1
|
van der Merwe NC, Buccimazza I, Rossouw B, Araujo M, Ntaita KS, Schoeman M, Vorster K, Napo K, Kotze MJ, Oosthuizen J. Clinical relevance of double heterozygosity revealed by next-generation sequencing of homologous recombination repair pathway genes in South African breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 207:331-342. [PMID: 38814507 PMCID: PMC11297091 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07362-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Genetically predisposed breast cancer (BC) patients represent a minor but clinically meaningful subgroup of the disease, with 25% of all cases associated with actionable variants in BRCA1/2. Diagnostic implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) resulted in the rare identification of BC patients with double heterozygosity for deleterious variants in genes partaking in homologous recombination repair of DNA. As clinical heterogeneity poses challenges for genetic counseling, this study focused on the occurrence and clinical relevance of double heterozygous BC in South Africa. METHODS DNA samples were diagnostically screened using the NGS-based Oncomine™ BRCA Expanded Research Assay. Data was generated on the Ion GeneStudio S5 system and analyzed using the Torrent Suite™ and reporter software. The clinical significance of the variants detected was determined using international variant classification guidelines and treatment implications. RESULTS Six of 1600 BC patients (0.375%) tested were identified as being bi-allelic for two germline likely pathogenic or pathogenic variants. Most of the variants were present in BRCA1/2, including two founder-related small deletions in three cases, with family-specific variants detected in ATM, BARD1, FANCD2, NBN, and TP53. The scientific interpretation and clinical relevance were based on the clinical and tumor characteristics of each case. CONCLUSION This study increased current knowledge of the risk implications associated with the co-occurrence of more than one pathogenic variant in the BC susceptibility genes, confirmed to be a rare condition in South Africa. Further molecular pathology-based studies are warranted to determine whether clinical decision-making is affected by the detection of a second pathogenic variant in BRCA1/2 and TP53 carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nerina C van der Merwe
- Division of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
- Division of Human Genetics, National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Hospital, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
| | - Ines Buccimazza
- Genetics Unit, Inkosi Albert Luthuli General Hospital, Durban, South Africa
- Department of Surgery, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, Inkosi Albert Luthuli General Hospital, Durban, South Africa
| | - Bianca Rossouw
- Division of Human Genetics, National Health Laboratory Service, Braamfontein, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Division of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Monica Araujo
- Division of Human Genetics, National Health Laboratory Service, Braamfontein, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Division of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Kholiwe S Ntaita
- Division of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
- Division of Human Genetics, National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Hospital, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| | - Mardelle Schoeman
- Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Karin Vorster
- Department of Oncology, Free State Department of Health, Universitas Annex Hospital, Bloemfontein, South Africa
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| | - Kgabo Napo
- Department of Oncology, Free State Department of Health, Universitas Annex Hospital, Bloemfontein, South Africa
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| | - Maritha J Kotze
- Division of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology, National Health Laboratory Service, Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
- Division of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Jaco Oosthuizen
- Division of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
- Division of Human Genetics, National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Hospital, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mishra A, Deo SVS, Kumar N, Bansal B, Gogia A, Pramanik R, Batra A, Sharma DN, Mathur S, Pathak M. A Prospective Questionnaire-Based Study Evaluating Genetic Literacy and Impact of Brief Educational Intervention Among Breast Cancer Patients in a Low- to Middle-Income Country. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:5911-5918. [PMID: 38862836 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15527-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A significant proportion of breast cancer cases are hereditary and are potentially preventable. However, adoption of the preventive measures remains a significant challenge, particularly because of to lack of knowledge and awareness in low- to middle-income countries. METHODS This prospective study conducted at a high-volume tertiary care cancer center in North India to assess the knowledge, awareness, and attitudes of female breast cancer patients and impact of a brief educational intervention. The study involved three phases: pre-interventional assessment, educational intervention, and post-interventional assessment utilizing a structured questionnaire. RESULTS The study involved 300 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients; 16.7% were familial. At the outset, 87.0% patients had low knowledge of risk factors, 90.3% about screening, and 32.7% about treatment. Awareness levels were low: 13.7% aware of familial risk and 2.7% of breast cancer genes. Affordability of genetic testing was low (15.2%), and interest in testing for self and family members was limited (32.0% and 26.3%). Following educational intervention, a significant positive percentage change was noticed in knowledge (risk factors: 12.8%, screening: 36.2%, treatment: 82%), awareness (familial risk: 66.7%, BRCA gene: 12.3%), and attitude (testing for self: 17.8%, family: 19.5%). CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the significant knowledge gaps among breast cancer patients regarding genetics. The educational intervention led to notable improvements in knowledge, awareness, and attitudes, underscoring the importance of tailored patient education in breast cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashutosh Mishra
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - S V S Deo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
| | - Navin Kumar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Babul Bansal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ajay Gogia
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Raja Pramanik
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Atul Batra
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - D N Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sandeep Mathur
- Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Mona Pathak
- Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cortesi L, Cortesi G, Venturelli M, Marcheselli L, Toss A, Barbieri E, Tamburrano F, Musolino A, De Giorgi U, Bisagni G, Arcangeli V, Zamagni C, Cavanna L, Dominici M. Can contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy increase survival in BRCA-related breast cancer? Results from the Italian MUTina study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108603. [PMID: 39154430 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2024] [Revised: 07/21/2024] [Accepted: 08/11/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy, a unique Hub and Spoke model was adopted to recognize BRCA-related breast cancer (BC) patients. Characteristics and outcomes of tumors identified by this model will be presented. METHODS This multicenter retrospective cohort study involved patients diagnosed with BRCA-related BC identified in the Emilia-Romagna region between January 2000 and December 2013. Seven provinces collected data on patient and tumor characteristics; clinical and gene testing information were also registered. Comparisons between BRCA1 and BRCA2 BC were performed. To balance different variants to identify significant predictors of survival, an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis on Cox regression was conducted. RESULTS From 2000 to 2013, 284 BRCA-related BC were registered (171 BRCA1, 110 BRCA2, and 3 BRCA1 and BRCA2). BRCA1 were diagnosed at an earlier stage compared to BRCA2 (50.1 % vs 30 %, respectively, in stage I, P = 0.0015). BRCA2 patients underwent more up-front surgery (85 % vs. 74.9 %, P = 0.049) and less chemotherapy (69.1 % vs 88.9 %, P = 0.004) than BRCA1 patients. At 11.8 years median follow-up, BRCA1 patients developed more second contralateral BC (P = 0.09), while BRCA2 had more visceral relapses (P = 0.013). No differences in overall survival (OS) between BRCA1 and BRCA2 patients (P = 0.07) were found. An advantage in OS was independently seen for patients who underwent contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (P = 0.0001) and oophorectomy (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, adopting a homogeneous regional framework provides important information about prevention and treatment strategies of BRCA-related BC and suggests using maximal surgery to improve OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Modena Italy.
| | - Giulia Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Modena Italy
| | - Marta Venturelli
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Modena Italy
| | - Luigi Marcheselli
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Modena Italy
| | - Angela Toss
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Modena Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Modena Italy
| | - Elena Barbieri
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Modena Italy
| | - Fabio Tamburrano
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Modena Italy
| | - Antonino Musolino
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori," Meldola, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Bisagni
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS Tecnologie Avanzate e Modelli Assistenziali in Oncologia di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Valentina Arcangeli
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori," Meldola, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Infermi, 47923 Rimini, Italy
| | - Claudio Zamagni
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Luigi Cavanna
- Medical Oncology, Hospital of Piacenza, Piacenza, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Massimo Dominici
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Modena Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Modena Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vinayak S, Cecil DL, Disis ML. Vaccines for breast cancer prevention: Are we there yet? Mol Aspects Med 2024; 98:101292. [PMID: 38991631 DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2024.101292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Shaveta Vinayak
- University of Washington, Division of Oncology, Seattle, WA, USA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Denise L Cecil
- University of Washington, Division of Oncology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Mary L Disis
- University of Washington, Division of Oncology, Seattle, WA, USA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huang X, Chen C, Lin Y, Wang C, Zhou X, Xu Y, Sun Q, Zhou Y. Pedigree analysis exploring the inconsistency between diverse phenotypes and testing criteria for germline TP53 mutations in Chinese women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 206:653-666. [PMID: 38878125 PMCID: PMC11208215 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07341-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the present study, we addressed the inconsistency between the testing criteria and diverse phenotypes for germline TP53 mutation in patients with breast cancer in the Chinese population. METHOD We proposed a new added item (synchronous or metachronous bilateral breast cancer) as one of the testing criteria (aimed at high-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes) and applied it for determining TP53 germline mutation status in 420 female patients with breast cancer using multigene panel-based next-generation sequencing, Sanger sequencing, and mass spectrometry. RESULTS We found that 1.4% of patients carried a pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline TP53 mutation. Compared with BRCA mutation carriers (8.0%) and non-carriers (7.1%), TP53 mutation carriers (33.3%) developed breast cancer earlier. The majority of TP53 mutation carriers (66.7%) developed breast cancer after age 30 and had bilateral breast cancer (33.3%). Pedigree investigation of four TP53 carriers and a patient with a TP53 variant of unknown significance revealed that neither of their parents harbored the same mutations as the probands, indicating that the mutations might occur de novo. CONCLUSION Our study revealed distinguishing features of TP53 carriers among Chinese women with breast cancer, which is inconsistent with the currently used testing criteria; therefore, the newly proposed testing criteria may be more appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Huang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chang Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Lin
- Department of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Changjun Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xingtong Zhou
- Department of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Xu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Qiang Sun
- Department of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yidong Zhou
- Department of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cardoso F, Paluch-Shimon S, Schumacher-Wulf E, Matos L, Gelmon K, Aapro MS, Bajpai J, Barrios CH, Bergh J, Bergsten-Nordström E, Biganzoli L, Cardoso MJ, Carey LA, Chavez-MacGregor M, Chidebe R, Cortés J, Curigliano G, Dent RA, El Saghir NS, Eniu A, Fallowfield L, Francis PA, Franco Millan SX, Gilchrist J, Gligorov J, Gradishar WJ, Haidinger R, Harbeck N, Hu X, Kaur R, Kiely B, Kim SB, Koppikar S, Kuper-Hommel MJJ, Lecouvet FE, Mason G, Mertz SA, Mueller V, Myerson C, Neciosup S, Offersen BV, Ohno S, Pagani O, Partridge AH, Penault-Llorca F, Prat A, Rugo HS, Senkus E, Sledge GW, Swain SM, Thomssen C, Vorobiof DA, Vuylsteke P, Wiseman T, Xu B, Costa A, Norton L, Winer EP. 6th and 7th International consensus guidelines for the management of advanced breast cancer (ABC guidelines 6 and 7). Breast 2024; 76:103756. [PMID: 38896983 PMCID: PMC11231614 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
This manuscript describes the Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) international consensus guidelines updated at the last two ABC international consensus conferences (ABC 6 in 2021, virtual, and ABC 7 in 2023, in Lisbon, Portugal), organized by the ABC Global Alliance. It provides the main recommendations on how to best manage patients with advanced breast cancer (inoperable locally advanced or metastatic), of all breast cancer subtypes, as well as palliative and supportive care. These guidelines are based on available evidence or on expert opinion when a higher level of evidence is lacking. Each guideline is accompanied by the level of evidence (LoE), grade of recommendation (GoR) and percentage of consensus reached at the consensus conferences. Updated diagnostic and treatment algorithms are also provided. The guidelines represent the best management options for patients living with ABC globally, assuming accessibility to all available therapies. Their adaptation (i.e. resource-stratified guidelines) is often needed in settings where access to care is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation, and ABC Global Alliance, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Shani Paluch-Shimon
- Hadassah University Hospital - Sharett Institute of Oncology, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | - Leonor Matos
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Karen Gelmon
- BC Cancer Agency, Department of Medical Oncology, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Matti S Aapro
- Cancer Center, Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland
| | | | - Carlos H Barrios
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Grupo Oncoclínicas, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Jonas Bergh
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Laura Biganzoli
- Department of Oncology, Hospital of Prato - Azienda USL Toscana Centro Prato, Italy and European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA), Italy
| | - Maria João Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation and Lisbon University, Faculty of Medicine, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Lisa A Carey
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Mariana Chavez-MacGregor
- Health Services Research, Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Houston, USA
| | | | - Javier Cortés
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Madrid and Barcelona, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Nagi S El Saghir
- NK Basile Cancer Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Alexandru Eniu
- Hôpital Riviera-Chablais, Vaud-Valais Rennaz, Switzerland and European School of Oncology (ESO), United Kingdom
| | - Lesley Fallowfield
- Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Prudence A Francis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | - Joseph Gligorov
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Est APHP Tenon, University Paris VI, Nice/St Paul Guidelines, Paris, France
| | - William J Gradishar
- Northwestern Medicine, Illinois, USA and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), USA
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Centre, University of Munich, Munich and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, Kommission Mamma (AGO Guidelines), Germany
| | - Xichun Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Ranjit Kaur
- Breast Cancer Welfare Association, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
| | - Belinda Kiely
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney Medical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sung-Bae Kim
- Asan Medical Centre, Department of Oncology, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Smruti Koppikar
- Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Bombay Hospital Institute of Medical Sciences, Asian Cancer Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Marion J J Kuper-Hommel
- Te Whatu Ora Waikato, Midland Regional Cancer Centre, NZ ABC Guidelines, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Frédéric E Lecouvet
- Department of Radiology, Institut Roi Albert II and Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ginny Mason
- Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation, West Lafayette, USA
| | - Shirley A Mertz
- MBC US Alliance and Metastatic Breast Cancer Network US, Inverness, USA
| | - Volkmar Mueller
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, Kommission Mamma (AGO Guidelines), Germany
| | | | - Silvia Neciosup
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, Lima, ABC Latin America Guidelines, Peru
| | - Birgitte V Offersen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), Denmark
| | - Shinji Ohno
- Breast Oncology Centre, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Olivia Pagani
- Hôpital Riviera-Chablais, Vaud-Valais Rennaz, Switzerland
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology and Division of Breast Oncology, Boston, USA and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), USA
| | - Frédérique Penault-Llorca
- Centre Jean Perrin, Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, U1240 Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques, F-63000, Clermont Ferrand, Nice/St Paul Guidelines, France
| | - Aleix Prat
- Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hope S Rugo
- Breast Oncology and Clinical Trials Education, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, USA
| | - Elzbieta Senkus
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - George W Sledge
- Division of Oncology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - Sandra M Swain
- Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and MedStar Health, Washington DC, USA
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale) and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, Kommission Mamma (AGO Guidelines), Germany
| | | | - Peter Vuylsteke
- University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana and CHU UCL Namur Hospital, UCLouvain, Belgium
| | - Theresa Wiseman
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, University of Southampton, United Kingdom and European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS), United Kingdom
| | - Binghe Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Alberto Costa
- European School of Oncology, Milan, Italy and Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Larry Norton
- Breast Cancer Programs, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sandoval RL, Bottosso M, Tianyu L, Polidorio N, Bychkovsky BL, Verret B, Gennari A, Cahill S, Achatz MI, Caron O, Imbert-Bouteille M, Noguès C, Mawell KN, Fortuno C, Spurdle AB, Tayob N, Andre F, Garber JE. TP53-associated early breast cancer: new observations from a large cohort. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:1246-1254. [PMID: 38569880 PMCID: PMC11308175 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A recent large, well-annotated international cohort of patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome and early-stage breast cancer was examined for shared features. METHODS This multicenter cohort study included women with a germline TP53 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant and nonmetastatic breast cancer diagnosed between 2002 and 2022. Clinical and genetic data were obtained from institutional registries and clinical charts. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize proportions, and differences were assessed using χ2 or Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Metachronous contralateral breast cancer risk, radiation-induced sarcoma risk, and recurrence-free survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier methodology. RESULTS Among 227 women who met study criteria, the median age of first breast cancer diagnosis was 37 years (range = 21-71), 11.9% presented with bilateral synchronous breast cancer, and 18.1% had ductal carcinoma in situ only. In total, 166 (73.1%) patients underwent mastectomies, including 67 bilateral mastectomies as first breast cancer surgery. Among those patients with retained breast tissue, the contralateral breast cancer rate was 25.3% at 5 years. Among 186 invasive tumors, 72.1% were stages I to II, 48.9% were node negative, and the most common subtypes were hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (40.9%) and hormone receptor positive/HER2 positive (34.4%). At a median follow-up of 69.9 months (interquartile range = 32.6-125.9), invasive hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative disease had the highest recurrence risk among the subtypes (5-year recurrence-free survival = 61.1%, P = .001). Among those who received radiation therapy (n = 79), the 5-year radiation-induced sarcoma rate was 4.8%. CONCLUSION We observed high rates of ductal carcinoma in situ, hormone receptor-positive, and HER2-positive breast cancers, with a worse outcome in the hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative luminal tumors, despite appropriate treatment. Confirmation of these findings in further studies could have implications for breast cancer care in those with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renata L Sandoval
- Medical Oncology Center, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Brasília, DF, Brazil
- Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michele Bottosso
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, INERM U981, Université Paris Saclay, France
| | - Li Tianyu
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Natalia Polidorio
- Breast Surgery Department, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brittany L Bychkovsky
- Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin Verret
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, INERM U981, Université Paris Saclay, France
| | - Alessandra Gennari
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Sophie Cahill
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Olivier Caron
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Catherine Noguès
- Cancer Risk Management Department, Clinical Oncogenetics, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
- Aix Marseille Université, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Marseille, France
| | - Kara N Mawell
- Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Cristina Fortuno
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Nabihah Tayob
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fabrice Andre
- Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, INERM U981, Université Paris Saclay, France
| | - Judy E Garber
- Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pan JN, Li PC, Wang M, Li MW, Ding XW, Zhou T, Wang HN, Wang YK, Chen LB, Wang R, Ye WW, Wu WZ, Lou F, Wang XJ, Cao WM. AcornHRD: an HRD algorithm highly associated with anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer in China. Eur J Med Res 2024; 29:366. [PMID: 39014466 PMCID: PMC11253386 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-01936-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Our study aimed to develop and validate a homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scoring algorithm in the Chinese breast cancer population. METHODS AND MATERIALS Ninety-six in-house breast cancer (BC) samples and 6 HRD-positive standard cells were analyzed by whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Besides, 122 BCs from the TCGA database were down-sampled to ~ 1X WGS. We constructed an algorithm named AcornHRD for HRD score calculated based on WGS at low coverage as input data to estimate large-scale copy number alteration (LCNA) events on the genome. A clinical cohort of 50 BCs (15 cases carrying BRCA mutation) was used to assess the association between HRD status and anthracyclines-based neoadjuvant treatment outcomes. RESULTS A 100-kb window was defined as the optimal size using 41 in-house cases and the TCGA dataset. HRD score high threshold was determined as HRD score ≥ 10 using 55 in-house BCs with BRCA mutation to achieve a 95% BRCA-positive agreement rate. Furthermore, the HRD status agreement rate of AcornHRD is 100%, while the ShallowHRD is 60% in standard cells. BRCA mutation was significantly associated with a high HRD score evaluated by AcornHRD and ShallowHRD (p = 0.008 and p = 0.003, respectively) in the TCGA dataset. However, AcornHRD showed a higher positive agreement rate than did the ShallowHRD algorithm (70% vs 60%). In addition, the BRCA-positive agreement rate of AcornHRD was superior to that of ShallowHRD (87% vs 13%) in the clinical cohort. Importantly, the high HRD score assessed by AcornHRD was significantly correlated with a residual cancer burden score of 0 or 1 (RCB0/1). Besides, the HRD-positive group was more likely to respond to anthracycline-based chemotherapy than the HRD-negative group (pCR [OR = 9.5, 95% CI 1.11-81.5, p = 0.040] and RCB0/1 [OR = 10.29, 95% CI 2.02-52.36, p = 0.005]). CONCLUSION Using the AcornHRD algorithm evaluation, our analysis demonstrated the high performance of the LCNA genomic signature for HRD detection in breast cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Ni Pan
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, China
- Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, 310018, China
- Cancer Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macau, 999078, SAR, China
| | - Pu-Chun Li
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, China
- Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, China
| | - Meng Wang
- AcornMed Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Floor 18, Block 5, Yard 18, Kechuang 13 RD, Beijing, 100176, China
| | - Ming-Wei Li
- AcornMed Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Floor 18, Block 5, Yard 18, Kechuang 13 RD, Beijing, 100176, China
| | - Xiao-Wen Ding
- Department of Breast Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, China
| | - Tao Zhou
- AcornMed Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Floor 18, Block 5, Yard 18, Kechuang 13 RD, Beijing, 100176, China
| | - Hui-Na Wang
- AcornMed Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Floor 18, Block 5, Yard 18, Kechuang 13 RD, Beijing, 100176, China
| | - Yun-Kai Wang
- AcornMed Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Floor 18, Block 5, Yard 18, Kechuang 13 RD, Beijing, 100176, China
| | - Li-Bin Chen
- AcornMed Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Floor 18, Block 5, Yard 18, Kechuang 13 RD, Beijing, 100176, China
| | - Rong Wang
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, China
| | - Wei-Wu Ye
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, China
| | - Wei-Zhu Wu
- Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo Medical Center, Ningbo, 315040, China
| | - Feng Lou
- AcornMed Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Floor 18, Block 5, Yard 18, Kechuang 13 RD, Beijing, 100176, China.
| | - Xiao-Jia Wang
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, China.
| | - Wen-Ming Cao
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cortina CS, Purdy A, Brazauskas R, Stachowiak SM, Fodrocy J, Klement KA, Sasor SE, Krucoff KB, Robertson K, Buth J, Lakatos AEB, Petroll AE, Doren EL. The Impact of a Breast Cancer Risk Assessment on the Decision for Gender-Affirming Chest Masculinization Surgery in Transgender and Gender-Diverse Individuals: A Pilot Single-Arm Educational Intervention Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15701-2. [PMID: 38940898 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15701-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Persons assigned female or intersex at birth and identify as transgender and/or gender-diverse (TGD) may undergo gender-affirming chest masculinization surgery (GACMS); however, GACMS is not considered equivalent to risk-reducing mastectomies (RRM). This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of elevated breast cancer (BC) risk in TGD persons, compare self-perceived versus calculated risk, and determine how risk impacts the decision for GACMS versus RRM. METHODS A prospective single-arm pilot educational intervention trial was conducted in individuals assigned female or intersex at birth, age ≥ 18 years, considering GACMS, without a BC history or a known pathogenic variant. BC risk was calculated using the Tyrer-Cuzik (all) and Gail models (age ≥ 35 years). Elevated risk was defined as ≥ 17%. RESULTS Twenty-five (N = 25) participants were enrolled with a median age of 24.0 years (interquartile range, IQR 20.0-30.0 years). All were assigned female sex at birth, most (84%) were Non-Hispanic (NH)-White, 48% identified as transgender and 40% as nonbinary, and 52% had a first- and/or second-degree family member with BC. Thirteen (52%) had elevated risk (prevalence 95% confidence interval (CI) 31.3-72.2%). Median self-perceived risk was 12% versus 17.5% calculated risk (p = 0.60). Of the 13 with elevated risk, 5 (38.5%) underwent/are scheduled to undergo GACMS, 3 (23%) of whom underwent/are undergoing RRM. CONCLUSIONS Over half of the cohort had elevated risk, and most of those who moved forward with surgery chose to undergo RRM. A BC risk assessment should be performed for TGD persons considering GACMS. Future work is needed to examine BC incidence and collect patient-reported outcomes. Trial Registration Number ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT06239766).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chandler S Cortina
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
- Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
| | - Anna Purdy
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Ruta Brazauskas
- Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Samantha M Stachowiak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Jessica Fodrocy
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Kristen A Klement
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Sarah E Sasor
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Kate B Krucoff
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Kevin Robertson
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
- Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin's Inclusion Health Clinic, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Jamie Buth
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
- Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin's Inclusion Health Clinic, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Annie E B Lakatos
- Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin's Inclusion Health Clinic, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Andrew E Petroll
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
- Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin's Inclusion Health Clinic, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Erin L Doren
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dominguez-Ortiz J, Álvarez-Gómez RM, Montiel-Manríquez R, Cedro-Tanda A, Alcaraz N, Castro-Hernández C, Bautista-Hinojosa L, Contreras-Espinosa L, Torres-Maldonado L, Fragoso-Ontiveros V, Sánchez-Contreras Y, González-Barrios R, la Fuente-Hernández MAD, Mejía-Aguayo MDLL, Juárez-Figueroa U, Padua-Bracho A, Sosa-León R, Obregon-Serrano G, Vidal-Millán S, Núñez-Martínez PM, Pedroza-Torres A, Nicasio-Arzeta S, Rodríguez A, Luna F, Cisneros-Soberanis F, Frías S, Arriaga-Canon C, Herrera-Montalvo LA. A Molecular Characterization of the Allelic Expression of the BRCA1 Founder Δ9-12 Pathogenic Variant and Its Potential Clinical Relevance in Hereditary Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:6773. [PMID: 38928478 PMCID: PMC11204022 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25126773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Revised: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome is a genetic condition that increases the risk of breast cancer by 80% and that of ovarian cancer by 40%. The most common pathogenic variants (PVs) causing HBOC occur in the BRCA1 gene, with more than 3850 reported mutations in the gene sequence. The prevalence of specific PVs in BRCA1 has increased across populations due to the effect of founder mutations. Therefore, when a founder mutation is identified, it becomes key to improving cancer risk characterization and effective screening protocols. The only founder mutation described in the Mexican population is the deletion of exons 9 to 12 of BRCA1 (BRCA1Δ9-12), and its description focuses on the gene sequence, but no transcription profiles have been generated for individuals who carry this gene. In this study, we describe the transcription profiles of cancer patients and healthy individuals who were heterozygous for PV BRCA1Δ9-12 by analyzing the differential expression of both alleles compared with the homozygous BRCA1 control group using RT-qPCR, and we describe the isoforms produced by the BRCA1 wild-type and BRCA1Δ9-12 alleles using nanopore long-sequencing. Using the Kruskal-Wallis test, our results showed a similar transcript expression of the wild-type allele between the healthy heterozygous group and the homozygous BRCA1 control group. An association between the recurrence and increased expression of both alleles in HBOC patients was also observed. An analysis of the sequences indicated four wild-type isoforms with diagnostic potential for discerning individuals who carry the PV BRCA1Δ9-12 and identifying which of them has developed cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julieta Dominguez-Ortiz
- Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Avenida San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; (J.D.-O.); (R.M.-M.); (C.C.-H.); (L.B.-H.); (L.C.-E.); (R.G.-B.); (F.L.)
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Coyoacán, Mexico City 04510, Mexico
- Clínica de Cáncer Hereditario, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; (R.M.Á.-G.); (V.F.-O.); (Y.S.-C.); (M.A.D.l.F.-H.); (M.d.l.L.M.-A.); (A.P.-B.); (R.S.-L.); (G.O.-S.); (S.V.-M.); (P.M.N.-M.); (A.P.-T.)
| | - Rosa M. Álvarez-Gómez
- Clínica de Cáncer Hereditario, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; (R.M.Á.-G.); (V.F.-O.); (Y.S.-C.); (M.A.D.l.F.-H.); (M.d.l.L.M.-A.); (A.P.-B.); (R.S.-L.); (G.O.-S.); (S.V.-M.); (P.M.N.-M.); (A.P.-T.)
| | - Rogelio Montiel-Manríquez
- Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Avenida San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; (J.D.-O.); (R.M.-M.); (C.C.-H.); (L.B.-H.); (L.C.-E.); (R.G.-B.); (F.L.)
| | - Alberto Cedro-Tanda
- Núcleo B de Innovación en Medicina de Precisión, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica, Periférico Sur 4809, Arenal Tepepan, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14610, Mexico;
| | - Nicolás Alcaraz
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3A, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark;
| | - Clementina Castro-Hernández
- Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Avenida San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; (J.D.-O.); (R.M.-M.); (C.C.-H.); (L.B.-H.); (L.C.-E.); (R.G.-B.); (F.L.)
| | - Luis Bautista-Hinojosa
- Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Avenida San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; (J.D.-O.); (R.M.-M.); (C.C.-H.); (L.B.-H.); (L.C.-E.); (R.G.-B.); (F.L.)
| | - Laura Contreras-Espinosa
- Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Avenida San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; (J.D.-O.); (R.M.-M.); (C.C.-H.); (L.B.-H.); (L.C.-E.); (R.G.-B.); (F.L.)
| | - Leda Torres-Maldonado
- Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Insurgentes Sur No. 3700-C. Coyoacán, Mexico City 04530, Mexico; (L.T.-M.); (U.J.-F.); (A.R.); (S.F.)
| | - Verónica Fragoso-Ontiveros
- Clínica de Cáncer Hereditario, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; (R.M.Á.-G.); (V.F.-O.); (Y.S.-C.); (M.A.D.l.F.-H.); (M.d.l.L.M.-A.); (A.P.-B.); (R.S.-L.); (G.O.-S.); (S.V.-M.); (P.M.N.-M.); (A.P.-T.)
| | - Yuliana Sánchez-Contreras
- Clínica de Cáncer Hereditario, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; (R.M.Á.-G.); (V.F.-O.); (Y.S.-C.); (M.A.D.l.F.-H.); (M.d.l.L.M.-A.); (A.P.-B.); (R.S.-L.); (G.O.-S.); (S.V.-M.); (P.M.N.-M.); (A.P.-T.)
| | - Rodrigo González-Barrios
- Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Avenida San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; (J.D.-O.); (R.M.-M.); (C.C.-H.); (L.B.-H.); (L.C.-E.); (R.G.-B.); (F.L.)
| | - Marcela Angélica De la Fuente-Hernández
- Clínica de Cáncer Hereditario, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; (R.M.Á.-G.); (V.F.-O.); (Y.S.-C.); (M.A.D.l.F.-H.); (M.d.l.L.M.-A.); (A.P.-B.); (R.S.-L.); (G.O.-S.); (S.V.-M.); (P.M.N.-M.); (A.P.-T.)
| | - María de la Luz Mejía-Aguayo
- Clínica de Cáncer Hereditario, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; (R.M.Á.-G.); (V.F.-O.); (Y.S.-C.); (M.A.D.l.F.-H.); (M.d.l.L.M.-A.); (A.P.-B.); (R.S.-L.); (G.O.-S.); (S.V.-M.); (P.M.N.-M.); (A.P.-T.)
| | - Ulises Juárez-Figueroa
- Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Insurgentes Sur No. 3700-C. Coyoacán, Mexico City 04530, Mexico; (L.T.-M.); (U.J.-F.); (A.R.); (S.F.)
| | - Alejandra Padua-Bracho
- Clínica de Cáncer Hereditario, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; (R.M.Á.-G.); (V.F.-O.); (Y.S.-C.); (M.A.D.l.F.-H.); (M.d.l.L.M.-A.); (A.P.-B.); (R.S.-L.); (G.O.-S.); (S.V.-M.); (P.M.N.-M.); (A.P.-T.)
| | - Rodrigo Sosa-León
- Clínica de Cáncer Hereditario, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; (R.M.Á.-G.); (V.F.-O.); (Y.S.-C.); (M.A.D.l.F.-H.); (M.d.l.L.M.-A.); (A.P.-B.); (R.S.-L.); (G.O.-S.); (S.V.-M.); (P.M.N.-M.); (A.P.-T.)
| | - Gabriela Obregon-Serrano
- Clínica de Cáncer Hereditario, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; (R.M.Á.-G.); (V.F.-O.); (Y.S.-C.); (M.A.D.l.F.-H.); (M.d.l.L.M.-A.); (A.P.-B.); (R.S.-L.); (G.O.-S.); (S.V.-M.); (P.M.N.-M.); (A.P.-T.)
| | - Silvia Vidal-Millán
- Clínica de Cáncer Hereditario, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; (R.M.Á.-G.); (V.F.-O.); (Y.S.-C.); (M.A.D.l.F.-H.); (M.d.l.L.M.-A.); (A.P.-B.); (R.S.-L.); (G.O.-S.); (S.V.-M.); (P.M.N.-M.); (A.P.-T.)
| | - Paulina María Núñez-Martínez
- Clínica de Cáncer Hereditario, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; (R.M.Á.-G.); (V.F.-O.); (Y.S.-C.); (M.A.D.l.F.-H.); (M.d.l.L.M.-A.); (A.P.-B.); (R.S.-L.); (G.O.-S.); (S.V.-M.); (P.M.N.-M.); (A.P.-T.)
| | - Abraham Pedroza-Torres
- Clínica de Cáncer Hereditario, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Av. San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; (R.M.Á.-G.); (V.F.-O.); (Y.S.-C.); (M.A.D.l.F.-H.); (M.d.l.L.M.-A.); (A.P.-B.); (R.S.-L.); (G.O.-S.); (S.V.-M.); (P.M.N.-M.); (A.P.-T.)
| | - Sergio Nicasio-Arzeta
- Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA;
| | - Alfredo Rodríguez
- Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Insurgentes Sur No. 3700-C. Coyoacán, Mexico City 04530, Mexico; (L.T.-M.); (U.J.-F.); (A.R.); (S.F.)
- Departamento de Medicina Genómica y Toxicología Ambiental, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), México City 04510, Mexico
| | - Fernando Luna
- Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Avenida San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; (J.D.-O.); (R.M.-M.); (C.C.-H.); (L.B.-H.); (L.C.-E.); (R.G.-B.); (F.L.)
| | - Fernanda Cisneros-Soberanis
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, ICB, University of Edinburgh, Michael Swann Building, King’s Buildings, Max Born Crescent, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, UK;
| | - Sara Frías
- Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Insurgentes Sur No. 3700-C. Coyoacán, Mexico City 04530, Mexico; (L.T.-M.); (U.J.-F.); (A.R.); (S.F.)
- Departamento de Medicina Genómica y Toxicología Ambiental, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), México City 04510, Mexico
| | - Cristian Arriaga-Canon
- Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Avenida San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; (J.D.-O.); (R.M.-M.); (C.C.-H.); (L.B.-H.); (L.C.-E.); (R.G.-B.); (F.L.)
- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey 64710, Mexico
| | - Luis A. Herrera-Montalvo
- Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Avenida San Fernando No. 22 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; (J.D.-O.); (R.M.-M.); (C.C.-H.); (L.B.-H.); (L.C.-E.); (R.G.-B.); (F.L.)
- Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey 64710, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abdel-Razeq H, Tamimi F, Iweir S, Sharaf B, Abdel-Razeq S, Salama O, Edaily S, Bani Hani H, Azzam K, Abaza H. Genetic counseling and genetic testing for pathogenic germline mutations among high-risk patients previously diagnosed with breast cancer: a traceback approach. Sci Rep 2024; 14:12820. [PMID: 38834641 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63300-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Genetic counseling and testing are more accessible than ever due to reduced costs, expanding indications and public awareness. Nonetheless, many patients missed the opportunity of genetic counseling and testing due to barriers that existed at that time of their cancer diagnoses. Given the identified implications of pathogenic mutations on patients' treatment and familial outcomes, an opportunity exists to utilize a 'traceback' approach to retrospectively examine their genetic makeup and provide consequent insights to their disease and treatment. In this study, we identified living patients diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) between July 2007 and January 2022 who would have been eligible for testing, but not tested. Overall, 422 patients met the eligibility criteria, 282 were reached and invited to participate, and germline testing was performed for 238, accounting for 84.4% of those invited. The median age (range) was 39.5 (24-64) years at BC diagnosis and 49 (31-75) years at the date of testing. Genetic testing revealed that 25 (10.5%) patients had pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants; mostly in BRCA2 and BRCA1. We concluded that long overdue genetic referral through a traceback approach is feasible and effective to diagnose P/LP variants in patients with history of BC who had missed the opportunity of genetic testing, with potential clinical implications for patients and their relatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hikmat Abdel-Razeq
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, 202 Queen Rania Al Abdullah Street, P.O. Box: 1269, Amman, 11941, Jordan.
- School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
| | - Faris Tamimi
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, 202 Queen Rania Al Abdullah Street, P.O. Box: 1269, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Sereen Iweir
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, 202 Queen Rania Al Abdullah Street, P.O. Box: 1269, Amman, 11941, Jordan
- CRDF Global, Global Health Mission Area, Amman, Jordan
| | - Baha Sharaf
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, 202 Queen Rania Al Abdullah Street, P.O. Box: 1269, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | | | - Osama Salama
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, 202 Queen Rania Al Abdullah Street, P.O. Box: 1269, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Sarah Edaily
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, 202 Queen Rania Al Abdullah Street, P.O. Box: 1269, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Hira Bani Hani
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, 202 Queen Rania Al Abdullah Street, P.O. Box: 1269, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Khansa Azzam
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, 202 Queen Rania Al Abdullah Street, P.O. Box: 1269, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Haneen Abaza
- Office of Scientific Affairs and Research, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wanis KN, Kuerer HM, Sun SX, Hunt KK, Glencer AC, Teshome M, Lucci A, Weiser R, Johnson H, Smith BD, Gutierrez AM, Shaitelman SF, Arun BK. Clinical Outcomes for BRCA Pathogenic Variant Carriers With Breast Cancer Undergoing Breast Conservation. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2418486. [PMID: 38916888 PMCID: PMC11200147 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Although most women with BRCA-associated breast cancer choose bilateral mastectomy, current guidelines support breast-conserving therapy as an option. As the indications for genetic testing expand and targeted therapies emerge, understanding the outcomes of breast-conserving therapy in the population of patients choosing breast conservation is important. Objective To describe the clinical outcomes of women with BRCA-associated breast cancer who were treated with breast-conserving therapy, including the risks of ipsilateral and contralateral cancer events and bilateral mastectomy-free survival. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study conducted at a single-institution academic national comprehensive cancer center included 172 women identified from a prospectively maintained database who had pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants and were treated with breast-conserving therapy from January 1, 1977, to December 31, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures Clinical and pathologic characteristics for patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 were compared, and estimates of overall survival, bilateral mastectomy-free survival, distant disease-free survival, risk of ipsilateral breast cancer, and risk of contralateral cancer were computed. Results The cohort included 172 women (mean [SD] age, 47.1 [11.7] years), with 42 (24.4%) receiving a diagnosis of breast cancer prior to 40 years of age. Compared with BRCA2 variant carriers (80 [46.5%]), women with BRCA1 variants (92 [53.5%]) were younger at breast cancer diagnosis and tended to have more advanced tumors, which were more likely to be hormone receptor negative and higher grade. At a median follow-up of 11.8 years (IQR, 5.7-18.2 years), estimates of 10-year survival and risk were: overall survival, 88.5% (95% CI, 83.1%-94.2%); bilateral mastectomy-free survival, 70.7% (95% CI, 63.3%-78.9%); risk of an ipsilateral breast cancer event, 12.2% (95% CI, 5.8%-18.2%); and risk of contralateral cancer, 21.3% (95% CI, 13.3%-28.6%). Risks continued to increase after 10 years of follow-up. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, although women with breast cancer and pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants treated with breast-conserving therapy had above-average risks of ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer events, most did not have another cancer event and remained bilateral mastectomy free. These findings may be useful for informing patients with BRCA variants choosing breast conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Henry M. Kuerer
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Susie X. Sun
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kelly K. Hunt
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Alexa C. Glencer
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mediget Teshome
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anthony Lucci
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Roi Weiser
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Helen Johnson
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Benjamin D. Smith
- Department of Breast Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Simona F. Shaitelman
- Department of Breast Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Banu K. Arun
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sanabria-Salas MC, Pedroza-Duran A, Díaz-Casas SE, Nuñez Lemus M, Grillo-Ardila CF, Briceño-Morales X, García-Mora M, Ángel-Aristizábal J, Mariño Lozano IF, Suarez Rodríguez RA, Guzmán Abisaab LH. Management and Clinical Outcomes of Breast Cancer in Women Diagnosed with Hereditary Cancer Syndromes in a Clinic-Based Sample from Colombia. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2020. [PMID: 38893140 PMCID: PMC11171067 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate prognosis and survival differences in 82 breast cancer patients with germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PVs) treated and followed at the Breast Unit of the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Colombia (INC-C) between 2018 and 2021. Median age at diagnosis was 46 years, with 62.2% presenting locally advanced tumors, 47.6% histological grade 3, and 35.4% with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype. Most carriers, 74.4% (61/82), had PVs in known breast cancer susceptibility genes (i.e., "associated gene carriers" group, considered inherited breast cancer cases): BRCA2 (30), BRCA1 (14), BARD1 (4), RAD51D (3), TP53 (2), PALB2 (2), ATM (2), CHEK2 (1), RAD51C (1), NF1 (1), and PTEN (1). BRCA1-2 represented 53.7%, and homologous recombination DNA damage repair (HR-DDR) genes associated with breast cancer risk accounted for 15.9%. Patients with PVs in non-breast-cancer risk genes were combined in a different category (21/82; 25.6%) (i.e., "non-associated gene carriers" group, considered other breast cancer cases). Median follow-up was 38.1 months, and 24% experienced recurrence, with 90% being distant. The 5-year Disease-Free Survival (DFS) for inherited breast cancer cases was 66.5%, and for other breast cancer cases it was 88.2%. In particular, for carriers of PVs in the BRCA2 gene, it was 37.6%. The 5-year Overall Survival (OS) rates ranged from 68.8% for those with PVs in BRCA2 to 100% for those with PVs in other HR-DDR genes. Further studies are crucial for understanding tumor behavior and therapy response differences among Colombian breast cancer patients with germline PVs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Carolina Sanabria-Salas
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Ana Pedroza-Duran
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Sandra E. Díaz-Casas
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Marcela Nuñez Lemus
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Carlos F. Grillo-Ardila
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Avenida Carrera 30 N. 45-3, Bogotá 111321, Colombia;
| | - Ximena Briceño-Morales
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Mauricio García-Mora
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Javier Ángel-Aristizábal
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Iván Fernando Mariño Lozano
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Raúl Alexis Suarez Rodríguez
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| | - Luis Hernán Guzmán Abisaab
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Calle 1 N. 9-85, Bogotá 111511, Colombia; (A.P.-D.); (S.E.D.-C.); (M.N.L.); (X.B.-M.); (M.G.-M.); (J.Á.-A.); (I.F.M.L.); (R.A.S.R.); (L.H.G.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abdel-Razeq H, Mansour A. Challenges and Opportunities in Breast Cancer Care in Low-Resourced Countries, Jordan as An Example. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1751. [PMID: 38730701 PMCID: PMC11083275 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Jordan is a relatively small country with a rapidly growing population and a challenged economy. Breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer among women worldwide and also in Jordan. Though the age-standardized rate (ASR) of breast cancer incidence is still lower than that in Western societies, the number of newly diagnosed cases continues to increase, involving younger women, and new cases are usually detected at more advanced stages. Improvements in breast cancer care across the health care continuum, including early detection, prevention, treatment, and survivorship and palliative care, have become very visible, but may not match the magnitude of the problem. More organized, goal-oriented work is urgently needed to downstage the disease and improve awareness of, access to, and participation in early detection programs. The cost of recently introduced anti-cancer therapies poses a great challenge, but the impact of these therapies on treatment outcomes, including overall survival, is becoming very noticeable. Though the concept of a multidisciplinary approach to breast cancer treatment is often used at most health care facilities, its implementation in real practice varies significantly. The availability of breast reconstruction procedures, survivorship programs, germline genetic testing, counselling, and palliative care is improving, but these are not widely practiced. In this manuscript, we review the status of breast cancer in Jordan and highlight some of the existing challenges and opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hikmat Abdel-Razeq
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman 11941, Jordan
- School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan
| | - Asem Mansour
- Department of Radiology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman 11941, Jordan;
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Al-Shamsi HO, Alwbari A, Azribi F, Calaud F, Thuruthel S, Tirmazy SHH, Kullab S, Ostomane S, Abulkhair O. BRCA testing and management of BRCA-mutated early-stage breast cancer: a comprehensive statement by expert group from GCC region. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1358982. [PMID: 38725624 PMCID: PMC11080009 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1358982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BReast CAncer (BRCA)1 and BRCA2 gene pathogenic variants account for most hereditary breast cancers (BC). Identification of BRCA mutations can significantly influence both prognosis and treatment outcomes. Furthermore, it enables the identification of individuals who are at heightened risk of developing BC due to inherited genetic mutations. Many developing countries rely on western guidelines for BRCA testing and BC management; however, there exist wide disparities in the prevalence of risk factors, availability of medical resources, and practice patterns. Guidelines tailored to specific regions can help mitigate healthcare variations, promote consistency in treatment, and aid healthcare providers in identifying effective therapies for improving patient outcomes. Hence, oncologists from the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) congregated virtually in March 2023 and reviewed existing data on the epidemiology of BC, BRCA mutations, practices and challenges associated with BRCA testing and management of BRCA mutated early-stage BC in the GCC region. They also provided insights on the real-world diagnostic and treatment practices and challenges in the GCC region in the BRCA-mutated early-stage BC domain and suggested some variations to international guidelines to aid their uptake in this region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Humaid O. Al-Shamsi
- Burjeel Medical City, Burjeel Holding, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
- Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
- Emirates Oncology Society, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
- Gulf Cancer Society, Alsafa, Kuwait
| | - Ahmed Alwbari
- Almoosa Specialist Hospital Cancer Center, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | | | | | | - Sharif Kullab
- King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Davey MG, Tormey S. Implications of Highly Penetrant Genetic Variants on Breast Surgery. Clin Breast Cancer 2024; 24:180-183. [PMID: 38218718 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
It seems the most probable beneficiaries from the molecular era are those harboring hereditary genetic variants, which are responsible for 5% to 10% of all breast cancer diagnoses. There are several key implications of such variants on clinical practice, from expedited anticipation of primary cancer diagnoses, which can have their risk mitigated by risk reduction surgery, to pragmatism surrounding the management of male breast cancer patients. This communication discusses the implications of highly penetrant (or pathogenic) hereditary variants in contemporary breast surgery practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Davey
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Breast Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
| | - Shona Tormey
- Department of Breast Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mustafa M, Abbas K, Alam M, Ahmad W, Moinuddin, Usmani N, Siddiqui SA, Habib S. Molecular pathways and therapeutic targets linked to triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Mol Cell Biochem 2024; 479:895-913. [PMID: 37247161 DOI: 10.1007/s11010-023-04772-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Cancer is a group of diseases characterized by uncontrolled cellular growth, abnormal morphology, and altered proliferation. Cancerous cells lose their ability to act as anchors, allowing them to spread throughout the body and infiltrate nearby cells, tissues, and organs. If these cells are not identified and treated promptly, they will likely spread. Around 70% of female breast cancers are caused by a mutation in the BRCA gene, specifically BRCA1. The absence of progesterone, oestrogen and HER2 receptors (human epidermal growth factor) distinguishes the TNBC subtype of breast cancer. There were approximately 6,85,000 deaths worldwide and 2.3 million new breast cancer cases in women in 2020. Breast cancer is the most common cancer globally, affecting 7.8 million people at the end of 2020. Compared to other cancer types, breast cancer causes more women to lose disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Worldwide, women can develop breast cancer at any age after puberty, but rates increase with age. The maintenance of mammary stem cell stemness is disrupted in TNBC, governed by signalling cascades controlling healthy mammary gland growth and development. Interpreting these essential cascades may facilitate an in-depth understanding of TNBC cancer and the search for an appropriate therapeutic target. Its treatment remains challenging because it lacks specific receptors, which renders hormone therapy and medications ineffective. In addition to radiotherapy, numerous recognized chemotherapeutic medicines are available as inhibitors of signalling pathways, while others are currently undergoing clinical trials. This article summarizes the vital druggable targets, therapeutic approaches, and strategies associated with TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohd Mustafa
- Department of Biochemistry, J.N. Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, 202002, India
| | - Kashif Abbas
- Department of Zoology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India
| | - Mudassir Alam
- Department of Zoology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India
| | - Waleem Ahmad
- Department of Medicine, J.N. Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India
| | - Moinuddin
- Department of Biochemistry, J.N. Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, 202002, India
| | - Nazura Usmani
- Department of Zoology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India
| | - Shahid Ali Siddiqui
- Department of Radiotherapy, J.N. Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India
| | - Safia Habib
- Department of Biochemistry, J.N. Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, 202002, India.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bedrosian I, Somerfield MR, Achatz MI, Boughey JC, Curigliano G, Friedman S, Kohlmann WK, Kurian AW, Laronga C, Lynce F, Norquist BS, Plichta JK, Rodriguez P, Shah PD, Tischkowitz M, Wood M, Yadav S, Yao K, Robson ME. Germline Testing in Patients With Breast Cancer: ASCO-Society of Surgical Oncology Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:584-604. [PMID: 38175972 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop recommendations for germline mutation testing for patients with breast cancer. METHODS An ASCO-Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) panel convened to develop recommendations based on a systematic review and formal consensus process. RESULTS Forty-seven articles met eligibility criteria for the germline mutation testing recommendations; 18 for the genetic counseling recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS BRCA1/2 mutation testing should be offered to all newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer ≤65 years and select patients >65 years based on personal history, family history, ancestry, or eligibility for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy. All patients with recurrent breast cancer who are candidates for PARP inhibitor therapy should be offered BRCA1/2 testing, regardless of family history. BRCA1/2 testing should be offered to women who develop a second primary cancer in the ipsilateral or contralateral breast. For patients with prior history of breast cancer and without active disease, testing should be offered to patients diagnosed ≤65 years and selectively in patients diagnosed after 65 years, if it will inform personal and family risk. Testing for high-penetrance cancer susceptibility genes beyond BRCA1/2 should be offered to those with supportive family histories; testing for moderate-penetrance genes may be offered if necessary to inform personal and family cancer risk. Patients should be provided enough pretest information for informed consent; those with pathogenic variants should receive individualized post-test counseling. Variants of uncertain significance should not impact management, and patients with such variants should be followed for reclassification. Referral to providers experienced in clinical cancer genetics may help facilitate patient selection and interpretation of expanded testing, and provide counseling of individuals without pathogenic germline variants but with significant family history.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- University of Milan, Italy
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Sue Friedman
- FORCE (Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered), Tampa, FL
| | - Wendy K Kohlmann
- University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Patricia Rodriguez
- Hereditary Cancer Risk Assessment Program, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Arlington, VA
| | - Payal D Shah
- Basser Center for BRCA & Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Katherine Yao
- Division of Surgical Oncology at NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL
| | - Mark E Robson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Barili V, Ambrosini E, Bortesi B, Minari R, De Sensi E, Cannizzaro IR, Taiani A, Michiara M, Sikokis A, Boggiani D, Tommasi C, Serra O, Bonatti F, Adorni A, Luberto A, Caggiati P, Martorana D, Uliana V, Percesepe A, Musolino A, Pellegrino B. Genetic Basis of Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Approaches and Lessons Learnt from Three Decades of Inherited Predisposition Testing. Genes (Basel) 2024; 15:219. [PMID: 38397209 PMCID: PMC10888198 DOI: 10.3390/genes15020219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Germline variants occurring in BRCA1 and BRCA2 give rise to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome, predisposing to breast, ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers marked by elevated incidences of genomic aberrations that correspond to poor prognoses. These genes are in fact involved in genetic integrity, particularly in the process of homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair, a high-fidelity repair system for mending DNA double-strand breaks. In addition to its implication in HBOC pathogenesis, the impairment of HR has become a prime target for therapeutic intervention utilizing poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. In the present review, we introduce the molecular roles of HR orchestrated by BRCA1 and BRCA2 within the framework of sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. We examine the genetic architecture underneath breast and ovarian cancer ranging from high- and mid- to low-penetrant predisposing genes and taking into account both germline and somatic variations. Finally, we consider higher levels of complexity of the genomic landscape such as polygenic risk scores and other approaches aiming to optimize therapeutic and preventive strategies for breast and ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Barili
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Enrico Ambrosini
- Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Beatrice Bortesi
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Roberta Minari
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Erika De Sensi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | | | - Antonietta Taiani
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Maria Michiara
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Angelica Sikokis
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Daniela Boggiani
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Chiara Tommasi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Olga Serra
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Francesco Bonatti
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Alessia Adorni
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Anita Luberto
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | | | - Davide Martorana
- Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Vera Uliana
- Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Antonio Percesepe
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Antonino Musolino
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Benedetta Pellegrino
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
- Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kast K, Rhiem K, Larsen M, Wappenschmidt B, Schmutzler R. Phenotype analysis of families with TP53 germline variants at the Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Cologne. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6920. [PMID: 38230850 PMCID: PMC10905677 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Tumor protein p53 (TP53) pathogenic variant (PV) carriers are identified during genetic testing for hereditary causes of cancer. PVs in TP53 are associated with the Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), and thus, surveillance and preventive measures are important for TP53 PV carriers. However, the penetrance of TP53 PVs can be low if the Chompret criteria are not fulfilled. In this study, we compared the phenotypic characteristics of families that did and did not fulfill the LFS criteria according to Chompret. METHODS The German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC) database was used to identify index patients with a likely pathogenic/pathogenic TP53 variant and their family members. The study investigated the type of variant, pedigree, age of onset, number of primary tumors, and histological type of BC. RESULTS TP53 PV were present in the index cases of 35 families, 57% (20/35) of which fulfilled the Chompret criteria. The median age of onset at first BC diagnosis was lower in families that fulfilled the Chompret criteria compared to those who did not. Four of all diseased individuals were minors (4%; 4/105) when malignancy was first diagnosed. Sarcomas and brain tumors occurred in 10% (10/105) and in 7% (7/105) of all diseased persons, respectively. BC was the most frequently occurring first tumor (60%; 62/105) and additional malignancy (45%; 20/44) in this cohort. Subsequent malignancies developed in 31% (20/65) of the individuals who fulfilled the Chompret criteria compared with 15% (6/40) of those who did not. CONCLUSION The tumor spectrum and age of onset found in this study showed that tumors other than BC had low disease penetrance in TP53 PV carriers identified using the GC-HBOC criteria for genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. Kast
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical FacultyUniversity Hospital CologneCologneGermany
| | - K. Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical FacultyUniversity Hospital CologneCologneGermany
| | - M. Larsen
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical FacultyUniversity Hospital CologneCologneGermany
| | - B. Wappenschmidt
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical FacultyUniversity Hospital CologneCologneGermany
| | - R. Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical FacultyUniversity Hospital CologneCologneGermany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Horton C, Hoang L, Zimmermann H, Young C, Grzybowski J, Durda K, Vuong H, Burks D, Cass A, LaDuca H, Richardson ME, Harrison S, Chao EC, Karam R. Diagnostic Outcomes of Concurrent DNA and RNA Sequencing in Individuals Undergoing Hereditary Cancer Testing. JAMA Oncol 2024; 10:212-219. [PMID: 37924330 PMCID: PMC10625669 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.5586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
Importance Personalized surveillance, prophylaxis, and cancer treatment options for individuals with hereditary cancer predisposition are informed by results of germline genetic testing. Improvements to genomic technology, such as the availability of RNA sequencing, may increase identification of individuals eligible for personalized interventions by improving the accuracy and yield of germline testing. Objective To assess the cumulative association of paired DNA and RNA testing with detection of disease-causing germline genetic variants and resolution of variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Design, Setting, and Participants Paired DNA and RNA sequencing was performed on individuals undergoing germline testing for hereditary cancer indication at a single diagnostic laboratory from March 2019 through April 2020. Demographic characteristics, clinical data, and test results were curated as samples were received, and changes to variant classification were assessed over time. Data analysis was performed from May 2020 to June 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures Main outcomes were increase in diagnostic yield, decrease in VUS rate, the overall results by variant type, the association of RNA evidence with variant classification, and the corresponding predicted effect on cancer risk management. Results A total of 43 524 individuals were included (median [range] age at testing, 54 [2-101] years; 37 373 female individuals [85.7%], 6224 male individuals [14.3%], and 2 individuals of unknown sex [<0.1%]), with 43 599 tests. A total of 2197 (5.0%) were Ashkenazi Jewish, 1539 (3.5%) were Asian, 3077 (7.1%) were Black, 2437 (5.6%) were Hispanic, 27 793 (63.7%) were White, and 2049 (4.7%) were other race, and for 4507 individuals (10.3%), race and ethnicity were unknown. Variant classification was impacted in 549 individuals (1.3%). Medically significant upgrades were made in 97 individuals, including 70 individuals who had a variant reclassified from VUS to pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) and 27 individuals who had a novel deep intronic P/LP variant that would not have been detected using DNA sequencing alone. A total of 93 of 545 P/LP splicing variants (17.1%) were dependent on RNA evidence for classification, and 312 of 439 existing splicing VUS (71.1%) were resolved by RNA evidence. Notably, the increase in positive rate (3.1%) and decrease in VUS rate (-3.9%) was higher in Asian, Black, and Hispanic individuals combined compared to White individuals (1.6%; P = .02; and -2.5%; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance Findings of this diagnostic study demonstrate that the ability to perform RNA sequencing concurrently with DNA sequencing represents an important advancement in germline genetic testing by improving detection of novel variants and classification of existing variants. This expands the identification of individuals with hereditary cancer predisposition and increases opportunities for personalization of therapeutics and surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Huy Vuong
- Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Elizabeth C Chao
- Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California
- University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Guo R, Yu Y, Huang Y, Lin M, Liao Y, Hu Y, Li Q, Peng C, Zhou J. A nomogram model combining ultrasound-based radiomics features and clinicopathological factors to identify germline BRCA1/2 mutation in invasive breast cancer patients. Heliyon 2024; 10:e23383. [PMID: 38169922 PMCID: PMC10758804 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective BRCA1/2 status is a key to personalized therapy for invasive breast cancer patients. This study aimed to explore the association between ultrasound radiomics features and germline BRCA1/2 mutation in patients with invasive breast cancer. Materials and methods In this retrospective study, 100 lesions in 92 BRCA1/2-mutated patients and 390 lesions in 357 non-BRCA1/2-mutated patients were included and randomly assigned as training and validation datasets in a ratio of 7:3. Gray-scale ultrasound images of the largest plane of the lesions were used for feature extraction. Maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) algorithm and multivariate logistic least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression were used to select features. The multivariate logistic regression method was used to construct predictive models based on clinicopathological factors, radiomics features, or a combination of them. Results In the clinical model, age at first diagnosis, family history of BRCA1/2-related malignancies, HER2 status, and Ki-67 level were found to be independent predictors for BRCA1/2 mutation. In the radiomics model, 10 significant features were selected from the 1032 radiomics features extracted from US images. The AUCs of the radiomics model were not inferior to those of the clinical model in both training dataset [0.712 (95% CI, 0.647-0.776) vs 0.768 (95% CI, 0.704-0.835); p = 0.429] and validation dataset [0.705 (95% CI, 0.597-0.808) vs 0.723 (95% CI, 0.625-0.828); p = 0.820]. The AUCs of the nomogram model combining clinical and radiomics features were 0.804 (95% CI, 0.748-0.861) in the training dataset and 0.811 (95% CI, 0.724-0.894) in the validation dataset, which were proved significantly higher than those of the clinical model alone by DeLong's test (p = 0.041; p = 0.007). To be noted, the negative predictive values (NPVs) of the nomogram model reached a favorable 0.93 in both datasets. Conclusion This machine nomogram model combining ultrasound-based radiomics and clinical features exhibited a promising performance in identifying germline BRCA1/2 mutation in patients with invasive breast cancer and may help avoid unnecessary gene tests in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yini Huang
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China
| | - Min Lin
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China
| | - Ying Liao
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China
| | - Yixin Hu
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China
| | - Qing Li
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China
| | - Chuan Peng
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China
| | - Jianhua Zhou
- Department of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zhang Y, Wu H, Gan C, Rao H, Wang Q, Guo X. BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in Chinese Hakka breast cancer patients. BMC Med Genomics 2024; 17:3. [PMID: 38167124 PMCID: PMC10763220 DOI: 10.1186/s12920-023-01772-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the prevalence of BRCA1/2 gene variants and evaluate the clinical and pathological characteristics associated with these variants in Chinese Hakka breast cancer patients. METHODS A total of 409 breast cancer patients were analyzed based on next-generation sequencing results, with 337 categorized as non-carriers and 72 as carriers of BRCA1/2 variants. Data on the patients' BRCA1/2 gene mutation status, clinical and pathological characteristics, as well as menstrual and reproductive information, were collected, analyzed, compared, and tabulated. Logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the relationship between clinical characteristics and pathogenic variants. RESULTS Among the patients, 72 were identified as carriers of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2, while 337 had likely benign or benign mutations. The BRCA1 c.2635G > T (p. Glu879*) variant was detected at a high frequency, accounting for 12.5% (4/32) of the BRCA1 mutations, while the c.5164_5165del (p.Ser1722Tyrfs*4) variant was common among the BRCA2 mutations, accounting for 17.5% (7/40). It was observed that a higher proportion of BRCA1 carriers had the triple-negative breast cancer subtype, whereas more BRCA2 carriers exhibited estrogen receptor (ER) + and progesterone receptor (PR) + subtypes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a family history of cancer (OR = 2.36, 95% CI = 1.00-5.54), bilateral cancer (OR = 4.78, 95% CI 1.61-14.20), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- (OR = 8.23, 95% CI 3.25-20.84), and Ki67 ≥ 15% (OR = 3.88, 95% CI 1.41-10.65) were associated with BRCA1/2 mutations, with the age at diagnosis, age at menarche, and premenopausal status serving as covariates. CONCLUSIONS The most common pathogenic variant of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast cancer patients was c.2635G > T and c.5164_5165del, respectively. Additionally, a family history of cancer, bilateral cancer, HER2-, and Ki67 ≥ 15% were identified as independent predictors of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinmei Zhang
- Center for Precision Medicine, Meizhou People's Hospital (Huangtang Hospital), Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, No 63 Huangtang Road, Meijiang District, Meizhou, 514031, P. R. China
- Guangdong Engineering Technological Research Center of Clinical Molecular Diagnosis and Antibody Drugs, Meizhou, China
| | - Heming Wu
- Center for Precision Medicine, Meizhou People's Hospital (Huangtang Hospital), Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, No 63 Huangtang Road, Meijiang District, Meizhou, 514031, P. R. China
| | - Caiyan Gan
- Center for Precision Medicine, Meizhou People's Hospital (Huangtang Hospital), Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, No 63 Huangtang Road, Meijiang District, Meizhou, 514031, P. R. China
- Guangdong Engineering Technological Research Center of Clinical Molecular Diagnosis and Antibody Drugs, Meizhou, China
| | - Hui Rao
- Center for Precision Medicine, Meizhou People's Hospital (Huangtang Hospital), Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, No 63 Huangtang Road, Meijiang District, Meizhou, 514031, P. R. China
| | - Qiuming Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Meizhou People's Hospital (Huangtang Hospital), Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, Meizhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xueming Guo
- Center for Precision Medicine, Meizhou People's Hospital (Huangtang Hospital), Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, No 63 Huangtang Road, Meijiang District, Meizhou, 514031, P. R. China.
- Guangdong Engineering Technological Research Center of Clinical Molecular Diagnosis and Antibody Drugs, Meizhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Shelton C, Ruiz A, Shelton L, Montgomery H, Freas K, Ellsworth RE, Poll S, Pineda-Alvarez D, Heald B, Esplin ED, Nielsen SM. Universal Germline-Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer: Implementation in a Rural Practice and Impact on Shared Decision-Making. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:325-334. [PMID: 37814187 PMCID: PMC10695880 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14394-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whereas the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria restrict germline-genetic testing (GGT) to a subset of breast cancer (BC) patients, the American Society of Breast Surgeons recommends universal GGT. Although the yield of pathogenic germline variants (PGV) in unselected BC patients has been studied, the practicality and utility of incorporating universal GGT into routine cancer care in community and rural settings is understudied. This study reports real-world implementation of universal GGT for patients with breast cancer and genetics-informed, treatment decision-making in a rural, community practice with limited resources. METHODS From 2019 to 2022, all patients with breast cancer at a small, rural hospital were offered GGT, using a genetics-extender model. Statistical analyses included Fisher's exact test, t-tests, and calculation of odds ratios. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS Of 210 patients with breast cancer who were offered GGT, 192 (91.4%) underwent testing with 104 (54.2%) in-criteria (IC) and 88 (45.8%) out-of-criteria (OOC) with NCCN guidelines. Pathogenic germline variants were identified in 25 patients (13.0%), with PGV frequencies of 15 of 104 (14.4%) in IC and ten of 88 (11.4%) in OOC patients (p = 0.495). GGT informed treatment for 129 of 185 (69.7%) patients. CONCLUSIONS Universal GGT was successfully implemented in a rural, community practice with > 90% uptake. Treatment was enhanced or de-escalated in those with and without clinically actionable PGVs, respectively. Universal GGT for patients with breast cancer is feasible within rural populations, enabling optimization of clinical care to patients' genetic profile, and may reduce unnecessary healthcare, resource utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Karen Freas
- The Outer Banks Hospital, Nags Head, NC, USA
| | | | - Sarah Poll
- Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Christowitz C, Olivier DW, Schneider JW, Kotze MJ, Engelbrecht AM. Incorporating functional genomics into the pathology-supported genetic testing framework implemented in South Africa: A future view of precision medicine for breast carcinomas. MUTATION RESEARCH. REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH 2024; 793:108492. [PMID: 38631437 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2024.108492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
A pathology-supported genetic testing (PSGT) framework was established in South Africa to improve access to precision medicine for patients with breast carcinomas. Nevertheless, the frequent identification of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) with the use of genome-scale next-generation sequencing has created a bottleneck in the return of results to patients. This review highlights the importance of incorporating functional genomics into the PSGT framework as a proposed initiative. Here, we explore various model systems and experimental methods available for conducting functional studies in South Africa to enhance both variant classification and clinical interpretation. We emphasize the distinct advantages of using in vitro, in vivo, and translational ex vivo models to improve the effectiveness of precision oncology. Moreover, we highlight the relevance of methodologies such as protein modelling and structural bioinformatics, multi-omics, metabolic activity assays, flow cytometry, cell migration and invasion assays, tube-formation assays, multiplex assays of variant effect, and database mining and machine learning models. The selection of the appropriate experimental approach largely depends on the molecular mechanism of the gene under investigation and the predicted functional effect of the VUS. However, before making final decisions regarding the pathogenicity of VUSs, it is essential to assess the functional evidence and clinical outcomes under current variant interpretation guidelines. The inclusion of a functional genomics infrastructure within the PSGT framework will significantly advance the reclassification of VUSs and enhance the precision medicine pipeline for patients with breast carcinomas in South Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Christowitz
- Department of Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa.
| | - Daniel W Olivier
- Department of Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa; Division of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town 7505, South Africa
| | - Johann W Schneider
- Division of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town 7505, South Africa; National Health Laboratory Service, Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town 7505, South Africa
| | - Maritha J Kotze
- Division of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town 7505, South Africa; National Health Laboratory Service, Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town 7505, South Africa
| | - Anna-Mart Engelbrecht
- Department of Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa; Department of Global Health, African Cancer Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town 7505, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Incorvaia L, Badalamenti G, Novo G, Gori S, Cortesi L, Brando C, Cinieri S, Curigliano G, Ricciardi GR, Toss A, Chiari R, Berardi R, Ballatore Z, Bono M, Bazan Russo TD, Gristina V, Galvano A, Damerino G, Blasi L, Bazan V, Russo A. Anthracycline-related cardiotoxicity in patients with breast cancer harboring mutational signature of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). ESMO Open 2024; 9:102196. [PMID: 38118367 PMCID: PMC10837774 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The BRCA proteins play a key role in the homologous recombination (HR) pathway. Beyond BRCA1/2, other genes are involved in the HR repair (HRR). Due to the prominent role in the cellular repair process, pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PV/LPVs) in HRR genes may cause inadequate DNA damage repair in cardiomyocytes. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study to investigate the heart toxicity from anthracycline-containing regimens (ACRs) in the adjuvant setting of breast cancer (BC) patients carrying germline BRCA PV/LPVs and no-BRCA HRR pathway genes. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was assessed using cardiac ultrasound before starting ACR therapy and at subsequent time points according to clinical indications. RESULTS Five hundred and three BC patients were included in the study. We predefined three groups: (i) BRCA cohort; (ii) no-BRCA cohort; (iii) variant of uncertain significance (VUS)/wild-type (WT) cohort. When baseline (T0) and post-ACR (T1) LVEFs between the three cohorts were compared, pre-treatment LVEF values were not different (BRCA1/2 versus HRR-no-BRCA versus VUS/WT cohort). Notably, during monitoring (T1, median 3.4 months), patients carrying BRCA or HRR no-BRCA germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants showed a statistically significant reduction of LVEF compared to baseline (T0). To assess the relevance of HRR on the results, we included the analysis of the subgroup of 20 BC patients carrying PV/LPVs in other genes not involved in HRR, such as mismatch repair genes (MUTYH, PMS2, MSH6). Unlike HRR genes, no significant differences in T0-T1 were found in this subgroup of patients. CONCLUSION Our data suggest that deleterious variants in HRR genes, leading to impaired HR, could increase the sensitivity of cardiomyocytes to ACR in early BC patients. In this subgroup of patients, other measurements, such as the global longitudinal strain, and a more in-depth assessment of risk factors may be proposed in the future to optimize cardiovascular risk management and improve long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Incorvaia
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - G Badalamenti
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - G Novo
- Division of Cardiology, University Hospital Paolo Giaccone, Palermo; Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE) "G. D'Alessandro", University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - S Gori
- Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella
| | - L Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena
| | - C Brando
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - S Cinieri
- Complex Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Brindisi Senatore Antonio Perrino Hospital, Brindisi
| | - G Curigliano
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan
| | - G R Ricciardi
- Medical Oncology Unit, A.O. Papardo & Department of Human Pathology, University of Messina, Messina
| | - A Toss
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena
| | - R Chiari
- Medical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti Padova Sud, Monselice
| | - R Berardi
- Medical Oncology, AOU Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I-GM Lancisi-G Salesi, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona
| | - Z Ballatore
- Medical Oncology, AOU Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I-GM Lancisi-G Salesi, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona
| | - M Bono
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - T D Bazan Russo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - V Gristina
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - A Galvano
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo
| | - G Damerino
- Division of Cardiology, University Hospital Paolo Giaccone, Palermo
| | - L Blasi
- Medical Oncology Unit, ARNAS Civico, Palermo
| | - V Bazan
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (Bind), Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - A Russo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Westbrook L, Miltenburg D, Souter V, Maisenbacher MK, Howard KL, Sha Y, Yavari M, Kypraios N, Rodriguez A, Weitzel JN. Hereditary cancer testing in a diverse sample across three breast imaging centers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 203:365-372. [PMID: 37861889 PMCID: PMC10787882 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07137-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Up to 10% of all breast cancers (BC) are attributed to inherited pathogenic variants (PV) in BC susceptibility genes; however, most carriers of PVs remain unidentified. Here, we sought to determine the yield of hereditary cancer gene PVs among diverse women attending breast imaging centers, who could benefit from enhanced surveillance and/or risk reduction interventions. METHODS This cross-sectional retrospective cohort study included consecutive women, unselected for personal or family cancer history, who were offered genetic testing for hereditary cancer genes at the time of breast imaging at three centers (November 2020-March 2022). RESULTS Among 1943 patients (median age: 66 years), self-reported race/ethnicity was White (34.5%), Hispanic (27.7%), African American (17.9%), Asian (4.5%), Ashkenazi Jewish (0.6%), Other (3.5%), and missing (13.0%). Thirty-nine patients (2%) were identified as carriers of a PV in an autosomal dominant clinically actionable hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC)-related or Lynch syndrome gene, most frequently, BRCA2 (6/39; 15.4%), PALB2 (8/39; 20.5%), CHEK2 (10/39; 25.6%), and PMS2 (5/39; 12.8%). Of the 34 PVs with known race/ethnicity, 47% were detected among non-White patients. Overall, 354/1,943 (18.2%) of patients met NCCN guidelines for HBOC gene testing and only 15/39 (38.5%) patients with an autosomal dominant clinically actionable PV met guidelines. CONCLUSION This population health approach extended the reach of genetic cancer risk assessment in a diverse population and highlighted the limits of a guideline-based approach. This may help address inequity in access to risk-appropriate screening and cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Youbao Sha
- Natera, Inc., 13011 McCallen Pass, Austin, TX, 78753, USA
| | - Maygol Yavari
- Natera, Inc., 13011 McCallen Pass, Austin, TX, 78753, USA
| | | | | | - Jeffrey N Weitzel
- Natera, Inc., 13011 McCallen Pass, Austin, TX, 78753, USA.
- Precision Prevention, The Kansas University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zureick AH, Zakalik D, Quinn TJ, Rangarajan TS, Grzywacz VP, Rotenbakh LR, Chen PY, Dilworth JT. Breast Irradiation Is Well Tolerated in Carriers of a Pathogenic ATM Variant. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:e29-e39. [PMID: 37742832 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE There are mixed and limited data regarding radiation therapy (RT) tolerance in carriers of a germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) ATM variant. We investigated RT-related toxic effects in carriers of an ATM variant who received treatment for breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS We identified 71 patients treated with adjuvant RT for breast cancer who were carriers of a variant in ATM: 15 were classified as P/LP and 56 classified as variants of unknown significance (VUS). We additionally identified 205 consecutively treated patients during a similar timeframe who were either confirmed ATM wild type or had no prior genetic testing. RT plans were reviewed. Acute and chronic toxic effects were evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 criteria. Fisher's exact tests for count data were performed to compare toxic effects between the cohorts (P/LP vs VUS vs control). Wilcoxon rank-sum testing was performed to assess for differences in patient characteristics. RESULTS The median toxicity follow-up was 19.4 months; median follow-up for the subcohorts was 13.3 months (P/LP), 12.6 months (VUS), and 23.3 months (control). There were no significant differences in radiation plan heterogeneity, receipt of a boost, or size of breast/chest wall planning target volume. There was greater use of hypofractionated RT in the control cohort (P = .023). After accounting for patient- and treatment-related factors that may affect toxic effects, we found no significant differences with respect to acute dermatitis, hyperpigmentation, moist desquamation, breast/chest wall pain, or breast edema. Additionally, we found no significant differences with respect to chronic breast/chest wall pain, induration, telangiectasia, or cosmetic outcome. CONCLUSIONS RT as part of the management of breast cancer was well tolerated in carriers of a P/LP ATM variant, with toxic effect profiles that were similar to those seen in patients without known ATM mutations. High rates of excellent or good cosmesis were observed in carriers of a P/LP ATM variant who underwent breast conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew H Zureick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Dana Zakalik
- Nancy and James Grosfeld Cancer Genetics Center, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Oakland University, William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan
| | - Thomas J Quinn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Tara S Rangarajan
- Nancy and James Grosfeld Cancer Genetics Center, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Vincent P Grzywacz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Leah R Rotenbakh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oakland University, William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan
| | - Peter Y Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Oakland University, William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan
| | - Joshua T Dilworth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Oakland University, William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hintelmann K, Borgmann K. [BRCA-like breast cancer patients benefit from cisplatin plus veliparib-results from the S1416 phase II study]. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:1258-1261. [PMID: 37823898 PMCID: PMC10673732 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02155-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Hintelmann
- Ambulanzzentrum der UKE GmbH, Fachbereich Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
| | - Kerstin Borgmann
- Labor für Strahlenbiologie & Experimentelle Radioonkologie, Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Onkologisches Zentrum, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lee MK, Robson ME. Contralateral breast cancer risk with radiation therapy in BRCA mutation carriers: what do we tell patients? J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:1243-1245. [PMID: 37603726 PMCID: PMC10637031 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Minna K Lee
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark E Robson
- Breast Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Barrett F, Shaw J, Besser AG, Grifo JA, Blakemore JK. Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders: clinical experience with BRCA1 and BRCA2 from 2010-2021. J Assist Reprod Genet 2023; 40:2705-2713. [PMID: 37691027 PMCID: PMC10643755 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02925-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Our aim was to describe the reproductive decisions and outcomes of BRCA-positive patients who used preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M). METHODS We performed a retrospective case series of all PGT-M cycles for BRCA variants between 2010-2021 at a large urban academic fertility center. All patients who underwent ≥ 1 cycle of IVF with PGT-M for BRCA1 or BRCA2 were included. The primary outcome was total number of BRCA-negative euploid embryos per patient. RESULTS Sixty four patients underwent PGT-M for BRCA variants. Forty-five percent (29/64) were BRCA1-positive females, 27% (17/64) were BRCA2-positive females, 16% (10/64) were BRCA1-positive males, 11% (7/64) were BRCA2-positive males, and one was a BRCA1 and BRCA2-positive male. There were 125 retrieval cycles with PGT-M, and all cycles included PGT for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Eighty-six percent (55/64) of patients obtained at least one BRCA- negative euploid embryo, with median of 1 (range 0-10) BRCA-negative euploid embryo resulted per cycle and median 3 (range 0-10) BRCA-negative euploid embryos accumulated per patient after a median of 2 (range 1-7) oocyte retrievals. Sixty-four percent (41/64) of patients attempted at least one frozen embryo transfer (FET) with a total of 68 FET cycles. Fifty-nine percent (40/68) of embryos transferred resulted in live births. Subgroup analysis revealed different reproductive pathways for BRCA1-positive females, BRCA2-positive females, and BRCA1/2-positive males (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION PGT-M is a viable option for BRCA-positive patients to avoid transmission while building their families. Most patients in our cohort achieved pregnancy with BRCA-negative euploid embryos.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Barrett
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, New York University Langone Fertility Center, 159 East 53rd St, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
| | - Jacquelyn Shaw
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, New York University Langone Fertility Center, 159 East 53rd St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Andria G Besser
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, New York University Langone Fertility Center, 159 East 53rd St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - James A Grifo
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, New York University Langone Fertility Center, 159 East 53rd St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Jennifer K Blakemore
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, New York University Langone Fertility Center, 159 East 53rd St, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mendes Serrão E, Klug M, Moloney BM, Jhaveri A, Lo Gullo R, Pinker K, Luker G, Haider MA, Shinagare AB, Liu X. Current Status of Cancer Genomics and Imaging Phenotypes: What Radiologists Need to Know. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2023; 5:e220153. [PMID: 37921555 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.220153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
Ongoing discoveries in cancer genomics and epigenomics have revolutionized clinical oncology and precision health care. This knowledge provides unprecedented insights into tumor biology and heterogeneity within a single tumor, among primary and metastatic lesions, and among patients with the same histologic type of cancer. Large-scale genomic sequencing studies also sparked the development of new tumor classifications, biomarkers, and targeted therapies. Because of the central role of imaging in cancer diagnosis and therapy, radiologists need to be familiar with the basic concepts of genomics, which are now becoming the new norm in oncologic clinical practice. By incorporating these concepts into clinical practice, radiologists can make their imaging interpretations more meaningful and specific, facilitate multidisciplinary clinical dialogue and interventions, and provide better patient-centric care. This review article highlights basic concepts of genomics and epigenomics, reviews the most common genetic alterations in cancer, and discusses the implications of these concepts on imaging by organ system in a case-based manner. This information will help stimulate new innovations in imaging research, accelerate the development and validation of new imaging biomarkers, and motivate efforts to bring new molecular and functional imaging methods to clinical radiology. Keywords: Oncology, Cancer Genomics, Epignomics, Radiogenomics, Imaging Markers Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Mendes Serrão
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Medical Imaging Toronto, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (E.M.S., A.J., M.A.H., X.L.); Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (M.K.); Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Trust, Manchester, England (B.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY (R.L.G., K.P.); Center for Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (G.L.); Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (M.A.H.); and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.B.S.)
| | - Maximiliano Klug
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Medical Imaging Toronto, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (E.M.S., A.J., M.A.H., X.L.); Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (M.K.); Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Trust, Manchester, England (B.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY (R.L.G., K.P.); Center for Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (G.L.); Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (M.A.H.); and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.B.S.)
| | - Brian M Moloney
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Medical Imaging Toronto, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (E.M.S., A.J., M.A.H., X.L.); Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (M.K.); Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Trust, Manchester, England (B.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY (R.L.G., K.P.); Center for Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (G.L.); Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (M.A.H.); and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.B.S.)
| | - Aaditeya Jhaveri
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Medical Imaging Toronto, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (E.M.S., A.J., M.A.H., X.L.); Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (M.K.); Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Trust, Manchester, England (B.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY (R.L.G., K.P.); Center for Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (G.L.); Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (M.A.H.); and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.B.S.)
| | - Roberto Lo Gullo
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Medical Imaging Toronto, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (E.M.S., A.J., M.A.H., X.L.); Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (M.K.); Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Trust, Manchester, England (B.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY (R.L.G., K.P.); Center for Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (G.L.); Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (M.A.H.); and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.B.S.)
| | - Katja Pinker
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Medical Imaging Toronto, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (E.M.S., A.J., M.A.H., X.L.); Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (M.K.); Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Trust, Manchester, England (B.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY (R.L.G., K.P.); Center for Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (G.L.); Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (M.A.H.); and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.B.S.)
| | - Gary Luker
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Medical Imaging Toronto, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (E.M.S., A.J., M.A.H., X.L.); Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (M.K.); Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Trust, Manchester, England (B.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY (R.L.G., K.P.); Center for Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (G.L.); Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (M.A.H.); and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.B.S.)
| | - Masoom A Haider
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Medical Imaging Toronto, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (E.M.S., A.J., M.A.H., X.L.); Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (M.K.); Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Trust, Manchester, England (B.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY (R.L.G., K.P.); Center for Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (G.L.); Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (M.A.H.); and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.B.S.)
| | - Atul B Shinagare
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Medical Imaging Toronto, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (E.M.S., A.J., M.A.H., X.L.); Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (M.K.); Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Trust, Manchester, England (B.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY (R.L.G., K.P.); Center for Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (G.L.); Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (M.A.H.); and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.B.S.)
| | - Xiaoyang Liu
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Medical Imaging Toronto, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 585 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2N2 (E.M.S., A.J., M.A.H., X.L.); Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (M.K.); Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Trust, Manchester, England (B.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY (R.L.G., K.P.); Center for Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (G.L.); Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (M.A.H.); and Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.B.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Frasson AL, Falcone AB, Barbosa F, Anton de Souza AB, Malhone C, Miranda I, Vollbrecht B, Rodriguez Martinez Frasson MA, Kobe L, Lichtenfels M. Low rate of complications in nipple-sparing mastectomy for patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation. Per Med 2023; 20:493-501. [PMID: 37909344 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2023-0084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
Background: To describe the indications and outcomes of BRCA mutation carriers undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). Methods: In this retrospective study, 76 BRCA mutation carriers with no cancer who opted to undergo risk reduction NSM or diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) who opted to undergo therapeutic NSM were included. Results: Indications for NSM: cancer treatment (n = 33), bilateral risk reduction (n = 39) and contralateral prophylactic NSM (n = 4). In a mean follow-up of 45 months (median: 30 months), one patient (2.5%) undergoing risk-reducing NSM developed a new BC. One (3%) local, one (3%) ipsilateral axillary and one (3%) distant recurrence were observed in BC patients. No partial or total nipple necrosis occurred. Conclusion: NSM is safe for reducing the risk of BC development in BRCA mutation carriers and for treating cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antônio Luiz Frasson
- Breast Cancer Group, Albert Einstein Hospital, Albert Einstein Avenue 627, 05652-900, São Paulo, Brazil
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Ipiranga 6690, 90610-000, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Ana Beatriz Falcone
- Breast Cancer Group, Albert Einstein Hospital, Albert Einstein Avenue 627, 05652-900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fernanda Barbosa
- Breast Cancer Group, Albert Einstein Hospital, Albert Einstein Avenue 627, 05652-900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alessandra Borba Anton de Souza
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Ipiranga 6690, 90610-000, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Carolina Malhone
- Breast Cancer Group, Albert Einstein Hospital, Albert Einstein Avenue 627, 05652-900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Isabela Miranda
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Ipiranga 6690, 90610-000, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Betina Vollbrecht
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Ipiranga 6690, 90610-000, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Monica Adriana Rodriguez Martinez Frasson
- Breast Cancer Group, Albert Einstein Hospital, Albert Einstein Avenue 627, 05652-900, São Paulo, Brazil
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Ipiranga 6690, 90610-000, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Luiza Kobe
- Breast Cancer Group, Albert Einstein Hospital, Albert Einstein Avenue 627, 05652-900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Martina Lichtenfels
- Breast Cancer Group, Albert Einstein Hospital, Albert Einstein Avenue 627, 05652-900, São Paulo, Brazil
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Ipiranga 6690, 90610-000, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Farncombe KM, Wong D, Norman ML, Oldfield LE, Sobotka JA, Basik M, Bombard Y, Carile V, Dawson L, Foulkes WD, Malkin D, Karsan A, Parkin P, Penney LS, Pollett A, Schrader KA, Pugh TJ, Kim RH. Current and new frontiers in hereditary cancer surveillance: Opportunities for liquid biopsy. Am J Hum Genet 2023; 110:1616-1627. [PMID: 37802042 PMCID: PMC10577078 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023] Open
Abstract
At least 5% of cancer diagnoses are attributed to a causal pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline genetic variant (hereditary cancer syndrome-HCS). These individuals are burdened with lifelong surveillance monitoring organs for a wide spectrum of cancers. This is associated with substantial uncertainty and anxiety in the time between screening tests and while the individuals are awaiting results. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing has recently shown potential as a non-invasive strategy for monitoring cancer. There is an opportunity for high-yield cancer early detection in HCS. To assess clinical validity of cfDNA in individuals with HCS, representatives from eight genetics centers from across Canada founded the CHARM (cfDNA in Hereditary and High-Risk Malignancies) Consortium in 2017. In this perspective, we discuss operationalization of this consortium and early data emerging from the most common and well-characterized HCSs: hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Lynch syndrome, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, and Neurofibromatosis type 1. We identify opportunities for the incorporation of cfDNA sequencing into surveillance protocols; these opportunities are backed by examples of earlier cancer detection efficacy in HCSs from the CHARM Consortium. We seek to establish a paradigm shift in early cancer surveillance in individuals with HCSs, away from highly centralized, regimented medical screening visits and toward more accessible, frequent, and proactive care for these high-risk individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten M Farncombe
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Derek Wong
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maia L Norman
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Leslie E Oldfield
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Julia A Sobotka
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Basik
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Victoria Carile
- Jewish General Hospital Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Lesa Dawson
- Memorial University, St. John's, NL, Canada; Eastern Health Authority, St. John's, NL, Canada
| | - William D Foulkes
- Jewish General Hospital Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - David Malkin
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Patricia Parkin
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Pediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Kasmintan A Schrader
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Trevor J Pugh
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Raymond H Kim
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Chai TS, Yin K, Wooters M, Shannon KM, Hughes KS. Mainstreamed genetic testing of breast cancer patients: experience from a single surgeon's practice in a large US Academic Center. Fam Cancer 2023; 22:467-474. [PMID: 37354306 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-023-00342-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
This study evaluated the impact of mainstreamed genetic testing (MGT) on the timing and uptake of testing in an academic breast surgeon's practice. Before September 2019 (pre-MGT phase), a breast surgery practice at Massachusetts General Hospital followed a traditional model of a pre-test consultation with a genetic counselor (GC) following a referral. After September 2019 (post-MGT phase), the same practice offered patients genetic testing in a single clinical encounter with a breast surgeon. We evaluated the waiting time between referral and GC visit in the pre-MGT phase and compared the uptake and positivity rates between both phases. In the pre-MGT phase (204 patients), the median waiting time for GC visit was seven days for patients with a newly diagnosed cancer, 211 days for patients with a personal history of cancer, and 224 days for non-cancer patients who had a family history. A total of 105 (51.5%) patients completed a GC appointment. In the post-MGT phase (202 patients), a significantly higher proportion of patients (88.1%, p < 0.001) consented to genetic testing, while the proportion of patients who tested positive was lower (pathogenic variant: 11.9% vs. 20.0%; variant of uncertain significance: 19.9% vs. 28.0%; p = 0.047). Implementing MGT can reduce the number of clinical visits, significantly shorten patients' wait time to test initiation, and increase the completion of genetic testing. Successful integration of this model relied on the genetic expertise of the breast surgeon involved and the support of the GC team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa S Chai
- Center for Cancer Risk Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kanhua Yin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mackenzie Wooters
- Center for Cancer Risk Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kristen M Shannon
- Center for Cancer Risk Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kevin S Hughes
- Division of Oncologic & Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 30 Courtenay Drive, Ste. 246 MSC 295, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hanson H, Astiazaran-Symonds E, Amendola LM, Balmaña J, Foulkes WD, James P, Klugman S, Ngeow J, Schmutzler R, Voian N, Wick MJ, Pal T, Tischkowitz M, Stewart DR. Management of individuals with germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in CHEK2: A clinical practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med 2023; 25:100870. [PMID: 37490054 PMCID: PMC10623578 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although the role of CHEK2 germline pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition is well known, resources for managing CHEK2 heterozygotes in clinical practice are limited. METHODS An international workgroup developed guidance on clinical management of CHEK2 heterozygotes informed by peer-reviewed publications from PubMed. RESULTS Although CHEK2 is considered a moderate penetrance gene, cancer risks may be considered as a continuous variable, which are influenced by family history and other modifiers. Consequently, early cancer detection and prevention for CHEK2 heterozygotes should be guided by personalized risk estimates. Such estimates may result in both downgrading lifetime breast cancer risks to those similar to the general population or upgrading lifetime risk to a level at which CHEK2 heterozygotes are offered high-risk breast surveillance according to country-specific guidelines. Risk-reducing mastectomy should be guided by personalized risk estimates and shared decision making. Colorectal and prostate cancer surveillance should be considered based on assessment of family history. For CHEK2 heterozygotes who develop cancer, no specific targeted medical treatment is recommended at this time. CONCLUSION Systematic prospective data collection is needed to establish the spectrum of CHEK2-associated cancer risks and to determine yet-unanswered questions, such as the outcomes of surveillance, response to cancer treatment, and survival after cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Hanson
- Southwest Thames Regional Genetics Service, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Esteban Astiazaran-Symonds
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD; Department of Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | | | - Judith Balmaña
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - William D Foulkes
- Departments of Human Genetics, Oncology and Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Paul James
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Susan Klugman
- Division of Reproductive & Medical Genetics, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Joanne Ngeow
- Genomic Medicine, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore; Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nicoleta Voian
- Providence Genetic Risk Clinic, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR
| | - Myra J Wick
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Clinical Genomics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Tuya Pal
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Douglas R Stewart
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Jonczyk MM, Karamchandani M, Zaccardelli A, Bahadur A, Fisher CS, Czerniecki B, Margenthaler JA, Persing S, Homsy C, Nardello S, O'Brien J, Losken A, Chatterjee A. External Validation of the Breast Cancer Surgery Risk Calculator (BCSRc): A Predictive Model for Postoperative Complications. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6245-6253. [PMID: 37458950 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13904-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The breast cancer surgical risk calculator (BCSRc) is a prognostic tool that determines a breast cancer patient's unique risk of acute complications following each possible surgical intervention. When used in the preoperative setting, it can help to stratify patients with an increased complication risk and enhance the patient-physician informed decision-making process. The objective of this study was to externally validate the four models used in the BCSRc on a large cohort of patients who underwent breast cancer surgery. METHODS The BCSRc was developed by using a retrospective cohort from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2018. Four models were built by using logistic regression methods to predict the following composite outcomes: overall, infectious, hematologic, and internal organ complications. This study obtained a new cohort of patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program by utilizing participant user files from 2019 to 2020. The area under the curve, brier score, and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test measured model performance, accuracy, and calibration, respectively. RESULTS A total of 192,095 patients met inclusion criteria in the development of the BCSRc, and the validation cohort included 60,144 women. The area under the curve during external validation for each model was approximately 0.70. Accuracy, or Brier scores, were all between 0.04 and 0.003. Model calibration using the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic found all p-values > 0.05. All of these model coefficients will be updated on the web-based BCSRc platform: www.breastcalc.org . CONCLUSIONS The BCSRc continues to show excellent external-validation measures. Collectively, this prognostic tool can enhance the decision-making process, help stratify patients with an increased complication risk, and improve expectant management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael M Jonczyk
- Department of Surgery, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Carla Suzanne Fisher
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Julie A Margenthaler
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sarah Persing
- Department of General Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher Homsy
- Department of General Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Julie O'Brien
- Department of Surgery, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA
| | - Albert Losken
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Han X, Han B, Luo H, Ling H, Hu X. Integrated Multi-Omics Profiling of Young Breast Cancer Patients Reveals a Correlation between Galactose Metabolism Pathway and Poor Disease-Free Survival. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4637. [PMID: 37760606 PMCID: PMC10526161 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a notable rise in the incidence of breast cancer among young patients, who exhibit worse survival outcomes and distinct characteristics compared to intermediate and elderly patients. Therefore, it is imperative to identify the specific features unique to young patients, which could offer insights into potential therapeutic strategies and improving survival outcomes. In our study, we performed an integrative analysis of bulk transcriptional and genomic data from extensive clinical cohorts to identify the prognostic factotrs. Additionally, we analyzed the single-cell transcriptional data and conducted in vitro experiments. Our work confirmed that young patients exhibited higher grading, worse disease-free survival (DFS), a higher frequency of mutations in TP53 and BRCA1, a lower frequency of mutations in PIK3CA, and upregulation of eight metabolic pathways. Notably, the galactose metabolism pathway showed upregulation in young patients and was associated with worse DFS. Further analysis and experiments indicated that the galactose metabolism pathway may regulate the stemness of cancer cells and ultimately contribute to worse survival outcomes. In summary, our finding identified distinct clinicopathological, transcriptional, and genomics features and revealed a correlation between the galactose metabolism pathway, stemness, and poor disease-free survival of breast cancer in young patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangchen Han
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; (X.H.); (B.H.)
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Precision Cancer Medical Center Affiliated to Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China;
| | - Boyue Han
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; (X.H.); (B.H.)
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Precision Cancer Medical Center Affiliated to Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China;
| | - Hong Luo
- Precision Cancer Medical Center Affiliated to Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China;
| | - Hong Ling
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; (X.H.); (B.H.)
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Xin Hu
- Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Precision Cancer Medical Center Affiliated to Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China;
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abdel-Razeq H. Surgical options for patients with early-stage breast cancer and pathogenic germline variants: an oncologist perspectives. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1265197. [PMID: 37781190 PMCID: PMC10539549 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1265197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer continues to be the most common cancer diagnosed among women worldwide. Family history of breast cancer is frequently encountered, and 5-15% of patients may carry inherited pathogenic germline variants, identification of which can be helpful for both; patients themselves and their unaffected close relatives. The availability and affordability of molecular diagnostics, like next generation sequencing (NGS), had resulted in wider adoption of such technologies to detect pathogenic variants of cancer-predisposing genes. International guidelines had recently broadened the indications for germline genetic testing to include much more patients, and also expanded the testing to include multi-gene panels, while some professional societies are calling for universal testing of all newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer, regardless of their age, personal or family history. The risk of experiencing a contralateral breast cancer (CBC) or ipsilateral recurrence, is well known. Such risk is highest with variants like BRCA1 and BRCA2, but less well-studied with other less common variants. The optimal local therapy for women with BRCA-associated breast cancer remains controversial, but tends to be aggressive and may involve bilateral mastectomies, which may not have any survival advantage. Additionally, surgical management of unaffected women, known to carry a pathogenic cancer-predisposing gene, may vary from surveillance to bilateral mastectomies, too. The oncological safety, and the higher satisfaction of unaffected women and patients with new surgical techniques, like the skin-sparing (SSM) and nipple-sparing (NSM) mastectomies, eased up the process of counselling. In this review, we address the oncological safety of less aggressive surgical options for both; patients and unaffected carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hikmat Abdel-Razeq
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
- School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ayala de la Peña F, Antolín Novoa S, Gavilá Gregori J, González Cortijo L, Henao Carrasco F, Martínez Martínez MT, Morales Estévez C, Stradella A, Vidal Losada MJ, Ciruelos E. SEOM-GEICAM-SOLTI clinical guidelines for early-stage breast cancer (2022). Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:2647-2664. [PMID: 37326826 PMCID: PMC10425528 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03215-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer in women in Spain and its annual incidence is rapidly increasing. Thanks to the screening programs in place, nearly 90% of breast cancer cases are detected in early and potentially curable stages, despite the COVID-19 pandemic possibly having impacted these numbers (not yet quantified). In recent years, locoregional and systemic therapies are increasingly being directed by new diagnostic tools that have improved the balance between toxicity and clinical benefit. New therapeutic strategies, such as immunotherapy, targeted drugs, and antibody-drug conjugates have also improved outcomes in some patient subgroups. This clinical practice guideline is based on a systematic review of relevant studies and on the consensus of experts from GEICAM, SOLTI, and SEOM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Ayala de la Peña
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital G. Universitario Morales Meseguer, University of Murcia, Av. Marqués de los Vélez, s/n, 30008, Murcia, Spain.
| | - Silvia Antolín Novoa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario, A Coruña (CHUAC), Coruña, Spain
| | | | | | | | - María Teresa Martínez Martínez
- Medical Oncology Department, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico of Valencia, University of Valencia, 46010, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Agostina Stradella
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia. L'Hospitalet,, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Eva Ciruelos
- Medical Oncology Department, Breast Cancer Unit, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain and HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lin PH, Tien YW, Cheng WF, Chiang YC, Wu CH, Yang K, Huang CS. Diverse genetic spectrum among patients who met the criteria of hereditary breast, ovarian and pancreatic cancer syndrome. J Gynecol Oncol 2023; 34:e66. [PMID: 37170728 PMCID: PMC10482589 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e66] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Genetic high-risk assessment combines hereditary breast, ovarian and pancreatic cancer into one syndrome. However, there is a lack of data for comparing the germline mutational spectrum of the cancer predisposing genes between these three cancers. METHODS Patients who met the criteria of the hereditary breast, ovarian and pancreatic cancer were enrolled and received multi-gene sequencing. RESULTS We enrolled 730 probands: 418 developed breast cancer, 185 had ovarian cancer, and 145 had pancreatic cancer. Out of the 18 patients who had two types of cancer, 16 had breast and ovarian cancer and 2 had breast and pancreatic cancer. A total of 167 (22.9%) patients had 170 mutations. Mutation frequency in breast, ovarian and pancreatic cancer was 22.3%, 33.5% and 17.2%, respectively. The mutation rate was significantly higher in patients with double cancers than those with a single cancer (p<0.001). BRCA1 and BRCA2 were the most dominant genes associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, whereas ATM was the most prevalent gene related to hereditary pancreatic cancer. Genes of hereditary colon cancer such as lynch syndrome were presented in a part of patients with pancreatic or ovarian cancer but seldom in those with breast cancer. Families with a history of both ovarian and breast cancer were associated with a higher mutation rate than those with other histories. CONCLUSION The mutation spectrum varies across the three cancer types and family histories. Our analysis provides guidance for physicians, counsellors, and counselees on the offer and uptake of genetic counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po-Han Lin
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Medical Genomics and Proteomics, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yun-Wen Tien
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and Medical College of the National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Fang Cheng
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ying-Cheng Chiang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Huei Wu
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and Medical College of the National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Karen Yang
- Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Chiun-Sheng Huang
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and Medical College of the National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Henning JW, Boileau JF, Peck L, McFarlane T. Clinical Considerations for the Integration of Adjuvant Olaparib into Practice for Early Breast Cancer: A Canadian Perspective. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:7672-7691. [PMID: 37623037 PMCID: PMC10453371 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30080556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
With the recent Health Canada approval of olaparib for high-risk, HER2-negative early breast cancer, physicians are now facing the practical challenges of integrating olaparib into current management of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and HR-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer. This review provides perspectives on some of the challenges related to identification of olaparib candidates, with a focus on the latest guidance for germline BRCA testing and considerations regarding high-risk disease definitions. Updated treatment pathways are explored for both disease states, including other adjuvant treatment options such as pembrolizumab, capecitabine, and abemaciclib. Gaps in the current literature regarding the sequential or combined use of these adjuvant therapies are noted and future, potentially informative, studies are briefly examined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan-Willem Henning
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
| | - Jean-François Boileau
- Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada;
| | - Larissa Peck
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada;
| | - Tom McFarlane
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Toss A, Ponzoni O, Riccò B, Piombino C, Moscetti L, Combi F, Palma E, Papi S, Tenedini E, Tazzioli G, Dominici M, Cortesi L. Management of PALB2-associated breast cancer: A literature review and case report. Clin Case Rep 2023; 11:e7747. [PMID: 37621724 PMCID: PMC10444947 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.7747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Germline pathogenic variants (PV) of the PALB2 tumor suppressor gene are associated with an increased risk of breast, pancreatic, and ovarian cancer. In previous research, PALB2-associated breast cancer showed aggressive clinicopathological phenotypes, particularly triple-negative subtype, and higher mortality regardless of tumor stage, type of chemotherapy nor hormone receptor status. The identification of this germline alteration may have an impact on clinical management of breast cancer (BC) from the surgical approach to the systemic treatment choice. We herein report the case of a patient with a germline PV of PALB2, diagnosed with locally advanced PD-L1 positive triple-negative BC, who progressed after an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-containing regimen and then experienced a pathologic complete response after platinum-based chemotherapy. This case report hints a major role of the germline PALB2 alteration compared to the PD-L1 expression as cancer driver and gives us the opportunity to extensively review and discuss the available literature on the optimal management of PALB2-associated BC. Overall, our case report and review of the literature provide additional evidence that the germline analysis of PALB2 gene should be included in routine genetic testing for predictive purposes and to refine treatment algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Toss
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
- Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Ornella Ponzoni
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Beatrice Riccò
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Claudia Piombino
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Luca Moscetti
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Francesca Combi
- Unit of Breast Surgical OncologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, International Doctorate School in Clinical and Experimental MedicineUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Enza Palma
- Unit of Breast Surgical OncologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Simona Papi
- Unit of Breast Surgical OncologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Elena Tenedini
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Diagnostic Hematology and Clinical Genomics UnitAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Giovanni Tazzioli
- Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
- Unit of Breast Surgical OncologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Massimo Dominici
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
- Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
| | - Laura Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and HematologyAzienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di ModenaModenaItaly
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abdel-Razeq H, Mansour A, Edaily S, Dayyat A. Delays in Initiating Anti-Cancer Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer-How Slow Can We Go? J Clin Med 2023; 12:4502. [PMID: 37445537 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women worldwide, and is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. When diagnosed at an early stage, appropriate and timely treatment results in a high cure rate and better quality of life. Delays in initiating anti-cancer therapy, including surgical resection, adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy are commonly encountered, even in developed health care systems. Existing comorbidities that mandate referral to other services, genetic counseling and testing that may dictate the extent and type of anti-cancer therapy and insurance coverage, are among the most commonly cited factors. However, delays can be unavoidable; for over three years, health care systems across the globe were busy dealing with the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic. War across hot zones around the globe resulted in millions of refugees; most of them have no access to cancer care, and when/where available, there may be significant delays. Thus, cancer patients across the globe will probably continue to suffer from significant delays in diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Many retrospective reports showed significant negative impacts on different aspects of treatment outcomes and on patients' psychosocial wellbeing and productivity. In this paper, we review the available data on the impact of delays in initiating appropriate treatment on the outcomes of patients with early-stage breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hikmat Abdel-Razeq
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman 11941, Jordan
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan
| | - Asem Mansour
- Department of Radiology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman 11941, Jordan
| | - Sarah Edaily
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman 11941, Jordan
| | - Abdulmajeed Dayyat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman 11941, Jordan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Okonogi N, Kono S, Karasawa K, Banu PA, Xu X, Erawati D, Adylkhanov T, Jang WI, E Y, Calaguas MJ, Thephamongkhol K, Dung TA, Ng WNP, Kato S. Significance of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Postoperative Irradiation for Breast Cancer: An Asian Multi-institutional Prospective Study. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:463-471. [PMID: 37179216 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
AIMS There is a need for the adequate distribution of healthcare resources in Southeast Asia. Many countries in the region have more patients with advanced breast cancer who are eligible for postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). Therefore, it is critical that hypofractionated PMRT is effective in most of these patients. This study investigated the significance of postoperative hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer, including advanced breast cancer, in these countries. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighteen facilities in 10 Asian countries participated in this prospective, interventional, single-arm study. The study included two independent regimens: hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (WBI) for patients who had undergone breast-conserving surgery and hypofractionated PMRT for patients who had undergone total mastectomy at a dose of 43.2 Gy in 16 fractions. In the hypofractionated WBI group, patients with high-grade factors received additional 8.1 Gy boost irradiation sessions for the tumour bed in three fractions. RESULTS Between February 2013 and October 2019, 227 and 222 patients were enrolled in the hypofractionated WBI and hypofractionated PMRT groups, respectively. The median follow-up periods in the hypofractionated WBI and hypofractionated PMRT groups were 61 and 60 months, respectively. The 5-year locoregional control rates were 98.9% (95% confidence interval 97.4-100.0) and 96.3% (95% confidence interval 93.2-99.4) in the hypofractionated WBI and hypofractionated PMRT groups, respectively. Regarding adverse events, grade 3 acute dermatitis was observed in 2.2% and 4.9% of patients in the hypofractionated WBI and hypofractionated PMRT groups, respectively. However, no other adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION Although further follow-up is required, hypofractionated radiotherapy regimens for postoperative patients with breast cancer in East and Southeast Asian countries are effective and safe. In particular, the proven efficacy of hypofractionated PMRT indicates that more patients with advanced breast cancer can receive appropriate care in these countries. Hypofractionated WBI and hypofractionated PMRT are reasonable approaches that can contain cancer care costs in these countries. Long-term observation is required to validate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Okonogi
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Inage-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, Japan
| | - S Kono
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Karasawa
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Inage-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - P A Banu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Delta Hospital Limited, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - X Xu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - D Erawati
- Department of Radiotherapy, Dr. Soetomo Academic General Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - T Adylkhanov
- National Research Oncology Center, Astana, Kazakhstan
| | - W I Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yadamsuren E
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
| | - M J Calaguas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines
| | - K Thephamongkhol
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - T A Dung
- Department of General Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Viet Nam
| | - W N P Ng
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Putrajaya, Malaysia
| | - S Kato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Muranen TA, Morra A, Khan S, Barnes DR, Bolla MK, Dennis J, Keeman R, Leslie G, Parsons MT, Wang Q, Ahearn TU, Aittomäki K, Andrulis IL, Arun BK, Behrens S, Bialkowska K, Bojesen SE, Camp NJ, Chang-Claude J, Czene K, Devilee P, Domchek SM, Dunning AM, Engel C, Evans DG, Gago-Dominguez M, García-Closas M, Gerdes AM, Glendon G, Guénel P, Hahnen E, Hamann U, Hanson H, Hooning MJ, Hoppe R, Izatt L, Jakubowska A, James PA, Kristensen VN, Lalloo F, Lindeman GJ, Mannermaa A, Margolin S, Neuhausen SL, Newman WG, Peterlongo P, Phillips KA, Pujana MA, Rantala J, Rønlund K, Saloustros E, Schmutzler RK, Schneeweiss A, Singer CF, Suvanto M, Tan YY, Teixeira MR, Thomassen M, Tischkowitz M, Tripathi V, Wappenschmidt B, Zhao E, Easton DF, Antoniou AC, Chenevix-Trench G, Pharoah PDP, Schmidt MK, Blomqvist C, Nevanlinna H. PREDICT validity for prognosis of breast cancer patients with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants. NPJ Breast Cancer 2023; 9:37. [PMID: 37173335 PMCID: PMC10182045 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-023-00546-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
We assessed the PREDICT v 2.2 for prognosis of breast cancer patients with pathogenic germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants, using follow-up data from 5453 BRCA1/2 carriers from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA) and the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). PREDICT for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer had modest discrimination for BRCA1 carrier patients overall (Gönen & Heller unbiased concordance 0.65 in CIMBA, 0.64 in BCAC), but it distinguished clearly the high-mortality group from lower risk categories. In an analysis of low to high risk categories by PREDICT score percentiles, the observed mortality was consistently lower than the expected mortality, but the confidence intervals always included the calibration slope. Altogether, our results encourage the use of the PREDICT ER-negative model in management of breast cancer patients with germline BRCA1 variants. For the PREDICT ER-positive model, the discrimination was slightly lower in BRCA2 variant carriers (concordance 0.60 in CIMBA, 0.65 in BCAC). Especially, inclusion of the tumor grade distorted the prognostic estimates. The breast cancer mortality of BRCA2 carriers was underestimated at the low end of the PREDICT score distribution, whereas at the high end, the mortality was overestimated. These data suggest that BRCA2 status should also be taken into consideration with tumor characteristics, when estimating the prognosis of ER-positive breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taru A Muranen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
- Research Program in Systems Oncology, Department of Biochemistry and Developmental Biology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Anna Morra
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sofia Khan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Genetics, HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Individualized Drug Therapy Research Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Daniel R Barnes
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Manjeet K Bolla
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joe Dennis
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Renske Keeman
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Goska Leslie
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michael T Parsons
- Population Health Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Qin Wang
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thomas U Ahearn
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kristiina Aittomäki
- Department of Medical and Clinical Genetics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Irene L Andrulis
- Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Banu K Arun
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sabine Behrens
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katarzyna Bialkowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Stig E Bojesen
- Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nicola J Camp
- Department of Internal Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alison M Dunning
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- LIFE - Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University Hospital Foundation NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Breast Centre, Oglesby Cancer Research Centre, The Christie, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Manuela Gago-Dominguez
- Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela Foundation (FIDIS), SERGAS, Cancer Genetics and Epidemiology Group Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Montserrat García-Closas
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Anne-Marie Gerdes
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gord Glendon
- Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pascal Guénel
- Team "Exposome and Heredity", CESP, Gustave Roussy, INSERM, University Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Villejuif, France
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ute Hamann
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Helen Hanson
- SouthWest Thames Centre for Genomics, St George's University Hospital's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Maartje J Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Reiner Hoppe
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany
- University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Louise Izatt
- Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Paul A James
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vessela N Kristensen
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Geoffrey J Lindeman
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Cancer Biology and Stem Cells Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Arto Mannermaa
- Translational Cancer Research Area, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Biobank of Eastern Finland, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Sara Margolin
- Department of Oncology, Stockholm South General Hospital (Södersjukhuset), Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - William G Newman
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Paolo Peterlongo
- Genome Diagnostics Program, IFOM ETS - The AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Kelly-Anne Phillips
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Miquel Angel Pujana
- Translational Research Laboratory, IDIBELL (Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute), Catalan Institute of Oncology, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Karina Rønlund
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | | | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Molecular Biology of Breast Cancer, University Womens Clinic Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian F Singer
- Dept of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Maija Suvanto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Yen Yen Tan
- Dept of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Manuel R Teixeira
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odence C, Denmark
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Vishakha Tripathi
- Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Emily Zhao
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Carl Blomqvist
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Schick S, Manghelli J, Ludwig KK. The Role of the Surgeon in the Germline Testing of the Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patient. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:4677-4687. [PMID: 37232811 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30050353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
For patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer, information regarding hereditary predisposition can influence treatment decisions. From a surgical standpoint, patients with known germline mutations may alter decisions of local therapy to reduce the risk of second breast primaries. This information may also be considered in the choice of adjuvant therapies or eligibility for clinical trials. In recent years, the criteria for the consideration of germline testing in patients with breast cancer has expanded. Additionally, studies have shown a similar prevalence of pathogenic mutations in those patients outside of these traditional criteria, prompting calls for genetic testing for all patients with a history of breast cancer. While data confirms the benefit of counseling by certified genetics professionals, the capacity of genetic counselors may no longer meet the needs of these growing numbers of patients. National societies assert that counseling and testing can be performed by providers with training and experience in genetics. Breast surgeons are well positioned to offer this service, as they receive formal genetics training during their fellowship, manage these patients daily in their practices, and are often the first providers to see patients after their cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Schick
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Joshua Manghelli
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Kandice K Ludwig
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Klein J, Allister AB, Schmidt G, Otto A, Heinecke K, Bax-Knoche J, Beger C, Becker S, Bartels S, Ripperger T, Bohne J, Dörk T, Schlegelberger B, Hofmann W, Steinemann D. A Novel Alu Element Insertion in ATM Induces Exon Skipping in Suspected HBOC Patients. Hum Mutat 2023. [DOI: 10.1155/2023/6623515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
The vast majority of patients at risk of hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome remain without a molecular diagnosis after routine genetic testing. One type of genomic alteration that is commonly missed by diagnostic pipelines is mobile element insertions (MEIs). Here, we reanalyzed multigene panel data from suspected HBOC patients using the MEI detection tool Mobster. A novel Alu element insertion in ATM intron 54 (ATM:c.8010+30_8010+31insAluYa5) was identified as a potential contributing factor in seven patients. Transcript analysis of patient-derived RNA from three heterozygous carriers revealed exon 54 skipping in 38% of total ATM transcripts. To manifest the direct association between the Alu element insertion and the aberrant splice pattern, HEK293T and MCF7 cells were transfected with wild-type or Alu element-carrying minigene constructs. On average, 77% of plasmid-derived transcripts lacked exon 54 in the presence of the Alu element insertion compared to only 4.7% of transcripts expressed by the wild-type minigene. These results strongly suggest ATM:c.8010+30_8010+31insAluYa5 as the main driver of ATM exon 54 skipping. Since this exon loss is predicted to cause a frameshift and a premature stop codon, mutant transcripts are unlikely to translate into functional proteins. Based on its estimated frequency of up to 0.05% in control populations, we propose to consider ATM:c.8010+30_8010+31insAluYa5 in suspected HBOC patients and to clarify its role in carcinogenesis through future epidemiological and functional analyses. Generally, the implementation of MEI detection tools in diagnostic sequencing pipelines could increase the diagnostic yield, as MEIs are likely underestimated contributors to genetic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janin Klein
- Department of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Gunnar Schmidt
- Department of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Annette Otto
- Department of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Kai Heinecke
- MVZ Labor Krone GbR, Bad Salzuflen, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | - Carmela Beger
- MVZ Labor Krone GbR, Bad Salzuflen, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Sarah Becker
- MVZ Labor Krone GbR, Bad Salzuflen, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Stephan Bartels
- Department of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Tim Ripperger
- Department of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Jens Bohne
- Department of Virology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Winfried Hofmann
- Department of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Doris Steinemann
- Department of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Yadav S, Boddicker NJ, Na J, Polley EC, Hu C, Hart SN, Gnanaolivu RD, Larson N, Holtegaard S, Huang H, Dunn CA, Teras LR, Patel AV, Lacey JV, Neuhausen SL, Martinez E, Haiman C, Chen F, Ruddy KJ, Olson JE, John EM, Kurian AW, Sandler DP, O'Brien KM, Taylor JA, Weinberg CR, Anton-Culver H, Ziogas A, Zirpoli G, Goldgar DE, Palmer JR, Domchek SM, Weitzel JN, Nathanson KL, Kraft P, Couch FJ. Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk Among Carriers of Germline Pathogenic Variants in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:1703-1713. [PMID: 36623243 PMCID: PMC10022863 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To estimate the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) among women with germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2. METHODS The study population included 15,104 prospectively followed women within the CARRIERS study treated with ipsilateral surgery for invasive breast cancer. The risk of CBC was estimated for PV carriers in each gene compared with women without PVs in a multivariate proportional hazard regression analysis accounting for the competing risk of death and adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics. The primary analyses focused on the overall cohort and on women from the general population. Secondary analyses examined associations by race/ethnicity, age at primary breast cancer diagnosis, menopausal status, and tumor estrogen receptor (ER) status. RESULTS Germline BRCA1, BRCA2, and CHEK2 PV carriers with breast cancer were at significantly elevated risk (hazard ratio > 1.9) of CBC, whereas only the PALB2 PV carriers with ER-negative breast cancer had elevated risks (hazard ratio, 2.9). By contrast, ATM PV carriers did not have significantly increased CBC risks. African American PV carriers had similarly elevated risks of CBC as non-Hispanic White PV carriers. Among premenopausal women, the 10-year cumulative incidence of CBC was estimated to be 33% for BRCA1, 27% for BRCA2, and 13% for CHEK2 PV carriers with breast cancer and 35% for PALB2 PV carriers with ER-negative breast cancer. The 10-year cumulative incidence of CBC among postmenopausal PV carriers was 12% for BRCA1, 9% for BRCA2, and 4% for CHEK2. CONCLUSION Women diagnosed with breast cancer and known to carry germline PVs in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, or PALB2 are at substantially increased risk of CBC and may benefit from enhanced surveillance and risk reduction strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jie Na
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Eric C. Polley
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Chunling Hu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Steven N. Hart
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Nicole Larson
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Susan Holtegaard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Huaizhi Huang
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Carolyn A. Dunn
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Lauren R. Teras
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Alpa V. Patel
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | - Elena Martinez
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Christopher Haiman
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Fei Chen
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Janet E. Olson
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Esther M. John
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
- Division of Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Allison W. Kurian
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
- Division of Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Dale P. Sandler
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, NC
| | | | - Jack A. Taylor
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, NC
| | | | | | | | - Gary Zirpoli
- Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Susan M. Domchek
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Katherine L. Nathanson
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Peter Kraft
- Harvard University T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Fergus J. Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Blondeaux E, Arecco L, Punie K, Graffeo R, Toss A, De Angelis C, Trevisan L, Buzzatti G, Linn SC, Dubsky P, Cruellas M, Partridge AH, Balmaña J, Paluch-Shimon S, Lambertini M. Germline TP53 pathogenic variants and breast cancer: A narrative review. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 114:102522. [PMID: 36739824 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Approximately 10% of breast cancers are associated with the inheritance of a pathogenic variant (PV) in one of the breast cancer susceptibility genes. Multiple breast cancer predisposing genes, including TP53, are responsible for the increased breast cancer risk. Tumor protein-53 (TP53) germline PVs are associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a rare autosomal dominant inherited cancer predisposition syndrome associated with early-onset pediatric and multiple primary cancers such as soft tissue and bone sarcomas, breast cancer, brain tumors, adrenocortical carcinomas and leukemias. Women harboring a TP53 PV carry a lifetime risk of developing breast cancer of 80-90%. The aim of the present narrative review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the criteria for offering TP53 testing, prevalence of TP53 carriers among patients with breast cancer, and what is known about its prognostic and therapeutic implications. A summary of the current indications of secondary cancer surveillance and survivorship issues are also provided. Finally, the spectrum of TP53 alteration and testing is discussed. The optimal strategies for the treatment of breast cancer in patients harboring TP53 PVs poses certain challenges. Current guidelines favor the option of performing mastectomy rather than lumpectomy to avoid adjuvant radiotherapy and subsequent risk of radiation-induced second primary malignancies, with careful consideration of radiation when indicated post-mastectomy. Some studies suggest that patients with breast cancer and germline TP53 PV might have worse survival outcomes compared to patients with breast cancer and wild type germline TP53 status. Annual breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and whole-body MRI are recommended as secondary prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Blondeaux
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Luca Arecco
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Kevin Punie
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rossella Graffeo
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Angela Toss
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Carmine De Angelis
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Lucia Trevisan
- Hereditary Cancer Unit, Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giulia Buzzatti
- Hereditary Cancer Unit, Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Sabine C Linn
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Dubsky
- Breast Centre, Hirslanden Klinik St Anna, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Mara Cruellas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Judith Balmaña
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Shani Paluch-Shimon
- Breast Cancer Unit, Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah Medical Center & Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, 91120 Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|