Polatuzumab Vedotin in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Easy as ABC: Managing Toxicities of Antibody-Drug Conjugates, Bispecific Antibodies, and CAR T-Cell Therapies

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), bispecific antibodies that engage T cells (BsAbs), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are widely used standard-of-care therapies that have revolutionized the treatment of lymphoid and plasma cell malignancies. With recent regulatory approvals, these therapies are poised to also revolutionize the treatment of common solid tumors and become a part of the everyday lexicon, the ABCs, of the practicing oncologist. Drawing from experience in hematology, we review the early, late, and rare toxicities of ADCs, BsAbs, and CAR T cells and provide general principles for their management.

A Model of Intratumor and Interpatient Heterogeneity Explains Clinical Trials of Curative Combination Therapy for Lymphoma

SIGNIFICANCE

A new model of intratumor and interpatient heterogeneity in response to drug combinations explains and predicts the results of clinical trials of curative-intent treatments for DLBCL. This model can be used to understand and inform optimal design of curative drug combinations and clinical trials. See related commentary by Goldstein et al., p. 153.

Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab plus Modified EPOCH (Etoposide, Vincristine, Doxorubicin, Carboplatin, and Prednisolone) for Transplant-ineligible Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Objective Despite the recent development of various novel therapeutic approaches for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL), optimal management of patients with R/R DLBCL who are elderly and/or unfit has not yet been established. Methods and Patients We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of the R-mEPOCH regimen comprising rituximab, etoposide, vincristine, doxorubicin, carboplatin, and prednisolone in transplant-ineligible patients with R/R DLBCL. Results In total, 22 patients were included in this study. The median patient age was 75 years old. The median number of prior lines of therapy was one (range, 1-5). The overall response rate was 68%, with 45% achieving complete response (CR) or unconfirmed CR and 23% achieving partial response. With a median follow-up of 27.8 months, the median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 17.1 and 27.4 months, respectively. The 2- and 5-year OS rates were 50% and 28%, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (n=18 [82%]), febrile neutropenia (n=16 [73%]), anemia (n=12 [55%]), and thrombocytopenia (n=8 [36%]). The median total lifetime cumulative dose of anthracyclines was 281 mg/m2 (range, 69-536 mg/m2) in doxorubicin equivalents. One case of grade 1 bradycardia occurred, leading to the discontinuation of R-mEPOCH. No other cardiac adverse events of grade ≥3 and/or discontinuation of treatment were observed. Conclusion Our study suggests that the R-mEPOCH regimen may be an effective and tolerable salvage regimen for transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL patients.

Immunotherapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: advances and challenges

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized as a clonal proliferation of mature B lymphocytes with distinct immunophenotypic traits, predominantly affecting the middle-aged and elderly population. This condition is marked by an accumulation of lymphocytes within the peripheral blood, bone marrow, spleen, and lymph nodes. The associated immune dysregulation predisposes CLL patients to a higher risk of secondary malignancies and infections, which significantly contribute to morbidity and mortality rates. The advent of immunotherapy has revolutionized the prognosis of CLL, advancing treatment modalities and offering substantial benefits to patient outcomes. This review endeavors to synthesize and scrutinize the efficacy, merits, and limitations of the current immunotherapeutic strategies for CLL. The aim is to inform the selection of optimal treatment regimens tailored to individual patient needs. Furthermore, the review juxtaposes various therapeutic combinations to elucidate the comparative advantages of each approach, with the ultimate objective of enhancing patient prognosis and quality of life.

Marine Natural Products in Inflammation-Related Diseases: Opportunities and Challenges

In recent decades, the potentiality of marine natural products (MNPs) in the medical field has been increasingly recognized. Natural compounds derived from marine microorganisms, algae, and invertebrates have shown significant promise for treating inflammation-related diseases. In this review, we cover the three primary sources of MNPs and their diverse and unique chemical structures and bioactivities. This review aims to summarize the progress of MNPs in combating inflammation-related diseases. Moreover, we cover the functions and mechanisms of MNPs in diseases, highlighting their functions in regulating inflammatory signaling pathways, cellular stress responses, and gut microbiota, among others. Meanwhile, we focus on key technologies and scientific methods to address the current limitations and challenges in MNPs.

A phase 1 trial of prizloncabtagene autoleucel, a CD19/CD20 CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

ABSTRACT

Prizloncabtagene autoleucel (prizlon-cel), a novel bispecific chimeric antigen receptor T cell, targets and eliminates CD19/CD20-positive tumor cells. This phase 1, open-label study investigated the safety and efficacy of prizlon-cel in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R B-NHL). Patients with CD19 and/or CD20-positive R/R B-NHL received a 3-day lymphodepletion (cyclophosphamide: 300 mg/m2 per day; fludarabine: 30 mg/m2 per day) followed by an IV dose of prizlon-cel. The primary end points were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Of the 48 patients infused prizlon-cel, 44 had large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). No patient experienced DLT. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 93.8% of the patients, with only 1 case of grade 3. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurred in 6.3% of patients, with no grade 3 or higher events. The most common grade 3 or higher TEAEs were neutropenia (83.3%) and leukopenia (50%). The ORR and complete response (CR) rates in all patients were 91.5% and 85.1%, respectively, and in LBCL patients, ORR was 90.7% with 86.0% CR. With median follow-up of 30.0 months, median DOR, PFS, and OS were all not reached. Kaplan-Meier estimate of 2-year DOR, PFS, and OS rates were 66.0%, 62.6%, and 76.5%, respectively. Prizlon-cel had a favorable safety profile and a high and durable response in patients with R/R B-NHL, suggesting a promising treatment option for patients with R/R B-NHL. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04317885, #NCT04655677, #NCT04696432, and #NCT04693676.

Real-World Effectiveness of Chemoimmunotherapy and Novel Therapies for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive Large B-Cell Lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Clinical trials provide meaningful data regarding the safety and efficacy of novel therapies but there is often a lag between the time of new drug approval and information on posttreatment clinical outcomes in real-world practice. This study evaluated clinical outcomes in a large real-world population of patients with relapsed and/or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (r/r LBCL) treated with chemoimmunotherapy or novel therapies in second or later lines of therapy (2L+).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) Consortium of Real-World Evidence (CReWE) cohort (1/1/2015-2/15/2023) were analyzed. Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics were described and response rates, duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were evaluated. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess associations between patient clinical characteristics and outcomes.

RESULTS

The 2L+ cohort included patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy (N = 593), lenalidomide-based therapy (n = 60), polatuzumab vedotin-based therapy (N = 116), tafasitamab-based therapy (N = 55), and loncastuximab tesirine (N = 42). Most patients who received prior chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) were refractory to the treatment. Across all patients, overall response rates were <50%, with one-quarter achieving complete response and median duration of response and overall survival were short (<6 and <10 months, respectively) among patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy or novel therapies. The prognosis was worse for patients who had previously received CAR-T. Primary refractory status, high-risk disease, and failing 3 or more lines of therapy were significantly associated with worse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Patients with r/r LBCL have unfavorable outcomes and need more effective treatment alternatives.

Outcomes of Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated With R-GemOx: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Rituximab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin (R-GemOx) is a commonly used chemoimmunotherapy regimen for relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but there are limited real-world data. In a multicenter retrospective study from a cohort of eight US academic centers (LEO CReWE), we evaluated 183 patients with R/R DLBCL and high-grade B cell lymphoma treated with R-GemOx, including subgroups treated without intent for consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy (n = 100), those utilizing R-GemOx as a bridge to ASCT or CAR T (n = 83), and those aged 70 and older (n = 71). Overall response rates (ORRs) for all patients treated with R-GemOx were 45% with a complete response (CR) rate of 29%. The median event-free survival (EFS) was 2.3 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 13.5 months. Patients receiving R-GemOx without intent for ASCT or CAR T had ORR and CR rates of 33% and 18%, respectively, with median EFS and OS of 2.0 and 9.5 months, respectively. Patients receiving R-GemOx as a bridge to ASCT or CAR T had ORR and CR rates of 57% and 36%, respectively, with median EFS and OS of 3.5 and 17.4 months, respectively. Patients receiving R-GemOx aged 70 and older had ORR and CR rates of 53% and 33%, respectively, with median EFS and OS of 2.2 and 13.9 months, respectively. These data provide a benchmark for R-GemOx in the rapidly evolving landscape of R/R DLBCL therapies.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Contemporary Role of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the Era of Cellular Therapies

Since the 1990s, the standard of care for the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) had been salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT) in patients with a chemotherapy-sensitive remission. However, promising results from the recent TRANSFORM and ZUMA-7 trials evaluating the efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy versus HDT-ASCT for second line relapsed/refractory DLBCL have sought to challenge this standard of care. While these studies have established a new standard for the treatment of early relapsed and primary refractory DLBCL, significant differences in the trial design between these studies and limitations with the timing of randomization during the disease course warrant a thoughtful interpretation of the results. Additionally, the financial burden and logistic challenges of CAR T-cell administration and limited access to these therapies continue to be ongoing issues. Despite the encouraging results from these trials, HDT-ASCT continues to have a role in the treatment of DLBCL, especially in disease relapsing ≥12 months after initial therapy, and in chemo sensitive disease with a good response to salvage chemotherapy. Ongoing studies evaluating novel salvage regimens for use prior to HDT-ASCT, and future studies evaluating the role of CAR T-cell therapy in chemo sensitive disease will help determine the continued role of HDT-ASCT for relapsed/refractory DLBCL.

Advancements in Targeted Therapies for Colorectal Cancer: Innovative Drug Formulation and Delivery Strategies

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, with increasing incidence presenting significant treatment challenges. Traditional nontargeted therapies often result in high toxicity and limited efficacy, underscoring the need for improved treatment modalities. This review highlights recent advancements in drug delivery systems to enhance therapeutic outcomes for CRC. We examine innovative strategies, including computer-assisted pharmaceutical formulation, sustained-release matrices, and prodrugs, as well as targeted delivery mechanisms such as exosomes, liposomes, hydrogels, antibody-drug conjugates, and stimuli-responsive systems. These methodologies offer improved drug biodistribution, enhanced targeting of cancer cells, and reduced off-target effects, promising better clinical outcomes. Additionally, we discuss the development of novel formulations designed to optimize the delivery of therapeutic agents in advanced CRC. Ongoing clinical trials investigating these innovative systems signify a shift toward more effective patient treatment options. While challenges remain in the clinical application of these targeted therapies, continued research offers promising avenues for improving patient outcomes in CRC. This study aims to inform future strategies for managing this aggressive disease, ultimately enhancing survival rates and quality of life for affected individuals.

Brentuximab Vedotin Combination for Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

PURPOSE

In patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), brentuximab vedotin (BV) as monotherapy or combined with either lenalidomide (Len) or rituximab (R) has demonstrated efficacy with acceptable safety. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of BV + Len + R versus placebo + Len + R in patients with R/R DLBCL.

METHODS

ECHELON-3 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 trial comparing BV + Len + R with placebo + Len + R in patients with R/R DLBCL. Patients received BV or placebo once every 3 weeks, Len once daily, and R once every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end points included investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). A prespecified interim analysis was performed after 134 OS events, with two-sided P = .0232 as the efficacy boundary.

RESULTS

Patients (N = 230) were randomly assigned to receive BV + Len + R (n = 112) or placebo + Len + R (n = 118). Two patients in the placebo arm did not receive treatment. With a median follow-up of 16.4 months, the median OS was 13.8 months with BV + Len + R versus 8.5 months with placebo + Len + R (hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.89]; two-sided P = .009). The median PFS was 4.2 months with BV + Len + R versus 2.6 months with placebo + Len + R (hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.73]; two-sided P < .001). The ORR was 64% ([95% CI, 55 to 73]; two-sided P < .001) with BV + Len + R and 42% (95% CI, 33 to 51) with placebo + Len + R; complete response rates were 40% and 19%, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 97% of patients in both arms. In both arms, the most common treatment-emergent AEs were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, and anemia.

CONCLUSION

BV + Len + R demonstrated a statistically significant survival benefit with a manageable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with R/R DLBCL.

Current treatment approach and future perspectives in B cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL) represent the two major subtypes of mature B cell lymphoma. A deeper understanding of tumor biology, as well as molecular classification characterized by targetable gene alterations, and the introduction of novel treatment options, including targeted drugs (e.g., antibody-drug conjugates and small molecules [e.g., Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor]) and immune therapies (e.g., chimeric antigen receptor [CAR] T cell therapy and bispecific antibody [BsAb]), has changed the treatment paradigms for DLBCL and FL. In clinical practice, however, treatment regimens are determined mainly based on prior treatment history, duration of response after previous treatment, patient age, and patient frailty because there have been few randomized trials to inform treatment selection for patients with relapsed or refractory disease and because there is no single prognostic index that guides suitable treatment for each patient. In this review, we summarize the treatment options for DLBCL and FL and discuss the treatment strategies for these two subtypes. We also discuss future perspectives for the treatment of these subtypes.

Comparative efficacy of lisocabtagene maraleucel in the PILOT study versus second-line chemotherapy regimens in the real world

This study assessed the comparative efficacy of lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) in the open-label, phase II PILOT study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03483103) versus conventional second-line (2L) chemotherapy regimens in the real world administered to patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) who were not intended for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The liso-cel-treated cohort (N=61) was based on patients who received liso-cel in the PILOT study. The conventional chemotherapy cohort included patients who met PILOT eligibility criteria and received conventional 2L chemotherapy in the real-world clinical setting (N=273). After using the trimmed stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting method to balance cohorts according to baseline characteristics, there were statistically significant differences in all tested measures of efficacy. Compared with real-world conventional chemotherapy regimens, liso-cel demonstrated higher overall response rates (79.6% with liso-cel vs. 50.5% with conventional chemotherapy; relative risk [RR]: 1.6; P<0.0001) and complete response rates (53.1% vs. 24.0%; RR: 2.2; P<0.0001), longer median duration of response (12.1 vs. 4.3 months; hazard ratio [HR: 0.40; P=0.0001), longer median event-free survival (7.0 vs. 2.8 months; HR: 0.43; P<0.0001), longer median progression-free survival (7.0 vs. 2.9 months; HR: 0.46; P<0.0001), and longer median overall survival (not reached vs. 12.6 months; HR: 0.58; P=0.0256). Results from analyses applying various additional statistical approaches consistently favored outcomes with liso-cel over real-world conventional chemotherapy regimens. These results reinforce the efficacy of liso-cel as 2L therapy for patients with R/R LBCL who are not intended for HSCT.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates: The Toxicities and Adverse Effects That Emergency Physicians Must Know

Antibody-drug conjugates are novel antineoplastic agents whose use is expanding, both in terms of the number of drugs and the number of patients being treated. This article reviews the known toxicities and complications of antibody-drug conjugates that are currently approved for the treatment of cancer in the United States, with a focus on their emergency presentation and management. Similar to many other cancer therapies, most antibody-drug conjugates can cause diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, rash, peripheral neuropathy, and cytopenia, which are generally treated following standard-of-care. Interstitial lung disease, which may mimic pneumonia and cause respiratory failure and death, has been seen with trastuzumab deruxtecan and mirvetuximab soravtansine; emergency treatment of this condition includes oxygenation, ventilatory support, and corticosteroids. Inotuzumab ozogamicin and gemtuzumab ozogamicin are both associated with sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, a potentially fatal liver dysfunction that presents with weight gain, fluid overload, and jaundice. Abnormal liver function tests in patients who have been recently treated with these agents should be cautiously evaluated. Cardiac adverse events with antibody-drug conjugates are rare, but trastuzumab emtansine and trastuzumab deruxtecan may cause a decrease in cardiac contractility, and heart rate corrected QT interval prolongation is a rare effect of trastuzumab deruxtecan. Ocular adverse events, especially blurred vision, and keratopathy, are common with mirvetuximab soravtansine and tisotumab vedotin. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy has been reported with brentuximab vedotin and polatuzumab vedotin. Tumor lysis syndrome may occur after treatment with gemtuzumab ozogamicin, polatuzumab vedotin, and brentuximab vedotin. Patients receiving enfortumab vedotin or brentuximab vedotin may develop hyperglycemia, sometimes presenting as diabetic ketoacidosis. Tisotumab vedotin and trastuzumab emtansine are associated with bleeding; although it is minor in most cases, severe bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage have occurred. Several antibody-drug conjugates can cause an anaphylactoid infusion-related reaction, which occurs most commonly during or soon after infusion but may be delayed up to 24 hours. Further research is needed to establish the real-world incidence of rare complications and how often patients with these complications present to the emergency department.

Loncastuximab tesirine in Chinese patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial

Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have a poor prognosis. Loncastuximab tesirine (Lonca), an antibody conjugate targeting CD19, has demonstrated significant clinical benefit in R/R DLBCL in a global phase II LOTIS-2 study. In the China bridging pivotal phase II OL-ADCT-402-001 study, eligible patients aged ≥18 years with R/R DLBCL who had failed ≥2 lines of systemic therapies were enrolled and treated every 3 weeks with 150 μg/kg Lonca for two cycles; then 75 μg/kg for subsequent cycles (up to 1 year). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) assessed by an independent review committee. Primary analyses for efficacy and safety were performed on the patients who received at least one treatment and had at least 6 months of follow-up following an initial documented response. As of data cutoff, 64 patients received Lonca (median 4.0 cycles; range, 1-17). The median number of prior lines of therapies was 3.0 (range, 2-12). The ORR was 51.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.7-64.2), and the complete response rate was 23.4%. Hematological events accounted for the majority of the most common (≥15%) grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), in which increased γ-glutamyltransferase (25.0%), and hypokalaemia (18.8%) also were reported. Serious TEAE were reported in 35 of 64 patients with four fatal TEAE. In conclusion, Lonca monotherapy demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy and was well-tolerated in heavily pretreated Chinese patients with R/R DLBCL, which was consistent with the results of the LOTIS-2 study in Caucasian patients.

New strategies for enhancing enrollment of underrepresented minorities in lymphoma clinical trials

ABSTRACT

New lymphoma treatments, including chimeric antigen receptor T cells, bispecific antibodies, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, have significantly improved patient outcomes. Despite these therapeutic advances, only 2% to 3% of adult patients with cancer participate in clinical trials. This participation is even lower among certain groups, including ethnic and racial minorities, individuals with low socioeconomic status, rural residents, older adults, and young adults. Underrepresentation of these groups in clinical trials limits the generalizability of trial results and is detrimental to those populations that do not receive equal access to novel therapies. Although racial and ethnic minorities constitute >40% of the US population, they make up only ∼15% of clinical trial participants. The US Food and Drug Administration now requires sponsors seeking regulatory approval for therapies via registrational clinical trials to submit a plan to ensure diversity among trial participants. This article addresses strategies for enhancing enrollment of underrepresented minorities in lymphoma clinical trials.

Marine peptides in lymphoma: surgery at molecular level for therapeutic understanding

Lymphoma, the most common form of blood cancer, affects primarily the intricate network of tissues and organs known as the lymphatic system. Globally, it ranks among the leading causes of cancer-related deaths. Although conventional therapies have led to significant advancements, they are accompanied by adverse side effects and present challenges in cases of multidrug resistance, refractory patients, and relapses. This highlights a pressing need for innovative treatment approaches. Extensive research on the anti-lymphoma properties of natural compounds has particularly focused on marine organisms as valuable sources for potential medicinal agents. Among these, anticancer peptides have garnered attention due to their multiple beneficial effects against cancer, coupled with reduced toxicity to normal cells. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms underlying the anti-lymphoma effects of marine peptides, examining the diverse pathways through which these peptides impact physiological processes. Key effects include modulation of cell viability, induction of apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, antimitotic activity, immunotherapeutic properties, disruption of mitochondrial function and induction of oxidative stress, cancer cell membrane destruction, and interference with microtubule stability. The review also highlights the antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) derived from marine peptides and their synergistic effects with other anti-lymphoma medications. This knowledge should inspire future study and development of these prospective therapeutic modalities and hasten the investigation and creation of novel lymphoma remedies derived from marine sources.

Progress in the discovery and development of anticancer agents from marine cyanobacteria

Covering 2010-April 2024There have been tremendous new discoveries and developments since 2010 in anticancer research based on marine cyanobacteria. Marine cyanobacteria are prolific sources of anticancer natural products, including the tubulin agents dolastatins 10 and 15 which were originally isolated from a mollusk that feeds on cyanobacteria. Decades of research have culminated in the approval of six antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and many ongoing clinical trials. Antibody conjugation has been enabling for several natural products, particularly cyanobacterial cytotoxins. Targeting tubulin dynamics has been a major strategy, leading to the discovery of the gatorbulin scaffold, acting on a new pharmacological site. Cyanobacterial compounds with different mechanisms of action (MOA), targeting novel or validated targets in a range of organelles, also show promise as anticancer agents. Important advances include the development of compounds with novel MOA, including apratoxin and coibamide A analogues, modulating cotranslational translocation at the level of Sec61 in the endoplasmic reticulum, largazole and santacruzamate A targeting class I histone deacetylases, and proteasome inhibitors based on carmaphycins, resembling the approved drug carfilzomib. The pipeline extends with SERCA inhibitors, mitochondrial cytotoxins and membrane-targeting agents, which have not yet advanced clinically since the biology is less understood and selectivity concerns remain to be addressed. In addition, efforts have also focused on the identification of chemosensitizing and antimetastatic agents. The review covers the state of current knowledge of marine cyanobacteria as anticancer agents with a focus on the mechanism, target identification and potential for drug development. We highlight the importance of solving the supply problem through chemical synthesis as well as illuminating the biological activity and in-depth mechanistic studies to increase the value of cyanobacterial natural products to catalyze their development.

Antibody Therapy for Patients with Lymphoid Malignancies: Past and Present

Antibody therapies are a crucial component of modern lymphoid malignancy treatment and an exciting area of active research. We performed a review of modern antibody therapies used in the treatment of lymphoid malignancies, with an emphasis on landmark studies and current directions. We describe the indications for rituximab, obinutuzumab, ADCs, and bispecific antibody therapies. Finally, we summarize early data from ongoing trials on emerging novel therapy combination regimens and discuss the role of machine learning in future therapy development.

Improving access to chimeric antigen receptor T-cells for refractory or relapsing diffuse large B cell lymphoma therapy in Asia

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T)-mediated therapies have shown promising clinical benefit in patients with refractory or relapsing (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, CAR-T treatment presents challenges such as lack of drug accessibility, financial barriers, variable physician preference or experience, and risk assessment based on patient-specific characteristics. This article thus aims to provide an overview of the CAR-T landscape for R/R DLBCL in Asia, with a focus on identifying barriers to access, from the perspective of Asian and international lymphoma experts. Presently, existing clinical data indicate that CAR-T therapy is a potentially curative strategy for R/R DLBCL in addition to stem cell transplantation, provided the patient's disease profile and treatment history have been thoroughly considered. However, longer-term follow-up data from large-scale studies are needed to confirm curative potential and define optimal sequencing of CAR-T in the context of novel emerging treatments, such as bi-specific antibodies, in the management of R/R DLBCL. Consequently, further research into CAR-T would benefit from collaboration between institutions. Furthermore, there is a wide disparity in CAR-T accessibility across regions due to complicated logistics and cost, which represent a significant barrier to patients in Asia. Hence, there is a need to increase representation and engagement across different stakeholders such as policymakers, payers, and the industry to arrive at a consensus on patient selection, establish clear guidelines, and develop strategies to lower CAR-T costs. Ultimately, data can support a multi-stakeholder approach when devising strategies to make CAR-T feasible and sustainable for patients.

Current Issues and Future Perspectives of Targeted Therapies in Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMLBCL) is a rare, aggressive B-cell lymphoma, sharing common features with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). PMLBCL is usually cured with single-hit immunochemotherapy in the first-line setting. Relapses tend to be aggressive and may be unresponsive to conventional chemotherapy. Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains a viable option for chemosensitive patients; nevertheless, targeted therapies appear to be highly promising. Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have already transformed the course of relapse/refractory disease, while CD-19-directed Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy may produce remarkably favorable outcomes. The exact position of CAR T-cells and CPIs in the treatment algorithm, along with the role of radiotherapy and ASCT, remains to be precisely determined. In the current review, we aim to present the recent research on targeted agents in PMLBCL and define their sequencing within the treatment algorithm, mainly in the relapse/refractory setting.

Liposomes-enabled cancer chemoimmunotherapy

Chemoimmunotherapy is an emerging paradigm in the clinic for treating several malignant diseases, such as non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and large B-cell lymphoma. However, the efficacy of this strategy is still restricted by serious adverse events and a high therapeutic termination rate, presumably due to the lack of tumor-targeted distribution of both chemotherapeutic and immunotherapeutic agents. Targeted drug delivery has the potential to address this issue. Among the most promising nanocarriers in clinical translation, liposomes have drawn great attention in cancer chemoimmunotherapy in recent years. Liposomes-enabled cancer chemoimmunotherapy has made significant progress in clinics, with impressive therapeutic outcomes. This review summarizes the latest preclinical and clinical progress in liposome-enabled cancer chemoimmunotherapy and discusses the challenges and future directions of this field.

Targeted Therapies: The Role of Monoclonal Antibodies in Disease Management

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are a key class of biotherapeutic medicines used to treat a wide range of diseases, such as cancer, infectious diseases, autoimmune disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and hemophilia. They can be engineered for greater effectiveness and specific applications while maintaining their structural elements for immune targeting. Traditional immunoglobulin treatments have limited therapeutic uses and various adverse effects. That makes mAbs show rapid growth in the pharmaceutical market, with over 250 mAbs in clinical studies. Although mAbs offer higher specificity, they are less effective against complex antigens. They have become essential in treating diseases with limited medical options, providing innovative solutions that improve patients' quality of life through increasing survival rates, shortening the length of stay in hospitals with an improved treatment outcome, and reducing side effects. This review outlines the mechanisms, applications, and advancements of mAbs, highlighting their transformative role in modern medicine and their potential to shape future therapeutic interventions.

Matching plus regression adjustment for the estimation of the average treatment effect on survival outcomes: a case study with mosunetuzumab in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (England's health technology assessment body) recommend the use of the average treatment effect (ATE) as an estimand for economic evaluations. However there is limited literature on methods to estimate the ATE, particularly in the case of survival outcomes. Single-arm trials and real-world data are playing an increasing role in health technology assessments, particularly in oncology/rare diseases, generating a need for new ATE estimation methods. This study aimed to present the adaptation and utility of this methodology for survival outcomes.

METHODS

The approach is based on a "doubly robust" method combining matching with regression adjustment (Austin 2020) using a Weibull model (lowest Akaike information criteria [AIC] specification) to estimate counterfactual event times. As a case study, we compared mosunetuzumab versus rituximab/bendamustine, as a proxy for rituximab/chemotherapy, in 3L+ relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. Individual patient data for mosunetuzumab (NCT02500407) and a combination of two rituximab/bendamustine 3L+ follicular lymphoma cohorts (NCT02187861/NCT02257567) were used. Endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Sensitivity analyses were performed to test robustness to different distributional assumptions (log-normal, log-logistic and exponential) or model specifications (second, third and fourth lowest AIC) for event times.

RESULTS

The case study found improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.43 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.13, 0.91]) and OS (HR 0.30 [95% CI: 0.05, 5.28]) for mosunetuzumab. Consistent findings (HR range 0.25-0.47 and 0.21-0.50 with all CIs excluding/including 1 for PFS/OS, respectively) were observed in sensitivity analyses.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS

The proposed adaptation expands the range of available approaches for the estimation of the (local) ATE for survival outcomes in health technology assessments using "doubly robust" methods. This approach appeared relatively robust to modelling decisions in our case study.

Resistance to antibody-drug conjugates: A review

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are antitumor drugs composed of monoclonal antibodies and cytotoxic payload covalently coupled by a linker. Currently, 15 ADCs have been clinically approved worldwide. More than 100 clinical trials at different phases are underway to investigate the newly developed ADCs. ADCs represent one of the fastest growing classes of targeted antitumor drugs in oncology drug development. It takes advantage of the specific targeting of tumor-specific antigen by antibodies to deliver cytotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs precisely to tumor cells, thereby producing promising antitumor efficacy and favorable adverse effect profiles. However, emergence of drug resistance has severely hindered the clinical efficacy of ADCs. In this review, we introduce the structure and mechanism of ADCs, describe the development of ADCs, summarized the latest research about the mechanisms of ADC resistance, discussed the strategies to overcome ADCs resistance, and predicted biomarkers for treatment response to ADC, aiming to contribute to the development of ADCs in the future.

Marine natural products as a source of novel anticancer drugs: an updated review (2019-2023)

Marine natural products have long been recognized as a vast and diverse source of bioactive compounds with potential therapeutic applications, particularly in oncology. This review provides an updated overview of the significant advances made in the discovery and development of marine-derived anticancer drugs between 2019 and 2023. With a focus on recent research findings, the review explores the rich biodiversity of marine organisms, including sponges, corals, algae, and microorganisms, which have yielded numerous compounds exhibiting promising anticancer properties. Emphasizing the multifaceted mechanisms of action, the review discusses the molecular targets and pathways targeted by these compounds, such as cell cycle regulation, apoptosis induction, angiogenesis inhibition, and modulation of signaling pathways. Additionally, the review highlights the innovative strategies employed in the isolation, structural elucidation, and chemical modification of marine natural products to enhance their potency, selectivity, and pharmacological properties. Furthermore, it addresses the challenges and opportunities associated with the development of marine-derived anticancer drugs, including issues related to supply, sustainability, synthesis, and clinical translation. Finally, the review underscores the immense potential of marine natural products as a valuable reservoir of novel anticancer agents and advocates for continued exploration and exploitation of the marine environment to address the unmet medical needs in cancer therapy.

How I treat older patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

ABSTRACT

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive, yet curable, malignancy, but older patients are at higher risk of relapsed disease because they may not be eligible for full-intensity frontline chemoimmunotherapy or have comorbidities that limit standard treatments. Recent years have brought more treatment options than ever for this patient population, but it remains challenging to determine which can be safely and effectively offered to older patients. Formal determinations of fitness including geriatric assessments remain critical, but there is less guidance on how to best use this tool in the relapsed setting. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is accessible to older patients, provided they can be supported through the intensive road to this treatment. If relapse occurs despite this or alternative therapies are preferred, many novel therapeutic options and combinations exist with some potential modifications for older adults, such as bispecific antibodies, tafasitamab and lenalidomide, polatuzumab-containing regimens, or loncastuximab tesirine. This article provides a summary of our approach to the management of this diverse population of older patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL.

Efficacy and Safety of Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin and Prednisone for Previously Untreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Real-World, Multi-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study

Polatuzumab vedotin plus R-CHP (Pola-R-CHP) is approved as a new standard first-line therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) based on the POLARIX trial. However, real-world data on its efficacy and safety in unselected patients is lacking. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate Pola-R-CHP versus R-CHOP outcomes in routine clinical practice in China. This is a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study and included all consecutive patients that received at least one dose of polatuzumab vedotin up until February 2024. A total of 600 eligible patients from 6 centers were identified, 131 receiving Pola-R-CHP and 469 R-CHOP. After 1:2 propensity score matching, 128 pairs were obtained for further survival and prognosis analysis. With a median follow-up of 12.8 months, 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) was numerically higher with Pola-R-CHP versus R-CHOP (90.3% vs. 84.1%, p = 0.18). Benefits were consistently observed across molecular subgroups, especially advanced stage, ECOG ≥ 2, extranodal involvement ≥ 2 and non-GCB group. The complete response rate of the Pola-R-CHP group was higher than that of the RCHOP group (86.8% vs. 79.7%; p = 0.09), but there was no statistical difference. Safety profiles were comparable, with no new concerns. Among 128 patients treated with Pola-R-CHP, 96 underwent gene sequencing analysis: MCD (25.0%), EZB (13.5%), combined subtype (12.5%), ST2 (9.4%), and other/unclassifiable subtype (30.2%). The most common mutations (> 25% of cases) were PIM1, TP53, BCL-6, KMT2D, SOCS1, BCL-2. Genetic testing results show the correlation between genotyping, gene mutations in PIM1/TP53 and therapeutic efficacy. This large real-world study supports Pola-R-CHP as an effective frontline option for DLBCL, with sustained efficacy versus R-CHOP observed in unselected populations. While 12-month PFS failed to reach statistical significance, subgroup analyses favor Pola-R-CHP. Further research with a wider population, longer follow-up, and screening of advantageous groups are warranted.

Poor outcome of older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after progression

One-third of the patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) experience relapse despite receiving standard R-CHOP chemotherapy. We aimed to elucidate the clinical course and prognosis in older patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) DLBCL in a single-center experience in Japan. We conducted a retrospective survey of 52 older patients with R/R DLBCL (aged >65 years at diagnosis; 54% men) who received R-CHOP chemotherapy, to assess their clinical course and prognosis. The median progression-free survival was 8.5 months. Seventeen patients had central nervous system (CNS) relapse, with 11 receiving high-dose methotrexate or whole-brain irradiation. Briefly, 30 patients underwent salvage chemotherapy, whereas 11 received palliative care only. Overall survival (OS) from initial treatment and progression were 20.8 and 7.8 months, respectively. Patients with disease progression within 12 months from initial treatment had a significantly poorer OS than those with disease progression over 12 months, while CNS relapse did not affect OS. Among the 41 reported deaths, 40 were due to lymphoma. As the prognosis in older patients with R/R DLBCL is poor even after salvage chemotherapy, improved initial treatment strategies to reduce the risk of progression and more effective and feasible treatments after progression are warranted.

A real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system events for polatuzumab vedotin

BACKGROUND

Polatuzumab vedotin is the first antibody-drug conjugate approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. This study evaluated adverse events (AEs) associated with polatuzumab vedotin by data mining of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

METHODS

This study included AEs registered in FAERS between 2019 Q2 and 2023 Q2. Four algorithms were used to quantify the signals of polatuzumab vedotin-associated AEs, including reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker.

RESULTS

A total of 7,609,450 reports were collected from the FAERS database, and 1,388 reports of polatuzumab vedotin were identified as primary suspected AEs. Polatuzumab vedotin-associated AEs involved 26 organ systems. According to the four algorithms, 108 significant disproportionality AEs were retained simultaneously. Unexpected significant AEs included gastrointestinal hemorrhage, ileus, gastrointestinal perforation, cholecystitis, hypogammaglobulinemia, hepatitis B reactivation, hypercalcemia, hydronephrosis, cystitis hemorrhagic, interstitial lung disease, and thrombophlebitis. The median time to onset of polatuzumab vedotin-associated AEs was 20 (interquartile range 4-56) days.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identified significant new AE signals for polatuzumab vedotin through real-world disproportionality analysis data and may provide additional evidence for risk identification of polatuzumab vedotin.

Double hit lymphoma: contemporary understanding and practices

Double-hit lymphoma (DHL) is a high-risk subtype of large B-cell lymphoma, defined by concurrent rearrangements MYC and BCL2. The diagnosis is confirmed through histologic and immunophenotypic examination and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to demonstrate the rearrangements. DHL morphology ranges from DLBCL to high-grade B-cell lymphoma which can resemble Burkitt lymphoma and is almost always germinal center B-cell like (GCB). Prognosis is influenced by elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), advanced stage, and extranodal involvement, among other factors. Treatment outcomes vary, but intensive chemotherapy regimens such as dose-adjusted EPOCH-R have shown the most promising results, though low-risk cases do occur and may do well with less intensive treatments. Recent therapeutic advances such as CAR-T cells and bispecific antibodies offer promise for patients with relapsed/refractory disease. This review synthesizes data from recent literature to provide a comprehensive analysis of the molecular underpinnings, diagnostic criteria, prognostic factors, and therapeutic strategies for DHL.

Balance Index to Determine the Follow-Up Duration of Oncology Trials

Several indices were suggested to determine the follow up duration in oncology trials from either maturity or stability perspective, by maximizing timet such that the index was either greater or less than a pre-defined cutoff value. However, the selection of cutoff value was subjective and usually no commonly agreed cutoff value existed; sometimes one had to resort to simulations. To solve this problem, a new balance index was proposed, which integrated both data stability and data maturity. Its theoretical properties and relationships with other indices were investigated; then its performance was demonstrated through a case study. The highlights of the index are: (1) easy to calculate; (2) free of cutoff value selection; (3) generally consistent with the other indices while sometimes able to shorten the follow-up duration thus more flexible. For the cases where the new balance index cannot be calculated, a modified balance index was also proposed and discussed. For either single arm trial or randomized clinical trial, the two new balance indices can be implemented to widespread situations such as designing a new trial from scratch, or using aggregated trial information to inform the decision-making in the middle of trial conduct.

The potential of antibody-drug conjugates for effective therapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a rapidly evolving class of anti-cancer drugs with a significant impact on management of hematological malignancies including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). ADCs combine a cytotoxic drug (a.k.a. payload) attached through a linker to a monoclonal antibody specific to a particular cancer antigen. Payloads include microtubule disruptors or DNA damaging chemicals. After attaching to the antigen, the ADCs are internalized, and the payload is dissociated from ADC by lysozymes and delivered to the intended site for exerting cytotoxic effects. This unique molecular design permits a better balance of efficacy and safety. Loncastuximab tesirine and polatuzumab vedotin are two ADCs approved in the U.S.A. for treatment of DLBCL.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the efficacy and safety data of these two drugs. We will review new ADC-based combination regimens and novel constructs in development.

EXPERT OPINION

ADCs have made a significant impact in improving outcomes of DLBCL patients. Both polatuzumab vedotin and loncastuximab tesirine are established as useful therapeutics options, with polatuzumab vedotin currently approved in first line and relapsed/refractory setting, while loncastuximab tesirine is approved in relapsed setting. ADCs are effective with tolerable safety profile and currently many more ADCs are undergoing clinical trials.

Neuro-toxicities of chemo- and immune-therapies in haematologic malignancies: from mechanism to management

Chemo- and immune therapies administered to treat haematologic malignancies frequently cause neurologic injury. The adverse events range from mild cognitive impairment and headaches to severe conditions such as seizures, stroke and encephalitis. We performed a comprehensive literature review and report the types, mechanisms, management and prevention of neuro-toxicity resulting from these therapies in subjects who develop these toxic effects. Our paper will not discuss radiation therapy, as it has already been extensively reviewed by many authors. Our focus will be on recently developed anti-cancer drugs.

Tafasitamab for the treatment of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) require additional treatments, especially those not eligible or not responding to high dose cytotoxic chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. Over the last few years, several new treatments have been developed and approved for these patients, among them of particular relevance are those targeting CD19. Tafasitamab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting CD19, composed of a modified fragment crystallizable (Fc) region engineered with higher affinity for Fc gamma receptors (FcγR) receptors, leading to increased cytotoxicity through natural killer cells and macrophages (antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis). In this product review, we will discuss its mechanism of action, safety profile and efficacy results from clinical trials that led to its approval in combination with lenalidomide for patients with R/R DLBCL ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy and autologous transplantation.

FDA Approval Summary: Polatuzumab Vedotin in the First-Line Treatment of Select Large B-Cell Lymphomas

In April 2023, the U.S. FDA granted regular approval to polatuzumab vedotin-piiq in combination with a rituximab product, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (pola+R-CHP) for adult patients who have previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified, or high-grade B-cell lymphoma and who have an International Prognostic Index score of 2 or greater. Approval was based on POLARIX, a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the superiority of substituting vincristine with polatuzumab vedotin in the rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone regimen as first-line therapy for patients with large B-cell lymphoma. Efficacy was based on investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) in 879 patients who were randomized to receive pola+R-CHP or rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, followed by two cycles of rituximab alone. PFS was statistically significantly longer with pola+R-CHP, with an HR of 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.95) and log-rank P value of 0.0177 (two-sided α = 0.05). There was no improvement demonstrated in the key secondary endpoints of the complete response rate at the end of therapy or overall survival (OS). Several issues raised uncertainty about the benefit-risk profile of polatuzumab vedotin in this curative-intent setting, including the modest PFS benefit of pola+R-CHP and lack of OS benefit. The application was therefore presented at an Oncology Drugs Advisory Committee. This article summarizes key aspects of the regulatory review, including perspectives on PFS and OS results and other endpoints.

Antibody-Based Immunotherapies for the Treatment of Hematologic Malignancies

Despite the great advancements in treatment strategies for hematological malignancies (HMs) over the years, their effective treatment remains challenging. Conventional treatment strategies are burdened with several serious drawbacks limiting their effectiveness and safety. Improved understanding of tumor immunobiology has provided novel anti-cancer strategies targeting selected immune response components. Currently, immunotherapy is counted as the fourth pillar of oncological treatment (together with surgery, chemo- and radiotherapy) and is becoming standard in the treatment regimen, alone or in combination therapy. Several categories of immunotherapies have been developed and are currently being assessed in clinical trials for the treatment of blood cancers, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, antigen-targeted antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, tumor vaccines, and adoptive cell therapies. However, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and their derivatives have achieved the most notable clinical outcome so far. Since the approval of rituximab for treating B-cell malignancies, the availability of mAbs against tumor-specific surface molecules for clinical use has flourished. Antibody-based therapy has become one of the most successful strategies for immunotherapeutic cancer treatment in the last few decades, and many mAbs have already been introduced into standard treatment protocols for some hematologic malignancies. To further increase the efficacy of mAbs, they can be conjugated to radioisotopes or cytostatic drugs, so-called antibody-drug conjugates. Moreover, with the growing recognition of T-cell immunity's role in cancer development, strategies aimed at enhancing T cell activation and inhibiting mechanisms that suppress T cell function are actively being developed. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current status of immunotherapeutic strategies based on monoclonal antibodies and their derivatives, including antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engagers, and checkpoint inhibitors, approved for the treatment of various HMs.

Sequencing of therapy for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the era of novel drugs

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive lymphoma, accounting for ~40% of all cases in adults. Whilst approximately two-thirds of DLBCL patients can be cured by first-line therapy, one-third of patients are primary refractory or relapse after an initial response (r/r DLBCL). Recent advances in the treatment of DLBCL have been achieved by a plethora of novel drugs, such as monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), bi-specific T-cell engagers (BITEs), and CD-19 directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapies. The increasing number of therapeutic options significantly improved the outcome of patients; however, the therapeutic algorithm has become increasingly complex. In this review, we provide an overview of novel therapies for DLBCL patients and potential treatment sequencing from first to second, third, and later lines.

Review of dose justifications for antibody-drug conjugate approvals from clinical pharmacology perspective: A focus on exposure-response analyses

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are revolutionizing cancer treatment by specific targeting of the cancer cells thereby improving the therapeutic window of the drugs. Nevertheless, they are not free from unwanted toxicities mainly resulting from non-specific targeting and release of the payload. Therefore, the dosing regimen must be optimized through integrated analysis of the risk-benefit profile, to maximize the therapeutic potential. Exposure-response (E-R) analysis is one of the most widely used tools for risk-benefit assessment and it plays a pivotal role in dose optimization of ADCs. However, compared to conventional E-R analysis, ADCs pose unique challenges since they feature properties of both small molecules and antibodies. In this article, we review the E-R analyses that have formed the key basis of dose justification for each of the 12 ADCs approved in the USA. We discuss the multiple analytes and exposure metrics that can be utilized for such analysis and their relevance for safety and efficacy of the treatment. For the endpoints used for the E-R analysis, we were able to uncover commonalities across different ADCs for both safety and efficacy. Additionally, we discuss dose optimization strategies for ADCs which are now a critical component in clinical development of oncology drugs.

Racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma in adolescent and young adults: a SEER database analysis

Data regarding racial disparities in the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is limited in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) population. We utilized the surveillance, epidemiology, and end-result (SEER) registry research plus database to evaluate racial/ethnic disparities in 8605 AYA patients with DLBCL. Race/ethnicity was categorized into three main subsets: non-Hispanic Whites (NHW), non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB), and 'other races' that included Hispanics (H), American Indian/Alaskan Native (AI/AN), Asian or Pacific Islander (A/PI). NHB were more likely to present with advanced stage disease (p < 0.001) and B symptoms (p < 0.001) and were less likely to receive chemotherapy (p < 0.001) compared to non-Hispanic white (NHW) patients and other races respectively. NHB patients had inferior 5-year disease specific survival (DSS) (70% vs 85% vs 80%, p < 0.001) and 5-year overall survival (OS) (66% vs 82% vs 77%, p < 0.001) compared to NHW and other races respectively. Black race was independently associated with both inferior DSS (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.17-2.05, p = 0.002) and OS (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.10-1.83, p = 0.007) after adjusting for age, gender, stage, presence of B symptoms, receipt of chemotherapy and radiation. NHB-DLBCL patients also had a lower 1-year relative survival rate (RSR) compared to NHW and other races. The low RSR in NHB patients persisted up to 5 years from diagnosis unlike NHW and other races. Our study shows that despite significant therapeutic advances in DLBCL over the last two decades, NHB AYA patients with DLBCL continue to have inferior survival outcomes compared to other ethnic and racial groups with disparities arising as early as the first year of diagnosis.

Epcoritamab in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma: 2-year follow-up from the pivotal EPCORE NHL-1 trial

Primary results (median follow-up, 10.7 months) from the pivotal EPCORE® NHL-1 study in relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) demonstrated deep, durable responses with epcoritamab, a CD3xCD20 bispecific antibody, when used as monotherapy. We report long-term efficacy and safety results in patients with LBCL (N = 157; 25.1-month median follow-up). As of April 21, 2023, overall response rate was 63.1% and complete response (CR) rate was 40.1%. Estimated 24-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 27.8% and 44.6%, respectively. An estimated 64.2% of complete responders remained in CR at 24 months. Estimated 24-month PFS and OS rates among complete responders were 65.1% and 78.2%, respectively. Of 119 minimal residual disease (MRD)-evaluable patients, 45.4% had MRD negativity, which correlated with longer PFS and OS. CR rates were generally consistent across predefined subgroups: 36% prior chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, 32% primary refractory disease, and 37% International Prognostic Index ≥3. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were cytokine release syndrome (51.0%), pyrexia (24.8%), fatigue (24.2%), and neutropenia (23.6%). These results underscore the long-term benefit of epcoritamab for treating R/R LBCL with deep responses across subgroups, including patients with hard-to-treat disease and expected poor prognosis (ClinicalTrials.gov Registration: NCT03625037).

Dermatologic toxicities of antibody-drug conjugates

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a new and emerging category of oncologic treatments that combine the target specificity of a monoclonal antibody with a cytotoxic payload. These drugs are associated with unique cutaneous toxicities that vary across agents. Currently, there are eleven ADCs with regulatory approval for solid and liquid tumors and over 80 ADCs currently in clinical development, it is critical for dermatologists to recognize and appropriately mitigate the cutaneous toxicities associated with these therapies. This clinical review will summarize the novel mechanisms and indications of approved ADCs, discuss dermatologic toxicities demonstrated in clinical trials and postmarketing studies, and impart recognition and management guidance when encountering these reactions to help maintain patients safely and comfortably on their medications.

Polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A phase III bridging study in Chinese patients

BACKGROUND

Patients with transplant-ineligible relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) have limited treatment options and poor outcomes.

METHODS

This phase III study (NCT04236141) evaluated the efficacy and safety of polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab (Pola+BR) versus BR in Chinese patients with transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL to support regulatory submission in China. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive Pola+BR or placebo+BR. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) at the end of treatment (EOT) by positron emission tomography-computed tomography.

RESULTS

Overall, 42 patients were analyzed (Pola+BR, n = 28; placebo+BR, n = 14). At data cutoff (July 12, 2021; median follow-up: 7.5 months), CR at EOT was 25.0% (7/28) with Pola+BR and 14.3% (2/14) with placebo+BR, 10.7% difference [95% confidence interval (CI): -19.0, 40.4]. The median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 4.6 (95%CI: 3.1-6.4) months with Pola+BR and 2.0 (95% CI: 1.9-4.6) months with placebo+BR, with a 50% reduction in risk of progression or death (unstratified hazard ratio: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.24-1.05). The median overall survival was 10.6 [95% CI: 5.5-not evaluable (NE)] and 6.5 (95% CI: 6.0-NE) months, with a 45% reduction in risk of death. The incidence of Grade 3-4 adverse events was similar between Pola+BR (20/27 patients, 74.1%) and placebo+BR arms (11/14 patients, 78.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Efficacy findings were consistent with results of the GO29365 study (NCT02257567); treatment with Pola+BR led to clinically meaningful improvements in response rates in Chinese patients with transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL with no new safety signals.

Heterogeneous Surface CD79b Expression in Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas Assessed by Flow Cytometry on Lymph Node Biopsies

Background: CD79b is a B-cell-specific antigen that is crucial to the B-cell receptor and is considered a key target for treatment in aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Methods: While immunohistochemical studies have shown widespread expression of CD79b in mature B-cell-derived lymphomas, flow cytometry allows for precise measurement and differentiation between surface and intracellular localization. Results: In our comparative analysis, we discovered that CD79b expression percentages and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) were lower in a group of 127 cases of aggressive B-cell lymphomas compared to a control group of benign reactive hyperplasia. We also observed significant variability in the surface expression of CD79b among lymphoma cases, with 18% showing predominantly intracellular positivity. There was a strong correlation between the surface expression of CD79b and clonal light chains. Notably, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphomas exhibited significantly lower surface CD79b expression compared to other lymphoma subtypes (median 0.8% IQR 0-48.5 vs. 80% IQR 24-97, p = 0.0005). Furthermore, patients over 60 years old and those with a higher Revised International Prognostic Index (R-IPI) had significantly higher CD79b expression, both of which are associated with a significant benefit from adding an anti-CD79b drug conjugate to first-line chemotherapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Conclusions: In conclusion, the quantitative flow cytometric analysis of CD79b surface expression in aggressive B-cell lymphomas provides clinically relevant information, highlighting its potential usefulness in guiding therapeutic decisions.

Therapeutic advances in the targeting of ROR1 in hematological cancers

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are key cell surface receptors involved in cell communication and signal transduction, with great importance in cell growth, differentiation, survival, and metabolism. Dysregulation of RTKs, such as EGFR, VEGFR, HER2 or ROR, could lead to various diseases, particularly cancers. ROR1 has emerged as a promising target in hematological malignancies. The development of ROR1 targeted therapies is continuously growing leading to remarkable novel therapeutical approaches using mAbs, antibody-drug conjugates, several small molecules or CAR T cells which have shown encouraging preclinical results. In the hematological field, mAbs, small molecules, BiTEs or CAR T cell therapies displayed promising outcomes with the clinical trials data encouraging the use of anti-ROR1 therapies. This paper aims to offer a comprehensive analysis of the current landscape of ROR1-targeted therapies in hematological malignancies marking the innovative approaches with promising preclinical and clinical. Offering a better understanding of structural and functional aspects of ROR1 could lead to new perspectives in targeting a wide spectrum of malignancies.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Older Adults: A Comprehensive Review

Older adults (OA) with DLBCL are a heterogenous population with suboptimal outcomes. In this review, we identify and address the unique challenges encountered in the care of OA with DLBCL. We elaborate on the role and limitations of current geriatric assessment (GA) tools and ways to incorporate fitness in therapeutic decision making. We suggest best practices to implement GA in routine practice and clinical trials. The most widely used tool is simplified GA (sGA) which categorizes patients into fit, unfit and frail groups. Patients who are fit benefit from full dose/curative approach, whereas consideration should be made to reduce the intensity of chemotherapy for unfit patients. Frail patients with DLBCL are a major unmet need without any satisfactory treatment options. Ongoing investigations combining novel therapies into chemotherapy-free regimens are underway with promising early results. In the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting, anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy (CART) is now the standard of care for primary refractory disease or relapse within 12 months of completing therapy. Autologous stem cell transplant is still a consideration for fit OA with relapse >12 months after completing therapy. The recent approval of bispecific antibodies is a welcome advance that will greatly benefit OA not eligible for CART. Other regimens available for patients ineligible for CART or for those who experience progression post-CART include polatuzumab-rituximab±bendamustine, tafasitamab-lenalidomide, loncastuximab or chemotherapy-based approaches such as rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin. We discuss the changing paradigm in R/R DLBCL and spotlight emerging data from recent congresses that can improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Event-free survival at 36 months is a suitable endpoint for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with immunochemotherapy: real-world evidence from the North Japan Hematology Study Group

Information regarding follow-up duration after treatment for newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is important. However, a clear endpoint has yet to be established. We enrolled a total of 2,182 patients newly diagnosed with DLBCL between 2008 and 2018. The median age of the patients was 71 years. All patients were treated with rituximab- and anthracycline-based chemotherapies. Each overall survival (OS) was compared with the age- and sex-matched Japanese general population (GP) data. At a median follow-up of 3.4 years, 985 patients experienced an event and 657 patients died. Patients who achieved an event-free survival (EFS) at 36 months (EFS36) had an OS equivalent to that of the matched GP (standard mortality ratio [SMR], 1.17; P=0.1324), whereas those who achieved an EFS24 did not have an OS comparable to that of the matched GP (SMR, 1.26; P=0.0095). Subgroup analysis revealed that relatively old patients (>60 years), male patients, those with limited-stage disease, those with a good performance status, and those with low levels of soluble interleukin 2 receptor already had a comparable life expectancy to the matched GP at an EFS24. In contrast, relatively young patients had a shorter life expectancy than matched GP, even with an EFS36. In conclusion, an EFS36 was shown to be a more suitable endpoint for newly diagnosed DLBCL patients than an EFS24. Of note, younger patients require a longer EFS period than older patients in order to obtain an equivalent life expectancy to the matched GP.

The role of antibody therapies in treating relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a review

INTRODUCTION

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is one of the most common types of leukemia in adult patients. The landscape of CLL therapy has changed in the last decades with the introduction of antibody-based therapies and novel targeted agents resulting in improved outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This article describes the use of monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates in the treatment of relapsed and refractory CLL. The mechanism of action and clinical applications and safety of antibody-based therapies, both as monotherapy and in combination with other drugs, are discussed. A literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles published in English. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references from the chosen articles.

EXPERT OPINION

Antibody-based therapeutic strategies have drastically changed the treatment of CLL, as they have introduced the concept of boosting immune responses against tumor cells. While immunotherapy is generally effective, some treatment failure can occur due to antigen loss, mutation, or down-regulation, and this remains the main obstacle to cure. The development of novel antibody therapies, including their combinations with targeted drugs and bispecific antibodies, might help to reduce toxicity and improve efficacy.