Drug prescribing for schizophrenic out-patients on depot injections. Repeat surveys over 18 years

Professional attitudes in the UK towards neuroleptic maintenance therapy in schizophrenia

Controlled trials show that about 80% of schizophrenic patients remain relapse free when given adequate neuroleptic maintenance therapy but this level of efficacy is not achieved in clinical practice. Guidelines for proper use of neuroleptics in relapse prevention were developed by a group of experienced psychiatrists – the ‘Consensus Group’ – in 1989. In this survey, the views of UK psychiatrists, GPs, CPNs and pharmacists involved in community care of schizophrenia were compared with the Guidelines.

Prescribing patterns in a psychiatric follow-up clinic

There have been several surveys of prescribing for psychiatric patients (Muijen & Silverstone, 1987; Johnson & Wright, 1990) indicating inappropriate prescribing and a tendency towards polypharmacy. Most studies have looked at prescriptions for psychiatric patients in all settings (out-patients, day-patients and in-patients) in conglomeration rather than just out-patients. Out-patients experience a comparatively lesser degree of supervision (hence a greater risk of non-compliance) and have other opportunities to acquire prescriptions (e.g. through general practice). With this in view a pilot study to observe prescribing pattern in a follow-up clinic was performed.

Patients with learning disability at Kneesworth House Hospital

This paper reports a retrospective case note study of all patients with learning disability and challenging behaviour admitted to Kneesworth House Hospital between 1986 and 1991 (n=70), describing their demographic and clinical characteristics. The subjects had high levels of psychiatric morbidity, in addition to learning disability. Patients whose stay was relatively short, or who were discharged to community placements, were not able to be differentiated on clinical grounds, suggesting that the provision of local facilities determined the length of the admission. There is a need for more regional and sub-regional services for this group with multiple long-term problems.

A Hierarchical Generative Framework of Language Processing: Linking Language Perception, Interpretation, and Production Abnormalities in Schizophrenia

Language and thought dysfunction are central to the schizophrenia syndrome. They are evident in the major symptoms of psychosis itself, particularly as disorganized language output (positive thought disorder) and auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs), and they also manifest as abnormalities in both high-level semantic and contextual processing and low-level perception. However, the literatures characterizing these abnormalities have largely been separate and have sometimes provided mutually exclusive accounts of aberrant language in schizophrenia. In this review, we propose that recent generative probabilistic frameworks of language processing can provide crucial insights that link these four lines of research. We first outline neural and cognitive evidence that real-time language comprehension and production normally involve internal generative circuits that propagate probabilistic predictions to perceptual cortices - predictions that are incrementally updated based on prediction error signals as new inputs are encountered. We then explain how disruptions to these circuits may compromise communicative abilities in schizophrenia by reducing the efficiency and robustness of both high-level language processing and low-level speech perception. We also argue that such disruptions may contribute to the phenomenology of thought-disordered speech and false perceptual inferences in the language system (i.e., AVHs). This perspective suggests a number of productive avenues for future research that may elucidate not only the mechanisms of language abnormalities in schizophrenia, but also promising directions for cognitive rehabilitation.

A qualitative study of experiences with and perceptions regarding long-acting injectable antipsychotics: Part I-patient perspectives

OBJECTIVE

Despite the well-acknowledged problem of poor adherence to antipsychotic (AP) medication, long-acting injectables (LAIs) that could improve adherence are underused in Canada. Attitudes concerning LAIs among patients and psychiatrists may contribute to this underuse. Our objective was to investigate perceptions of and attitudes toward LAIs among patients in Canada.

METHOD

Focus groups were conducted with 34 patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum psychoses in 4 Canadian provinces. The focus groups inquired about experiences with and attitudes toward LAI APs. The sessions were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim, and transcripts were coded using a combination of deductive and inductive methods.

RESULTS

Four themes emerged: awareness of and knowledge about LAIs; perceptions about LAIs; cost and convenience considerations; and issues arising from the coercive context under which LAIs were often prescribed. Nine patients had never heard about LAIs, and some others reported not having understood what was discussed with them regarding LAIs. Patients had typically heard about LAIs in either a context of coercion or of medication nonadherence. Patients had positive and negative perceptions concerning LAIs. The positive perceptions centred on relapse prevention and reduced effort in ensuring adherence, and the negative perceptions centred on financial costs and the inconvenience of appointments to receive injections.

CONCLUSION

To enhance LAI usage, some of the issues that need to be addressed are the inadequacy of information given to patients, the element of coercion involved in LAI introduction, the pragmatic barriers to LAI uptake by patients, and negative subjective perceptions about LAIs.

A qualitative study of experiences with and perceptions regarding long-acting injectable antipsychotics: part II-physician perspectives

OBJECTIVE

In many countries, including Canada, a small proportion of people with psychotic disorders receive long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics (APs), despite their demonstrated effectiveness and possible advantages for improving adherence rates. Attitudes regarding LAIs among physicians may influence their prescribing practices and thereby contribute to the underuse of LAIs. Here, we report on a qualitative study of perceptions and attitudes toward LAIs among psychiatrists in Canada.

METHOD

Focus groups were conducted with 24 psychiatrists in 4 Canadian provinces. The focus groups inquired about experiences with and attitudes toward LAI APs. The sessions were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim, and transcripts were coded using a hybrid process of deductive and inductive methods. A brief pre-focus group questionnaire was administered.

RESULTS

The pre-focus group questionnaires indicated that psychiatrists in our study prescribed the oral formulation of APs most of the time and had limited experience with LAIs. The focus groups yielded 4 main themes: limited knowledge about and experience with LAIs; attitudes toward LAIs (beliefs about negative perceptions of patients regarding LAIs, personal bias against needles, and consensus about some advantages of LAIs); prescribing practices around LAIs (generally seen as a last-resort option for patients with a history of nonadherence); and pragmatic barriers to using LAIs (for example, cost, storage, and staffing).

CONCLUSION

Several factors may be contributing to the underuse of LAIs and the continuing stigmatized and coercive image of LAIs. Psychiatrists may benefit from better education about LAIs, and from self-examination of their attitudes to LAIs and their prescribing practices.

Antipsychotic polypharmacy: a comprehensive evaluation of relevant correlates of a long-standing clinical practice

Antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) is common in the treatment of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The literature indicates that APP is related to patient, illness, and treatment variables that are proxy measures for greater illness acuity, severity, complexity, and chronicity. The largely unknown relative risks and benefits of APP need to be weighed against the known risks and benefits of clozapine for treatment-resistant patients. To inform evidence-based clinical practice, controlled, high-quality antipsychotic combination and discontinuation trials are necessary to determine the effectiveness, safety, and role of APP in the management of severely ill patients with insufficient response to antipsychotic monotherapy.

Prevalence and correlates of antipsychotic polypharmacy: a systematic review and meta-regression of global and regional trends from the 1970s to 2009

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence and correlates of antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) across decades and regions.

METHODS

Electronic PubMed/Google Scholar search for studies reporting on APP, published from 1970 to 05/2009. Median rates and interquartile ranges (IQR) were calculated and compared using non-parametric tests. Demographic and clinical variables were tested as correlates of APP in bivariate and meta-regression analyses.

RESULTS

Across 147 studies (1,418,163 participants, 82.9% diagnosed with schizophrenia [IQR=42-100%]), the median APP rate was 19.6% (IQR=12.9-35.0%). Most common combinations included first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs)+second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) (42.4%, IQR=0.0-71.4%) followed by FGAs+FGAs (19.6%, IQR=0.0-100%) and SGAs+SGAs (1.8%, IQR=0.0-28%). APP rates were not different between decades (1970-1979:28.8%, IQR=7.5-44%; 1980-1989:17.6%, IQR=10.8-38.2; 1990-1999:22.0%, IQR=11-40; 2000-2009:19.2% IQR=14.4-29.9, p=0.78), but between regions, being higher in Asia and Europe than North America, and in Asia than Oceania (p<0.001). APP increased numerically by 34% in North America from the 1980s 12.7%) to 2000s (17.0%) (p=0.94) and decreased significantly by 65% from 1980 (55.5%) to 2000 (19.2%) in Asia (p=0.03), with non-significant changes in Europe. APP was associated with inpatient status (p<0.001), use of FGAs (p<0.0001) and anticholinergics (<0.001), schizophrenia (p=0.01), less antidepressant use (p=0.02), greater LAIs use (p=0.04), shorter follow-up (p=0.001) and cross-sectional vs. longitudinal study design (p=0.03). In a meta-regression, inpatient status (p<0.0001), FGA use (0.046), and schizophrenia diagnosis (p=0.004) independently predicted APP (N=66, R(2)=0.44, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

APP is common with different rates and time trends by region over the last four decades. APP is associated with greater anticholinergic requirement, shorter observation time, greater illness severity and lower antidepressant use.

Long-acting injectable antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia: their role in relapse prevention

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Antipsychotic medications are the cornerstone of treatment in schizophrenia, and a large body of data confirms the value of ongoing and continuous antipsychotic pharmacotherapy in controlling symptoms and preventing relapse. However, nonadherence with antipsychotic treatment is a significant issue, with estimates as high as 90%.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This review focuses on long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics and their role in the treatment of schizophrenia. The existing literature, with an emphasis on clinical evidence, is assessed. This includes both reviews and specific trials that examine LAIs and compare them with oral agents, with measures ranging from relapse and rehospitalization to adherence. Both advantages and limitations (e.g., challenges in terms of dose titration and time to steady state) are examined.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

This overview serves as an update for clinicians wishing to understand LAIs better, including the newer second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) with this formulation available, and their potential role in the long-term treatment of individuals with schizophrenia.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Despite identified advantages, LAIs are not used as widely as might be expected. It would seem that clinicians are at least partly responsible for this, influenced by our own misperceptions (e.g., that LAIs are not acceptable to patients) and, perhaps, misinformation (e.g., increased side effect risk). As clinicians, we may well be shortchanging LAIs if we position them as a treatment of last resort for the multi-episode, nonadherent, 'revolving door' patient, especially given recent evidence underscoring their potential benefits in first-episode patients. The search for new and more effective antipsychotics will continue, but we are reminded that suboptimal outcomes may have as much to do with nonadherence as inadequate treatments. Evidence has established that LAI antipsychotics demonstrate distinct benefits in this regard, and we would be remiss if we did not exploit this already available strategy. As well as additional research, we need to rethink how we position these agents in our treatment algorithms if we are to maximize their potential.

Antipsychotic long-acting injections: mind the gap

Long-acting injections of antipsychotic medication (or depots) were developed specifically to promote treatment adherence and are a valuable option for maintenance medication in psychotic illnesses. Approximately 40-60% of patients with schizophrenia are partially or totally non-adherent to their antipsychotic regimen, but only 30% or less are prescribed a long-acting injection. The use of such injections has declined in recent years after the introduction of second-generation (atypical) oral antipsychotic drugs. Research shows that possible reasons for this decline include concerns that may be based on suboptimal knowledge, as well as an erroneous assumption that one's own patient group is more adherent than those of one's colleagues. Research on attitudes has also revealed that psychiatrists feel that long-acting injections have an ;image' problem. This editorial addresses the gaps in knowledge and behaviour associated with possible underutilisation of these formulations, highlighting the role of stigma and the need for more research.

Historical perspective on antipsychotic long-acting injections

BACKGROUND

Clinical experience has shown considerable potential benefits from long-term continuous medication for chronic or relapsing forms of schizophrenia. These benefits have not always been realised.

AIMS

To review the research literature in order to understand the problems of long-term medication and use of antipsychotic oral medication and long-acting injections (LAIs), and to place these in an historical context.

METHOD

Review of literature.

RESULTS

Research showed that the potential success of LAI therapy depends on the quality of the follow-up service.

CONCLUSIONS

Following the advent of second-generation oral antipsychotics confidence in the use of LAIs has eroded and that mistakes made in LAI use during the past century may be repeated.

Unmet need for mental health care in schizophrenia: an overview of literature and new data from a first-admission study

We present an overview of the literature on the patterns of mental health service use and the unmet need for care in individuals with schizophrenia with a focus on studies in the United States. We also present new data on the longitudinal course of treatments from a study of first-admission patients with schizophrenia. In epidemiological surveys, approximately 40% of the respondents with schizophrenia report that they have not received any mental health treatments in the preceding 6-12 months. Clinical epidemiological studies also find that many patients virtually drop out of treatment after their index contact with services and receive little mental health care in subsequent years. Clinical studies of patients in routine treatment settings indicate that the treatment patterns of these patients often fall short of the benchmarks set by evidence-based practice guidelines, while at least half of these patients continue to experience significant symptoms. The divergence from the guidelines is more pronounced with regard to psychosocial than medication treatments and in outpatient than in inpatient settings. The expansion of managed care has led to further reduction in the use of psychosocial treatments and, in some settings, continuity of care. In conclusion, we found a substantial level of unmet need for care among individuals with schizophrenia both at community level and in treatment settings. More than half of the individuals with this often chronic and disabling condition receive either no treatment or suboptimal treatment. Recovery in this patient population cannot be fully achieved without enhancing access to services and improving the quality of available services. The recent expansion of managed care has made this goal more difficult to achieve.

Real-world antipsychotic treatment practices

This article examines real-world antipsychotic use in the treatment of schizophrenia by comparing real-world prescribing with medication algorithms and guidelines, by evaluating the evidence underlying recommendations and guidelines, and by examining the roles of side effects and medication adherence in real-world prescribing decisions.

Formation of immature neutrophil leucocytes in schizophrenic patients treated with various antipsychotic drugs: comparisons and predictions

The neutrophils of schizophrenic patients taking antipsychotic drugs were evaluated. Neutrophil immaturity was assessed by determining mean nuclear lobe number in peripheral blood smears of patients and controls. Subjects were patients medicated with typical (upenthixol (n 6), uphenazine (n 7), haloperidol (n 23), thioridazine (n 15), and triuoperazine (n 6)) or atypical (olanzapine (n 15), risperidone (n 10), and sulpiride (n 7)) antipsychotic drugs. Controls (n 58) were healthy, non-medicated clinical and academic staff. Mean lobe number was determined using light microscopy and examining 300 neutrophils per individual. For subject and control groups, means and medians of mean lobe numbers, and also mean white cell and neutrophil counts, were determined. Means for each group were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test; variances using F ratios. Mean lobe numbers of all patients were decreased compared to controls. The left shift occurring in patients medicated with haloperidol, olanzapine, risperidone, thioridazine, and triuoperazine was signícantat P 0.0001; for upenthixol P 0.001, and for sulpiride P 0.05. The left shift for uphenazine was not statistically signíant. For one patient, mean lobe numbers were obtained before and after medication with olanzapine commenced, and a lowering of mean lobe number was seen. Although the coefficient of variation in the patient groups was large compared to the controls, nevertheless more than half of the patients had mean lobe numbers outside the observed range of values seen in the control population. White blood cell and neutrophil counts in patients and controls were not signiécantly different. This study demonstrated that patients taking antipsychotic drugs have immature neutrophils, but normal total white cell and neutrophil numbers. The effect was seen with both typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs, and is probably drug-induced. It is possible that mean lobe number may predict patients at risk from neutropenia or agranulocytosis, as is also suggested by an analysis of the relative numbers of literature reports of neutrophil pathology for these drugs. It is of interest that olanzapine, which has been considered a haematologically non-hazardous drug, was shown to be associated with a significant decrease in mean lobe number.

Prescription of psychotropic drugs to patients with schizophrenia: an Italian national survey

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to: (a) describe the type and doses of psychotropic drugs received by outpatients with schizophrenia in Italy; (b) explore the relationship between prescription and patients' clinical conditions, disability and socio-demographic characteristics; and (c) estimate the percentage of patients receiving polypharmacy and antipsychotics within the official recommended ranges.

METHODS

A total of 682 patients with schizophrenia were consecutively recruited in 30 Italian mental health departments, randomly selected taking into account the geographic location and population density of their catchment areas.

RESULTS

Of the sample, 98% were in treatment with neuroleptics, 47% received benzodiazepines, 25% were on anticholinergics, 10% were prescribed antidepressants and 8% were on mood stabilisers. Polypharmacy was found in 29% of the sample. Patients treated with one neuroleptic received this within therapeutic doses in 77% of cases. In patients who received two neuroleptics (24%), the former was prescribed within the official range in 71% of cases and the latter in 46%. Polytherapy was more frequently prescribed in patients treated with typicals (60% versus 34%) and in those who also received benzodiazepines (61% versus 41%) and anticholinergics (44% versus 16%). Patients in treatment with atypicals (45%) were mainly younger and lived in highly populated areas. Depot medications (25%) were more frequently prescribed to patients living in areas of low population density, who were older and who had a lower educational level, a longer duration of illness and milder anxiety/depression symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The consistent percentage of patients receiving polypharmacy and neuroleptics outside the therapeutic doses highlights the need to promote interventions aimed at increasing a rational use of psychotropic drugs among mental health professionals.

Effect of switching to atypical antipsychotics on memory in patients with chronic schizophrenia

While the usefulness of atypical antipsychotics for improving cognitive function has been proven, the specific effects of these drugs are still unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate changes of the immediate memory and verbal working memory in patients with chronic schizophrenia after switching to one of four atypical antipsychotic agents and cessation of anticholinergic therapy. The subjects included 77 schizophrenic patients who were treated primarily with typical antipsychotics. Treatment was randomly switched to one of four atypical antipsychotics (olanzapine, perospirone, quetiapine, or risperidone) over a 4-week period, and then the drug was continued for another 4 weeks while the patient was taken off anticholinergics. The immediate memory, verbal working memory, and symptoms were evaluated. Significant improvement of immediate memory was only seen with olanzapine and risperidone. Improvement was also seen after switching to perospirone, but immediate memory worsened after treatment with this anticholinergic drug was discontinued. Deterioration was seen after switching to quetiapine, but immediate memory improved and reached the previous level after treatment with anticholinergic drugs was discontinued. Significant improvement of the verbal working memory was only seen during risperidone administration. The findings suggested that switching chronic schizophrenic patients to atypical antipsychotics can improve both the immediate memory and the verbal working memory when risperidone is used, while improvement of immediate memory can be expected with olanzapine. From the viewpoint of improving the memory, quetiapine should not be administered concomitantly with anticholinergic drugs, and caution should be exercised when discontinuing anticholinergic drugs during treatment with perospirone.

Clinical practice variations in prescribing antipsychotics for patients with schizophrenia

Few studies have examined the variations among individual physicians in prescribing antipsychotics for schizophrenia. This study examined clinical practice variations in the route and dosage of antipsychotic medication prescribed for inpatients with schizophrenia by 11 different psychiatrists. The sample consisted of 130 patients with a DSM-III-R diagnosis of schizophrenia who had received inpatient care at a state hospital or Veterans Affairs medical center in the southeastern United States in 1992-1993. Mixed-effects regression models were developed to explore the influence of individual physicians and hospitals on route of antipsychotic administration (oral or depot) and daily antipsychotic dose, controlling for patient case-mix variables (age, race, sex, duration of illness, symptom severity, and substance-abuse diagnosis). The average daily antipsychotic dose was 1092 +/- 892 chlorpromazine mg equivalents. Almost half of the patients (48%) were prescribed doses above or below the range recommended by current practice guidelines. The proportion of patients prescribed depot antipsychotics was significantly different at the 2 hospitals, as was the antipsychotic dose prescribed at discharge. Individual physicians and patient characteristics were not significantly associated with prescribing practices. These data, which were obtained before clinical practice guidelines were widely disseminated, provide a benchmark against which to examine more current practice variations in antipsychotic prescribing. The results raise several questions about deviations from practice guidelines in the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia. To adequately assess quality and inform and possibly further develop clinical practice guideline recommendations for schizophrenia, well-designed research studies conducted in routine clinical settings are needed.

The pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia in Chinese patients: a comparison of prescription patterns between 1996 and 1999

AIMS

In 1996 a Hong Kong-wide survey of pharmacological treatment for schizophrenic inpatients identified a few idiosyncratic prescription patterns that were not consistent with international standards. In the context of continuous quality assurance, the survey was repeated in 1999 to monitor trends in the pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia and to identify changes in prescribing practices. It was expected that the widespread introduction of novel antipsychotic drugs coupled with continuing medical education would favourably alter prescribing habits.

METHODS

A representative random sample of 1202 schizophrenic patients from all inpatient settings in Hong Kong was surveyed. Basic socio-demographic data and a list of all psychotropic medication taken on census day were collected.

RESULTS

Significant improvement was noted in several aspects of pharmacotherapy in 1999 as compared with 1996. The total daily dosage of antipsychotic drugs decreased from 716 +/- 627 to 561 +/- 482 mg day-1 chlorpromazine equivalent (CPZeq) (Mann-Whitney U-test; Z = -3.906, P = 0.000; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 70.0, 240.2 mg day-1 CPZeq), for acute patients and from 923 +/- 809 to 675 +/- 545 mg day-1 CPZeq (Mann-Whitney U-test; Z=-5.036, P = 0.000; 95% CI = 175.57, 321.63 mg day-1 CPZeq) for chronic patients. The percentage of patients coprescribed antipsychotics and an antiparkinson drug significantly decreased from 67.8% to 61.8% (chi2 = 5.558, P = 0.018) in the chronic schizophrenia group. The percentage of patients taking atypical antipsychotic medication increased significantly from 5.5% to 19.2% (chi2 = 27.14, P = 0.000) in the acute and 3.4% to 12.3% (chi2 = 27.76, P = 0.000) in the chronic group.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated surveys of prescribing practices proved to be a useful tool to demonstrate trends in the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia. Our findings suggest that the widespread use of atypical antipsychotic drugs contributed to a more rational pharmacotherapy for schizophrenia.

Quality of life and treatment costs in schizophrenic outpatients, treated with depot neuroleptics

Study aim was 1) to find out the influences on quality of life (QoL) of chronic outpatients with schizophrenia; 2) to calculate Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY); and 3) to estimate direct 1-year treatment costs. In a 20% sample (100 males, 100 females) of schizophrenic outpatients from the Outpatients Clinic in Ljubljana, Slovenia receiving depot neuroleptics demographic, clinical, and treatment data were collected for the year 1996. The Krawiecka Scale, Global Assessment Scale (GAS), Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale, Rating Scale for Drug-Induced Akathisia, Rating Scale for Extrapyramidal Side Effects, Quality of Life Scale (QLS), EQ-5D and QALY were used. Multivariate linear regression was used with the QLS score as dependent variable. The patients were on average 44 years old and had been treated for 14 years. The average GAS score was 70. GAS was positively related to the QLS score while the parkinsonism score was inversely correlated with QLS. The patients can expect to live for 10. 20 more QALY on average. The QoL on the EQ-5D scale was 0.73. The annual direct treatment costs amounted to $216,216 in 1996 prices. In well-adjusted chronic patients with schizophrenia the QoL seems to depend mostly on their psychosocial performance and side effects. Although rare, re-hospitalisations accounted for one-half of all treatment expenses.

Antipsychotic drugs result in the formation of immature neutrophil leucocytes in schizophrenic patients

Subclinical abnormality of neutrophil populations of patients suffering from schizophrenia and medicated with antipsychotic drugs was evaluated using cellular immaturity as a criterion. Neutrophil maturity of patients and controls was compared by determining mean nuclear lobularity in peripheral blood smears. White blood cell and neutrophil counts were made. Subjects were patients medicated with chlorpromazine (n = 17) or clozapine (n = 48). Controls (n = 58) were healthy, non-medicated clinical and academic staff. Determination of mean lobe number involved assessment of 300 neutrophils per individual. For subject and control groups, means and medians of mean lobe numbers and mean white cell and neutrophil counts were determined. Means for each group were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test; variances using F ratios. Means of lobe numbers of both patient populations were significantly different (p < 0.0001) compared to controls. Two-thirds of patients had mean lobe numbers outside the control range. Dose-response (mean lobe number) plots were significant for patients medicated with both chlorpromazine and clozapine. White cell and neutrophil counts in patients and controls did not differ significantly. For six patients, mean lobe numbers were obtained before and after medication commenced and all showed lowering of mean lobe number. The mean lobe number of the one patient who subsequently suffered from agranulocytosis was at the low end of the patient range. Thus, patients medicated with antipsychotic drugs typically have immature neutrophils, but normal white cell and neutrophil numbers. This effect is probably drug-induced. Mean lobe number may predict patients at risk from agranulocytosis.

Psychotropic drug use in Italy, 1984-99: the impact of a change in reimbursement status

After years of corruption surrounding drug reimbursement, in 1994, a change in drug reimbursement status was implemented in Italy according to cost-effectiveness criteria. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of these changes on the use of psychotropic drugs. National trends in antipsychotic, antidepressant and benzodiazepine prescriptions were analysed from 1984 to 1999. During the study period, prescriptions of antipsychotic drugs were stable from 1984 to 1994 but, in the subsequent 5 years, increased by 54%. Although the use of atypical compounds in 1999 accounted for only 6% of total antipsychotics sold, the cost of these new drugs accounted for almost one-half the total antipsychotic expenditure. The use of benzodiazepines increased by 53%. In 1999, the psychotropic drugs lorazepam and alprazolam were the most sold by value. From 1984 to 1999, the total antidepressants sold increased by 55%. Although the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and newer antidepressants in 1999 accounted for less than 50% of total antidepressants sold, the cost of these drugs accounted for 65% of total antidepressant expenditure. This analysis highlights specific areas of concern which should become the object of public health programs.

Prevalence and characteristics of patients with pseudoakathisia

Pseudoakathisia (PsA) is characterised by the typical motor features of akathisia but there is a lack of subjective awareness. A total of 153 in-patients on neuroleptic medication hospitalized in two representative wards of the Psychiatric Hospital of Attica in Athens were rated on the census date using the Rating Scale for Drug-Induced Akathisia [Barnes, Br. J. Psychiatry, 154 (1989) 672-676], the Rating Scale for Extrapyramidal Side-Effects [Simpson and Angus, Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 212 (Suppl.) (1970) 11-19] and the Abnormal Involuntary Movements Scale [US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, ECDEU Assessment Manual (1976) pp. 534-537]. Eight subjects of the total in-patient population were found to have PsA of chronic type (point prevalence 5.23%). The point-prevalence of PsA among schizophrenic patients was 4.76%. In addition to the diagnosis of chronic pseudoakathisia, five patients (62.5%) had a concurrent diagnosis of chronic parkinsonism. Among patients with PsA, significant correlations were found between parkinsonism score and current daily dose of neuroleptics or high potency neuroleptics. There is evidence of a relationship between chronic pseudoakathisia, chronic parkinsonism and daily dose of neuroleptic.

Depot perphenazine decanoate and enanthate for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Anti-psychotic drugs are usually given orally but compliance with medication given by this route may be difficult to quantify. The development of depot injections in the 1960s gave rise to extensive use of depots as a means of long-term maintenance treatment. Perphenazine decanoate and enanthate are depot antipsychotics that belong to the phenothiazine family and have a piperazine ethanol side chain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of depot perphenazine decanoate and enanthate versus placebo, oral anti-psychotics and other depot antipsychotic preparations for people with schizophrenia in terms of clinical, social and economic outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Biological Abstracts (1982-1998), the Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 1998), the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (June 1998), EMBASE (1980-1998), MEDLINE (1966-1998), and PsycLIT (1974-1998) were searched. References of all identified trials were also inspected for more studies and industry contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials focusing on people with schizophrenia where depot perphenazine decanoate and enanthate, oral anti-psychotics or other depot preparations were compared.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Studies were reliably selected, quality rated and data extracted. For dichotomous data Peto odds ratios (OR) with the 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Where possible, the number needed to treat statistic (NNT) was calculated. Analysis was by intention-to-treat.

MAIN RESULTS

One study of six months duration, compared perphenazine enanthate to clopenthixol decanoate. There was no differences between the two for outcomes of global improvement, relapse and leaving the study early. More people in the perphenazine enanthate group required anticholinergic drugs than those allocated to clopenthixol decanoate (OR 3.6 CI 1.2-10, NNT 10). A single study (n=64, duration six weeks) compared perphenazine enanthate and its longer acting decanoate ester. Data on relapse and leaving the study early failed to show convincing differences. The enanthate group, however, experienced more movement disorders (OR 0.2 CI 0.06-0.7) than those allocated the decanoate ester of the same drug (NNT 4.0) and required more anticholinergic drugs (OR 0.2 CI 0.08-0.7, NNT 3.7).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Depot perphenazine is in clinical use in the Nordic countries, Belgium, Portugal and the Netherlands. At a conservative estimate a quarter of a million people suffer from schizophrenia in those countries and could be treated with depot perphenazine. The total number of participants in the two trials with useful data is 236. Neither study observes the effect of oral versus depot antipsychotic drugs. Until well conducted and reported randomised trials are undertaken clinicians will be in doubt as to the effects of perphenazine depots and people with schizophrenia should exercise their own judgement or ask to be randomised.

Depot haloperidol decanoate for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

The mainstay of treatment for schizophrenia is the antipsychotic group of drugs. These are usually given orally but compliance with medication given by this route may be difficult to quantify. Problems with treatment adherence are common. The development of depot injections in the 1960s gave rise to their extensive use as a means of long-term maintenance treatment. Haloperidol decanoate is one depot drug available in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of haloperidol decanoate versus oral anti-psychotics and other depot antipsychotic preparations for people with schizophrenia in terms of clinical, social and economic outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant trials were identified by searching Biological Abstracts (1982-1998), Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 1998), Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (June 1998), EMBASE (1980-1998), MEDLINE (1966-1998) and PsycLIT (1974-1998). References of all identified trials were also inspected for more studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All relevant randomised trials focusing on people with schizophrenia where haloperidol decanoate, oral anti-psychotics or other depot preparations were compared. Outcomes such as death, clinically significant change in global function, mental state, relapse, hospital admission, adverse effects and acceptability of treatment were sought.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Studies were reliably selected, quality rated and data extracted. For dichotomous data Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios (OR) with the 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Where possible, the number needed to treat statistic (NNT) was calculated. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Normal continuous data were summated using the weighted mean difference (WMD). Scale data were presented only for those tools that had attained pre-specified levels of quality.

MAIN RESULTS

In a haloperidol decanoate versus placebo comparison, two small studies reported that significantly fewer people on depot left early (OR 0.09 CI 0.03-0.21, NNT 2 CI 1-3) or experienced no important improvement in mental state (OR 0. 04 CI 0.01-0.15). Zississ (1982) suggested that those taking haloperidol decanoate would need less additional antipsychotic medication (OR 0.14 Cl 0.04-0.55, NNT 2 CI 1-5). Haloperidol decanoate was compared to oral haloperidol in a single trial that showed no differences in global impression, mental state or side effects ( approximately approximately Zuardi 1983 approximately approximately , n=22). Compliance with medication was not reported in this study. Eight trials compared haloperidol decanoate to other depot neuroleptics and again no differences were found for the outcomes of death, global impression, mental state, behaviour, or side effects.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Haloperidol decanoate may have a substantial effect in improving the symptoms and behaviour associated with schizophrenia in comparison to placebo, but data are remarkably sparse. There are no discernible differences between the depot form of haloperidol and its oral equivalent. For those needing and willing to take the drug, the means of administration is then a matter of individual choice and clinical judgement. As there are no clear differences between haloperidol decanoate and other depots, the choice of depot medication could also be individually tailored and patient preference exercised. Well-conducted and reported randomised trials are needed comparing haloperidol decanoate with other depots but the comparison of haloperidol decanoate to oral antipsychotics is a priority.

Zuclopenthixol decanoate for schizophrenia and other serious mental illnesses

BACKGROUND

There is a clear link between stopping antipsychotic medications and a relapse of psychotic symptoms. A series of long-acting intra-muscular preparations has been developed since the 1960s in the hope of reducing the frequency of relapse and, hence, overall disability. These depot preparations, active for weeks at a time, are frequently used for those who find taking oral medication on a regular basis difficult or unacceptable. It has, however, been a consistent concern that any reduction in relapse rate afforded by depot preparations may be offset by an increase in adverse effects such as drug-induced movement disorders.

OBJECTIVES

To compare zuclopenthixol decanoate to oral zuclopenthixol and other antipsychotic preparations for the treatment of schizophrenia and similar serious mental illness.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of Biological Abstracts (1982-1998), CINAHL (1982-1998), The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 1998), The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (April 1998), EMBASE (1980-1998), MEDLINE (1966-1998), and PsycLIT (1974-1998) were searched. References of all eligible studies were searched for further trials. The manufacturer of zuclopenthixol was contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Inclusion criteria were that the clinical study should be randomised, focus on people with schizophrenia or other serious mental illness with psychotic symptoms, and compare the use of zuclopenthixol decanoate to oral zuclopenthixol or other antipsychotic preparations.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was extracted independently by two reviewers (EC, MF). Authors of trials were contacted for additional and missing data. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of homogenous dichotomous data were calculated with the Peto method. Where possible the number needed to treat (NNT) and its 95% confidence interval was also calculated.

MAIN RESULTS

Four studies relating to zuclopenthixol decanoate were included. All compared zuclopenthixol decanoate with other depot preparations. Zuclopenthixol decanoate prevented or postponed relapses when compared to other depots (NNT 8, CI 5-53). However, zuclopenthixol decanoate may induce more adverse effects (NNH 5, CI 3-31) although it decreases need for anticholinergic medication when compared to a group of other depot preparations (NNT 9, CI 5-38). For the risk of leaving the study early, there was also a trend for benefit to those allocated to zuclopenthixol decanoate. None of the studies reported outcomes on service utilisation, costs, or quality of life.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Choice of which depot to use must always take into account clinical judgement and the preferences of the recipients of care and their carers. Limited trial data suggests, however, that there are real differences between zuclopenthixol decanoate and other depots and these differences largely favour the former. This review highlights the need for good controlled clinical trials to fully address the effects of zuclopenthixol decanoate for those with schizophrenia. Future studies should report service utilisation data, as well as satisfaction with care and economic outcomes. Duration of such trials should be of a longer duration than the included studies (12 months or more).

Depot fluspirilene for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Anti-psychotic drugs are the mainstay treatment for schizophrenia and similar psychotic disorders. Long-acting depot injections of drugs such as fluspirilene are extensively used as a means of long-term maintenance treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of depot fluspirilene versus placebo, oral anti-psychotics and other depot antipsychotic preparations for people with schizophrenia in terms of clinical, social and economic outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant trials were identified by searching Biological Abstracts (1982-1998), Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 1998), Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (June 1998), EMBASE (1980-1998), MEDLINE (1966-1998) and PsycLIT (1974-1998). References of all identified trials were also inspected for more studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All relevant randomised trials focusing on people with schizophrenia where depot fluspirilene, oral anti-psychotics or other depot preparations were compared. Outcomes such as death, clinically significant change in global function, mental state, relapse, hospital admission, adverse effects and acceptability of treatment were sought.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Studies were reliably selected, quality rated and data extracted. For dichotomous data, Peto odds ratios (OR) with the 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Where possible, the number needed to treat statistic (NNT) was calculated. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Normal continuous data were summated using the weighted mean difference (WMD). Scale data were presented only for those tools that had attained pre-specified levels of quality.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven studies were included. Most comparisons included very few participants. There are no convincing data showing fluspirilene decanoate's advantage over oral chlorpromazine or other depot antipsychotics. No study reported on hospital and service outcomes or commented on participants' overall satisfaction with care. Economic outcomes were not recorded by any of the included studies.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The total numbers in each comparison were small and there were no clear differences demonstrated between fluspirilene and oral medication or other depots. The choice of whether to use fluspirilene as a depot medication and whether it has advantages over other depots, cannot, at present, be informed by trial-derived data. Well-conducted and reported randomised trials are still needed to inform practice.

Depot pipothiazine palmitate and undeclynate for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Anti-psychotic drugs are usually given orally but compliance with medication given by this route may be difficult to quantify. The development of depot injections in the 1960s gave rise to extensive use of depots as a means of long-term maintenance treatment. Pipothiazine palmitate is a depot from the phenothiazine family of antipsychotic drugs.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of depot pipothiazine palmitate and undeclynate versus placebo, oral anti-psychotics and other depot antipsychotic preparations for people with schizophrenia in terms of clinical, social and economic outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant trials were identified by searching Biological Abstracts (1982-1998), Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 1998), Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (June 1998), EMBASE (1980-1998), MEDLINE (1966-1998) and PsycLIT (1974-1998). References of all identified trials were also inspected for more studies and industry contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All clinical randomised trials focusing on people with schizophrenia where depot pipothiazine palmitate and undeclynate, oral anti-psychotics or other depot preparations were compared.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Studies were reliably selected, quality rated and data extracted. For dichotomous data Peto odds ratios (OR) with the 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Where possible, the number needed to treat statistic (NNT) was calculated. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Normal continuous data were summated using the weighted mean difference (WMD). Scale data were presented only for those tools that had attained pre-specified levels of quality.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included. When pipothiazine palmitate was compared to 'standard' oral antipsychotics no differences were found for outcomes of mental state, study attrition, behaviour and adverse effects (total randomised = 166). Pipothiazine palmitate was compared to other depot preparations in nine studies (n=455). Again no differences were identified for outcomes of global improvement, mental state, study attrition, behaviour and adverse effects.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Although well-conducted and reported randomised trials are still needed to inform practice (no trial data exists reporting hospital and services outcomes, satisfaction with care and economics) pipothiazine palmitate is a viable choice for clinician and recipient of care. Data suggests it is not different to other depot antipsychotics.

Depot flupenthixol decanoate for schizophrenia or other similar psychotic disorders

BACKGROUND

Anti-psychotic drugs are the mainstay treatment for schizophrenia and similar psychotic disorders. Long-acting depot injections of drugs such as flupenthixol decanoate are extensively used as a means of long-term maintenance treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects flupenthixol decanoate in comparison with placebo, oral antipsychotics and other depot neuroleptic preparations for people with schizophrenia and other severe mental illnesses, in terms of clinical, social and economic outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant trials were identified by searching Biological Abstracts (1982-1998), Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 1998), Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (December 1998), EMBASE (1980-1998), MEDLINE (1966-1998) and PsycLIT (1974-1998). The references of all identified trials were inspected for more studies and the first author of each included trial and relevant pharmaceutical companies were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials that focused on people with schizophrenia or other similar psychotic disorders where flupenthixol decanoate had been compared to placebo or other antipsychotic drugs. All clinically relevant outcomes were sought.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Studies were reliably selected, quality rated and data extracted. For dichotomous data Peto odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Where possible, the number needed to treat statistic (NNT) was also calculated. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Normal continuous data were summated using the weighted mean difference (WMD). Scale data were presented only for those tools that had attained pre-specified levels of quality.

MAIN RESULTS

No trials compared flupenthixol decanoate to placebo. One small study compared flupenthixol decanoate with an oral antipsychotic (penfluridol). There were no clear differences between the two preparations. When flupenthixol decanoate was compared to other depot preparations, there were no differences between depots for outcomes such as death, global impression, relapse (OR 1.16 CI 0.7-1.9) or leaving the study early (OR 1.00 CI 0.6-1.7). Two small studies suggest that flupenthixol decanoate is responsible for less movement disorders than other depot antipsychotic drugs (OR 0.23 CI 0.08-0.7, NNT 5). This finding did not hold for specific side effects, such as tremor (OR 1.2 CI 0.3-4) and tardive dyskinesia (OR 1.60 CI 0.4-6). Two trials comparing high doses of flupenthixol decanoate to the standard approximately 40mg per injection reported no significant difference for the outcome of relapse (OR 0.32 CI 0.09-1.2). One small (n=59) trial comparing a very low dose of flupenthixol decanoate ( approximately 6 mg/IM) to a very low dose approximately 9 mg per injection also reported no difference in relapse rates (OR 0.3 CI 0.1-1.1).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

From the data reported in clinical trials, it would be understandable if those suffering from schizophrenia, who are willing to take flupenthixol decanoate, would request the standard dose rather than the high dose. In the current state of evidence, there is nothing to choose between flupenthixol decanoate and other depot antipsychotics. The choice of which depot to use must therefore be based on clinical judgement and the preferences of people with schizophrenia and their carers. Managers and policy makers should expect better data than the research community has provided thus far. This review highlighted the need for large, well-designed and reported randomised clinical trials to address the effects of flupenthixol decanoate, in particular when compared to oral antipsychotics. Future studies should also consider hospital and service outcomes, satisfaction with care and record economic data.

Atypical neuroleptics: autonomy and compliance?

Non-compliance is a major stumbling block to the effectiveness of drug therapy. The nurse, both in hospital and community, has a crucial role to play in overcoming this problem to the benefit of the patient. Recent treatment advances, 'new-generation' anti-depressants and atypical neuroleptics, make this issue highly topical in mental health nursing. The atypical neuroleptics are a pharmacological breakthrough in the treatment of schizophrenia, which could herald a new era in psychiatry. These medicines give the benefits of the older (typical) neuroleptics but with fewer side-effects. Neuroleptics are sometimes called antipsychotics, antischizophrenics or major tranquillisers. Currently the atypical neuroleptics are not available in depot form. This critical review considers literature on interventions to promote compliance with neuroleptics generally and reflects on nursing implications relevant to the atypical neuroleptics. Three main forms of interventions emerge from the review; these are labelled as: imposed compliance, chosen compliance and active compliance. Historically the literature shows a gradual trend towards a realization by professionals that increased patient autonomy and involvement relates to improved compliance. This change in thinking is reflected in the new name 'adherence', which has begun to replace the term 'compliance'. It is concluded that mental health nurses have a key role to play in enabling this reconceptualization to change practice.

Diabetes insipidus and polydipsia in a patient with Asperger's disorder and an empty sella: a case report

The paper describes a patient with Asperger disorder, Neurogenic Diabetes Insipidus (NDI) and Primary Empty Sella (ES). His response to vasopressin treatment suggested a concomitant presence of primary polydipsia. This is the first reported case of an autistic spectrum disorder associated with NDI or ES. The implications of the observed co-occurrence of these relatively rare disorders are discussed in relation to diagnosis and pathogenesis.

Modifying psychotropic drug prescription patterns: a follow-up survey

Cross-sectional surveys of prescription patterns of psychotropic drugs provide a quick, global estimation of the appropriateness of psychopharmacotherapy. Recurrent inadequacies in prescribing for psychiatric patients include polypharmacy, high doses of antipsychotics (APS), the use of multiple APS simultaneously, and the administration of these drugs in multiple divided doses. Faulty prescribing patterns are difficult to amend. Following a survey in a rehabilitation facility for chronic psychiatric patients, a systematic education program and other measures were introduced to improve prescribing habits. Two years later the survey was repeated. Significant improvements were detected in the following areas: reductions in the doses of APS and antiparkinsonian (AP) drugs, reductions in the number of patients placed on these drugs, and reductions in the percentage of patients receiving multiple antipsychotics simultaneously. Despite these reductions in doses of psychotropic agents, patients' rehabilitative potential was not compromised.

Neuroleptic dosing in chronic schizophrenia: a 10-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate neuroleptic dosing patterns in individuals with schizophrenia over a 10-year interval.

METHOD

Changes in neuroleptic dosing between 1980 and 1990 were followed in 65 patients with a diagnosis of chronic schizophrenia.

RESULTS

According to more recent dosing guidelines, doses were already high at the time of initial evaluation, yet overall they continued to increase during the next decade of treatment for both males and females. Patients were almost equally divided, however, by those who underwent an increase (n = 33) and those whose dose remained stable (n = 4) or was decreased (n = 28).

CONCLUSION

A considerable number of patients with schizophrenia appear to receive progressively higher neuroleptic doses over the course of their illness, despite a lack of empirical data to support such an approach. Results are discussed in terms of current dosing recommendations and factors influencing dose changes.

Lithium and neuroleptics in combination: is there enhancement of neurotoxicity leading to permanent sequelae?

Neurotoxicity in relation to concomitant administration of lithium and neuroleptic drugs, particularly haloperidol, has been an ongoing issue. This study examined whether use of lithium with neuroleptic drugs enhances neurotoxicity leading to permanent sequelae. The Spontaneous Reporting System database of the United States Food and Drug Administration and extant literature were reviewed for spectrum cases of lithium/neuroleptic neurotoxicity. Groups taking lithium alone (Li), lithium/haloperidol (LiHal) and lithium/ nonhaloperidol neuroleptics (LiNeuro), each paired for recovery and sequelae, were established for 237 cases. Statistical analyses included pairwise comparisons of lithium levels using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum procedure and logistic regression to analyze the relationship between independent variables and development of sequelae. The Li and Li-Neuro groups showed significant statistical differences in median lithium levels between recovery and sequelae pairs, whereas the LiHal pair did not differ significantly. Lithium level was associated with sequelae development overall and within the Li and LiNeuro groups; no such association was evident in the LiHal group. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, lithium level and taking lithium/haloperidol were significant factors in the development of sequelae, with multiple possibly confounding factors (e.g., age, sex) not statistically significant. Multivariable logistic regression analyses with neuroleptic dose as five discrete dose ranges or actual dose did not show an association between development of sequelae and dose. Database limitations notwithstanding, the lack of apparent impact of serum lithium level on the development of sequelae in patients treated with haloperidol contrasts notably with results in the Li and LiNeuro groups. These findings may suggest a possible effect of pharmacodynamic factors in lithium/neuroleptic combination therapy.

Patterns of drug treatment of schizophrenic patients in Estonia, Spain and Sweden

1. Patterns of drug treatment and the use of polypharmacy in schizophrenic in-patients were compared and evaluated in the University Teaching Hospitals of Psychiatry in Badajoz, Spain, Huddinge, Sweden, and Tartu, Estonia. 2. The medical records of up to 100 consecutively admitted patients were retrospectively reviewed using a standardized data form. 3. The male patients were significantly younger than females in all study locations, but there were no age differences between the locations. The length of stay was equal for the two series in the same hospital, but considerably longer in Tartu than in Badajoz and Huddinge. 4. The neuroleptic drugs used most commonly in Badajoz and Tartu were similar in prescription frequency and in the doses prescribed, but different from those used in Huddinge. Haloperidol was the most frequently prescribed neuroleptic in Badajoz and Tartu, accounting for one third of all neuroleptic prescriptions. In Huddinge the choice of neuroleptics was more evenly spread over several compounds. Intramuscular injections other than depot preparations were commonly used in Tartu and Badajoz, but not in Huddinge. 5. At least two neuroleptics were prescribed simultaneously on 73% of treatment days in Badajoz and 46% in both Huddinge and Tartu. The average cumulative daily doses of concomitant multiple neuroleptic treatment, expressed in chlorpromazine equivalents, were lower in Huddinge than in the other study locations and higher for male patients in Badajoz and Tartu. 6. Anticholinergics were used together with neuroleptics in 42% of treatment days in Badajoz and 30% in Huddinge as compared with 75% in Tartu. The use of anticholinergics increased in parallel to the increase in the number and the cumulative dose of concomitant neuroleptics in all study locations. 7. About 15% of patients in Badajoz and Tartu, but only 1% in Huddinge, received concomitant treatment with antidepressant drugs. The simultaneous use of antidepressants and benzodiazepines was inversely related to the number and the cumulative dose of neuroleptics in Badajoz and Tartu. In contrast, the cumulative dose and number of neuroleptics were greater, when additional benzodiazepines were prescribed in Huddinge. 8. The study in schizophrenic in-patients revealed that polypharmacy with concomitant multiple neuroleptics, additional anticholinergics and other psychotropics is an international phenomenon.

Working with schizophrenia: a clinician's personal experience

There are few mental illnesses that have as profound an effect on individuals and their families as schizophrenia. The management of patients with schizophrenia requires the clinician to be aware of the wide range of outcomes and the multiple facets of management that can be used. This article examines the variety of ways in which the physician can work with patients with schizophrenia to help them achieve their full potential.

Issues in drug administration in a psychiatric rehabilitation unit

The aim of the investigation was to study medication-taking using dosetts by inpatients in a 25-bed rehabilitation assessment ward. Data were obtained on 39 predominantly schizophrenic patients over a three month period during which there were nearly 3,000 separate occasions when tablets were required to be taken. Recorded problems included: needing a reminder, requiring personal individual dispensing, refusal to take medication, taking from the wrong dosett slot, taking another patient's dose, and not taking medication home on weekend leave. Tablets were taken without problem on 78% of occasions; the most common problem noted was needing a reminder. Certain differences between days of the week and times of day were observed. Patients varied greatly in how satisfactorily they managed their dosetts. Those who managed poorly were rated worse on a wide variety of daily living skills and social behaviours. The implications for the return of patients to the community are discussed.

Long-term depot antipsychotics. A risk-benefit assessment

The main advantage of depot antipsychotic medication is that it overcomes the problem of covert noncompliance. Patients receiving depot treatment who refuse their injection or fail to receive it for any other reason can be immediately identified and appropriate action taken. In the context of a carefully monitored management programme, depot treatment can have a major impact on compliance and, consequently, the risk of relapse and hospitalisation can be reduced. Another major advantage is that the considerable individual variation in bioavailability and metabolism with oral antipsychotic drugs is markedly reduced with depot treatment. A better correlation between the dose administered and the concentration of medication found in blood or plasma is achieved with depot treatment, and thus, the clinician has greater control over the amount of drug being delivered to the site of activity. A further benefit of depot treatment is the achievement of stable plasma concentrations over long periods, allowing injections to be given every few weeks. However, this also represents a potential disadvantage in that there is a lack of flexibility of administration. Should adverse effects develop, the drug cannot be rapidly withdrawn. Furthermore, adjustment to the optimal dose becomes a long term strategy. The controlled studies of low dose maintenance therapy with depot treatment suggest that it can take months or years for the consequences of dose reduction, in terms of increased risk of relapse, to become manifest. When weighing up the risks and benefits of long term antipsychotic treatment for the individual patient with schizophrenia, the clinician must take into account the nature, severity and frequency of past relapses, and the degree of distress and disability related to any adverse effects. However, the clinical decision to prescribe either a depot or an oral antipsychotic for maintenance treatment will probably rest largely on an assessment of the risk of poor compliance in the particular patient. There is no convincing evidence that the range, nature or severity of adverse effects reported with depot treatment is significantly different from that seen with oral treatment, and depot treatment has been shown to be as good or better than oral medication in preventing or postponing relapse. Furthermore, when adjusting the dose or frequency of depot injection, to improve control of psychotic symptoms or reduce adverse effects, the clinician can be confident that the dose prescribed is the dose being received by the patient.

Depot antipsychotic drugs. Place in therapy

The pharmacokinetics of depot antipsychotic medications are such that an intramuscular injection given at intervals of from 1 to 4 weeks will produce adequate plasma concentrations that are sufficient to prevent relapse over the dosage interval. Such medication is useful in patients who do not reliably take their oral medication. The pharmacokinetics and clinical actions of various depot formulations of antipsychotic drugs have been extensively studied. Unfortunately, patients who do not reliably take their oral medications are unlikely to volunteer for controlled studies. This is because the same factors that influence a patient to not cooperate with the physician in taking the medication as prescribed will also interfere with their willingness to volunteer for research protocols. Thus, evidence from blinded controlled trials may not necessarily reflect the actual patient population at risk. We feel that particularly important evidence of efficacy of depot vs oral medication comes from mirror-image studies. In these trials, the number of hospitalisations after initiation of depot medication is compared with that observed when the patient was solely taking oral medication. Studies of this type show that depot medication substantially reduces the rate of relapse. There is considerable evidence about how long depot medications should be used. For many patients, depot medication to prevent relapse in schizophrenia should be used for the life of the patient. As the conventional antipsychotic agents are replaced by a new generation of agents, the need for depot formulations will continue, and the knowledge gained about the current formulations should transfer to future generations of drugs.

Rationalizing neuroleptic polypharmacy in chronic schizophrenics: effects of changing to a single depot preparation

This study investigated the effects of transferring patients on combined depot and oral neuroleptics to a single depot preparation; a secondary objective was to assess the effects of transferring patients from one depot neuroleptic to another. It was found that, whereas transferring from one depot preparation (flupenthixol) to another (fluphenazine) had no clear disadvantage for the patients, changing over from a combined oral and depot (fluphenazine) regimen to equivalent doses of depot alone resulted in an unacceptably high rate of relapse. The reasons for this may relate to either the unique pharmacokinetics of these drugs or subtle qualitative differences between them. It is suggested that caution is necessary whenever attempts are made to rationalize polypharmacy in schizophrenic patients.