The modulation of fluorouracil with leucovorin in metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a prospective randomized phase III trial. Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group

Synthesis and characterisation of a nucleotide based pro-drug formulated with a peptide into a nano-chemotherapy for colorectal cancer

Recent studies in colorectal cancer patients (CRC) have shown that increased resistance to thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitors such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), reduce the efficacy of standard of care (SoC) treatment regimens. The nucleotide pool cleanser dUTPase is highly expressed in CRC and is an attractive target for potentiating anticancer activity of chemotherapy. The purpose of the current work was to investigate the activity of P1, P4-di(2',5'-dideoxy-5'-selenouridinyl)-tetraphosphate (P4-SedU2), a selenium-modified symmetrically capped dinucleoside with prodrug capabilities that is specifically activated by dUTPase. Using mechanochemistry, P4-SedU2 and the corresponding selenothymidine analogue P4-SeT2 were prepared with a yield of 19% and 30% respectively. The phosphate functionality facilitated complexation with the amphipathic cell-penetrating peptide RALA to produce nanoparticles (NPs). These NPs were designed to deliver P4-SedU2 intracellularly and thereby maximise in vivo activity. The NPs demonstrated effective anti-cancer activity and selectivity in the HCT116 CRC cell line, a cell line that overexpresses dUTPase; compared to HT29 CRC cells and NCTC-929 fibroblast cells which have reduced levels of dUTPase expression. In vivo studies in BALB/c SCID mice revealed no significant toxicity with respect to weight or organ histology. Pharmacokinetic analysis of blood serum showed that RALA facilitates effective delivery and rapid internalisation into surrounding tissues with NPs eliciting lower plasma Cmax than the equivalent injection of free P4-SedU2, translating the in vitro findings. Tumour growth delay studies have demonstrated significant inhibition of growth dynamics with the tumour doubling time extended by >2weeks. These studies demonstrate the functionality and action of a new pro-drug nucleotide for CRC.

The use of adjuvant chemotherapy is not associated with recurrence or cancer-specific death following curative resection for stage III rectal cancer: a competing risks analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in stage III rectal cancer (RC) has been argued based on evidence from its use in colon cancer. Previous trials have analysed disease-free and overall survivals as endpoints, rather than disease recurrence. This study compares the competing risks incidences of recurrence and cancer-specific death between patients who did and did not receive AC for stage III RC.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent a potentially curative resection for stage III RC (1995-2019) at Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia, were studied. AC was considered following multidisciplinary discussion. Primary outcome measures were the competing risks incidences of disease recurrence and cancer-specific death. Associations between these outcomes and use of AC (and other variables) were tested by regression modelling.

RESULTS

Some 338 patients (213 male, mean age 64.4 years [SD12.7]) were included. Of these, 208 received AC. The use of AC was associated with resection year (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.74, 95%CI 1.27-2.38); age ≥75 years (aOR0.04, 95%CI 0.02-0.12); peripheral vascular disease (aOR0.08, 95%CI 0.01-0.74); and postoperative abdomino-pelvic abscess (aOR0.23, 95%CI 0.07-0.81). One hundred fifty-seven patients (46.5%) were diagnosed with recurrence; death due to RC occurred in 119 (35.2%). After adjustment for the competing risk of non-cancer death, neither recurrence nor RC-specific death was associated with AC (HR0.97, 95%CI 0.70-1.33 and HR0.72, 95%CI 0.50-1.03, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study found no significant difference in either recurrence or cancer-specific death between patients who did and did not receive AC following curative resection for stage III RC.

A phase I/II study of arfolitixorin and 5-fluorouracil in combination with oxaliplatin (plus or minus bevacizumab) or irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer

Background

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combined with a folate remains an essential treatment component for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Leucovorin is the folate most often used, but requires intracellular conversion to a reduced folate, and has high pharmacokinetic variability and limited bioavailability in patients with low folate pathway gene expression. Arfolitixorin is an immediately active form of folate, [6R]-5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate ([6R]-MTHF), and may improve outcomes.

Patients and methods

This open-label, multicenter, phase I/II study in patients with mCRC (NCT02244632) assessed the tolerability and efficacy of first- or second-line arfolitixorin (30, 60, 120, or 240 mg/m² intravenous) with 5-FU alone, or in combination with oxaliplatin (plus or minus bevacizumab) or irinotecan, every 14 days. Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics were assessed before and after four cycles (8 weeks) of treatment.

Results

In 105 treated patients, investigators reported 583 adverse events (AEs) in 86 patients (81.9%), and 256 AEs (43.9%) were potentially related to arfolitixorin and 5-FU. Dose adjustments were required in 16 patients (15.2%). At 8 weeks, 9 out of 57 patients assessed for efficacy achieved an objective response (15.8%), and all 9 achieved a partial response. Six of these nine patients had received arfolitixorin as a first-line treatment. A further 33 patients (57.9%) achieved stable disease. Pharmacokinetics were assessed in 35 patients. The average t_max was 10 min, and area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to 1 h increased linearly between 30 and 240 mg/m². No accumulation was observed for [6R]-MTHF following repeated administration, and there were no major pharmacokinetic differences between cycle 1 and cycle 4 at any dose.

Conclusions

Arfolitixorin is a well-tolerated moderator of 5-FU activity. It is suitable for further investigation in mCRC and has the potential to improve treatment outcomes in patients with low folate pathway gene expression. Arfolitixorin can easily be incorporated into current standard of care, requiring minimal changes to chemotherapy regimens.

•

Arfolitixorin is an immediately active form of folate and may improve outcomes with 5-FU-based chemotherapy.

•

This phase I/II clinical trial demonstrated that arfolitixorin is a well-tolerated and effective folate agent in mCRC.

•

Arfolitixorin can easily be incorporated into the current standard of care and is suitable for further investigation.

Role of Ginseng, Quercetin, and Tea in Enhancing Chemotherapeutic Efficacy of Colorectal Cancer

As the most common gastrointestinal malignancy, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Although multimodal chemotherapy has effectively improved the prognosis of patients with CRC in recent years, severe chemotherapy-associated side effects and chemoresistance still greatly impair efficacy and limit its clinical application. In response to these challenges, an increasing number of traditional Chinese medicines have been used as synergistic agents for CRC administration. In particular, ginseng, quercetin, and tea, three common dietary supplements, have been shown to possess the potent capacity of enhancing the sensitivity of various chemotherapy drugs and reducing their side effects. Ginseng, also named “the king of herbs”, contains a great variety of anti-cancer compounds, among which ginsenosides are the most abundant and major research objects of various anti-tumor studies. Quercetin is a flavonoid and has been detected in multiple common foods, which possesses a wide range of pharmacological properties, especially with stronger anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory effects. As one of the most consumed beverages, tea has become particularly prevalent in both West and East in recent years. Tea and its major extracts, such as catechins and various constituents, were capable of significantly improving life quality and exerting anti-cancer effects both in vivo and in vitro. In this review, we mainly focused on the adjunctive effects of the three herbs and their constituents on the chemotherapy process of CRC.

The survival benefit of increasing the number of active drugs for metastatic colorectal cancer: A multicenter retrospective study

Background

The development of chemotherapy and treatment strategies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have provided patients with significant survival benefits. Currently, molecular targeting agents and late‐line treatment with regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) are available. However, the impact of this increase in drug availability on overall survival (OS) in mCRC remains a clinical question.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data on consecutive mCRC patients who were treated at three institutions in Japan. We divided the patients into three cohorts: patients who initiated first‐line treatment from Jan 2005 to Dec 2006 (cohort A: only cytotoxic drugs available), Jan 2007 to Dec 2011 (cohort B: molecular targeting drugs available), and Jan 2012 to Sep 2016 (cohort C: late‐line treatment available).

Results

A total of 1409 consecutive patients were analyzed. The median survival time (MST) in cohorts A, B, and C was 18.6, 25.4, and 26.4 months, respectively. The hazard ratio (HR) for cohort B versus A was 0.81 (95% CI 0.68–0.97), for cohort C versus A was 0.74 (95% CI 0.61–0.89), and for cohort C versus B was 0.92 (0.81–1.03). The median number of administered drugs (range) was 3 (1–5) in cohort A, 4 (1–7) in cohort B, and 4 (1–7) in cohort C. The increase in drug availability extended the MST from 15.5 months in patients treated with ≤3 drugs to 36.0–37.3 months in patients treated with six to seven drugs.

Conclusion

The development of chemotherapy including late‐line treatments could improve the prognosis of mCRC patients.

Prognostic Prediction Models for Liver Metastasis and Overall Survival in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Objective

The objective of this study was to develop novel prediction models for liver metastasis-free survival (LMFS) and overall survival (OS) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients following surgically curative resections. We developed novel prediction models for LMFS and OS in CRC patients following surgically curative resections. Using clinicopathologic factors, such models were constructed with concordance indices of 0.811 and 0.776 for LMFS and OS, respectively.

Methods

Seven hundred seventy-six CRC patients presenting to the Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases between January 2004 and December 2010 were retrospectively studied. The exclusion criteria were patients with preoperative treatment, synchronous distant metastasis, noncurative resection, and incomplete postoperative follow-up.

Results

Based on the analysis of clinicopathologic factors, the following factors had significant correlation with LMFS: preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (pre-CEA), tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, and venous invasion. Using these variables, a novel prediction model was constructed by the Cox regression model with a concordance index (c-index) of 0.811 for LMFS. The following factors had a significant correlation with OS: age, pre-CEA, preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9, tumor location, pathologically defined tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, and venous invasion. Using these variables, a prediction model was constructed with a c-index of 0.776 for OS. These models were validated by external datasets in an independent patient group.

Conclusions

We demonstrated the utility of a novel personalized prognostic model for liver metastasis, integrating tumor node metastasis factors, pre-CEA, and histologic lymphovascular invasion to predict the prognosis. Such models can help clinicians in treating CRC patients postoperatively.

Enhancement of Annexin V in response to combination of epigallocatechin gallate and quercetin as a potent arrest the cell cycle of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers leading to comorbidities and mortalities globally. The rational of current study was to evaluate the combined epigallocatechin gallate and quercetin as a potent antitumor agent as commentary agent for therapeutic protocol. The present study investigated the effect of epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG) (150mg) and quercetin (200mg) at different proportions on proliferation and induction of apoptosis in human colon cancer cells (HCT-116). Cell growth, colonogenic, Annexin V in addition cell cycle were detected in response to phytomolecules. Data obtained showed that, the colony formation was inhibited significantly in CRC starting from the lowest concentration tested of 10 µg/mL resulting in no colonies as visualized by a phase-contrast microscope. Data showed a significant elevation in the annexin V at 100 µg/mL EGCG(25.85%) and 150 µg/mL quercetin (48.35%). Moreover, cell cycle analysis showed that this combination caused cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase at concentration of 100 µg/mL (72.7%) and 150 µg/mL (75.25%). The combined effect of epigallocatechin Gallate and quercetin exert antiproliferative activity against CRC, it is promising in alternative conventional chemotherapeutic agent.

The Superoxide Dismutase Mimetic M40403, Improves 5-Fluorouracil-induced Small Intestinal Mucositis in a Mouse Model

BACKGROUND/AIM

Intestinal mucositis with diarrhea is a dose-limiting toxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). M40403, a superoxide dismutase mimetic, was evaluated on whether it improves the mucositis with diarrhea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

BALB/c mice were treated with daily intraperitoneal injections of 5-FU±M40403 for five consecutive days. Following treatment, light microscopy (apoptosis), electron microscopy (autophagy), and analyses for the expression of apoptosis/autophagy-related proteins were performed in analysing small intestinal samples. Body weight, diarrhea score, blood cytokine levels, complete blood count, and blood chemistries were measured. The in vivo anti-tumor activity of 5-FU±M40403 was also evaluated.

RESULTS

M40403 improved 5-FU-induced intestinal mucositis (apoptosis and autophagy) and attenuated 5-FU-induced changes in the expression of apoptosis/autophagy-related proteins, weight loss, diarrhea score, and serum TNF-α levels. M40403 neither added further adverse effects nor compromised the anti-tumor activity during 5-FU treatment.

CONCLUSION

M40403 can be useful in improving 5-FU-induced intestinal mucositis with diarrhea.

Liver Transplantation for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Current Management and Future Perspectives

Patients with nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer have few therapeutic options and a dismal prognosis. Although liver transplantation for this indication has historically a poor reputation, recent advances in the field of chemotherapy and immunosuppression have paved the way to revisit the concept. New data have shown promising results that need to be validated in several ongoing clinical trials. Since liver grafts represent a scarce resource, several new tools are being explored to expand the donor pool for this indication. The purpose of this review is to present all current available data and perspectives about liver transplantation for nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Clinical factors related to severe enterocolitis after adjuvant CAPOX for colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis

Background

CAPOX regimen is a standard option in stage III adjuvant colon cancer. Gastrointestinal toxicity is well described with fluoropyrimidine regimens and can be life-threatening. Identification of risk factors associated with severe gastrointestinal toxicity may help clinicians when choosing the adjuvant regimen.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analysed 61 patients treated with adjuvant CAPOX. Our primary objective was to estimate the incidence of severe chemotherapy-induced enterocolitis among patients treated with CAPOX. A secondary objective was to describe the main demographic and clinical characteristics of these patients. A univariate logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% CI to identify a predictor for severe enterocolitis.

Results

Grade 3 diarrhoea was reported in 10 patients (16.3%). Admissions to hospital due to toxicity occurred in nine cases. Reasons for hospitalisation were severe enterocolitis in eight cases (13.1%) and rectal bleeding plus thrombocytopenia in one case. Age > 70 years (OR 9.6; 95% CI 1.81–50.6; p = 0.008), primary surgery involving right/transverse colon (OR 16.8; 95% CI 2.88–98.8; p = 0.002) and Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB) use (OR 8.14; 95% CI 1.64–40.3; p = 0.010) were associated with severe enterocolitis.

Conclusion

Our data showed that adjuvant CAPOX induced severe enterocolitis in 13.1% of patients. In addition, we found that advanced age, right colectomy and concurrent use of ARB were statistically associated with these events. Awareness of these factors could be easily incorporated into the treatment decision and patient orientation.

Efficacy and safety of high-dose vs low-dose leucovorin in patients with colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The clinical benefits of a combination of leucovorin and fluorouracil have been established in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Due to a leucovorin shortage in 2008, many institutions revised their protocols to reduce the dose of leucovorin. After the shortage was resolved, some hospitals still maintained their modified protocols. Thus, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low- vs high-dose leucovorin in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

METHOD

The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for studies published before May 2019. The meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled effect sizes by using a random effect model. The primary outcomes were median survival time and tumour response rate. Secondary outcomes were haematological and nonhaematological toxicities.

RESULTS

Eight randomized controlled trials and four retrospective studies were reviewed. The pooled median survival time was similar between the two dose levels (standard mean difference -0.06, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.08). The pooled tumour response rate was comparatively higher in the high-dose leucovorin regimen (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.55-1.18). No statistically significant difference was found between the haematological and nonhaematological toxicities of the two groups. However, there were fewer diarrhoea events in the low-dose leucovorin regimen.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose leucovorin regimens seemed feasible approaches for colorectal cancer treatment when the shortage happened, because both regimens manifested comparable outcomes in survival time and tumour response rate.

Differential Survival Benefits of 5-Fluorouracil-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With Microsatellite-Stable Stage III Colorectal Cancer According to the Tumor Budding Status: A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent research has established tumor budding as a prognostic factor and a possible histomorphologic reflection of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer, highlighting the ability of cancer cells exhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition to resist chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy according to the tumor budding status in microsatellite-stable stage III colorectal cancer.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study of 2 cohorts.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at the National Defense Medical College in Japan.

PATIENTS

We reviewed 2 data sets of patients with microsatellite-stable stage III colorectal cancer with curatively intended surgery (R0) from 1999 to 2005 (first cohort; n = 203) and 2006 to 2012 (second cohort; n = 346). In both cohorts, 128 and 203 patients received 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy and 75 and 143 patients did not.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We assessed the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy according to the grades of tumor budding based on the cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

In low-budding tumors, the chemotherapy group exhibited better cancer-specific survival than the surgery-alone group (first cohort, 93.1% vs 65.5%, p = 0.001; second cohort, 94.0% vs 76.0%, p < 0.0001). Conversely, the prognostic difference between the chemotherapy and surgery-alone groups was statistically insignificant in high-budding tumors (first cohort, 59.7% vs 52.4%, p = 0.57; second cohort, 83.1% vs 75.6%, p = 0.19). The multivariate analysis corroborated the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy in low-budding tumors (first cohort, p = 0.002, HR = 0.28; second cohort, p < 0.0001, HR = 0.23) but not in high-budding tumors.

LIMITATIONS

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and treatments for recurrence were not homogeneous, and the patient backgrounds differed between the chemotherapy and surgery alone groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The high-budding group demonstrated resistance to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, whereas the low-budding group exhibited significant survival benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colorectal cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B14. BENEFICIOS DE SUPERVIVENCIA DIFERENCIAL DE LA QUIMIOTERAPIA ADYUVANTE BASADA EN 5-FLUOROURACILO PARA PACIENTES CON CÁNCER COLORRECTAL EN ESTADIO III ESTABLE CON MICROSATÉLITE SEGÚN EL ESTADO DE BROTACIÓN DEL TUMOR: UN ANÁLISIS RETROSPECTIVO:: Investigaciones recientes han establecido la aparición de tumores como un factor pronóstico y una posible reflexión histomorfológica de la transición epitelial-mesenquimatosa en el cáncer colorrectal, destacando la capacidad de las células cancerosas que presentan una transición epitelio-mesenquimática para resistir la quimioterapia.El objetivo de este estudio es investigar los beneficios clínicos de la quimioterapia adyuvante según el estado de brotación del tumor en el cáncer colorrectal en estadio III estable con microsatélite.Este fue un estudio retrospectivo de dos cohortes.El estudio se realizó en la Escuela de Medicina de la Defensa Nacional de Japón.Revisamos dos conjuntos de datos de pacientes con cáncer colorrectal en estadio III estable con microsatélite con cirugía de intención curativa (R0) de 1999 a 2005 (primera cohorte; n = 203) y 2006 a 2012 (segunda cohorte; n = 346). En ambas cohortes, 128 y 203 pacientes recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante basada en 5-fluorouracilo y 75 y 143 pacientes no, respectivamente.Evaluamos los beneficios de la quimioterapia adyuvante de acuerdo con los grados de brotación del tumor en función de la supervivencia específica del cáncer.n los tumores con brotes bajos, el grupo de quimioterapia mostró una mejor supervivencia específica al cáncer que el grupo con cirugía sola (primera cohorte, 93.1% vs. 65.5%, p = 0.001; segunda cohorte, 94.0% vs. 76.0%, p < 0.0001). A la inversa, la diferencia pronóstica entre los grupos de quimioterapia y cirugía sola fue estadísticamente insignificante en los tumores de brotes elevados (primera cohorte, 59.7% vs. 52.4%, p = 0.57; segunda cohorte, 83.1% vs. 75.6%, p = 0.19). El análisis multivariado corroboró los beneficios de la quimioterapia adyuvante en los tumores de brotes bajos (primera cohorte, p = 0,002, índice de riesgo: 0,28; segundo cohorte, p <0,0001, índice de riesgo: 0,23) pero no en los tumores de alto brote.a quimioterapia adyuvante postoperatoria y los tratamientos para la recurrencia no fueron homogéneos, y los antecedentes de los pacientes difirieron entre los grupos de quimioterapia y cirugía sola.El grupo de alto brote demostró resistencia a la quimioterapia basada en 5-fluorouracilo, mientras que el grupo de bajo brote mostró beneficios significativos de supervivencia de la quimioterapia adyuvante en el cáncer colorrectal en estadio III. Vea el Resumen del Video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B14.

Induced miR-31 by 5-fluorouracil exposure contributes to the resistance in colorectal tumors

Drug resistance makes treatment difficult in cancers. The present study identifies and analyzes drug resistance‐related miRNA in colorectal cancer. We established 4 types of 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU)‐resistant colon cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo. We then analyzed the miRNA expression profile by miRNA array in these 4 cell lines, and identified the drug resistance‐related miRNAs. We examined the expression levels of the identified miRNA in 112 colorectal tumor samples from the patients. We identified 12 possible miRNAs involved in 5‐FU resistance by miRNA arrays. We then examined the relationship between miR‐31, which was the most promising among them, and drug resistance. The ectopic expression of mimic miR‐31 showed significant 5‐FU resistance in the parental DLD‐1 cells, while anti–miR‐31 caused significant growth inhibition in DLD/F cells; that is, 5‐FU‐resistant colon cancer cell line DLD‐1 under exposure to 5‐FU. When we exposed high doses of 5‐FU to parent or 5‐FU‐resistant cells, the expression levels of miR‐31 were raised higher than those of controls. Notably, the expression levels of miR‐31 were positively correlated with the grade of clinical stages of colorectal tumors. The protein expression levels of factors inhibiting hypoxia‐inducible factor 1 were downregulated by transfection of mimic miR‐31 into DLD‐1 cells. This study provides evidence supporting the association of miR‐31 with 5‐FU drug resistance and clinical stages of colorectal tumors.

Recurrence and cancer-specific death after adjuvant chemotherapy for Stage III colon cancer

AIM

The recommended standard of care for patients after resection of Stage III colon cancer is adjuvant 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy - FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin with oxaliplatin) - or CAPOX (capecitabine, oxaliplatin). This may be modified in older patients or depending on comorbidity. This has been challenged recently as the apparent benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy may arise from improvements in surgery or preoperative imaging or pathology staging. This study compares recurrence and colon-cancer-specific death between patients who received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and those who did not.

METHOD

Prospectively recorded data from 363 consecutive patients who had a resection for Stage III colonic adenocarcinoma between 1995 and 2010 inclusive were analysed. Surviving patients were followed for at least 5 years. The suitability of patients for chemotherapy was discussed routinely at multidisciplinary team meetings. The incidence of recurrence and colon-cancer-specific death was evaluated by competing risk methods.

RESULTS

After adjustment for the competing risk of non-colorectal cancer death, there was no significant difference in recurrence between the 204 patients who received chemotherapy and the 159 who did not [hazard ratio (HR) 0.94, 95% CI 0.66-1.32, P = 0.700) and no significant difference in colon-cancer-specific death (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.50-1.04, P = 0.084; HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.57-1.36, P = 0.577 after adjustment for relevant covariates).

CONCLUSION

These findings question the routine use of chemotherapy after complete mesocolic excision for Stage III colon cancer. Recurrence and cancer-specific death, assessed by competing risk methods, should be the standard outcomes for evaluating the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection.

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the Era of Personalized Medicine: A More Tailored Approach to Systemic Therapy

Colorectal cancer is the second most common malignancy diagnosed in Canada. Despite declining incidence and mortality rates in recent years, there is still a significant number of cases that are metastatic at presentation. Fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy was the backbone of colorectal cancer treatment, but the addition of irinotecan and oxaliplatin to form combination regimens has significantly improved overall survival. In the past decade, the development of novel biologic agents including therapies directed against vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor has further altered the landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment. However, clinical trials have demonstrated that not all patients respond to these therapies similarly and consideration must be given to individual patient- and tumor-related factors. A more tailored and biomarker driven approach to treatment selection can optimize outcomes and avoid unnecessary adverse effects. In this review article, we offer a comprehensive overview of the panel of clinical- and tumor-associated characteristics that influence treatment decisions in metastatic colorectal cancer and how this sets the foundation for a more personalized treatment strategy in oncology.

Fluorouracil plus Folinic Acid in Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of Unknown Primary Site Suggestive of a Gastrointestinal Primary

Aims and Background

The results of treatment strategies for carcinoma of an unknown primary location have been discouraging. Currently, no chemotherapeutic approach can be considered standard.

Methods

We therefore initiated a Phase II study in which fluorouracil (370 mg/m2, day 1 through 5) plus folinic acid (200 mg/m2 day 1 through 5) was administered in a subset of 17 patients (median age, 57 years) affected by histologically diagnosed adenocarcinoma of unknown primary location characterized by liver metastases and elevated CEA of CA 19.9. All of the patients had a performance status of 0-2 (ECOG Scale), and liver involvement was > 30 % in 7 cases.

Results

No objective response was observed (4 cases of stabilization and 13 of disease progression). Median survival was 5 months. Toxicity was mild or moderate, and severe diarrhea was observed in only one case.

Conclusions

The proposed regimen is inactive among this subset of patients and confirms that subdiaphragmatic metastases are related to a poor prognosis. Our results, in agreement with data published in the literature, suggest that patients affected by adenocarcinoma of an unknown primary origin metastatic to the liver and with a good performance status should be treated in an investigative setting.

Reversal of Resistance to Doxifluridine and Fluorouracil in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Role of High-Dose Folinic Acid

The benefits from medical treatment in colorectal cancer are limited. Fluorouracil remains the only recognized drug, and how to treat unresponsive patients is still debated. To evaluate the role of folinic acid (FA) in circumvence resistance in colorectal cancer, 28 patients pretreated with fluoropyrimidine were candidated to receive one of the following schedules: fluorouracil (600 mg/m2) associated with FA (500 mg/m2) weekly for 6 weeks (Regimen A: 21 cases), or fluorouracil (370 mg/m2) plus FA (200 mg/m2) dally for 5 days every 4 weeks (Regimen B: 7 cases). Fourteen patients were pretreated with doxifluridlne, a new fluoropyrimldine derivative with a peculiar mechanism of action, and the remaining 14 patients with fluorouracil. All but 2 patients were unresponsive to first-line treatments. When the treatment began, the median age of the patients was 60 years (range, 30-68). The performance status (ECOG) was 0/1 in 25 of them, and the primary tumor was in the colon and rectum in 19 and 9 patients, respectively. Sites of disease were liver (64 %), lung (35 %), local recurrence (10 %) and peritoneum (10 %). A median of 3 cycles (range, 1-7) was delivered, and no objective response was observed in the group of patients pretreated with doxlfluridine or in the group pretreated with fluorouracil. In 5 cases a significant decrease in baseline CEA values was observed. Therapy was well tolerated, and no grade 4 toxicity was encountered. Severe toxicity was limited and included diarrhea (7 patients), stomatitis (1 patient) and nausea/vomiting (1 patient). High-dose FA has no role in reversing resistance to fluoropyrimidine, and other mechanisms of refractoriness are surely involved. FA should be associated with fluoropyrimidine as first-line therapy together with other biochemical modulators. Further rescue therapies need to be developed.

A Pilot Clinical Trial of Postoperative Intensive Weekly Chemotherapy Using Cisplatin, Epi-Doxorubicin, 5-Fluorouracil, 6S-Leucovorin, Glutathione and Filgrastim in Patients with Resected Gastric Cancer

Aims and background

The study was performed to assess the feasibility and activity of an intensive chemotherapeutic regimen as adjuvant treatment for patients with resected gastric cancer at high risk of recurrence (PT2N1-2; pT3-4Nany M0).

Patients and methods

Starting 21 to 28 days after potentially curative surgery for primary gastric cancer, 25 patients received 8 weekly cycles of cisplatin 40 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epidoxorubicin 35 mg/m2, 6S-stereoisomer of leucovorin at a dose of 250 mg/m2, and glutathione at a dose of 1.5 g/m2. From the day after to the day before each cycle of chemotherapy, filgrastim was administered by subcutaneous injection at a dose of 5 μg/kg.

Results

After a median follow-up of 33 months, 80% of the patients were alive and disease-free. Five patients had relapsed: three in the liver, one in the peritoneum and one in the lymph nodes. Toxicity was mild: five patients experienced WHO grade III toxicity (three leukopenia, two thrombocytopenia); no toxic deaths occurred.

Conclusion

Intensive weekly chemotherapy is a feasible postoperative treatment option for patients with resected gastric cancer at high risk of relapse. These data, together with recent results in advanced disease, make this approach of interest for the development of new programs of adjuvant therapy in this setting.

Medical Management of Colorectal Carcinomas

Current information on the medical treatment of colorectal cancer was reviewed after a search of the literature through Medline. Publications from 1984 to present were surveyed. Appropriate adjuvant therapy increases overall survival and disease-free intervals. The treatment modalities of unresectable or metastatic tumors are disappointing, with at best 40% of patients experiencing short-lasting responses. Whenever possible, patients with advanced colorectal cancer should be enrolled in clinical trials.

The Potential Role of Tomudex in the Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancer

Aims and Background

The quinazoline folate analog thymidylate synthase inhibitor, Tomudex, is about to enter the Italian pharmaceutical market. Its place among the therapeutic options for advanced colorectal cancer is discussed.

Methods

The pros and cons of currently available chemotherapeutic regimens are briefly described with special attention to patient's and tumor's determinants of treatment outcome. The mechanism of action and the results of phase I, II and III studies of Tomudex are reviewed.

Results

Not all patients need to be treated. Guidelines are given in this respect. Tomudex at the dose of 3 mg/m2 given i.v. every three weeks has antitumor activity similar to that of currently available regimens, with a favorable toxicity profile.

Conclusions

Current research approaches are unlikely to dramatically improve the treatment outcome of this disease in the near future. What can reasonably be expected is less toxicity and more convenient routes and schedules of drug administration that may translate into better quality of life for our patients. Tomudex has been devised along these lines.

Intensive Weekly Chemotherapy for Elderly Gastric Cancer Patients, Using 5-Fluorouracil, Cisplatin, Epi-Doxorubicin, 6S-Leucovorin and Glutathione with the Support of G-CSF

Aims and background

Elderly patients constitute the largest group of advanced gastric cancer patients. Since there is a widespread misconception that the elderly are poorly tolerant of chemotherapy, most of them are untreated or receive a less aggressive but also less efficacious chemotherapy. However, because tolerance and response to cancer seem to vary more with physiologic age than chronologic age, we evaluated the feasibility and activity of an intensive weekly chemotherapy in elderly gastric cancer patients.

Methods

23 advanced gastric cancer patients (13 males and 10 females), older than 70 years, received weekly: cisplatin, 40 mg/m2 iv; epi-doxorubicin, 35 mg/m2 iv; 6S-leucovorin, 250 mg/m2 iv; 5-fluorouracil, 500 mg/m2 iv; and glutathione, 1.5 g/m2 G-CSF, at the dose of 5 μg/kg, was administered daily from the day after to the day before each chemotherapy administration.

Results

Toxicity was mild. The most common adverse effects were leukopenia (grade 3 in 2 patients); thrombocytopenia (grade 3 in 1 patient) and anemia (grade 3 in 3 patients). Five patients (20%) achieved a complete response and 9 (39%) a partial response, resulting in an overall response rate of 59% (95% CI, 40% to 78%). The median survival time was 13 months for all the patients and 15 months for patients with objective responses.

Conclusions

This regimen appears feasible also in elderly gastric cancer patients and, because of its activity, suitable for further studies.

Increasing Doses of 5-Fluorouracil and High-Dose Folinic ACID in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

Combined 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and folinic acid (FA) is the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The aims of this study were to individualize the dose of 5FU in a weekly schedule in which the maximum tolerated dose of 5FU is administered to each patient, and to evaluate the impact of increasing 5FU doses on response and survival.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients (30 evaluable for response) with metastatic colorectal cancer were treated with weekly intravenous doses of FA 150 mg/m2 and a fast infusion of 5FU, at an initial dose of 600 mg/m2 which was increased by 60 mg/m2 every week until the appearance of a side effect, in order to determine the maximum tolerated dose for the patient.

RESULTS

We obtained 11 objective responses (36.7%, median survival 22 months) and 15 disease stabilizations (50%, median survival 15 months); there were four cases of progressive disease (13.3%, median survival 4 months). The overall survival was 15 months. Twenty-eight patients (87.5%) tolerated 5FU doses of 720 mg/m2 or more.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly 5FU with high-dose FA modulation can be individualized by dose escalation. A 5FU dose of 720 mg/m2 per week seems to be critical, as higher doses are no more effective and lead to severe side effects. This schedule gives good results in terms of response, even though the complete response rate remains low.

Prior Surgical Score: An Analysis of the Prognostic Significance of an Initial Nondefinitive Surgical Intervention in Patients With Peritoneal Carcinomatosis of a Colorectal Origin Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Perioperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The prior surgical score estimates the extent of previous surgical intervention by quantitating surgical dissection within 9 abdominopelvic regions.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to analyze the prognostic significance of the prior surgical score in our cohort of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis of a colorectal origin.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database for all patients treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis of a colorectal origin.

SETTINGS

The prospectively maintained surgical oncology tumor database was analyzed for the study period 1989-2014.

PATIENTS

A total of 407 patients diagnosed with peritoneal carcinomatosis of a colorectal origin and treated with cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy were included in this analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The prognostic significance and clinicopathologic factors associated with an initial nondefinitive surgical intervention in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of a colorectal origin undergoing cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy was evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 210 men (51.6%) and 197 women (48.4%) in the study. Mean age at presentation was 53.7 years (range, 19.0-87.0 y). Data on prior surgical score for 69 patients were missing, leaving us with a study cohort of 338 patients. Grouped by prior surgical score, 46 (13.6%) had a prior surgical score of 0 versus 25 (7.4%), 122 (36.1%), and 145 (42.9%) who had a prior surgical score of 1, 2, or 3. Overall survival was 53.0%. Three- and 5-year survival rates were 75% and 75% for group prior surgical score 0 versus 26% and 13%, 39% and 37%, and 21% and 16% for group prior surgical scores 1, 2, and 3. Median survival time for the various prior surgical score groups were 180.0, 30.4, 30.5, and 21.3 months for prior surgical scores 0, 1, 2, and 3 (p = 0.000). A total of 87.2% of the prior surgical score 0 group had a completeness of cytoreduction score of 0/1 (no residual disease/tumor <0.25 cm) versus 68.0%, 68.1%, and 48.6% for prior surgical scores of 1, 2, or 3 (p = 0.000). Significant independent predictors of a shorter survival in multivariate analysis included a high cytoreduction score status (p < 0.000) and a high prior surgical score (p = 0.05).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its retrospective, population-based design.

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of a previous nondefinitive surgical intervention contributes to the poor prognosis associated with peritoneal carcinomatosis of a colorectal origin. Independent predictors for an improved overall survival include completeness of cytoreduction and low prior surgical score. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A573.

Association between poorly differentiated clusters and efficacy of 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colorectal cancer

Objective

Although poorly differentiated cluster has been reported to be a useful grading system for predicting prognosis in colorectal cancer, its relationship to chemotherapy efficacy has not been demonstrated. We aimed to investigate the association between poorly differentiated cluster and the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colorectal cancer.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 131 patients with stage III colorectal cancer who underwent curative resection: 72 received 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy (chemotherapy group) and 59 did not (surgery-alone group). Poorly differentiated cluster was defined as a cancer cluster of ≥5 cancer cells without gland-like structure, and was classified into poorly differentiated cluster G1, G2 and G3 according to the number of clusters. The benefit of 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy was evaluated based on poorly differentiated cluster grade.

Results

Thirty-nine, 40 and 52 patients were classified as poorly differentiated cluster G1, G2 and G3, respectively. Significant differences in the 5-year cumulative recurrence rate and relapse-free survival were observed between poorly differentiated cluster G1/G2 and G3 (26.7% vs. 47.5%, P = 0.010; 66.0% vs. 43.9%, P = 0.004). A comparison of cumulative recurrence rate and relapse-free survival between the chemotherapy and surgery-alone groups showed a significant benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in poorly differentiated cluster G1/G2 patients (cumulative recurrence rate: 17.4% vs. 37.3%, P = 0.035; relapse-free survival: 79.5% vs. 51.9%, P = 0.002), but not in poorly differentiated cluster G3 patients (cumulative recurrence rate: 48.6% vs. 44.8%, P = 0.885; relapse-free survival: 51.4% vs. 32.7%, P = 0.068).

Conclusions

In stage III colorectal cancer, poorly differentiated cluster G1/G2 predicts a significant benefit from 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas poorly differentiated cluster G3 predicts a poor response to it.

New frontiers in the treatment of colorectal cancer: Autophagy and the unfolded protein response as promising targets

Colorectal cancer (CRC), despite numerous therapeutic and screening attempts, still remains a major life-threatening malignancy. CRC etiology entails both genetic and environmental factors. Macroautophagy/autophagy and the unfolded protein response (UPR) are fundamental mechanisms involved in the regulation of cellular responses to environmental and genetic stresses. Both pathways are interconnected and regulate cellular responses to apoptotic stimuli. In this review, we address the epidemiology and risk factors of CRC, including genetic mutations leading to the occurrence of the disease. Next, we discuss mutations of genes related to autophagy and the UPR in CRC. Then, we discuss how autophagy and the UPR are involved in the regulation of CRC and how they associate with obesity and inflammatory responses in CRC. Finally, we provide perspectives for the modulation of autophagy and the UPR as new therapeutic options for CRC treatment.

Survival outcomes following laparoscopic versus open D3 dissection for stage II or III colon cancer (JCOG0404): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Although benefits of laparoscopic surgery compared with open surgery have been suggested, the long-term survival of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer requiring Japanese D3 dissection remains unclear. We did a randomised controlled trial to establish non-inferiority of laparoscopic surgery to open surgery.

METHODS

We did an open-label, multi-institutional, randomised, two-arm phase 3 trial in 30 hospitals in Japan. Patients aged 20-75 years who had histologically proven colon cancer; tumours located in the caecum or ascending, sigmoid, or rectosigmoid colon; T3 or deeper lesions without involvement of other organs, node stages N0-2, and metastasis stage M0; and tumour size of 8 cm or smaller were included. Only accredited surgeons did surgery as an operator or instructor. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) preoperatively to undergo D3 resection either by an open route or a laparoscopic route, via phone call or fax to the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) Data Center. Randomisation used a minimisation method with a biased-coin assignment according to tumour location (caecum, ascending vs sigmoid, rectosigmoid) and institution. The primary endpoint was overall survival and was analysed by intention to treat. The non-inferiority margin for the hazard ratio (HR) was set at 1·366. This study is registered with UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, number C000000105, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00147134.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 1, 2004, and March 27, 2009, 1057 patients were randomly assigned to either open surgery (n=528) or laparoscopic surgery (n=529). 5-year overall survival was 90·4% (95% CI 87·5-92·6) for open surgery and 91·8% (89·1-93·8) for laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic D3 surgery was not non-inferior to open surgery for overall survival (HR 1·06, 90% CI 0·79-1·41; p_{non-inferiority}=0·073). 65 (13%) patients in the open surgery group and 53 (10%) patients in the laparoscopic surgery group had grade 2-4 adverse events. Grade 2-4 adverse events included diarrhoea (15 [3%] in the open surgery group vs 14 [3%] in the laparoscopic surgery group), paralytic ileus (six [1%] vs nine [2%]), and small intestine bowel obstruction (16 [3%] vs 11 [2%]). Two treatment-related deaths occurred in the open surgery group: one patient died 7 days after surgery (probably due to myocardial infarction), and one patient died from febrile neutropenia, pneumonia, diarrhoea, and gastrointestinal haemorrhage during postoperative chemotherapy.

INTERPRETATION

Laparoscopic D3 surgery was not non-inferior to open D3 surgery in terms of overall survival for patients with stage II or III colon cancer. However, because overall survival in both groups was similar and better than expected, laparoscopic D3 surgery could be an acceptable treatment option for patients with stage II or III colon cancer.

FUNDING

National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund, Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research, and Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant for Clinical Cancer Research from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan.

Translationally controlled tumour protein TCTP is induced early in human colorectal tumours and contributes to the resistance of HCT116 colon cancer cells to 5-FU and oxaliplatin

Background

Translationally controlled tumour protein TCTP is an anti-apoptotic protein frequently overexpressed in cancers, where high levels are often associated with poor patient outcome. TCTP may be involved in protecting cancer cells against the cytotoxic action of anti-cancer drugs. Here we study the early increase of TCTP levels in human colorectal cancer (CRC) and the regulation of TCTP expression in HCT116 colon cancer cells, in response to treatment with the anti-cancer drugs 5-FU and oxaliplatin.

Methods

Using immunohistochemistry, we assessed TCTP levels in surgical samples from adenomas and adenocarcinomas of the colon, compared to normal colon tissue. We also studied the regulation of TCTP in HCT116 colon cancer cells in response to 5-FU and oxaliplatin by western blotting. TCTP mRNA levels were assessed by RT-qPCR. We used mTOR kinase inhibitors to demonstrate mTOR-dependent translational regulation of TCTP under these conditions. Employing the Real-Time Cell Analysis (RTCA) System and the MTS assay, we investigated the effect of TCTP-knockdown on the sensitivity of HCT116 cells to the anti-cancer drugs 5-FU and oxaliplatin.

Results

1. TCTP levels are significantly increased in colon adenomas and adenocarcinomas, compared to normal colon tissue. 2. TCTP protein levels are about 4-fold upregulated in HCT116 colon cancer cells, in response to 5-FU and oxaliplatin treatment, whereas TCTP mRNA levels are down regulated. 3. mTOR kinase inhibitors prevented the up-regulation of TCTP protein, indicating that TCTP is translationally regulated through the mTOR complex 1 signalling pathway under these conditions. 4. Using two cellular assay systems, we demonstrated that TCTP-knockdown sensitises HCT116 cells to the cytotoxicity caused by 5-FU and oxaliplatin.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that TCTP levels increase significantly in the early stages of CRC development. In colon cancer cells, expression of this protein is largely upregulated during treatment with the DNA-damaging anti-cancer drugs 5-FU and oxaliplatin, as part of the cellular stress response. TCTP may thus contribute to the development of anti-cancer drug resistance. These findings indicate that TCTP might be suitable as a biomarker and that combinatorial treatment using 5-FU/oxaliplatin, together with mTOR kinase inhibitors, could be a route to preventing the development of resistance to these drugs.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12964-017-0164-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Irinotecan: a new treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer

Objective. Historically, outcomes of metastatic colorectal cancer therapy have been disappointing, with fluorouracil (5-FU) producing response rates of no more than 15%. The addition of leucovorin increases response rates; however, survival rates are largely unaffected. Recently, the topoisomerase I inhibitor, irinotecan, has proved active in metastatic colorectal cancer and is indicated as second-line therapy following disease recurrence or progression after 5-FU-based therapy. More recently, irinotecan plus 5-FU-LV was compared with 5-FU-LV as first line treatment of colorectal cancer, showing impressive results. This article discusses the role of irinotecan, as a single agent and in combination with 5-FU-LV, in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

Data sources. A MEDLINE search was conducted using 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, leucovorin, and metastatic colorectal cancer as primary search terms. Reference lists, bibliographies of pertinent articles, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Society for Medical Oncology annual meetings were also identified and reviewed. Clinical literature was reviewed and analyzed.

Data synthesis. Results of studies comparing irinotecan with continuos infusion 5-FU or best supportive care suggest that irinotecan is superior to either treatment as second-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer. Based on these study results, along with irinotecan's lack of cross-resistance with other chemotherapy agents and mechanism of action that differs from 5-FU, phase III trials evaluating the use of irinotecan in combination with 5-FU-LV as first-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer were conducted. The results of a pivotal trial evaluating irinotecan plus 5-FU-LV in this setting show superior response rates (RRs), time to tumor progression (TTP), and median survival times (MSTs) when compared with 5-FU-LV alone. This combination represents a major advance in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer and should be considered the first-line treatment standard.

Prognostic Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer Patients After Curative Resection

To develop a prediction tool for recurrence and survival in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients following surgically curative resections. We developed a reliable prediction model for CRC patients after surgically curative resections. Using clinicopathologic factors, novel prediction models were constructed with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.841 and 0.876 for DFS and CSS, respectively. Between January 2004 and December 2007, 376 CRC patients were investigated at the Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases. Patients with at least 1 of the following criteria were excluded: preoperative treatment, synchronous distant metastasis, noncurative resection, and incomplete follow-up after operation. All patients were retrospectively analyzed. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to develop a prediction model for disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). In univariate and multivariate analyses of clinicopathologic factors, the following factors had significant correlation with DFS and CSS: tumor location, preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), pathologically defined tumor invasion, and lymph node metastasis. Using these variables, novel prediction models were constructed by the logistic regression model with AUC of 0.840 and 0.876 for DFS and CSS, respectively. The prediction models were validated by external datasets in an independent patient group. This study showed novel and reliable personalized prognostic models, integrating not only TNM factors but also tumor location and preoperative serum CEA to predict patient prognosis. These individualized prediction models could help clinicians in the treatment of postoperative CRC patients.

Chinese Herbal Medicine and Fluorouracil-Based Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer: A Quality-Adjusted Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background Chinese herbal medicines reportedly increase efficacy and minimize toxicity of chemotherapy; however, little attention has been paid to how poor study quality can bias outcomes. Methods We systematically searched MEDLINE, TCMLARS, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials of Chinese herbal medicines combined with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy compared with the same chemotherapy alone. We screened for eligibility, extracted data, and pooled data with random-effects meta-analysis. Outcome measures were survival, toxicity, tumor response, performance status, quality of life, and Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB) criteria to critically evaluate the quality of reporting in the randomized trials included in the meta-analysis. Results We found 36 potentially eligible studies, with only 3 (those with low ROB) qualifying for meta-analysis. Two reported chemotherapy-related diarrhea reduced by 57% (relative risk [RR] = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.19-1.01; I(2) test for variation in RR due to heterogeneity = 0.0%), with nonsignificant results. Two reported white blood cell toxicity reduced by 66% (RR = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.16-0.72; I(2) test for variation in RR due to heterogeneity = 0.0%), with statistically significant results. Stratifying analysis by studies with high versus low ROB, we found substantial overestimation of benefit: Studies with high ROB overestimated by nearly 2-fold reduction of platelet toxicity by Chinese herbal medicines (RR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.15-0.84 vs RR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.11-3.92). Studies with high ROB overestimated by nearly 2-fold reduction of vomiting toxicity (RR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.33-0.61 vs RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.48-1.58). And, studies with high ROB overestimated by 21% the reduction in diarrhea toxicity (RR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.20-0.58 vs RR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.19-1.01). Studies with high ROB also overestimated by 16% improvement in tumor response (RR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.18-1.63 vs RR = 1.20; 95% CI = 0.81-1.79). Not accounting for ROB would have exaggerated evidence of benefit and failed to detect nonsignificance of results. Conclusions In the present analysis, involving 36 studies, 2593 patients, 20 outcomes, 36 medical institutions, and 271 named research authors, 92% of the data points were from studies at high ROB. Given the poor quality of the data in studies identified, it cannot be concluded whether combining Chinese herbs with chemotherapy reduces toxicity of chemotherapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Combined With Fluoropyrimidine Monotherapy for Unfit or Older Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether bevacizumab represents a feasible option for the first-line treatment of unfit and elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains controversial. The present systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety data of bevacizumab combined with first-line fluoropyrimidine monochemotherapy for these complex patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic search of the published data was conducted through May 31, 2016. The random-effects model was used to combine the effect estimates and the I² index to quantify the between-study heterogeneity unexplained by sampling error.

RESULTS

We included 3 randomized controlled trials, 4 single-arm phase II trials, and 1 prospective cohort study in the present meta-analysis (n = 782). The monochemotherapy administered was capecitabine in 531 patients (67.9%) and 5-fluorouracil in 251 (32.1%); 500 (63.9%) also received bevacizumab. The median age was 75 years, 441 patients (56.4%) were men, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 to 1 in 684 patients (87.7%). The combination with bevacizumab produced advantages in terms of both progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.64; P < .00001; I² = 0%) and overall survival (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.98; P = .03; I² = 0%). The pooled effect estimates of the randomized controlled trials have been previously reported. As expected, all-grade hypertension (27% vs. 4.9%), bleeding (24% vs. 6.4%), thromboembolic events (10% vs. 5%), and proteinuria (25.6% vs. 8.2%) were more frequent in the bevacizumab combination group.

CONCLUSION

Adding bevacizumab to first-line fluoropyrimidine monochemotherapy significantly improved progression-free and overall survival in unfit and elderly patients with mCRC, with a manageable safety profile and no unexpected toxicities.

High- versus low-dose leucovorin in the modified FOLFOX6 regimen for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

Background In response to the national leucovorin shortage in 2008, our institution adjusted the modified FOLFOX6 (leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) protocol to utilize a lower dose of leucovorin (20 mg/m²). This adjustment was based on prospective studies suggesting that lower doses of leucovorin may be equally effective in other fluorouracil containing regimens. This retrospective study evaluates outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with low- (20 mg/m²) vs. high-dose (400 mg/m²) leucovorin in the FOLFOX6 regimen for mCRC. Methods This retrospective analysis included consecutive mCRC patients from 2004 to 2011 if they received at least one cycle of modified FOLFOX6 as first line therapy. Patients who received an initial leucovorin dose other than 20 mg/m² or 400 mg/m² on their first cycle were excluded. Patient characteristics included demographics, metastatic site at initial diagnosis, and treatment history including chemotherapy and surgery. Primary outcome was date of death or last contact. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were utilized to evaluate the effect of leucovorin dose on overall survival. Log-rank tests were used to compare median survival times by dose group. Results Of the 93 mCRC patients who received first line modified FOLFOX6, leucovorin 400 mg/m² was administered to 47 (51%) patients and 20 mg/m² to 46 (49%) patients. There were no differences of baseline characteristics between the groups with exception of primary site of cancer ( p = 0.038). The overall survival time was 22.5 months (95% CI 16.6-29.6). The median survival time in the leucovorin 400 mg/m² group was 23.1 months (95% CI 16.2-35.7) compared to leucovorin 20 mg/m² which was 20.5 months (95% CI 14.2-34.2); p = 0.573. The median survival times in patients with one versus two or more sites with metastasis were statistically different (26.9 vs. 16.2 months, p = 0.009). Metastatic site removal or ablation showed differences in the median survival, 34.2 months (95% CI 20.8-50.9) vs. 16.6 months (95% CI 14.1-23.6) without metastatic disease removal ( p = 0.004). The odds of dying for patients with two metastatic sites was higher compared with the odds of those patients with one site, HR 1.8 (95% CI 1.08-3.0). Patients without metastatic site removal or ablation had higher odds of dying compared to those patients without this procedure, HR 0.47 (95% CI 0.27-0.81). Conclusion In this single center retrospective study, there was no difference in overall survival for mCRC patients treated with first line FOLFOX6 with low- vs. high-dose leucovorin.

A novel antimetabolite: TAS-102 for metastatic colorectal cancer

TAS-102 is a new oral anti-tumor drug, composed of a thymidine-based nucleoside analog (trifluridine: FTD) and a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor (tipiracil hydrochloride: TPI). TAS-102 has been shown to significantly improve overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in placebo-controlled randomized phase II and III trials. The current review summarizes mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics/dynamics and preclinical and clinical data of TAS-102 in colorectal cancer. TAS-102 is a new salvage-line treatment option for patients with mCRC. TAS-102 is well tolerated and has great potential in future clinical drug combination therapies.

Effects of the leucovorin shortage: Pilot study investigating cost, efficacy, and toxicity comparison of low fixed-dose versus body surface area-adjusted leucovorin dosing in patients with resectable colon or metastatic colorectal cancer

Purpose As a result of the leucovorin shortage, we switched from BSA-adjusted to low fixed-dose leucovorin in patients with colon cancer receiving fluorouracil-containing therapy. Methods A retrospective, pilot study of adults receiving intravenous leucovorin as part of a fluorouracil-containing treatment was conducted including individuals with stage II or III colon or newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal cancer. One low fixed-dose (leucovorin 50 mg) patient was matched by the investigator to one BSA-adjusted (leucovorin 200-500 mg/m²/dose) patient on disease stage and age. The objectives were to compare cost of alternative dosing strategies as well as efficacy and adverse event rates. Only patients being treated in the first-line metastatic colorectal cancer setting were included in the efficacy analysis. Results Fifty-eight patients were included. Leucovorin cost was reduced by 7- to 14-fold, and we were able to conserve a total of 1580-3400 doses of leucovorin by changing to fixed-dose (estimated from 200 mg/m² or 400 mg/m² dosing strategies, respectively). No statistically significant differences in progression-free survival ( p = 0.254), overall survival ( p = 0.923), or complications resulted. Conclusion Our decision to reduce the dose of leucovorin allowed us to conserve supply and control cost. The small sample size did not allow us to detect differences in efficacy or adverse event rates, and thus a larger study would be required to confirm our findings that efficacy was not compromised nor adverse effects greater.

Bevacizumab in combination with fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan- or fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for first-line and maintenance treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

Despite a slight decrease in mortality rates, recent advances in screening methods, diagnosis and overall improved therapeutic options, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains among the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. The major cause is the mortality related to metastatic status of CRC. Increasing clinical evidence derived from randomized trials strongly suggests that the efficacy of standard cytotoxic agents, including various combinations of 5-fluoouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV), capecitabine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, may be significantly augmented with concomitant administration of molecular agents targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathways, such as bevacizumab. Herein, we critically discuss the current data on the efficacy and safety profile of bevacizumab in combination with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for first-line and maintenance treatment of metastatic CRC and briefly comment on existing controversies and future perspectives.

Phase II study on hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using percutaneous catheter placement techniques for liver metastases from colorectal cancer (JFMC28 study)

AIM

This prospective multicenter study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) using percutaneous catheter placement techniques for liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

We administered 5-fluorouracil at 1000 mg/m2 over 5 h via hepatic arterial infusion on a weekly schedule. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (RR). The secondary endpoints were the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicities.

RESULTS

Between February 2000 and March 2002, seventy-seven eligible patients were enrolled in this study. After a median of 26 treatment cycles, 4 patients achieved a complete response, 29 achieved a partial response, 28 had stable disease, 15 had progressive disease and the status of one patient was unknown. The overall RR was 42.9% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 79.2%. The median PFS and OS times were 203 and 560 days, respectively. The most common grade 3 or 4 hematological and non-hematological toxicities were total bilirubin level elevation (10.4%) and gamma-glutamyl transferase level elevation (10.4%). With regard to the relationship between the background factors and treatment outcomes, the DCR, RR, PFS and OS were different between patients with and without extrahepatic lesions (DCR: 86.5% vs 64%, RR: 46.2% vs 36.0%, PFS: 233 days vs 99 days, OS: 587 days vs 558 days).

CONCLUSION

The primary endpoint of this study was not met. HAIC using percutaneous catheter placement techniques did not improve the RR for liver metastasis from CRC.

A review of the evolution of systemic chemotherapy in the management of colorectal cancer

Herein we present a historical review of the development of systemic chemotherapy for colorectal cancer (CRC) in the metastatic and adjuvant treatment settings. We describe the discovery of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by Heidelberger and colleagues in 1957, the potentiation of 5-FU cytotoxicity by the reduced folate leucovorin, and the advent of novel cytotoxic agents, including the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan, the platinum-containing agent oxaliplatin, and the 5-FU prodrug capecitabine. The combination therapies, FOLFOX (5-FU/leucovorin and oxaliplatin) and FOLFIRI (5-FU/leucovorin and irinotecan), have become established as efficacious cytotoxic regimens for the treatment of metastatic CRC, resulting in overall survival times of approximately 2 years. When used as adjuvant therapy, FOLFOX also improves survival and is now the gold standard of care in this setting. Biological agents have been discovered that enhance the effect of cytotoxic therapy, including bevacizumab (a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets vascular endothelial growth factor, a central regulator of angiogenesis) and cetuximab/panitumumab (monoclonal antibodies directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor). Despite the ongoing development of novel antitumor agents and therapeutic principles as we enter the era of personalized cancer medicine, systemic chemotherapy involving infusional 5-FU/leucovorin continues to be the cornerstone of treatment for patients with CRC.

Management of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent solid tumors in the Western world. Treatment options are dependent on the stage of the disease, the performance status of the patient, and increasingly the molecular makeup of the tumor. In countries with surveillance programs, the incidence rate as well as the mortality rate has gone down because of the earlier stages at which the tumors are detected. For rectal cancer, standard of care differs from that of colon cancer with regard to perioperative treatment. In the metastatic setting, treatment options are uniform for colorectal cancer. Over the years, treatment options have emerged from single-agent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment to combination regimens using 5-FU and oxaliplatin or irinotecan or both. Treatment efficacy in the metastatic setting has been increased with the introduction of targeted substances. These include (a) the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor-A (anti-VEGF-A) antibody bevacizumab, (b) the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab, (c) the anti-angiogenic multi-kinase inhibitor regorafenib, and (d) the anti-angiogenic compound aflibercept. Anti-EGFR antibodies have shown efficacy only in the subpopulations of tumors that do not have any mutation in KRAS and NRAS exon 2, 3, 4. Physicians have the choice in the first line to use anti-EGFR or anti-VEGF inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy based on treatment goals and patient performance. In recent years, tumor location has been shown to be prognostic and predictive for clinical outcome. Right-sided sporadic colon cancers differ significantly in molecular characteristics and, with the exception of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) tumors, are associated with poor prognosis. Tumors based on hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, on the other hand, have excellent prognosis in stage II and III disease. Recent efforts have focused on the molecular classification of colorectal cancer with the purpose of establishing molecularly defined subgroups.

Impact of the perioperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on the long-term survival following an elective resection of colorectal carcinoma

PURPOSES

The present study was designed to evaluate the prognostic value of the perioperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for the long-term survival in patients with colorectal cancer.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 524 patients with histologically proven stage II or III colorectal cancer who underwent curative colorectal resection. We classified patients into a low NLR group or high NLR group base on their NLR values at three time points (before surgery (Pre), on the first postoperative day (POD1), and on the third or fourth postoperative day (POD3)) and evaluated the survival according to the group.

RESULTS

The cancer-specific survival was significantly longer in the groups with a low NLR on POD3. The disease-free survival was significantly longer in the group with a low NLR on Pre. We subsequently allocated a score of 1 to patients with a high NLR at each point and reclassified patients into those with a low perioperative NLR group (score of 0 or 1) and high perioperative NLR group (score of 2 or 3). Both the cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival rates were significantly different between the two perioperative NLR groups. Both univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that being in the high perioperative NLR group was an independent risk factor for both the cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Not only the preoperative but also the postoperative NTR is thus considered to be a predictor of the long-time survival in patients with colorectal cancer.

Near fatal 5-FU gut toxicity post surgery--remarkable effect of high-dose sucralfate

BACKGROUND

The objective of this review article and case report was to investigate the effectiveness of high-dose sucralfate on severe life-threatening 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) gut toxicity, with reference to, but not limited to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency.

METHODS

A search was conducted on PubMed from 1950 to July 2013 for original studies on 5-FU gut toxicity and sucralfate. Studies were limited to human trials and English language and all articles included in this study were assessed with the application of predetermined selection criteria. Each article was then reviewed independently by two reviewers. A case report from our own centre was included in this review.

RESULTS

From 33 results, 6 manuscripts were identified including 4 randomized controlled trial. One trial evaluated the use of sucralfate to alleviate stomatitis in patients with 5-FU-based chemotherapy. The other three trials evaluated the role of sucralfate in radiation toxicity. There was one case report which showed gastroscopy confirmed normalization of severe dysplastic erosive gastroduodenitis attributed to hepatic arterial infusion of 5-FU following a 2-month course of sucralfate and cimetidine and one case series showing clinical and sigmoidoscopically demonstrated improvement in ulcerative colitis in majority of patients receiving sucralfate enemas. There was no current literature specifically focussed on the role of sucralfate in 5-FU gut toxicity. Our case report describes the clinical course and successful treatment with sucralfate of a patient with Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) who experienced 5-FU gut toxicity resulting in life-threatening bleeding due to presumed DPD deficiency post intraperitoneal 5-FU administration.

CONCLUSION

This review article showed a lack of literature concerning the use of sucralfate in 5-FU gut toxicity. In our patient's case, sucralfate had a crucial role in the management of near fatal 5-FU gut toxicity, and further evaluation is required.

Optimal treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

For over 40 years, fluorouracil has been the only drug registered for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. During the past 5 years, combination chemotherapy regimens including either irinotecan or oxaliplatin have proven to be superior to fluorouracil monotherapy in randomized clinical trials, in terms of response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival. Both doublets demonstrated similar efficacy, therefore either combination can be considered standard first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Recently, a new orally active fluorouracil analog, capecitabine, and two targeted biological agents, cetuximab and bevacizumab, have been added to the armamentarium of drugs active against metastatic colorectal cancer, thus making the scenario more complex. Moreover, ongoing clinical trials are currently testing new promising molecularly targeted agents. Thus, we are facing a new era in which the rapid clinical development of novel agents is outpacing the ability to perform Phase III clinical trials. At present, there is no single standard treatment suitable for all patients. However, general principles of management can be derived from the available clinical data in order to guide the therapeutic choice and individualize treatment.

New approaches in systemic treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: the molecular targets era

The prognosis of advanced colorectal cancer remains poor in spite of the advances obtained in recent years with new therapeutic agents, new approaches in surgical procedures and new diagnostic methods. New treatments directed to molecular targets have emerged and are being developed to improve these results, but there is a need to optimize and define the best use of these new approaches. In this review, the authors examine the most important trials with monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

Comparison of outcomes after fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for stages II and III colon cancer between 1978 to 1995 and 1996 to 2007: evidence of stage migration from the ACCENT database

PURPOSE

With improved patient care, better diagnosis, and more treatment options after tumor recurrence, outcomes after fluorouracil (FU) -based treatment are expected to have improved over time in early-stage colon cancer. Data from 18,449 patients enrolled onto 21 phase III trials conducted from 1978 to 2002 were evaluated for potential differences in time to recurrence (TTR), time from recurrence to death (TRD), and overall survival (OS) with regard to FU-based adjuvant regimens.

METHODS

Trials were predefined as old versus newer era using initial accrual before or after 1995. Outcomes were compared between patients enrolled onto old- or newer-era trials, stratified by stage.

RESULTS

Within the first 3 years, recurrence rates were lower in newer- versus old-era trials for patients with stage II disease, with no differences among those with stage III disease. Both TRD and OS were significantly longer in newer-era trials overall and within each stage. The lymph node (LN) ratio (ie, number of positive nodes divided by total nodes harvested) in those with stage III disease declined over time. TTR improved slightly, with larger number of LNs examined in both stages.

CONCLUSION

Improved TRD in newer trials supports the premise that more aggressive intervention (oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapy and/or surgery for recurrent disease) improves OS for patients previously treated in the adjuvant setting. Lower recurrence rates with identical treatments in those with stage II disease enrolled onto newer-era trials reflect stage migration over time, calling into question historical data related to the benefit of FU-based adjuvant therapy in such patients.