Baricitinib decreases anti-dsDNA in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a phase II double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Innovations in Cutaneous Lupus

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an autoimmune-mediated skin disease under the family of lupus erythematosus. Systemic immunosuppressants and topical treatments have been used to manage CLE; however, these treatments tend to be moderately efficacious and leave patients with unmet therapeutic needs. There is a need for medications that target pruritus, scarring, dyspigmentation, and other symptoms of chronic CLE that contribute to decreased quality of life. The introduction of new biologics and other systemic medications has expanded dermatologists' and rheumatologists' ability to manage CLE. This article discusses new pharmaceuticals and guidelines providing an updated overview of the clinical management of CLE.

JAK inhibitors (JAKi): Mechanisms of action and perspectives in systemic and autoimmune diseases

Janus kinase (JAK) molecules are involved in important cellular activation pathways. Over the past decade, many targeted therapies have emerged, including the increasingly promising role of JAK inhibitors (JAKi) in the treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. The spectrum of use of these small molecules is increasingly broader. JAKi have been approved in several autoimmune diseases. Currently, four molecules (tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib and filgotinib) have been labeled for moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with failure or poor tolerance of one or more conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARDS), or biologics (bDMARDS). JAKi are now also commonly used in other diseases such as psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and ulcerative colitis. They have also shown promising results in clinical trials for the treatment of other autoimmune conditions. We present here their mechanisms of action, and the main data about JAKi use on systemic and autoimmune diseases.

The safety and efficacy of Baricitinib for systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background and objective

Baricitinib is a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor approved for treating active rheumatoid arthritis and atopic dermatitis. Therefore, the authors aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of once-daily oral Baricitinib 2 mg or 4 mg versus placebo in active SLE patients receiving standard care.

Methods

The authors synthesized randomized controlled studies (RCTs) from MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library until 20 March 2023. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO.

Results

Three RCTs with 1849 participants were included. The Baricitinib group had a significant SRI-4 response [RR: 1.11 with 95% CI (1.03, 1.21), P=0.008] and greater than or equal to 4-point SLEDAI-2K domain improvement [RR: 1.13 with 95% CI (1.02, 1.25), P=0.02] compared to the placebo group; however, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups, regarding the secondary endpoints. For safety outcomes, Baricitinib was significantly associated with a higher incidence of Any serious adverse event [RR: 1.48 with 95% CI (1.07, 2.05), P=0.02].

Conclusion

Baricitinib is associated with significant outcomes of SRI-4 response, greater than or equal to 4-point improvement SLEDAI-2K score, and Joint Indices. Regarding safety, there was no difference in the outcomes other than the serious adverse events.

JAK inhibitors in systemic lupus erythematosus: Translating pathogenesis into therapy

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex multi-organ autoimmune disease marked by the production of autoantibodies against nuclear structures, formation of immune complexes, and chronic inflammation triggered by their tissular deposition. SLE is characterized by alternating periods of relapse and remission and each flare has the potential to cause new organ damage related to either the disease process or the medication toxicity. Despite remarkable progress across its multiple domains, SLE is still an area with many unmet needs, calling for innovative and practical solutions. The efforts of the drug development programme in lupus have led to considerable growth in the last decade, owing to the approval of belimumab, anifrolumab, and voclosporin. The increasing understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease has enabled the exploration of novel therapeutic strategies. New discoveries in the intricate cytokine kaleidoscope of lupus have made the concept of targeted therapy an attractive and promising research focus. JAK inhibitors are oral targeted therapies approved for a wide variety of diseases across the Rheumatology, Gastroenterology, Dermatology, and Haematology fields. Multiple JAKis are currently being investigated in SLE. This paper aims to summarize existing data coming from both clinical trials and case reports regarding the use of JAK inhibitors in SLE.

A double-blind pilot study of oral baricitinib in adult patients with lupus erythematosus panniculitis

Lupus erythematosus panniculitis (LEP) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a significant impact on the overall well-being of patients. The safety and efficacy of oral baricitinib for the treatment of LEP have not been studied. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of oral baricitinib in patients with LEP who are recalcitrant or intolerant to conventional therapies. Patients (aged ≥18 years) with active LEP (with a revised cutaneous lupus erythematosus disease area and severity index [RCLASI]-active score ≥4] were randomly assigned 2:1 to baricitinib (4 mg) or placebo (once daily for 20 weeks). The placebo group was switched to baricitinib (4 mg) at week 13, and the final evaluation was conducted at week 24. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with an RCLASI-A score decreased by 20% at week 12. The secondary endpoints included the changes in the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index active-(CLASI-A) score, the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score, and safety. Five patients were enrolled. Three patients received baricitinib (4 mg), and two patients were treated with placebo. Two patients in the baricitinib treatment group showed a significant RCLASI-A decrease at week 12 and week 24. Two patients in the placebo group had no change in RCLASI-A at week 12 and a significant decrease at week 24. No new safety events were observed. Treatment with baricitinib was effective and well tolerated in patients with LEP.

Baricitinib in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Background

Baricitinib, a Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor, has emerged as a potential therapeutic option for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This systematic review aims to synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the potential of baricitinib in treating SLE.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted across electronic databases to identify relevant RCTs assessing baricitinib in patients with SLE. Studies reporting outcomes such as the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index-4 (SRI-4), adverse events, and safety profiles were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed following PRISMA guidelines.

Results

A total of four studies were evaluated for efficacy and safety of baricitinib therapy. Three studies reported SRI-4, British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG), and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K), except for Dorner and colleagues Only Dorner and colleagues and Wallace and colleagues discuss the anti-dsDNA titres following treatment with baricitinib. The findings consistently demonstrated improved efficacy of baricitinib compared to placebo, particularly in terms of SRI-4 scores. Higher dosages of baricitinib showed significant improvement in disease activity and severity indices. Adverse events, including infections and gastrointestinal disturbances, were reported.

Conclusion

Baricitinib holds promise for treating SLE, but caution is needed due to potential adverse events. Careful patient selection and monitoring are crucial. Future research should prioritize long-term safety and comparative effectiveness studies to better understand baricitinib's role in managing SLE.

Efficacy and safety study of targeted small-molecule drugs in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Targeted small-molecule drugs in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have attracted increasing attention from clinical investigators. However, there is still a lack of evidence on the difference in the efficacy and safety of different targeted small-molecule drugs. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of different targeted small-molecule drugs for SLE.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on targeted small-molecule drugs in the treatment of SLE in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched as of April 25, 2023. Risk of bias assessment was performed for included studies using the Cochrane's tool for evaluating the risk of bias. The primary outcome indicators were SRI-4 response, BICLA response, and adverse reaction. Because different doses and courses of treatment were used in the included studies, Bayesian network meta-regression was used to investigate the effect of different doses and courses of treatment on efficacy and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies were included, involving 3,622 patients and 9 targeted small-molecule drugs. The results of network meta-analysis showed that, in terms of improving SRI-4, Deucravacitinib was significantly superior to that of Baricitinib (RR = 1.32, 95% CI (1.04, 1.68), P < 0.05). Deucravacitinib significantly outperformed the placebo in improving BICLA response (RR = 1.55, 95% CI (1.20, 2.02), P < 0.05). In terms of adverse reactions, targeted small-molecule drugs did not significantly increase the risk of adverse events as compared to placebo (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Based on the evidence obtained in this study, the differences in the efficacy of targeted small-molecule drugs were statistically significant as compared to placebo, but the difference in the safety was not statistically significant. The dose and the course of treatment had little impact on the effect of targeted small-molecule drugs. Deucravacitinib could significantly improve BICLA response and SRI-4 response without significantly increasing the risk of AEs. Therefore, Deucravacitinib is very likely to be the best intervention measure. Due to the small number of included studies, more high-quality clinical evidence is needed to further verify the efficacy and safety of targeted small-molecule drugs for SLE.

JAK Inhibition as a Potential Treatment Target in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs) are a group of molecules responsible for signal transduction of multiple cytokines and growth factors in different cell types, involved in the maintenance of immune tolerance. Thus, the dysregulation of this pathway plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of multiple autoimmune, inflammatory, and allergic diseases and is an attractive treatment target. JAK inhibitors (JAKinibs) have been approved in the treatment of multiple autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (SPA). In SLE, there is a plethora of ongoing trials evaluating their efficacy, with tofacitinib, baricitinib and deucravacitinib showing promising results, without major safety concerns. In this review, we will discuss the rationale of targeting JAKinibs in SLE and summarize the clinical data of efficacy and safety of JAKinibs in SLE patients.

Type I IFN in Glomerular Disease: Scarring beyond the STING

The field of nephrology has recently directed a considerable amount of attention towards the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) molecule since it appears to be a potent driver of chronic kidney disease (CKD). STING and its activator, the cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS), along with intracellular RIG-like receptors (RLRs) and toll-like receptors (TLRs), are potent inducers of type I interferon (IFN-I) expression. These cytokines have been long recognized as part of the mechanism used by the innate immune system to battle viral infections; however, their involvement in sterile inflammation remains unclear. Mounting evidence pointing to the involvement of the IFN-I pathway in sterile kidney inflammation provides potential insights into the complex interplay between the innate immune system and damage to the most sensitive segment of the nephron, the glomerulus. The STING pathway is often cited as one cause of renal disease not attributed to viral infections. Instead, this pathway can recognize and signal in response to host-derived nucleic acids, which are also recognized by RLRs and TLRs. It is still unclear, however, whether the development of renal diseases depends on subsequent IFN-I induction or other processes involved. This review aims to explore the main endogenous inducers of IFN-I in glomerular cells, to discuss what effects autocrine and paracrine signaling have on IFN-I induction, and to identify the pathways that are implicated in the development of glomerular damage.

Janus kinase inhibitors modify the fatty acid profile of extracellular vesicles and modulate the immune response

Background

Janus kinase inhibitors (jakinibs) are immunomodulators used for treating malignancies, autoimmune diseases, and immunodeficiencies. However, they induce adverse effects such as thrombosis, lymphocytosis, and neutropenia that could be mediated by extracellular vesicles (EVs). These particles are cell membrane-derived structures that transport cellular and environmental molecules and participate in intercellular communication. Jakinibs can modify the content of EVs and enable them to modulate the activity of different components of the immune response.

Objective

to evaluate the interactions between immune system components of healthy individuals and EVs derived from monocytic and lymphoid lineage cells generated in the presence of baricitinib (BARI) and itacitinib (ITA) and their possible effects.

Methods

EVs were isolated from monocytes (M) and lymphocytes (L) of healthy individuals, as well as from U937 (U) and Jurkat (J) cells exposed to non-cytotoxic concentrations of BARI, ITA, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; vehicle control). The binding to and engulfment of EVs by peripheral blood leukocytes of healthy individuals were analyzed by flow cytometry using CFSE-stained EVs and anti-CD45-PeCy7 mAb-labeled whole blood. The effect of EVs on respiratory burst, T-cell activation and proliferation, cytokine synthesis, and platelet aggregation was evaluated. Respiratory burst was assessed in PMA-stimulated neutrophils by the dihydrorhodamine (DHR) test and flow cytometry. T-cell activation and proliferation and cytokine production were assessed in CFSE-stained PBMC cultures stimulated with PHA; expression of the T-cell activation markers CD25 and CD69 and T-cell proliferation were analyzed by flow cytometry, and the cytokine levels were quantified in culture supernatants by Luminex assays. Platelet aggregation was analyzed in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) samples by light transmission aggregometry. The EVs' fatty acid (FA) profile was analyzed using methyl ester derivatization followed by gas chromatography.

Results

ITA exposure during the generation of EVs modified the size of the EVs released; however, treatment with DMSO and BARI did not alter the size of EVs generated from U937 and Jurkat cells. Circulating neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes showed a 2-fold greater tendency to internalize ITA-U-EVs than their respective DMSO control. The neutrophil respiratory burst was attenuated in greater extent by M-EVs than by L-EVs. Autologous ITA-M-EVs reduced T-cell proliferation by decreasing IL-2 levels and CD25 expression independently of CD69. A higher accumulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines was observed in PHA-stimulated PBMC cultures exposed to M-EVs than to L-EVs; this difference may be related to the higher myristate content of M-EVs. Platelet aggregation increased in the presence of ITA-L/M-EVs by a mechanism presumably dependent on the high arachidonic acid content of the vesicles.

Conclusions

Cellular origin and jakinib exposure modify the FA profile of EVs, enabling them, in turn, to modulate neutrophil respiratory burst, T-cell proliferation, and platelet aggregation. The increased T-cell proliferation induced by BARI-L/M-EVs could explain the lymphocytosis observed in patients treated with BARI. The higher proportion of arachidonic acid in the FA content of ITA-L/M-EVs could be related to the thrombosis described in patients treated with ITA. EVs also induced a decrease in the respiratory burst of neutrophils.

Targeted therapies for lupus nephritis: Current perspectives and future directions

ABSTRACT

Lupus nephritis (LN), a severe manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus, poses a substantial risk of progression to end-stage renal disease, with increased mortality. Conventional therapy for LN relies on broad-spectrum immunosuppressants such as glucocorticoids, mycophenolate mofetil, and calcineurin inhibitors. Although therapeutic regimens have evolved over the years, they have inherent limitations, including non-specific targeting, substantial adverse effects, high relapse rates, and prolonged maintenance and remission courses. These drawbacks underscore the need for targeted therapeutic strategies for LN. Recent advancements in our understanding of LN pathogenesis have led to the identification of novel therapeutic targets and the emergence of biological agents and small-molecule inhibitors with improved specificity and reduced toxicity. This review provides an overview of the current evidence on targeted therapies for LN, elucidates the biological mechanisms of responses and failure, highlights the challenges ahead, and outlines strategies for subsequent clinical trials and integrated immunomodulatory approaches.

Efficacy of baricitinib for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by abnormal autoantibody production, inflammation, and organ damage. Most SLE treatment strategies aim to induce remission or reduce disease activity while avoiding flares. Baricitinib has been used effectively to manage various inflammatory diseases, and some randomized controlled trials (RCT) have shown that it is beneficial in treating SLE. The current study aims to assess the efficacy of baricitinib in treating SLE patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Various databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Science Direct were searched to obtain eligible studies for the present meta-analysis. Data such as baseline characteristics of patients, doses of the baricitinib, follow-up duration, and treatment outcome in the form of SLE responder index-4 (SRI-4) and lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) were extracted. Combined odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and probability values were calculated to study the efficacy of baricitinib in treating SLE patients. A p-value less than .05 was taken as significant. Comprehensive meta-analysis v3 was used for all analyses.

RESULTS

Three articles were found eligible for the present meta-analysis comprising 614 patients with placebo, 614 SLE patients receiving 4 mg, and 621 patients with 2 mg of baricitinib. Meta-analysis revealed a beneficial effect of 4 mg baricitinib in SLE patients compared to placebo, as measured by an increase in the SRI-4 (p = .006, OR = 1.370) and LLDAS (p = .083, OR = 1.252) rates. In contrast to the placebo group, however, patients receiving 2 mg of baricitinib exhibited no significant improvement. The trial sequential analysis revealed the need for additional RCTs to determine the role of baricitinib in treating SLE patients.

CONCLUSION

In treating SLE patients, administrating a higher dose of baricitinib (4 mg) may be effective. However, additional RCTs in different populations with larger sample sizes are required to validate our findings.

Transcriptional profiling upon T cell stimulation reveals down-regulation of inflammatory pathways in T and B cells in SLE versus Sjögren's syndrome

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) share clinical as well as pathogenic similarities. Although previous studies suggest various abnormalities in different immune cell compartments, dedicated cell-type specific transcriptomic signatures are often masked by patient heterogeneity. Here, we performed transcriptional profiling of isolated CD4, CD8, CD16 and CD19 lymphocytes from pSS and SLE patients upon T cell stimulation, in addition to a steady-state condition directly after blood drawing, in total comprising 581 sequencing samples. T cell stimulation, which induced a pronounced inflammatory response in all four cell types, gave rise to substantial re-modulation of lymphocyte subsets in the two autoimmune diseases compared to healthy controls, far exceeding the transcriptomic differences detected at steady-state. In particular, we detected cell-type and disease-specific down-regulation of a range of pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine pathways. Such differences between SLE and pSS patients are instrumental for selective immune targeting by future therapies.

Efficacy of baricitinib in the treatment of Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): A Systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease. It affects multiple organ systems and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The treatment for SLE primarily aims at controlling and remitting the disease. Baricitinib is a kinase inhibitor that selectively inhibits JAK1 and JAK2 enzymes. Recently this drug is being investigated as a potential therapeutic option for SLE.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the efficacy of baricitinib in treating SLE.

METHODS

Search of databases identified relevant studies that reported the efficacy of baricitinib. Data of patient characteristics, intervention details, and outcomes was extracted. The data from the studies were pooled using a random-effects model. The odds ratio with their respective 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to analyze the results. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

3 RCTs were included in the analysis. 1849 patients were extracted from the included studies, most of the participants were females with a mean age of 43 years. The studies showed a significant effect of Baricitinib 4 mg in achieving SRI-4 [OR = 1.42 (95 % CI: 1.01, 2.00); p = 0.04]. There was no significant association of Baricitinib 2 mg in achieving SRI-4. Both dosages of the drug did not have any significant association in achieving LLDAS as compared to placebo. Serious adverse side effects were significantly associated with Bar 4 mg as compared to Bar 2 mg.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis suggests that baricitinib might be a potential treatment option for SLE. Further large-scale clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings. Potential side effects should also be considered while the administration of this drug.

B cell-targeted polylactic acid nanoparticles as platform for encapsulating jakinibs: potential therapeutic strategy for systemic lupus erythematosus

Background: B cells are pivotal in systemic lupus erythematosus and autoimmune disease pathogenesis. Materials & methods: To address this, Nile Red-labeled polylactic acid nanoparticles (NR-PLA NPs) loaded with the JAK inhibitor baricitinib (BARI), specifically targeting JAK1 and JAK2 in B cells, were developed. Results: Physicochemical characterization confirmed NP stability over 30 days. NR-PLA NPs were selectively bound and internalized by CD19+ B cells, sparing other leukocytes. In contrast to NR-PLA NPs, BARI-NR-PLA NPs significantly dampened B-cell activation, proliferation and plasma cell differentiation in healthy controls. They also inhibited key cytokine production. These effects often surpassed those of equimolar-free BARI. Conclusion: This study underscores the potential of PLA NPs to regulate autoreactive B cells, offering a novel therapeutic avenue for autoimmune diseases.

Lupus Nephritis Risk Factors and Biomarkers: An Update

Lupus nephritis (LN) represents the most severe organ manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in terms of morbidity and mortality. To reduce these risks, tremendous efforts have been made in the last decade to characterize the different steps of the disease and to develop biomarkers in order to better (i) unravel the pre-SLE stage (e.g., anti-nuclear antibodies and interferon signature); (ii) more timely initiation of therapy by improving early and accurate LN diagnosis (e.g., pathologic classification was revised); (iii) monitor disease activity and therapeutic response (e.g., recommendation to re-biopsy, new urinary biomarkers); (iv) prevent disease flares (e.g., serologic and urinary biomarkers); (v) mitigate the deterioration in the renal function; and (vi) reduce side effects with new therapeutic guidelines and novel therapies. However, progress is poor in terms of improvement with early death attributed to active SLE or infections, while later deaths are related to the chronicity of the disease and the use of toxic therapies. Consequently, an individualized treat-to-target strategy is mandatory, and for that, there is an unmet need to develop a set of accurate biomarkers to be used as the standard of care and adapted to each stage of the disease.

Safety profile of baricitinib in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: an integrated analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety of the oral Janus kinase inhibitor baricitinib in adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) receiving stable background therapy. Topics of special interest included infections and cardiovascular and thromboembolic events.

METHODS

This analysis included integrated safety data from three randomised, placebo-controlled studies (one phase 2 and two phase 3) and one long-term extension study. Data are reported in three data sets: placebo-controlled, extended exposure and all-baricitinib. Outcomes include treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), AEs of special interest and abnormal laboratory changes. Proportions of patients with events and incidence rates (IRs) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 1655 patients received baricitinib for up to 3.5 years (median duration 473 days). With baricitinib 4 mg, baricitinib 2 mg and placebo, respectively, 50.8%, 50.7% and 49.0% of patients reported at least one infection and 4.4%, 3.4% and 1.9% of patients had a serious infection. The most common treatment-emergent infections included urinary tract infection, COVID-19, upper respiratory tract infection and nasopharyngitis. Herpes zoster was more common with baricitinib 4 mg (4.7%) vs baricitinib 2 mg (2.7%) and placebo (2.8%). Among baricitinib-4 mg, 2 mg and placebo-treated patients, respectively, 4 (IR=0.9), 1 (IR=0.2) and 0 experienced at least one positively adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular event, and 0, 3 (IR=0.6) and 2 (IR=0.4) reported at least one positively adjudicated venous thromboembolism.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this integrated safety analysis in patients with SLE are not substantially different to the established safety profile of baricitinib. No increased venous thromboembolism was found.

Promising Experimental Treatments for Lupus Nephritis: Key Talking Points and Potential Opportunities

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a frequent and serious complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), impairing patients' quality of life and significantly increasing mortality. Despite optimizing the use of conventional immunosuppressants and other biological drugs, its management remains unsatisfactory. This is mainly due to the heterogeneity of SLE, but also to insufficiently effective treatment regimens and clinical trial limitations (strict criteria, low number of patients included, and side effects). Most clinical trials of new biological therapies have failed to meet their primary endpoints in both general SLE and LN, with only two biological drugs (belimumab and anifrolumab) being approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of SLE. Recently, several Phase II randomized controlled trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of new biologics in LN, and some of them have demonstrated an improvement in clinical and laboratory measures. Multi-target therapies are also being successfully developed and encourage a belief that there will be an improvement in LN outcomes.

Janus kinase inhibitors in systemic lupus erythematosus: implications for tyrosine kinase 2 inhibition

Aberrant activation of the Janus kinase (JAK) and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway is common in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), conferring immune-mediated properties in target tissues. Multiple cytokines activate different combinations of JAKs and STATs to alter the cell fate of target tissue and induce end-organ damage. Thus, the simultaneous blockade of several different cytokines by small molecules acting downstream intracellular signalling has gained traction. JAK inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of several rheumatic diseases, yet hitherto not for SLE. Nevertheless, JAK inhibitors including tofacitinib, baricitinib, and deucravacitinib have shown merit as treatments for SLE. Tofacitinib, a JAK1/3 inhibitor, reduced cholesterol levels, improved vascular function, and decreased the type I interferon signature in SLE patients. Baricitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, demonstrated significant improvements in lupus rashes and arthritis in a phase 2 and a phase 3 randomised controlled trial, but the results were not replicated in another phase 3 trial. Deucravacitinib, a selective tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor, yielded greater response rates than placebo in a phase 2 trial of SLE and will be investigated in larger phase 3 trials. TYK2 is activated in response to cytokines actively involved in lupus pathogenesis; this review highlights the potential of targeting TYK2 as a promising therapy for SLE.

Kunxian capsule alleviates renal damage by inhibiting the JAK1/STAT1 pathway in lupus nephritis

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Kunxian capsule (KXC) is a new traditional Chinese medicine drug included in "The key science and technology achievements" in the Ninth Five Year Plan of China. KXC has been clinically used for more than 10 years in the treatment of lupus nephritis (LN). However, the underlying role and molecular mechanism of KXC in LN remain unclear.

AIM OF THE STUDY

This study aimed to explore the efficacy and potential mechanisms of KXC through pharmacological network, in vitro and in vivo studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pharmacological network analysis of KXC treatment in LN was performed using data acquired from the Traditional Chinese Medicine System Pharmacology Database and Analysis Platform (TCMSP, https://old.tcmsp-e.com/tcmsp.php) and NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/database). HK-2 cells were chosen as an in vitro model of the tubular immune response by simulation with interferon γ (IFN-γ). MRL/lpr mice were used to explore the mechanism of KXC in vivo. Finally, the specific active molecules of KXC were further analyzed by molecular docking.

RESULTS

The pharmacological network analysis showed that STAT1 is a key factor in the effects of KXC. In vitro and in vivo experiments confirmed the therapeutic effect of KXC on LN renal function and tubular inflammation. The protective effect of KXC is mediated by STAT1 blockade, which further reduces T-cell infiltration and improves the renal microenvironment in LN. Two main components of KXC, Tripterygium hypoglaucum (H.Lév.) Hutch (Shanhaitang) and Epimedium brevicornu Maxim (Yinyanghuo) could block JAK1-STAT1 activation. Furthermore, we found 8 molecules that could bind to the ATP pocket of JAK1 with high affinities by performing docking analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

KXC inhibits renal damage and T-cell infiltration in LN by blocking the JAK1-STAT1 pathway.

High serum immunoglobulin D levels in systemic lupus erythematosus: more to be found?

INTRODUCTION

Many studies have shown that serum immunoglobulin D (IgD) is usually increased in autoimmune diseases. The potential role of IgD in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is still unclear. Our study aimed to compare the serum IgD levels of SLE with different population and to evaluate the relationship between serum IgD and SLE.

METHODS

Fifty SLE patients, 40 non-SLE chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, and 50 healthy volunteers were enrolled in this study. Serum IgD levels were analyzed by ELISA assay and compared between groups. The correlation of serum IgD and SLE disease were evaluated. The ability of serum IgD to predict SLE was analyzed by graphing receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Serum IgD levels were significantly higher in SLE patients compared to non-SLE CKD and healthy controls (7436.1 ± 5862.1 vs. 4517.8 ± 5255.2 vs. 4180.4 ± 4881 ng/mL, p = 0.01, p = 0.002, respectively), and in patients with high SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) scores compared with those with low scores (8572.9 ± 5968.7 vs. 5020.4 ± 4972.5 ng/mL, p = 0.044). High level of inflammatory cytokines and decreased circulating basophil counts were found in SLE patients (p < 0.05). No correlations was identified between serum IgD levels and SLEDAI scores (p > 0.05). Serum IgD was noninferior to IgG or IgE in discriminating SLE with an area under the curve of 0.672 (95% CI, 0.59-0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum IgD levels are significantly elevated in SLE patients with high SLEDAI scores. Simultaneous occurrence of increased inflammatory cytokines and decreased basophil counts highlights the potential role of IgD-targets interaction in SLE pathogenesis. Key points • Total serum IgD levels were elevated in SLE patients. • High IgD levels were significantly higher in SLE patients with high SLEDAI scores. • The ability of serum IgD was equivalent to IgG or IgE in discriminating SLE from CKD and healthy adult.

Targeted Small Molecules for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Drugs in the Pipeline

Despite the uncertainty of the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus, novel small molecules targeting specific intracellular mechanisms of immune cells are being developed to reverse the pathophysiological processes. These targeted molecules have the advantages of convenient administration, lower production costs, and the lack of immunogenicity. The Janus kinases, Bruton's tyrosine kinases, and spleen tyrosine kinases are important enzymes for activating downstream signals from various receptors on immune cells that include cytokines, growth factor, hormones, Fc, CD40, and B-cell receptors. Suppression of these kinases impairs cellular activation, differentiation, and survival, leading to diminished cytokine actions and autoantibody secretion. Intracellular protein degradation by immunoproteasomes, levered by the cereblon E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, is an essential process for the regulation of cellular functions and survival. Modulation of the immunoproteasomes and cereblon leads to depletion of long-lived plasma cells, reduced plasmablast differentiation, and production of autoantibodies and interferon-α. The sphingosine 1-phosphate/sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor-1 pathway is responsible for lymphocyte trafficking, regulatory T-cell/Th17 cell homeostasis, and vascular permeability. Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor-1 modulators limit the trafficking of autoreactive lymphocytes across the blood-brain barrier, increase regulatory T-cell function, and decrease production of autoantibodies and type I interferons. This article summarizes the development of these targeted small molecules in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus, and the future prospect for precision medicine.

Baricitinib for systemic lupus erythematosus: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (SLE-BRAVE-I)

BACKGROUND

Baricitinib is an oral selective inhibitor of Janus kinase 1 and 2 approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, atopic dermatitis, and alopecia areata. In a 24-week phase 2 study in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), baricitinib 4 mg significantly improved SLE disease activity compared with placebo. The objective of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients with active SLE in a 52-week phase 3 study.

METHODS

In a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 study, SLE-BRAVE-I, patients (aged ≥18 years) with active SLE receiving stable background therapy were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to baricitinib 4 mg, 2 mg, or placebo once daily for 52 weeks with standard of care. Glucocorticoid tapering was encouraged but not required per protocol. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients reaching an SLE Responder Index (SRI)-4 response at week 52 in the baricitinib 4 mg treatment group compared with placebo. The primary endpoint was assessed by logistic regression analysis with baseline disease activity, baseline corticosteroid dose, region, and treatment group in the model. Efficacy analyses were done on a modified intention-to-treat population, comprising all participants who were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of investigational product. Safety analyses were done on all randomly assigned participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who did not discontinue from the study for the reason of lost to follow-up at the first post-baseline visit. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03616912.

FINDINGS

760 participants were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of baricitinib 4 mg (n=252), baricitinib 2 mg (n=255), or placebo (n=253). A significantly greater proportion of participants who received baricitinib 4 mg (142 [57%]; odds ratio 1·57 [95% CI 1·09 to 2·27]; difference with placebo 10·8 [2·0 to 19·6]; p=0·016), but not baricitinib 2 mg (126 [50%]; 1·14 [0·79 to 1·65]; 3·9 [-4·9 to 12·6]; p=0·47), reached SRI-4 response compared with placebo (116 [46%]). There were no significant differences between the proportions of participants in either baricitinib group reaching any of the major secondary endpoints compared with placebo, including glucocorticoid tapering and time to first severe flare. 26 (10%) participants receiving baricitinib 4 mg had serious adverse events, 24 (9%) participants receiving baricitinib 2 mg, and 18 (7%) participants receiving placebo. The safety profile of baricitinib in participants with SLE was consistent with the known baricitinib safety profile.

INTERPRETATION

The primary endpoint in this study was met for the 4 mg baricitinib group. However, key secondary endpoints were not. No new safety signals were observed.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly and Company.

Baricitinib for systemic lupus erythematosus: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (SLE-BRAVE-II)

BACKGROUND

Baricitinib is an oral selective inhibitor of Janus kinase 1 and 2 approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, atopic dermatitis, and alopecia areata. In a 24-week phase 2 study in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), baricitinib 4 mg significantly improved SLE disease activity compared with placebo. In this Article, we report the evaluation of efficacy and safety of baricitinib in patients with SLE in a 52-week phase 3 study.

METHODS

In this phase 3 double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study, SLE-BRAVE-II, patients (aged ≥18 years) with active SLE receiving stable background therapy were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to baricitinib 4 mg, baricitinib 2 mg, or placebo once daily for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with an SLE Responder Index (SRI)-4 response at week 52 in the baricitinib 4 mg treatment group compared with placebo. Glucocorticoid tapering was encouraged but not required per protocol. The primary endpoint was assessed by logistic regression analysis with baseline disease activity, baseline corticosteroid dose, region, and treatment group in the model. Efficacy analyses were done on an intention-to-treat population, comprising all participants who were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of investigational product and who did not discontinue from the study for the reason of lost to follow-up at the first post-baseline visit. Safety analyses were done on all randomly assigned participants who received at least one dose of investigational product and who did not discontinue. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03616964, and is complete.

FINDINGS

A total of 775 patients were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of baricitinib 4 mg (n=258), baricitinib 2 mg (n=261), or placebo (n=256). There was no difference in the primary efficacy outcome of the proportion of SRI-4 responders at week 52 between participants who received baricitinib 4mg (121 [47%]; odds ratio 1·07 [95% CI 0·75 to 1·53]; difference with placebo 1·5 [95% CI -7·1 to 10·2]), 2 mg (120 [46%]; 1·05 [0·73 to 1·50]; 0·8 [-7·9 to 9·4]) and placebo (116 [46%]). None of the major secondary endpoints, including glucocorticoid tapering and time to first severe flare, were met. Serious adverse events were observed in 29 (11%) participants in the baricitinib 4 mg group, 35 (13%) in the baricitinib 2 mg group, and 22 (9%) in the placebo group. The safety profile of baricitinib in patients with SLE was consistent with the known baricitinib safety profile.

INTERPRETATION

Although phase 2 data suggested baricitinib as a potential treatment for patients with SLE, which was supported in SLE-BRAVE-I, this result was not replicated in SLE-BRAVE-II. No new safety signals were observed.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly and Company.

Modulation of Immune Cells as a Therapy for Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an autoimmune disorder like systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Both SLE and CLE characterize autoantibody secretion and immune cell recruitment. In particular, CLE can be divided into three more frequent types, varying in the severity of the skin lesions they present. The role of type I IFN was shown to be one of the leading causes of the development of this pathology in the skin. Different treatments have been developed and tested against these different variants of CLE to decrease the increasing levels of CLE in humans. In this article, a literature revision discussing the similarities between SLE and CLE is carried out. In addition, new advances in understanding the development of CLE and the leading treatments being evaluated in animal models and clinical trials are reviewed.

IFN-γ, should not be ignored in SLE

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a typical autoimmune disease with a complex pathogenesis and genetic predisposition. With continued understanding of this disease, it was found that SLE is related to the interferon gene signature. Most studies have emphasized the important role of IFN-α in SLE, but our previous study suggested a nonnegligible role of IFN-γ in SLE. Some scholars previously found that IFN-γ is abnormally elevated as early as before the classification of SLE and before the emergence of autoantibodies and IFN-α. Due to the large overlap between IFN-α and IFN-γ, SLE is mostly characterized by expression of the IFN-α gene after onset. Therefore, the role of IFN-γ in SLE may be underestimated. This article mainly reviews the role of IFN-γ in SLE and focuses on the nonnegligible role of IFN-γ in SLE to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the disease.