1
|
Arranz Arija JA, Del Muro XG, Caro RL, Méndez-Vidal MJ, Pérez-Valderrama B, Aparicio J, Climent Durán MÁ, Caballero Díaz C, Durán I, González-Billalabeitia E. SEOM-GG clinical guidelines for the management of germ-cell testicular cancer (2023). Clin Transl Oncol 2024:10.1007/s12094-024-03532-2. [PMID: 38958901 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03532-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
Testicular germ cell tumors are the most common tumors in adolescent and young men. They are curable malignancies that should be treated with curative intent, minimizing acute and long-term side effects. Inguinal orchiectomy is the main diagnostic procedure, and is also curative for most localized tumors, while patients with unfavorable risk factors for recurrence, or those who are unable or unwilling to undergo close follow-up, may require adjuvant treatment. Patients with persistent markers after orchiectomy or advanced disease at diagnosis should be staged and classified according to the IGCCCG prognostic classification. BEP is the most recommended chemotherapy, but other schedules such as EP or VIP may be used to avoid bleomycin in some patients. Efforts should be made to avoid unnecessary delays and dose reductions wherever possible. Insufficient marker decline after each cycle is associated with poor prognosis. Management of residual masses after chemotherapy differs between patients with seminoma and non-seminoma tumors. Patients at high risk of relapse, those with refractory tumors, or those who relapse after chemotherapy should be managed by multidisciplinary teams in experienced centers. Salvage treatment for these patients includes conventional-dose chemotherapy (TIP) and/or high-dose chemotherapy, although the best regimen and strategy for each subgroup of patients is not yet well established. In late recurrences, early complete surgical resection should be performed when feasible. Given the high cure rate of TGCT, oncologists should work with patients to prevent and identify potential long-term side effects of the treatment. The above recommendations also apply to extragonadal retroperitoneal and mediastinal tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xavier García Del Muro
- Hospital Duran I Reynals, Institut Català D'Oncologia L'Hospitalet (ICO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Raquel Luque Caro
- Hospital Universitario Virgen de Las Nieves, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria Ibs, Granada, Spain
| | | | | | - Jorge Aparicio
- Hospital Universitario I Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | - Ignacio Durán
- Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Myers AA, Briganti A, Leibovich B, Lerner SP, Moschini M, Rouprêt M, Shariat SF, Spiess PE, Stenzl A, Taneja SS, Touijer KA, Kamat AM. Contemporary Role of Lymph Node Dissection in Genitourinary Cancers: Where Are We in 2023? Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:412-420. [PMID: 37980250 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Lymphadenectomy during surgery for genitourinary malignancies has varying benefits. OBJECTIVE To review contemporary evidence on lymph node dissection in genitourinary cancers. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a collaborative review to summarize current evidence supporting lymph node dissection in urothelial, prostate, kidney, penile, and testis cancers. We present the evidence on patient selection and recommended dissection templates, and highlight knowledge gaps and ongoing areas of investigation. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Lymph node dissection remains the reference standard for lymph node staging. Pathologic nodal stage informs prognosis and guides adjuvant treatment. Appropriate template and patient selection are paramount to optimize outcomes and capitalize on the selective therapeutic benefits. CONCLUSIONS Accurate staging with lymphadenectomy is contingent on appropriate template selection. The cumulative benefit will depend on judicious patient selection. PATIENT SUMMARY We performed a collaborative review by a diverse group of experts in urology. We reviewed current evidence on lymph node dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda A Myers
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Seth P Lerner
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Urology, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of GU Oncology and Tumor Biology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Samir S Taneja
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karim A Touijer
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wagner T, Toft BG, Lauritsen J, Bandak M, Christensen IJ, Engvad B, Kreiberg M, Agerbæk M, Dysager L, Carus A, Rosenvilde JJ, Berney D, Daugaard G. Prognostic factors for relapse in patients with clinical stage I testicular non-seminoma: A nationwide, population-based cohort study. Eur J Cancer 2024; 202:114025. [PMID: 38531266 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 30% of patients with clinical stage I non-seminoma (CSI-NS) relapse. Current risk stratification is based on lymphovascular invasion (LVI) alone. The extent to which additional tumor characteristics can improve risk prediction remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To determine the most important prognostic factors for relapse in CSI-NS patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Population-based cohort study including all patients with CSI-NS diagnosed in Denmark between 2013 and 2018 with follow-up until 2022. Patients were identified in the prospective Danish Testicular Cancer database. By linkage to the Danish National Pathology Registry, histological slides from the orchiectomy specimens were retrieved. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Histological slides were reviewed blinded to the clinical outcome. Clinical data were obtained from medical records. The association between prespecified potential prognostic factors and relapse was assessed using Cox regression analysis. Model performance was evaluated by discrimination (Harrell's C-index) and calibration. RESULTS Of 453 patients included, 139 patients (30.6%) relapsed during a median follow-up of 6.3 years. Tumor invasion into the hilar soft tissue of the testicular hilum, tumor size, LVI and embryonal carcinoma were independent predictors of relapse. The estimated 5-year risk of relapse ranged from < 5% to > 85%, depending on the number of risk factors. After internal model validation, the model had an overall concordance statistic of 0.75. Model calibration was excellent. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE The identified prognostic factors provide a much more accurate risk stratification than current clinical practice, potentially aiding clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Wagner
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Birgitte Grønkær Toft
- Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jakob Lauritsen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Bandak
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ib Jarle Christensen
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls vej 1, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - Birte Engvad
- Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws vej 15, Winsløwsparken 15, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Michael Kreiberg
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mads Agerbæk
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Lars Dysager
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws vej 15, Winsløwsparken 15, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Andreas Carus
- Department of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Josephine Julie Rosenvilde
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Daniel Berney
- Centre of Cancer Biomarkers and Biotherapeutics, Barts Cancer Institute, Charterhouse Square, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Gedske Daugaard
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Seales CL, Puri D, Yodkhunnatham N, Pandit K, Yuen K, Murray S, Smitham J, Lafin JT, Bagrodia A. Advancing GCT Management: A Review of miR-371a-3p and Other miRNAs in Comparison to Traditional Serum Tumor Markers. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1379. [PMID: 38611057 PMCID: PMC11010994 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Revised: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
MicroRNAs, short non-protein coding RNAs, are overexpressed in GCTs. Circulating levels of germ cell tumor (GCT)-associated miRNAs, such as miR-371a-3p, can be utilized as efficient and cost-effective alternatives in diagnosing and managing patients presenting with GCTs. This quality of miRNAs has demonstrated favorable performance characteristics as a reliable blood-based biomarker with high diagnostic accuracy compared to current serum tumor markers (STMs), including α-fetoprotein (AFP), beta human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). The conventional STMs exhibit limited specificity and sensitivity. Potential clinical implications of miRNAs include impact on de-escalating or intensifying treatment, detecting recurrence at earlier stages, and lessening the necessity of cross-sectional imaging or invasive tissue biopsy for non-teratomatous GCTs. Here, we also highlight the outstanding issues that must be addressed prior to clinical implementation. Standards for measuring circulating miRNAs and determining ideal cutoff values are essential for integration into current clinical guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Crystal L. Seales
- Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30310, USA;
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; (D.P.); (N.Y.); (K.P.); (K.Y.); (J.S.)
| | - Dhruv Puri
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; (D.P.); (N.Y.); (K.P.); (K.Y.); (J.S.)
| | - Nuphat Yodkhunnatham
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; (D.P.); (N.Y.); (K.P.); (K.Y.); (J.S.)
| | - Kshitij Pandit
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; (D.P.); (N.Y.); (K.P.); (K.Y.); (J.S.)
| | - Kit Yuen
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; (D.P.); (N.Y.); (K.P.); (K.Y.); (J.S.)
| | - Sarah Murray
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA;
| | - Jane Smitham
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; (D.P.); (N.Y.); (K.P.); (K.Y.); (J.S.)
| | - John T. Lafin
- Department of Urology, University Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA;
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; (D.P.); (N.Y.); (K.P.); (K.Y.); (J.S.)
- Department of Urology, University Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chavarriaga J, Atenafu EG, Mousa A, Langleben C, Anson-Cartwright L, Jewett M, Hamilton RJ. Propensity-matched Analysis of Open Versus Robotic Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Clinical Stage II Testicular Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00032-4. [PMID: 38278693 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (O-RPLND) is the accepted standard surgical approach to treat retroperitoneal nodal disease in testis cancer. Increasingly, robotic RPLND (R-RPLND) is being performed due to the potential for lower blood loss, shorter length of stay, and accelerated recovery. OBJECTIVE We have performed a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis comparing the survival and perioperative outcomes of O- and R-RPLND. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Analyzing the data from all patients who underwent primary RPLND at our center between 1990 and 2022, we used PSM to create a 2:1 (O-RPLND:R-RPLND) matched cohort. INTERVENTION Primary O-RPLND versus R-RPLND. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary endpoint was time to relapse. The secondary endpoints included operating time, length of stay, estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical complications. Relapse-free survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank tests were used to compare perioperative outcomes of O-RPLND versus R-RPLND. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 178 patients underwent primary RPLND: 137 O-RPLND and 41 R-RPLND. After PSM, 26 patients in the R-RPLND group were matched with 38 in the O-RPLND group. After matching, no significant baseline differences were noted. After a median follow-up of 23.5 mo (interquartile range 4.4-59.2), one (3.8%) relapse was noted in the R-RPLND group versus three (7.8%) in the O-RPLND group; however, this was not significant (hazard ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.07-6.31, p = 0.7097). No in-field relapses occurred in either cohort. R-RPLND was associated with a shorter length of stay (1 vs 5 d, p < 0.0001) and lower EBL (200 vs 300 ml, p = 0.032), but longer operative time (8.8 vs 4.3 h, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS R-RPLND offers low morbidity and improved perioperative outcomes, while maintaining oncologic efficacy of the open approach. PATIENT SUMMARY To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare open and robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (R-RPLND) using a propensity score-matched system. We encourage the discussion and inclusion of primary R-RPLND into the standard of care algorithm for patients with de novo clinical stage (CS) II and relapsed CS I with CS II equivalent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Chavarriaga
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Eshetu G Atenafu
- Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ahmad Mousa
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carley Langleben
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lynn Anson-Cartwright
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Jewett
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yuan Y, Zhang D, Ning Y, Luo H, Qiu X, Tan Y, Li Y, Yang X. Clinical efficacy and safety of robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1257528. [PMID: 38169835 PMCID: PMC10758414 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1257528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is an effective treatment for testicular tumors. In recent years, with the development of robotics, many urological procedures performed via standard laparoscopy have been replaced by robots. Our objective was to compare the safety and efficacy of robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (R-RPLND) versus Non-robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (NR-RPLND) in testicular cancer. Methods Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for literature on robotic surgery for testicular germ cell tumors up to April 2023. The statistical and sensitivity analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate mean difference (MD), odds ratio(OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) effect indicators. Results Eight studies with 3875 patients were finally included in this study, 453 with R-RPLND and 3422 with open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (O-RPLND)/laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (L-RPLND). The results showed that R-RPLND had lower rates of intraoperative blood loss (MD = -436.39; 95% CI -707.60 to -165.19; P = 0.002), transfusion (OR = 0.06; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.26; P = 0.0001), total postoperative complication rates (OR = 0.39; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.70; P = 0.002), and length of stay (MD=-3.74; 95% CI -4.69 to -2.78; P<0.00001). In addition, there were no statistical differences between the two groups regarding perioperative and oncological outcomes regarding total operative time, the incidence of postoperative complications grade≥III, abnormal ejaculation rate, lymph node yield, and postoperative recurrence rate. Conclusions The R-RPLND and O-RPLND/L-RPLND provide safe and effective retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer. Patients with R-RPLND have less intraoperative bleeding, shorter hospitalization period, fewer postoperative complications, and faster recovery. It should be considered a viable alternative to O-RPLND/L-RPLND. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023411696.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yacheng Yuan
- Department of Urology, The 940 Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese PLA, Lanzhou, China
- The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
| | - Dawei Zhang
- Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yiping Ning
- Department of Urology, The 940 Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese PLA, Lanzhou, China
- The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
| | - Hengfeng Luo
- Department of Urology, The 940 Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese PLA, Lanzhou, China
- The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiaolong Qiu
- Department of Urology, The 940 Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese PLA, Lanzhou, China
- The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yangyang Tan
- Department of Urology, The 940 Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese PLA, Lanzhou, China
- The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yuxiang Li
- Department of Urology, The 940 Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese PLA, Lanzhou, China
- The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xukai Yang
- Department of Urology, The 940 Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese PLA, Lanzhou, China
- The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Conduit C, Hutchinson AD, Leonard M, O 'Haire S, Moody M, Thomas B, Sim I, Hong W, Ahmad G, Lawrentschuk N, Lewin J, Tran B, Dhillon HM. An exploration of testicular cancer survivors' experience of ejaculatory dysfunction following retroperitoneal lymph node dissection-a sub-study of the PREPARE clinical trial. J Cancer Surviv 2023:10.1007/s11764-023-01489-9. [PMID: 37981616 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01489-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ejaculatory dysfunction secondary to retrograde ejaculation or anejaculation is a complication of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for survivors of testicular cancer. We explored survivors' experiences of ejaculatory dysfunction following RPLND. METHODS In a sub-study of a single-arm phase 2 clinical trial (ACTRN12622000537752/12622000542796), participants reporting ejaculatory dysfunction ≥ 6 months following RPLND were invited to complete semi-structured interviews. Purposive sampling was used. Interviews continued until thematic saturation occurred, and codebook thematic analysis of interviews was performed. RESULTS Of 58 individuals recruited to the trial, 33 (57%) reported ejaculatory dysfunction. Of these, 32 (97%) agreed to interview and 15 participated. Participants interviewed had median age 34 years (range 24-66), 12 (80%) in a long-term relationship with median time from surgery 36 months (range 11-112). Three overarching themes were identified. The first reflected the value of RPLND despite ejaculatory dysfunction. The second illuminated the impact(s) of ejaculatory dysfunction closely mapped to life stage, with flow-on impacts to fertility, sex, psychological wellbeing and communication. The third reflected information needs. Fertility was a substantial source of concern for some participants. Ejaculatory dysfunction had no effect on sex for some, whilst for others, sex was less pleasurable. Some reported benefits. Few reported ejaculatory dysfunction challenged masculinity, confidence, or self-esteem. CONCLUSIONS Future research should examine interventions to reduce distress related to fertility, challenged masculinity and body image. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Whilst most participants considered ejaculatory dysfunction to have little impact on their sexual function and relationships, some reported significant difficulties varying by life stage and relationship status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Conduit
- Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan St., Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - A D Hutchinson
- Justice & Society, Behaviour-Brain-Body Research Centre, University of South Australia, Magill, Australia
| | - M Leonard
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, Australia
| | - S O 'Haire
- Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - M Moody
- Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - B Thomas
- Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - I Sim
- Endocrinology, Monash Health and Eastern Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - W Hong
- Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - G Ahmad
- Andrology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - N Lawrentschuk
- Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Urology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - J Lewin
- Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan St., Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- ONTrac at Peter Mac, Victorian Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Service, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - B Tran
- Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan St., Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Personalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - H M Dhillon
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chavarriaga J, Bobrowski A, Hamilton RJ. Guideline of guidelines: follow-up after orchidectomy for clinical stage 1 testicular cancer. BJU Int 2023; 132:485-495. [PMID: 37409830 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
Several medical organisations have developed evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of testicular cancer. This article aimed to review, compare, and summarise the most updated international guidelines and surveillance protocols for clinical stage 1 (CS1) testicular cancer. We reviewed a total of 46 articles on proposed follow-up strategies for testicular cancer, and six clinical practice guidelines including four guidelines published by urological scientific associations and two guidelines published by medical oncology associations. Most of these guidelines have been developed by panels of experts with different backgrounds in clinical training, and geographic practise patterns, which explains the considerable variability between published schedules, and recommended follow-up intensity. We present you with a comprehensive review of the most important clinical practice guidelines and propose unifying recommendations based on the most up to date evidence to help standardise follow-up schedules based on patterns and risk of disease relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Chavarriaga
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adam Bobrowski
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Conduit C, Lewin J, Weickhardt A, Lynam J, Wong S, Grimison P, Sengupta S, Pranavan G, Parnis F, Bastick P, Campbell D, Hansen AR, Leonard M, McJannett M, Stockler MR, Gibbs P, Toner G, Davis ID, Tran B, Kuchel A. Patterns of Relapse in Australian Patients With Clinical Stage 1 Testicular Cancer: Utility of the Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group Surveillance Recommendations. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:973-980. [PMID: 37327464 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE International guidelines advocate for active surveillance as the preferred treatment strategy for patients with stage 1 testicular cancer after orchidectomy although a personalized discussion is required. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted an analysis of individuals registered in iTestis, Australia's testicular cancer registry, to describe the patterns of relapse and outcomes of patients treated in Australia where the Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group Surveillance Recommendations are widely adopted. RESULTS A total of 650 individuals diagnosed between 2000 and 2020 were included, 63% (411 of 650) seminoma and 37% (239 of 650) nonseminoma. The median age was 34 years (range 14-74). 26% (106 of 411) with seminoma and 15% (36 of 239) nonseminoma received adjuvant chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 43 months (range 0-267) postorchidectomy, relapse occurred in 10% (43 of 411) of seminoma and 18% (43 of 239) of nonseminoma. The two-year relapse-free survival was 92% (95% CI, 89 to 95) and 82% (95% CI, 78 to 87) in seminoma and nonseminoma, respectively. All relapses (86 of 86) were detected at a routine surveillance visit; 98% (85 of 86) were asymptomatic and detected solely through imaging (62 of 86, 72%), tumor markers (6 of 86, 7%), or a combination (17 of 86, 20%). The most common relapse site was isolated retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy (53 of 86, 62%). No nonpulmonary visceral metastases occurred. At relapse, 98% (84 of 86) had International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) good prognosis; 2 of 86 intermediate prognosis (both nonseminoma). No deaths occurred. CONCLUSION In our cohort of stage 1 testicular cancer, where national surveillance recommendations have been widely adopted, recurrences were detected at routine surveillance visits and, almost exclusively, asymptomatic with IGCCCG good-prognosis disease. This provides reassurance that active surveillance is safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciara Conduit
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Jeremy Lewin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- ONTrac at Peter Mac, Victorian Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Service, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Weickhardt
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
- La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - James Lynam
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW, Australia
- University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Shirley Wong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Footscray, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter Grimison
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Shomik Sengupta
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Urology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia
| | - Ganes Pranavan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Canberra Hospital, Garran, ACT, Australia
| | - Francis Parnis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Icon Cancer Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Patricia Bastick
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Southside Cancer Care Centre, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, St George/Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, NSW, Australia
| | - David Campbell
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Matt Leonard
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Margaret McJannett
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Martin R Stockler
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Footscray, VIC, Australia
| | - Guy Toner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Ian D Davis
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Monash University Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia
| | - Ben Tran
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Anna Kuchel
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate (ANZUP) Cancer Trials Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lobo J, Acosta AM, Netto GJ. Molecular Biomarkers With Potential Clinical Application in Testicular Cancer. Mod Pathol 2023; 36:100307. [PMID: 37611872 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) and sex cord-stromal tumors (SCSTs) are the most common testicular neoplasms. The morphologic spectrum of such tumors is wide, with several histologic subtypes within each group. Testicular tumors often represent a diagnostic challenge, requiring proper identification of their biologic potential for accurate risk stratification and selection of therapy. In the era of precision medicine, molecular biomarkers are increasingly assuming a critical role in the management of patients with cancer. Given the overall rarity of certain types of testicular neoplasms, progress in biomarker research has been relatively slow. However, in recent years, we have witnessed a multitude of important contributions, including both tissue-based and liquid biopsy biomarkers, stemming from important discoveries of tumor pathobiology, accurate histopathological analysis, multi-institutional studies, and genome-wide molecular analyses of specific tumor subtypes. In this review, we provide an overview of the progress in molecular biomarkers of TGCTs and SCSTs, focusing on those with greatest potential for clinical application. In TGCTs, developmental biology has been the key to understanding these tumors and identifying clinically useful biomarkers (from classical serum tumor markers to pluripotency factors and circulating microRNAs of the 371-373 cluster). For SCSTs, studies have focused on tissue biomarkers only, and genome-wide investigations have recently contributed to a better understanding of rare phenotypes and the aggressive biological behavior of some tumors within this nosologic category. Several new biomarkers are moving toward clinical implementation in this field. Therefore, the practicing pathologist should be aware of their strengths and limitations in order to utilize them properly and maximize their clinical benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João Lobo
- Department of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center Raquel Seruca (P.CCC), Porto, Portugal; Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (GEBC CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center Raquel Seruca & RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal; Department of Pathology and Molecular Immunology, ICBAS-School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Andres M Acosta
- Department of Pathology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - George J Netto
- Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ge S, Zeng Z, Li Y, Gan L, Meng C, Li K, Wang Z, Zheng L. The role of robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2023; 109:2808-2818. [PMID: 37222676 PMCID: PMC10498841 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RA-RPLND) versus non-robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular cancer. METHODS The statistical analysis software used Stata 17. The weighted mean difference (WMD) represents the continuous variable, and the dichotomous variable chooses the odds ratio, and calculates the 95% CI. This systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA criteria, and AMSTAR guidelines (assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews). The Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched. The upper limit of the search time frame was February 2023, and no lower limit was set. RESULTS Seven studies involving 862 patients. Compared with open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, RA-RPLND appears to have a shorter length of stay [WMD=-1.21, 95% CI (-1.66, -0.76), P <0.05], less estimated blood loss [WMD=-0.69, 95% CI (-1.07, -0.32), P <0.05], and lower overall complications [odds ratio=0.45, 95% CI (0.28, 0.73), P <0.05]. RA-RPLND appears to have more lymph node yields than laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection [WMD=5.73, 95% CI (1.06, 10.40), P <0.05]. However, robotic versus open/laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection had similar results in operation time, lymph node positivity rate, recurrence during follow-up, and postoperative ejaculation disorders. CONCLUSION RA-RPLND appears to be safe and effective for testicular cancer, but longer follow-up and more studies are needed to confirm this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si Ge
- Department of Urology, School of Clinical Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - Zhiqiang Zeng
- Department of Urology, School of Clinical Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - Yunxiang Li
- Department of Urology, School of Clinical Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - Lijian Gan
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - Chunyang Meng
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - Kangsen Li
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - Zuoping Wang
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Daneshmand S, Cary C, Masterson T, Einhorn L, Adra N, Boorjian SA, Kollmannsberger C, Schuckman A, So A, Black P, Bagrodia A, Skinner E, Alemozaffar M, Brand T, Eggener S, Pierorazio P, Stratton K, Nappi L, Nichols C, Luo C, Li M, Hu B. Surgery in Early Metastatic Seminoma: A Phase II Trial of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Seminoma With Limited Retroperitoneal Lymphadenopathy. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:3009-3018. [PMID: 36913642 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The long-term toxicities of chemotherapy and radiotherapy can represent a significant burden to testicular cancer survivors. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is an established treatment for testicular germ cell tumors with minimal late morbidity although little data exist on its efficacy in early metastatic seminoma. Surgery in early metastatic seminoma is a prospective phase II single-arm, multi-institutional trial of RPLND as first-line treatment for testicular seminoma with clinically low-volume retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twelve sites in the United States and Canada prospectively enrolled adult patients with testicular seminoma and isolated retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy (1-3 cm). Open RPLND was performed by certified surgeons with a primary end point of 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). Complication rates, pathologic up/downstaging, recurrence patterns, adjuvant therapies, and treatment-free survival were assessed. RESULTS A total of 55 patients were enrolled, with a median (IQR) largest clinical lymph node size of 1.6 cm (1.3-1.9). RPLND pathology demonstrated a median (IQR) largest lymph node size of 2.3 cm (0.9-3.5); nine patients (16%) were pN0, 12 (22%) pN1, 31 (56%) pN2, and 3 (5%) pN3. One patient received adjuvant chemotherapy. With a median (IQR) follow-up of 33 months (12.0-61.6), 12 patients experienced recurrence, with a 2-year RFS of 81% and a recurrence rate of 22%. Of the patients who experienced recurrence, 10 were treated with chemotherapy and two underwent additional surgery. At last follow-up, all patients who experienced a recurrence were disease-free and the 2-year overall survival was 100%. Four patients (7%) experienced short-term complications, and four patients experienced long-term complications including incisional hernia (1) and anejaculation (3). CONCLUSION RPLND is a treatment option for testicular seminoma with clinically low-volume retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy and is associated with low long-term morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Clint Cary
- Department of Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | - Lawrence Einhorn
- Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Melvin & Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Nabil Adra
- Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Melvin & Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | | | - Anne Schuckman
- Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Alan So
- Department of Urological Sciences, The Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Peter Black
- Department of Urological Sciences, The Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Eila Skinner
- Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | | | - Timothy Brand
- Department of Urology, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA
| | - Scott Eggener
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Phillip Pierorazio
- Department of Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MA
| | - Kelly Stratton
- Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Lucia Nappi
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Craig Nichols
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Chunqiao Luo
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ming Li
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Brian Hu
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Neuenschwander A, Lonati C, Antonelli L, Papachristofilou A, Cathomas R, Rothermundt C, Templeton AJ, Gulamhusein A, Fischer S, Gillessen S, Hermanns T, Lorch A, Mattei A, Fankhauser CD. Treatment Outcomes for Men with Clinical Stage II Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumours Treated with Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:541-546. [PMID: 36379869 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Guidelines recommend primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as a treatment option for tumour marker-negative stage II nonseminomatous germ cell tumour (NSGCT). OBJECTIVE To review the literature on oncological outcomes for men with stage II NSGCT treated with RPLND. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review of studies describing clinicopathological outcomes following primary RPLND in stage II NSGCT was conducted in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. Baseline data, perioperative and postoperative parameters, and oncological outcomes were collected. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS In total, 12 of 4387 studies were included, from which we collected data for 835 men. Among men with clinical stage II NSGCT, pathological stage II was confirmed in 615 of 790 patients (78%). Most studies administered adjuvant chemotherapy in cases with large lymph nodes, multiple affected lymph nodes, or persistently elevated tumour markers. Recurrence was observed in 12-40% of patients without adjuvant chemotherapy and 0-4% of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The literature describing RPLND in clinical stage II NSGCT is heterogeneous and no meta-analysis was possible, but RPLND can provide accurate staging and may be curative in selected patients. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed the literature to summarise results after surgical removal of enlarged lymph nodes in the back of the abdomen in men with testis cancer. This procedure provides accurate information on how far the cancer has spread and may provide a cure in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chiara Lonati
- Department of Urology, Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Antonelli
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Richard Cathomas
- Department of Oncology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Christian Rothermundt
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Arnoud J Templeton
- Department of Oncology, St. Claraspital Basel and St. Clara Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Aziz Gulamhusein
- Department of Urology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Stefanie Fischer
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Department of Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Hermanns
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Agostino Mattei
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Christian D Fankhauser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wood GE, Chamberlain F, Tran B, Conduit C, Liow E, Nicol DL, Shamash J, Alifrangis C, Rajan P. Treatment de-escalation for stage II seminoma. Nat Rev Urol 2023:10.1038/s41585-023-00727-0. [PMID: 36882564 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-023-00727-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group good-risk metastatic seminoma has cure rates of >95%. Within this risk group, patients with stage II disease exhibit the best oncological outcomes with the standard-of-care treatment strategies of radiotherapy or combination chemotherapy. However, these treatments can be associated with substantial early and late toxic effects. Therapy de-escalation aims to reduce treatment morbidity whilst preserving oncological outcomes. The evidence supporting such approaches is largely from non-randomized institutional data, and therefore this strategy is not recognized as standard of care. Current de-escalation approaches for stage II seminoma include single-agent chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery based on early data from clinical studies. Increased recognition of emerging data on treatment modification to reduce morbidity whilst maintaining cure rates and consideration of therapy de-escalation could improve patient survivorship outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgina E Wood
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Ben Tran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Personalized Medicine, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ciara Conduit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Personalized Medicine, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Liow
- Division of Personalized Medicine, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David L Nicol
- Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Shamash
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Constantine Alifrangis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. .,National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Prabhakar Rajan
- Centre for Cancer Cell and Molecular Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. .,Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK. .,Department of Urology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK. .,Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Alsyouf M, Daneshmand S. Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Stage I and Low-volume Metastatic Germ Cell Tumors. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:248-250. [PMID: 36707277 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) are the most common malignancy among young males. The majority of patients present with early stages of the disease that are highly curable. For stage I disease, treatment options include surveillance, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), and systemic chemotherapy. For stage II disease, systemic therapy had been the mainstay of treatment. However, it has recently been shown that primary RPLND is effective as a treatment for low-volume metastatic GCT and offers the benefit of avoiding chemotherapy in young men at risk of suffering the long-term sequelae of systemic treatments. In this narrative mini-review, we evaluate the data on primary RPLND for the management of stage I and low-volume metastatic GCT. PATIENT SUMMARY: This mini-review discusses the role of surgery involving removal of retroperitoneal lymph nodes for stage I and low-volume stage II testicular cancer. We found that for well-selected patients, surgery can be curative in the majority of cases and avoids the risks associated with systemic chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhannad Alsyouf
- USC Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- USC Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lesko P, Chovanec M, Mego M. Biomarkers of disease recurrence in stage I testicular germ cell tumours. Nat Rev Urol 2022; 19:637-658. [PMID: 36028719 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00624-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Stage I testicular cancer is a disease restricted to the testicle. After orchiectomy, patients are considered to be without disease; however, the tumour is prone to relapse in ~4-50% of patients. Current predictive markers of relapse, which are tumour size and invasion to rete testis (in seminoma) or lymphovascular invasion (in non-seminoma), have limited clinical utility and are unable to correctly predict relapse in a substantial proportion of patients. Adjuvant therapeutic strategies based on available biomarkers can lead to overtreatment of 50-85% of patients. Discovery and implementation of novel biomarkers into treatment decision making will help to reduce the burden of adjuvant treatments and improve patient selection for adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Lesko
- 2nd Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University and National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Michal Chovanec
- 2nd Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University and National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Michal Mego
- 2nd Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University and National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gariscsak PJ, Anson-Cartwright L, Atenafu EG, Jiang DM, Chung P, Bedard P, Warde P, O'Malley M, Sweet J, Glicksman RM, Hamilton RJ. Safety of Minimizing Intensity of Follow-up on Active Surveillance for Clinical Stage I Testicular Germ Cell Tumors. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 40:46-53. [PMID: 35638085 PMCID: PMC9142749 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Objective Design, setting, and participants Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Results and limitations Conclusions Patient summary
Collapse
|
18
|
Dieckmann KP, Pokrivcak T, Geczi L, Niehaus D, Dralle-Filiz I, Matthies C, Dienes T, Zschäbitz S, Paffenholz P, Gschliesser T, Pichler R, Mego M, Bader P, Zengerling F, Heinzelbecker J, Krausewitz P, Krege S, Aurilio G, Aksoy C, Hentrich M, Seidel C, Törzsök P, Nestler T, Majewski M, Hiester A, Buchler T, Vallet S, Studentova H, Schönburg S, Niedersüß-Beke D, Ring J, Trenti E, Heidenreich A, Wülfing C, Isbarn H, Pichlmeier U, Pichler M. Single-course bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (1xBEP) as adjuvant treatment in testicular nonseminoma clinical stage 1: outcome, safety, and risk factors for relapse in a population-based study. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359221086813. [PMID: 35386956 PMCID: PMC8977693 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221086813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Clinical stage 1 (CS1) nonseminomatous (NS) germ cell tumors involve a 30% probability of relapse upon surveillance. Adjuvant chemotherapy with one course of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (1xBEP) can reduce this risk to <5%. However, 1xBEP results are based solely on five controlled trials from high-volume centers. We analyzed the outcome in a real-life population. Patients and Methods: In a multicentric international study, 423 NS CS1 patients receiving 1xBEP were retrospectively evaluated. Median follow-up was 37 (range, 6–89) months. Primary end points were relapse-free and overall survival evaluated after 5 years. We also looked at associations of relapse with clinico-pathological factors using stratified Kaplan–Meier methods and Cox regression models. Treatment modality and outcome of recurrences were analyzed descriptively. Results: The 5-year relapse-free survival rate was 96.2%. Thirteen patients (3.1%; 95% confidence interval, 1.65–5.04%) relapsed after a median time of 13 months, of which 10 were salvaged (77%). Relapses were mostly confined to retroperitoneal nodes. Three patients succumbed, two to disease progression and one to toxicity of chemotherapy. Pathological stage >pT2 was significantly associated with relapse rate. Conclusion: The relapse rate of 3.1% found in this population of NS CS1 patients treated with 1xBEP at the routine care level was not inferior to the median rate of 2.3% reported from a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Also, the cure rate of relapses of 77% is consistent with the previously reported rate of 80%. This study clearly shows that the 1xBEP regimen represents a safe treatment for NS CS1 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus-Peter Dieckmann
- Department of Urology, Hodentumorzentrum, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Paul Ehrlich Straße 1, 22763 Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Albertinen-Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tomas Pokrivcak
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Lajos Geczi
- National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - David Niehaus
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Cord Matthies
- Department of Urology, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tamas Dienes
- National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Stefanie Zschäbitz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pia Paffenholz
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Michal Mego
- 2nd Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Pia Bader
- Department of Urology, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | | | - Julia Heinzelbecker
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Centre, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Philipp Krausewitz
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Susanne Krege
- Department of Urology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Gaetano Aurilio
- Medical Oncology Division of Urogenital and Head and Neck Tumours, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cem Aksoy
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marcus Hentrich
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Red Cross Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Seidel
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Division of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Péter Törzsök
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Tim Nestler
- Department of Urology, Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Hiester
- Department of Urology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Tomas Buchler
- Department of Oncology, Charles University and Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Sonia Vallet
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Universitätsklinikum Krems, Krems, AustriaDepartment of Oncology, Palacký University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Hana Studentova
- Department of Oncology, Palacký University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Sandra Schönburg
- Department of Urology, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | | - Julia Ring
- Department of Urology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Emanuela Trenti
- Department of Urology, Central Hospital Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Hendrik Isbarn
- Martini-Klinik, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Uwe Pichlmeier
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Pichler
- Division of Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Minimally invasive retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for men with testis cancer: a retrospective cohort study of safety and feasibility. World J Urol 2022; 40:1505-1512. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-03974-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
20
|
Lourenço BC, Guimarães-Teixeira C, Flores BCT, Miranda-Gonçalves V, Guimarães R, Cantante M, Lopes P, Braga I, Maurício J, Jerónimo C, Henrique R, Lobo J. Ki67 and LSD1 Expression in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors Is Not Associated with Patient Outcome: Investigation Using a Digital Pathology Algorithm. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:life12020264. [PMID: 35207551 PMCID: PMC8875543 DOI: 10.3390/life12020264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
TGCTs represent a model of curable disease afflicting especially young men. Defining tumor biological characteristics is crucial to increase current knowledge and tailor the best clinical management. Ki67, a potential prognostic marker, still exhibits heterogenous associations with patient outcomes, thus bringing the need of corroboration with larger cohorts in clinical practice. LSD1, an epigenetic enzyme, represents a future target for epigenetic drugs that may lower treatment-associated morbidity. This study aimed to assess Ki67/LSD1 immunoexpression across all TGCT histological subtypes and correlate it with clinicopathological features. Results were compared with an in silico analysis of the TCGA database. Immunohistochemistry for Ki67 and LSD1 was carried out in a cohort of 157 TGCT tumor samples and assessed using a digital pathology algorithm. LSD1 protein expression was explored in TGCT cell lines, including ATRA-differentiated clones. There was a significant positive correlation between Ki67 and LSD1 H-scores (rs = 0.182, p = 0.037). Ki67 positivity percentage and H-score were significantly higher in non-seminomas (p = 0.0316 and 0.0113, respectively). Expression was not significantly different according to clinicopathological features, including stage, IGCCCG prognosis-based system, or relapse/progression-free survival, which was corroborated by in silico analysis. Our study, making use of digital image analysis, does not confirm the utility of these biomarkers in a daily practice cohort. Although not affecting patient outcome in our cohort, LSD1 is expressed overall in TGCTs, suggesting sensitivity to LSD1 inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatriz Chaves Lourenço
- Department of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; (B.C.L.); (R.G.); (M.C.); (P.L.)
| | - Catarina Guimarães-Teixeira
- Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, Research Center of IPO Porto (CI-IPOP)/RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; (C.G.-T.); (B.C.T.F.); (V.M.-G.); (C.J.)
| | - Bianca C. T. Flores
- Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, Research Center of IPO Porto (CI-IPOP)/RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; (C.G.-T.); (B.C.T.F.); (V.M.-G.); (C.J.)
| | - Vera Miranda-Gonçalves
- Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, Research Center of IPO Porto (CI-IPOP)/RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; (C.G.-T.); (B.C.T.F.); (V.M.-G.); (C.J.)
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Immunology, ICBAS–School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto (ICBAS-UP), Rua Jorge Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-513 Porto, Portugal
| | - Rita Guimarães
- Department of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; (B.C.L.); (R.G.); (M.C.); (P.L.)
| | - Mariana Cantante
- Department of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; (B.C.L.); (R.G.); (M.C.); (P.L.)
| | - Paula Lopes
- Department of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; (B.C.L.); (R.G.); (M.C.); (P.L.)
| | - Isaac Braga
- Department of Urology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal;
| | - Joaquina Maurício
- Department of Medical Oncology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal;
| | - Carmen Jerónimo
- Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, Research Center of IPO Porto (CI-IPOP)/RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; (C.G.-T.); (B.C.T.F.); (V.M.-G.); (C.J.)
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Immunology, ICBAS–School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto (ICBAS-UP), Rua Jorge Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-513 Porto, Portugal
| | - Rui Henrique
- Department of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; (B.C.L.); (R.G.); (M.C.); (P.L.)
- Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, Research Center of IPO Porto (CI-IPOP)/RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; (C.G.-T.); (B.C.T.F.); (V.M.-G.); (C.J.)
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Immunology, ICBAS–School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto (ICBAS-UP), Rua Jorge Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-513 Porto, Portugal
- Correspondence: (R.H.); or (J.L.)
| | - João Lobo
- Department of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; (B.C.L.); (R.G.); (M.C.); (P.L.)
- Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, Research Center of IPO Porto (CI-IPOP)/RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; (C.G.-T.); (B.C.T.F.); (V.M.-G.); (C.J.)
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Immunology, ICBAS–School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto (ICBAS-UP), Rua Jorge Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-513 Porto, Portugal
- Correspondence: (R.H.); or (J.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nason GJ, Hamilton RJ. Robotic RPLND for stage IIA/B nonseminoma: the Princess Margaret Experience. World J Urol 2022; 40:335-342. [PMID: 34988650 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03899-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is a treatment option for men in a primary and post-chemotherapy setting. The aim of this review was to explore the published data looking at feasibility, safety and outcomes of robotic RPLND for CSI/II NSGCT but we will in particular highlight how we have approached adoption of robotic RPLND at the Princess Margaret. METHODS A review and summary of the published data to date was performed regarding the role of robotic RPLND for stage IIA/B nonseminoma. RESULTS Published series of robotic RPLND to date have proven feasibility and safety in experienced centres. Less blood loss, shorter length of stay and decreased morbidity are promising findings. Our data from Princess Margaret strengthen the argument of oncologic efficacy as we operated only on patients with known retroperitoneal disease (Stage at RPLND was IIA (n = 15, 55.6%), IIB (n = 9, 33.3%), IIC (n = 1, 3.7%) and III (n = 2, 7.4%)), did not use adjuvant chemotherapy and found a relapse rate (11%) similar to open RPLND. CONCLUSIONS The debate is ongoing regarding the role of robotic RPLND- the excellent oncological outcomes achieved by an open RPLND are the minimum starting point for robotic RPLND. Until such time that robotic RPLND is proven to be gold standard it should be performed in experienced centres by high volume RPLND surgeons and in the setting of a protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G J Nason
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue - Suite - 3-130, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue - Suite - 3-130, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Testicular cancer is the most common solid malignancy amongst young men, and a large proportion present with stage I disease. The options for management following radical orchiectomy are multifold. We review here approaches to treatment in this setting, providing an update on recent publications. RECENT FINDINGS At Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, we maintain a nonrisk adapted active surveillance approach. With a dedicated surveillance program using low-dose computed tomography imaging, patients are appropriately identified early for treatment on relapse. There are ongoing investigations into minimizing toxicities of treatments for relapse, and in particular, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) presents an attractive alternative. This, though, remains investigational in the setting of seminoma. SUMMARY Testicular cancer is a highly curable malignancy. In stage I disease, an active surveillance approach following radical orchiectomy is preferred, irrespective of risk-profile. This approach serves to limit the toxicity of adjuvant treatment in a significant proportion of patients, while maintaining excellent survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerusha Padayachee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto
| | - Roderick Clark
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Padraig Warde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
First-line salvage treatment options for germ cell tumor patients failing stage-adapted primary treatment : A comprehensive review compiled by the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. World J Urol 2022; 40:2853-2861. [PMID: 35226138 PMCID: PMC9712404 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-03959-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In this review, we summarize and discuss contemporary treatment standards and possible selection criteria for decision making after failure of adjuvant or first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy for primarily localized or metastatic germ cell tumors. METHODS This work is based on a systematic literature search conducted for the elaboration of the first German clinical practice guideline to identify prospective clinical trials and retrospective comparative studies published between Jan 2010 and Feb 2021. Study end points of interest were progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), relapse rate (RR), and/or safety. RESULTS Relapses of clinical stage I (CS I) patients irrespective of prior adjuvant treatment after orchiectomy are treated stage adapted in accordance for primary metastatic patients. Surgical approaches for sole retroperitoneal relapses are investigated in ongoing clinical trials. The appropriate salvage chemotherapy for metastatic patients progressing or relapsing after first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy is still a matter of controversy. Conventional cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the international guideline-endorsed standard of care, but based on retrospective data high-dose chemotherapy and subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation may offer a 10-15% survival benefit for all patients. Secondary complete surgical resection of all visible residual masses irrespective of size is paramount for treatment success. CONCLUSIONS Patients relapsing after definite treatment of locoregional disease are to be treated by stage-adapted first-line standard therapy for metastatic disease. Patients with primary advanced/metastatic disease failing one line of cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy should be referred to GCT expert centers. Dose intensity is a matter of ongoing debate, but sequential high-dose chemotherapy seems to improve patients' survival.
Collapse
|
24
|
Nerve-sparing Robot-assisted Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection: The Monoblock Technique. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 32:1-7. [PMID: 34667953 PMCID: PMC8505201 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is a treatment option for men with stage 1 or 2 testis cancer and the standard of care for men with postchemotherapy retroperitoneal residual disease. Given the morbidity of RPLND, four important surgical modifications have been proposed: minimally invasive access, nerve-sparing resection, template resection, and en-bloc resection. Objective To describe the surgical steps and perioperative outcomes of robotic nerve-sparing unilateral template RPLND with en-bloc resection (roboRPLND-NS+). Design, setting, and participants From 2017 to 2019, five patients with suspicion of retroperitoneal metastatic testicular cancer on abdominopelvic computed tomography underwent roboRPLND-NS+ at a single referral center. All surgeries were carried out by a single surgeon who has performed more than 500 extended and more than 50 super-extended robot-assisted lymph node dissections. Surgical procedure A lateral transperitoneal robotic approach with a da Vinci Xi Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) in six-arm configuration was used. The sympathetic chains, postganglionic sympathetic fibers, and hypogastric plexus were preserved as much as possible to ensure a nerve-sparing procedure. The template borders consisted of the renal vein cranially, the ureter laterally, the interaortocaval space medially, the common iliac artery caudally, and the psoas muscle dorsally for the right and left modified RPLND templates. Lymph nodes and the surrounding fatty tissue were progressively resected from the common iliac vessels and the abdominal aorta using the split-and-roll technique, and all of the template tissue was resected as a single specimen. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Measurements Lymph node yield and perioperative and postoperative oncological and functional outcomes were measured. Results and limitations The median patient age was 38 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 32–41) and the median operative time was 274 min (IQR 238–280). Node metastases were pathologically confirmed in three patients. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 19 (IQR 18–21), and the median number of positive lymph nodes was 2 (IQR 1–3). No patient experienced intraoperative or postoperative complications. The postoperative hospital stay was either 3 or 4 d. Maintenance of antegrade ejaculation was achieved in all patients. After median follow-up of 15 mo (IQR 14–30), all patients were alive and no recurrence was observed. Limitations include the low number of patients and the single surgeon experience. Conclusions RoboRPLND-NS+ is a safe and feasible technique that allows removal of a high number of lymph nodes with good functional outcomes. Short-term survival outcomes were excellent, with no recurrences or deaths recorded. Patient summary We describe a feasible and safe robot-assisted surgical procedure for removal of lymph nodes in patients with testicular cancer. Our technique has potential to decrease the medical problems arising as side effects of the surgery while achieving good cancer control.
Collapse
|
25
|
Oerlemans MIFJ, Groenewegen G, Vink A, van Laake LW, van der Kaaij NP, de Jonge N. Donor-Derived Testicular Germ Cell Cancer in a Heart Transplant Recipient. JACC: CARDIOONCOLOGY 2021; 3:322-325. [PMID: 34396342 PMCID: PMC8352306 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2021.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gerard Groenewegen
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Aryan Vink
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Linda W van Laake
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Niels P van der Kaaij
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nicolaas de Jonge
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for primary and post-chemotherapy testis cancer. J Robot Surg 2021; 16:369-375. [PMID: 33982173 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01252-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
The role of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in testicular cancer is well established in both the primary and post-chemotherapy setting. The aim of this study was to report our 2 years oncological outcomes of robotic RPLND. A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing robotic RPLND by a single surgeon at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Demographic, perioperative, and oncologic data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Between September 2014 and June 2020, 141 patients underwent an RPLND [33 (23.4%) were primary, 108 (76.6%) were post-chemotherapy]. 27 (19.1%) patients underwent a robotic bilateral template nerve-sparing RPLND. RPLND indication was primary (i.e. pre-chemotherapy) in 18 (66.7%), and post-chemotherapy in 9 (33.3%) patients. Stage at RPLND was 2A (n = 15, 55.6%), 2B (n = 9, 33.3%), 2C (n = 1, 3.7%) and 3 (n = 2, 7.4%). Median OR time (incision to closure) was 525 min and blood loss was 200 ml. Nerve sparing was performed in all but one case. Six (22.2%) adjuvant procedures were performed including two (7.4%) vascular repairs. Median length of stay was 2 days. Viable tumor was detected in 17 (63%) and teratoma in 9 (33.3%). Median follow-up was 31.3 months. No adjuvant chemotherapy was given. Three patients (11.1%) relapsed: 2 out-of-field and 1 with both in-field and out-of-field disease. Robotic RPLND can be performed safely. Long-term follow-up of series such as ours, enriched with patients with viable disease and/or teratoma, and not treated with adjuvant chemotherapy is required to ensure oncological outcomes are comparable to the open approach.
Collapse
|
27
|
Aparicio J. Recent treatment advances in clinical stage i nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Actas Urol Esp 2021; 45:326-327. [PMID: 33622525 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2020.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J Aparicio
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zhang CJ, Li ZT, Shen KJ, Chen L, Xu DF, Gao Y. Characterization of progression-related alternative splicing events in testicular germ cell tumors. Asian J Androl 2021; 23:259-265. [PMID: 33037172 PMCID: PMC8152425 DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_30_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Accumulating evidence supports the significance of aberrant alternative splicing (AS) events in cancer; however, genome-wide profiling of progression-free survival (PFS)-related AS events in testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) has not been reported. Here, we analyzed high-throughput RNA-sequencing data and percent-spliced-in values for 150 patients with TGCT. Using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis and a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method, we identified the top 15 AS events most closely associated with disease progression. A risk-associated AS score (ASS) for the 15 AS events was calculated for each patient. ASS, pathological stage, and T stage were significantly associated with disease progression by univariate analysis, but only ASS and pathological stage remained significant by multivariate analysis. The ability of these variables to predict 5-year progression was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. ASS had stronger predictive value than a combination of age, pathological stage, and T stage (area under the curve = 0.899 and 0.715, respectively). Furthermore, Kaplan–Meier analysis of patients with low and high ASS demonstrated that high ASS was associated with significantly worse PFS than low ASS (P = 1.46 × 10−7). We also analyzed the biological functions of the PFS-related AS-related genes and found enrichment in pathways associated with DNA repair and modification. Finally, we identified a regulatory network of splicing factors with expression levels that correlated significantly with AS events in TGCT. Collectively, this study identifies a novel method for risk stratification of patients and provides insight into the molecular events underlying TGCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuan-Jie Zhang
- Department of Urinary Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Zong-Tai Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gaozhou People's Hospital, Gaozhou 525200, China
| | - Kan-Jie Shen
- First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210000, China
| | - Lu Chen
- Department of Urinary Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Dan-Feng Xu
- Department of Urinary Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Yi Gao
- Department of Urinary Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bagrodia A, Savelyeva A, Lafin JT, Speir RW, Chesnut GT, Frazier AL, Woldu SL, Margulis V, Murray MJ, Amatruda JF, Lotan Y. Impact of circulating microRNA test (miRNA-371a-3p) on appropriateness of treatment and cost outcomes in patients with Stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumours. BJU Int 2020; 128:57-64. [PMID: 33124175 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine whether utilisation of a serum microRNA (miRNA) test could improve treatment appropriateness and cost-effectiveness for patients with Stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCTs). PATIENTS AND METHODS A decision tree model was built to investigate treatment course, clinical and cost outcomes for patients with Stage IA (T1N0M0S0) and IB (T2-4N0M0S0) NSGCT. The model compared outcomes and cost of standard approach using histopathology, conventional serum tumour markers and radiographic staging (standard model) to a miRNA-based approach using the standard model + post-orchidectomy serum miR-371a-3p (marker model). Probabilities of expected treatment and outcomes were based on presence/absence of cancer upon entering into the model. Overtreatment was defined as adjuvant chemotherapy or primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in a patient without cancer. Undertreatment was defined as initial surveillance for a patient with cancer. RESULTS Utilising the miRNA marker-based approach, 26% of patients avoid overtreatment and 8% avoid undertreatment in Stage IA NSGCT; 27% avoid overtreatment and 23% avoid undertreatment in Stage IB disease. Appropriate treatment decision-making increased from 65% to 94% and 50% to 92% for Stage IA and IB, respectively. The miRNA-based approach remained cost-effective over a wide range of performance characteristics with savings of ~$1400 (American dollars)/patient for both Stage IA and IB disease. CONCLUSION A miRNA-based approach may potentially select patients with Stage I NSGCT for correct treatment in a cost-effective manner. Identification of residual teratoma-only remains an issue. Prospective studies are necessary to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya Bagrodia
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Anna Savelyeva
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - John T Lafin
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ryan W Speir
- Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Tacoma, WA, USA
| | | | | | - Solomon L Woldu
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Matthew J Murray
- Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - James F Amatruda
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Approximately 30% of clinical stage 1 (CS1) nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT) and 15-20% of CS1 seminoma relapse without adjuvant treatment. Despite this, the 5-year survival for CS1 is 99%. The purpose of this review is to assess if active surveillance should be standard for all patients with CS1 testis cancer independent of risk factors. RECENT FINDINGS Recent data from Princess Margaret Cancer Centre suggest a nonrisk-adapted surveillance approach avoids treatment in ∼70% of patients. Most relapse early at a median time of 7.4 months. The majority of relapses are confined to the retroperitoneum (66%) and only one modality of treatment is required: chemotherapy only in 61% and RPLND only in 73%. SUMMARY Surveillance is the preferred option and a safe proven strategy for the management of CS1 disease independent of risk factors. The prognosis for CS1 disease is excellent and the decision to offer surveillance or adjuvant treatment needs to highlight the treatment-related morbidity in an otherwise fit and healthy young man.
Collapse
|
31
|
Nappi L, Ottaviano M, Rescigno P, Tortora M, Banna GL, Baciarello G, Basso U, Canil C, Cavo A, Cossu Rocca M, Czaykowski P, De Giorgi U, Garcia Del Muro X, Di Napoli M, Fornarini G, Gietema JA, Heng DYC, Hotte SJ, Kollmannsberger C, Maruzzo M, Messina C, Morelli F, Mulder S, Nichols C, Nolè F, Oing C, Sava T, Secondino S, Simone G, Soulieres D, Vincenzi B, Zucali PA, De Placido S, Palmieri G. Management of Germ Cell Tumors During the Outbreak of the Novel Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic: A Survey of International Expertise Centers. Oncologist 2020; 25:e1509-e1515. [PMID: 32735386 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has become a public health emergency affecting frail populations, including patients with cancer. This poses the question of whether cancer treatments can be postponed or modified without compromising their efficacy, especially for highly curable cancers such as germ cell tumors (GCTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS To depict the state-of-the-art management of GCTs during the COVID-19 pandemic, a survey including 26 questions was circulated by e-mail among the physicians belonging to three cooperative groups: (a) Italian Germ Cell Cancer Group; (b) European Reference Network-Rare Adult Solid Cancers, Domain G3 (rare male genitourinary cancers); and (c) Genitourinary Medical Oncologists of Canada. Percentages of agreement between Italian respondents (I) versus Canadian respondents (C), I versus European respondents (E), and E versus C were compared by using Fisher's exact tests for dichotomous answers and chi square test for trends for the questions with three or more options. RESULTS Fifty-three GCT experts responded to the survey: 20 Italian, 6 in other European countries, and 27 from Canada. Telemedicine was broadly used; there was high consensus to interrupt chemotherapy in COVID-19-positive patients (I = 75%, C = 55%, and E = 83.3%) and for use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor primary prophylaxis for neutropenia (I = 65%, C = 62.9%, and E = 50%). The main differences emerged regarding the management of stage I and stage IIA disease, likely because of cultural and geographical differences. CONCLUSION Our study highlights the common efforts of GCT experts in Europe and Canada to maintain high standards of treatment for patients with GCT with few changes in their management during the COVID-19 pandemic. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Despite the chaos, disruptions, and fears fomented by the COVID-19 illness, oncology care teams in Italy, other European countries, and Canada are delivering the enormous promise of curative management strategies for patients with testicular cancer and other germ cell tumors. At the same time, these teams are applying safe and innovative solutions and sharing best practices to minimize frequency and intensity of patient contacts with thinly stretched health care capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Nappi
- British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver Cancer Center, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Margaret Ottaviano
- Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II,", Naples, Italy
- Centro di riferimento Campania per i tumori rar (CRCTR) Regional Rare Tumors Reference Center, Naples, Italy
| | - Pasquale Rescigno
- The Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marianna Tortora
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II,", Naples, Italy
- Centro di riferimento Campania per i tumori rar (CRCTR) Regional Rare Tumors Reference Center, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Giulia Baciarello
- Oncology Medicine Department, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Umberto Basso
- Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IOV), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padua, Italy
| | - Christina Canil
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | | | - Marco Maruzzo
- Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IOV), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padua, Italy
| | | | - Franco Morelli
- IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | - Sasja Mulder
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Craig Nichols
- Testicular Cancer Commons, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) Group Chair's Office, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Franco Nolè
- European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Teodoro Sava
- Oncologia Azienda Unità Locale Socio Sanitaria 6 (AUSLSS6) EUGANEA, Padua, Italy
| | | | | | - Denis Soulieres
- Center Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Paolo A Zucali
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Sabino De Placido
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II,", Naples, Italy
- Centro di riferimento Campania per i tumori rar (CRCTR) Regional Rare Tumors Reference Center, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovannella Palmieri
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II,", Naples, Italy
- Centro di riferimento Campania per i tumori rar (CRCTR) Regional Rare Tumors Reference Center, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lobo J, Gillis AJM, van den Berg A, Looijenga LHJ. Prediction of relapse in stage I testicular germ cell tumor patients on surveillance: investigation of biomarkers. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:728. [PMID: 32758242 PMCID: PMC7405370 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07220-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Better biomarkers for assessing risk of relapse in stage I testicular germ cell tumor patients are needed, to complement classical histopathological variables. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of previously suggested biomarkers, related to proliferation (MIB-1 and TEX19) and to immune microenvironment (CXCL12, CXCR4, beta-catenin and MECA-79) in a surveillance cohort of stage I testicular germ cell tumor patients. Methods A total of 70 patients were included. Survival analyses were performed, including Cox regression models. Results Patients with vascular invasion and elevated human chorionic gonadotropin levels showed significantly poorer relapse-free survival in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio = 2.820, 95% confidence interval 1.257–6.328; hazard ratio = 3.025, 95% confidence interval 1.345–6.808). Patients with no vascular invasion but with MIB-1 staining in > 50% tumor cells showed significantly shorter relapse-free survival (p = 0.042). TEX19 nuclear immunoexpression was confirmed in spermatogonial cells, and weak cytoplasmic immunoexpression was depicted in 15/70 tumors, not significantly impacting survival. CXCL12 immunoexpression in tumor cells did not associate with relapse, but non-seminoma patients exhibiting vascular invasion and CXCL12-positive stromal/inflammatory cells showed significantly improved relapse-free survival (p = 0.015). Exclusively nuclear immunoexpression of CXCR4 associated with better relapse-free survival (p = 0.032), but not after adjusting for vascular invasion. Patients with higher beta-catenin scores showed a tendency for poorer relapse-free survival (p = 0.056). MECA-79 immunoexpression was absent. Conclusions The informative protein biomarkers (i.e., MIB-1, CXCL12, beta-catenin, and possibly CXCR4) may prove useful for risk-stratifying patients if validated in larger, multicentric and well-defined studies. Currently, classical histopathological features of testicular germ cell tumors remain key for relapse prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João Lobo
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584, CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal. .,Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (GEBC CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) & Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (P.CCC), R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal. .,Department of Pathology and Molecular Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto (ICBAS-UP), Rua Jorge Viterbo Ferreira 228, 4050-513, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Ad J M Gillis
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584, CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Lab. for Exp. Patho-Oncology (LEPO), Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Cancer Institute, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annette van den Berg
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584, CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leendert H J Looijenga
- Department of Pathology, Lab. for Exp. Patho-Oncology (LEPO), Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Cancer Institute, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Nason GJ, Sweet J, Landoni L, Leao R, Anson-Cartwright L, Mok S, Guzylak V, D'Angelo A, Fang ZY, Geist I, Warde P, Jewett MAS, Hamilton RJ. Discrepancy in pathology reports upon second review of radical orchiectomy specimens for testicular germ cell tumors. Can Urol Assoc J 2020; 14:411-415. [PMID: 32574142 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We sought to evaluate the discrepancies between primary pathology report and second pathology review of radical orchiectomy (RO) specimens. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of RO specimens from the Ontario Cancer Registry. All cases required both a primary pathology report and a second pathology review from another institution. Histopathological variables assessed included histological subtype and components of mixed germ cell tumor (GCT), pathological tumor (pT) stage, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), spermatic cord invasion, and surgical margin. RESULTS Between 1994 and 2015, 5048 ROs were performed with 2719 (53.9%) seminoma and 2029 (40.2%) non-seminoma. Of these, 519 (10.3%) received a second pathology review. There was concordance between primary pathology report and second pathology review in 326 (62.8%) cases. The most common discrepancies involved a change in pT stage (n=148, 28.5%), with upstaging in 83 (16%) and downstaging in 65 (12.5%) cases relative to the original pT stage. The second most common discrepancy regarded the reporting of LVI (n=121, 23.3%), with 62 (11.9%) reporting presence of LVI when the primary pathology report did not. Other discrepancies included a change in the histological subtype in 28 (5.4%) cases and spermatic cord margin status in five (9.6%) cases. CONCLUSIONS Only 10% of orchiectomy specimens underwent a second pathology review, with nearly 40% of reviews leading to a meaningful change in parameters. Such variation could lead to incorrect tumor staging, estimate of relapse risk, and inappropriate treatment decisions. Expert pathology review of RO specimens should be considered, as it has significant implications for decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory J Nason
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joan Sweet
- Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lauren Landoni
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ricardo Leao
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine; University of Coimbra, Portugal; Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Lynn Anson-Cartwright
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Spencer Mok
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vanessa Guzylak
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea D'Angelo
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zhi Yi Fang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ilana Geist
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Padraig Warde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael A S Jewett
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Nason GJ, Chung P, Warde P, Huddart R, Albers P, Kollmannsberger C, Booth CM, Hansen AR, Bedard PL, Einhorn L, Nichols C, Rendon RA, Wood LA, Jewett MAS, Hamilton RJ. Controversies in the management of clinical stage 1 testis cancer. Can Urol Assoc J 2020; 14:E537-E542. [PMID: 32569575 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
In November 2018, The Canadian Testis Cancer Workshop was convened. The two-day workshop involved urologists, medical and radiation oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, physician’s assistants, residents and fellows, nurses, patients and patient advocacy groups. One of the goals of the workshop was to discuss the challenging areas of testis cancer care where guidelines may not be specific. The objective was to distill through discussion around cases, expert approach to working through these challenges. Herein we present a summary of discussion from the workshop around controversies in the management of clinical stage 1 (CS1) disease. CS1 represents organ confined non-metastatic testis cancer that represents approximately 70-80% of men at presentation. Regardless of management, CS1 has an excellent prognosis. However, without adjuvant treatment, approximately 30% of CS1 nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) and 15% of CS1 seminoma relapse. The workshop reviewed that while surveillance has become the standard for the majority of patients with CS1 disease there remains debate in the management of patients at high-risk of relapse. The controversy in the management of CS1 testis cancer surrounds the optimal balance between the morbidity of overtreatment and the identification of patients who may derive most benefit from adjuvant treatment. The challenge lies in a shared decision process where discussion of options extends beyond the simple risk of relapse but to include the long-term toxicities of adjuvant treatments and the favorable cancer-specific survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory J Nason
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Padraig Warde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert Huddart
- The Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, Heinrich-Heine University, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Christian Kollmannsberger
- British Columbia Cancer Agency Vancouver Cancer Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Christopher M Booth
- Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Aaron R Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Philippe L Bedard
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lawrence Einhorn
- Department of Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Craig Nichols
- Testicular Cancer Multidisciplinary Clinic, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Ricardo A Rendon
- Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Lori A Wood
- Division of Medical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Michael A S Jewett
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ray S, Pierorazio PM, Allaf ME. Primary and post-chemotherapy robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: a review. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:949-958. [PMID: 32420211 PMCID: PMC7214990 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2020.02.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is the gold standard for surgical management of the retroperitoneum in patients with testicular cancer, and is associated with excellent oncologic outcomes and significant morbidity including length of stay. Minimally invasive RPLND, starting with laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in 1992 and now robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in 2006, endeavor to decrease the morbidity of open RPLND while maintaining excellent oncologic outcomes. This review surveys the literature regarding both primary and post-chemotherapy robotic RPLND, emphasizing that while early outcomes are promising, much work needs to be done before widespread use of this technique is implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shagnik Ray
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Phillip M Pierorazio
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mohamad E Allaf
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Partial orchiectomy: The Princess Margaret cancer centre experience. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:605.e19-605.e24. [PMID: 32284257 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radical orchiectomy (RO) is the standard treatment for a testis cancer. Organ sparing surgery can be considered in the setting of a solitary functioning testis or bilateral tumors. It has also been suggested as an alternative to RO for small lesions. In this study we report our partial orchiectomy (PO) experience. METHODS We performed a retrospective review using our prospectively maintained database analyzing PO. RESULTS Between 1983 and 2018, 77 patients underwent PO. Mean age was 31.3 years (range 17-56). A lesion was palpable in 70 (90.9%) and median lesion size 14.1 mm (range 3-35 mm). Reasons for PO included ``small lesion" in 39 (50.6%); solitary functioning testis in 30 (39%); bilateral lesions in 6 (7.8%); or assumed benign lesion in 1 (1.3%). Median follow-up was 43.5 months (range 1-258). Lesion histology was benign in 25 (32.5%). A positive surgical margin was noted in 6 (7.8%) with none developing local or distant recurrence. Sixteen (20.8%) patients underwent salvage ipsilateral RO at a median of 3 months (range 0-46). Reasons for salvage RO included a radiologically detected lesion in 7, palpable lesion in 4, positive surgical margin in 3 and adverse pathology in 2 patients. Malignant histology was present in 12 (75%) of the salvage RO specimens. There were no reported Clavien-Dindo Grade 3 to 5 complications. CONCLUSION Organ sparing surgery is a safe and feasible approach to small testis lesions. For the third with benign disease, and even those with malignant histology, a RO can be avoided in carefully selected patients.
Collapse
|
37
|
Nichols CR, Nappi L, Kollmannsberger C, Hamilton R, Daneshmand S. Back to the Future-Moving Forward for Testicular Cancer Survivors. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2020; 4:pkz082. [PMID: 32190816 PMCID: PMC7065711 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkz082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Revised: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Craig R Nichols
- Testicular Cancer Commons, Portland, OR
- SWOG Group Chair’s Office, Portland, OR
| | - Lucia Nappi
- British Columbia Cancer, Division of Medical Oncology, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Robert Hamilton
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Application of miRNAs in the diagnosis and monitoring of testicular germ cell tumours. Nat Rev Urol 2020; 17:201-213. [PMID: 32157202 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-020-0296-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs) are the most frequent cancer type in young men and originate from the common precursor germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS). For decades, clinical management of patients with TGCT has relied on classic serum tumour markers: α-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin subunit-β and lactate dehydrogenase. In the past 10 years, microRNAs have been shown to outperform classic serum tumour markers in the diagnosis of primary tumours and in follow-up monitoring and prediction of relapse. miR-371a-3p is the most consistent marker and exhibits >90% diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in TGCT. However, miR-371a-3p cannot be used to diagnose GCNIS or mature teratoma. Future efforts must technically standardize the microRNA-based methods internationally and introduce miR-371a-3p as a molecular liquid biopsy-based marker for TGCTs in the clinic.
Collapse
|
39
|
Fischer S, Tandstad T, Cohn-Cedermark G, Thibault C, Vincenzi B, Klingbiel D, Albany C, Necchi A, Terbuch A, Lorch A, Aparicio J, Heidenreich A, Hentrich M, Wheater M, Langberg CW, Ståhl O, Fankhauser CD, Hamid AA, Koutsoukos K, Shamash J, White J, Bokemeyer C, Beyer J, Gillessen S. Outcome of Men With Relapses After Adjuvant Bleomycin, Etoposide, and Cisplatin for Clinical Stage I Nonseminoma. J Clin Oncol 2019; 38:1322-1331. [PMID: 31877087 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.01876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical stage I (CSI) nonseminoma (NS) is a disease limited to the testis without metastases. One treatment strategy after orchiectomy is adjuvant chemotherapy. Little is known about the outcome of patients who experience relapse after such treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from 51 patients with CSI NS who experienced a relapse after adjuvant bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) from 18 centers/11 countries were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcomes were overall and progression-free survivals calculated from day 1 of treatment at first relapse. Secondary outcomes were time to, stage at, and treatment of relapse and rate of subsequent relapses. RESULTS Median time to relapse was 13 months, with the earliest relapse 2 months after start of adjuvant treatment and the latest after 25 years. With a median follow-up of 96 months, the 5-year PFS was 67% (95% CI, 54% to 82%) and the 5-year OS was 81% (95% CI, 70% to 94%). Overall, 19 (37%) of 51 relapses occurred later than 2 years. Late relapses were associated with a significantly higher risk of death from NS (hazard ratio, 1.10 per year; P = .01). Treatment upon relapse was diverse: the majority of patients received a combination of chemotherapy and surgery. Twenty-nine percent of patients experienced a subsequent relapse. At last follow-up, 41 patients (80%) were alive and disease-free, eight (16%) had died of progressive disease, and one patient (2%) each had died from therapy-related or other causes. CONCLUSION Outcomes of patients with relapse after adjuvant BEP seem better compared with patients who experience relapse after treatment of metastatic disease but worse compared with those who have de-novo metastatic disease. We found a substantial rate of late and subsequent relapses. There seem to be three patterns of relapse with different outcomes: pure teratoma, early viable NS relapse (< 2 years), and late viable NS relapse (> 2 years).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Fischer
- Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, St. Gallen, Switzerland.,Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Torgrim Tandstad
- The Cancer Clinic, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.,SWENOTECA, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Gabriella Cohn-Cedermark
- SWENOTECA, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, and Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Constance Thibault
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Costantine Albany
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Angelika Terbuch
- Abteilung für Onkologie, Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Anja Lorch
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Jorge Aparicio
- Hospital Universitari I Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain, Spanish Germ Cell Cancer Group
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marcus Hentrich
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Red Cross Hospital, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthew Wheater
- Medical Oncology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Carl W Langberg
- SWENOTECA, Trondheim, Norway.,The Cancer Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Olof Ståhl
- SWENOTECA, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Oncology, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Anis A Hamid
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Jeff White
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jörg Beyer
- University Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, St. Gallen, Switzerland.,Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.,University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona and Universita della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Nappi L, Thi M, Lum A, Huntsman D, Eigl BJ, Martin C, O’Neil B, Maughan BL, Chi K, So A, Black PC, Gleave M, Wyatt AW, Lavoie JM, Khalaf D, Bell R, Daneshmand S, Hamilton RJ, Leao RR, Nichols C, Kollmannsberger C. Developing a Highly Specific Biomarker for Germ Cell Malignancies: Plasma miR371 Expression Across the Germ Cell Malignancy Spectrum. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:3090-3098. [PMID: 31553692 PMCID: PMC7351323 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.02057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Our objective was to evaluate operating characteristics, particularly specificity and positive predictive value (PPV), by mapping plasma miR371 expression to actual clinical events in patients with a history of germ cell tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred eleven male patients with a history of or newly diagnosed germ cell tumors were evaluable. Biospecimens obtained before confirmed clinical events were analyzed for miR371 expression with blinding of providers and laboratory personnel to analytic results or clinical status, respectively. Cases (patients with clinically confirmed active germ cell malignancy [aGCM]) and controls (patients with no clinically confirmed aGCM) were assigned over the course of the management. Patients were assigned risk status (high, low, or moderate) based on the composite clinical picture at time points in management. RESULTS Considering all cases and controls and results of prospectively obtained biosamples analyzed for miR371 expression, 46 (35%) of 132 samples had clinically confirmed aGCM over the course of management; 44 (96%) of these 46 patients had plasma miR371 expression (true positives) with no false positives. Two (4%) of 46 patients had no miRNA expression despite pathologic confirmation of aGCM (false negatives). Plasma miR371 expression in confirmed aGCM had a specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100%, 96%, 100%, and 98%, respectively. Interpretation of sensitivity and negative predictive value is limited by modest follow-up. Specificity and sensitivity were 100% and 98%, 100% and 92%, and 100% and 97% in the low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups, respectively, with a median follow-up time of 15 months. CONCLUSION Plasma miR371 expression predicts aGCM with high specificity and positive predictive value. Although other operating characteristics of miR371 await longer follow-up for more complete definition, the findings of a highly specific liquid biopsy strongly support moving forward with large-scale, real-world clinical trials to further define full operating characteristics and to identify clinical utility and areas of patient benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Nappi
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Marisa Thi
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Amy Lum
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Bernie J. Eigl
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Brock O’Neil
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Kim Chi
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alan So
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Peter C. Black
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Martin Gleave
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alex W. Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jean Michel Lavoie
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Daniel Khalaf
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Robert Bell
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Ricardo R.N. Leao
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Craig Nichols
- Testicular Cancer Commons, Beaverton, OR
- SWOG Group Chairs Office, Portland, OR
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kollmannsberger CK, Nappi L, Nichols C. Management of Stage II Germ Cell Tumors: Be Sure, Be Patient, Be Safe. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:1856-1862. [PMID: 31180818 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.A healthy 27-year-old man discovered a left testicular mass. Several months later he saw an urologist, who palpated a suspicious mass on the left testicle; an ultrasound confirmed a 2-cm solid mass. Serum tumor marker testing disclosed a slightly elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) of 12.3 µg/L (upper limit of normal, 8.0 µg/L), and a normal β-human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG). Staging imaging with a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest/abdomen/pelvis showed no evidence for retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy or distant metastases. He underwent a left radical orchiectomy, and pathology showed a 1.5-cm mixed germ cell tumor with 85% embryonal, 10% yolk sac tumor, and 5% mature teratoma histologies. Lymphovascular invasion was present. His AFP normalized after surgery. After discussion of management alternatives, he chose active surveillance, but 4 months later a scheduled surveillance CT scan identified a 1.4-cm left para-aortic lymph node just below the left renal hilum (Fig 1). Serum tumor markers remained negative. He returns to discuss his results and potential management options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian K Kollmannsberger
- 1British Columbia Cancer Agency-Vancouver Cancer Centre; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lucia Nappi
- 1British Columbia Cancer Agency-Vancouver Cancer Centre; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Craig Nichols
- 2Testicular Cancer Commons, Vancouver, WA.,3SWOG Group Chairs Office, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hamilton RJ, Jewett MAS, Warde P, Hansen A. Optimal Management of High-risk Stage I Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor: Surveillance is the Preferred Option. Eur Urol Focus 2019; 5:702-703. [PMID: 31129064 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2019] [Accepted: 05/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
At Princess Margaret, we recommend active surveillance for all patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor. Here we refute common arguments against surveillance and urge clinicians to engage in a shared decision-making process that goes beyond merely citing relapse rates for the different options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Hamilton
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and The University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Michael A S Jewett
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and The University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Padraig Warde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Aaron Hansen
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Klaassen Z, Hamilton RJ. The Role of Robotic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testis Cancer. Urol Clin North Am 2019; 46:409-417. [PMID: 31277735 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2019.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is complex; however, recent advances in technology have allowed adoption of the robotic platform for highly select cases. Initial case series have shown improved cosmesis, less blood loss, and decreased length of stay compared with open RPLND. Our preference for performing robotic RPLND is via a transperitoneal approach with the patient in the supine position, thus facilitating a bilateral template dissection identical to that used in all our open procedures. Robotic RPLND should mimic the open approach with regard to oncologic principles and should only be performed by clinicians well versed in open RPLND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Klaassen
- Division of Urology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, 1120 15th Street, BA-8414, Augusta, GA 30912, USA; Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Division of Urology, University Health Network, 610 University Avenue - Suite 3-130, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|