pathologic responders. Nevertheless, the PET findings mismatched the tumor load in some patients. A PD-L1 expression ≥10 % in the pretreatment biopsy was associated with at least major pathologic response. Five patients (33 %) presented grade 2-3 treatment related adverse events (TRAE), the overall postoperative morbidity was 7 % and 30-day mortality was 0 %.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab is a feasible therapy in surgical lung cancer patients. It was associated with tolerable toxicity and did not compromise tumor resection.

Surgery after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer

Surgery is the standard of care for patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, as a single modality, surgery for early stage or locally advanced NSCLC remains associated with high rates of local and distant recurrence. The addition of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy has modestly improved outcomes. While systemic therapy paired with surgery for other malignancies such as breast cancer have resulted in far better outcomes for equivalent stage designations, outcome improvements for operable NSCLC have lagged in part as a result of trials where adjuvant chemotherapy seemed to incur harm for stage IA patients and only modest survival benefit for stage IB–IIIA patients (AJCC 7^th ed.). In recent years, immunotherapy for NSCLC has emerged as a systemic therapy with significant benefit over traditional chemotherapy regimens. These advances with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have opened the door to administering peri-operative immunotherapy for operable NSCLC. As a result, a great multitude of studies investigating the use of immunotherapy in combination with surgery for NSCLC as well as several other malignancies have emerged. In this review, we outline the rationale for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the treatment of operable NSCLC and summarize the available evidence that include preoperative ICI as a single modality or in combination with systemic agents and/or radiotherapy. Further, we summarize how such treatment trajectories open multiple unique windows of opportunity for scientific discovery and potential therapeutic gains for these vulnerable patients.

Therapeutic and Systemic Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis for Clinical Management of NSCLC

Non-small-cell lung cancer takes up the majority of lung carcinoma-caused deaths. It is reported that targeting PD-1/PD-L1, a well-known immune evasion checkpoint, can eradicate tumor. Checkpoint inhibitors, such as monoclonal antibodies, are actively employed in cancer treatment. Thus, this review aimed to assess the therapeutic and toxic effects of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in treatment of NSCLC. So far, 6 monoclonal antibodies blocking PD-1/PD-L1 interaction are identified and used in clinical trials and randomized controlled trials for NSCLC therapy. These antibody-based therapies for NSCLC were collected by using search engine PubMed, and articles about the assessment of adverse events were collected by using Google search. Route of administration and dosage are critical parameters for efficient immunotherapy. Although antibodies can improve overall survival and are expected to be target-specific, they can cause systemic adverse effects in the host. Targeting certain biomarkers can limit the toxicity of adverse effects of the antibody-mediated therapy. Clinical experts with knowledge of adverse effects (AEs) of checkpoint inhibitors can help manage and reduce mortalities associated with antibody-based therapy of NSCLC.

Inhaled cytotoxic chemotherapy: clinical challenges, recent developments, and future prospects

INTRODUCTION

Since 1968, inhaled chemotherapy has been evaluated and has shown promising results up to phase II but has not yet reached the market. This is due to technological and clinical challenges that require to be overcome with the aim of optimizing the efficacy and the tolerance of drug to re-open new developments in this field. Moreover, recent changes in the therapeutic standard of care for treating the patient with lung cancer also open new opportunities to combine inhaled chemotherapy with standard treatments.

AREAS COVERED

Clinical and technological concerns are highlighted from the reported clinical trials made with inhaled cytotoxic chemotherapies. This work then focuses on new pharmaceutical developments using dry powder inhalers as inhalation devices and on formulation strategies based on controlled drug release and with sustained lung retention or based on nanomedicine. Finally, new clinical strategies are described in regard to the impact of the immunotherapy on the patient's standard of care.

EXPERT OPINION

The choice of the drug, inhalation device, and formulation strategy as well as the position of inhaled chemotherapy in the patient's clinical care are crucial factors in optimizing local tolerance and efficacy as well as in its scalability and applicability in clinical practice.

Bispecific anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 antibody for advanced solid tumors

PD-1 and CTLA-4 are checkpoint inhibitors of the immune response in cancer, making them the target molecules for the development of therapeutic antibodies. US2019161548 patent describes a bispecific antibody capable of specifically binding to PD-1 and CTLA-4 that induced the proliferation and activation of CD8⁺ cells, as well as the expression of induclble co-stimulator in CD4⁺ T cells. Clinical trials to evaluate safety, dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated/administered dose are still in the patient recruitment phase, but it will be of great interest to the scientific and medical community to know if the first bispecific anti-PD-1/CLTA-4 antibody, exceeds expectations and exceeds action of the combination of nivolumab and epilimumab in the treatment of cancer.

Immuno-based therapeutic strategies for initial unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a case report

Lung cancer is the leading global cause of cancer-related deaths. Even for patients who receive multidimensional treatment, the prognosis for locally advanced lung cancer is poor. The outcomes of neoadjuvant immunotherapy have been encouraging in many types of cancer, and especially lung cancer. However, the prognoses of patients with initially unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with T4 or bulky swollen N2 lymph nodes are still unsatisfying, and novel therapeutic modalities are desperately needed. Here, we present a case of a patient with initially unresectable NSCLC with T4 and bulky swollen N2 lymph nodes, and present the argument for neoadjuvant immuno-based therapeutic strategies as a reasonable option for such patients.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for NSCLC: Current Concepts and Future Approaches

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Patients with resectable NSCLC are often treated with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. However, these patients continue to have a high risk of recurrence and death. Unfortunately, there has been little progress in the treatment of resectable NSCLC over the past several decades. Neoadjuvant therapy, which has been considered as an approach to improve survival in patients with resectable NSCLC, is a hotly debated topic. A systematic review of 32 randomized trials involving 10,000 patients revealed that there was no difference in survival between preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy. Because of such results and the theoretical concern about resectable tumors progressing on relatively ineffective neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and thus becoming unresectable, neoadjuvant chemotherapy fell out of favor, and many clinicians preferred adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. However, neoadjuvant therapy has been revived in the past couple of years, with emerging data from various ongoing trials suggesting that neoadjuvant immunotherapy may have significant efficacy and could potentially improve the survival of patients with resectable NSCLC. In this review article, we discuss the evidence supporting the role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the multimodal management of resectable NSCLC. We summarize early results of ongoing clinical trials and highlight the challenges in adopting a uniform definition of treatment "success." We address hurdles to be overcome for seeking regulatory approval for neoadjuvant immunotherapy and establishing it as a standard of care. Finally, we provide some perspectives for the future.

Cancer immunotherapy with immunoadjuvants, nanoparticles, and checkpoint inhibitors: Recent progress and challenges in treatment and tracking response to immunotherapy

Chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation are accepted as the preferred treatment modalities against cancer, but in recent years the use of immunotherapeutic approaches has gained prominence as the fourth treatment modality in cancer patients. In this approach, a patient's innate and adaptive immune systems are activated to achieve clearance of occult cancerous cells. In this review, we discuss the preclinical and clinical immunotherapeutic (e.g., immunoadjuvants (in-situ vaccines, oncolytic viruses, CXC antagonists, device activated agents), organic and inorganic nanoparticles, and checkpoint blockade) that are under investigation for cancer therapy and diagnostics. Additionally, the innovations in imaging of immune cells for tracking therapeutic responses and limitations (e.g., toxicity, inefficient immunomodulation, etc.) are described. Existing data suggest that if immune therapy is optimized, it can be a real and potentially paradigm-shifting cancer treatment frontier.