1
|
Sacks OA, Murphy M, O’Malley J, Birkmeyer N, Barnato AE. A Quality Improvement Initiative for Inpatient Advance Care Planning. JAMA HEALTH FORUM 2024; 5:e243172. [PMID: 39365606 PMCID: PMC11452818 DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 08/02/2024] [Indexed: 10/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented advance care planning (ACP) billing codes in 2016 to encourage practitioners to conduct and document ACP conversations, and included ACP as a quality metric in the CMS Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative in 2018. Use of this billing code in the inpatient setting has not been studied. Objective To determine whether a quality improvement intervention to increase inpatient ACP is effective in increasing ACP billing rates or changing hospital treatment plans or patient outcomes. Design, Settings, and Participants This nationwide cohort study and difference-in-differences analyses compared changes in ACP billing, treatment, and outcomes in Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years and older who were hospitalized and cared for by 3 different groups: practitioners employed by a national acute care staffing organization who underwent an ACP quality improvement intervention, nonintervention practitioners at the same hospital, and control group practitioners from other hospitals. Using data from the Master Beneficiary Summary File, acute care hospital stays for nonsurgical conditions were linked to Medicare enrollment, claims, and vital status data from 1-year preadmission to 1-year postadmission from 2015 to 2019. The ACP billing rates for each group were assessed for associations with 6 inpatient treatments and 4 outcomes. Data analyses were performed from January 2022 to December 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures Billed ACP conversations, receipt of intensive care and life support (intensive care unit admission, gastrostomy tube placement, mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy), treatment limitations (newly initiated do-not-resuscitate orders) and outcomes (discharge to hospice, inpatient death, 30-day postadmission death, and 1-year postadmission death). Results The total study sample included 109 intervention hospitals, 1691 control hospitals, nearly 12 million Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years and older, and 738 309 practitioners associated with admissions from 2016 to 2018. ACP billing rates increased more for the intervention (1.3% in preintervention to 14.0% in postintervention; P < .001) than for the nonintervention (same hospitals) and control groups (odds ratio [OR], 2.6; 95% CI, 1.7-4.1 intervention vs control). Increased ACP billing rates were significantly associated with decreased rates of inpatient death in the intervention group (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00) compared to the nonintervention (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.17) and control groups (reference). All other associations were nonsignificant. Conclusions and Relevance This nationwide cohort study suggests that while the ACP quality initiative increased ACP billing, changes in clinical outcomes were inconsistent with the hypotheses. Further study is needed to address questions regarding confounding by unobserved measures of care quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia A. Sacks
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Megan Murphy
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - James O’Malley
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Nancy Birkmeyer
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Amber E. Barnato
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- Section of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth and Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kenning C, Usher-Smith JA, Jamison J, Jones J, Boaz A, Little P, Mallen C, Bower P, Park S. Impact of research activity on performance of general practices: a qualitative study. BJGP Open 2024:BJGPO.2024.0073. [PMID: 38649161 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpo.2024.0073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is evidence that engaging in research is directly associated with better performance. If this relationship is to be strengthened, it is necessary to understand the mechanisms that might underlie that relationship. AIM To explore the perspectives of staff and wider stakeholders about mechanisms by which research activity may impact on the performance of general practices. DESIGN & SETTING Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with general practice professionals and wider stakeholders in England. METHOD Individual interviews with 41 purposively sampled staff in 'research-ready' or 'research-active' general practices, and 21 other stakeholders. Interviews were independently coded by three researchers using a framework approach. RESULTS Participants described potential 'direct' and 'indirect' impacts on their work. 'Direct' impacts included improved knowledge and skills that could change practice work (for example, additional records searches for particular conditions); bringing in additional resources (for example, access to investigations or staff); and improving relationships with patients. 'Indirect' impacts included job satisfaction (for example, perception of practice as a centre of excellence and innovation, and the variety afforded by research activity reducing burnout); and staff recruitment (increasing the attractiveness of the practice as a place to work). Responders identified few negative impacts. CONCLUSION Staff and stakeholders identified a range of potential impacts of research activity on practice performance, with impacts on their working lives most salient. Negative impacts were not generally raised. Nevertheless, responders generally discussed potential impacts rather than providing specific examples of those impacts. This may reflect the type of research activity conducted in general practice, often led by external collaborators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassandra Kenning
- Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Juliet A Usher-Smith
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - James Jamison
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jennifer Jones
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Annette Boaz
- NIHR Health and Social Care Workforce Research Unit, Policy Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Little
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Peter Bower
- Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Sophie Park
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Hampstead, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mendoza-Jiménez MJ, van Exel J, Brouwer W. On spillovers in economic evaluations: definition, mapping review and research agenda. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024; 25:1239-1260. [PMID: 38261132 PMCID: PMC11377364 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01658-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
An important issue in economic evaluations is determining whether all relevant impacts are considered, given the perspective chosen for the analysis. Acknowledging that patients are not isolated individuals has important implications in this context. Increasingly, the term "spillovers" is used to label consequences of health interventions on others. However, a clear definition of spillovers is lacking, and as a result, the scope of the concept remains unclear. In this study, we aim to clarify the concept of spillovers by proposing a definition applicable in health economic evaluations. To illustrate the implications of this definition, we highlight the diversity of potential spillovers through an expanded impact inventory and conduct a mapping review that outlines the evidence base for the different types of spillovers. In the context of economic evaluations of health interventions, we define spillovers as all impacts from an intervention on all parties or entities other than the users of the intervention under evaluation. This definition encompasses a broader range of potential costs and effects, beyond informal caregivers and family members. The expanded impact inventory enables a systematic approach to identifying broader impacts of health interventions. The mapping review shows that the relevance of different types of spillovers is context-specific. Some spillovers are regularly included in economic evaluations, although not always recognised as such, while others are not. A consistent use of the term "spillovers", improved measurement of these costs and effects, and increased transparency in reporting them are still necessary. To that end, we propose a research agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María J Mendoza-Jiménez
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral (ESPOL), Guayaquil, Ecuador.
| | - Job van Exel
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Werner Brouwer
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fahmy JN, Kong L, Wang L, Chung KC. Employer-Sponsored Medicare Advantage Plans and the 2018 Therapy Cap Repeal: Reduced Overall Spending Does Not Constrain Out-of-Pocket Costs. Ann Plast Surg 2024:00000637-990000000-00531. [PMID: 39150791 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000004074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Policy impacting traditional Medicare beneficiaries may have unintended effects for privately insured patients. After the repeal of a longstanding $1500 outpatient therapy cap in 2018, we aimed to evaluate if this policy change was associated with differences in use of cost of postoperative therapy after common hand surgeries, including carpal tunnel release, trigger finger release, ganglion cyst excision, De Quervain tenosynovitis release, carpometacarpal arthroplasty, and distal radius fracture open reduction/internal fixation or percutaneous pinning. METHODS The Medicare Supplement and Coordination of Benefits files from Marketscan were used. Frequency of therapy appointments, overall costs, and out-of-pocket costs were obtained. A segmented interrupted time series with Poisson and log-transformed linear regression was performed. RESULTS No significant monthly change in odds of therapy use was found in the postpolicy period for patients who underwent trigger finger release, carpal tunnel release, Ganglion cyst excision, De Quervain tenosynovitis release, carpometacarpal arthroplasty, or distal radius fracture, pinning, or open reduction/internal fixation. Overall cost decreased in the postpolicy period by 2% for comprehensive plans (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.03 to -0.01, P < 0.001), by 7% for those with exclusive provider organizations (95% CI: -0.10 to -0.04, P < 0.001), by 1% for HMOs (95% CI: -0.01 to 0.002, P = 0.01), and by 3% for preferred provider organizations (95% CI: -0.03 to -0.02, P < 0.001). In the postpolicy period, no monthly change in out-of-pocket cost was observed for patients with comprehensive, exclusive provider organization, health maintenance organization, preferred provider organization, or point of service with capitation insurance plans. CONCLUSIONS Patients with employer-sponsored Medicare Advantage plans experienced increased out-of-pocket costs for therapy despite lower net costs. These data highlight an urgent need for policy ensuring that patients benefit when overall costs of care decrease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph N Fahmy
- From the Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor MI
| | - Lingxuan Kong
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI
| | - Lu Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI
| | - Kevin C Chung
- From the Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor MI
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pulcini CD, Lamberson M, Collins SC, Axtmayer C, Mathon CJ, Della Grotta K, Bisanzo M, Fleisher C, Marsac ML. Measurement of Patient-Level Outcomes After Implementation of Trauma-Informed Care Training in the Emergency Department: A Pilot Study. J Emerg Nurs 2024:S0099-1767(24)00168-5. [PMID: 39023475 DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2024.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Revised: 06/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Trauma-informed care has been posited as a framework to optimize patient care and engagement, but there is a paucity of data on patient-level outcomes after trauma-informed care training in health care settings. We sought to measure patient-level outcomes after a painful procedure after implementation of trauma-informed care training for ED staff. METHODS As part of a quality improvement initiative, we trained 110 ED providers in trauma-informed care. Next, we prospectively recruited patients who had undergone a painful procedure to complete a survey to assess several patient-level outcomes, such as anxiety reduction and overall experience of care. We compared differences in patient outcomes for those who were treated by providers in the trauma-informed care intervention group with those who were treated by providers who did not complete the training (usual care). RESULTS One-hundred forty-seven adult patients completed survey measures (n = 76 trauma-informed care intervention group; n = 71 usual care group) over a 1-month period. Most patients offered the highest rating for all ED staff-related questions. We found no significant differences in assessment of patient-reported outcomes based on intervention versus usual care. DISCUSSION Our trauma-informed care training did not seem to have a significant effect on our selected patient outcomes. This may be caused by the training itself or the challenges in measurement of the patient-level impact of trauma-informed care training owing to the study design, setting, and lack of standardized tools. Recommendations for future study of trauma-informed care training and measuring its direct impact on patients in the ED setting are discussed.
Collapse
|
6
|
Greene AC, Ziegler O, Quattrone M, Stack MJ, Becker B, Pameijer CR, Shen C. Association between Medicaid Expansion and Cutaneous Melanoma Diagnosis and Outcomes: Does Where You Live Make a Difference? Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4584-4593. [PMID: 38553653 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15214-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early detection and standardized treatment are crucial for enhancing outcomes for patients with cutaneous melanoma, the commonly diagnosed skin cancer. However, access to quality health care services remains a critical barrier for many patients, particularly the uninsured. Whereas Medicaid expansion (ME) has had a positive impact on some cancers, its specific influence on cutaneous melanoma remains understudied. METHODS The National Cancer Database identified 87,512 patients 40-64 years of age with a diagnosis of non-metastatic cutaneous melanoma between 2004 and 2017. In this study, patient demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment variables were analyzed, and ME status was determined based on state policies. Standard univariate statistics were used to compare patients with a diagnosis of non-metastatic cutaneous melanoma between ME and non-ME states. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used to evaluate overall survival (OS) between ME and non-ME states. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to examine associations with OS. RESULTS Overall, 28.6 % (n = 25,031) of the overall cohort was in ME states. The patients in ME states were more likely to be insured, live in neighborhoods with higher median income quartiles, receive treatment at academic/research cancer centers, have lower stages of disease, and receive surgery than the patients in non-ME states. Kaplan-Meier analysis found enhanced 5-year OS for the patients in ME states across all stages. Cox regression showed improved survival in ME states for stage II (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84) and stage III (HR, 0.75) melanoma. CONCLUSIONS This study underscores the positive association between ME and improved diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes for patients with non-metastatic cutaneous melanoma. These findings advocate for continued efforts to enhance health care accessibility for vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia C Greene
- Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Olivia Ziegler
- Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - McKell Quattrone
- Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Michael J Stack
- Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Benjamin Becker
- Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Colette R Pameijer
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Chan Shen
- Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nielsen VM, Ursprung WWS, Song G, Hirsch G, Mason T, Santarelli C, Guimaraes E, Marshall E, Allen CG, Lei PP, Brown D, Behl-Chadha B. The Launch of Massachusetts Community Health Worker Certification: Findings From the Massachusetts Community Health Worker Workforce Surveys. Public Health Rep 2024:333549241253419. [PMID: 38807371 DOI: 10.1177/00333549241253419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The launch of state certification for community health workers (CHWs) in Massachusetts in 2018 aimed to promote and champion this critical workforce. However, concerns exist about unintentional adverse effects of certification. Given this, we conducted 2 cross-sectional surveys to evaluate this certification policy. METHODS We conducted surveys of CHW employers and CHWs in 3 sample frames: community health centers and federally qualified health centers, acute-care hospitals, and community-based organizations. We administered the surveys in 2016 (before certification launch) and 2021 (after certification launch) to answer the following questions: Was certification associated with positive outcomes among CHWs after its launch? Did harmful shifts occur among the CHW workforce and employers after certification launch? Was certification associated with disparities among CHWs after its launch? RESULTS Certification was associated with higher pay among certified (vs noncertified) CHWs, better perceptions of CHWs among certified (vs noncertified) CHWs, and better integration of certified (vs noncertified) CHWs into care teams. We found no adverse shifts in CHW workforce by sociodemographic variables or in CHW employer characteristics (most notably CHW employer hiring requirements) after certification launch. After certification launch, certified and uncertified CHWs had similar demographic and educational characteristics. However, certified CHWs more often worked in large, clinical organizations while uncertified CHWs most often worked in medium-sized community-based organizations. CONCLUSIONS Our evaluation of Massachusetts CHW certification suggests that CHW certification was not associated with workforce disparities and was associated with positive outcomes. Our study fills a notable gap in the research literature and can guide CHW research agendas, certification efforts in Massachusetts and other states, and program efforts to champion this critical, grassroots workforce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria M Nielsen
- Office of Population Health, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - W W Sanouri Ursprung
- Office of Statistics and Evaluation, Bureau of Community Health and Prevention, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Glory Song
- Office of Statistics and Evaluation, Bureau of Community Health and Prevention, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gail Hirsch
- Office of Community Health Workers, Bureau of Community Health and Prevention, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Theresa Mason
- Office of Community Health Workers, Bureau of Community Health and Prevention, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Claire Santarelli
- Bureau of Community Health and Prevention, Division of Health Protection and Promotion, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Erica Guimaraes
- ForHealth Consulting, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Erica Marshall
- Bureau of Community Health and Prevention, Division of Community-Based Prevention and Care, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Caitlin G Allen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Pei-Pei Lei
- Office of Survey Research, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Shrewsbury, MA, USA
| | - Diane Brown
- Office of Survey Research, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Shrewsbury, MA, USA
| | - Bittie Behl-Chadha
- Office of Survey Research, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Shrewsbury, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cavallaro F, Clery A, Gilbert R, van der Meulen J, Kendall S, Kennedy E, Phillips C, Harron K. Evaluating the real-world implementation of the Family Nurse Partnership in England: a data linkage study. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2024; 12:1-223. [PMID: 38784984 DOI: 10.3310/bvdw6447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Background/objectives The Family Nurse Partnership is an intensive home visiting programme for adolescent mothers. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Family Nurse Partnership on outcomes up to age 7 using national administrative data. Design We created a linked cohort of all mothers aged 13-19 using data from health, educational and children's social care and defined mothers enrolled in the Family Nurse Partnership or not using Family Nurse Partnership system data. Propensity scores were used to create matched groups for analysis. Setting One hundred and thirty-six local authorities in England with active Family Nurse Partnership sites between 2010 and 2017. Participants Mothers aged 13-19 at last menstrual period with live births between April 2010 and March 2019, living in a Family Nurse Partnership catchment area and their firstborn child(ren). Interventions The Family Nurse Partnership includes up to 64 home visits by a family nurse from early pregnancy until the child's second birthday and is combined with usual health and social care. Controls received usual health and social care. Main outcome measures Indicators of child maltreatment (hospital admissions for injury/maltreatment, referral to social care services); child health and development (hospital utilisation and education) outcomes and maternal hospital utilisation and educational outcomes up to 7 years following birth. Data sources Family Nurse Partnership Information System, Hospital Episode Statistics, National Pupil Database. Results Of 110,520 eligible mothers, 25,680 (23.2%) were enrolled in the Family Nurse Partnership. Enrolment rates varied across 122 sites (range: 11-68%). Areas with more eligible mothers had lower enrolment rates. Enrolment was higher among mothers aged 13-15 (52%), than 18-19 year-olds (21%). Indicators of child maltreatment: we found no evidence of an association between the Family Nurse Partnership and indicators of child maltreatment, except for an increased rate of unplanned admissions for maltreatment/injury-related diagnoses up to age 2 for children born to Family Nurse Partnership mothers (6.6% vs. 5.7%, relative risk 1.15; 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.24). Child health and developmental outcomes: there was weak evidence that children born to Family Nurse Partnership mothers were more likely to achieve a Good Level of Development at age 5 (57.5% vs. 55.4%, relative risk 1.05; 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.09). Maternal outcomes: There was some evidence that Family Nurse Partnership mothers were less likely to have a subsequent delivery within 18 months of the index birth (8.4% vs. 9.3%, relative risk 0.92; 95% confidence interval 0.88 to 0.97). Younger and more vulnerable mothers received higher numbers of visits and were more likely to achieve fidelity targets. Meeting the fidelity targets was associated with some outcomes. Limitations Bias by indication and variation in the intervention and usual care over time and between areas may have limited our ability to detect effects. Multiple testing may have led to spurious, significant results. Conclusions This study supports findings from evaluations of the Family Nurse Partnership showing no evidence of benefit for maltreatment outcomes measured in administrative data. Amongst all the outcomes measured, we found weak evidence that the Family Nurse Partnership was associated with improvements in child development at school entry, a reduction in rapid repeat pregnancies and evidence of increased healthcare-seeking in the mother and child. Future work Future evaluations should capture better measures of Family Nurse Partnership interventions and usual care, more information on maternal risk factors and additional outcomes relating to maternal well-being. Study registration The study is registered as NIHR CRN Portfolio (42900). Funding This award was funded by the National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/99/19) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 11. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amanda Clery
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Ruth Gilbert
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Jan van der Meulen
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Sally Kendall
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Eilis Kennedy
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- Eilis Kennedy, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Catherine Phillips
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Katie Harron
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Monsur M, Hefner T, Van Allen J, Trina NA, Andalib SY, Cosco N. Effects of Childcare Hands-On Gardening on Preschoolers' (3-5 Years) Physical Activity in Semi-Arid Climate Zone. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 21:548. [PMID: 38791763 PMCID: PMC11121640 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21050548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
How hands-on gardening impacts behaviors including healthy eating and physical activity during early childhood can be of critical importance for preventing the early onset of obesity. This study investigates how participating in hands-on gardening impacts preschoolers' (3-5 years old) physical activity (measured by accelerometers) in childcare centers in the semi-arid climate zone. The research was conducted in eight licensed childcare centers located in West Texas with 149 children (n = 149). Four childcare centers in the experimental group received hands-on garden interventions; the other four in the control group did not. In both experimental (intervention) and control (non-intervention) centers, children wore Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometers continuously for 5 days before and for 5 days after intervention (a total of 10 days). Results show that the duration of sedentary behavior of children in the experimental (intervention) group significantly decreased compared to children in the control (non-intervention) group. The finding suggests that the positive effects of childcare hands-on gardening on physical activity extend to semi-arid climate zones where gardening is challenging due to high temperatures and lack of annual rainfall. The research emphasizes the critical need to incorporate hands-on gardening in childcare centers as an obesity prevention strategy nationally in the US and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muntazar Monsur
- Department of Landscape Architecture (DoLA), Davis College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA; (N.A.T.); (S.Y.A.)
| | - Tristen Hefner
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA; (T.H.); (J.V.A.)
| | - Jason Van Allen
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA; (T.H.); (J.V.A.)
| | - Nazia Afrin Trina
- Department of Landscape Architecture (DoLA), Davis College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA; (N.A.T.); (S.Y.A.)
| | - S. Y. Andalib
- Department of Landscape Architecture (DoLA), Davis College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA; (N.A.T.); (S.Y.A.)
| | - Nilda Cosco
- Department of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning, College of Design, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Donnelly JP, Seelye SM, Kipnis P, McGrath BM, Iwashyna TJ, Pogue J, Jones M, Liu VX, Prescott HC. Impact of Reducing Time-to-Antibiotics on Sepsis Mortality, Antibiotic Use, and Adverse Events. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2024; 21:94-101. [PMID: 37934602 PMCID: PMC10867916 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.202306-505oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Shorter time-to-antibiotics is lifesaving in sepsis, but programs to hasten antibiotic delivery may increase unnecessary antibiotic use and adverse events. Objectives: We sought to estimate both the benefits and harms of shortening time-to-antibiotics for sepsis. Methods: We conducted a simulation study using a cohort of 1,559,523 hospitalized patients admitted through the emergency department with meeting two or more systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria (2013-2018). Reasons for hospitalization were classified as septic shock, sepsis, infection, antibiotics stopped early, and never treated (no antibiotics within 48 h). We simulated the impact of a 50% reduction in time-to-antibiotics for sepsis across 12 hospital scenarios defined by sepsis prevalence (low, medium, or high) and magnitude of "spillover" antibiotic prescribing to patients without infection (low, medium, high, or very high). Outcomes included mortality and adverse events potentially attributable to antibiotics (e.g., allergy, organ dysfunction, Clostridiodes difficile infection, and culture with multidrug-resistant organism). Results: A total of 933,458 (59.9%) hospitalized patients received antimicrobial therapy within 48 hours of presentation, including 38,572 (2.5%) with septic shock, 276,082 (17.7%) with sepsis, 370,705 (23.8%) with infection, and 248,099 (15.9%) with antibiotics stopped early. A total of 199,937 (12.8%) hospitalized patients experienced an adverse event; most commonly, acute liver injury (5.6%), new MDRO (3.5%), and Clostridiodes difficile infection (1.7%). Across the scenarios, a 50% reduction in time-to-antibiotics for sepsis was associated with a median of 1 to 180 additional antibiotic-treated patients and zero to seven additional adverse events per death averted from sepsis. Conclusions: The impacts of faster time-to-antibiotics for sepsis vary markedly across simulated hospital types. However, even in the worst-case scenario, new antibiotic-associated adverse events were rare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P. Donnelly
- Department of Learning Health Sciences
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- VA Center for Implementation and Evaluation Resources, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Sarah M. Seelye
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Patricia Kipnis
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
| | - Brenda M. McGrath
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- OCHIN Inc., Portland, Oregon
| | - Theodore J. Iwashyna
- Department of Internal Medicine, and
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jason Pogue
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Makoto Jones
- Salt Lake City VA Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, Utah; and
- Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Vincent X. Liu
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
| | - Hallie C. Prescott
- Department of Internal Medicine, and
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zoh RS, Yu X, Dawid P, Smith GD, French SJ, Allison DB. Causal models and causal modelling in obesity: foundations, methods and evidence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2023; 378:20220227. [PMID: 37661742 PMCID: PMC10475873 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Discussing causes in science, if we are to do so in a way that is sensible, begins at the root. All too often, we jump to discussing specific postulated causes but do not first consider what we mean by, for example, causes of obesity or how we discern whether something is a cause. In this paper, we address what we mean by a cause, discuss what might and might not constitute a reasonable causal model in the abstract, speculate about what the causal structure of obesity might be like overall and the types of things we should be looking for, and finally, delve into methods for evaluating postulated causes and estimating causal effects. We offer the view that different meanings of the concept of causal factors in obesity research are regularly being conflated, leading to confusion, unclear thinking and sometimes nonsense. We emphasize the idea of different kinds of studies for evaluating various aspects of causal effects and discuss experimental methods, assumptions and evaluations. We use analogies from other areas of research to express the plausibility that only inelegant solutions will be truly informative. Finally, we offer comments on some specific postulated causal factors. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Causes of obesity: theories, conjectures and evidence (Part II)'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger S. Zoh
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, 47405-7000, USA
| | - Xiaoxin Yu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, 47405-7000, USA
| | | | - George Davey Smith
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Stephen J. French
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, 47405-7000, USA
| | - David B. Allison
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, 47405-7000, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Glynn J, Jones T, Bell M, Blazeby J, Burton C, Conefrey C, Donovan JL, Farrar N, Morley J, McNair A, Owen-Smith A, Rule E, Thornton G, Tucker V, Williams I, Rooshenas L, Hollingworth W. Did the evidence-based intervention (EBI) programme reduce inappropriate procedures, lessen unwarranted variation or lead to spill-over effects in the National Health Service? PLoS One 2023; 18:e0290996. [PMID: 37656701 PMCID: PMC10473535 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health systems are under pressure to maintain services within limited resources. The Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme published a first list of guidelines in 2019, which aimed to reduce inappropriate use of interventions within the NHS in England, reducing potential harm and optimising the use of limited resources. Seventeen procedures were selected in the first round, published in April 2019. METHODS We evaluated changes in the trends for each procedure after its inclusion in the EBI's first list of guidelines using interrupted time series analysis. We explored whether there was any evidence of spill-over effects onto related or substitute procedures, as well as exploring changes in geographical variation following the publication of national guidance. RESULTS Most procedures were experiencing downward trends in the years prior to the launch of EBI. We found no evidence of a trend change in any of the 17 procedures following the introduction of the guidance. No evidence of spill-over increases in substitute or related procedures was found. Geographic variation in the number of procedures performed across English CCGs remained at similar levels before and after EBI. CONCLUSIONS The EBI programme had little success in its aim to further reduce the use of the 17 procedures it deemed inappropriate in all or certain circumstances. Most procedure rates were already decreasing before EBI and all continued with a similar trend afterwards. Geographical variation in the number of procedures remained at a similar level post EBI. De-adoption of inappropriate care is essential in maintaining health systems across the world. However, further research is needed to explore context specific enablers and barriers to effective identification and de-adoption of such inappropriate health care to support future de-adoption endeavours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Glynn
- Health Economics Bristol, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy Jones
- Health Economics Bristol, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Mike Bell
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Blazeby
- Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Burton
- School of Allied and Public Health Professions, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, United Kingdom
| | - Carmel Conefrey
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jenny L. Donovan
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Farrar
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Josie Morley
- Health Economics Bristol, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Angus McNair
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Amanda Owen-Smith
- Health Economics Bristol, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Ellen Rule
- Gloucestershire Integrated Care Board (ICB), Brockworth, United Kingdom
| | - Gail Thornton
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Victoria Tucker
- Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire Integrated Care Board (ICB), Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Iestyn Williams
- Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Leila Rooshenas
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - William Hollingworth
- Health Economics Bristol, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Britteon P, Kristensen SR, Lau YS, McDonald R, Sutton M. Spillover effects of financial incentives for providers onto non-targeted patients: daycase surgery in English hospitals. HEALTH ECONOMICS, POLICY, AND LAW 2023; 18:289-304. [PMID: 37190849 DOI: 10.1017/s1744133123000063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incentives for healthcare providers may also affect non-targeted patients. These spillover effects have important implications for the full impact and evaluation of incentive schemes. However, there are few studies on the extent of such spillovers in health care. We investigated whether incentives to perform surgical procedures as daycases affected whether other elective procedures in the same specialties were also treated as daycases. DATA 8,505,754 patients treated for 92 non-targeted procedures in 127 hospital trusts in England between April and March 2016. METHODS Interrupted time series analysis of the probability of being treated as a daycase for non-targeted patients treated in six specialties where targeted patients were also treated and three specialties where they were not. RESULTS The daycase rate initially increased (1.04 percentage points, SE: 0.30) for patients undergoing a non-targeted procedure in incentivised specialties but then reduced over time. Conversely, the daycase rate gradually decreased over time for patients treated in a non-incentivised specialty. DISCUSSION Spillovers from financial incentives have variable effects over different activities and over time. Policymakers and researchers should consider the possibility of spillovers in the design and evaluation of incentive schemes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Britteon
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Søren Rud Kristensen
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Danish Centre for Health Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Yiu-Shing Lau
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ruth McDonald
- Alliance Manchester Business School, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Matt Sutton
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Melbourne Institute: Applied Economics and Social Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Offodile AC, Lin YL, Shah SA, Swisher SG, Jain A, Butler CE, Aliu O. Is the Centralization of Complex Surgical Procedures an Unintended Spillover Effect of Global Capitation? - Insights from the Maryland Global Budget Revenue Program. Ann Surg 2023; 277:535-541. [PMID: 36512741 PMCID: PMC9994796 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine if global budget revenue (GBR) models incent the centralization of complex surgical care. SUMMARY BACKGROUND In 2014, Maryland initiated a statewide GBR model. While prior research has shown improvements in cost and outcomes for surgical care post-GBR implementation, the mechanism remains unclear. METHODS Utilizing state inpatient databases, we compared the proportion of adults undergoing elective complex surgeries (gastrectomy, pneumonectomy/lobectomy, proctectomies, and hip/knee revision) at high-concentration hospitals (HCHs) in Maryland and control states. Annual concentration, per procedure, was defined as hospital volume divided by state volume. HCHs were defined as hospitals with a concentration at least at the 75 th percentile in 2010. We estimated the difference-in-differences (DiD) of the probability of patients undergoing surgery at HCHs before and after GBR implementation. FINDINGS Our sample included 122,882 surgeries. Following GBR implementation, all procedures were increasingly performed at HCHs in Maryland. States satisfied the parallel trends assumption for the centralization of gastrectomy and pneumonectomy/lobectomy. Post-GBR, patients were more likely to undergo gastrectomy (DiD: 5.5 p.p., 95% CI [2.2, 8.8]) and pneumonectomy/lobectomy (DiD: 12.4 p.p., 95% CI [10.0, 14.8]) at an HCH in Maryland compared with control states. For our hip/knee revision analyses, we assumed persistent counterfactuals and noted a positive DiD post-GBR implementation (DiD: 4.8 p.p., 95% CI [1.3, 8.2]). No conclusion could be drawn for proctectomy due to different pre-GBR trends. CONCLUSIONS GBR implementation is associated with increased centralization for certain complex surgeries. Future research is needed to explore the impact of centralization on patient experience and access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anaeze C. Offodile
- Department of Plastic Surgery
- Department of Health Services Research
- Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, Houston, TX
| | - Yu-Li Lin
- Department of Health Services Research
| | | | - Stephen G. Swisher
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | | | | | - Oluseyi Aliu
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Desterbecq C, Tubeuf S. Inclusion of Environmental Spillovers in Applied Economic Evaluations of Healthcare Products. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023:S1098-3015(23)00106-7. [PMID: 36967027 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Climate change and environmental factors have an impact on human health and the ecosystem. The healthcare sector is responsible for substantial environmental pollution. Most healthcare systems rely on economic evaluation to select efficient alternatives. Nevertheless, environmental spillovers of healthcare treatments are rarely considered whether it is from a cost or a health perspective. The objective of this article is to identify economic evaluations of healthcare products and guidelines that have included any environmental dimensions. METHODS Electronic searches of 3 literature databases (PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE) and official health agencies guidelines were conducted. Documents were considered eligible if they assessed the environmental spillovers within the economic evaluation of a healthcare product or provided any recommendations on the inclusion of environmental spillovers in the health technology assessment process. RESULTS From the 3878 records identified, 62 documents were deemed eligible and 18 were published in 2021 and 2022. The environmental spillovers considered were carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, water or energy consumption, and waste disposal. The environmental spillovers were mainly assessed using the lifecycle assessment (LCA) approach while the economic analysis was mostly limited to costs. Only 9 documents, including the guidelines of 2 health agencies presented theoretical and practical ways to include environmental spillovers into the decision-making process. CONCLUSIONS There is a clear lack of methods on whether environmental spillovers should be included in health economic evaluation and how this should be done. If healthcare systems want to reduce their environment footprint, the development of methodology which integrates environmental dimensions in health technology assessment will be key.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Desterbecq
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain (UClouvain), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Sandy Tubeuf
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain (UClouvain), Brussels, Belgium; Institute of Economic and Social Research (IRES), Université Catholique de Louvain (UClouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
An interrupted time-series analysis of the effects of withdrawal of financial incentives on diagnosis of atrial fibrillation as resolved. Does withdrawal of an incentive reverse its unintended effects? BJGP Open 2022; 6:BJGPO.2022.0089. [PMID: 36167402 PMCID: PMC9904788 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpo.2022.0089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The UK introduced financial incentives for management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in 2006, after which there was an increase in the proportion of patients with AF diagnosed as resolved. Removal of incentives in Scotland provides a natural experiment to investigate the effects of withdrawal of an incentive on diagnosis of resolved AF. AIM To investigate the effects of introduction and withdrawal of financial incentives on the diagnosis of resolved AF. DESIGN & SETTING Cohort study in a large database of UK primary care records, before and after introduction of incentives in April 2006 in Scotland, England, and Northern Ireland, and their withdrawal in April 2016 in Scotland. METHOD Interrupted time-series analysis of monthly rates of resolved AF from January 2000-September 2019. RESULTS A total of 251 526 adult patients with AF were included, of whom 14 674 were diagnosed as resolved AF. In April 2006 there were similar shift-changes in rates of resolved AF per 1000 in England 1.55 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11 to 2.00) and Northern Ireland 1.54 (95% CI = 0.91 to 2.18), and a smaller increase in Scotland 0.79 (95% CI = 0.04 to 1.53). There were modest downward post-introduction trends in all countries. After Scotland's withdrawal of the incentive in April 2016 there was a small, statistically non-significant, downward shift in rate of resolved AF per 1000 (0.39 [95% CI = -3.21 to 2.42]) and no change in post-removal trend. CONCLUSION Introduction of a financial incentive coincided with an increase in resolved AF but no evidence was found that its withdrawal led to a reduction.
Collapse
|
17
|
Valentelyte G, Keegan C, Sorensen J. A comparison of four quasi-experimental methods: an analysis of the introduction of activity-based funding in Ireland. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1311. [PMID: 36329423 PMCID: PMC9635092 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08657-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Health services research often relies on quasi-experimental study designs in the estimation of treatment effects of a policy change or an intervention. The aim of this study is to compare some of the commonly used non-experimental methods in estimating intervention effects, and to highlight their relative strengths and weaknesses. We estimate the effects of Activity-Based Funding, a hospital financing reform of Irish public hospitals, introduced in 2016. Methods We estimate and compare four analytical methods: Interrupted time series analysis, Difference-in-Differences, Propensity Score Matching Difference-in-Differences and the Synthetic Control method. Specifically, we focus on the comparison between the control-treatment methods and the non-control-treatment approach, interrupted time series analysis. Our empirical example evaluated the length of stay impact post hip replacement surgery, following the introduction of Activity-Based Funding in Ireland. We also contribute to the very limited research reporting the impacts of Activity-Based-Funding within the Irish context. Results Interrupted time-series analysis produced statistically significant results different in interpretation, while the Difference-in-Differences, Propensity Score Matching Difference-in-Differences and Synthetic Control methods incorporating control groups, suggested no statistically significant intervention effect, on patient length of stay. Conclusion Our analysis confirms that different analytical methods for estimating intervention effects provide different assessments of the intervention effects. It is crucial that researchers employ appropriate designs which incorporate a counterfactual framework. Such methods tend to be more robust and provide a stronger basis for evidence-based policy-making. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08657-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gintare Valentelyte
- Structured Population and Health services Research Education (SPHeRE) Programme, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Mercer Street Lower, Dublin, Ireland. .,Healthcare Outcome Research Centre (HORC), School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Conor Keegan
- Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Whitaker Square, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jan Sorensen
- Healthcare Outcome Research Centre (HORC), School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|