1
|
Leonhardt CS, Stamm T, Hank T, Prager G, Strobel O. Defining oligometastatic pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and critical synthesis of consensus. ESMO Open 2023; 8:102067. [PMID: 37988953 PMCID: PMC10774968 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Small retrospective series suggest that local consolidative treatment (LCT) may improve survival in oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, no uniform definition of oligometastatic disease (OMD) in PDAC exists; this impedes meaningful conclusions. PATIENTS AND METHODS A systematic literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL registries for studies and protocols reporting on definitions and/or LCT of OMD in PDAC was performed. The primary endpoint was the definition of OMD. Levels of agreement were categorized as consensus (≥75% agreement between studies), fair agreement (50%-74%), and absent/poor agreement (<50%). RESULTS After screening of 5374 abstracts, the full text of 218 studies was assessed, of which 76 were included in the qualitative synthesis. The majority of studies were retrospective (n = 66, 87%), two were prospective studies and eight were study protocols. Studies investigated mostly liver (n = 38, 51%) and lung metastases (n = 15, 20%). Across studies, less than one-half (n = 32, 42%) reported a definition of OMD, while 44 (58%) did not. Involvement was limited to a single organ (consensus). Additional criteria for defining OMD were the number of lesions (consensus), metastatic site (poor agreement), metastatic size (poor agreement), treatment possibilities (poor agreement), and biomarker response (poor agreement). Liver OMD could involve three or fewer lesions (consensus) and synchronous disease (fair agreement), while lung metastases could involve two or fewer lesions and metachronous disease (consensus). The large majority of studies were at a high risk of bias or did not include any control groups. CONCLUSION Definitions of OMD were not used or varied widely between studies hampering across-study comparability and highlighting an unmet need for a consensus. The present study is part of a multistep process that aims to develop an interdisciplinary consensus on OMD in pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C-S Leonhardt
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna
| | - T Stamm
- Institute of Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Vienna
| | - T Hank
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna
| | - G Prager
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - O Strobel
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Levy A, Khalifa J, Martin E, Botticella A, Quevrin C, Lavaud P, Aldea M, Besse B, Planchard D, Barlesi F, Deutsch E, Massabeau C, Doyen J, Le Péchoux C. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for extra-cranial oligoprogressive or oligorecurrent small-cell lung cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 41:100637. [PMID: 37206411 PMCID: PMC10189362 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The role of local ablative treatments, including stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), is an area of active research in oligometastatic patients. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a poor prognosis, with common diffuse metastatic evolution. We evaluated the outcomes after SBRT in uncommon oligoprogressive/oligorecurrent SCLC presentation. Methods Data of SCLC patients who received SBRT for oligoprogressive/oligorecurrent metastatic disease at four centers were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with synchronous oligometastatic disease, SBRT for primary lung tumor and brain radiosurgery were not included. Relapse and survival rates were defined as the time between the date of SBRT and the first event. Results Twenty patients (60% with initially limited-disease [LD]) presenting 24 lesions were identified. Oligoprogression and oligorecurrence were observed in 6/20 (30%) and 14/20 (70%) patients, respectively. SBRT was delivered to one (n = 16) to two (n = 4) lesions (median size, 26 mm), mainly to lung [n = 17/24] metastases. At a median follow-up of 2.9 years, no local relapse was observed and 15/20 patients experienced a distant relapse (DR). The median DR and OS were 4.5 months (95 %CI: 2.9-13.7 months) and 17.2 months (95 %CI: 7.5-65.2 months), respectively. The 3-year distant control and OS rates were 25% (95 %CI: 6-44%) and 37% (95 %CI: 15-59%), respectively. Initial LD (vs extensive-disease) was the only prognosis factor associated with a lower risk of post-SBRT DR (HR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0-0.88; p = 0.03). There was no severe observed SBRT-related toxicities. Conclusion Prognosis was poor, with DR occurring in most patients. However, local control was excellent and long term response after SBRT may rarely occur in patients with oligoprogressive/oligorecurrent SCLC. Local ablative treatments should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting on well-selected cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonin Levy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Jonathan Khalifa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France
| | - Etienne Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Unicancer-Georges-Francois Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France
| | - Angela Botticella
- Department of Radiation Oncology, International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Clément Quevrin
- Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Pernelle Lavaud
- Department of Cancer Medicine, International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Mihaela Aldea
- Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- Department of Cancer Medicine, International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Benjamin Besse
- Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- Department of Cancer Medicine, International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - David Planchard
- Department of Cancer Medicine, International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Fabrice Barlesi
- Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- Department of Cancer Medicine, International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Eric Deutsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Carole Massabeau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France
| | - Jérôme Doyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, Fédération Claude-Lalanne, Nice, France
| | - Cécile Le Péchoux
- Department of Radiation Oncology, International Center for Thoracic Cancers (CICT), Gustave Roussy, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mukherjee D, Romano E, Walshaw R, Zeef LAH, Banyard A, Kitcatt SJ, Cheadle EJ, Tuomela K, Pendharkar S, Al-Deka A, Salerno B, Raby S, Mills IG, Honeychurch J, Illidge TM. Reprogramming the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment results in successful clearance of tumors resistant to radiation therapy and anti-PD-1/PD-L1. Oncoimmunology 2023; 12:2223094. [PMID: 37332616 PMCID: PMC10274532 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2023.2223094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite breakthroughs in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), the majority of tumors, including those poorly infiltrated by CD8+ T cells or heavily infiltrated by immunosuppressive immune effector cells, are unlikely to result in clinically meaningful tumor responses. Radiation therapy (RT) has been combined with ICI to potentially overcome this resistance and improve response rates but reported clinical trial results have thus far been disappointing. Novel approaches are required to overcome this resistance and reprogram the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and address this major unmet clinical need. Using diverse preclinical tumor models of prostate and bladder cancer, including an autochthonous prostate tumor (Pten-/-/trp53-/-) that respond poorly to radiation therapy (RT) and anti-PD-L1 combinations, the key drivers of this resistance within the TME were profiled and used to develop rationalized combination therapies that simultaneously enhance activation of anti-cancer T cell responses and reprogram the immunosuppressive TME. The addition of anti-CD40mAb to RT resulted in an increase in IFN-y signaling, activation of Th-1 pathways with an increased infiltration of CD8+ T-cells and regulatory T-cells with associated activation of the CTLA-4 signaling pathway in the TME. Anti-CTLA-4mAb in combination with RT further reprogrammed the immunosuppressive TME, resulting in durable, long-term tumor control. Our data provide novel insights into the underlying mechanisms of the immunosuppressive TME that result in resistance to RT and anti-PD-1 inhibitors and inform therapeutic approaches to reprogramming the immune contexture in the TME to potentially improve tumor responses and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debayan Mukherjee
- Targeted Therapy Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Erminia Romano
- Targeted Therapy Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard Walshaw
- Targeted Therapy Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Leo A. H. Zeef
- Bioinformatics Core Facility, Michael Smith Building, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Antonia Banyard
- Mass and Flow Cytometry Core Facility, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Stephen J. Kitcatt
- Scientific Computing Core Facility, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Eleanor J. Cheadle
- Targeted Therapy Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Karoliina Tuomela
- Targeted Therapy Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Swati Pendharkar
- Targeted Therapy Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Aws Al-Deka
- Targeted Therapy Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Beatrice Salerno
- Targeted Therapy Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Sophie Raby
- Targeted Therapy Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ian G. Mills
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Jamie Honeychurch
- Targeted Therapy Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Tim M. Illidge
- Targeted Therapy Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pierrard J, Van Ooteghem G, Van den Eynde M. Implications of the Organ-Specific Immune Environment for Immune Priming Effect of Radiotherapy in Metastatic Setting. Biomolecules 2023; 13:689. [PMID: 37189436 PMCID: PMC10136331 DOI: 10.3390/biom13040689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
With the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the tumour immune microenvironment (TIME) has been increasingly considered to improve cancer management. The TIME of metastatic lesions is strongly influenced by the underlying immune contexture of the organ in which they are located. The metastatic location itself appears to be an important prognostic factor in predicting outcomes after ICI treatment in cancer patients. Patients with liver metastases are less likely to respond to ICIs than patients with metastases in other organs, likely due to variations in the metastatic TIME. Combining additional treatment modalities is an option to overcome this resistance. Radiotherapy (RT) and ICIs have been investigated together as an option to treat various metastatic cancers. RT can induce a local and systemic immune reaction, which can promote the patient's response to ICIs. Here, we review the differential impact of the TIME according to metastatic location. We also explore how RT-induced TIME modifications could be modulated to improve outcomes of RT-ICI combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Pierrard
- UCLouvain, Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Institute de Recherche Experimentale et Clinique (IREC), 1200 Brussels, Belgium
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Geneviève Van Ooteghem
- UCLouvain, Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Institute de Recherche Experimentale et Clinique (IREC), 1200 Brussels, Belgium
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marc Van den Eynde
- UCLouvain, Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Institute de Recherche Experimentale et Clinique (IREC), 1200 Brussels, Belgium
- Medical Oncology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Singh R, Valluri A, Didwania P, Lehrer EJ, Baliga S, Hiniker S, Braunstein SE, Murphy ES, Lazarev S, Tinkle C, Terezakis S, Palmer JD. Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Malignancies: The LITE-SABR Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101123. [PMID: 36845622 PMCID: PMC9943773 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Limited data are currently available on clinical outcomes after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer. We aimed to perform a systematic review and study-level meta-analysis to characterize associated local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and toxicity after SBRT. Methods and Materials Relevant studies were queried using a Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, Study Design (PICOS)/Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)/Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) selection criteria. Primary outcomes were 1-year and 2-year LC as well as incidence of acute and late grade 3 to 5 toxicities, with secondary outcomes of 1-year overall survival and 1-year PFS. Outcome effect sizes were estimated with weighted random effects meta-analyses. Mixed-effects weighted regression models were performed to examine potential correlations between biologically effective dose (BED10), LC, and toxicity incidence. Results Across 9 published studies, we identified 142 pediatric and AYA patients with 217 lesions that were treated with SBRT. Estimated 1-year and 2-year LC rates were 83.5% (95% confidence interval, 70.9%-96.2%) and 74.0% (95% CI, 64.6%-83.4%), respectively, with an estimated acute and late grade 3 to 5 toxicity rate of 2.9% (95% CI, 0.4%-5.4%; all grade 3). The estimated 1-year OS and PFS rates were 75.4% (95% CI, 54.5%-96.3%) and 27.1% (95% CI, 17.3%-37.0%), respectively. On meta-regression, higher BED10 was correlated with improved 2-year LC with every 10 Gy10 increase in BED10 associated with a 5% improvement in 2-year LC (P = .02) in sarcoma-predominant cohorts. Conclusions SBRT provided durable LC for pediatric and AYA patients with cancer with minimal severe toxicities. Dose escalation may result in improved LC for sarcoma-predominant cohorts without a subsequent increase in toxicity. However, further investigations with patient-level data and prospective inquiries are indicated to better define the role of SBRT based on patient and tumor-specific characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raj Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Anisha Valluri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, West Virginia
| | | | - Eric J. Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Susan Hiniker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Steve E. Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Erin S. Murphy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Stanislav Lazarev
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Christopher Tinkle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Stephanie Terezakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Joshua D. Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huynh MA, Tang C, Siva S, Berlin A, Hannan R, Warner A, Koontz B, De Meeleer G, Palma D, Ost P, Tran PT. Review of Prospective Trials Assessing the Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Metastasis-directed Treatment in Oligometastatic Genitourinary Cancers. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:28-38. [PMID: 36283936 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Emerging evidence supports the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as metastatic-directed therapy (MDT) for oligometastatic genitourinary cancers; however, the prospective data to guide its application as an alternative standard of care remain limited. OBJECTIVE To review prospective trials that assess the role of SBRT for patients with genitourinary cancers within a modern framework of oligometastatic disease (OMD) and to highlight clinical scenarios where SBRT may offer a benefit to patients with metastatic cancer. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a critical review of PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov in April 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, combined with expert input to identify prospective studies investigating the role of SBRT for oligometastatic prostate, renal, or bladder cancer. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The most commonly studied application of SBRT has been for metachronous oligorecurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC). Further prospective study is needed to define the role of SBRT in delaying time to next therapy or inducing synergy with other systemic therapies. CONCLUSIONS SBRT has been associated with high rates of local control and minimal risk of toxicity with multiple trials assessing an MDT-alone approach for oligorecurrent HSPC. From a tumor-agnostic perspective, the clinical benefit of SBRT for OMD has been associated with the ability to extend overall survival. As methods of cancer detection and treatment evolve, expansion of studies that prospectively evaluate SBRT MDT, stratifying by tumor histology and oligometastatic state, is needed to inform optimal patient selection and treatment strategy. PATIENT SUMMARY We review outcomes from prospective trials assessing the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for oligometastatic genitourinary cancers, which have predominantly investigated SBRT for oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Much work remains to define how SBRT alone compares with other standard of care treatments for prostate cancer or the role of SBRT in tumor control or delaying time to next therapy in oligometastatic renal and bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mai Anh Huynh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre Building, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Gert De Meeleer
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Palma
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Phuoc T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tran PT, Sutera P, Phillips RM, Deek MP, Chmura S. From Idea to Clinical Practice: A Brief History of Oligometastatic Disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:576-580. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
8
|
Turchan WT, Pitroda SP, Weichselbaum RR. Beyond the Visible Spectrum: Considering the Oligometastatic Hypothesis in the Light of a New Era. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:581-586. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
9
|
Piffko A, Asey B, Dührsen L, Ristow I, Salamon J, Wikman H, Maire CL, Lamszus K, Westphal M, Sauvigny T, Mohme M. Clinical determinants impacting overall survival of patients with operable brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:951805. [DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.951805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is currently the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, and the incidence of brain metastases (BM) in NSCLC patients is continuously increasing. The recent improvements of systemic treatment in NSCLC necessitate continuous updates on prognostic subgroups and factors determining overall survival (OS). In order to improve clinical decision-making in tumor boards, we investigated the clinical determinants affecting survival in patients with resectable NSCLC BM. A retrospective analysis was conducted of NSCLC patients with surgically resectable BM treated in our institution between 01/2015 and 12/2020. The relevant clinical factors affecting survival identified by univariate analysis were included in a multivariate logistic regression model. Overall, 264 patients were identified, with a mean age of 62.39 ± 9.98 years at the initial diagnosis of NSCLC BM and OS of 23.22 ± 1.71 months. The factors that significantly affected OS from the time of primary tumor diagnosis included the systemic metastatic load (median: 28.40 ± 4.82 vs. 40.93 ± 11.18 months, p = 0.021) as well as a number of BM <2 (median: 17.20 ± 2.52 vs. 32.53 ± 3.35 months, p = 0.014). When adjusted for survival time after neurosurgical intervention, a significant survival benefit was found in patients <60 years (median 16.13 ± 3.85 vs. 9.20 ± 1.39 months, p = 0.011) and, among others, patients without any concurrent systemic metastases at time of NSCLC BM diagnosis. Our data shows that the number of BM (singular/solitary), the Karnofsky Performance Status, gender, and age but not localization (infra-/supratentorial), mass-edema index or time to BM occurrence impact OS, and postsurgical survival in NSCLC BM patients. Additionally, our study shows that patients in prognostically favorable clinical subgroups an OS, which differs significantly from current statements in literature. The described clinically relevant factors may improve the understanding of the risks and the course of this disease and Faid future clinical decision making in tumor boards.
Collapse
|
10
|
Liu CS, Song YQ, Wang RZ, Wang Z, He R, Xu K, Wang CY, Wu Y, Wang Y, Zhang XF, Li G, Wang TL. Thorax radiotherapy using 18F-positron emission tomography/computed tomography-guided precision radiotherapy is a prognostic factor for survival in patients with extracranial oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer:A two-center propensity score-matched analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:991378. [PMID: 36353556 PMCID: PMC9639371 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.991378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This retrospective study compared positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and CT in the treatment of extracranial oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and explored the impact of thorax radiotherapy (TRT) on patient survival. Methods We reviewed the medical records of Chinese patients with stage IV extracranial oligometastatic NSCLC who underwent PET/CT or CT at two centers. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to control differences in patient characteristics between the maintenance chemotherapy alone and TRT plus maintenance chemotherapy groups. Results We analyzed 192 eligible patients. The median survival time was better in patients who received PET/CT than in those who only received CT (n = 192, 16 months vs. 6 months, p<0.001). Subgroup analysis showed the median survival time was significantly longer in the TRT plus maintenance group than in the chemotherapy alone group in patients who underwent PET/CT examinations (n = 94, 25 months vs. 11 months, p<0.001). However, there was no statistical difference in survival between both groups in patients who underwent CT examinations (n = 98, 8 months vs. 5 months, p = 0.180). A multifactorial analysis revealed a more favorable prognosis in patients who underwent PET/CT evaluation (HR: 0.343, 95% CI: 0.250-0.471, p <0.001) and TRT (HR: 0.624, 95% CI: 0.464-0.840, p = 0.002), than in those who did not. PSM was consistent with these results. Conclusions PET/CT-guided TRT is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with stage IV extracranial oligometastatic NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng-Sen Liu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Ying-Qiu Song
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Run-Ze Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Rong He
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Ke Xu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Chen-Yu Wang
- Department of Information Management, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Yu Wu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Ye Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Xiao-fang Zhang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Guang Li
- Department of Radiotherapy, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Tian-Lu Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
- *Correspondence: Tian-Lu Wang,
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Strang P. Palliative oncology and palliative care. Mol Oncol 2022; 16:3399-3409. [PMID: 35762045 PMCID: PMC9533690 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
New therapeutic approaches can produce promising results even in severely ill cancer patients. But they also pose new challenges with respect to prognostication, as patients who were once not eligible for treatment, due to age or comorbidities, now are. Palliative oncology constitutes a major part of oncological care, with life prolongation and quality of life as its main goals. Palliative care specialists are experts in symptom control and psychosocial and existential support, and the integration of their expertise early on in patient care can prolong survival. In this article, I discuss the need to integrate specialist palliative care into early cancer treatment plans to achieve quality of life for patients. I also discuss the ways in which palliative care specialists balance the benefits of novel treatments against their adverse effects for patients, particularly for the elderly, the frail and those in advance stages of disease. I highlight the need to ensure equal access to palliative care to improve cancer patients' quality of life but also why futile, burdensome treatments should be avoided especially in the frail, elderly patients. Further, I discuss benefits and problems related to nutritional support in patients with cachexia and exemplify why translational research is needed to link basic research with clinical oncology and effective symptom control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Strang
- Department of Oncology‐Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Regional Cancer Centre in Stockholm – Gotland, and R & D DepartmentStockholm's Sjukhem FoundationSweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Turchan WT, Pitroda SP, Weichselbaum RR. Combined radio-immunotherapy: An opportunity to increase the therapeutic ratio of oligometastasis-directed radiotherapy. Neoplasia 2022; 27:100782. [PMID: 35303578 PMCID: PMC8931441 DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2022.100782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The utility of radiotherapy as a means of palliating symptoms due to metastatic cancer is well-accepted. A growing body of literature suggests that radiotherapy may play a role beyond palliation in some patients with low-burden metastatic disease. Recent data suggest that oligometastasis-directed radiotherapy may improve progression-free and even overall survival in select patients. Immunotherapy also has a growing role in the management of patients with metastatic cancer and, like radiotherapy, appears to be most effective in the setting of low-volume disease. Thus, the addition of immunotherapy may be a feasible means of increasing the therapeutic ratio of metastasis-directed radiotherapy, particularly among patients with oligometastatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Tyler Turchan
- University of Chicago, Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology and the Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, 5758 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
| | - Sean P Pitroda
- University of Chicago, Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology and the Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, 5758 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, United States
| | - Ralph R Weichselbaum
- University of Chicago, Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology and the Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, 5758 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Thompson SM, Welch BT, Kurup AN. Ablation for oligometastatic colorectal carcinoma in extrahepatic, extrapulmonary sites. Int J Hyperthermia 2022; 39:633-638. [DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1952318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brian T. Welch
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - A. Nick Kurup
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Turchan WT, Pitroda SP, Weichselbaum RR. Treatment of Cancer with Radio-Immunotherapy: What We Currently Know and What the Future May Hold. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:9573. [PMID: 34502479 PMCID: PMC8431248 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22179573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy and immunotherapy are most effective as cancer therapies in the setting of low-volume disease. Although initial studies of radio-immunotherapy in patients with metastatic cancer have not confirmed the efficacy of this approach, the role of radio-immunotherapy in patients with limited metastatic burden is unclear. We propose that further investigation of radio-immunotherapy in metastatic patients should focus upon patients with oligometastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ralph R. Weichselbaum
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology and the Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, University of Chicago, 5758 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; (W.T.T.); (S.P.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Li M, Liu D, Lee D, Cheng Y, Baumhover NJ, Marks BM, Sagastume EA, Ballas ZK, Johnson FL, Morris ZS, Schultz MK. Targeted Alpha-Particle Radiotherapy and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Induces Cooperative Inhibition on Tumor Growth of Malignant Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13153676. [PMID: 34359580 PMCID: PMC8345035 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiation therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been demonstrated to cooperatively activate adaptive anti-tumor immunity with curative potential in preclinical models of melanoma. Receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy can be systemically injected to selectively deliver ionizing radiation to tumor sites throughout the body, potentially rendering all tumor sites more susceptible to anti-tumor immune response. In this study, we demonstrated the feasibility of delivering alpha-particle radiation to murine melanoma tumors using a 212Pb radiolabeled peptide [212Pb]VMT01 that targets the melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R). Our data showed anti-tumor cooperation between [212Pb]VMT01 and ICIs in melanoma, mediated by induction of tumor-specific immunity. The immunogenicity of [212Pb]VMT01 in melanoma was also evidenced by enhanced tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and tumor vaccination assays. Abstract Radiotherapy can facilitate the immune recognition of immunologically “cold” tumors and enhance the efficacy of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in melanoma. Systemic administration of receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy has the potential to selectively deliver radionuclides to multiple tumors throughout the body in metastatic settings. By triggering immunologic cell death and increasing the immune susceptibility of surviving tumor cells in these locations, targeted radionuclide therapies may overcome resistance to ICIs and render immunologically “cold” tumors throughout the body responsive to ICIs and immunologically “hot”. Here, we show the anti-tumor cooperation of targeted α-particle radionuclide therapy (α-TRT) and ICIs in preclinical models of melanoma. Melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R)-targeted radiopeptide [212Pb]VMT01 was employed to deliver α-radiation to melanoma tumors in mice. A single injection of 4.1 MBq [212Pb]VMT01 significantly slowed the tumor growth of B16-F10 melanoma and the combination of [212Pb]VMT01 and ICIs induced a cooperative anti-tumor effect leading to 43% complete tumor response with no sign of malignancy on autopsy. Animals with complete response developed anti-tumor immunity to reject further tumor inoculations. This therapeutic cooperation was completely abolished in RAG1 KO mice, which are deficient in T-cell maturation. In addition, the anti-tumor cooperation was compromised when fractionated [212Pb]VMT01 was used in the combination. We also demonstrated that [212Pb]VMT01 induced immunogenic cell death in tumor vaccination assays and in vitro exposure to [212Pb]VMT01 sensitized immunotolerant melanoma to ICIs treatment in vivo. Enhanced tumor infiltrating CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ lymphocytes were observed following injection of 1.4 MBq [212Pb]VMT01. Overall, we demonstrated anti-tumor cooperation between α-TRT and ICIs in melanoma that is mediated by tumor specific immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengshi Li
- Viewpoint Molecular Targeting, Inc., Coralville, IA 52241, USA; (M.L.); (D.L.); (N.J.B.); (B.M.M.); (E.A.S.); (F.L.J.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA;
| | - Dijie Liu
- Viewpoint Molecular Targeting, Inc., Coralville, IA 52241, USA; (M.L.); (D.L.); (N.J.B.); (B.M.M.); (E.A.S.); (F.L.J.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA;
| | - Dongyoul Lee
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA;
| | - Yinwen Cheng
- Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Human Toxicology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA;
- Department of Pathology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Nicholas J. Baumhover
- Viewpoint Molecular Targeting, Inc., Coralville, IA 52241, USA; (M.L.); (D.L.); (N.J.B.); (B.M.M.); (E.A.S.); (F.L.J.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA;
| | - Brenna M. Marks
- Viewpoint Molecular Targeting, Inc., Coralville, IA 52241, USA; (M.L.); (D.L.); (N.J.B.); (B.M.M.); (E.A.S.); (F.L.J.)
| | - Edwin A. Sagastume
- Viewpoint Molecular Targeting, Inc., Coralville, IA 52241, USA; (M.L.); (D.L.); (N.J.B.); (B.M.M.); (E.A.S.); (F.L.J.)
| | - Zuhair K. Ballas
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA;
| | - Frances L. Johnson
- Viewpoint Molecular Targeting, Inc., Coralville, IA 52241, USA; (M.L.); (D.L.); (N.J.B.); (B.M.M.); (E.A.S.); (F.L.J.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA;
| | - Zachary S. Morris
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA;
| | - Michael K. Schultz
- Viewpoint Molecular Targeting, Inc., Coralville, IA 52241, USA; (M.L.); (D.L.); (N.J.B.); (B.M.M.); (E.A.S.); (F.L.J.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA;
- Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Human Toxicology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA;
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
- Department of Chemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(865)-356-1861
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Priskin K, Pólya S, Pintér L, Jaksa G, Csányi B, Enyedi MZ, Sági-Zsigmond E, Sükösd F, Oláh-Németh O, Kelemen G, Nikolényi A, Uhercsák G, Sántha D, Dobi Á, Szilágyi É, Valicsek E, Tordai L, Tóth R, Kahán Z, Haracska L. BC-Monitor: Towards a Routinely Accessible Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Tool for Real-Time Monitoring Breast Cancer Progression and Treatment Effectiveness. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:3489. [PMID: 34298704 PMCID: PMC8305126 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly employed in the screening, follow-up, and monitoring of the continuously evolving tumor; however, most ctDNA assays validated for clinical use cannot maintain the right balance between sensitivity, coverage, sample requirements, time, and cost. Here, we report our BC-monitor, a simple, well-balanced ctDNA diagnostic approach using a gene panel significant in breast cancer and an optimized multiplex PCR-based NGS protocol capable of identifying allele variant frequencies below 1% in cell-free plasma DNA. We monitored a cohort of 45 breast cancer patients prospectively enrolled into our study receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy or palliative therapy for metastatic diseases. Their tumor mutation status was examined in the archived tumor samples and plasma samples collected before and continuously during therapy. Traceable mutations of the used 38-plex NGS assay were found in approximately two-thirds of the patients. Importantly, we detected new pathogenic variants in follow-up plasma samples that were not detected in the primary tumor and baseline plasma samples. We proved that the BC-monitor can pre-indicate disease progression four-six months earlier than conventional methods. Our study highlights the need for well-designed ctDNA monitoring during treatment and follow-up, integrated into a real-time treatment assessment, which could provide information on the active tumor DNA released into the blood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katalin Priskin
- Delta Bio 2000 Ltd., 6726 Szeged, Hungary; (K.P.); (L.P.); (G.J.); (M.Z.E.); (E.S.-Z.)
| | - Sára Pólya
- Visal Plus Ltd., 6726 Szeged, Hungary; (S.P.); (B.C.)
| | - Lajos Pintér
- Delta Bio 2000 Ltd., 6726 Szeged, Hungary; (K.P.); (L.P.); (G.J.); (M.Z.E.); (E.S.-Z.)
| | - Gábor Jaksa
- Delta Bio 2000 Ltd., 6726 Szeged, Hungary; (K.P.); (L.P.); (G.J.); (M.Z.E.); (E.S.-Z.)
| | | | - Márton Zsolt Enyedi
- Delta Bio 2000 Ltd., 6726 Szeged, Hungary; (K.P.); (L.P.); (G.J.); (M.Z.E.); (E.S.-Z.)
| | - Eszter Sági-Zsigmond
- Delta Bio 2000 Ltd., 6726 Szeged, Hungary; (K.P.); (L.P.); (G.J.); (M.Z.E.); (E.S.-Z.)
| | - Farkas Sükösd
- Department of Pathology, University of Szeged, 6701 Szeged, Hungary;
| | - Orsolya Oláh-Németh
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary; (O.O.-N.); (G.K.); (A.N.); (G.U.); (D.S.); (Á.D.); (É.S.); (E.V.); (L.T.); (R.T.); (Z.K.)
| | - Gyöngyi Kelemen
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary; (O.O.-N.); (G.K.); (A.N.); (G.U.); (D.S.); (Á.D.); (É.S.); (E.V.); (L.T.); (R.T.); (Z.K.)
| | - Alíz Nikolényi
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary; (O.O.-N.); (G.K.); (A.N.); (G.U.); (D.S.); (Á.D.); (É.S.); (E.V.); (L.T.); (R.T.); (Z.K.)
| | - Gabriella Uhercsák
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary; (O.O.-N.); (G.K.); (A.N.); (G.U.); (D.S.); (Á.D.); (É.S.); (E.V.); (L.T.); (R.T.); (Z.K.)
| | - Dóra Sántha
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary; (O.O.-N.); (G.K.); (A.N.); (G.U.); (D.S.); (Á.D.); (É.S.); (E.V.); (L.T.); (R.T.); (Z.K.)
| | - Ágnes Dobi
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary; (O.O.-N.); (G.K.); (A.N.); (G.U.); (D.S.); (Á.D.); (É.S.); (E.V.); (L.T.); (R.T.); (Z.K.)
| | - Éva Szilágyi
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary; (O.O.-N.); (G.K.); (A.N.); (G.U.); (D.S.); (Á.D.); (É.S.); (E.V.); (L.T.); (R.T.); (Z.K.)
| | - Erzsébet Valicsek
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary; (O.O.-N.); (G.K.); (A.N.); (G.U.); (D.S.); (Á.D.); (É.S.); (E.V.); (L.T.); (R.T.); (Z.K.)
| | - László Tordai
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary; (O.O.-N.); (G.K.); (A.N.); (G.U.); (D.S.); (Á.D.); (É.S.); (E.V.); (L.T.); (R.T.); (Z.K.)
| | - Rozália Tóth
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary; (O.O.-N.); (G.K.); (A.N.); (G.U.); (D.S.); (Á.D.); (É.S.); (E.V.); (L.T.); (R.T.); (Z.K.)
| | - Zsuzsanna Kahán
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary; (O.O.-N.); (G.K.); (A.N.); (G.U.); (D.S.); (Á.D.); (É.S.); (E.V.); (L.T.); (R.T.); (Z.K.)
| | - Lajos Haracska
- HCEMM-BRC Mutagenesis and Carcinogenesis Research Group, Biological Research Centre, Institute of Genetics, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sezen D, Verma V, He K, Abana CO, Barsoumian H, Ning MS, Tang C, Hurmuz P, Puebla-Osorio N, Chen D, Tendler I, Comeaux N, Nguyen QN, Chang JY, Welsh JW. Considerations for Clinical Trials Testing Radiotherapy Combined With Immunotherapy for Metastatic Disease. Semin Radiat Oncol 2021; 31:217-226. [PMID: 34090648 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Metastatic cancer is inherently heterogeneous, and patients with metastatic disease can experience vastly different oncologic outcomes depending on several patient- and disease-specific characteristics. Designing trials for such a diverse population is challenging yet necessary to improve treatment outcomes for metastatic-previously thought to be incurable-disease. Here we review core considerations for designing and conducting clinical trials involving radiation therapy and immunotherapy for patients with metastatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duygu Sezen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kewen He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Chike O Abana
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Hampartsaum Barsoumian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Matthew S Ning
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Pervin Hurmuz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nahum Puebla-Osorio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Dawei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Irwin Tendler
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Nathan Comeaux
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joe Y Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - James W Welsh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Turchan WT, Pitroda SP, Weichselbaum RR. Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy Combinations in the Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Disease: Current Status and Future Focus. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:5188-5194. [PMID: 34140404 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 05/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy and immunotherapy benefit subsets of patients with metastatic cancer. Here, we review selected laboratory and clinical studies investigating the utility of combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy in metastatic patients. We examine potential approaches to increase the therapeutic ratio of radioimmunotherapy in the treatment of metastatic cancers moving forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Tyler Turchan
- University of Chicago, Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sean P Pitroda
- University of Chicago, Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ralph R Weichselbaum
- University of Chicago, Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kim K, Kim TH, Kim TH, Seong J. Efficacy of Local Therapy for Oligometastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2021; 8:35-44. [PMID: 33604314 PMCID: PMC7886258 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s290197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose With respect to various solid cancers, patients with oligometastasis may benefit from local therapy. However, this approach is not widely accepted for hepatocellular carcinoma. This study investigated the efficacy of local therapy for oligometastatic lesions in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients and Methods The study included 69 hepatocellular carcinoma patients presenting with oligometastasis to the lung. Characteristics of the patients and treatment options for metastatic lesions were reviewed, and a survival analysis was performed. After propensity score matching, overall survival and progression-free survival were calculated from the time of pulmonary metastasis detection. Factors predicting prognosis were analyzed using a multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results After propensity score matching, 58 patients with Child-Pugh grade A disease were selected. Among them, 22 patients were treated with systemic therapy alone while 36 patients received local therapy or a combination of local and systemic therapies for metastatic lesions. Survival rates were higher in patients receiving local therapy than in those receiving systemic therapy (2-year overall survival rate, 66.6 vs 31.2%, p<0.001; 2-year progression-free survival rate, 47.0 vs 10.6%, p=0.005). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, alpha-fetoprotein levels less than 400 ng/mL and the use of local therapy for metastatic lesions were found to be significant favorable prognostic factors. Conclusion Local therapy for metastatic lesions improved the oncologic outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with pulmonary oligometastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kangpyo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Hyung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Hyun Kim
- Department of Statistics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jinsil Seong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Phillips R, Shi WY, Deek M, Radwan N, Lim SJ, Antonarakis ES, Rowe SP, Ross AE, Gorin MA, Deville C, Greco SC, Wang H, Denmeade SR, Paller CJ, Dipasquale S, DeWeese TL, Song DY, Wang H, Carducci MA, Pienta KJ, Pomper MG, Dicker AP, Eisenberger MA, Alizadeh AA, Diehn M, Tran PT. Outcomes of Observation vs Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The ORIOLE Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2021; 6:650-659. [PMID: 32215577 PMCID: PMC7225913 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 695] [Impact Index Per Article: 231.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Question How effectively does stereotactic ablative radiotherapy prevent progression of disease compared with observation in men with recurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with 1 to 3 metastases? Findings In this phase 2 randomized clinical trial of 54 men, progression of disease at 6 months occurred in 7 of 36 participants (19%) treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and in 11 of 18 participants (61%) undergoing observation, a statistically significant difference. Meaning Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy is a promising treatment approach for men with recurrent hormone-sensitive oligometastatic prostate cancer who wish to delay initiation of androgen deprivation therapy. Importance Complete metastatic ablation of oligometastatic prostate cancer may provide an alternative to early initiation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Objective To determine if stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) improves oncologic outcomes in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants The Observation vs Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer (ORIOLE) phase 2 randomized study accrued participants from 3 US radiation treatment facilities affiliated with a university hospital from May 2016 to March 2018 with a data cutoff date of May 20, 2019, for analysis. Of 80 men screened, 54 men with recurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and 1 to 3 metastases detectable by conventional imaging who had not received ADT within 6 months of enrollment or 3 or more years total were randomized. Interventions Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive SABR or observation. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was progression at 6 months by prostate-specific antigen level increase, progression detected by conventional imaging, symptomatic progression, ADT initiation for any reason, or death. Predefined secondary outcomes were toxic effects of SABR, local control at 6 months with SABR, progression-free survival, Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form)–measured quality of life, and concordance between conventional imaging and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–targeted positron emission tomography in the identification of metastatic disease. Results In the 54 men randomized, the median (range) age was 68 (61-70) years for patients allocated to SABR and 68 (64-76) years for those allocated to observation. Progression at 6 months occurred in 7 of 36 patients (19%) receiving SABR and 11 of 18 patients (61%) undergoing observation (P = .005). Treatment with SABR improved median progression-free survival (not reached vs 5.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11-0.81; P = .002). Total consolidation of PSMA radiotracer-avid disease decreased the risk of new lesions at 6 months (16% vs 63%; P = .006). No toxic effects of grade 3 or greater were observed. T-cell receptor sequencing identified significant increased clonotypic expansion following SABR and correlation between baseline clonality and progression with SABR only (0.082085 vs 0.026051; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance Treatment with SABR for oligometastatic prostate cancer improved outcomes and was enhanced by total consolidation of disease identified by PSMA-targeted positron emission tomography. SABR induced a systemic immune response, and baseline immune phenotype and tumor mutation status may predict the benefit from SABR. These results underline the importance of prospective randomized investigation of the oligometastatic state with integrated imaging and biological correlates. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02680587
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Phillips
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - William Yue Shi
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Matthew Deek
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Noura Radwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Su Jin Lim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Emmanuel S Antonarakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Steven P Rowe
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ashley E Ross
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Michael A Gorin
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Curtiland Deville
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Stephen C Greco
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hailun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Samuel R Denmeade
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Channing J Paller
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Shirl Dipasquale
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Theodore L DeWeese
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Daniel Y Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hao Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Michael A Carducci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Kenneth J Pienta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Martin G Pomper
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Adam P Dicker
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Mario A Eisenberger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ash A Alizadeh
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Maximilian Diehn
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Phuoc T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Franzese C, Ingargiola R, Tomatis S, Iacovelli NA, Beltramo G, Franco P, Bonomo P, Zanetti IB, Argenone A, Cante D, Romanello DA, Musio D, De Felice F, Furlan C, Scorsetti M, Orlandi E. Metastatic salivary gland carcinoma: A role for stereotactic body radiation therapy? A study of AIRO-Head and Neck working group. Oral Dis 2020; 28:345-351. [PMID: 33320410 DOI: 10.1111/odi.13755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The role of radiotherapy (RT) for oligometastases is currently established in different oncological settings but data on salivary gland cancer (SGC) are lacking. We evaluated the role of RT in oligometastatic SGC patients, focusing on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective, multicentric study of oligometastatic SGC treated with palliative RT or SBRT. Endpoints included response evaluation and local control (LC). RESULTS Between 2006 and 2016, 64 patients were collected from 9 Italian Cancer Centers, on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Head and Neck Working Group. 37 patients (57.8%) were suffering from adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) and 27 patients (42.2%) had non-ACC. Thirty-four patients underwent palliative RT (53,1%), and 30 received SBRT (46,9%). Most common metastatic sites were bone for palliative RT and lung for SBRT. Among patients treated with SBRT, an objective response or a stability was observed in all treated lesions. After a median follow-up of 29.2 months (range 2.3-117.1), LC at 12 months was 57.5% for patients treated with SBRT and was higher in ACC subgroup. CONCLUSION We confirmed the potential role of SBRT in the management of oligometastatic SGC patients to control limited burden of disease considering the absence of effective systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciro Franzese
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Rossana Ingargiola
- Radiation Oncology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Tomatis
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | - Giancarlo Beltramo
- Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife Center, Centro Diagnostico Italiano, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Bonomo
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Isa Bossi Zanetti
- Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife Center, Centro Diagnostico Italiano, Milan, Italy
| | - Angela Argenone
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale per la cura e lo studio dei tumori, Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Domenico Cante
- Radiotherapy Department, Ivrea Community Hospital, Ivrea (Turin), Italy
| | | | - Daniela Musio
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Furlan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCSS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Unit 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kucharczyk MJ, So J, Gravis G, Sweeney C, Saad F, Niazi T. A combined biological and clinical rationale for evaluating metastasis directed therapy in the management of oligometastatic prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2020; 152:80-88. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Revised: 08/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
|
23
|
Taussky D, Delouya G. Is pelvic prophylactic radiotherapy in prostate cancer just right? Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:2296-2298. [PMID: 33209698 PMCID: PMC7658169 DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Taussky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Canada
| | - Guila Delouya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Haughey CM, Mukherjee D, Steele RE, Popple A, Dura-Perez L, Pickard A, Patel M, Jain S, Mullan PB, Williams R, Oliveira P, Buckley NE, Honeychurch J, S. McDade S, Illidge T, Mills IG, Eddie SL. Investigating Radiotherapy Response in a Novel Syngeneic Model of Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E2804. [PMID: 33003551 PMCID: PMC7599844 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12102804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The prostate cancer (PCa) field lacks clinically relevant, syngeneic mouse models which retain the tumour microenvironment observed in PCa patients. This study establishes a cell line from prostate tumour tissue derived from the Pten-/-/trp53-/- mouse, termed DVL3 which when subcutaneously implanted in immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice, forms tumours with distinct glandular morphology, strong cytokeratin 8 and androgen receptor expression, recapitulating high-risk localised human PCa. Compared to the commonly used TRAMP C1 model, generated with SV40 large T-antigen, DVL3 tumours are immunologically cold, with a lower proportion of CD8+ T-cells, and high proportion of immunosuppressive myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), thus resembling high-risk PCa. Furthermore, DVL3 tumours are responsive to fractionated RT, a standard treatment for localised and metastatic PCa, compared to the TRAMP C1 model. RNA-sequencing of irradiated DVL3 tumours identified upregulation of type-1 interferon and STING pathways, as well as transcripts associated with MDSCs. Upregulation of STING expression in tumour epithelium and the recruitment of MDSCs following irradiation was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. The DVL3 syngeneic model represents substantial progress in preclinical PCa modelling, displaying pathological, micro-environmental and treatment responses observed in molecular high-risk disease. Our study supports using this model for development and validation of treatments targeting PCa, especially novel immune therapeutic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles M. Haughey
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen’s University, Belfast BT9 7AE, UK; (C.M.H.); (R.E.S.); (L.D.-P.); (A.P.); (S.J.); (P.B.M.); (R.W.); (N.E.B.); (S.S.M.)
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Debayan Mukherjee
- Targeted Therapy Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; (D.M.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (J.H.)
| | - Rebecca E. Steele
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen’s University, Belfast BT9 7AE, UK; (C.M.H.); (R.E.S.); (L.D.-P.); (A.P.); (S.J.); (P.B.M.); (R.W.); (N.E.B.); (S.S.M.)
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Amy Popple
- Targeted Therapy Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; (D.M.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (J.H.)
| | - Lara Dura-Perez
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen’s University, Belfast BT9 7AE, UK; (C.M.H.); (R.E.S.); (L.D.-P.); (A.P.); (S.J.); (P.B.M.); (R.W.); (N.E.B.); (S.S.M.)
| | - Adam Pickard
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen’s University, Belfast BT9 7AE, UK; (C.M.H.); (R.E.S.); (L.D.-P.); (A.P.); (S.J.); (P.B.M.); (R.W.); (N.E.B.); (S.S.M.)
- Wellcome Centre for Cell Matrix Research, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Mehjabin Patel
- Targeted Therapy Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; (D.M.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (J.H.)
| | - Suneil Jain
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen’s University, Belfast BT9 7AE, UK; (C.M.H.); (R.E.S.); (L.D.-P.); (A.P.); (S.J.); (P.B.M.); (R.W.); (N.E.B.); (S.S.M.)
| | - Paul B. Mullan
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen’s University, Belfast BT9 7AE, UK; (C.M.H.); (R.E.S.); (L.D.-P.); (A.P.); (S.J.); (P.B.M.); (R.W.); (N.E.B.); (S.S.M.)
| | - Rich Williams
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen’s University, Belfast BT9 7AE, UK; (C.M.H.); (R.E.S.); (L.D.-P.); (A.P.); (S.J.); (P.B.M.); (R.W.); (N.E.B.); (S.S.M.)
| | - Pedro Oliveira
- The Christie Hospital Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK;
| | - Niamh E. Buckley
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen’s University, Belfast BT9 7AE, UK; (C.M.H.); (R.E.S.); (L.D.-P.); (A.P.); (S.J.); (P.B.M.); (R.W.); (N.E.B.); (S.S.M.)
- School of Pharmacy, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK
| | - Jamie Honeychurch
- Targeted Therapy Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; (D.M.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (J.H.)
| | - Simon S. McDade
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen’s University, Belfast BT9 7AE, UK; (C.M.H.); (R.E.S.); (L.D.-P.); (A.P.); (S.J.); (P.B.M.); (R.W.); (N.E.B.); (S.S.M.)
| | - Timothy Illidge
- Targeted Therapy Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; (D.M.); (A.P.); (M.P.); (J.H.)
- The Christie Hospital Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK;
| | - Ian G. Mills
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen’s University, Belfast BT9 7AE, UK; (C.M.H.); (R.E.S.); (L.D.-P.); (A.P.); (S.J.); (P.B.M.); (R.W.); (N.E.B.); (S.S.M.)
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Sharon L. Eddie
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen’s University, Belfast BT9 7AE, UK; (C.M.H.); (R.E.S.); (L.D.-P.); (A.P.); (S.J.); (P.B.M.); (R.W.); (N.E.B.); (S.S.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abbas AE. Commentary: When cancer is oligometastatic, even mesothelioma is curable. JTCVS Tech 2020; 3:361-362. [PMID: 34317931 PMCID: PMC8302998 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Revised: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Abbas E Abbas
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Temple University Hospital and Fox Chase Comprehensive Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pa
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Muilwijk T, Akand M, Van der Aa F, Dumez H, De Meerleer G, Van Raemdonck D, De Leyn P, Van Poppel H, Albersen M, Joniau S. Metastasectomy of oligometastatic urothelial cancer: a single-center experience. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:1296-1305. [PMID: 32676413 PMCID: PMC7354317 DOI: 10.21037/tau-19-624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Survival in patients with urothelial cancer (UC) recurrence after initial treatment with curative intent is limited and treatment options are sparse. Metastasectomy could be considered a treatment option in selected cases. Identifying prognostic factors for survival can be used to counsel patients and aid multidisciplinary teams in making treatment decisions. Methods We collected a retrospective case series of patients undergoing metastasectomy for oligometastatic UC between 1999 and 2018 at University Hospitals Leuven. Oligometastatic UC was defined as recurrence of UC in a single organ with ≤3 metastases. Survival outcomes of interest were: overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and secondary recurrence-free survival (RFS2). Complications were reported using the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). Survival analysis are descriptive and were performed using Kaplan-Meier plots to visualize survival data and log-rank was used to compare survival between groups. Results From 1999 to 2018, a total of 22 patients underwent metastasectomy of oligometastatic UC. Metastasectomy sites were: pulmonary (59.1%), loco-regional (13.6%), hepatic (9.1%), adrenal (4.5%), testicular (4.5%), nodal above aortic bifurcation (4.5%), and renal transplant (4.5%). The 5-year OS, CSS and RFS2 after metastasectomy were 51.4%, 57.0%, and 49.9%, respectively. Patients with primary upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) involvement and patients treated with hepatic metastasectomy had a significantly worse OS, CSS, and RFS2. Patients with a lesion size >8 mm and patients with >1 pulmonary lesion had a significantly worse CSS. Two CDC grade 3B occurred during follow-up and were both non-procedure related. Conclusions Metastasectomy of oligometastatic UC is feasible and can achieve durable cancer control in a highly selected subgroup of patients. Our results suggest that patients with hepatic metastases or primary UTUC involvement could be considered poor candidates for metastasectomy, while patients with a small (<8 mm) or solitary pulmonary lesion might benefit most. These findings should be validated in multi-institutional collaborations or prospective clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Muilwijk
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Murat Akand
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey
| | - Frank Van der Aa
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Herlinde Dumez
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gert De Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Van Raemdonck
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Paul De Leyn
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Maarten Albersen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Witjes JA, Babjuk M, Bellmunt J, Bruins HM, De Reijke TM, De Santis M, Gillessen S, James N, Maclennan S, Palou J, Powles T, Ribal MJ, Shariat SF, Der Kwast TV, Xylinas E, Agarwal N, Arends T, Bamias A, Birtle A, Black PC, Bochner BH, Bolla M, Boormans JL, Bossi A, Briganti A, Brummelhuis I, Burger M, Castellano D, Cathomas R, Chiti A, Choudhury A, Compérat E, Crabb S, Culine S, De Bari B, De Blok W, J L De Visschere P, Decaestecker K, Dimitropoulos K, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Fanti S, Fonteyne V, Frydenberg M, Futterer JJ, Gakis G, Geavlete B, Gontero P, Grubmüller B, Hafeez S, Hansel DE, Hartmann A, Hayne D, Henry AM, Hernandez V, Herr H, Herrmann K, Hoskin P, Huguet J, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kamat AM, Khoo V, Kiltie AE, Krege S, Ladoire S, Lara PC, Leliveld A, Linares-Espinós E, Løgager V, Lorch A, Loriot Y, Meijer R, Mir MC, Moschini M, Mostafid H, Müller AC, Müller CR, N'Dow J, Necchi A, Neuzillet Y, Oddens JR, Oldenburg J, Osanto S, J G Oyen W, Pacheco-Figueiredo L, Pappot H, Patel MI, Pieters BR, Plass K, Remzi M, Retz M, Richenberg J, Rink M, Roghmann F, Rosenberg JE, Rouprêt M, Rouvière O, Salembier C, Salminen A, Sargos P, Sengupta S, Sherif A, Smeenk RJ, Smits A, Stenzl A, Thalmann GN, Tombal B, Turkbey B, Lauridsen SV, Valdagni R, Van Der Heijden AG, Van Poppel H, Vartolomei MD, Veskimäe E, Vilaseca A, Rivera FAV, Wiegel T, Wiklund P, Williams A, Zigeuner R, Horwich A. EAU-ESMO Consensus Statements on the Management of Advanced and Variant Bladder Cancer-An International Collaborative Multistakeholder Effort †: Under the Auspices of the EAU-ESMO Guidelines Committees. Eur Urol 2020; 77:223-250. [PMID: 31753752 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.09.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although guidelines exist for advanced and variant bladder cancer management, evidence is limited/conflicting in some areas and the optimal approach remains controversial. OBJECTIVE To bring together a large multidisciplinary group of experts to develop consensus statements on controversial topics in bladder cancer management. DESIGN A steering committee compiled proposed statements regarding advanced and variant bladder cancer management which were assessed by 113 experts in a Delphi survey. Statements not reaching consensus were reviewed; those prioritised were revised by a panel of 45 experts prior to voting during a consensus conference. SETTING Online Delphi survey and consensus conference. PARTICIPANTS The European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), experts in bladder cancer management. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Statements were ranked by experts according to their level of agreement: 1-3 (disagree), 4-6 (equivocal), and 7-9 (agree). A priori (level 1) consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement and ≤15% disagreement, or vice versa. In the Delphi survey, a second analysis was restricted to stakeholder group(s) considered to have adequate expertise relating to each statement (to achieve level 2 consensus). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 116 statements were included in the Delphi survey. Of these statements, 33 (28%) achieved level 1 consensus and 49 (42%) achieved level 1 or 2 consensus. At the consensus conference, 22 of 27 (81%) statements achieved consensus. These consensus statements provide further guidance across a broad range of topics, including the management of variant histologies, the role/limitations of prognostic biomarkers in clinical decision making, bladder preservation strategies, modern radiotherapy techniques, the management of oligometastatic disease, and the evolving role of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS These consensus statements provide further guidance on controversial topics in advanced and variant bladder cancer management until a time when further evidence is available to guide our approach. PATIENT SUMMARY This report summarises findings from an international, multistakeholder project organised by the EAU and ESMO. In this project, a steering committee identified areas of bladder cancer management where there is currently no good-quality evidence to guide treatment decisions. From this, they developed a series of proposed statements, 71 of which achieved consensus by a large group of experts in the field of bladder cancer. It is anticipated that these statements will provide further guidance to health care professionals and could help improve patient outcomes until a time when good-quality evidence is available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Marek Babjuk
- Depatment of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- IMIM-Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - H Maxim Bruins
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Theo M De Reijke
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nicholas James
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Juan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Tom Powles
- The Royal Free NHS Trust, London, UK; Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Maria J Ribal
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Depatment of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Theo Van Der Kwast
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah (NCI-CCC), Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Tom Arends
- Urology Department, Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Aristotle Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Dept of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Alison Birtle
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, Preston, UK
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada
| | - Bernard H Bochner
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA; Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michel Bolla
- Emeritus Professor of Radiation Oncology, Grenoble - Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Milan; Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Iris Brummelhuis
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Max Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Castellano
- Medical Oncology Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Richard Cathomas
- Departement Innere Medizin, Abteilung Onkologie und Hämatologie, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Tenon hospital, HUEP, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Simon Crabb
- Cancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Stephane Culine
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - Berardino De Bari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire "Jean Minjoz" of Besançon, INSERM UMR 1098, Besançon, France; Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Willem De Blok
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J L De Visschere
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Genitourinary Radiology and Mammography, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Stefano Fanti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico S Orsola, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Valerie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Jurgen J Futterer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Georgios Gakis
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Julius-Maximillians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Bogdan Geavlete
- Department of Urology, Saint John Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Molinette Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Shaista Hafeez
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Donna E Hansel
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego Pathology, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Dickon Hayne
- Department of Urology, UWA Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Ann M Henry
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Virginia Hernandez
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación de Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Harry Herr
- Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, London, UK
| | - Jorge Huguet
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Rob Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology - Division of Surgery, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Vincent Khoo
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anne E Kiltie
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Susanne Krege
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Sylvain Ladoire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Pedro C Lara
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Roque; Universidad Fernando Pessoa, Canarias, Spain
| | - Annemarie Leliveld
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Vibeke Løgager
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, INSERM U981, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Richard Meijer
- UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, MS Oncologic Urology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Carmen Mir
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | | | | | - James N'Dow
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Hospital Foch, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Jorg R Oddens
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Oldenburg
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Susanne Osanto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Wim J G Oyen
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Luís Pacheco-Figueiredo
- Department of Urology, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal; Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - Helle Pappot
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Manish I Patel
- Department of Urology, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bradley R Pieters
- Department Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Plass
- EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Mesut Remzi
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Margitta Retz
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jonathan Richenberg
- Department of Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Florian Roghmann
- Department of Urology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Marien Hospital, Herne, Germany
| | - Jonathan E Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Rouvière
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service d'Imagerie Urinaire et Vasculaire, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, faculté de médecine Lyon Est, Lyon, France
| | - Carl Salembier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Europe Hospitals Brussels, Belgium
| | - Antti Salminen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Turku, Finland
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Shomik Sengupta
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Amir Sherif
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå university, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Robert J Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Anita Smits
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - George N Thalmann
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Bertrand Tombal
- Division of Urology, IREC, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCL, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Susanne Vahr Lauridsen
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Riccardo Valdagni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Mihai D Vartolomei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Romania
| | - Erik Veskimäe
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Antoni Vilaseca
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Franklin A Vives Rivera
- Clinica HematoOncologica Bonadona Prevenir, Universidad Metropolitana, Clinica Club de Leones, Barranquilla, Colombia
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System New York City, New York, USA; Department of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Andrew Williams
- Department of Urology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- Department of Urology, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Alan Horwich
- Emeritus Professor, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chee J, Liu X, Eu D, Loh T, Ho F, Wong LC, Tham I, Tan CS, Goh BC, Lim CM. Defining a cohort of oligometastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with improved clinical outcomes. Head Neck 2020; 42:945-954. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.26061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Revised: 11/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Chee
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery National University Health System Singapore Singapore
| | - Xuandao Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery National University Health System Singapore Singapore
| | - Donovan Eu
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery National University Health System Singapore Singapore
| | - Thomas Loh
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery National University Health System Singapore Singapore
- National University Cancer Institute Singapore Singapore
| | - Francis Ho
- National University Cancer Institute Singapore Singapore
| | - Lea C. Wong
- National University Cancer Institute Singapore Singapore
| | - Ivan Tham
- National University Cancer Institute Singapore Singapore
| | - Chee S. Tan
- National University Cancer Institute Singapore Singapore
| | - Boon C. Goh
- National University Cancer Institute Singapore Singapore
| | - Chwee M. Lim
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery National University Health System Singapore Singapore
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Singapore General Hospital Singapore Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Damanakis AI, Ostertag L, Waldschmidt D, Kütting F, Quaas A, Plum P, Bruns CJ, Gebauer F, Popp F. Proposal for a definition of "Oligometastatic disease in pancreatic cancer". BMC Cancer 2019; 19:1261. [PMID: 31888547 PMCID: PMC6937989 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6448-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, patients with metastasized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC M1) are regarded as a uniform collective. We hypothesize the existence of oligometastatic disease (OMD): a state of PDAC M1 disease with better tumor biology, limited metastasis, and increased survival. METHODS Data of 128 PDAC M1 patients treated at the University of Cologne between 2008 and 2018 was reviewed. Interdependence between clinical parameter was calculated using the Mann-Whitney U-Test. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed using the log-rank test. RESULTS Eighty-one (63%) patients had metastases confined to one organ (single organ metastasis, SOG) whereas the remaining 47 (37%) showed multiple metastatic sites (multi-organ metastasis, MOG). Survival analysis revealed a median overall survival (OS) of 12.2 months for SOG vs 4.5 months for MOG (95% CI 5.7-9.8; p < 0.001). We defined limited disease by the presence of ≤4 metastases in liver or lung. Limited disease together with CA 19-9 baseline < 1000 U/ml and response or stable disease after first-line chemotherapy defined OMD. We identified 8 patients with hepatic metastases and 2 with pulmonary metastases matching all OMD criteria. This group of 10 (7.8%) had a median overall survival of 19.4 vs 7.2 months compared to the remaining patients (95% CI 5.7-9.8; p = 0.009). CONCLUSION We propose a definition of oligometastatic disease in PDAC including anatomical criteria and biological criteria reflecting better tumor biology. The 10 OMD patients (7.8%) survived significantly longer and might even benefit from surgical resection in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander I Damanakis
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Luisa Ostertag
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dirk Waldschmidt
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Fabian Kütting
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexander Quaas
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Patrick Plum
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christiane J Bruns
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Florian Gebauer
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Felix Popp
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pacheco JM, Moghanaki D. Local consolidative therapy for oligometastatic patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer may improve survival, but unanswered questions remain. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2019; 8:S407-S411. [PMID: 32038926 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.06.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jose M Pacheco
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Drew Moghanaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Decatur, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Milano MT, Chowdhry AK, Salama JK, Chmura SJ. Signals from SABR-COMET time to move on to phase III studies. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2019; 7:S316. [PMID: 32016034 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.09.152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Amit K Chowdhry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Joseph K Salama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Steven J Chmura
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Horwich A, Babjuk M, Bellmunt J, Bruins HM, De Reijke TM, De Santis M, Gillessen S, James N, Maclennan S, Palou J, Powles T, Ribal MJ, Shariat SF, Van Der Kwast T, Xylinas E, Agarwal N, Arends T, Bamias A, Birtle A, Black PC, Bochner BH, Bolla M, Boormans JL, Bossi A, Briganti A, Brummelhuis I, Burger M, Castellano D, Cathomas R, Chiti A, Choudhury A, Compérat E, Crabb S, Culine S, De Bari B, DeBlok W, De Visschere PJL, Decaestecker K, Dimitropoulos K, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Fanti S, Fonteyne V, Frydenberg M, Futterer JJ, Gakis G, Geavlete B, Gontero P, Grubmüller B, Hafeez S, Hansel DE, Hartmann A, Hayne D, Henry AM, Hernandez V, Herr H, Herrmann K, Hoskin P, Huguet J, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kamat AM, Khoo V, Kiltie AE, Krege S, Ladoire S, Lara PC, Leliveld A, Linares-Espinós E, Løgager V, Lorch A, Loriot Y, Meijer R, Carmen Mir M, Moschini M, Mostafid H, Müller AC, Müller CR, N'Dow J, Necchi A, Neuzillet Y, Oddens JR, Oldenburg J, Osanto S, Oyen WJG, Pacheco-Figueiredo L, Pappot H, Patel MI, Pieters BR, Plass K, Remzi M, Retz M, Richenberg J, Rink M, Roghmann F, Rosenberg JE, Rouprêt M, Rouvière O, Salembier C, Salminen A, Sargos P, Sengupta S, Sherif A, Smeenk RJ, Smits A, Stenzl A, Thalmann GN, Tombal B, Turkbey B, Vahr Lauridsen S, Valdagni R, Van Der Heijden AG, Van Poppel H, Vartolomei MD, Veskimäe E, Vilaseca A, Vives Rivera FA, Wiegel T, Wiklund P, Williams A, Zigeuner R, Witjes JA. EAU-ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer-an international collaborative multi-stakeholder effort: under the auspices of the EAU and ESMO Guidelines Committees†. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1697-1727. [PMID: 31740927 PMCID: PMC7360152 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although guidelines exist for advanced and variant bladder cancer management, evidence is limited/conflicting in some areas and the optimal approach remains controversial. OBJECTIVE To bring together a large multidisciplinary group of experts to develop consensus statements on controversial topics in bladder cancer management. DESIGN A steering committee compiled proposed statements regarding advanced and variant bladder cancer management which were assessed by 113 experts in a Delphi survey. Statements not reaching consensus were reviewed; those prioritised were revised by a panel of 45 experts before voting during a consensus conference. SETTING Online Delphi survey and consensus conference. PARTICIPANTS The European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), experts in bladder cancer management. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Statements were ranked by experts according to their level of agreement: 1-3 (disagree), 4-6 (equivocal), 7-9 (agree). A priori (level 1) consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement and ≤15% disagreement, or vice versa. In the Delphi survey, a second analysis was restricted to stakeholder group(s) considered to have adequate expertise relating to each statement (to achieve level 2 consensus). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 116 statements were included in the Delphi survey. Of these, 33 (28%) statements achieved level 1 consensus and 49 (42%) statements achieved level 1 or 2 consensus. At the consensus conference, 22 of 27 (81%) statements achieved consensus. These consensus statements provide further guidance across a broad range of topics, including the management of variant histologies, the role/limitations of prognostic biomarkers in clinical decision making, bladder preservation strategies, modern radiotherapy techniques, the management of oligometastatic disease and the evolving role of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS These consensus statements provide further guidance on controversial topics in advanced and variant bladder cancer management until a time where further evidence is available to guide our approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Horwich
- Emeritus Professor, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Emeritus Professor, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - M Babjuk
- Depatment of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - J Bellmunt
- IMIM-Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - H M Bruins
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - T M De Reijke
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M De Santis
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Gillessen
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - N James
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
| | - S Maclennan
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - J Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Powles
- The Royal Free NHS Trust, London; Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - M J Ribal
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S F Shariat
- Depatment of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - T Van Der Kwast
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris; Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - N Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah (NCI-CCC), Salt Lake City, USA
| | - T Arends
- Urology Department, Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Dept of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A Birtle
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, Preston, UK
| | - P C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - B H Bochner
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - M Bolla
- Emeritus Professor of Radiation Oncology, Grenoble - Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | - J L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Bossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - A Briganti
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Milan; Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - I Brummelhuis
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - M Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - D Castellano
- Medical Oncology Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - R Cathomas
- Department Innere Medizin, Abteilung Onkologie und Hämatologie, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - A Chiti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - A Choudhury
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - E Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, HUEP, Paris; Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - S Crabb
- Cancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - S Culine
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris
| | - B De Bari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire "Jean Minjoz" of Besançon, INSERM UMR 1098, Besançon, France; Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - W DeBlok
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P J L De Visschere
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Genitourinary Radiology and Mammography, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent
| | - K Decaestecker
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - K Dimitropoulos
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - J L Dominguez-Escrig
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - S Fanti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico S Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - V Fonteyne
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - M Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - J J Futterer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G Gakis
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Julius-Maximillians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - B Geavlete
- Department of Urology, Saint John Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - P Gontero
- Division of Urology, Molinette Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - B Grubmüller
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - S Hafeez
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D E Hansel
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego Pathology, La Jolla, USA
| | - A Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - D Hayne
- Department of Urology, UWA Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - A M Henry
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - V Hernandez
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación de Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - H Herr
- Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - K Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - P Hoskin
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, London, UK
| | - J Huguet
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - B A Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - R Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - A M Kamat
- Department of Urology - Division of Surgery, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - V Khoo
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A E Kiltie
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S Krege
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - S Ladoire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - P C Lara
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Roque, Canarias; Universidad Fernando Pessoa, Canarias, Spain
| | - A Leliveld
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - V Løgager
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - A Lorch
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Y Loriot
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, INSERM U981, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - R Meijer
- UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, MS Oncologic Urology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Carmen Mir
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - M Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - H Mostafid
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - A-C Müller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - C R Müller
- Cancer Treatment Centre, Sorlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - J N'Dow
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - A Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Hospital Foch, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - J R Oddens
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Oldenburg
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - S Osanto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - W J G Oyen
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - L Pacheco-Figueiredo
- Department of Urology, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto; Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - H Pappot
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M I Patel
- Department of Urology, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - B R Pieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
| | - K Plass
- EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - M Remzi
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Retz
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J Richenberg
- Department of Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - M Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - F Roghmann
- Department of Urology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Marien Hospital, Herne, Germany
| | - J E Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - M Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris
| | - O Rouvière
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service d'Imagerie Urinaire et Vasculaire, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Lyon, France
| | - C Salembier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Europe Hospitals Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Salminen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - P Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - S Sengupta
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Sherif
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - R J Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Smits
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - A Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - G N Thalmann
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Berne, Switzerland
| | - B Tombal
- Division of Urology, IREC, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCL, Brussels, Belgium
| | - B Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - S Vahr Lauridsen
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - R Valdagni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - H Van Poppel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M D Vartolomei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Targu Mures, Romania
| | - E Veskimäe
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - A Vilaseca
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F A Vives Rivera
- Clinica HematoOncologica Bonadona Prevenir, Universidad Metropolitana, Clinica Club de Leones, Barranquilla, Colombia
| | - T Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - P Wiklund
- Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System, New York City, USA; Department of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Williams
- Department of Urology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - R Zigeuner
- Department of Urology, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - J A Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Luo R, Firat E, Gaedicke S, Guffart E, Watanabe T, Niedermann G. Cisplatin Facilitates Radiation-Induced Abscopal Effects in Conjunction with PD-1 Checkpoint Blockade Through CXCR3/CXCL10-Mediated T-cell Recruitment. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:7243-7255. [PMID: 31506388 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-1344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Revised: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Localized radiotherapy can cause T-cell-mediated abscopal effects on nonirradiated metastases, particularly in combination with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). However, results of prospective clinical trials have not met the expectations. We therefore investigated whether additional chemotherapy can enhance radiotherapy-induced abscopal effects in conjunction with ICB. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN In three different two-tumor mouse models, triple therapy with radiotherapy, anti-PD-1, and cisplatin (one of the most widely used antineoplastic agents) was compared with double or single therapies. RESULTS In these mouse models, the response of the nonirradiated tumor and the survival of the mice were much better upon triple therapy than upon radiotherapy + anti-PD-1 or cisplatin + anti-PD-1 or the monotherapies; complete regression of the nonirradiated tumor was usually only observed in triple-treated mice. Mechanistically, the enhanced abscopal effect required CD8+T cells and relied on the CXCR3/CXCL10 axis. Moreover, CXCL10 was found to be directly induced by cisplatin in the tumor cells. Furthermore, cisplatin-induced CD8+T cells and direct cytoreductive effects of cisplatin also seem to contribute to the enhanced systemic effect. Finally, the results show that the abscopal effect is not precluded by the observed transient radiotherapy-induced lymphopenia. CONCLUSIONS This is the first report showing that chemotherapy can enhance radiotherapy-induced abscopal effects in conjunction with ICB. This even applies to cisplatin, which is not classically immunogenic. Whereas previous studies have focused on how to effectively induce tumor-specific T cells, this study highlights that successful attraction of the induced T cells to nonirradiated tumors is also crucial for potent abscopal effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ren Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Elke Firat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simone Gaedicke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Elena Guffart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tsubasa Watanabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Institute for Integrated Radiation and Nuclear Science, Kyoto University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Gabriele Niedermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Arina A, Beckett M, Fernandez C, Zheng W, Pitroda S, Chmura SJ, Luke JJ, Forde M, Hou Y, Burnette B, Mauceri H, Lowy I, Sims T, Khodarev N, Fu YX, Weichselbaum RR. Tumor-reprogrammed resident T cells resist radiation to control tumors. Nat Commun 2019; 10:3959. [PMID: 31477729 PMCID: PMC6718618 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11906-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Successful combinations of radiotherapy and immunotherapy depend on the presence of live T cells within the tumor; however, radiotherapy is believed to damage T cells. Here, based on longitudinal in vivo imaging and functional analysis, we report that a large proportion of T cells survive clinically relevant doses of radiation and show increased motility, and higher production of interferon gamma, compared with T cells from unirradiated tumors. Irradiated intratumoral T cells can mediate tumor control without newly-infiltrating T cells. Transcriptomic analysis suggests T cell reprogramming in the tumor microenvironment and similarities with tissue-resident memory T cells, which are more radio-resistant than circulating/lymphoid tissue T cells. TGFβ is a key upstream regulator of T cell reprogramming and contributes to intratumoral Tcell radio-resistance. These findings have implications for the design of radio-immunotherapy trials in that local irradiation is not inherently immunosuppressive, and irradiation of multiple tumors might optimize systemic effects of radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ainhoa Arina
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology and Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
| | - Michael Beckett
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology and Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Christian Fernandez
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology and Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Wenxin Zheng
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology and Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Sean Pitroda
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology and Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Steven J Chmura
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology and Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Jason J Luke
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Martin Forde
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology and Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Yuzhu Hou
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology and Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Byron Burnette
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology and Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Helena Mauceri
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology and Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Israel Lowy
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY, USA
| | - Tasha Sims
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY, USA
| | - Nikolai Khodarev
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology and Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Yang-Xin Fu
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Ralph R Weichselbaum
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology and Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Greco C, Pares O, Pimentel N, Louro V, Morales J, Nunes B, Castanheira J, Oliveira C, Silva A, Vaz S, Costa D, Zelefsky M, Kolesnick R, Fuks Z. Phenotype-Oriented Ablation of Oligometastatic Cancer with Single Dose Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 104:593-603. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Revised: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
36
|
Clinical outcome of stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung-only oligometastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Is the deferral of systemic therapy a potential goal? Oral Oncol 2019; 93:1-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2019] [Accepted: 04/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
37
|
Battaglia A, Devos G, Decaestecker K, Witters M, Moris L, Van den Broeck T, Berghen C, Everaerts W, Albersen M, Tsaturyan A, De Meerleer G, Van Poppel H, Goffin K, Ost P, Tosco L, Joniau S. Metastasectomy for visceral and skeletal oligorecurrent prostate cancer. World J Urol 2019; 37:1543-1549. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02716-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Accepted: 03/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
|
38
|
Aujla KS, Katz AW, Singh DP, Okunieff P, Milano MT. Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Non-breast or Prostate Cancer Oligometastases: A Tail of Survival Beyond 10 Years. Front Oncol 2019; 9:111. [PMID: 30873385 PMCID: PMC6400963 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose and Objective(s): We sought to analyze the long-term follow-up of patients treated with hypofractionated, stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) for oligometastases from malignancies other than breast or prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: From 2001 to 2006, 82 cancer patients with 1-5 radiographically apparent metastatic lesions (in 1-3 organs) from primary sites other than breast or prostate cancer, were enrolled on a prospective study of HSRT. Freedom from widespread metastasis (FFWM) was defined from date of enrollment until death, an event (i.e., widespread distant metastasis not amenable to local therapy), or last radiographic study. Local recurrence was scored as an event if pathologically confirmed or if a treated lesion increased by ≥20% using RECIST criteria. Prognostic variables were assessed using Cox regression analysis. Results: The mean age was 61 ± 11 years, with a male to female ratio of 46:36. The most common metastatic sites were liver (50%), lung (48%), thoracic lymph nodes (18%), and bone (5%). Sixty-one patients (74%) had 1 involved organ and 18 (22%) had 1 lesion treated. The preferred dose-fractionation scheduled was 50 Gy in 10 fractions (52 patients). The median follow-up was 1.7 years. Eleven patients lived >5 years, and 6 lived >10 years. The 5-year OS, PFS, FFWM, and LC rates were 13.4, 7.3, 18.3, and 63.4%, and the 10-years OS, PFS, FFWM, and patient LC rates were 7.3, 6.1, 13.4, and 62.2%, respectively. A greater net gross tumor volume (GTV) was significantly adverse for OS (p < 0.01) and LC (p < 0.01). For FFWM, net GTV was not a significant factor (p = 0.14). Four patients remain alive at >13 years from enrollment and treatment, without evidence of active disease. Conclusion: A small subset of select non-breast, non-prostate cancer patients with limited metastasis treated with HSRT are long-term survivors. Net GTV is a significant factor for tumor control and survival. Further research is needed to help better select patients most likely to benefit from local therapy for metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khush S. Aujla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Alan W. Katz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Deepinder P. Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Paul Okunieff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Michael T. Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Chen HY, Xie HY, Liu XX, Li LF, Bai YR, Gao JX. Splenic irradiation combined with tumor irradiation promotes T cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment and helps in tumor control. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2019; 510:156-162. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.01.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
40
|
Oligometastatic breast cancer treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: Some patients survive longer than a decade. Radiother Oncol 2018; 131:45-51. [PMID: 30773186 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2018] [Revised: 11/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical state of oligometastases describes metastases limited in number and extent, amenable to metastasis-directed therapy. We sought to analyze long-term outcomes and characterize potential prognostic factors, in women with breast cancer (BC) oligometastases treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiation (HSRT) therapy on a prospective phase II protocol. METHODS Forty-eight women with 1-5 extracranial BC oligometastases received HSRT to all radiographically apparent sites of disease. Various dose-fractionation schedules were used. Most (n = 27) received 10 daily fractions, typically ≥50 Gy (n = 17). RESULTS BC patients with bone-only oligometastases (BO, n = 12) vs. all other patients (non-BO; n = 36) were significantly younger, more likely to present with oligometastases at the time of primary BC diagnosis (i.e., synchronous), and significantly more likely to have had hormone receptor-positive disease. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates after HSRT were 83% and 75%, respectively, for BO patients vs. 31% and 17%, respectively, for non-BO patients (p = 0.002). BO patients experienced a significantly (p = 0.018) greater freedom from widespread metastases (FFWM). Among non-BO patients, net oligometastatic GTV >25 cc (reflecting disease burden) was a significant factor for freedom from local recurrence (p = 0.047) and FFWM (p = 0.028). The number of oligometastatic lesions (p = 0.007) and organs (p = 0.001) involved were also significant factors for FFWM in non-BO patients. CONCLUSIONS Some patients with BC oligometastases treated with HSRT can survive >10 years. Tumor burden (volume and number of lesions) appears to impact risk of recurrence. Further research is needed to help better identify BC patients most likely to benefit from metastasis-directed radiotherapy.
Collapse
|