Characteristics and health burden of the undiagnosed population at risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China

Effect of Baduanjin exercise on health and functional status in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a community-based, cluster-randomized controlled trial

Baduanjin has been shown to be an effective method of exercise for promoting body function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, this method is rarely used by rural doctors in rural communities. The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic effects of Baduanjin exercise with those of conventional pulmonary rehabilitation (CPR) implemented by rural doctors in patients with COPD. A total of 472 COPD patients from 18 village clinics were randomly allocated to the Baduanjin group (n = 158), CPR group (n = 154), or control group (n = 160). The Baduanjin group received six months of Baduanjin training, the CPR group received six months of rehabilitation training, and the control group received usual care. The primary outcomes were changes in health status, as measured by the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), and dyspnoea, as assessed via the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea scale. The secondary outcomes included six-minute walking distance (6MWD) performance and anxiety and depression scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A and HADS-D, respectively). Baseline data were collected before randomization, and outcomes were ascertained at the six-month follow-up by blinded assessors. After six months of training, compared with the control group, the Baduanjin group presented significant improvements in CAT scores (t = 5.121, P < 0.001), mMRC scale scores (t = 5.719, P < 0.001), 6MWD performance (t = 12.608, P < 0.001), HADS-A scores (t = 6.210, P < 0.001), and HADS-D scores (t = 2.945, P = 0.010). The CPR group also presented significant improvements in CAT scores (t = 4.725, P < 0.001), mMRC scale scores (t = 5.499, P < 0.001), 6MWD performance (t = 11.662, P < 0.001), HADS-A scores (t = 5.697, P < 0.001), and HADS-D scores (t = 2.671, P = 0.023). In contrast, the control group participants showed no significant changes in CAT scores (t = -0.252, P = 0.801), mMRC scale scores (t = -0.085, P = 0.932), 6MWD performance (t = -0.463, P = 0.644), HADS-A scores (t = -2.75, P = 0.783), or HADS-D scores (t = -0.281, P = 0.779). No adverse events were reported during the study. The positive effects of Baduanjin exercise on the subjective symptoms of COPD patients are similar to those of CPR. The trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (reference: ChiCTR-TRC-12001958) (22/02/2012).

Effects of the teach-back method on the health status of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a real-world community-based cluster-randomized controlled trial

Background

The teach-back method (TBM), also known as the "show-me" method, is a technique for verifying patients' understanding of health-related information that has been recommended for improving health literacy. However, the research on TBM effect on the outcomes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the effect of a TBM intervention on the health status of COPD patients.

Methods

This real-world community-based cluster-randomized controlled trial enrolled 1,688 patients with COPD from 18 communities in China. Participants received either TBM plus usual care (UC) or UC only. General practitioners were trained in TBM before the intervention. The primary outcomes were depression and anxiety symptoms, as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life and dyspnea, as measured by the COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Dyspnea was assessed using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale. Data on acute exacerbations and deaths were extracted from medical records. Lung function was expressed as the forced expiratory volume in 1 second as a percentage of the predicted value [FEV1 (% pred)].

Results

In total, 336 of the 853 COPD patients in the intervention group (TBM plus UC) had comorbid depression, compared with 329 of the 835 in the control group (UC only). The TBM group showed a significantly greater improvement in HADS depression and anxiety subscale scores (HADS-D and HADS-A, respectively) than the UC group at12 months (t =8.34, P<0.001; t=12.18, P<0.001). The CAT and mMRC scores were significantly lower in the TBM than UC group at 12 months (t=8.43, P<0.001; t=7.23, P<0.001). The numbers of acute exacerbations and deaths were significantly lower in the TBM than UC group at 12 months (mean MCF values were 0.35 and 0.56, respectively [difference of 0.22; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.41, -0.02; χ2=9.63, P<0.001]. The FEV1 (% pred) was significantly higher in the TBM than UC group at 12 months (t=7.45, P<0.001).

Conclusions

General practitioners can use TBM interventions to effectively reduce anxiety, depression, and dyspnea symptoms, decrease the frequency of exacerbations and likelihood of death, and improve health-related quality of life and pulmonary function in patients with COPD.

Trial Registration

The trial was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (reference: ChiCTR-TRC-12001958).

Feasibility and performance of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease population screener and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening questionnaire in a Chinese physical examination center

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects up to 13% of the Chinese population, though it is under diagnosed throughout China. Screening among asymptomatic individual as part of routine health checks in China can facilitate early diagnosis and intervention to prevent disease progress. The COPD Population Screener (COPD-PS) or COPD Screening Questionnaire (COPD-SQ) has yet to be applied in Chinese physical examination centers (PECs) for COPD screening, and their feasibility and effectiveness should be clarified before full-scale implementation. This study is the first to apply the COPD-PS and COPD-SQ in a public hospital PEC in China to assess their feasibility and effectiveness and to identify their optimal cutoff values.

Methods

People aged ≥40 years who attended the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University PECs from September 2021 to December 2022 were asked to complete the COPD-PS and COPD-SQ and to undergo spirometry. The optimal cutoff values of the two questionnaires at the maximal Youden index were found, and the sensitivity and specificity were calculated.

Results

Data from 198 participants were analyzed; mean [standard deviation (SD)] age of patients was 63.52 (10.94) years. Twenty-five participants (12.63%) were diagnosed with COPD. The number of COPD patients classified as Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) grades 1 to 4 were 8, 12, 4, and 1, respectively. The area under the curves (AUCs) of the COPD-PS and COPD-SQ were 0.730 and 0.738, respectively. The optimal COPD-PS cutoff value of 4 points corresponded to a sensitivity of 72.00% and a specificity of 60.10%. The COPD-SQ optimal cutoff value of 15 points corresponded to a sensitivity of 76.00% and a specificity of 63.60%.

Conclusions

Applying the COPD-PS and COPD-SQ in Chinese PECs is feasible, cost-effective and effective. COPD-PS and COPD-SQ can facilitate the early diagnosis of COPD, and whether they can improve the participants' quality of life would benefit a further study. It is recommended that the COPD-PS or COPD-SQ questionnaires be added to the screening of the physical examination program in PECs as part of health checks for people over 40 years old.

Prognostic Value of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio for Predicting 90-Day Poor Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for poor outcomes within 90-day in hospitalized patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).

Methods

A retrospective study including 503 AECOPD patients was performed, and the subjects' clinical characteristics were collected. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for 90-day poor outcomes in patients with AECOPD. Receiver-operating characteristic curves (ROC) and areas under the curves (AUC) were used to assess the ability of different biomarkers to predict the risk of 90-day mortality, readmission and re-exacerbation in patients with AECOPD.

Results

During the follow-up, 188 patients (38.4%) redeveloped exacerbations, 112 patients (22.9%) were readmitted, and 20 patients (4.1%) died directly resulted from COPD or COPD-related causes. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age>72 years (OR: 14.817, 95% CI: 1.561-140.647), NLR>14.17 (OR: 9.611, 95% CI: 2.303-40.113), EOS<0.15% (OR: 8.621, 95% CI: 3.465-34.913) and BNP>2840ng/L (OR: 5.291, 95% CI: 1.367-20.474) at discharge were independent risk factors for 90-day mortality in AECOPD patients. NLR was the optimal biomarker for predicting 90-day mortality with an AUC of 0.802 (95% CI: 0.631-0.973). Using 14.17 as the critical value of NLR, the sensitivity was 76.7%, and the specificity was 88.9%. Compared with mortality, NLR had no significant advantage in predicting risk of short-term re-exacerbation (AUC=0.580, 95% CI:0.529-0.632, p=0.001) and readmission (AUC=0.555, 95% CI:0.497-0.614, p=0.045), with AUCs less than 0.6. In contrast, the predictive value of EOS (AUC=0.561, 95% CI:0.502-0.621, p=0.038) was slightly better than NLR in terms of readmission within 90 days. CRP did not serve as a well predictive biomarker for the risk of readmission and re-deterioration (p>0.05).

Conclusion

NLR is of great value in predicting the risk of poor outcomes, especially COPD associated mortality, in hospitalized patients with AECOPD within 90 days after discharge.

Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward disease prevention among a high-risk population for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A cross-sectional study

Objective

This study aimed to describe the current situation of knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) prevention among a high-risk population for COPD.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted. A total of 241 participants at risk of COPD were selected who visited the respiratory outpatient department of a Class A tertiary hospital in Chongqing, China from January to December 2021. A self-developed COPD prevention KAP assessment was used for evaluation which included knowledge (21 items), attitude (9 items), and practice (9 items) three dimension, 39 items.

Results

The average overall KAP score was 68.29 ± 12.91, with scores for the knowledge, attitude, and practice dimension was 68.75 ± 18.07, 71.13 ± 15.09 and 65.00 ± 20.93, respectively. Among the people at risk of COPD, 76.8% experienced a moderate level of KAP toward COPD prevention, while 22.0% were at a poor level. Significant differences in the KAP scores were based on gender, educational level, occupation, type of medical insurance, smoking, and passive smoking status (P < 0.05). The male COPD high-risk group has better KAP toward COPD prevention than the female group (P < 0.05). The knowledge and attitude of COPD prevention present worse in people with a high risk of COPD aged 70 or above, primary school and below educational level, and farmers (P < 0.05). Smoking and passive smoking groups have higher recognition of the knowledge but the lower practice of COPD prevention (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The participants with a high risk of COPD had a moderate level of KAP for COPD prevention, in which the understanding and action on vaccination and lung function test was weak, but an active attitude for health. It is necessary to implement tailored health education interventions to their characteristics to reduce the incidence and development of COPD.

REALizing and improving management of stable COPD in China: results of a multicentre, prospective, observational study (REAL)

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management in China is far from adequate; underdiagnosis and undertreatment are major barriers to optimal care and improved patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To generate reliable information on COPD management, outcomes, treatment patterns and adherence, and disease knowledge in China in a real-world setting.

DESIGN

A 52-week multicentre, prospective, observational study.

METHODS

Outpatients (⩾40 years old) diagnosed with COPD were enrolled from 50 secondary and tertiary hospitals across six geographical regions. Data were collected in routine clinical practice.

RESULTS

Between June 2017 and January 2019, 5013 patients were enrolled and 4978 included in the analysis. Mean [standard deviation (SD)] age was 66.2 (8.9) years, 79.5% were male and 90% had moderate-to-very-severe airflow limitation. Annual rates of overall and severe exacerbation were 0.56 and 0.31, respectively. During 1 year, 1536 (30.8%) patients experienced ⩾1 exacerbation and 960 (19.3%) patients had ⩾1 exacerbation requiring hospitalization/emergency visit. Mean (SD) COPD assessment test score was 14.6 (7.6) at baseline and 10.6 (6.8) at follow-up; however, 42-55% of patients had persistent dyspnoea, chest tightness and wheezing at 1 year. The most prescribed treatments were inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) (36.0%), ICS/LABA + long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) (17.7%) and LAMA monotherapy (15.3%). Among patients with high exacerbation risk (GOLD Groups C and D), 10.1% and 13.1%, respectively, did not receive any long-acting inhalers; only 53.8% and 63.6% of Group C and D patients with ⩾1 exacerbation during follow-up were prescribed ICS-containing therapy, respectively. Mean (SD) adherence for long-acting inhalers was 59.0% (34.3%). Mean (SD) score for the COPD questionnaire was 6.7 (2.4).

CONCLUSION

These results indicate a high burden of severe exacerbations and symptoms in Chinese outpatients with COPD, and low adherence with treatment guidelines, highlighting the need for more effective management nationwide.

REGISTRATION

The trial was registered on 20 March 2017 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03131362).

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the New Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (New BJSQ) among workers in China

This study aimed to develop the Chinese version of the New Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (New BJSQ) and investigate its reliability and validity. The survey was administered at two time-points separated by a two-week interval among Chinese workers. The Chinese version of the New BJSQ was developed according to the international guidelines. Cronbach's alpha, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Pearson correlation coefficient were calculated to assess the reliability. A variance explained by the first factor was calculated to examine factor-based validity, and confirmatory factor analysis was performed (CFA) to determine the construct validity. Baseline and follow-up analyses included 516 and 52 workers, respectively. In most scales, sufficient internal consistency and test-retest reliability were observed, and principal component analyses demonstrated that the first factor explained more than 50% proportion of the variance. CFA showed that the four-factor model (Job demands, Task-level job resources, Workgroup-level job resources, and Organizational-level job resources) demonstrated a moderate fit, similar to the original version. The Chinese version of New BJSQ showed good reliability and moderate validity. Future studies should explore content and construct validities and the factor structure of the Chinese version of the New BJSQ in more detail.

PUMA screening tool to detect COPD in high-risk patients in Chinese primary care–A validation study

The early stage of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is not easily recognized. Screening tools can help to identify high-risk patients in primary care settings for spirometry and may be helpful in the early detection in COPD and management. This study aims to validate the PUMA questionnaire for use in Chinese primary care settings. This cross-sectional study recruited participants (≥40 years old, current or former smoker with ≥10 packs of cigarette per year) in primary health care clinics in Hong Kong. The Chinese version of the PUMA questionnaire was administered by trained research staff to participants awaiting consultation. COPD diagnosis was confirmed by spirometry (post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <0.70). A total 377 patients were recruited of which 373 completed the spirometry. The percentage of participants diagnosed with COPD (post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <0.70) was 27.1%. A higher PUMA score was more likely to have an advanced stage of GOLD classification (P = 0.013). The area under the ROC curve of the PUMA score was 0.753 (95%CI 0.698–0.807). The best cut-point according to Youden’s index for PUMA score was ≥6 with sensitivity 76.5%, specificity 63.3% and negative predictive value (NPV) 63.3%. A cut-off point of PUMA score ≥5 was selected due to higher sensitivity of 91.2%, specificity of 42.6% and high NPV of 92.7%. PUMA score performed better than CDQ and COPD-PS in the area under the ROC curve (0.753 versus 0.658 and 0.612 respectively), had higher sensitivity than COPD-PS (91.2% versus 61%) and had higher specificity than CDQ (42.6% versus 13.1%). The use of PUMA as a screening tool was feasible in Chinese primary care and can be conducted by trained staff and health professionals. The validation results showed high sensitivity and high NPV to identify high risk patient with COPD at cut-off point of ≥5. It can be useful for early detection and management of COPD.

Automated interpretation of the pulmonary function test by a portable spirometer in Chinese adults

Introduction

A portable spirometer is a promising alternative to a traditional pulmonary function test (PFT) spirometer for respiratory function evaluation.

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of automated interpretation of the PFT measured by a portable Yue Cloud spirometer in Chinese adults.

Methods

The PFT was performed to evaluate subjects prospectively enrolled at Ruijin Hospital (n = 220). A Yue Cloud spirometer and a conventional Jaeger MasterScreen device were applied to each patient with a 20‐min quiescent period between each measurement. Pulmonary function parameters, including forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF), maximal expiratory flow at 25%, 50%, and 75% of the FVC (MEF25, MEF50, and MEF75, respectively), and maximal mid‐expiratory flow (MMEF), were compared by correlation analyses and Bland–Altman methods. The Yue Cloud spirometer automatically interpreted the PFT results, and a conventional strategy was performed to interpret the PFT results obtained by the Jaeger machine. Concordance of the categorization of pulmonary dysfunction, small airway dysfunction, and severity was analyzed by the kappa (κ) statistic.

Results

Significantly similar correlations of all variables measured with the two spirometers were observed (all p < 0.001). No significant bias was observed in any of the measured spirometer variables. A satisfactory concordance of pulmonary function and severity classification was observed between the automated interpretation results obtained with the Yue Cloud spirometer vs. a conventional spirometer interpretation strategy (all κ > 0.80).

Conclusion

The portable Yue Cloud spirometer not only yields reliable measurements of pulmonary function but also can automatically interpret the PFT results.

Discriminative Accuracy of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening Instruments in 3 Low- and Middle-Income Country Settings

IMPORTANCE

Most of the global morbidity and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) occurs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with significant economic effects.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the discriminative accuracy of 3 instruments using questionnaires and peak expiratory flow (PEF) to screen for COPD in 3 LMIC settings.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A cross-sectional analysis of discriminative accuracy, conducted between January 2018 and March 2020 in semiurban Bhaktapur, Nepal; urban Lima, Peru; and rural Nakaseke, Uganda, using a random age- and sex-stratified sample of the population 40 years or older.

EXPOSURES

Three screening tools, the COPD Assessment in Primary Care to Identify Undiagnosed Respiratory Disease and Exacerbation Risk (CAPTURE; range, 0-6; high risk indicated by a score of 5 or more or score 2-5 with low PEF [<250 L/min for females and <350 L/min for males]), the COPD in LMICs Assessment questionnaire (COLA-6; range, 0-5; high risk indicated by a score of 4 or more), and the Lung Function Questionnaire (LFQ; range, 0-25; high risk indicated by a score of 18 or less) were assessed against a reference standard diagnosis of COPD using quality-assured postbronchodilator spirometry. CAPTURE and COLA-6 include a measure of PEF.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was discriminative accuracy of the tools in identifying COPD as measured by area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) with 95% CIs. Secondary outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

RESULTS

Among 10 709 adults who consented to participate in the study (mean age, 56.3 years (SD, 11.7); 50% female), 35% had ever smoked, and 30% were currently exposed to biomass smoke. The unweighted prevalence of COPD at the 3 sites was 18.2% (642/3534 participants) in Nepal, 2.7% (97/3550) in Peru, and 7.4% (264/3580) in Uganda. Among 1000 COPD cases, 49.3% had clinically important disease (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease classification B-D), 16.4% had severe or very severe airflow obstruction (forced expiratory volume in 1 second <50% predicted), and 95.3% of cases were previously undiagnosed. The AUC for the screening instruments ranged from 0.717 (95% CI, 0.677-0.774) for LFQ in Peru to 0.791 (95% CI, 0.770-0.809) for COLA-6 in Nepal. The sensitivity ranged from 34.8% (95% CI, 25.3%-45.2%) for COLA-6 in Nepal to 64.2% (95% CI, 60.3%-67.9%) for CAPTURE in Nepal. The mean time to administer the instruments was 7.6 minutes (SD 1.11), and data completeness was 99.5%.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study demonstrated that screening instruments for COPD were feasible to administer in 3 low- and middle-income settings. Further research is needed to assess instrument performance in other low- and middle-income settings and to determine whether implementation is associated with improved clinical outcomes.

LINC01414/LINC00824 genetic polymorphisms in association with the susceptibility of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Objective

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a complicated multi-factor, multi-gene disease. Here, we aimed to assess the association of genetic polymorphisms in LINC01414/ LINC00824 and interactions with COPD susceptibility.

Methods

Three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in LINC01414/LINC00824 was genotyped by Agena MassARRAY platform among 315 COPD patients and 314 controls. Logistic analysis adjusted by age and gender were applied to estimate the genetic contribution of selected SNPs to COPD susceptibility.

Results

LINC01414 rs699467 (OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.56–0.94, p = 0.015) and LINC00824 rs7815944 (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.31–0.99, p = 0.046) might be protective factors for COPD occurrence, while LINC01414 rs298207 (OR = 2.88, 95% CI 1.31–6.31, p = 0.008) risk-allele was related to the increased risk of COPD in the whole population. Rs7815944 was associated with the reduced risk of COPD in the subjects aged > 70 years (OR = 0.29, p = 0.005). Rs6994670 (OR = 0.57, p = 0.007) contribute to a reduced COPD risk, while rs298207 (OR = 7.94, p = 0.009) was related to a higher susceptibility to COPD at age ≤ 70 years. Rs298207 (OR = 2.54, p = 0.043) and rs7815944 (OR = 0.43, p = 0.028) variants was associated COPD risk among males. Rs7815944 (OR = 0.16, p = 0.031) was related to the reduced susceptibility of COPD in former smokers. Moreover, the association between rs298207 genotype and COPD patients with dyspnea was found (OR = 0.50, p = 0.016), and rs7815944 was related to COPD patients with wheezing (OR = 0.22, p = 0.008).

Conclusion

Our finding provided further insights into LINC01414/LINC00824 polymorphisms at risk of COPD occurrence and accumulated evidence for the genetic susceptibility of COPD.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-021-01579-3.

Sedentary behavior is associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A generalized propensity score-weighted analysis

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the fourth and third leading cause of death worldwide and in China, respectively. Sedentary behavior has been shown to increase the risk of respiratory disease, such as asthma. However, the relationship between sedentary behavior and COPD is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between sedentary behavior and COPD.Data was extracted from the 2018 a large-scale cross-sectional study of Chronic Disease and Lifestyle Population Survey in Sichuan Province of China, in which sedentary behavior and chronic diseases were self-reported according to medical records. The association between sedentary behavior on risk of COPD was estimated using multivariable regression model in non-matching cohorts and generalized propensity score-weighted (GPSW)cohorts, respectively, controlling for potential confounders.Individuals who remained sedentary for more than 7 hours per day were more likely to have COPD than the control group (<3 hours) both in conventional multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR = 2.020, 95%CI: 1.575-2.585, P < .001) and GPSW analysis (OR = 2.381, 95%CI: 1.778-3.188, P < .001). After GPSW and the sensitivity analysis using refined smoking variable further found a dose-effect between sedentary behavior and COPD, with 1.242 (95%CI: 1.006-1.532, P < .05) times risk of COPD in those sedentary behavior of more than 5 hours per day (GPSW) and 1.377 (95%CI: 1.092-1.736, P < .05) times risk in those sedentary behavior above 5 hours per day (sensitivity analysis), comparing with the control group.Sedentary behavior is independently associated with increased risk of COPD, adjusting for other confounders. The findings of this study have important implications for future research and public health guidance. Reducing sedentary time may have a significant role in COPD prevention.

Influenza-associated pneumonia as reference to assess seriousness of coronavirus disease (COVID-19)

Information on severity of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) (transmissibility, disease seriousness, impact) is crucial for preparation of healthcare sectors. We present a simple approach to assess disease seriousness, creating a reference cohort of pneumonia patients from sentinel hospitals. First comparisons exposed a higher rate of COVID-19 patients requiring ventilation. There were more case fatalities among COVID-19 patients without comorbidities than in the reference cohort. Hospitals should prepare for high utilisation of ventilation and intensive care resources.