Increasing antipsychotic dose versus switching antipsychotic for non response in schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Many people with schizophrenia do not respond to an initially prescribed antipsychotic drug. In such cases, one treatment strategy could be to increase the antipsychotic dose; and another strategy could be to switch to a different antipsychotic drug.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the efficacy of increasing the antipsychotic dose versus switching the antipsychotic drug in the treatment of non-responsive people with schizophrenia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (10 June 2014, 6 October 2015, and 30 March 2017). We examined references of all included studies for further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing increasing the antipsychotic dose versus switching to a different antipsychotic drug for people with schizophrenia who have not responded to their initial antipsychotic treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two review authors independently extracted data. We analysed dichotomous data using relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We analysed continuous data using mean differences (MD) and their 95% CIs. We assessed risk of bias for included studies and used GRADE to create a 'Summary of findings' table.

MAIN RESULTS

We include one RCT with relevant data on 29 participants in this review. The trial had a parallel design and was double-blind, but blinding procedures were not described. The trial included people who were non-responsive to fluphenazine 20 mg/day administered for 4 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned to continuing treatment with fluphenazine 20 mg/day, increasing the dose to fluphenazine 80 mg/day or switching to haloperidol 20 mg/day for four additional weeks. Data were reported only for 47 out of 58 initially randomised participants. The trial was published in 1993. The fact that only one RCT with a small sample size (N = 29) was included in the analysis limits the quality of the evidence. Overall, no clear difference was found between groups in terms of the three available outcomes: global state (number of participants with clinically relevant response (RR 1.63, 95% CI 0.17 to 15.99, very low quality evidence); general mental state (endpoint score, BPRS total) (MD 2.00, 95% CI -4.20 to 8.20, very low quality evidence); and negative symptoms (endpoint score, SANS) (MD 3.40, 95% CI -12.56 to 19.36). No data were reported for leaving the study early, adverse effects, time in hospital, quality of life, satisfaction with care and functioning.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is extremely limited evidence and no clear conclusions can be drawn. There is an urgent need for further trials in order to determine the optimal treatment strategy for people with schizophrenia who do not respond to their initial antipsychotic treatment.

Fluphenazine decanoate (depot) and enanthate for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Intramuscular injections (depot preparations) offer an advantage over oral medication for treating schizophrenia by reducing poor compliance. The benefits gained by long-acting preparations, however, may be offset by a higher incidence of adverse effects.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of fluphenazine decanoate and enanthate versus oral anti-psychotics and other depot neuroleptic preparations for individuals with schizophrenia in terms of clinical, social and economic outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Trials Register (February 2011 and October 16, 2013), which is based on regular searches of CINAHL, BIOSIS, AMED, EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and registries of clinical trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered all relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on people with schizophrenia comparing fluphenazine decanoate or enanthate with placebo or oral anti-psychotics or other depot preparations.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We reliably selected, assessed the quality, and extracted data of the included studies. For dichotomous data, we estimated risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Analysis was by intention-to-treat. We used the mean difference (MD) for normal continuous data. We excluded continuous data if loss to follow-up was greater than 50%. Tests of heterogeneity and for publication bias were undertaken. We used a fixed-effect model for all analyses unless there was high heterogeneity. For this update. we assessed risk of bias of included studies and used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to create a 'Summary of findings' table.

MAIN RESULTS

This review now includes 73 randomised studies, with 4870 participants. Overall, the quality of the evidence is low to very low.Compared with placebo, use of fluphenazine decanoate does not result in any significant differences in death, nor does it reduce relapse over six months to one year, but one longer-term study found that relapse was significantly reduced in the fluphenazine arm (n = 54, 1 RCT, RR 0.35, CI 0.19 to 0.64, very low quality evidence). A very similar number of people left the medium-term studies (six months to one year) early in the fluphenazine decanoate (24%) and placebo (19%) groups, however, a two-year study significantly favoured fluphenazine decanoate (n = 54, 1 RCT, RR 0.47, CI 0.23 to 0.96, very low quality evidence). No significant differences were found in mental state measured on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) or in extrapyramidal adverse effects, although these outcomes were only reported in one small study each. No study comparing fluphenazine decanoate with placebo reported clinically significant changes in global state or hospital admissions.Fluphenazine decanoate does not reduce relapse more than oral neuroleptics in the medium term (n = 419, 6 RCTs, RR 1.46 CI 0.75 to 2.83, very low quality evidence). A small study found no difference in clinically significant changes in global state. No difference in the number of participants leaving the study early was found between fluphenazine decanoate (17%) and oral neuroleptics (18%), and no significant differences were found in mental state measured on the BPRS. Extrapyramidal adverse effects were significantly less for people receiving fluphenazine decanoate compared with oral neuroleptics (n = 259, 3 RCTs, RR 0.47 CI 0.24 to 0.91, very low quality evidence). No study comparing fluphenazine decanoate with oral neuroleptics reported death or hospital admissions.No significant difference in relapse rates in the medium term between fluphenazine decanoate and fluphenazine enanthate was found (n = 49, 1 RCT, RR 2.43, CI 0.71 to 8.32, very low quality evidence), immediate- and short-term studies were also equivocal. One small study reported the number of participants leaving the study early (29% versus 12%) and mental state measured on the BPRS and found no significant difference for either outcome. No significant difference was found in extrapyramidal adverse effects between fluphenazine decanoate and fluphenazine enanthate. No study comparing fluphenazine decanoate with fluphenazine enanthate reported death, clinically significant changes in global state or hospital admissions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are more data for fluphenazine decanoate than for the enanthate ester. Both are effective antipsychotic preparations. Fluphenazine decanoate produced fewer movement disorder effects than other oral antipsychotics but data were of low quality, and overall, adverse effect data were equivocal. In the context of trials, there is little advantage of these depots over oral medications in terms of compliance but this is unlikely to be applicable to everyday clinical practice.

Treatment compliance of outpatients with schizophrenia: patient's attitudes, demographic, clinical and therapeutic variables

AIM

To compare patient's attitudes, demographic, clinical characteristics, psychopathology, insight and type of antipsychotic therapy in compliant and non-compliant outpatients with schizophrenia; to explore correlations between patient's attitudes and related variables.

METHODS

A sample of 44 outpatients of both genders (> 60 years), with a diagnosis of ICD-10 Schizophrenia (F20) was included into the study. All the patients were on maintenance treatment with different classes of antipsychotics (oral, depot or both), for at least 6 months from the latest hospitalisation. The exclusion criteria were determined. The BPRS and the PANSS were used to assess psychopathology and insight (G12 item). The self-report questionnaire MARS was used to assess patient's attitudes.

RESULTS

Compliant patients (N=37) showed the following significant differences compared to non-compliant patients (N=7): higher the MARS (p<0.001), lower the PANSS (Positive sub score) (p<0.01) G12 scores (p<0.01) (the Student t test) and percentage of patients with previous non-compliance (p<0.05) (chi2 test). Considerable correlation between the MARS and the BPRS (p<0.001), the PANSS (Positive, General psychopathology) (p<0.001; p<0.01), G12 scores (p<0.05) (negative) and current compliance (p<0.001) was also found (The Spearman's correlation).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that special attention should be paid to attitudes, severity of psychopathology, insight and history of non-compliance in compliance evaluation of outpatients with schizophrenia.

Treatment of schizophrenia with long-acting fluphenazine, haloperidol, or risperidone

OBJECTIVE

This study compares 3 cohorts of patients with schizophrenia before, during, and after initiating treatment with fluphenazine decanoate (FD), haloperidol decanoate (HD), or long-acting injectable risperidone (LAR).

METHODS

Administrative data are analyzed from California Medicaid (Medi-Cal) beneficiaries with schizophrenia who initiated FD, HD, or LAR treatment. Patients were required to have been continuously enrolled in Medi-Cal for 180 days before and 180 days after the start of the new episode of long-acting antipsychotic therapy.

RESULTS

There were few demographic and clinical differences among patients initiating FD, HD, and LAR. During the 180 days before starting long-acting injections, most patients initiating FD (53.5%), HD (58.5%), and LAR (61.2%) received oral antipsychotic medications for <80% of the days in this period (medication possession ratio: <0.80). The mean duration of depot treatment episodes was 58.3 days (SD = 53.6) for FD, 71.7 days (SD = 56.4) for HD, and 60.6 days (SD = 48.8) for LAR (F = 18.3, df = 2, 2694, P < .0001, HD > FD). Few patients who started on FD (5.4%), HD (9.7%), or LAR (2.6%) continued for at least 180 days. Most patients in each group (FD [77.4%], HD [78.9%], and LAR [75.5%]) received oral antipsychotic medications during the 45 days after discontinuing long-acting injections. Coprescription with antidepressants, mood stabilizers, and benzodiazepines was common.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with long-acting antipsychotic injections tend to have complex pharmacological regimens and recent medication nonadherence. A great majority of patients initiating long-acting antipsychotic medications discontinue use within the first few months of treatment.

Diphenyl diselenide decreases the prevalence of vacuous chewing movements induced by fluphenazine in rats

RATIONALE

Chronic treatment with neuroleptics causes, as a side effect, tardive dyskinesia in humans; however, the mechanisms involved in its pathophysiology remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of diphenyl diselenide, an organoselenium compound with antioxidant properties, in an animal model of vacuous chewing movements (VCMs) induced by long-term treatment with fluphenazine.

RESULTS

Adult male rats were treated during 24 weeks with fluphenazine (25 mg/kg, intramuscularly [i.m.], once every 21 days) and diphenyl diselenide (1 mg/kg, subcutaneously, three times a week). VCMs and body weight gain were quantified every 3 weeks. The fluphenazine treatment produced VCMs in the majority of the treated rats (87% after 24 weeks). Concomitant treatment with diphenyl diselenide decreased the prevalence of VCMs to 50%. Additionally, we separated the rats that developed or did not develop VCMs. We did not find any statistical differences among the groups when oxidative stress parameters were evaluated. Chronic fluphenazine treatment significantly decreased [(3)H]-dopamine uptake. Concomitant treatment with diphenyl diselenide was not able to prevent this decrease in those rats that developed VCMs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the reduction in dopamine transport can be a possible mechanism related to the maintenance of VCMs in rats. Moreover, diphenyl diselenide seems to be a promising pharmacological agent in the reduction in the prevalence of VCMs in rats.

Intracerebroventricular ethanol-induced conditioned place preferences are prevented by fluphenazine infusions into the nucleus accumbens of rats

The rewarding properties of centrally administered ethanol (EtOH) were examined using a conditioned place preference (CPP) test. Male rats subjected to bilateral intracerebroventricular (icv) infusions of EtOH (0-240 nmol) produced a dose-dependent preference for the drug-paired environment that was potentiated by concurrent intravenous (iv) administration of heroin (0.025 mg/kg). The role of mesolimbic dopamine (DA) pathways in the development of EtOH reward was then examined by challenging EtOH-treated rats with bilateral intra-accumbens shell applications of a DA receptor antagonist. Fluphenazine (10 or 50 microg/side), infused immediately prior to daily place conditioning trials, was found to reliably attenuate the development of CPPs produced by icv EtOH administration. When fluphenazine was administered into the nucleus accumbens shell prior to the final test trial only (i.e., in already conditioned rats), intra-accumbens shell DA receptor blockade was found to prevent the expression of CPPs produced by icv EtOH. In summary, rats form reliable learned preferences for EtOH-paired locations (CPPs) that are potentiated by iv heroin and whose acquisition and expression rely on intact DA functionality within the nucleus accumbens.

Characteristics and use patterns of patients taking first-generation depot antipsychotics or oral antipsychotics for schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

Investigators compared patient characteristics and antipsychotic use patterns between individuals with schizophrenia treated in usual care with first-generation depot antipsychotics and those treated with oral antipsychotics (first- or second-generation or both).

METHODS

Analyses used data from the U.S. Schizophrenia Care and Assessment Program, a large, prospective study of treatment for schizophrenia conducted July 1997 through September 2003. Participants were assessed at enrollment and every six months thereafter with patient self-report, validated psychiatric measures, and systematic extraction of medical records. Individuals treated with a first-generation depot antipsychotic at any time during the three-year study (N=569) were compared with those treated with only oral antipsychotics (N=1,617) on characteristics at enrollment and medication use pattern during the year after enrollment.

RESULTS

Compared with patients receiving only oral antipsychotics, participants treated with depot medications (haloperidol or fluphenazine decanoate) were more likely to be African American (p<.001); less likely to be a veteran (p=.005); had more psychiatric hospitalizations in the year before enrollment (p<.001); and were more likely to have been arrested (p<.001), to use alcohol and illicit substances (p<.001), and to show higher psychopathology, particularly psychotic symptoms and disorganized thinking (p<.01 for both). In the year after enrollment, participants treated with depot medications had a high mean medication possession ratio (91%), and most of the medication regimens (68%) were augmented with oral antipsychotics for prolonged durations (median of 144 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with schizophrenia treated with first-generation depot antipsychotics differed from those treated with only oral antipsychotics. Findings suggest that first-generation depot antipsychotics might address some unmet needs of a unique subgroup of patients with schizophrenia.

Risks versus benefits of different types of long-acting injectable antipsychotics

Since their introduction into clinical practice in the early 1960s, long-acting depot antipsychotics have been widely used as maintenance therapy for patients with schizophrenia. The improved pharmacokinetics of injectable long-acting antipsychotic therapies have provided more reliable drug delivery and reduced differences in peak and trough plasma levels of the drug. Studies that have compared short-acting oral antipsychotics with long-acting injectable antipsychotics, although imperfect, support injectable antipsychotics as having real benefit over oral antipsychotics on patient outcome owing largely to improved adherence. If patients forget or refuse to take their prescribed oral medications, weeks or months may go by before they experience an exacerbation; the effects of nonadherence become apparent too late to preempt the problem. On the other hand, if a patient fails to show up for an injection, the problem of nonadherence can be immediately addressed. When injectable medication is combined with an active psychosocial treatment program that will respond assertively to nonadherence, relapse rates may be reduced. By preventing or delaying relapse, consistent treatment can improve the patient's quality of life and lead to an overall reduction in the cost of care.

Series of seizures as a sign of development of recurrent malignant neuroleptic syndrome - a case report

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is an uncommon but sometimes fatal complication of neuroleptics and other medications that involve the central dopaminergic system. Many diagnostic criteria have been proposed for NMS but because of its variable presentation, universal criteria have not been established yet. Hyperthermia, disturbances of consciousness, extrapyramidal and autonomic symptoms are common features of NMS. We report the case of a 36 years old woman suffering from chronic schizophrenia and treated with flufenazine and olanzapine, who presented with series of generalised tonic-clonic seizures as the acute onset of recurrent malignant neuroleptic syndrome. Although atypical neuroleptics were previously thought to have less risk for MNS, combination of conventional and atypical neuroleptics in therapy increases the risk of NMS development and olanzapine might be responsible for the epileptic manifestations at the onset of fulminant NMS.

Carbamazepine for acute psychosis with EEG abnormalities

AIM

To investigate the efficacy of carbamazepine as adjuvant drug therapy in acute paranoid psychosis with associated EEG abnormalities, compared to sole antipsychotic treatment.

METHODS

Eleven medication-naive patients, diagnosed with acute paranoid psychosis with associated EEG abnormalities, were divided into two treatment groups: sole fluphenazine group, with flexible dosing of 5-10 mg/day (n=6), and carbamazepine group (n=5) with the addition of carbamazepine (600 mg/day) to fluphenazine treatment. Clinical Global Impression (CGI), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), and EEG were assessed on the baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment. Paired and two-tailed t-tests were used for statistical significance.

RESULTS

All the patients showed significant improvement of mental state after 6 weeks of treatment with no significant differences in CGI, BPRS, and total SANS scores in relation to the therapy with carbamazepine. Nevertheless, after 6 weeks of the treatment, EEG findings were significantly better in carbamazepine group, in relation to the findings from the onset of the treatment, as well as in comparison to sole fluphenazine group.

CONCLUSION

Although carbamazepine stabilized abnormal brain electrical activities it seemed that the associated EEG abnormalities were not significant for acute psychosis observed. These preliminary results suggested that there was no convincing evidence that carbamazepine was efficient as the augmentation of antipsychotic treatment for patients with both acute paranoid psychosis and EEG abnormalities.

Rehospitalization risk with second-generation and depot antipsychotics

Decreasing hospital admissions is important for improving outcomes for people with schizophrenia. Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are better tolerated for long-term therapy than traditional medications and may contribute to a lower rehospitalization risk, but have not been compared to depot forms with regard to long-term outcomes. This study evaluates the risk of readmission in patients discharged from six State of Maryland inpatient mental health facilities between Jan. 1, 1997 and Dec. 31, 1997 on clozapine (N = 41), risperidone (N = 149), and olanzapine (N = 103). These patients were compared with those discharged from the two largest state facilities during the same time period on fluphenazine decanoate (N = 59) or haloperidol decanoate (N = 59). One-year readmission risk (measured by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with Holm's adjustment for multiple comparison on Log Rank tests) were 10% for clozapine, 12% for risperidone, and 13% for olanzapine. These risks were not significantly lower than the readmission risk for fluphenazine decanoate (21%) but were significantly lower than haloperidol decanoate (35%) for all three SGAs. Demographic and clinical variables did not predict readmission for any of the medications. In patients with similar demographic and clinical characteristics, 1-year risk of readmission for patients treated with SGAs were at least comparable to the 1-year risk for patients receiving fluphenazine decanoate and lower than the risk for patients treated with haloperidol decanoate. SGAs may provide better long-term prognoses and outcomes for patients with schizophrenia.

Fluphenazine plasma level monitoring for patients receiving fluphenazine decanoate

BACKGROUND

Finding a dose of an antipsychotic for maintenance therapy that is both safe and effective can be difficult because clinicians are unable to titrate dose against clinical response in patients who are already stable. Therapeutic monitoring of antipsychotic plasma levels has the potential for helping clinicians in dosage selection. With this in mind, we evaluated the usefulness of monitoring fluphenazine plasma levels for patients with schizophrenia who were receiving maintenance treatment with fluphenazine decanoate.

METHOD

Thirty-one patients with schizophrenia were randomly assigned to low, medium, or high (0.1-0.3, 0.3-0.6, 0.6-1.0 ng/ml) plasma levels of fluphenazine. The dose of fluphenazine decanoate was adjusted in order to maintain patients in their assigned range. Side effects, psychopathology, and psychotic exacerbations were measured during the year following randomization.

RESULTS

All of the psychotic exacerbations occurred during the first eight weeks following randomization, before patients had adequate time to reach their plasma level assignments. We did not find a relationship between plasma levels of fluphenazine and clinical outcomes or side effects.

CONCLUSION

Our results do not provide support for the usefulness of monitoring fluphenazine plasma levels for patients receiving fluphenazine decanoate.

Clinical outcome following neuroleptic discontinuation in patients with remitted recent-onset schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this report was to examine the clinical course following neuroleptic discontinuation of patients with recent-onset schizophrenia who had been receiving maintenance antipsychotic treatment for at least 1 year.

METHOD

Fifty-three volunteer patients with recent-onset schizophrenia who had been clinically stabilized on a maintenance regimen of fluphenazine decanoate for a mean of 16.7 months had their antipsychotic medications withdrawn under clinical supervision. Participants initially entered a 24-week, double-blind crossover trial in which fluphenazine and placebo were administered for 12 weeks each. For those who did not experience symptom exacerbation or relapse during this period, fluphenazine was openly withdrawn; participants were then followed for up to 18 additional months.

RESULTS

When a low threshold for defining symptom reemergence was used, 78% (N=39 of 50) of the patients experienced an exacerbation or relapse within 1 year; 96% (N=48 of 50) did so within 2 years. Mean time to exacerbation or relapse was 235 days. When hospitalization was used as a relapse criterion, only six of 45 of individuals (13%) experiencing an exacerbation or relapse who continued in treatment in the clinic were hospitalized, demonstrating the sensitivity of the psychotic exacerbation criterion.

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of clinically stable individuals with recent-onset schizophrenia will experience an exacerbation or relapse after antipsychotic discontinuation, even after more than a year of maintenance medication. However, clinical monitoring and a low threshold for reinstating medications can prevent hospitalization for the majority of these patients.

The influence of personality on nicotine craving: a hierarchical multivariate statistical prediction model

The present study proposes a hierarchical multivariate statistical prediction model which enables to determine the most prominent variables (physiological, biochemical and personality factors) related to nicotine craving and dopaminergic activation. Based on animal studies reporting a reduction of the rewarding effects of psychotropic drugs after blockade or destruction of the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) system, changes in nicotine craving after pharmacological manipulation by means of a DA agonist (lisuride 0.2 mg) and a DA antagonist (fluphenazine 2 mg) were assessed in 36 healthy male heavy smokers. The major aim was the development of a multivariate prediction model which is applicable in samples lacking variance homogeneity or the prerequisite of a multivariate normal distribution. The model proposed is a combination of multivariate parametric and nonparametric methods taking advantage of their individual merits. Especially personality variables, such as sensation seeking, impulsivity, and neuroticism showed to be important predictors of craving in this responder approach.

Systemic relaxin in pregnant pony mares grazed on endophyte-infected fescue: effects of fluphenazine treatment

Tall fescue is one of the most widely grown forage grasses for horses in the United States. However, it is frequently infected with the endophyte Neotyphodium coenophialum which produces ergot alkaloids that cause severe adverse effects in the pregnant mare. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of fescue toxicosis and fluphenazine on circulating relaxin in pregnant pony mares and evaluate the usefulness of relaxin as a monitor of treatment efficacy. Twelve mares were maintained on endophyte-infected tall fescue pasture. Group TRT (n = 6), received 25 mg of fluphenazine decanoate (i.m.) on Day 320 of gestation while Group UTRT served as untreated controls. Daily blood samples were collected from Day 300 of gestation until Day 3 post partum and analyzed for plasma relaxin concentrations using a homologous equine radioimmunoassay. Mean gestation lengths were 330 +/- 0.7 and 336.5 +/- 3.2 days for TRT and UTRT mares, respectively (P = 0.07). Mean plasma relaxin concentrations in both groups of mares during the week before treatment (Day 313 to 319) were not different (UTRT, 53.4 +/- 11.3 ng/mL; TRT, 61.4 +/- 9.3 ng/mL). In the week after treatment (Day 320 to 326), mean plasma relaxin tended to be higher (P = 0.1) in TRT mares (66.7 +/- 6.2 ng/mL) when compared with UTRT mares (49.6 +/- 6.6 ng/mL), representing a 17.1 ng/mL difference in circulating relaxin between the two groups. Systemic relaxin during the last week before delivery (days relative to parturition) for UTRT and TRT mares was 45.7 +/- 6.7 and 64.7 +/- 6.4 ng/mL (P = 0.06), respectively. At Day -8 and Day -5 relative to parturition, systemic relaxin in TRT mares was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than in UTRT mares. Three of the six UTRT mares and one TRT mare showed clinical symptoms of fescue toxicosis. In the week before delivery, circulating relaxin in mares with problematic pregnancies (39.9 +/- 7.8 ng/mL) was significantly lower than concentrations measured in mares with normal pregnancies (63.4 +/- 5.4 ng/mL; P = 0.03). Clinical observations suggest that a one-time injection with fluphenazine improved pregnancy outcome by reducing the adverse effects of fescue toxicosis concomitant with a stabilization of plasma relaxin concentrations. These data support the hypothesis that systemic relaxin may be a useful biochemical means of monitoring placental function and treatment efficacy in the mare.

Family treatment and medication dosage reduction in schizophrenia: effects on patient social functioning, family attitudes, and burden

The effects of 2 family intervention programs (supportive family management [SFM], including monthly support groups for 2 years; or applied family management [AFM], including 1 year of behavioral family therapy plus support groups for 2 years), and 3 different neuroleptic dosage strategies (standard, low, targeted) on social functioning of patients with schizophrenia. their relatives' attitudes, and family burden were examined. AFM was associated with lower rejecting attitudes by relatives toward patients and less friction in the family perceived by patients. Patients in both AFM and SFM improved in social functioning but did not differ, whereas family burden was unchanged. Medication strategy had few effects, nor did it interact with family intervention. The addition of time-limited behavioral family therapy to monthly support groups improved family atmosphere, but did not influence patient social functioning or family burden.

Depot antipsychotics. Patient characteristics and prescribing pattern

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prescribing pattern of depot neuroleptics and the clinical characteristics of patients attending depot clinic.

METHODS

A case series of chronic psychotics attending the depot clinic in the day care center at King Abdulaziz University Hospital in Riyadh, over 10 years. Data was obtained from hospital records, patients interview and contact with patients' relatives and social workers.

RESULTS

The total number of patients was 69 (55% were males). The majority were single schizophrenics between 25 and 45 years. Fifty-one percent of patients lost contact with the service. The Chlorpromazine equivalent depot dose was 188.5 mg/day.

CONCLUSION

Patients clinical characteristics were not significant predictors of use or non-compliance with depot neuroleptics. Losing contact with service was very high. Regular internal audits are required.

Structured diagnostic assessment and depot fluphenazine treatment of multiple suicide attempters in the emergency department

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of two doses of monthly intramuscular (i.m.) injections of fluphenazine decanoate in reducing self-harm behaviours in outpatients with histories of multiple suicide attempts. Fifty-eight patients who presented to a psychiatric emergency service after an attempted suicide and who had histories of multiple suicide attempts, were randomized to receive monthly i.m. injections of fluphenazine decanoate. Thirty patients received monthly 12.5 mg ('low' dose), and 28 patients received monthly 1.5 mg ('ultra low' dose) under double-blind conditions. DSM-III-R diagnoses were obtained on all patients using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R-Patient Version (SCID-P) and SCID for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders (SCID-II). Outcomes were assessed by the Parasuicide History Inventory and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale, collected monthly for 6 months. Patients had an average of six current Axis I and 2.6 Axis II diagnoses, with borderline personality (85%) and alcohol dependence (58%) occurring most frequently in the sample. Both the low dose and ultra-low dose groups showed a marked reduction in self-harm behaviours. For 'serious' self-harm behaviours, there was a trend for a greater effect of the low dose over the ultra-low dose group, however, the differences did not reach statistical significance. A survival analysis indicated that the presence of 'acute' stressors at baseline and female sex were risk factors for continuing (post-randomization) 'serious' self-harm behaviours, while younger age and the absence of concurrent general medical conditions were risk factors for all self-harm behaviours.

The brain metabolic patterns of clozapine- and fluphenazine-treated female patients with schizophrenia: evidence of a sex effect

The regional cerebral glucose metabolic rates of clozapine-treated and fluphenazine-treated women with schizophrenia and normal controls were obtained by positron emission tomography (PET) using [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) as the tracer. The regional metabolic patterns were compared to each other and to the changes previously observed in men. In women, as in men, both clozapine- and fluphenazine-treatment were associated with lower metabolism in the superior prefrontal cortex and higher metabolism in the medial temporal lobe. In both men and women, clozapine treatment led to a greater lowering of inferior prefrontal cortex activity than fluphenazine, which was statistically significant in the larger male cohort. Fluphenazine led to higher metabolic rates in the lateral temporal lobe than clozapine did, but the differences between the two neuroleptics were not statistically significant in either group. The greatest differences in the female as compared to the male responses to fluphenazine and clozapine were in the cingulate and striatum. As compared to controls, the cingulate metabolic rates of women were reduced by 9.1% and 11.4% on clozapine and fluphenazine, respectively; whereas, men have a statistically nonsignificant reduction of 0.1% with clozapine and a 3.2% increase with fluphenazine. In men, fluphenazine was associated with a much greater elevation in basal ganglia metabolic rates than was clozapine, 23.5% as compared to 3.75%; whereas, in women, basal ganglia metabolic rates are nearly equally increased by fluphenazine (21.6%) and clozapine (15.1%).

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome during low dosed neuroleptic medication in first-episode psychosis: a case report

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare but potentially fatal side-effect of antipsychotic drug therapy, especially of dopamine receptor antagonists. As a dose relationship has been postulated, low dose neuroleptization would be expected to help to avoid this side-effect. In contrast, we report on a 21-year-old female following low dose fluphenazine treatment with 2.5 mg/day. The patient recovered from NMS after 3 days of dantrolene administration. Eventually, remission from psychotic symptoms was achieved with clozapine. At 8-month follow-up, psychopathology remained stable and there were no more signs of NMS.

Comparative effectiveness of fluphenazine decanoate injections every 2 weeks versus every 6 weeks

OBJECTIVE

Dose reduction strategies for the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia are designed to maintain the benefits of antipsychotic drug therapy while reducing risks. Previous strategies with decanoate preparations have been based on the use of lower doses per injection to achieve dose reduction; these strategies have achieved dose reduction but have resulted in some increase in symptoms. The authors tested a new dose reduction approach: increasing the interval between injections during intramuscular decanoate antipsychotic treatment.

METHOD

Fifty outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were randomly assigned to receive 25 mg of fluphenazine decanoate intramuscularly either every 2 weeks or every 6 weeks for 54 weeks in a double-blind design.

RESULTS

The two dose regimens did not differ significantly in relapse, symptom, or side effect measures. The every-6-weeks regimen was associated with a significant reduction in total antipsychotic exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of injections every 6 weeks instead of every 2 weeks may increase compliance and improve patients' comfort as well as decrease cumulative antipsychotic exposure, without increasing relapse rates or symptoms.

Predictors of relapse following response from a first episode of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

BACKGROUND

We examined relapse after response to a first episode of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

METHODS

Patients with first-episode schizophrenia were assessed on measures of psychopathologic variables, cognition, social functioning, and biological variables and treated according to a standardized algorithm. The sample for the relapse analyses consisted of 104 patients who responded to treatment of their index episode and were at risk for relapse.

RESULTS

Five years after initial recovery, the cumulative first relapse rate was 81.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70.6%-93.2%); the second relapse rate was 78.0% (95% CI, 46.5%-100.0%). By 4 years after recovery from a second relapse, the cumulative third relapse rate was 86.2% (95% CI, 61.5%-100.0%). Discontinuing antipsychotic drug therapy increased the risk of relapse by almost 5 times (hazard ratio for an initial relapse, 4.89 [99% CI, 2.49-9.60]; hazard ratio for a second relapse, 4.57 [99% CI, 1.49-14.02]). Subsequent analyses controlling for antipsychotic drug use showed that patients with poor premorbid adaptation to school and premorbid social withdrawal relapsed earlier. Sex, diagnosis, obstetric complications, duration of psychotic illness before treatment, baseline symptoms, neuroendocrine measures, methylphenidate hydrochloride challenge response, neuropsychologic and magnetic resonance imaging measures, time to response of the initial episode, adverse effects during treatment, and presence of residual symptoms after the initial episode were not significantly related to time to relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a high rate of relapse within 5 years of recovery from a first episode of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. This risk is diminished by maintenance antipsychotic drug treatment.

Reduced tyrosine kinase receptor C mRNA levels in the frontal cortex of patients with schizophrenia

Using a quantitative RNA-PCR approach tyrosine kinase receptor (trk) C mRNA levels were determined in brain material from the frontal cortex (BA10), temporal cortex (BA20) and cerebellum of control specimen and patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or non-psychotic depression (15 subjects each). In the frontal cortex of schizophrenics there was a 5.8-fold reduction of trk C mRNA levels, which reached statistical significance (P < 0.05). Trk C levels in the cerebellum were positively correlated with lifetime fluphenazine equivalents (r = 0.54), suggesting that neuroleptics influence TRK C gene activity in the cerebellum. Moreover, the distinct medication-independent reduction of trk C mRNA may point to a disturbed neurotrophic gene activity in the frontal cortex of schizophrenic patients.

Serum neuroleptic levels during reduced dose fluphenazine decanoate maintenance therapy

Forty-one remitted and chronically psychotic schizophrenic out-patients completed a two-year clinical trial during which they were assigned, on the basis of their clinically determined maintenance dosages, to one of two reduced, fixed-dose fluphenazine decanoate (FD) regimens: 35 mg/4 wks (19 patients) or 10 mg/4 wks (22 patients). Eighty-one percent of chronically psychotic patients, who represented 74% of the high dose group, relapsed, in comparison with only 38% of remitted patients (p < .001), who represented 86% of the low dose group. During this study serum neuroleptic levels were assessed, using the radioreceptor assay, before the administration of each FD injection and whenever a patient relapsed. Overall, 334 serum neuroleptic activity measurements were performed. Serum neuroleptic levels were detectable in all patients and were higher, although not significantly, in the 35 mg/4 wks group. The dichotomous clinical outcome of chronically psychotic and remitted patients occurred within the framework of essentially similar serum neuroleptic levels. These findings suggest that: 1) serum neuroleptic levels can be monitored during low dose FD treatment, 2) the poor maintenance therapy outcome of chronically psychotic patients cannot be accounted for by inadequate neuroleptic bioavailability, 3) a majority of remitted FD maintained patients retain their clinical response at serum neuroleptic levels lower than those initially attained at steady state.

Studies on the mechanism of absorption of depot neuroleptics: fluphenazine decanoate in sesame oil

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic characteristics of fluphenazine (FLU) and its decanoate (FLU-D) after intravenous and intramuscular administration to dogs.

METHODS

A group of four beagle dogs was used in all intravenous and intramuscular experiments, with washout periods of no less than three months between doses.

RESULTS

After intravenous FLU-D, the pharmacokinetics of the prodrug (mean +/- SD) were as follows: Clearance (CL) 42.9 +/- 6.3 L/h; terminal half-life (t1/2) 3.5 +/- 0.8 h; volume of distribution (Vd) 216 +/- 61 L. The fractional availability of FLU was 1.0 +/- 0.2. After intravenous FLU, the volume of distribution of FLU (51 +/- 17.8 L) was some 4 fold less than that of the prodrug. Simulations (Stella II) suggested that the rate limiting step was slow formation of FLU from the prodrug in the tissue compartment. After intramuscular FLU-D in sesame oil, the apparent t1/2 of FLU was 9.7 +/- 2.0 days whereas after intramuscular FLU base in sesame oil, the apparent t1/2 was only 7.7 +/- 3.4 h showing that the absorption of FLU itself from the intramuscular site and proximal lymph nodes is relatively rapid.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate limiting step after intramuscular FLU-D appeared to be the slow partitioning of the prodrug out of the sesame oil at the injection site and in proximal lymph nodes.

Relapse and rehospitalization during maintenance treatment of schizophrenia. The effects of dose reduction and family treatment

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have examined dose reduction and family treatment in schizophrenia, but none has examined their interaction. This study assessed the impact of dose reduction of antipsychotic medication and family treatment on relapse and rehospitalization during maintenance treatment.

METHODS

Subjects were 313 male and female outpatients at 5 centers with a DSM-III-R diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. In a 3 x 2 design, subjects were randomized to 1 of 3 medication strategies using fluphenazine decanoate under double-blind conditions: continuous moderate dose (standard) (12.5-50 mg every 2 weeks); continuous low dose (2.5-10 mg every 2 weeks); or targeted, early intervention (fluphenazine only when symptomatic). Subjects also were randomized to 1 of 2 family treatment strategies (supportive or applied). Supportive family management involved monthly group meetings. The more intensive applied family management involved monthly group meetings and home visits where communication and problem-solving skills were taught. Patients and families were treated and assessed for 2 years.

RESULTS

Both continuous low-dose and targeted treatment increased use of rescue medication and relapse; only targeted treatment increased rehospitalization. This pattern was consistent across both family treatments; there were no differences between family treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings reaffirm the value of antipsychotic medication in preventing relapse and rehospitalization. The absence of family treatment differences may be because both conditions engaged families.

Absence of parkinsonism among patients in long-term neuroleptic therapy who abuse cocaine

The study used the United Parkinson's Disease Scale to compare parkinsonian signs and symptoms among 19 patients in long-term neuroleptic therapy who had a history of cocaine abuse with those among 24 similar patients with no history of cocaine use. There was no significant difference between the two groups' scores. The results suggest that chronic cocaine abuse is not a risk factor for parkinsonism among subjects in long-term neuroleptic therapy.

Evaluation of inpatient depot antipsychotic prescribing

OBJECTIVE

To assess the use of fluphenazine decanoate and haloperidol decanoate in an inpatient setting.

DESIGN

A prospective observational study conducted over a 3-month period.

SETTING

A 400-bed state psychiatric hospital.

INTERVENTIONS

The psychiatric pharmacy staff evaluated the medical records and new orders of 30 consecutive patients receiving depot antipsychotic formulations using a detailed evaluation form and the hospital pharmacy computer database. Criteria for evaluation were derived from the medical literature and product information, and included the following areas: diagnosis, stabilization on a short-acting form of the antipsychotic, appropriateness of dosage conversion to depot therapy, concomitant administration of short-acting antipsychotics (and duration of concomitant medications), and plasma concentration monitoring.

RESULTS

Only 7 patients (23%) received what would be considered optimal depot antipsychotic therapy. These patients were receiving a stable dosage of a short-acting antipsychotic prior to conversion to depot therapy (i.e., > or = 7 d), received optimal dose conversion to a depot form, and received optimum overlap with a short-acting preparation (i.e., overlap < or = 7 d with fluphenazine HCI and 7-30 d with haloperidol HCI). When length of stay data were evaluated, no significant differences were observed in patients who received optimal therapy versus those who did not. There was also no difference in length of stay when the study group was compared with an age-, sex-, and diagnosis-matched cohort group. However, quantitatively fewer adverse effects were reported for patients whose treatment was considered optimal on the basis of the evaluation criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Depot antipsychotic therapy frequently did not meet the criteria for optimal use. This did not affect length of hospital stay in these individuals. However, individuals who met the criteria experienced quantitatively fewer adverse events.

Absolute bioavailability of oral immediate and slow release fluphenazine in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE

The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the absolute bioavailability of fluphenazine in healthy volunteers after administration of immediate and slow release oral formulations.

METHODS

The oral dose was 12 mg fluphenazine hydrochloride. The intravenous bolus dose was 2.5 mg. Fourteen healthy volunteers of both sexes were enrolled in this randomised, crossover trial. Twelve volunteers completed the trial according to protocol.

RESULTS

The concentration maxima after administration of the slow release formulation were approximately half those measured after the immediate release formulation and were recorded later by a factor of 2 (immediate release: Cmax = 2.3 ng.ml-1, tmax = 2.8 h; slow release: Cmax = 1.2 ng.ml-1, tmax = 4.6 h). The concentrations measured 10 min after intravenous bolus administration of 2.5 mg fluphenazine hydrochloride were approximately 100 times higher (261 ng.ml-1). The geometric means for the absolute bioavailability of fluphenazine were 2.7% for the immediate release formulation and 3.4% for the slow release formulation. The absolute bioavailability of fluphenazine is thus much lower than previously generally accepted.

Intervention and social breakdown in the elderly

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the ethical and clinical issues associated with the management of social breakdown in the elderly (SBE) in relation to the case of a 76-year-old recluse who was referred following community concerns about her living conditions and behaviour.

METHOD

Longitudinal assessment and management of the patient resulted in a diagnosis of schizophrenia and treatment with fluphenazine decanoate.

RESULTS

The patient responded to treatment and was returned home, after which a relationship was maintained by community services.

CONCLUSIONS

A coherent and defensible position on both clinical and ethical grounds may be made in favour of intervention with SBE. Practical aspects of the process are suggested.

Effects of ceruletide on perioral movements and the dopamine receptor-adenylate cyclase system in rats chronically treated with fluphenazine

The effects of repeated administration of ceruletide (100 micrograms/kg/perday, i.p. for 3 days) on perioral movements and the striatal dopamine receptor adenylate cyclase system were examined in rats chronically treated with fluphenazine enanthate (FPZ) (25 mg/kg i.m. every 3 weeks for 30 weeks) and sesame oil-treated (control) rats. After the tenth injection of fluphenazine, the rats started to display five types of perioral movements (teeth chattering, chewing, tongue protrusion, mouth opening and perioral tremors). Moreover, increases in SCH23390 binding and spiperone binding to striatal membranes, were found in the FPZ-treated rats. Furthermore, dopamine receptor-coupled adenylate cyclase activity was potentiated in striatal membranes. High amplitude EMG discharges (8-10 Hz), recorded from the masseter in the FPZ-treated rats occurred concurrently with perioral tremors. Repeated ceruletide (CLT) injections abolished perioral movements, and reversed both the elevated SCH23390 binding and the dopamine stimulated adenylate cyclase (AC) activity to the control level. The effect of CLT on perioral movements, D1 receptors and dopamine-stimulated AC activity continued for 6 days after the final CLT injection. These findings suggest that systemically administered CLT affects the D1 receptor adenylate cyclase system and that an increase of the D1 receptor mechanism may play an important role in the pathogenesis of tardive dyskinesia.

Idazoxan and response to typical neuroleptics in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Comparison with the atypical neuroleptic, clozapine

BACKGROUND

We investigated whether antagonism of alpha 2 adrenergic receptors would augment treatment response in schizophrenia, by administering idazoxan, an alpha 2 antagonist drug, to treatment-resistant patients on typical neuroleptics.

METHOD

Seventeen hospitalised treatment-resistant patients with DSM-III-R schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were studied on typical neuroleptic treatment, on treatment with idazoxan plus typical neuroleptic, and after discontinuation of idazoxan, in fixed, non-random order, and under double-blind, placebo-controlled conditions.

RESULTS

The addition of idazoxan to fluphenazine treatment resulted in significant reductions of global psychosis and total, positive and negative symptoms on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, compared to neuroleptic treatment alone. Symptom improvement significantly correlated with idazoxan-induced changes in indices of noradrenergic function. In a subgroup of patients, idazoxan plus typical neuroleptic treatment compared favourably with clozapine treatment, when both were compared to typical neuroleptic treatment alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The antagonism of alpha 2 receptors augmented therapeutic response to typical neuroleptic treatment in treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia. This antagonism may contribute to clozapine's superior antipsychotic effects.

Substance use: a powerful predictor of relapse in schizophrenia

This study examined substance use among a group of 37 schizophrenia patients participating in a year-long fluphenazine decanoate (FD; Prolixin) dosage reduction study (Inderbitzin et al. (1994) Am. J. Psychiatry 151, 1753-1759). Ten (50%) of the 20 FD dose-reduced patients, and 6 (35%) of the 17 control group patients were identified as substance users. The dose-reduced and control groups did not differ significantly in substance use. We examine here the 37 patients regrouped by substance users (n = 16) versus non-users (n = 21) to determine the effects of substance use. In addition to identifying substance users and types of substances used, we hypothesize that substance users differ demographically from non-users, have worse symptomatology, worse compliance, higher rates of relapse, and therefore, can confound studies. Clinical and demographic data were obtained. At least half of the substance users were using alcohol or cocaine. The substance use group had a significantly higher severity of illness score on the BPRS at study onset. We found no significant differences between the two groups on other rating scales. The non-use group lived more independently, and the substance use group was younger. The substance use group had nearly twice as many hospitalizations in the 2 years prior to the study, a greater rate of missed appointments in the year before and during the study, and 4 times as many relapses during the year of the study than the non-use group. The key finding was that among 9 of the 37 patients who relapsed in the year of the study, 7 of the 9 had a history of substance use. Substance use was found to be a better predictor of relapse and hospitalization than gradual 50% dosage reduction of FD in the related study. Substance use among schizophrenia patients is a major complicating factor.

The interaction of clozapine with the meta-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP) discriminative stimulus

The psychotropic effects of the 5-HT2C agonist mCPP in human subjects are blocked by the atypical antipsychotic clozapine, but not by typical antipsychotics. An understanding of the mechanistic basis for the interaction of clozapine and mCPP would provide further insight into the basis for its unique therapeutic effects in humans. Drug-induced stimulus control provides an animal model for the subjective effects of psychotropic agents in humans. In the present study, the interaction of the atypical antipsychotic clozapine and the typical antipsychotic fluphenazine with the mCPP-stimulus were defined. Neither drug antagonized the stimulus effects of mCPP in vivo. In contrast, clozapine fully antagonized the mCPP-stimulated phosphoinositide turnover at the 5-HT2C receptor in vitro. The present data indicate that the paradigm of mCPP-induced stimulus control does not facilitate the differentiation of atypical and typical antipsychotic activities.

Subject selection biases in clinical trials: data from a multicenter schizophrenia treatment study

To evaluate subject selection biases in clinical trials, demographic characteristics (gender, race, and age) of subjects at different phases of evaluation for a multicenter maintenance trial in schizophrenia were examined. Six thousand twelve diagnostically appropriate subjects were screened for the study; of these, 1,320 met eligibility criteria and 528 (9% of the screened sample) entered the study. Women, blacks, and older subjects were more likely not to meet eligibility criteria; women and older subjects were more likely and blacks were less likely to refuse study participation. Overall, compared with the screened population, the sample of subjects who entered the study contained proportionately fewer women (33 vs. 43%), more blacks (48.5 vs. 41%), and fewer older subjects (mean age of the entered sample was 29.4 +/- 7.4 vs. 34.8 +/- 11.3 years for the screened population). Having identified these selection factors, a second goal was to assess the potential clinical relevance of selection biases of these magnitudes on clinical trials using models of hypothetical studies with different degrees of selection bias. These showed that selection biases would rarely change overall study outcomes to a clinically relevant degree. However, in our models, selection biases did limit the ability to make inferences about results for select small subgroups of the study population. Investigators should consider collecting data on the recruitment process to allow estimation of the effects of selection biases on the generalizability of their findings.

Schizophrenic patients' perceptions of their relatives' attitudes

Although the attitudes of family members as revealed by measures of expressed emotion (EE) have been shown to be associated with the course of schizophrenic illness, little is known about how the patients perceive these attitudes. A detailed interview was used to assess patients' perceptions of their family members' behaviors toward them. Family member's EE was assessed with the Five-Minute Speech Sample (FMSS). Overall, patients' perceptions of criticism were congruent with a component of the FMSS-EE that measures criticism. Results indicated that when family members had high EE/critical scores, patients perceived them as displaying more instances of critical behavior. All cases in which patients' perceptions of criticism were incongruent with measures of FMSS-EE occurred among ethnic minority group members. Although the FMSS-EE did not predict outcome in this study, patients who perceived their relatives as higher in criticism had more negative outcomes at 1 year. These findings suggest that when family environments are examined in patients from ethnic minority groups, the patients' perspective may be a more potent predictor of outcome than traditional measures of EE.

[Antiparkinson drugs in neuroleptic treatment: comparative study of progressive and abrupt withdrawal]

The systematic and long term association of anti-parkinsonian drugs to neuroleptics is questioned by many authors because of their side effects and their toxicomanogenous risks whereas their efficiency in extrapyramidal effects of prophylaxis is not certain. This work aims at evaluating the interest of prescribing long term parkinsonian drug in association with neuroleptics. The study centered on 101 psychotic patients treated with neuroleptics, and followed on an ambulatory bases. 97% of this patients systematically received antiparkinsonian drugs. Extrapyramidal symptoms of varied intensity have noted for 61% of patients. The authors have compared, in double blind, the effects of the progressive and abrupt withdrawal of anti-parkinsonian drugs for 37 patients among the 101. These patients have been regularly treated for at least 6 months by neuroleptics (fluphenazine or pipothiazine) in association with trihexyphenidyle. They were randomly divided into 3 groups, and statified by sex and type of neuroleptic. For group I, composed of 13 patients, trihexyphenidyle is abruptly withdrawn and replaced by a placebo. For group II, composed of 11 patients, withdrawal is progressive for 2 weeks, trihexyphenidyle being replaced by a placebo. Group III, composed of 13 patients, is a sample group which went on receiving trihexyphenidyle. The results of this study showed that within the brutal withdrawal group (group I), 10 patients over 13 needed trihexyphenidyle again, whereas only 3 patients over 11 needed it in the progressive withdrawal group (group II). In the sample group (group III), one patient over 13 showed extrapyramidal symptoms, necessitating his leaving school. The global chi 2 is significant with p < 0.001.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Fluphenazine plasma levels, dosage, efficacy, and side effects

OBJECTIVE

The authors sought to determine whether fluphenazine dose or plasma level predicts clinical improvement or side effects during acute treatment.

METHOD

Oral fluphenazine was given in fixed, randomized, double-blind doses (10, 20, or 30 mg/day) for 4 weeks to 72 inpatients with acute schizophrenic exacerbations. Outcome measures included percentage improvement in ratings of positive symptoms (hallucinations, delusions, and thought disorder), percentage improvement in negative symptoms, and maximum score for extrapyramidal symptoms. Response was defined as an improvement in positive symptoms of 40% or more.

RESULTS

The 42 responders had a shorter duration of illness, less chronic course, and lower rate of akathisia. Plasma level and dose did not differentiate responders and nonresponders, but they did predict percentage improvement in positive symptoms within the responder subgroup. Akathisia was more common and extrapyramidal symptoms were more severe at higher plasma levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Responders showed the greatest improvement at fluphenazine plasma levels above 1.0 ng/ml and doses above 0.20-0.25 mg/kg per day. Since the literature suggests that optimal plasma levels are similar during acute and maintenance treatment, monitoring of plasma levels may thus be useful. Conditions for applying the "responder-only" analytic strategy in future studies are discussed.

Monitoring plasma levels of fluphenazine during chronic therapy with fluphenazine decanoate

This study was conducted to examine the interpatient variability in steady-state plasma concentrations of fluphenazine by repeat depot intramuscular administration, and to determine the relationship between these concentrations and clinical state. Steady-state pre-dose concentrations of fluphenazine in plasma were measured using a sensitive and specific gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) assay in 24 patients with schizophrenia who were receiving continuous treatment with depot intramuscular fluphenazine decanoate. Clinical response was measured using the Andreasen Scale for positive and negative symptoms. Steady-state plasma concentrations of fluphenazine ranged from undetectable (< 0.1 ng/ml) to 27.9 ng/ml, with a median of 0.5 ng/ml. No significant associations were found between plasma concentration and dosage, or age and sex of the patient. Steady-state plasma concentrations in patients taking anticholinergic agents were significantly higher than in patients not receiving such drugs (P < 0.05 by Mann-Whitney U-test). Poorer control, expressed as the sum of the negative symptom scores or the sum of the positive and negative symptom scores, was related to higher log transformed plasma concentration of fluphenazine and higher fluphenazine decanoate dosage. The log transformed plasma concentrations of fluphenazine and the fluphenazine decanoate dosages were weakly related. Patients receiving another antipsychotic drug in addition to fluphenazine decanoate tended to have poorer clinical control and higher dosages of fluphenazine decanoate. These results indicate the useful role that plasma level monitoring can fulfil in identifying patients who are therapy-resistant despite high plasma levels.

A placebo-controlled trial of fluoxetine added to neuroleptic in patients with schizophrenia

Following a 2-week placebo lead-in, schizophrenic patients were randomly assigned to fluoxetine 20 mg/day or placebo added to depot neuroleptic for a 6-week, double blind trial. All patients had received a stable dose of depot neuroleptic for at least 6 months and did not meet criteria for depression. Serum samples were obtained at baseline and at weeks 4 and 6. Scores on the negative symptom subscale of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) were significantly lower at week 6, controlling for baseline scores, in patients receiving fluoxetine (n = 20) compared to patients receiving placebo (n = 21). Measures of psychosis, depression, global functioning and extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) did not differ between groups at week 6. Fluoxetine administration was associated with a mean 65% increase in serum fluphenazine concentrations in 15 patients and a mean 20% increase in serum haloperidol concentrations in three patients. The change in negative symptoms at week 6 did not correlate with serum concentrations of fluoxetine or norfluoxetine, but did inversely correlate with S-norfluoxetine, an active stereoisomer of fluoxetine. For these chronically ill patients, fluoxetine significantly improved negative symptoms and did not worsen EPS, despite causing substantial elevation in serum concentrations of neuroleptics.