1
|
Babin É, Vigneau E, Antignac JP, Le Bizec B, Cano-Sancho G. Opportunities offered by latent-based multiblock strategies to integrate biomarkers of chemical exposure and biomarkers of effect in environmental health studies. CHEMOSPHERE 2024; 361:142465. [PMID: 38810805 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
Modern environmental epidemiology benefits from a new generation of technologies that enable comprehensive profiling of biomarkers, including environmental chemical exposure and omic datasets. The integration and analysis of large and structured datasets to identify functional associations is constrained by computational challenges that cannot be overcome using conventional regression methods. Some extensions of Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression have been developed to efficently integrate multiple datasets, including Multiblock PLS (MB-PLS) and Sequential and Orthogonalized PLS; however, these approaches remain seldom applied in environmental epidemiology. To address that research gap, this study aimed to assess and compare the applicability of PLS-based multiblock models in an observational case study, where biomarkers of exposure to environmental chemicals and endogenous biomarkers of effect were simultaneously integrated to highlight biological links related to a health outcome. The methods were compared with and without sparsity coupling two metrics to support the variable selection: Variable Importance in Projection (VIP) and Selectivity Ratio (SR). The framework was applied to a case-study dataset mimicking the structure of 36 environmental exposure biomarkers (E-block), 61 inflammation biomarkers (M-block), and their relationships with the gestational age at delivery of 161 mother-infant pairs. The results showed an overall consistency in the selected variables across models, although some specific selection patterns were identified. The block-scaled concatenation-based approaches (e.g. MB-PLS) tended to select more variables from the E-block, while these methods were unable to identify certain variables in the M-block. Overall, the number of variables selected using the SR criterion was higher than using the VIP criterion, with lower predictive performances. The multiblock models coupled to VIP, appeared to be the methods of choice for identifying relevant variables with similar statistical performances. Overall, the use of multiblock PLS-based methods appears to be a good strategy to efficiently support the variable selection process in modern environmental epidemiology.
Collapse
|
2
|
Zahid U, Lawrence EG, de Freitas DF, Parri LA, Quadros W, Hua P, Harriss E, Oliver D, Hosang GM, Bhui K. Understanding psychosis complexity through a syndemic framework: A systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2024; 159:105614. [PMID: 38432448 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
Psychotic conditions pose significant challenges due to their complex aetiology and impact on individuals and communities. Syndemic theory offers a promising framework to understand the interconnectedness of various health and social problems in the context of psychosis. This systematic review aims to examine existing literature on testing whether psychosis is better understood as a component of a syndemic. We conducted a systematic search of 7 databases, resulting in the inclusion of five original articles. Findings from these studies indicate a syndemic characterized by the coexistence of various health and social conditions, are associated with a greater risk of psychosis, adverse health outcomes, and disparities, especially among ethnic minorities and deprived populations. This review underscores the compelling need for a new paradigm and datasets that can investigate how psychosis emerges in the context of a syndemic, ultimately guiding more effective preventive and care interventions as well as policies to improve the health of marginalised communities living in precarity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uzma Zahid
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Erin Grace Lawrence
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK; Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniela Fonseca de Freitas
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lois A Parri
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Wesley Quadros
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Phuong Hua
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK; Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Eli Harriss
- Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Wadham College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Dominic Oliver
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK; Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Georgina M Hosang
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK; Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kamaldeep Bhui
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Wadham College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK; Queen Mary University London Global Policy Institute, London, UK; Collaborating Centre of World Psychiatric Association, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gizamba JM, Wilson JP, Mendenhall E, Ferguson L. A review of place-related contextual factors in syndemics research. Health Place 2023; 83:103084. [PMID: 37437495 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
This review investigates the extent to which a place-based approach has been used to conceptualize context, as well as the place-related contextual factors explored in studies that explicitly invoked a syndemic framework. The literature search focused on 29 peer-reviewed empirical syndemic studies. Only 11 studies used a place-based approach to define and measure contextual factors and the spatial context was denoted using administrative boundaries such as census tracts, counties, and countries. A narrow range of place-related contextual factors were explored and most of them were related to social and economic factors that were used to define a place. Methodological gaps like a paucity of multilevel studies and studies using a place-based approach to measure context were identified. Future syndemics research should leverage multidimensional geospatial approaches to decipher the role of place-related contextual factors in syndemic dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John P Wilson
- Spatial Science Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Emily Mendenhall
- School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Laura Ferguson
- Institute on Inequalities in Global Health, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zahid U, Hosang GM, de Freitas DF, Mooney R, Bhui K. Ethnic inequality, multimorbidity and psychosis: can a syndemic framework resolve disputed evidence? SCHIZOPHRENIA (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2023; 9:37. [PMID: 37296141 DOI: 10.1038/s41537-023-00367-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Syndemic theory is described as population-level clustering or co-occurrence of health conditions in the context of shared aetiologies that interact and can act synergistically. These influences appear to act within specific places of high disadvantage. We suggest ethnic inequality in experiences and outcomes of multimorbidity, including psychosis, may be explained through a syndemic framework. We discuss the evidence for each component of syndemic theory in relation to psychosis, using psychosis and diabetes as an exemplar. Following this, we discuss the practical and theoretical adaptations to syndemic theory in order to apply it to psychosis, ethnic inequality and multimorbidity, with implications for research, policy, and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uzma Zahid
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - Georgina M Hosang
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Daniela Fonseca de Freitas
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Roisin Mooney
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kamaldeep Bhui
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Wadham College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
- Queen Mary University London Global Policy Institute, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
O'Donnell S, Quigley E, Hayden J, Adamis D, Gavin B, McNicholas F. Work-related experiences of consultant psychiatrists during the COVID-19 response: qualitative analysis. BJPsych Open 2023; 9:e49. [PMID: 36876639 PMCID: PMC10044173 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2023.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research has begun to draw attention to the challenges mental health professionals faced in delivering services during the COVID-19 pandemic response. However, few studies have examined the specific experiences of consultant psychiatrists. AIMS To examine the work-related experiences and psychosocial needs of consultant psychiatrists situated in the Republic of Ireland arising from the COVID-19 response. METHOD We interviewed 18 consultant psychiatrists and analysed data using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Work-related experience of participants was characterised by increased workload associated with assumption of guardianship of physical and mental health of vulnerable patients. Unintended consequences of public health restrictions increased case complexity, limited availability of alternative supports and hindered the practice of psychiatry, including inhibiting peer support systems for psychiatrists. Participants perceived available psychological supports as generally unsuitable for their needs given their specialty. Long-standing under-resourcing, mistrust in management and high levels of burnout exacerbated the psychological burden of the COVID-19 response. CONCLUSIONS The challenges of leading mental health services were evident in the increased complexity involved in caring for vulnerable patients during the pandemic, contributing to uncertainty, loss of control and moral distress among participants. These dynamics worked synergistically with pre-existing system-level failures, eroding capacity to mount an effective response. The longer-term psychological well-being of consultant psychiatrists - as well as the pandemic preparedness of healthcare systems - is contingent on implementation of policies addressing long-standing under-investment in the services vulnerable populations rely on, not least community mental health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shane O'Donnell
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Etain Quigley
- School of Law and Criminology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland
| | - John Hayden
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Dimitrios Adamis
- Health Service Executive, Sligo Mental Health Service, Sligo, Ireland
| | - Blánaid Gavin
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Fiona McNicholas
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Children's Health Ireland, Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland; and Lucena Clinic, Rathgar, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fonseca de Freitas D, Pritchard M, Shetty H, Khondoker M, Nazroo J, Hayes RD, Bhui K. Ethnic inequities in multimorbidity among people with psychosis: a retrospective cohort study. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2022; 31:e52. [PMID: 35844106 PMCID: PMC9305726 DOI: 10.1017/s2045796022000385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Research shows persistent ethnic inequities in mental health experiences and outcomes, with a higher incidence of illnesses among minoritised ethnic groups. People with psychosis have an increased risk of multiple long-term conditions (MLTC; multimorbidity). However, there is limited research regarding ethnic inequities in multimorbidity in people with psychosis. This study investigates ethnic inequities in physical health multimorbidity in a cohort of people with psychosis. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, using the Clinical Records Interactive Search (CRIS) system, we identified service-users of the South London and Maudsley NHS Trust with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder, and then additional diagnoses of diabetes, hypertension, low blood pressure, overweight or obesity and rheumatoid arthritis. Logistic and multinomial logistic regressions were used to investigate ethnic inequities in odds of multimorbidity (psychosis plus one physical health condition), and multimorbidity severity (having one or two physical health conditions, or three or more conditions), compared with no additional health conditions (no multimorbidity), respectively. The regression models adjusted for age and duration of care and investigated the influence of gender and area-level deprivation. RESULTS On a sample of 20 800 service-users with psychosis, aged 13-65, ethnic differences were observed in the odds for multimorbidity. Controlling for sociodemographic factors and duration of care, compared to White British people, higher odds of multimorbidity were found for people of Black African [adjusted Odds Ratio = 1.41, 95% Confidence Intervals (1.23-1.56)], Black Caribbean [aOR = 1.79, 95% CI (1.58-2.03)] and Black British [aOR = 1.64, 95% CI (1.49-1.81)] ethnicity. Reduced odds were observed among people of Chinese [aOR = 0.61, 95% CI (0.43-0.88)] and Other ethnic [aOR = 0.67, 95% CI (0.59-0.76)] backgrounds. Increased odds of severe multimorbidity (three or more physical health conditions) were also observed for people of any Black background. CONCLUSIONS Ethnic inequities are observed for multimorbidity among people with psychosis. Further research is needed to understand the aetiology and impact of these inequities. These findings support the provision of integrated health care interventions and public health preventive policies and actions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. Fonseca de Freitas
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M. Pritchard
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- Biomedical Research Centre Nucleus, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - H. Shetty
- Biomedical Research Centre Nucleus, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M. Khondoker
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - J. Nazroo
- Sociology, School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - R. D. Hayes
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - K. Bhui
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mooney R, Newbigging K, McCabe R, McCrone P, Halvorsrud K, Raghavan R, Joseph D, Bhui K. Experience-based investigation and codesign of approaches to prevent and reduce Mental Health Act use (CO-PACT): a protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e060086. [PMID: 35131837 PMCID: PMC8823141 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Independent Review of the Mental Health Act (MHA) in England and Wales confirmed increasing levels of compulsory detentions, especially for racialised communities. This research aims to: (a) understand the causes of and propose preventive opportunities to reduce the disproportionate use of the MHA, (b) use an adapted form of experience-based codesign (EBCD) to facilitate system-wide changes and (c) foreground the voices of service users at risk of detention to radically reform policy and implement new legislation to ensure the principles of equity are retained. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a qualitative study, using a comparative case study design. This study is composed of five work packages; photovoice workshops will be conducted in eight local systems with service users and healthcare professionals separately (WP1); a series of three EBCD workshops in each local system to develop approaches that reduce detentions and improve the experience of people from racialised communities. This will inform a comparative analysis and national knowledge exchange workshop (WP2); an evaluation led by the patient and public involvement group to better understand what it is like for people to participate in photovoice, codesign and participatory research (WP3); an economic evaluation (WP4) and dissemination strategy (WP5). The impact of the involvement of patients and public will be independently evaluated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study is sponsored by the University of Oxford and granted ethical approval from the NHS Research Ethics Committee and Health Research Authority (21/SC/0204). The outputs from this study will be shared through several local and national channels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roisin Mooney
- CHiMES Collborative, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Karen Newbigging
- CHiMES Collborative, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Rose McCabe
- School of Health Sciences, City University of London, London, UK
| | - Paul McCrone
- Institute for Lifecourse Development, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Kristoffer Halvorsrud
- NIHR ARC North Thames, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Raghu Raghavan
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| | - Doreen Joseph
- CHiMES Collborative, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kamaldeep Bhui
- CHiMES Collborative, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|