1
|
Cross L, Banham D, Melendez-Torres GJ, Ford T, van Sluijs E, Liabo K. Developing inclusive public involvement and engagement activities with secondary school students and educational professionals: a protocol. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2024; 10:68. [PMID: 38951878 PMCID: PMC11218269 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-024-00581-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public involvement and engagement (PI&E) is increasingly recognised as an important component of research. It can offer valuable insights from those with experiential knowledge to improve research quality, relevance, and reach. Similarly, schools are ever more common sites for health research and, more recently, PI&E. However, 'gold-standard' practice is yet to be established, and activities/approaches remain underreported. As a result, knowledge can remain localised or lost. Diversity and inclusion also remains a challenge. METHODS This protocol has been informed by UK national guidance, evidence-based frameworks and available implementation literature. It describes both rationale and approach to conducting PI&E activities within a secondary school context. Activities are designed to be engaging, safe and accessible to young people with diverse experiences, with scope to be iteratively developed in line with public collaborator preference. DISCUSSION Young people should be architects of their involvement and engagement. Ongoing appraisal and transparency of approaches to PI&E in school settings is crucial. Expected challenges of implementing this protocol include facilitating a safe space for the discussion of sensitive topics, absence and attrition, recruiting students with a diverse range of experiences, and potential knowledge and capacity barriers of both facilitator and contributors. Activities to mitigate these risks are suggested and explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Cross
- University of Cambridge (MRC Epidemiology Unit), Cambridge, UK.
| | | | | | - Tamsin Ford
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Barrett M, Shaw S, Jenner S, Hardy-Johnson P, Stanescu S, Woods-Townsend K, Strommer S, Barker M. Creating meaningful knowledge exchange between young people and public health practitioners: what role can researchers play? Perspect Public Health 2024; 144:212-214. [PMID: 39108129 PMCID: PMC11308321 DOI: 10.1177/17579139241230852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- M Barrett
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- Centre for Food Policy, City, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK
| | - S Shaw
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - S Jenner
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - P Hardy-Johnson
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - S Stanescu
- Southampton City Council, Southampton, UK
| | - K Woods-Townsend
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- School of Healthcare Enterprise and Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - S Strommer
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - M Barker
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wijngaarde R, Koning M, Fijnvandraat K, Ubbink D. Shared decision-making between paediatric haematologists, children with sickle cell disease and their parents: an exploratory study. Eur J Pediatr 2024; 183:389-402. [PMID: 37906307 PMCID: PMC10857996 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-023-05280-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) face various healthcare choices to be made during the disease process that may impact their lives. Shared decision-making (SDM) could improve their health outcomes. We assessed if, and to what extent, paediatricians engage children with SCD and/or their parents in the decision-making process. In this observational cross-sectional study, paediatric SCD patients and their parents visiting the outpatient paediatrics clinic of a university hospital participated in a SDM baseline measurement. Two evaluators independently and objectively analysed the level of patient involvement in decision-making from the audio-recordings of the consultations using the OPTION-5 instrument, a 0-20-point scale from which scores are usually expressed as a percentage of ideal SDM. The level of SDM, as perceived by patients, parents and paediatricians, was appreciated using the SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc questionnaires, respectively. Scores could range from 0% (no SDM) to 100% (exemplary SDM). Twenty-four consultations in which a decision needed to be made about SCD treatment were audiotaped and analysed; six were from each paediatrician. The group consisted of 17 male and 7 female patients from various cultural backgrounds between 2 and 17 years old, with a mean age of 9.4 years (SD 4.2). Median OPTION-5 scores were 25.0% [IQR] 20.0-40.0%; range 0-55%). Median SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc scores were 56.7% (IQR 39.4-88.9%) and 68.9% (IQR 57.8-77.8%), respectively. CONCLUSION Although subjective scores of SDM were fair, the objectively scored level of SDM among children suffering from SCD leaves room for improvement. This may be realized by increasing knowledge about the benefits of SDM, child-centred SDM interventions and SDM-training for paediatricians that takes into account the complexity of intercultural challenges and risk communication between stakeholders. WHAT IS KNOWN • Children that suffer from sickle cell disease (SCD) are more vulnerable to factors that negatively impact the care that they receive as well as suboptimal health outcomes. • Shared decision-making (SDM) can help children participate in a collaborative decision-making process about their preferred treatment options and improve their health outcomes. WHAT IS NEW • The level of participation in the decision-making process for patients suffering from SCD and the families that they belong to leaves room for improvement. The impact of intercultural challenges and the quality and consistency of risk-communication between stakeholders in paediatric SDM needs further exploration. • Paediatricians are more confident about their ability to involve the child and parents compared to how children and their parents experience their level of involvement in a shared decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Wijngaarde
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Mijra Koning
- Alkmaar Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Wilhelminalaan 12, 1816 JD, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Fijnvandraat
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk Ubbink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Watson D, Barker M, Boua PR, Chatio S, Compaoré A, Danis M, Dalaba M, Erzse A, Hardy-Johnson P, Kehoe SH, Hofman KJ, Lawrence WT, Nonterah EA, Sorgho H, Rwafa-Ponela T, Ward KA, Tugendhaft A. What works in engaging communities? Prioritising nutrition interventions in Burkina Faso, Ghana and South Africa. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0294410. [PMID: 38091334 PMCID: PMC10718458 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND "Choosing All Together" (CHAT), is a community engagement tool designed to give the public a voice in how best to allocate limited resources to improve population health. This process evaluation explored the mechanisms through which CHAT generates community engagement. METHOD The CHAT tool was adapted and implemented for use in two rural communities (Nanoro, Burkina Faso, and Navrongo, Ghana) and one urban township (Soweto, South Africa) to prioritize maternal and child nutrition interventions. Community discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and translated into English. Twenty-two transcripts, including six each from Navrongo and Soweto and 10 from Nanoro, were analysed thematically to generate data driven codes and themes to explain mechanisms underlying the CHAT process. The process evaluation was based on the UK MRC process evaluation guidance. RESULTS Seven themes describing the functions and outcomes of CHAT were identified. Themes described participants deliberating trade-offs, working together, agreeing on priorities, having a shared vision, and increasing their knowledge, also the skills of the facilitator, and a process of power sharing between participants and researchers. Participants came to an agreement of priorities when they had a shared vision. Trained facilitators are important to facilitate meaningful discussion between participants and those with lower levels of literacy to participate fully. CONCLUSION CHAT has been shown to be adaptable and useful in prioritising maternal and child nutrition interventions in communities in Burkina Faso, Ghana, and South Africa. Conducting CHAT in communities over a longer period and involving policy-makers would increase trust, mutual respect and develop partnerships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniella Watson
- School of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- SAMRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Barker
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - P. Romuald Boua
- Clinical Research Unit of Nanoro, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Nanoro, Burkina Faso
| | - Samuel Chatio
- Navrongo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana
| | - Adelaide Compaoré
- Clinical Research Unit of Nanoro, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Nanoro, Burkina Faso
| | - Marion Danis
- Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Maxwell Dalaba
- Navrongo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana
- Institute of Heath Research, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - Agnes Erzse
- SAMRC/Wits Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science—PRICELESS SA, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Polly Hardy-Johnson
- School of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah H. Kehoe
- School of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Karen J. Hofman
- SAMRC/Wits Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science—PRICELESS SA, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Wendy T. Lawrence
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- Primary Care, Population Science and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Engelbert A. Nonterah
- Navrongo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana
- Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hermann Sorgho
- Clinical Research Unit of Nanoro, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Nanoro, Burkina Faso
| | - Teurai Rwafa-Ponela
- SAMRC/Wits Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science—PRICELESS SA, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Kate A. Ward
- School of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Aviva Tugendhaft
- SAMRC/Wits Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science—PRICELESS SA, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moolla A, Constance M, Ngcobo N, Mngadi S, Govathson C, Long L, Pascoe SJ. "I want one nurse who is friendly to talk to me properly like a friend": Learner preferences for HIV and contraceptive service provision in Gauteng, South Africa. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3725260. [PMID: 38168214 PMCID: PMC10760307 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3725260/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Background Research with adolescents indicates that youth aged 15-24 years, especially females, are at high risk for HIV infection. The overall HIV prevalence among youth in this age group was 6.2% estimated in 2022. In addition, > 800,000 adolescents are newly infected with HIV every year and 79% of these infections occur in sub-Saharan Africa. The health service provision preferences and needs of adolescents are critical to reaching this population. Methods This qualitative study was conducted with learners from three public secondary schools in Gauteng, South Africa. Using convenience sampling, 22 in-depth stakeholder interviews (KIIs) with stakeholders and 8 focus group discussions (FGDs) with 55 learners aged ≥ 15, were conducted between March and October 2018. Learners < 18 were given assent and parental consent forms, whilst those ≥ 18 could consent of their own accord. KIIs and FGDs were conducted in private venues in the preferred language by trained interviewers and audio-recorded. Audio files were transcribed verbatim and translated into English if needed. Data were analysed thematically using NVivo version 11. Results The findings from both stakeholders and learners indicate many critical accessibility barriers which include: negative healthcare staff attitudes from older judgemental staff; stigmatisation from healthcare workers, the community as well as family; a lack of private consulting spaces and no confidentiality of patient information at facilities; inconvenient clinic operating times; long queues and facility resource issues. Both groups of participants suggested that accessibility to healthcare could be improved through value-added services (including free Wi-Fi and food), social gatherings and educational information sessions, as well as being staffed by younger, friendlier, confidential and non-judgemental staff in a private healthcare setting. Conclusion It is clear that there are many critical barriers that deter learners from accessing HIV and contraceptive services. Provision of private rooms and trying to ensure information confidentiality for youth-friendly services at locations and times that can be easily accessed by learners is key. Greater emphasis on learner-parent-teacher communication around sexual health education at school is needed along with making this information being more readily available to learners.
Collapse
|
6
|
Kapeke K, Muse K, Rowan J, Saw P, White T, Ojinnaka-Psillakis A, Peries TD, Miranda NP, Ali S, Dau A, Taafua L, Nalupta C, Harvey M, Zorbas C. Who holds power in decision making for young people's future? Med J Aust 2023; 219 Suppl 10:S30-S34. [PMID: 37982337 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.52147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Khalid Muse
- Multicultural Youth Network, Victorian Multicultural Commission, Melbourne, VIC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Christina Zorbas
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Deakin University Institute for Health Transformation, Melbourne, VIC
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brown JA, Alalwan MA, Absie S, Korley ND, Parvanta CF, Meade CM, Best AL, Gwede CK, Ewing AP. Racial, Lifestyle, and Healthcare Contributors to Perceived Cancer Risk among Physically Active Adolescent and Young Adult Women Aged 18-39 Years. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:ijerph20095740. [PMID: 37174256 PMCID: PMC10177863 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20095740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
The cancer incidence among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) has significantly increased in recent years, but there is limited information about the factors that influence the perceived cancer risk among AYAs. A cross-sectional, web-based survey of 281 physically active Black and White AYA women was administered to assess the influences of demographic characteristics, family history of cancer, cancer risk factor knowledge, and lifestyle-related risk and protective behaviors on perceived cancer risk. Linear regression analyses were performed in SAS version 9.4. Self-reported Black race (β = -0.62, 95% CI: -1.07, -0.17) and routine doctor visits (β = -0.62, 95% CI: -1.18, -0.07) were related to a lower perceived cancer risk. Family history of cancer (β = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.13, 0.99), cancer risk factor knowledge (β = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.19), and current smoking status (β = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.20, 1.40) were related to a higher perceived cancer risk. Perceptions of cancer risk varied among this sample of physically active, AYA women. Lower perceptions of cancer risk among Black AYA women demonstrate a need for culturally tailored cancer educational information that presents objective data on lifetime cancer risk. Reportedly higher perceptions of cancer risk among AYA smokers presents an ideal opportunity to promote smoking cessation interventions. Future interventions to address cancer risk perception profiles among physically active, AYA women should tailor approaches that are inclusive of these unique characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordyn A Brown
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
- Division of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Mahmood A Alalwan
- Division of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Sumaya Absie
- Division of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Naa D Korley
- Division of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Claudia F Parvanta
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Cathy M Meade
- Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Alicia L Best
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Clement K Gwede
- Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Aldenise P Ewing
- Division of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|