1
|
Merner B, Schonfeld L, Virgona A, Lowe D, Walsh L, Wardrope C, Graham-Wisener L, Xafis V, Colombo C, Refahi N, Bryden P, Chmielewski R, Martin F, Messino NM, Mussared A, Smith L, Biggar S, Gill M, Menzies D, Gaulden CM, Earnshaw L, Arnott L, Poole N, Ryan RE, Hill S. Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 3:CD013274. [PMID: 36917094 PMCID: PMC10065807 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013274.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Partnering with consumers in the planning, delivery and evaluation of health services is an essential component of person-centred care. There are many ways to partner with consumers to improve health services, including formal group partnerships (such as committees, boards or steering groups). However, consumers' and health providers' views and experiences of formal group partnerships remain unclear. In this qualitative evidence synthesis (QES), we focus specifically on formal group partnerships where health providers and consumers share decision-making about planning, delivering and/or evaluating health services. Formal group partnerships were selected because they are widely used throughout the world to improve person-centred care. For the purposes of this QES, the term 'consumer' refers to a person who is a patient, carer or community member who brings their perspective to health service partnerships. 'Health provider' refers to a person with a health policy, management, administrative or clinical role who participates in formal partnerships in an advisory or representative capacity. This QES was co-produced with a Stakeholder Panel of consumers and health providers. The QES was undertaken concurrently with a Cochrane intervention review entitled Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation. OBJECTIVES 1. To synthesise the views and experiences of consumers and health providers of formal partnership approaches that aimed to improve planning, delivery or evaluation of health services. 2. To identify best practice principles for formal partnership approaches in health services by understanding consumers' and health providers' views and experiences. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL for studies published between January 2000 and October 2018. We also searched grey literature sources including websites of relevant research and policy organisations involved in promoting person-centred care. SELECTION CRITERIA We included qualitative studies that explored consumers' and health providers' perceptions and experiences of partnering in formal group formats to improve the planning, delivery or evaluation of health services. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Following completion of abstract and full-text screening, we used purposive sampling to select a sample of eligible studies that covered a range of pre-defined criteria, including rich data, range of countries and country income level, settings, participants, and types of partnership activities. A Framework Synthesis approach was used to synthesise the findings of the sample. We appraised the quality of each study using the CASP (Critical Appraisal Skill Program) tool. We assessed our confidence in the findings using the GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach. The Stakeholder Panel was involved in each stage of the review from development of the protocol to development of the best practice principles. MAIN RESULTS We found 182 studies that were eligible for inclusion. From this group, we selected 33 studies to include in the final synthesis. These studies came from a wide range of countries including 28 from high-income countries and five from low- or middle-income countries (LMICs). Each of the studies included the experiences and views of consumers and/or health providers of partnering in formal group formats. The results were divided into the following categories. Contextual factors influencing partnerships: government policy, policy implementation processes and funding, as well as the organisational context of the health service, could facilitate or impede partnering (moderate level of confidence). Consumer recruitment: consumer recruitment occurred in different ways and consumers managed the recruitment process in a minority of studies only (high level of confidence). Recruiting a range of consumers who were reflective of the clinic's demographic population was considered desirable, particularly by health providers (high level of confidence). Some health providers perceived that individual consumers' experiences were not generalisable to the broader population whereas consumers perceived it could be problematic to aim to represent a broad range of community views (high level of confidence). Partnership dynamics and processes: positive interpersonal dynamics between health providers and consumers facilitated partnerships (high level of confidence). However, formal meeting formats and lack of clarity about the consumer role could constrain consumers' involvement (high level of confidence). Health providers' professional status, technical knowledge and use of jargon were intimidating for some consumers (high level of confidence) and consumers could feel their experiential knowledge was not valued (moderate level of confidence). Consumers could also become frustrated when health providers dominated the meeting agenda (moderate level of confidence) and when they experienced token involvement, such as a lack of decision-making power (high level of confidence) Perceived impacts on partnership participants: partnering could affect health provider and consumer participants in both positive and negative ways (high level of confidence). Perceived impacts on health service planning, delivery and evaluation: partnering was perceived to improve the person-centredness of health service culture (high level of confidence), improve the built environment of the health service (high level of confidence), improve health service design and delivery e.g. facilitate 'out of hours' services or treatment closer to home (high level of confidence), enhance community ownership of health services, particularly in LMICs (moderate level of confidence), and improve consumer involvement in strategic decision-making, under certain conditions (moderate level of confidence). There was limited evidence suggesting partnering may improve health service evaluation (very low level of confidence). Best practice principles for formal partnering to promote person-centred care were developed from these findings. The principles were developed collaboratively with the Stakeholder Panel and included leadership and health service culture; diversity; equity; mutual respect; shared vision and regular communication; shared agendas and decision-making; influence and sustainability. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Successful formal group partnerships with consumers require health providers to continually reflect and address power imbalances that may constrain consumers' participation. Such imbalances may be particularly acute in recruitment procedures, meeting structure and content and decision-making processes. Formal group partnerships were perceived to improve the physical environment of health services, the person-centredness of health service culture and health service design and delivery. Implementing the best practice principles may help to address power imbalances, strengthen formal partnering, improve the experiences of consumers and health providers and positively affect partnership outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bronwen Merner
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Lina Schonfeld
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Ariane Virgona
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Dianne Lowe
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
- Child and Family Evidence, Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Louisa Walsh
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Cheryl Wardrope
- Clinical Governance, Metro South Hospital and Health Service, Eight Mile Plains, Australia
| | | | - Vicki Xafis
- The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, Australia
| | - Cinzia Colombo
- Laboratory for medical research and consumer involvement, Department of Public Health, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Nora Refahi
- Consumer Representative, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Paul Bryden
- Consumer Representative, Caboolture, Australia
| | - Renee Chmielewski
- Planning and Patient Experience, The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Lorraine Smith
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Susan Biggar
- Consumer Representative, Melbourne, Australia
- Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA), Melbourne, Australia
| | - Marie Gill
- Gill and Wilcox Consultancy, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David Menzies
- Chronic Disease Programs, South Eastern Melbourne Primary Health Network, Heatherton, Australia
| | - Carolyn M Gaulden
- Detroit Wayne County Authority Health Residency Program, Michigan State University, Providence Hospital, Southfield, Michigan, USA
| | | | | | - Naomi Poole
- Strategy and Innovation, Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rebecca E Ryan
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Sophie Hill
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abayneh S, Lempp H, Kohrt BA, Alem A, Hanlon C. Using participatory action research to pilot a model of service user and caregiver involvement in mental health system strengthening in Ethiopian primary healthcare: a case study. Int J Ment Health Syst 2022; 16:33. [PMID: 35818056 PMCID: PMC9275138 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-022-00545-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Little is known about actual involvement or how to achieve service user and caregiver in mental health systems strengthening in low-and middle-income countries. This study describes the processes and explores involvement experiences of participants in a pilot study of a new model of service user involvement in mental health system strengthening in a rural district in southern Ethiopia. Methods We applied a case study design using participatory action research (PAR). The PAR process comprised of three stages, each with iterative activities of plan, act, observe and reflect. Two stakeholder groups, a Research Advisory Group (RAG) and Research Participant Group (RPG), were established and collaborated in the PAR process. Data collection involved process documentation of meetings and activities: attendances, workshop minutes, discussion outputs, reflective notes, participatory observation of sessions, and in-depth interviews with 12 RPG members. We analyzed the process data descriptively. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative data. Triangulation and synthesis of findings was carried out to develop the case study. Results The stakeholder groups identified their top research priorities, developed an intervention and action plan and made a public presentation of preliminary findings. Key mechanisms used for inclusive participation included capacity building and bringing together diverse stakeholders, anchoring the study in established strong community involvement structures, and making use of participatory strategies and activities during the PAR process. Four themes were developed about experiences of involvement in PAR: (i) expectations and motivation, (ii) experiences of the dynamics of the PAR process, (iii) perceived impacts of involvement in the PAR process, and (iv) implementation challenges and future directions. Conclusions This case study demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a complex model of service-user involvement in mental health system strengthening in a resource constrained setting. More needs to be done to embed service-user involvement into routines of the primary healthcare system, alongside sustained support and strengthening multi-stakeholder collaboration at multiple levels. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13033-022-00545-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sisay Abayneh
- College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Addis Ababa University, WHO Collaborating Centre in Mental Health Research and Capacity Building, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. .,Madda Walabu University College of Education and Behavoural Studies, Bale Robe, Ethiopia.
| | - Heidi Lempp
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Weston Education Centre, King's College London, 10, Cutcombe Rd, London, SE5 9RJ, UK
| | - Brandon A Kohrt
- Department of Psychiatry, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Atalay Alem
- College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Addis Ababa University, WHO Collaborating Centre in Mental Health Research and Capacity Building, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Charlotte Hanlon
- College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Addis Ababa University, WHO Collaborating Centre in Mental Health Research and Capacity Building, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.,Centre for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.,Centre for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT-Africa), College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Musa MK, Akdur G, Brand S, Killett A, Spilsbury K, Peryer G, Burton JK, Gordon AL, Hanratty B, Towers AM, Irvine L, Kelly S, Jones L, Meyer J, Goodman C. The uptake and use of a minimum data set (MDS) for older people living and dying in care homes: a realist review. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:33. [PMID: 34996391 PMCID: PMC8739629 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02705-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Care homes provide long term care for older people. Countries with standardised approaches to residents' assessment, care planning and review (known as minimum data sets (MDS)) use the aggregate data to guide resource allocation, monitor quality, and for research. Less is known about how an MDS affects how staff assess, provide and review residents' everyday care. The review aimed to develop a theory-driven understanding of how care home staff can effectively implement and use MDS to plan and deliver care for residents. METHODS The realist review was organised according to RAMESES (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: and Evolving Standards) guidelines. There were three overlapping stages: 1) defining the scope of the review and theory development on the use of minimum data set 2) testing and refining candidate programme theories through iterative literature searches and stakeholders' consultations as well as discussion among the research team; and 3) data synthesis from stages 1 and 2. The following databases were used MEDLINE via OVID, Embase, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), ASSIA [Applied Social Sciences Citation Index and Abstracts]) and sources of grey literature. RESULTS Fifty-one papers informed the development of three key interlinked theoretical propositions: motivation (mandates and incentives for Minimum Data Set completion); frontline staff monitoring (when Minimum Data Set completion is built into the working practices of the care home); and embedded recording systems (Minimum Data Set recording system is integral to collecting residents' data). By valuing the contributions of staff and building on existing ways of working, the uptake and use of an MDS could enable all staff to learn with and from each other about what is important for residents' care CONCLUSIONS: Minimum Data Sets provides commissioners service providers and researchers with standardised information useful for commissioning planning and analysis. For it to be equally useful for care home staff it requires key activities that address the staff experiences of care, their work with others and the use of digital technology. REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration number CRD42020171323.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massirfufulay Kpehe Musa
- Centre for Research in Public health and Community Care (CRIPACC), School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Gizdem Akdur
- Centre for Research in Public health and Community Care (CRIPACC), School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Sarah Brand
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, UK
| | - Anne Killett
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Karen Spilsbury
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, Yorkshire and Humber, Leeds, UK
| | - Guy Peryer
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | | | - Adam Lee Gordon
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, East Midlands (ARC-EM), Leicester, UK
| | - Barbara Hanratty
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, North East and North Cumbria, Newcastle, UK
| | - Ann-Marie Towers
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, Surrey and Sussex, Kent, UK
| | - Lisa Irvine
- Centre for Research in Public health and Community Care (CRIPACC), School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Sarah Kelly
- Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Liz Jones
- National Care Forum, Friars House, Manor House Drive, Coventry, UK
| | - Julienne Meyer
- Care for Older People, School of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Public health and Community Care (CRIPACC), School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stabler L, MacPhee M, Collins B, Carroll S, Davison K, Thakkar V, Fuller-Thomson E, Lin S(L, Hey B. A Rapid Realist Review of Effective Mental Health Interventions for Individuals with Chronic Physical Health Conditions during the COVID-19 Pandemic Using a Systems-Level Mental Health Promotion Framework. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:12292. [PMID: 34886013 PMCID: PMC8657385 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182312292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The 2020 global outbreak of COVID-19 exposed and heightened threats to mental health across societies. Research has indicated that individuals with chronic physical health conditions are at high risk for suffering from severe COVID-19 illness and from the adverse consequences of public health responses to COVID-19, such as social isolation. This paper reports on the findings of a rapid realist review conducted alongside a scoping review to explore contextual factors and underlying mechanisms or drivers associated with effective mental health interventions within and across macro-meso-micro systems levels for individuals with chronic physical health conditions. This rapid realist review extracted 14 qualified studies across 11 countries and identified four key mechanisms from COVID-19 literature-trust, social connectedness, accountability, and resilience. These mechanisms are discussed in relation to contextual factors and outcomes reported in the COVID literature. Realist reviews include iterative searches to refine their program theories and context-mechanism-outcome explanations. A purposive search of pre-COVID realist reviews on the study topic was undertaken, looking for evidence of the robustness of these mechanisms. There were differences in some of the pre-COVID mechanisms due to contextual factors. Importantly, an additional mechanism-power-sharing-was highlighted in the pre-COVID literature, but absent in the COVID literature. Pre-existing realist reviews were used to identify potential substantive theories and models associated with key mechanisms. Based on the overall findings, implications are provided for mental health promotion policy, practice, and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorna Stabler
- School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3NN, UK
| | - Maura MacPhee
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada;
| | - Benjamin Collins
- Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 750 Bannatyne Ave, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0W2, Canada;
| | - Simon Carroll
- Department of Sociology, Cornett Building, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 3P5, Canada;
| | - Karen Davison
- Health Science Program, Kwantlen Polytechnic University, 12666 72 Ave, Surrey, BC V3W 2M8, Canada; (K.D.); (V.T.)
| | - Vidhi Thakkar
- Health Science Program, Kwantlen Polytechnic University, 12666 72 Ave, Surrey, BC V3W 2M8, Canada; (K.D.); (V.T.)
| | - Esme Fuller-Thomson
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, 246 Bloor St W, Toronto, ON M5S 1V4, Canada; (E.F.-T.); (S.L.)
| | - Shen (Lamson) Lin
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, 246 Bloor St W, Toronto, ON M5S 1V4, Canada; (E.F.-T.); (S.L.)
| | - Brandon Hey
- Mental Health Commission of Canada, 350 Albert Street, Suite 1210, Ottawa, ON K1R 1A4, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Folayan MO, Ibigbami OI, Oloniniyi IO, Oginni O, Aloba O. Associations between psychological wellbeing, depression, general anxiety, perceived social support, tooth brushing frequency and oral ulcers among adults resident in Nigeria during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Oral Health 2021; 21:520. [PMID: 34645423 PMCID: PMC8510883 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01871-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aims of this study were to determine the associations between psychological wellbeing, and the frequency of tooth brushing and presence of oral ulcers during the COVID-19 pandemic; and to identify the mediating roles of psychological distress (general anxiety and depression) and perceived social support in the paths of observed associations. METHODS This cross-sectional study recruited 996 adults in Nigeria between June and August 2020. Data collected through an online survey included outcome variables (decreased frequency of tooth brushing and presence of oral ulcers), explanatory variable (psychological wellbeing), mediators (general anxiety symptoms, depression symptoms and perceived social support) and confounders (age, sex at birth, educational and employment status). Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the risk indicators for the outcome variables. A path analysis was conducted to identify the indirect effect of mediators on the association between the outcome and explanatory variables. RESULTS Of the 966 respondents, 96 (9.9%) reported decreased tooth-brushing frequency and 129 (13.4%) had oral ulcers during the pandemic. The odds of decreased tooth-brushing during the pandemic decreased as the psychological wellbeing increased (AOR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.83-0.91; p < 0.001) and as generalized anxiety symptoms increased (AOR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.86-0.98; p = 0.009). The odds of having an oral ulcer was higher as the generalized anxiety symptoms increased (AOR: 1.15; 95% CI: 01.08-1.21; p < 0.001). Only generalized anxiety (indirect effect: 0.02; 95% CI: 0.01-0.04; P = 0.014) significantly mediated the relationship between wellbeing and tooth-brushing accounting for approximately 12% of the total effect of wellbeing on decreased toothbrushing. Generalized anxiety (indirect effect 0.05; 95% CI: - 0.07-0.03; P < 0.001) also significantly mediated the relationship between wellbeing and presence of oral ulcer accounting for 70% of the total effect of wellbeing on presence of oral ulcer. Depressive symptoms and perceived social support did not significantly mediate the associations between psychological wellbeing, decreased frequency of tooth brushing and the presence of oral ulcers. CONCLUSION Patients who come into the dental clinic with poor oral hygiene or oral ulcers during the COVID-19 pandemic may benefit from screening for generalized anxiety and psychological wellbeing to identify those who will benefit from interventions for mental health challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Olakunle Oginni
- Department of Mental Health, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
| | - Olutayo Aloba
- Department of Mental Health, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kenny A, Dickson-Swift V, Chan CKY, Masood M, Gussy M, Christian B, Hodge B, Furness S, Hanson LC, Clune S, Zadow E, Knevel RJ. Oral health interventions for older people in residential aged care facilities: a protocol for a realist systematic review. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e042937. [PMID: 33952539 PMCID: PMC8103368 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Poor oral health among older people is a global problem impacting on health and well-being. The economic cost to the health system is significant. An ageing population is intensifying the urgency for action. However, poor oral health, particularly for those in residential aged care facilities, continues to be highly resistant to resolution. The overall aims of this realist review are to: (A) explore and synthesise evidence on oral health interventions for older people in residential aged care facilities, (B) produce a causal theory on how contextual factors and mechanisms interact to produce outcomes, and (C) produce guidelines/policies to inform high-quality oral health interventions to improve older people's oral health in residential aged care facilities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The review is guided by the RAMESES publication standards for realist synthesis. Participants include older people in residential aged care facilities, the aged care workforce, carers and families. Interventions include oral healthcare, oral health education, policy interventions and oral health promotion. The five-step realist review process of Pawson et al will guide the review: clarification of scope and development of initial framework, systematic searches, study appraisal and data extraction, synthesising evidence, drawing conclusions, and dissemination, implementation and evaluation. Expert input with key stakeholders will occur through a blog. Stakeholders will examine consistencies across studies and an explanatory causal theory will be developed to guide policy and practice. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Formal ethical approval was granted by the La Trobe University Ethics Committee HREC 20144. The developed theory will guide education, practice and policy decisions about interventions and the factors that impact on implementation. Using an integrated knowledge translation approach, traditional research outputs such as international conference presentations and publications will be supplemented with stakeholder forums, infographics, blogs, social media postings, webinars, podcasts and writing for web-based independent outlets. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021155658.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Kenny
- La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Carina Ka Yee Chan
- School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University College of Science, Health and Engineering, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mohd Masood
- Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Gussy
- Lincoln International Institute for Rural Health, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
| | - Bradley Christian
- Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
| | - Brad Hodge
- La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan Furness
- La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa C Hanson
- La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
| | - Samantha Clune
- La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emma Zadow
- La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ron J Knevel
- Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Musa MK, Akdur G, Hanratty B, Kelly S, Gordon A, Peryer G, Spilsbury K, Killett A, Burton J, Meyer J, Fortescue S, Towers AM, Irvine L, Goodman C. Uptake and use of a minimum data set (MDS) for older people living and dying in care homes in England: a realist review protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e040397. [PMID: 33191266 PMCID: PMC7668360 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Care homes provide nursing and social care for older people who can no longer live independently at home. In the UK, there is no consistent approach to how information about residents' medical history, care needs and preferences are collected and shared. This limits opportunities to understand the care home population, have a systematic approach to assessment and documentation of care, identifiy care home residents at risk of deterioration and review care. Countries with standardised approaches to residents' assessment, care planning and review (eg, minimum data sets (MDS)) use the data to understand the care home population, guide resource allocation, monitor services delivery and for research. The aim of this realist review is to develop a theory-driven understanding of how care home staff implement and use MDS to plan and deliver care of individual residents. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A realist review will be conducted in three research stages.Stage 1 will scope the literature and develop candidate programme theories of what ensures effective uptake and sustained implementation of an MDS.Stage2 will test and refine these theories through further iterative searches of the evidence from the literature to establish how effective uptake of an MDS can be achieved.Stage 3 will consult with relevant stakeholders to test or refine the programme theory (theories) of how an MDS works at the resident level of care for different stakeholders and in what circumstances. Data synthesis will use realist logic to align data from each eligible article with possible context-mechanism-outcome configurations or specific elements that answer the research questions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The University of Hertfordshire Ethics Committee has approved this study (HSK/SF/UH/04169). Findings will be disseminated through briefings with stakeholders, conference presentations, a national consultation on the use of an MDS in UK long-term care settings, publications in peer-reviewed journals and in print and social media publications accessible to residents, relatives and care home staff. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020171323; this review protocol is registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massirfufulay Kpehe Musa
- Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
- Centre for Research in Public health and Community Care (CRIPACC), School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Gizdem Akdur
- Centre for Research in Public health and Community Care (CRIPACC), School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Barbara Hanratty
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, North East and North Cumbra, UK
| | - Sarah Kelly
- Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Adam Gordon
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, East Midlands, UK
| | - Guy Peryer
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Karen Spilsbury
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, Yorkshire and Humber, UK
| | - Anne Killett
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Jennifer Burton
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Julienne Meyer
- National Care Forum/Care for Older People, School of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ann-Marie Towers
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, Kent Surrey and Sussex, UK
| | - Lisa Irvine
- Centre for Research in Public health and Community Care (CRIPACC), School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Public health and Community Care (CRIPACC), School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration, East of England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Harris R, Fletcher S, Sims S, Ross F, Brearley S, Manthorpe J. Understanding key mechanisms of successfully leading integrated team-based services in health and social care: protocol for a realist synthesis. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e038591. [PMID: 32647024 PMCID: PMC7351270 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As systems of health and social care in England move towards more integrated and collaborative models, leaders will need different skills than their predecessors to enable system leadership, building partnerships and working across organisations and sectors. There is little understanding of what the mechanisms for effective leadership across integrated health and social care systems might be, the contexts that influence good leadership, or the nature of the resulting outcomes. This review aims to identify, refine and test programme theories of leadership of integrated team-based services in health and social care, exploring what works, for whom and in what circumstances. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study uses a realist synthesis approach, following RAMESES guidelines, supported by stakeholder consultation. Stage 1 will develop initial programme theories about leadership of integrated health and social care based on a review of the scientific and grey literature and a stakeholder consultation workshop. Stage 2 will involve focused searching of empirical literature, data extraction and synthesis to refine the initial programme theories and identify relationships between identified contexts, mechanisms and outcomes. A second stakeholder event will guide the focus of the review. Stage 3 will further refine and interrogate the theories testing them against substantive theory on leadership of complex systems and through the experiences and expertise of the stakeholder group. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Our study does not require ethics committee approval. This research will contribute to building an in-depth understanding of what aspects of leadership of integrated team-based services work, for whom and in what circumstances. It will identify the professional development needs of leaders and provide recommendations about optimal organisational and interorganisational structures and processes that support effective leadership in integrated health and social care systems. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications, conference presentations and formal and informal reports. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018119291.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Harris
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Simon Fletcher
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Sims
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Fiona Ross
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Sally Brearley
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- NIHR Health & Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kenny A, Dickson-Swift V, Gussy M, Kidd S, Cox D, Masood M, Azul D, Chan C, Christian B, Theobold J, Hodge B, Knevel R, McKinstry C, Couch D, Hyett N, Veginadu P, Doroud N. Oral health interventions for people living with mental disorders: protocol for a realist systematic review. Int J Ment Health Syst 2020; 14:24. [PMID: 32211054 PMCID: PMC7092453 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-020-00357-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increasing number of people who experience mental disorders is a global problem. People with mental disorders have high rates of co-morbidity and significantly poorer oral health outcomes than the general public. However, their oral health remains largely a hidden and neglected issue. A complex range of factors impact the oral health of this group. These include anxiety and dental phobia, dietary habits, including the heavy consumption of sugary drinks, substance misuse of tobacco, alcohol, and/or psychostimulants, the adverse orofacial side effects of anti-psychotic and anti-depression medications, and financial, geographic, and social barriers to accessing oral health care. METHODS The aim of this realist systematic review is to (a) identify and synthesise evidence that explores oral health interventions for people living with mental disorders; (b) explore the context and mechanisms that have contributed to the success of interventions or the barriers and challenges; (c) produce program theories on causal, contextual and mechanistic factors to facilitate outcomes and (d) produce recommendations and guidelines to guide future oral health interventions for people with mental disorders at both the policy and practice level. Using a five-step process, that incorporates primary data collection from key stakeholders, a beginning theoretical framework will be developed to describe contextual and mechanistic factors and how they might impact on the success or failure of oral health interventions for people with mental disorders. Key database searches will be conducted, with data extraction focused on the factors that might have impacted on intervention implementation and outcomes. Quality appraisal of studies will occur, and the theoretical framework will be populated with extracted data. Stakeholder input will support the development and refinement of a theory on oral health interventions for people with mental disorders. DISCUSSION This will be the first review to take a realist approach to explore the broad scope of causal factors that impact on the success or failure of oral health interventions for people with mental disorders. The approach includes extensive stakeholder engagement and will advance realist systematic review methodology. Review outcomes will be important in guiding policy and practice to ensure oral health interventions better meet the needs of people with mental disorders.Systematic review registration This review protocol is registered with PROSPERO (Number) 155969.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Kenny
- Violet Vines Marshman Centre for Rural Health Research, LaTrobe Rural Health School, P.O. Box 199, Bendigo, VIC 3552 Australia
| | - Virginia Dickson-Swift
- Violet Vines Marshman Centre for Rural Health Research, LaTrobe Rural Health School, P.O. Box 199, Bendigo, VIC 3552 Australia
| | - Mark Gussy
- College of Social Science University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, Lincolnshire LN6 7TS UK
| | - Susan Kidd
- Mental Health Nursing, Mental Health Nurse Practitioner, Victoria University, Footscray, VIC Australia
| | - Dianne Cox
- Violet Vines Marshman Centre for Rural Health Research, LaTrobe Rural Health School, P.O. Box 199, Bendigo, VIC 3552 Australia
| | - Mohd Masood
- LaTrobe Rural Health School, Health School, Dentistry and Oral Health, P.O. Box 199, Bendigo, VIC 3552 Australia
| | - David Azul
- Violet Vines Marshman Centre for Rural Health Research, LaTrobe Rural Health School, P.O. Box 199, Bendigo, VIC 3552 Australia
| | - Carina Chan
- School of Psychology and Public Health, LaTrobe University, Bendigo, Australia
| | - Bradley Christian
- LaTrobe Rural Health School, Health School, Dentistry and Oral Health, P.O. Box 199, Bendigo, VIC 3552 Australia
| | - Jacqui Theobold
- Violet Vines Marshman Centre for Rural Health Research, LaTrobe Rural Health School, P.O. Box 199, Bendigo, VIC 3552 Australia
| | - Brad Hodge
- Violet Vines Marshman Centre for Rural Health Research, LaTrobe Rural Health School, P.O. Box 199, Bendigo, VIC 3552 Australia
| | - Ron Knevel
- LaTrobe Rural Health School, Health School, Dentistry and Oral Health, P.O. Box 199, Bendigo, VIC 3552 Australia
| | - Carol McKinstry
- Violet Vines Marshman Centre for Rural Health Research, LaTrobe Rural Health School, P.O. Box 199, Bendigo, VIC 3552 Australia
| | - Danielle Couch
- Violet Vines Marshman Centre for Rural Health Research, LaTrobe Rural Health School, P.O. Box 199, Bendigo, VIC 3552 Australia
| | - Nerida Hyett
- Violet Vines Marshman Centre for Rural Health Research, LaTrobe Rural Health School, P.O. Box 199, Bendigo, VIC 3552 Australia
| | - Prabhakar Veginadu
- Violet Vines Marshman Centre for Rural Health Research, LaTrobe Rural Health School, P.O. Box 199, Bendigo, VIC 3552 Australia
| | - Nastaran Doroud
- Violet Vines Marshman Centre for Rural Health Research, LaTrobe Rural Health School, P.O. Box 199, Bendigo, VIC 3552 Australia
| |
Collapse
|