1
|
Greenwood HI, Maldonado Rodas CK, Freimanis RI, Glencer AC, Miller PN, Mukhtar RA, Brabham C, Yau C, Rosenbluth JM, Hirst GL, Campbell MJ, Borowsky A, Hylton N, Esserman LJ, Basu A. Magnetic resonance imaging insights from active surveillance of women with ductal carcinoma in situ. NPJ Breast Cancer 2024; 10:71. [PMID: 39098868 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-024-00677-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024] Open
Abstract
New approaches are needed to determine which ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is at high risk for progression to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). We retrospectively studied DCIS patients who declined surgery (2002-2019), and received endocrine therapy (ET) and breast MRI. Baseline MRI and changes at 3 months and 6 months were analyzed by recursive partitioning to stratify IDC risk. Sixty-two patients (63 DCIS; 1 bilateral) with a mean follow-up of 8.5 years were included. Fifty-one percent remained on active surveillance (AS) without evidence of IDC, with a mean duration of 7.6 years. A decision tree based on MRI features of lesion distinctness and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) at baseline and change after 3 months of ET stratified patients into low, intermediate, and high risk for progression to IDC. MRI imaging features in patients treated with ET and undergoing AS, may help determine which DCIS lesions are at low versus high risk for IDC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather I Greenwood
- University of California San Francisco Department of Radiology, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Rita I Freimanis
- University of California San Francisco Department of Radiology, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alexa C Glencer
- University of California San Francisco Department of Surgery, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Phoebe N Miller
- University of California San Francisco Department of Surgery, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rita A Mukhtar
- University of California San Francisco Department of Surgery, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Christina Yau
- University of California San Francisco Department of Surgery, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer M Rosenbluth
- University of California San Francisco Department of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Gillian L Hirst
- University of California San Francisco Department of Surgery, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michael J Campbell
- University of California San Francisco Department of Surgery, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alexander Borowsky
- University of California Davis Department of Pathology, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Nola Hylton
- University of California San Francisco Department of Radiology, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Laura J Esserman
- University of California San Francisco Department of Surgery, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Amrita Basu
- University of California San Francisco Department of Surgery, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Magni V, Cozzi A, Muscogiuri G, Benedek A, Rossini G, Fanizza M, Di Giulio G, Sardanelli F. Background parenchymal enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography: associations with breast density and patient's characteristics. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2024:10.1007/s11547-024-01860-5. [PMID: 39060886 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01860-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate if background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), graded according to the 2022 CEM-dedicated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon, is associated with breast density, menopausal status, and age. METHODS This bicentric retrospective analysis included CEM examinations performed for the work-up of suspicious mammographic findings. Three readers independently and blindly evaluated BPE on recombined CEM images and breast density on low-energy CEM images. Inter-reader reliability was estimated using Fleiss κ. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed, dichotomising breast density and BPE as low (a/b BI-RADS categories, minimal/mild BPE) and high (c/d BI-RADS categories, moderate/marked BPE). RESULTS A total of 200 women (median age 56.8 years, interquartile range 50.5-65.6, 140/200 in menopause) were included. Breast density was classified as a in 27/200 patients (13.5%), as b in 110/200 (55.0%), as c in 52/200 (26.0%), and as d in 11/200 (5.5%), with moderate inter-reader reliability (κ = 0.536; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.482-0.590). BPE was minimal in 95/200 patients (47.5%), mild in 64/200 (32.0%), moderate in 25/200 (12.5%), marked in 16/200 (8.0%), with substantial inter-reader reliability (κ = 0.634; 95% CI 0.581-0.686). At multivariable logistic regression, premenopausal status and breast density were significant positive predictors of high BPE, with adjusted odds ratios of 6.120 (95% CI 1.847-20.281, p = 0.003) and 2.416 (95% CI 1.095-5.332, p = 0.029) respectively. CONCLUSION BPE on CEM is associated with well-established breast cancer risk factors, being higher in women with higher breast density and premenopausal status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica Magni
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Luigi Mangiagalli 31, 20133, Milan, Italy.
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
| | - Andrea Cozzi
- Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy
- Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland (IIMSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Via Tesserete 46, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Giulia Muscogiuri
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Adrienn Benedek
- Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy
| | - Gabriele Rossini
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Marianna Fanizza
- Department of Breast Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Di Giulio
- Department of Breast Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesco Sardanelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Luigi Mangiagalli 31, 20133, Milan, Italy
- Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy
- Lega Italiana per la Lotta contro i Tumori (LILT) Milano Monza Brianza, Piazzale Paolo Gorini 22, 20133, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Matheson J, Elder K, Nickson C, Park A, Mann GB, Rose A. Contrast-enhanced mammography for surveillance in women with a personal history of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024:10.1007/s10549-024-07419-2. [PMID: 38963525 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07419-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Women with a personal history of breast cancer have an increased risk of subsequent breast malignancy and may benefit from more sensitive surveillance than conventional mammography (MG). We previously reported outcomes for first surveillance episode using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), demonstrating higher sensitivity and comparable specificity to MG. We now report CEM performance for subsequent surveillance. METHODS A retrospective study of 1,190 women in an Australian hospital setting undergoing annual surveillance following initial surveillance CEM between June 2016 and December 2022. Outcome measures were recall rate, cancer detection rate, contribution of contrast to recalls, false positive rate, interval cancer rate and characteristics of surveillance detected and interval cancers. RESULTS 2,592 incident surveillance episodes were analysed, of which 93% involved contrast-based imaging. Of 116 (4.5%) recall episodes, 40/116 (34%) recalls were malignant (27 invasive; 13 ductal carcinoma in situ), totalling 15.4 cancers per 1000 surveillance episodes. 55/116 (47%) recalls were contrast-directed including 17/40 (43%) true positive recalls. Tumour features were similar for contrast-directed recalls and other diagnoses. 8/9 (89%) of contrast-directed invasive recalls were Grade 2-3, and 5/9 (56%) were triple negative breast cancers. There were two symptomatic interval cancers (0.8 per 1000 surveillance episodes, program sensitivity 96%). CONCLUSION Routine use of CEM in surveillance of women with PHBC led to an increase in the detection of clinically significant malignant lesions, with a low interval cancer rate compared to previous published series. Compared to mammographic surveillance, contrast-enhanced mammography increases the sensitivity of surveillance programs for women with PHBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Matheson
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Kenneth Elder
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Parkville, Australia
- The Royal Women's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, Australia
| | - Carolyn Nickson
- Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Allan Park
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Parkville, Australia
| | - Gregory Bruce Mann
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Parkville, Australia.
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
- The Royal Women's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Allison Rose
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Parkville, Australia
- The Royal Women's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Radiology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chikarmane SA, Smith S. Background Parenchymal Enhancement: A Comprehensive Update. Radiol Clin North Am 2024; 62:607-617. [PMID: 38777537 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2023.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Breast MR imaging is a complementary screening tool for patients at high risk for breast cancer and has been used in the diagnostic setting. Normal enhancement of breast tissue on MR imaging is called breast parenchymal enhancement (BPE), which occurs after administration of an intravenous contrast agent. BPE varies widely due to menopausal status, use of exogenous hormones, and breast cancer treatment. Degree of BPE has also been shown to influence breast cancer risk and may predict treatment outcomes. The authors provide a comprehensive update on BPE with review of the recent literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sona A Chikarmane
- Breast Imaging Division, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Sharon Smith
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Müller-Franzes G, Khader F, Tayebi Arasteh S, Huck L, Bode M, Han T, Lemainque T, Kather JN, Nebelung S, Kuhl C, Truhn D. Intraindividual Comparison of Different Methods for Automated BPE Assessment at Breast MRI: A Call for Standardization. Radiology 2024; 312:e232304. [PMID: 39012249 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.232304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/17/2024]
Abstract
Background The level of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) at breast MRI provides predictive and prognostic information and can have diagnostic implications. However, there is a lack of standardization regarding BPE assessment. Purpose To investigate how well results of quantitative BPE assessment methods correlate among themselves and with assessments made by radiologists experienced in breast MRI. Materials and Methods In this pseudoprospective analysis of 5773 breast MRI examinations from 3207 patients (mean age, 60 years ± 10 [SD]), the level of BPE was prospectively categorized according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System by radiologists experienced in breast MRI. For automated extraction of BPE, fibroglandular tissue (FGT) was segmented in an automated pipeline. Four different published methods for automated quantitative BPE extractions were used: two methods (A and B) based on enhancement intensity and two methods (C and D) based on the volume of enhanced FGT. The results from all methods were correlated, and agreement was investigated in comparison with the respective radiologist-based categorization. For surrogate validation of BPE assessment, how accurately the methods distinguished premenopausal women with (n = 50) versus without (n = 896) antihormonal treatment was determined. Results Intensity-based methods (A and B) exhibited a correlation with radiologist-based categorization of 0.56 ± 0.01 and 0.55 ± 0.01, respectively, and volume-based methods (C and D) had a correlation of 0.52 ± 0.01 and 0.50 ± 0.01 (P < .001). There were notable correlation differences (P < .001) between the BPE determined with the four methods. Among the four quantitation methods, method D offered the highest accuracy for distinguishing women with versus without antihormonal therapy (P = .01). Conclusion Results of different methods for quantitative BPE assessment agree only moderately among themselves or with visual categories reported by experienced radiologists; intensity-based methods correlate more closely with radiologists' ratings than volume-based methods. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Mann in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustav Müller-Franzes
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany (G.M.F., F.K., S.T.A., L.H., M.B., T.H., T.L., S.N., C.K., D.T.); National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.); and Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.)
| | - Firas Khader
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany (G.M.F., F.K., S.T.A., L.H., M.B., T.H., T.L., S.N., C.K., D.T.); National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.); and Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.)
| | - Soroosh Tayebi Arasteh
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany (G.M.F., F.K., S.T.A., L.H., M.B., T.H., T.L., S.N., C.K., D.T.); National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.); and Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.)
| | - Luisa Huck
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany (G.M.F., F.K., S.T.A., L.H., M.B., T.H., T.L., S.N., C.K., D.T.); National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.); and Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.)
| | - Maike Bode
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany (G.M.F., F.K., S.T.A., L.H., M.B., T.H., T.L., S.N., C.K., D.T.); National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.); and Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.)
| | - Tianyu Han
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany (G.M.F., F.K., S.T.A., L.H., M.B., T.H., T.L., S.N., C.K., D.T.); National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.); and Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.)
| | - Teresa Lemainque
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany (G.M.F., F.K., S.T.A., L.H., M.B., T.H., T.L., S.N., C.K., D.T.); National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.); and Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.)
| | - Jakob Nikolas Kather
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany (G.M.F., F.K., S.T.A., L.H., M.B., T.H., T.L., S.N., C.K., D.T.); National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.); and Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.)
| | - Sven Nebelung
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany (G.M.F., F.K., S.T.A., L.H., M.B., T.H., T.L., S.N., C.K., D.T.); National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.); and Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.)
| | - Christiane Kuhl
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany (G.M.F., F.K., S.T.A., L.H., M.B., T.H., T.L., S.N., C.K., D.T.); National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.); and Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.)
| | - Daniel Truhn
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany (G.M.F., F.K., S.T.A., L.H., M.B., T.H., T.L., S.N., C.K., D.T.); National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (J.N.K.); Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.); and Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany (J.N.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang H, H M van der Velden B, Verburg E, Bakker MF, Pijnappel RM, Veldhuis WB, van Gils CH, Gilhuijs KGA. Automated rating of background parenchymal enhancement in MRI of extremely dense breasts without compromising the association with breast cancer in the DENSE trial. Eur J Radiol 2024; 175:111442. [PMID: 38583349 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) as rated by radiologists is subject to inter- and intrareader variability. We aim to automate BPE category from DCE-MRI. METHODS This study represents a secondary analysis of the Dense Tissue and Early Breast Neoplasm Screening trial. 4553 women with extremely dense breasts who received supplemental breast MRI screening in eight hospitals were included. Minimal, mild, moderate and marked BPE rated by radiologists were used as reference. Fifteen quantitative MRI features of the fibroglandular tissue were extracted to predict BPE using Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, and KNN classifiers. Majority voting was used to combine the predictions. Internal-external validation was used for training and validation. The inverse-variance weighted mean accuracy was used to express mean performance across the eight hospitals. Cox regression was used to verify non inferiority of the association between automated rating and breast cancer occurrence compared to the association for manual rating. RESULTS The accuracy of majority voting ranged between 0.56 and 0.84 across the eight hospitals. The weighted mean prediction accuracy for the four BPE categories was 0.76. The hazard ratio (HR) of BPE for breast cancer occurrence was comparable between automated rating and manual rating (HR = 2.12 versus HR = 1.97, P = 0.65 for mild/moderate/marked BPE relative to minimal BPE). CONCLUSION It is feasible to rate BPE automatically in DCE-MRI of women with extremely dense breasts without compromising the underlying association between BPE and breast cancer occurrence. The accuracy for minimal BPE is superior to that for other BPE categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Wang
- Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Erik Verburg
- Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marije F Bakker
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud M Pijnappel
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter B Veldhuis
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kenneth G A Gilhuijs
- Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Murakami W, Mortazavi S, Yu T, Kathuria-Prakash N, Yan R, Fischer C, McCann KE, Lee-Felker S, Sung K. Clinical Significance of Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Breast Cancer Risk Stratification. J Magn Reson Imaging 2024; 59:1742-1757. [PMID: 37724902 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) is an established breast cancer risk factor. However, the relationship between BPE levels and breast cancer risk stratification remains unclear. PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical relationship between BPE levels and breast cancer risk with covariate adjustments for age, ethnicity, and hormonal status. STUDY TYPE Retrospective. POPULATION 954 screening breast MRI datasets representing 721 women divided into four cohorts: women with pathogenic germline breast cancer (BRCA) mutations (Group 1, N = 211), women with non-BRCA germline mutations (Group 2, N = 60), women without high-risk germline mutations but with a lifetime breast cancer risk of ≥20% using the Tyrer-Cuzick model (Group 3, N = 362), and women with <20% lifetime risk (Group 4, N = 88). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 3 T/axial non-fat-saturated T1, short tau inversion recovery, fat-saturated pre-contrast, and post-contrast T1-weighted images. ASSESSMENT Data on age, body mass index, ethnicity, menopausal status, genetic predisposition, and hormonal therapy use were collected. BPE levels were evaluated by two breast fellowship-trained radiologists independently in accordance with BI-RADS, with a third breast fellowship-trained radiologist resolving any discordance. STATISTICAL TESTS Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to adjust covariates, including age, ethnicity, menopausal status, hormonal treatments, and prior bilateral oophorectomy. The Mann-Whitney U test, chi-squared test, and univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed, with an odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval. Weighted Kappa statistic was used to assess inter-reader variation. A P value <0.05 indicated a significant result. RESULTS In the assessment of BPE, there was substantial agreement between the two interpreting radiologists (κ = 0.74). Patient demographics were not significantly different between patient groups after PSM. The BPE of Group 1 was significantly lower than that of Group 4 and Group 3 among premenopausal women. In estimating the BPE level, the OR of gene mutations was 0.35. DATA CONCLUSION Adjusting for potential confounders, the BPE level of premenopausal women with BRCA mutations was significantly lower than that of non-high-risk women. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wakana Murakami
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Radiology, Showa University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shabnam Mortazavi
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Tiffany Yu
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nikhita Kathuria-Prakash
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ran Yan
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Cheryce Fischer
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kelly E McCann
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Stephanie Lee-Felker
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kyunghyun Sung
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Guan Z, Jin C, Liu Z. Editorial for "Clinical Significance of Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Breast Cancer Risk Stratification". J Magn Reson Imaging 2024; 59:1740-1741. [PMID: 37698134 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ziyun Guan
- Department of Emergency, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Foshan, China
| | - Cangzheng Jin
- Department of Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Foshan, China
| | - Zhuangsheng Liu
- Department of Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Foshan, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kuhl CK. Abbreviated Breast MRI: State of the Art. Radiology 2024; 310:e221822. [PMID: 38530181 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.221822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Abbreviated MRI is an umbrella term, defined as a focused MRI examination tailored to answer a single specific clinical question. For abbreviated breast MRI, this question is: "Is there evidence of breast cancer?" Abbreviated MRI of the breast makes maximum use of the fact that the kinetics of breast cancers and of benign tissue differ most in the very early postcontrast phase; therefore, abbreviated breast MRI focuses on this period. The different published approaches to abbreviated MRI include the following three subtypes: (a) short protocols, consisting of a precontrast and either a single postcontrast acquisition (first postcontrast subtracted [FAST]) or a time-resolved series of postcontrast acquisitions with lower spatial resolution (ultrafast [UF]), obtained during the early postcontrast phase immediately after contrast agent injection; (b) abridged protocols, consisting of FAST or UF acquisitions plus selected additional pulse sequences; and (c) noncontrast protocols, where diffusion-weighted imaging replaces the contrast information. Abbreviated MRI was proposed to increase tolerability of and access to breast MRI as a screening tool. But its widening application now includes follow-up after breast cancer and even diagnostic assessment. This review defines the three subtypes of abbreviated MRI, highlighting the differences between the protocols and their clinical implications and summarizing the respective evidence on diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiane K Kuhl
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, RWTH Pauwelsstr 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wilding M, Fleming J, Moore K, Crook A, Reddy R, Choi S, Schlub TE, Field M, Thiyagarajan L, Thompson J, Berman Y. Clinical and imaging modality factors impacting radiological interpretation of breast screening in young women with neurofibromatosis type 1. Fam Cancer 2023; 22:499-511. [PMID: 37335380 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-023-00340-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
Young women with Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) have a high risk of developing breast cancer and poorer survival following breast cancer diagnosis. International guidelines recommend commencing breast screening between 30 and 35 years; however, the optimal screening modality is unestablished, and previous reports suggest that breast imaging may be complicated by the presence of intramammary and cutaneous neurofibromas (cNFs). The aim of this study was to explore potential barriers to implementation of breast screening for young women with NF1.Twenty-seven women (30-47 years) with NF1 completed breast screening with breast MRI, mammogram and breast ultrasound. Nineteen probably benign/suspicious lesions were detected across 14 women. Despite the presence of breast cNFs, initial biopsy rate for participants with NF1 (37%), were comparable to a BRCA pathogenic variant (PV) cohort (25%) (P = 0.311). No cancers or intramammary neurofibromas were identified. Most participants (89%) returned for second round screening.The presence of cNF did not affect clinician confidence in 3D mammogram interpretation, although increasing breast density, frequently seen in young women, impeded confidence for 2D and 3D mammogram. Moderate or marked background parenchymal enhancement on MRI was higher in the NF1 cohort (70.4%) than BRCA PV carriers (47.3%), which is an independent risk factor for breast cancer.Breast MRI was the preferred mode of screening over mammogram, as the majority (85%) with NF1 demonstrated breast density (BI-RADS 3C/4D), which hinders mammogram interpretation. For those with high breast density and high cNF breast coverage, 3D rather than 2D mammogram is preferred, if MRI is unavailable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathilda Wilding
- NSLHD Familial Cancer Service, Department of Cancer Services, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Jane Fleming
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Katrina Moore
- Department of Endocrine Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ashley Crook
- NSLHD Familial Cancer Service, Department of Cancer Services, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ranjani Reddy
- North Shore Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Pacific Highway, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sarah Choi
- North Shore Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Pacific Highway, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Timothy E Schlub
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Field
- NSLHD Familial Cancer Service, Department of Cancer Services, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lavvina Thiyagarajan
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jeff Thompson
- Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Yemima Berman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang H, Gao L, Chen X, Wang SJ. Quantitative evaluation of Kaiser score in diagnosing breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for patients with high-grade background parenchymal enhancement. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2023; 13:6384-6394. [PMID: 37869283 PMCID: PMC10585520 DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
Background High-grade background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), including moderate and marked, poses a considerable challenge for the diagnosis of breast disease due to its tendency to increase the rate of false positives and false negatives. The purpose of our study was to explore whether the Kaiser score can be used for more accurate assessment of benign and malignant lesions in high-grade BPE compared with the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Methods A retrospective review was conducted on consecutive breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) scans from 2 medical centers. Included were patients who underwent DCE-MRI demonstrating high-grade BPE and who had a pathology-confirmed diagnosis. Excluded were patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or who had undergone biopsy prior to MRI examination. Two physicians with more than 7 years of experience specializing in breast imaging diagnosis jointly reviewed breast magnetic resonance (MR) images. The Kaiser score was used to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the BI-RADS from different BPE groups and different enhancement types. The performance of the Kaiser score and BI-RADS were compared according to diagnostic accuracy. Results A total of 126 cases of high-grade BPE from 2 medical centers were included in this study. The Kaiser score had a higher specificity and PPV than did the BI-RADS (87.5% vs. 46.3%) as well as a higher PPV (94.3% vs. 79.8%). The value of diagnostic accuracy and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the Kaiser score (accuracy 0.928; 95% CI: 0.883-0.973) was larger than that for BI-RADS (accuracy 0.810; 95% CI: 0.741-0.879). Moreover, the Kaiser score had a significantly higher value of diagnostic accuracy for both mass and non-mass enhancement, especially mass lesions (Kaiser score: accuracy 0.947, 95% CI: 0.902-0.992; BI-RADS: accuracy 0.821, 95% CI: 0.782-0.860), with a P value of 0.006. Conclusions The Kaiser score is a useful diagnostic tool for the evaluation of high-grade BPE lesions, with a higher specificity, PPV, and diagnostic accuracy as compared to the BI-RADS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Wang
- Department of Radiology, Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
- Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Ling Gao
- Department of Radiology, Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Xu Chen
- Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Shou-Ju Wang
- Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Uematsu T, Izumori A, Moon WK. Overcoming the limitations of screening mammography in Japan and Korea: a paradigm shift to personalized breast cancer screening based on ultrasonography. Ultrasonography 2023; 42:508-517. [PMID: 37697823 PMCID: PMC10555688 DOI: 10.14366/usg.23047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Screening mammography programs have been implemented in numerous Western countries with the aim of reducing breast cancer mortality. However, despite over 20 years of population-based screening mammography, the mortality rates in Japan and Korea continue to rise. This may be due to the fact that screening mammography is not as effective for Japanese and Korean women, who often have dense breasts. This density decreases the sensitivity of mammography due to a masking effect. Therefore, the early detection of small invasive cancers requires more than just mammography, particularly for women in their 40s. This review discusses the limitations and challenges of screening mammography, as well as the keys to successful population-based breast cancer screening in Japan and Korea. This includes a focus on breast ultrasonography techniques, which are based on histopathologic anatomical knowledge, and personalized screening strategies that are based on risk assessments measured by glandular tissue components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayoshi Uematsu
- Department of Breast Imaging and Breast Intervention Radiology and Department of Clinical Physiology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Japan
| | - Ayumi Izumori
- Department of Breast Surgery, Takamatsu Heiwa Hospital, Takamatsu, Japan
| | - Woo Kyung Moon
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Watt GP, Thakran S, Sung JS, Jochelson MS, Lobbes MBI, Weinstein SP, Bradbury AR, Buys SS, Morris EA, Apte A, Patel P, Woods M, Liang X, Pike MC, Kontos D, Bernstein JL. Association of Breast Cancer Odds with Background Parenchymal Enhancement Quantified Using a Fully Automated Method at MRI: The IMAGINE Study. Radiology 2023; 308:e230367. [PMID: 37750771 PMCID: PMC10546291 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.230367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
Background Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) at breast MRI has been associated with increased breast cancer risk in several independent studies. However, variability of subjective BPE assessments have precluded its use in clinical practice. Purpose To examine the association between fully objective measures of BPE at MRI and odds of breast cancer. Materials and Methods This prospective case-control study included patients who underwent a bilateral breast MRI examination and were receiving care at one of three centers in the United States from November 2010 to July 2017. Breast volume, fibroglandular tissue (FGT) volume, and BPE were quantified using fully automated software. Fat volume was defined as breast volume minus FGT volume. BPE extent was defined as the proportion of FGT voxels with enhancement of 20% or more. Spearman rank correlation between quantitative BPE extent and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) BPE categories assigned by an experienced board-certified breast radiologist was estimated. With use of multivariable logistic regression, breast cancer case-control status was regressed on tertiles (low, moderate, and high) of BPE, FGT volume, and fat volume, with adjustment for covariates. Results In total, 536 case participants with breast cancer (median age, 48 years [IQR, 43-55 years]) and 940 cancer-free controls (median age, 46 years [IQR, 38-55 years]) were included. BPE extent was positively associated with BI-RADS BPE (rs = 0.54; P < .001). Compared with low BPE extent (range, 2.9%-34.2%), high BPE extent (range, 50.7%-97.3%) was associated with increased odds of breast cancer (odds ratio [OR], 1.74 [95% CI: 1.23, 2.46]; P for trend = .002) in a multivariable model also including FGT volume (OR, 1.39 [95% CI: 0.97, 1.98]) and fat volume (OR, 1.46 [95% CI: 1.04, 2.06]). The association of high BPE extent with increased odds of breast cancer was similar for premenopausal and postmenopausal women (ORs, 1.75 and 1.83, respectively; interaction P = .73). Conclusion Objectively measured BPE at breast MRI is associated with increased breast cancer odds for both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Clinical trial registration no. NCT02301767 © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Bokacheva in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon P. Watt
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Snekha Thakran
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Janice S. Sung
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Maxine S. Jochelson
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Marc B. I. Lobbes
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Susan P. Weinstein
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Angela R. Bradbury
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Saundra S. Buys
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Elizabeth A. Morris
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Aditya Apte
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Prusha Patel
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Meghan Woods
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Xiaolin Liang
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Malcolm C. Pike
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Despina Kontos
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Jonine L. Bernstein
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wu Z, Lin Q, Wang H, Wang G, Fu G, Bian T. An MRI-Based Radiomics Nomogram to Distinguish Ductal Carcinoma In Situ with Microinvasion From Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of Breast Cancer. Acad Radiol 2023; 30 Suppl 2:S71-S81. [PMID: 37211478 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.03.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Accurate preoperative differentiation between ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISM) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) could facilitate treatment optimization and individualized risk assessment. The present study aims to build and validate a radiomics nomogram based on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) that could distinguish DCISM from pure DCIS breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS MR images of 140 patients obtained between March 2019 and November 2022 at our institution were included. Patients were randomly divided into a training (n = 97) and a test set (n = 43). Patients in both sets were further split into DCIS and DCISM subgroups. The independent clinical risk factors were selected by multivariate logistic regression to establish the clinical model. The optimal radiomics features were chosen by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and a radiomics signature was built. The nomogram model was constructed by integrating the radiomics signature and independent risk factors. The discrimination efficacy of our nomogram was assessed by using calibration and decision curves. RESULTS Six features were selected to construct the radiomics signature for distinguishing DCISM from DCIS. The radiomics signature and nomogram model exhibited better calibration and validation performance in the training (AUC 0.815, 0.911, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.703-0.926, 0.848-0.974) and test (AUC 0.830, 0.882, 95% CI, 0.672-0.989, 0.764-0.999) sets than in the clinical factor model (AUC 0.672, 0.717, 95% CI, 0.544-0.801, 0.527-0.907). The decision curve also demonstrated that the nomogram model exhibited good clinical utility. CONCLUSION The proposed noninvasive MRI-based radiomics nomogram model showed good performance in distinguishing DCISM from DCIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zengjie Wu
- Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China (Z.W.)
| | - Qing Lin
- Breast Disease Center, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China (Q.L., H.W., T.B.)
| | - Haibo Wang
- Breast Disease Center, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China (Q.L., H.W., T.B.)
| | - Guanqun Wang
- Department of Pathology, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China (G.W., G.F.)
| | - Guangming Fu
- Department of Pathology, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China (G.W., G.F.)
| | - Tiantian Bian
- Breast Disease Center, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, China (Q.L., H.W., T.B.).
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Xu C, Jiang M, Lin F, Zhang K, Xie H, Lv W, Ji H, Mao N. Qualitative assessments of density and background parenchymal enhancement on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography associated with breast cancer risk in high-risk women. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20220051. [PMID: 37227804 PMCID: PMC10392639 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the correlation between the risk of breast cancer for high-risk females and the density and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM). METHODS Females at high-risk, without breast cancer history and received CESM from July 2016 to December 2017 were retrospectively enrolled. The longest follow-up time was 4.5 years, and patients who developed breast cancer with maximized follow-up time were classified as cancer cohort, while females who did not develop breast cancer were categorized as control cohort. These two cohorts were one-to-one matched in age, family and/or genetic history of breast cancer, menopausal status and BRCA status. The density and BPE at CESM imaging were assessed. Conditional logistic regression was applied to evaluate the relationship between imaging features and breast cancer risk. RESULTS During the follow-up interval, 90 women at high-risk without history of breast cancer were newly diagnosed. Compared with minimal BPE, increasing BPE levels were associated with the risk of breast cancer among high-risk females in a time interval of 4.5 years (mild: odds ratio [OR]=3.2, p = 0.001; moderate: OR = 4.0, p = 0.002; marked: OR = 11.2, p < 0.001). In addition, females with mild, moderate or marked BPE were four times more likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer than females with minimal BPE in a time interval of 4.5 years (OR = 4.0, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Qualitative CESM BPE assessment may be useful in the prediction of breast cancer risk among high-risk females. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE • Qualitative CESM BPE assessment may be useful in the prediction of breast cancer risk among high-risk women during the follow-up period of 4.5 years. • The significance of breast density as an independent risk factor is not fully established for high-risk women during the follow-up period of 4.5 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cong Xu
- Physical Examination Center, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Meiping Jiang
- Department of Ultrasound, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Fan Lin
- Department of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Kun Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Haizhu Xie
- Department of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Wei Lv
- Physical Examination Center, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Haixia Ji
- Department of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wang H, van der Velden BHM, Verburg E, Bakker MF, Pijnappel RM, Veldhuis WB, van Gils CH, Gilhuijs KGA. Assessing Quantitative Parenchymal Features at Baseline Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI and Cancer Occurrence in Women with Extremely Dense Breasts. Radiology 2023; 308:e222841. [PMID: 37552061 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.222841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
Background Automated identification of quantitative breast parenchymal enhancement features on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI scans could provide added value in assessment of breast cancer risk in women with extremely dense breasts. Purpose To automatically identify quantitative properties of the breast parenchyma on baseline DCE MRI scans and assess their association with breast cancer occurrence in women with extremely dense breasts. Materials and Methods This study represents a secondary analysis of the Dense Tissue and Early Breast Neoplasm Screening trial. MRI was performed in eight hospitals between December 2011 and January 2016. After segmentation of fibroglandular tissue, quantitative features (including volumetric density, volumetric morphology, and enhancement characteristics) of the parenchyma were extracted from baseline MRI scans. Principal component analysis was used to identify parenchymal measures with the greatest variance. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was applied to assess the association between breast cancer occurrence and quantitative parenchymal features, followed by stratification of significant features into tertiles. Results A total of 4553 women (mean age, 55.7 years ± 6 [SD]) with extremely dense breasts were included; of these women, 122 (3%) were diagnosed with breast cancer. Five principal components representing 96% of the variance were identified, and the component explaining the greatest independent variance (42%) consisted of MRI features relating to volume of enhancing parenchyma. Multivariable analysis showed that volume of enhancing parenchyma was associated with breast cancer occurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.18; P = .02). Additionally, women in the high tertile of volume of enhancing parenchyma showed a breast cancer occurrence twice that of women in the low tertile (HR, 2.09; 95% CI: 1.25, 3.61; P = .005). Conclusion In women with extremely dense breasts, a high volume of enhancing parenchyma on baseline DCE MRI scans was associated with increased occurrence of breast cancer as compared with a low volume of enhancing parenchyma. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Grimm in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Wang
- From the Image Sciences Institute (H.W., B.H.M.v.d.V., E.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Bas H M van der Velden
- From the Image Sciences Institute (H.W., B.H.M.v.d.V., E.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Erik Verburg
- From the Image Sciences Institute (H.W., B.H.M.v.d.V., E.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marije F Bakker
- From the Image Sciences Institute (H.W., B.H.M.v.d.V., E.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ruud M Pijnappel
- From the Image Sciences Institute (H.W., B.H.M.v.d.V., E.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter B Veldhuis
- From the Image Sciences Institute (H.W., B.H.M.v.d.V., E.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- From the Image Sciences Institute (H.W., B.H.M.v.d.V., E.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Kenneth G A Gilhuijs
- From the Image Sciences Institute (H.W., B.H.M.v.d.V., E.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sallam H, Lenga L, Solbach C, Becker S, Vogl TJ. Correlation of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI with breast cancer. Clin Radiol 2023:S0009-9260(23)00218-0. [PMID: 37330320 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2023.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the prognostic value of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) in breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in women referred to radiological department as a high risk for breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective, cross-sectional study included 327 consecutive patients (mean age: 60 years, age range: 30-90 years) who underwent breast MRI and tissue biopsy between 2007 and 2016. All MRI images (T1, T2, and subtraction images) were evaluated visually. The relationship of BPE with patient age, fibroglandular tissue (FGT), Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) categories, presence of breast cancer, and expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), progesterone receptor (PR), oestrogen receptor (ER), and Ki67 were analysed. Furthermore, all variables were correlated with pre- and postmenopausal status. RESULTS BPE of bilateral breast showed a weak correlation with FGT (right BPE: r=-0.14, p=0.004; left BPE: r=0.16, p=0.003), a weak negative correlation with patient age (right BPE: r=-0.14, p=0.007; left BPE: r=-0.15, p=0.006), and significant correlation with HER2 (right BPE, p=0.02), left BPE with HER2 was not significant. Among the correlations between BPE and BIRADS, only between right BPE and right BIRADS was significant (p=0.031). No clear evidence of an association between breast MRI BPE and breast cancer in premenopausal and postmenopausal status was observed, and no difference was found between the right and left breasts. CONCLUSIONS The results of the present study showed no significant correlations between BPE and breast cancer. In addition, there was no significant difference between the right and left breast. Hence, BPE of MRI may not be a reliable biomarker of breast cancer development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Sallam
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - L Lenga
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - C Solbach
- Department Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - S Becker
- Department Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - T J Vogl
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Liu Y, Wang S, Qu J, Tang R, Wang C, Xiao F, Pang P, Sun Z, Xu M, Li J. High-temporal resolution DCE-MRI improves assessment of intra- and peri-breast lesions categorized as BI-RADS 4. BMC Med Imaging 2023; 23:58. [PMID: 37076817 PMCID: PMC10116788 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-023-01015-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND BI-RADS 4 breast lesions are suspicious for malignancy with a range from 2 to 95%, indicating that numerous benign lesions are unnecessarily biopsied. Thus, we aimed to investigate whether high-temporal-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (H_DCE-MRI) would be superior to conventional low-temporal-resolution DCE-MRI (L_DCE-MRI) in the diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 breast lesions. METHODS This single-center study was approved by the IRB. From April 2015 to June 2017, patients with breast lesions were prospectively included and randomly assigned to undergo either H_DCE-MRI, including 27 phases, or L_DCE-MRI, including 7 phases. Patients with BI-RADS 4 lesions were diagnosed by the senior radiologist in this study. Using a two-compartment extended Tofts model and a three-dimensional volume of interest, several pharmacokinetic parameters reflecting hemodynamics, including Ktrans, Kep, Ve, and Vp, were obtained from the intralesional, perilesional and background parenchymal enhancement areas, which were labeled the Lesion, Peri and BPE areas, respectively. Models were developed based on hemodynamic parameters, and the performance of these models in discriminating between benign and malignant lesions was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS A total of 140 patients were included in the study and underwent H_DCE-MRI (n = 62) or L_DCE-MRI (n = 78) scans; 56 of these 140 patients had BI-RADS 4 lesions. Some pharmacokinetic parameters from H_DCE-MRI (Lesion_Ktrans, Kep, and Vp; Peri_Ktrans, Kep, and Vp) and from L_DCE-MRI (Lesion_Kep, Peri_Vp, BPE_Ktrans and BPE_Vp) were significantly different between benign and malignant breast lesions (P < 0.01). ROC analysis showed that Lesion_Ktrans (AUC = 0.866), Lesion_Kep (AUC = 0.929), Lesion_Vp (AUC = 0.872), Peri_Ktrans (AUC = 0.733), Peri_Kep (AUC = 0.810), and Peri_Vp (AUC = 0.857) in the H_DCE-MRI group had good discrimination performance. Parameters from the BPE area showed no differentiating ability in the H_DCE-MRI group. Lesion_Kep (AUC = 0.767), Peri_Vp (AUC = 0.726), and BPE_Ktrans and BPE_Vp (AUC = 0.687 and 0.707) could differentiate between benign and malignant breast lesions in the L_DCE-MRI group. The models were compared with the senior radiologist's assessment for the identification of BI-RADS 4 breast lesions. The AUC, sensitivity and specificity of Lesion_Kep (0.963, 100.0%, and 88.9%, respectively) in the H_DCE-MRI group were significantly higher than those of the same parameter in the L_DCE-MRI group (0.663, 69.6% and 75.0%, respectively) for the assessment of BI-RADS 4 breast lesions. The DeLong test was conducted, and there was a significant difference only between Lesion_Kep in the H_DCE-MRI group and the senior radiologist (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Pharmacokinetic parameters (Ktrans, Kep and Vp) from the intralesional and perilesional regions on high-temporal-resolution DCE-MRI, especially the intralesional Kep parameter, can improve the assessment of benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 breast lesions to avoid unnecessary biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yufeng Liu
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), 54 Youdian Road, Hangzhou, China
- The First Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shiwei Wang
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), 54 Youdian Road, Hangzhou, China
- The First Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jingjing Qu
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), 54 Youdian Road, Hangzhou, China
- The First Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Rui Tang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chundan Wang
- The First Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China
| | - Fengchun Xiao
- The First Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China
| | - Peipei Pang
- GE Healthcare, Precision Health Institution, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhichao Sun
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), 54 Youdian Road, Hangzhou, China
- The First Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Maosheng Xu
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), 54 Youdian Road, Hangzhou, China.
- The First Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
| | - Jiaying Li
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), 54 Youdian Road, Hangzhou, China.
- The First Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Acciavatti RJ, Lee SH, Reig B, Moy L, Conant EF, Kontos D, Moon WK. Beyond Breast Density: Risk Measures for Breast Cancer in Multiple Imaging Modalities. Radiology 2023; 306:e222575. [PMID: 36749212 PMCID: PMC9968778 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.222575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Breast density is an independent risk factor for breast cancer. In digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis, breast density is assessed visually using the four-category scale developed by the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (5th edition as of November 2022). Epidemiologically based risk models, such as the Tyrer-Cuzick model (version 8), demonstrate superior modeling performance when mammographic density is incorporated. Beyond just density, a separate mammographic measure of breast cancer risk is parenchymal textural complexity. With advancements in radiomics and deep learning, mammographic textural patterns can be assessed quantitatively and incorporated into risk models. Other supplemental screening modalities, such as breast US and MRI, offer independent risk measures complementary to those derived from mammography. Breast US allows the two components of fibroglandular tissue (stromal and glandular) to be visualized separately in a manner that is not possible with mammography. A higher glandular component at screening breast US is associated with higher risk. With MRI, a higher background parenchymal enhancement of the fibroglandular tissue has also emerged as an imaging marker for risk assessment. Imaging markers observed at mammography, US, and MRI are powerful tools in refining breast cancer risk prediction, beyond mammographic density alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Beatriu Reig
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400
Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (R.J.A., E.F.C., D.K.); Department of
Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.L.,
W.K.M.); and Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (B.R.,
L.M.)
| | - Linda Moy
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400
Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (R.J.A., E.F.C., D.K.); Department of
Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.L.,
W.K.M.); and Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (B.R.,
L.M.)
| | - Emily F. Conant
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400
Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (R.J.A., E.F.C., D.K.); Department of
Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea (S.H.L.,
W.K.M.); and Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (B.R.,
L.M.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kuhl CK. What the Future Holds for the Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Radiology 2023; 306:e223338. [PMID: 36802999 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.223338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Christiane K Kuhl
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, Pauwelsstr 30, 52074 Aachen, RWTH, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Brown JC, Ligibel JA, Crane TE, Kontos D, Yang S, Conant EF, Mack JA, Ahima RS, Schmitz KH. Obesity and metabolic dysfunction correlate with background parenchymal enhancement in premenopausal women. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2023; 31:479-486. [PMID: 36628617 PMCID: PMC10141499 DOI: 10.1002/oby.23649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study tested the hypothesis that obesity and metabolic abnormalities correlate with background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), the volume and intensity of enhancing fibroglandular breast tissue on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS Participants included 59 premenopausal women at high risk of breast cancer. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 . Metabolic parameters included dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry-quantified body composition, plasma biomarkers of insulin resistance, adipokines, inflammation, lipids, and urinary sex hormones. BPE was assessed using computerized algorithms on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS BMI was positively correlated with BPE (r = 0.69; p < 0.001); participants with obesity had higher BPE than those without obesity (404.9 ± 189.6 vs. 261.8 ± 143.8 cm2 ; Δ: 143.1 cm2 [95% CI: 49.5-236.7]; p = 0.003). Total body fat mass (r = 0.68; p < 0.001), body fat percentage (r = 0.64; p < 0.001), visceral adipose tissue area (r = 0.65; p < 0.001), subcutaneous adipose tissue area (r = 0.60; p < 0.001), insulin (r = 0.59; p < 0.001), glucose (r = 0.35; p = 0.011), homeostatic model of insulin resistance (r = 0.62; p < 0.001), and leptin (r = 0.60; p < 0.001) were positively correlated with BPE. Adiponectin (r = -0.44; p < 0.001) was negatively correlated with BPE. Plasma biomarkers of inflammation and lipids and urinary sex hormones were not correlated with BPE. CONCLUSIONS In premenopausal women at high risk of breast cancer, increased BPE is associated with obesity, insulin resistance, leptin, and adiponectin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin C. Brown
- Pennington Biomedical Research Center, 6400 Perkins Rd, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA
- LSU Health Sciences Center New Orleans School of Medicine, 1901 Perdido St, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
- Stanley S. Scott Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 533 Bolivar St, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA
| | | | - Tracy E. Crane
- University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, 1600 NW 10 Ave, Miami, FL 33136
| | - Despina Kontos
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center, Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 10104
| | - Shengping Yang
- Pennington Biomedical Research Center, 6400 Perkins Rd, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA
| | - Emily F. Conant
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center, Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 10104
| | - Julie A. Mack
- Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033
| | - Rexford S. Ahima
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1830 E. Monument St., Baltimore, MD 21287
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lee SH, Jang MJ, Yoen H, Lee Y, Kim YS, Park AR, Ha SM, Kim SY, Chang JM, Cho N, Moon WK. Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Postoperative Surveillance Breast MRI: Association with Future Second Breast Cancer Risk. Radiology 2023; 306:90-99. [PMID: 36040335 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.220440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Background Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) is a known risk factor for breast cancer. However, studies on the association between BPE and second breast cancer risk are still lacking. Purpose To investigate whether BPE at surveillance breast MRI is associated with subsequent second breast cancer risk in women with a personal history of breast cancer. Materials and Methods A retrospective search of the imaging database of an academic medical center identified consecutive surveillance breast MRI examinations performed between January 2008 and December 2017 in women who underwent surgery for primary breast cancer and had no prior diagnosis of second breast cancer. BPE at surveillance breast MRI was qualitatively assessed using a four-category classification of minimal, mild, moderate, or marked. Future second breast cancer was defined as ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence or contralateral breast cancer diagnosed at least 1 year after each surveillance breast MRI examination. Factors associated with future second breast cancer risk were evaluated using the multivariable Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model. Results Among the 2668 women (mean age at baseline surveillance breast MRI, 49 years ± 8 [SD]), 109 developed a second breast cancer (49 ipsilateral, 58 contralateral, and two ipsilateral and contralateral) at a median follow-up of 5.8 years. Mild, moderate, or marked BPE at surveillance breast MRI (hazard ratio [HR], 2.1 [95% CI: 1.4, 3.1]; P < .001), young age (<45 years) at initial breast cancer diagnosis (HR, 3.4 [95% CI: 1.7, 6.4]; P < .001), positive results from a BRCA1/2 genetic test (HR, 6.5 [95% CI: 3.5, 12.0]; P < .001), and negative hormone receptor expression in the initial breast cancer (HR, 1.6 [95% CI: 1.1, 2.6]; P = .02) were independently associated with an increased risk of future second breast cancer. Conclusion Background parenchymal enhancement at surveillance breast MRI was associated with future second breast cancer risk in women with a personal history of breast cancer. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Niell in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Hyun Lee
- From the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., H.Y., Y.L., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.) and Medical Research Collaborating Center (M.J.J.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; and the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Myoung-Jin Jang
- From the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., H.Y., Y.L., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.) and Medical Research Collaborating Center (M.J.J.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; and the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Heera Yoen
- From the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., H.Y., Y.L., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.) and Medical Research Collaborating Center (M.J.J.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; and the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Youkyoung Lee
- From the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., H.Y., Y.L., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.) and Medical Research Collaborating Center (M.J.J.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; and the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeon Soo Kim
- From the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., H.Y., Y.L., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.) and Medical Research Collaborating Center (M.J.J.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; and the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ah Reum Park
- From the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., H.Y., Y.L., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.) and Medical Research Collaborating Center (M.J.J.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; and the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Su Min Ha
- From the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., H.Y., Y.L., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.) and Medical Research Collaborating Center (M.J.J.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; and the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Soo-Yeon Kim
- From the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., H.Y., Y.L., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.) and Medical Research Collaborating Center (M.J.J.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; and the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Min Chang
- From the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., H.Y., Y.L., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.) and Medical Research Collaborating Center (M.J.J.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; and the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Nariya Cho
- From the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., H.Y., Y.L., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.) and Medical Research Collaborating Center (M.J.J.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; and the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo Kyung Moon
- From the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., H.Y., Y.L., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.) and Medical Research Collaborating Center (M.J.J.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; and the Department of Radiology (S.H.L., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.), Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Glencer AC, Miller PN, Greenwood H, Maldonado Rodas CK, Freimanis R, Basu A, Mukhtar RA, Brabham C, Kim P, Hwang ES, Rosenbluth JM, Hirst GL, Campbell MJ, Borowsky AD, Esserman LJ. Identifying Good Candidates for Active Surveillance of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Insights from a Large Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Cohort. CANCER RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 2022; 2:1579-1589. [PMID: 36970720 PMCID: PMC10035518 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-22-0263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a biologically heterogenous entity with uncertain risk for invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) development. Standard treatment is surgical resection often followed by radiation. New approaches are needed to reduce overtreatment. This was an observational study that enrolled patients with DCIS who chose not to pursue surgical resection from 2002 to 2019 at a single academic medical center. All patients underwent breast MRI exams at 3- to 6-month intervals. Patients with hormone receptor-positive disease received endocrine therapy. Surgical resection was strongly recommended if clinical or radiographic evidence of disease progression developed. A recursive partitioning (R-PART) algorithm incorporating breast MRI features and endocrine responsiveness was used retrospectively to stratify risk of IDC. A total of 71 patients were enrolled, 2 with bilateral DCIS (73 lesions). A total of 34 (46.6%) were premenopausal, 68 (93.2%) were hormone-receptor positive, and 60 (82.1%) were intermediate- or high-grade lesions. Mean follow-up time was 8.5 years. Over half (52.1%) remained on active surveillance without evidence of IDC with mean duration of 7.4 years. Twenty patients developed IDC, of which 6 were HER2 positive. DCIS and subsequent IDC had highly concordant tumor biology. Risk of IDC was characterized by MRI features after 6 months of endocrine therapy exposure; low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were identified with respective IDC rates of 8.7%, 20.0%, and 68.2%. Thus, active surveillance consisting of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy and serial breast MRI may be an effective tool to risk-stratify patients with DCIS and optimally select medical or surgical management. Significance A retrospective analysis of 71 patients with DCIS who did not undergo upfront surgery demonstrated that breast MRI features after short-term exposure to endocrine therapy identify those at high (68.2%), intermediate (20.0%), and low risk (8.7%) of IDC. With 7.4 years mean follow-up, 52.1% of patients remain on active surveillance. A period of active surveillance offers the opportunity to risk-stratify DCIS lesions and guide decisions for operative management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexa C. Glencer
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Phoebe N. Miller
- University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California
| | - Heather Greenwood
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Rita Freimanis
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Amrita Basu
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Rita A. Mukhtar
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Paul Kim
- Quinnipiac University School of Medicine, North Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Jennifer M. Rosenbluth
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Gillian L. Hirst
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Michael J. Campbell
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Laura J. Esserman
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Jones MA, Islam W, Faiz R, Chen X, Zheng B. Applying artificial intelligence technology to assist with breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction. Front Oncol 2022; 12:980793. [PMID: 36119479 PMCID: PMC9471147 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.980793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer remains the most diagnosed cancer in women. Advances in medical imaging modalities and technologies have greatly aided in the early detection of breast cancer and the decline of patient mortality rates. However, reading and interpreting breast images remains difficult due to the high heterogeneity of breast tumors and fibro-glandular tissue, which results in lower cancer detection sensitivity and specificity and large inter-reader variability. In order to help overcome these clinical challenges, researchers have made great efforts to develop computer-aided detection and/or diagnosis (CAD) schemes of breast images to provide radiologists with decision-making support tools. Recent rapid advances in high throughput data analysis methods and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, particularly radiomics and deep learning techniques, have led to an exponential increase in the development of new AI-based models of breast images that cover a broad range of application topics. In this review paper, we focus on reviewing recent advances in better understanding the association between radiomics features and tumor microenvironment and the progress in developing new AI-based quantitative image feature analysis models in three realms of breast cancer: predicting breast cancer risk, the likelihood of tumor malignancy, and tumor response to treatment. The outlook and three major challenges of applying new AI-based models of breast images to clinical practice are also discussed. Through this review we conclude that although developing new AI-based models of breast images has achieved significant progress and promising results, several obstacles to applying these new AI-based models to clinical practice remain. Therefore, more research effort is needed in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meredith A. Jones
- School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States
- *Correspondence: Meredith A. Jones,
| | - Warid Islam
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States
| | - Rozwat Faiz
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States
| | - Xuxin Chen
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States
| | - Bin Zheng
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Brooks JD, Christensen RAG, Sung JS, Pike MC, Orlow I, Bernstein JL, Morris EA. MRI background parenchymal enhancement, breast density and breast cancer risk factors: A cross-sectional study in pre- and post-menopausal women. NPJ Breast Cancer 2022; 8:97. [PMID: 36008488 PMCID: PMC9411561 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-022-00458-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast tissue enhances on contrast MRI and is called background parenchymal enhancement (BPE). Having high BPE has been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. We examined the relationship between BPE and the amount of fibroglandular tissue on MRI (MRI-FGT) and breast cancer risk factors. This was a cross-sectional study of 415 women without breast cancer undergoing contrast-enhanced breast MRI at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. All women completed a questionnaire assessing exposures at the time of MRI. Prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) describing the relationship between breast cancer risk factors and BPE and MRI-FGT were generated using modified Poisson regression. In multivariable-adjusted models a positive association between body mass index (BMI) and BPE was observed, with a 5-unit increase in BMI associated with a 14% and 44% increase in prevalence of high BPE in pre- and post-menopausal women, respectively. Conversely, a strong inverse relationship between BMI and MRI-FGT was observed in both pre- (PR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.57, 0.76) and post-menopausal (PR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.56, 0.78) women. Use of preventive medication (e.g., tamoxifen) was associated with having low BPE, while no association was observed for MRI-FGT. BPE is an imaging marker available from standard contrast-enhanced MRI, that is influenced by endogenous and exogenous hormonal exposures in both pre- and post-menopausal women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer D Brooks
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | - Janice S Sung
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Malcolm C Pike
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Irene Orlow
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonine L Bernstein
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Morris
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lee SH, Moon WK. Glandular Tissue Component on Breast Ultrasound in Dense Breasts: A New Imaging Biomarker for Breast Cancer Risk. Korean J Radiol 2022; 23:574-580. [PMID: 35617993 PMCID: PMC9174505 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Su Hyun Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woo Kyung Moon
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ma Y, Liu A, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Wang Y, Zhao M, Liang Z, Qu Z, Yin L, Lu H, Ye Z. Comparison of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT) and breast MRI. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:5773-5782. [PMID: 35320411 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08699-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) levels on contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT) and MRI, evaluate inter-reader reliability, and analyze the relationship between clinical factors and BPE level on CE-CBBCT. METHODS In this retrospective study, patients who underwent both CE-CBBCT and MRI were analyzed. BPE levels on CE-CBBCT and MRI were assessed by five specialists independently in random fashion, with a wash-out period of 4 weeks. Weighted kappa was used to analyze the agreement between CE-CBBCT and MRI, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the inter-reader reliability for each modality. The association between BPE level on CE-CBBCT and clinical factors was evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS A total of 221 patients from January 2017 to April 2021 were enrolled. CE-CBBCT showed substantial agreement (weighted kappa = 0.690) with MRI for BPE evaluation, with good degree of inter-reader reliability on both CE-CBBCT (ICC = 0.712) and MRI (ICC = 0.757). Based on majority reports, BPE levels on CE-CBBCT were lower than MRI (p < 0.001). BPE level on CE-CBBCT was significantly associated with menstrual status (odds ratio, OR = 0.125), breast density (OR = 2.308), and previously treated breast cancer (OR = 0.052) (all p < 0.05). BPE level for premenopausal patients was associated with menstrual cycle, with lower BPE level for the 2nd week of menstrual cycle (OR = 0.246). CONCLUSIONS CE-CBBCT showed substantial agreement and comparable inter-reader reliability with MRI for BPE evaluation, indicating that the corresponding BI-RADS lexicons could be used to describe BPE level on CE-CBBCT. The 2nd week of menstrual cycle timing is suggested as the optimal examination period for CE-CBBCT. KEY POINTS • CE-CBBCT showed substantial agreement and comparable inter-reader reliability with MRI for BPE evaluation. • Menstrual status, breast density, and previously treated breast cancer were associated with the BPE level on CE-CBBCT images. • The 2ndweek of the menstrual cycle is suggested as the optimal examination period for CE-CBBCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Ma
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Aidi Liu
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuwei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Yueqiang Zhu
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Yafei Wang
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Mengran Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhiran Liang
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhiye Qu
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Lu Yin
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Hong Lu
- Department of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhaoxiang Ye
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Park GE, Kim SH, Lee EB, Nam Y, Sung W. Ipsilateral Recurrence of DCIS in Relation to Radiomics Features on Contrast Enhanced Breast MRI. Tomography 2022; 8:596-606. [PMID: 35314626 PMCID: PMC8938812 DOI: 10.3390/tomography8020049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 02/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the association between ipsilateral recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and radiomics features from DCIS and contralateral normal breast on contrast enhanced breast MR imaging. A total of 163 patients with DCIS who underwent preoperative MR imaging between January 2010 and December 2014 were included (training cohort; n = 117, validation cohort; n = 46). Radiomics features were extracted from whole tumor volume of DCIS on early dynamic T1-subtraction images and from the contralateral normal breast on precontrast T1 and early dynamic T1-subtraction images. After feature selection, a Rad-score was established by LASSO Cox regression model. Performance of Rad-score was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Kaplan Meier curve with log rank test. The Rad-score was significantly associated with ipsilateral recurrence free survival (RFS). The low-risk group with a low Rad-score showed higher ipsilateral RFS than the high-risk group with a high Rad-score in both training and validation cohorts (p < 0.01). The Rad-score based on radiomics features from DCIS and contralateral normal breast on breast MR imaging showed the potential for prediction of ipsilateral RFS of DCIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ga Eun Park
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea; (G.E.P.); (E.B.L.)
| | - Sung Hun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea; (G.E.P.); (E.B.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-2-2258-6250
| | - Eun Byul Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea; (G.E.P.); (E.B.L.)
| | - Yoonho Nam
- Division of Biomedical Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin 17035, Korea;
| | - Wonmo Sung
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea;
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mathelin C, Barranger E, Boisserie-Lacroix M, Boutet G, Brousse S, Chabbert-Buffet N, Coutant C, Daraï E, Delpech Y, Duraes M, Espié M, Fornecker L, Golfier F, Grosclaude P, Hamy AS, Kermarrec E, Lavoué V, Lodi M, Luporsi É, Maugard CM, Molière S, Seror JY, Taris N, Uzan C, Vaysse C, Fritel X. [Non-genetic indications for risk reducing mastectomies: Guidelines of the National College of French Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE, FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE 2022; 50:107-120. [PMID: 34920167 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the value of performing a risk-reducting mastectomy (RRM) in the absence of a deleterious variant of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, in 4 clinical situations at risk of breast cancer. DESIGN The CNGOF Commission of Senology, composed of 26 experts, developed these recommendations. A policy of declaration and monitoring of links of interest was applied throughout the process of making the recommendations. Similarly, the development of these recommendations did not benefit from any funding from a company marketing a health product. The Commission of Senology adhered to the AGREE II (Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare) criteria and followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method to assess the quality of the evidence on which the recommendations were based. The potential drawbacks of making recommendations in the presence of poor quality or insufficient evidence were highlighted. METHODS The Commission of Senology considered 8 questions on 4 topics, focusing on histological, familial (no identified genetic abnormality), radiological (of unrecognized cancer), and radiation (history of Hodgkin's disease) risk. For each situation, it was determined whether performing RRM compared with surveillance would decrease the risk of developing breast cancer and/or increase survival. RESULTS The Commission of Senology synthesis and application of the GRADE method resulted in 11 recommendations, 6 with a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and 5 with a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). CONCLUSION There was significant agreement among the Commission of Senology members on recommendations to improve practice for performing or not performing RRM in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carole Mathelin
- CHRU, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France; ICANS, 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67033 Strasbourg cedex, France.
| | | | | | - Gérard Boutet
- AGREGA, service de chirurgie gynécologique et médecine de la reproduction, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, centre hospitalier universitaire de Bordeaux, groupe hospitalier Pellegrin, place Amélie-Raba-Léon, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
| | - Susie Brousse
- CHU de Rennes, 2, rue Henri-le-Guilloux, 35033 Rennes cedex 9, France.
| | | | - Charles Coutant
- Département d'oncologie chirurgicale, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue du Pr-Marion, 21079 Dijon cedex, France.
| | - Emile Daraï
- Hôpital Tenon, service de gynécologie-obstétrique, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France.
| | - Yann Delpech
- Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France.
| | - Martha Duraes
- CHU de Montpellier, 191, avenue du Doyen-Giraud, 34295 Montpellier cedex, France.
| | - Marc Espié
- Hôpital Saint-Louis, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France.
| | - Luc Fornecker
- Département d'onco-hématologie, ICANS, 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67033 Strasbourg cedex, France.
| | - François Golfier
- Centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, bâtiment 3B, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France.
| | | | | | - Edith Kermarrec
- Hôpital Tenon, service de radiologie, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France.
| | - Vincent Lavoué
- CHU, service de gynécologie, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35200 Rennes, France.
| | | | - Élisabeth Luporsi
- Oncologie médicale et oncogénétique, CHR Metz-Thionville, hôpital de Mercy, 1, allée du Château, 57085 Metz, France.
| | - Christine M Maugard
- Service de génétique oncologique clinique, unité de génétique oncologique moléculaire, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
| | | | | | - Nicolas Taris
- Oncogénétique, ICANS, 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67033 Strasbourg, France.
| | - Catherine Uzan
- Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 47, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.
| | - Charlotte Vaysse
- Service de chirurgie oncologique, CHU Toulouse, institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse, France.
| | - Xavier Fritel
- Centre hospitalo-universitaire de Poitiers, 2, rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers, France.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Background parenchymal enhancement in contrast-enhanced MR imaging suggests systemic effects of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:7430-7438. [PMID: 35524784 PMCID: PMC9668774 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08809-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Revised: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive devices (LNG-IUDs) are designed to exhibit only local hormonal effects. There is an ongoing debate on whether LNG-IUDs can have side effects similar to systemic hormonal medication. Benign background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI has been established as a sensitive marker of hormonal stimulation of the breast. We investigated the association between LNG-IUD use and BPE in breast MRI to further explore possible systemic effects of LNG-IUDs. METHODS Our hospital database was searched to identify premenopausal women without personal history of breast cancer, oophorectomy, and hormone replacement or antihormone therapy, who had undergone standardized DCE breast MRI at least twice, once with and without an LNG-IUD in place. To avoid confounding aging-related effects on BPE, half of included women had their first MRI without, the other half with, LNG-IUD in place. Degree of BPE was analyzed according to the ACR categories. Wilcoxon-matched-pairs signed-rank test was used to compare the distribution of ACR categories with vs. without LNG-IUD. RESULTS Forty-eight women (mean age, 46 years) were included. In 24/48 women (50% [95% CI: 35.9-64.1%]), ACR categories did not change with vs. without LNG-IUDs. In 23/48 women (48% [33.9-62.1%]), the ACR category was higher with vs. without LNG-IUDs; in 1/48 (2% [0-6%]), the ACR category was lower with vs. without LNG-IUDs. The change of ACR category depending on the presence or absence of an LNG-IUD proved highly significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The use of an LNG-IUD can be associated with increased BPE in breast MRI, providing further evidence that LNG-IUDs do have systemic effects. KEY POINTS • The use of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive devices is associated with increased background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI. • This suggests that hormonal effects of these devices are not only confined to the uterine cavity, but may be systemic. • Potential systemic effects of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive devices should therefore be considered.
Collapse
|
31
|
Houser M, Barreto D, Mehta A, Brem RF. Current and Future Directions of Breast MRI. J Clin Med 2021; 10:5668. [PMID: 34884370 PMCID: PMC8658585 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Revised: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive exam for detecting breast cancer. The American College of Radiology recommends women with 20% or greater lifetime risk of developing breast cancer be screened annually with MRI. However, other high-risk populations would also benefit. Hartmann et al. reported women with atypical hyperplasia have nearly a 30% incidence of breast cancer at 25-year follow-up. Women with dense breast tissue have up to a 4-fold increased risk of breast cancer when compared to average-risk women; their cancers are more likely to be mammographically occult. Because multiple cohorts of women are at high risk for developing breast cancer, there has been a movement to develop an abbreviated MRI (abMRI) protocol to expand the availability of MRI screening. Studies on abMRI effectiveness have been promising, with Weinstein et al. demonstrating a cancer detection rate of 27.4/1000 in women with dense breasts after a negative digital breast tomosynthesis. Breast MRI is also used to evaluate the extent of disease as part of preoperative assessment in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, and to assess a patient's response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This paper aims to explore the current uses of MRI and propose future indications and directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Houser
- George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC 20037, USA;
| | - David Barreto
- George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, DC 20037, USA; (D.B.); (A.M.)
| | - Anita Mehta
- George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, DC 20037, USA; (D.B.); (A.M.)
| | - Rachel F. Brem
- George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, DC 20037, USA; (D.B.); (A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ragusi MAA, Bismeijer T, van der Velden BHM, Loo CE, Canisius S, Wesseling J, Wessels LFA, Elias SG, Gilhuijs KGA. Contralateral parenchymal enhancement on MRI is associated with tumor proteasome pathway gene expression and overall survival of early ER+/HER2-breast cancer patients. Breast 2021; 60:230-237. [PMID: 34763270 PMCID: PMC8591464 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Revised: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess whether contralateral parenchymal enhancement (CPE) on MRI is associated with gene expression pathways in ER+/HER2-breast cancer, and if so, whether such pathways are related to survival. Methods Preoperative breast MRIs were analyzed of early ER+/HER2-breast cancer patients eligible for breast-conserving surgery included in a prospective observational cohort study (MARGINS). The contralateral parenchyma was segmented and CPE was calculated as the average of the top-10% delayed enhancement. Total tumor RNA sequencing was performed and gene set enrichment analysis was used to reveal gene expression pathways associated with CPE (N = 226) and related to overall survival (OS) and invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) in multivariable survival analysis. The latter was also done for the METABRIC cohort (N = 1355). Results CPE was most strongly correlated with proteasome pathways (normalized enrichment statistic = 2.04, false discovery rate = .11). Patients with high CPE showed lower tumor proteasome gene expression. Proteasome gene expression had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.40 (95% CI = 0.89, 2.16; P = .143) for OS in the MARGINS cohort and 1.53 (95% CI = 1.08, 2.14; P = .017) for IDFS, in METABRIC proteasome gene expression had an HR of 1.09 (95% CI = 1.01, 1.18; P = .020) for OS and 1.10 (95% CI = 1.02, 1.18; P = .012) for IDFS. Conclusion CPE was negatively correlated with tumor proteasome gene expression in early ER+/HER2-breast cancer patients. Low tumor proteasome gene expression was associated with improved survival in the METABRIC data. Contralateral parenchymal enhancement on MRI was associated with tumor proteasome gene expression in ER+/HER2-breast cancer. A high contralateral parenchymal enhancement was associated with a low proteasome gene expression in the breast cancer. Low proteasome tumor gene expression was associated with improved survival in an independent patient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max A A Ragusi
- Department of Radiology / Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Tycho Bismeijer
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis - Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas H M van der Velden
- Department of Radiology / Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Claudette E Loo
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sander Canisius
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis - Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Lodewyk F A Wessels
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis - Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics, and Computer Science, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 5, 2628 CD Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Kenneth G A Gilhuijs
- Department of Radiology / Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
This article gives a brief overview of the development of artificial intelligence in clinical breast imaging. For multiple decades, artificial intelligence (AI) methods have been developed and translated for breast imaging tasks such as detection, diagnosis, and assessing response to therapy. As imaging modalities arise to support breast cancer screening programs and diagnostic examinations, including full-field digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound, and MRI, AI techniques parallel the efforts with more complex algorithms, faster computers, and larger data sets. AI methods include human-engineered radiomics algorithms and deep learning methods. Examples of these AI-supported clinical tasks are given along with commentary on the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiyuan Hu
- Committee on Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Avenue, MC2026, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Maryellen L Giger
- Committee on Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Avenue, MC2026, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Chalfant JS, Mortazavi S, Lee-Felker SA. Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI: Assessment and Clinical Implications. CURRENT RADIOLOGY REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40134-021-00386-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
To present recent literature regarding the assessment and clinical implications of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI.
Recent Findings
The qualitative assessment of BPE remains variable within the literature, as well as in clinical practice. Several different quantitative approaches have been investigated in recent years, most commonly region of interest-based and segmentation-based assessments. However, quantitative assessment has not become standard in clinical practice to date. Numerous studies have demonstrated a clear association between higher BPE and future breast cancer risk. While higher BPE does not appear to significantly impact cancer detection, it may result in a higher abnormal interpretation rate. BPE is also likely a marker of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with decreases in BPE during and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy correlated with pCR. In contrast, pre-treatment BPE does not appear to be predictive of pCR. The association between BPE and prognosis is less clear, with heterogeneous results in the literature.
Summary
Assessment of BPE continues to evolve, with heterogeneity in approaches to both qualitative and quantitative assessment. The level of BPE has important clinical implications, with associations with future breast cancer risk and treatment response. BPE may also be an imaging marker of prognosis, but future research is needed on this topic.
Collapse
|
35
|
Steinhof-Radwańska K, Grażyńska A, Lorek A, Gisterek I, Barczyk-Gutowska A, Bobola A, Okas K, Lelek Z, Morawska I, Potoczny J, Niemiec P, Szyluk K. Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Assessment of Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:3448-3462. [PMID: 34590596 PMCID: PMC8482113 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28050298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Evaluating the tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is key to planning further therapy of breast cancer. Our study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of low-energy and subtraction contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) images in the detection of complete response (CR) for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer. Methods: A total of 63 female patients were qualified for our retrospective analysis. Low-energy and subtraction CESM images just before the beginning of NAC and as a follow-up examination 2 weeks before the end of chemotherapy were compared with one another and assessed for compliance with the postoperative histopathological examination (HP). The response to preoperative chemotherapy was evaluated based on the RECIST 1.1 criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). Results: Low-energy images tend to overestimate residual lesions (6.28 mm) and subtraction images tend to underestimate them (2.75 mm). The sensitivity of low-energy images in forecasting CR amounted to 33.33%, while the specificity was 92.86%. In the case of subtraction CESM, the sensitivity amounted to 85.71% and the specificity to 71.42%. Conclusions: CESM is characterized by high sensitivity in the assessment of CR after NAC. The use of only morphological assessment is insufficient. CESM correlates well with the size of residual lesions on histopathological examination but tends to underestimate the dimensions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Steinhof-Radwańska
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Prof. Kornel Gibiński Independent Public Central Clinical Hospital, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-514 Katowice, Poland;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-32-358-1350
| | - Anna Grażyńska
- Students’ Scientific Society, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-514 Katowice, Poland; (A.G.); (K.O.); (Z.L.); (I.M.); (J.P.)
| | - Andrzej Lorek
- Department of Oncological Surgery, Prof. Kornel Gibiński Independent Public Central Clinical Hospital, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-514 Katowice, Poland;
| | - Iwona Gisterek
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Prof. Kornel Gibiński Independent Public Central Clinical Hospital, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-514 Katowice, Poland; (I.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Anna Barczyk-Gutowska
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Prof. Kornel Gibiński Independent Public Central Clinical Hospital, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-514 Katowice, Poland;
| | - Agnieszka Bobola
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Prof. Kornel Gibiński Independent Public Central Clinical Hospital, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-514 Katowice, Poland; (I.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Karolina Okas
- Students’ Scientific Society, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-514 Katowice, Poland; (A.G.); (K.O.); (Z.L.); (I.M.); (J.P.)
| | - Zuzanna Lelek
- Students’ Scientific Society, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-514 Katowice, Poland; (A.G.); (K.O.); (Z.L.); (I.M.); (J.P.)
| | - Irmina Morawska
- Students’ Scientific Society, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-514 Katowice, Poland; (A.G.); (K.O.); (Z.L.); (I.M.); (J.P.)
| | - Jakub Potoczny
- Students’ Scientific Society, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-514 Katowice, Poland; (A.G.); (K.O.); (Z.L.); (I.M.); (J.P.)
| | - Paweł Niemiec
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, School of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Medyków 18, 40-752 Katowice, Poland;
| | - Karol Szyluk
- 1st Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, District Hospital of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Bytomska 62, 41-940 Piekary Śląskie, Poland;
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Vong S, Ronco AJ, Najafpour E, Aminololama-Shakeri S. Screening Breast MRI and the Science of Premenopausal Background Parenchymal Enhancement. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2021; 3:407-415. [PMID: 38424792 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbab045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
The significance of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on screening and diagnostic breast MRI continues to be elucidated. Background parenchymal enhancement was initially deemed probably benign and followed or thought of as an artifact degrading the accuracy of breast cancer detection on breast MRI examinations. Subsequent research has focused on understanding the role of BPE regarding screening breast MRI. Today, there is growing evidence that a myriad of factors affect BPE, which in turn may influence patient outcomes. Additionally, BPE could represent an important risk factor for the future development of breast cancer. This article aims to describe the most up-to-date research on BPE as it relates to screening breast MRI in premenopausal women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Vong
- University of California Davis, Department of Radiology, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Anthony J Ronco
- University of California Davis, Department of Radiology, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Elham Najafpour
- University of California Davis, Department of Radiology, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lee SH, Ryu HS, Jang MJ, Yi A, Ha SM, Kim SY, Chang JM, Cho N, Moon WK. Glandular Tissue Component and Breast Cancer Risk in Mammographically Dense Breasts at Screening Breast US. Radiology 2021; 301:57-65. [PMID: 34282967 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021210367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Background Breast density at mammography is an established risk factor for breast cancer, but it cannot be used to distinguish between glandular and fibrous tissue. Purpose To evaluate the association between the glandular tissue component (GTC) at screening breast US and the risk of future breast cancer in women with dense breasts and the association between the GTC and lobular involution. Materials and Methods Screening breast US examinations performed in women with no prior history of breast cancer and with dense breasts with negative findings from mammography from January 2012 to December 2015 were retrospectively identified. The GTC was reported as being minimal, mild, moderate, or marked at the time of the US examination. In women who had benign breast biopsy results, the degree of lobular involution in normal background tissue was categorized as not present, mild, moderate, or complete. The GTC-related breast cancer risk in women with a cancer diagnosis or follow-up after 6 months was estimated by using Cox proportional hazards regression. Cumulative logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between the GTC and lobular involution. Results Among 8483 women (mean age, 49 years ± 8 [standard deviation]), 137 developed breast cancer over a median follow-up time of 5.3 years. Compared with a minimal or mild GTC, a moderate or marked GTC was associated with an increased cancer risk (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% CI: 1.05, 2.1; P = .03) after adjusting for age and breast density. The GTC had an inverse association with lobular involution; women with no, mild, or moderate involution had greater odds (odds ratios of 4.9 [95% CI: 1.5, 16.6], 2.6 [95% CI: 0.95, 7.2], and 1.8 [95% CI: 0.7, 4.6], respectively) of a moderate or marked GTC than those with complete involution (P = .004). Conclusion The glandular tissue component was independently associated with the future breast cancer risk in women with dense breasts and reflects the lobular involution. It should be considered for risk stratification during screening breast US. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Hyun Lee
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.H.L., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.) and Pathology (H.S.R.), College of Medicine, Seoul National University, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.J.); and Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (A.Y.)
| | - Han-Suk Ryu
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.H.L., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.) and Pathology (H.S.R.), College of Medicine, Seoul National University, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.J.); and Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (A.Y.)
| | - Myoung-Jin Jang
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.H.L., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.) and Pathology (H.S.R.), College of Medicine, Seoul National University, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.J.); and Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (A.Y.)
| | - Ann Yi
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.H.L., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.) and Pathology (H.S.R.), College of Medicine, Seoul National University, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.J.); and Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (A.Y.)
| | - Su Min Ha
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.H.L., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.) and Pathology (H.S.R.), College of Medicine, Seoul National University, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.J.); and Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (A.Y.)
| | - Soo-Yeon Kim
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.H.L., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.) and Pathology (H.S.R.), College of Medicine, Seoul National University, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.J.); and Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (A.Y.)
| | - Jung Min Chang
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.H.L., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.) and Pathology (H.S.R.), College of Medicine, Seoul National University, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.J.); and Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (A.Y.)
| | - Nariya Cho
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.H.L., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.) and Pathology (H.S.R.), College of Medicine, Seoul National University, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.J.); and Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (A.Y.)
| | - Woo Kyung Moon
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.H.L., S.M.H., S.Y.K., J.M.C., N.C., W.K.M.) and Pathology (H.S.R.), College of Medicine, Seoul National University, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (M.J.J.); and Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (A.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Early prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response by exploiting a transfer learning approach on breast DCE-MRIs. Sci Rep 2021; 11:14123. [PMID: 34238968 PMCID: PMC8266861 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93592-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging plays a crucial role in evaluating the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) even since its early stage through the prediction of the final pathological complete response (pCR). In this study, we proposed a transfer learning approach to predict if a patient achieved pCR (pCR) or did not (non-pCR) by exploiting, separately or in combination, pre-treatment and early-treatment exams from I-SPY1 TRIAL public database. First, low-level features, i.e., related to local structure of the image, were automatically extracted by a pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) overcoming manual feature extraction. Next, an optimal set of most stable features was detected and then used to design an SVM classifier. A first subset of patients, called fine-tuning dataset (30 pCR; 78 non-pCR), was used to perform the optimal choice of features. A second subset not involved in the feature selection process was employed as an independent test (7 pCR; 19 non-pCR) to validate the model. By combining the optimal features extracted from both pre-treatment and early-treatment exams with some clinical features, i.e., ER, PgR, HER2 and molecular subtype, an accuracy of 91.4% and 92.3%, and an AUC value of 0.93 and 0.90, were returned on the fine-tuning dataset and the independent test, respectively. Overall, the low-level CNN features have an important role in the early evaluation of the NAC efficacy by predicting pCR. The proposed model represents a first effort towards the development of a clinical support tool for an early prediction of pCR to NAC.
Collapse
|
39
|
Yerushalmi R, Bargil S, Ber Y, Ozlavo R, Sivan T, Rapson Y, Pomerantz A, Tsoref D, Sharon E, Caspi O, Grubsrein A, Margel D. 3,3-Diindolylmethane (DIM): a nutritional intervention and its impact on breast density in healthy BRCA carriers. A prospective clinical trial. Carcinogenesis 2021; 41:1395-1401. [PMID: 32458980 PMCID: PMC7566319 DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgaa050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2020] [Revised: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Women who carry the BRCA mutation are at high lifetime risk of breast cancer, but there is no consensus regarding an effective and safe chemoprevention strategy. A large body of evidence suggests that 3,3-diindolylmethane (DIM), a dimer of indole-3-carbinol found in cruciferous vegetables, can potentially prevent carcinogenesis and tumor development. The primary aim of this prospective single-arm study was to investigate the effect of DIM supplementation on breast density, a recognized predictive factor of breast cancer risk. Participants were 23 healthy female BRCA carriers (median age 47 years; 78% postmenopausal) who were treated with oral DIM 100 mg × 1/day for 1 year. The amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed before and after the intervention was scored by two independent expert radiologists using the Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System. The results showed a decrease in the average score for FGT amount from 2.8 ± 0.8 at the onset to 2.65 ± 0.84 after 1 year (P = 0.031), with no significant change in BPE (P = 0.429). A group of DIM-untreated age- and menopausal-status-matched women from the BRCA clinic did not show a significant change in FGT amount (P = 0.33) or BPE (P = 0.814) in a parallel year. Mean estradiol level decreased from 159 to 102 pmol/l (P = 0.01), and mean testosterone level decreased from 0.42 to 0.31 pmol/l (P = 0.007). Side effects were grade 1. In conclusion, 1 year’s supplementation with DIM 100 mg × 1/day in BRCA carriers was associated with a significant decline in FGT amount on MRI. Larger randomized studies are warranted to corroborate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rinat Yerushalmi
- Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center-Beilinson Campus, Petach Tikva, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Sharon Bargil
- Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center-Beilinson Campus, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Yaara Ber
- Division of Urology, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | | | | | - Yael Rapson
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Imaging Department, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Adi Pomerantz
- Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center-Beilinson Campus, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Daliah Tsoref
- Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center-Beilinson Campus, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Eran Sharon
- Division of Surgery, Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center-Beilinson Campus, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Opher Caspi
- Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center-Beilinson Campus, Petach Tikva, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ahuvah Grubsrein
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Imaging Department, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - David Margel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Division of Urology, Petach Tikva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Quantitative Measures of Background Parenchymal Enhancement Predict Breast Cancer Risk. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 217:64-75. [PMID: 32876474 PMCID: PMC9801515 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.23804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Higher categories of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) increase breast cancer risk. However, current clinical BPE categorization is subjective. OBJECTIVE. Using a semiautomated segmentation algorithm, we calculated quantitative BPE measures and investigated the utility of individual features and feature pairs in significantly predicting subsequent breast cancer risk compared with radiologist-assigned BPE category. METHODS. In this retrospective case-control study, we identified 95 women at high risk of breast cancer but without a personal history of breast cancer who underwent breast MRI. Of these women, 19 subsequently developed breast cancer and were included as cases. Each case was age matched to four control patients (76 control patients total). Sociodemographic characteristics were compared between the cases and matched control patients using the Mann-Whitney U test. From each dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI examination, quantitative fibroglandular tissue and BPE measures were computed by averaging enhancing voxels above enhancement ratio thresholds (0-100%), totaling the enhancing volume above thresholds (BPE volume in cm3), and estimating the percentage of enhancing tissue above thresholds relative to total breast volume (BPE%) on each gadolinium-enhanced phase. For the 91 imaging features generated, we compared predictive performance using conditional logistic regression with 80:20 hold-out cross validation and ROC curve analysis. ROC AUC was the figure of merit. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were also computed. All feature pairs were exhaustively searched to identify those with the highest AUC and Youden index. A DeLong test was used to compare predictive performance (AUCs). RESULTS. Women subsequently diagnosed with breast cancer were more likely to have mild, moderate, or marked BPE (odds ratio, 3.0; 95% CI, 0.9-10.0; p = .07). According to ROC curve analysis, a BPE category threshold greater than minimal resulted in a maximized AUC (0.62) in distinguishing cases from control patients. Compared with BPE category, the first gadolinium-enhanced (phase 1) BPE% at the 30% and 40% enhancement ratio thresholds yielded significantly higher AUC values of 0.85 (p = .0007) and 0.84 (p = .0004), respectively. Feature combinations showed similar AUC values with improved sensitivity. CONCLUSION. Preliminary data indicate that quantitative BPE measures may outperform radiologist-assigned category in breast cancer risk prediction. CLINICAL IMPACT. Future risk prediction models that incorporate quantitative measures warrant additional investigation.
Collapse
|
41
|
Nguyen AAT, Arasu VA, Strand F, Li W, Onishi N, Gibbs J, Jones EF, Joe BN, Esserman LJ, Newitt DC, Hylton NM. Comparison of Segmentation Methods in Assessing Background Parenchymal Enhancement as a Biomarker for Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 6:101-110. [PMID: 32548286 PMCID: PMC7289261 DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2020.00009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Breast parenchymal enhancement (BPE) has shown association with breast cancer risk and response to neoadjuvant treatment. However, BPE quantification is challenging, and there is no standardized segmentation method for measurement. We investigated the use of a fully automated breast fibroglandular tissue segmentation method to calculate BPE from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for use as a predictor of pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant treatment in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL. In this trial, patients had DCE-MRI at baseline (T0), after 3 weeks of treatment (T1), after 12 weeks of treatment and between drug regimens (T2), and after completion of treatment (T3). A retrospective analysis of 2 cohorts was performed: one with 735 patients and another with a final cohort of 340 patients, meeting a high-quality benchmark for segmentation. We evaluated 3 subvolumes of interest segmented from bilateral T1-weighted axial breast DCE-MRI: full stack (all axial slices), half stack (center 50% of slices), and center 5 slices. The differences between methods were assessed, and a univariate logistic regression model was implemented to determine the predictive performance of each segmentation method. The results showed that the half stack method provided the best compromise between sampling error from too little tissue and inclusion of incorrectly segmented tissues from extreme superior and inferior regions. Our results indicate that BPE calculated using the half stack segmentation approach has potential as an early biomarker for response to treatment in the hormone receptor–negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Anh-Tu Nguyen
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Vignesh A Arasu
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.,Department of Radiology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Vallejo, CA
| | - Fredrik Strand
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; and
| | - Wen Li
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Natsuko Onishi
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jessica Gibbs
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Ella F Jones
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Bonnie N Joe
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Laura J Esserman
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - David C Newitt
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Nola M Hylton
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Khojasteh Poor F, Keivan M, Ramazii M, Ghaedrahmati F, Anbiyaiee A, Panahandeh S, Khoshnam SE, Farzaneh M. Mini review: The FDA-approved prescription drugs that target the MAPK signaling pathway in women with breast cancer. Breast Dis 2021; 40:51-62. [PMID: 33896802 DOI: 10.3233/bd-201063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer and the prevalent type of malignancy among women. Multiple risk factors, including genetic changes, biological age, dense breast tissue, and obesity are associated with BC. The mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) signaling pathway has a pivotal role in regulating biological functions such as cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and survival. It has become evident that the MAPK pathway is associated with tumorigenesis and may promote breast cancer development. The MAPK/RAS/RAF cascade is closely associated with breast cancer. RAS signaling can enhance BC cell growth and progression. B-Raf is an important kinase and a potent RAF isoform involved in breast tumor initiation and differentiation. Depending on the reasons for cancer, there are different strategies for treatment of women with BC. Till now, several FDA-approved treatments have been investigated that inhibit the MAPK pathway and reduce metastatic progression in breast cancer. The most common breast cancer drugs that regulate or inhibit the MAPK pathway may include Farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTIs), Sorafenib, Vemurafenib, PLX8394, Dabrafenib, Ulixertinib, Simvastatin, Alisertib, and Teriflunomide. In this review, we will discuss the roles of the MAPK/RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway in BC and summarize the FDA-approved prescription drugs that target the MAPK signaling pathway in women with BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatemeh Khojasteh Poor
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
| | - Mona Keivan
- Fertility and Infertility Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.,Fertility, Infertility and Perinatology Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Ramazii
- Kerman University of Medical Sciences, University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
| | - Farhoodeh Ghaedrahmati
- Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Amir Anbiyaiee
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Samira Panahandeh
- School of Health, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Seyed Esmaeil Khoshnam
- Persian Gulf Physiology Research Center, Medical Basic Sciences Research Institute, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Maryam Farzaneh
- Fertility, Infertility and Perinatology Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kim GR, Cho N, Kim SY, Han W, Moon WK. Interval Cancers after Negative Supplemental Screening Breast MRI Results in Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer. Radiology 2021; 300:314-323. [PMID: 34100684 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021203074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background There are few interval cancer studies of incident screening MRI for women with a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC). Purpose To evaluate the performance measures of screening breast MRI in women with a PHBC across multiple rounds and to identify subgroups who might be more at risk for interval cancer. Materials and Methods Between January 2008 and March 2019, consecutive screening breast MRI studies for women who had undergone breast-conserving surgery because of breast cancer were retrospectively identified. Inclusion criteria were negative or benign findings at mammography with US, availability of at least 1 year of follow-up data, and examinations having been performed within 12 months after the initial cancer surgery. Performance measures were calculated for each round. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with the risk of interval cancer. Results Among the 6603 MRI examinations for 2809 women (median age, 47 years; interquartile range, 42-53 years), the cancer detection rate was 8.3 per 1000 screening examinations (55 of 6603 examinations) and the interval cancer rate was 1.5 per 1000 screening examinations (10 of 6603 examinations). The sensitivity and specificity were 85% (55 of 65 examinations; 95% CI: 76, 93) and 88.3% (5775 of 6538 examinations; 95% CI: 87.6, 89.1), respectively. At multivariable analysis, interval cancers were associated with a first-degree family history of breast cancer (odds ratio [OR], 5.4; 95% CI: 1.3, 22.5; P = .02), estrogen receptor- and progesterone receptor-negative primary cancers (OR, 3.6; 95% CI: 1.1, 12.2; P = .04), and moderate or marked background parenchymal enhancement (OR, 10.8; 95% CI: 3.3, 35.7; P < .001). Conclusion Performance of screening breast MRI in women with a personal history of breast cancer was sustained across multiple rounds, and a first-degree family history of breast cancer, estrogen receptor- and progesterone receptor-negative primary cancers, and moderate or marked background parenchymal enhancement at MRI were independently associated with the risk of developing interval cancers. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Slanetz in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ga Ram Kim
- From the Departments of Radiology (G.R.K., N.C., S.Y.K., W.K.M.) and Surgery (W.H.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (G.R.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (N.C., S.Y.K., W.K.M.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (N.C., S.Y.K., W.K.M.)
| | - Nariya Cho
- From the Departments of Radiology (G.R.K., N.C., S.Y.K., W.K.M.) and Surgery (W.H.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (G.R.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (N.C., S.Y.K., W.K.M.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (N.C., S.Y.K., W.K.M.)
| | - Soo-Yeon Kim
- From the Departments of Radiology (G.R.K., N.C., S.Y.K., W.K.M.) and Surgery (W.H.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (G.R.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (N.C., S.Y.K., W.K.M.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (N.C., S.Y.K., W.K.M.)
| | - Wonshik Han
- From the Departments of Radiology (G.R.K., N.C., S.Y.K., W.K.M.) and Surgery (W.H.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (G.R.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (N.C., S.Y.K., W.K.M.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (N.C., S.Y.K., W.K.M.)
| | - Woo Kyung Moon
- From the Departments of Radiology (G.R.K., N.C., S.Y.K., W.K.M.) and Surgery (W.H.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (G.R.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (N.C., S.Y.K., W.K.M.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (N.C., S.Y.K., W.K.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Response Predictivity to Neoadjuvant Therapies in Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Analysis of Background Parenchymal Enhancement in DCE-MRI. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11040256. [PMID: 33915842 PMCID: PMC8065517 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11040256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: For assessing the predictability of oncology neoadjuvant therapy results, the background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) parameter in breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has acquired increased interest. This work aims to qualitatively evaluate the BPE parameter as a potential predictive marker for neoadjuvant therapy. Method: Three radiologists examined, in triple-blind modality, the MRIs of 80 patients performed before the start of chemotherapy, after three months from the start of treatment, and after surgery. They identified the portion of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) and BPE of the contralateral breast to the tumor in the basal control pre-treatment (baseline). Results: We observed a reduction of BPE classes in serial MRI checks performed during neoadjuvant therapy, as compared to baseline pre-treatment conditions, in 61.3% of patients in the intermediate step, and in 86.7% of patients in the final step. BPE reduction was significantly associated with sequential anthracyclines/taxane administration in the first cycle of neoadjuvant therapy compared to anti-HER2 containing therapies. The therapy response was also significantly related to tumor size. There were no associations with menopausal status, fibroglandular tissue (FGT) amount, age, BPE baseline, BPE in intermediate, and in the final MRI step. Conclusions: The measured variability of this parameter during therapy could predict therapy effectiveness in early stages, improving decision-making in the perspective of personalized medicine. Our preliminary results suggest that BPE may represent a predictive factor in response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer, warranting future investigations in conjunction with radiomics.
Collapse
|
45
|
Hu N, Zhao J, Li Y, Fu Q, Zhao L, Chen H, Qin W, Yang G. Breast cancer and background parenchymal enhancement at breast magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Imaging 2021; 21:32. [PMID: 33607959 PMCID: PMC7893738 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-021-00566-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The background parenchymal enhancement at breast magnetic resonance imaging use to predict breast cancer attracts many searchers to draw a possible relationship. However, the results of their relationships were conflicting. This meta-analysis was performed to assess breast cancer frequency associations with background parenchymal enhancement. Methods A systematic literature search up to January 2020 was performed to detect studies recording associations between breast cancer frequency and background parenchymal enhancement. We found thirteen studies including 13,788 women at the start with 4046 breast cancer. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between breast cancer frequency and background parenchymal enhancement by the dichotomous technique with a random or fixed-effect model. Results Women with minimal or mild background parenchymal enhancement at breast magnetic resonance imaging did not have any risk of breast cancer compared to control women (OR, 1.20; 95% CI 0.54–2.67). However, high background parenchymal enhancement at breast magnetic resonance imaging (OR, 2.66; 95% CI 1.36–5.19) and moderate (OR, 2.51; 95% CI 1.49–4.21) was associated with a significantly higher rate of breast cancer frequency compared to control women. Conclusions Our meta-analysis showed that the women with high and moderate background parenchymal enhancement at breast magnetic resonance imaging have higher risks, up to 2.66 fold, of breast cancer. We suggest that women with high or moderate background parenchymal enhancement at breast magnetic resonance imaging to be scheduled for more frequent follow-up and screening for breast cancer to avoid any complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Hu
- Department of Radiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, 629000, Sichuan, China
| | - Jinghao Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, 629000, Sichuan, China
| | - Yong Li
- Department of Radiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, 629000, Sichuan, China
| | - Quanshui Fu
- Department of Radiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, 629000, Sichuan, China
| | - Linwei Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, 629000, Sichuan, China
| | - Hong Chen
- Department of Radiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, 629000, Sichuan, China
| | - Wei Qin
- Department of Radiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, 629000, Sichuan, China.
| | - Guoqing Yang
- Department of Radiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, 629000, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Watt GP, Sung J, Morris EA, Buys SS, Bradbury AR, Brooks JD, Conant EF, Weinstein SP, Kontos D, Woods M, Colonna SV, Liang X, Stein MA, Pike MC, Bernstein JL. Association of breast cancer with MRI background parenchymal enhancement: the IMAGINE case-control study. Breast Cancer Res 2020; 22:138. [PMID: 33287857 PMCID: PMC7722419 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-020-01375-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be associated with breast cancer risk, but previous studies of the association are equivocal and limited by incomplete blinding of BPE assessment. In this study, we evaluated the association between BPE and breast cancer based on fully blinded assessments of BPE in the unaffected breast. Methods The Imaging and Epidemiology (IMAGINE) study is a multicenter breast cancer case-control study of women receiving diagnostic, screening, or follow-up breast MRI, recruited from three comprehensive cancer centers in the USA. Cases had a first diagnosis of unilateral breast cancer and controls had no history of or current breast cancer. A single board-certified breast radiologist with 12 years’ experience, blinded to case-control status and clinical information, assessed the unaffected breast for BPE without view of the affected breast of cases (or the corresponding breast laterality of controls). The association between BPE and breast cancer was estimated by multivariable logistic regression separately for premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Results The analytic dataset included 835 cases and 963 controls. Adjusting for fibroglandular tissue (breast density), age, race/ethnicity, BMI, parity, family history of breast cancer, BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations, and other confounders, moderate/marked BPE (vs minimal/mild BPE) was associated with breast cancer among premenopausal women [odds ratio (OR) 1.49, 95% CI 1.05–2.11; p = 0.02]. Among postmenopausal women, mild/moderate/marked vs minimal BPE had a similar, but statistically non-significant, association with breast cancer (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.92–2.27; p = 0.1). Conclusions BPE is associated with breast cancer in premenopausal women, and possibly postmenopausal women, after adjustment for breast density and confounders. Our results suggest that BPE should be evaluated alongside breast density for inclusion in models predicting breast cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon P Watt
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Ave., Second Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
| | - Janice Sung
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Morris
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Saundra S Buys
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Angela R Bradbury
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Jennifer D Brooks
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Emily F Conant
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Susan P Weinstein
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Despina Kontos
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Meghan Woods
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Ave., Second Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | - Sarah V Colonna
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Xiaolin Liang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Ave., Second Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | - Matthew A Stein
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Malcolm C Pike
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Ave., Second Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | - Jonine L Bernstein
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Ave., Second Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hellgren R, Saracco A, Strand F, Eriksson M, Sundbom A, Hall P, Dickman PW. The association between breast cancer risk factors and background parenchymal enhancement at dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. Acta Radiol 2020; 61:1600-1607. [PMID: 32216451 PMCID: PMC7720360 DOI: 10.1177/0284185120911583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Background Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) of normal tissue at breast magnetic resonance imaging is suggested to be an independent risk factor for breast cancer. Its association with established risk factors for breast cancer is not fully investigated. Purpose To study the association between BPE and risk factors for breast cancer in a healthy, non-high-risk screening population. Material and Methods We measured BPE and mammographic density and used data from self-reported questionnaires in 214 healthy women aged 43–74 years. We estimated odds ratios for the univariable association between BPE and risk factors. We then fitted an adjusted model using logistic regression to evaluate associations between BPE (high vs. low) and risk factors, including mammographic breast density. Results The majority of women had low BPE (84%). In a multivariable model, we found statistically significant associations between BPE and age (P = 0.002) and BMI (P = 0.03). We did find a significant association between systemic progesterone medication and BPE, but due to small numbers, the results should be interpreted with caution. The adjusted odds ratio for high BPE was 3.1 among women with density D (compared to B) and 2.1 for density C (compared to B). However, the association between high BPE and density was not statistically significant. We did not find statistically significant associations with any other risk factors. Conclusion Our study confirmed the known association of BPE with age and BMI. Although our results show a higher likelihood for high BPE with increasing levels of mammographic density, the association was not statistically significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanna Hellgren
- Department of Medical Imaging, Division of Breast Imaging, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ariel Saracco
- Department of Medical Imaging, Division of Breast Imaging, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Strand
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Thoracic Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mikael Eriksson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ann Sundbom
- Department of Medical Imaging, Division of Breast Imaging, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Paul W Dickman
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Li W, Newitt DC, Gibbs J, Wilmes LJ, Jones EF, Arasu VA, Strand F, Onishi N, Nguyen AAT, Kornak J, Joe BN, Price ER, Ojeda-Fournier H, Eghtedari M, Zamora KW, Woodard SA, Umphrey H, Bernreuter W, Nelson M, Church AL, Bolan P, Kuritza T, Ward K, Morley K, Wolverton D, Fountain K, Lopez-Paniagua D, Hardesty L, Brandt K, McDonald ES, Rosen M, Kontos D, Abe H, Sheth D, Crane EP, Dillis C, Sheth P, Hovanessian-Larsen L, Bang DH, Porter B, Oh KY, Jafarian N, Tudorica A, Niell BL, Drukteinis J, Newell MS, Cohen MA, Giurescu M, Berman E, Lehman C, Partridge SC, Fitzpatrick KA, Borders MH, Yang WT, Dogan B, Goudreau S, Chenevert T, Yau C, DeMichele A, Berry D, Esserman LJ, Hylton NM. Predicting breast cancer response to neoadjuvant treatment using multi-feature MRI: results from the I-SPY 2 TRIAL. NPJ Breast Cancer 2020; 6:63. [PMID: 33298938 PMCID: PMC7695723 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-020-00203-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI provides both morphological and functional information regarding breast tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The purpose of this retrospective study is to test if prediction models combining multiple MRI features outperform models with single features. Four features were quantitatively calculated in each MRI exam: functional tumor volume, longest diameter, sphericity, and contralateral background parenchymal enhancement. Logistic regression analysis was used to study the relationship between MRI variables and pathologic complete response (pCR). Predictive performance was estimated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The full cohort was stratified by hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status (positive or negative). A total of 384 patients (median age: 49 y/o) were included. Results showed analysis with combined features achieved higher AUCs than analysis with any feature alone. AUCs estimated for the combined versus highest AUCs among single features were 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76, 0.86) versus 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.85) in the full cohort, 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77, 0.92) versus 0.73 (95% CI: 0.61, 0.84) in HR-positive/HER2-negative, 0.88 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.97) versus 0.78 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.89) in HR-positive/HER2-positive, 0.83 (95% CI not available) versus 0.75 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.81) in HR-negative/HER2-positive, and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.91) versus 0.75 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.83) in triple negatives. Multi-feature MRI analysis improved pCR prediction over analysis of any individual feature that we examined. Additionally, the improvements in prediction were more notable when analysis was conducted according to cancer subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Li
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Ella F Jones
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Fredrik Strand
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | - John Kornak
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Bonnie N Joe
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mark Rosen
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Pulin Sheth
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Karen Y Oh
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Neda Jafarian
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Wei T Yang
- University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Basak Dogan
- University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Don Berry
- Berry Consultants, LLC, Austin, TX, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Nam Y, Park GE, Kang J, Kim SH. Fully Automatic Assessment of Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI Using Machine-Learning Models. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 53:818-826. [PMID: 33219624 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Automated measurement and classification models with objectivity and reproducibility are required for accurate evaluation of the breast cancer risk of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE). PURPOSE To develop and evaluate a machine-learning algorithm for breast FGT segmentation and BPE classification. STUDY TYPE Retrospective. POPULATION A total of 794 patients with breast cancer, 594 patients assigned to the development set, and 200 patients to the test set. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 3T and 1.5T; T2 -weighted, fat-saturated T1 -weighted (T1 W) with dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE). ASSESSMENT Manual segmentation was performed for the whole breast and FGT regions in the contralateral breast. The BPE region was determined by thresholding using the subtraction of the pre- and postcontrast T1 W images and the segmented FGT mask. Two radiologists independently assessed the categories of FGT and BPE. A deep-learning-based algorithm was designed to segment and measure the volume of whole breast and FGT and classify the grade of BPE. STATISTICAL TESTS Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) and Spearman correlation analysis were used to compare the volumes from the manual and deep-learning-based segmentations. Kappa statistics were used for agreement analysis. Comparison of area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC) and F1 scores were calculated to evaluate the performance of BPE classification. RESULTS The mean (±SD) DSC for manual and deep-learning segmentations was 0.85 ± 0.11. The correlation coefficient for FGT volume from manual- and deep-learning-based segmentations was 0.93. Overall accuracy of manual segmentation and deep-learning segmentation in BPE classification task was 66% and 67%, respectively. For binary categorization of BPE grade (minimal/mild vs. moderate/marked), overall accuracy increased to 91.5% in manual segmentation and 90.5% in deep-learning segmentation; the AUC was 0.93 in both methods. DATA CONCLUSION This deep-learning-based algorithm can provide reliable segmentation and classification results for BPE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoonho Nam
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Division of Biomedical Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin, Republic of Korea
| | - Ga Eun Park
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Junghwa Kang
- Division of Biomedical Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Hun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Pashayan N, Antoniou AC, Ivanus U, Esserman LJ, Easton DF, French D, Sroczynski G, Hall P, Cuzick J, Evans DG, Simard J, Garcia-Closas M, Schmutzler R, Wegwarth O, Pharoah P, Moorthie S, De Montgolfier S, Baron C, Herceg Z, Turnbull C, Balleyguier C, Rossi PG, Wesseling J, Ritchie D, Tischkowitz M, Broeders M, Reisel D, Metspalu A, Callender T, de Koning H, Devilee P, Delaloge S, Schmidt MK, Widschwendter M. Personalized early detection and prevention of breast cancer: ENVISION consensus statement. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2020; 17:687-705. [PMID: 32555420 PMCID: PMC7567644 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-020-0388-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 156] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The European Collaborative on Personalized Early Detection and Prevention of Breast Cancer (ENVISION) brings together several international research consortia working on different aspects of the personalized early detection and prevention of breast cancer. In a consensus conference held in 2019, the members of this network identified research areas requiring development to enable evidence-based personalized interventions that might improve the benefits and reduce the harms of existing breast cancer screening and prevention programmes. The priority areas identified were: 1) breast cancer subtype-specific risk assessment tools applicable to women of all ancestries; 2) intermediate surrogate markers of response to preventive measures; 3) novel non-surgical preventive measures to reduce the incidence of breast cancer of poor prognosis; and 4) hybrid effectiveness-implementation research combined with modelling studies to evaluate the long-term population outcomes of risk-based early detection strategies. The implementation of such programmes would require health-care systems to be open to learning and adapting, the engagement of a diverse range of stakeholders and tailoring to societal norms and values, while also addressing the ethical and legal issues. In this Consensus Statement, we discuss the current state of breast cancer risk prediction, risk-stratified prevention and early detection strategies, and their implementation. Throughout, we highlight priorities for advancing each of these areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora Pashayan
- Department of Applied Health Research, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, London, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Urska Ivanus
- Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Laura J Esserman
- Carol Franc Buck Breast Care Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - David French
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Gaby Sroczynski
- Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT-University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Division of Health Technology Assessment, Oncotyrol - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London, Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jacques Simard
- Genomics Center, CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center of Family Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Odette Wegwarth
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Center for Adaptive Rationality, Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Pharoah
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | - Zdenko Herceg
- Epigenetic Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), WHO, Lyon, France
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Epidemiology Unit, Azienda USL di Reggio Emilia - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - David Ritchie
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mireille Broeders
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Dan Reisel
- Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Andres Metspalu
- The Estonian Genome Center, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Thomas Callender
- Department of Applied Health Research, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, London, UK
| | - Harry de Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Human Genetics, Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Suzette Delaloge
- Breast Cancer Department, Gustave Roussy Institute, Paris, France
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Martin Widschwendter
- Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
- Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
- European Translational Oncology Prevention and Screening (EUTOPS) Institute, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|