The impact of aggressive debulking surgery and cisplatin-based chemotherapy on progression-free survival in stage III and IV ovarian carcinoma

Is complete mesocolic excision or total mesorectal excision necessary during cytoreductive surgery in ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis with colonic involvement?

INTRODUCTION

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy are effective in the treatment of ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis (OPC). Colon resection is often required to achieve maximal cytoreduction during CRS. The success of complete mesocolic excision (CME) and total mesorectal excision (TME) in the surgical treatment of primary colorectal tumors is well-known. Our study aimed to investigate the factors affecting mesocolic lymph node metastasis (MLNM) and the contribution of CME/TME techniques to maximal cytoreduction in patients diagnosed with ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis (OPC) with colon metastasis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2004-2020, 30 patients who underwent colorectal resection with CME/TME techniques due to OPC-related colon metastasis were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The median age of patients was 61 (33-86). Six (20%) patients underwent total colectomy, 7 (23%) subtotal colectomy, 6 (20%) right hemicolectomy, 4 (13%) left hemicolectomy, and 7 (23%) rectosigmoid resection. Histopathological diagnosis was high-grade serous carcinoma in 29 (97%) patients, and malignant mixed Mullerian tumor in 1 (3%) patient. MLNM was detected in 17 (56%) of 30 patients. There was a significant relationship between MLNM and pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis (PALNM) (p = 0.009) and lymphovascular invasion in primary ovarian tumors (p = 0.017). There was no significant relationship between MLNM and depth of colonic invasion (p = 0.463), histological grade (p = 0.711), and primary/secondary surgery (p = 0.638). MLNM was seen in 8 (47%) of 17 patients with only serosal invasion.

CONCLUSION

A high rate of MLNM can be seen in OPC-induced colon metastasis regardless of the degree of colon wall invasion. In patients with PALNM, the frequency of MLNM increases. We believe that if colon resection is to be performed in OPC, a colectomy should be performed by CME/TME principles to achieve maximal cytoreduction.

Surgery in Advanced Ovary Cancer: Primary versus Interval Cytoreduction

Primary debulking surgery (PDS) has remained the only treatment of ovarian cancer with survival advantage since its development in the 1970s. However, survival advantage is only observed in patients who are optimally resected. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has emerged as an alternative for patients in whom optimal resection is unlikely and/or patients with comorbidities at high risk for perioperative complications. The purpose of this review is to summarize the evidence to date for PDS and NACT in the treatment of stage III/IV ovarian carcinoma. We systematically searched the PubMed database for relevant articles. Prior to 2010, NACT was reserved for non-surgical candidates. After publication of EORTC 55971, the first randomized trial demonstrating non-inferiority of NACT followed by interval debulking surgery, NACT was considered in a wider breadth of patients. Since EORTC 55971, 3 randomized trials-CHORUS, JCOG0602, and SCORPION-have studied NACT versus PDS. While CHORUS supported EORTC 55971, JCOG0602 failed to demonstrate non-inferiority and SCORPION failed to demonstrate superiority of NACT. Despite conflicting data, a subset of patients would benefit from NACT while preserving survival including poor surgical candidates and inoperable disease. Further randomized trials are needed to assess the role of NACT.

En bloc pelvic resection of ovarian cancer with rectosigmoid colectomy: a literature review

Maximal cytoreductive surgery is an important prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). To achieve maximal cytoreductive surgery, en bloc pelvic resection with rectosigmoid colectomy can be an effective surgical strategy. This surgical methodology was first described in 1968 as "radical oophorectomy." Since then, it has been adopted by many medical institutions around the world, and its safety has been shown by many studies. However, research on the surgical method is still lacking due to the limited number of prospective comparative studies. We will review the journals on en bloc pelvic resection with rectosigmoid colectomy published to date and discuss its efficacy, complications, and surgical techniques of the procedures.

Ultra-radical upfront surgery does not improve survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer; a natural experiment in a complete population

OBJECTIVE

Ultra-radical surgery to achieve complete resection in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has been widely accepted without strong supporting data. Our objective was to assess overall survival after a structured shift to an ultra-radical upfront surgical treatment algorithm and to investigate changes in the distribution of primary treatments after this shift.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this population-based cohort study, all women with suspected EOC in the Stockholm-Gotland region of Sweden reported to the Swedish Quality Registry for Gynecologic Cancer (SQRGC) and National Cancer Registry (NCR) were selected in two 3-year cohorts, based on year of diagnosis (before (cohort1) or after (cohort 2) change in surgical treatment algorithm) and followed for at least three years. 5-year overall survival (OS) in non-surgically and surgically treated women was analyzed. Moreover, proportional distribution of primary treatment was evaluated.

RESULTS

752 women were included in the final analysis (n = 364 and 388 in cohort 1 and 2 respectively) with a median follow-up of 29 and 27 months. The complete resection rate increased from 37 to 67% (p ≤ 0.001) as well as proportion non-surgically treated women, 24 to 33%. No improvement in OS was observed in non-surgically (HR 0.76 (95% CI, 0.58-1.01); p = 0.06) or surgically treated (HR 0.94 (95% CI, 0.75-1.18); p = 0.59) women, even when complete resection was achieved (HR 1.31 (95% CI, 0.89-1.92); p = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

A shift to ultra-radical upfront surgery in EOC did not improve survival despite a significant increase in complete resection rate. Identifying the limitations of surgical treatment remains a challenge.

Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy with Mitoxanthrone in Ovarian Cancer

Aims and background

Ovarian carcinoma remains confined to the peritoneal cavity for the greater part of its natural history, so intraperitoneal (IP) administration of chemotherapy could result in greater total drug exposure of the tumor and minimize systemic antiblastic drug side effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and toxic effects of intraperitoneal mitoxanthrone in patients affected by ovarian carcinoma with macroscopic absence of disease or minimal residual disease.

Methods

Ten patients were enrolled (stage II and III) who had been previously treated with neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (CDDP or CBDCA + CTX) and radical surgery resulting in macroscopic absence of disease or minimal residual disease (<1 cm). Mitoxanthrone (25 mg/m2) was instilled in 2 liters of normal saline every four weeks for 2-4 cycles.

Results

A total of 26 courses was administered; two patients discontinued IP therapy, one for chemoperitonitis and another for bowel perforation requiring catheter removal. Of the 10 patients receiving IP chemotherapy, 7 are alive at 5 years from radical surgery, and 3 had relapses at 13, 14 and 57 months, respectively, from radical surgery.

Conclusions

Intraperitoneal mitoxanthrone appears to be an effective second-line therapy in ovarian cancer; it is well tolerated as far as toxic effects are concerned, allowing cost reduction and improved patient compliance. For those cases requiring a limited number of peritoneal accesses traditional percutaneous systems have a more favorable cost/benefit ratio.

Biological Pathways Involved in Tumor Angiogenesis and Bevacizumab Based Anti-Angiogenic Therapy with Special References to Ovarian Cancer

The creation of new blood vessels from existing ones, which is a mechanism called “angiogenesis”, is essential in cancer to supply cancerous growth. Moreover, the development and the progression of the tumor and its metastases are the result of an efficient vascular response. Cancer cells release and activate different angiogenic growth factors and their receptors in the tumor microenvironment to promote the angiogenic process. The most important pro-angiogenic factor is the “Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor” (VEGF) because of its mitogen activity on vascular endothelium. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody that obstructs the binding of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor to its receptors and has been approved for the treatment of primary and recurrent ovarian cancer but also for many other solid tumors.

Preoperative prognostic nutritional index is a powerful predictor of prognosis in patients with stage III ovarian cancer

Many established inflammation- and nutrition-related factors have been investigated as potential independent prognostic factors in various cancers, including the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR), lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), body mass index (BMI), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI). This study was performed to estimate the prognostic value of these factors in predicting survival and platinum resistance in ovarian cancer (OC), especially according to stage. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analyses were performed to plot the survival curve and determine the independent prognostic factors. Additionally, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to predict platinum resistance and prognosis by comparing the predictive ability of PNI and cancer antigen (CA)-125. In all patients, decreased PNI was significantly associated with platinum resistance and poor overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Regarding tumor stage, decreased PNI was significantly associated with poor PFS and OS only in stage III OC. Furthermore, the PNI also showed a significantly higher AUC value than CA-125 for predicting mortality and platinum resistance in all OC patients, but not in stage III patients. In conclusion, decreased PNI is a powerful predictor of a poor prognosis in OC, and especially for stage III cases.

Current South African clinical Practice in Debulking Surgery for Ovarian Cancer

Introduction

The aim of this study was to assess practice patterns and rationale with regard to debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma among South African Gynaecological oncologists.

Methods

A survey was distributed to all practicing gynecological oncologists in South Africa. It was structured to assess definitions of optimal debulking, procedures used to achieve optimal debulking, and reasons for not performing specific procedures. Respondents were also asked to report on experience and additional surgical training to improve skill in performing ultra-radical debulking surgery.

Results

Eighty percent of gynecological oncologists completed the survey. Sixty percent of respondents reported that they view optimal debulking as no visible disease, and this was achieved in 63% of surgical cases. The most common barriers to optimal debulking were medical comorbidities (85%), followed by lack of expertise in ultra-radical debulking surgery (55%) and advanced patient age (40%). At operation, the most common disease findings precluding optimal debulking were large volume confluent peritoneal disease and confluent diaphragmatic disease. All of the surgeons perform excision of bulky pelvic and lower paraaortic nodes themselves. Bowel resections are often performed with the help of a colleague, but more than half of the respondents never perform diaphragmatic stripping, resection of liver metastases, distal pancreatic resection, or ablation of peritoneal metastases. Overall, most participants seem to regularly perform debulking procedures in the pelvis but are less comfortable with resection of upper abdominal or peritoneal disease. Most common reasons for not performing procedures were concerns about patient morbidity and concerns regarding benefit. Fifty percent of respondents also reported a lack of personal expertise in performing ultra-radical debulking procedures.

Conclusions

The progression of South African Gynaecological Oncologist towards more aggressive debulking surgery is following international trends, but many of the surgeons report a lack of experience in ultra-radical debulking surgery, especially in the upper abdomen.

Abdominal aortic resection and Y-graft placement to achieve complete cytoreduction in stage IIIc ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Major vascular resection with reconstruction in patients with gynecologic malignancy is rarely performed and infrequently reported.

CASE

A 40-year-old woman undergoing surgery for stage IIIc ovarian papillary serous adenocarcinoma was left with a 7-cm aortic metastasis not separable from the infrarenal abdominal aorta. An aortic resection with prosthetic graft placement was performed to achieve complete tumor resection. She remains disease-free in excess of 10 years with no evidence of graft complication.

CONCLUSION

Major vascular reconstructive procedures for the management of malignancy need not be precluded in properly selected circumstances.

A contemporary analysis of morbidity and outcomes in cytoreduction/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion

The risks and benefits of cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CS/HIPEC) continue to be debated by the oncology community. A retrospective analysis of contemporary data (2003–2011) was performed to provide objective information regarding surgical morbidity, mortality, and survival for patients undergoing CS/HIPEC at a comprehensive cancer center. While procedure-associated morbidity was comparable to other major surgical oncology procedures, there was no operative or 30-day mortality and 60-day mortality was 2.7%. Increasing numbers of bowel resections were found to correlate to an increased incidence of deep surgical site infections (including abscess and enterocutaneous fistula) and need for reoperation which was in turn associated with a decreased overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Five-year OS rates varied by site of tumor origin and histology (disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis [91.3%], Mesothelioma [80.8%], Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma [38.7%], and Colorectal Adenocarcinoma [38.2%]). With an acceptable morbidity and mortality rate, CS/HIPEC should be included as an effective treatment modality in the multidisciplinary care of select patients with peritoneal metastases.

Maximal cytoreduction in patients with FIGO stage IIIC to stage IV ovarian, fallopian, and peritoneal cancer in day-to-day practice: a Retrospective French Multicentric Study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the outcome of maximal cytoreductive surgery in patients with stage IIIC to stage IV ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer regarding overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five hundred twenty-seven patients with stage IIIC (peritoneal) and stage IV (pleural) ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma underwent surgery between January 2003 and December 2007 in 7 gynecologic oncology centers in France. Patients undergoing primary and interval debulking surgery were included, whichever the number of chemotherapy cycles. The extent of disease, type of surgical procedure, and amount of residual disease were recorded. A multivariate analysis of the outcome was performed, taking into account the stage, grade, and timing of surgery.

RESULTS

Median DFS was 17.9 months, but median OS was not reached at the time of analysis. Complete cytoreductive surgery, without evident residual tumor at the end of the procedure, was obtained in 71% of all patients (primary surgery, 33%). After neoadjuvant therapy, the rate of complete debulking surgery was higher (74%) compared to primary cytoreductive surgery (65%). Twenty-three percent of patients needed "ultra radical surgery" to achieve this goal. The most significant predictive factor for DFS and OS was complete cytoreductive surgery compared to any amount, even minimal (1-10 mm), of residual disease. In the group of patients with complete cytoreductive surgery, the patients undergoing surgery before chemotherapy showed better DFS than those having first chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The findings confirm that complete cytoreduction is the criterion standard of surgery in the management of advanced ovarian, peritoneal, and fallopian tube cancer, whatever the timing of surgery. With experienced teams, surgery was completed, without evident residual tumor in 71% of the cases.

Surgical cytoreduction for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

The standard management of primary ovarian cancer is optimal cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. Most women with primary ovarian cancer achieve remission on this combination therapy. For women achieving clinical remission after completion of initial treatment, most (60%) with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer will ultimately develop recurrent disease. However, the standard treatment of women with recurrent ovarian cancer remains poorly defined. Surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer has been suggested to be associated with increased overall survival.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of optimal secondary cytoreductive surgery for women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. To assess the impact of various residual tumour sizes, over a range between 0 cm and 2 cm, on overall survival.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to December 2012. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field. For databases other than MEDLINE, the search strategy has been adapted accordingly.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Retrospective data on residual disease, or data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective/retrospective observational studies that included a multivariate analysis of 50 or more adult women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, who underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy. We only included studies that defined optimal cytoreduction as surgery leading to residual tumours with a maximum diameter of any threshold up to 2 cm.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (KG, TA) independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where possible the data were synthesised in a meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

There were no RCTs; however, we found nine non-randomised studies that reported on 1194 women with comparison of residual disease after secondary cytoreduction using a multivariate analysis that met our inclusion criteria. These retrospective and prospective studies assessed survival after secondary cytoreductive surgery in women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.Meta- and single-study analyses show the prognostic importance of complete cytoreduction to microscopic disease, since overall survival was significantly prolonged in these groups of women (most studies showed a large statistically significant greater risk of death in all residual disease groups compared to microscopic disease).Recurrence-free survival was not reported in any of the studies. All of the studies included at least 50 women and used statistical adjustment for important prognostic factors. One study compared sub-optimal (> 1 cm) versus optimal (< 1 cm) cytoreduction and demonstrated benefit to achieving cytoreduction to less than 1 cm, if microscopic disease could not be achieved (hazard ratio (HR) 3.51, 95% CI 1.84 to 6.70). Similarly, one study found that women whose tumour had been cytoreduced to less than 0.5 cm had less risk of death compared to those with residual disease greater than 0.5 cm after surgery (HR not reported; P value < 0.001).There is high risk of bias due to the non-randomised nature of these studies, where, despite statistical adjustment for important prognostic factors, selection is based on retrospective achievability of cytoreduction, not an intention to treat, and so a degree of bias is inevitable.Adverse events, quality of life and cost-effectiveness were not reported in any of the studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In women with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, ability to achieve surgery with complete cytoreduction (no visible residual disease) is associated with significant improvement in overall survival. However, in the absence of RCT evidence, it is not clear whether this is solely due to surgical effect or due to tumour biology. Indirect evidence would support surgery to achieve complete cytoreduction in selected women. The risks of major surgery need to be carefully balanced against potential benefits on a case-by-case basis.

Evolution of surgical treatment paradigms for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: redefining 'optimal' residual disease

Over the past 40 years, the survival of patients with advanced ovarian cancer has greatly improved due to the introduction of combination chemotherapy with platinum and paclitaxel as standard front-line treatment and the progressive incorporation of increasing degrees of maximal cytoreductive surgery. The designation of "optimal" surgical cytoreduction has evolved from residual disease ≤ 1 cm to no gross residual disease. There is a growing body of evidence that patients with no gross residual disease have better survival than those with optimal but visible residual disease. In order to achieve this, more radical cytoreductive procedures such as radical pelvic resection and extensive upper abdominal procedures are increasingly performed. However, some investigators still suggest that tumor biology is a major determinant in survival and that optimal surgery cannot fully compensate for tumor biology. The aim of this review is to outline the theoretical rationale and historical evolution of primary cytoreductive surgery, to re-evaluate the preferred surgical objective and procedures commonly required to achieve optimal cytoreduction in the platinum/taxane era based on contemporary evidence, and to redefine the concept of "optimal" residual disease within the context of future surgical developments and analysis of treatment outcomes.

Current surgical management of ovarian cancer

Surgical management of ovarian cancer requires excellent judgment and mastery of a wide array of procedures. Involvement of a gynecologic oncologist improves outcomes. Staging of apparent stage I disease is important. Minimally invasive techniques provide advantages. Primary debulking surgery provides the best long-term survival of any strategy in advanced ovarian cancer. Aggressive surgical paradigms have the greatest success. Further cytoreductive surgery may be appropriate. Most relapsed patients require management of bowel obstruction at some point. Palliative intervention can enhance quality of life. Surgical correction may extend survival. For end-stage patients with progressive disease, the treating gynecologic oncologist must manage expectations.

Adnexal masses and malignancies of importance to the colorectal surgeon

In this article, the authors review both benign and malignant ovarian masses, as the colorectal surgeon who encounters an adnexal mass at the time of surgery should be aware of the steps necessary for surgical staging and optimal tumor resection.Ovarian tumors-most of which are benign-are divided into three major categories, in order of frequency: epithelial, germ cell, and sex cord-stromal tumors. Nonneoplastic conditions of the ovary that may present as adnexal masses include the following, according to World Health Organization (WHO) classification: pregnancy luteoma, hyperplasia of ovarian stroma, hyperthecosis, massive edema, solitary follicle cysts and corpus luteal cysts, multiple follicle cysts, and endometriosis.Epithelial ovarian tumors arise from the surface epithelium and can be benign or malignant. Histologic types are serous, mucinous, endometrioid, clear cell, or Brenner. Germ cell tumors are more likely to appear in females under 20 years, accounting for 70% of ovarian tumors in this age group. Approximately 3% are malignant. Teratomas are the most common germ cell tumors. Malignancies, in addition to malignant teratomas, include dysgerminomas, endodermal sinus tumors, and embryonal carcinomas. The more common sex cord-stromal tumors include granulosa stromal cell tumors, Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors, and gynandroblastomas.Surgical staging and optimal tumor resection are also addressed, with a focus on epithelial malignancies, as they are the most relevant to colorectal surgeons.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with prolonged primary treatment intervals in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) relative to primary surgery (PS) to determine if there was a difference in the total time and number of chemotherapy cycles given in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We identified 263 consecutive women meeting eligibility from 1993 to 2005 for this institutional review board-approved study. Eligible patients in this analysis were those women with advanced disease (stage IIIC-IV) in whom a maximal cytoreductive effort was planned either at PS or after NC. Time to start chemotherapy was defined as follows: (1) NC group: confirmation of diagnosis through biopsy, cytological diagnosis from ascites, and pleural effusion; (2) PS group: confirmation of diagnosis from the date of surgery that confirmed the diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer. Total chemotherapy cycles: (1) NC group: NC chemotherapy cycles plus postoperative cycles; (2) PS group: chemotherapy after primary tumor debulking surgery. Clinical information evaluated included chemotherapy type, chemotherapy cycle number, total time to administer frontline chemotherapy, and survival.

RESULTS

Median chemotherapy cycles were greater in the NC group compared with the PS group (9 [range, 4-30] vs 6 [range, 3-19]; P < 0.01). The PS group was also more likely to undergo chemotherapy regimens involving platinum and taxane treatment compared with the NC group (79% vs 65%; P = 0.017). Total time undergoing primary chemotherapy from initial diagnosis was greater in the NC group compared with PS (223 vs 151 days; P < 0.01). No significant difference was observed in overall survival and progression-free survival in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced ovarian cancer, NC followed by abdominal hysterectomy is associated with improved perioperative outcomes including optimal cytoreduction, decreased blood loss, and decreased inpatient hospitalization. In this cohort, NC was also associated with prolonged chemotherapy treatment intervals and increased chemotherapy cycles without improvement in survival.

The Role of Surgery in the Management of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Background

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most deadly gynecologic cancer in the United States. Multiple modalities of therapy are utilized in the management of the disease. The role of surgery remains important in the treatment of this disease and is described herein.

Methods

Medline and PubMed were utilized to search the English language medical literature up to March 2010. A broad range of studies and quality of data were analyzed, including prospective studies, case control analyses, and meta-analyses. When possible, the highest level of evidence was reviewed and presented.

Results

For the medically fit patient, optimal cytoreductive surgery positively impacts survival. For some highly selected patients, there is a role for a minimally invasive approach. In the recurrent setting, factors such as interval to recurrence and the distribution of disease will determine the utility of secondary cytoreductive surgery. A subgroup of patients may benefit from palliative surgical procedures in the recurrent setting.

Conclusions

Despite advances in the use of chemotherapy and biologic agents, surgery remains an important modality in the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer.

Cytoreductive surgery plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Most women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer will ultimately develop recurrent disease after completion of initial treatment with primary surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Secondary cytoreductive surgery may have survival benefits in selected patients. However, a number of chemotherapeutic agents are active in recurrent ovarian cancer and the standard treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer remains poorly defined.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of secondary surgical cytoreduction and chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone for women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Trials Register, The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, (CENTRAL) Issue 1 2009, MEDLINE and EMBASE up to February 2009. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of review articles and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We searched for RCTs, quasi-randomised trials and non-randomised studies that compared secondary cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy to chemotherapy alonein women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three reviewers independently assessed whether potentially relevant studies met the inclusion criteria. No trials were found and therefore no data were analysed.

MAIN RESULTS

The search strategy identified 1431 unique references of which all were excluded on the basis of title and abstract.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence from RCTs to inform decisions about secondary surgical cytoreduction and chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone for women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Ideally, a large randomised controlled trial or, at the very least, well designed non-randomised studies that use multivariate analysis to adjust for baseline imbalances are needed to compare these treatment modalities.

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in treating advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

The current management of advanced ovarian cancer consists of aggressive primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) followed by combination platinum based chemotherapy. Recent studies have suggested that platinum-based chemotherapy may be of benefit in patients with advanced ovarian cancer prior to cytoreductive surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, NACT). The concept of NACT has not been completely validated in the treatment of ovarian cancer. This review will discuss the role of NACT in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

The effect of primary cytoreduction on outcomes of patients with FIGO stage IIIC ovarian cancer stratified by the initial tumor burden in the upper abdomen cephalad to the greater omentum

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to analyze the effect of surgical outcome on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma stratified by the initial presence and volume of upper abdominal disease cephalad to the greater omentum (UAD) found at the time of exploration.

METHODS

We evaluated all patients with FIGO stage IIIC ovarian carcinoma who underwent primary cytoreduction followed by platinum-based chemotherapy at our institution between January 1989 and December 2006. The effect of surgical outcome was investigated using a time-to-event analysis. A Cox proportional hazards model was fit using clinical, surgical, and postoperative variables.

RESULTS

We identified 526 evaluable patients. Optimal versus suboptimal cytoreduction was significantly associated with improved median PFS and OS in patients with no, minimal (<or=1 cm), and bulky (>1 cm) UAD. On multivariate analysis, patients with bulky UAD who underwent optimal cytoreduction had a 28% decreased risk of relapse (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.53-0.99; P=0.04) and a 33% decreased risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval: 0.47-0.96; P=0.03) compared to patients who underwent suboptimal cytoreduction.

CONCLUSION

The presence of large-volume disease found during surgical exploration does not preclude the benefit of optimal cytoreduction. The findings support the management strategy of maximizing surgical efforts with increasing tumor burden in patients with stage IIIC ovarian cancer. Prospective studies are needed to more precisely quantify tumor burden and accurately determine the specific impact of cytoreduction on outcome.

Tertiary cytoreduction in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer: an updated series

OBJECTIVE

Surgical cytoreduction is an integral therapeutic modality for patients with epithelial ovarian (EOC), fallopian tube (FTC), or primary peritoneal (PPC) cancer in the primary setting. The role of surgical cytoreduction in the recurrent setting is not clearly defined and remains controversial. The objective of this study was to assess this potential survival benefit in a large cohort of patients with a long follow-up period.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients with recurrent EOC, FTC, or PPC who underwent tertiary cytoreduction at our institution from 2/98 to 2/08. Disease-specific survival (DSS) was calculated from the time of tertiary cytoreduction to death or last follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to analyze outcomes and to identify potential prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 77 patients were identified, of which 38 (49%) have died of disease. The median time from secondary to tertiary cytoreduction was 25.7 months (range, 4.1-99.4 months). The median follow-up after tertiary cytoreduction was 28.9 months (range, 0.7-123.7 months), with a median DSS for the entire cohort of 47.7 months (95% CI, 25.5-69.9 months). On univariate analysis, residual disease after tertiary cytoreduction and TFI were found to be significant prognostic factors. On multivariate analysis, only residual disease after tertiary cytoreduction retained prognostic significance (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Tertiary surgical cytoreduction may offer a survival benefit in a highly select group of patients with recurrent EOC, FTC, or PPC. This benefit appears to be greatest in patients in whom a complete gross resection can be achieved.

Oncolytic adenoviral gene therapy in ovarian cancer: why we are not wasting our time

Preclinical gene-therapy studies in the past 15 years have repeatedly raised hopes that we were about to enter a brave new era. However, many clinical trials have disappointed. For tumor types with poor response rates to first-line conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or high rates of chemorefractory disease, there remain very few treatment options. In this article we review gene therapy within the context of ovarian cancer. We examine why clinical data have been discouraging and discuss how the lessons learned from earlier trials are being applied to current research.

Aggressive surgical strategies in advanced ovarian cancer: a monocentric study of 203 stage IIIC and IV patients

AIMS

The standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer consists of cytoreductive surgery associated with a platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. Nevertheless, there is still the question as to the extent and timing of the surgical debulking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the place of surgery in the therapeutic sequence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed data from all consecutive patients with stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer, operated on at our institution between 1990 and 2005. Patients were divided into 2 groups, according to the position of surgery in the therapeutic sequence. Patients in group 1 received initial debulking surgery. Group 2 consisted of patients having received their first debulking after initial chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Two hundred and three patients were identified and frequently underwent aggressive surgery, in particular, digestive surgery with bowel resections. Perioperative mortality and morbidity rates were low (2% and 14%, respectively) and there was no difference between the groups. Overall survival in group 1 for patients with complete cytoreduction (residual disease (RD)=0), optimal surgery (RD<1cm) or sub-optimal surgery (RD>1cm) was 50%, 30% and 14%, respectively. In group 2, overall survival following complete surgery was 30%, and no long-term survival was observed when surgery was not complete at the time of interval surgery. Survival was worse for patients who had received more than 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the importance of surgery in the prognosis of advanced ovarian cancer. Only the patient subgroup that underwent complete initial or interval surgery was associated with a prolonged remission. Optimal surgery with a controlled morbidity can be achieved in many cases, even if bowel resection is needed, at the time of primary debulking. In the interval cytoreductive surgery subgroup, the response to initial chemotherapy and surgery was found to be essential for prognosis.

Cytoreductive surgery for patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify favorable preoperative characteristics and examine the impact of secondary cytoreductive surgery on survival for patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer were identified in our surgical database for the period 1988-2004. Patient charts were reviewed and data collected regarding patient demographics, surgical management, preoperative evaluation, perioperative complications, and oncologic outcome.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients met eligibility criteria. Preoperative factors that correlated with improved survival were disease-free interval of greater than 12 months (p<0.01) and residual disease after primary surgery of <2 cm (p<0.02). Other preoperative factors evaluated but not found significant included radiographic findings, physical findings, previous histology, stage, grade, previous chemotherapy, prior recurrence, and serum CA-125 level. Optimal resection to <1 cm residual disease was achieved in 86% of patients who had secondary cytoreduction. Small bowel and colon resection for cytoreduction occurred in 7% and 51% of patients, respectively. Operative complications occurred in 14% and postoperative complications occurred in 21% of patients. The median survival of patients who were optimally cytoreduced to <1 cm was 30 months compared to 17 months for patients with residual disease>or=1 cm (p<0.05). Operative factors that were evaluated and did not significantly effect survival were location of recurrence, presence of ascites, and extent of recurrence. Recurrent or progressive disease occurred in 75% of patients during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

When selecting patients for secondary cytoreduction, the most significant preoperative factors are disease-free interval and success of a prior cytoreductive effort. Once secondary cytoreductive surgery is attempted, the most important factor for improved survival is optimal cytoreduction. Of equal importance is counseling regarding the significant risk for bowel surgery, colostomy, and complications.

Role of surgery in ovarian carcinoma

Surgery plays a critical role in the optimal management of all stages of ovarian carcinoma. In apparent early-stage ovarian cancer, a comprehensive surgical evaluation allows stratification of patients into low- and high-risk categories. Low-risk patients may be candidates for fertility-sparing surgery and can safely avoid chemotherapy and be observed. Treatment of patients with high-risk early- or advanced-stage ovarian cancer usually requires a combined modality approach. Although it is well known that epithelial ovarian cancer is moderately chemosensitive, what distinguishes it most from other metastatic solid tumors is that surgical cytoreduction of tumor volume is highly correlated with prolongation of patient survival. Procedures such as radical pelvic surgery, bowel resection, and aggressive upper abdominal surgery are commonly required to achieve optimal cytoreduction. Women who develop recurrent disease may be eligible for a secondary cytoreductive surgery or may require a surgical intervention to palliate disease-related symptoms. For women at high risk of ovarian cancer, prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy significantly reduces the incidence of this disease. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the surgical management of ovarian carcinoma. The roles of primary, interval, and secondary cytoreductive surgeries; second-look procedures; and palliative surgery are reviewed. The indications for fertility-sparing and minimally invasive surgery as well as the current guidelines for prophylactic surgery in high-risk mutation carriers are also discussed.

Duration of second or greater complete clinical remission in ovarian cancer: exploring potential endpoints for clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

To explore benchmarks for future consolidation strategies, we evaluated a strictly defined (normal CA-125 and normal CT) second-complete-remission (CR) ovarian cancer population for 1) the median progression-free survival (PFS), 2) the frequency with which second remission exceeds first, and 3) the proportion of patients in remission at given time points.

METHODS

Retrospective sampling was carried out at Memorial Sloan-Kettering (10/1993-12/2000) and the Royal Marsden Hospital (1/1995-4/2003) for the following: histological confirmation and elevated CA-125 at diagnosis; primary surgery; first-and second-line platinum-based chemotherapy with CR; and no maintenance therapy.

RESULTS

In 35 patients 1) the duration of first PFS was 17.8 months (95% CI, 13.2-24.5 months) and second PFS was 10.8 months (95% CI, 9.6-12.2 months); 2) the number of patients with second response longer than first was 3/35 (9%); 3) the proportion of patients remaining in second complete remission was 100% (3 months), 100% (6 months), 83% (9 months), 34% (12 months), 23% (15 months) and 8.6% (18 months), respectively.

CONCLUSION

1) The median PFS from second complete remission is short. 2) A second response is rarely longer than the first even in this second CR population. 3) The number of patients with a second response longer than the first, or the proportion of patients remaining in complete remission at given time points could be evaluated as an outcome measure in future studies.

Centralization of care for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of centralized referral of patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

A decision-analysis model was used to compare 2 referral strategies for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer: 1) referral to an expert center, with a rate of optimal primary cytoreduction of 75% and utilization of combined intraperitoneal and intravenous adjuvant chemotherapy, and 2) referral to a less experienced center, with a rate of optimal primary cytoreduction of 25% and adjuvant treatment that consisted predominantly of intravenous chemotherapy alone. The cost-effectiveness of each strategy was evaluated from the perspective of society.

RESULTS

A cost-effectiveness analysis revealed that the strategy of expert center referral had an overall cost per patient of $50,652 and had an effectiveness of 5.12 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The strategy of referral to a less experienced center carried an overall cost of $39,957 and had an effectiveness of 2.33 QALYs. The expert center strategy was associated with an additional 2.78 QALYs at an incremental cost of $10,695 but was more cost-effective, with a cost-effective ratio of $9893 per QALY compared with $17,149 per QALY for the less experienced center referral strategy. Sensitivity analyses and a Monte Carlo simulation confirmed the robustness of the model.

CONCLUSIONS

According to results from the decision-analysis model, centralized referral of patients with ovarian cancer to an expert center was a cost-effective healthcare strategy and represents a paradigm for quality cancer care, delivering superior patient outcomes at an economically affordable cost. Increased efforts to align current patterns of care with a universal strategy of centralized expert referral are warranted.

The potential therapeutic role of lymph node resection in epithelial ovarian cancer: a study of 13918 patients

The aim of the study is to determine the role of lymphadenectomy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program reported between 1988 and 2001. Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for analysis. Of 13 918 women with stage III–IV epithelial ovarian cancer (median age: 64 years), 87.9% were Caucasian, 5.6% African Americans, and 4.4% Asians. A total of 4260 (30.6%) underwent lymph node dissections with a median number of six nodes reported. For all patients, a more extensive lymph node dissection (0, 1, 2–5, 6–10, 11–20, and >20 nodes) was associated with an improved 5-year disease-specific survival of 26.1, 35.2, 42.6, 48.4, 47.5, and 47.8%, respectively (P<0.001). Of the stage IIIC patients with nodal metastases, the extent of nodal resection (1, 2–5, 6–10, 11–20, and >20 nodes) was associated with improved survivals of 36.9, 45.0, 47.8, 48.7, and 51.1%, respectively (P=0.023). On multivariate analysis, the extent of lymph node dissection and number of positive nodes were significant independent prognosticators after adjusting for age, year at diagnosis, stage, and grade of disease. The extent of lymphadenectomy is associated with an improved disease-specific survival of women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

“Optimal” cytoreduction for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A commentary

OBJECTIVE

To derive the most appropriate threshold to classify primary cytoreductive operations as "optimal" and address the clinical significance of this issue.

METHODS

Criteria used to classify primary cytoreductive outcomes are reviewed. Survival outcomes are analyzed to address relative influences of the completeness of cytoreduction and "biological aggressiveness", as manifested by the extent of intra-abdominal metastases.

RESULTS

Most cohorts analyzing relative influences of metastatic tumor burden and the dimension of residual disease on survival report completeness of cytoreduction to influence the prognosis more significantly than tumor burden, with necessity to perform various procedures having minimal or no influence. Equivalent survival is reported for completely cytoreduced patients with stage III disease whether substages IIIa/b (smaller tumor burden) are excluded or included. However, some stage IIIc series report more favorable median and 5-year survivals for small fractions of completely cytoreduced patients than series with a large visibly disease-free fraction. Increasing fractions of complete cytoreduction are reported in recent cohorts, without increase in morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete primary cytoreduction improves the prognosis for survival significantly more than a small dimension of residual disease. Although prospective randomized trials addressing surgical issues have not been undertaken and numerous variables may reflect "biological aggressiveness" by influencing the prognosis, available data justify elimination of macroscopic disease to be the most appropriate objective of primary cytoreductive surgery. Stratification of survival by dimensions of residual disease in an investigational setting should include a visibly disease-free subgroup and if used, the term "optimal" should be applied to patients undergoing complete cytoreduction.

Colorectal resection in patients with ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

This study examines the operative details and complications of colorectal resection in patients with ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients who underwent colorectal resection for ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer were identified in our surgical database for the period 1988 through 2002.

RESULTS

Of the 125 patients who were identified, 73% were undergoing primary cytoreduction; 18% were undergoing secondary cytoreduction, and 7% were undergoing interval cytoreduction. The mean length of colon that was removed was 15.7 cm. The method of anastomosis was stapler in 63% and hand sewn in 22%; 15% patients had no anastomosis performed. A protective ostomy was used in 13% of patients. Optimal cytoreduction (<1 cm) was achieved in 74%. Operative complications occurred in 37% of patients, with the most common being hemorrhage (25%). Anastomotic leaks occurred in 2.5% of the patients, and the most common postoperative complication was ileus (28%). Postoperative bowel function returned to normal in 71% of patients.

CONCLUSION

To obtain optimal cytoreduction in patients with ovarian cancer, colorectal resection often is necessary. Colorectal resection can be performed with a low risk of anastomotic complications, and patients frequently have the return of normal bowel function.

The benefits of low anterior en bloc resection as part of cytoreductive surgery for advanced primary and recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer patients outweigh morbidity concerns

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the safety, efficacy and impact on survival of low anterior resection and primary anastomosis at the time of en bloc resection for primary and recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 46 primary and 14 recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients who underwent procedures between April 2001 and May 2005 in our center. Data were obtained from patient medical records and the cancer registry. Parameters for safety, efficacy and survival were considered as primary endpoints.

RESULTS

For primary advanced ovarian cancer patients, 43.5% showed no visible tumor at the completion of surgery and optimal cytorection (residual tumor [RT] less than or equal 5 mm) was achieved in 89.2%. Complications associated with en bloc resection occurred in two patients (1 leakage of anastomosis site and 1 rectovaginal fistula), and these were managed with diversion colostomy. Patients with no visible residual tumor had longer disease-free survival compared to those with visible RT (median, 30 vs. 7 months; P=0.0082) and longer overall survival (3-year survival rate, 82.03% vs. 66.63%; P=0.0437). Patients with rectal invasions up to the serosa/subserosa had longer disease-free survival than those with rectal invasion up to the muscle/mucosa (P=0.0176) but did not differ significantly in terms of overall survival (P=0.0880). For recurrent ovarian cancer patients, 42.9% showed no visible tumor at the completion of surgery and optimal cytorection was achieved in 64.3%. One patient experienced an en-bloc-resection-associated complication (a rectovaginal fistula), which was managed conservatively. Patients with no visible residual tumor (RT) had longer disease-free survival than visible RT patients (median, not reached vs. 5 months; P=0.0156) but did not differ significantly in terms of overall survival (median, 32 months for no visible RT vs. 24 months for visible RT patients; P=0.0833). There were no surgery-related deaths among the overall 60 primary and recurrent ovarian cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

En bloc resection of primary and recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinomas with low anterior resection permits a high rate of complete debulking with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. Patients with no visible RT after surgery had a survival advantage over patients with visible RT.

Maspin expression in epithelial ovarian cancer and associations with poor prognosis: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVE

This study examined MASPIN expression in human ovarian cancer, and explored the association between MASPIN and prognosis in patients with advanced stage disease treated with first-line cisplatin, carboplatin and/or paclitaxel.

METHODS

Frozen primary tumors were obtained from 68 women with previously untreated, advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer who participated in a specimen banking protocol and a phase III treatment trial conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Immunoblot analysis was performed in lysates prepared from these tumor specimens to quantify the relative expression of MASPIN/beta-actin.

RESULTS

MASPIN was expressed at detected levels in 49 (72%) cases with relative expression ranging from 0.02 to 7.7 (median = 0.2), and was not detected in 19 (28%) of the primary tumors tested. Non-detectable levels of this class II tumor suppressor gene product and inhibitor of angiogenesis were associated with suboptimally-debulked disease (P = 0.034) but not with patient age, FIGO stage, tumor grade, or histologic subtype. After adjusting for prognostic variables for disease progression or death, non-detectable MASPIN expression predicted an increased risk of disease progression (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-3.45; P = 0.038) and death (HR = 1.99; 95% CI: 1.07-3.69; P = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

In advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer, non-detectable MASPIN appears to be associated with suboptimally-debulked disease and be an independent predictor of an increased risk of progression and death. Further studies are needed to validate these exploratory findings, determine the molecular mechanism controlling MASPIN expression as well as down-regulation and loss in ovarian cancer, and determine if MASPIN can prevent progression of this disease.

The role of surgery in ovarian cancer with special emphasis on cytoreductive surgery for recurrence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer has not clearly been defined, and randomized trials are lacking. Some series have reported favorable outcomes for selected patients. This review summarizes the available evidence for selecting patients and the results of cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

A Medline search identified 23 series including 1795 patients (21-285 patients per study). Patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery for recurrence were highly selected. Complete tumor resection was feasible in 9 to 82% of patients and was commonly associated with prolonged survival. A variety of predictive and prognostic factors for complete resection were reported. Good performance status, disease characteristics (e.g. peritoneal carcinosis), and outcome of prior surgery seemed to have an impact on surgical outcome. By contrast, disease-free survival played only a minor role, especially in patients with recurrence later than 6 months after primary treatment.

SUMMARY

Prospective evaluation of predictive scores for successful cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer is urgently needed. In a second step, randomized trials evaluating the role of surgery in the treatment strategy of recurrent ovarian cancer should be initiated. Until then, experienced and trained surgeons might offer surgery for recurrent disease to individually selected patients after giving information about the potential benefit and about the limited available evidence regarding this strategy.

Splenectomy as part of cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Epithelial ovarian carcinoma with extensive upper abdominal disease may require splenectomy for optimal tumor cytoreduction. We describe patients who required splenectomy during tumor reduction procedures for primary or recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

METHODS

Data were abstracted from records of 112 patients who underwent splenectomy as part of primary or secondary cytoreductive surgery.

RESULTS

Of 112 patients, 66 had primary and 46 had secondary cytoreduction. Some patients also required bowel resection (50%), formal lymphadenectomy (31%), or urinary tract resection (5%). The most common indications for splenectomy were direct metastatic involvement (46%), facilitation of an en bloc resection of perisplenic disease (41%), and intraoperative trauma (13%). Histologically, 65% had hilar involvement; 52%, capsular involvement; and 16%, parenchymal metastases. Short-term complications included wound infections (7), pneumonias (5), thromboembolic events (9), and sepsis (5). Sepsis was associated with an anastomotic bowel leak in 1 patient, with fungal infections in 2 patients (1 pneumonia and 1 pelvic abscess), and with no identifiable infectious source in 2. Two patients required reoperation for bleeding: 1 for diffuse intraabdominal bleeding, including the splenic bed, and 1 for pelvic sidewall bleeding. The perioperative mortality rate at splenectomy was 5%: 3 from sepsis (1 anastomotic leak, 2 pneumonias), 2 from pulmonary embolism, and 1 for which the precise cause of death was not ascertainable. The primary cytoreduction group had a median survival of 1.8 years, with an estimated 2-year survival rate of 46%. The median survival in the secondary debulking group was 1.7 years, with an estimated 2-year survival of 42%.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with clinically significant upper abdominal disease, splenectomy as part of primary or secondary cytoreductive surgery is associated with modest morbidity and mortality. The risk-benefit ratio of aggressive surgical cytoreduction must be considered.

Major hepatectomy and right hemicolectomy at the time of primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: report of a case

Major liver involvement at the time of diagnosis is a rare event in patients with ovarian cancer, and the issue of major hepatectomy at the time of primary cytoreductive surgery is controversial. A 61-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with nonspecific abdominal pain of 2-month duration and weight loss of 5 kg during the last semester. A computed tomography scan demonstrated bilateral ovarian masses, extending to the right iliac fossa, pressing the cecum-ascending colon. In the liver parenchyma, three cystic lesions were found of about 6-cm maximum diameter each, along with pelvic lymphadenopathy. There was no ascites. The diagnosis of advanced ovarian cancer was clinically suspected; the patient underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, right hemicolectomy, omentectomy, left lobectomy, deroofing, and draining of the cystic formation of the right liver lobe along with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Systemic chemotherapy (six cycles of paclitaxel/carboplatin) was subsequently administered, and after 15 months of follow-up period, the patient is still in first remission and alive. Ovarian cancer with concomitant extensive right colon infiltration and hematogenous liver metastases can be successfully managed with aggressive surgical resection and postoperative chemotherapy in carefully selected patients.

Validation of referral guidelines for women with pelvic masses

OBJECTIVE

Guidelines for referring women with pelvic masses suspicious for ovarian cancers to gynecologic oncologists have been published jointly by Society of Gynecologic Oncologists (SGO) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). They are based on patient age, CA 125 level, physical findings, imaging study results, and family history. Although the guidelines are evidence-based, their predictive value in distinguishing cancers from benign masses is unknown.

METHODS

Chart review for factors included in the guidelines of surgically evaluated women with pelvic masses at 7 tertiary care centers during a 12-month interval was performed. This information was used to estimate the predictive values of the SGO and ACOG guidelines in identifying patients with malignant pelvic masses.

RESULTS

A total of 1,035 patients were identified, including 318 (30.7%) with primary malignancies of the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum. Seventy-seven were younger than 50 years old (premenopausal group), and 240 were 50 years old or older (postmenopausal group). Fifty additional patients (4.8%) had cancers metastatic to the ovaries, and the remaining 667 (64.4%) had benign masses. The referral guidelines captured 70% of the ovarian cancers in the premenopausal group and 94% of the ovarian cancers in the postmenopausal group. The positive predictive value was 33.8% for the premenopausal group and 59.5% for the postmenopausal group, whereas the negative predictive values were more than 90% for both groups. Elevated CA 125 level was the single best predictor of malignancy in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The SGO and ACOG referral guidelines effectively separate women with pelvic masses into 2 risk categories for malignancy. This distinction permits a rational approach for referring high-risk patients to a gynecologic oncologist for management.

Predictive factors for irresectability in advanced ovarian cancer

Despite advances in surgical modalities and chemotherapeutic agents, the 5-year survival for patients with advanced ovarian cancer is barely 40-50%. At the moment, optimally cytoreductive primary surgery is the best option for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Predictive factors of primary optimum reduction surgery have been described based on imaging studies and tumor markers and based on the premise to know a priori the weight and tumor volume, with promising results. A retrospective study was conducted based on the hypothesis that it is feasible to identify those patients not susceptible of undergoing optimum primary cytoreductive surgery. The variables associated with a lesser probability of success in this study are the presence of palpable abdominal tumor on physical examination, the presence of tumor in Douglas' cul-de-sac on vaginal exploration, the presence of ascites in any quantity, elevation of CA-125 above 1000 U/l, and the presence of pulmonary and liver metastases. The success rate for cytoreduction was 62% when none or one of these variables was present and 32% when two or more variables were present.

Radical oophorectomy with primary stapled colorectal anastomosis for resection of locally advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to describe the feasibility, associated morbidity, and efficacy of radical oophorectomy with primary stapled colorectal anastomosis among patients with locally advanced ovarian cancer with contiguous extension to or encasement of the reproductive organs, pelvic peritoneum, cul-de-sac, and sigmoid colon.

STUDY DESIGN

Thirty-one consecutive patients undergoing radical oophorectomy as part of an initial maximal surgical effort for International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) stage IIIB-IV ovarian cancer were prospectively collected from October 1, 1997 through November 30, 2001. The surgical technique, associated morbidity, and clinical outcomes are described.

RESULTS

The median age was 63 years. All patients had advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: FIGO stage IIIB (6.5%), stage IIIC (64.5%), stage IV (29.0%). Median operating time was 240 minutes (range 165 to 330 minutes), and the median estimated blood loss was 700 mL (range 300 to 2,900 mL). All patients underwent en bloc rectosigmoid colectomy with primary stapled anastomosis without protective intestinal diversion. There was one (3.2%) anastomotic breakdown requiring reoperation and colostomy. Complete clearance of macroscopic pelvic disease was achieved in all cases. Overall, 87.1% of patients were left with optimal (</=1 cm) residual disease and 61.3% were visibly disease free. There were no postoperative deaths, but major and minor postoperative morbidity occurred in 12.9% and 35.5% of patients, respectively. Blood product transfusion was required in 29.0% of cases. Thirty patients received multiagent platinum-based chemotherapy, with a median overall survival time of 39.5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical oophorectomy with primary stapled anastomosis is an effective technique for resection of locally advanced ovarian cancer and contributes significantly to a maximal cytoreductive surgical effort. The associated morbidity is acceptable, and protective intestinal diversion appears unnecessary.

The potential role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer

There is a multitude of evidence from retrospective analyses and meta-analyses showing that the amount of residual tumor after debulking surgery and before chemotherapy is one of the most powerful prognostic determinants in advanced ovarian cancer. This supports the important role of maximum cytoreductive surgery as one of the cornerstones in the treatment of this disease. These same analyses, however, do not suggest that patients whose tumors cannot be debulked optimally derive a significant survival benefit from upfront surgery. For these patients and those who have a poor performance status or other morbidity, making comprehensive upfront surgery contraindicated, different therapeutic approaches have to be explored. One possible way to go is to change the timing of the different therapeutic modalities: upfront chemical cytoreduction, followed by a maximal surgical effort, in turn followed by the remainder of the first-line chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval or delayed debulking surgery. The potential role of this approach and the experience with it thus far are discussed.

Interval debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

Cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy are the mainstay for the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. In order to minimize the tumour burden before chemotherapy, cytoreductive surgery is usually performed first. The importance of the amount of residual disease as the main prognostic factor for patients suffering from advanced disease has been almost universally accepted even in the absence of prospective randomized trials addressing the benefit of cytoreductive surgery. In the last decade, the value of debulking surgery after induction chemotherapy - interval debulking surgery, IDS - has been widely debated, especially after the completion of a prospective randomized study from the EORTC addressing the introduction of a surgical procedure with debulking intent preceded and followed by cytoreductive chemotherapy. The rationale of such a strategy in the context of the primary treatment of advanced ovarian cancer lies in a higher cytoreductibility to the 'optimal' status forwarded, and possibly facilitated, by chemotherapy. The results demonstrated a prolongation of both progression-free survival and median survival in favour of patients randomized to IDS (5 and 6 months, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed IDS to be an independent prognostic factor which reduced the risk of death by 33% at 3 years and by 48% in subsequent re-evaluation after more than 6 years of observation. Despite the above, results have been questioned by many, leading the GOG to perform a similar study which has been concluded very recently. Nevertheless, the main concern regarding the application of IDS in all instances relates to the morbidity of two major surgical procedures integrated within a short period during which cytotoxic chemotherapy is also administered. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been recently proposed to avoid a non-useful surgical procedure in patients considered 'optimally unresectable' after diagnosis of advanced ovarian cancer. Whether or not this newer approach will translate into a longer survival with a better quality of life is going to be addressed by a novel EORTC study. Finally, the concept of a 'chemical' cytoreduction preceding and facilitating a subsequent 'surgical' effort has been recently introduced also in the treatment of recurrent disease. The EORTC has recently initiated a prospective randomized study (LOROCSON - Late Onset Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Surgery or Not) to validate the importance of such an approach to be balanced with medical treatment alone not only in terms of survival but also as far as quality of life is concerned.

Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relative effect of percent maximal cytoreductive surgery and other prognostic variables on survival among cohorts of patients with advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-one cohorts of patients with stage III or IV ovarian carcinoma (6,885 patients) were identified from articles in MEDLINE (1989 through 1998). Linear regression models, with weighted correlation calculations, were used to assess the effects on log median survival time of the proportion of each cohort undergoing maximal cytoreduction, dose-intensity of the platinum compound administered, proportion of patients with stage IV disease, median age, and year of publication.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant positive correlation between percent maximal cytoreduction and log median survival time, and this correlation remained significant after controlling for all other variables (P <.001). Each 10% increase in maximal cytoreduction was associated with a 5.5% increase in median survival time. When actuarial survival was estimated, cohorts with < or = 25% maximal cytoreduction had a mean weighted median survival time of 22.7 months, whereas cohorts with more than 75% maximal cytoreduction had a mean weighted median survival time of 33.9 months--an increase of 50%. The relationship between platinum dose-intensity and log median survival time was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

During the platinum era, maximal cytoreduction was one of the most powerful determinants of cohort survival among patients with stage III or IV ovarian carcinoma. Consistent referral of patients with apparent advanced ovarian cancer to expert centers for primary surgery may be the best means currently available for improving overall survival.