1
|
Nahata L, Anazodo A, Cherven B, Logan S, Meacham LR, Meade CD, Zarnegar-Lumley S, Quinn GP. Optimizing health literacy to facilitate reproductive health decision-making in adolescent and young adults with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70 Suppl 5:e28476. [PMID: 32633029 PMCID: PMC7785658 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Despite being considered "standard of care" by many organizations, fertility and reproductive health communications and counseling practices remain inconsistent for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) newly diagnosed with cancer and during survivorship. One factor known to affect how information is provided and received in the medical setting is health literacy. Providers should consider health literacy to optimize reproductive health communication with AYAs as they cope with their diagnosis, understand what it means for their future, process information about treatment options, learn about their potential harmful effects on fertility, make quick decisions about fertility preservation, and navigate a future family planning course. Thus, the objectives of this manuscript are to (a) summarize literature on reproductive health literacy; (b) describe health literacy frameworks; (c) examine ways to assess health literacy; and (d) identify ways to enhance clinician-patient communication in the AYA oncofertility setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leena Nahata
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
- Center for Biobehavioral Health, The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- School of Women and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Brooke Cherven
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine
| | - Shanna Logan
- School of Women and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lillian R. Meacham
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine
| | - Cathy D. Meade
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Division of Population Science, Health Outcomes & Behavior
| | - Sara Zarnegar-Lumley
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Gwendolyn P. Quinn
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saly L, Marshall SA, Mallory KD, Hunt AW, Kakonge L, Provvidenza C, Hickling A, Stevens SA, Bennett S, Scratch SE. Pediatric acquired brain injury resources for educators: a multi-year scan of Canadian-relevant internet resources. Brain Inj 2023; 37:337-351. [PMID: 36533924 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2022.2158230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) is the leading cause of death and disability in children, yet educators report a lack of knowledge about ABI and supporting students with ABI. With no formal learning about ABI, education professionals may turn to the internet for information. OBJECTIVES To find online resources about supporting students with ABI, in any format, available freely and publicly, aimed toward elementary educators and that could be applied in a Canadian context. METHODS We performed an environmental scan using keyword Google searches, key websites, and expert recommendations. The search was performed twice: 2018 and 2021. RESULTS 96 resources were included after screening. The resources were published by organizations in the United States (n = 57), Canada (n = 19), United Kingdom (n = 16), Australia (n = 3) and New Zealand (n = 1). Traumatic brain injury and concussion were the most commonly addressed type of ABI, and Short Fact/Information sheets were the most common resource format. Between 2018 and 2021, 13 previously included resource links were no longer accessible. CONCLUSIONS This scan suggests that there are many online resources available to educators in a variety of formats, and that information online can be transient. Future studies should evaluate the accuracy and quality of the resources available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Saly
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sara A Marshall
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kylie D Mallory
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anne W Hunt
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lisa Kakonge
- HollandBloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Christine Provvidenza
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,HollandBloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrea Hickling
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sara A Stevens
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,HollandBloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sheila Bennett
- Department of Educational Studies, Brock University, St. Catharines, Canada
| | - Shannon E Scratch
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,HollandBloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jones GL, Moss RH, Darby F, Mahmoodi N, Phillips B, Hughes J, Vogt KS, Greenfield DM, Brauten-Smith G, Gath J, Campbell T, Stark D, Velikova G, Snowden JA, Baskind E, Mascerenhas M, Yeomanson D, Skull J, Lane S, Bekker HL, Anderson RA. Cancer, Fertility and Me: Developing and Testing a Novel Fertility Preservation Patient Decision Aid to Support Women at Risk of Losing Their Fertility Because of Cancer Treatment. Front Oncol 2022; 12:896939. [PMID: 35847858 PMCID: PMC9280471 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.896939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Women with a new cancer diagnosis face complex decisions about interventions aiming to preserve their fertility. Decision aids are more effective in supporting decision making than traditional information provision. We describe the development and field testing of a novel patient decision aid designed to support women to make fertility preservation treatment decisions around cancer diagnosis. Methods A prospective, mixed-method, three stage study involving: 1) co-development of the resource in collaboration with a multi-disciplinary group of key stakeholders including oncology and fertility healthcare professionals and patient partners (n=24), 2) alpha testing with a group of cancer patients who had faced a fertility preservation treatment decision in the past (n=11), and oncology and fertility healthcare professionals and stakeholders (n=14) and, 3) beta testing with women in routine care who had received a recent diagnosis of cancer and were facing a fertility preservation treatment decision (n=41) and their oncology and fertility healthcare professionals (n=3). Ten service users recruited from a closed Breast Cancer Now Facebook group and the support group Cancer and Fertility UK also provided feedback on CFM via an online survey. Results A 60-page paper prototype of the Cancer, Fertility and Me patient decision aid was initially developed. Alpha testing of the resource found that overall, it was acceptable to cancer patients, healthcare professionals and key stakeholders and it was considered a useful resource to support fertility preservation treatment decision-making. However, the healthcare professionals felt that the length of the patient decision aid, and elements of its content may be a barrier to its use. Subsequently, the prototype was reduced to 40 pages. During beta testing of the shortened version in routine care, women who received the resource described its positive impact on their ability to make fertility preservation decisions and support them at a stressful time. However, practical difficulties emerged which impacted upon its wider dissemination in clinical practice and limited some elements of the evaluation planned. Discussion Women receiving the decision aid within the cancer treatment pathway found it helped them engage with decisions about fertility preservation, and make better informed, values-based care plans with oncology and fertility teams. More work is needed to address access and implementation of this resource as part of routine oncology care pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgina L. Jones
- Leeds School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Rachael H. Moss
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom
| | - Frances Darby
- Leeds School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Neda Mahmoodi
- Leeds School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Bob Phillips
- Hull-York Medical School and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Hughes
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Katharina S. Vogt
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom
| | - Diana M. Greenfield
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield and Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jacqui Gath
- Independent Cancer Patients’ Voice, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Daniel Stark
- Leeds Institute for Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute for Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - John A. Snowden
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield and Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Ellissa Baskind
- Leeds Fertility, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | - Daniel Yeomanson
- Haematology and Oncology, Sheffield Children’s Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Skull
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield and Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Sheila Lane
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Hilary L. Bekker
- Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Research Centre for Patient Involvement (ResCenPI) Central Region Denmark, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Richard A. Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shaffer VA, Brodney S, Gavaruzzi T, Zisman-Ilani Y, Munro S, Smith S, Thomas E, Valentine KD, Bekker HL. Do Personal Stories Make Patient Decision Aids More Effective? An Update from the International Patient Decision Aids Standards. Med Decis Making 2021; 41:897-906. [PMID: 34027739 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x211011100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This article evaluates the evidence for the inclusion of patient narratives in patient decision aids (PtDAs). We define patient narratives as stories, testimonials, or anecdotes that provide illustrative examples of the experiences of others that are relevant to the decision at hand. METHOD To evaluate the evidence for the effectiveness of narratives in PtDAs, we conducted a narrative scoping review of the literature from January 2013 through June 2019 to identify relevant literature published since the last International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) update in 2013. We considered research articles that examined the impact of narratives on relevant outcomes or described relevant theoretical mechanisms. RESULTS The majority of the empirical work on narratives did not measure concepts that are typically found in the PtDA literature (e.g., decisional conflict). Yet, a few themes emerged from our review that can be applied to the PtDA context, including the impact of narratives on relevant outcomes (knowledge, behavior change, and psychological constructs), as well as several theoretical mechanisms about how and why narratives work that can be applied to the PtDA context. CONCLUSION Based on this evidence update, we suggest that there may be situations when narratives could enhance the effectiveness of PtDAs. The recent theoretical work on narratives has underscored the fact that narratives are a multifaceted construct and should no longer be considered a binary option (include narratives or not). However, the bottom line is that the evidence does not support a recommendation for narratives to be a necessary component of PtDAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria A Shaffer
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Suzanne Brodney
- Division of Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Padova, Veneto, Italy
| | - Teresa Gavaruzzi
- Department of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, Universita degli Studi di Padova Scuola di Psicologia, Padova, Veneto, Italy
| | - Yaara Zisman-Ilani
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sarah Munro
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sian Smith
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Thomas
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Hilary L Bekker
- Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ussher JM, Perz J, Hawkey AJ. A randomized controlled evaluation of an educational resource to address fertility concerns after cancer. Psychooncology 2021; 30:1442-1448. [PMID: 33860553 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the acceptability and impact of a written oncofertility educational resource (ER), as a self-help intervention (SH), and as an adjunct to a one-hour health-care professional discussion (HP). METHODS Within a randomized control trial (RCT), 194 adults with cancer (175 womens; 19 mens) were allocated to the SH or HP intervention. 127 completed 6-weeks post-intervention measures, a retention rate of 65.85%. RESULTS Across interventions, the ER was rated as highly acceptable and useful, in terms of ease of understanding, and information. Heath literacy significantly increased post-intervention, including functional literacy, communicative literacy, and critical health literacy. There were no significant changes in ratings of fertility distress or general distress pre-post intervention. Quality of life was significantly reduced post intervention. Those in the HP condition reported higher quality of life and greater likelihood of communication with others about fertility, most notably with intimate partners, post-intervention. Qualitative identification of increased knowledge, confidence with communication and normalization of fertility concerns, reflects increased health literacy, and provides explanation for significant reductions in feeling nervous and fearful about fertility treatments post-intervention. CONCLUSIONS Our findings confirm the importance of information provision about the impact of cancer on fertility. Written ERs are a useful adjunct to a patient-clinician discussion, increasing health literacy, which facilitates knowledge, self-efficacy and management of fertility concerns and changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane M Ussher
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith South, Australia
| | - Janette Perz
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith South, Australia
| | - Alexandra J Hawkey
- Translational Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith South, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Online resources supporting workers with chronic episodic disabilities: an environmental scan. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WORKPLACE HEALTH MANAGEMENT 2020. [DOI: 10.1108/ijwhm-08-2020-0137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this research was to conduct an environmental scan describing publicly available resources focussed on working with an episodic disability and providing information and advice about communication and accommodation to support working people living with episodic disabilities.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted an environmental scan of English language, freely available, online resources relevant to episodic disabilities in the workplace. The authors used Google™ to conduct structured keyword searches. Resources were reviewed and data extracted about episodic health condition(s) addressed, intended audience(s), resource format and content about health, legal rights, workplace issues, and accommodation and communication needs.FindingsSearches yielded 5,300 links to websites which was supplemented by 101 links identified by partners. Screening for relevance found 210 resources for which data were extracted. Of them, 158 addressed specific episodic disabilities or episodic disabilities generally. Most resources provided useful information addressing communication and accommodation of episodic disability. However, information specific to the episodic nature of disability was not consistently available. The resources generally lacked interactivity which could potentially limit users in applying the information to their personal circumstances.Practical implicationsThe findings suggest there are good resources to help workers and managers/supervisors navigate accommodations for episodic disabilities. Research should aim to improve the interactivity of information to personalize resources to worker and workplace needs, as well as formally evaluate resources and their outcomes. Practitioners may wish to recommend resources that specifically address workplace challenges for their clients.Originality/valueThe authors believe this is one of few studies that examined publicly available resources relevant to working with episodic disabilities.
Collapse
|
7
|
Winterbottom AE, Mooney A, Russon L, Hipkiss V, Ziegler L, Williams R, Finderup J, Bekker HL. Kidney disease pathways, options and decisions: an environmental scan of international patient decision aids. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2020; 35:2072-2082. [PMID: 32830240 PMCID: PMC7716808 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conservative management is recognized as an acceptable treatment for people with worsening chronic kidney disease; however, patients consistently report they lack understanding about their changing disease state and feel unsupported in making shared decisions about future treatment. The purpose of this review was to critically evaluate patient decision aids (PtDAs) developed to support patient-professional shared decision-making between dialysis and conservative management treatment pathways. METHODS We performed a systematic review of resources accessible in English using environmental scan methods. Data sources included online databases of research publications, repositories for clinical guidelines, research projects and PtDAs, international PtDA expert lists and reference lists from relevant publications. The resource selection was from 56 screened records; 17 PtDAs were included. A data extraction sheet was applied to all eligible resources, eliciting resource characteristics, decision architecture to boost/bias thinking, indicators of quality such as International Standards for Patient Decision Aids Standards checklist and engagement with health services. RESULTS PtDAs were developed in five countries; eleven were publically available via the Internet. Treatment options described were dialysis (n = 17), conservative management (n = 9) and transplant (n = 5). Eight resources signposted conservative management as an option rather than an active choice. Ten different labels across 14 resources were used to name 'conservative management'. The readability of the resources was good. Six publications detail decision aid development and/or evaluation research. Using PtDAs improved treatment decision-making by patients. Only resources identified as PtDAs and available in English were included. CONCLUSIONS PtDAs are used by some services to support patients choosing between dialysis options or end-of-life options. PtDAs developed to proactively support people making informed decisions between conservative management and dialysis treatments are likely to enable services to meet current best practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew Mooney
- Adult Renal Services, Lincoln Wing, St James University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Vicki Hipkiss
- Bradford Renal Unit, Horton Wing, St Luke’s Hospital, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Lucy Ziegler
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, School of Medicine, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Richard Williams
- Adult Renal Services, Lincoln Wing, St James University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Jeanette Finderup
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- ResCenPI, Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Aarhus University Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Hilary L Bekker
- ResCenPI, Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Aarhus University Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Speller B, Micic S, Daly C, Pi L, Little T, Baxter NN. Oncofertility Decision Support Resources for Women of Reproductive Age: Systematic Review. JMIR Cancer 2019; 5:e12593. [PMID: 31199289 PMCID: PMC6592478 DOI: 10.2196/12593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2018] [Revised: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 05/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer treatments have the potential to cause infertility among women of reproductive age. Many cancer patients do not receive sufficient oncofertility information or referrals to reproductive specialists prior to starting cancer treatment. While health care providers cite lack of awareness on the available oncofertility resources, the majority of cancer patients use the internet as a resource to find additional information to supplement discussions with their providers. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to identify and characterize Web-based oncofertility decision aids and health education materials accessible for women of reproductive age with a diagnosis of any cancer. METHODS We searched five databases and the gray literature for the years 1994-2018. The developer and content information for identified resources was extracted. Each resource underwent a quality assessment. RESULTS We identified 31 open access resources including 4 decision aids and 27 health educational materials. The most common fertility preservation options listed in the resources included embryo (31/31, 100%), egg (31, 100%), and ovarian tissue freezing (30, 97%). Notably, approximately one-third (11, 35%) contained references and 5 (16%) had a reading level of grade 8 or below. Resources were of varying quality; two decision aids from Australia and the Netherlands, two booklets from Australia and the United Kingdom, and three websites from Canada and the United States rated as the highest quality. CONCLUSIONS This comprehensive review characterizes numerous resources available to support patients and providers with oncofertility information, counseling, and decision making. More focus is required to improve the awareness and the access of existing resources among patients and providers. Providers can address patient information needs by leveraging or adapting existing resources to support clinical discussions and their specific patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany Speller
- Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Selena Micic
- Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Corinne Daly
- Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lebei Pi
- Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tari Little
- Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|