1
|
Zhou L, Wang L, Liu G, Cai E. Prognosis prediction models for post-stroke depression: a protocol for systematic review, meta-analysis, and critical appraisal. Syst Rev 2024; 13:138. [PMID: 38778417 PMCID: PMC11110183 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02544-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Post-stroke depression (PSD) is a prevalent complication that has been shown to have a negative impact on rehabilitation outcomes and quality of life and poses a significant risk for suicidal intention. However, models for discriminating and predicting PSD in stroke survivors for effective secondary prevention strategies are inadequate as the pathogenesis of PSD remains unknown. Prognostic prediction models that exhibit greater rule-in capacity have the potential to mitigate the issue of underdiagnosis and undertreatment of PSD. Thus, the planned study aims to systematically review and critically evaluate published studies on prognostic prediction models for PSD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A systematic literature search will be conducted in PubMed and Embase through Ovid. Two reviewers will complete study screening, data extraction, and quality assessment utilizing appropriate tools. Qualitative data on the characteristics of the included studies, methodological quality, and the appraisal of the clinical applicability of models will be summarized in the form of narrative comments and tables or figures. The predictive performance of the same model involving multiple studies will be synthesized with a random effects meta-analysis model or meta-regression, taking into account heterogeneity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is considered not applicable for this systematic review. Findings will be shared through dissemination at academic conferences and/or publication in peer-reviewed academic journals. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42023388548.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Zhou
- School of Nursing, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, China
| | - Lei Wang
- School of Nursing, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, China
| | - Gao Liu
- School of Nursing, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, China
| | - EnLi Cai
- School of Nursing, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim HJ, Cho E, Shin G. Experiences of Changes in Eating Habits and Eating Behaviors of Women First Diagnosed with Gestational Diabetes. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:8774. [PMID: 34444523 PMCID: PMC8394878 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18168774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2021] [Revised: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
As gestational diabetes, which is increasing steadily around the world, can cause complications in the mother and fetus, it is essential to change eating habits and eating behavior to prevent this. According to the 2020 American Diabetes Association recommendations, the food plan should be designed for the adequate calorie intake to achieve glycemic goals and consequently promote maternal and fetal health. Thus, the following study has used the qualitative theme analysis method to assess what it means for 28 South Korean women, who were diagnosed with gestational diabetes for the first time, to change their eating habits and behaviors. As a result, themes were derived related to reflection on daily life, formation of new relationships in the same group, efforts that must be made, rediscovery of couples, and lifestyles reborn as new roles. Based on the results of the study, it is shown that the study participants recovered the peace in their mental state after the crisis of gestational diabetes to pursue relaxation and ultimately higher quality of life by following the plan to fulfill healthy achievements, such as changing their eating habits and behaviors. Therefore, future research and support measures to help the healthy behaviors should be sought by comprehensively exploring the effects of women's experiences in changing their eating habits and behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye-Jin Kim
- Department of Nursing, Changwon Moonsung University, 91 Chunghonro, Seongsan-gu, Changwon 51410, Korea;
| | - Eunjeong Cho
- College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, 84 Dongjak-gu, Heukseok-ro, Seoul 06974, Korea;
| | - Gisoo Shin
- College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, 84 Dongjak-gu, Heukseok-ro, Seoul 06974, Korea;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Basu S, Johnson KT, Berkowitz SA. Use of Machine Learning Approaches in Clinical Epidemiological Research of Diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 2020; 20:80. [PMID: 33270183 DOI: 10.1007/s11892-020-01353-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Machine learning approaches-which seek to predict outcomes or classify patient features by recognizing patterns in large datasets-are increasingly applied to clinical epidemiology research on diabetes. Given its novelty and emergence in fields outside of biomedical research, machine learning terminology, techniques, and research findings may be unfamiliar to diabetes researchers. Our aim was to present the use of machine learning approaches in an approachable way, drawing from clinical epidemiological research in diabetes published from 1 Jan 2017 to 1 June 2020. RECENT FINDINGS Machine learning approaches using tree-based learners-which produce decision trees to help guide clinical interventions-frequently have higher sensitivity and specificity than traditional regression models for risk prediction. Machine learning approaches using neural networking and "deep learning" can be applied to medical image data, particularly for the identification and staging of diabetic retinopathy and skin ulcers. Among the machine learning approaches reviewed, researchers identified new strategies to develop standard datasets for rigorous comparisons across older and newer approaches, methods to illustrate how a machine learner was treating underlying data, and approaches to improve the transparency of the machine learning process. Machine learning approaches have the potential to improve risk stratification and outcome prediction for clinical epidemiology applications. Achieving this potential would be facilitated by use of universal open-source datasets for fair comparisons. More work remains in the application of strategies to communicate how the machine learners are generating their predictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjay Basu
- Center for Primary Care, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Research and Population Health, Collective Health, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, SW7, UK.
| | - Karl T Johnson
- General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Seth A Berkowitz
- General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McBride N, Yousefi P, White SL, Poston L, Farrar D, Sattar N, Nelson SM, Wright J, Mason D, Suderman M, Relton C, Lawlor DA. Do nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based metabolomics improve the prediction of pregnancy-related disorders? Findings from a UK birth cohort with independent validation. BMC Med 2020; 18:366. [PMID: 33222689 PMCID: PMC7681995 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01819-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prediction of pregnancy-related disorders is usually done based on established and easily measured risk factors. Recent advances in metabolomics may provide earlier and more accurate prediction of women at risk of pregnancy-related disorders. METHODS We used data collected from women in the Born in Bradford (BiB; n = 8212) and UK Pregnancies Better Eating and Activity Trial (UPBEAT; n = 859) studies to create and validate prediction models for pregnancy-related disorders. These were gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA) and preterm birth (PTB). We used ten-fold cross-validation and penalised regression to create prediction models. We compared the predictive performance of (1) risk factors (maternal age, pregnancy smoking, body mass index (BMI), ethnicity and parity) to (2) nuclear magnetic resonance-derived metabolites (N = 156 quantified metabolites, collected at 24-28 weeks gestation) and (3) combined risk factors and metabolites. The multi-ethnic BiB cohort was used for training and testing the models, with independent validation conducted in UPBEAT, a multi-ethnic study of obese pregnant women. RESULTS Maternal age, pregnancy smoking, BMI, ethnicity and parity were retained in the combined risk factor and metabolite models for all outcomes apart from PTB, which did not include maternal age. In addition, 147, 33, 96, 51 and 14 of the 156 metabolite traits were retained in the combined risk factor and metabolite model for GDM, HDP, SGA, LGA and PTB, respectively. These include cholesterol and triglycerides in very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) in the models predicting GDM, HDP, SGA and LGA, and monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), ratios of MUFA to omega 3 fatty acids and total fatty acids, and a ratio of apolipoprotein B to apolipoprotein A-1 (APOA:APOB1) were retained predictors for GDM and LGA. In BiB, discrimination for GDM, HDP, LGA and SGA was improved in the combined risk factors and metabolites models. Risk factor area under the curve (AUC 95% confidence interval (CI)): GDM (0.69 (0.64, 0.73)), HDP (0.74 (0.70, 0.78)) and LGA (0.71 (0.66, 0.75)), and SGA (0.59 (0.56, 0.63)). Combined risk factor and metabolite models AUC 95% (CI): GDM (0.78 (0.74, 0.81)), HDP (0.76 (0.73, 0.79)) and LGA (0.75 (0.70, 0.79)), and SGA (0.66 (0.63, 0.70)). For GDM, HDP and LGA, but not SGA, calibration was good for a combined risk factor and metabolite model. Prediction of PTB was poor for all models. Independent validation in UPBEAT at 24-28 weeks and 15-18 weeks gestation confirmed similar patterns of results, but AUCs were attenuated. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest a combined risk factor and metabolite model improves prediction of GDM, HDP and LGA, and SGA, when compared to risk factors alone. They also highlight the difficulty of predicting PTB, with all models performing poorly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy McBride
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. .,NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. .,Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Paul Yousefi
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sara L White
- Department of Women and Children's Health, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Lucilla Poston
- Department of Women and Children's Health, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Diane Farrar
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Naveed Sattar
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, British Heart Foundation Glasgow, Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.,School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Scott M Nelson
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, British Heart Foundation Glasgow, Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.,School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - John Wright
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Dan Mason
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Matthew Suderman
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Caroline Relton
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Deborah A Lawlor
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cooray SD, Boyle JA, Soldatos G, Zamora J, Fernández Félix BM, Allotey J, Thangaratinam S, Teede HJ. Protocol for development and validation of a clinical prediction model for adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e038845. [PMID: 33154055 PMCID: PMC7646337 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gestational diabetes (GDM) is a common yet highly heterogeneous condition. The ability to calculate the absolute risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes for an individual woman with GDM would allow preventative and therapeutic interventions to be delivered to women at high-risk, sparing women at low-risk from unnecessary care. The Prediction for Risk-Stratified care for women with GDM (PeRSonal GDM) study will develop, validate and evaluate the clinical utility of a prediction model for adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with GDM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We undertook formative research to conceptualise and design the prediction model. Informed by these findings, we will conduct a model development and validation study using a retrospective cohort design with participant data collected as part of routine clinical care across three hospitals. The study will include all pregnancies resulting in births from 1 July 2017 to 31 December 2018 coded for a diagnosis of GDM (estimated sample size 2430 pregnancies). We will use a temporal split-sample development and validation strategy. A multivariable logistic regression model will be fitted. The performance of this model will be assessed, and the validated model will also be evaluated using decision curve analysis. Finally, we will explore modes of model presentation suited to clinical use, including electronic risk calculators. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Monash Health (RES-19-0000713 L). We will disseminate results via presentations at scientific meetings and publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS Systematic review proceeding this work was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019115223) and the study was registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000915954); Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shamil D Cooray
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Diabetes Unit, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jacqueline A Boyle
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Women's Program, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Georgia Soldatos
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Diabetes and Endocrinology Units, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Javier Zamora
- CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health, Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain
- Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Borja M Fernández Félix
- CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health, Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain
- Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - John Allotey
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Shakila Thangaratinam
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Helena J Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Diabetes and Endocrinology Units, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chung WK, Erion K, Florez JC, Hattersley AT, Hivert MF, Lee CG, McCarthy MI, Nolan JJ, Norris JM, Pearson ER, Philipson L, McElvaine AT, Cefalu WT, Rich SS, Franks PW. Precision medicine in diabetes: a Consensus Report from the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia 2020; 63:1671-1693. [PMID: 32556613 PMCID: PMC8185455 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-020-05181-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The convergence of advances in medical science, human biology, data science and technology has enabled the generation of new insights into the phenotype known as 'diabetes'. Increased knowledge of this condition has emerged from populations around the world, illuminating the differences in how diabetes presents, its variable prevalence and how best practice in treatment varies between populations. In parallel, focus has been placed on the development of tools for the application of precision medicine to numerous conditions. This Consensus Report presents the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Precision Medicine in Diabetes Initiative in partnership with the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), including its mission, the current state of the field and prospects for the future. Expert opinions are presented on areas of precision diagnostics and precision therapeutics (including prevention and treatment) and key barriers to and opportunities for implementation of precision diabetes medicine, with better care and outcomes around the globe, are highlighted. Cases where precision diagnosis is already feasible and effective (i.e. monogenic forms of diabetes) are presented, while the major hurdles to the global implementation of precision diagnosis of complex forms of diabetes are discussed. The situation is similar for precision therapeutics, in which the appropriate therapy will often change over time owing to the manner in which diabetes evolves within individual patients. This Consensus Report describes a foundation for precision diabetes medicine, while highlighting what remains to be done to realise its potential. This, combined with a subsequent, detailed evidence-based review (due 2022), will provide a roadmap for precision medicine in diabetes that helps improve the quality of life for all those with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy K Chung
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karel Erion
- American Diabetes Association, Arlington, VA, USA
| | - Jose C Florez
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Metabolism Program, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew T Hattersley
- Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Marie-France Hivert
- Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christine G Lee
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mark I McCarthy
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - John J Nolan
- School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jill M Norris
- Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ewan R Pearson
- Division of Population Health and Genomics, Ninewells Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Louis Philipson
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - William T Cefalu
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stephen S Rich
- Center for Public Health Genomics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Paul W Franks
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Lund University Diabetes Centre, Lund University, CRC, Skåne University Hospital - Malmö, Building 91, Level 12, Jan Waldenströms gata 35, SE-205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chung WK, Erion K, Florez JC, Hattersley AT, Hivert MF, Lee CG, McCarthy MI, Nolan JJ, Norris JM, Pearson ER, Philipson L, McElvaine AT, Cefalu WT, Rich SS, Franks PW. Precision Medicine in Diabetes: A Consensus Report From the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2020; 43:1617-1635. [PMID: 32561617 PMCID: PMC7305007 DOI: 10.2337/dci20-0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 169] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The convergence of advances in medical science, human biology, data science, and technology has enabled the generation of new insights into the phenotype known as "diabetes." Increased knowledge of this condition has emerged from populations around the world, illuminating the differences in how diabetes presents, its variable prevalence, and how best practice in treatment varies between populations. In parallel, focus has been placed on the development of tools for the application of precision medicine to numerous conditions. This Consensus Report presents the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Precision Medicine in Diabetes Initiative in partnership with the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), including its mission, the current state of the field, and prospects for the future. Expert opinions are presented on areas of precision diagnostics and precision therapeutics (including prevention and treatment), and key barriers to and opportunities for implementation of precision diabetes medicine, with better care and outcomes around the globe, are highlighted. Cases where precision diagnosis is already feasible and effective (i.e., monogenic forms of diabetes) are presented, while the major hurdles to the global implementation of precision diagnosis of complex forms of diabetes are discussed. The situation is similar for precision therapeutics, in which the appropriate therapy will often change over time owing to the manner in which diabetes evolves within individual patients. This Consensus Report describes a foundation for precision diabetes medicine, while highlighting what remains to be done to realize its potential. This, combined with a subsequent, detailed evidence-based review (due 2022), will provide a roadmap for precision medicine in diabetes that helps improve the quality of life for all those with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy K Chung
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.,Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Karel Erion
- American Diabetes Association, Arlington, VA
| | - Jose C Florez
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.,Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.,Metabolism Program, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA.,Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew T Hattersley
- Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, U.K
| | - Marie-France Hivert
- Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.,Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Christine G Lee
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD
| | - Mark I McCarthy
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.,Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K
| | - John J Nolan
- School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jill M Norris
- Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Ewan R Pearson
- Division of Population Health and Genomics, Ninewells Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, U.K
| | - Louis Philipson
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | - William T Cefalu
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD
| | - Stephen S Rich
- Center for Public Health Genomics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.,Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Paul W Franks
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Lund University Diabetes Centre, Lund University, Malmo, Sweden .,Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cooray SD, Wijeyaratne LA, Soldatos G, Allotey J, Boyle JA, Teede HJ. The Unrealised Potential for Predicting Pregnancy Complications in Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17093048. [PMID: 32349442 PMCID: PMC7246772 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17093048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Gestational diabetes (GDM) increases the risk of pregnancy complications. However, these risks are not the same for all affected women and may be mediated by inter-related factors including ethnicity, body mass index and gestational weight gain. This study was conducted to identify, compare, and critically appraise prognostic prediction models for pregnancy complications in women with gestational diabetes (GDM). A systematic review of prognostic prediction models for pregnancy complications in women with GDM was conducted. Critical appraisal was conducted using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST). Five prediction modelling studies were identified, from which ten prognostic models primarily intended to predict pregnancy complications related to GDM were developed. While the composition of the pregnancy complications predicted varied, the delivery of a large-for-gestational age neonate was the subject of prediction in four studies, either alone or as a component of a composite outcome. Glycaemic measures and body mass index were selected as predictors in four studies. Model evaluation was limited to internal validation in four studies and not reported in the fifth. Performance was inadequately reported with no useful measures of calibration nor formal evaluation of clinical usefulness. Critical appraisal using PROBAST revealed that all studies were subject to a high risk of bias overall driven by methodologic limitations in statistical analysis. This review demonstrates the potential for prediction models to provide an individualised absolute risk of pregnancy complications for women affected by GDM. However, at present, a lack of external validation and high risk of bias limit clinical application. Future model development and validation should utilise the latest methodological advances in prediction modelling to achieve the evolution required to create a useful clinical tool. Such a tool may enhance clinical decision-making and support a risk-stratified approach to the management of GDM. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42019115223.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shamil D. Cooray
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia; (L.A.W.); (G.S.); (J.A.B.)
- Diabetes Unit, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia
- Correspondence: (S.D.C.); (H.J.T.)
| | - Lihini A. Wijeyaratne
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia; (L.A.W.); (G.S.); (J.A.B.)
| | - Georgia Soldatos
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia; (L.A.W.); (G.S.); (J.A.B.)
- Diabetes Unit, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia
| | - John Allotey
- Barts Research Centre for Women’s Health, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AB, UK;
- Multidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Jacqueline A. Boyle
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia; (L.A.W.); (G.S.); (J.A.B.)
- Monash Women’s Program, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia
| | - Helena J. Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia; (L.A.W.); (G.S.); (J.A.B.)
- Diabetes Unit, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia
- Correspondence: (S.D.C.); (H.J.T.)
| |
Collapse
|