1
|
Martin-Kerry J, Higgins S, Knapp P, Liabo K, Young B. Engaging children, young people, parents and health professionals in interviews: Using an interactive ranking exercise within the co-design of multimedia websites. J Child Health Care 2024; 28:181-195. [PMID: 35748108 PMCID: PMC10882948 DOI: 10.1177/13674935221109684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
When planning paediatric trials, it is important to consider how best to communicate with children and young people (CYP) so they understand what they are taking part in. It is also important to consider what information they need. Involving CYP as research participants leads to research that is more relevant although it can be difficult to engage CYP in qualitative research to improve trial materials due to the topic area. This paper describes how a visual ranking exercise within qualitative interviews acted as a helpful conduit to engaging discussions to inform a co-designed website with information for trial participants. 40 people participated in interviews during which the ranking exercise was used (11 CYP aged 9-18 years, 14 parents, 15 professionals). We found the ranking exercise supported participant engagement and prevented them feeling that particular responses were expected. It also enabled participants to discuss their ranking (and decisions behind this) with other participants and the researcher. Co-design interviews with CYP that use interactive exercises such as ranking are likely to elicit richer data than those relying on traditional questioning techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Peter Knapp
- Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - Kristin Liabo
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Bridget Young
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Parker A, Arundel C, Clark L, Coleman E, Doherty L, Hewitt CE, Beard D, Bower P, Cooper C, Culliford L, Devane D, Emsley R, Eldridge S, Galvin S, Gillies K, Montgomery A, Sutton CJ, Treweek S, Torgerson DJ. Undertaking Studies Within A Trial to evaluate recruitment and retention strategies for randomised controlled trials: lessons learnt from the PROMETHEUS research programme. Health Technol Assess 2024; 28:1-114. [PMID: 38327177 PMCID: PMC11017159 DOI: 10.3310/htqw3107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Randomised controlled trials ('trials') are susceptible to poor participant recruitment and retention. Studies Within A Trial are the strongest methods for testing the effectiveness of strategies to improve recruitment and retention. However, relatively few of these have been conducted. Objectives PROMoting THE Use of Studies Within A Trial aimed to facilitate at least 25 Studies Within A Trial evaluating recruitment or retention strategies. We share our experience of delivering the PROMoting THE Use of Studies Within A Trial programme, and the lessons learnt for undertaking randomised Studies Within A Trial. Design A network of 10 Clinical Trials Units and 1 primary care research centre committed to conducting randomised controlled Studies Within A Trial of recruitment and/or retention strategies was established. Promising recruitment and retention strategies were identified from various sources including Cochrane systematic reviews, the Study Within A Trial Repository, and existing prioritisation exercises, which were reviewed by patient and public members to create an initial priority list of seven recruitment and eight retention interventions. Host trial teams could apply for funding and receive support from the PROMoting THE Use of Studies Within A Trial team to undertake Studies Within A Trial. We also tested the feasibility of undertaking co-ordinated Studies Within A Trial, across multiple host trials simultaneously. Setting Clinical trials unit-based trials recruiting or following up participants in any setting in the United Kingdom were eligible. Participants Clinical trials unit-based teams undertaking trials in any clinical context in the United Kingdom. Interventions Funding of up to £5000 and support from the PROMoting THE Use of Studies Within A Trial team to design, implement and report Studies Within A Trial. Main outcome measures Number of host trials funded. Results Forty-two Studies Within A Trial were funded (31 host trials), across 12 Clinical Trials Units. The mean cost of a Study Within A Trial was £3535. Twelve Studies Within A Trial tested the same strategy across multiple host trials using a co-ordinated Study Within A Trial design, and four used a factorial design. Two recruitment and five retention strategies were evaluated in more than one host trial. PROMoting THE Use of Studies Within A Trial will add 18% more Studies Within A Trial to the Cochrane systematic review of recruitment strategies, and 79% more Studies Within A Trial to the Cochrane review of retention strategies. For retention, we found that pre-notifying participants by card, letter or e-mail before sending questionnaires was effective, as was the use of pens, and sending personalised text messages to improve questionnaire response. We highlight key lessons learnt to guide others planning Studies Within A Trial, including involving patient and public involvement partners; prioritising and selecting strategies to evaluate and elements to consider when designing a Study Within A Trial; obtaining governance approvals; implementing Studies Within A Trial, including individual and co-ordinated Studies Within A Trials; and reporting Study Within A Trials. Limitations The COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted five Studies Within A Trial, being either delayed (n = 2) or prematurely terminated (n = 3). Conclusions PROMoting THE Use of Studies Within A Trial significantly increased the evidence base for recruitment and retention strategies. When provided with both funding and practical support, host trial teams successfully implemented Studies Within A Trial. Future work Future research should identify and target gaps in the evidence base, including widening Study Within A Trial uptake, undertaking more complex Studies Within A Trial and translating Study Within A Trial evidence into practice. Study registration All Studies Within A Trial in the PROMoting THE Use of Studies Within A Trial programme had to be registered with the Northern Ireland Network for Trials Methodology Research Study Within A Trial Repository. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 13/55/80) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 2. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adwoa Parker
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Catherine Arundel
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Laura Clark
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Elizabeth Coleman
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Laura Doherty
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - David Beard
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Science, NIHR Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Cindy Cooper
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Lucy Culliford
- Bristol Trials Centre, Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK
| | - Declan Devane
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Republic of Ireland
- Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network, Galway, Republic of Ireland
| | - Richard Emsley
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sandra Eldridge
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Sandra Galvin
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Republic of Ireland
- Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network, Galway, Republic of Ireland
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresthill, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Alan Montgomery
- University of Nottingham, Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University Park Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, UK
| | | | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresthill, Aberdeen, UK
| | - David J Torgerson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Madurasinghe VW, Knapp P, Eldridge S, Collier D, Treweek S, Rick J, Graffy J, Parker A, Salisbury C, Torgerson D, Jolly K, Sidhu MS, Fife-Schaw C, Hull MA, Sprange K, Brettell E, Bhandari S, Montgomery A, Bower P. Can we achieve better trial recruitment by presenting patient information through multimedia? Meta-analysis of 'studies within a trial' (SWATs). BMC Med 2023; 21:425. [PMID: 37940944 PMCID: PMC10634086 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03081-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People need high-quality information to make decisions about research participation. Providing information in written format alone is conventional but may not be the most effective and acceptable approach. We developed a structure for the presentation of information using multimedia which included generic and trial-specific content. Our aim was to embed 'Studies Within A Trial' (SWATs) across multiple ongoing trials to test whether multimedia presentation of patient information led to better rates of recruitment. METHODS Five trials included a SWAT and randomised their participants to receive a multimedia presentation alongside standard information, or standard written information alone. We collected data on trial recruitment, acceptance and retention and analysed the pooled results using random effects meta-analysis, with the primary outcome defined as the proportion of participants randomised following an invitation to take part. RESULTS Five SWATs provided data on the primary outcome of proportion of participants randomised. Multimedia alongside written information results in little or no difference in recruitment rates (pooled odds ratio = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.79 to 1.17, p-value = 0.671, I2 = 0%). There was no effect on any other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Multimedia alongside written information did not improve trial recruitment rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN71952900, ISRCTN 06710391, ISRCTN 17160087, ISRCTN05926847, ISRCTN62869767.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vichithranie W Madurasinghe
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Peter Knapp
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York & the Hull York Medical School, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Sandra Eldridge
- Centre for Clinical Trials and Methodology, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK
| | - David Collier
- Barts NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, 3Rd Floor, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Jo Rick
- National Institute of Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Jonathan Graffy
- General Practitioner Arbury Road Surgery 114, Arbury Road, Cambridge, CB4 2JG, UK
| | - Adwoa Parker
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Chris Salisbury
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - David Torgerson
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Kate Jolly
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Manbinder S Sidhu
- Health Services Management Centre, School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2RT, UK
| | | | - Mark A Hull
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Kirsty Sprange
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Elizabeth Brettell
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Sunil Bhandari
- Department of Renal Medicine, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, and Hull York Medical School, Hull, East Yorkshire, HU3 2JZ, UK
| | - Alan Montgomery
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dean A, Rose F, Jones K, Scantlebury A, Adamson J, Knapp P. Why do people take part in vaccine trials? A mixed methods narrative synthesis. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 114:107861. [PMID: 37354732 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To understand why individuals do or do not take part in vaccine trials, exploring the motivators and barriers to identify effective strategies to optimise recruitment in vaccine research. METHODS Qualitative studies and quantitative surveys capturing data on reasons for trial participation/decline were included. Six databases were searched from 1996 to October 2021. Two reviewers independently screened and assessed risk of bias. Results were reported narratively and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS We included 32 studies (17 qualitative; 12 quantitative; 3 mixed-methods) that covered a wide range of populations, geographical areas and disease types. Eight themes were identified 1) altruism; 2) potential for personal benefit; 3) perceived risks; 4) trust or distrust; 5) social networks; 6) stigma; 7) practical implications; 8) research vanguard. CONCLUSION Our findings provide a detailed description of how potential participants weigh up their decisions to participate in vaccine trials, which could inform the planning and implementation of studies to enhance recruitment. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Clinical trial researchers should consider a patient-centered approach to recruitment, tailoring promoting material and attempt to understand fears, stigma and perceived risks. In addition, recognising the importance of trust and the key role friends, communities, family, and those in supervisory positions play in decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Dean
- MSc student, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Fi Rose
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Katherine Jones
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, UK
| | | | - Joy Adamson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Peter Knapp
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, and the Hull York Medical School, York, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moe-Byrne T, Knapp P, Perry D, Achten J, Spoors L, Appelbe D, Roche J, Martin-Kerry JM, Sheridan R, Higgins S. Does digital, multimedia information increase recruitment and retention in a children's wrist fracture treatment trial, and what do people think of it? A randomised controlled Study Within A Trial (SWAT). BMJ Open 2022; 12:e057508. [PMID: 35831055 PMCID: PMC9280884 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate digital, multimedia information (MMI) for its effects on trial recruitment, retention, decisions about participation and acceptability by patients, compared with printed information. DESIGN Study Within A Trial using random cluster allocation within the Forearm Fracture Recovery in Children Evaluation (FORCE) study. SETTING Emergency departments in 23 UK hospitals. PARTICIPANTS 1409 children aged 4-16 years attending with a torus (buckle) fracture, and their parents/guardian. Children's mean age was 9.2 years, 41.0% were female, 77.4% were ethnically White and 90.0% spoke English as a first language. INTERVENTIONS Participants and their parents/guardian received trial information either via multimedia, including animated videos, talking head videos and text (revised for readability and age appropriateness when needed) on tablet computer (MMI group; n=681), or printed participant information sheet (PIS group; n=728). OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome was recruitment rate to FORCE. Secondary outcomes were Decision-Making Questionnaire (nine Likert items, analysed summatively and individually), three 'free text' questions (deriving subjective evaluations) and trial retention. RESULTS MMI produced a small, not statistically significant increase in recruitment: 475 (69.8%) participants were recruited from the MMI group; 484 (66.5%) from the PIS group (OR=1.35; 95% CI 0.76 to 2.40, p=0.31). A total of 324 (23.0%) questionnaires were returned and analysed. There was no difference in total Decision-Making Questionnaire scores: adjusted mean difference 0.05 (95% CI -1.23 to 1.32, p=0.94). The MMI group was more likely to report the information 'very easy' to understand (89; 57.8% vs 67; 39.4%; Z=2.60, p=0.01) and identify information that was explained well (96; 62.3% vs 71; 41.8%). Almost all FORCE recruits were retained at the 6 weeks' timepoint and there was no difference in retention rate between the information groups: MMI (473; 99.6%); PIS (481; 99.4%). CONCLUSIONS MMI did not increase recruitment or retention in the FORCE trial, but participants rated multimedia as easier to understand and were more likely to evaluate it positively. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN73136092 and ISRCTN13955395.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Knapp
- Health Sciences and the Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | - Louise Spoors
- NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Jenny Roche
- Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Perry DC, Achten J, Knight R, Dutton SJ, Dritsaki M, Mason JM, Appelbe DE, Roland DT, Messahel S, Widnall J, Gibson P, Preston J, Spoors LM, Campolier M, Costa ML. Offer of a bandage versus rigid immobilisation in 4- to 15-year-olds with distal radius torus fractures: the FORCE equivalence RCT. Health Technol Assess 2022; 26:1-78. [PMID: 35904496 DOI: 10.3310/bdns6122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Torus (buckle) fractures of the wrist are the most common fractures in children involving the distal radius and/or ulna. It is unclear if children require rigid immobilisation and follow-up or would recover equally as well by being discharged without any immobilisation or a bandage. Given the large number of these injuries, identifying the optimal treatment strategy could have important effects on the child, the number of days of school absence and NHS costs. OBJECTIVES To establish whether or not treating children with a distal radius torus fracture with the offer of a soft bandage and immediate discharge (i.e. offer of a bandage) provides the same recovery, in terms of pain, function, complications, acceptability, school absence and resource use, as treatment with rigid immobilisation and follow-up as per usual practice (i.e. rigid immobilisation). DESIGN A pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled equivalence trial. SETTING Twenty-three UK emergency departments. PARTICIPANTS A total of 965 children (aged 4-15 years) with a distal radius torus fracture were randomised from January 2019 to July 2020 using a secure, centralised, online-encrypted randomisation service. Exclusion criteria included presentation > 36 hours after injury, multiple injuries and an inability to complete follow-up. INTERVENTIONS A bandage was offered to 489 participants and applied to 458, and rigid immobilisation was carried out in 476 participants. Participants and clinicians were not blinded to the treatment allocation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The pain at 3 days post randomisation was measured using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. Secondary outcomes were the patient-reported outcomes measurement system upper extremity limb score for children, health-related quality of life, complications, school absence, analgesia use and resource use collected up to 6 weeks post randomisation. RESULTS A total of 94% of participants provided primary outcome data. At 3 days, the primary outcome of pain was equivalent in both groups. With reference to the prespecified equivalence margin of 1.0, the adjusted difference in the intention-to-treat population was -0.10 (95% confidence interval -0.37 to 0.17) and the per-protocol population was -0.06 (95% confidence interval -0.34 to 0.21). There was equivalence of pain in both age subgroups (i.e. 4-7 years and 8-15 years). There was no difference in the rate of complications, with five complications (1.0%) in the offer of a bandage group and three complications (0.6%) in the rigid immobilisation group. There were no differences between treatment groups in functional recovery, quality of life or school absence at any point during the follow-up. Analgesia use was marginally higher at day 1 in the offer of a bandage group than it was in the rigid immobilisation group (83% vs. 78% of participants), but there was no difference at other time points. The offer of a bandage significantly reduced the cost of treatment and had a high probability of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. LIMITATIONS Families had a strong pre-existing preference for the rigid immobilisation treatment. Given this, and the inability to blind families to the treatment allocation, observer bias was a concern. However, there was clear evidence of equivalence. CONCLUSIONS The study findings support the offer of a bandage in children with a distal radius torus fracture. FUTURE WORK A clinical decision tool to determine which children require radiography is an important next step to prevent overtreatment of minor wrist fractures. There is also a need to rationalise interventions for other common childhood injuries (e.g. 'toddler's fractures' of the tibia). TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered as ISRCTN13955395 and UKCRN Portfolio 39678. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 33. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel C Perry
- Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Kadoorie Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Juul Achten
- Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Kadoorie Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ruth Knight
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Susan J Dutton
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Melina Dritsaki
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - James M Mason
- Centre for Health Economics at Warwick (CHEW), University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Duncan E Appelbe
- Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Kadoorie Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Damian T Roland
- Paediatric Emergency Medicine Leicester Academic (PEMLA) Group, Children's Emergency Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.,SAPPHIRE Group, Health Sciences, Leicester University, Leicester, UK
| | - Shrouk Messahel
- Emergency Department, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - James Widnall
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Phoebe Gibson
- Parents and Carers Forum, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jennifer Preston
- Experimental Arthritis Treatment Centre for Children, University of Liverpool, Institute in the Park, Liverpool, UK
| | - Louise M Spoors
- Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Kadoorie Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Marta Campolier
- Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Kadoorie Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Matthew L Costa
- Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Kadoorie Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
What do parents think of using informational videos to support recruitment for parenting trials? A qualitative study. Trials 2021; 22:872. [PMID: 34863256 PMCID: PMC8642858 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05826-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Lower than expected recruitment and retention rates are common challenges in parenting trials—particularly for community-based trials targeting parents of young children that rely on face-to-face recruitment by frontline workers. Recruitment requires parental informed consent, yet information sheets have been criticized for being lengthy and complex, and particularly challenging for parents with low literacy. Recent innovations include ‘talking head’ information videos. This paper aims to explore parent perceptions of using a ‘talking head’ video to support informed consent, recruitment, and retention procedures in parenting trials. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with a sample of 24 mothers recruited after their final follow-ups in two different parenting trials in Denmark. Before consenting to participate in the trials, parents were invited to view a video of a member of the study team giving information about the study, and again before the interviews for the current study. The audio data was transcribed and thematic analysis was conducted. Results We identified three overarching themes: (1) general impression of the video, (2) thoughts on participation in research, and (3) recruitment and retention. Participants were generally positive in their appraisal of the two talking head informational videos. We found that participants felt that a mix of paper-based and video-based sources of information would enable them to make an informed choice about whether to participate in a research study. We also found that a professionally produced video featuring a key member of the study team produced a feeling of commitment to the study that could impact retention rates. Conclusions Informational videos are acceptable to parents; however, co-production or participant/patient involvement in the development of such videos is recommended. Informational videos may not increase recruitment but have the potential for improving retention. Key design recommendations are to ensure a ‘professional’ look to the video, to supplement videos with paper-based information, to keep the length to < 3 min, and for the ‘talking head’ part to feature a key member of the study team. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05826-0.
Collapse
|
8
|
Madurasinghe VW, Bower P, Eldridge S, Collier D, Graffy J, Treweek S, Knapp P, Parker A, Rick J, Salisbury C, Man MS, Torgerson D, Sheridan R, Sullivan F, Cockayne S, Dack C. Can we achieve better recruitment by providing better information? Meta-analysis of 'studies within a trial' (SWATs) of optimised participant information sheets. BMC Med 2021; 19:218. [PMID: 34551765 PMCID: PMC8459527 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02086-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The information given to people considering taking part in a trial needs to be easy to understand if those people are to become, and then remain, trial participants. However, there is a tension between providing comprehensive information and providing information that is comprehensible. User-testing is one method of developing better participant information, and there is evidence that user-tested information is better at informing participants about key issues relating to trials. However, it is not clear if user-testing also leads to changes in the rates of recruitment in trials, compared to standard trial information. As part of a programme of research, we embedded 'studies within a trial' (SWATs) across multiple ongoing trials to see if user-tested materials led to better rates of recruitment. METHODS Seven 'host' trials included a SWAT evaluation and randomised their participants to receive routine information sheets generated by the research teams, or information sheets optimised through user-testing. We collected data on trial recruitment and analysed the results across these trials using random effects meta-analysis, with the primary outcome defined as the proportion of participants randomised in a host trial following an invitation to take part. RESULTS Six SWATs (n=27,805) provided data on recruitment. Optimised participant information sheets likely result in little or no difference in recruitment rates (7.2% versus 6.8%, pooled odds ratio = 1.03, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.19, p-value = 0.63, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS Participant information sheets developed through user testing did not improve recruitment rates. The programme of work showed that co-ordinated testing of recruitment strategies using SWATs is feasible and can provide both definitive and timely evidence on the effectiveness of recruitment strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION Healthlines Depression (ISRCTN14172341) Healthlines CVD (ISRCTN27508731) CASPER (ISRCTN02202951) ISDR (ISRCTN87561257) ECLS (NCT01925625) REFORM (ISRCTN68240461) HeLP Diabetes (ISRCTN02123133).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vichithranie W Madurasinghe
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7L, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Sandra Eldridge
- Centre for Clinical Trials and Methodology, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK
| | - David Collier
- Barts NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Jonathan Graffy
- Arbury Road Surgery 114, Arbury Road, Cambridge, CB4 2JG, UK
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Room 306, 3rd Floor, Health Sciences Building Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Peter Knapp
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York & the Hull York Medical School, York, UK
| | - Adwoa Parker
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Jo Rick
- National Institute of Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Chris Salisbury
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Mei See Man
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - David Torgerson
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Rebecca Sheridan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Frank Sullivan
- University of St. Andrews North Haugh, St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9T, UK
| | - Sarah Cockayne
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Charlotte Dack
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Knapp P, Mandall N, Hulse W, Roche J, Moe-Byrne T, Martin-Kerry J, Sheridan R, Higgins S. Evaluating the use of multimedia information when recruiting adolescents to orthodontics research: A randomised controlled trial. J Orthod 2021; 48:343-351. [PMID: 34227411 PMCID: PMC8652365 DOI: 10.1177/14653125211024250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To compare two methods of providing information about the Bone Anchored Maxillary Protraction (BAMP) trial: standard printed information and multimedia websites, for their quality and ease of understanding, and impact on decision-making. Design: Randomised controlled trial. Setting: Orthodontic outpatient clinic in the UK. Methods: Participants were 109 adolescents (aged 11–14 years) attending for orthodontic treatment. While awaiting treatment they were asked to imagine being recruited to the BAMP clinical trial. They were individually randomised to receive the printed or the multimedia website information (comprising text, animations and ‘talking head’ videos). After reading or viewing the information, they completed a 9-item Likert scale Decision-Making Questionnaire (DMQ) (score range 0–36) plus three free-text questions on their evaluation of the information. Results: A total of 104 participants completed the questionnaire. Mean total DMQ scores were higher (more positive) in the website group (28.1 vs. 27.0), although the difference was small and not statistically significant (P = 0.20). Analysis of individual questionnaire items showed two statistically significant differences: the website information had higher ratings on ‘easy to understand’ (Z = 3.03; P = 0.003) and ‘confidence in decision-making’ (Z = 2.00; P = 0.044). On the three free-text questions, more positive and fewer negative comments were made about the websites than the printed information. Conclusion: In this hypothetical trial setting, adolescent patients found that trial information conveyed on a multimedia website was easier to understand and made them more confident in their decision about trial participation. Their subjective evaluations of the website were also more positive and less negative than about the printed information. Multimedia information has the potential to increase the quality of engagement and information exchange when seeking consent for research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Knapp
- Department of Health Sciences & the Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - Nicky Mandall
- Tameside General Hospital, Ashton-under-Lyne, Tameside, UK
| | - Wendy Hulse
- Tameside General Hospital, Ashton-under-Lyne, Tameside, UK
| | - Jenny Roche
- Department of Health Sciences & the Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.,Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Thirimon Moe-Byrne
- Department of Health Sciences & the Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.,Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Jacqueline Martin-Kerry
- Department of Health Sciences & the Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.,Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Rebecca Sheridan
- Department of Health Sciences & the Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.,Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
O'Neill L, Knapp P, Doyle SL, Guinan E, Parker A, Segurado R, Connolly D, O'Sullivan J, Reynolds JV, Hussey J. Patient and family co-developed participant information to improve recruitment rates, retention, and patient understanding in the Rehabilitation Strategies Following Oesophago-gastric and Hepatopancreaticobiliary Cancer (ReStOre II) trial: Protocol for a study within a trial (SWAT). HRB Open Res 2020; 2:27. [PMID: 33392438 PMCID: PMC7745189 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.12950.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Whilst the potential benefits of exercise rehabilitation in cancer survivorship are plentiful, recruitment to survivorship rehabilitation trials remains suboptimal. There is growing evidence that Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) initiatives can increase the rate of recruitment to research. This study within a trial (SWAT) will examine if participant information co-developed by patients and their families can lead to greater recruitment rates, retention and understanding of the Rehabilitation Strategies in Oesophago-gastric and Hepatopancreaticobiliary Cancer (ReStOre II) trial when compared to standard participant information. Methods: This SWAT will be carried out over two phases. Phase I will utilise qualitative methods to develop (Phase Ia) and refine (Phase Ib) the new participant information. Phase Ia will recruit up to 20 survivors of upper gastrointestinal or hepatopancreaticobiliary cancer, or their family members, to take part in a focus group or interview to develop the new participant information. Focus groups/interviews will be recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. In Phase Ib, participants will return for a second focus group/interview to refine the participant information. Once finalised, the participant information will be submitted to ethics for approval. In Phase II, potential participants for the ReStOre II trial will be randomly assigned to receive either the standard or patient and family co-developed participant information. The two forms of participant information will be compared by recruitment and retention rates, and participant understanding of the trial (Decision-Making Questionnaire). Discussion: We anticipate that engaging with patients and their families to develop participant information will help to increase patient understanding of the ReStOre II trial and therefore recruitment and retention rates. The results of this SWAT will indicate the usefulness of this strategy for optimising recruitment to exercise rehabilitation trials in cancer survivorship. Registration: SWAT: Northern Ireland Hub for Trials Methodology Research SWAT Repository Store ( SWAT-100). ReStOre II: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03958019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda O'Neill
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Peter Knapp
- Department of Health Sciences and the Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - Suzanne L. Doyle
- School of Biological and Health Sciences, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Emer Guinan
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Adwoa Parker
- Department of Health Sciences and the Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - Ricardo Segurado
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sport Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Deirdre Connolly
- Discipline of Occupational Therapy, School Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jacintha O'Sullivan
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, and St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - John V. Reynolds
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, and St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Juliette Hussey
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mattock HC, Ryan R, O'Farrelly C, Babalis D, Ramchandani PG. Does a video clip enhance recruitment into a parenting trial? Learnings from a study within a trial. Trials 2020; 21:856. [PMID: 33059763 PMCID: PMC7558733 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04779-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Reaching recruitment targets in randomised controlled trials is a challenge. Media tools are increasingly used to engage participants, yet there is a paucity of research into the use of video to optimise recruitment. We therefore tested whether adding a participant information video clip to a standard participant information sheet improved recruitment into a parenting trial. Methods One hundred seven participants were randomised to receive either a participant information sheet (n = 51) or an informational video clip (n = 56) as part of an email contact following a screening phase. All participants went on to receive the information sheet as part of the existing consent procedure. Results The video condition did not increase the odds of recruitment into the trial, such that those in the video condition were significantly less likely to participate in the main trial (OR = 0.253, CI = 0.104–0.618, p = 0.003). Conclusion The introduction of a video clip into the recruitment stages of a parenting trial did not lead to an improvement in recruitment; however, the small sample size precludes definitive inferences. We offer reflections on challenges encountered in implementing the SWAT and suggestions for other researchers seeking to embed recruitment SWATs into similar trials. Trial registration Current controlled trials ISRCTN 58327365. Registered on 19 March 2015. SWAT registration SWAT 106; Effects of a video clip on recruitment into a randomised trial. Registered on 20 December 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rachael Ryan
- Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Christine O'Farrelly
- Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.,PEDAL Research Centre, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, 184 Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 8PQ, UK
| | - Daphne Babalis
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Paul G Ramchandani
- Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK. .,PEDAL Research Centre, Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, 184 Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 8PQ, UK. .,Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Heys R, Stoica S, Angelini G, Beringer R, Evans R, Ghorbel M, Lansdowne W, Parry A, Pieles G, Reeves B, Rogers C, Saxena R, Sheehan K, Smith S, Walker-Smith T, Tulloh RM, Caputo M. Intermittent antegrade warm-blood versus cold-blood cardioplegia in children undergoing open heart surgery: a protocol for a randomised controlled study (Thermic-3). BMJ Open 2020; 10:e036974. [PMID: 33055113 PMCID: PMC7559029 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgical repair of congenital heart defects often requires the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cardioplegic arrest. Cardioplegia is used during cardiac surgery requiring CPB to keep the heart still and to reduce myocardial damage as a result of ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Cold cardioplegia is the prevalent method of myocardial protection in paediatric patients; however, warm cardioplegia is used as part of usual care throughout the UK in adults. We aim to provide evidence to support the use of warm versus cold blood cardioplegia on clinical and biochemical outcomes during and after paediatric congenital heart surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We are conducting a single-centre randomised controlled trial in paediatric patients undergoing operations requiring CPB and cardioplegic arrest at the Bristol Royal Hospital for Children. We will randomise participants in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 'cold-blood cardioplegia' or 'warm-blood cardioplegia'. The primary outcome will be the difference between groups with respect to Troponin T levels over the first 48 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes will include measures of cardiac function; renal function; cerebral function; arrythmias during and postoperative hours; postoperative blood loss in the first 12 hours; vasoactive-inotrope score in the first 48 hours; intubation time; chest and wound infections; time from return from theatre until fit for discharge; length of postoperative hospital stay; all-cause mortality to 3 months postoperative; myocardial injury at the molecular and cellular level. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This trial has been approved by the London - Central Research Ethics Committee. Findings will be disseminated to the academic community through peer-reviewed publications and presentation at national and international meetings. Patients will be informed of the results through patient organisations and newsletters to participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN13467772; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Heys
- Bristol Trials Centre, Clincal Trials and Evaulation Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Serban Stoica
- Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Gianni Angelini
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Heart Institue, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Richard Beringer
- Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Rebecca Evans
- Bristol Trials Centre, Clincal Trials and Evaulation Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - William Lansdowne
- Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Andrew Parry
- Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Guido Pieles
- Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Barnaby Reeves
- Bristol Trials Centre, Clincal Trials and Evaulation Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Chris Rogers
- Bristol Trials Centre, Clincal Trials and Evaulation Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rohit Saxena
- Cardiac Intensive Care, Great Ormond Street Hospital For Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Karen Sheehan
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Stella Smith
- Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Terrie Walker-Smith
- Bristol Trials Centre, Clincal Trials and Evaulation Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Robert Mr Tulloh
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Heart Institue, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Massimo Caputo
- Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
O'Neill L, Knapp P, Doyle SL, Guinan E, Parker A, Segurado R, Connolly D, O'Sullivan J, Reynolds JV, Hussey J. Patient and family co-developed participant information to improve recruitment rates, retention, and patient understanding in the Rehabilitation Strategies Following Oesophago-gastric and Hepatopancreaticobiliary Cancer (ReStOre II) trial: Protocol for a study within a trial (SWAT). HRB Open Res 2019; 2:27. [PMID: 33392438 PMCID: PMC7745189 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.12950.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 03/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Whilst the potential benefits of exercise rehabilitation in cancer survivorship are plentiful, recruitment to survivorship rehabilitation trials remains suboptimal. There is growing evidence that Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) initiatives can increase the rate of recruitment to research. This study within a trial (SWAT) will examine if participant information co-developed by patients and their families can lead to greater recruitment rates, retention and understanding of the Rehabilitation Strategies in Oesophago-gastric and Hepatopancreaticobiliary Cancer (ReStOre II) trial when compared to standard participant information. Methods: This SWAT will be carried out over two phases. Phase I will utilise qualitative methods to develop (Phase Ia) and refine (Phase Ib) the new participant information. Phase Ia will recruit up to 20 survivors of upper gastrointestinal or hepatopancreaticobiliary cancer, or their family members, to take part in a focus group or interview to develop the new participant information. Focus groups/interviews will be recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. In Phase Ib, participants will return for a second focus group/interview to refine the participant information. Once finalised, the participant information will be submitted to ethics for approval. In Phase II, potential participants for the ReStOre II trial will be randomly assigned to receive either the standard or patient and family co-developed participant information. The two forms of participant information will be compared by recruitment and retention rates, and participant understanding of the trial (Decision-Making Questionnaire). Discussion: We anticipate that engaging with patients and their families to develop participant information will help to increase patient understanding of the ReStOre II trial and therefore recruitment and retention rates. The results of this SWAT will indicate the usefulness of this strategy for optimising recruitment to exercise rehabilitation trials in cancer survivorship. Registration: SWAT: Northern Ireland Hub for Trials Methodology Research SWAT Repository Store ( SWAT-100). ReStOre II: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03958019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda O'Neill
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Peter Knapp
- Department of Health Sciences and the Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - Suzanne L. Doyle
- School of Biological and Health Sciences, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Emer Guinan
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Adwoa Parker
- Department of Health Sciences and the Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - Ricardo Segurado
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sport Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Deirdre Connolly
- Discipline of Occupational Therapy, School Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jacintha O'Sullivan
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, and St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - John V. Reynolds
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, and St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Juliette Hussey
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sheridan R, Martin-Kerry J, Watt I, Higgins S, Stones SR, Taylor DH, Knapp P. User testing digital, multimedia information to inform children, adolescents and their parents about healthcare trials. J Child Health Care 2019; 23:468-482. [PMID: 30384772 DOI: 10.1177/1367493518807325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Digital, multimedia information resources (MMIs) containing text, video, animation and pictures are a promising alternative to written participant information materials designed to inform children, adolescents and parents about healthcare trials, but little research has tested whether they are fit for purpose. This study employed a consecutive groups design and user testing questionnaire to assess whether participants were able to find and understand key information in multimedia resources. Two rounds of testing were completed. In each round, seven children aged 7-11 tested the MMI with a parent; six adolescents aged 12-17 and seven parents tested the MMI independently. After round 1, the resources were revised based on participant scores, behaviour and feedback. Round 1 identified problems with 2/10 information items (length of trial and use of insulin pump); only 3/20 participants could locate all information items without difficulty. After revisions, 14/20 participants scored a clear round. Information comprehension was high: 96% understood in round 1 and 99% in round 2. Participant feedback on the multimedia resources was positive, although presentation preferences varied. User testing was employed successfully with children, adolescents and parents to identify issues with, and improve, multimedia resources developed to inform potential healthcare trial participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ian Watt
- 2 Department of Health Sciences & the Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Simon R Stones
- 4 Patient and Public Involvement advisory group member & School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Peter Knapp
- 2 Department of Health Sciences & the Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jolly K, Sidhu M, Bower P, Madurasinghe V. Improving recruitment to a study of telehealth management for COPD: a cluster randomised controlled 'study within a trial' (SWAT) of a multimedia information resource. Trials 2019; 20:453. [PMID: 31340853 PMCID: PMC6657092 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3496-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Good quality information is critical for valid informed consent to trials, but current paper-based consent procedures are potentially unwieldy and can be difficult to comprehend, which may deter people from participating. Multimedia resources may be able to provide more accessible and user-friendly information. We aimed to test whether offering access to a multimedia information resource alongside standard, printed patient information impacted on recruitment rates by conducting a pragmatic 'study within a trial' (SWAT) embedding a trial of a multimedia resource within an existing trial. METHODS The PSM COPD study involved people with mild symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recruited from primary care being randomised to a nurse-delivered telephone health coaching intervention, or usual primary care. For the SWAT of recruitment procedures, practices recruiting participants were cluster randomised to use either the standard printed patient information materials or standard printed patient information materials with access to a multimedia information resource. The multimedia resource was developed by patient and public involvement (PPI) contributors and researchers, and included study-specific information (e.g. study purpose, risks), and generic information about trials (e.g. confidentiality, randomisation). We developed a list of components and used animations as well as video clips of patients discussing their experiences of participation, matched to these components. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants randomised. RESULTS Nine point six percent of those receiving standard printed patient information materials and access to the multimedia information resource were recruited, compared to 10.8% in those receiving standard printed materials alone (odds ratio (OR) = 0.844, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 1.22). We also found no effects on the proportion of people responding to the invitation (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.33) or retention in the trial at 6 (ORs 0.84, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.22) and 12 months after randomisation (ORs 0.80, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.18), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The study suggests no benefits of access to a multimedia information resource alongside patient information materials on recruitment. This may reflect the limited engagement of patients with the multimedia resource. Further uses of multimedia resources will need to explore how content can be explicitly matched to user needs and preferences and methods to encourage engagement to see if effects can be enhanced. More SWATs of multimedia into ongoing trials will provide a more precise estimate of effect, and explore further how effects vary by trial context and recruitment process, intervention, and patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current controlled trials ISRCTN 06710391 . Registered on 21 November 2013. SWAT REGISTRATION SWAT 23: Systematic Techniques for Assisting Recruitment to Trials (MRC START). Registered on 11 January 2012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Jolly
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Manbinder Sidhu
- Health Services Management Centre, School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2RT, UK
| | | | - Peter Bower
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Vichithranie Madurasinghe
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Preston J, Stones SR, Davies H, Preston J, Phillips B. How to involve children and young people in what is, after all, their research. Arch Dis Child 2019; 104:494-500. [PMID: 31000534 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2018] [Revised: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 12/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Third in a series of four articles addressing ethical approaches and issues in undertaking clinical research with children and young people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Preston
- NIHR Alder Hey Clinical Research Facility, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | | | - Bob Phillips
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds, UK.,Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Martin-Kerry J, Parker A, Bower P, Watt I, Treweek S, Torgerson D, Arundel C, Knapp P. SWATted away: the challenging experience of setting up a programme of SWATs in paediatric trials. Trials 2019; 20:141. [PMID: 30782209 PMCID: PMC6381684 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3236-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomised controlled trials are considered the best method for determining the effectiveness and safety of health interventions. Trials involving children are essential to ensure that treatments are safe and effective. However, many trials, in both adult and paediatric populations, do not achieve recruitment targets and/or maintain retention of participants, which can lead to a reduction in the internal and external validity of the results. Identifying ways of improving trial efficiency are important in order to increase the successful completion of trials. MAIN BODY A 'Study Within A Trial' (SWAT) is a self-contained study embedded within an ongoing trial, which aims to establish evidence to improve the management and delivery of trials in healthcare. Increasing numbers of SWATs have been undertaken in recent years yet very few within paediatric trials. Herein, we describe some of the challenges with undertaking a programme of SWATs within paediatric clinical trials in the UK. The TRECA (TRials Engagement in Children and Adolescents) study involves developing multimedia websites for use within paediatric trials to provide recruitment information to children, young people and their families about the clinical trial. Challenges encountered included governance issues such as host trial approval processes and sharing of anonymised data, funding issues for host trials, internet quality and accessibility within the healthcare setting, and ethical concerns associated with SWAT methodology. We believe the ethical concerns are more pronounced in the paediatric setting, perhaps because of the fewer SWATs undertaken in these settings or that a more cautious, risk-averse approach to undertaking research with children is taken. CONCLUSION SWATs are becoming increasingly common to provide an evidence base for methods to improve trial efficiency. However, we encountered a number of unanticipated challenges to embedding TRECA that have not been previously reported within the scientific literature. We believe that, if these issues were addressed through wider promotion and explanation of undertaking SWATs involving all key stakeholders, as well as by exploration of alternative funding models for SWATs, this would enable more streamlined, appropriate and timely processes for SWATs and a stronger evidence base for what works to increase trial efficiency. TRIAL REGISTRATION The TRECA study is registered on ISRCTN, ID 73136092 . Registered on 24 August 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adwoa Parker
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Peter Bower
- MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL UK
| | - Ian Watt
- Department of Health Sciences and the Hull York Medical School, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD UK
| | - David Torgerson
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Catherine Arundel
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Peter Knapp
- Department of Health Sciences and the Hull York Medical School, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Martin-Kerry JM, Knapp P, Atkin K, Bower P, Watt I, Stones C, Higgins S, Sheridan R, Preston J, Horton Taylor D, Baines P, Young B. Supporting children and young people when making decisions about joining clinical trials: qualitative study to inform multimedia website development. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e023984. [PMID: 30782720 PMCID: PMC6340013 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To understand stakeholders' views regarding the content and design of paediatric clinical trial multimedia websites. To describe how this knowledge informed the development of the multimedia websites. DESIGN Qualitative study comprising two rounds of interviews or focus groups, with thematic analysis of interview transcripts. PARTICIPANTS Sixty-two people (21 children and young people with long-term health conditions, 24 parents and 17 professionals). SETTING One UK children's hospital and one UK Young Persons' Advisory Group. RESULTS When asked what was important in deciding whether to join a trial, children, young people and parents prioritised information about what participation would involve, what the trial was testing, potential benefits and risks of participation and knowing they could leave the trial if they later changed their minds. Young people and parents trusted trial teams to follow regulatory and quality requirements and therefore did not think such information was a priority for the websites, although logos of trusted organisations could lend credibility. Professionals largely concurred with these views. Children and young people advised on the importance of designing the multimedia website to ensure its appearance, tone and wording suited the intended audience and on using animated characters to facilitate children's engagement. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides insights into the information that families value when deciding about healthcare trial participation. It provides guidance on the design of information resources to appeal to children and young people, while also being acceptable to parents and professionals who are often gatekeepers of children's access to information. Our findings will be of use to others developing similar multimedia websites. We report specific information needs and new visual preferences that are not usually addressed in printed trial information. Our work illustrates what qualitative research and participatory design practices can contribute to the development of information resources more generally. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN73136092; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Knapp
- Department of Health Sciences & Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - Karl Atkin
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ian Watt
- Department of Health Sciences & Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - Catherine Stones
- School of Design, Clothworkers' Central, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Jenny Preston
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Clinical Research Facility, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | | | - Paul Baines
- Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Bridget Young
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|