Revisiting Research Safety Protocols: The Urgency for Alternatives to Law Enforcement in Crisis Intervention

Research safety protocols are ubiquitous in mental health research involving human subjects and have the potential to harm research participants from racial-ethnic minority populations. For mental health emergencies, such protocols commonly rely on law enforcement for crisis intervention. The authors review inequities experienced by individuals with mental illness in law enforcement encounters, especially Black, Latinx, and other minoritized populations. They then describe the development of a research safety protocol that uses community-based crisis intervention programs as alternatives to law enforcement and provide a roadmap for researchers and institutional review boards to revisit and revise their human subjects safety protocols.

The use of key social determinants of health variables in psychiatric research using routinely collected health data: a systematic analysis

PURPOSE

Social determinants of health (SDoH) impact psychiatric conditions. Routinely collected health data are frequently used to evaluate important psychiatric clinical and health services outcomes. This study explored how key SDoH are used in psychiatric research employing routinely collected health data.

METHODS

A search was conducted in PubMed for English-language articles published in 2019 that used routinely collected health data to study psychiatric conditions. Studies (n = 19,513) were randomly ordered for title/abstract review; the first 150 meeting criteria progressed to full-text review. Three key SDoH categories were assessed: (1) gender and sex, (2) race and ethnicity, and (3) socioeconomic status. Within each category, data were extracted on how variables were included, defined, and used in study design and analysis.

RESULTS

All studies (n = 103) reported on at least one of the key SDoH variables; 102 (99.0%) studies included a gender and/or sex variable, 30 (29.1%) included a race and/or ethnicity variable, and 55 (53.4%) included a socioeconomic status variable. No studies explicitly differentiated between gender and sex, and SDoH were often defined only as binary variables. SDoH were used to define the target population in 14 (13.6%) studies. Within analysis, SDoH were most often included as confounders (n = 65, 63.1%), exposures or predictors (n = 23, 22.3%), and effect modifiers (n = 14, 13.6%). Only 21 studies (20.4%) disaggregated results by SDoH and 7 (6.8%) considered intersections between SDoH.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest improvements are needed in how key SDoH are used in routinely collected health data-based psychiatric research, to ensure relevance to diverse populations and improve equity-oriented research.

Experience of Inpatient Mental Health Care Assessed With Service User-Developed and Conventional Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to examine and compare the psychometric properties of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) generated with patients’ input (Views on Inpatient Care [VOICE]) and a PROM conventionally generated without patients’ input (Service Satisfaction Scale: Residential Services Evaluation [SSS-Res]) for assessing a patient’s perception of psychiatric ward care.

METHODS

In a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial conducted in the United Kingdom, 1,058 participants admitted to 16 wards reported on their perceptions of care via VOICE and SSS-Res before or up to 2 years after the staff training. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to investigate the structure of the PROMs and to assess reliability and convergent validity as well as sensitivity to change; the analyses also considered whether study participants had been admitted voluntarily to the ward.

RESULTS

Two factors emerged from VOICE, labeled “trust” and “involvement,” and from SSS-Res, labeled “environment” and “care,” at baseline. All subscales had high internal consistency and good convergent validity. An ability to detect change in care due to the staff training was observed on the trust subscale of VOICE (N=1,058, mean difference=−0.25, 95% CI=−0.48 to −0.02), but no change was detected on any of the SSS-Res subscales. Patients admitted involuntarily benefited the most from the staff training.

CONCLUSIONS

VOICE captured patients’ perceptions of ward care better than SSS-Res and was sensitive to changes in aspects of trust, suggesting that participatory approaches for developing PROMs improve patients’ self-reports on the care they received.

Hearing Loss Among People With Schizophrenia: Implications for Clinical Practice

OBJECTIVE

The authors characterized hearing loss among individuals diagnosed as having schizophrenia to inform provision of routine behavioral health services to this population.

METHODS

Audiometry data collected between October 2019 and December 2021 from 84 community-dwelling adults with schizophrenia and 81 age-matched participants without the condition were analyzed. Rates of hearing loss were identified within groups and across age decades (20-50 years). Hearing threshold and rates of hearing loss were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Participants with schizophrenia had significantly higher mean hearing thresholds (p=0.006), indicating worse hearing. This difference remained significant after controlling for age (p=0.01). A significantly larger proportion of participants with schizophrenia had mild hearing loss (24%) compared with age-matched participants (6%) (p=0.002), with higher rates of mild hearing loss observed across all ages.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening for and detection of hearing loss among adults with schizophrenia may be an unmet need. Hearing loss is a treatable source of cognitive and psychosocial disability, warranting scalable assessment and intervention practices.

Taking an Evidence-Based Approach to Involuntary Psychiatric Hospitalization

The field of psychiatry has placed a growing emphasis on research-based diagnostic and treatment practices related to mental illness. Involuntary hospitalization is a controversial and potentially lifesaving intervention in psychiatric care; yet, to what degree is this practice evidence based? This Open Forum examines the ethical and logistical limitations to traditional research, such as randomized controlled trials and observational studies, surrounding involuntary psychiatric hospitalization. Given recent efforts across the United States to expand the use of involuntary hospitalization, the authors call for systematic data collection to monitor, study, and guide the use of this intervention.

Developing an International Standard Set of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Psychotic Disorders

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this project was to develop a set of patient-reported outcome measures for adolescents and adults who meet criteria for a psychotic disorder.

METHODS

A research team and an international consensus working group, including service users, clinicians, and researchers, worked together in an iterative process by using a modified Delphi consensus technique that included videoconferencing calls, online surveys, and focus groups. The research team conducted systematic literature searches to identify outcomes, outcome measures, and risk adjustment factors. After identifying outcomes important to service users, the consensus working group selected outcome measures, risk adjustment factors, and the final set of outcome measures. International stakeholder groups consisting of >100 professionals and service users reviewed and commented on the final set.

RESULTS

The consensus working group identified four outcome domains: symptoms, recovery, functioning, and treatment. The domains encompassed 14 outcomes of importance to service users. The research team identified 131 measures from the literature. The consensus working group selected nine measures in an outcome set that takes approximately 35 minutes to complete.

CONCLUSIONS

A set of patient-reported outcome measures for use in routine clinical practice was identified. The set is free to service users, is available in at least two languages, and reflects outcomes important to users. Clinicians can use the set to improve clinical decision making, and administrators and researchers can use it to learn from comparing program outcomes.

Representation of sexual and gender minorities in psychiatric research

Representation of people who identify as members of sexual and gender minority (SGM) groups is lacking in psychiatric research. Few researchers openly identify as members of an SGM group, and those who do continue to face career obstacles. Separately, in the context of psychiatric research studies, little attention has been paid to how participants' SGM identities might intersect with other factors to influence each individual's experience of mental illness. In this brief commentary, we summarize these and related issues, then offer suggestions for how institutions, professional societies, labs, and individuals might help to improve SGM representation in psychiatric research.

Practical Research Ethics in Psychiatric Clinical Trials: A Guide for Investigators

The conduct of clinical psychiatric research is critical to advance the science and efficacy of treatment while also safeguarding the interests of participants. This article emerges from the authors' experience, providing practical guidance to colleagues seeking input on how to design and implement clinical research protocols in accordance with key ethical considerations. Thus, the intent of this article is to provide (1) an overview of common ethical considerations when conducting psychiatric clinical research along with (2) practical advice for preparing Institutional Review Board applications and associated materials in the ethical conduct of psychiatric clinical research.

Outcomes from Indo-United States-Egypt tri-national psychiatric research training programmes

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of mental health disorders is increasing globally. Countries in South Asia, Southeast Asia and the Middle East regions carry high burdens of mental health need; however, there are relatively few mental health research publications from this region, suggesting inadequate research funds and a paucity of qualified research personnel. To increase and strengthen the pool of mental health researchers in India and Egypt, we conducted three psychiatric research programmes in these countries: the Training Program for Psychiatric Genetics in India (2002-2011), the Tri-National Training Program for Psychiatric Genetics (2009-2014) and the Cross-Fertilized Research Training for New Investigators in Egypt and India (2014-2019). A total of 66 trainees, including psychiatrists, psychiatric social workers, clinical psychologists and research psychologists, were supported in research development, which included didactic training, proposal development, hands-on research and manuscript preparation.

METHODS

The aim of this study is to evaluate these three training programmes using the four-level Kirkpatrick Model of Training Evaluation that assesses reaction, learning, behaviour and outcomes. A descriptive analysis was used to explore the data collected throughout the duration of the three training programmes. Online surveys were crafted and sent to the mentors and trainees of the three programmes to supplement objective training data.

RESULTS

In addition to positive changes in the areas of reaction, learning and behaviour, significant outcomes were demonstrated. As of the writing of this manuscript, the trainees published a total of 130 papers, 59 as first author. In addition, 26 trainees have co-authored papers with one or more trainees or mentors, which demonstrates successful research networking and collaboration.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that our training approach is a successful model for building independent mental health researchers. This is a critical step in the development of effective mental health interventions in low- and middle-income countries.

Nutrition and immunology in mental health: Precision medicine and integrative approaches to address unmet clinical needs in psychiatric treatments

The 'monoamine hypothesis' is insufficient in approaching the aetiology of psychiatric disorders or in developing novel therapies. Accumulating evidence suggests that inflammatory regulation plays an important role in pathophysiology and therapeutic mechanism across the major psychiatric disorders. "Inflammation theory" might not be the full answer for the big picture of mental disorders, but it might explain high occurrence of somatic symptoms and comorbidity of physical illness in certain subtypes of the heterogeneous groups. Due to the complexity of clinical manifestations and bio-psycho-social etiology, each single treatment shows only small effectiveness with limited effect sizes when compared with placebo. Unfortunately, clinicians are still struggling with trial-and-error practice without any reliable clinical or biological markers to predict therapeutic responses. Therefore, it is important to open up our minds to integrative approaches such dietary modification and nutraceutical prescription. In this special issue, we included 15 papers discussing the role of nutrition (blueberries, omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, melatonergic agonist, S-Adenosyl-L-Methionine, Cannabidiol and Kratom) in the context of immunoregulation across different psychiatric disorders from depression, bipolar disorders, and schizophrenia to alcohol-induced dementia and anorexia nervosa. Moreover, we also included research in perinatal depression that highlight the role of estradiol and the component of breast milk and the association with the neurodevelopment of the offspring. In addition, several articles focused on the role of microbiota in mental health and pain as recent research has pointed to the gut-brain axis as a main regulator of brain, behaviour and immunity. Lastly, inflammatory mechanisms underlying psychiatric disorders including alcohol induced dementia and anorexia nervosa are also highlighted in the special issue.

Characteristics of mental health trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry was established in 2000 to address concerns about publication bias and public access to information about clinical trials. We aimed to evaluate differences between for-profit and non-profit sponsors of efficacy mental health trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on key trial characteristics that relate to data integrity. We also sought to evaluate whether the registry is fulfilling its purpose as a means of promoting transparency between researchers and the public by providing complete and quality information about the trials it contains. We found that trials tend to be small, use a placebo instead of an active comparator, and employ randomization and blinding. We discuss the implications of these design characteristics and the limitations of the registry.

Indian psychiatry, research and Asian countries

Asia has some of the largest conglomerations of human populations and also the fastest growing economies of the world. About 23% of the world's population lives in the South Asian region, and one-fifth of psychiatrically ill patients in the world live in this part of the world. Despite vast cultural, religious, geographical, and political diversities, the factors influencing mental health remain the same throughout this wide region, as highlighted at the recently concluded Asian summit, where the slogan, 'One vision, one identity, one community,' was launched. Thus, the need to strengthen regional cooperation in the field of mental health has always been felt. This article highlights facts about influence of Indian Psychiatry research as well as of some Asian countries in the world psychiatry and vice versa.

Innovations in clinical research design and conduct in psychiatry: shifting to pragmatic approaches

The classically structured clinical trial does not offer enough flexibility to make use of continuously emerging knowledge that is generated as the trial progresses. In this regard, there are consistent issues impeding effective psychiatric research, including limitations in efficiency, difficulty demonstrating significant differences between treatment arms, poor external validity, and ethical constraints. For example, research in the field of psychiatry shows that it is growing increasingly more challenging to demonstrate superiority of interventions to placebo in part related to the increasing placebo response rates. Various design innovations and other tricks of the trade have surfaced to improve sensitivity towards detecting drug-placebo differences and reduce sources of bias in psychiatric research. Diverse strategies have been developed to address these obstacles and improve the outcomes of clinical research in psychiatry. The current review highlights many of these innovations and describes examples of their practical use, mainly focusing on the study design and conduct perspectives. In the study design issues, adaptive, equipoise stratified, sequential parallel and effectiveness design will be explored. The proper strategies for pragmatic and ethical conduction of clinical trials will be also discussed in-depth.

The wind of change in psychiatric publications

It is getting more difficult to get papers published that it used to be, even though many more journals are available. This article is written mainly for young researchers who are ambitious to get their research published in the best possible journals. A systematic strategic policy is suggested that does not necessarily contradict the aims of achieving the best possible science.

What shall we do about our concern with the most recent in psychiatric research?

Most clinicians and researchers are concerned with recent advances in psychiatry. This involves the danger whether something time-tested may get sidelined for extra-scientific reasons. That the pharmaceutical industry and superspecialist researcher may keep churning out new findings to impress audiences is only a partial truth. Research progresses by refutation and self-correction. Acceptance in science is always provisional; changing paradigms, frameworks of enquiry and raising new questions is integral to break through in scientific knowledge. Hence, there is in science a constant concern with the new. Moreover, the number of treatment non- responders to the time-tested swells with time, and researchers feel challenged to find ways and means of resolving their difficulties. Newer challenges need newer strategies. Obsession with the most recent can lead us astray, but a healthy evidence-based acceptance of the new is essential for advancement in psychiatric research. As indeed of research in all fields of medicine. And of science in general. The role of lithium and newer mood stabilizers in bipolar disorders are taken as examples to highlight this point.