1
|
Purdy GM, Nanad R, Ternes L, Dolgoy ND, Sellar CM, Francis G, Crisp N, Pituskin E, de Guzman Wilding M, Perry S, Sandhu I, Venner CP, McNeely ML. Exercise Preferences, Barriers, and Facilitators of Individuals With Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy Before Stem Cell Transplantation: A Mixed-Methods Study. Cancer Nurs 2024; 47:E287-E297. [PMID: 37058603 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exercise can help mitigate side effects of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), particularly when initiated before HSCT. However, the exercise-related barriers, facilitators, and preferences of this population remain unclear. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore the patient experience to inform future implementation of a prehabilitation intervention. INTERVENTIONS/METHODS A 2-phase sequential explanatory mixed-methods study was conducted using (1) cross-sectional survey and (2) focus groups. Survey questions aligned with the Theoretical Domains Framework. Focus group data were analyzed using a directed content analysis approach, followed by inductive thematic analysis to generate themes that represented the exercise-related barriers, facilitators, and preferences of participants. RESULTS Twenty-six participants completed phase 1 (n = 22 with multiple myeloma). Fifty percent of participants (n = 13) were fairly/very confident in their ability to exercise pre-HSCT. Eleven participants completed phase 2. Exercise barriers included knowledge/skill limitations, inadequate healthcare provider support, and the emotional toll of treatment. Facilitators included social support and goals. Exercise preferences were related to 2 themes: (1) program structure (subthemes: prescription and scheduling, mode of delivery) and (2) support (subthemes: support from personnel, tailoring, and education). CONCLUSION Key exercise-related barriers included knowledge limitations, disease/treatment effects, and inadequate support. Prehabilitation should be tailored, flexible, and include education and a virtual or hybrid delivery model in this population. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Nurses are well positioned to identify functional limitations and counsel and refer patients to exercise programming and/or physiotherapy services. Including an exercise professional in the pretransplant care team would provide key supportive care assistance for the nursing team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graeme M Purdy
- Author Affiliations: Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine (Mr Purdy, Mrs Nanad, Mrs Ternes, and Drs Dolgoy, Sellar, and McNeely), and Faculty of Nursing (Dr Pituskin), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta (Drs Francis and Perry); Cross Cancer Institute, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta (Mrs Crisp); Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta (Drs Pituskin, Sandhu, and Venner); Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (Mrs de Guzman Wilding and Drs Perry and McNeely)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Travis E, Kerrison RS, O'Connor DB, Ashley L. Barriers and facilitators to colonoscopy for cancer detection: patient and practitioner perspectives. Psychol Health 2024; 39:1263-1283. [PMID: 36373225 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2022.2141241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To further understand the barriers and facilitators to attending colonoscopy examination following a positive routinely offered stool test result, from the perspective of patients and Specialist Screening Practitioners (SSPs). METHODS Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted. Participants (N = 32) were patients (n = 20) who, as part of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England, were invited to attend a colonoscopy examination, and SSPs (n = 12), who worked for the BCSP in England. Framework analysis included inductive and deductive coding. RESULTS Anxiety was as a key barrier cited by patients and SSPs, arising from the moment the patient received the invitation letter. Notably, procedural-related anxieties centred upon the fear of pain and discomfort and test invasiveness. The role of family, friends and the SSP were recognised by patients and SSPs to facilitate participation. Many patients, yet not SSPs, emphasised an obligation to attend all medical test invitations. CONCLUSION Practically orientated strategies suggested by patients and SSPs address the patient barriers identified. These include earlier information to patients on the option of sedation for pain relief, earlier notification of potential financial support for patients unable to fund their own travel costs, and fewer uses of the term cancer within written materials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Laura Ashley
- Leeds School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Park KU, Padamsee TJ, Birken SA, Lee S, Niles K, Blair SL, Grignol V, Dickson-Witmer D, Nowell K, Neuman H, King T, Mittendorf E, Paskett ED, Brindle M. Factors Influencing Implementation of the Commission on Cancer's Breast Synoptic Operative Report (Alliance A20_Pilot9). Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:5888-5895. [PMID: 38862840 PMCID: PMC11300652 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15515-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The technical aspects of cancer surgery have a significant impact on patient outcomes. To monitor surgical quality, in 2020, the Commission on Cancer (CoC) revised its accreditation standards for cancer surgery and introduced the synoptic operative reports (SORs). The standardization of SORs holds promise, but successful implementation requires strategies to address key implementation barriers. This study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to implementing breast SOR within diverse CoC-accredited programs. METHODS In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 health care professionals across diverse CoC-accredited sites. The study used two comprehensive implementation frameworks to guide data collection and analysis. RESULTS Successful SOR implementation was impeded by disrupted workflows, surgeon resistance to change, low prioritization of resources, and poor flow of information despite CoC's positive reputation. Participants often lacked understanding of the requirements and timeline for breast SOR and were heavily influenced by prior experiences with templates and SOR champion relationships. The perceived lack of monetary benefits (to obtaining CoC accreditation) together with the significant information technology (IT) resource requirements tempered some of the enthusiasm. Additionally, resource constraints and the redirection of personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic were noted as hurdles. CONCLUSIONS Surgeon behavior and workflow change, IT and personnel resources, and communication and networking strategies influenced SOR implementation. During early implementation and the implementation planning phase, the primary focus was on achieving buy-in and initiating successful roll-out rather than effective use or sustainment. These findings have implications for enhancing standardization of surgical cancer care and guidance of future strategies to optimize implementation of CoC accreditation standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ko Un Park
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/ Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Tasleem J Padamsee
- James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Sarah A Birken
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Sandy Lee
- James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Kaleigh Niles
- James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Sarah L Blair
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Valerie Grignol
- James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Kerri Nowell
- Physicians' Clinic of Iowa, Cedar Rapids, IA, USA
| | - Heather Neuman
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Tari King
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/ Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Mittendorf
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/ Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Electra D Paskett
- James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mary Brindle
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Surgery, Alberta Children's Hospital, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cheng SWM, Guan C, Dennis S, Alison J, Stamatakis E, McKeough Z. A behaviour change intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative study. Physiotherapy 2024; 124:9-20. [PMID: 38795529 DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2024.04.347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To document the experiences of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who underwent a behaviour change intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour (SB) in a clinical trial. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews to explore perspectives of the behaviour change intervention and specific intervention components in people with stable COPD on the waitlist for pulmonary rehabilitation. SETTING Three outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programmes in Sydney, Australia. INTERVENTIONS The six-week behaviour change intervention with once weekly contact with a physiotherapist aimed to reduce SB by replacing it with light-intensity physical activity (PA) and by breaking up prolonged SB. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Of 30 participants who completed the behaviour change intervention, interviews were conducted with 13 participants and analysed using the 'capability, opportunity, motivation, behaviour (COM-B)' framework of behaviour change. RESULTS Intervention components regarded as most helpful by participants were verbal education on health consequences on SB, goal setting, and self-monitoring of, and feedback on, step count using activity trackers. There was a clear preference during goal setting to increase PA rather than to reduce SB. Physical limitations and enjoyment of SB were the most reported barriers to reducing SB. CONCLUSIONS Goal setting, verbal education, and self-monitoring of, and feedback on step count, were viewed positively by people with COPD and may show promise for reducing SB and increasing PA based on individual preference. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Wing Mei Cheng
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Catherine Guan
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Physiotherapy, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sarah Dennis
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia; South West Sydney Allied Health Research Collaboration, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jennifer Alison
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Allied Health Professorial Unit, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Emmanuel Stamatakis
- Charles Perkins Centre, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Zoe McKeough
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wshah A, Alqatarneh N, Al-Nassan S, Goldstein R. Factors related to the implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation in Jordan: Perspective of healthcare professionals. Respir Med 2024; 231:107728. [PMID: 38969025 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Revised: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in the management of chronic respiratory disease conditions (CRC) are well-documented, it remains underutilized. In Jordan, the scarcity of PR services denies those with CRC the opportunity to improve their functional capacity, mental health, and quality of life. OBJECTIVE To explore the factors related to the implementation of PR in Jordan from the perspective of the healthcare professionals (HCPs). METHODS This was a qualitative study that utilized semi-structured interviews informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Twenty-one HCPs were interviewed. Interview transcripts were coded against the relevant TDF domain(s) and then domains' summaries were generated. RESULTS A total of 997 quotes were coded against the TDF domains. Knowledge, environmental context and resources, social influences, and skills domains were the ones most coded. The study identified several barriers to PR implementation such as: limited knowledge and skills pertaining to PR among HCPs, limited public awareness of PR, financial costs, limited legislation related to establishment of PR and role confusion of HCPs in PR. The main facilitators include: HCPs willingness to be involved in new programs such as PR, the perception of the importance and need for PR and HCPs beliefs about capabilities to overcome barriers for a successful implementation of PR. CONCLUSION The current study provided information that will inform stakeholders and policymakers about the factors affecting PR implementation in Jordan. Improvements in HCPs skills and knowledge about PR, financial support, improvements in undergraduate syllabi and policies to control PR service provision are considered to be key to a successful implementation of PR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adnan Wshah
- Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, The Hashemite University, P.O. Box 330127, Zarqa, 13133, Jordan; Respiratory Medicine, West Park Healthcare Centre, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Nisrin Alqatarneh
- Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, The Hashemite University, P.O. Box 330127, Zarqa, 13133, Jordan
| | - Saad Al-Nassan
- Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, The Hashemite University, P.O. Box 330127, Zarqa, 13133, Jordan; Department of Physiotherapy, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Roger Goldstein
- Respiratory Medicine, West Park Healthcare Centre, Toronto, Canada; Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Waddell A, Goodwin D, Spassova G, Sampson L, Candy A, Bragge P. "We will be the ones bearing the consequences": A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospital-based maternity care. Birth 2024; 51:581-594. [PMID: 38270268 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnant women involved in decisions about their care report better health outcomes for themselves and their children. Shared decision-making (SDM) is a priority for health services; however, there is limited research on factors that help and hinder SDM in hospital-based maternity settings. The purpose of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators to SDM in a large tertiary maternity care service from the perspectives of multiple stakeholders. METHODS Qualitative semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 39 participants including women, clinicians, health service administrators and decision-makers, and government policymakers. The interview guide and thematic analysis were based on the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify barriers and facilitators to SDM. RESULTS Women expect to be included in decisions about their care. Health service administrators and decision-makers, government policymakers, and most clinicians want to include them in decisions. Key barriers to SDM included lack of care continuity, knowledge, and clinician skills, as well as professional role and decision-making factors. Key facilitators pertained to policy and guideline changes, increased knowledge, professional role factors, and social influences. CONCLUSION This study revealed common barriers and facilitators to SDM and highlighted the need to consider perspectives outside the patient-clinician dyad. It adds to the limited literature on barriers and facilitators to SDM in hospital care settings. Organizational- and system-wide changes to service delivery are necessary to facilitate SDM. These changes may be enabled by education and training, changes to policies and guidelines to include and support SDM, and adequately timed information provision to enable SDM conversations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Waddell
- Safer Care Victoria, Victorian Department of Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Denise Goodwin
- BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gerri Spassova
- Department of Marketing, Monash Business School, Caulfield East, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Alix Candy
- Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Bragge
- Monash Sustainable Development Institute Evidence Review Service, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Warner J, Stocker R, Brandt K, Crabtree DR, Ormond L, Stevenson E, Holliday A. Appetite, food intake, and gut hormone responses to glycomacropeptide protein ingestion in older adults: A feasibility, acceptability, and pilot study. Appetite 2024; 200:107509. [PMID: 38795943 DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
Glycomacropeptide (GMP) has a unique amino acid profile which may make less satiating than other dietary proteins. This study assessed the feasibility and likely acceptability of a leucine-enriched GMP drink and determined appetite response in older adults (OA). Thirteen OA (11f; 70 ± 4 years) were recruited for sensory assessments of a leucine-enriched GMP drink when mixed with water and with fruit smoothie, compared with whey protein isolate (WHEY). Participants also partook in a single focus group exploring acceptability to protein and supplementation. Separately, a counterbalanced, double-blind study with twelve OA (8f; 69 ± 3 years) was conducted to determine appetite and gut hormone responses. Fasting subjective appetite was recorded using visual analogue scales and a fasted venous blood sample was collected (to measures acyl-ghrelin, PYY, GLP-1, and CCK) before participants consumed either: GMP protein (27g + 3g leucine, 350 mL water), WHEY (30g, 350 mL water), or water. Participants rested for 240 min, with appetite measures and blood sampling throughout. An ad libitum pasta-based meal was then consumed. Sensory testing revealed low pleasantness rating for GMP in water vs. WHEY (16 ± 14 vs 31 ± 24, p = 0.016). GMP addition to smoothie reduced pleasantness (26 ± 21 vs. 61 ± 29, p = 0.009) and worsened the aroma (46 ± 15 vs. 69 ± 28, p = 0.014). The focus group revealed uncertainty of protein needs and a scepticism of supplements, with preference for food. Gut hormone response did not differ between GMP and WHEY (nAUC for all gut hormones p > 0.05). There was no difference between conditions for lunch ad libitum intake (549 ± 171 kcal, 512 ± 238 kcal, 460 ± 199 kcal for GMP, WHEY, and water, p = 0.175), or for subjective appetite response. Leucine-enriched GMP was not less satiating than WHEY, and low palatability and scepticism of supplements question the likely acceptability of GMP supplementation. Providing trusted nutritional advice and food enrichment/fortification may be preferred strategies for increasing protein intake in OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan Warner
- School of Biomedical, Nutritional, and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rachel Stocker
- School of Biomedical, Nutritional, and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Kirsten Brandt
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; Human Nutrition and Exercise Research Centre, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | - Emma Stevenson
- School of Biomedical, Nutritional, and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; Human Nutrition and Exercise Research Centre, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Adrian Holliday
- School of Biomedical, Nutritional, and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; Human Nutrition and Exercise Research Centre, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brennan C, O'Donoghue G, Keogh A, Rhodes RE, Matthews J. "You are either sporty or you are not" a qualitative exploration of pre-teen girls of low-socioeconomic position experiences of being physically active. PSYCHOLOGY OF SPORT AND EXERCISE 2024; 74:102692. [PMID: 38945186 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eighty one percent of adolescents do not meet the recommended physical activity (PA) guidelines with levels of physical activity declining steadily with age and more pronounced in girls of low socioeconomic position (SEP). Furthermore, early adolescence is a time when the rate of decline in PA is most severe amongst girls, placing them at an increased likelihood of developing negative health outcomes associated with physical inactivity. In response, the aim of this study was to explore low-SEP pre-teen girls' experiences of being physically active and to understand their perceptions of the individual, social and environmental factors that influence these experiences. METHODS Focus groups were conducted with 107 girls aged 10-12 years from four urban and three rural primary schools. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data, with themes mapped to the relevant domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). RESULTS Themes highlighted how skills and confidence underpin girls' self-identity for PA. Girls described how their social network (i.e., peers, family, coaches and teachers) shaped their experiences of being active. Girls recognised how being active was impacted by the challenges and opportunities in their local community (e.g., lack of facilities and anti-social behaviour). CONCLUSION This study provides insight into low-SEP pre-teen girls' experiences of being physically active in both rural and urban locations, while highlighting the complex interplay of individual, social and environmental factors. Additionally, the use of the TDF presents an in-depth behavioural diagnosis which can be used to inform future theory-based interventions to promote low-SEP pre-teen girls PA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol Brennan
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy, and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Grainne O'Donoghue
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy, and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Alison Keogh
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ryan E Rhodes
- School of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Canada
| | - James Matthews
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy, and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Institute of Sport and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vincent H, Walker S, Hodder A, Davies SM, Dasgupta T, Bale N, Birch A, Kotun J, Christie K. Barriers and facilitators for implementation of OptiBreech collaborative care: A qualitative study as part of an implementation process evaluation. Women Birth 2024; 37:101656. [PMID: 39018606 DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2024] [Revised: 07/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
PROBLEM Lack of opportunity for breech training and clinical experience reduced professional confidence and expertise in supporting vaginal breech birth. BACKGROUND OptiBreech collaborative care is a care pathway for breech presentation at term that aims to enable improve safety through person-centred care and improved training opportunities for maternity professionals, within dedicated clinics and intrapartum support. In feasibility work, barriers and facilitators to team implementation were observed by team members. AIM This study sought to describe factors affecting optimal future implementation and safety of OptiBreech care. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff members at 13 OptiBreech trial sites (17 midwives and 4 obstetricians, n=21), via video conferencing software. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to identify factors impacting team implementation. Themes identified in the TDF were refined in reflexive discussion and grouped into key facilitators, key barriers, and dynamic factors (which span both barriers and facilitators). The interviews were then coded, analysed, and interpreted according to the refined framework. FINDINGS The key facilitators were broadly categorised within skill development, beliefs about capabilities, and social support from the wider multidisciplinary team. Key barrier categories were resources, social obstacles, and fears about consequences. Dynamic factor categories were individual responsibility, training, and attending births. CONCLUSION While some factors affecting implementation were specific to the individuals and cultures of certain Trusts, recommendations emerged from analysis that are more widely applicable across multiple settings. These should be considered going forward for future service implementation, and in the next stage of OptiBreech clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Honor Vincent
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Shawn Walker
- Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Alice Hodder
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Siân M Davies
- Department of Women & Children's Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tisha Dasgupta
- Department of Women & Children's Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Natasha Bale
- Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexandra Birch
- Department of Midwifery and Allied Health, Staffordshire University, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Joanne Kotun
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Keelie Christie
- School of Healthcare, Leicester University, Leicester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Alkhaldi O, McMillan B, Ainsworth J. Using the behaviour change wheel to develop a tailored intervention to overcome general practitioners' perceived barriers to referring insomnia patients to digital therapeutic sleepio. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:967. [PMID: 39174968 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11384-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital therapeutic Sleepio has proven effective in improving sleep quality and decreasing symptoms of anxiety. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance recommends Sleepio as an alternative treatment to usual sleep hygiene education and hypnotic medications. General practitioners (GPs) play a critical role in the adoption of digital therapeutics in patient care. Previous interventions did not adopt theoretical frameworks to systematically understand GPs behaviour toward referring patients to digital therapeutics. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to report the systematic and comprehensive development of an intervention to encourage GPs to refer insomnia patients to Sleepio, using the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW). METHODS The eight steps outlined in the BCW were followed to develop an intervention. The Capability Opportunity Motivation-Behaviour Self-Evaluation Questionnaire (COM-B-Qv1) was adopted to understand GPs perceived facilitators and barriers to refer insomnia patients to Sleepio. The Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy Version 1 (BCTv1) was thereafter used to identify possible strategies that could be used to facilitate changes in GPs' behaviour in relation to Sleepio. RESULTS The BCW design process resulted in the identification of five intervention functions, three policy categories and five behaviour change techniques (BCTs) as potential active components for an intervention. The intervention includes providing GPs with an orientation about using Sleepio to improve their knowledge and confidence, sending visual reminders to GPs to recommend Sleepio to their patients, providing ongoing technical support. CONCLUSION The BCW can be successfully applied through a systematic process to understand the drivers of GPs' behaviour and to develop an intervention that can encourage them to refer insomnia patients to Sleepio.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ohoud Alkhaldi
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PM, UK.
- Health Information Management and Technology Department, College of Public Health, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Brian McMillan
- Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PM, UK
| | - John Ainsworth
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PM, UK
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gallant AJ, Steenbeek A, Halperin SA, Parsons Leigh J, Curran JA. Operationalizing the Behaviour Change Wheel and APEASE criteria to co-develop recommendations with stakeholders to address barriers to school-based immunization programs. Vaccine 2024; 42:126226. [PMID: 39173194 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION School-based immunization programs offer an accessible route to routine vaccines for students. During the COVID-19 pandemic, school closures to comply with public health measures had a drastic effect on school-based immunization program delivery and associated vaccine uptake. We sought to integrate findings from a mixed methods study to co-develop evidence-based and theory-informed recommendations with a diverse group of stakeholders (i.e., decision makers, healthcare providers, school staff, parents and adolescent students) to address barriers to new and existing school-based immunization programs. METHODS Findings from a mixed methods study were integrated using a joint display and narrative summary. These findings were mapped through the Behaviour Change Wheel, a series of tools designed to facilitate the development of behaviour change interventions. Draft recommendations were provided to previous mixed methods study participants who consented to participating in future phases of the research study (n = 26). Feedback was captured using a Likert-scale survey of acceptability, practicality, effectiveness, affordability, safety and equity (APEASE) criteria, with feedback and additional insights captured using open-ended textboxes. Data was used to revise and finalize recommendations. RESULTS Applying the Behaviour Change Wheel, we drafted 26 evidence-based, theory-informed recommendations to address barriers to school-based immunization programs. Participants (n = 16) provided feedback, with half of the recommendations scoring 80% or higher across all six APEASE criteria. The remaining 13 recommendations received a moderate score across one or more criteria. Stakeholders identified a high level of interest in expanding the use of e-consent forms, expanding programming to offer a meningitis B vaccine, and recommendations to ease student anxiety. CONCLUSION We co-developed a range of recommendations to improve school-based immunization programs with stakeholders using data generated from a mixed methods study. Implementation of any single or combination of recommendations will need to be tailored to local clinic procedures, school system and health system resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allyson J Gallant
- Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, 5968 College Street, PO BOX 15000, Halifax, Nova Scotia (NS) B3H 4R2, Canada.
| | | | | | | | - Janet A Curran
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mohsen M, Abbaticchio A, Zhang T, Jassal SV, Battistella M. Barriers and facilitators to using a clinical decision support tool for the management of osteoarthritis pain in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a qualitative study. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2024; 25:308. [PMID: 39160487 PMCID: PMC11331684 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02564-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 08/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While osteoarthritis is a significant issue within the hemodialysis population and contributes to reduced quality of life, pain related to osteoarthritis is poorly managed by healthcare professionals (HCPs) in hemodialysis settings due to the absence of clinical guidance applicable to this population. The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions of HCPs on the barriers and facilitators to using a clinical decision support tool for osteoarthritis pain management in the hemodialysis setting. METHODS A qualitative descriptive study was conducted. Purposeful and snowball sampling techniques were used to recruit hemodialysis clinicians from academic and community settings across multiple Canadian provinces. One-to-one interviews were conducted with clinicians using a semi-structured, open ended interview guide informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework, a behavior change framework. A general inductive approach was applied to identify the main themes of barriers and facilitators. RESULTS A total of 11 interviews were completed with 3 nephrologists, 2 nurse practitioners and 6 pharmacists. Findings revealed 6 main barriers and facilitators related to the use of the clinical decision support tool. Alignment of the tool with practice roles emerged as a key barrier and facilitator. Other barriers included challenges related to the dialysis environment, varying levels of clinician comfort with pain medications, and limited applicability of the tool due to patient factors. An important facilitator was the intrinsic motivation among clinicians to use the tool. CONCLUSIONS Most participants across the included hemodialysis settings expressed satisfaction with the clinical decision support tool and acknowledged its overall potential for improving osteoarthritis pain management among patients on hemodialysis. Future implementation of the tool may be limited by existing roles and practices at different institutions. Increased collaboration among hemodialysis and primary care teams may promote uptake of the tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mai Mohsen
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Nephrology, Toronto General Hospital - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Angelina Abbaticchio
- Department of Nephrology, Toronto General Hospital - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tracy Zhang
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Nephrology, Toronto General Hospital - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S Vanita Jassal
- Department of Nephrology, Toronto General Hospital - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marisa Battistella
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Department of Nephrology, Toronto General Hospital - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Department of Pharmacy, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth St. EB 214, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
van der Veer SN, Anderson NE, Finnigan R, Kyte D. Electronic Collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes to Improve Kidney Care: Benefits, Drawbacks, and Next Steps. Semin Nephrol 2024:151552. [PMID: 39164148 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/22/2024]
Abstract
Kidney services worldwide are increasingly using digital health technologies to deliver care. This includes kidney electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems: ambulatory digital technologies that enable the capture of PRO data electronically from people with kidney disease remotely and in real time to be shared with their kidney care team. Current kidney ePRO systems commonly aim to support the monitoring and management of symptoms in patients with kidney disease. The majority have thus far only been implemented in research settings and are not yet routinely used in clinical practice, leaving their readiness for real-world implementation largely unknown. Compared with paper-based PRO collection, ePRO systems have certain advantages, which we categorize as efficiency benefits (e.g., lower administrative burden), direct patient care benefits (e.g., automated PRO-based patient education), and health system and research benefits (e.g., collecting ePRO data once for multiple purposes). At the same time, kidney ePRO systems come with drawbacks, such as their potential to exacerbate existing inequities in care and outcomes and to negatively affect staff burden and patients' experience of kidney care. Areas that hold promise for expediting the development and uptake of kidney ePRO systems at the local, organizational, and national level include harnessing national kidney registries as enabling infrastructures; using novel data-driven technologies (e.g., computerized adaptive test systems, configurable dashboards); applying implementation science and action research approaches to enhance translation of ePRO research findings into clinical practice; and engaging stakeholders, including patients and carers, health care professionals, policymakers, payers, ePRO experts, technology providers, and organizations that monitor and improve the quality of kidney services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine N van der Veer
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Nicola E Anderson
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research (CPROR), Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rob Finnigan
- NHS England North West Kidney Network, NHS England, Leeds, UK
| | - Derek Kyte
- School of Allied Health and Community, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
De Lott LB, Gonzalez L, Guetterman TC, Kerber KA, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Factors That Influence Clinician Prescribing of Corticosteroids for Acute Idiopathic and Multiple Sclerosis-Associated Optic Neuritis: A Qualitative Study. J Neuroophthalmol 2024:00041327-990000000-00699. [PMID: 39148168 DOI: 10.1097/wno.0000000000002219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment with corticosteroids is common for patients with idiopathic and multiple sclerosis-associated optic neuritis (I/MS-ON). Yet, the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial and meta-analyses confirm that few patients benefit and that visual benefit is of questionable clinical significance, short-lived, and comes with potential harms. The purpose of this study was to uncover the breadth of factors that underlie clinicians' treatment decisions and determine how these factors may influence corticosteroid use for I/MS-ON. METHODS We performed semistructured, one-on-one, qualitative interviews with neurologists, neuro-ophthalmologists, and emergency department clinicians at 15 academic and private practices across the United States. The interview guide used the Theoretical Domain Framework and a vignette to explore numerous factors that might influence decision making for definite I/MS-ON. We analyzed transcripts using inductive thematic analysis to generate themes. RESULTS A total of 22 clinicians were interviewed before thematic saturation was reached: 8 neuro-ophthalmologists, 8 neurologists, and 6 emergency medicine (EM) clinicians (2 physician assistants, 4 physicians). All neuro-ophthalmologists and nearly all neurologists (7 of 8) were aware of risks/benefits of corticosteroid treatment for I/MS-ON. However, neuro-ophthalmologists varied in their corticosteroid treatment recommendation (n = 3 recommended treatment, n = 2 recommended observation, n = 3 recommended shared decision making), whereas all neurologists recommended corticosteroids, indicating that knowledge of corticosteroid risk/benefit alone does not drive decision making. EM clinicians were not aware of risk/benefits of corticosteroid treatment for I/MS-ON and relied on the treatment recommendations of neurologists. Clinicians recommending corticosteroids held personal beliefs that corticosteroids benefit those with worse vision loss, relieve pain, allow earlier return to work, or have easily mitigated side effects. They also perceived that prescribing steroid was the principal method of "doing something," which fit a key provider role. Clinicians who did not recommend corticosteroids or were neutral perceived the risks as nontrivial, considered discussing treatment trade-offs as "doing something" and incorporated patient preferences. CONCLUSIONS Knowledge of risk/benefits of corticosteroids are necessary but not sufficient for evidence-based I/MS-ON practice. Variation in how clinicians treat patients with acute I/MS-ON is influenced largely by psychosocial factors, such as beliefs about corticosteroid risk/benefit trade-offs and the role of the clinician to provide treatment. Interventions to support evidence-based decision making for I/MS-ON treatment will need to provide risk/benefit information to support clinicians with varying levels of expertise, incorporate patient preference, and normalize the option to observe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey B De Lott
- Department of Ophthalmology (LBDL), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation (LBDL, TCG, BJZ-F), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Ophthalmology (LG), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; The Ohio State University College of Medicine (LG), Columbus, Ohio; Mixed Methods Program and Department of Family Medicine (TCG), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Neurology (KAK), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Department of Health Behavior and Health Education (BJZ-F), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Internal Medicine (BJZ-F), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (BJZ-F), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kraak JT, Verhoef K, Kramer SE, Merkus P. Barriers to and enablers of the use of the Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam in clinical practice-a qualitative post-implementation study. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2024; 8:96. [PMID: 39141062 PMCID: PMC11324631 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00741-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam (OQUA) is developed to evaluate multiple ear complaints and their impact on patients' daily lives. The current clinical use of this questionnaire is below the potential utilization. AIM To identify the barriers and enablers of using the OQUA as perceived by ENT surgeons and patients and provide recommendations for an implementation strategy. METHODS Prospective and qualitative analysis was performed using focus groups and interviews with ENT professionals (n = 15) and patients (n = 25) with ear complaints of one tertiary referral hospital and two regional hospitals. Barriers and enablers were identified and classified by using the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior model and the Theoretical Domains Framework. Suggestions for an implementation strategy will be made accordingly. RESULTS ENT professionals' barriers included lack of knowledge and skills to use the OQUA, inadequate technological support and perceived time constraints during consultation, uncertainty about the clinical relevance and lack of feedback on the outcomes of the OQUA. Enablers included beneficial consequences of the OQUA for the professional, organization and science. Patients' barriers included lack of knowledge about the objective and usefulness of the OQUA, perceived burden, difficulties in completing the questionnaire and insufficient feedback during consultation. Patient enablers included beliefs about beneficial consequences of the OQUA for the patient, health care and society. Suggested interventions involved education, training, environmental restructuring and incentivisation. CONCLUSION Based on the findings, we propose an implementation strategy should focus on education and training about the objective, outcomes and relevance of the OQUA, environmental restructuring regarding the optimal use of the OQUA, and incentivisation with feedback on the valuable outcomes of the OQUA for the patient, professional and healthcare. Future research is needed to determine the feasibility of the implementation strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J T Kraak
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - K Verhoef
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S E Kramer
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Merkus
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Naseralallah L, Koraysh S, Aboujabal B, Alasmar M. Effectiveness of pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship programs in perioperative settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Res Social Adm Pharm 2024:S1551-7411(24)00237-7. [PMID: 39153871 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Revised: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 08/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to characterize and evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacist-led AMS interventions in improving antimicrobial use and subsequent surgical site infections (SSI) in perioperative settings. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by searching PubMed, Embase and CINAHL. Two independent reviewers extracted the data using the Descriptive Elements of Pharmacist Intervention Characterization Tool and undertook quality assessment using the Crowe Critical Appraisal. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effect model. RESULTS Eleven studies were included in this review. Pharmacists were found to have various roles in AMS, including educational sessions, ward rounds, audits and feedback, and guidelines development. The discussion of interventions lacked details on the development. A meta-analysis revealed that pharmacist-led AMS programs in perioperative settings was associated with a significant improvement in antibiotic selection (OR 4.29; 95 % CI 2.52-7.30), administration time (OR 4.93; 95 % CI 2.05-11.84), duration (OR 5.27; 95 % CI 1.58-17.55), and SSI (OR 0.51; 95 % CI 0.34-0.77). CONCLUSION Pharmacist-led AMS programs were effective in improving antimicrobial prescribing while reducing SSI; however most studies were of moderate quality. Studies lacked the utilization of theory to develop interventions, therefore, it is not clear whether theory-derived interventions are more effective than those without a theoretical element. High-quality, multicomponent, theory-derived, interventional studies using appropriate methodology and standardized data collection, are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Somaya Koraysh
- Pharmacy Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | | | - May Alasmar
- Pharmacy Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Brygger Venø L, Jarbøl DE, Ertmann RK, Søndergaard J, Pedersen LB. Barriers to assessing vulnerability in pregnant women. A cross-sectional survey in Danish general practice. Fam Pract 2024; 41:484-493. [PMID: 36420813 PMCID: PMC11324321 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmac134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Undetected vulnerability in pregnancy contributes to inequality in maternal and perinatal health and is associated with negative birth outcomes and adverse child outcomes. Nationwide reports indicate important barriers to assessing vulnerability among Danish general practitioners. OBJECTIVE To explore general practitioners perceived barriers to vulnerability assessment in pregnant women and whether the barriers are associated with practice organization of antenatal care, general practitioner, and practice characteristics. METHODS The questionnaire was sent to all Danish general practitioners (N = 3,465). Descriptive statistics described the barriers to assessing vulnerability in pregnant women. Analytical statistics with ordered logistic regression models were used to describe the association between selected barriers to vulnerability assessment and antenatal care organization, and general practitioner and practice characteristics. RESULTS 760 general practitioners (22%) answered. Barriers to vulnerability assessment were related to lacking routines for addressing vulnerability, lacking attention to and record-keeping on vulnerability indicators, an insufficient overview of vulnerable pregnant women, and perceived insufficient remuneration for antenatal care consultations. Not prioritizing extra time when caring for vulnerable pregnant women was associated with experiencing more barriers. Always prioritizing continuity of care was associated with experiencing fewer barriers. General practitioners of either young age, male gender, or who did not prioritize extra time to care for vulnerable pregnant women experienced more barriers. CONCLUSION Barriers to vulnerability assessment among pregnant women do exist in general practice and are associated with organizational characteristics such as lacking prioritization of extra time and continuity in antenatal care consultations. Also, general practitioner characteristics like male gender and relatively young age are associated with barriers to vulnerability assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Brygger Venø
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Dorte Ejg Jarbøl
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ruth Kirk Ertmann
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens Søndergaard
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Line Bjørnskov Pedersen
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- DaCHE, Danish Centre for Health Economics, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shepherd HA, Galarneau JM, Neill M, Karmali S, Turcotte K, Williamson RA, Cowle S, Macpherson A, Reed N, Schneider KJ, Belton KL, Gagnon I, Black AM, Emery CA, Babul S. Concussion Awareness Training Tool for Youth: Impact on Concussion Knowledge, Beliefs, and Reporting Intentions. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR 2024:10901981241263577. [PMID: 39138808 DOI: 10.1177/10901981241263577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concussion education is recommended to increase concussion knowledge, beliefs, and reporting intentions. The Concussion Awareness Training Tool for Youth (CATT-Youth) is a 40-minute e-Learning module developed for high school-aged youth. AIM The aim of the study was to evaluate changes in concussion knowledge, beliefs, and reporting intentions in high school youth from Calgary, Canada, following completion of the CATT-Youth. METHODS This study used a modified stepped-wedge trial design. High school classes were randomly assigned to an intervention (Ix) or delayed intervention (DIx) group. Ix group participants completed a pre-CATT survey immediately followed by the CATT-Youth, then a post-CATT survey 2 to 6 weeks later. DIx group participants completed two pre-CATT surveys 2 to 6 weeks apart, with the CATT-Youth completed immediately following the second pre-CATT, then a post-CATT survey 2 to 6 weeks later. The pre-/post-CATT survey encompassed 11 subtests evaluating concussion knowledge, beliefs, and reporting intentions. Independent mixed linear regression models were conducted to examine changes in scores for each subtest. RESULTS Participants included 454 high school students: five Ix schools (16 classes, n = 323) and two DIx schools (six classes, n = 131). The CATT-Youth significantly increased general concussion knowledge, Ix δ = 0.546/8 (95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.243, 0.849]), DIx δ = 0.728/8 (95% CI = [0.389, 1.106]), and beliefs about capabilities, Ix δ = 2.462/28 (95% CI = [1.086, 3.838]), DIx δ = 3.219/28 (95% CI = [1.594, 4.844]) for both groups. For some subtests, improvements were noted in the DIx group only. CONCLUSION The CATT-Youth module improved concussion knowledge and beliefs about capabilities for students in both groups. Future studies should explore the utility of the CATT-Youth in changing knowledge, beliefs, and reporting intentions in high school students.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather A Shepherd
- The Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jean-Michel Galarneau
- The Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Matthew Neill
- The Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Shazya Karmali
- BC Injury Research and Prevention Unit, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kate Turcotte
- BC Injury Research and Prevention Unit, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Rylen A Williamson
- The Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Nick Reed
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kathryn J Schneider
- The Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Amanda M Black
- The Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Carolyn A Emery
- The Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Shelina Babul
- BC Injury Research and Prevention Unit, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Guo S, Liu D, Bi X, Feng Y, Zhang K, Jiang J, Wang Y. Barriers and facilitators to self-management among women with gestational diabetes: A systematic review using the COM-B model. Midwifery 2024; 138:104141. [PMID: 39178483 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.104141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/07/2024] [Indexed: 08/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gestational diabetes mellitus is a common complication during pregnancy, and its prevalence rates have increased dramatically in recent years. Treatment of gestational diabetes requires the active self-management, however, this can be challenging. Understanding the barriers and facilitators of adherence to self-management recommendations is essential for designing effective interventions. AIM To identify and synthesize barriers and facilitators to self-management of gestational diabetes reported by pregnant women. METHODS This was a mixed-methods systematic review, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies. A literature search was conducted in four databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and the Web of Science). Eligible studies explored the barriers and/or facilitators, experiences and/or perceptions to engage in self-management in women with gestational diabetes. The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour model was used to classify barriers and facilitators affecting self-management. RESULTS Thirty-six studies (23 qualitative, 11 quantitative, and 2 mixed-methods) met the inclusion criteria. We identified barriers and facilitators relating to capability (e.g., physical discomforts and constraints; lack of knowledge of GDM and self-management behaviours; forgetfulness), opportunity (e.g., limited education and resources; social support from family, friends, and peer groups; conflict with existing lifestyles or cultural norms), and motivation (e.g., perceived negative consequence of self-management behaviours or not perceived benefits; negative emotion; concern the health of the baby). CONCLUSION In this study, we identified the barriers and facilitators of self-management in women with gestational diabetes, which were explained by relevant theoretical models. Interventions should be developed with full consideration of these findings to ensure that pregnant women have the correct knowledge and confidence to self-manage their complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shujie Guo
- School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China; Department of Clinical Nursing, School of Nursing, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Dongmei Liu
- School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Xiaoxuan Bi
- School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Yuxuan Feng
- School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Ke Zhang
- School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Jingjing Jiang
- School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Yanhong Wang
- School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Davison N, Waddell A, Chandrasekara D, Tran T, Hammarberg K, Kirkman M, Nimesh S, Lowthian JA, Olivier P, Romero L, Fisher J, Dwyer R. Barriers and facilitators to implementing psychosocial digital health interventions for older adults presenting to emergency departments: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e085304. [PMID: 39134431 PMCID: PMC11331967 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Older adults can face challenges when seeking care from emergency departments (EDs) due to presenting with multiple comorbidities and non-specific symptoms. Psychosocial care is a possible target to help improve ED care for this population. It is possible that digital health technologies can be implemented within emergency settings to improve the provision of psychosocial care. However, it is unclear what the barriers and facilitators are to implementing digital psychosocial interventions for older adults presenting to the ED. Therefore, the scoping review aims to determine what are these barriers and facilitators. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The scoping review will be conducted in line with the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and will use the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. The databases Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Scopus will be searched. The search strategy will be developed in consultation with a specialist research librarian and will cover three key concepts: EDs, digital health technologies and older adults. Additionally, the first 100 hits of a Google Scholar search will be screened for inclusion. We will include both qualitative and quantitative studies that investigate ED digital interventions for psychosocial care where the primary focus is the views, attitudes, experiences and perceptions of patients, families and staff. After extracting all data, analysis and synthesis will follow the 'best-fit framework synthesis' approach and the Theoretical Domains Framework will be used to identify barriers and facilitators. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review since only publicly available data will be analysed and appraised. The findings of the scoping review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neve Davison
- Global and Women’s Health, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alex Waddell
- Department of Human Centred Computing, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Thach Tran
- Global and Women’s Health, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karin Hammarberg
- Global and Women’s Health, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maggie Kirkman
- Global and Women’s Health, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Seema Nimesh
- Emergency Department, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
| | - Judy A Lowthian
- Bolton Clarke Research Institute, Bolton Clarke, Forrest Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | - Patrick Olivier
- Department of Human Centred Computing, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lorena Romero
- The Ian Potter Library, The Alfred, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jane Fisher
- Global and Women’s Health, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rosamond Dwyer
- Global and Women’s Health, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Emergency Department, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Reicherzer L, Scheermesser M, Kläy A, Duarte JE, Graf ES. Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Wearable Robots as Assistive Devices: Qualitative Study With Older Adults and Physiotherapists. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2024; 11:e52676. [PMID: 39132691 PMCID: PMC11327840 DOI: 10.2196/52676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Light wearable robots have the potential to assist older adults with mobility impairments in daily life by compensating for age-related decline in lower extremity strength. Physiotherapists may be the first point of contact for older adults with these devices. Objective The aims of this study were to explore views of older adults and physiotherapists on wearable robots as assistive devices for daily living and to identify the barriers and facilitators to their use. Methods Six older adults (aged 72-88 years) tested a wearable robot (Myosuit) and participated in semistructured interviews. A focus group with 6 physiotherapists who had a minimum of 5 years of professional experience and specialized in geriatrics was conducted. Data were analyzed using thematic qualitative text analysis. Results Older adults perceived benefits and had positive use experiences, yet many saw no need to use the technology for themselves. Main barriers and facilitators to its use were the perception of usefulness, attitudes toward technology, ease of use, and environmental factors such as the support received. Physiotherapists named costs, reimbursement schemes, and complexity of the technology as limiting factors. Conclusions A light wearable robot-the Myosuit-was found to be acceptable to study participants as an assistive device. Although characteristics of the technology are important, the use and acceptance by older adults heavily depend on perceived usefulness and need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah Reicherzer
- Institute of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Mandy Scheermesser
- Institute of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Adrian Kläy
- Institute of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland
- Medbase AG, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Eveline S Graf
- Institute of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wu X, Kuang Y, Guo Y, Wei N, Fan Z, Ling J. Analyzing the barriers and enablers to internet hospital implementation: a qualitative study of a tertiary hospital using TDF and COM-B framework. Front Digit Health 2024; 6:1362395. [PMID: 39175961 PMCID: PMC11340510 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1362395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Internet hospitals have become an important way to improve the accessibility of medical services and promote medical equity in China. However, there is still lack of research on the behavior of medical personnel during the process of using Internet medical services, and the elements of behavior that motivate doctors to actively use or resist the use of Internet hospitals are still not fully analyzed. The study applied the Theoretical Domains Framework to examine the factors affecting the engagement of medical personnel in Internet hospitals, with the aim of guiding the design of intervention to enhance Internet hospital participation. Methods This study utilized qualitative analysis. Semi-structured questionnaires based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model was developed and administered to 40 doctors and nurses at a Grade A tertiary hospital in Guangdong Province. Data was coded and analyzed using qualitative methods including Nvivo software. Results The research displayed 19 barriers and 7 enablers for the implementation of Internet hospitals, all 14 TDF domains impacted participation with motivation cited most frequently. Despite challenges, medical personnel exhibited a generally optimistic stance towards utilization of the Internet hospital. Major barriers include the higher requirement of diagnostic ability, objective difficulties brought by online consultation to the decision-making process, limitation of time and other resources, not ideal technological and institutional environment, lack of self-efficacy and negative expectation of results in online consultation. Key enablers include patient needs and the positive impact of online care on the medical process and patient experience. Discussion This qualitative study identified a range of barriers and enablers to Internet hospital participation according to medical personnel, providing an conceptual framework to guide further research evaluating implementation strategies. Expanded research and targeted interventions design can help optimize participation in this evolving healthcare delivery model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaolong Wu
- Business School, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Yulin Kuang
- Business School, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Yonglin Guo
- School of Government, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Ning Wei
- Shenzhen Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Zichun Fan
- Business School, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Jingru Ling
- Business School, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Woodcock C, Cornwall N, Dikomitis L, Harrisson SA, White S, Helliwell T, Knaggs R, Hodgson E, Pincus T, Santer M, Mallen CD, Ashworth J, Jinks C. Designing a primary care pharmacist-led review for people treated with opioids for persistent pain: a multi-method qualitative study. BJGP Open 2024:BJGPO.2023.0221. [PMID: 38631722 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpo.2023.0221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioids are frequently prescribed for persistent non-cancer pain despite limited evidence of long-term effectiveness and risk of harm. Evidence-based interventions to address inappropriate opioid prescribing are lacking. AIM To explore perspectives of people living with persistent pain to understand barriers and facilitators in reducing opioids in the context of a pharmacist-led primary care review, and identify review components and features for optimal delivery. DESIGN & SETTING A multi-method qualitative study undertaken in the primary care setting in the UK. METHOD Adults with experience of persistent pain and taking opioids participated in semi-structured interviews (n = 15, 73% female) and an online discussion forum (n = 31). The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) provided a framework for data collection and thematic analysis, involving deductive analysis to TDF domains, inductive analysis within domains to generate sub-themes, and sub-theme comparison to form across-domain overarching themes. The behaviour change technique taxonomy (v1) and motivational behaviour change technique classification system were used to systematically map themes to behaviour change techniques to identify potential review components and delivery features. RESULTS Thirty-two facilitator and barrier sub-themes for patients reducing opioids were identified across 13 TDF domains. These combined into the following six overarching themes: learning to live with pain; opioid reduction expectations; assuming a medical model; pharmacist-delivered reviews; pharmacist-patient relationship; and patient engagement. Sub-themes mapped to 21 unique behaviour change techniques, yielding 17 components and five delivery features for the proposed PROMPPT review. CONCLUSION This study generated theoretically informed evidence for design of a practice pharmacist-led PROMPPT review. Future research will test the feasibility and acceptability of the PROMPPT review and pharmacist training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Woodcock
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Nicola Cornwall
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Lisa Dikomitis
- Centre for Health Services Studies and Kent and Medway Medical School, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Sarah A Harrisson
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Haywood Hospital, High Lane, Burslem, Stoke on Trent, UK
| | - Simon White
- School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
| | - Toby Helliwell
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Haywood Hospital, High Lane, Burslem, Stoke on Trent, UK
| | - Roger Knaggs
- Division of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Primary Integrated Community Services Ltd, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Tamar Pincus
- Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Miriam Santer
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Christian D Mallen
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Haywood Hospital, High Lane, Burslem, Stoke on Trent, UK
| | - Julie Ashworth
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Haywood Hospital, High Lane, Burslem, Stoke on Trent, UK
| | - Clare Jinks
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Health Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Price O, Armitage CJ, Bee P, Brooks H, Lovell K, Butler D, Cree L, Fishwick P, Grundy A, Johnston I, Mcpherson P, Riches H, Scott A, Walker L, Papastavrou Brooks C. De-escalating aggression in acute inpatient mental health settings: a behaviour change theory-informed, secondary qualitative analysis of staff and patient perspectives. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24:548. [PMID: 39107709 PMCID: PMC11301843 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05920-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND De-escalation is often advocated to reduce harm associated with violence and use of restrictive interventions, but there is insufficient understanding of factors that influence de-escalation behaviour in practice. For the first time, using behaviour change and implementation science methodology, this paper aims to identify the drivers that will enhance de-escalation in acute inpatient and psychiatric intensive care mental health settings. METHODS Secondary analysis of 46 qualitative interviews with ward staff (n = 20) and patients (n = 26) informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. RESULTS Capabilities for de-escalation included knowledge (impact of trauma on memory and self-regulation and the aetiology and experience of voice hearing) and skills (emotional self-regulation, distress validation, reducing social distance, confirming autonomy, setting limits and problem-solving). Opportunities for de-escalation were limited by dysfunctional risk management cultures/ relationships between ward staff and clinical leadership, and a lack of patient involvement in safety maintenance. Motivation to engage in de-escalation was limited by negative emotion associated with moral formulations of patients and internal attributions for behaviour. CONCLUSION In addition to training that enhances knowledge and skills, interventions to enhance de-escalation should target ward and organisational cultures, as well as making fundamental changes to the social and physical structure of inpatient mental health wards. Psychological interventions targeting negative emotion in staff are needed to increase motivation. This paper provides a new evidence-based framework of indicative changes that will enhance de-escalation in adult acute mental health inpatient and PICU settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owen Price
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, England.
| | - Christopher J Armitage
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, Nelson Street, Manchester, M13 9NQ, England
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
| | - Penny Bee
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
| | - Helen Brooks
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
| | - Karina Lovell
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
| | - Debbie Butler
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, England
| | - Lindsey Cree
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
| | - Paul Fishwick
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
| | - Andrew Grundy
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
| | - Isobel Johnston
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
| | - Peter Mcpherson
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, England
| | - Holly Riches
- Merseycare NHS Foundation Trust, Kings Business Park, Prescot, L34 1PJ, England
| | - Anne Scott
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
| | - Lauren Walker
- School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB, England
| | - Cat Papastavrou Brooks
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, England
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bretherton CP, Kotwal T, Sandhu H, Baird J, Griffin XL. Patient experiences and desires for recovery after ankle fracture surgery. Injury 2024; 55:111763. [PMID: 39106533 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Revised: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study investigates patients' experiences of commencing weight-bearing after ankle fracture surgery and their recovery priorities to inform a new rehabilitation intervention. METHODS Embedded within the Weight bearing in Ankle Fractures (WAX) trial, this qualitative study conducted semi-structured interviews with patients following ankle fracture surgery. The Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) framework guided the interview questions to ensure comprehensive domain coverage. A purposive, maximum variation sampling strategy was used for participant selection. Data analysis employed a combined deductive and inductive approach. RESULTS A total of 29 patients were interviewed, revealing five key themes: understanding the recovery journey, navigating the healthcare system, understanding personal physical capabilities, building confidence for weight-bearing, and resuming daily activities. Themes emphasised the variability in healthcare access, the impact of non-weight-bearing on independence, and the role of self-efficacy in recovery. CONCLUSIONS The study highlighted the diversity in patient experiences and recovery challenges post-ankle fracture surgery. Patients' recovery was influenced by access to consistent healthcare advice, self-efficacy, and the physical and psychological impact of non-weight-bearing. The findings suggest a need for tailored, patient-centred rehabilitation interventions that consider individual recovery trajectories and promote self-management. These insights provide a foundational understanding for developing interventions that more effectively address patient priorities and barriers to recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Bretherton
- Bone and Joint Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University London, 4 Newark Street, London, E1 2AT, United Kingdom; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, E1 1BB, United Kingdom.
| | - Tejas Kotwal
- Bone and Joint Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University London, 4 Newark Street, London, E1 2AT, United Kingdom
| | - Harbinder Sandhu
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom
| | - Janis Baird
- Centre for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom
| | - Xavier L Griffin
- Bone and Joint Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University London, 4 Newark Street, London, E1 2AT, United Kingdom; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, E1 1BB, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Curtis K, Clark B, Lam MK, Huckle R, Melville G, Binks S, Ryan MW, Gardner T, Parsons MB, Ashford B. Rethinking the tiered trauma team response: A case-series study in a regional trauma centre. Emerg Med Australas 2024; 36:571-578. [PMID: 38451003 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.14399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To reduce perceived unnecessary resource use, we modified our tiered trauma response. If a patient was not physiologically compromised, surgical registrar attendance was not mandated. We investigated the effect of this change on missed injury, unplanned representation to ED, diagnostic imaging rates and staff satisfaction. METHODS A retrospective case series study assessing the 3-month period before and after the intervention was conducted. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between ordering of computerised tomography (CT) and ED length of stay (LOS), injury severity (ISS), age, surgical review and admission. A staff survey was conducted to investigate staff perceptions of the practice change. Free text data were analysed using inductive content analysis. RESULTS There were 105 patients in the control and 166 in the intervention group and their mean (SD) ISS was the same (ISS [SD] = 4 [±4] [P = 0.608]). A higher proportion of the control group were admitted (56.3% vs 42.2% [P = 0.032]) and they had a shorter ED LOS (274 min [202-456] vs 326 min [225-560], P = 0.044). The rate of missed injury was unchanged. A surgical review resulted in a 26-fold increase in receipt of a whole-body CT scan (odds ratio = 26.89, 95% confidence interval = 3.31-218.17). Just over half of survey respondents felt the change was safe (54.4%), and more surgical (90%) than ED staff (69%) reported the change as positive. CONCLUSION The removal of the surgical registrar from the initial trauma standby response did not result in any adverse events, reduced admissions, pathology and imaging, but resulted in an increased ED LOS and time to surgical review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Curtis
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Emergency Department, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Benjamin Clark
- Emergency Department, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mary K Lam
- Department of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ryan Huckle
- Emergency Department, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Geoffrey Melville
- Emergency Department, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- Research Operations, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- Faulty of Science Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Simon Binks
- Emergency Department, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ms Wende Ryan
- Emergency Department, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Trevor Gardner
- Emergency Department, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ms Brooke Parsons
- Emergency Department, Southern NSW Local Health District, Cooma Hospital, Cooma, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bruce Ashford
- Research Operations, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- Faulty of Science Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jolliffe L, Andrew NE, Srikanth V, Beare R, Noeske KE, Snowdon DA. Development of an implementation strategy for routine collection of generic patient reported outcome measures: a qualitative study in multidisciplinary community rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2024; 46:3895-3904. [PMID: 37735798 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2258334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore staff perceptions of barriers and enablers towards implementing the EQ-5D-5L in community rehabilitation, and develop a theory-informed implementation approach for routine administration of generic patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using implementation science frameworks. MATERIALS AND METHODS A qualitative study was conducted at three sites. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation staff completed individual semi-structured interviews, which were transcribed and coded against the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). We identified and selected potentially effective behaviour change techniques using the Behavior Change Wheel. Hypothetical strategies were operationalised. RESULTS Twenty-one interviews were conducted, and four themes emerged: (1) The Impact of PROMs on patient centered-care; (2) Considerations for validity of PROMs; (3) Service-level impact of embedding PROMs; (4) Practical issues of embedding PROMs within the service. Barriers and enablers were mapped to seven of the TDF domains; relating most to clinicians' "belief about consequences", "reinforcement", and "environmental context and resources". Five hypothetical strategies were developed to overcome identified barriers and strengthen enablers. Key behaviour change techniques underpinning the strategies include: restructuring the physical environment, incentivisation, persuasion and education, enablement, and, social support. CONCLUSIONS Our implementation approach highlights the importance of automating processes, engaging site champions, routinely reporting, and using PROM data to inform service provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Jolliffe
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing (NCHA), Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nadine E Andrew
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing (NCHA), Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Velandai Srikanth
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing (NCHA), Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Richard Beare
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing (NCHA), Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kate E Noeske
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing (NCHA), Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David A Snowdon
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing (NCHA), Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Arnet I, Eickhoff C, Sahm LJ, Caloz S, Mittag M, Schulz M, Allemann SS. Inconclusiveness of psychometric testing of medication adherence questionnaires. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2024; 80:1189-1195. [PMID: 38647703 PMCID: PMC11226495 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-024-03684-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To propose a paradigm change for the validation procedures of medication adherence questionnaires. METHODS A total of 121 validation procedures of unique questionnaires for medication adherence were analyzed. RESULTS "Construct validity" and "internal consistency" were most often assessed, and test results varied largely. A more in-depth analysis indicated that the assessment of medication non-adherence included distinct but related constructs, such as the extent to which doses are missed, and the attempt to identify different facets of medication-taking behavior. Consequently, each construct requires a different measurement approach with different psychometric tests for establishing its validity and reliability. CONCLUSION Results show that assessing the validity and reliability of adherence questionnaires with standard procedures including statistical tests is inconclusive. Refinement of the constructs of non-adherence is needed in pharmacy and medical practice. We suggest a distinction between the (i) extent of missed doses over the past 2 weeks, (ii) modifiable reasons for non-adherence behavior, and (iii) unmodifiable factors of non-adherence. Validation procedures and corresponding statistical methods should be selected according to the specific single constructs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Arnet
- Pharmaceutical Care, Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Christiane Eickhoff
- Department of Medicine, ABDA-Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists, Berlin, Germany
| | - Laura J Sahm
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Sabine Caloz
- Pharmaceutical Care, Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Martin Schulz
- Department of Medicine, ABDA-Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Samuel S Allemann
- Pharmaceutical Care, Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Evrard P, Henrard S, Spinewine A. Development of a Behavior-Change Intervention toward Benzodiazepine Deprescribing in Older Adults Living in Nursing Homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2024; 25:105053. [PMID: 38838741 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to develop a context-specific intervention toward benzodiazepine deprescribing in nursing homes (NHs), with insights from behavior-change theories and involvement of stakeholders. DESIGN Selection of behavior change techniques (BCTs), through online survey and group discussion, followed by operationalization of these BCTs into intervention components. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS The intervention was developed for Belgian NHs, involving various stakeholders: health care professionals (HCPs), NH administrators, and policy makers. METHODS Using the Theory and Techniques Tool, we preselected the BCTs linked to one of the 9 Theoretical Domain Framework domains identified as being the main barriers for benzodiazepine deprescribing in Belgian NHs. These were then presented to stakeholders. Based on the APEASE (Acceptability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Affordability, Side-effects, and Ethics) criteria, participants ranked BCTs through an online survey, and then performed final selection during a group discussion. Selected BCTs were operationalized into intervention components, with specific contents and methods of delivery validated by stakeholders. RESULTS Thirty-seven potential BCTs were identified. Eighteen stakeholders participated in the survey, and 7 in the group discussion. This led to the final inclusion of 9 BCTs: instruction on how to perform the behavior, information about health consequences, pros and cons, problem solving, goal setting (behavior), social comparison, restructuring physical environment, restructuring social environment, and graded tasks. These BCTs were operationalized into a 6-component intervention: process and goal setting, HCP education, physical environment adaptations, audit and feedback, NH residents' and relatives' increased awareness, and multidisciplinary work. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS Use of a theory-based approach toward intervention development has the potential to improve the probability of its feasibility and effectiveness in tackling barriers to benzodiazepine deprescribing. By doing so, we have developed a multifaceted approach with actions taken at the patient, HCP, and NH levels. Our novel 6-component intervention will be evaluated in a pilot cluster-randomized controlled trial to assess its feasibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Perrine Evrard
- Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacoepidemiology Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Séverine Henrard
- Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacoepidemiology Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium; Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anne Spinewine
- Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacoepidemiology Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium; Pharmacy Department, CHU UCL Namur, UCLouvain, Yvoir, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Jackson HM, Batterham PJ, Ohan JL, Calear AL, Farrer LM. Skill enactment and knowledge acquisition among community users of digital mental health interventions: qualitative study with thematic analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24:545. [PMID: 39090611 PMCID: PMC11293152 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05953-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The acquisition of knowledge and use of skills from digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) are considered important for effectiveness. However, our understanding of user experiences implementing skills learned from these interventions is limited, particularly outside of research trials. This qualitative study aimed to investigate how community users learn and apply knowledge and skills from DMHIs based on cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in daily life. The study also examined factors influencing the selection and use of skills and explored perceived changes in mental health resulting from the intervention. METHODS Thirteen adults aged 26 to 66 years (10 females) were recruited using social media advertising and participated in semi-structured interviews by telephone or videoconference. All participants were living in Australia and had used a digital CBT program within the past 3 months. Interviews lasted on average 45 min. Transcripts were analysed using theoretical thematic analysis. RESULTS Participants demonstrated high levels of program engagement. Findings were organised into three topics with six major themes. Participants reported that their chosen intervention reinforced existing knowledge and fostered new skills and insights (Topic 1, Theme 1: knowledge consolidation). Most described actively applying skills (Topic 1, Theme 2: active approach to skill enactment), although the extent of learning and range of skills enacted varied across participants. Influences on skill selection included the perceived relevance of intervention strategies to the user's needs and personal characteristics (Topic 2, Theme 1: relevance of intervention strategies), as well as the perceived or experienced effectiveness of those strategies (Topic 2, Theme 2: perceived and experienced benefit). Challenges to ongoing skill enactment included time scarcity, prioritisation difficulties, and lack of motivation (Topic 2, Theme 3: navigating time constraints and low motivation). Improvements in mental health were generally modest and attributed mainly to participants' proactive efforts (Topic 3, Theme 1: perceived changes). CONCLUSIONS DMHIs may reinforce existing understanding of psychotherapeutic strategies, offer new knowledge, and encourage the application of skills in everyday life among community users who actively engage with these interventions. Future research should prioritise personalising DMHIs and investigating methods to optimise the acquisition, retention, and sustained application of knowledge and skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley M Jackson
- Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
| | - Philip J Batterham
- Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Jeneva L Ohan
- School of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Alison L Calear
- Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Louise M Farrer
- Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Clarke JR, Gibson M, Savaglio M, Navani R, Mousa M, Boyle JA. Digital screening for mental health in pregnancy and postpartum: A systematic review. Arch Womens Ment Health 2024; 27:489-526. [PMID: 38557913 PMCID: PMC11230976 DOI: 10.1007/s00737-024-01427-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review aimed to determine if digital screening for mental health in pregnancy and postpartum is acceptable, feasible and more effective than standard care (paper-and pen-based screening or no screening). The second aim was to identify barriers and enablers to implementing digital screening in pregnancy and postpartum. METHOD OVID MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, Joanna Briggs Database and All EMB reviews incorporating Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (OVID) were systematically searched for articles that evaluated digital screening for mental health in pregnancy and postpartum between 2000 and 2021. Qualitative articles were deductively mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). RESULTS A total of 34 articles were included in the analysis, including qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies. Digital screening was deemed acceptable, feasible and effective. TDF domains for common barriers included environmental context and resources, skills, social/professional role and identity and beliefs about consequences. TDF domains for common enablers included knowledge, social influences, emotion and behavioural regulation. CONCLUSION When planning to implement digital screening, consideration should be made to have adequate training, education and manageable workload for healthcare professionals (HCP's). Organisational resources and support are important, as well as the choice of the appropriate digital screening assessment and application setting for women. Theory-informed recommendations are provided for both healthcare professionals and women to inform future clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jocelyn R Clarke
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Melanie Gibson
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Te Tātai Hauora o Hine - National Centre for Women's Health Research Aotearoa, Wellington Faculty of Health,, Victoria University of Wellington,, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Melissa Savaglio
- Health and Social Care Unit (HSCU), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (SPHPM), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Mariam Mousa
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jacqueline A Boyle
- Health Systems and Equity, Eastern Health Clinical School,, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bisset CN, Moug SJ, Oliphant R, Dames N, Cleland J. Surgeon perceptions of personality as an influencing factor on anastomotic decision-making: A qualitative analysis. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:1608-1616. [PMID: 39162024 DOI: 10.1111/codi.17078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 06/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024]
Abstract
AIM Surgeon personality is a factor influencing rectal anastomotic decision-making. However, it is unclear how or why this may be the case, or what aspects of personality are involved. The aim of this study was to investigate the views of colorectal surgeons on how their individual personality may influence variation in anastomotic decision-making. METHOD Purposive sampling was used to invite certified UK-based colorectal surgeons to participate, with individual interviews used for data collection. Participants were recruited until ongoing data review indicated no new codes were generated (i.e. data sufficiency). Data were analysed thematically following Braun and Clarke's six-step framework. RESULTS Seventeen colorectal surgeons (eight female, nine male) participated. Two key themes relating to personality and decision-making were identified: (1) surgeon development and training and (2) patient-surgeon interactions, each with relevant subthemes. Surgeons described how their personality may influence patients' postoperative outcomes (e.g. decision-making, team working and communication) and potential mechanisms for how their personality may influence operative risk-taking. Following anastomotic leakage, surgeons described a disproportionate sense of guilt and responsibility. There appears to be a significant transition in responsibility from trainee to newly appointed consultant, which may be part of the 'hidden curriculum' of surgical training. CONCLUSION Colorectal surgeons have described their perceptions of how personality traits may impact variation in decision-making and patient outcomes for the first time. Early career surgeons felt ill-prepared for the level of guilt experienced when managing complications. Surgeons appear open to personality assessment if this was through an educational lens, with the aim of improving decision-making following complications and overall performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly N Bisset
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, UK
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Susan J Moug
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, UK
- Department of General Surgery, Golden Jubilee University National Hospital, Clydebank, UK
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Raymond Oliphant
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, UK
| | - Nicola Dames
- Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland Patient Liaison Group, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jennifer Cleland
- Medical Education Research and Scholarship Unit, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Johnson LCM, Khan SH, Ali MK, Galaviz KI, Waseem F, Ordóñez CE, Siedner MJ, Nyatela A, Marconi VC, Lalla-Edward ST. Understanding barriers and facilitators to integrated HIV and hypertension care in South Africa. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:87. [PMID: 39090730 PMCID: PMC11295645 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00625-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/27/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The burden of hypertension among people with HIV is high, particularly in low-and middle-income countries, yet gaps in hypertension screening and care in these settings persist. This study aimed to identify facilitators of and barriers to hypertension screening, treatment, and management among people with HIV in primary care clinics in Johannesburg, South Africa. Additionally, different stakeholder groups were included to identify discordant perceptions. METHODS Using a cross-sectional study design, data were collected via interviews (n = 53) with people with HIV and hypertension and clinic managers and focus group discussions (n = 9) with clinic staff. A qualitative framework analysis approach guided by COM-B and the Theoretical Domains Framework were used to identify and compare determinants of hypertension care across stakeholder groups. RESULTS Data from clinic staff and managers generated three themes characterizing facilitators of and barriers to the adoption and implementation of hypertension screening and treatment: 1) clinics have limited structural and operational capacity to support the implementation of integrated care models, 2) education and training on chronic care guidelines is inconsistent and often lacking across clinics, and 3) clinicians have the goal of enhancing chronic care within their clinics but first need to advocate for health system characteristics that will sustainably support integrated care. Patient data generated three themes characterizing existing facilitators of and barriers to clinic attendance and chronic disease self-management: 1) the threat of hypertension-related morbidity and mortality as a motivator for lifestyle change, 2) the emotional toll of clinic's logistical, staff, and resource challenges, and 3) hypertension self-management as a patchwork of informational and support sources. The main barriers to hypertension screening, treatment, and management were related to environmental resources and context (i.e., lack of enabling resources and siloed flow of clinic operations) and patients' knowledge and emotions (i.e., lack of awareness about hypertension risk, fear, and frustration). Clinical actors and patients differed in perceived need to prioritize HIV versus hypertension care. CONCLUSIONS The convergence of multi-stakeholder data highlight key areas for improvement, where tailored implementation strategies targeting motivations of clinic staff and capacity of patients may address challenges to hypertension screening, treatment, and management recognized across groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie C M Johnson
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd, 30322, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Suha H Khan
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd, 30322, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mohammed K Ali
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory Global Diabetes Research Center, Woodruff Health Sciences Center, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd, 30322, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Karla I Galaviz
- Applied Health Science, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, 1025 E. Seventh Street, Suite 111, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA
| | - Fatima Waseem
- Center for the Study of Human Health, College of Arts and Sciences, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd, 30322, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Claudia E Ordóñez
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd, 30322, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mark J Siedner
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University , Africa Health Research Institute, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Athini Nyatela
- Ezintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Vincent C Marconi
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd, 30322, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Samanta T Lalla-Edward
- Ezintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Graham ND, Graham ID, Vanderspank-Wright B, Nadalin Penno L, Fergusson DA, Squires JE. Factors influencing nurses' use of sedation interruptions in a critical care unit: a descriptive qualitative study. JBI Evid Implement 2024; 22:316-329. [PMID: 38533695 PMCID: PMC11323761 DOI: 10.1097/xeb.0000000000000415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS This study examined critical care nurses', physicians', and allied health professionals' perceptions of factors that support, inhibit, or limit the use of sedation interruption (SI) to improve the use of this integral component of care for mechanically ventilated patients. METHOD We conducted a theory-based, descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with critical care registered nurses, respiratory therapists, a pharmacist, and a physician in a hospital in Ontario, Canada. The interview guide and analysis were informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and transcripts were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS We identified 9 facilitators and 20 barriers to SI use by nurses. Facilitators included the innovation (importance of protocols) and potential adopters (comfort with the skill). The barriers were the potential adopters' (nurses) knowledge gaps regarding the performance and goal of SI and the practice environment (lack of time, availability of extra staff, and lack of multidisciplinary rounds). CONCLUSION This study identified facilitators and barriers to SI for mechanically ventilated patients. Implementation efforts must address barriers associated with nurses, the environment, and contextual factors. A team-based approach is essential, as the absence of interprofessional rounds is a significant barrier to the appropriate use or non-use of SI. Future research can focus on the indications, contraindications, and goals of SI, emphasizing a shared appreciation for these factors across disciplines. Nursing capacity to manage a patient waking up from sedation is necessary for point-of-care adherence; future research should focus on the best ways to do so. Implementation study designs should use theory and evidence-based determinants of SI to bridge the evidence-to-practice gap. SPANISH ABSTRACT http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A178.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole D. Graham
- Faculty of Environmental and Health Sciences, Canadore College, North Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Ian D. Graham
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Letitia Nadalin Penno
- Faculty of Environmental and Health Sciences, Canadore College, North Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Dean A. Fergusson
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Janet E. Squires
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gagnon H, Hearn K, Tsang C, Yip E, Stuber L, Ile E, Bridger L, Saulnier G, Hanson HM, Leal J. "We could have used a lot more of this before…": A qualitative study understanding barriers and facilitators to implementing a provincial PPE safety coach program during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Infect Control 2024; 52:947-957. [PMID: 38492807 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2024.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A Provincial PPE Safety Coach Program was introduced to support appropriate use of personal protective equipment by health care workers. The objective was to understand barriers and facilitators to implementation. METHODS A qualitative study was conducted mid-2021. Participants were recruited using a purposive sampling strategy. Interviews were conducted using a guide informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Analysis was conducted using the Theoretical Domains Framework. RESULTS Prominent domains identified by staff were "social influences and skills", "environmental context and resources", "social/professional role and identity", "emotion", and "belief of consequences". Prominent domains identified by safety coaches were "knowledge", "social/professional role and identity", "environmental context and resources", and "memory". Only "environmental context and resources" and "social/professional role and identity" were similar. The main facilitators were fear of COVID-19 and leadership commitment, while the main barriers were lack of clarity and balancing the role. DISCUSSION Understanding the local context of a health care environment influenced the success of safety coaches. The role allowed individuals to develop leadership skills and help staff improve their perceived competence in using personal protective equipment. CONCLUSIONS Safety coaches were well received. Influencing factors provide a basis for strategies to embed this approach throughout a health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Gagnon
- Infection Prevention and Control, Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kaitlin Hearn
- Infection Prevention and Control, Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada; School of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christian Tsang
- Infection Prevention and Control, Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada; Department of Community Health Services, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Erica Yip
- Infection Prevention and Control, Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lorinda Stuber
- Infection Prevention and Control, Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada
| | - Eric Ile
- Infection Prevention and Control, Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada
| | - Laurel Bridger
- Infection Prevention and Control, Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gisele Saulnier
- Infection Prevention and Control, Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada
| | - Heather M Hanson
- Department of Community Health Services, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Provincial Seniors Health and Continuing Care, Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jenine Leal
- Infection Prevention and Control, Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada; Department of Community Health Services, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada; O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Nichol B, Haighton C, Wilson R, Rodrigues AM. Enhancing making every contact count (MECC) training and delivery for the third and social economy (TSE) sector: a strategic behavioural analysis. Psychol Health 2024:1-32. [PMID: 39086100 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2024.2386289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To enhance Making Every Contact Count (MECC, an opportunistic approach to health promotion), training in the Third and Social Economy (TSE, all groups and organisations primarily working towards social justice, outside of the government or household) by examining the degree to which the behavioural content of MECC training tackled significant factors influencing MECC delivery. METHODS AND MEASURES A strategic behavioural analysis design. Semi-structured interviews with service providers (n = 15) and users (n = 5) were coded for barriers and facilitators of MECC delivery using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Existing MECC training was coded for behaviour change techniques (BCTs) and intervention functions (IFs). The degree to which BCTs and IFs addressed the key TDF domains of influences on MECC delivery in the TSE were examined using prespecified tools. RESULTS Seven key TDF domains of influences in MECC delivery were identified. Overall, only 9/31 linked BCTs were utilised within MECC training, with percentage utilisation of relevant BCTs for each domain ranging from 0% to 66.7%. Training adequately addressed 2/7 key domains. CONCLUSION The TSE and healthcare share many common key TDF domains, although there are differences in how each are relevant. Limitations and recommendations for MECC training are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth Nichol
- Department of Social Work, Education, and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Catherine Haighton
- Department of Social Work, Education, and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rob Wilson
- Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Angela M Rodrigues
- Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Schulz GL, Painter AC, McQueen A, Shenoy S, DuBois JM. Barriers and Facilitators to Youth Decision-Making Involvement in Families Referred for Stem Cell Transplant. JOURNAL OF FAMILY NURSING 2024:10748407241261123. [PMID: 39066518 DOI: 10.1177/10748407241261123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
Youth prefer to be involved in treatment decisions, yet youth participation is minimally present in decisions like stem cell transplant (SCT) that require frequent medications and social isolation to be successful in curing cancer and chronic illness. The purpose of our study is to identify the barriers and facilitators to youth decision-making involvement in the youth-parent interaction when referred for treatment with SCT. We report qualitative findings from our theory-driven mixed-methods study. We thematically analyzed our field notes of youth and parent observations and audio-recordings during SCT consultations and semi-structured interviews. Data were collected from 10 youth, 8 to 16 (median 12) years of age, and their parents (n = 20). Three themes emerged: (a) Reluctant unless motivated, (b) Uncertain but capable, and (c) Limited unless supported. Our findings emphasize the critical role parents may take in facilitating youth involvement in decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Amy McQueen
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Shalini Shenoy
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - James M DuBois
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Macedo L, Di Pelino S, Santos VS, Richardson J, MacDermid J, Hancock M, Battie MC, Saragiotto BT, Hayden JA, Rushton A, Packham T, Freman M, Bray S, Griffin M, Hladysh G, Miller P, Attwell S. Implementation of back to living well, a community-based program for the tertiary prevention of low back pain: a study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25:593. [PMID: 39068385 PMCID: PMC11283700 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07712-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current literature supports the effectiveness of exercise, education, and self-management interventions for the long-term management of persistent low back pain. However, there is significant uncertainty about the implementation of interventions related to barriers, facilitators, and patient's preferences. This study will evaluate the Back to Living Well program implementation from a participant and organizational perspective. More specifically we address the following objectives: 1) identify program barriers and facilitators from participants' perspectives, 2) identify factors related to program, personal and contextual factors that contribute to negative and positive outcomes, and outcome trajectories, 3) identify factors influencing participants' selection of an in-person or e-health program, and 4) evaluate program specific barriers and facilitators from the organization and care delivery perspectives. METHODS This study will utilize a mixed-method convergent design including a longitudinal cohort strand and a longitudinal qualitative interview strand. The RE-AIM framework will be used to assess program implementation. Participants (n = 90, 1:1: in person or virtual) who choose to register in the program as well as staff (n = 10 to 15) involved in the delivery of the program will be invited to participate. Participants will participate in a 12-week physical activity, education, and self-management program. Implementation outcomes will be measured at 3-, 6-, 12-months, and six months after the end of the follow-ups. Interview scripts and directed content analysis will be constructed based on the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Neuromatrix Model of Pain, Theoretical Domains Framework. Staff interviews will be constructed and analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Participants will also complete pain, disability, quality of life and psychological questionnaires, wear an activity tracker at all time points, and complete weekly pain and activity limitation questions using a mobile application. DISCUSSION The study results will provide evidence to inform potential future implementation of the program. An effective, appropriately targeted, and well implemented exercise program for the long-term management (i.e., tertiary prevention) of LBP could minimize the burden of the condition on patients, the health care system and society. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05929846. This (Registration Date: July 3 2023) study has been approved by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board Project ID#15,354.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciana Macedo
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | | | - Veronica Souza Santos
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University and Master's and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Julie Richardson
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Bruno T Saragiotto
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, Graduate School of Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | - Tara Packham
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Matt Freman
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Steven Bray
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Meridith Griffin
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Pat Miller
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gyawali R, Gamboa S, Rolfe K, Westbrook JI, Raban MZ. Consumer perspectives on antibiotic use in residential aged care: a mixed-methods systematic review. Am J Infect Control 2024:S0196-6553(24)00608-4. [PMID: 39067702 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2024.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Revised: 07/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Aged care staff and doctors frequently highlight consumers' role in antibiotic treatment decisions. However, few studies include consumers. This study aimed to investigate consumer perspectives on antibiotic use in residential aged care. METHODS A search across six online databases yielded 3373 studies, with five meeting inclusion criteria. Participant quotes, themes, statistical analyses, and authors' interpretive summaries in the included studies were inductively coded and refined to generate themes. RESULTS Three themes emerged: perception of benefits and risks of antibiotics; perceived role in antibiotic treatment decision-making and information-communication needs. Consumers held positive attitudes towards antibiotics, did not associate antibiotics with the exclusive treatment of bacterial infections, and had limited awareness of potential risks, such as antibiotic resistance. Studies showed diverse perceptions regarding residents' and their families' involvement in antibiotic treatment decision-making with some residents actively seeking antibiotics and others trusting doctors to decide. Studies also described consumer need for effective provider-consumer communication and information sharing which was affected by contextual barriers such as motivation, preferences, available information resources, and provider attitudes. CONCLUSION Limited literature is available on consumer perspectives on antibiotic use in aged care. The review highlights that consumer needs are more complex than simply wanting an antibiotic. Antimicrobial stewardship programs should target consumer awareness, beliefs and provider-consumer communication to enhance antibiotic use in aged care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajendra Gyawali
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University
| | - Sarah Gamboa
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University
| | - Kathleen Rolfe
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University
| | - Johanna I Westbrook
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University
| | - Magdalena Z Raban
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
O'Leary MC, Kwong E, Cox C, Gentry AL, Stover AM, Vu MB, Carda-Auten J, Leeman J, Mody GN. Patient motivators of postoperative electronic patient-reported outcome symptom monitoring use in thoracic surgery patients: a qualitative study. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2024; 8:81. [PMID: 39060464 PMCID: PMC11282008 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00766-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems can be used to engage patients in remote symptom monitoring to support postoperative care. We interviewed thoracic surgery patients with ePRO experience to identify factors that influenced use of ePROs to report their symptoms post-discharge. METHOD This qualitative study used semi-structured telephone interviews with adults who underwent major thoracic surgery at an academic medical center in North Carolina. Individuals who enrolled in symptom monitoring, completed at least one ePRO survey, and were reachable by phone for the interview were included. The ePRO surveys assessed 10 symptoms, including validated Patient-Reported Outcome Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) measures and thoracic surgery-specific questions. Surveys, offered via web-based and automated telephone options, were administered for four weeks post-discharge with alerts sent to clinicians for concerning symptoms. The interviews were guided by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation model for behavior change (COM-B) and examined factors that influenced patients' completion of ePRO surveys post-discharge. Team members independently coded interviews and identified themes, informed by COM-B. We report descriptive statistics (demographics, number of surveys completed) and themes organized by COM-B components. RESULTS Of 28 patients invited, 25 (89%) completed interviews from July to October 2022. Participants were a median 58 years, 56% female, 80% White, and 56% had a history of malignancy. They completed 131/150 (87%) possible ePRO surveys. For capability, participants reported building ePROs into their routine and having the skills and knowledge, but lacking physical and emotional energy, to complete ePROs. For opportunity, participants identified the ease and convenience of accessing ePROs and providers' validation of ePROs. Motivators were perceived benefits of a deepening connection to their clinical team, improved symptom management for themselves and others, and self-reflection about their recovery. Factors limiting motivation included lack of clarity about the purpose of ePROs and a disconnect between symptom items and individual recovery experience. CONCLUSIONS Patients described being motivated to complete ePROs when reinforced by clinicians and considered ePROs as valuable to their post-discharge experience. Future work should enhance ePRO patient education, improve provider alerts and communications about ePROs, and integrate options to capture patients' complex health journeys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan C O'Leary
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Elizabeth Kwong
- Carolina Health Informatics Program, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Chase Cox
- Department of Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Amanda L Gentry
- School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Angela M Stover
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Maihan B Vu
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jessica Carda-Auten
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer Leeman
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- School of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Gita N Mody
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Meloncelli N, O'Connor H, de Jersey S, Rushton A, Pateman K, Gallaher S, Kearney L, Wilkinson S. Designing a behaviour change intervention using COM-B and the Behaviour Change Wheel: Co-designing the Healthy Gut Diet for preventing gestational diabetes. J Hum Nutr Diet 2024. [PMID: 39054768 DOI: 10.1111/jhn.13355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence suggests that modulating the gut microbiota during pregnancy may help prevent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The Healthy Gut Diet study is a complex behaviour change intervention co-designed with women who have a lived experience of GDM. The aim of the study was to describe the development of the behaviour change dietary intervention, the Healthy Gut Diet. METHODS This study followed the process for designing behaviour change interventions using the Behaviour Change Wheel. Six researchers and 12 women with lived experience participated in online workshops to co-design the Healthy Gut Diet intervention. This included "diagnosing" the barriers and enablers to two target behaviours: eating more plant foods and eating less ultra processed/saturated fat containing foods. Content analysis of the workshop transcripts and activities was undertaken, underpinned by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). RESULTS Barriers and enablers to the target behaviours were described across all six COM-B components and 10 TDF domains. The intervention functions for the Healthy Gut Diet were education, enablement, environmental restructuring, persuasion and incentivisation. Forty behaviour change techniques were integrated into five modes of delivery for the Healthy Gut Diet intervention. The feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of the Healthy Gut Diet is being tested within a randomised controlled trial. CONCLUSIONS Using the Behaviour Change Wheel process in partnership with consumers resulted in a clearly described complex intervention targeting barriers and enablers of dietary behaviour change to improve the gut microbiota diversity in pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Meloncelli
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Office of the Chief Allied Health Practitioner, Metro North Health, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Hannah O'Connor
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Dietetics and Foodservices, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Health, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Susan de Jersey
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Dietetics and Foodservices, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Health, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Alita Rushton
- Office of the Chief Allied Health Practitioner, Metro North Health, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Kelsey Pateman
- Centre for Allied Health Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
- School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Lauren Kearney
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Women's and Newborn Service Group, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Shelley Wilkinson
- Department of Obstetric Medicine, Mater Mothers Hospitals, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kithulegoda N, Williams C, Senthilmurugan A, Aimola S, Atkinson J, Banerjee AT, Bazeghi F, Bender JL, Flynn S, Ghatage L, Goulbourne E, Grunfeld E, Heisey R, Rao A, Sutcliffe K, Lofters A, Ivers NM. Assessing the effectiveness of "BETTER Women", a community-based, primary care-linked peer health coaching programme for chronic disease prevention: protocol for a pragmatic, wait-list controlled, type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e085933. [PMID: 39053957 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Building on Existing Tools to Improve Cancer and Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care (BETTER) programme trains allied health professionals working in primary care settings to develop personalised chronic disease 'prevention prescriptions' with patients. However, maintenance of health behaviour changes is difficult without ongoing support. Sustainable options to enhance the BETTER programme and ensure accessibility to underserved populations are needed. We designed the BETTER Women programme, which uses a digital app to match patients with a trained peer health coach (PHC) who provides ongoing support for health behaviour change after receipt of a BETTER prevention prescription in primary care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will conduct a type 1 hybrid implementation-effectiveness patient-randomised trial. Interested women aged 40-68 years will be recruited from three large, sociodemographically distinct primary care clinics (urban, suburban and rural). Patients will be randomised 1:1 to intervention or wait-list control after receipt of their BETTER prevention prescription. We will aim to recruit 204 patients per group (408 total). Effectiveness will be assessed by the primary outcome of targeted behaviours achieved for each participant at 6 months, consisting of three cancer screening tests (cervical, breast and colorectal) and four behavioural determinants of cancer and chronic disease (diet, smoking, alcohol use and physical activity). Data will be collected through patient survey and clinical chart review, measured at 3, 6 and 12 months. Implementation outcomes will be assessed through patient surveys and interviews with patients, peer health coaches and healthcare providers. An embedded economic evaluation will examine cost per quality-adjusted life-year and per additional health behavioural targets achieved. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has been approved by Women's College Hospital Research Ethics Board (REB), the Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre REB and the University of Toronto REB. All participants will provide informed consent prior to enrolment. Participation is voluntary and withdrawal will have no impact on the usual care received from their primary care provider. The results of this trial will be published in peer-reviewed journals and shared via conference presentations. Deidentified datasets will be shared on request, after publication of results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04746859.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Kithulegoda
- Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Camille Williams
- Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aranee Senthilmurugan
- Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sabrina Aimola
- Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John Atkinson
- Ontario Public Health Association, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ananya Tina Banerjee
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Farnaz Bazeghi
- Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jacqueline L Bender
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Susan Flynn
- Canadian Cancer Society, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Elaine Goulbourne
- Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eva Grunfeld
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ruth Heisey
- Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anjana Rao
- Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Aisha Lofters
- Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Noah M Ivers
- Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gooden TE, Mkhoi ML, Mwalukunga LJ, Mdoe M, Senkoro E, Kibusi SM, Thomas GN, Nirantharakumar K, Manaseki-Holland S, Greenfield S. Exploring the preferred integration approach for HIV, diabetes and hypertension care and associated barriers and facilitators in Central Tanzania: An exploratory qualitative study. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 4:e0003510. [PMID: 39046965 PMCID: PMC11268702 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
Timely diagnosis and management of diabetes and hypertension among people living with HIV (PLWH) is imperative; however, many barriers exist within the current model of care for these comorbidities. We aimed to understand how HIV, diabetes, and hypertension care should be delivered and the associated barriers and facilitators for the preferred delivery approach. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 PLWH with comorbidities of diabetes and/or hypertension (referred to hereafter as non-communicable diseases [NCDs]), 10 healthcare professionals (HCPs) that provide care for NCDs, and 10 HCPs that provide care for HIV. Participants were recruited from two healthcare facilities in Dodoma, Tanzania and interviewed in Swahili. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and translated into English. We used the differentiated service delivery building blocks as a framework to determine where, who, what and when care should be provided. We applied the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to HCP transcripts to determine barriers and facilitators for the preferred integration approach. There was a consensus among participants that all care for NCDs should be provided for PLWH at HIV clinics (known as care and treatment centres [CTCs]) by either CTC doctors or NCD specialists. Participants preferred flexible follow-up care for NCDs and for it to be aligned with HIV follow-up appointments. The main barriers were mapped to the TDF domains of environmental context and resources, and social influences; the former included the lack of NCD medications, NCD diagnostic equipment, space, staff and guidelines whereas the latter included negative influences from peers and traditional healers. Several facilitators were mentioned regarding CTC HCPs' knowledge, skills, optimism and beliefs regarding their capabilities to care for PLWH with NCDs. The preferred integration approach should be tested, utilising the enabling factors described. The barriers described must be addressed with or without integration to achieve optimal care for PLWH with NCDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany E. Gooden
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Mkhoi L. Mkhoi
- Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania
| | | | - Mwajuma Mdoe
- Department of Public Health, University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania
| | | | | | - G. Neil Thomas
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Sheila Greenfield
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Murphy M, Coffey A, Pallan M, Oyebode O. Changing the food environment in secondary school canteens to promote healthy dietary choices: a qualitative study with school caterers. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:1970. [PMID: 39044155 PMCID: PMC11267781 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19513-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Typical adolescent diets do not meet current dietary recommendations. There is a need to address these dietary patterns to reduce the risk of obesity and other diet-related diseases. Schools provide an opportune setting to do so, as students consume a substantial proportion of their daily dietary intake whilst at school. There is a developing evidence base on the use of choice architecture (food choice cues) to promote healthy eating in school contexts. It is necessary to understand the acceptability and feasibility of implementing such interventions. We aimed to explore these factors from the perspectives of secondary school caterers. METHODS We conducted qualitative interviews with caterers from secondary schools across the West Midlands, UK and national/regional catering representatives. A semi-structured topic guide and visual aid were used to guide interviews. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Framework analysis was conducted in NVivo v12. RESULTS Twelve participants took part. Seven themes were identified and grouped into three categories: Acceptability (Suitability; Salient cues; Student engagement), Barriers (Catering decision drivers; Limits of influence), and Enablers (Perceived role; Opportunities). Caterers considered healthy food cues to be suited to adolescents as they require minimal reflective motivation. Salient cues included enhancing the placement, presentation and portability of healthy items, improving the dining environment and focusing pricing/incentive strategies on increased quantity. Student engagement was considered important. Some catering decision drivers conflicted with healthy food cues, and many felt that their role in healthy eating was limited due to the overwhelming influence of external food environments, adolescent resistance, and features of the secondary school canteen setting e.g. short duration of lunchtime, lack of space. However, caterers appeared motivated to implement healthy food cues and identified key opportunities for implementation, including integration into whole-school approaches to healthy eating. CONCLUSIONS Interventions using healthy food cues appeared acceptable to secondary school caterers, key potential implementers of these strategies. Future interventions could incorporate strategies relating to placement, presentation and pricing to prompt healthy selections, and actions to engage the student body and improve the dining environment. Evaluations should consider potential impacts upon food purchasing, consumption and waste to address caterers' concerns about these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Murphy
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Alice Coffey
- Institute of Global Sustainable Development, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Miranda Pallan
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Oyinlola Oyebode
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Grimshaw JM, Levinson W. Reducing low value care: opportunities and challenges for Choosing Wisely campaigns. BMJ Evid Based Med 2024; 29:215-218. [PMID: 37586873 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy M Grimshaw
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wendy Levinson
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Nettelrodt KME, Tomsic I, Stolz M, Krauth C, Chaberny IF, von Lengerke T. Psychometric Properties of Scales Assessing Psychosocial Determinants of Staff Compliance with Surgical Site Infection Prevention: The WACH-Study. Psychol Res Behav Manag 2024; 17:2757-2767. [PMID: 39070067 PMCID: PMC11283262 DOI: 10.2147/prbm.s464335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Psychosocial determinants influence healthcare workers' compliance with surgical site infection (SSI) preventive interventions. In order to design needs-based interventions promoting compliance, such determinants must first be assessed using valid and reliable questionnaire scales. To compare professional groups without bias, the scales must also be measurement-equivalent. We examine the validity/reliability and measurement equivalence of four scales using data from physicians and nurses from outside the university sector. Additionally, we explore associations with self-reported SSI preventive compliance. Participants and Methods N = 90 physicians and N = 193 nurses (response rate: 31.5%) from nine general/visceral or orthopedic/trauma surgery departments in six non-university hospitals in Germany participated. A written questionnaire was used to assess the compliance with SSI preventive interventions and the determinants of compliance based on the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior-Model. Psychometric testing involved single- and multiple-group confirmatory factor analyses, and explorative analyses used t-tests and multiple linear regression. Results The scales assessing individual determinants of compliance (capability, motivation, and planning) were found to be reliable (each Cronbach's α ≥ 0.85) and valid (each Root-Mean-Square-Error of Approximation ≤ 0.065, each Comparative-Fit-Index = 0.95) and revealed measurement equivalence for physicians and nurses. The scale assessing external determinants (opportunity) did not demonstrate validity, reliability, or measurement equivalence. Group differences were found neither in compliance (p = 0.627) nor determinants (p = 0.192; p = 0.866; p = 0.964). Capability (β = 0.301) and planning (β = 0.201) showed associations with compliance for nurses only. Conclusion The scales assessing motivation, capability, and planning regarding SSI preventive compliance provided reliable and valid scores for physicians and nurses in surgery. Measurement equivalence allows group comparisons of scale means to be interpreted without bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolin M E Nettelrodt
- Department of Medical Psychology, Center of Public Health, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ivonne Tomsic
- Department of Medical Psychology, Center of Public Health, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Maike Stolz
- Institute of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Center of Public Health, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christian Krauth
- Institute of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Center of Public Health, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Iris F Chaberny
- Institute of Hygiene, Hospital Epidemiology and Environmental Medicine, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
- Christian-Albrecht University of Kiel and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Institute of Hospital Epidemiology and Environmental Hygiene, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thomas von Lengerke
- Department of Medical Psychology, Center of Public Health, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Anderson M, van Kessel R, Wood E, Stokes A, Fistein J, Porter I, Mossialos E, Valderas JM. Understanding factors impacting patient-reported outcome measures integration in routine clinical practice: an umbrella review. Qual Life Res 2024:10.1007/s11136-024-03728-7. [PMID: 39023733 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03728-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-report outcome measures (PROMs) have gained widespread support as a mechanism to improve healthcare quality. We aimed to map out key enablers and barriers influencing PROMs implementation strategies in routine clinical practice. METHODS An umbrella review was conducted to identify reviews exploring enablers and barriers related to the integration of PROMs in routine clinical practice from January 2000 to June 2023. Information on key enablers and barriers was extracted and summarised thematically according to the Theoretical Domains Framework. RESULTS 34 reviews met our criteria for inclusion. Identified reviews highlighted barriers such as limited PROMs awareness among clinicians and patients, perceived low value by clinicians and patients, PROMs that were too complex or difficult for patients to complete, poor usability of PROMs systems, delayed feedback of PROMs data, clinician concerns related to use of PROMs as a performance management tool, patient concerns regarding privacy and security, and resource constraints. Enablers encompassed phased implementation, professional training, stakeholder engagement prior to implementation, clear strategies and goals, 'change champions' to support PROMs implementation, systems to respond to issues raised by PROMs, and integration into patient pathways. No consensus favoured paper or electronic PROMs, yet offering both options to mitigate digital literacy bias and integrating PROMs into electronic health records emerged as important facilitators. CONCLUSIONS The sustainable implementation of PROMs is a complex process that requires multicomponent organisational strategies covering training and guidance, necessary time and resources, roles and responsibilities, and consultation with patients and clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Anderson
- Health Organisation, Policy, Economics (HOPE), Centre for Primary Care & Health Services Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
- LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
| | - Robin van Kessel
- LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
- Department of International Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Eleanor Wood
- LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Adam Stokes
- Centre for Global Health, St Georges, University of London, London, UK
| | - Jon Fistein
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ian Porter
- Health Services and Policy Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Elias Mossialos
- LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jose M Valderas
- Health Services and Policy Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Centre for Research On Health Systems Performance, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Loveday S, Chen L, Constable LN, Kabir A, White N, Goldfeld S, Sanci L, Hiscock H. Opening Pandora's box - key facilitators of practice change in detecting and responding to childhood adversity - a practitioner perspective. BMC Pediatr 2024; 24:461. [PMID: 39026201 PMCID: PMC11256471 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-024-04918-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Childhood adversities worsen physical and mental health across the lifespan. Health and social care practitioners play a key role in identifying and responding to childhood adversity, however, may be reluctant to do so due to a perceived lack of services to refer to, time pressures and a deficit of training and confidence. We aimed to (1) quantify changes in practitioner comfort and confidence to identify and respond to childhood adversity following a multimodal intervention within an integrated child and family health and social care hub and (2) to understand barriers and facilitators of practice change. METHODS Hub practitioners were surveyed about their competence and comfort to directly ask about and confidence to respond to adversity at baseline and then at six and twelve months post training. Interviews were undertaken to explore practitioner barriers and enablers of practice change. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The theoretical domains framework was used to identify the key drivers of practice change. RESULTS Fifteen of 18 practitioners completed all three surveys and 70% reported increased competence and comfort to directly ask, and confidence to respond across a range of adversities over the 12-month intervention. Twenty-one practitioners completed interviews. Six themes were identified as either facilitators or barriers to practice change. Facilitator themes included (1) connection matters, (2) knowledge provides assurance, (3) confidence in ability and (4) choosing change. Barrier themes were (1) never enough time and (2) opening Pandora's box. Following analysis, key drivers of practice change were 'social influence', 'belief in capability', 'knowledge' and 'behaviour regulation' while barriers to practice change were 'environmental context and resources' and 'emotion'. CONCLUSIONS Practitioners reported improved confidence in identifying and responding to adversity through a multimodal intervention delivered in an integrated Child and Family Hub. Changing practice requires more than just education and training. Opportunities for social connection and coaching to improve self-confidence and perceived competence are needed to overcome the fear of opening Pandora's box.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Loveday
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
- Health Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Lingling Chen
- Health Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Leanne N Constable
- Health Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ashraful Kabir
- Health Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Natalie White
- Policy and Equity, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sharon Goldfeld
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Policy and Equity, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lena Sanci
- Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Harriet Hiscock
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Health Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Sun L, Booth A, Sworn K. Adaptability, Scalability and Sustainability (ASaS) of complex health interventions: a systematic review of theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci 2024; 19:52. [PMID: 39020399 PMCID: PMC11253497 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01375-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 06/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complex health interventions (CHIs) are increasingly used in public health, clinical research and education to reduce the burden of disease worldwide. Numerous theories, models and frameworks (TMFs) have been developed to support implementation of CHIs. This systematic review aims to identify and critique theoretical frameworks concerned with three features of implementation; adaptability, scalability and sustainability (ASaS). By dismantling the constituent theories, analysing their component concepts and then exploring factors that influence each theory the review team hopes to offer an enhanced understanding of considerations when implementing CHIs. METHODS This review searched PubMed MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for research investigating the TMFs of complex health interventions. Narrative synthesis was employed to examine factors that may influence the adaptability, scalability and sustainability of complex health interventions. RESULTS A total of 9763 studies were retrieved from the five databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar). Following removal of duplicates and application of the eligibility criteria, 35 papers were eligible for inclusion. Influencing factors can be grouped within outer context (socio-political context; leadership funding, inter-organisational networks), inner context; (client advocacy; organisational characteristics), intervention characteristics (supervision, monitoring and evaluation), and bridging factors (individual adopter or provider characteristics). CONCLUSION This review confirms that identified TMFS do not typically include the three components of adaptability, scalability, and sustainability. Current approaches focus on high income countries or generic "whole world" approaches with few frameworks specific to low- and middle-income countries. The review offers a starting point for further exploration of adaptability, scalability and sustainability, within a low- and middle-income context. TRIAL REGISTRATION Not registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lixin Sun
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Andrew Booth
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Katie Sworn
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kwok G, Senger A, Sharma A, Mandato I, Devine KA. Understanding the multilevel factors influencing the implementation of digital health interventions for supportive care in Adolescents and Young Adult (AYA) cancer survivorship: determinants of adopting mindfulness-based mobile applications. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:76. [PMID: 39020422 PMCID: PMC11253365 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00612-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adolescents and Young Adult (AYA) cancer survivors are at risk for psychological distress due to their unique developmental and medical needs. Healthcare providers can leverage the convenience and appeal of technology to provide supportive care for this vulnerable population. Using evidence-based mindfulness-based mobile interventions as a case example, the goal of this study was to identify key patient-, provider-, and organization-level barriers and facilitators to supportive care and implementing digital health interventions in AYA survivorship care. METHODS Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with stakeholders including AYA survivors (n = 10; between 18-29 years old) and clinical providers and administrators (n = 10). Interviews were transcribed and deductively mapped using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) complementary frameworks. RESULTS Results indicated that factors like cost and patients' needs and resources were prevalent among both survivors and providers. There were key differences between providers and AYA survivors. Providers' adoption and promotion of digital health interventions were influenced most strongly by contextual factors, including available resources (Inner Setting), culture (Outer Setting), and networks and communications (Outer Setting). On the other hand, survivors emphasized individual and intervention-related factors; they reported that social influence and knowledge influenced their adoption and use of digital health interventions, including meditation apps. CONCLUSIONS These results identified barriers and facilitators to the adoption of supportive care digital health interventions from multiple stakeholders. Results can be used to guide the development of implementation strategies to improve the uptake of digital health interventions in survivorship care, ultimately improving the psychosocial well-being of AYA cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary Kwok
- Cancer Prevention Precision Control Institute, Center for Discovery & Innovation, at Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, NJ, 07110, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
| | - Angela Senger
- Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA
| | - Archana Sharma
- Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA
| | - Ivelisse Mandato
- Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA
| | - Katie A Devine
- Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA
| |
Collapse
|