1
|
Fernández Castillo G, Linhardt R, Salas E. How to Make an Internal Team Coach: An Integration of Research. Behav Sci (Basel) 2024; 14:452. [PMID: 38920784 PMCID: PMC11200866 DOI: 10.3390/bs14060452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Team coaching has been found to increase group effort, improve interpersonal processes, and increase team knowledge and learning. However, the team coaching literature is renowned for its inability to define team coaching itself-making it difficult to solidify its place in the world of team science. So far, there is no consensus on what specific training would serve internal leaders best, and how they would connect to the team coaching literature. We know leadership and team training are effective in improving organizational outcomes, but the gap in the literature lies in identifying what specific competencies internal team coaches need, and what training could fulfill these. In this piece, we seek to (1) identify what competencies internal team leaders need based on the outcomes we know team coaching yields, (2) identify specific behaviors that can fulfill these competencies, and (3) integrate the literature to form an evidence-based guide on what training to provide to internal team coaches. By doing so, we hope to provide a definitive understanding of what internal team coaches need to be successful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Fernández Castillo
- Department of Psychological Sciences-MS 25, Rice University, 6100 Main St., Sewall Hall, Houston, TX 77005, USA; (R.L.); (E.S.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dolgoy N, Bernard S, Huang F, Driga A, Hall-Lavoie D, Brown A, Pituskin E, Fairchild A, McNeely ML. Determining the destination: a co-designed chronic advanced cancer rehabilitation conceptual framework for engagement of individuals with lived experience in rehabilitation research. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2024; 10:35. [PMID: 38528573 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-024-00566-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals living with chronic advanced cancer (CAC) often face distinct physical, functional, and cognitive issues. Their rehabilitation needs are not yet routinely met, warranting further CAC-specific rehabilitation-based research. Given the complexity of functional and symptom presentations, engagement of individuals living with CAC as partners in the research process is encouraged to better understand the lived perspective. Formal engagement requires both structured approaches and iterative processes. The aim was to co-design a conceptual framework to develop and integrate engagement strategies into rehabilitation research focused on CAC populations. METHODS A multidisciplinary team of authors, including two individuals with lived experience, conducted an implementation-focused descriptive study to inform future research design, including: interviews and follow-up, review of current models and approaches, and development of a co-designed conceptual framework for engaging individuals with lived experience into CAC-specific rehabilitation research. RESULTS Emergent themes include shared understanding, transparent appreciation, iterative processes and unique partnership needs. A definition, guiding principles and tools for engagement were identified. In consultation with individuals with lived experience, and application of the emergent themes in context, a conceptual framework to guide the engagement process was developed. CONCLUSION A novel conceptual framework for engaging individuals with lived experience with CAC as partners in rehabilitation research is proposed to facilitate implementation-focused team-based approaches for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi Dolgoy
- Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
- Cancer Rehabilitation Clinic, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| | - Stephanie Bernard
- École des sciences de la réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Fleur Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Amy Driga
- Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Adam Brown
- Individuals With Lived Experience, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Edith Pituskin
- Faculty of Nursing, Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Alysa Fairchild
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Margaret L McNeely
- Department of Physical Therapy, Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Cancer Rehabilitation Clinic, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cantrell A, Sworn K, Chambers D, Booth A, Taylor Buck E, Weich S. Factors within the clinical encounter that impact upon risk assessment within child and adolescent mental health services: a rapid realist synthesis. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2024; 12:1-107. [PMID: 38314750 DOI: 10.3310/vkty5822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
Background Risk assessment is a key process when a child or adolescent presents at risk for self-harm or suicide in a mental health crisis or emergency. Risk assessment by a healthcare professional should be included within a biopsychosocial assessment. However, the predictive value of risk-screening tools for self-harm and suicide in children and adolescents is consistently challenged. A review is needed to explore how best to undertake risk assessment and the appropriate role for tools/checklists within the assessment pathway. Aims To map research relating to risk assessment for child and adolescent mental health and to identify features that relate to a successful risk assessment. Objectives To review factors within the clinical encounter that impact upon risk assessments for self-harm and suicide in children and adolescents: i. to conduct a realist synthesis to understand mechanisms for risk assessment, why they occur and how they vary by context ii. to conduct a mapping review of primary studies/reviews to describe available tools of applicability to the UK. Data sources Databases, including MEDLINE, PsycINFO®, EMBASE, CINAHL, HMIC, Science and Social Sciences Citation Index and the Cochrane Library, were searched (September 2021). Searches were also conducted for reports from websites. Review methods A resource-constrained realist synthesis was conducted exploring factors that impact upon risk assessments for self-harm and suicide. This was accompanied by a mapping review of primary studies/reviews describing risk-assessment tools and approaches used in UK child and adolescent mental health. Following piloting, four reviewers screened retrieved records. Items were coded for the mapping and/or for inclusion in the realist synthesis. The review team examined the validity and limitations of risk-screening tools. In addition, the team identified structured approaches to risk assessment. Reporting of the realist synthesis followed RAMESES guidelines. Results From 4084 unique citations, 249 papers were reviewed and 41 studies (49 tools) were included in the mapping review. Eight reviews were identified following full-text screening. Fifty-seven papers were identified for the realist review. Findings highlight 14 explanations (programme theories) for a successful risk assessment for self-harm and suicide. Forty-nine individual assessment tools/approaches were identified. Few tools were developed in the UK, specifically for children and adolescents. These lacked formal independent evaluation. No risk-screening tool is suitable for risk prediction; optimal approaches incorporate a relationship of trust, involvement of the family, where appropriate, and a patient-centred holistic approach. The objective of risk assessment should be elicitation of information to direct a risk formulation and care plan. Limitations Many identified tools are well-established but lack scientific validity, particularly predictive validity, or clinical utility. Programme theories were generated rapidly from a survey of risk assessment. Conclusions No single checklist/approach meets the needs of risk assessment for self-harm and suicide. A whole-system approach is required, informed by structured clinical judgement. Useful components include a holistic assessment within a climate of trust, facilitated by family involvement. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42021276671. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR135079) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 1. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Cantrell
- Health Economics & Decision Science (HEDS) School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Regent Court, Sheffield, UK
| | - Katie Sworn
- Health Economics & Decision Science (HEDS) School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Regent Court, Sheffield, UK
| | - Duncan Chambers
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Regent Court, Sheffield, UK
| | - Andrew Booth
- Health Economics & Decision Science (HEDS) School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Regent Court, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Scott Weich
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Regent Court, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sarkies M, Francis-Auton E, Long J, Roberts N, Westbrook J, Levesque JF, Watson DE, Hardwick R, Sutherland K, Disher G, Hibbert P, Braithwaite J. Audit and feedback to reduce unwarranted clinical variation at scale: a realist study of implementation strategy mechanisms. Implement Sci 2023; 18:71. [PMID: 38082301 PMCID: PMC10714549 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01324-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unwarranted clinical variation in hospital care includes the underuse, overuse, or misuse of services. Audit and feedback is a common strategy to reduce unwarranted variation, but its effectiveness varies widely across contexts. We aimed to identify implementation strategies, mechanisms, and contextual circumstances contributing to the impact of audit and feedback on unwarranted clinical variation. METHODS Realist study examining a state-wide value-based healthcare program implemented between 2017 and 2021 in New South Wales, Australia. Three initiatives within the program included audit and feedback to reduce unwarranted variation in inpatient care for different conditions. Multiple data sources were used to formulate the initial audit and feedback program theory: a systematic review, realist review, program document review, and informal discussions with key program stakeholders. Semi-structured interviews were then conducted with 56 participants to refute, refine, or confirm the initial program theories. Data were analysed retroductively using a context-mechanism-outcome framework for 11 transcripts which were coded into the audit and feedback program theory. The program theory was validated with three expert panels: senior health leaders (n = 19), Agency for Clinical Innovation (n = 11), and Ministry of Health (n = 21) staff. RESULTS The program's audit and feedback implementation strategy operated through eight mechanistic processes. The strategy worked well when clinicians (1) felt ownership and buy-in, (2) could make sense of the information provided, (3) were motivated by social influence, and (4) accepted responsibility and accountability for proposed changes. The success of the strategy was constrained when the audit process led to (5) rationalising current practice instead of creating a learning opportunity, (6) perceptions of unfairness and concerns about data integrity, 7) development of improvement plans that were not followed, and (8) perceived intrusions on professional autonomy. CONCLUSIONS Audit and feedback strategies may help reduce unwarranted clinical variation in care where there is engagement between auditors and local clinicians, meaningful audit indicators, clear improvement plans, and respect for clinical expertise. We contribute theoretical development for audit and feedback by proposing a Model for Audit and Feedback Implementation at Scale. Recommendations include limiting the number of audit indicators, involving clinical staff and local leaders in feedback, and providing opportunities for reflection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell Sarkies
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
- School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Emilie Francis-Auton
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Janet Long
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Natalie Roberts
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Johanna Westbrook
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jean-Frederic Levesque
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia
- NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation, Sydney, Australia
| | - Diane E Watson
- Bureau of Health Information, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Rebecca Hardwick
- Peninsula Medical School, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | | | | | - Peter Hibbert
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- Allied Health and Human Performance, IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kanno NDP, Peduzzi M, Germani ACCG, Soárez PCD, Silva ATCD. Interprofessional collaboration in primary health care from the perspective of implementation science. CAD SAUDE PUBLICA 2023; 39:e00213322. [PMID: 37971099 PMCID: PMC10645058 DOI: 10.1590/0102-311xpt213322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The objective was to analyze the perceptions of primary health care (PHC) workers about interprofessional collaboration from the perspective of implementation science. This is a qualitative study that used in-depth interview as a data production technique. Interviews were conducted with 15 workers (three community health agents, one nursing assistant, three nurses, three managers, three physicians, and two nursing technicians) from basic health units in the Municipality of São Bernardo do Campo, São Paulo State, Brazil. The interview plan was based on three domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Thematic content analysis was used. In the interprofessional collaboration characteristics domain, respondents highlighted the complexity, and its possible influence, as to the implementation and sustainability of this practice. In the inner setting domain, factors that influence interprofessional collaboration were identified, namely: how the time allocated to formal communication/team meetings is used; social interactions between professionals; and leadership characteristics, such as feedback, autonomy and participation in decisions. In the individuals characteristics domain, participants noted interprofessional collaboration geared to quality of care and the need for integration between knowledge centers. Thus, measures to enhance the quality of communication, collective team building and leadership can contribute to improve interprofessional collaboration in PHC and leverage its impacts on health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natália de Paula Kanno
- Prefeitura do Município de São Bernardo do Campo, São Bernardo do Campo, Brasil
- Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil
| | - Marina Peduzzi
- Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bhugra D, Smith A, Ventriglio A, Hermans MHM, Ng R, Javed A, Chumakov E, Kar A, Ruiz R, Oquendo M, Chisolm MS, Werneke U, Suryadevara U, Jibson M, Hobbs J, Castaldelli-Maia J, Nair M, Seshadri S, Subramanyam A, Patil N, Chandra P, Liebrenz M. World Psychiatric Association-Asian Journal of Psychiatry Commission on Psychiatric Education in the 21st century. Asian J Psychiatr 2023; 88:103739. [PMID: 37619422 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2023.103739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
Psychiatric practice faces many challenges in the first quarter of 21st century. Society has transformed, as have training requirements and patient expectations, underlining an urgent need to look at educational programmes. Meanwhile, awareness has grown around psychiatric disorders and there are evolving workforce trends, with more women going to medical school and specialising in psychiatry. Trainee psychiatrists carry different expectations for work-life balance and are increasingly becoming conscious of their own mental health. A tendency to see health as a commodity and the litigious nature of society has elicited additional pressures for healthcare professionals. Cartesian mind-body dualism has created further complexity and this can often be frustrating for patients and care-partners alike. In many cultures across Asia and beyond, patients can present with physical symptoms to express underlying psychological distress with increasing physical investigations. Simultaneously, in various countries, a shift from asylums to community-based interventions and then home treatments have changed psychiatric care in remarkable ways. These changes have added to pressures faced by mental healthcare professionals. However, trainees and other mental healthcare professionals continue to receive similar training as they did a generation ago. The tensions and differences in ideology/orientation between different branches of psychiatry have made responses to patient needs challenging. Recognising that it is difficult to predict the future, this World Psychiatric Association-Asian Journal of Psychiatry Commission makes recommendations that could help institutions and individuals enhance psychiatric education. This Commission draws from existing resources and recent developments to propose a training framework for future psychiatrists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinesh Bhugra
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciences, Kings College, London SE5 8AF, UK.
| | - Alexander Smith
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Roger Ng
- Secretary for Education, WPA, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Afzal Javed
- World Psychiatric Association, Geneva. Switzerland. Fountain House, Lahore. Pakistan
| | - Egor Chumakov
- Department of Psychiatry & Addiction, St Petersburg State University, St Petersburg, Russia
| | - Anindya Kar
- Advanced Neuropsychiatry Institute, Kolkata, India
| | - Roxanna Ruiz
- University of Francisco Moaroquin, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Maria Oquendo
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
| | | | - Ursula Werneke
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Psychiatry, Umeå University, Sunderby Research Unit, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Uma Suryadevara
- Geriatric Division, Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
| | - Michael Jibson
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
| | - Jacqueline Hobbs
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
| | | | - Muralidharan Nair
- Department of Neurology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695011, India
| | - Shekhar Seshadri
- Department of Child Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560029, India
| | - Alka Subramanyam
- Department of Psychiatry, Topiwala Nair Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400008, India
| | - Nanasaheb Patil
- Department of Psychiatry, J.N. Medical College, Belgavi, Karnataka 590010, India
| | - Prabha Chandra
- Behavioral Sciences, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru 560029, India
| | - Michael Liebrenz
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wilson C, Janes G, Lawton R, Benn J. Feedback for Emergency Ambulance Staff: A National Review of Current Practice Informed by Realist Evaluation Methodology. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2229. [PMID: 37628427 PMCID: PMC10454701 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11162229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Research suggests that feedback in Emergency Medical Services (EMS) positively affects quality of care and professional development. However, the mechanisms by which feedback achieves its effects still need to be better understood across healthcare settings. This study aimed to understand how United Kingdom (UK) ambulance services provide feedback for EMS professionals and develop a programme theory of how feedback works within EMS, using a mixed-methods, realist evaluation framework. A national cross-sectional survey was conducted to identify feedback initiatives in UK ambulance services, followed by four in-depth case studies involving qualitative interviews and documentary analysis. We used qualitative content analysis and descriptive statistics to analyse survey responses from 40 prehospital feedback initiatives, alongside retroductive analysis of 17 interviews and six documents from case study sites. Feedback initiatives mainly provided individual patient outcome feedback through "pull" initiatives triggered by staff requests. Challenges related to information governance were identified. Our programme theory of feedback to EMS professionals encompassed context (healthcare professional and organisational characteristics), mechanisms (feedback and implementation characteristics, psychological reasoning) and outcomes (implementation, staff and service outcomes). This study suggests that most UK ambulance services use a range of feedback initiatives and provides 24 empirically based testable hypotheses for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Wilson
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
- Research and Development Department, Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Wakefield WF2 0XQ, UK
- Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford BD9 6RJ, UK
| | - Gillian Janes
- Faculty of Health and Education, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BH, UK
| | - Rebecca Lawton
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
- Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford BD9 6RJ, UK
| | - Jonathan Benn
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
- Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford BD9 6RJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sun H, Qian Q, Qin Y, Guo L, Hengudomsub P. Dynamic changes in resilience among family caregivers in the face of healthcare challenges: A scoping review. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2023; 45:113-123. [PMID: 37544685 DOI: 10.1016/j.apnu.2023.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resilience as a dynamic concept has already been described through various longitudinal studies. To better understand the changes in the resilience of caregivers over the course of care-providing, however, a scoping review can provide a clearer picture of their resilience process which, in turn, can be used to improve caregivers' well-being. OBJECTIVES To provide a comprehensive overview of dynamic change in the resilience of caregivers while caring for the family to enhance understanding and potential for future research. METHODS Following the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley, this scoping review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and the Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. Five electronic databases were searched for research published in English between January 2012 and May 2022, after which a manual search was performed. Key terms related to resilience and caregivers in longitudinal studies were included and screened for. Identified trajectories of patterns in resilience and factors associated with resilience process were categorized using content analysis. RESULTS In total, 24 longitudinal studies met the eligibility criteria. Conceptually, our findings demonstrate three modes of change following healthcare challenges, each of which varies substantially. Methodologically, the results reveal three subcategories of assessment tools that can be used to impact caregivers' resilience when confronted with significant healthcare challenges. Consequentially, personal traits and environmental resources interacting with the resilience process will then lead to various outcomes in their resilience, including stability, growth, or decline. CONCLUSION This review describes the change patterns of the resilience process, assessment instruments, and associated factors to offer a dynamic perspective for the investigation and intervention of psychological resilience. Major gaps nonetheless remain for future research regarding an operationalizing dynamic change in resilience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haiyan Sun
- School of Nursing, Jiangsu Vocational College of Medicine, 224005, Jiangsu, P.R. China; Faculty of Nursing, Burapha University, 20131, Chon Buri, Thailand
| | - Qian Qian
- School of Nursing, Jiangsu Vocational College of Medicine, 224005, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Yang Qin
- School of Nursing, Jiangsu Vocational College of Medicine, 224005, Jiangsu, P.R. China; Faculty of Nursing, Burapha University, 20131, Chon Buri, Thailand
| | - Lingling Guo
- School of Nursing, Jiangsu Vocational College of Medicine, 224005, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gauly J, Court R, Currie G, Seers K, Clarke A, Metcalfe A, Wilson A, Hazell M, Grove AL. Advancing leadership in surgery: a realist review of interventions and strategies to promote evidence-based leadership in healthcare. Implement Sci 2023; 18:15. [PMID: 37179327 PMCID: PMC10182608 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01274-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare systems invest in leadership development of surgeons, surgical trainees, and teams. However, there is no agreement on how interventions should be designed, or what components they must contain to be successful. The objective of this realist review was to generate a programme theory explaining in which context and for whom surgical leadership interventions work and why. METHODS Five databases were systematically searched, and articles screened against inclusion considering their relevance. Context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) and fragments of CMOCs were identified. Gaps in the CMOCs were filled through deliberation with the research team and stakeholder feedback. We identified patterns between CMOCs and causal relationships to create a programme theory. RESULTS Thirty-three studies were included and 19 CMOCs were developed. Findings suggests that interventions for surgeons and surgical teams improve leadership if timely feedback is delivered on multiple occasions and by trusted and respected people. Negative feedback is best provided privately. Feedback from senior-to-junior or peer-to-peer should be delivered directly, whereas feedback from junior-to-senior is preferred when delivered anonymously. Leadership interventions were shown to be most effective for those with awareness of the importance of leadership, those with confidence in their technical surgical skills, and those with identified leadership deficits. For interventions to improve leadership in surgery, they need to be delivered in an intimate learning environment, consider implementing a speak-up culture, provide a variety of interactive learning activities, show a genuine investment in the intervention, and be customised to the needs of surgeons. Leadership of surgical teams can be best developed by enabling surgical teams to train together. CONCLUSIONS The programme theory provides evidence-based guidance for those who are designing, developing and implementing leadership interventions in surgery. Adopting the recommendations will help to ensure interventions are acceptable to the surgical community and successful in improving surgical leadership. TRIAL REGISTRATION The review protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021230709).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Gauly
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7HL, UK
| | - Rachel Court
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7HL, UK
| | - Graeme Currie
- Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Scarman Rd, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Kate Seers
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7HL, UK
| | - Aileen Clarke
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7HL, UK
| | - Andy Metcalfe
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Campus, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Anna Wilson
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7HL, UK
| | - Matthew Hazell
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7HL, UK
| | - Amy Louise Grove
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7HL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gauly J, Court R, Seers K, Currie G, Grove A. In which context and for whom can interventions improve leadership of surgical trainees, surgeons and surgical teams and why: a realist review protocol. NIHR OPEN RESEARCH 2023; 3:16. [PMID: 37881463 PMCID: PMC10593322 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13364.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
Background Improving effective leadership of individuals, groups, and healthcare organisations is essential for improving surgical performance and indirectly improving health outcomes for patients. Numerous systematic reviews have been conducted which seek to determine the effectiveness of specific leadership interventions across a range of disciplines and healthcare outcomes. The purpose of this realist review is to systematically synthesise the literature which examines in which context and for whom leadership interventions improve leadership of surgeons, surgical teams, and trainees. Methods Several approaches will be used to iteratively search the scientific and grey literature to identify relevant evidence. Selected articles will inform the development of a programme theory that seeks to explain in which context and for whom interventions can improve leadership of surgical trainees, surgeons, and surgical teams. Next, empirical studies will be searched systematically in order to test and, where necessary, refine the theory. Once theoretical saturation has been achieved, recommendations for advancing leadership in surgery will be developed. Stakeholder and patient and public consultations will contribute to the development of the programme theory. The review will be written up according to the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards publication standards. No ethical review will be required for the conduct of this realist review. Discussion The knowledge gained from this review will provide evidence-based guidance for those planning or designing leadership interventions in surgery. The recommendations will help policymakers, educationalists, healthcare providers, and those delivering or planning leadership development programmes across the surgical disciplines to design interventions that are acceptable to the surgical community and successful in improving surgical leadership.PROSPERO registration: CRD42021230709.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Gauly
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Rachel Court
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Kate Seers
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Graeme Currie
- Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Amy Grove
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
De Brún A, McAuliffe E. “When there's collective leadership, there's the power to make changes”: A realist evaluation of a collective leadership intervention (Co-Lead) in healthcare teams. JOURNAL OF LEADERSHIP & ORGANIZATIONAL STUDIES 2022. [DOI: 10.1177/15480518221144895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
There is accumulating evidence for collective approaches to leadership, where multiple individuals share leadership roles, but there remains a lack of theory-informed research on how collective leadership is fostered in practice. This study evaluated the impact of a collective leadership intervention, exploring what works for whom, how, and under what circumstances through a mixed-methods realist evaluation of four case studies. Eight context-mechanism-outcome configurations (theories) were extrapolated that elucidate the mechanisms triggered to drive outcomes in particular settings. This is the first study to apply a realist lens to understand collective leadership and articulate the generative mechanisms that enable/inhibit collective leadership in healthcare teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. De Brún
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - E. McAuliffe
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Silva JAM, Mininel VA, Fernandes Agreli H, Peduzzi M, Harrison R, Xyrichis A. Collective leadership to improve professional practice, healthcare outcomes and staff well-being. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 10:CD013850. [PMID: 36214207 PMCID: PMC9549469 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013850.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Collective leadership is strongly advocated by international stakeholders as a key approach for health service delivery, as a response to increasingly complex forms of organisation defined by rapid changes in health technology, professionalisation and growing specialisation. Inadequate leadership weakens health systems and can contribute to adverse events, including refusal to prioritise and implement safety recommendations consistently, and resistance to addressing staff burnout. Globally, increases in life expectancy and the number of people living with multiple long-term conditions contribute to greater complexity of healthcare systems. Such a complex environment requires the contribution and leadership of multiple professionals sharing viewpoints and knowledge. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of collective leadership for healthcare providers on professional practice, healthcare outcomes and staff well-being, when compared with usual centralised leadership approaches. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, five other databases and two trials registers on 5 January 2021. We also searched grey literature, checked references for additional citations and contacted study authors to identify additional studies. We did not apply any limits on language. SELECTION CRITERIA Two groups of two authors independently reviewed, screened and selected studies for inclusion; the principal author was part of both groups to ensure consistency. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared collective leadership interventions with usual centralised leadership or no intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Three groups of two authors independently extracted data from the included studies and evaluated study quality; the principal author took part in all groups. We followed standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane and the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS We identified three randomised trials for inclusion in our synthesis. All studies were conducted in acute care inpatient settings; the country settings were Canada, Iran and the USA. A total of 955 participants were included across all the studies. There was considerable variation in participants, interventions and measures for quantifying outcomes. We were only able to complete a meta-analysis for one outcome (leadership) and completed a narrative synthesis for other outcomes. We judged all studies as having an unclear risk of bias overall. Collective leadership interventions probably improve leadership (3 RCTs, 955 participants). Collective leadership may improve team performance (1 RCT, 164 participants). We are uncertain about the effect of collective leadership on clinical performance (1 RCT, 60 participants). We are uncertain about the intervention effect on healthcare outcomes, including health status (inpatient mortality) (1 RCT, 60 participants). Collective leadership may slightly improve staff well-being by reducing work-related stress (1 RCT, 164 participants). We identified no direct evidence concerning burnout and psychological symptoms. We are uncertain of the intervention effects on unintended consequences, specifically on staff absence (1 RCT, 60 participants). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Collective leadership involves multiple professionals sharing viewpoints and knowledge with the potential to influence positively the quality of care and staff well-being. Our confidence in the effects of collective leadership interventions on professional practice, healthcare outcomes and staff well-being is moderate in leadership outcomes, low in team performance and work-related stress, and very low for clinical performance, inpatient mortality and staff absence outcomes. The evidence was of moderate, low and very low certainty due to risk of bias and imprecision, meaning future evidence may change our interpretation of the results. There is a need for more high-quality studies in this area, with consistent reporting of leadership, team performance, clinical performance, health status and staff well-being outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Marina Peduzzi
- Professional Orientation Department, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Reema Harrison
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Andreas Xyrichis
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Braut H, Øygarden O, Storm M, Mikkelsen A. General practitioners' perceptions of distributed leadership in providing integrated care for elderly chronic multi-morbid patients: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1085. [PMID: 36002824 PMCID: PMC9404619 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08460-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Distributed Leadership (DL) has been suggested as being helpful when different health care professionals and patients need to work together across professional and organizational boundaries to provide integrated care (IC). This study explores whether General Practitioners (GPs) adopt leadership actions that transcend organizational boundaries to provide IC for patients and discusses whether the GPs’ leadership actions in collaboration with patients and health care professionals contribute to DL. Methods We interviewed GPs (n = 20) of elderly multimorbid patients in a municipality in Norway. A qualitative interpretive case design and Gioia methodology was applied to the collection and analysis of data from semi-structured interviews. Results GPs are involved in three processes when contributing to IC for elderly multimorbidity patients; the process of creating an integrated patient experience, the workflow process and the process of maneuvering organizational structures and medical culture. GPs take part in processes comparable to configurations of DL described in the literature. Patient micro-context and health care macro-context are related to observed configurations of DL. Conclusion Initiating or moving between different configurations of DL in IC requires awareness of patient context and the health care macro-context, of ways of working, capacity of digital tools and use of health care personnel. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08460-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Braut
- University of Stavanger Business School, Stavanger, Norway.
| | | | - Marianne Storm
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.,Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Care, Molde University College, Molde, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gupta S, Nawaz N, Tripathi A, Arif Chaudhry S, Agrawal K. Impact of Inclusive Leadership on Innovation Performance During Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak: Mediating Role of Employee Innovation Behavior and Moderating Role of Psychological Empowerment. Front Psychol 2022; 13:811330. [PMID: 36059737 PMCID: PMC9434368 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.811330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
This study investigates the effect of inclusive leadership on innovation performance with a mediating role of employee innovation behavior and the moderating role of psychological empowerment (PE). Supervisors and employees of Saudi manufacturing firms are the participants of this study. This study used a quantitative research technique with a cross-sectional approach and a self-administrative survey questionnaire to collect the data. The data were analyzed by using the Smart PLS 3 software. The results depict that inclusive leadership has a significant positive impact on the firm's innovation performance. Employees' innovation behavior has a significant mediating effect on the association of inclusive leadership and innovation performance. Findings revealed that PE has an important moderating role in the association of inclusive leadership and innovation performance. The findings of this study contribute to the body of knowledge by finding that inclusive leadership has a significant effect on the firm's innovative performance and PE is crucial to enhance innovation performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuchi Gupta
- Accounting Department, University of Ha’il, Ha’il, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nishad Nawaz
- Department of Business Management, College of Business Administration, Kingdom University, Riffa, Bahrain
| | - Abhishek Tripathi
- Department of Management and Information Systems, College of Business Administration, University of Ha’il, Ha’il, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Khushbu Agrawal
- Pacific Institute of Management, Pacific University, Udaipur, India
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Han S, Liu D, Lv Y. The Influence of Psychological Safety on Students' Creativity in Project-Based Learning: The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment. Front Psychol 2022; 13:865123. [PMID: 35572343 PMCID: PMC9093144 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Creative-oriented new educational model will shape the direction and appearance of world development. This study focuses on the role of psychological safety and psychological empowerment in improving students' creativity in the context of project-based learning from the perspective of student empowerment. Based on self-determination theory, we propose that psychological safety positively affects students' creativity through psychological empowerment, and fault-tolerant culture plays a positive role in it. In this study, 238 students who participated in project-based learning were randomly selected to conduct a questionnaire survey. The results show that there is a positive correlation between psychological safety and creativity, and psychological empowerment plays an intermediary role in the relationship between them. The fault-tolerant culture enhances the direct influence of psychological safety on psychological empowerment and the indirect influence of psychological safety on creativity. Theoretical and practical implications were also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shenghao Han
- College of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China
| | - Dewen Liu
- School of Management, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing, China
| | - Yiliang Lv
- School of Management, Guizhou University of Commerce, Guiyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kodate N, Taneda K, Yumoto A, Kawakami N. How do healthcare practitioners use incident data to improve patient safety in Japan? A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:241. [PMID: 35193562 PMCID: PMC8862528 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07631-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient incident reporting systems have been widely used for ensuring safety and improving quality in care settings in many countries. However, little is known about the way in which incident data are used by frontline clinical staff. Furthermore, while the use of a systems perspective has been reported as an effective way of learning from incident data in a multidisciplinary team, the level of adaptability of this perspective to a different cultural context has not been widely explored. The primary aim of the study, therefore, was to investigate how healthcare practitioners in Japan perceive the reporting systems and utilize a systems perspective in learning from incident data in acute care and mental health settings. METHODS A non-experimental, descriptive and exploratory research design was adopted with the following two data-collection methods: 1) Sixty-one semi-structured interviews with frontline staff in two hospitals; and 2) Non-participatory observations of thirty-seven regular incident review meetings. The two hospitals in the Greater Tokyo area which were invited to take part were: 1) a not-for-profit, privately-run, acute care hospital with approximately 500 beds; and 2) a publicly-run mental health hospital with 200 beds. RESULTS While the majority of staff acknowledge the positive impacts of the reporting systems on safety, the observation data found that little consideration was given to systems aspects during formal meetings. The meetings were primarily a place for the exchange of practical information, as opposed to in-depth discussions regarding causes of incidents and corrective measures. Learning from incident data was influenced by four factors: professional boundaries; dealing with a psychological burden; leadership and educational approach; and compatibility of patient safety with patient-centered care. CONCLUSIONS Healthcare organizations are highly complex, comprising of many professional boundaries and risk perceptions, and various communication styles. In order to establish an optimum method of individual and organizational learning and effective safety management, a fine balance has to be struck between respect for professional expertise in a local team and centralized safety oversight with a strong focus on systems. Further research needs to examine culturally-sensitive organizational and professional dynamics, including leader-follower relationships and the impact of resource constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naonori Kodate
- School of Social Policy, Social Work and Social Justice, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
- Public Policy Research Centre, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan.
- Fondation France-Japon, L'École Des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris, France.
- Institute for Future Initiatives, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
- UCD Centre for Japanese Studies, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Ken'ichiro Taneda
- Department of International Health and Collaboration / Department of Health and Welfare Services, National Institute of Public Health, Saitama, Japan
| | - Akiyo Yumoto
- Graduate School of Nursing, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Nana Kawakami
- Graduate School of Nursing, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fisher RJ, Chouliara N, Byrne A, Cameron T, Lewis S, Langhorne P, Robinson T, Waring J, Geue C, Paley L, Rudd A, Walker MF. Large-scale implementation of stroke early supported discharge: the WISE realist mixed-methods study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr09220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
In England, the provision of early supported discharge is recommended as part of an evidence-based stroke care pathway.
Objectives
To investigate the effectiveness of early supported discharge services when implemented at scale in practice and to understand how the context within which these services operate influences their implementation and effectiveness.
Design
A mixed-methods study using a realist evaluation approach and two interlinking work packages was undertaken. Three programme theories were tested to investigate the adoption of evidence-based core components, differences in urban and rural settings, and communication processes.
Setting and interventions
Early supported discharge services across a large geographical area of England, covering the West and East Midlands, the East of England and the North of England.
Participants
Work package 1: historical prospective patient data from the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme collected by early supported discharge and hospital teams. Work package 2: NHS staff (n = 117) and patients (n = 30) from six purposely selected early supported discharge services.
Data and main outcome
Work package 1: a 17-item early supported discharge consensus score measured the adherence to evidence-based core components defined in an international consensus document. The effectiveness of early supported discharge was measured with process and patient outcomes and costs. Work package 2: semistructured interviews and focus groups with NHS staff and patients were undertaken to investigate the contextual determinants of early supported discharge effectiveness.
Results
A variety of early supported discharge service models had been adopted, as reflected by the variability in the early supported discharge consensus score. A one-unit increase in early supported discharge consensus score was significantly associated with a more responsive early supported discharge service and increased treatment intensity. There was no association with stroke survivor outcome. Patients who received early supported discharge in their stroke care pathway spent, on average, 1 day longer in hospital than those who did not receive early supported discharge. The most rural services had the highest service costs per patient. NHS staff identified core evidence-based components (e.g. eligibility criteria, co-ordinated multidisciplinary team and regular weekly multidisciplinary team meetings) as central to the effectiveness of early supported discharge. Mechanisms thought to streamline discharge and help teams to meet their responsiveness targets included having access to a social worker and the quality of communications and transitions across services. The role of rehabilitation assistants and an interdisciplinary approach were facilitators of delivering an intensive service. The rurality of early supported discharge services, especially when coupled with capacity issues and increased travel times to visit patients, could influence the intensity of rehabilitation provision and teams’ flexibility to adjust to patients’ needs. This required organising multidisciplinary teams and meetings around the local geography. Findings also highlighted the importance of good leadership and communication. Early supported discharge staff highlighted the need for collaborative and trusting relationships with patients and carers and stroke unit staff, as well as across the wider stroke care pathway.
Limitations
Work package 1: possible influence of unobserved variables and we were unable to determine the effect of early supported discharge on patient outcomes. Work package 2: the pragmatic approach led to ‘theoretical nuggets’ rather than an overarching higher-level theory.
Conclusions
The realist evaluation methodology allowed us to address the complexity of early supported discharge delivery in real-world settings. The findings highlighted the importance of context and contextual features and mechanisms that need to be either addressed or capitalised on to improve effectiveness.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN15568163.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 9, No. 22. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Fisher
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Niki Chouliara
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Adrian Byrne
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Trudi Cameron
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sarah Lewis
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Peter Langhorne
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Thompson Robinson
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Justin Waring
- Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Claudia Geue
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lizz Paley
- Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Anthony Rudd
- Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Marion F Walker
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Widnall E, Dodd S, Simmonds R, Bohan H, Russell A, Limmer M, Kidger J. A process evaluation of a peer education project to improve mental health literacy in secondary school students: study protocol. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1879. [PMID: 34663288 PMCID: PMC8522854 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11921-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emotional disorders in young people are increasing but studies have found that this age group do not always recognise the signs and symptoms of mental health problems in themselves or others. The Mental Health Foundation's school-based Peer Education Project (PEP) has the potential to improve young people's understanding of their own mental health at a critical developmental stage (early adolescence) using a peer teaching method. This study is a process evaluation to understand: the mechanisms through which PEP might improve young people's mental health literacy, any challenges with delivery, how the project can be embedded within wider school life and how it can be improved to be of most benefit to the widest number of young people. We will also validate a bespoke mental health literacy questionnaire, and test the feasibility of using it to measure outcomes in preparation for a future study evaluating effectiveness. METHODS All schools recruited to the study will receive the PEP intervention. The process evaluation will be informed by realist evaluation approaches to build understanding regarding key mechanisms of change and the impact of different school contexts. The evaluation will test and revise an existing intervention logic model which has been developed in partnership with the Mental Health Foundation. Process evaluation data will be collected from newly recruited schools (n = 4) as well as current PEP user schools (n = 2) including training and lesson delivery observations, staff interviews and student focus groups. Baseline and follow-up data will be collected in all newly recruited intervention schools (n = 4) from all students in Year 7/8 (who receive the PEP) and recruited peer educators in Year 12 via a self-report survey. DISCUSSION This study will enable us to refine the logic model underpinning the peer education project and identify areas of the intervention that can be improved. Findings will also inform the design of a future effectiveness study which will test out the extent to which PEP improves mental health literacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Widnall
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PL, UK.
| | | | | | | | - Abigail Russell
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PL, UK.,College of Medicine & Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Judi Kidger
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ito A, Sato K, Yumoto Y, Sasaki M, Ogata Y. A concept analysis of psychological safety: Further understanding for application to health care. Nurs Open 2021; 9:467-489. [PMID: 34651454 PMCID: PMC8685887 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To clarify the concept of psychological safety in a healthcare context and to provide the first theoretical framework for improving interpersonal relationships in the workplace to better patient care. DESIGN A Rodgers' concept analysis. METHODS The concept analysis was conducted using a systematic search strategy on PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Ichushi-Web. RESULTS An analysis of 88 articles studying psychological safety in health care identified five attributes: perceptions of the consequences of taking interpersonal risks, strong interpersonal relationships, group-level phenomenon, safe work environment for taking interpersonal risks and non-punitive culture. The antecedents included structure/system factors, interpersonal factors and individual factors. The four consequences included performance outcomes, organizational culture outcomes, and psychological and behavioural outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayano Ito
- Department of Gerontological Nursing and Healthcare Systems Management, Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kana Sato
- Department of Gerontological Nursing and Healthcare Systems Management, Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshie Yumoto
- Department of Gerontological Nursing and Healthcare Systems Management, Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Miki Sasaki
- Department of Gerontological Nursing and Healthcare Systems Management, Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuko Ogata
- Department of Gerontological Nursing and Healthcare Systems Management, Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Teamworking in Healthcare during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph181910371. [PMID: 34639671 PMCID: PMC8508523 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph181910371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The widespread impact of COVID-19 on healthcare has demanded new ways of working across many organisation types and many forms of healthcare delivery while at the same time endeavouring to place minimal, or no, additional burden on already strained healthcare teams. This is a cross-sectional mixed-method study which captured the experiences of teamwork during the COVID-19 pandemic contributing to successful collaboration. We hypothesised that work engagement and psychological safety separately contribute to collective leadership and organisational citizenship behaviours. Participants were healthcare staff on active duty during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ireland (n = 152) who responded to our social media (Twitter) invitation to participate in this study. Survey and free-text responses were collected through an online platform. Structural equation modelling examined the relationships between work engagement and psychological safety, and collective leadership and OCBs. Open text responses relating to experiences of teamworking during the pandemic were analysed for latent themes. From the survey data, the structural model demonstrated excellent statistical fit indicating that psychological safety, but not work engagement, was predictive of collective leadership and OCBs. From the qualitative data, two key themes were generated: (1) Contrasting experiences of working in a team during the pandemic; and (2) The pandemic response: a tipping point for burnout. This study offers a valuable starting point to explore the factors driving change and the shift to more collective ways of working observed in response to COVID-19. Future studies should use longitudinal data to capture the temporal relationship of these variables which could be moderated by prolonged pressure to healthcare staff during the pandemic.
Collapse
|
21
|
Jackson C, McBride T, Manley K, Dewar B, Young B, Ryan A, Roberts D. Strengthening nursing, midwifery and allied health professional leadership in the UK – a realist evaluation. Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl) 2021. [DOI: 10.1108/lhs-11-2020-0097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to share the findings of a realist evaluation study that set out to identify how to strengthen nursing, midwifery and allied health professions (NMAHP) leadership across all health-care contexts in the UK conducted between 2018 and 2019. The collaborative research team were from the Universities of Bangor, Ulster, the University of the West of Scotland and Canterbury Christ Church University.
Design/methodology/approach
Realist evaluation and appreciative inquiry were used across three phases of the study. Phase 1 analysed the literature to generate tentative programme theories about what works, tested out in Phase 2 through a national social media Twitter chat and sense-making workshops to help refine the theories in Phase 3. Cross-cutting themes were synthesised into a leadership framework identifying the strategies that work for practitioners in a range of settings and professions based on the context, mechanism and output configuration of realist evaluation. Stakeholders contributed to the ongoing interrogation, analysis and synthesis of project outcomes.
Findings
Five guiding lights of leadership, a metaphor for principles, were generated that enable and strengthen leadership across a range of contexts. – “The Light Between Us as interactions in our relationships”, “Seeing People’s Inner Light”, “Kindling the Spark of light and keeping it glowing”, “Lighting up the known and the yet to be known” and “Constellations of connected stars”.
Research limitations/implications
This study has illuminated the a-theoretical nature of the relationships between contexts, mechanisms and outcomes in the existing leadership literature. There is more scope to develop the tentative programme theories developed in this study with NMAHP leaders in a variety of different contexts. The outcomes of leadership research mostly focussed on staff outcomes and intermediate outcomes that are then linked to ultimate outcomes in both staff and patients (supplemental). More consideration needs to be given to the impact of leadership on patients, carers and their families.
Practical implications
The study has developed additional important resources to enable NMAHP leaders to demonstrate their leadership impact in a range of contexts through the leadership impact self-assessment framework which can be used for 360 feedback in the workplace using the appreciative assessment and reflection tool.
Social implications
Whilst policymakers note the increasing importance of leadership in facilitating the culture change needed to support health and care systems to adopt sustainable change at pace, there is still a prevailing focus on traditional approaches to individual leadership development as opposed to collective leadership across teams, services and systems. If this paper fails to understand how to transform leadership policy and education, then it will be impossible to support the workforce to adapt and flex to the increasingly complex contexts they are working in. This will serve to undermine system integration for health and social care if the capacity and capability for transformation are not attended to. Whilst there are ambitious global plans (WHO, 2015) to enable integrated services to be driven by citizen needs, there is still a considerable void in understanding how to authentically engage with people to ensure the transformation is driven by their needs as opposed to what the authors think they need. There is, therefore, a need for systems leaders with the full skillset required to enable integrated services across place-based systems, particularly clinicians who are able to break down barriers and silo working across boundaries through the credibility, leadership and facilitation expertise they provide.
Originality/value
The realist evaluation with additional synthesis from key stakeholders has provided new knowledge about the principles of effective NMAHP leadership in health and social care, presented in such a way that facilitates the use of the five guiding lights to inform further practice, education, research and policy development.
Collapse
|
22
|
Cunningham U, De Brún A, Willgerodt M, Abu-Rish Blakeney E, McAuliffe E. A Realist Evaluation of Team Interventions in Acute Hospital Contexts-Use of Two Case Studies to Test Initial Programme Theories. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:8604. [PMID: 34444352 PMCID: PMC8393900 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18168604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Designing and implementing team interventions to improve quality and safety of care in acute hospital contexts is challenging. There is little emphasis in the literature on how contextual conditions impact interventions or how specific active ingredients of interventions impact on team members' reasoning and enact change. This realist evaluation helps to deepen the understanding of the enablers and barriers for effective team interventions in these contexts. METHODS Five previously developed initial programme theories were tested using case studies from two diverse hospital contexts. Data were collected from theory driven interviews (n = 19) in an Irish context and from previously conducted evaluative interviews (n = 16) in a US context. Data were explored to unpack the underlying social and psychological drivers that drove both intended and unintended outcomes. Patterns of regularity were identified and synthesised to develop middle-range theories (MRTs). RESULTS Eleven MRTs demonstrate how and why intervention resources introduced in specific contextual conditions enact reasoning mechanisms and generate intended and unintended outcomes for patients, team members, the team and organisational leaders. The triggered mechanisms relate to shared mental models; openness, inclusivity and connectedness; leadership and engagement; social identity and intrinsic motivational factors. CONCLUSIONS The findings provide valuable information for architects and facilitators of team interventions in acute hospital contexts, as well as help identify avenues for future research. Dataset: The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to their sensitive nature and potential identification of participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Una Cunningham
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin 4, Ireland; (A.D.B.); (E.M.)
- Pillar Centre for Transformative Healthcare, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles St, D07 R2WY Dublin 7, Ireland
| | - Aoife De Brún
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin 4, Ireland; (A.D.B.); (E.M.)
| | - Mayumi Willgerodt
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; (M.W.); (E.A.-R.B.)
| | - Erin Abu-Rish Blakeney
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; (M.W.); (E.A.-R.B.)
| | - Eilish McAuliffe
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin 4, Ireland; (A.D.B.); (E.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Silva JAM, Fernandes Agreli H, Harrison R, Peduzzi M, Mininel VA, Xyrichis A. Collective leadership to improve professional practice, healthcare outcomes, and staff well-being. Hippokratia 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Reema Harrison
- School of Population Health; University of New South Wales; Sydney Australia
| | - Marina Peduzzi
- Professional Orientation Department; University of Sao Paulo; Sao Paulo Brazil
| | | | - Andreas Xyrichis
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care; King's College London; London UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sarkies MN, Francis-Auton E, Long JC, Partington A, Pomare C, Nguyen HM, Wu W, Westbrook J, Day RO, Levesque JF, Mitchell R, Rapport F, Cutler H, Tran Y, Clay-Williams R, Watson DE, Arnolda G, Hibbert PD, Lystad R, Mumford V, Leipnik G, Sutherland K, Hardwick R, Braithwaite J. Implementing large-system, value-based healthcare initiatives: a realist study protocol for seven natural experiments. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e044049. [PMID: 33371049 PMCID: PMC7757496 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Value-based healthcare delivery models have emerged to address the unprecedented pressure on long-term health system performance and sustainability and to respond to the changing needs and expectations of patients. Implementing and scaling the benefits from these care delivery models to achieve large-system transformation are challenging and require consideration of complexity and context. Realist studies enable researchers to explore factors beyond 'what works' towards more nuanced understanding of 'what tends to work for whom under which circumstances'. This research proposes a realist study of the implementation approach for seven large-system, value-based healthcare initiatives in New South Wales, Australia, to elucidate how different implementation strategies and processes stimulate the uptake, adoption, fidelity and adherence of initiatives to achieve sustainable impacts across a variety of contexts. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This exploratory, sequential, mixed methods realist study followed RAMESES II (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) reporting standards for realist studies. Stage 1 will formulate initial programme theories from review of existing literature, analysis of programme documents and qualitative interviews with programme designers, implementation support staff and evaluators. Stage 2 envisages testing and refining these hypothesised programme theories through qualitative interviews with local hospital network staff running initiatives, and analyses of quantitative data from the programme evaluation, hospital administrative systems and an implementation outcome survey. Stage 3 proposes to produce generalisable middle-range theories by synthesising data from context-mechanism-outcome configurations across initiatives. Qualitative data will be analysed retroductively and quantitative data will be analysed to identify relationships between the implementation strategies and processes, and implementation and programme outcomes. Mixed methods triangulation will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval has been granted by Macquarie University (Project ID 23816) and Hunter New England (Project ID 2020/ETH02186) Human Research Ethics Committees. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals. Results will be fed back to partner organisations and roundtable discussions with other health jurisdictions will be held, to share learnings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell N Sarkies
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emilie Francis-Auton
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Janet C Long
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew Partington
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chiara Pomare
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hoa Mi Nguyen
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wendy Wu
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Johanna Westbrook
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard O Day
- Clinical Pharmacology, St Vincents Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
- Pharmacology, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jean-Frederic Levesque
- Bureau of Health Information, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rebecca Mitchell
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Frances Rapport
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Henry Cutler
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yvonne Tran
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robyn Clay-Williams
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Diane E Watson
- Bureau of Health Information, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gaston Arnolda
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter D Hibbert
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
- University of South Australia Division of Health Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Reidar Lystad
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Virginia Mumford
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| | - George Leipnik
- New South Wales Ministry of Health, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kim Sutherland
- New South Wales Agency for Clinical Innovation, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
De Brún A, Anjara S, Cunningham U, Khurshid Z, Macdonald S, O’Donovan R, Rogers L, McAuliffe E. The Collective Leadership for Safety Culture (Co-Lead) Team Intervention to Promote Teamwork and Patient Safety. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17228673. [PMID: 33266448 PMCID: PMC7700115 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17228673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Traditional hierarchical leadership has been implicated in patient safety failings internationally. Given that healthcare is almost wholly delivered by multidisciplinary teams, there have been calls for a more collective and team-based approach to the sharing of leadership and responsibility for patient safety. Although encouraging a collective approach to accountability can improve the provision of high quality and safe care, there is a lack of knowledge of how to train teams to adopt collective leadership. The Collective Leadership for Safety Cultures (Co-Lead) programme is a co-designed intervention for multidisciplinary healthcare teams. It is an open-source resource that offers teams a systematic approach to the development of collective leadership behaviours to promote effective teamworking and enhance patient safety cultures. This paper provides an overview of the co-design, pilot testing, and refining of this novel intervention prior to its implementation and discusses key early findings from the evaluation. The Co-Lead intervention is grounded in the real-world experiences and identified needs and priorities of frontline healthcare staff and management and was co-designed based on the evidence for collective leadership and teamwork in healthcare. It has proven feasible to implement and effective in supporting teams to lead collectively to enhance safety culture. This intervention overview will be of value to healthcare teams and practitioners seeking to promote safety culture and effective teamworking by supporting teams to lead collectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aoife De Brún
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education, and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland; (S.A.); (U.C.); (Z.K.); (S.M.); (R.O.); (L.R.); (E.M.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Sabrina Anjara
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education, and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland; (S.A.); (U.C.); (Z.K.); (S.M.); (R.O.); (L.R.); (E.M.)
| | - Una Cunningham
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education, and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland; (S.A.); (U.C.); (Z.K.); (S.M.); (R.O.); (L.R.); (E.M.)
- Transformation Office, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles St, Dublin 7, Ireland
| | - Zuneera Khurshid
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education, and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland; (S.A.); (U.C.); (Z.K.); (S.M.); (R.O.); (L.R.); (E.M.)
| | - Steve Macdonald
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education, and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland; (S.A.); (U.C.); (Z.K.); (S.M.); (R.O.); (L.R.); (E.M.)
- School of Medicine, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland
| | - Róisín O’Donovan
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education, and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland; (S.A.); (U.C.); (Z.K.); (S.M.); (R.O.); (L.R.); (E.M.)
| | - Lisa Rogers
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education, and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland; (S.A.); (U.C.); (Z.K.); (S.M.); (R.O.); (L.R.); (E.M.)
| | - Eilish McAuliffe
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education, and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland; (S.A.); (U.C.); (Z.K.); (S.M.); (R.O.); (L.R.); (E.M.)
| |
Collapse
|