1
|
Todd AL, Petrunoff N, Frommer M, Nutbeam D. The value of health service-based research to health service organisations: a qualitative study with senior health service executives. Health Res Policy Syst 2024; 22:65. [PMID: 38822374 PMCID: PMC11141057 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01149-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research evidence has demonstrably improved health care practices and patient outcomes. However, systemic translation of evidence into practice is far from optimal. The reasons are complex, but often because research is not well aligned with health service priorities. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences and perspectives of senior health service executives on two issues: (1) the alignment between local research activity and the needs and priorities of their health services, and (2) the extent to which research is or can be integrated as part of usual health care practice. METHODS In this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with senior health leaders from four large health service organisations that are members of Sydney Health Partners (SHP), one of Australia's nationally accredited research translation centres committed to accelerating the translation of research findings into evidence-based health care. The interviews were conducted between November 2022 and January 2023, and were either audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim or recorded in the interviewer field notes. A thematic analysis of the interview data was conducted by two researchers, using the framework method to identify common themes. RESULTS Seventeen health executives were interviewed, including chief executives, directors of medical services, nursing, allied health, research, and others in executive leadership roles. Responses to issue (1) included themes on re-balancing curiosity- and priority-driven research; providing more support for research activity within health organisations; and helping health professionals and researchers discuss researchable priorities. Responses to issue (2) included identification of elements considered essential for embedding research in health care; and the need to break down silos between research and health care, as well as within health organisations. CONCLUSIONS Health service leaders value research but want more research that aligns with their needs and priorities. Discussions with researchers about those priorities may need some facilitation. Making research a more integrated part of health care will require strong and broad executive leadership, resources and infrastructure, and investing in capacity- and capability-building across health clinicians, managers and executive staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela L Todd
- Sydney Health Partners, Level 2, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Nicholas Petrunoff
- The Sax Institute, Level 3/30C Wentworth St, Glebe, NSW, 2037, Australia
| | - Michael Frommer
- The Sax Institute, Level 3/30C Wentworth St, Glebe, NSW, 2037, Australia
| | - Don Nutbeam
- Sydney Health Partners, Level 2, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Khomsi K, Bouzghiba H, Mendyl A, Al-Delaimy AK, Dahri A, Saad-Hussein A, Balaw G, El Marouani I, Sekmoudi I, Adarbaz M, Khanjani N, Abbas N. Bridging research-policy gaps: An integrated approach. Environ Epidemiol 2024; 8:e281. [PMID: 38343738 PMCID: PMC10852389 DOI: 10.1097/ee9.0000000000000281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
It is often difficult for policymakers to make informed decisions without evidence-based support, resulting in potentially ineffective policies. The purpose of this article is to advocate for collaboration and communication between researchers and policymakers to enhance evidence-based policymaking. The workshop hosted by the International Society of Environmental Epidemiology-Eastern Mediterranean Chapter further explores the challenges of connecting researchers and policymakers. The article highlights the gap between researchers and policymakers, attributed to different visions and objectives, time constraints, and communication issues. To strengthen the research-policy interface, strategies such as enhanced communication skills and early involvement of policymakers in research are suggested. The article proposes an integrated model combining the Collaborative Knowledge Model and the policy entrepreneurship mindset, emphasizing the co-creation of knowledge and evidence-based policy solutions. The use of this model can lead to the development of evidence-based policies that effectively address societal needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenza Khomsi
- General Directorate of Meteorology, Morocco
- Mohammed VI University of Sciences and Health, Morocco
| | - Houria Bouzghiba
- Environmental Doctoral School, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Hungary
| | - Abderrahmane Mendyl
- Department of Meteorology, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary
| | | | - Amal Dahri
- Direction of Epidemiology and Disease Control, Ministry of Health Morocco
| | - Amal Saad-Hussein
- Environmental & Occupational Medicine Department, Environment and Climate Change Research Institute, National Research Centre, Egypt
| | - Ghada Balaw
- Jordan University of Sciences and Technology, Jordan
| | | | | | | | - Narges Khanjani
- Department of Medical Education, Paul Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Science Centre El Paso
| | - Nivine Abbas
- Public Health Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Balamand, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Barreto JOM, Romão DMM, Setti C, Machado MLT, Riera R, Gomes R, Machado DA, Abreu J, de Andrade KRC, Boeira LDS, Pozza L, Souza NM, Logullo P, Silva RB, de Oliveira SMDVL, Mota SEDC, Dias TS, Toma TS, da Silva SF. An evidence-informed policymaking (EIPM) competency profile for the Brazilian Health System developed through consensus: process and outcomes. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:105. [PMID: 37828575 PMCID: PMC10571264 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01052-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-informed policymaking (EIPM) requires a set of individual and organizational knowledge, skills and attitudes that should be articulated with background factors and needs. In this regard, the development of an EIPM competency profile is important to support the diagnosis, planning and implementation of EIPM. PURPOSE To present the process and outcomes of the development of an EIPM competency profile by an expert committee, to be applied in different contexts of the Brazilian Health System. METHODS A committee of experts in EIPM shared different views, experiences and opinions to develop an EIPM competency profile for Brazil. In six consensus workshops mediated by facilitators, the committee defined from macro problems to key actions and performances essential for the competency profile. The development steps consisted of: (1) Constitution of the committee, including researchers, professionals with practical experience, managers, and educators; (2) Development of a rapid review on EIPM competency profiles; (3) Agreement on commitments and responsibilities in the processes; (4) Identification and definition of macro problems relating to the scope of the competency profile; and (5) Outlining of general and specific capacities, to be incorporated into the competency profile, categorized by key actions. RESULTS The development of the EIPM competency profile was guided by the following macro problems: (1) lack of systematic and transparent decision-making processes in health policy management; (2) underdeveloped institutional capacity for knowledge management and translation; and (3) incipient use of scientific evidence in the formulation and implementation of health policies. A general framework of key actions and performances of the EIPM Competency Profile for Brazil was developed, including 42 specific and general key actions distributed by area of activity (Health Management, Scientific Research, Civil Society, Knowledge Translation, and Cross-sectional areas). CONCLUSIONS The competency profile presented in this article can be used in different contexts as a key tool for the institutionalization of EIPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Cecilia Setti
- Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Veredas Institute, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Rachel Riera
- Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Unifesp (Federal University of São Paulo), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Romeu Gomes
- Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- IFF/Fiocruz (National Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Patrícia Logullo
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine (CSM), Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Diseases (NDORMS), and UK EQUATOR Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fahim C, Courvoisier M, Somani N, De Matas F, Straus SE. Creation of a theoretically rooted workbook to support implementers in the practice of knowledge translation. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:99. [PMID: 37596659 PMCID: PMC10436469 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00480-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few training opportunities or resources for non-expert implementers focus on the "practice" as opposed to the "science" of knowledge translation (KT). As a guide for novice implementers, we present an open-access, fillable workbook combining KT theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) that are commonly used to support the implementation of evidence-based practices. We describe the process of creating and operationalizing our workbook. METHODS Our team has supported more than 1000 KT projects and 300 teams globally to implement evidence-based interventions. Our stakeholders have consistently highlighted their need for guidance on how to operationalize various KT TMFs to support novice implementers in "practising" KT. In direct response to these requests, we created a pragmatic, fillable KT workbook. The workbook was designed by KT scientists and experts in the fields of adult education, graphic design, and usability and was piloted with novice implementers. It is rooted in an integrated KT approach and applies an intersectionality lens, which prompts implementers to consider user needs in the design of implementation efforts. RESULTS The workbook is framed according to the knowledge-to-action model and operationalizes each stage of the model using appropriate theories or frameworks. This approach removes guesswork in selecting appropriate TMFs to support implementation efforts. Implementers are prompted to complete fillable worksheets that are informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, the Behaviour Change Wheel, the Effective Practice and Organization of Care framework, Proctor's operationalization framework, the Durlak and DuPre process indicators, and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. As they complete the worksheets, users are guided to apply theoretically rooted approaches in planning the implementation and evaluation of their evidence-based practice. CONCLUSIONS This workbook aims to support non-expert implementers to use KT TMFs to select and operationalize implementation strategies to facilitate the implementation of evidence-based practices. It provides an accessible option for novice implementers who wish to use KT methods to guide their work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Fahim
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, 30 Bond St., Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
| | - Melissa Courvoisier
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, 30 Bond St., Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Nadia Somani
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, 30 Bond St., Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada
- Grand Challenges Canada at the Sandra Rotman Centre, Unity Health Network, MaRS Centre, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada
| | - Fatiah De Matas
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, 30 Bond St., Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Sharon E Straus
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, 30 Bond St., Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Randhawa GK, Orach J, Black A, Chan V, Potter N, Brinkman J, Côté H, Worfolk L, Knight D, Leversage I, Tebbutt SJ. Design, delivery, and evaluation of a knowledge translation intervention for multi-stakeholders. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:85. [PMID: 37488655 PMCID: PMC10364428 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00465-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowledge translation (KT) is a key competency for trainees (graduate students and post-doctoral fellows), the new generation of researchers who must learn how to synthesize, disseminate, exchange, and ethically apply knowledge to improve patient and health system services, products, and outcomes. KT training is a key enabler to support KT competency development. Yet, there is a dearth of research on the design, delivery, and evaluation of KT training for trainees. METHODS The study applied a QUAN(qual) mixed methods approach with an embedded experimental model design. A heart and lung patient was also recruited to participate as a partner and researcher in the study. A multi-faceted KT intervention for trainees was designed, delivered, and evaluated. Data were collected using surveys and focus groups. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics in R Studio and MS Excel. Qualitative data were analyzed in NVivo using thematic analysis. RESULTS Participation in each KT intervention varied, with 8-42 participants attending KT webinars, 61 attendees in the Three Minute Thesis (3MT) Competition Heat, and 31 participants in the Patient & Public Forum. In total, 27 trainees and 4 faculty participated in at least one of the KT webinars. Trainee participants reported satisfaction, as well as statistically significant increases in 10/13 KT competencies after receiving one or more components of the KT intervention. Additionally, participating faculty, patients, and the public were satisfied with the intervention components they participated in. Several challenges and facilitators were also identified to improve the KT intervention. CONCLUSIONS The KT intervention is a promising initiative that can be adopted and adapted across various post-secondary settings to support trainees' competency development in KT. This evaluation demonstrates that trainees will respond to opportunities for KT training and that capacity for KT competencies can be advanced through a multi-faceted intervention that involves trainees, faculty, patients, and health system collaborators in its design and delivery. This evaluation study contributes the design and results of a novel KT intervention for multi-stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gurprit Kaur Randhawa
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
| | - Juma Orach
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Agnes Black
- Providence Health Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Vivienne Chan
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Naomi Potter
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Hélène Côté
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Larry Worfolk
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barreto JOM, Romão DMM, Setti C, Machado MLT, Riera R, Gomes R, da Silva SF. Competency profiles for evidence-informed policy-making (EIPM): a rapid review. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:16. [PMID: 36755283 PMCID: PMC9909856 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-00964-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-informed policy-making (EIPM) requires a set of individual and organizational capacities, linked with background factors and needs. The identification of essential knowledge, skills and attitudes for EIPM can support the development of competency profiles and their application in different contexts. PURPOSE To identify elements of competency (knowledge, skills and attitudes) for EIPM, according to different professional profiles (researcher, health professional, decision-maker and citizen). METHODS Rapid umbrella review. A structured search was conducted and later updated in two comprehensive repositories (BVSalud and PubMed). Review studies with distinctive designs were included, published from 2010 onwards, without language restrictions. Assessment of the methodological quality of the studies was not performed. A meta-aggregative narrative synthesis was used to report the findings. RESULTS Ten reviews were included. A total of 37 elements of competency were identified, eight were categorized as knowledge, 19 as skills and 10 as attitudes. These elements were aggregated into four competency profiles: researcher, health professional, decision-maker and citizen. The competency profiles included different sets of EIPM-related knowledge, skills and attitudes. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS This study is innovative because it aggregates different profiles of competency from a practical perspective, favouring the application of its results in different contexts to support EIPM. Methodological limitations are related to the shortcuts adopted in this review: complementary searches of the grey literature were not performed, and the study selection and data extraction were not conducted in duplicate. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: EIPM requires the development of individual and organizational capacities. This rapid review contributes to the discussion on the institutionalization of EIPM in health systems. The competency profiles presented here can support discussions about the availability of capacity and the need for its development in different contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto
- Hospital Sírio-Libanês (HSL), São Paulo, Brazil. .,Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Brasília, Brazil.
| | - Davi Mamblona Marques Romão
- grid.413471.40000 0000 9080 8521Hospital Sírio-Libanês (HSL), São Paulo, Brazil ,Instituto Veredas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Maria Lúcia Teixeira Machado
- grid.413471.40000 0000 9080 8521Hospital Sírio-Libanês (HSL), São Paulo, Brazil ,grid.411247.50000 0001 2163 588XUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rachel Riera
- grid.413471.40000 0000 9080 8521Hospital Sírio-Libanês (HSL), São Paulo, Brazil ,grid.411249.b0000 0001 0514 7202Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Romeu Gomes
- grid.413471.40000 0000 9080 8521Hospital Sírio-Libanês (HSL), São Paulo, Brazil ,grid.418068.30000 0001 0723 0931Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (IFF/Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abdullahi L, Hara H, Kahurani E, Kamthunzi V, Nthakomwa L, Oronje R, Madise N. EIDM training as a key intervention among researchers to enhance research uptake and policy engagement: an evaluation study. Wellcome Open Res 2023. [DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18018.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
In the past decade, the field of Evidence Informed Decision Making (EIDM) has been evolving faster than before. This shows a need for capacity enhancement amongst evidence producers and evidence users in EIDM training. Through the Enhance DELTAS programme, led by the African Institute for Development Policy (AFIDEP), we provided research uptake and policy engagement training, mentorship and webinars to awardees of the Developing Excellence in Leadership, Training and Science (DELTAS) Africa initiative, led by the African Academy of Sciences (AAS). Two workshops were offered to individual early career DELTAS researchers in policy engagement and evidence uptake, referred to as ENHD101, and among research leaders to enhance institutional capacity on policy engagement and evidence uptake, (ENHD102). Overall, over the eight months’ period of training, mentorship and webinars, the programme attracted 31 early career researchers and 20 research leaders. Following the programme, the early career researchers understood the importance of EIDM for better health policies and programmes. In addition, the team appreciated the complexities of the policymaking processes as they developed the policy engagement strategy for their research. The utilisation of the EIDM knowledge was reflected during the mentorship with policy briefs as end product. For research leaders, they appreciated their role in strengthening capacity for EIDM in decision-making spaces. Although during the programme none of the research leaders participated in strengthening capacity for EIDM, the team anticipated improving in the area in the long run. In addition, the research leaders developed and implemented institutional strategies for policy engagement and research uptake through use of social media to influence policymakers. In conclusion, the project supported capacity building of African researchers in EIDM. It was evident that enhancing knowledge and skills on EIDM through an integrated approach to include training, mentorship, and webinars demonstrated enhanced capacity for policy engagement and evidence uptake.
Collapse
|
8
|
Wende ME, Wilcox S, Rhodes Z, Kinnard D, Turner-McGrievy G, McKeever BW, Kaczynski AT. Developing criteria for research translation decision-making in community settings: a systematic review and thematic analysis informed by the Knowledge to Action Framework and community input. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:76. [PMID: 35850778 PMCID: PMC9290208 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00316-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is a pressing need to translate empirically supported interventions, products, and policies into practice to prevent and control prevalent chronic diseases. According to the Knowledge to Action (K2A) Framework, only those interventions deemed “ready” for translation are likely to be disseminated, adopted, implemented, and ultimately institutionalized. Yet, this pivotal step has not received adequate study. The purpose of this paper was to create a list of criteria that can be used by researchers, in collaboration with community partners, to help evaluate intervention readiness for translation into community and/or organizational settings. Methods The identification and selection of criteria involved reviewing the K2A Framework questions from the “decision to translate” stage, conducting a systematic review to identify characteristics important for research translation in community settings, using thematic analysis to select unique research translation decision criteria, and incorporating researcher and community advisory board feedback. Results The review identified 46 published articles that described potential criteria to decide if an intervention appears ready for translation into community settings. In total, 17 unique research translation decision criteria were identified. Of the 8 themes from the K2A Framework that were used to inform the thematic analysis, all 8 were included in the final criteria list after research supported their importance for research translation decision-making. Overall, the criteria identified through our review highlighted the importance of an intervention’s public health, cultural, and community relevance. Not only are intervention characteristics (e.g., evidence base, comparative effectiveness, acceptability, adaptability, sustainability, cost) necessary to consider when contemplating introducing an intervention to the “real world,” it is also important to consider characteristics of the target setting and/or population (e.g., presence of supporting structure, support or buy-in, changing sociopolitical landscape). Conclusions Our research translation decision criteria provide a holistic list for identifying important barriers and facilitators for research translation that should be considered before introducing an empirically supported intervention into community settings. These criteria can be used for research translation decision-making on the individual and organizational level to ensure resources are not wasted on interventions that cannot be effectively translated in community settings to yield desired outcomes.
Collapse
|
9
|
Brinckley MM, Bourke S, Watkin Lui F, Lovett R. Knowledge translation in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander research contexts in Australia: scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e060311. [PMID: 35840302 PMCID: PMC9295646 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Knowledge translation (KT) involves bridging the gaps between research knowledge and research application or practice, by sharing this knowledge with knowledge-users. KT is increasingly being used in research with Indigenous peoples globally to address the top-down and inappropriate research approaches commonly used in Indigenous research. Employing KT in Indigenous research in Australia is an emergent field, despite Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples having conducted KT for generations.There is limited evidence which demonstrates how KT is applied in the Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander context. Results will benefit researchers by demonstrating ways of appropriately translating research findings to knowledge-users, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, researchers and policy makers. The scoping review will also inform a KT definition, method and practices used in a large-scale, longitudinal cohort study of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults: the Mayi Kuwayu Study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Under guidance of an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander governance committee, we will conduct a scoping review on KT in Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander research. We will follow the scoping review method outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute. We will search the ANU SuperSearch, and grey and hard to find literature in June 2022. Abstracts and full-text articles will be screened by two independent reviewers. We will include studies that relate to KT in Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander research, regardless of the research topic. Results will be used to inform the KT definition, method and practices that can be used in Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander research contexts in Australia. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Mayi Kuwayu Study has ethics approvals from the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, 12 Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander organisations, and the Australian National University Human Research Ethics Committee. Results will be disseminated through peer-review publication and community workshops. Protocol registration is available online (10.17605/OSF.IO/JMFQ3).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makayla-May Brinckley
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, ACTON, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Sarah Bourke
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, ACTON, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Felecia Watkin Lui
- Indigenous Education and Research Centre, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Raymond Lovett
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, ACTON, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chapman E, Pantoja T, Kuchenmüller T, Sharma T, Terry RF. Assessing the impact of knowledge communication and dissemination strategies targeted at health policy-makers and managers: an overview of systematic reviews. Health Res Policy Syst 2021; 19:140. [PMID: 34865640 PMCID: PMC8645346 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-021-00780-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The use of research evidence as an input for health decision-making is a need for most health systems. There are a number of approaches for promoting evidence use at different levels of the health system, but knowledge of their effectiveness is still scarce. The objective of this overview was to evaluate the effectiveness of knowledge communication and dissemination interventions, strategies or approaches targeting policy-makers and health managers. Methods This overview of systematic reviews used systematic review methods and was conducted according to a predefined and published protocol. A comprehensive electronic search of 13 databases and a manual search in four websites were conducted. Both published and unpublished reviews in English, Spanish or Portuguese were included. A narrative synthesis was undertaken, and effectiveness statements were developed, informed by the evidence identified. Results We included 27 systematic reviews. Three studies included only a communication strategy, while eight only included dissemination strategies, and the remaining 16 included both. None of the selected reviews provided “sufficient evidence” for any of the strategies, while four provided some evidence for three communication and four dissemination strategies. Regarding communication strategies, the use of tailored and targeted messages seemed to successfully lead to changes in the decision-making practices of the target audience. Regarding dissemination strategies, interventions that aimed at improving only the reach of evidence did not have an impact on its use in decisions, while interventions aimed at enhancing users’ ability to use and apply evidence had a positive effect on decision-making processes. Multifaceted dissemination strategies also demonstrated the potential for changing knowledge about evidence but not its implementation in decision-making. Conclusions There is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions targeting health managers and policy-makers, as well as the mechanisms required for achieving impact. More studies are needed that are informed by theoretical frameworks or specific tools and using robust methods, standardized outcome measures and clear descriptions of the interventions. We found that passive communication increased access to evidence but had no effect on uptake. Some evidence indicated that the use of targeted messages, knowledge-brokering and user training was effective in promoting evidence use by managers and policy-makers. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-021-00780-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tomas Pantoja
- Family Medicine Department, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Tanja Kuchenmüller
- Evidence to Policy and Impact, Research for Health - Science Division - World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Robert F Terry
- Manager Research Policy, The Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Laur C, Corrado AM, Grimshaw JM, Ivers N. Trialists perspectives on sustaining, spreading, and scaling-up of quality improvement interventions. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:35. [PMID: 33795027 PMCID: PMC8017766 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00137-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality improvement (QI) evaluations rarely consider how a successful intervention can be sustained long term, nor how to spread or scale to other locations. A survey of authors of randomized trials of diabetes QI interventions included in an ongoing systematic review found that 78% of trials reported improved quality of care, but 40% of these trials were not sustained. This study explores why and how the effective interventions were sustained, spread, or scaled. METHODS A qualitative approach was used, focusing on case examples. Diabetes QI program trial authors were purposefully sampled and recruited for telephone interviews. Authors were eligible if they had completed the author survey, agreed to follow-up, and had a completed a diabetes QI trial they deemed "effective." Snowball sampling was used if the participant identified someone who could provide a different perspective on the same trial. Interviews were transcribed verbatim. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted to identify barriers and facilitators to sustainability, spread, and/or scale of the QI program, using case examples to show trajectories across projects and people. RESULTS Eleven of 44 eligible trialists participated in an interview. Four reported that the intervention was "sustained" and nine were "spread," however, interviews highlighted that these terms were interpreted differently over time and between participants. Participant stories highlighted the varied trajectories of how projects evolved and how some research careers adapted to increase impact. Three interacting themes, termed the "3C's," helped explain the variation in sustainability, spread, and scale: (i) understanding the concepts of implementation, sustainability, sustainment, spread, and scale; (ii) having the appropriate competencies; and (iii) the need for individual, organizational, and system capacity. CONCLUSIONS Challenges in defining sustainability, spread and scale make it difficult to fully understand impact. However, it is clear that from the beginning of intervention design, trialists need to understand the concepts and have the competency and capacity to plan for feasible and sustainable interventions that have potential to be sustained, spread and/or scaled if found to be effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celia Laur
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, and Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Ann Marie Corrado
- The Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jeremy M Grimshaw
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Noah Ivers
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, and Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ghahfarokhi RJ, Alavi M, Soleymani MR. Developing a program to enhance health professionals' readiness to evidence utilization in diabetes care: A mixed-methods protocol study. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION 2021; 10:36. [PMID: 33688545 PMCID: PMC7933619 DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_821_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Diabetes is one of the most common metabolic disorders in the world and because of high prevalence and incidence rate, it is a serious challenge posed to the health system in Iran. Despite extensive knowledge of the desirable care for these patients, evidence suggests that the quality of care provided to these patients is not desirable. OBJECTIVE The aim is to develop a training program to enhance the preparation of health professionals for evidence utilization in providing comprehensive health cares to patients with diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is an exploratory mixed-method study using consecutive qualitative-quantitative methods that will be conducted in three phases using the approach proposed by Werner and DeSimone to design the program. In the first phase, a qualitative study will be conducted for context assessment and identification of the requirements to enhance evidence utilization taking into account the overall knowledge translation process using semi-structured interviews with policymakers and health professionals. In the second phase, a training program will be designed based on the data extracted from the first phase, experts' opinions, and review of the literature. In the third phase, the training program will be implemented, and its effectiveness on the readiness of multidisciplinary health professionals for evidence utilization will be evaluated. CONCLUSION The results of this study will provide a better understanding of how to identify and incorporate contextual factors and the real needs of health-care professionals and develop a program tailored to improving their readiness to use evidence. It can subsequently lead to providing quality care to patients with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mousa Alavi
- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Mohammad Reza Soleymani
- Health Information Technology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Malavia TA, Nimgaonkar V, Bhatia T, Ibrahim IMA, Mansour H, Wesesky M, Wood J, Deshpande SN, Hawk M. Outcomes from Indo-United States-Egypt tri-national psychiatric research training programmes. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:82. [PMID: 32680525 PMCID: PMC7368677 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00595-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of mental health disorders is increasing globally. Countries in South Asia, Southeast Asia and the Middle East regions carry high burdens of mental health need; however, there are relatively few mental health research publications from this region, suggesting inadequate research funds and a paucity of qualified research personnel. To increase and strengthen the pool of mental health researchers in India and Egypt, we conducted three psychiatric research programmes in these countries: the Training Program for Psychiatric Genetics in India (2002-2011), the Tri-National Training Program for Psychiatric Genetics (2009-2014) and the Cross-Fertilized Research Training for New Investigators in Egypt and India (2014-2019). A total of 66 trainees, including psychiatrists, psychiatric social workers, clinical psychologists and research psychologists, were supported in research development, which included didactic training, proposal development, hands-on research and manuscript preparation. METHODS The aim of this study is to evaluate these three training programmes using the four-level Kirkpatrick Model of Training Evaluation that assesses reaction, learning, behaviour and outcomes. A descriptive analysis was used to explore the data collected throughout the duration of the three training programmes. Online surveys were crafted and sent to the mentors and trainees of the three programmes to supplement objective training data. RESULTS In addition to positive changes in the areas of reaction, learning and behaviour, significant outcomes were demonstrated. As of the writing of this manuscript, the trainees published a total of 130 papers, 59 as first author. In addition, 26 trainees have co-authored papers with one or more trainees or mentors, which demonstrates successful research networking and collaboration. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that our training approach is a successful model for building independent mental health researchers. This is a critical step in the development of effective mental health interventions in low- and middle-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tulsi A. Malavia
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
| | - Vishwajit Nimgaonkar
- Psychiatry and Human Genetics, Program for Genetics and Psychosis, School of Medicine and Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Triptish Bhatia
- Indo-US Projects, Department of Psychiatry, Centre of Excellence in Mental Health, ABVIMS - Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Road, New Delhi, 110001 India
| | | | - Hader Mansour
- Addiction Medicine Services Inpatient Unit, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Maribeth Wesesky
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
| | - Joel Wood
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
| | - Smita N. Deshpande
- Department of Psychiatry, Centre of Excellence in Mental Health, ABVIMS - Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Road, New Delhi, 110001 India
| | - Mary Hawk
- University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, 6120 Public Health, 130 DeSoto Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Provvidenza C, Townley A, Wincentak J, Peacocke S, Kingsnorth S. Building knowledge translation competency in a community-based hospital: a practice-informed curriculum for healthcare providers, researchers, and leadership. Implement Sci 2020; 15:54. [PMID: 32620129 PMCID: PMC7333339 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-01013-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enacting knowledge translation (KT) in healthcare settings is a complex process that requires organizational facilitation. In addition to addressing organizational-level barriers, targeting individual-level factors such as KT competencies are a necessary component of this aim. While literature on KT competency training is rapidly growing, there has been little exploration of the potential benefits of training initiatives delivered from an intra-organizational perspective. Addressing this gap, we developed the Knowledge Translation Facilitator Network (KTFN) to meet the KT needs of individuals expected to use and produce knowledge (e.g., healthcare providers, research staff, managers, family advisors) within an academic health sciences center. The aim of this study is to describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of the KTFN curriculum. METHODS An educational framework was used to guide creation of the KTFN curriculum. Stakeholder interviews, a literature review of KT competency, and environmental scan of capacity building initiatives plus adult learning principles were combined with in-house experience of KT practitioners to inform content and delivery. An evaluation strategy consisting of pre/post-test curriculum and post-session satisfaction surveys, as well as post-curriculum interviews assessed impact on participant knowledge and skills and captured perceived value of KFTN. RESULTS The curriculum has been delivered three times over 3 years, with 30 individuals trained, representing healthcare providers, graduate level research trainees, managers, and family advisors. Using the New World Kirkpatrick Model as an analysis framework, we found that the KTFN curriculum was highly valued and shifted learners' perceptions of KT. Participants identified enhanced knowledge and skills that could be applied to different facets of their work; increased confidence in their ability to execute KT tasks; and intention to use the content in future projects. Barriers to future use included time to plan and conduct KT activities. CONCLUSION KTFN was developed to enhance KT competency among organizational members. This initiative shows promise as a highly valued training program that meets both individual and organizational KT needs and speaks to the importance of investing in tailored KT competency initiatives as an essential building block to support moving evidence into practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Provvidenza
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, 150 Kilgour Road, Toronto, ON M4G 1R8 Canada
| | - Ashleigh Townley
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, 150 Kilgour Road, Toronto, ON M4G 1R8 Canada
| | - Joanne Wincentak
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, 150 Kilgour Road, Toronto, ON M4G 1R8 Canada
| | - Sean Peacocke
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, 150 Kilgour Road, Toronto, ON M4G 1R8 Canada
| | - Shauna Kingsnorth
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, 150 Kilgour Road, Toronto, ON M4G 1R8 Canada
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, 150 Kilgour Road, Toronto, ON M4G 1R8 Canada
| |
Collapse
|