Management of sudden sensorineural hearing loss among primary care physicians in Canada: a survey study

Efficacy and safety of SENS-401 in sudden sensorineural hearing loss: The AUDIBLE-S randomized placebo-controlled phase IIb trial

PURPOSE

Safety and efficacy of SENS-401, a serotonin type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist and calcineurin inhibitor, in patients with acute sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL).

METHODS

Multicentre randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled adult subjects with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) or unilateral/bilateral acute acoustic trauma leading to SSNHL within 96 h of disease onset. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of the three oral dose groups: 29 mg, 43.5 mg or placebo given twice daily for 28 days. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in Pure Tone Average (PTA) in the affected ear to the end of treatment visit (day 28). Subjects were further followed up 8 weeks after the end of the treatment period (day 84).

RESULTS

A total of 115 subjects were randomized. SENS-401 was well tolerated. Although the primary efficacy endpoint was not met at day 28, post-hoc analyses revealed clinically significant and meaningful efficacy outcomes with SENS-401 when compared to placebo in a substantial group of participants diagnosed with idiopathic SSNHL and who had received corticosteroid treatment. Notable improvements were observed in the PTA change from baseline, the complete hearing recovery rate, and the Word Recognition Score (WRS), particularly at day 84. The responder rate consistently favored treated subjects over those who received the placebo.

CONCLUSION

While the primary endpoint was not achieved at the end of the treatment period, the study revealed consistently positive efficacy results of clinical relevance in patients with idiopathic SSNHL who received SENS-401, particularly in the 8-weeks follow-up phase after the completion of the treatment.

Access to Sudden Hearing Loss Care at Urgent Care Centers

OBJECTIVES

To compare patient access to urgent care centers (UCCs) with a diagnosis of sudden hearing loss based on insurance.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-five random UCCs in states with Medicaid expansion and 125 random UCCs in states without Medicaid expansion were contacted by a research assistant posing as a family member seeking care on behalf of a patient with a one-week history of sudden, unilateral hearing loss. Each clinic was called once as a Medicaid patient and once as a private insurance (PI) patient for 500 total calls. Each phone encounter was evaluated for insurance acceptance and self-pay price. Secondary outcomes included other measures of timely/accessible care. Chi-square/McNemar's tests and independent/paired sample t-tests were performed to determine whether there were statistically significant differences between expansion status and insurance type. Calls ended before answering questions were not included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Medicaid acceptance rate was significantly lower than PI (68.1% vs. 98.4%, p < 0.001). UCCs in Medicaid expansion states were significantly more likely to accept Medicaid (76.8% vs. 59.2%, p = 0.003). The mean wage-adjusted self-pay price was significantly greater in states with Medicaid expansion at $169.84 than in states without at $145.34 when called as a Medicaid patient (mean difference: $24.50, 95% Confidence Interval: $0.45-$48.54, p = 0.046). The rates of referral to an emergency department and self-pay price nondisclosure rates were greater for Medicaid calls than for private insurance calls (8.2% vs. 0.4% and 17.4% vs. 5.8%; p < 0.001 for both).

CONCLUSION

Medicaid patients with otologic emergencies face reduced access to care at UCCs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 2024.

Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Patients Aged from 15 to 40 Years

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the hearing characteristics and causes of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) in patients aged from 15 to 40 years, focusing on audiological outcomes one year after the diagnosis. Methods: The medical records of individuals with SSNHL who were referred to our tertiary-level audiologic center were reviewed. All patients had undergone comprehensive diagnostic evaluations, including high-resolution 3D-FLAIR delayed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and screening for coagulation, infectious, and autoimmune diseases. Results: Overall, 56 patients (mean age 28.1 ± 7.6 years) were included in the study. The hearing threshold in the affected ear improved significantly from 56.0 ± 18.0 dB at the diagnosis to 46.9 ± 22.3 dB after one year (p = 0.02). The degree of hearing loss, audiometric configurations, hearing improvements, and adherence to hearing treatments showed considerable variability among patients. Aural fullness, tinnitus, and hyperacusis were the predominant symptoms associated with SSNHL, and their prevalence decreased significantly over time. The diagnostic protocol led to the identification of the specific cause of SSNHL in 75% (42/56) of patients. The known etiology was found to be otological (39.3%), infectious (21.4%), autoimmune (7.1%), vascular (5.4%), or neoplastic (1.8%). In particular, Menière's disease (n = 12), isolated cochlear endolymphatic hydrops (n = 6), HSV-1 (n = 5), and EBV (n = 4) infections were the most frequent causes of SSNHL. Conclusions: The identification of the specific etiology of SSNHL may facilitate a more personalized approach to management and treatment.

Access to Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Care at Private Equity-Owned Otolaryngology Clinics

OBJECTIVE

Characterizing access to sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) care at private practice otolaryngology clinics of varying ownership models.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional prospective review.

SETTING

Private practice otolaryngology clinics.

METHODS

We employed a Secret Shopper study design with private equity (PE) owned and non-PE-owned clinics within 15 miles of one another. Using a standardized script, researchers randomly called 50% of each clinic type between October 2021 and January 2022 requesting an appointment on behalf of a family member enrolled in either Medicaid or private insurance (PI) experiencing SSNHL. Access to timely care was assessed between clinic ownership and insurance type.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight total PE-owned otolaryngology clinics were identified across the United States. Only 40 non-PE clinics could be matched to the PE clinics; 39 PE and 28 non-PE clinics were called as Medicaid patients; 39 PE and 25 non-PE clinics were called as PI patients; 48.7% of PE and 28.6% of non-PE clinics accepted Medicaid. The mean wait time to new appointment ranged between 9.55 and 13.21 days for all insurance and ownership types but did not vary significantly (P > .480). Telehealth was significantly more likely to be offered for new Medicaid patients at non-PE clinics compared to PE clinics (31.8% vs 0.0%, P = .001). The mean cost for an appointment was significantly greater at PE clinics than at non-PE clinics ($291.18 vs $203.75, P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients seeking SSNHL care at PE-owned otolaryngology clinics are likely to face long wait times prior to obtaining an initial appointment and reduced telehealth options.

Lipids and sudden sensorineural hearing loss: A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis

OBJECTIVE

While numerous observational studies have indicated an association between lipids and Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SSNHL), it remains uncertain whether dyslipidemia serves as a causal risk factor for SSNHL. Our objective is to elucidate the potential causal relationship between lipid levels and SSNHL through Mendelian randomization analysis.

METHODS

The primary and secondary lipid data used in this study were sourced from the UK Biobank (UKBB) and the Global Lipid Genetics Consortium results (GLGC), respectively. These datasets were obtained from large, publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The outcome data for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) were acquired from the Finnegan Biobank, consisting of 1491 cases and 196,592 controls. Subsequently, both single-variable Mendelian randomization (SVMR) and multivariate Mendelian randomization (MVMR) methods were employed to evaluate the causal relationship between lipids and the occurrence of SSNHL.

RESULTS

Among the primary lipid data, SVMR analysis showed a significant correlation between high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (OR: 0.822, 95 %CI: 0.694-0.974, p = 0.023) and SSNHL, and triglycerides (TG) (OR: 0.997, 95 %CI: 0.836-1.188, p = 0.975), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (OR: 1.067, 95 %CI: 0.861-1.322, p = 0.552) did not correlate with SSNHL. In the secondary lipid data, SVMR analysis showed that HDL-C (OR: 0.987, 95 %CI: 0.805-1.210, p = 0.903), TG (OR: 0.991, 95 %CI: 0.787-1.246, p = 0.937) and LDL-C (OR: 1.092, 95 % CI: 0.926-1.287, p = 0.294) did not correlate with SSNHL. MVMR analysis of the primary lipid data showed that HDL-cholesterol (OR: 0.755, 95 % CI: 0.596-0.956, p = 0.019) was significantly associated with SSNHL, while TG (OR: 0.808, 95 %CI: 0.611-1.068, p = 0.134) and LDL-C (OR: 1.146, 95 %CI: 0.869-1.511, p = 0.333) did not correlate with SSNHL, consistent with the results of SVMR. Inverse MR results showed that SSNHL did not correlate with TG (OR: 0.999, 95 %CI: 0.997-1.001, p = 0.835), HDL-C (OR: 1.001, 95 %CI: 0.998-1.003), LDL-C (OR: 0.999, 95 %CI: 0.997-1.002, p = 0.863).

CONCLUSIONS

Mendelian randomization (MR) results suggest that decreased serum HDL-C levels are an independent risk factor for SSNHL. Monitoring and focusing on lipid levels may be of value in the prevention and treatment of SSNHL.

Approach to Sudden Hearing Loss Among Primary Care Physicians in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

INTRODUCTION

A medical emergency known as sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) affects the ears suddenly, has a considerable probability of negative cognitive and functional outcomes, and can influence the patient's quality of life. Primary care physicians play a crucial role in diagnosing SSNHL and initiating prompt and efficient management since they are the ones who would likely encounter it initially. This study aims to evaluate the present knowledge, diagnostic, and management perspective of SSNHL among primary care physicians in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

A self-generated questionnaire with 17 questions was developed, and a link to the online survey was delivered to primary care physicians (PHPs) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, concerning the management of SSNHL.

RESULTS

The knowledge level regarding SSNHL was evaluated, in which 21 (25%) of the participants had a low knowledge level, 34 (40.5%) had moderate knowledge, and 29 (34.5%) had a high knowledge level. Among 84 participants, 20 (23.8%) were confident in their ability to administer and understand the findings of tuning fork tests (TFT) to differentiate between sensorineural hearing loss and conductive hearing loss, whereas 64 (76.2%) were unsure about it. In addition, to distinguish between sensorineural hearing loss and conductive hearing loss, 62 (73.8%) participants were confident, and 22 (26.2%) participants were skeptical about their ability to interpret a formal audiogram.

CONCLUSION

Considering SSNHL as a medical emergency, in our survey, many family doctors would make proper referral and treatment decisions. However, TFTs were underutilized for guiding management decisions compared to other ways to distinguish between conductive and sensorineural hearing loss.

Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Outcome: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Machine Learning models have been applied in various healthcare fields, including Audiology, to predict disease outcomes. The prognosis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss is difficult to predict due to the variable course of the disease. Hence, researchers have attempted to utilize ML models to predict the outcome of patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss. The objectives of this study were to review the performance of these machine learning models and assess their applicability in real-world settings.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. Only studies that built machine learning prediction models were included, and studies that used algorithms such as logistic regression only for the purpose of adjusting for confounding variables were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).

RESULTS

After screening, a total of 7 papers were eligible for synthesis. In total, these studies built 48 ML models. The most common utilized algorithms were Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and boosting. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged between 0.59 and 0.915. All of the included studies had a high risk of bias; hence there are concerns regarding their applicability.

CONCLUSION

Although these models showed great performance and promising results, future studies are still needed before these models can be applied in a real-world setting. Future studies should employ multiple cohorts, different feature selection methods, and external validation to further validate the models' applicability.

Association between Serum Vitamin D Levels and Risk of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A cross-sectional Study

Background

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is an autoimmune diseases of the inner ear which is usually defined by acute onset of hearing loss in one or both ears, of 30 dB or more on at least three contiguous audiometric frequencies within 3 days or less. This study aimed to compare the serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (VitD) between patients with SSNHL and healthy controls.

Methods

A total of 50 patients with SSNHL and 50 healthy individuals without hearing loss as control group were enrolled in this study. Serum levels of VitD and other related laboratory tests such as calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), and parathyroid hormone (PTH) were measured and compared between two study groups.

Results

Serum level of VitD was significantly lower in patients suffering from SSNHL compared to the healthy controls (26.55 ± 14.44 vs. 33.51 ± 14.21, P = 0.017, respectively). VitD insufficiency was observed in 70% (n = 35) of the patients with SSNHL as compared to 44% (n = 22) of healthy individuals, demonstrating a significant difference between two study groups. However, no statistically difference was observed for serum levels of Ca, P, and PTH.

Conclusion

This study indicated an increased prevalence of VitD insufficiency in subjects with SSNHL, suggesting a possible association between serum VitD levels and the development of SSNHL. VitD may protect the hearing loss through its antioxidant role.

Social Media Utilization in Otolaryngology: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

Social media (SM) is an increasingly popular medium for the medical community to engage with patients, trainees, and colleagues. This review aimed to identify reported uses of SM in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS), assess the quality of evidence supporting these uses, and identify gaps in the literature. With the relative lack of regulatory guidelines for the development of SM content, we hypothesized that the quality of content available on SM would be highly variable.

DATA SOURCES AND METHODS

A scoping review was performed of English-language peer-reviewed studies published to date discussing SM use in any form within OHNS. Three reviewers independently screened all abstracts. Two reviewers independently extracted data of interest from the full text of articles identified from the preliminary abstract screen.

RESULTS

171 studies were included, with 94 (54.9%) studies published between 2020 and 2022. 104 (60.8%) studies were conducted in the US. 135 (78.9%) used cross-sectional or survey-based methodology; only 7 (4.1%) were controlled studies. SM was most commonly employed for professional networking (n = 37 [21%]), and within subspecialties of otology (n = 38 [22%]) and rhinology/allergy (n = 25 [15%]). Facebook was most frequently used for study recruitment (n = 23 [13.5%]), YouTube for patient education (n = 15 [14.6%]), and Twitter for professional networking (n = 16 [9.4%]).

CONCLUSION

SM use within OHNS is increasing rapidly, with applications including patient education, professional networking, and study recruitment. Despite myriad articles, there remains a paucity of well-controlled studies. As SM becomes integrated into healthcare, particularly for applications directly impacting patient care, higher levels of evidence are needed to understand its true impact. Laryngoscope, 133:2447-2456, 2023.

Intratympanic Versus Systemic Steroid Therapy for Idiopathic Sudden Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL) is a common condition characterized by hearing threshold reduction, most often of unknown causes. The patient experiences a sudden reduction of the hearing threshold in one or both ears. Steroids are the mainstream of the treatment. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of intratympanic steroid administration compared with systemic administration and the combination of the two steroid treatments in the hearing recovery of patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. We searched electronic databases such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, CINAHL, Cochrane (Central), Ovid, and Medline from August 31, 2021, to November 31, 2021, and from February 5 to 10, 2022. We included 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and performed a meta-analysis comparing the efficiency in the hearing recovery of intratympanic versus systemic steroid treatment, systemic versus combined, and intratympanic versus combined steroid treatment. The results of the intratympanic versus systemic steroid therapy comparison showed no actual difference in efficiency and no statistical significance (odds ratio: 1.07 (Mantel-Haenszel (M-H), fixed, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-1.51)). Systemic steroid treatment was inferior to combined steroid treatment and was the only outcome with statistical significance (odds ratio: 0.55 (M-H, fixed, 95% CI: 0.38-0.80)). Intratympanic steroid treatment was inferior to combined steroid treatment, although the results were not statistically significant (odds ratio: 0.65 (M-H, fixed, 95% CI: 0.37-1.16)). In conclusion, systemic steroid therapy was inferior to combined steroid therapy. The comparison of intratympanic with systemic therapy and intratympanic with combined therapy showed no statistical significance. Further research is needed with more RCTs, and side effects should be considered.

Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Why It’s an Emergency

This review shows the importance of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) as a significant cause of hearing loss that often goes under-recognized, especially by primary care physicians. Contrasted with conductive hearing loss, SSNHL involves inner ear damage. This work reviewed the diagnostic methods and treatments of SSNHL in the U.S. and Canada, including treatment options. It is imperative that primary care physicians and providers be able to recognize this condition early so that treatment may be initiated without delay as hearing loss can become permanent if not managed immediately.

The association of genetic polymorphisms in interleukin-1 receptors type 1 and type 2 with sudden sensorineural hearing loss in a Taiwanese population: a case control study

Background

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is a disease with an unknown etiology; damage to the auditory nerve from inflammation due to viral infection or vascular incidents has been implicated. According to several studies, cytokines, including interleukins, are associated with SSNHL in terms of serum expression and genetic polymorphisms. Interleukin-1 (IL-1) plays a key role in inflammation and may be associated with SSNHL. This study analyzed the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of IL-1 receptor (IL-1R) genes with SSNHL in Taiwan.

Methods

We conducted a case–control study involving 401 patients with SSNHL and 730 healthy controls. Four SNPs (IL-1R type 1 gene [IL1R1] [rs3917225 and rs2234650] and IL-1R type 2 gene [IL1R2] [rs4141134 and rs2071008]) were selected. The genotypes were determined using the TaqMan assay. The Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was tested for each SNP, and genetic effects were evaluated.

Results

The TT genotype of rs2234650 had an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 2.988 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.27–6.82) (P = 0.012) compared with the CC genotype in patients with SSNHL. The SNP rs2234650 was associated with SSNHL in the recessive model (TT vs. CC + CT, P = 0.0206, OR = 2.681). The CT genotype of rs4141134 had an adjusted OR of 3.860 (95% CI 2.01–7.44; P < 0.0001) compared with the TT genotype, in patients with SSNHL. The SNP rs4141134 was associated with SSNHL under the dominant model (CC + CT vs. TT, P < 0.0001, OR = 4.087).

Conclusion

These findings suggest that IL1R1 and IL1R2 gene polymorphisms may contribute to an increased risk of SSNHL in Taiwan.