1
|
Jadidfard MP, Tahani B. Painless cost control as a central strategy for universal oral health coverage: A critical review with policy guide. Int J Dent Hyg 2024. [PMID: 38764157 DOI: 10.1111/idh.12818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
AIM This study aimed to critically review the methods used to control the significantly increasing costs of dental care. METHODS Through a comprehensive search of the available literature, the cost control (CC) mechanisms for health services were identified from a healthcare system perspective. The probable applicability of each CC method was evaluated mainly based on its potential contribution to oral health promotion. Each mechanism was then classified and discussed under any of the two headings of financing and service provision. An operational guide was finally presented for policy-making in each of the three main models of healthcare systems, including National Health Services, social/public health insurance and private insurance. RESULTS From a total of 142 articles/reports retrieved in PubMed, 73 in Scopus and 791 in Google Scholar, 35 were included in the final review after eliminating the duplicates and screening process. Totally ten mechanisms were identified for CC of dental care. Seven were discussed under the financing function, including cost sharing, preauthorization, mixed payment method and an evidence-based approach to benefit package definition, among others. Three further methods were classified under the service provision function, including workforce skill mix with emphasis on primary oral healthcare providers, development of primary healthcare (PHC) network and an appropriate use of tele-dentistry. CONCLUSION Painless control of dental expenditures requires a smart integration of prevention into the CC plans. The suggested policy guide emphasizes organizational factors; particularly including the development of PHC-based networks with midlevel providers (desirably extended-duty dental hygienists) as the frontline oral healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad-Pooyan Jadidfard
- Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Community Oral Health, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Bahareh Tahani
- Department of Oral Public Health, Dental Research Center, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baines R, Stevens S, Austin D, Anil K, Bradwell H, Cooper L, Maramba ID, Chatterjee A, Leigh S. Patient and Public Willingness to Share Personal Health Data for Third-Party or Secondary Uses: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e50421. [PMID: 38441944 PMCID: PMC10951832 DOI: 10.2196/50421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND International advances in information communication, eHealth, and other digital health technologies have led to significant expansions in the collection and analysis of personal health data. However, following a series of high-profile data sharing scandals and the emergence of COVID-19, critical exploration of public willingness to share personal health data remains limited, particularly for third-party or secondary uses. OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to explore factors that affect public willingness to share personal health data for third-party or secondary uses. METHODS A systematic search of 6 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, and SocINDEX) was conducted with review findings analyzed using inductive-thematic analysis and synthesized using a narrative approach. RESULTS Of the 13,949 papers identified, 135 were included. Factors most commonly identified as a barrier to data sharing from a public perspective included data privacy, security, and management concerns. Other factors found to influence willingness to share personal health data included the type of data being collected (ie, perceived sensitivity); the type of user requesting their data to be shared, including their perceived motivation, profit prioritization, and ability to directly impact patient care; trust in the data user, as well as in associated processes, often established through individual choice and control over what data are shared with whom, when, and for how long, supported by appropriate models of dynamic consent; the presence of a feedback loop; and clearly articulated benefits or issue relevance including valued incentivization and compensation at both an individual and collective or societal level. CONCLUSIONS There is general, yet conditional public support for sharing personal health data for third-party or secondary use. Clarity, transparency, and individual control over who has access to what data, when, and for how long are widely regarded as essential prerequisites for public data sharing support. Individual levels of control and choice need to operate within the auspices of assured data privacy and security processes, underpinned by dynamic and responsive models of consent that prioritize individual or collective benefits over and above commercial gain. Failure to understand, design, and refine data sharing approaches in response to changeable patient preferences will only jeopardize the tangible benefits of data sharing practices being fully realized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Baines
- Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Sebastian Stevens
- Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
- Prometheus Health Technologies Ltd, Newquay, United Kingdom
| | - Daniela Austin
- Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | | | - Hannah Bradwell
- Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Leonie Cooper
- Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | | | - Arunangsu Chatterjee
- Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Leigh
- Prometheus Health Technologies Ltd, Newquay, United Kingdom
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Conventry, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Looi JCL, Allison S, Bastiampillai T, Maguire PA, Kisely S, Looi RCH. Mitigating the consequences of electronic health record data breaches for patients and healthcare workers. AUST HEALTH REV 2024; 48:4-7. [PMID: 38109886 DOI: 10.1071/ah23258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
Electronic health records (EHRs) have been widely adopted in Australian public sector healthcare and will remain an ongoing, essential data system. However, recent substantial data breaches from hacked business data systems in Australian enterprises, as well as international healthcare providers, mean that EHR data breaches are increasingly likely in Australia. Risks include medical identity theft and extortion attempts based on threats to release sensitive patient information. Hacking is now a foreseeable additional risk of medical treatment. Risk mitigation for the consequences of data breaches needs to be considered, as well as support for patients (and families) and healthcare workers. This includes identity theft protection services, cybersecurity insurance, and psychological support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey C L Looi
- Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine, School of Medicine and Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra Hospital, Building 4, Level 2, PO Box 11, Garran, Canberra, ACT 2605, Australia; and Consortium of Australian-Academic Psychiatrists for Independent Policy and Research Analysis (CAPIPRA), Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Stephen Allison
- Consortium of Australian-Academic Psychiatrists for Independent Policy and Research Analysis (CAPIPRA), Canberra, ACT, Australia; and College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Tarun Bastiampillai
- Consortium of Australian-Academic Psychiatrists for Independent Policy and Research Analysis (CAPIPRA), Canberra, ACT, Australia; and College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia; and Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Vic., Australia
| | - Paul A Maguire
- Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine, School of Medicine and Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra Hospital, Building 4, Level 2, PO Box 11, Garran, Canberra, ACT 2605, Australia; and Consortium of Australian-Academic Psychiatrists for Independent Policy and Research Analysis (CAPIPRA), Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Steve Kisely
- Consortium of Australian-Academic Psychiatrists for Independent Policy and Research Analysis (CAPIPRA), Canberra, ACT, Australia; and School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, Qld, Australia; and Departments of Psychiatry, Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leigh S, Baines R, Stevens S, Garba-Sani Z, Austin D, Chatterjee A. Walk a mile in my shoes: perspectives towards sharing of health and experience data among individuals living with sickle cell disorder. Mhealth 2024; 10:4. [PMID: 38323148 PMCID: PMC10839506 DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-23-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Advancements in digital health technologies (DHTs) mean people are increasingly recording and managing personal health data. As observed during the COVID-19 pandemic, sharing of such data may provide unrivalled opportunities in advancing our understanding of conditions otherwise poorly understood, including rare conditions. Methods A semi-structured focus group (n=25) explored perspectives and experiences of sharing health data among those with a group of rare haematological conditions, sickle cell disorder (SCD). The focus group explored (I) what 'feeling well' looks like; (II) how this could be monitored using DHTs; (III) which data healthcare professionals (HCPs) should pay greater attention to and; (IV) types of data willing to be shared, with whom, and under which conditions. Key themes were further assessed via an online survey (n=50). Results Patient-relevant measures of condition-management focused on "everything else that comes with" SCD, suggesting HCPs did not pay sufficient attention to day-to-day symptom variability. This was juxtaposed against the "fixed and one-off" electronic health record (EHR), collecting pre-specified data at pre-determined snapshots of time, not considered reflective of outcomes associated with "feeling well" day-to-day. Forty-four-point-seven percent of respondents had previously shared health data. Most were willing to share data concerning symptoms and health service utilisation, but were less willing to share genomic and EHR data. Sixty-one-point-seven percent believed HCPs did not pay enough attention to daily fluctuations in mental and physical health. Financial benefits (74.5%), trust in organisations seeking data (72.3%), and knowing how data will be used (61.7%) were key facilitators of data sharing. Seventy-one percent, 70% and 65.2% had not previously shared health data with the pharmaceutical industry, charitable organisations and digital health interventions respectively, but were open to doing so in the future. Conclusions Those living with the rare condition SCD were supportive of collecting and sharing data to foster research and improve understanding and outcomes. However, specific requirements were identified to respect privacy and informational needs regarding future use of data. DHTs can be a valuable tool in improving understanding of the day-to-day impact of health conditions, but understanding patient needs is critical in ensuring involvement in the process, as not all data types are considered of equal value, benefit, or risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Leigh
- Prometheus Health Technologies, Mor Workspace, Newquay, UK
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Rebecca Baines
- Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Sebastian Stevens
- Prometheus Health Technologies, Mor Workspace, Newquay, UK
- Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | | | - Daniella Austin
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Arunangsu Chatterjee
- Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Papadopoulos K, von Wyl V, Gille F. What is public trust in national electronic health record systems? A scoping review of qualitative research studies from 1995 to 2021. Digit Health 2024; 10:20552076241228024. [PMID: 38288130 PMCID: PMC10823845 DOI: 10.1177/20552076241228024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Public trust in national electronic health record systems is essential for the successful implementation within a healthcare system. Research investigating public trust in electronic health records is limited, leading to a lack of conceptual clarity. In response, the objective of this study is to gain a clearer understanding on the conceptualizations of public trust in electronic health records, which can support the implementation of national electronic health record systems. Methods Guided by the PRISMA-ScR checklist, a scoping review of 27 qualitative studies on public trust in electronic health records found between January 2022 and June 2022 was conducted using an inclusive search method. In an iterative process, conceptual themes were derived describing the promoters and outcomes of public trust in electronic health records. Results Five major conceptual themes with 15 sub-themes were present across the literature. Comprehension, autonomy, and data protection promote public trust in electronic health record; while personal and system benefits are the outcomes once public trust in electronic health records exists. Additional findings highlight the pivotal role of healthcare actors for the public trust building process. Conclusions The results underscore comprehension, autonomy, and data protection as important themes that help ascertain and solidify public trust in electronic health records. As well, health system actors have the capacity to promote or hinder national electronic health record implementation, depending on their actions and how the public perceives those actions. The findings can assist researchers, policymakers, and other health system actors in attaining a better understanding of the intricacies of public trust in electronic health records.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimon Papadopoulos
- Digital Society Initiative (DSI), University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care (IfIS), University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Viktor von Wyl
- Digital Society Initiative (DSI), University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care (IfIS), University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Felix Gille
- Digital Society Initiative (DSI), University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care (IfIS), University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Morris JS. A Call to Reconsider a Nationwide Electronic Health Record System: Correcting the Failures of the National Program for IT. JMIR Med Inform 2023; 11:e53112. [PMID: 38163966 PMCID: PMC10958994 DOI: 10.2196/53112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Abstract
The National Programme for IT (NPfIT) was launched in 2005 to implement 7 nationwide IT services across the National Health Service (NHS). Despite the success of many of these designated “deliverables,” the establishment of a single nationwide electronic health record (EHR) system never fully materialized. As a result, NHS medical records are now stored using a diverse array of alternate EHR systems, which frequently restricts health care practitioners from accessing extensive portions of their patients’ notes. This not only limits their ability to make well-informed clinical decisions but also impacts the quality of care they are able to provide. This article assesses the medical, economic, and bureaucratic implications of an NHS-wide EHR system. Additionally, it explores how the shortcomings of the NPfIT should be addressed when attempting to introduce such a system in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Seymour Morris
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pronicki Ł, Czech M, Gujski M, Boguszewska ND. Awareness, Attitudes and Willingness to Donate Biological Samples to a Biobank: A Survey of a Representative Sample of Polish Citizens. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2714. [PMID: 37893788 PMCID: PMC10606933 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11202714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Biotechnology is developing at an ever-increasing pace, and the progressive computerization of health care and research is making it increasingly easy to share data. One of the fastest growing areas is biobanking. However, even with the best equipment and the best trained staff, a biobank will be useless without donors. For this reason, we have decided to gauge Polish citizens' awareness and attitudes towards biobanking and their willingness to donate biological samples. For this purpose the survey was conducted among a nationwide group of 1052 Poles aged 18 and over where the totals for gender, age and place of residence were selected according to their representation in the total population of adult Poles. The survey was conducted using the Computer Assisted Web Interview (CAWI) technique. Approximately two thirds of respondents N = 701 (66.6%) indicated that they had heard of scientific studies in which samples of biological material such as blood, saliva or urine are collected. More than half of respondents (N = 613, 58.3%) had a positive opinion regarding scientific research in which samples of biological material are taken. Only N = 220 (20.9%) of respondents had previously encountered the term biobanking. More than a half N = 687 (65.3%) of respondents would participate in a scientific study that biobanked biological material and health information. Almost half of the respondents (48.0%) would like specific consent to be used in biobanking. In our study we observed a negligible correlation between socio-demographic factors and a willingness to donate biological material to a biobank. Considering the results presented above, the level of knowledge and awareness of biobanks, and their role in scientific research and the health care system, among Polish citizens is low and requires education and information activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Łukasz Pronicki
- Department of Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warszawa, Poland
| | - Marcin Czech
- Institute of Mother and Child, 01-211 Warszawa, Poland
| | - Mariusz Gujski
- Department of Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warszawa, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ong R. Factors affecting patient and public perceptions of the adoption of electronic health record sharing: A Hong Kong study. Int J Med Inform 2023; 178:105193. [PMID: 37672981 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The disclosure of personal health information in electronic health records (eHR) highlights privacy and security concerns that are complicated by the digitization and interoperability of health records. Hong Kong's Electronic Health Record Sharing System (eHRSS), introduced in March 2016, enables eHR sharing among public and private health services upon the consent of patients. Based on a September 2021 survey, this study examined the specific context of Hong Kong, patient and public perceptions on the security and privacy of eHR sharing, correlation of trust with personal privacy and security concerns, and how perceptions affect health care-related decisions. METHODS Using a random sample of householders aged 45-70 years, the study conducted a questionnaire survey on respondents' awareness, perceived benefits, and obstacles to participating in the eHRSS, and the impact of their perceptions on health care-related decisions. A focus group discussion with 13 participants further explored views on the security of Hong Kong's eHRSS and their readiness to support the system. RESULTS The study analyzed data from 400 responses. The findings showed a low degree of awareness of the eHRSS. Privacy and security concerns were impeding factors in the sharing of information; half of the respondents reported being concerned over their personal health information being part of the eHRSS. The majority (86.9%) expressed conditional support for the sharing of information. Despite their concerns on security and privacy, 66.5% and 77.9%, respectively, would not withhold information nor postpone the seeking of medical care based on those concerns. Participants in the focus group expressed concerns regarding eHRSS registration, data leaks, information accuracy, and the potential prejudice that may result in discrimination and inequality in health care provision. CONCLUSIONS Satisfaction with the health care services played a role in the trust reposed in the Hospital Authority and health care providers and institutions. Security and privacy were decisive factors in respodents' refusal to seek care from physicians who had violated their privacy. Respondents expressed greater interest in sharing their information if measures were in place for anonymization and punishing data misuse. Ensuring rights of control toward information sharing would inspire greater confidence among patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Ong
- Room 6346 6/F, Li Dak Sum Yip Yio Chin Building, School of Law, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon HKSAR, Hong Kong.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
von Kalckreuth N, Feufel MA. Extending the Privacy Calculus to the mHealth Domain: Survey Study on the Intention to Use mHealth Apps in Germany. JMIR Hum Factors 2023; 10:e45503. [PMID: 37585259 PMCID: PMC10468710 DOI: 10.2196/45503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the increasing digitalization of the health sector, more and more mobile health (mHealth) apps are coming to the market to continuously collect and process sensitive health data for the benefit of patients and providers. These technologies open up new opportunities to make the health care system more efficient and save costs but also pose potential threats such as loss of data or finances. OBJECTIVE This study aims to present an empirical review and adaptation of the extended privacy calculus model to the mHealth domain and to understand what factors influence the intended usage of mHealth technologies. METHODS A survey study was conducted to empirically validate our model, using a case vignette as cover story. Data were collected from 250 German participants and analyzed using a covariance-based structural equation model. RESULTS The model explains R2=79.3% of the variance in intention to use. The 3 main factors (social norms, attitude to privacy, and perceived control over personal data) influenced the intention to use mHealth apps, albeit partially indirectly. The intention to use mHealth apps is driven by the perceived benefits of the technology, trust in the provider, and social norms. Privacy concerns have no bearing on the intention to use. The attitude to privacy has a large inhibiting effect on perceived benefits, as well as on trust in the provider. Perceived control over personal data clearly dispels privacy concerns and supports the relationship of trust between the user and the provider. CONCLUSIONS Based on the privacy calculus, our domain-specific model explains the intention to use mHealth apps better than previous, more general models. The findings allow health care providers to improve their products and to increase usage by targeting specific user groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niklas von Kalckreuth
- Division of Ergonomics, Department of Psychology and Ergonomics (IPA), Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus A Feufel
- Division of Ergonomics, Department of Psychology and Ergonomics (IPA), Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kerasidou A, Kerasidou CX. Data-driven research and healthcare: public trust, data governance and the NHS. BMC Med Ethics 2023; 24:51. [PMID: 37452393 PMCID: PMC10349411 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00922-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
It is widely acknowledged that trust plays an important role for the acceptability of data sharing practices in research and healthcare, and for the adoption of new health technologies such as AI. Yet there is reported distrust in this domain. Although in the UK, the NHS is one of the most trusted public institutions, public trust does not appear to accompany its data sharing practices for research and innovation, specifically with the private sector, that have been introduced in recent years. In this paper, we examine the question of, what is it about sharing NHS data for research and innovation with for-profit companies that challenges public trust? To address this question, we draw from political theory to provide an account of public trust that helps better understand the relationship between the public and the NHS within a democratic context, as well as, the kind of obligations and expectations that govern this relationship. Then we examine whether the way in which the NHS is managing patient data and its collaboration with the private sector fit under this trust-based relationship. We argue that the datafication of healthcare and the broader 'health and wealth' agenda adopted by consecutive UK governments represent a major shift in the institutional character of the NHS, which brings into question the meaning of public good the NHS is expected to provide, challenging public trust. We conclude by suggesting that to address the problem of public trust, a theoretical and empirical examination of the benefits but also the costs associated with this shift needs to take place, as well as an open conversation at public level to determine what values should be promoted by a public institution like the NHS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angeliki Kerasidou
- Ethox Centre, Oxford Population Health (Nuffield Department of Population Health, Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery Oxford, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Charalampia Xaroula Kerasidou
- Ethox Centre, Oxford Population Health (Nuffield Department of Population Health, Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery Oxford, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang Y, Cui H, Li L, Cao Y, Qu H, Ailina H, Dou Z, Tang C, Qin W, Wang C, Yang X, Feng S, Liu Y, Han D. Digitalization of prevention and treatment and the combination of western and Chinese medicine in management of acute heart failure. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1146941. [PMID: 37304970 PMCID: PMC10248001 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1146941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Digitalization has emerged as a new trend in healthcare, with great potential and creating many unique opportunities, as well as many challenges. Cardiovascular disease is one of the major causes of disease-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, and the threat to life posed by acute heart failure is evident. In addition to traditional collegiate therapies, this article reviews the current status and subdisciplinary impact of digital healthcare at the level of combined Chinese and Western medical therapies. It also further discusses the prospects for the development of this approach, with the objective of developing an active role for digitalization in the combination of Western and Chinese medicine for the management of acute heart failure in order to support maintenance of cardiovascular health in the population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingxin Wang
- School of Life Science, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Herong Cui
- School of Life Science, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Liwen Li
- School of Acupuncture and Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yajing Cao
- School of Life Science, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Hanyun Qu
- School of Life Science, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Halisi Ailina
- School of Life Science, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Zhili Dou
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Chuwei Tang
- School of Acupuncture and Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Wanli Qin
- School of Life Science, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Chenlu Wang
- School of Life Science, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xue Yang
- School of Life Science, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Shixing Feng
- Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yixing Liu
- School of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Dongran Han
- School of Life Science, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Agweyu A, Hill K, Diaz T, Jackson D, Hailu BG, Muzigaba M. Regular measurement is essential but insufficient to improve quality of healthcare. BMJ 2023; 380:e073412. [PMID: 36914202 PMCID: PMC9999465 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
Ambrose Agweyu and colleagues argue that large scale improvements in quality of healthcare require strong change management as well as health information systems that can provide continuous and rapid feedback
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambrose Agweyu
- Department of Epidemiology and Demography KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Theresa Diaz
- Department of Maternal Newborn, Child, and Adolescent Health, and Ageing, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Debra Jackson
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa
- Data and Analytics Section, Unicef, New York, USA
| | - Binyam G Hailu
- World Health Organization Country Office, Free Town, Sierra Leone
| | - Moise Muzigaba
- Department of Maternal Newborn, Child, and Adolescent Health, and Ageing, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Suzuki MY, Ohnuki Y, Takeshita K. Genetic Data Governance in Japanese Hospitals. Asian Bioeth Rev 2023; 15:1-19. [PMID: 37361688 PMCID: PMC9993371 DOI: 10.1007/s41649-023-00242-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The storage and access of genetic testing results have unique considerations for medical records. Initially, genetic testing was limited to patients with single gene diseases. Genetic medicine and testing have expanded, as have concerns about appropriately handling genetic information. In this study, we surveyed the management of genetic information in general hospitals in Japan using a questionnaire on access restrictions. Our questions included whether any other medical information was managed in a unique way. We identified 1037 hospitals designated for clinical training located throughout Japan and received responses from 258 hospitals, and 191 reported that they handle genetic information and results of genetic tests. Of the 191 hospitals that handle genetic information, 112 hospitals implement access restrictions to genetic information. Seventy-one hospitals, one of which uses paper medical records rather than electrical medical records, do not enforce access restrictions. For eight hospitals, it was not known whether access restrictions were enforced or not. The responses from these hospitals indicated that access restrictions and storage methods varied across institution type (e.g., general vs. university hospitals), institution size, and the presence of a clinical genetics department. Other information, such as infectious disease diagnosis, psychological counseling records, abuse, and criminal history, was also subject to access restriction in 42 hospitals. The disparity in how medical facilities handle sensitive genetic information demonstrates a need for discussion between medical professionals and the general public on the storage of sensitive records, including genetic information. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41649-023-00242-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mizuho Yamazaki Suzuki
- Department of Medical Ethics, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa Prefecture Japan
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Tokai University Hospital, Isehara, Kanagawa Prefecture Japan
| | - Yuko Ohnuki
- Department of Medical Ethics, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa Prefecture Japan
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Tokai University Hospital, Isehara, Kanagawa Prefecture Japan
| | - Kei Takeshita
- Department of Medical Ethics, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa Prefecture Japan
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Tokai University Hospital, Isehara, Kanagawa Prefecture Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Moulaei K, Iranmanesh E, Amiri P, Ahmadian L. Attitudes of Covid-19 patients toward sharing their health data: A survey-based study to understand security and privacy concerns. Health Sci Rep 2023; 6:e1132. [PMID: 36865528 PMCID: PMC9971706 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.1132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Many people around the world, especially at the time of the Covid-19 outbreak, are concerned about their e-health data. The aim of this study was to investigate the attitudes of patients with Covid-19 toward sharing their health data for research and their concerns about security and privacy. Methods This survey is a cross-sectional study conducted through an electronic researcher-made questionnaire from February to May 2021. Convenience sampling was applied to select the participants and all 475 patients were referred to two to Afzalipour and Shahid Bahonar hospitals were invited to the study. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 204 patients were included in the study and completed the questionnaire. Descriptive statistics (frequency, mean, and standard deviation) were used to analyze the questionnaire data. SPSS 23.0 was used for data analysis. Results Participants tended to share information about "comments provided by individuals on websites" (68.6%), "fitness tracker data" (64.19%), and "online shopping history" (63.21%) before death. Participants also tended to share information about "electronic medical records data" (36.75%), "genetic data" (24.99%), and "Instagram data" (24.99%) after death. "Fraud or misuse of personal information" (4.48 [±1.27]) was the most common concern of participants regarding the virtual world. "Unauthorized access to the account" (4.38 [±0.73]), "violation of the privacy of personal information" (4.26 [±0.85]), and "violation of the patient privacy and personal information confidentially" (4.26 [±0.85]) were the most of the unauthorized security incidents that occurred online for participants. Conclusion Patients with Covid-19 were concerned about releasing information they shared on websites and social networks. Therefore, people should be made aware of the reliability of websites and social media so that their security and privacy are not affected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khadijeh Moulaei
- Student Research CommitteeKerman University of Medical SciencesKermanIran
| | - Elnaz Iranmanesh
- Department of Information Technoloy Engineering, Faculty of SciencesIslamic Azad UniversityKermanIran
| | - Parasto Amiri
- Student Research CommitteeKerman University of Medical SciencesKermanIran
| | - Leila Ahmadian
- Department of Health Information Sciences, Faculty of Management and Medical Information SciencesKerman University of Medical SciencesKermanIran
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hollo Z, Martin DE. An equitable approach to enhancing the privacy of consumer information on My Health Record in Australia. HEALTH INF MANAG J 2023; 52:37-40. [PMID: 34132130 DOI: 10.1177/18333583211019764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Australia's national electronic health record (EHR), My Health Record (MHR), raises concerns about information privacy and the presumption of consent to participation. In contrast to the "opt-out" framework for participation, consumers must "opt-in" to obtain additional privacy features to protect their health information on MHR. We review ethical considerations relating to opt-in and opt-out frameworks in the context of EHRs, discussing potential reasons why consent for additional safeguards is not currently presumed. Exploring the implications of recent amendments to strengthen consumer privacy, we present recommendations to promote equity in health information security for all Australians using MHR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Hollo
- 95522Deakin University, Australia.,St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Grad DA, Mureșanu D. Electronic health records in Romania - window of opportunity in improving population's health? J Med Life 2022; 15:1327-1329. [PMID: 36567830 PMCID: PMC9762377 DOI: 10.25122/jml-2022-1032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Alecsandra Grad
- RoNeuro Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, Cluj-Napoca, Romania,Department of Public Health, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Dafin Mureșanu
- RoNeuro Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, Cluj-Napoca, Romania,Department of Neurosciences, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Basil NN, Ambe S, Ekhator C, Fonkem E. Health Records Database and Inherent Security Concerns: A Review of the Literature. Cureus 2022; 14:e30168. [DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
18
|
Perception of clinical research among patients and healthy volunteers of clinical trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 78:1647-1655. [PMID: 35896802 PMCID: PMC9482583 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-022-03366-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Clinical research relies on data from patients and volunteers, yet the target sample size is often not achieved. Here, we assessed the perception of clinical research among clinical trial participants to improve the recruitment process for future studies. Methods We conducted a single-center descriptive and exploratory study of 300 current or former participants in various phase I–III clinical trials. Questionnaires were either distributed to current clinical trial participants or emailed to former subjects. Results Subjects strongly agreed or agreed that contributing to improving medical care (> 81%), contributing to scientific research (> 79%), and trusting their treating physicians (> 77%) were motives for study participation. Among healthy volunteers, financial motives positively correlated with the number of clinical trials they had participated in (p < 0.05). Higher age positively correlated with expectation of best available treatment during study participation among patients (p < 0.05). Less than 8% of all subjects expressed “great concern” about the potential risks of sharing their personal information as part of the study. Subjects displayed “great trust” or “trust” in medical staff (86.6%) and in government research institutions (76.4%), and “very little trust” or “little trust” in pharmaceutical companies (35.4%) and health insurance companies (16.9%). Conclusion Altruistic motives and trust in treating physicians were predominant motives for clinical trial participation. Older patients expected to receive the best available treatment during participation. Healthy volunteers who reported financial motives had participated in more clinical trials. Consistent with great trust in medical staff and government research institutions, little concern was expressed about the misuse of personal data during the trial. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00228-022-03366-3.
Collapse
|
19
|
Pilares ICA, Azam S, Akbulut S, Jonkman M, Shanmugam B. Addressing the Challenges of Electronic Health Records Using Blockchain and IPFS. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 22:4032. [PMID: 35684652 PMCID: PMC9183171 DOI: 10.3390/s22114032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Electronic Health Records (EHR) are the healthcare sector's core digital strategy meant to improve the quality of care provided to patients. Despite the benefits afforded by this digital transformation initiative, adoption among healthcare organizations has been slower than desired. The sheer volume and sensitive nature of patient records compel these organizations to exercise a healthy amount of caution in implementing EHR. Cyberattacks have also increased the risks associated with non-optimal EHR implementations. An influx of high-profile data breaches has plagued the sector during the COVID-19 pandemic, which put the spotlight on EHR cybersecurity. One objective of this research project is to aid the acceleration of EHR adoption. Another objective is to ensure the robustness of the system to resist malicious attacks. For the former, a systematic review was used to unearth all the possible causes why the adoption of EHR has been anemic. In this paper, sixty-five existing proposed EHR solutions were analyzed and it was found that there are fourteen major challenges that need to be addressed to reduce friction and risk for health organizations. These were privacy, security, confidentiality, interoperability, access control, scalability, authentication, accessibility, availability, data storage, data ownership, data validity, data integrity, and ease of use. We propose EHRChain, a new framework that tackles all the listed challenges simultaneously to address the first objective while also being designed to achieve the second objective. It is enabled by dual-blockchains based on Hyperledger Sawtooth to allow patient data decentralization via a consortium blockchain and IPFS for distributed data storage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sami Azam
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-411-759-459
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ivanova J, Tang T, Idouraine N, Murcko A, Whitfield MJ, Dye C, Chern D, Grando A. Behavioral Health Professionals' Perceptions on Patient-Controlled Granular Information Sharing (Part 2): Focus Group Study. JMIR Ment Health 2022; 9:e18792. [PMID: 35442213 PMCID: PMC9069296 DOI: 10.2196/18792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-directed selection and sharing of health information "granules" is known as granular information sharing. In a previous study, patients with behavioral health conditions categorized their own health information into sensitive categories (eg, mental health) and chose the health professionals (eg, pharmacists) who should have access to those records. Little is known about behavioral health professionals' perspectives of patient-controlled granular information sharing (PC-GIS). OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess behavioral health professionals' (1) understanding of and opinions about PC-GIS; (2) accuracy in assessing redacted medical information; (3) reactions to patient rationale for health data categorization, assignment of sensitivity, and sharing choices; and (4) recommendations to improve PC-GIS. METHODS Four 2-hour focus groups and pre- and postsurveys were conducted at 2 facilities. During the focus groups, outcomes from a previous study on patients' choices for medical record sharing were discussed. Thematic analysis was applied to focus group transcripts to address study objectives. RESULTS A total of 28 health professionals were recruited. Over half (14/25, 56%) were unaware or provided incorrect definitions of granular information sharing. After PC-GIS was explained, all professionals demonstrated understanding of the terminology and process. Most (26/32 codes, 81%) recognized that key medical data had been redacted from the study case. A majority (41/62 codes, 66%) found the patient rationale for categorization and data sharing choices to be unclear. Finally, education and other approaches to inform and engage patients in granular information sharing were recommended. CONCLUSIONS This study provides detailed insights from behavioral health professionals on granular information sharing. Outcomes will inform the development, deployment, and evaluation of an electronic consent tool for granular health data sharing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Ivanova
- School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States
| | - Tianyu Tang
- College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Nassim Idouraine
- College of Health Solutions, Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Scottsdale, AZ, United States
| | - Anita Murcko
- College of Health Solutions, Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Scottsdale, AZ, United States
| | | | - Christy Dye
- Partners in Recovery, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Darwyn Chern
- Partners in Recovery, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Adela Grando
- College of Health Solutions, Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Scottsdale, AZ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chatterjee A, Prinz A. Applying Spring Security Framework with KeyCloak-Based OAuth2 to Protect Microservice Architecture APIs: A Case Study. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 22:s22051703. [PMID: 35270850 PMCID: PMC8914669 DOI: 10.3390/s22051703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
In this study, we implemented an integrated security solution with Spring Security and Keycloak open-access platform (SSK) to secure data collection and exchange over microservice architecture application programming interfaces (APIs). The adopted solution implemented the following security features: open authorization, multi-factor authentication, identity brokering, and user management to safeguard microservice APIs. Then, we extended the security solution with a virtual private network (VPN), Blowfish and crypt (Bcrypt) hash, encryption method, API key, network firewall, and secure socket layer (SSL) to build up a digital infrastructure. To accomplish and describe the adopted SSK solution, we utilized a web engineering security method. As a case study, we designed and developed an electronic health coaching (eCoach) prototype system and hosted the system in the expanded digital secure infrastructure to collect and exchange personal health data over microservice APIs. We further described our adopted security solution's procedural, technical, and practical considerations. We validated our SSK solution implementation by theoretical evaluation and experimental testing. We have compared the test outcomes with related studies qualitatively to determine the efficacy of the hybrid security solution in digital infrastructure. The SSK implementation and configuration in the eCoach prototype system has effectively secured its microservice APIs from an attack in all the considered scenarios with 100% accuracy. The developed digital infrastructure with SSK solution efficiently sustained a load of (≈)300 concurrent users. In addition, we have performed a qualitative comparison among the following security solutions: Spring-based security, Keycloak-based security, and their combination (our utilized hybrid security solution), where SSK showed a promising outcome.
Collapse
|
22
|
Chourasia S, Tyagi A, Pandey SM, Walia RS, Murtaza Q. Sustainability of Industry 6.0 in Global Perspective: Benefits and Challenges. MAPAN 2022; 37:443-452. [PMCID: PMC8905282 DOI: 10.1007/s12647-022-00541-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
In the present area, the outbreak of COVID-19, customer behavior have been seen toward their individual specific need, which encourages advanced-manufacturing industries to provide mass personalization of goods and services. The Covid-19 crises bring opportunities for industries and service providers to enhance their capability for a fault-free environment, zero failure, anti-fragile, and improve production capacity. The present paper provides an overview of the sustainability of Industry 6.0 in a global perspective with vision, objective, and transformation of Industrial Revolutions. The sole aim of industry 6.0 is to seizure the new technologies, which can be applied worldwide and deliver wealth, prosperity away from the job and provide growth to nations across all planetary boundaries. This revolution would promote living harmony with nature, support the principle of sustainability where technology would not be a thing, and promote the human virtual digital twin where all can simultaneously see physical goods and virtual product information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shubhangi Chourasia
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana India
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Delhi Technological University, Delhi, India
| | - Ankit Tyagi
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana India
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Delhi Technological University, Delhi, India
| | - S. M. Pandey
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, NIT Patna, Patna, India
| | - R. S. Walia
- Department of Production Industrial Engineering, PEC, Chandigarh, India
| | - Qasim Murtaza
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Delhi Technological University, Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Brown R, Coventry L, Sillence E, Blythe J, Stumpf S, Bird J, Durrant AC. Collecting and sharing self-generated health and lifestyle data: Understanding barriers for people living with long-term health conditions - a survey study. Digit Health 2022; 8:20552076221084458. [PMID: 35284085 PMCID: PMC8905063 DOI: 10.1177/20552076221084458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The growing popularity of collecting self-generated health and lifestyle data presents a valuable opportunity to develop our understanding of long-term health conditions and improve care. Barriers remain to the effective sharing of health and lifestyle data by those living with long-term health conditions which include beliefs around concepts of Trust, Identity, Privacy and Security, experiences of stigma, perceptions of risk and information sensitivity. Method We surveyed 250 UK adults who reported living with a range of long-term health conditions. We recorded data to assess self-reported behaviours, experiences, attitudes and motivations relevant to sharing self-generated health and lifestyle data. We also asked participants about their beliefs about Trust, Identity, Privacy and Security, stigma, and perceptions of risk and information sensitivity regarding their health and lifestyle data. Results Three-quarters of our sample reported recording information about their health and lifestyle on a daily basis. However, two-thirds reported never or rarely sharing this information with others. Trust, Identity, Privacy and Security concerns were considered to be ‘very important’ by those with long-term health conditions when deciding whether or not to share self-generated health and lifestyle data with others, with security concerns considered most important. Of those living with a long-term health condition, 58% reported experiencing stigma associated with their condition. The greatest perceived risk from sharing with others was the potential for future harm to their social relationships. Conclusions Our findings suggest that, in order for health professionals and researchers to benefit from the increased prevalence of self-generated health and lifestyle data, more can be done to address security concerns and to understand perceived risks associated with data sharing. Digital platforms aimed at facilitating the sharing of self-generated health and lifestyle data may look to highlight security features, enable users to control the sharing of certain information types, and emphasise the practical benefits to users of sharing health and lifestyle data with others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Brown
- Psychology Department, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Lynne Coventry
- Psychology Department, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK
| | | | | | - Simone Stumpf
- Department of Computer Science, City University of London, UK
| | - Jon Bird
- Department of Computer Science, University of Bristol, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Shah N, Viberg Johansson J, Haraldsdóttir E, Bentzen HB, Coy S, Mascalzoni D, Jónsdóttir GA, Kaye J. Governing health data across changing contexts: A focus group study of citizen's views in England, Iceland, and Sweden. Int J Med Inform 2021; 156:104623. [PMID: 34717179 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The governance structures associated with health data are evolving in response to advances in digital technologies that enable new ways of capturing, using, and sharing different types of data. Increasingly, health data moves between different contexts such as from healthcare to research, or to commerce and marketing. Crossing these contextual boundaries has the potential to violate societal expectations about the appropriate use of health data and diminish public trust. Understanding citizens' views on the acceptability of and preferences for data use in different contexts is essential for developing information governance policies in these new contexts. METHODS Focus group design presenting data sharing scenarios in England, Iceland, and Sweden. RESULTS Seventy-one participants were recruited. Participants supported the need for data to help understand the observable world, improve medical research, the quality of public services, and to benefit society. However, participants consistently identified the lack of information, transparency and control as barriers to trusting organisations to use data in a way that they considered appropriate. There was considerable support for fair and transparent data sharing practices where all parties benefitted. CONCLUSION Data governance policy should involve all stakeholders' perspectives on an ongoing basis, to inform and implement changes to health data sharing practices that accord with stakeholder views. The Findings showed that (1) data should be used for ethical purposes even when there was commercial interest; (2) data subjects and/or public institutions that provide and share data should also receive benefits from the sharing of data; (3) third parties use of data requires greater transparency and accountability than currently exists, (4) there should be greater information provided to empower data subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Shah
- Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies, Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - J Viberg Johansson
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - E Haraldsdóttir
- Social Science Research Institute, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - H B Bentzen
- Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law, Faculty of Law, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - S Coy
- Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies, Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - D Mascalzoni
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Institute for Biomedicine, EURAC Research, Bolzano, Italy
| | - G A Jónsdóttir
- Social Science Research Institute, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - J Kaye
- Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies, Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies, Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Benn R, Shaw A. Examining the barriers to accepting big health data from a health marketeer's perspective. Health Mark Q 2021; 40:1-18. [PMID: 34720070 DOI: 10.1080/07359683.2021.1994115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Studies have shown that the sharing of big health data can improve patient management across primary and secondary care sectors. It can also reduce costs and can enhance the medical research process. Unfortunately, many big health data initiatives are being impeded because of a range of complex issues. This study was initiated to identify the said issues and develop a tool for health marketers to use to negate the barriers in big healthcare data projects. The study demonstrates how the Interactive Communication Technology Adoption Model can be operationalized to support qualitative researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alan Shaw
- Leeds Business School, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nunes Vilaza G, Coyle D, Bardram JE. Public Attitudes to Digital Health Research Repositories: Cross-sectional International Survey. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e31294. [PMID: 34714253 PMCID: PMC8590194 DOI: 10.2196/31294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Digital health research repositories propose sharing longitudinal streams of health records and personal sensing data between multiple projects and researchers. Motivated by the prospect of personalizing patient care (precision medicine), these initiatives demand broad public acceptance and large numbers of data contributors, both of which are challenging. Objective This study investigates public attitudes toward possibly contributing to digital health research repositories to identify factors for their acceptance and to inform future developments. Methods A cross-sectional online survey was conducted from March 2020 to December 2020. Because of the funded project scope and a multicenter collaboration, study recruitment targeted young adults in Denmark and Brazil, allowing an analysis of the differences between 2 very contrasting national contexts. Through closed-ended questions, the survey examined participants’ willingness to share different data types, data access preferences, reasons for concern, and motivations to contribute. The survey also collected information about participants’ demographics, level of interest in health topics, previous participation in health research, awareness of examples of existing research data repositories, and current attitudes about digital health research repositories. Data analysis consisted of descriptive frequency measures and statistical inferences (bivariate associations and logistic regressions). Results The sample comprises 1017 respondents living in Brazil (1017/1600, 63.56%) and 583 in Denmark (583/1600, 36.44%). The demographics do not differ substantially between participants of these countries. The majority is aged between 18 and 27 years (933/1600, 58.31%), is highly educated (992/1600, 62.00%), uses smartphones (1562/1600, 97.63%), and is in good health (1407/1600, 87.94%). The analysis shows a vast majority were very motivated by helping future patients (1366/1600, 85.38%) and researchers (1253/1600, 78.31%), yet very concerned about unethical projects (1219/1600, 76.19%), profit making without consent (1096/1600, 68.50%), and cyberattacks (1055/1600, 65.94%). Participants’ willingness to share data is lower when sharing personal sensing data, such as the content of calls and texts (1206/1600, 75.38%), in contrast to more traditional health research information. Only 13.44% (215/1600) find it desirable to grant data access to private companies, and most would like to stay informed about which projects use their data (1334/1600, 83.38%) and control future data access (1181/1600, 73.81%). Findings indicate that favorable attitudes toward digital health research repositories are related to a personal interest in health topics (odds ratio [OR] 1.49, 95% CI 1.10-2.02; P=.01), previous participation in health research studies (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.24-2.35; P=.001), and awareness of examples of research repositories (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.83-4.38; P<.001). Conclusions This study reveals essential factors for acceptance and willingness to share personal data with digital health research repositories. Implications include the importance of being more transparent about the goals and beneficiaries of research projects using and re-using data from repositories, providing participants with greater autonomy for choosing who gets access to which parts of their data, and raising public awareness of the benefits of data sharing for research. In addition, future developments should engage with and reduce risks for those unwilling to participate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanna Nunes Vilaza
- Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
| | - David Coyle
- School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jakob Eyvind Bardram
- Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Moerenhout T, Devisch I, Cooreman L, Bernaerdt J, De Sutter A, Provoost V. Patients' moral attitudes toward electronic health records: Survey study with vignettes and statements. Health Informatics J 2021; 27:1460458220980039. [PMID: 33446034 DOI: 10.1177/1460458220980039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Patient access to electronic health records gives rise to ethical questions related to the patient-doctor-computer relationship. Our study aims to examine patients' moral attitudes toward a shared EHR, with a focus on autonomy, information access, and responsibility. A de novo self-administered questionnaire containing three vignettes and 15 statements was distributed among patients in four different settings. A total of 1688 valid questionnaires were collected. Patients' mean age was 51 years, 61% was female, 50% had a higher degree (college or university), and almost 50% suffered from a chronic illness. Respondents were hesitant to hide sensitive information electronically from their care providers. They also strongly believed hiding information could negatively affect the quality of care provided. Participants preferred to be informed about negative test results in a face-to-face conversation, or would have every patient decide individually how they want to receive results. Patients generally had little experience using patient portal systems and expressed a need for more information on EHRs in this survey. They tended to be hesitant to take up control over their medical data in the EHR and deemed patients share a responsibility for the accuracy of information in their record.
Collapse
|
28
|
Tapuria A, Porat T, Kalra D, Dsouza G, Xiaohui S, Curcin V. Impact of patient access to their electronic health record: systematic review. Inform Health Soc Care 2021; 46:192-204. [PMID: 33840342 DOI: 10.1080/17538157.2021.1879810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Patient access to their own electronic health records (EHRs) is likely to become an integral part of healthcare systems worldwide. It has the potential to decrease the healthcare provision costs, improve access to healthcare data, self-care, quality of care, and health and patient-centered outcomes. This systematic literature review is aimed at identifying the impact in terms of benefits and issues that have so far been demonstrated by providing patients access to their own EHRs, via providers' secure patient portals from primary healthcare centers and hospitals. Searches were conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, CINHAL, and Google scholar. Over 2000 papers were screened and were filtered based on duplicates, then by reading the titles and finally based on their abstracts or full text. In total, 74 papers were retained, analyzed, and summarized. Papers were included if providing patient access to their own EHRs was the primary intervention used in the study and its impact or outcome was evaluated. The search technique used to identify relevant literature for this paper involved input from five experts. While findings from 54 of the 74 papers showed positive outcome or benefits of patient access to their EHRs via patient portals, 10 papers have highlighted concerns, 8 papers have highlighted both and 2 have highlighted absence of negative outcomes. The benefits range from re-assurance, reduced anxiety, positive impact on consultations, better doctor-patient relationship, increased awareness and adherence to medication, and improved patient outcomes (e.g., improving blood pressure and glycemic control in a range of study populations). In addition, patient access to their health information was found to improve self-reported levels of engagement or activation related to self-management, enhanced knowledge, and improve recovery scores, and organizational efficiencies in a tertiary level mental health care facility. However, three studies did not find any statistically significant effect of patient portals on health outcomes. The main concerns have been around security, privacy and confidentiality of the health records, and the anxiety it may cause amongst patients. This literature review identified some benefits, concerns, and attitudes demonstrated by providing patients' access to their own EHRs. This access is often part of government strategies when developing patient-centric self-management elements of a sustainable healthcare system. The findings of this review will give healthcare providers a framework to analyze the benefits offered by promoting patient access to EHRs and decide on the best approach for their own specialties and clinical setup. A robust cost-benefit evaluation of such initiatives along with its impact on major stakeholders within the healthcare system would be essential in understanding the overall impact of such initiatives. Implementation of patient access to their EHRs could help governments to appropriately prioritize the development or adoption of national standards, whilst taking care of local variations and fulfilling the healthcare needs of the population, e.g., UK Government is aiming to make full primary care records available online to every patient. Ultimately, increasing transparency and promoting personal responsibility are key elements of a sustainable healthcare system for future generations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archana Tapuria
- King's College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Talya Porat
- Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Dipak Kalra
- University College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Glen Dsouza
- University College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Sun Xiaohui
- King's College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Vasa Curcin
- King's College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Eriksson-Backa K, Hirvonen N, Enwald H, Huvila I. Enablers for and barriers to using My Kanta - A focus group study of older adults' perceptions of the National Electronic Health Record in Finland. Inform Health Soc Care 2021; 46:399-411. [PMID: 33787438 DOI: 10.1080/17538157.2021.1902331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
To explicate how experiences with patient-accessible electronic health records correspond to the expectations of the users, we present qualitative results of older adults' experiences with the Finnish national patient-accessible health record My Kanta and similar services. 24 persons, 17 women and 7 men aged 55-73, took part in the study. We interviewed six focus groups of 3-5 participants with previous experience of My Kanta, in two cities in Finland. We used a convenience sample and video- and audio-recording as well as note taking. The interviews were transcribed verbatim. The inductive analysis was based on content analysis. We identified major uses, enablers, barriers, and outcomes of My Kanta. In addition to earlier reported barriers and enablers, the findings show that launch-time lack of useful content and features in systems still under development can cause frustration and hinder their effective use at the time and in the long run. Concerns and barriers relating to use were socio-techno-informational and tightly associated with the contents of the system. Improved security, usability and additional information and functions might increase use. Furthermore, coherent and timely information from health-care providers should be available in the e-health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Noora Hirvonen
- Information Studies, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.,Information Studies, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Heidi Enwald
- Information Studies, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.,Information Studies, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Isto Huvila
- Information Studies, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.,Department of ALM, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lounsbury O, Roberts L, Goodman JR, Batey P, Naar L, Flott KM, Lawrence-Jones A, Ghafur S, Darzi A, Neves AL. Opening a "Can of Worms" to Explore the Public's Hopes and Fears About Health Care Data Sharing: Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e22744. [PMID: 33616532 PMCID: PMC7939935 DOI: 10.2196/22744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence suggests that health care data sharing may strengthen care coordination, improve quality and safety, and reduce costs. However, to achieve efficient and meaningful adoption of health care data-sharing initiatives, it is necessary to engage all stakeholders, from health care professionals to patients. Although previous work has assessed health care professionals' perceptions of data sharing, perspectives of the general public and particularly of seldom heard groups have yet to be fully assessed. OBJECTIVE This study aims to explore the views of the public, particularly their hopes and concerns, around health care data sharing. METHODS An original, immersive public engagement interactive experience was developed-The Can of Worms installation-in which participants were prompted to reflect about data sharing through listening to individual stories around health care data sharing. A multidisciplinary team with expertise in research, public involvement, and human-centered design developed this concept. The installation took place in three separate events between November 2018 and November 2019. A combination of convenience and snowball sampling was used in this study. Participants were asked to fill self-administered feedback cards and to describe their hopes and fears about the meaningful use of data in health care. The transcripts were compiled verbatim and systematically reviewed by four independent reviewers using the thematic analysis method to identify emerging themes. RESULTS Our approach exemplifies the potential of using interdisciplinary expertise in research, public involvement, and human-centered design to tell stories, collect perspectives, and spark conversations around complex topics in participatory digital medicine. A total of 352 qualitative feedback cards were collected, each reflecting participants' hopes and fears for health care data sharing. Thematic analyses identified six themes under hopes: enablement of personal access and ownership, increased interoperability and collaboration, generation of evidence for better and safer care, improved timeliness and efficiency, delivery of more personalized care, and equality. The five main fears identified included inadequate security and exploitation, data inaccuracy, distrust, discrimination and inequality, and less patient-centered care. CONCLUSIONS This study sheds new light on the main hopes and fears of the public regarding health care data sharing. Importantly, our results highlight novel concerns from the public, particularly in terms of the impact on health disparities, both at international and local levels, and on delivering patient-centered care. Incorporating the knowledge generated and focusing on co-designing solutions to tackle these concerns is critical to engage the public as active contributors and to fully leverage the potential of health care data use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Lounsbury
- Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, London, United Kingdom
- Patient Safety Movement Foundation, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Lily Roberts
- Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan R Goodman
- Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, London, United Kingdom
| | - Philippa Batey
- The Helix Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lenny Naar
- The Helix Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kelsey M Flott
- Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Lawrence-Jones
- Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, London, United Kingdom
| | - Saira Ghafur
- Centre for Health Policy, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ara Darzi
- Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ana Luisa Neves
- Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, London, United Kingdom
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research / Department of Community Medicine, Health Information and Decision, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Huvila I, Cajander Å, Moll J, Enwald H, Eriksson-Backa K, Rexhepi H. Technological and informational frames: explaining age-related variation in the use of patient accessible electronic health records as technology and information. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & PEOPLE 2021. [DOI: 10.1108/itp-08-2020-0566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
Data from a national patient survey (N = 1,155) of the Swedish PAEHR “Journalen” users were analysed, and an extended version of the theory of technological frames was developed to explain the variation in the technological and informational framing of information technologies found in the data.
Design/methodology/approach
Patient Accessible Electronic Health Records (PAEHRs) are implemented globally to address challenges with an ageing population. However, firstly, little is known about age-related variation in PAEHR use, and secondly, user perceptions of the PAEHR technology and the health record information and how the technology and information–related perceptions are linked to each other. The purpose of this study is to investigate these two under-studied aspects of PAEHRs and propose a framework based on the theory of technological frames to support studying the second aspect, i.e. the interplay of information and technology–related perceptions.
Findings
The results suggest that younger respondents were more likely to be interested in PAEHR contents for general interest. However, they did not value online access to the information as high as older ones. Older respondents were instead inclined to use medical records information to understand their health condition, prepare for visits, become involved in their own healthcare and think that technology has a much potential. Moreover, the oldest respondents were more likely to consider the information in PAEHRs useful and aimed for them but to experience the technology as inherently difficult to use.
Research limitations/implications
The sample excludes non-users and is not a representative sample of the population of Sweden. However, although the data contain an unknown bias, there are no specific reasons to believe that it would differently affect the survey's age groups.
Practical implications
Age should be taken into account as a key factor that influences perceptions of the usefulness of PAEHRs. It is also crucial to consider separately patients' views of PAEHRs as a technology and of the information contained in the EHR when developing and evaluating existing and future systems and information provision for patients.
Social implications
This study contributes to bridging the gap between information behaviour and systems design research by showing how the theory of technological frames complemented with parallel informational frames to provide a potentially powerful framework for elucidating distinct conceptualisations of (information) technologies and the information they mediate. The empirical findings show how information and information technology needs relating to PAEHRs vary according to age. In contrast to the assumptions in much of the earlier work, they need to be addressed separately.
Originality/value
Few earlier studies focus on (1) age-related variation in PAEHR use and (2) user perceptions of the PAEHR technology and the health record information and how the technology and information–related perceptions are linked to each other.
Collapse
|
32
|
Bak MAR, Veeken R, Blom MT, Tan HL, Willems DL. Health data research on sudden cardiac arrest: perspectives of survivors and their next-of-kin. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22:7. [PMID: 33509184 PMCID: PMC7844916 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00576-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consent for data research in acute and critical care is complex as patients become at least temporarily incapacitated or die. Existing guidelines and regulations in the European Union are of limited help and there is a lack of literature about the use of data from this vulnerable group. To aid the creation of a patient-centred framework for responsible data research in the acute setting, we explored views of patients and next-of-kin about the collection, storage, sharing and use of genetic and health-related data for observational research. METHODS We conducted qualitative interviews (n = 19) with Dutch sudden cardiac arrest survivors who donated clinical and socio-economic data and genetic samples to research. We also interviewed their next-of-kin. Topics were informed by ethics literature and we used scenario-sketches to aid discussion of complex issues. RESULTS Sudden cardiac arrest survivors displayed limited awareness of their involvement in health data research and of the content of their given consent. We found that preferences regarding disclosure of clinically actionable genetic findings could change over time. When data collection and use were limited to the medical realm, patients trusted researchers to handle data responsibly without concern for privacy or other risks. There was no consensus as to whether deferred consent should be explicitly asked from survivors. If consent is asked, this would ideally be done a few months after the event when cognitive capacities have been regained. Views were divided about the need to obtain proxy consent for research with deceased patients' data. However, there was general support for the disclosure of potentially relevant post-mortem genetic findings to relatives. CONCLUSIONS Sudden cardiac arrest patients' donation of data for research was grounded in trust in medicine overall, blurring the boundary between research and care. Our findings also highlight questions about the acceptability of a one-time consent and about responsibilities of patients, researchers and ethics committees. Finally, further normative investigation is needed regarding the (continued) use of participants' data after death, which is of particular importance in this setting. Our findings are thought to be of relevance for other acute and life-threatening illnesses as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke A R Bak
- Section of Medical Ethics, Department of General Practice, Amsterdam, UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Rens Veeken
- Faculty of Medicine, Amsterdam, UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke T Blom
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam, UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanno L Tan
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, Amsterdam, UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Dick L Willems
- Section of Medical Ethics, Department of General Practice, Amsterdam, UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Farwati M, Riaz H, Tang WHW. Digital Health Applications in Heart Failure: a Critical Appraisal of Literature. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE 2021; 23:12. [PMID: 33488049 PMCID: PMC7812033 DOI: 10.1007/s11936-020-00885-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of the review Despite advancements in the diagnostic and therapeutic armamentarium, heart failure (HF) remains a major public health concern in the USA and worldwide. Digital health applications hold promise to bridge this gap and improve HF care. This review will provide the reader with a concise overview of the current digital health applications in HF, the main challenges to its use, and discuss the future of digital health for promoting care for HF patients. Recent findings Emerging evidence continues to support the potential role of digital health across the continuum of HF disease process including primary prevention, early detection, disease management, and reducing associated morbidity. There is also increasing emphasis on the need to pursue rigorous investigations to validate these promising claims, with some successful stories that have changed clinical practices. Summary Digital health technologies have emerged as potentially useful tools to complement HF care in both research and clinical realms. As digital technologies continue to play an increasing role in transforming healthcare delivery, creating the framework for its effective use would be necessary to ensure that digital health applications consistently improve outcomes and enhance care for HF patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Medhat Farwati
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk J3-4, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
| | - Haris Riaz
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk J3-4, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
| | - W H Wilson Tang
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk J3-4, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Talal AH, Sofikitou EM, Jaanimägi U, Zeremski M, Tobin JN, Markatou M. A framework for patient-centered telemedicine: Application and lessons learned from vulnerable populations. J Biomed Inform 2020; 112:103622. [PMID: 33186707 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2020] [Revised: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Virtual technologies can facilitate clinical monitoring, clinician-patient interactions, and enhance patient-centered approaches to healthcare delivery. Telemedicine, two-way communication between a healthcare provider and a patient not in the same physical location, emphasizes patient preference and convenience by substituting the transportation of patients with information transfer. We present a framework for implementation of a comprehensive, dynamic, patient-centered telemedicine network deployed in 12 opioid treatment programs (OTP) located throughout New York State (NYS). The program aims to effectively manage hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection via telemedicine with co-administration of HCV and substance use medications. We have found that the Sociotechnical System model with emphasis on patient-centered factors provides a framework for telemedicine deployment and implementation to a vulnerable population. The issue of interoperability between the telemedicine platform and the electronic health record (EHR) system as well as clinical information retrieval for medical decision-making are challenges with implementation of a comprehensive, dynamic telemedicine system. Targeting telemedicine to a vulnerable population requires additional consideration of trust in the security and confidentiality of the telemedicine system. Our contribution is the valuable lessons learned from implementing a comprehensive, dynamic, patient-centered telemedicine system among an OTP network throughout NYS as applied to a vulnerable population that can be generalized to other difficult-to-reach populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew H Talal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Elisavet M Sofikitou
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Urmo Jaanimägi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Marija Zeremski
- Clinical Directors Network, Inc. (CDN), New York, NY, United States
| | - Jonathan N Tobin
- Clinical Directors Network, Inc. (CDN), New York, NY, United States; Center for Clinical and Translational Science, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Marianthi Markatou
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Healthcare Professional and User Perceptions of eHealth Data and Record Privacy in Dubai. INFORMATION 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/info11090415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Dubai city made a significant leap forward, which aligns with the vision of leadership, in the region’s eHealth services by adopting a unified electronic medical record system across the country. Electronic medical records provide a better, more efficient standard of care and a vital database that will streamline the administrative process and promote better outcomes with less utilization of resources. Medical records form an essential part in patient management and include a variety of patient data information that might be sensitive. Therefore, the primary challenge is to maintain data privacy of the electronic medical records. Objective: Current studies to measure the user and health provider perceptions of electronic medical records data privacy are limited in the region. We aimed to investigate the perceptions of healthcare professionals and healthcare users toward electronic medical records and data privacy in eHealthcare facilities in Dubai. Methods: In this quantitative descriptive study, we explored the perceptions towards electronic medical records and data privacy using an online survey as a data collection tool. The dependent variables were the user and provider perceptions, while the independent variables included gender, nationality, income and age. A random sample of 201 eHealthcare facilities professionals and users was included. Results: The findings of the study revealed that most healthcare professionals and users agreed on the presence of good eHealth data protection practices and privacy principles in Dubai. There was a statistical correlation between the surveyed privacy practice perceptions and gender, nationality and income. However, age had no statistically significant association. Conclusions: These research findings can influence policymakers and stakeholders when developing electronic medical records and data privacy policies and guidelines across the United Arab Emirates’ healthcare facilities, in particular, during the implementation of unified electronic medical records. Future research could investigate the effect of the specific demographic variables on the perception of privacy among eHealthcare facility users that might influence electronic medical records and data privacy.
Collapse
|
36
|
Slater M, Abelson J, Wong ST, Langton JM, Burge F, Hogg W, Hogel M, Martin-Misener R, Johnston S. Priority measures for publicly reporting primary care performance: Results of public engagement through deliberative dialogues in 3 Canadian provinces. Health Expect 2020; 23:1213-1223. [PMID: 32744413 PMCID: PMC7696126 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective While public reporting of hospital‐based performance measurement is commonplace, it has lagged in the primary care sector, especially in Canada. Despite the increasing recognition of patients as active partners in the health‐care system, little is known about what information about primary care performance is relevant to the Canadian public. We explored patient perspectives and priorities for the public reporting of primary care performance measures. Methods We conducted six deliberative dialogue sessions across three Canadian provinces (British Columbia, Ontario, Nova Scotia). Participants were asked to rank and discuss the importance of collecting and reporting on specific dimensions and indicators of primary care performance. We conducted a thematic analysis of the data. Results Fifty‐six patients participated in the dialogue sessions. Measures of access to primary care providers, communication with providers and continuity of information across all providers involved in a patient's care were identified as the highest priority indicators of primary care performance from a patient perspective. Several common measures of quality of care, such as rates of cancer screening, were viewed as too patient dependent to be used to evaluate the health system or primary care provider's performance. Conclusions Our findings suggest that public reporting aimed at patient audiences should focus on a nuanced measure of access, incorporation of context reported alongside measurement that is for public audiences, clear reporting on provider communication and a measure of information continuity. Participants highlighted the importance the public places on their providers staying up to date with advances in care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan Slater
- Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Julia Abelson
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Sabrina T Wong
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Julia M Langton
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Fred Burge
- Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - William Hogg
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,CT Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, ÉlisabethBruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew Hogel
- CT Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, ÉlisabethBruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Sharon Johnston
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,CT Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, ÉlisabethBruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Javaid M, Haleem A. Impact of industry 4.0 to create advancements in orthopaedics. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2020; 11:S491-S499. [PMID: 32774017 PMCID: PMC7394797 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Scientists and health professional are focusing on improving the medical sciences for the betterment of patients. The fourth industrial revolution, which is commonly known as Industry 4.0, is a significant advancement in the field of engineering. Industry 4.0 is opening a new opportunity for digital manufacturing with greater flexibility and operational performance. This development is also going to have a positive impact in the field of orthopaedics. The purpose of this paper is to present various advancements in orthopaedics by the implementation of Industry 4.0. To undertake this study, we have studied the available literature extensively on Industry 4.0, technologies of Industry 4.0 and their role in orthopaedics. Paper briefly explains about Industry 4.0, identifies and discusses the major technologies of Industry 4.0, which will support development in orthopaedics. Finally, from the available literature, the paper identifies twelve significant advancements of Industry 4.0 in orthopaedics. Industry 4.0 uses various types of digital manufacturing and information technologies to create orthopaedics implants, patient-specific tools, devices and innovative way of treatment. This revolution is to be useful to perform better spinal surgery, knee and hip replacement, and invasive surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohd Javaid
- Corresponding author., https://scholar.google.co.in/citations?user=rfyiwvsAAAAJ&hl=en
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Patient Privacy Violation Detection in Healthcare Critical Infrastructures: An Investigation Using Density-Based Benchmarking. FUTURE INTERNET 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/fi12060100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Hospital critical infrastructures have a distinct threat vector, due to (i) a dependence on legacy software; (ii) the vast levels of interconnected medical devices; (iii) the use of multiple bespoke software and that (iv) electronic devices (e.g., laptops and PCs) are often shared by multiple users. In the UK, hospitals are currently upgrading towards the use of electronic patient record (EPR) systems. EPR systems and their data are replacing traditional paper records, providing access to patients’ test results and details of their overall care more efficiently. Paper records are no-longer stored at patients’ bedsides, but instead are accessible via electronic devices for the direct insertion of data. With over 83% of hospitals in the UK moving towards EPRs, access to this healthcare data needs to be monitored proactively for malicious activity. It is paramount that hospitals maintain patient trust and ensure that the information security principles of integrity, availability and confidentiality are upheld when deploying EPR systems. In this paper, an investigation methodology is presented towards the identification of anomalous behaviours within EPR datasets. Many security solutions focus on a perimeter-based approach; however, this approach alone is not enough to guarantee security, as can be seen from the many examples of breaches. Our proposed system can be complementary to existing security perimeter solutions. The system outlined in this research employs an internal-focused methodology for anomaly detection by using the Local Outlier Factor (LOF) and Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) algorithms for benchmarking behaviour, for assisting healthcare data analysts. Out of 90,385 unique IDs, DBSCAN finds 102 anomalies, whereas 358 are detected using LOF.
Collapse
|
39
|
Payne TH, Lovis C, Gutteridge C, Pagliari C, Natarajan S, Yong C, Zhao LP. Status of health information exchange: a comparison of six countries. J Glob Health 2020; 9:0204279. [PMID: 31673351 PMCID: PMC6815656 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.09.020427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Health information exchange (HIE) is frequently cited as an important objective of health information technology investment because of its potential to improve quality, reduce cost, and increase patient satisfaction. In this paper we examine the status and practices of HIE in six countries, drawn from a range of higher and lower income regions. Methods For each of the countries represented – China, England, India, Scotland, Switzerland, and the United States – we describe the state of current practice of HIE with reference to two scenarios: transfer of care and referral. For each country we discuss national objectives, barriers and plans for further advancing clinical information exchange. Results The countries vary widely in levels of adoption of EHRs, availability of health information in electronic form suitable for HIE, and in the information technology infrastructure to be used for transmission. Common themes emerged, however, including an expectation that information will be exchanged rather than gathered anew, the need for incentives to promote information exchange, and concerns about data security and patient confidentiality. Conclusions Although the ability to transfer health information to where it is most needed is nearly always mentioned as an advantage of HIE adoption, there are wide differences in the degree to which this has been achieved to support the scenarios used in this study. Nevertheless, these differences indicate varying stages of progress along a comparable pathway, with similar barriers being identified in the countries described. In some cases, these have been partially surmounted while elsewhere work is needed. We reflect on contextual factors influencing the status and direction of HIE efforts in different global regions and their implications for progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christian Lovis
- University of Geneva and University hospitals of Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Cui Yong
- Peking University Medical Informatics Center, Beijing, Peoples' Republic of China
| | - Lue-Ping Zhao
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Bearth A, Siegrist M. Psychological factors that determine people's willingness-to-share genetic data for research. Clin Genet 2019; 97:483-491. [PMID: 31833061 DOI: 10.1111/cge.13686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Of all the information that we share, health and genetic data might be among the most valuable for researchers. As data are handled as particularly sensitive information, a number of pressing issues regarding people's preferences and privacy concerns are raised. The goal of the present study was to contribute to an understanding of people's reported willingness-to-share genetic data for science (WTS). For this, predictive psychological factors (eg, risk and benefit perceptions, trust, knowledge) were investigated in an online survey (N = 416). Overall, participants seemed willing to provide their genetic data for research. Participants who perceived more benefits associated with data sharing were particularly willing to share their data for research (β = .29), while risk perceptions were less influential (β = -.14). As participants with higher knowledge of the potential uses of genetic data for research perceived more benefits (β = .20), WTS can likely be improved by providing people with information regarding the usefulness of genetic data for research. In addition to knowledge and perceptions, trust in data recipients increased people's willingness-to-share directly (β = .24). Especially in the sensitive area of genetic data, future research should strive to understand people's shifting perceptions and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Bearth
- Consumer Behavior, Institute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Siegrist
- Consumer Behavior, Institute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Karampela M, Ouhbi S, Isomursu M. Connected Health User Willingness to Share Personal Health Data: Questionnaire Study. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e14537. [PMID: 31774410 PMCID: PMC6906622 DOI: 10.2196/14537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Revised: 07/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Connected health has created opportunities for leveraging health data to deliver preventive and personalized health care services. The increasing number of personal devices and advances in measurement technologies contribute to an exponential growth in digital health data. The practices for sharing data across the health ecosystem are evolving as there are more opportunities for using such data to deliver responsive health services. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to explore user attitudes toward sharing personal health data (PHD). The study was executed within the first year after the implementation of the new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) legal framework. METHODS The authors analyzed the results of an online questionnaire survey to explore the willingness of 8004 people using connected health services across four European countries to share their PHD and the conditions under which they would be willing to do so. RESULTS Our findings indicate that the majority of users are willing to share their personal PHD for scientific research (1811/8004, 22.63%). Age, education level, and occupation of the participants, in addition to the level of digitalization in their country were found to be associated with data sharing attitudes. CONCLUSIONS Positive attitudes toward data sharing for scientific research can be perceived as an indication of trust established between users and academia. Nevertheless, the interpretation of data sharing attitudes is a complex process, related to and influenced by various factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sofia Ouhbi
- United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Brown JP, Wing K, Evans SJ, Bhaskaran K, Smeeth L, Douglas IJ. Use of real-world evidence in postmarketing medicines regulation in the European Union: a systematic assessment of European Medicines Agency referrals 2013-2017. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e028133. [PMID: 31662354 PMCID: PMC6830614 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the use, and evaluate the usefulness, of non-interventional studies and routinely collected healthcare data in postmarketing assessments conducted by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). DESIGN We reviewed and systematically assessed all referrals to the EMA made due to safety or efficacy concerns that were evaluated between 1 January 2013 and 30 June 2017. We extracted information from the assessment report and the referral notification. Two reviewers independently assessed the contribution of non-interventional evidence to decision-making. RESULTS The preliminary evidence leading to the assessment in 52 eligible referrals was mostly from spontaneous reports (cited in 26 of 52 referrals) and randomised trials (22/52). In contrast, many evidence types were used for the full assessment. Non-interventional studies were frequently used in the full assessment for the evaluation of product safety (31/52) and product efficacy (18/52). In particular, non-interventional studies were relied on for the evaluation of safety and efficacy in subgroups, the evaluation of safety relating to a rare adverse event, understanding product usage and misuse and for evaluation of the effectiveness of risk minimisation measures. The most common recommendations were changes to product information (43/52) and marketing authorisation withdrawal or suspension (12/52). In the majority of referrals, non-interventional evidence was judged to contribute to the decision made (30/52) and in three referrals it was the primary source of evidence. CONCLUSIONS European regulatory decision-making relies on multiple evidence types, particularly randomised trials, spontaneous reports and non-interventional studies. Non-interventional studies had an important role particularly for the characterisation and quantification of adverse events, the evaluation of product usage and for evaluating the effectiveness of regulatory action to minimise risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Philip Brown
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Kevin Wing
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Stephen J Evans
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Krishnan Bhaskaran
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Liam Smeeth
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ian J Douglas
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Tully MP, Hassan L, Oswald M, Ainsworth J. Commercial use of health data-A public "trial" by citizens' jury. Learn Health Syst 2019; 3:e10200. [PMID: 31641688 PMCID: PMC6802529 DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2018] [Revised: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surveys suggest a dichotomy in how citizens view research for public benefit and research for commercial gain. Therefore, a research initiative, such as a learning health system, which works for both public and commercial benefit, may be controversial and lower public trust. METHODS This study aimed to investigate what informed citizens considered to be appropriate uses of health data in a learning health system and why they made those decisions. Two-paired 4-day juries were run, with different jurors but the same purpose, expert witnesses, and facilitators. Overall, 694 people applied; 36 jurors were selected to match criteria based on demographics and privacy views. Jurors considered whether and why eight exemplars of anonymised patient data were acceptable. The exemplars were either planned initiatives to improve care pathways (Planned Examples) or possible commercial data uses (Potential Examples). RESULTS These citizens' juries found that all Planned and two of the Potential Examples were considered appropriate by most, but not all, jurors because they could deliver public benefit. In general, positive health outcomes for patients were more acceptable than improved efficiency of services for the NHS, although they recognised that the latter also improved health. Jurors had concerns about whether improving efficiency would lead to inequitable distribution or closure of services, based on their existing understanding from media reports. Commercial gain that accrued secondary to this benefit was acceptable, with some jurors becoming more accepting of commercial uses as they understood them better. Prioritising profit, however, was unacceptable, regardless of any governance arrangements. CONCLUSIONS Jurors tended to be more accepting of data sharing to both private and public sectors after the jury process. Many jurors accept commercial gain if public benefit is achieved. Some were suspicious of data sharing for efficiency gains. Juries elicited more informed and nuanced judgement from citizens than surveys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary P. Tully
- Health E‐Research Centre, Division of Imaging, Informatics and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthUniversity of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science CentreManchesterUK
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthUniversity of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science CentreManchesterUK
| | - Lamiece Hassan
- Health E‐Research Centre, Division of Imaging, Informatics and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthUniversity of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science CentreManchesterUK
| | - Malcolm Oswald
- School of Law, Faculty of HumanitiesUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
- Citizens Juries c.i.cManchesterUK
| | - John Ainsworth
- Health E‐Research Centre, Division of Imaging, Informatics and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthUniversity of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science CentreManchesterUK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Neves AL, Poovendran D, Freise L, Ghafur S, Flott K, Darzi A, Mayer EK. Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on the Secondary Use of Health Records to Improve Quality and Safety of Care in England: Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e14135. [PMID: 31573898 PMCID: PMC6787532 DOI: 10.2196/14135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2019] [Revised: 07/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health care professionals (HCPs) are often patients' first point of contact in what concerns the communication of the purposes, benefits, and risks of sharing electronic health records (EHRs) for nondirect care purposes. Their engagement is fundamental to ensure patients' buy-in and a successful implementation of health care data sharing schemes. However, their views on this subject are seldom evaluated. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore HCPs' perspectives on the secondary uses of health care data in England. Specifically, we aimed to assess their knowledge on its purposes and the main concerns about data sharing processes. METHODS A total of 30 interviews were conducted between March 27, 2017, and April 7, 2017, using a Web-based interview platform and following a topic guide with open-ended questions. The participants represented a variety of geographic locations across England (London, West Midlands, East of England, North East England, and Yorkshire and the Humber), covering both primary and secondary care services. The transcripts were compiled verbatim and systematically reviewed by 2 independent reviewers using the framework analysis method to identify emerging themes. RESULTS HCPs were knowledgeable about the possible secondary uses of data and highlighted its importance for patient profiling and tailored care, research, quality assurance, public health, and service delivery planning purposes. Main concerns toward data sharing included data accuracy, patients' willingness to share their records, challenges on obtaining free and informed consent, data security, lack of adequacy or understanding of current policies, and potential patient exposure and exploitation. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest a high level of HCPs' understanding about the purposes of data sharing for secondary purposes; however, some concerns still remain. A better understanding of HCPs' knowledge and concerns could inform national communication policies and improve tailoring to maximize efficiency and improve patients' buy-in.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Luísa Neves
- Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research / Department of Community Medicine, Health Information and Decision, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Dilkushi Poovendran
- Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa Freise
- Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Saira Ghafur
- Centre for Health Policy, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kelsey Flott
- Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ara Darzi
- Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Erik K Mayer
- Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Afrizal SH, Hidayanto AN, Handayani PW, Budiharsana M, Eryando T. Narrative Review for Exploring Barriers to Readiness of Electronic Health Record Implementation in Primary Health Care. Healthc Inform Res 2019; 25:141-152. [PMID: 31406606 PMCID: PMC6689507 DOI: 10.4258/hir.2019.25.3.141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2019] [Revised: 07/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this study is to explore the enabling factors associated with readiness in Electronic Health Record (EHR) implementation and to identify the barriers related to readiness regarding the situation of primary health cares in developed and developing countries. Methods A narrative review of open-source literature was conducted using the ProQuest, ScienceDirect, MEDLINE, and PMC databases to identify the enabling factors and barriers to EHR readiness. The keywords applied were 'electronic health record', 'readiness', 'primary health care', and 'primary care'. Results Some barriers were found that may affect readiness, specifically individual barriers and organizational barriers. In developing countries, organizational barriers such as a lack of skilled manpower, insufficient senior management, and a lack of interaction among team members were the common barriers, while in developed countries individual barriers such as unfamiliarity with new systems and a lack of time to use computers were frequently found as barriers to readiness. Conclusions This study summarized the enabling factors and barriers with regard to EHR readiness in developed and developing countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Tris Eryando
- Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Becker A. Artificial intelligence in medicine: What is it doing for us today? HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2019.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
47
|
2017 Roadmap for Innovation-ACC Health Policy Statement on Healthcare Transformation in the Era of Digital Health, Big Data, and Precision Health: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Health Policy Statements and Systems of Care. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 70:2696-2718. [PMID: 29169478 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
48
|
Skovgaard LL, Wadmann S, Hoeyer K. A review of attitudes towards the reuse of health data among people in the European Union: The primacy of purpose and the common good. Health Policy 2019; 123:564-571. [PMID: 30961905 PMCID: PMC6558994 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2017] [Revised: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Studies of attitudes towards reuse of health data mainly from the UK. Studies show lack of awareness of current usages of health data among people living in the EU. Studies report positive attitudes towards the sharing of health data. Concerns about commercial use of health data is expressed in the studies. Attitudes towards informed consent are inconsistent.
Health data are used for still more purposes, and policies are enacted to facilitate data reuse within the European Union. This literature synthesis explores attitudes among people living in the European Union towards the use of health data for purposes other than treatment. Our findings indicate that while a majority hold positive attitudes towards the use of health data for multiple purposes, the positive attitudes are typically conditional on the expectation that data will be used to further the common good. Concerns evolve around the commercialisation of data, data security and the use of data against the interests of the people providing the data. Studies of these issues are limited geographically as well as in scope. We therefore identify a need for cross-national exploration of attitudes among people living in the European Union to inform future policies in health data governance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lea L Skovgaard
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farigmagsgade 5, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark.
| | - Sarah Wadmann
- The Danish Center for Social Science Research, VIVE, Herluf Trolles Gade 11. 1052, Copenhagen K, Denmark
| | - Klaus Hoeyer
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farigmagsgade 5, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Stockdale J, Cassell J, Ford E. "Giving something back": A systematic review and ethical enquiry into public views on the use of patient data for research in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. Wellcome Open Res 2019; 3:6. [PMID: 30854470 PMCID: PMC6402072 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.13531.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Use of patients' medical data for secondary purposes such as health research, audit, and service planning is well established in the UK. However, the governance environment, as well as public understanding about this work, have lagged behind. We aimed to systematically review the literature on UK and Irish public views of patient data used in research, critically analysing such views though an established biomedical ethics framework, to draw out potential strategies for future good practice guidance and inform ethical and privacy debates. Methods: We searched three databases using terms such as patient, public, opinion, and electronic health records. Empirical studies were eligible for inclusion if they surveyed healthcare users, patients or the public in UK and Ireland and examined attitudes, opinions or beliefs about the use of patient data for medical research. Results were synthesised into broad themes using a framework analysis. Results: Out of 13,492 papers and reports screened, 20 papers or reports were eligible. While there was a widespread willingness to share patient data for research for the common good, this very rarely led to unqualified support. The public expressed two generalised concerns about the potential risks to their privacy. The first of these concerns related to a party's competence in keeping data secure, while the second was associated with the motivation a party might have to use the data. Conclusions: The public evaluates trustworthiness of research organisations by assessing their competence in data-handling and motivation for accessing the data. Public attitudes around data-sharing exemplified several principles which are also widely accepted in biomedical ethics. This provides a framework for understanding public attitudes, which should be considered in the development in any guidance for regulators and data custodians. We propose four salient questions which decision makers should address when evaluating proposals for the secondary use of data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Stockdale
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
- Department of Philosophy, School of History, Art History and Philosophy, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Jackie Cassell
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Elizabeth Ford
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mbuthia D, Molyneux S, Njue M, Mwalukore S, Marsh V. Kenyan health stakeholder views on individual consent, general notification and governance processes for the re-use of hospital inpatient data to support learning on healthcare systems. BMC Med Ethics 2019; 20:3. [PMID: 30621693 PMCID: PMC6325859 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-018-0343-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2018] [Accepted: 12/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing adoption of electronic health records in hospitals provides new opportunities for patient data to support public health advances. Such learning healthcare models have generated ethical debate in high-income countries, including on the role of patient and public consent and engagement. Increasing use of electronic health records in low-middle income countries offers important potential to fast-track healthcare improvements in these settings, where a disproportionate burden of global morbidity occurs. Core ethical issues have been raised around the role and form of information sharing processes for learning healthcare systems, including individual consent and individual and public general notification processes, but little research has focused on this perspective in low-middle income countries. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study on the role of information sharing and governance processes for inpatient data re-use, using in-depth interviews with 34 health stakeholders at two public hospitals on the Kenyan coast, including health managers, providers and researchers. Data were collected between March and July 2016 and analysed using a framework approach, with Nvivo 10 software to support data management. RESULTS Most forms of clinical data re-use were seen as an important public health good. Individual consent and general notification processes were often argued as important, but contingent on interrelated influences of the type of data, use and secondary user. Underlying concerns were linked to issues of patient privacy and autonomy; perceived risks to trust in health systems; and fairness in how data would be used, particularly for non-public sector re-users. Support for engagement often turned on the anticipated outcomes of information-sharing processes, as building or undermining trust in healthcare systems. CONCLUSIONS As reported in high income countries, learning healthcare systems in low-middle counties may generate a core ethical tension between supporting a public good and respecting patient autonomy and privacy, with the maintenance of public trust acting as a core requirement. While more evidence is needed on patient and public perspectives on learning healthcare activities, greater collaboration between public health and research governance systems is likely to support the development of efficient and locally responsive learning healthcare activities in LMICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Mbuthia
- Ujamaa Africa, Kenya, 5th Floor, Landmark Plaza, Kamunde Rd, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Sassy Molyneux
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, 80108 Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, South Parks Road, Oxford University, Oxford, OX1 3SY UK
| | - Maureen Njue
- Institute for Tropical Medicine, Kronenburgstraat 43, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Salim Mwalukore
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, 80108 Kenya
| | - Vicki Marsh
- KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, 80108 Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, South Parks Road, Oxford University, Oxford, OX1 3SY UK
| |
Collapse
|