Hemoglobin A1c as screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in Nordic Caucasian women

First-trimester HbA1c in relation to plasma glucose concentrations in an oral glucose tolerance test at 12 to 16 weeks' gestation-a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Early-onset GDM often requires pharmacological treatment and is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, but data is insufficient regarding the best methods to identify high-risk women requiring early GDM screening. The aim of this study was to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of HbA1c in the prediction of (1) plasma glucose concentrations > 90th percentile in an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 12-16 weeks' gestation; and (2) pharmacologically treated early- or late-onset GDM.

METHODS

HbA1c was measured at 8-14 weeks' gestation in a population-based cohort of 1394 Finnish women recruited for the Early Diagnosis of Diabetes in Pregnancy (EDDIE) study between 3/2013 and 12/2016. Information on maternal risk factors were collected at recruitment. Subsequently, a 2-hour 75 g OGTT was performed at 12-16 weeks' gestation (OGTT1), and if normal, repeated at 24-28 weeks' gestation (OGTT2). Early- and late-onset GDM were diagnosed using the same nationally endorsed cut-offs for fasting, 1 h- and 2 h-plasma glucose: ≥5.3, ≥ 10.0mmol/l, and/or ≥ 8.6mmol/l, respectively. In total, 52/1394 (3.7%) women required metformin or insulin treatment for GDM, including 39 women with early-onset GDM diagnosed at OGTT1 and 13 women with late-onset GDM diagnosed at OGTT2.

RESULTS

Maternal early-pregnancy HbA1c ≥ 35mmol/mol (≥ 5.4%) was the best cut-off to predict fasting or post-load plasma glucose > 90th percentile in OGTT1, but its diagnostic accuracy was low [AUC (95% CI) 0.65 (0.62 to 0.69), sensitivity 0.55 (0.49 to 0.60) and specificity 0.67 (0.64 to 0.70)] both alone and in combination with other maternal risk factors. However, HbA1c ≥ 35mmol/mol correlated positively with plasma glucose concentrations at all time points of OGTT1 and predicted pharmacologically treated GDM diagnosed at OGTT1 or OGTT2; AUC (95% CI) 0.75 (0.68 to 0.81), sensitivity 0.75 (0.61 to 0.86), specificity 0.64 (0.61 to 0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

In our population-based cohort, early-pregnancy HbA1c ≥ 35mmol/mol was positively associated with fasting and post-load plasma glucose concentrations in an OGTT at 12-16 weeks' gestation and predicted pharmacologically-treated early- and late-onset GDM, suggesting potential utility in first-trimester identification of women at high risk of severe GDM subtypes.

Biomarkers of Pre-eclampsia in Pregnant Women With Gestational Diabetes and Pre-existing Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Pre-eclampsia (PE) is one of the leading causes of maternal and perinatal health morbidity, producing more than 4.6% of complications in pregnancy worldwide. This systematic review was conducted to determine the significance of specific biomarkers in predicting PE in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). The review measured and explained the significant abnormalities in lipids, blood glucose, cytokines, inflammatory markers, placental proteins, urinary proteins, and other serum biomarkers that contribute to the development of PE in GDM and type 2 DM populations. We searched CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, Maternity and Infant care, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies were included if they had a measurable component in the blood serum or urine of women who developed PE and suffered from GDM or pre-existing type 2 DM. A narrative synthesis was conducted instead of a meta-analysis due to the high heterogeneity of data from the studies. A total of 2,593 studies were screened, producing eight relevant studies. Twenty-seven different biomarkers were investigated from the study group of 40 to 1,344 participants. No single biomarker was identified; however, there is a need for further research on specific biomarkers of PE, especially in CRP, FABP4, and microalbuminuria in the GDM-PE group and calprotectin in the type 2 DM population. Many biomarkers were identified as practical in predicting PE when combined with other biomarkers and more data are required to verify the predictability of the diagnostic markers in pregnant women.

Employing fasting plasma glucose to safely limit the use of oral glucose tolerance tests in pregnancy: a pooled analysis of four Norwegian studies

Background/objective

There is no international consensus about the optimal approach to screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) has been proposed as an alternative universal screening test to simplify the diagnosis of GDM. We investigate the ability of the FPG to predict a 2-hour glucose value below the cut-off for GDM, thereby "ruling out" the necessity of a full OGTT and assess the proportion of GDM-related complications associated with the identified FPG level.

Materials and methods

This study included secondary data from four Norwegian pregnancy cohorts (2002-2013), encompassing 2960 women universally screened with late mid-pregnancy 75g OGTT measuring FPG and 2-hour glucose. For a range of FPG thresholds, we calculated sensitivity to predict elevated 2-hour glucose, number of OGTTs needed and percentage of GDM cases missed, applying modified World Health Organization (WHO) 2013 criteria (2013WHO) and 2017 Norwegian criteria (2017Norwegian). We analyzed pregnancy outcomes for women above and below our selected threshold.

Results

The prevalence of GDM was 16.6% (2013WHO) and 10.1% (2017Norwegian). A FPG threshold of 4.7 mmol/L had a sensitivity of 76% (2013WHO) and 80% (2017Norwegian) for detecting elevated 2-hour glucose, with few missed GDM cases (2.0% of those ruled out and 7.5% of all GDM cases for 2013WHO, and 1.1% of those ruled out and 7% of all GDM cases for 2017Norwegian). When excluding women with FPG <4.7mmol/l and those with GDM based on FPG, only 24% (2013WHO) and 29% (2017Norwegian) would require OGTT. Women with FPG <4.7mmol/l, including missed GDM cases, had low risk of large-for-gestational-age newborns, cesarean section and operative vaginal delivery.

Conclusion

A FPG threshold of 4.7mmol/l as a first step when screening for GDM could potentially eliminate the need for OGTT in 70-77% of pregnancies. Women with FPG below this threshold appear to carry low risk of GDM-associated adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Preeclampsia: Correlation and Influencing Factors

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and preeclampsia (PE) are common pregnancy complications with similar risk factors and pathophysiological changes. Evidence from previous studies suggests that the incidence of PE is significantly increased in women with GDM, but whether GDM is independently related to the occurrence of PE has remained controversial. GDM complicated by PE further increases perinatal adverse events with greater impact on the future maternal and offspring health. Identify factors associated with PE in women with GDM women, specifically those that are controllable, is important for improving pregnancy outcomes. This paper provides the findings of a review on the correlation between GDM and PE, factors associated with PE in women with GDM, possible mechanisms, and predictive markers. Most studies concluded that GDM is independently associated with PE in singleton pregnancy, and optimizing the treatment and management of GDM can reduce the incidence of PE, which is very helpful to improve pregnancy outcomes.

Screening for Gestational Diabetes: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force

IMPORTANCE

Gestational diabetes is associated with several poor health outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To update the 2012 review on screening for gestational diabetes to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL (2010 to May 2020), ClinicalTrials.gov, reference lists; surveillance through June 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

English-language intervention studies for screening and treatment; observational studies on screening; prospective studies on screening test accuracy.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Dual review of titles/abstracts, full-text articles, and study quality. Single-reviewer data abstraction with verification. Random-effects meta-analysis or bivariate analysis (accuracy).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Pregnancy, fetal/neonatal, and long-term health outcomes; harms of screening; accuracy.

RESULTS

A total of 76 studies were included (18 randomized clinical trials [RCTs] [n = 31 241], 2 nonrandomized intervention studies [n = 190], 56 observational studies [n = 261 678]). Direct evidence on benefits of screening vs no screening was limited to 4 observational studies with inconsistent findings and methodological limitations. Screening was not significantly associated with serious or long-term harm. In 5 RCTs (n = 25 772), 1-step (International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group) vs 2-step (Carpenter and Coustan) screening was significantly associated with increased likelihood of gestational diabetes (11.5% vs 4.9%) but no improved health outcomes. At or after 24 weeks of gestation, oral glucose challenge tests with 140- and 135-mg/dL cutoffs had sensitivities of 82% and 93%, respectively, and specificities of 82% and 79%, respectively, against Carpenter and Coustan criteria, and a test with a 140-mg/dL cutoff had sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 81% against the National Diabetes Group Data criteria. Fasting plasma glucose tests with cutoffs of 85 and 90 mg/dL had sensitivities of 88% and 81% and specificities of 73% and 82%, respectively, against Carpenter and Coustan criteria. Based on 8 RCTs and 1 nonrandomized study (n = 3982), treatment was significantly associated with decreased risk of primary cesarean deliveries (relative risk [RR], 0.70 [95% CI, 0.54-0.91]; absolute risk difference [ARD], 5.3%), shoulder dystocia (RR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.23-0.77]; ARD, 1.3%), macrosomia (RR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.41-0.68]; ARD, 8.9%), large for gestational age (RR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.47-0.66]; ARD, 8.4%), birth injuries (odds ratio, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.11-0.99]; ARD, 0.2%), and neonatal intensive care unit admissions (RR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.53-0.99]; ARD, 2.0%). The association with reduction in preterm deliveries was not significant (RR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.56-1.01]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Direct evidence on screening vs no screening remains limited. One- vs 2-step screening was not significantly associated with improved health outcomes. At or after 24 weeks of gestation, treatment of gestational diabetes was significantly associated with improved health outcomes.

An Update on Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a frequent medical complication during pregnancy. Screening and diagnostic practices for GDM are inconsistent across the world. This narrative review includes data from 87 observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and aims to give an overview of the current evidence on screening strategies and diagnostic criteria for GDM. Screening in early pregnancy remains controversial and studies show conflicting results on the benefit of screening and treatment of GDM in early pregnancy. Implementing the one-step "International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups" (IADPSG) screening strategy at 24-28 weeks often leads to a substantial increase in the prevalence of GDM, without conclusive evidence regarding the benefits on pregnancy outcomes compared to a two-step screening strategy with a glucose challenge test (GCT). In addition, RCTs are needed to investigate the impact of treatment of GDM diagnosed with IADPSG criteria on long-term maternal and childhood outcomes. Selective screening using a risk-factor-based approach could be helpful in simplifying the screening algorithm but carries the risk of missing significant proportions of GDM cases. A two-step screening method with a 50g GCT and subsequently a 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with IADPSG could be an alternative to reduce the need for an OGTT. However, to have an acceptable sensitivity to screen for GDM with the IADPSG criteria, the threshold of the GCT should be lowered from 7.8 to 7.2 mmol/L. A pragmatic approach to screen for GDM can be implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic, using fasting plasma glucose (FPG), HbA1c or even random plasma glucose (RPG) to reduce the number of OGTTs needed. However, usual guidelines and care should be resumed as soon as the COVID pandemic is controlled.

Effectiveness of Glycated Haemoglobin in the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus among Pregnant Women in Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Background

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is a common metabolic complication in pregnancy with a broad range of adverse foetal and maternal outcomes if not properly managed. Due to the difficult nature of the Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), the utilization of the Glycatedhaemoglobin (HbA1c) test as a simpler and acceptable alternative has been suggested. The aims were to determine the GDM prevalence, the diagnostic accuracy, the optimal cut-off point and the validity of the HbA1c in diagnosing GDM using OGTT as the gold standard in the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital (UPTH).

Methodology

This was a prospective cross-sectional study involving a cohort of 250 antenatal attendees at 24-28 weeks of pregnancy in the UPTH from 1st February 2018 - 30th April 2018. Socio-demographic data and results of the OGTT and HbA1c tests were analysed using SPSS 21.0 for windows® statistical software. The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve was used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of HbA1c. The Youden index was used to get the optimal cut-off point for HbA1c. The validity of the HbA1c was determined using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. The P-value at p<0.05 was set as the level of significance.

Results

Out of the 250 women, 36 (14.4%) had GDM hence in this study, the GDM prevalence was 14.4%. Area under the curve (AUC) = 0.649; 95% confidence interval: 0.550 - 0.748; p-value = 0.004. The optimal cut-off point for HbA1c was 5.18% with a sensitivity of 63.9%, a specificity of 59.3%, a positive predictive value of 20.9% and a negative predictive value of 90.7%.

Conclusion

The HbA1c at the Optimal cut-off point of 5.18% in our environment cannot replace the OGTT in the diagnosis of GDM because of its low sensitivity and specificity but will be useful in the screening for GDM because of its high negative predictive value at 24-28 weeks gestation. This will reduce the count of gravidae who undergo the cumbersome OGTT.

Limiting the Use of Oral Glucose Tolerance Tests to Screen for Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy during Pandemics

We aimed to evaluate each proposal of Australian–New Zealand Societies to limit the number of oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) to diagnose hyperglycemia in pregnancy (HIP) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. At our university hospital (2012–2016), we retrospectively applied in 4245 women who had OGTT between 22 and 30 weeks of gestation (reference standard: WHO criteria) the proposals in which OGTT is performed only in high-risk women; in all (Option 1) or high-risk (Option 1-Sel) women with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 4.7–5.0 mmol/L; in all (Option 2) or high-risk (Option 2-Sel) women without history of HIP and with FPG 4.7–5.0 mmol/L. We also tested FPG measurement alone in all high-risk women. Measuring FPG alone had a sensitivity of 49% (95% confidence interval 45–54) applying universal screening. Option 2 appeared to have the best balance considering the needed OGTT (17.3%), sensitivity (72% (67–76)) and rates of a composite outcome (true negative cases: 10.6%, false positive cases: 24.4%; true positive cases: 19.5%; false negative cases: 10.2%). Consideration of a history of HIP and measuring first FPG can avoid more than 80% of OGTTs and identify women with the highest risk of adverse HIP-related events.

Performance of early pregnancy HbA1c for predicting gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes in obese European women

AIMS

To investigate the performance of early pregnancy HbA_1c for predicting gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and adverse pregnancy outcomes in obese women.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis using data from the Vitamin D And Lifestyle Intervention for GDM prevention trials conducted across 9 European countries (2012-2014). Pregnant women (BMI ≥ 29 kg/m²) underwent a baseline HbA_1c and oral glucose tolerance tests at < 20 weeks, 24-28 weeks, and 35-37 weeks. Women with GDM were referred for treatment.

RESULTS

Among the 869 women tested, the prevalence of GDM was 25.9% before 20 weeks, with a further 8.6% at 24-28 weeks. The areas under the curves for HbA_1c at the two time points were 0.55 (0.50-0.59) and 0.54 (0.47-0.61), respectively. An early HbA_1c ≥ 5.7% (39 mmol/mol) (N = 111) showed low sensitivity (18.2%) with 89.1% specificity for GDM before 20 weeks, at 24-28 weeks (sensitivity of 8.0% and specificity of 88.6% after excluding early GDM), and throughout gestation (sensitivity of 15.9% and specificity of 89.4%). The ≥ 5.7% (39 mmol/mol) threshold was significantly associated with concurrent GDM before 20 weeks (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.77(1.39-5.51)) and throughout gestation (aOR 1.72 (1.02-2.89)), but not adverse pregnancy outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Early pregnancy HbA_1c is of limited use for predicting either GDM or adverse outcomes in overweight/obese European women.

The accuracy of haemoglobin A1c as a screening and diagnostic test for gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy studies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with adverse pregnancy complications. Accurate screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes are critical to treatment, and in a pandemic scenario like coronavirus disease 2019 needing a simple test that minimises prolonged hospital stay. We undertook a meta-analysis on the screening and diagnostic accuracy of the haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) test in women with and without risk factors for gestational diabetes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Unlike the oral glucose tolerance test, the HbA1c test is simple, quick and more acceptable. There is a growing body of evidence on the accuracy of HbA1c as a screening and diagnostic test for GDM. We searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library and selected relevant studies. Accuracy data for different thresholds within the final 23 included studies (16 921 women) were pooled using a multiple thresholds model. Summary accuracy indices were estimated by selecting an optimal threshold that optimises either sensitivity or specificity according to different scenarios.

SUMMARY

HbA1c is more useful as a specific test at a cut-off of 5.7% (39 mmol/mol) with a false positive rate of 10%, but should be supplemented by a more sensitive test to detect women with GDM.

Association Between Maternal Normal Range HbA1c Values and Adverse Birth Outcomes

CONTEXT

Higher blood glucose level during gestational periods has been consistently associated with increased risk of adverse birth outcomes. Evidence regarding the association between higher glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) within the normal range and adverse birth outcomes is limited.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to examine the association between HbA1c within the normal range and the risk of adverse birth outcomes.

DESIGN AND SETTING

The data were abstracted from the Information System of Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, China, from September 2014 to March 2018.

PATIENTS

A total of 5658 pregnant women with normal gestational HbA1c were included in this analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The adverse birth outcomes include preterm birth, macrosomia, and large for gestational age (LGA).

RESULTS

Among 5658 subjects, the rates of preterm birth, macrosomia, and LGA were 4.6% (261/5658), 3.5% (200/5658), and 5.7% (325/5658), respectively. The results of multivariate logistic regression model showed that each 1% increase in maternal HbA1c was positively associated with increased risks of preterm birth (OR 1.58; 95% CI, 1.08-2.31), macrosomia (OR 1.70; 95% CI, 1.10-2.64), and LGA (OR 1.38; 95% CI, 0.98-1.96). The association between gestational HbA1c and preterm birth was more evident among women with prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) ≤ 24 kg/m2.

CONCLUSIONS

Gestational higher HbA1c level within the normal range is an independent risk factor for preterm birth, macrosomia, and LGA. Intervention for reducing HbAc1 may help to prevent adverse birth outcomes.

Factors associated with macrosomia, hypoglycaemia and low Apgar score among Fijian women with gestational diabetes mellitus

Background

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in Fiji is a serious public health issue. However, there are no recent studies on GDM among pregnant women in Fiji. The aim of this study was to examine prevalence of, and sociodemographic factors associated with adverse neonatal outcomes among Fijian women with GDM.

Methods

We used cross-sectional data of 255 pregnant women with GDM who gave birth to singleton infants at Colonial War Memorial Hospital (CWMH) in Suva city. Women underwent testing for GDM during antenatal clinic visits and were diagnosed using modified International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to investigate factors associated with neonatal outcomes.

Results

Women with a previous baby weighing > 4 kg were 6.08 times more likely to experience neonatal macrosomia (Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 6.08; 95%CI: 2.46, 15.01). Compared to unmarried women, the odds of macrosomia among married women reduced by 71% (AOR = 0.29; 95%CI: 0.11, 0.77). Compared with delivery before 38 weeks of gestation, the infants of women who delivered between 38 and 41 weeks of gestation were 62 and 86% less likely to experience neonatal hypoglycaemia and Apgar score < 7 at 5 mins, respectively. The offspring of women who were overweight and obese had higher odds of neonatal hypoglycaemia. Late booking in gestation (≥28 weeks) was significantly associated with Apgar score < 7 at 5 min (AOR = 7.87; 95%CI: 1.11, 55.75). Maternal pre-eclampsia/pregnancy induced hypertension was another factor associated with low Apgar score in infants.

Conclusions

The study found high rates of adverse neonatal outcomes among off springs of Fijian women with GDM and showed that interventions targeting pregnant women who are overweight, had a previous baby weighing > 4 kg, had pre-eclampsia, delivered before 38 weeks of gestation, and those who booked later than 13 weeks in gestation, are needed to improve pregnancy outcomes.

A Critical Review of Proteomic Studies in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Gestational diabetes mellitus is a progressive and complex pregnancy complication, which threatens both maternal and fetal health. It is urgent to screen for specific biomarkers for early diagnosis and precise treatment, as well as to identify key moleculars to better understand the pathogenic mechanisms. In the present review, we comprehensively summarized recent studies of gestational diabetes using mass spectrometry-based proteomic technologies. Focused on the entire experimental design and proteomic results, we showed that these studies have covered a broad range of research contents in terms of sampling time, sample types, and outcome associations. Although most of the studies only stayed in the stage of initial discovery, several proteins were further verified to be efficient for disease diagnosis. Functional analysis of all the combined significant proteins also showed that a small number of proteins are known to be involved in the regulation of insulin or indirect signaling pathways. However, many factors such as diagnostic criteria, sample processing, proteomic method, and statistical method can greatly affect the identification of reproducible and reliable protein candidates. Thus, we further provided constructive suggestions and recommendations for carrying out proteomic or follow-up studies of gestational diabetes or other pregnancy complications in the future.

Does serum hemoglobin A1C during early pregnancy predict performance on the 1-hour glucose challenge test?

PURPOSE

To determine the negative and positive predictive values of hemoglobin A1c (HgbA1c) levels in predicting abnormal 1-hour glucose challenge test (GCT) results in pregnancy.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study consisted of pregnant patients from a private practice obstetrics clinic. The primary exposure was early HgbA1c measurement, and the primary outcome was third trimester 1-hour GCT results above or below 140 mg/dL. We calculated the predictive value of early HgbA1c to identify a 1-hour GCT of ≤140 mg/dL or >140 mg/dL.

RESULTS

Of the 1404 one-hour GCT results, 635 were associated with HgbA1c being measured in a patient on the same day or before the 1-hour GCT. The median interval between the HgbA1c test and the 1-hour GCT was 95 days (IQR 56-122 days). Among women with a hgbA1c less than or equal to 4.9, 5.0 and 5.1, respectively, the probability of their 1 hour GCT being 140 mg/dl or less was 91.3%, 91.0% and 90.1%, respectively (Table 1). Among our study population, 14.5%, 22.8% and 35.0% had an Hgb A1c less than or equal to 4.9, 5.0 and 5.1 respectively. Among women with HgbA1c greater than 6.1, the probability of their 1-hour GCT being greater than 140 mg/dL was 100%. Only 0.3% of our population had HgbA1c greater than 6.1. There was no other cut point for HgbA1c, where the positive predictive value for predicting an abnormal 1-hour GCT was equal to or greater than 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

The greatest value of an early HgbA1C test appears to be that very low values (5.1 or less) can predict a normal 1 h GCT with high probability (at least 90%). However, it has limited ability to predict abnormal 1 h GCT. Overall, an early HgbA1C cannot replace the 1 h GCT based on the current body of evidence.

Optimal first trimester HbA1c threshold to identify Singaporean women at risk of gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A pilot study

This pilot study examined the use of early HbA1c in screening for gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Singapore. One hundred and fifty-one pregnant women with a gestational age of under 14 weeks had an HbA1c test measured with their antenatal bloods prior to a second trimester oral glucose tolerance test. Patient characteristics and pregnancy outcome data were collected. Gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence was 11%. A receiver operating characteristic curve showed an HbA1c level of 5.2% (33 mmol/mol), had an 82% sensitivity, 72% specificity, 97% negative predictive value and 27% positive predictive value to predict gestational diabetes mellitus. Women with HbA1c of 5.2% (33 mmol/mol) or over 5.2% (33 mmol/mol) were older, had higher BMI and were less likely to be Chinese than those with HbA1c less than 5.2% (33 mmol/mol). There was no difference in pregnancy outcomes. Early HbA1c less than 5.2% (33 mmol/mol) may be useful to exclude low-risk Singaporean women from further testing, while those with HbA1c of 5.2% (33 mmol/mol) or greater would still need a oral glucose tolerance test between 24 and 28 weeks' gestation.

Diagnostic value of glycemic markers HbA1c, 1,5-anhydroglucitol and glycated albumin in evaluating gestational diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is the current established method performed worldwide to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of the use of long- and short-term markers of glycemic status.

METHODS

The study group was composed of 80 pregnant women, 40 with GDM and 40 with normal glucose tolerance. GDM was diagnosed with the American Diabetes Association criteria. Glycemic markers were measured in the OGTT blood samples of women at 24-28 weeks of gestation.

RESULTS

HbA1c was significantly higher in the GDM group when compared with the controls, whereas 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) levels were significantly lower. There was not a significant difference between the groups for glycated albumin. Whereas HbA1c levels were correlated with fasting and 1 h glucose and negatively correlated with mean corpuscular volume, 1,5-AG was only negatively correlated with the first hour glucose. No difference was found for the diagnostic performances of HbA1c and 1,5-AG (receiver operating characteristic of the area under the concentration curve values were 0.756 and 0.722, respectively).

CONCLUSION

HbA1c and 1,5-AG alone does not have sufficient diagnostic accuracy to diagnose GDM. 1,5-AG values were correlated with post-load glucose values in pregnant women so will improve the GDM management and be useful to predict complications.

Associations of mid-pregnancy HbA1c with gestational diabetes and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk Taiwanese women

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to investigate the associations among the mid-pregnancy glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level, gestational diabetes (GDM), and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women without overt diabetes and with positive 50-g, 1-h glucose challenge test (GCT) results (140 mg/dL or greater).

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 1,989 pregnant Taiwanese women. A two-step approach, including a 50-g, 1-h GCT and 100-g, 3-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), was employed for the diagnosis of GDM at weeks 23-32. The mid-pregnancy HbA1c level was measured at the time the OGTT was performed. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the relationship between the mid-pregnancy HbA1c level and GDM. Multiple logistic regression models were implemented to assess the relationships between the mid-pregnancy HbA1c level and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

An ROC curve demonstrated that the optimal mid-pregnancy HbA1c cut-off point to predict GDM, as diagnosed by the Carpenter-Coustan criteria using a two-step approach, was 5.7%. The area under the ROC curve of the mid-pregnancy HbA1c level for GDM was 0.70. Compared with the levels of 4.5-4.9%, higher mid-pregnancy HbA1c levels (5.0-5.4, 5.5-5.9, 6.0-6.4, 6.5-6.9, and >7.0%) were significantly associated with increased risks of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia, preterm delivery, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, low birth weight, and macrosomia (the odds ratio [OR] ranges were 1.20-9.98, 1.31-5.16, 0.88-3.15, 0.89-4.10, and 2.22-27.86, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The mid-pregnancy HbA1c level was associated with various adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk Taiwanese women. However, it lacked adequate sensitivity and specificity to replace the two-step approach in the diagnosis of GDM. The current study comprised a single-center prospective study; thus, additional, randomized control design studies are required.