1
|
Spena G, Moretti TB, Dávila FS, Dos Anjos G, Khan I, Calace FP, Aveta A, Pandolfo SD, Tufano A, Izzo A, Farias A, Perdonà S, Maes K. Ga68-PSMA PET for lymph node staging in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2024; 76:467-473. [PMID: 39051893 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.24.05736-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In intermediate/high risk prostate cancer, preoperative staging exams are mandatory. The aim of these imaging studies is to evaluate eventual lymph nodes involvement and/or metastatic spread of the tumor. Nevertheless, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), bone scan modalities have controversial sensitivity. Introduction of PET-PSMA and its use also as preoperative exam, seems to improve diagnostic accuracy due to favorable negative predictive value. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of PET-PSMA as a preoperative staging exam and its accuracy in predicting lymph nodes involvement in intermediate/high risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 50 patients diagnosed with intermediate/high risk PCa between 2018 and 2022 has been performed. All patients underwent preoperative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) + extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). The cohort was categorized into two groups: pathologically negative lymph nodes (pN0) vs. positive nodes (pN1). A descriptive and comparative analysis was conducted. Correlation analysis between continuous variables was performed using the Spearman's Rank Test. Using lymph nodes histopathological results as reference standard, the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was calculated. RESULTS Overall, 50 patients were included. The mean age was 63.3 years with a median prostatic specific antigen (PSA) of 7.7 ng/dL. Forty-four percent of the patients exhibited an International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) score of 4 or higher, and 28% had a pT3 stage. Overall, 43 (86%) patients submitted to ePLND did not present lymph node metastases (pN0), while 8 (14%) patients were pN1. PET-PSMA showed low sensitivity in detecting lymph node metastases (25%) while a high specificity in excluding lymph-node disease (88.1%) has been observed. Finally, we noted a significant positive correlation between the total SUVmax of the prostate and the initial total PSA (r=0.38; P=0.019), as well as the percentage of tumor involvement (r=0.383; P=0.022). CONCLUSIONS Evidence on the role of PET-PSMA in the primary staging of PCa is steadily building up. A positive correlation between SUV and prostate involvement indicates that PET-PSMA could reflect, with a good approximation, the pathological features of the prostate. However, the low sensitivity depicted remains the main limitation. Future prospective studies are needed to determine the impact on patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Spena
- Department of Urology, Hospital Da Luz Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal -
- Unit of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy -
| | - Tomás B Moretti
- Department of Urology, Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Gabriel Dos Anjos
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ilaana Khan
- Department of Urology, Hospital Da Luz Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Achille Aveta
- Department of Urology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Savio D Pandolfo
- Department of Urology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Tufano
- Unit of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
- Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Izzo
- Unit of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Artur Farias
- Department of Urology, Hospital Da Luz Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Unit of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Kris Maes
- Department of Urology, Hospital Da Luz Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Trägårdh E, Ulén J, Enqvist O, Edenbrandt L, Larsson M. Improving sensitivity through data augmentation with synthetic lymph node metastases for AI-based analysis of PSMA PET-CT images. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2024; 44:332-339. [PMID: 38563413 DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We developed a fully automated artificial intelligence (AI)AI-based-based method for detecting suspected lymph node metastases in prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)(PSMA) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT)(PET-CT) images of prostate cancer patients by using data augmentation that adds synthetic lymph node metastases to the images to expand the training set. METHODS Synthetic data were derived from original training images to which new synthetic lymph node metastases were added. Thus, the original training set from a previous study (n = 420) was expanded by one synthetic image for every original image (n = 840), which was used to train an AI model. The performance of the AI model was compared to that of nuclear medicine physicians and a previously developed AI model. The human readers were alternately used as a reference and compared to either another reading or AI model. RESULTS The new AI model had an average sensitivity of 84% for detecting lymph node metastases compared with 78% for human readings. Our previously developed AI method without synthetic data had an average sensitivity of 79%. The number of false positive lesions were slightly higher for the new AI model (average 3.3 instances per patient) compared to human readings and the previous AI model (average 2.8 instances per patient), while the number of false negative lesions was lower. CONCLUSIONS Creating synthetic lymph node metastases, as a form of data augmentation, on [18F]PSMA-1007F]PSMA-1007 PETPET-CT-CT images improved the sensitivity of an AI model for detecting suspected lymph node metastases. However, the number of false positive lesions increased somewhat.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elin Trägårdh
- Department of Translational Medicine and Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Olof Enqvist
- Eigenvision AB, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Lars Edenbrandt
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tenbergen CJA, Fortuin AS, van Asten JJA, Veltien A, Philips BWJ, Hambrock T, Orzada S, Quick HH, Barentsz JO, Maas MC, Scheenen TWJ. The Potential of Iron Oxide Nanoparticle-Enhanced MRI at 7 T Compared With 3 T for Detecting Small Suspicious Lymph Nodes in Patients With Prostate Cancer. Invest Radiol 2024; 59:519-525. [PMID: 38157433 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000001056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate detection of lymph node (LN) metastases in prostate cancer (PCa) is a challenging but crucial step for disease staging. Ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables distinction between healthy LNs and nodes suspicious for harboring metastases. When combined with MRI at an ultra-high magnetic field, an unprecedented spatial resolution can be exploited to visualize these LNs. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to explore USPIO-enhanced MRI at 7 T in comparison to 3 T for the detection of small suspicious LNs in the same cohort of patients with PCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty PCa patients with high-risk primary or recurrent disease were referred to our hospital for an investigational USPIO-enhanced 3 T MRI examination with ferumoxtran-10. With consent, they underwent a 7 T MRI on the same day. Three-dimensional anatomical and T2*-weighted images of both examinations were evaluated blinded, with an interval, by 2 readers who annotated LNs suspicious for metastases. Number, size, and level of suspicion (LoS) of LNs were paired within patients and compared between field strengths. RESULTS At 7 T, both readers annotated significantly more LNs compared with 3 T (474 and 284 vs 344 and 162), with 116 suspicious LNs on 7 T (range, 1-34 per patient) and 79 suspicious LNs on 3 T (range, 1-14 per patient) in 17 patients. For suspicious LNs, the median short axis diameter was 2.6 mm on 7 T (1.3-9.5 mm) and 2.8 mm for 3 T (1.7-10.4 mm, P = 0.05), with large overlap in short axis of annotated LNs between LoS groups. At 7 T, significantly more suspicious LNs had a short axis <2.5 mm compared with 3 T (44% vs 27%). Magnetic resonance imaging at 7 T provided better image quality and structure delineation and a higher LoS score for suspicious nodes. CONCLUSIONS In the same cohort of patients with PCa, more and more small LNs were detected on 7 T USPIO-enhanced MRI compared with 3 T MRI. Suspicious LNs are generally very small, and increased nodal size was not a good indication of suspicion for the presence of metastases. The high spatial resolution of USPIO-enhanced MRI at 7 T improves structure delineation and the visibility of very small suspicious LNs, potentially expanding the in vivo detection limits of pelvic LN metastases in PCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlijn J A Tenbergen
- From the Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.J.A.T., A.S.F., J.J.A.v.A., A.V., B.W.J.P., T.H., J.O.B., M.C.M., T.W.J.S.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei, Ede, the Netherlands (A.S.F.); Erwin L. Hahn Institute for MR Imaging, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany (S.O., H.H.Q., T.W.J.S.); High-Field and Hybrid MR Imaging, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany (S.O., H.H.Q.); and Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (S.O.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ali I, Rezk M, Hamouda D, Talaat O, Omar Y, Abdel Tawab M, Nasr I. Clinical value of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI in primary staging of patients with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:622-631. [PMID: 38265254 PMCID: PMC11027301 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the utility of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI in initial staging of intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa). METHODS A total of 46 patients with pathologically verified intermediate and/or HRPCa who underwent 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI with dedicated pelvic high-resolution multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) were included. RESULTS PET/MRI showed 100% sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy in detecting seminal vesicle (SV) and rectal invasion, versus 87.5%, 100%, 100% 93.8%, 95.7% and 50%, 100%,100%, 95.5%, and 95.7% for mpMRI respectively. However, PET/MRI had poor SN (40% and 0%) but high SP (94.4% and 100%) in detection of UB and neurovascular bundle (NV) invasion compared to 100% SN and SP for mpMRI. PET/MRI demonstrated stronger TNM staging agreement with the gold standard than mpMRI-WBMRI. It demonstrated concordance with T, N, and M stages in 40, 41, and 36 patients (k 0.84, 0.60, and 0.68, respectively) versus 29, 33, and 31 patients (k 0.54, 0.22, and 0.50) with accurate over all staging of 38/46 patients versus 30/46 patients (K 0.52 versus 0.22). CONCLUSION 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI is a promising imaging modality with high diagnostic accuracy in staging intermediate- and HRPCa; it improves local tumour evaluation and provides precise TNM staging. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI could have high diagnostic accuracy as shown in the current study for staging HRPCa patients that is crucial for treatment selection. We think that our study will contribute to the body of knowledge and improve the literature surrounding the clinical uses of integrated 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismail Ali
- Radiology Department, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Faculty of medicine street, Zagazig, Sharkia, 44519, Egypt
| | - Mahmoud Rezk
- Radiology Department, National cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, 11796, Egypt
| | - Dalia Hamouda
- Medical Oncology Department, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt
| | - Omnia Talaat
- Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, 11796, Egypt
| | - Yehia Omar
- Director of PET/MRI unit, Misr Radiology Cente, Cairo, 11766, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Abdel Tawab
- Radiology Department, Faculty of Human Medicine, Alazhar University, Cairo, 11651, Egypt
| | - Ibrahim Nasr
- Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Perez-Ardavin J, Martinez-Sarmiento M, Monserrat-Monfort JJ, Vera-Pinto V, Sopena-Novales P, Bello-Arqués P, Boronat-Tormo F, Vera-Donoso CD. The sentinel node with technetium-99m for prostate cancer. A safe and mature new gold standard? THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF... 2023; 67:287-293. [PMID: 35762662 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.22.03416-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective was to carry out a prospective study to compare the current extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) to the sentinel node (SN) technique with 99mTcnanocolloid. METHODS We conducted a prospective study between January 2013 and May 2020. In the first 74 patients, 99mTc-nanocolloid was used. Then from June 2017 onwards, in 38 patients we used a combined radiotracer prepared by adding indocyanine green (ICG). A preoperative SPECT/CT was also performed to check on the SNs. We extracted the SNs guided by a laparoscopic gamma-ray detection probe and/or a fluorescence camera. RESULTS We included 112 patients with a Briganti nomogram-assessed risk of 5% or more. In 4 out of the total, the radiotracer did not migrate. The mean number of extracted nodes was 21.56 (13.46-29.71) and the mean of extracted SNs was 5.17 (1.83-8.51) (P<0.001). The technique that registered the most nodes with high activity was SPECT/CT, with an average of 4.33 nodes (2.42-6.23) (P<0.001). We found SNs outside the template in 78% of the patients. A total of 46% of the complications were related to ePLND. The SN biopsy showed a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 97.5%, PVV of 92.86%, and NPV of 100%. CONCLUSIONS Our results prove that ePLND is a technique with significant morbidity; up to 46% of the complications were related to the ePLND. The SN surgery showed great accuracy in detecting metastases due to the SPECT/CT and a lower rate of complications than ePLND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Perez-Ardavin
- Doctoral School, Catholic University of Valencia San Vicente Mártir, Valencia, Spain -
| | | | | | - Victor Vera-Pinto
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, La Fe Universitary and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Pablo Sopena-Novales
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, La Fe Universitary and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Pilar Bello-Arqués
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, La Fe Universitary and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - César D Vera-Donoso
- Doctoral School, Catholic University of Valencia San Vicente Mártir, Valencia, Spain
- Department of Urology, La Fe Universitary and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Raju S, Sharma A, Kumar S, Seth A, Sharma A, Pandey AK, Kumar R. Impact of forced diuresis at two different time points on pelvic imaging in prostatic carcinoma with 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Nucl Med Commun 2023; 44:1135-1143. [PMID: 37799105 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We compared diagnostic quality of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging focused on the pelvic structures using two furosemide protocols in two different groups of patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 55 patients with prostate cancer were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Out of 55, 31 patients were in group 1 (median age: 66 years, Range 44-78 years) in which furosemide injection was given after completion of whole-body 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan and 24 patients were in group 2 (median age: 63.5 years, range: 50-82 years) in which it was given along with the 68 Ga-PSMA injection. In both groups, an initial time point scan (T0 scan) and a delayed time point scan (T1scan) were done. The images were analyzed qualitatively as well as quantitatively. RESULTS Quantitatively there was no statistically significant difference between the SUVmax and T:B of prostatic lesion and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) in both the groups at two time points ( P > 0.05). Early furosemide injection caused a washout of the urinary bladder radiotracer concentration in significantly higher number of patients in group 2 (62.5% vs. 6.45% patients, P < 0.001). There was significant clearance of radiotracer activity from the ureters in group 2 (SUVmax: 9.28 vs. 3.09, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION The simultaneous furosemide and 68 Ga-PSMA injection can reduce the urinary excretion of the tracer and improve the diagnostic confidence of prostatic lesion, SVI and lymph nodal metastasis, along with reducing the scanning time and radiation burden, making this protocol an effective alternative to the present protocol of delayed furosemide injection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Rakesh Kumar
- Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine Division, Department of Nuclear Medicine, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Georgakopoulos A, Bamias A, Chatziioannou S. Current role of PSMA-PET imaging in the clinical management of prostate cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231208960. [PMID: 38028141 PMCID: PMC10676057 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231208960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the developments of the last few years, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PC) remains a deadly disease. Until recently, almost all guidelines recommended magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) for the initial staging and local/systematic recurrence. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) at the present stage, emerged as a promising diagnostic imaging tool for PC. PSMA PET/CT alone or in combination with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) can improve the detection of clinically significant PC, especially for Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS) = 3 lesions. In addition, PSMA PET/CT is more accurate than CT and bone scan for intermediate to high-risk disease at the initial staging. Contrariwise, a negative PET is not useful for surgeons to avoid a pelvic nodal dissection. PET-PSMA imaging is appropriate for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence or PSA rise from undetectable level after radical prostatectomy or for PSA rise above nadir after definitive radiotherapy. Also, it is recommended for patients fit for curative salvage treatment. It should be noted that in patients, candidates for radionuclide therapy with Lutetium-177 (117Lu), a PSMA strong expression from PET/CT at baseline is considered necessary. This review summarizes the evolution of PSMA PET/CT and its current role in the management of PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Georgakopoulos
- 2nd Radiology Department, Nuclear Medicine Section, University General Hospital ‘Attikon’, Athens, Greece
| | - Aristotle Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, University General Hospital ‘Attikon’, Rimini 1, Athens 12462, Greece
| | - Sophia Chatziioannou
- 2nd Radiology Department, Nuclear Medicine Section, University General Hospital ‘Attikon’, Athens, Greece
- PET/CT Department, Biomedical Research Foundation Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim D, Lim B, Suh J, You D, Jeong IG, Hong JH, Ahn H. Clinical Significance of Radical Prostatectomy in Clinical Lymph Node Metastasis in Prostate Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:7903-7909. [PMID: 37689608 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14137-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate the role of radical prostatectomy (RP) among clinical nodal metastasis prostate cancer and whether histological confirmation of lymph node metastasis through surgery can help with treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS After excluding patients with distant metastatic prostate cancer or neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy, 42 patients with clinical nodal metastasis who underwent RP at our institution were included in the study. We classified them as having or not having pathological lymph node metastasis. Clinicopathologic data were analyzed in this retrospective chart review. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate the estimated castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)-free survival, biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, and cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS There is no significant difference in age, presence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, BCR time, CRPC time, overall survival, salvage RT rate, and initial prostate-specific antigen level between the two groups. However, there is a significant difference in the pathology N1 group in terms of pathological T stage, pathologic Gleason score, BCR rate, CRPC rate, and CSS. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to identify predictors of CRPC-free survival. Patients with pathological lymph node metastasis had a shorter CRPC-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 4.87; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-19.00, p = 0.02]. CONCLUSION Radical prostatectomy can confirm lymph node metastasis. Although pathologic diagnosis has no effect on time to BCR and CPRC, because it affects BCR rate, CRPC rate, and CSS, an accurate pathological diagnosis obtained through surgery is beneficial in the treatment of clinical lymph node metastasis prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongwon Kim
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bumjin Lim
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Jungyo Suh
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dalsan You
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - In Gab Jeong
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Hyuk Hong
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hanjong Ahn
- Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lucas Lucas C, García Zoghby L, Amo-Salas M, Soriano Castrejón ÁM, García Vicente AM. Diagnostic and therapeutic impact of PET/CT with 18F-DCFPyL versus 18F-Fluorocholine in initial staging of intermediate-/high-risk prostate cancer: a pilot study. Ann Nucl Med 2023; 37:551-560. [PMID: 37532975 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-023-01859-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
AIM To assess the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of PET/CT with 18F-DCFPyL with respect to 18F-Fluorocholine in initial staging of intermediate-/high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with recent diagnosis of intermediate-/high-risk PCa without androgen deprivation therapy and previous 18F-Fluorocholine-PET/CT (negative for extraprostatic disease or with oligometastatic disease) were referred to 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT. Patients' disease characteristic as grade group, D'Amico risk category (intermediate/high), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) closest to PET/CTs and its kinetics were obtained. The overall detection rate (DR) and molecular imaging TNM (miTNM) stage according to the prostate cancer molecular imaging standardized evaluation (PROMISE) criteria were assessed for both radiotracers, and their concordance (Kappa coefficient) was analyzed. The diagnostic and therapeutic impact of 18F-DCFPyL with respect to 18F-Fluorocholine was evaluated. RESULTS Fifty-eight patients were analyzed (84.5% high-risk). 18F-Fluorocholine showed a higher DR than 18F-DCFPyL of prostate gland involvement (100% versus 93.1%) and pelvic node disease (37.9% versus 31%; k = 0.436, p = 0.001). On the other hand, 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT showed a higher DR of metastatic disease than 18F-Fluorocholine-PET/CT, 9/58 patients (15.5%): 3 M1a, 5 M1b and 1 M1c) versus 5/58 (8.6%) patients: 1 M1a and 4 M1b), k = 0.426; p = 0.001. No significant association was found between clinical characteristics (grade group, risk category, PSA level and kinetic) and 18F-Fluorocholine or 18F-DCFPyL results. The results of 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT modified the previously planned treatment compared to 18F-Fluorocholine-PET/CT in 13 patients (22.4%). CONCLUSIONS 18F-Fluorocholine and 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT showed a similar DR of prostate gland and lymph node involvement, although with moderate concordance for the latter. 18F-DCFPyL was superior to 18F-Fluorocholine in detecting regional and distant metastasis with a therapeutic impact in one of every five patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Lucas Lucas
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital, C/Obispo Rafael Torija s/n, 13005, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - Laura García Zoghby
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Avda. Rio Guadiana s/n, 45007, Toledo, Spain
| | - Mariano Amo-Salas
- Department of Mathematics, Castilla-La Mancha University, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | | | - Ana María García Vicente
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Avda. Rio Guadiana s/n, 45007, Toledo, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Buch‐Olsen KM, Poulsen MH, Hansen S, Vilstrup MH, Holm J, Hess S, Holdgaard PC, Zieger KEA, Madsen SS, Gerke O, Pedersen KT, Dam JH, Langkjær N, Østergaard LD, Asmussen JT, Braad PE, Nørgaard B, Eiber M, Hildebrandt MG. A randomised trial of [ 18F]PSMA-1007-PET/CT versus NaF-PET/CT for staging primary prostate cancer: A trial protocol. BJUI COMPASS 2023; 4:513-522. [PMID: 37636207 PMCID: PMC10447207 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positron emission tomography/contrast-enhanced computed tomography (PET/CT) is a sensitive imaging modality for prostate cancer (PCa). Due to lack of knowledge of the patient benefit, PSMA-PET/CT is not yet recommended in the European guidelines for staging and treatment planning of patients with newly diagnosed PCa. We will investigate the potential difference in progression-free survival (PFS) and quality of life (QoL) of using PSMA-PET/CT versus sodium fluoride (NaF)-PET/CT for staging and treatment planning in patients with newly diagnosed PCa. Study Design This is a prospective randomised controlled multicentre trial carried out at three centres in the Region of Southern Denmark. Endpoints The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints are residual disease, stage migration, impact on treatment strategies, stage distribution, QoL and diagnostic accuracy measures. Patients and Methods Patients eligible for the study have newly diagnosed unfavourable intermediate- or high-risk PCa. A total of 448 patients will be randomised 1:1 into two groups: (A) a control group staged with Na[18F]F-PET/CT and (B) an intervention group staged with [18F]PSMA-1007-PET/CT. A subgroup in the intervention group will have a supplementary blinded Na[18F]F-PET/CT performed for the purpose of performing accuracy analyses. QoL will be assessed at baseline and with regular intervals (3-12 months) during the study period. Treatment decisions are achieved at multidisciplinary team conferences based on the results of the respective scans and according to current Danish guidelines. Trial Registration The Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (S-20190161) and the Danish Medicines Agency (EudraCT Number 2021-000123-12) approved the study, and it has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov (Record 2020110469).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Middelbo Buch‐Olsen
- Department of Nuclear MedicineOdense University HospitalOdense CDenmark
- MANTRA ‐ Centre for MagNetic resonance Technology for Response Adapted radiotherapyOdense University HospitalOdenseDenmark
- Department of Clinical ResearchUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
| | - Mads Hvid Poulsen
- Department of Clinical ResearchUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
- Department of UrologyOUH OdenseOdense CDenmark
- Department of UrologyThe Hospital of South West JutlandEsbjergDenmark
| | | | - Mie Holm Vilstrup
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineThe Hospital of South West JutlandEsbjergDenmark
| | - Jorun Holm
- Department of Nuclear MedicineOdense University HospitalOdense CDenmark
- Department of Clinical ResearchUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
- PREMIO ‐ Centre for Personalized Response Monitoring in OncologyOdense University HospitalOdenseDenmark
| | - Søren Hess
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineThe Hospital of South West JutlandEsbjergDenmark
- IRIS ‐ Imaging Research Initiative SouthwestHospital South West DenmarkEsbjergDenmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
| | - Paw Christian Holdgaard
- Department of Nuclear MedicineLillebaelt University Hospital of Southern DenmarkVejleDenmark
| | | | | | - Oke Gerke
- Department of Nuclear MedicineOdense University HospitalOdense CDenmark
| | | | - Johan Hygum Dam
- Department of Nuclear MedicineOdense University HospitalOdense CDenmark
- Department of Clinical ResearchUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
| | - Niels Langkjær
- Department of Nuclear MedicineOdense University HospitalOdense CDenmark
| | - Louise Dorner Østergaard
- Department of Clinical ResearchUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
- Department of UrologyOUH OdenseOdense CDenmark
| | | | - Poul Erik Braad
- Department of Clinical EngineeringRegion of Southern DenmarkVejleDenmark
| | - Birgitte Nørgaard
- Department of Public HealthUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense CDenmark
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear MedicineTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
| | - Malene Grubbe Hildebrandt
- Department of Nuclear MedicineOdense University HospitalOdense CDenmark
- PREMIO ‐ Centre for Personalized Response Monitoring in OncologyOdense University HospitalOdenseDenmark
- Centre for Innovative Medical TechnologyOdense University HospitalOdenseDenmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yan L, Zhang Z, Wang T, Yuan L, Sun X, Su P. Application of targeted diagnosis of PSMA in the modality shift of prostate cancer diagnosis: a review. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1179595. [PMID: 37727211 PMCID: PMC10505927 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1179595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a serious threat to the health of men all over the world. The progression of PCa varies greatly among different individuals. In clinical practice, some patients often progress to advanced PCa. Therefore, accurate imaging for diagnosis and staging of PCa is particularly important for clinical management of patients. Conventional imaging examinations such as MRI and CT cannot accurately diagnose the pathological stages of advanced PCa, especially metastatic lymph node (LN) stages. As a result, developing an accurate molecular targeted diagnosis is crucial for advanced PCa. Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is of great value in the diagnosis of PCa because of its specific expression in PCa. At present, researchers have developed positron emission tomography (PET) targeting PSMA. A large number of studies have confirmed that it not only has a higher tumor detection rate, but also has a higher diagnostic efficacy in the pathological stage of advanced PCa compared with traditional imaging methods. This review summarizes recent studies on PSMA targeted PET in PCa diagnosis, analyzes its value in PCa diagnosis in detail, and provides new ideas for urological clinicians in PCa diagnosis and clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Xiaoke Sun
- Department of Urology, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
| | - Pengxiao Su
- Department of Urology, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Muehlematter UJ, Schweiger L, Ferraro DA, Hermanns T, Maurer T, Heck MM, Rupp NJ, Eiber M, Rauscher I, Burger IA. Development and external validation of a multivariable [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-based prediction model for lymph node involvement in men with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:3137-3146. [PMID: 37261472 PMCID: PMC10382335 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06278-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop and evaluate a lymph node invasion (LNI) prediction model for men staged with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET. METHODS A consecutive sample of intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET, extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND), and radical prostatectomy (RP) at two tertiary referral centers were retrospectively identified. The training cohort comprised 173 patients (treated between 2013 and 2017), the validation cohort 90 patients (treated between 2016 and 2019). Three models for LNI prediction were developed and evaluated using cross-validation. Optimal risk-threshold was determined during model development. The best performing model was evaluated and compared to available conventional and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-based prediction models using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS A combined model including prostate-specific antigen, biopsy Gleason grade group, [68Ga]Ga Ga-PSMA-11 positive volume of the primary tumor, and the assessment of the [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 report N-status yielded an AUC of 0.923 (95% CI 0.863-0.984) in the external validation. Using a cutoff of ≥ 17%, 44 (50%) ePLNDs would be spared and LNI missed in one patient (4.8%). Compared to conventional and MRI-based models, the proposed model showed similar calibration, higher AUC (0.923 (95% CI 0.863-0.984) vs. 0.700 (95% CI 0.548-0.852)-0.824 (95% CI 0.710-0.938)) and higher net benefit at DCA. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that information from [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 may improve LNI prediction in intermediate to high-risk PCa patients undergoing primary staging especially when combined with clinical parameters. For better LNI prediction, future research should investigate the combination of information from both PSMA PET and mpMRI for LNI prediction in PCa patients before RP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Urs J Muehlematter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lilit Schweiger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniela A Ferraro
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Thomas Hermanns
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Department of Urology, Technische Universität München, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Urology and Martini-Klinik, Universität Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matthias M Heck
- Department of Urology, Technische Universität München, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Niels J Rupp
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Isabel Rauscher
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Irene A Burger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Baden Cantonal Hospital, Baden, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chow KM, So WZ, Lee HJ, Lee A, Yap DWT, Takwoingi Y, Tay KJ, Tuan J, Thang SP, Lam W, Yuen J, Lawrentschuk N, Hofman MS, Murphy DG, Chen K. Head-to-head Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Imaging Modalities for Initial Staging of Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2023; 84:36-48. [PMID: 37032189 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Whether prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) should replace conventional imaging modalities (CIM) for initial staging of intermediate-high risk prostate cancer (PCa) requires definitive evidence on their relative diagnostic abilities. OBJECTIVE To perform head-to-head comparisons of PSMA-PET and CIM including multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), computed tomography (CT) and bone scan (BS) for upfront staging of tumour, nodal, and bone metastasis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A search of the PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Scopus databases was conducted from inception to December 2021. Only studies in which patients underwent both PSMA-PET and CIM and imaging was referenced against histopathology or composite reference standards were included. Quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) checklist and its extension for comparative reviews (QUADAS-C). Pairwise comparisons of the sensitivity and specificity of PSMA-PET versus CIM were performed by adding imaging modality as a covariate to bivariate mixed-effects meta-regression models. The likelihood ratio test was applied to determine whether statistically significant differences existed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 31 studies (2431 patients) were included. PSMA-PET/MRI was more sensitive than mpMRI for detection of extra-prostatic extension (78.7% versus 52.9%) and seminal vesicle invasion (66.7% versus 51.0%). For nodal staging, PSMA-PET was more sensitive and specific than mpMRI (73.7% versus 38.9%, 97.5% versus 82.6%) and CT (73.2% versus 38.5%, 97.8% versus 83.6%). For bone metastasis staging, PSMA-PET was more sensitive and specific than BS with or without single-photon emission computerised tomography (98.0% versus 73.0%, 96.2% versus 79.1%). A time interval between imaging modalities >1 month was identified as a source of heterogeneity across all nodal staging analyses. CONCLUSIONS Direct comparisons revealed that PSMA-PET significantly outperforms CIM, which suggests that PSMA-PET should be used as a first-line approach for the initial staging of PCa. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed direct comparisons of the ability of a scan method called PSMA-PET (prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography) and current imaging methods to detect the spread of prostate cancer outside the prostate gland. We found that PSMA-PET is more accurate for detection of the spread of prostate cancer to adjacent tissue, nearby lymph nodes, and bones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kit Mun Chow
- YLL School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wei Zheng So
- YLL School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Han Jie Lee
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Alvin Lee
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Yemisi Takwoingi
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kae Jack Tay
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Jeffrey Tuan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sue Ping Thang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Winnie Lam
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - John Yuen
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Urology and Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre at Epworth, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Department of Urology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kenneth Chen
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Adiyat KT, Pooleri GK, Cherian DT, Santhamma SGN, Ravichandran K, Sundaram S. Negative predictive value of PSMA PET scan for lymph node staging in patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. Int Urol Nephrol 2023; 55:1453-1457. [PMID: 37086333 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03595-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the negative predictive value of PSMA PET scan for lymph node staging in patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection and had a preoperative negative PSMA PET scan for metastasis was performed. The documented pre-operative variables studied included age, BMI, PSA at diagnosis, Gleason score, and biopsy ISUP grades. Patients were categorised as low, intermediate and high risk according to the D Amico classification. The post-op variables included were number of lymph nodes harvested, number of positive nodes, positivity rate, size of the node metastasis, T staging and ISUP grading. RESULTS The overall negative predictive value of PSMA PET scan was 71.6%. Further sub-classification according to risk stratification demonstrated a NPV of 58.02%, 92.7% and 90% for high, intermediate and low risk, respectively. CONCLUSION Pelvic lymph node dissection cannot be excluded based on a negative preop PSMA PET/CT scan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kishore Thekke Adiyat
- Aster Medcity, Kochi, India.
- Department of Urology, Aster Medcity, Kuttisahib Road, Cheranelloor, Ernakulam, Kerala, 682027, India.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bentestuen M, Elkjær MC, Zacho HD. Not All Glittering Bone Lesions Are Gold: A Case of Sclerotic Bone Lesions with Elevated 68 Ga PSMA and 99m Tc HDP Uptake with No Signs of Malignancy. World J Nucl Med 2023; 22:67-69. [PMID: 36923978 PMCID: PMC10010856 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 68 Ga PSMA PET/CT) outperforms CT and bone scintigraphy in terms of diagnostic accuracy for the primary staging of prostate cancer and has become widely used. However, 68 Ga PSMA uptake is also encountered in nonprostatic tissue. We present a 63-year-old male with newly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer who underwent bone scintigraphy with single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT), which showed inhomogeneous elevated uptake in sclerotic bone lesions in the pelvis. Likewise, 68 Ga PSMA PET/CT revealed inhomogeneous uptake in the same areas. Subsequent biopsy revealed hyperplastic bone marrow without signs of malignancy. The patient underwent radical prostatectomy, and the prostate-specific antigen level dropped to less than 0.1 ng/mL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morten Bentestuen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Helle D Zacho
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Metastatic Sites' Location and Impact on Patient Management After the Introduction of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Newly Diagnosed and Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Critical Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:128-136. [PMID: 36804735 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The introduction of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) had a substantial impact on the management of prostate cancer (PCa) patients with a stage migration phenomenon and consequent treatment changes. OBJECTIVE To summarise the role of PSMA-PET to define the burden of disease through an accurate location of metastatic site(s) in PCa patients, describing the most common locations at PSMA-PET in the primary staging and recurrence setting, and to assess the clinical impact in the decision-making process. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A comprehensive nonsystematic literature review was performed in April 2022. Literature search was updated until March 2022. The most relevant studies have been summarised, giving priority to registered clinical trials and multicentre collaborations. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS PSMA-PET showed higher diagnostic accuracy than conventional imaging both in newly diagnosed PCa and in recurrent disease. This greater accuracy led to a migration of a higher proportion of patients identified with metastatic disease. Bone metastases were reported as the most frequent site of metastatic spread in staging (up to 17%) and restaging (up to 18%). In staging, considering the suboptimal sensitivity in lymph node metastasis detection prior to radical surgery, PSMA-PET should be performed in patients with high risk or unfavourable intermediate risk only, and it is not recommended to routinely avoid pelvic lymph node dissection in case of a negative scan. In case of prostate-specific antigen relapse, PSMA-PET had higher diagnostic accuracy than other diagnostic procedures in the early detection of the sites of recurrence, thus influencing the therapy decision-making process. CONCLUSIONS PSMA-PET detects a higher number of lesions than conventional imaging or other PET radiotracers, especially metastatic lesions unseen with other modalities. The high diagnostic accuracy of PSMA-PET leads to a significant patient upstage and thus an impact in clinical management, even if the overall impact on cancer mortality is still to be assessed. PATIENT SUMMARY Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) identifies metastatic lesions with higher accuracy than conventional imaging, both in primary prostate cancer and during disease recurrence. Skeletal metastasis and extrapelvic lymph nodes are the most common sites of metastatic spread. The high accuracy of PSMA-PET in the detection of metastatic disease led to a significant impact on patient management, even if the overall impact on cancer mortality is still to be assessed.
Collapse
|
17
|
Roberts MJ, Maurer T, Perera M, Eiber M, Hope TA, Ost P, Siva S, Hofman MS, Murphy DG, Emmett L, Fendler WP. Using PSMA imaging for prognostication in localized and advanced prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2023; 20:23-47. [PMID: 36473945 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00670-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The use of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed applications in modern prostate cancer management has evolved rapidly over the past few years, helping to establish new treatment pathways and provide further insights into prostate cancer biology. However, the prognostic implications of PSMA-PET have not been studied systematically, owing to rapid clinical implementation without long follow-up periods to determine intermediate-term and long-term oncological outcomes. Currently available data suggest that traditional prognostic factors and survival outcomes are associated with high PSMA expression (both according to immunohistochemistry and PET uptake) in men with localized and biochemically recurrent disease. Treatment with curative intent (primary and/or salvage) often fails when PSMA-positive metastases are present; however, the sensitivity of PSMA-PET in detecting all metastases is poor. Low PSMA-PET uptake in recurrent disease is a favourable prognostic factor; however, it can be associated with poor prognosis in conjunction with high 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clinical trials embedding PSMA-PET for guiding management with reliable oncological outcomes are needed to support ongoing clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Roberts
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- Department of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marlon Perera
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, GZA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Goettingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hayes M, Yu Y, Bassale S, Chakiryan N, Chen Y, Ye S, Garzotto M, Kopp R. Calibrated Regression Models Based on the Risk of Clinical Nodal Metastasis Should be Used as Decision Aids for Prostate Cancer Staging to Reduce Unnecessary Imaging. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:e490-e497. [PMID: 35649886 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radionuclide imaging will change the role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) for prostate cancer (CaP) staging. Current guidelines recommend abdominopelvic imaging for new cases of CaP categorized as unfavorable intermediate risk (UIR) or higher. We assessed the performance characteristics of CT/MRI based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and developed a model that predicts cN1 disease using conventional imaging. PATIENTS AND METHODS We selected patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with CaP from 2010 to 2016 with available age, prostate specific antigen, clinical locoregional staging, biopsy Gleason grading, and core information. Multivariate logistic regression (MLR) was used on a undersampled training dataset using cN1 as the outcome. Performance characteristics were compared to those of the three most recent versions of the NCCN guidelines. RESULTS A total of 443,640 men were included, and 2.5% had cN1 disease. Using CT/MRI only, the current NCCN guidelines have a sensitivity of 99%, and the number needed to image (NNI) is 24. At the same sensitivity, the cN1 risk was 1.6% using the MLR. The NNI for UIR alone is 341. Using the MLR model and a threshold of 10%, the PPV is 10.3% and 64% of CTs/MRIs could be saved at a cost of missing 6% of cN1 patients (or 0.15% of all patients). CONCLUSION The NCCN guidelines are sensitive for detecting cN1 with CT/MRI, however, the number needed to image is 24. Obtaining CT/MRI for nodal staging when patients have a cN1 risk of 10% would reduce total imaging while still remaining sensitive. As novel PET tracers becomes increasingly used for initial CaP staging, well calibrated prediction models trained on the outcome of interest should be developed as decision aids for obtaining imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell Hayes
- Department of Urology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Yun Yu
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Solange Bassale
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Yiyi Chen
- Biometrics, Seagen, Inc., Bothell, WA, USA
| | - Shangyuan Ye
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Mark Garzotto
- Department of Urology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Urology Section, VA Portland Healthcare System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Ryan Kopp
- Department of Urology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Urology Section, VA Portland Healthcare System, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
The Role of [ 68Ga]PSMA PET/CT for Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer in Patients with or without Previous Negative Biopsy: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14205036. [PMID: 36291820 PMCID: PMC9600353 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In this paper we systematically evaluate the evidence regarding the role of [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT for clinical suspicions of prostate cancer in patients with or without previous negative biopsy. A critical review of PubMed and Web of Science according to the PRISMA statement was conducted. Eighteen publications were selected for inclusion in the analysis. In 8 articles, there was a direct comparison with mpMRI. [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT resulted more accurate in identifying primary prostate cancer with PSA values between 4 and 20 ng/mL than mpMRI. Moreover, its use combined with MRI improved sensitivity for csPCa detection, thus potentially avoiding unnecessary biopsies. Overall, [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT resulted a promising technique in patients with clinical suspicion of PCa and precedent negative biopsy or contraindications to MRI. Abstract The purpose of the study is to systematically evaluate the evidence regarding the role of [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT for clinical suspicions of prostate cancer in patients with or without previous negative biopsy. We performed a critical review of PubMed and Web of Science according to the PRISMA statement. Eighteen publications were selected for inclusion in this analysis. QUADAS-2 evaluation was adopted for quality analyses. [68Ga]PSMA-11 was the radiotracer of choice in 15 studies, while [68Ga]PSMA-617 was used in another 3. In 8 articles, there was a direct comparison with mpMRI. The total number of patients included was 1379, ranging from 15 to 291, with a median age of 64 years (range: 42–90). The median baseline PSA value was 12.9 ng/mL, ranging from 0.85 to 4156 ng/mL. Some studies evaluated the PSMA uptake comparing the SUVmax of suspicious lesions with the SUVmax of the normal biodistribution to find out optimal cut-off points. In addition, some studies suggested a significant association between PSA levels, PSA density, and [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT finding. [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT seems to be more accurate in identifying primary prostate cancer with PSA values between 4 and 20 ng/mL than mpMRI. Moreover, in some trials, the combination of PSMA PET/CT and MRI improved the NPV in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) than MRI alone. Our findings are limited by the small numbers of studies and patient heterogeneity. [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT is a promising technique in patients with clinical suspicion of PCa and precedent negative biopsy or contraindications to MRI. Furthermore, its use combined with MRI improves sensitivity for csPCa detection and can avoid unnecessary biopsies.
Collapse
|
20
|
Nalliah S, Zacho HD. The value of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer and inconclusive standard imaging at primary staging. Nucl Med Commun 2022; 43:1092-1098. [PMID: 35950348 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The current standard imaging recommended for primary staging of intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) consists of bone scintigraphy (BS) and computed tomography (CT). Some patients will have equivocal lesions or divergent findings on BS and CT, leading to inconclusive disease staging. Our aim was to investigate the value of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in PCa with inconclusive disease stage based on standard imaging. METHODS We made a single-center study of patients with newly diagnosed PCa who underwent a 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT due to equivocal findings or discrepancies between BS and CT from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2020. The value of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was evaluated for each location of equivocal findings (regional lymphnode, nonregional lymphnodes, bones and other metastases) and on a patient level. RESULTS Seventy-six patients were included in the study (62 patients with 72 equivocal lesions, 14 with discrepancy between BS and CT). Equivocal lesions were predominately in the bones (61%, 44/72), or in the regional lymph nodes (17%, 12/72). 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT provided a conclusive diagnosis in 90% (65/72) of the equivocal lesions. All patients with discrepancies between BS and CT had definite answers after 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT also uncovered 32 additional sites of metastasis in 25 patients not visible by standard imaging. CONCLUSION 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT provides a definite disease stage in more than 90% of newly diagnosed patients with inconclusive standard imaging. Furthermore, it revealed additional sites of metastasis in 25 patients not detected by standard imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surenth Nalliah
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital
| | - Helle D Zacho
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zacho HD, Nalliah S, Petersen A, Petersen LJ. The clinical consequences of routine 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, ISUP grade 5 and no metastases based on standard imaging - preliminary results. Scand J Urol 2022; 56:353-358. [PMID: 36073096 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2119272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the clinical consequences of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT for primary staging in patients with ISUP grade 5 (Gleason score ≥9) prostate cancer (PCa), and no definitive distant metastases based on standard imaging. METHODS At our tertial referral center, PSMA PET/CT became standard of care from August 2018 for primary staging of prostate cancer given the following criteria: (1) no prior treatment for prostate cancer, (2) ISUP grade 5, (3) no definitive metastases on standard imaging (contrast enhanced CT and bone scintigraphy), and (4) deemed suitable for treatment with curative intent based on comorbidity and life expectancy. We present the preliminary results of first six months recruitment with 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS Forty-eight patients (mean age 69 years, median PSA 13.0 ng/mL, 20 patients with locally advanced PCa) were included. CT was positive in pelvic lymph nodes in two patients, bone scintigraphy was equivocal in three patients. PSMA PET/CT showed pathological uptake outside the prostatic bed in 22 patients (46%) of which 13 patients (27%) showed lesions confined to regional lymph nodes, and nine patients (19%) showed nonregional lymph node metastases and/or bone metastases. PSMA PET/CT changed the treatment strategy from curatively intended treatment to palliative treatment in 18 patients (38%). CONCLUSION PMSA PET/CT revealed pathological uptake in a large proportion of high-risk patients at primary staging among patients with no definite metastases on standard imaging leading to change of patient management in 38% of the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helle D Zacho
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Surenth Nalliah
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Astrid Petersen
- Department of Pathology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Lars J Petersen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Murray JR, Sankey P, Tree AC, Hall E. PEARLS: Is Our Use of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Meaningful for Our Patients? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:589-592. [PMID: 35649963 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J R Murray
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - P Sankey
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - A C Tree
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - E Hall
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mora S, Qi J, Morgan TM, Brede CM, Peabody J, George A, Lane BR. Radical prostatectomy for patients with high-risk, very-high risk, or radiographic suspicion for metastatic prostate cancer: Perioperative and early oncologic results from the MUSIC statewide collaborative. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:380.e1-380.e9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.05.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
24
|
Wang Y, Galante JR, Haroon A, Wan S, Afaq A, Payne H, Bomanji J, Adeleke S, Kasivisvanathan V. The future of PSMA PET and WB MRI as next-generation imaging tools in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2022; 19:475-493. [PMID: 35789204 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00618-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Radiolabelled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based PET-CT has been shown in numerous studies to be superior to conventional imaging in the detection of nodal or distant metastatic lesions. 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT is now recommended by many guidelines for the detection of biochemically relapsed disease after radical local therapy. PSMA radioligands can also function as radiotheranostics, and Lu-PSMA has been shown to be a potential new line of treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Whole-body (WB) MRI has been shown to have a high diagnostic performance in the detection and monitoring of metastatic bone disease. Prospective, randomized, multicentre studies comparing 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and WB MRI for pelvic nodal and metastatic disease detection are yet to be performed. Challenges for interpretation of PSMA include tracer trapping in non-target tissues and also urinary excretion of tracers, which confounds image interpretation at the vesicoureteral junction. Additionally, studies have shown how long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) affects PSMA expression and could, therefore, reduce tracer uptake and visibility of PSMA+ lesions. Furthermore, ADT of short duration might increase PSMA expression, leading to the PSMA flare phenomenon, which makes the accurate monitoring of treatment response to ADT with PSMA PET challenging. Scan duration, detection of incidentalomas and presence of metallic implants are some of the major challenges with WB MRI. Emerging data support the wider adoption of PSMA PET and WB MRI for diagnosis, staging, disease burden evaluation and response monitoring, although their relative roles in the standard-of-care management of patients are yet to be fully defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yishen Wang
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. .,Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford, UK.
| | - Joao R Galante
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Athar Haroon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Simon Wan
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Asim Afaq
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Heather Payne
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Jamshed Bomanji
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sola Adeleke
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gillessen S, Armstrong A, Attard G, Beer TM, Beltran H, Bjartell A, Bossi A, Briganti A, Bristow RG, Bulbul M, Caffo O, Chi KN, Clarke CS, Clarke N, Davis ID, de Bono JS, Duran I, Eeles R, Efstathiou E, Efstathiou J, Ekeke ON, Evans CP, Fanti S, Feng FY, Fizazi K, Frydenberg M, George D, Gleave M, Halabi S, Heinrich D, Higano C, Hofman MS, Hussain M, James N, Jones R, Kanesvaran R, Khauli RB, Klotz L, Leibowitz R, Logothetis C, Maluf F, Millman R, Morgans AK, Morris MJ, Mottet N, Mrabti H, Murphy DG, Murthy V, Oh WK, Ost P, O'Sullivan JM, Padhani AR, Parker C, Poon DMC, Pritchard CC, Rabah DM, Rathkopf D, Reiter RE, Rubin M, Ryan CJ, Saad F, Sade JP, Sartor O, Scher HI, Shore N, Skoneczna I, Small E, Smith M, Soule H, Spratt DE, Sternberg CN, Suzuki H, Sweeney C, Sydes MR, Taplin ME, Tilki D, Tombal B, Türkeri L, Uemura H, Uemura H, van Oort I, Yamoah K, Ye D, Zapatero A, Omlin A. Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Report from the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021. Eur Urol 2022; 82:115-141. [PMID: 35450732 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovations in treatments, imaging, and molecular characterisation in advanced prostate cancer have improved outcomes, but various areas of management still lack high-level evidence to inform clinical practice. The 2021 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) addressed some of these questions to supplement guidelines that are based on level 1 evidence. OBJECTIVE To present the voting results from APCCC 2021. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The experts identified three major areas of controversy related to management of advanced prostate cancer: newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), the use of prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands in diagnostics and therapy, and molecular characterisation of tissue and blood. A panel of 86 international prostate cancer experts developed the programme and the consensus questions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The panel voted publicly but anonymously on 107 pre-defined questions, which were developed by both voting and non-voting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The voting reflected the opinions of panellists and did not incorporate a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions received varying degrees of support from panellists, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results reported in the Supplementary material. CONCLUSIONS These voting results from a panel of experts in advanced prostate cancer can help clinicians and patients to navigate controversial areas of management for which high-level evidence is scant. However, diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised according to patient characteristics, such as the extent and location of disease, prior treatment(s), comorbidities, patient preferences, and treatment recommendations, and should also incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence and logistic and economic constraints. Enrolment in clinical trials should be strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2021 once again identified salient questions that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials. PATIENT SUMMARY The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference is a forum for discussing current diagnosis and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. An expert panel votes on predefined questions focused on the most clinically relevant areas for treatment of advanced prostate cancer for which there are gaps in knowledge. The voting results provide a practical guide to help clinicians in discussing treatment options with patients as part of shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Universita della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland; University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Andrew Armstrong
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Gert Attard
- University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - Tomasz M Beer
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Genitourinary Oncology, Prostate Brachytherapy Unit, Gustave Roussy, Paris, France
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Robert G Bristow
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Christie NHS Trust and CRUK Manchester Institute and Cancer Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Muhammad Bulbul
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Orazio Caffo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Kim N Chi
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Caroline S Clarke
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK
| | - Noel Clarke
- The Christie and Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester, UK
| | - Ian D Davis
- Monash University and Eastern Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Johann S de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Ros Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | | | - Jason Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Onyeanunam Ngozi Ekeke
- Department of Surgery, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
| | | | - Stefano Fanti
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Felix Y Feng
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Karim Fizazi
- Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Prostate Cancer Research Program, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dan George
- Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Martin Gleave
- Urological Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel Heinrich
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Gjøvik, Norway
| | | | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Maha Hussain
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nick James
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - Robert Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Raja B Khauli
- Department of Urology and the Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Laurence Klotz
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raya Leibowitz
- Oncology Institute, Shamir Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Chris Logothetis
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, David H. Koch Centre, MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Clinical Therapeutics, University of Athens Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Fernando Maluf
- Beneficiência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Departamento de Oncologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Alicia K Morgans
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael J Morris
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Hind Mrabti
- National Institute of Oncology, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - William K Oh
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, UK
| | - Chris Parker
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - Darren M C Poon
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Danny M Rabah
- The Cancer Research Chair, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dana Rathkopf
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rob E Reiter
- University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mark Rubin
- Bern Center for Precision Medicine and Department for Biomedical Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Charles J Ryan
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre Hospitalier de Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Juan P Sade
- Instituto Alexander Fleming, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Howard I Scher
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Iwona Skoneczna
- Rafal Masztak Grochowski Hospital and Maria Sklodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Eric Small
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Howard Soule
- Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Cora N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, Meyer Cancer Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Christopher Sweeney
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew R Sydes
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Levent Türkeri
- Department of Urology, M.A. Aydınlar Acıbadem University, Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hiroji Uemura
- Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hirotsugu Uemura
- Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Inge van Oort
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Aurelius Omlin
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cao Y, Deville C. Adjuvant Radiation for Pathologically Node-Positive Prostate Cancer: Evidence When Early Salvage May Not Be Early Enough. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:2179-2182. [PMID: 35605175 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yilin Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Curtiland Deville
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Małkiewicz B, Knura M, Łątkowska M, Kobylański M, Nagi K, Janczak D, Chorbińska J, Krajewski W, Karwacki J, Szydełko T. Patients with Positive Lymph Nodes after Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy—Do We Know the Proper Way of Management? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092326. [PMID: 35565455 PMCID: PMC9104304 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most frequent malignancy in the male population worldwide. Men with a nodal invasion established after radical prostatectomy with lymph node dissection are a heterogeneous group of patients who require more thorough stratification and therapy individualization, which remain uncovered by current guidelines. Considering a multitude of prognostic factors and novel diagnostic techniques, classifying patients into narrower and more specified risk groups should be a vital part of lymph node positive PCa management in the future. Abstract Lymph node invasion in prostate cancer is a significant prognostic factor indicating worse prognosis. While it significantly affects both survival rates and recurrence, proper management remains a controversial and unsolved issue. The thorough evaluation of risk factors associated with nodal involvement, such as lymph node density or extracapsular extension, is crucial to establish the potential expansion of the disease and to substratify patients clinically. There are multiple strategies that may be employed for patients with positive lymph nodes. Nowadays, therapeutic methods are generally based on observation, radiotherapy, and androgen deprivation therapy. However, the current guidelines are incoherent in terms of the most effective management approach. Future management strategies are expected to make use of novel diagnostic tools and therapies, such as photodynamic therapy or diagnostic imaging with prostate-specific membrane antigen. Nevertheless, this heterogeneous group of men remains a great therapeutic concern, and both the clarification of the guidelines and the optimal substratification of patients are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bartosz Małkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
- Correspondence: (B.M.); (J.K.); Tel.: +48-506-158-136 (B.M.)
| | - Miłosz Knura
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland;
| | - Małgorzata Łątkowska
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Maximilian Kobylański
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Krystian Nagi
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Dawid Janczak
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Joanna Chorbińska
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Jakub Karwacki
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
- Correspondence: (B.M.); (J.K.); Tel.: +48-506-158-136 (B.M.)
| | - Tomasz Szydełko
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Barbosa ÁRG, Amaral BS, Lourenço DB, Bianco B, Gushiken FA, Apezzato M, Silva JF, Cunha MLD, Filippi RZ, Baroni RH, Lemos GC, Carneiro A. Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI in lymph node staging for localized prostate cancer. EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO 2022; 20:eAO6599. [PMID: 35584444 PMCID: PMC9094607 DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2022ao6599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the predictive value of positron emission computed tomography or magnetic resonance (PET-CT and PET-MRI) using gallium-68-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) in lymph node involvement in prostate cancer. Methods A retrospective study comprising 91 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2016 to 2020, who underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT or PET-MRI for staging before prostatectomy. The patients were divided into Group 1, with 65 patients with satisfactory pathological lymph node analysis, and Group 2, with 91 patients representing the sum of patients with pathological lymph node analysis and those with postoperative prostate-specific antigen within 60 days after surgery. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were used to assess accuracy of predictive capacity of imaging exams for lymph node involvement. Results Regarding local clinical staging, the groups showed similar results, and 50% were classified as staging T2a. The accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT for prostate cancer lymph node staging was 86.5% (95%CI 0.74-0.94; p=0.06), with a sensitivity of 58.3% and specificity of 95%. The accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET-MRI was 84.6% (95%CI 0.69-0.94; p=0.09), with a sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 100%. Considering both 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI, the accuracy was 85.7% (95%CI 0.76-0.92; p=0.015), with sensitivity of 50% and specificity of 97%. Conclusion The imaging tests 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and PET-MRI were highly accurate to detect preoperative lymph node involvement, and could be useful tools to indicate the need for extended lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
|
29
|
Zschaeck S, Andela SB, Amthauer H, Furth C, Rogasch JM, Beck M, Hofheinz F, Huang K. Correlation Between Quantitative PSMA PET Parameters and Clinical Risk Factors in Non-Metastatic Primary Prostate Cancer Patients. Front Oncol 2022; 12:879089. [PMID: 35530334 PMCID: PMC9074726 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.879089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background PSMA PET is frequently used for staging of prostate cancer patients. Furthermore, there is increasing interest to use PET information for personalized local treatment approaches in surgery and radiotherapy, especially for focal treatment strategies. However, it is not well established which quantitative imaging parameters show highest correlation with clinical and histological tumor aggressiveness. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of 135 consecutive patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer and PSMA PET before any treatment. Clinical risk parameters (PSA values, Gleason score and D'Amico risk group) were correlated with quantitative PET parameters maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean SUV (SUVmean), tumor asphericity (ASP) and PSMA tumor volume (PSMA-TV). Results Most of the investigated imaging parameters were highly correlated with each other (correlation coefficients between 0.20 and 0.95). A low to moderate, however significant, correlation of imaging parameters with PSA values (0.19 to 0.45) and with Gleason scores (0.17 to 0.31) was observed for all parameters except ASP which did not show a significant correlation with Gleason score. Receiver operating characteristics for the detection of D'Amico high-risk patients showed poor to fair sensitivity and specificity for all investigated quantitative PSMA PET parameters (Areas under the curve (AUC) between 0.63 and 0.73). Comparison of AUC between quantitative PET parameters by DeLong test showed significant superiority of SUVmax compared to SUVmean for the detection of high-risk patients. None of the investigated imaging parameters significantly outperformed SUVmax. Conclusion Our data confirm prior publications with lower number of patients that reported moderate correlations of PSMA PET parameters with clinical risk factors. With the important limitation that Gleason scores were only biopsy-derived in this study, there is no indication that the investigated additional parameters deliver superior information compared to SUVmax.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephanie Bela Andela
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julian M. Rogasch
- BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Kai Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lee H, Scheuermann JS, Young AJ, Doot RK, Daube-Witherspoon ME, Schubert EK, Fillare MA, Alexoff D, Karp JS, Kung HF, Pryma DA. Preliminary Evaluation of 68Ga-P16-093, a PET Radiotracer Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen in Prostate Cancer. Mol Imaging Biol 2022; 24:710-720. [PMID: 35349040 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-022-01720-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a promising molecular target for imaging of prostate adenocarcinoma. 68Ga-P16-093, a small molecule PSMA ligand, previously showed equivalent diagnostic performance compared to 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in a pilot study of prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR). We performed a pilot study for further characterization of 68Ga-P16-093 including comparison to conventional imaging. PROCEDURES Patients were enrolled into two cohorts. The biodistribution cohort included 8 treated prostate cancer patients without recurrence, who underwent 6 whole body PET/CT scans with urine sampling for dosimetry using OLINDA/EXM. The dynamic cohort included 15 patients with BCR and 2 patients with primary prostate cancer. Two patients with renal cell carcinoma were also enrolled for exploratory use. A dynamic PET/CT was followed by 2 whole body scans for imaging protocol optimization based on bootstrapped replicates. 68Ga-P16-093 PET/CT was compared for diagnostic performance against available 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT, 99mTc-MDP scintigraphy, diagnostic CT, and MRI. RESULTS 68Ga-P16-093 deposited similar effective dose (0.024 mSv/MBq) and lower urinary bladder dose (0.064 mSv/MBq) compared to 68Ga-PSMA-11. The kidneys were the critical organ (0.290 mSv/MBq). While higher injected activities were preferable, lower injected activities at 74-111 MBq (2-3 mCi) yielded 80% retention in signal-to-noise ratio. The optimal injection-to-scan interval was 60 min, with acceptable delay up to 90 min. 68Ga-P16-093 PET/CT showed superior diagnostic performance over conventional imaging with overall patient-level lesion detection rate of 71%, leading to a change in management in 42% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS Based on its favorable imaging characteristics and diagnostic performance in prostate cancer, 68Ga-P16-093 PET/CT merits further investigation in larger clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hwan Lee
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Joshua S Scheuermann
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Anthony J Young
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Robert K Doot
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Erin K Schubert
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Matthew A Fillare
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - David Alexoff
- Five Eleven Pharma Inc., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Joel S Karp
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Hank F Kung
- Five Eleven Pharma Inc., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Daniel A Pryma
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
The Continuum of Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Interpreting PSMA PET Findings in Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061361. [PMID: 35326513 PMCID: PMC8946297 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Conventional imaging has been the standard imaging modality for assessing prostate cancer recurrence and is utilized to determine treatment response to therapy. Molecular imaging with PSMA PET-CT has proven to be more accurate, sensitive, and specific at identifying pelvic or distant metastatic disease, resulting in earlier diagnosis of advanced disease. Since advanced disease may not be seen on conventional imaging, due to its lower sensitivity, but can be identified by molecular imaging, this reveals that metastatic prostate cancer occurs on a continuum from negative PSMA PET-CT and negative conventional imaging to positive PSMA PET-CT and positive conventional imaging. Understanding this continuum, the accuracy of these modalities, and treatment related outcomes based on imaging, will allow the clinician to counsel patients on management. This review will highlight the differences in conventional and molecular imaging in prostate cancer and how PSMA PET-CT can be used for the management of prostate cancer patients in different clinical scenarios, while providing cautionary notes for overtreatment.
Collapse
|
32
|
Karagiannis V, Wichmann V, Saarinen J, Eigeliene N, Andersen H, Jekunen A. Radiotherapy treatment modification for prostate cancer patients based on PSMA-PET/CT. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:19. [PMID: 35093103 PMCID: PMC8800353 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-01989-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men, and its diagnosis and treatment are improving. Our study evaluated how PSMA-PET/CT prior to treatment planning might improve the optimal management of prostate cancer radiotherapy. METHODS This retrospective pilot study included 43 prostate cancer (PCa) patients referred to our radiation oncologist department, from the urology department, for radiation therapy. 18F-PSMA-PET/CT was ordered by the radiation oncologists mainly due to the lack of resent image staging. The patients were divided into three different groups according to their initially planned treatments: radical radiation therapy (RT) (newly diagnosed PCa patients), salvage RT (patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy), or oligometastatic RT (oligometastatic PCa patients with good response after systemic treatment). RESULTS Following PSMA-PET/CT, the initially planned RT was changed for 60.5% of the patients due to new findings (metastases and/or recurrent disease). The final treatment choice was effected by PSMA-PET/CT outcome in 60.5% (26/43) of the patients, and in 50% (16/32) of patients, the radiation treatment plan changed following PSMA-PET/CT. Only 39.5% (17/43) of the patients who underwent PSMA-PET/CT were treated according to their initial treatment plans. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that PSMA-PET/CT impacts treatment decisions and the selection of RT as well as adjuvant treatment protocols in the management of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasileios Karagiannis
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Hietalahdenkatu 2-4, 65130 Vaasa, Finland
| | - Viktor Wichmann
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Hietalahdenkatu 2-4, 65130 Vaasa, Finland
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Juha Saarinen
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Hietalahdenkatu 2-4, 65130 Vaasa, Finland
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Natalja Eigeliene
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Hietalahdenkatu 2-4, 65130 Vaasa, Finland
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Heidi Andersen
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Hietalahdenkatu 2-4, 65130 Vaasa, Finland
- Tema Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Antti Jekunen
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Hietalahdenkatu 2-4, 65130 Vaasa, Finland
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Tsechelidis I, Vrachimis A. PSMA PET in Imaging Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:831429. [PMID: 35155262 PMCID: PMC8832487 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.831429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
After prostate malignancy diagnosis, precise determination of disease extent are fundamental steps for tailored made therapy. The earlier the diagnosis of the burden of the disease, the longer the survival in many cases. National and international guidelines are based on “classic” imaging technics combining radiological and nuclear medicine scans like CT, MRI and bone scintigraphy (BS). The most recent nuclear medicine development is the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET and is emerging as the most promising tool of medical imaging, gaining ground every day. Nevertheless, the different onset among multiple studies fails to establish a worldwide admission and incorporation of this technique in guidelines and its position in workaday medical algorithms. It seems that the medical community agrees not to utilize PSMA PET for low-risk patients; intense debate and research is ongoing for its utility in intermediate risk patients. Contrariwise, in high-risk patients PSMA PET is confirmed outperforming CT and BS combined. Additionally, irrespectively to their castration status, patients with biochemical failure should be referred for PSMA PET. Even though PSMA PET reveals more extended disease than expected or exonerates equivalent lesions, thus impacting treatment optimization. Studies being in progress and future trials with clarify whether PSMA PET will be the new gold standard technic for specific groups of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Tsechelidis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus
- *Correspondence: Ioannis Tsechelidis,
| | - Alexis Vrachimis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus
- Cancer Research and Innovation Center (CARIC), Limassol, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Langbein T, Wang H, Rauscher I, Krönke M, Knorr K, Wurzer A, Schwamborn K, Maurer T, Horn T, Haller B, Wester HJ, Eiber M. Utility of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 positron emission tomography for imaging of primary prostate cancer and pre-operative efficacy in N-staging of unfavorable intermediate to very high-risk patients validated by histopathology. J Nucl Med 2022; 63:1334-1342. [PMID: 34992154 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
18F-rhPSMA-7.3, the lead compound of a new class of radiohybrid prostate-specific membrane antigen (rhPSMA) ligands, is currently in phase III trials for prostate cancer (PCa) imaging. Here, we describe our experience in primary PCa staging. Methods: We retrospectively identified 279 patients with primary PCa who underwent 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET/CT (staging cohort). A subset of patients (83/279) subsequently underwent prostatectomy with lymph node (LN) dissection without prior treatment (efficacy cohort). Distribution of tumor lesions was determined for the staging cohort and stratified by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk score. Involvement of pelvic LN was assessed retrospectively by 3 blinded independent central readers, and a majority rule was used for analysis. Standard surgical fields were rated on a five-point scale independently for PET and for morphological imaging. Results were compared to histopathological findings on a patient-, right vs. -left, and template-basis. Results: For the staging cohort 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET was positive in 275/279 (98.6%), 106/279 (38.0%), 46/279 (16.5%), 65/279 (23.3%) and 5/279 (1.8%) patients for local, pelvic nodal, extrapelvic nodal, metastatic bone, and visceral metastatic disease. In the efficacy cohort, LN metastases were present in 24/83 patients (29%), located in 48/420 (11%) resected templates and in 33/166 (19.9%) hemi-pelvic templates in histopathology. Based on majority vote results, the patient-level sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for pelvic nodal metastases were 66.7% (95%CI, 44.7-83.6%), 96.6% (95%CI, 87.3-99.4%) and 88.0% (95%CI, 78.5-93.8%) for 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET and 37.5% (95%CI, 19.6-59.2%), 91.5% (95%CI, 80.6-96.8%) and 75.9% (95%CI, 65.0-84.3%) for morphological imaging, respectively. 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 showed higher interobserver agreement than morphological imaging (patient-level Fleiss' κ=0.54; 95%CI, 0.47-0.62 vs. 0.24; 95%CI, 0.17-0.31). A mean standardized uptake value ratio of 6.6 (95%CI, 5.2-8.1) documented a high image contrast between local tumors and adjacent low urinary tracer retention. Conclusion: 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 PET offers superior diagnostic performance to morphological imaging for primary N-staging of newly diagnosed PCa, shows lower inter-reader variation, and offers good distinction between primary tumor and bladder background activity. With increasing NCCN risk group an increasing frequency of extra-prostatic tumor lesions was observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Langbein
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Germany
| | - Hui Wang
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Germany
| | - Isabel Rauscher
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Germany
| | - Markus Krönke
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Germany
| | - Karina Knorr
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Germany
| | | | - Kristina Schwamborn
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Institute of Pathology, Germany
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Martini-Klinik and Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Thomas Horn
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Urology, Germany
| | - Bernhard Haller
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Germany
| | | | - Matthias Eiber
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Beyond the AJR: The Rapid Clinical Acceptance of PSMA PET Causes Important Bias in Open-Label Trials. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2022; 219:349. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.21.27241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
36
|
Wendler T, van Leeuwen FWB, Navab N, van Oosterom MN. How molecular imaging will enable robotic precision surgery : The role of artificial intelligence, augmented reality, and navigation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:4201-4224. [PMID: 34185136 PMCID: PMC8566413 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05445-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Molecular imaging is one of the pillars of precision surgery. Its applications range from early diagnostics to therapy planning, execution, and the accurate assessment of outcomes. In particular, molecular imaging solutions are in high demand in minimally invasive surgical strategies, such as the substantially increasing field of robotic surgery. This review aims at connecting the molecular imaging and nuclear medicine community to the rapidly expanding armory of surgical medical devices. Such devices entail technologies ranging from artificial intelligence and computer-aided visualization technologies (software) to innovative molecular imaging modalities and surgical navigation (hardware). We discuss technologies based on their role at different steps of the surgical workflow, i.e., from surgical decision and planning, over to target localization and excision guidance, all the way to (back table) surgical verification. This provides a glimpse of how innovations from the technology fields can realize an exciting future for the molecular imaging and surgery communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Wendler
- Chair for Computer Aided Medical Procedures and Augmented Reality, Technische Universität München, Boltzmannstr. 3, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany
| | - Fijs W. B. van Leeuwen
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Orsi Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Nassir Navab
- Chair for Computer Aided Medical Procedures and Augmented Reality, Technische Universität München, Boltzmannstr. 3, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany
- Chair for Computer Aided Medical Procedures Laboratory for Computational Sensing + Robotics, Johns-Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Matthias N. van Oosterom
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Skawran SM, Sanchez V, Ghafoor S, Hötker AM, Burger IA, Huellner MW, Eberli D, Donati OF. Primary staging in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: Multiparametric MRI and 68Ga-PSMA-PET/MRI - What is the value of quantitative data from multiparametric MRI alone or in conjunction with clinical information? Eur J Radiol 2021; 146:110044. [PMID: 34844173 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Comparing mpMRI and 68Ga-PSMA-PET/MRI in primary staging of PCa and investigating the value of quantitative mpMRI-measurements for prediction of extracapsular extension and N-metastases. METHODS Patients with PCa undergoing 68Ga-PSMA-PET/MRI and mpMRI during January 2016 to February 2019 were retrospectively included. Two readers each on 68Ga-PSMA-PET/MRI or mpMRI rated extraprostatic extension (≥T3) and regional lymph-node-metastasis (N1) on a Likert-scale. A fifth reader measured tumor volume, maximum diameter, and capsular contact length on mpMRI. Probability of lymph-node-metastasis was additionally calculated using the 2018 Briganti model. Interobserver-agreement was assessed by squared Cohen's kappa, and diagnostic accuracy was determined using radical prostatectomy (n = 35/49) as reference standard. RESULTS 49 patients (median age 66 years [IQR: 61-72 years]) were evaluated. Interobserver-agreement for mpMRI and 68Ga-PSMA-PET/MRI was: ≥T3: κ = 0.58/0.47; N1: κ = 0.55/0.92. Diagnostic accuracy for mpMRI vs 68Ga-PSMA-PET/MRI readers for ≥ T3 was AUC: 0.72, 0.62 vs 0.71, 0.72 (p > 0.38) and for N1 was AUC: 0.39, 0.55 vs 0.72, 0.78 (p < 0.01). Quantitative parameters delivered diagnostic accuracies of: AUC: 0.70-0.72 for ≥ T3. The 2018 Briganti model achieved an AUC of 0.89 for N1. CONCLUSIONS Interreader-agreement regarding ≥ T3 was similar for mpMRI and 68Ga-PSMA-PET/MRI while for N1 it was higher for 68Ga-PSMA-PET/MRI. Diagnostic accuracy was comparable for ≥ T3 while for N1 it was higher in 68Ga-PSMA-PET/MRI and the 2018 Briganti model. Combining clinical data and quantitative data from mpMRI in the 2018 Briganti model yielded the highest AUC for prediction of lymph node metastasis and may aid in selecting patients who will benefit from 68Ga-PSMA-PET/MRI for primary staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan M Skawran
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Vanessa Sanchez
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Soleen Ghafoor
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA
| | - Andreas M Hötker
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Irene A Burger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Baden Cantonal Hospital, Baden, Switzerland
| | - Martin W Huellner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Eberli
- University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Olivio F Donati
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hope TA, Eiber M, Armstrong WR, Juarez R, Murthy V, Lawhn-Heath C, Behr SC, Zhang L, Barbato F, Ceci F, Farolfi A, Schwarzenböck SM, Unterrainer M, Zacho HD, Nguyen HG, Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR, Reiter RE, Holden S, Herrmann K, Zhu S, Fendler WP, Czernin J, Calais J. Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for Pelvic Nodal Metastasis Detection Prior to Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Multicenter Prospective Phase 3 Imaging Trial. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:1635-1642. [PMID: 34529005 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.3771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Importance The presence of pelvic nodal metastases at radical prostatectomy is associated with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy. Objective To assess the accuracy of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) 68Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomographic (PET) imaging for the detection of pelvic nodal metastases compared with histopathology at time of radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. Design, Setting, and Participants This investigator-initiated prospective multicenter single-arm open-label phase 3 imaging trial of diagnostic efficacy enrolled 764 patients with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer considered for prostatectomy at University of California, San Francisco and University of California, Los Angeles from December 2015 to December 2019. Data analysis took place from October 2018 to July 2021. Interventions Imaging scan with 3 to 7 mCi of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the sensitivity and specificity for the detection pelvic lymph nodes compared with histopathology on a per-patient basis using nodal region correlation. Each scan was read centrally by 3 blinded independent central readers, and a majority rule was used for analysis. Results A total of 764 men (median [interquartile range] age, 69 [63-73] years) underwent 1 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging scan for primary staging, and 277 of 764 (36%) subsequently underwent prostatectomy with lymph node dissection (efficacy analysis cohort). Based on pathology reports, 75 of 277 patients (27%) had pelvic nodal metastasis. Results of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET were positive in 40 of 277 (14%), 2 of 277 (1%), and 7 of 277 (3%) of patients for pelvic nodal, extrapelvic nodal, and bone metastatic disease. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for pelvic nodal metastases were 0.40 (95% CI, 0.34-0.46), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.97), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.70-0.80), and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76-0.85), respectively. Of the 764 patients, 487 (64%) did not undergo prostatectomy, of which 108 were lost to follow-up. Patients with follow-up instead underwent radiotherapy (262 of 379 [69%]), systemic therapy (82 of 379 [22%]), surveillance (16 of 379 [4%]), or other treatments (19 of 379 [5%]). Conclusions and Relevance This phase 3 diagnostic efficacy trial found that in men with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection, the sensitivity and specificity of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET were 0.40 and 0.95, respectively. This academic collaboration is the largest known to date and formed the foundation of a New Drug Application for 68Ga-PSMA-11. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03368547, NCT02611882, and NCT02919111.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco.,Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.,Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Wesley R Armstrong
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Roxanna Juarez
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Vishnu Murthy
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Courtney Lawhn-Heath
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Spencer C Behr
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Li Zhang
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco.,Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Francesco Barbato
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Helle D Zacho
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Centre, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Hao G Nguyen
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco
| | | | - Peter R Carroll
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco.,Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Robert E Reiter
- Institute of Urologic Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Stuart Holden
- Institute of Urologic Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Shaojun Zhu
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Johannes Czernin
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.,Institute of Urologic Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.,Institute of Urologic Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Shahrokhi P, Masteri Farahani A, Tamaddondar M, Rezazadeh F. The utility of radiolabeled PSMA ligands for tumor imaging. Chem Biol Drug Des 2021; 99:136-161. [PMID: 34472217 DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.13946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a glycosylated type-II transmembrane protein expressed in prostatic tissue and significantly overexpressed in several prostate cancer cells. Despite its name, PSMA has also been reported to be overexpressed in endothelial cells of benign and malignant non-prostate disease. So its clinical use was extended to detection, staging, and therapy of various tumor types. Recently small molecules targeting PSMA have been developed as imaging probes for diagnosis of several malignancies. Preliminary studies are emerging improved diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of PSMA imaging, leading to a change in patient management. In this review, we evaluated the first preclinical and clinical studies on PSMA ligands resulting future perspectives radiolabeled PSMA in staging and molecular characterization, based on histopathologic examinations of PSMA expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pejman Shahrokhi
- Nuclear Medicine Center, Payambar Azam Hospital, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Hormozgan, Iran
| | - Arezou Masteri Farahani
- Nuclear Medicine Center, Payambar Azam Hospital, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Hormozgan, Iran
| | - Mohammad Tamaddondar
- Nephrology Department, Payambar Azam Hospital, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Hormozgan, Iran
| | - Farzaneh Rezazadeh
- Department of Radiopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Moradi F, Farolfi A, Fanti S, Iagaru A. Prostate cancer: Molecular imaging and MRI. Eur J Radiol 2021; 143:109893. [PMID: 34391061 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Revised: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The role of molecular imaging in initial evaluation of men with presumed or established diagnosis of prostate cancer and work up of biochemical recurrence and metastatic disease is rapidly evolving due to superior diagnostic performance compared to anatomic imaging. However, variable tumor biology and expression of transmembrane proteins or metabolic alterations poses a challenge. We review the evidence and controversies with emphasis on emerging PET radiopharmaceuticals and experience on clinical utility of PET/CT and PET/MRI in diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farshad Moradi
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
P Lima J, Carvalho J, Quaresma V, Tavares-da-Silva E, Silva R, Azinhais P, Costa G, Figueiredo A. The Role of Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT in the Initial Staging of Prostate Cancer - A Single Center 4 Year Experience. Res Rep Urol 2021; 13:479-485. [PMID: 34268257 PMCID: PMC8275176 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s310226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recommended imaging modalities for prostate cancer staging have disappointing sensitivities, whereas [68Ga]-PSMA PET/CT (PET-PSMA) shows promising sensitivities and specificities in the initial management of prostate cancer. Recent studies have revealed that a significant change of management when PET-PSMA was used, with favorable negative predictive values. Methods In this retrospective study, we analyzed every PET-PSMA performed in our center for initial staging of intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether imaging modalities other than PET-PSMA were performed. In patients submitted to radical prostatectomy, PET-PSMA findings were compared to histological analysis of the specimen. Results PET-PSMA results of 57 patients were gathered, with 77.2% (n=44) having performed CT scan or bone scan (BS) prior to PET-PSMA. Prostate cancer management strategy was changed in 61.4% (n=27), when PET-PSMA was performed following CT and BS. BS and CT results were consistent with PET-PSMA in 43.2% and 44.8%, respectively. In 30 cases, a curative strategy was used based on PET-PSMA findings. PET-PSMA revealed a negative predictive value of 95.2% in 23 patients submitted to radical prostatectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. Prostate SUV values on preoperative PET-PSMA correlated with initial PSA, ISUP grade, PC risk staging and presence of extraprostatic lesions. Conclusions PET-PSMA is a key element for prostate cancer staging and management, with high diagnostic accuracy. More prospective studies need to be implemented to determine its role as a first-line staging tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João P Lima
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Department, Coimbra University Hospital Center, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - João Carvalho
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Department, Coimbra University Hospital Center, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Vasco Quaresma
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Department, Coimbra University Hospital Center, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Edgar Tavares-da-Silva
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Department, Coimbra University Hospital Center, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Rodolfo Silva
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Coimbra University Hospital Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Paulo Azinhais
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Coimbra University Hospital Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Gracinda Costa
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Coimbra University Hospital Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Arnaldo Figueiredo
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Department, Coimbra University Hospital Center, Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Farn SS, Chang KW, Lin WC, Yu HM, Lin KL, Tseng YC, Chang Y, Yu CS, Lin WJ. Synthesis, Radiolabeling, and Preliminary in vivo Evaluation of [ 68Ga] IPCAT-NOTA as an Imaging Agent for Dopamine Transporter. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY 2021; 15:2577-2591. [PMID: 34168430 PMCID: PMC8216701 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s288600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Novel radiotracer development for imaging dopamine transporters is a subject of interest because although [99mTc]TRODAT-1, [123I]β-CIT, and [123I]FP-CIT are commercially available; 99Mo/99mTc generator is in short supply and 123I production is highly dependent on compact cyclotron. Therefore, we designed a novel positron emission tomography (PET) tracer based on a tropane derivative through C-2 modification to conjugate NOTA for chelating 68Ga, a radioisotope derived from a 68Ge/68Ga generator. Methods IPCAT-NOTA 22 was synthesized and labeled with [68Ga]GaCl4− at room temperature. Biological studies on serum stability, LogP, and in vitro autoradiography (binding assay and competitive assay) were performed. Furthermore, ex vivo autoradiography, biodistribution, and dynamic PET imaging studies were performed in Sprague Dawley rats. Results [68Ga]IPCAT-NOTA 24 obtained had a radiochemical yield of ≥90% and a specific activity of 4.25 MBq/nmol. [68Ga]IPCAT-NOTA 24 of 85% radiochemical purity (RCP%) was stable at 37°C for up to 60 minutes in serum with a lipophilicity of 0.88. The specific binding ratio (SBR%) reached 15.8 ± 6.7 at 60 minutes, and the 85% specific uptake could be blocked through co-injection at 100- and 1000-fold of the cold precursor in in vitro binding studies. Tissue regional distribution studies in rats with [68Ga]IPCAT-NOTA 24 showed striatal uptake (0.02% at 5 minutes and 0.007% at 60 minutes) with SBR% of 6%, 25%, and 62% at 5–15, 30–40, and 60–70 minutes, respectively, in NanoPET studies. The RCP% of [68Ga]IPCAT-NOTA 24 at 30 minutes in vivo remained 67.65%. Conclusion Data described here provide new information on the design of PET probe of conjugate/pendent approach for DAT imaging. Another chelator or another direct method of intracranial injection must be used to prove the relation between [68Ga]IPCAT-NOTA 24 uptake and transporter localization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiou-Shiow Farn
- Isotope Application Division, Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Taoyuan, 32546, Taiwan.,Department of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing-Hua University, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan
| | - Kang-Wei Chang
- Laboratory Animal Center, Office of Research and Development, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan
| | - Wan-Chi Lin
- Isotope Application Division, Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Taoyuan, 32546, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Man Yu
- Isotope Application Division, Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Taoyuan, 32546, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Liang Lin
- Isotope Application Division, Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Taoyuan, 32546, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chin Tseng
- Isotope Application Division, Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Taoyuan, 32546, Taiwan
| | - Yu Chang
- Isotope Application Division, Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Taoyuan, 32546, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Shan Yu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing-Hua University, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan.,Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Science, College of Nuclear Science, National Tsing-Hua University, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan
| | - Wuu-Jyh Lin
- Isotope Application Division, Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Taoyuan, 32546, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Focal unspecific bone uptake on [ 18F]-PSMA-1007 PET: a multicenter retrospective evaluation of the distribution, frequency, and quantitative parameters of a potential pitfall in prostate cancer imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:4483-4494. [PMID: 34120201 PMCID: PMC8566387 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05424-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Improved logistics and availability led to a rapid increase in the use of [18F]-PSMA-1007 for prostate cancer PET imaging. Initial data suggests increased uptake in benign lesions compared to [68 Ga]-PSMA-11, and clinical observations found increased unspecific bone uptake (UBU). We therefore investigate the frequency and characteristics of UBU in [18F]-PSMA-1007 PET. Methods We retrospectively analyzed [18F]-PSMA-1007 PET scans from four centers for the presence of UBU, defined as a focal mild-to-moderate uptake (SUVmax < 10.0) not obviously related to a benign or malignant cause. If present, up to three leading UBUs were quantified (SUVmax), localized, and correlated to clinical parameters, such as age, PSA, injected dose, Gleason score, tumor size (T1–T4), and type of PET scanner (analog vs. digital). Additionally, clinical and imaging follow-up results and therapeutic impact were evaluated. Results UBUs were identified in 179 out of 348 patients (51.4%). The most frequent localizations were ribs (57.5%) and pelvis (24.8%). The frequency of UBUs was not associated with PSA, Gleason score, tumor size, age, or the injected [18F]-PSMA-1007 dose. UBUs were significantly more frequent in images obtained with digital PET/CT scans (n = 74, 82%) than analog PET/CT scans (n = 221, 40.3%) (p = .0001) but not in digital PET/MR (n = 53, 51%) (p = .1599). In 80 out of 179 patients (44.7%), the interpretation of UBUs was critical for therapeutic management and therefore considered clinically relevant. For 65 UBUs, follow-ups were available: three biopsies, three radiotherapies with PSA follow-up, and 59 cases with imaging. After follow-up, UBUs were still considered unclear in 28 of 65 patients (43%), benign in 28 (43%), and malignant in nine (14%) patients. Conclusion UBUs occur in two-thirds of patients imaged with [18F]-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and are significantly more frequent on digital PET scanners than analog scanners. UBUs should be interpreted carefully to avoid over-staging. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-021-05424-x.
Collapse
|
44
|
Hoekstra RJ, Beulens A, Vrijhof EHJEJ, Wyndaele DNJ, Roef M, Brouwer LJM, Somford DM, Sedelaar M, van Basten JPA. Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT in primary lymph node staging of prostate cancer. Nucl Med Commun 2021; 42:476-481. [PMID: 33323869 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To determine preoperative diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT-scan in detection (or exclusion) of lymph node metastases (LNM) in men with prostate cancer (PCa) in comparison to the histopathological results of the extended pelvic lymph node dissection (e-PLND). METHODS A retrospective medical records-based cohort study, including 47 men with primary PCa who received 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT and subsequent e-PLND for lymph node staging. Incidence and number of visualized LNM, their locations and diameters on 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT were recorded in comparison to the histopathological results of the e-PLND as reference. Positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT were calculated on the basis of histopathology results after e-PLND. RESULTS Forty-seven men were eligible for analysis. Median lymph node yield was 19 (range 10-70). A total of 996 lymph nodes were removed, and 59 metastases were found in 21 cases (45%). Preoperative PET was issued 'positive' in 11 men and in 9 of them (82%) this was histopathologically confirmed resulting in a PPV of 82% (95% CI, 51-96). On the contrary, PET was issued 'negative' in 36 cases, but in 12 of them (33%) metastases were detected in the e-PLND specimen, resulting in an NPV of 67% (95% CI, 50-80). The patient-based sensitivity was 43% (95% CI, 24-64) and the patient-based specificity rate was 92% (95% CI, 75-99), whereas overall diagnostic accuracy was established to be 70% in the present cohort. CONCLUSION 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT has a high specificity and positive predicted value for the presence of LNM in men with prostate cancer. However, the sensitivity and NPV seem to be limited to exclude the absence of LNM at a clinically acceptable level. Prospective evaluation is necessary to define patients who may benefit from 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT as a triage test for the indication for e-PLND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Hoekstra
- Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen
- Prosper Prostate Network
| | | | - Eric H J E J Vrijhof
- Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven
- Prosper Prostate Network
| | - Dirk N J Wyndaele
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven
| | - Mark Roef
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven
| | | | - Diederik M Somford
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen
- Prosper Prostate Network
| | - Michiel Sedelaar
- Prosper Prostate Network
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Cytawa W, Hartrampf P, Lass P, Kircher M, Polat B, Buck AK, Lapa C. PSMA Theranostics: A "Must Have" in Every Prostate Cancer Center. Illustration of Two Clinical Cases and Review of the Literature. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 19:e235-e247. [PMID: 33906800 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
This manuscript describes the history of 2 patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and the role of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) theranostics in their clinical management. In the first patient, PSMA-directed positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging was used for primary staging of high-risk PCa before initial therapy. Then after biochemical relapse it was used to plan the scope of further treatment, in which it allowed among others to perform precise target volume delineation for salvage radiotherapy for pathologic lymph nodes. In the second patient with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), PSMA-guided imaging played a key role in the qualification for PSMA-directed radioligand therapy (RLT) with lutetium-177. We also present a review of the current literature concerning PSMA theranostics in the 2 clinical settings, ie, primary staging of PCa and PSMA RLT of mCRPC. In the first part of the review, we report on the diagnostic efficacy of various PSMA imaging radiotracers labeled with gallium-68, fluorine-18, and technetium-99m. In the second part, we describe the limitations and future perspectives of PSMA therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals, including various beta(-) and alpha emitters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wojciech Cytawa
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Philipp Hartrampf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Piotr Lass
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Malte Kircher
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Bülent Polat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Andreas K Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Cacciamani GE, Maas M, Nassiri N, Ortega D, Gill K, Dell'Oglio P, Thalmann GN, Heidenreich A, Eastham JA, Evans CP, Karnes RJ, De Castro Abreu AL, Briganti A, Artibani W, Gill I, Montorsi F. Impact of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection and Its Extent on Perioperative Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 4:134-149. [PMID: 33745687 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) yields the most accurate staging in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa), although it can be associated with morbidity. OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate the impact of PLND extent on perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing RP. A new PLND-related complication assessment tool is proposed. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) was conducted. MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched to yield studies discussing perioperative complications following RP and PLND. The extent of PLND was classified according to the European Association of Urology PCa guidelines. Studies were categorized according to the extent of PLND. Intra- and postoperative complications were classified as "strongly," "likely," or "unlikely" related to PLND. Anatomical site of perioperative complications was recorded. A cumulative meta-analysis of comparative studies was conducted using Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Our search generated 3645 papers, with 176 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Details of 77 303 patients were analyzed. Of these studies, 84 (47.7%), combining data on 28 428 patients, described intraoperative complications as an outcome of interest. Overall, 534 (1.8%) patients reported one or more intraoperative complications. Postoperative complications were reported in 151 (85.7%) studies, combining data on 73 629 patients. Overall, 10 401 (14.1%) patients reported one or more postoperative complication. The most reported postoperative complication strongly related to PLND was lymphocele (90.6%). The pooled meta-analysis revealed that RP + limited PLND/standard PLND had a significantly decreased risk of experiencing any intraoperative complication (risk ratio [RR]: 0.55; p = 0.01) and postoperative complication strongly related to PLND (RR: 0.46; p = <0.00001), particularly for lymphocele formation (RR: 0.52; p = 0.0003) and thromboembolic events (RR: 0.59; p = 0.008), when compared with extended/superextended PLND. The extent of PLND was confirmed to be an independent predictor of lymphocele formation (RR: 1.77; p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS The perioperative morbidity of PLND in patients undergoing RP and PLND for PCa significantly correlates with the extent of PLND. More standardized reporting of intra- and postoperative complications is needed to better estimate the direct impact of PLND extent on perioperative morbidity. PATIENT SUMMARY Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is the most accurate method for staging in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, although it can be associated with complications. This study aims to systematically evaluate the impact of PLND extent on perioperative complications in these patients. We found that intra- and postoperative complications correlate significantly with the extent of PLND. A more rigorous assessment and thorough reporting of perioperative complications are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni E Cacciamani
- The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Marissa Maas
- The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nima Nassiri
- The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - David Ortega
- The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Karanvir Gill
- The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - George N Thalmann
- Department of BioMedical Research, Urology Research Laboratory, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - James A Eastham
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christopher P Evans
- Department of Urologic Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA, USA; UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | - Andre L De Castro Abreu
- The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Urologic Clinic, Department of Oncological and Surgical Sciences, AOU Integrata and University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Inderbir Gill
- The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Witte M, Pos F, Incrocci L, Heemsbergen W. Association between incidental dose outside the prostate and tumor control after modern image-guided radiotherapy. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2021; 17:25-31. [PMID: 33898774 PMCID: PMC8057954 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Revised: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Background and purpose External beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer deposits incidental dose to a region surrounding the target volume. Previously, an association was identified between tumor control and incidental dose for patients treated with conventional radiotherapy. We investigated whether such an association exists for patients treated using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and tighter margins. Materials and methods Computed tomography scans and three-dimensional treatment planning dose distributions were available from the Dutch randomized HYPRO trial for 397 patients in the standard fractionation arm (39 × 2 Gy) and 407 patients in the hypofractionation arm (19 × 3.4 Gy), mainly delivered using online image-guided IMRT. Endpoint was any treatment failure within 5 years. A mapping of 3D dose distributions between anatomies was performed based on distance to the surface of the prostate delineation. Mean mapped dose distributions were computed for patient groups with and without failure, obtaining dose difference distributions. Random patient permutations were performed to derive p values and to identify relevant regions. Results For high-risk patients treated in the conventional arm, higher incidental dose was significantly associated with a higher probability of tumor control in both univariate and multivariate analysis. The locations of the excess dose mainly overlapped with the position of obturator internus muscles at about 2.5 cm from the prostate surface. No such relationship could be established for intermediate-risk patients. Conclusions An association was established between reduced treatment failure and the delivery of incidental dose outside the prostate for high-risk patients treated using conventionally fractionated IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marnix Witte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Floris Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luca Incrocci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilma Heemsbergen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Van Nieuwenhove S, Van Damme J, Padhani AR, Vandecaveye V, Tombal B, Wuts J, Pasoglou V, Lecouvet FE. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer assessment: Current status and future directions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 55:653-680. [PMID: 33382151 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the past decade, updated definitions for the different stages of prostate cancer and risk for distant disease, along with the advent of new therapies, have remarkably changed the management of patients. The two expectations from imaging are accurate staging and appropriate assessment of disease response to therapies. Modern, next-generation imaging (NGI) modalities, including whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) and nuclear medicine (most often prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA] positron emission tomography [PET]/computed tomography [CT]) bring added value to these imaging tasks. WB-MRI has proven its superiority over bone scintigraphy (BS) and CT for the detection of distant metastasis, also providing reliable evaluations of disease response to treatment. Comparison of the effectiveness of WB-MRI and molecular nuclear imaging techniques with regard to indications and the definition of their respective/complementary roles in clinical practice is ongoing. This paper illustrates the evolution of WB-MRI imaging protocols, defines the current state-of-the art, and highlights the latest developments and future challenges. The paper presents and discusses WB-MRI indications in the care pathway of men with prostate cancer in specific key situations: response assessment of metastatic disease, "all in one" cancer staging, and oligometastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandy Van Nieuwenhove
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Julien Van Damme
- Department of Urology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, London, UK
| | - Vincent Vandecaveye
- Department of Radiology and Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bertrand Tombal
- Department of Urology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Joris Wuts
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vassiliki Pasoglou
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Frederic E Lecouvet
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Sutani S, Yorozu A, Toya K, Shiraishi Y, Nishiyama T, Yagi Y, Nakamura K, Saito S. Effect of adding androgen deprivation therapy to permanent iodine-125 implantation with or without external beam radiation therapy on the outcomes in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis. Brachytherapy 2020; 20:10-18. [PMID: 33069598 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of adding androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation therapy on oncological outcomes in prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Overall, 1,171 patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation therapy with or without ADT between 2003 and 2013 were identified. Propensity score matching was used to counter biases between the ADT and non-ADT groups. The biochemical failure-free rate (bFFR), local recurrence-free rate, and overall survival rate were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and predictors were identified using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS After propensity score matching, 405 patients were included in each group. The median followup duration was 9.1 years; the median ADT duration was 6 months. In the ADT versus non-ADT groups, the 9-year bFFR, local recurrence-free rate, and overall survival rate were 93.4% versus 87.8% (p = 0.016), 96.9% versus 98.1% (p = 0.481), and 88.1% versus 90.4% (p = 0.969), respectively. On multivariate analyses, Gleason score (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.58-4.03) and ADT use (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.34-0.89) were associated with biochemical failure. Supplemental external beam radiation therapy use (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.16-0.91) was associated with lower local recurrence rates. Age (HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.08-1.16) and comorbidities (HR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.04-2.34) were associated with all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS A risk-benefit assessment between bFFR improvement and the potential side effects of adding ADT to brachytherapy-based radiotherapy is warranted before incorporating ADT as routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinya Sutani
- Department of Radiology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Atsunori Yorozu
- Department of Radiology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhito Toya
- Department of Radiology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiology, International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yutaka Shiraishi
- Department of Radiology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toru Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuto Yagi
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ken Nakamura
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shiro Saito
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Taussky D, Delouya G. Is pelvic prophylactic radiotherapy in prostate cancer just right? Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:2296-2298. [PMID: 33209698 PMCID: PMC7658169 DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Taussky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Canada
| | - Guila Delouya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Canada
| |
Collapse
|