Cerebral vasculitis mimicking intracranial metastatic progression of lung cancer during PD-1 blockade

Central nervous system adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may trigger immune-related adverse events which rarely affect the central nervous system (CNS-irAEs). Over the past few years, cumulative data have led to the characterization of well defined syndromes with distinct cancer and antibody associations as well as different outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most frequent CNS-irAE is encephalitis, which includes three main groups: meningoencephalitis, a nonfocal syndrome usually responsive to corticosteroids; limbic encephalitis, associated with high-risk paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) antibodies (e.g. anti-Hu, anti-Ma2) and neuroendocrine cancers, characterized by poor treatment response and outcomes; and cerebellar ataxia, with variable outcomes (worse when high-risk PNS antibodies are detected). Additionally, a diffuse encephalopathy without inflammatory findings, with poor response to corticosteroids and high mortality has been described. The spectrum of CNS-irAEs also includes meningitis, myelitis, and rarer presentations. A subset of CNS-irAEs (i.e. limbic encephalitis and/or rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia) is undistinguishable from ICI-naïve PNS.

SUMMARY

The clinical and outcomes diversity of CNS-irAEs suggests different pathogenic mechanisms, which need to be understood to establish more effective and specific treatment modalities. It is crucial to identify biomarkers able to predict which patients will experience severe CNS-irAEs, to anticipate their diagnosis, and to predict long-term outcomes.

A scoping review of vasculitis as an immune-related adverse event from checkpoint inhibitor therapy of cancer: Unraveling the complexities at the intersection of immunology and vascular pathology

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Vasculitis as an immune-related adverse event (irAE) from checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI) to treat cancer is a rare clinical event, and little is known regarding its nosology, clinical manifestations, or response to treatment and outcomes.

METHODS

To address these gaps, we used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) framework to further define this complication. Two independent PUBMED searches in September and November of 2022 revealed 127 publications with 37 excluded from title by relevance, 43 excluded by article type, and 23 excluded due to lack of biopsy results, or biopsy negative for vasculitis. Twenty-nine documented cases from 24 publications were included for final analysis. Basic demographics, ICI details, timing of onset of vasculitis symptoms, irAE treatment and outcomes were collected. The vasculitides were classified using 2022 ACR/EULAR Vasculitis Classification Criteria as well as 2012 Revised Chapel-Hill Nomenclature. Adaptations from Naidoo et al. 2023 [1] consensus definitions for irAEs were used and efforts were made to classify steroid-responsive versus unresponsive irAEs.

RESULTS

Of the 29 cases reviewed, the average age of patients was 62.1 ± 11.0, composed of 58.6 % (n = 17) male and 41.3 % (n = 12) female. Prominent cancer types were lung cancer (41.4 %; n = 12), melanoma (41.4 %; n = 12), and renal cancer (10.3 %; n = 3), with majority being stage 4 (75.9 %, n = 22) and stage 3 (10.3 %, n = 3). Only 8 cases met the ACR/EULAR criteria, and by Chapel-Hill Nomenclature, approximately a third were small-vessel vasculitis (31.0 %; n = 9) with n = 4 positive for ANCA. Most biopsies were taken from the skin (37.9 %, n = 11) and kidney (24.1 %, n = 7). Patients were either treated with single (65.5 %, n = 19), dual (17.2 %; n = 5), or sequential (17.2 %; n = 5) ICI regimen which included anti-PD-1 therapy in all but one case, with mean of 8.7 ± 10.5 cycles received. Mean time to onset of symptoms from start of ICI was 7.2 ± 7.8 months, with 55.2 % occurring >3 months since the initial immunotherapy. Vasculitis treatment included glucocorticoids in 96 % of cases and immunotherapy was often discontinued (44.8 %; n = 13). Clinical improvement of irAE was documented in 86.2 % (n = 25). Data were missing in terms of fate of ICI (34.5 %; n = 10) and tumor outcomes (41.4 %; n = 12). Cancer progressed in 20.7 % (n = 6), stable in 34.5 % (n = 10) cases, and 6 patients died of all-causes.

CONCLUSION

Vasculitis as an irAE appears clinically heterogeneous and rare. Among reported cases with adequate documentation, vasculitis is of delayed onset following the initiation of immunotherapy. Outcomes of ICI-vasculitis were generally favorable, responding to glucocorticoids and immunotherapy withdrawal. There is an urgent need for more standardized reporting of rare irAEs such as vasculitis to clarify clinical risks, classification, relationship to immunotherapy and outcomes.

The Utility of Laboratory Investigations for the Assessment and Management of Rheumatic Immune Related Adverse Events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have greatly improved survival of several cancers with historically very poor prognosis. ICIs act by stimulating the patient's own immune system to fight cancer. Simultaneously, this immune activation can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including rheumatic manifestations (Rh-irAEs). Rh-irAEs mimic primary rheumatic diseases including arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, myositis, vasculitis, sarcoidosis, and sicca. This article summarizes the latest evidence regarding the utility of laboratory investigations in Rh-irAEs.

Neurologic Complications of Cancer Immunotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Immunotherapeutic approaches have revolutionized cancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive T-cell therapy now approved to treat a variety of solid and hematologic malignancies. This article summarizes the distinctive neurologic side effects of these therapies as well as their management.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Neurologic immune-related adverse events are rare but potentially serious complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Both peripheral and central nervous system disorders have been described, often necessitating a pause or cessation of immunotherapy. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome is a potentially serious complication of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. While symptoms may be mild and self-limited, delirium, encephalopathy, seizures, focal neurologic deficits, and fulminant cerebral edema can be seen. Close neurologic monitoring is imperative. The mainstay of treatment for neurologic complications includes high-dose corticosteroids, although other immunomodulatory strategies may be used in severe or refractory cases.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

The spectrum of neurologic complications of cancer immunotherapy is broad, encompassing both central and peripheral nervous system disorders, indolent as well as fulminant clinical presentations, and wide-ranging severity with variable response to treatment. Early identification and multidisciplinary management are crucial to balance neurologic recovery and antitumor control.

Regression of a melanoma brain metastasis that had appeared after immune checkpoint inhibitor discontinuation: a hypothesis-generating case

We present the case of a 50-year-old woman previously treated with nivolumab-ipilimumab combination therapy for a metastatic melanoma. Despite premature discontinuation of these immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after 2 cycles due to severe immune-related hepatitis, the patient achieved a complete response. Nine months later, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed progression of a single cerebral lesion, and the patient was referred for stereotactic radiosurgery. Unexpectedly, the brain MRI acquired one month later as part of radiosurgery planning showed a spontaneous regression of this lesion, allowing for radiosurgery cancellation. Follow-up imaging showed a sustained response, although the patient did not receive any other oncological treatment. We discuss here the potential immune mechanisms involved in this unusual course and the importance of better understanding the behaviour of tumours in the era of ICIs.

Phase Ib/II trial of tipapkinogene sovacivec, a therapeutic human papillomavirus16-vaccine, in combination with avelumab in patients with advanced human papillomavirus16-positive cancers

PURPOSE

To evaluate tipapkinogene sovacivec (TG4001), a viral immunotherapeutic vaccine expressing human papillomavirus (HPV)16 E6/E7 non-oncogenic proteins and IL-2, in combination with avelumab in HPV16+ cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this open-label, phase Ib/II, multicenter study, HPV16+ advanced cancer patients received subcutaneous TG4001 at two dose levels (DL) in phase Ib and at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in phase II weekly for 6 weeks, then every 2 weeks (q2Wk) until 6 months, thereafter every 12 weeks, in combination with avelumab q2Wk starting from day 8. Exploratory end-points included immunomonitoring from sequential tumour and blood samples.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients, mainly heavily pretreated (88% ≥ 1 previous line), were included in the safety analysis, with a majority of anal cancer (44%). No dose-limiting toxicities were reported, and DL2 (5 × 107 Plaque forming units (PFU)) was selected as the RP2D. Treatment-related adverse events to TG4001 occurred in 93% of patients, mostly grade 1/2, with grade 3 anaemia in one patient and no grade 4/5. Overall response rate (ORR) was 22% (8/36) and 32% (8/25) in all and patients without liver metastases, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were 2.8 months (95% CI: 1.4-5.6) and 11.0 months (95% CI:7.5-16.7) in the total population and 5.6 months (95% CI:1.6-9.6) and 13.3 months (95% CI:8.7-32.7) in patients without liver metastases. Antigen-specific T-cell response was identified in 7/11 patients by IFNγ ELISpot.

CONCLUSIONS

TG4001 in combination with avelumab is safe, demonstrated antitumour activity in heavily pre-treated HPV16+ cancer patients, and is currently being evaluated in a randomised phase II trial in patients with incurable anogenital cancer and limited hepatic involvement.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03260023.

Neurologic Complications of Cancer Immunotherapy

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment over the past decade. As it is increasingly introduced into routine clinical practice, immune-related complications have become more frequent. Accurate diagnosis and treatment are essential, with the goal of reduced patient morbidity. This review aims to discuss the various clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatments, and prognosis of neurologic complications associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive T-cell therapies, and T-cell redirecting therapies. We also outline a suggested clinical approach related to the clinical use of these agents.

Immune-related adverse events and immune checkpoint inhibitors: a focus on neurotoxicity and clinical management

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent an innovative therapeutic approach of oncologic diseases. In Europe, this therapeutic class currently includes eight agents: ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, avelumab, cemiplimab, durvalumab and dostarlimab. Despite their proved clinical benefits, they can induce immune related adverse events (irADRs), that can also involve the nervous system.

AREAS COVERED

Despite their rarity, neurological irADRs related to ICI-treatments can lead to serious and dangerous complications, highlighting the importance of a strict monitoring of patients. This review aims to summarize the safety profile of ICIs, focusing on their possible neurotoxicity and their management.

EXPERT OPINION

Considering the clinical relevance of ICIs-induced irADRs and that the underlying mechanisms are still not completely understood, the use of ICIs requires extensive safety monitoring. Before to prescribe immunotherapy, oncologists should identify possible individual risk factors that may favor the onset of irADRs. Oncologists and general practitioners should inform and educate patients about the specific toxicities of immunological checkpoint inhibitors, including nervous ones. They should be carefully monitored at least 6 months after the end of treatment. ICIs-related nervous toxicities require a multidisciplinary management, in which neurologists and clinical pharmacologists should participate.

Implication of the Gut Microbiome and Microbial-Derived Metabolites in Immune-Related Adverse Events: Emergence of Novel Biomarkers for Cancer Immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed how we think about tumor management. Combinations of anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy have become the standard of care in many advanced-stage cancers, including as a first-line therapy. Aside from improved anti-tumor immunity, the mechanism of action of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) exposes a new toxicity profile known as immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). This novel toxicity can damage any organ, but the skin, digestive and endocrine systems are the most frequently afflicted. Most ICI-attributed toxicity symptoms are mild, but some are severe and necessitate multidisciplinary side effect management. Obtaining knowledge on the various forms of immune-related toxicities and swiftly changing treatment techniques to lower the probability of experiencing severe irAEs has become a priority in oncological care. In recent years, there has been a growing understanding of an intriguing link between the gut microbiome and ICI outcomes. Multiple studies have demonstrated a connection between microbial metagenomic and metatranscriptomic patterns and ICI efficacy in malignant melanoma, lung and colorectal cancer. The immunomodulatory effect of the gut microbiome can have a real effect on the biological background of irAEs as well. Furthermore, specific microbial signatures and metabolites might be associated with the onset and severity of toxicity symptoms. By identifying these biological factors, novel biomarkers can be used in clinical practice to predict and manage potential irAEs. This comprehensive review aims to summarize the clinical aspects and biological background of ICI-related irAEs and their potential association with the gut microbiome and metabolome. We aim to explore the current state of knowledge on the most important and reliable irAE-related biomarkers of microbial origin and discuss the intriguing connection between ICI efficacy and toxicity.

Exploring Gene Expression Profiles in Primary Central Nervous System Vasculitis

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to explore the gene expression profile of primary central nervous system vasculitis (PCNSV).

METHODS

Brain specimens of 4 patients with granulomatous vasculitis (GV), 5 with lymphocytic vasculitis (LV), 4 with amyloid β-related angiitis (ABRA), and 4 normal controls were studied. RNA-sequencing was performed using the Illumina Hiseq-4,000 platform and the Illumina TruSeq Total-RNA library. Student t test and false discovery rate tests were performed for each of the differentially expressed transcripts. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis was used for the pathway expression analysis. CIBERSORT was used to estimate the abundances of different immune cell subsets in the tissues based on gene expression data.

RESULTS

Transcripts differentially expressed between PCNSV and normal brain indicated that endosomal, mitochondrial, and ribosome dysfunction, alterations in protein synthesis, and noncoding RNAs might be involved in PCNSV. Pathway analysis revealed the activation of dendritic cell maturation and antigen processing as well as neuroinflammation in PCNSV versus normal brain, whereas oxidative phosphorylation was inhibited. CIBERSORT estimation of immune cell subsets suggested that activated NK cells, M1 macrophages, memory B cells, and follicular helper T cells were likely to be more prevalent in PCNSV samples. Naïve CD4 T cells and monocytes were mainly estimated to be present in GV and ABRA. Plasma cell and γδ T-cell signatures were mainly found in LV and normal brain. GV showed higher levels of genes associated with macrophage activities and T cells. ABRA showed higher levels of long noncoding RNAs and miR-616. LV showed higher levels of genes encoding immunoglobulins.

INTERPRETATION

RNA sequencing confirmed PCNSV heterogeneity. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:120-130.

Prediction of Immune-Related Adverse Events Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors With a Panel of Autoantibodies: Protocol of a Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Cohort Study

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is markedly improving the prognosis of patients with several types of cancer. On the other hand, the growth in the use of these drugs in oncology is associated with an increase in multiple immune-related adverse events (irAEs), whose optimal prevention and management remain unclear. In this context, there is a need for reliable and validated biomarkers to predict the occurrence of irAEs in patients treated with ICIs. Thus, the main objective of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a sensitive routinely available panel of autoantibodies consisting of antinuclear antibodies, rheumatoid factor, and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies to identify patients at risk of developing irAEs.

Methods and Analysis: A multicenter, prospective, observational, cohort study has been designed to be conducted in patients diagnosed with cancer amenable to ICI therapy. Considering the percentage of ICI-induced irAEs to be 25% and a loss to follow-up of 5%, it has been estimated that a sample size of 294 patients is required to detect an expected sensitivity of the autoantibody panel under study of 0.90 with a confidence interval (95%) of no less than 0.75. For 48 weeks, patients will be monitored through the oncology outpatient clinics of five hospitals in Spain. Immune-related adverse events will be defined and categorized according to CTCAE v. 5.0. All the patients will undergo ordinary blood tests at specific moments predefined per protocol and extraordinary blood tests at the time of any irAE being detected. Ordinary and extraordinary samples will be frozen and stored in the biobank until analysis in the same autoimmunity laboratory when the whole cohort reaches week 48. A predictive model of irAEs will be constructed with potential risk factors of immune-related toxicity including the autoantibody panel under study.

Ethics and Dissemination: This protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee of the Basque Country and the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants before their enrollment. The authors declare that the results will be submitted to an international peer-reviewed journal for their prompt dissemination.

Neurological Adverse Events Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Perspectives and New Development

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of multiple malignancies, especially in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With the extensive application of ICIs in clinical practice, clinicians have to manage their toxicities, which are often termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Several ICIs, such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and durvalumab, have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat advanced NSCLC, accompanied by a broad spectrum of toxicity reactions. However, ICIs-associated neurological toxicities, regarding polyneuropathy, Bell palsy, encephalopathy, and myasthenia gravis, as uncommon emerging toxicities have not been well recognized, present a challenge for clinicians to improve awareness of supervision, recognition, and management before death from them. Herein, we have summarized the incidence, diagnosis, clinical manifestations, potential mechanisms, treatments, and outcomes of ICIs-related neurotoxicity and optimized the management approach for NSCLC patients. Prompt recognition and proper management are indispensable to reduce the morbidity of these patients with immune-related neurological toxicities.

Central nervous system injury from novel cancer immunotherapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neurotoxicity from antineoplastic treatment remains a challenge in oncology. Cancer treatment-induced central nervous system (CNS) injury can be therapy-limiting, severely disabling, and even fatal. While emerging cancer immunotherapies have revolutionized oncology during the past decade, their immunomodulatory properties can cause immune-related adverse effects (IRAE) across organ systems, including the nervous system. Central neurologic IRAEs from chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI) are challenging complications of such therapies.We aim to provide clinicians with a comprehensive review of the relevant forms of CAR-T and ICPI-associated CNS toxicity, focusing on clinical features of such complications, diagnostic workup, predictive biomarkers, and management considerations in affected patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Unique forms of CAR-T and ICPI-related CNS toxicity have been characterized in the recent literature. CAR-T-related neurotoxicity is common and clinically well delineated. ICPI-related CNS toxicity is relatively rare but includes a heterogenous spectrum of severe and diagnostically challenging conditions. While putative risk factors, neurotoxicity biomarkers, imaging correlates and treatment strategies have been put forward, development of tailored diagnostic and management consensus guidelines awaits further clinical investigation.

SUMMARY

As CAR-T and ICPI become more widely adopted, early recognition, documentation, and management of immunotherapy-related CNS toxicity are of paramount importance in the clinical setting.

Neurological Immunotoxicity from Cancer Treatment

The emergence of immune-based treatments for cancer has led to a growing field dedicated to understanding and managing iatrogenic immunotoxicities that arise from these agents. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) can develop as isolated events or as toxicities affecting multiple body systems. In particular, this review details the neurological irAEs from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell immunotherapies. The recognition and treatment of neurological irAEs has variable success, depending on the severity and nature of the neurological involvement. Understanding the involved mechanisms, predicting those at higher risk for irAEs, and establishing safety parameters for resuming cancer immunotherapies after irAEs are all important fields of ongoing research.

A systematic review of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related neurological adverse events and association with anti-neuronal autoantibodies

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) therapy has led to a paradigm shift in cancer drug development and in the clinical evaluation of approaches to combination cancer treatment. Dysregulation of the immune system by ICI therapy may also elicit autoimmune phenomena and consequently manifest clinically as immune-related adverse events (irAEs) including neurological irAEs. Areas Covered: The purpose of this review is to explore the role of autoantibodies in the diagnosis and prediction of neurological irAEs and to evaluate their pathogenicity. We searched Pubmed and Embase for neurological irAEs and associated autoantibodies and found 28 patients with central and peripheral neurological irAEs. Of these patients, up to 40% had encephalitis, 34.4% with myasthenia gravis and 22% of patients with peripheral neuropathy and Guillain-Barre Syndrome had autoantibodies. Expert Opinion: Overall, our survey suggested a causal relationship between neurological irAEs and autoantibodies. Detection of autoantibodies may help to diagnose neurological irAEs and inform their clinical management.

Neurological complications of immune checkpoint inhibitor cancer immunotherapy

Neurological autoimmunity is increasingly recognized as a complication of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) cancer immunotherapy. ICIs act by enhancing endogenous anti-tumor immune responses and can also lead to autoimmunity affecting all organs. ICI-related neurological autoimmunity is rare, most often manifests with neuromuscular involvement and more rarely affects the central nervous system. Neurological complications often often present in the first three months of ICI treatment but can also appear after ICI discontinuation. These can occur in patients with tumors not traditionally associated with paraneoplastic neurological autoimmunity, such as melanoma and renal-cell carcinoma and should be suspected when a new neurological symptoms present while on ICI and cannot be explained by disease progression or as a consequence of metabolic dysfunction. Treatment consists of ICI discontinuation or withdrawal depending on the severity with or without immunosuppression. Generally, improvement is observed depending on the patient's baseline characteristics and neurological presentation.

Neurological complications of cancer immunotherapy

Immunotherapy has emerged as a powerful therapeutic approach in many areas of clinical oncology and hematology. The approval of ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the immune cell receptor CTLA-4, has marked the beginning of the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In the meantime, numerous antibodies targeting the PD-1 pathway have expanded the class of clinically approved immune checkpoint inhibitors. Furthermore, novel antibodies directed against other immune checkpoints are currently in clinical evaluation. More recently, bispecific antibodies, which link T cells directly to tumor cells as well as adoptive T cell transfer with immune cells engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor, have been approved in certain indications. Neurological complications associated with the use of these novel immunotherapeutic concepts have been recognized more and more frequently. Immune checkpoint inhibitors may cause various neurological deficits mainly by alterations of the peripheral nervous system's integrity. These include radiculopathies, neuropathies, myopathies as well as myasthenic syndromes. Side effects involving the central nervous system are less frequent but may result in severe clinical symptoms and syndromes. The administration of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell is subject to rigorous patient selection and their use is frequently associated with neurological complications including encephalopathy and seizures, which require immediate action and appropriate therapeutic measures. Close clinical monitoring for neurological symptoms is key for early recognition of immunotherapy-related side effects. Comprehensive diagnostic work-up and adequate therapeutic measures are essential to avoid further clinical deterioration and residual neurological deficits.

Neurologic Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To define the clinical characteristics, management, and outcome of neurologic immune-related adverse events (n-irAEs) of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

METHODS

Systematic review of the literature following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 694 articles were identified. Two hundred fifty-six articles, with 428 individual patients, met the inclusion criteria. Reports regarding neuromuscular disorders (319/428, 75%) were more frequent than those on CNS disorders (109/428, 25%). The most common n-irAEs reports were myositis (136/428, 32%), Guillain-Barré syndrome and other peripheral neuropathies (94/428, 22%), myasthenic syndromes (58/428, 14%), encephalitis (56/428, 13%), cranial neuropathies (31/428, 7%), meningitis (13/428, 3%), CNS demyelinating diseases (8/428, 2%), and myelitis (7/428, 2%). Other CNS disorders were detected in 25/428 (6%) patients. Compared with the whole sample, myasthenic syndromes were significantly more Ab positive (33/56, 59%; p < 0.001). Anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 was more frequent in myasthenic syndromes (50/58, 86%; p = 0.005) and less common in meningitis (2/13, 15%; p < 0.001) and cranial neuropathies (13/31, 42%; p = 0.005). Anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 ICIs were more frequent in meningitis (8/13, 62%; p < 0.001) and less common in encephalitis (2/56, 4%; p = 0.009) and myositis (12/136, 9%; p = 0.01). Combination of different ICIs was more frequent in cranial neuropathies (12/31, 39%; p = 0.005). Melanoma was more frequent in patients with peripheral neuropathies (64/94, 68%; p = 0.003) and less common in encephalitis (19/56, 34%; p = 0.001). The highest mortality rate was reached in myasthenic syndromes (28%).

CONCLUSION

Considering the increasing use of ICI therapy in the forthcoming future, this information can be valuable in assisting neurologists and oncologists in early n-irAEs diagnosis and treatment.

The potential for immune checkpoint modulators in cerebrovascular injury and inflammation

Introduction: Neuroinflammation has been linked to poor neurologic and functional outcomes in many cerebrovascular disorders. Immune checkpoints are upregulated in the setting of traumatic brain injury, intracerebral hemorrhage, ischemic stroke, central nervous systems vasculitis, and post-hemorrhagic vasospasm, and are potential mediators of pathologic inflammation. Burgeoning evidence suggests that immune checkpoint modulation is a promising treatment strategy to decrease immune cell recruitment, cytokine secretion, brain edema, and neurodegeneration.Areas covered: This review discusses the role of immune checkpoints in neuroinflammation, and the potential for therapeutic immune checkpoint modulation in inflammatory cerebrovascular disorders. A search of Pubmed and clinicaltrials.gov was performed to find relevant literature published within the last 50 years.Expert opinion: The clinical success of immune-activating checkpoint modulators in human cancers has shown the immense clinical potential of checkpoint-based immunotherapy. Given that checkpoint blockade can also precipitate a pathologic pro-inflammatory or autoimmune response, it is plausible that these pathways may also be targeted to quell aberrant inflammation. A limited but growing number of studies suggest that immune checkpoints play a critical role in regulating the immune response in the central nervous system in a variety of contexts, and that immune-deactivating checkpoint modulators may be a promising treatment strategy for acute and chronic neuroinflammation in cerebrovascular disorders.

Neurologic Complications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Thoracic Malignancies

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the prognosis of cancers previously considered lethal. The spectrum of therapeutic indications is rapidly expanding, including the vast majority of thoracic malignancies. By enhancing the immune responses against cancer, the ICI treatments lead to the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that may affect any organ. Severity varies from mild to fatal clinical manifestations. Neurologic involvement is relatively rare and highly heterogeneous, including central and peripheral nervous system diseases associated with neural-specific autoantibodies or not, central nervous system vasculitis, and granulomatous and demyelinating disorders. Symptoms often manifest within the first four cycles of treatment and can develop regardless of the class of ICI used. An unfavorable outcome is found in up to one-third of patients and is generally associated with the patients' clinical characteristics (e.g., age, coexistence of systemic adverse events), cancer type (e.g., lung cancer versus other), and specific clinical setting (e.g., ICI treatment in patients with preexisting paraneoplastic neurologic autoimmunity, ICI rechallenge after a first neurologic irAE). Diagnosis should be suspected in patients with new-onset neurologic symptoms while on ICI treatment which are not explained by metastatic disease or other metabolic/infectious disorders. Recommended treatment is based on clinical severity and consists of ICI discontinuation with or without immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory therapy, although alternative approaches are reasonable depending on cancer status (e.g., aggressive immunosuppression without discontinuing ICI in patients with initial cancer response). Early recognition and appropriate treatment of these neurologic irAEs are crucial for improved patient outcomes and therapeutic planning.

Vascular effects of cancer treatments

Chemotherapy, alone or in association with radiation therapy, has represented the cornerstone of cancer treatment for decades. However, in the last several years, an unprecedented progress in the understanding of cancer biology and the discovery of novel therapeutic targets have led to a paradigm shift in the management of patients with neoplastic diseases. The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, vascular endothelial growth factor pathway inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells, among others, has been associated with prolonged survival in many forms of cancer. A common feature of both chemotherapy and novel cancer treatments is the frequent occurrence of vascular toxicity, mainly mediated by injury to the endothelium. While the mechanisms may vary between agents, the clinical manifestations may overlap and range from hypertension, vasospastic and thrombotic arterial events (myocardial ischemia and infarction, peripheral ischemia, and limb gangrene), venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) to capillary leak syndrome. Therefore, the effective management of patients with cancer requires a multidisciplinary team approach in which oncologist and cardiovascular medicine specialists work together to prevent, detect, and minimize acute vascular toxicity and long-term consequences of cancer therapy.

Vascular toxic effects of cancer therapies

Cancer therapies can lead to a broad spectrum of cardiovascular complications. Among these, cardiotoxicities remain of prime concern, but vascular toxicities have emerged as the second most common group. The range of cancer therapies with a vascular toxicity profile and the clinical spectrum of vascular toxic effects are quite broad. Historically, venous thromboembolism has received the greatest attention but, over the past decade, the arterial toxic effects, which can present as acute vasospasm, acute thrombosis and accelerated atherosclerosis, of cancer therapies have gained greater recognition. This Review focuses on these types of cancer therapy-related arterial toxicity, including their mechanisms, and provides an update on venous thromboembolism and pulmonary hypertension associated with cancer therapies. Recommendations for the screening, treatment and prevention of vascular toxic effects of cancer therapies are outlined in the context of available evidence and society guidelines and consensus statements. The shift towards greater awareness of the vascular toxic effects of cancer therapies has further unveiled the urgent needs in this area in terms of defining best clinical practices. Well-designed and well-conducted clinical studies and registries are needed to more precisely define the incidence rates, risk factors, primary and secondary modes of prevention, and best treatment modalities for vascular toxicities related to cancer therapies. These efforts should be complemented by preclinical studies to outline the pathophysiological concepts that can be translated into the clinic and to identify drugs with vascular toxicity potential even before their widespread clinical use.

Mechanisms of Immune-Related Complications in Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the prognosis of many cancer patients. Blocking antibodies targeting inhibitory cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 or programmed cell death protein-1 receptors or the programmed cell death ligand-1 have led to long-lasting remissions in patients with even advanced cancers. Main side effects induced by ICIs are inflammatory complications with sometimes severe sequelae for patients. Recent studies have improved our understanding how such immune-related adverse events (irAEs) develop. Here, we summarize the current knowledge of pathomechanisms involved in the de-velopment of irAEs with a particular focus on potential pathways that could be targeted to prevent severe immune-related complications in patients treated with cancer immunotherapy.

Rheumatic Manifestations in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are monoclonal antibodies that activate the immune system, aiming at enhancing antitumor immunity. Their clinical efficacy is well-documented, but the side effects associated with their use are still under investigation. These drugs cause several immune-related adverse events (ir-AEs), some of which stand within the field of rheumatology. Herein, we present a literature review performed in an effort to evaluate all publicly available clinical data regarding rheumatic manifestations associated with ICIs. The most common musculoskeletal ir-AEs are inflammatory arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica and myositis. Non-musculoskeletal rheumatic manifestations are less frequent, with the most prominent being sicca, vasculitides and sarcoidosis. Cases of systemic lupus erythematosus or scleroderma are extremely rare. The majority of musculoskeletal ir-AEs are of mild/moderate severity and can be managed with steroids with no need for ICI discontinuation. In severe cases, more intense immunosuppressive therapy and permanent ICI discontinuation may be employed. Oncologists should periodically screen patients receiving ICIs for new-onset inflammatory musculoskeletal complaints and seek a rheumatology consultation in cases of persisting symptoms.

Case Report of Immuno-Oncotherapy (IO) Provoked Encephalitis Mimicking Brain Metastasis in a Patient with History of Traumatic Brain Injury

BACKGROUND

Immuno-oncotherapy (IO) has revolutionized systemic cancer care but remains experimental in brain tumors. IO treatment risks multiorgan autoimmune inflammatory responses that limit its use. The central nervous system (CNS) is an immune-specialized compartment with restricted cellular access, thus fewer cases are reported for immune-mediated encephalitis. Interestingly, patients with history of blood-brain barrier compromise are potentially at higher risk for immune cell trafficking to the CNS.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We report the first case, to our knowledge, of a 70-year-old man with clear cell renal cell carcinoma with pulmonary metastases treated with lung irradiation, nephrectomy, and chemotherapy prior to switching to single-agent nivolumab IO. The patient presented with new-onset generalized tonic-clonic seizure and left visual field-cut. Review of patient history revealed remote traumatic brain injury (TBI). Brain imaging noted a solid-enhancing right occipital mass that was presumed metastasis versus lymphoma. Cerebrospinal fluid cytology was negative for malignancy but concerning for lymphoproliferative process not determined to be malignant. The patient started steroids and anti-epileptic therapy. After negative systemic cancer re-staging, IO was discontinued and steroids were initiated with demonstrated patient clinical improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded the diagnosis of immune-mediated encephalitis secondary to IO with collection of reactive T-cells within the area of encephalomalacia. The area of encephalomalacia from prior TBI served to compartmentalize the reactive lymphocytes, giving the appearance of a mass. Taken together, new onset seizure in patients on IO might signal encephalitis and CNS metastatic mimicry should be considered in patients with a prior history of TBI and encephalomalacia.

EULAR points to consider for the diagnosis and management of rheumatic immune-related adverse events due to cancer immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors

Background

Rheumatic and musculoskeletal immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are observed in about 10% of patients with cancer receiving checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). Given the recent emergence of these events and the lack of guidance for rheumatologists addressing them, a European League Against Rheumatism task force was convened to harmonise expert opinion regarding their identification and management.

Methods

First, the group formulated research questions for a systematic literature review. Then, based on literature and using a consensus procedure, 4 overarching principles and 10 points to consider were developed.

Results

The overarching principles defined the role of rheumatologists in the management of irAEs, highlighting the shared decision-making process between patients, oncologists and rheumatologists. The points to consider inform rheumatologists on the wide spectrum of musculoskeletal irAEs, not fulfilling usual classification criteria of rheumatic diseases, and their differential diagnoses. Early referral and facilitated access to rheumatologist are recommended, to document the target organ inflammation. Regarding therapeutic, three treatment escalations were defined: (1) local/systemic glucocorticoids if symptoms are not controlled by symptomatic treatment, then tapered to the lowest efficient dose, (2) conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, in case of inadequate response to glucocorticoids or for steroid sparing and (3) biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, for severe or refractory irAEs. A warning has been made on severe myositis, a life-threatening situation, requiring high dose of glucocorticoids and close monitoring. For patients with pre-existing rheumatic disease, baseline immunosuppressive regimen should be kept at the lowest efficient dose before starting immunotherapies.

Conclusion

These statements provide guidance on diagnosis and management of rheumatic irAEs and aim to support future international collaborations.

Neurotoxicity associated with cancer immunotherapy: immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI) and chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) represent novel therapies recently approved to treat a number of human cancers. As both approaches modulate the immune system, they can generate a number of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including a large spectrum of novel neurological toxicities. These are of special interest given their potential severity and risk of compromising further oncologic treatment. We aim to provide a comprehensive review of the literature and discuss their optimal management.

RECENT FINDINGS

In contrast to irAEs involving other organs, neurological complications of ICPI are uncommon, may present throughout the course of treatment and involve the peripheral and central nervous system, including polyneuropathy, myositis, myasthenia gravis, demyelinating polyradiculopathy, myelitis, encephalitis and others. If started early, ICPI-related neurologic irAEs are usually responsive to steroids. In contrast, as many as 40% of patients undergoing CAR-T therapy will develop neurologic complications in the form of a cytokine-release-associated encephalopathy. It includes delirium, aphasia, tremor/myoclonus, seizure and seizure-like activity.

SUMMARY

irAEs associated with CAR-T and ICPI therapy constitute new entities. Early identification and treatment are essential to optimize the functional outcome and further oncologic management of the patient.

Nivolumab-associated digital small-vessel vasculitis in a patient with an advanced renal cell carcinoma

The immunotherapy (IO) agents in the renal cell carcinoma represent the best option in the second line of treatment. However, these drugs can be associated with different types of toxicities. The vascular toxicity related with IO is very uncommon. We report a case of a 46-year-old man diagnosed with stage IV renal cell carcinoma. He received a second-line treatment with nivolumab. After the fourth cycle, he presented a small-vessel serious vasculitis associated with IO toxicity. He required treatment with corticosteroids and immunosuppressors for toxicity control. We speculate that the anti-PD-1 agents can generate a disproportionate vascular inflammatory process mediated by T cells. The data suggest that there is an intimate relationship between alterations in the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway and vasculitis.

Cardio-Oncology: Vascular and Metabolic Perspectives: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Cardio-oncology has organically developed as a new discipline within cardiovascular medicine as a result of the cardiac and vascular adverse sequelae of the major advances in cancer treatment. Patients with cancer and cancer survivors are at increased risk of vascular disease for a number of reasons. First, many new cancer therapies, including several targeted therapies, are associated with vascular and metabolic complications. Second, cancer itself serves as a risk factor for vascular disease, especially by increasing the risk for thromboembolic events. Finally, recent data suggest that common modifiable and genetic risk factors predispose to both malignancies and cardiovascular disease. Vascular complications in patients with cancer represent a new challenge for the clinician and a new frontier for research and investigation. Indeed, vascular sequelae of novel targeted therapies may provide insights into vascular signaling in humans. Clinically, emerging challenges are best addressed by a multidisciplinary approach in which cardiovascular medicine specialists and vascular biologists work closely with oncologists in the care of patients with cancer and cancer survivors. This novel approach realizes the goal of providing superior care through the creation of cardio-oncology consultative services and the training of a new generation of cardiovascular specialists with a broad understanding of cancer treatments.

Separating or combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and radiotherapy in the treatment of NSCLC brain metastases

With the advancement of imaging technology, systemic disease control rate and survival rate, the morbidity of brain metastases (BMs) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been riding on a steady upward trend (40%), but management of BMs from NSCLC remains obscure. Systemic therapy is anticipated to offer novel therapeutic avenues in the management of NSCLC BMs, and radiotherapy (RT) and immunotherapy have their own advantages. Recently, it was confirmed that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and RT could mutually promote the efficacy in the treatment of BMs from NSCLC. In this paper, we provide a review on current understandings and practices of separating or combining ICIs and RT, which could provide a reference for the coming laboratory and clinical studies and contribute to the development of new approaches in NSCLC BMs.

Isolated testicular vasculitis due to immune checkpoint inhibitor

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly being used to treat various malignancies; consequently, more rheumatological side effects, ranging from arthritis to vasculitis, are being reported. Here we present, for the first time, a case of vasculitis involving the testicle in the setting of an immune checkpoint inhibitor. As reported in previous cases, recurrence of a malignancy, as opposed to vasculitis, was initially suspected, thus creating a diagnostic dilemma. These rheumatological side effects have garnered attention as they potentially provide a window into in the pathogenesis of rheumatological diseases.

Neurologic Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibition

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights the spectrum of neurologic adverse events seen with use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), their potential mechanisms, the treatments undertaken, and the clinical outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

The advent of ICIs has revolutionized cancer therapy. Neurologic adverse events (NAEs) are rare but clinically significant complication of ICIs. They can involve both the central and peripheral nervous system. Examples include myositis, neuropathy, encephalopathy, and myasthenia gravis. Treatment consists of holding the ICI, administration of corticosteroids, and other immunomodulatory agents as needed. The outcomes are generally favorable; however, rarely severe events can lead to significant morbidity and even mortality. Identifying and treating the range of neurologic adverse events that may potentially arise with ICIs is very important as the oncologic indications for their use continues to expand.

Management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related rheumatic adverse events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which target the programmed cell death receptor‐1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte‐associated antigen‐4 signaling pathways, represent remarkable breakthroughs in cancer treatment and have improved survival among patients with a variety of malignancies. However, the wide use of ICIs is associated with a spectrum of immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) that can affect any organ system, and may sometimes be life threatening. Rheumatic irAEs are not an infrequent type of irAE. In this systematic review, we consider the clinical characteristics of rheumatic irAEs, including patients with pre‐existing rheumatic diseases, and focus on the management of rheumatic irAEs.

[Management of Rheumatic Adverse Events Related to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors]

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have made remarkable breakthroughs in cancer treatment. However, the widely use of ICIs is associated with a spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). These adverse events can affect any organ system. In this article, we have made a systemic review about the clinical characteristics of rheumatic irAEs, and also summarized irAEs in patients with pre-exsiting rheumatic disease. We also focus on the management of rheumatic irAEs.

Autoimmune Effects of Lung Cancer Immunotherapy Revealed by Data-Driven Analysis on a Nationwide Cohort

The autoimmune adverse effects of lung cancer immunotherapy are not fully understood at the population level. Using observational data from commercial health insurance claims, we compared autoimmune diseases risk of immune checkpoint inhibitors (including pembrolizumab and nivolumab) and that of chemotherapy using the matching method. By 6 months after treatment initialization, the cumulative incidence of new autoimmune diseases among patients receiving immunotherapy was 13.13% (95% confidence interval (CI), 10.79-15.50%) and that of the matched chemotherapy patients was 6.65% (95% CI, 5.79-7.50%), constituting a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.97 (95% CI, 1.58-2.48). Both pembrolizumab (HR = 2.06 (95% CI, 1.20-3.65), P = 0.0032) and nivolumab (HR = 1.76 (95% CI, 1.39-2.24), P < 0.0001) were associated with higher risks of developing autoimmune diseases, especially for hypothyroidism (P < 0.0001). Our findings suggest the need to monitor autoimmune side effects of immunotherapy.

Immune-related adverse events associated with programmed cell death protein-1 and programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: a PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have remarkable clinical efficacy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the breakdown of immune escape causes a variety of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). With the increasing use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone or in combination with other therapies, awareness and management of irAEs have become more important. We aimed to assess the incidence and nature of irAEs associated with PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors for NSCLC.

Methods

Articles from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched through December 2017. The incidence of overall and organ-specific irAEs was investigated in all clinical trials with nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolimumab, durvalumab, and avelumab as single agents for treatment of NSCLC. We calculated the pooled incidence using R software with package Meta.

Results

Sixteen trials were included in the meta-analysis: 10 trials with PD-1 inhibitors (3734 patients) and 6 trials with PD-L1 inhibitors (2474 patients). The overall incidence of irAEs was 22% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17–28) for all grades and 4% (95% CI, 2–6) for high-grade irAEs. The frequency of irAEs varied based on drug type and organ, and patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors had an increased rate of any grade and high-grade irAEs compared with patients who received PD-L1 inhibitors. Organ-specific irAEs were most frequently observed in, in decreasing order, the endocrine system, skin, pulmonary tract, and gastrointestinal tract. The total number of patients whose death was attributed to irAEs was 14 (0.34%), and most (79%) of these patients died because of pneumonitis. The median time to the onset of irAEs after the initiation of treatment was 10 weeks (interquartile range, 6–19.5 weeks) and varied depending on the organ system involved.

Conclusions

The specificity of irAEs was closely associated with the mechanism of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies involved in restarting anticancer immune attacks. Comprehensive understanding, timely detection, and effective management could improve the compliance of patients and guide the interruption of treatment.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5701-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Inflammation-induced hypoparathyroidism triggered by combination immune checkpoint blockade for melanoma

BACKGROUND

Treatment with a combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 targeted checkpoint inhibition has improved outcome of melanoma patients and led to durable remissions but is also associated with significant toxicities. Endocrinopathies such as thyroiditis and hypophysitis are often seen, but other, rarer disturbances have also been described. Endocrinopathies affecting the parathyroid gland are rarely reported and no clear pathomechanism has been proposed.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here, we report a case of severe hypocalcemia due to an antibody-mediated hypoparathyroidism as an immune-related adverse event (irAE) in a patient who was treated with the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab and anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab. Hypocalcemia was rapidly corrected by substitution, but the endogenous serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) remained low. The patient demonstrated a rapid and profound tumor response to the combination immune checkpoint blockade, but developed a severe colitis that required high-dose intravenous corticosteroid and anti-TNFα therapy. During this strong immunosuppression the PTH level normalized and the calcium levels were stable without substitution. However, during tapering of immunosuppressants, the PTH and calcium levels decreased again to a level requiring calcium substitution.

CONCLUSION

Our report demonstrates a rare endocrinopathy as a complication of combined PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade. In addition, it provides evidence from the course of the disease that inflammation within the parathyroid gland is involved in the mechanism.

Thromboembolic Events Related to Treatment with Checkpoint Inhibitors: Report of Two Cases

Despite the significant clinical benefits, checkpoint inhibition is associated with a unique spectrum of immune-related adverse events. It is sometimes difficult to distinguish some rare adverse effects from a cancer progression; thus, such effects should be reported in clinical trials to be diagnosed by physicians. Only a few cases of arterial embolic events have been described in studies related to patients treated by immunotherapy. In this article, we report the cases of 2 patients who presented rare and severe thromboembolic events after using checkpoint inhibitors. The first case describes multiple organ embolism at the same time, associated with other autoimmune symptoms. In the second case, distal digital necrosis emerged after the initiation of immunotherapy. There is insufficient data about the real incidence of thromboembolic and rheumatological events related to checkpoint inhibition. Future trials should be done to establish preventive strategies.

Immune tumor board: integral part in the multidisciplinary management of cancer patients treated with cancer immunotherapy

Recent progress in the understanding of immune responses to cancer and how tumor cells evade immune control have led to the successful introduction of cancer immunotherapy, in particular immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Treatment of cancer patients with immunotherapy such as ICIs has led to new challenges, including starting and stopping rules for immunotherapy, the management of immune-related adverse events, and logistic issues for the production of cellular therapies and viral delivery vectors. These challenges are not disease- or organ-specific and several potential biomarkers to predict response to ICI are under investigation. We installed an interdisciplinary discussion platform for managing patient-specific challenges associated with cancer immunotherapy in our institution. Here, we describe an immune tumor board for the management of cancer patients treated with immunotherapy and provide an outlook on how such a platform could be potentially used in the future to discuss rational and personalized combination therapies, and how to improve the management of side effects occurring under immunotherapy.

[MRI alterations in immunomodulation]

In this review article, typical imaging findings of diseases elicited by immunomodulatory drugs are presented. Progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy (PML), a subacute infection due to reactivation of the JC virus, has a typical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pattern, which must be considered in the framework of immunomodulatory multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment with natalizumab, fingolimod, rituximab and fumarate and also in lymphoproliferative diseases or other forms of immunosuppression. Restoration of the immune system may result in an overlapping and overwhelming immune response in terms of an immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). Further conditions with typical MRI patterns comprise methotrexate-associated leucoencephalopathy and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). In immunotherapy with activation of T‑lymphocytes, attention should always be paid to the fact that the T‑lymphocytes activated by different processes not only target the diseased tissue but also normal brain tissue.