1
|
Wimmer K, Hlauschek D, Balic M, Pfeiler G, Greil R, Singer CF, Halper S, Steger G, Suppan C, Gampenrieder SP, Helfgott R, Egle D, Filipits M, Jakesz R, Sölkner L, Fesl C, Gnant M, Fitzal F. Is the CTS5 a helpful decision-making tool in the extended adjuvant therapy setting? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 205:227-239. [PMID: 38273214 PMCID: PMC11101536 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07186-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Clinical Treatment Score post-5 years (CTS5) is an easy-to-use tool estimating the late distant recurrence (LDR) risk in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer after 5 years of endocrine therapy (ET). Apart from evaluating the prognostic value and calibration accuracy of CTS5, the aim of this study is to clarify if this score is able to identify patients at higher risk for LDR who will benefit from extended ET. METHODS Prognostic power, calibration, and predictive value of the CTS5 was tested in patients of the prospective ABCSG-06 and -06a trials (n = 1254 and 860 patients, respectively). Time to LDR was analyzed with Cox regression models. RESULTS Higher rates of LDR in the years five to ten were observed in high- and intermediate-risk patients compared to low-risk patients (HR 4.02, 95%CI 2.26-7.15, p < 0.001 and HR 1.93, 95%CI 1.05-3.56, p = 0.035). An increasing continuous CTS5 was associated with increasing LDR risk (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.74-2.85, p < 0.001). Miscalibration of CTS5 in high-risk patients could be observed. Although not reaching significance, high-risk patients benefitted the most from prolonged ET with an absolute reduction of the estimated 5-year LDR of - 6.1% (95%CI - 14.4 to 2.3). CONCLUSION The CTS5 is a reliable prognostic tool that is well calibrated in the lower and intermediate risk groups with a substantial difference of expected versus observed LDR rates in high-risk patients. While a numerical trend in favoring prolonged ET for patients with a higher CTS5 was found, a significantly predictive value for the score could not be confirmed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ABCSG-06 trial (NCT00309491), ABCSG-06A7 1033AU/0001 (NCT00300508).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin Wimmer
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | | | - Marija Balic
- Department of Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Georg Pfeiler
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard Greil
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Salzburg Cancer Research Institute-CCCIT, Salzburg, Austria
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Christian F Singer
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefan Halper
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Günther Steger
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christoph Suppan
- Department of Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Simon P Gampenrieder
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Salzburg Cancer Research Institute-CCCIT, Salzburg, Austria
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Ruth Helfgott
- Department of Surgery, Ordensklinikum Linz - Sisters of Charity, Linz, Austria
| | - Daniel Egle
- Department of Gynaecology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Martin Filipits
- Center for Cancer Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Raimund Jakesz
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lidija Sölkner
- Austrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Fesl
- Austrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Gnant
- Austrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Florian Fitzal
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gleiss A, Gnant M, Schemper M. Explained variation and degrees of necessity and of sufficiency for competing risks survival data. Biom J 2024; 66:e2300140. [PMID: 38409618 DOI: 10.1002/bimj.202300140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
In this contribution, the Schemper-Henderson measure of explained variation for survival outcomes is extended to accommodate competing events (CEs) in addition to events of interest. The extension is achieved by moving from the unconditional and conditional survival functions of the original measure to unconditional and conditional cumulative incidence functions, the latter obtained, for example, from Fine and Gray models. In the absence of CEs, the original measure is obtained as a special case. We define explained variation on the population level and provide two different types of estimates. Recently, the authors have achieved a multiplicative decomposition of explained variation into degrees of necessity and degrees of sufficiency. These measures are also extended to the case of competing risks survival data. A SAS macro and an R function are provided to facilitate application. Interesting empirical properties of the measures are explored on the population level and by an extensive simulation study. Advantages of the approach are exemplified by an Austrian study of breast cancer with a high proportion of CEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Gleiss
- Center for Medical Data Science, Institute of Clinical Biometrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Gnant
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Schemper
- Center for Medical Data Science, Institute of Clinical Biometrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Singer CF, Holst F, Steurer S, Burandt EC, Lax SF, Jakesz R, Rudas M, Stöger H, Greil R, Sauter G, Filipits M, Simon R, Gnant M. Estrogen Receptor Alpha Gene Amplification Is an Independent Predictor of Long-Term Outcome in Postmenopausal Patients with Endocrine-Responsive Early Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:4112-4120. [PMID: 35920686 PMCID: PMC9475247 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-4328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Estrogen receptor (ER) expression is a prognostic parameter in breast cancer, and a prerequisite for the use of endocrine therapy. In ER+ early breast cancer, however, no receptor-associated biomarker exists that identifies patients with a particularly favorable outcome. We have investigated the value of ESR1 amplification in predicting the long-term clinical outcome in tamoxifen-treated postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN 394 patients who had been randomized into the tamoxifen-only arm of the prospective randomized ABCSG-06 trial of adjuvant endocrine therapy with available formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue were included in this analysis. IHC ERα expression was evaluated both locally and in a central lab using the Allred score, while ESR1 gene amplification was evaluated by FISH analysis using the ESR1/CEP6 ratio indicating focal copy number alterations. RESULTS Focal ESR1 copy-number elevations (amplifications) were detected in 187 of 394 (47%) tumor specimens, and were associated with a favorable outcome: After a median follow-up of 10 years, women with intratumoral focal ESR1 amplification had a significantly longer distant recurrence-free survival [adjusted HR, 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.26-0.91; P = 0.02] and breast cancer-specific survival (adjusted HR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27-0.80; P = 0.01) as compared with women without ESR1 amplification. IHC ERα protein expression, evaluated by Allred score, correlated significantly with focal ESR1 amplification (P < 0.0001; χ2 test), but was not prognostic by itself. CONCLUSIONS Focal ESR1 amplification is an independent and powerful predictor for long-term distant recurrence-free and breast cancer-specific survival in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early-stage breast cancer who received tamoxifen for 5 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian F. Singer
- Department of OB/GYN, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Corresponding Author: Christian F. Singer, Medical University of Vienna, AKH Wien, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria. Phone: 4314-0400-28010, Fax: 4314-0400-23230; E-mail:
| | | | - Frederik Holst
- Department of OB/GYN, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Steurer
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Eike C. Burandt
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sigurd F. Lax
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.,Hospital Graz II, Graz, Austria.,Johannes Kepler University, School of Medicine, Graz, Austria
| | - Raimund Jakesz
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Margaretha Rudas
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Herbert Stöger
- Department of Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Richard Greil
- Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Center for Clinical and Immunology Trials and Cancer Cluster Salzburg; IIIrd Medical Department, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | - Guido Sauter
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Filipits
- Center for Cancer Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Ronald Simon
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Gnant
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay on the Treatment of Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Breast Cancer Patients With 1-3 Positive Nodes: A Prospective Clinical Utility Study. Clin Breast Cancer 2021; 22:e74-e79. [PMID: 34690081 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The use of the 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) assay is emerging in node-positive estrogen receptor (ER)+ HER2-negative breast cancer (BC), particularly as initial data from the RxPONDER trial are now available. We investigated the impact of the RS result on adjuvant treatment decisions in such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS This prospective, multi-center study enrolled patients with ER+, HER2-negative BC and 1 to 3 positive nodes (microscopic [N1mi] or macroscopic [N1]). Treating oncologists documented treatment recommendations/plan before and after knowing the RS result. Sample size was determined assuming an overall treatment change rate (from chemohormonal therapy [CHT] to hormone therapy [HT] and vice-versa) of ≥30%. RESULTS The study included 84 patients across 5 regional cancer centers, of whom 82 underwent 21-gene testing (77%, N1 disease; 63% grade 2 tumors). Of the RS-tested patients, 60%, 33%, and 7% had RS 0 to 17, 18 to 30, and 31 to 100, respectively. In 43 patients (52%), treatment changed post-RS: 40 patients (49%) from CHT to HT and 3 patients (4%) from HT to CHT. The net change was a 45% reduction in chemotherapy use. Treatment recommendation changes were consistent with the RS result. In RS 0 to 17 patients, the only documented change was from CHT to HT (27 patients). In RS 18-30 patients, change was noted in both directions (CHT-to-HT, 13 patients; HT-to-CHT, 3 patients). No treatment change was reported for the RS 31 to 100 patients, all of whom were recommended CHT pre-testing. CONCLUSION Our results support the clinical utility of the RS assay in ER+ HER2-negative BC with 1 to 3 positive nodes.
Collapse
|
5
|
ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67 mRNA expression in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer: results from ABCSG Trial 6. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100228. [PMID: 34371382 PMCID: PMC8358421 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to assess the concordance of real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) detection of ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67 messenger RNA (mRNA) in breast cancer tissues with central immunohistochemistry (IHC) in women treated within the prospective, randomized Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) Trial 6. Patients and methods We evaluated ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67 mRNA expression by Xpert® Breast Cancer STRAT4 (enables cartridge-based RT-qPCR detection of mRNA in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues) and estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki67 protein expression by IHC [in situ hybridization (ISH) for HER2 IHC 2+] in 1115 surgical formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens from patients of ABCSG Trial 6. Overall percent agreement (concordance), positive percent agreement (sensitivity), and negative percent agreement (specificity) between STRAT4 and IHC were determined for each marker. The primary objective of the study was concordance between STRAT4 mRNA measurements of ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67 with central reference laboratory IHC (and ISH for HER2 IHC 2+ cases). Time to distant recurrence was analyzed by Cox models. Results All performance targets for ER, PR, and Ki67 were met. For HER2, the negative percent agreement target but not the positive percent agreement target was met. Concordance between STRAT4 and IHC was 98.9% for ER, 89.9% for PR, 98.2% for HER2, and 84.8% for Ki67 (excluding intermediate IHC 10%-20% staining). In univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses, all four biomarkers tested by either STRAT4 RT-qPCR or by central IHC (ISH) had a comparable time to distant recurrence indicating similar prognostic value. Conclusions With the exception of HER2, we demonstrate high concordance between centrally assessed IHC and mRNA measurements of ER, PR, and Ki67 as well as a high correlation of the two methods with clinical outcome. Thus, mRNA-based assessment by STRAT4 is a promising new tool for diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in breast cancer. Immunohistochemistry is the clinical gold standard for assessing ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 expression in breast cancer. RNA expression assays provide an alternative approach to measuring these biomarkers. We demonstrate high concordance of STRAT4 mRNA detection in comparison to central immunohistochemistry. The STRAT4 assay is a promising new tool which can be carried out in <2 h and with lower costs. STRAT4 may be a cost-effective alternative to obtain standardized diagnostic results for breast cancer patients.
Collapse
|
6
|
Gampenrieder SP, Pircher M, Fesl C, Rinnerthaler G, Mlineritsch B, Greil-Ressler S, Steger GG, Sagaster V, Fitzal F, Exner R, Devyatko Y, Balic M, Stöger H, Suppan C, Bauernhofer T, Singer CF, Pfeiler G, Seifert M, Helfgott R, Heck D, Rumpold H, Kwasny W, Wieder U, Gnant M, Greil R. Influence of Height on Risk and Outcome of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 4,925 Patients from 5 Randomized Trials of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG). Breast Care (Basel) 2021; 17:137-145. [PMID: 35707180 PMCID: PMC9149458 DOI: 10.1159/000516157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
<b><i>Background:</i></b> Associations between height, cancer risk and worse outcome have been reported for several cancers including breast cancer. We hypothesized that in breast cancer clinical trials, tall women should be overrepresented and might have worse prognosis. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Data of 4,935 women, included from 1990 to 2010 in 5 trials of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG), were analyzed retrospectively. The primary objective was to determine differences in height distribution between the ABCSG cohort and the Austrian female population according to a cross-sectional health survey conducted by the Austrian Statistic Center in 2006 and 2007. Secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in different height classes and differences of body mass index (BMI) distribution. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Breast cancer patients in the ABCSG cohort were only slightly but statistically significantly smaller compared to unselected Austrian adult females (mean 164.3 vs. 164.8 cm; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and significantly more patients were seen in the lower body height class (50 vs. 46%; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) when using the median as a cutoff. However, after adjustment for age, the difference in body height between the two cohorts was no longer significant (<i>p</i> = 0.089). DFS and OS in the two upper height groups (≥170 cm) compared to the two lowest height groups (<160 cm) was not significantly different (5-year DFS: 84.7 vs. 83.0%; HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.73–1.13, <i>p</i> = 0.379; 5-year OS: 94.8 vs. 91.7%; HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55–1.00, <i>p</i> = 0.051). The BMI of ABCSG patients was significantly higher than in the reference population (mean BMI 24.64 vs. 23.96; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our results do not confirm previous findings that greater body height is associated with a higher breast cancer risk and worse outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon P Gampenrieder
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Magdalena Pircher
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Christian Fesl
- Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gabriel Rinnerthaler
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Brigitte Mlineritsch
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Sigrun Greil-Ressler
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Günther G Steger
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, Division of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Verena Sagaster
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, Division of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Florian Fitzal
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ruth Exner
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Yelena Devyatko
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marija Balic
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Herbert Stöger
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Christoph Suppan
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Thomas Bauernhofer
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Georg Pfeiler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Seifert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ruth Helfgott
- Department of Surgery and Breast Health Center, Ordensklinikum Linz, Sisters of Charity Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Dietmar Heck
- Department of Surgery and Breast Health Center, Ordensklinikum Linz, Sisters of Charity Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Holger Rumpold
- Department of Internal Medicine 2 with Medical Oncology, Hematology, Gastroenterology and Rheumatology, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria
| | - Werner Kwasny
- Department of Surgery, Wiener Neustadt Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ursula Wieder
- Department of Surgery, Hanusch Hospital Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Gnant
- Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard Greil
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sestak I, Filipits M, Buus R, Rudas M, Balic M, Knauer M, Kronenwett R, Fitzal F, Cuzick J, Gnant M, Greil R, Dowsett M, Dubsky P. Prognostic Value of EndoPredict in Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:4682-4687. [PMID: 32561662 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-0260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for approximately 5%-15% of all invasive breast cancer cases. Most of the correlations between multigene assays and patient outcome were derived from studies based on patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) or without distinction between the subtypes. Here, we investigate the prognostic value of EndoPredict (EPclin) in a large cohort of ILCs pooled from three phase III randomized trials (ABCSG-6, ABCSG-8, TransATAC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN The primary objective of this analysis was to determine the prognostic value of EPclin for distant recurrence (DR) in years 0-10 in postmenopausal women with ILC. The primary outcome was DR. RESULTS 470 women (17.9%) presented with ILC, 1,944 (73.9%) with IDC, and 216 (8.2%) with other histologic types. EPclin was highly prognostic in women with ILC [HR = 3.32 (2.54-4.34)] and provided more prognostic value than the Clinical Treatment Score [CTS; HR = 2.17 (1.73-2.72)]. 63.4% of women were categorized into the low EPclin risk group and they had a 10-year DR of 4.8% (2.7-8.4) compared with 36.6% of women in the high-risk group with a 10-year DR risk of 26.6% (20.0-35.0). EPclin also provided highly prognostic information in women with node-negative disease [HR = 2.56 (1.63-4.02)] and node-positive disease [HR = 3.70 (2.49-5.50)]. CONCLUSIONS EPclin provided highly significant prognostic value and significant risk stratification for women with ILC. Ten-year DR risk in the EPclin low-risk groups were similar between ILC and IDC. Our results show that EPclin is informative in women with ILC and suggest that it is equally valid in both histologic subtypes.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Aged
- Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use
- Breast/pathology
- Breast/surgery
- Breast Neoplasms/genetics
- Breast Neoplasms/mortality
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/therapy
- Carcinoma, Lobular/genetics
- Carcinoma, Lobular/mortality
- Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology
- Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods
- Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
- Datasets as Topic
- Disease-Free Survival
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Gene Expression Profiling
- Humans
- Kaplan-Meier Estimate
- Mastectomy
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
- Prognosis
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis
- Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism
- Receptors, Estrogen/analysis
- Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism
- Receptors, Progesterone/analysis
- Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism
- Risk Assessment/methods
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivana Sestak
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Martin Filipits
- Medical University of Vienna, Cancer Research Institute, Department for Internal Medicine I and Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard Buus
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, Institute of Cancer, London, United Kingdom
- Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Margaretha Rudas
- Medical University of Vienna, Cancer Research Institute, Department for Internal Medicine I and Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marija Balic
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Centre Graz, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | | | - Florian Fitzal
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Gnant
- Medical University of Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard Greil
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Mitch Dowsett
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, Institute of Cancer, London, United Kingdom
- Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Dubsky
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Vienna, Austria
- St. Anna Breast Center, Hirslanden Klinik St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Filipits M, Dubsky P, Rudas M, Greil R, Balic M, Bago-Horvath Z, Singer CF, Hlauschek D, Brown K, Bernhisel R, Kronenwett R, Lancaster JM, Fitzal F, Gnant M. Prediction of Distant Recurrence Using EndoPredict Among Women with ER+, HER2− Node-Positive and Node-Negative Breast Cancer Treated with Endocrine Therapy Only. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:3865-3872. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-0376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 04/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
9
|
Sestak I, Martín M, Dubsky P, Kronenwett R, Rojo F, Cuzick J, Filipits M, Ruiz A, Gradishar W, Soliman H, Schwartzberg L, Buus R, Hlauschek D, Rodríguez-Lescure A, Gnant M. Prediction of chemotherapy benefit by EndoPredict in patients with breast cancer who received adjuvant endocrine therapy plus chemotherapy or endocrine therapy alone. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 176:377-386. [PMID: 31041683 PMCID: PMC6555778 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05226-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose EndoPredict (EPclin) is a prognostic test validated to inform decisions on adjuvant chemotherapy to endocrine therapy alone for patients with oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Here, we determine the performance of EPclin for estimating 10-year distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) rates for those who received adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) alone compared to those with chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy (ET + C). Methods A total of 3746 women were included in this joint analysis. 2630 patients received 5 years of ET alone (ABCSG-6/8, TransATAC) and 1116 patients received ET + C (GEICAM 2003-02/9906). The primary objective was to evaluate the ability of EPclin to provide an estimate of the 10-year DR rate as a continuous function of EPclin separately for ET alone and ET + C. Cox proportional hazard models were used for these analyses. Results EPclin was highly prognostic for DR in women who received ET alone (HR 2.79 (2.49–3.13), P < 0.0001) as well as in those who received ET + C (HR 2.27 (1.99–2.59), P < 0.0001). Women who received ET + C had significantly smaller increases in 10-year DR rates with the increasing EPclin score than those receiving ET alone (EPclin = 5; 12% ET + C vs. 20% ET alone). We observed a significant positive interaction between EPclin and treatment groups (P-interaction = 0.022). Conclusions In this comparative non-randomised analysis, the rate of increase in DR with EPclin score was significantly reduced in women who received ET + C versus ET alone. Our indirect comparisons suggest that a high EPclin score can predict chemotherapy benefit in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative disease. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-019-05226-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivana Sestak
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
| | - Miguel Martín
- Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.,Spanish Breast Cancer Group, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Peter Dubsky
- Hirslanden Klinik St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland.,Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Federico Rojo
- Spanish Breast Cancer Group, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain.,Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Martin Filipits
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Austrian Breast and Colorectal Study Group, ABCSG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Amparo Ruiz
- Spanish Breast Cancer Group, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - William Gradishar
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| | - Hatem Soliman
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Richard Buus
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, Institute of Cancer, London, UK.,Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Alvaro Rodríguez-Lescure
- Spanish Breast Cancer Group, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain.,Hospital Universitario de Elche, Valencia, Spain
| | - Michael Gnant
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vargas G, Bouchet M, Bouazza L, Reboul P, Boyault C, Gervais M, Kan C, Benetollo C, Brevet M, Croset M, Mazel M, Cayrefourcq L, Geraci S, Vacher S, Pantano F, Filipits M, Driouch K, Bieche I, Gnant M, Jacot W, Aubin JE, Duterque-Coquillaud M, Alix-Panabières C, Clézardin P, Bonnelye E. ERRα promotes breast cancer cell dissemination to bone by increasing RANK expression in primary breast tumors. Oncogene 2019; 38:950-964. [PMID: 30478447 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-018-0579-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2018] [Accepted: 10/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Bone is the most common metastatic site for breast cancer. Estrogen-related-receptor alpha (ERRα) has been implicated in cancer cell invasiveness. Here, we established that ERRα promotes spontaneous metastatic dissemination of breast cancer cells from primary mammary tumors to the skeleton. We carried out cohort studies, pharmacological inhibition, gain-of-function analyses in vivo and cellular and molecular studies in vitro to identify new biomarkers in breast cancer metastases. Meta-analysis of human primary breast tumors revealed that high ERRα expression levels were associated with bone but not lung metastases. ERRα expression was also detected in circulating tumor cells from metastatic breast cancer patients. ERRα overexpression in murine 4T1 breast cancer cells promoted spontaneous bone micro-metastases formation when tumor cells were inoculated orthotopically, whereas lung metastases occurred irrespective of ERRα expression level. In vivo, Rank was identified as a target for ERRα. That was confirmed in vitro in Rankl stimulated tumor cell invasion, in mTOR/pS6K phosphorylation, by transactivation assay, ChIP and bioinformatics analyses. Moreover, pharmacological inhibition of ERRα reduced primary tumor growth, bone micro-metastases formation and Rank expression in vitro and in vivo. Transcriptomic studies and meta-analysis confirmed a positive association between metastases and ERRα/RANK in breast cancer patients and also revealed a positive correlation between ERRα and BRCA1mut carriers. Taken together, our results reveal a novel ERRα/RANK axis by which ERRα in primary breast cancer promotes early dissemination of cancer cells to bone. These findings suggest that ERRα may be a useful therapeutic target to prevent bone metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Vargas
- INSERM-UMR1033, Lyon, France
- University of Lyon1, Lyon, France
| | - M Bouchet
- INSERM-UMR1033, Lyon, France
- University of Lyon1, Lyon, France
- IGFL, Lyon, France
| | - L Bouazza
- INSERM-UMR1033, Lyon, France
- University of Lyon1, Lyon, France
| | - P Reboul
- UMR7365-CNRS-Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - C Boyault
- Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - M Gervais
- INSERM-UMR1033, Lyon, France
- University of Lyon1, Lyon, France
| | - C Kan
- INSERM-UMR1033, Lyon, France
- University of Lyon1, Lyon, France
- Center for Cancer Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - C Benetollo
- University of Lyon1, Lyon, France
- INSERM-U1028-CNRS-UMR5292, Lyon, France
| | - M Brevet
- INSERM-UMR1033, Lyon, France
- Centre de Biologie et de Pathologie Est, Bron, France
| | - M Croset
- INSERM-UMR1033, Lyon, France
- University of Lyon1, Lyon, France
| | - M Mazel
- EA2415-Institut Universitaire de Recherche Clinique, Montpellier, France
| | - L Cayrefourcq
- EA2415-Institut Universitaire de Recherche Clinique, Montpellier, France
| | - S Geraci
- INSERM-UMR1033, Lyon, France
- University of Lyon1, Lyon, France
| | - S Vacher
- Department of Genetics, Institut-Curie, Paris, France
| | - F Pantano
- University-Campus-Bio-Medico, Rome, 00128, Italy
| | - M Filipits
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical-University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - K Driouch
- Department of Genetics, Institut-Curie, Paris, France
| | - I Bieche
- Department of Genetics, Institut-Curie, Paris, France
| | - M Gnant
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical-University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - W Jacot
- Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - J E Aubin
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - C Alix-Panabières
- EA2415-Institut Universitaire de Recherche Clinique, Montpellier, France
| | - P Clézardin
- INSERM-UMR1033, Lyon, France
- University of Lyon1, Lyon, France
| | - E Bonnelye
- INSERM-UMR1033, Lyon, France.
- University of Lyon1, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wimmer K, Strobl S, Bolliger M, Devyatko Y, Korkmaz B, Exner R, Fitzal F, Gnant M. Optimal duration of adjuvant endocrine therapy: how to apply the newest data. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2017; 9:679-692. [PMID: 29344105 PMCID: PMC5764154 DOI: 10.1177/1758834017732966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2017] [Accepted: 08/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The benefit of 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) is beyond discussion. Nevertheless, the risk of recurrence of luminal BC persists for 15 years or more after diagnosis. Consequently, approaches of extended adjuvant therapy have been investigated in large clinical trials, with the ultimate aim of further reducing the risk of recurrence in patients with HR+ BC. Methods: A review of recently published trial data is presented to provide a solid basis for discussion. A discussion of the side effects of long-term endocrine treatment, multigenetic tests aiming to identify patients at particular risk, and an outlook for further promising targets are additional aims of this review. Conclusion: Extended adjuvant therapy seems beneficial in reducing distant relapse and contralateral BC for a selected group of patients with HR+ BC, particularly if aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are used after initial tamoxifen therapy. However, patients with lower risk of recurrence and initial AI therapy may suffer more from side effects than benefit from extended therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin Wimmer
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephanie Strobl
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Bolliger
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Yelena Devyatko
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Belgin Korkmaz
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ruth Exner
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Florian Fitzal
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Gnant
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Clinical outcomes in ER+ HER2 -node-positive breast cancer patients who were treated according to the Recurrence Score results: evidence from a large prospectively designed registry. NPJ Breast Cancer 2017; 3:32. [PMID: 28900632 PMCID: PMC5591314 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-017-0033-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2017] [Revised: 06/27/2017] [Accepted: 07/03/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The Recurrence Score® is increasingly used in node-positive ER+ HER2-negative breast cancer. This retrospective analysis of a prospectively designed registry evaluated treatments/outcomes in node-positive breast cancer patients who were Recurrence Score-tested through Clalit Health Services from 1/2006 through 12/2011 (N = 709). Medical records were reviewed to verify treatments/recurrences/survival. Median follow-up, 5.9 years; median age, 62 years; 53.9% grade 2; 69.8% tumors ≤ 2 cm; 84.5% invasive ductal carcinoma; 42.0% N1mi, and 37.2%/15.5%/5.2% with 1/2/3 positive nodes; 53.4% Recurrence Score < 18, 36.4% Recurrence Score 18–30, and 10.2% Recurrence Score ≥ 31. Overall, 26.9% received adjuvant chemotherapy: 7.1%, 39.5%, and 86.1% in the Recurrence Score < 18, 18–30, and ≥ 31 group, respectively. The 5-year Kaplan–Meier estimates for distant recurrence were 3.2%, 6.3%, and 16.9% for these respective groups and the corresponding 5-year breast cancer death estimates were 0.5%, 3.4%, and 5.7%. In Recurrence Score < 18 patients, 5-year distant-recurrence rates for N1mi/1 positive node/2–3 positive nodes were 1.2%/4.4%/5.4%. As patients were not randomized to treatment and treatment decision is heavily influenced by Recurrence Score, analysis of 5-year distant recurrence by chemotherapy use was exploratory and should be interpreted cautiously: In Recurrence Score < 18, recurrence rate was 7.7% in chemotherapy-treated (n = 27) and 2.9% in chemotherapy-untreated patients (n = 352); P = 0.245. In Recurrence Score 18–30, recurrence rate in chemotherapy-treated patients (n = 102) was significantly lower than in untreated patients (n = 156) (1.0% vs. 9.7% P = 0.019); in Recurrence Score ≤ 25 (the RxPONDER study cutoff), recurrence rate was 2.3% in chemotherapy-treated (n = 89) and 4.4% in chemotherapy-untreated patients (n = 488); P = 0.521. In conclusion, our findings support using endocrine therapy alone in ER+ HER2-negative breast cancer patients with micrometastases/1–3 positive nodes and Recurrence Score < 18. Women with breast cancer that has spread to the lymph nodes do well on anti-hormone treatment alone if they score under 18 on OncotypeDX. Salomon Stemmer from Rabin Medical Center in Petah Tikvah, Israel, and colleagues conducted the first analysis of a large prospectively designed registry in which patients with breast cancer cells in the underarm lymph nodes have taken the 21-gene expression analysis known as OncotypeDX to guide their treatment. Among the 709 women with node-positive, ER-positive, HER-negative disease, patients with test scores under 18 did just as well if they received chemotherapy or not in addition to anti-hormone treatment, whereas those with scores of 18 to 30 had significantly lower recurrence rates if they received both therapies. The findings suggest that only women with OncotypeDX scores under 18 can safely forgo chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, with different subtypes having a distinct biological, molecular, and clinical course. Assessments of standard clinical and pathological features have traditionally been used to determine the use of adjuvant systemic therapy in patients with early stage breast cancer; however, the ability to identify those who will benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy remains a challenge, leading to the overtreatment of some patients. Advances in molecular medicine have substantially improved the accuracy of gene-expression profiling of breast tumours, resulting in improvements in the ability to predict a patient's risk of breast cancer recurrence and likely response to endocrine therapy and/or chemotherapy. These genomic assays, several of which are commercially available, have aided physicians in tailoring treatment decisions for patients at the individual level. Herein, we describe the available data on the clinical validity of the most widely available assays in patients with early stage breast cancer, with a focus on the development, validation, and clinical application of these assays, in addition to the anticipated outcomes of ongoing prospective trials. We also review data from comparative studies of these assays and from cost-effectiveness analyses relating to their clinical use.
Collapse
|
14
|
Freedman O, Fletcher G, Gandhi S, Mates M, Dent S, Trudeau M, Eisen A. Adjuvant endocrine therapy for early breast cancer: a systematic review of the evidence for the 2014 Cancer Care Ontario systemic therapy guideline. Curr Oncol 2015; 22:S95-S113. [PMID: 25848344 PMCID: PMC4381796 DOI: 10.3747/co.22.2326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care (pebc) recently created an evidence-based consensus guideline on the systemic treatment of early breast cancer. The evidence for the guideline was compiled using a systematic review to answer the question "What is the optimal systemic therapy for patients with early-stage, operable breast cancer, when patient and disease factors are considered?" The question was addressed in three parts: cytotoxic chemotherapy, endocrine treatment, and her2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2)-targeted therapy. METHODS For the systematic review, the literature in the medline and embase databases was searched for the period January 2008 to May 2014. The Standards and Guidelines Evidence directory of cancer guidelines and the Web sites of major oncology guideline organizations were also searched. The basic search terms were "breast cancer" and "systemic therapy" (chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, targeted agents, ovarian suppression), and results were limited to randomized controlled trials (rcts), guidelines, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. RESULTS Several hundred documents that met the inclusion criteria were retrieved. Meta-analyses from the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group encompassed many of the rcts found. Several additional studies that met the inclusion criteria were retained, as were other guidelines and systematic reviews. SUMMARY The results of the systematic review constitute a comprehensive compilation of high-level evidence, which was the basis for the 2014 pebc guideline on systemic therapy for early breast cancer. The review of the evidence for systemic endocrine therapy (adjuvant tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, and ovarian ablation and suppression) is presented here; the evidence for chemotherapy and her2-targeted treatment-and the final clinical practice recommendations-are presented separately in this supplement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - G.G. Fletcher
- Program in Evidence-Based Care, Cancer Care Ontario; and Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON
| | - S. Gandhi
- Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, ON
| | - M. Mates
- Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kinston General Hospital, and Queen’s University, Kingston, ON
| | - S.F. Dent
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
| | | | - A. Eisen
- Durham Regional Cancer Centre, Oshawa, ON
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Adjuvant endocrine therapy reduces the risk of recurrence and death from breast cancer in women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. Tamoxifen has been the standard therapy for decades, and this is still the case for pre-menopausal women. Ovarian suppression is of similar efficacy but currently there is no strong evidence for adding this to tamoxifen and the additional morbidity can be considerable. Results from two important trials addressing this issue are imminent. In post-menopausal women, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) (letrozole, anastrozole, or exemestane) are superior to tamoxifen in preventing recurrence but only letrozole has been shown to improve survival. The main gain is against high-risk cancers, and tamoxifen gives very similar benefit for low-risk disease. Traditionally, treatment has been given for around 5 years, but many women remain at risk of relapse for 10 years or more. The AIs, and more recently tamoxifen, have been shown to reduce further the risk of late recurrence in women still in remission after 5 years of tamoxifen if given for a further 5 years. The comparative benefits of these two options and the selection of patients most likely to benefit from long-term adjuvant endocrine therapy are important topics for further research, as is the optimum duration of AI therapy started upfront.
Collapse
|
16
|
Blank PR, Filipits M, Dubsky P, Gutzwiller F, Lux MP, Brase JC, Weber KE, Rudas M, Greil R, Loibl S, Szucs TD, Kronenwett R, Schwenkglenks M, Gnant M. Cost-effectiveness analysis of prognostic gene expression signature-based stratification of early breast cancer patients. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2015; 33:179-190. [PMID: 25404424 PMCID: PMC4305105 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-014-0227-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The individual risk of recurrence in hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer patients determines whether adjuvant endocrine therapy should be combined with chemotherapy. Clinicopathological parameters and molecular tests such as EndoPredict(®) (EPclin) can support decision making in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative cancer. OBJECTIVE Using a life-long Markov state transition model, we determined the health economic impact and incremental cost effectiveness of EPclin-based risk stratification in combination with clinical guidelines [German-S3, National Comprehensive Cancer Center Network (NCCN), and St. Gallen] to decide on chemotherapy use. METHODS Information on overall and metastasis-free survival came from Austrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group clinical trials 6/8 (n = 1,619) and published literature. Effectiveness was assessed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs (2010) were assessed from a German third-party payer perspective. RESULTS Lifetime costs per patient ranged from <euro>28,268 (St.Gallen and EPclin) to <euro>33,756 (NCCN). Due to an imperfect prognostic value and differences in chemotherapy use, strategies achieved between 13.165 QALYs (NCCN) and 13.173 QALYs (EPclin alone) per patient. Using German-S3 as reference, three strategies showed dominant results (St. Gallen and EPclin, German-S3 and EPclin, EPclin alone). Compared to German-S3, the addition of EPclin saved <euro>3,388 and gained 0.002 QALYs per patient. Combining guidelines with EPclin remained preferable in sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that molecular markers can be sensibly combined with clinical guidelines to determine the risk profile of adjuvant breast cancer patients. Compared with the current German best practice (German-S3), combinations of EPclin with the St. Gallen, German-S3 or NCCN guideline and EPclin alone were dominant from the perspective of the German healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia R Blank
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 61, 4056, Basel, Switzerland,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dixon JM. Extended adjuvant therapy with letrozole: reducing the risk of recurrence. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 6:849-59. [PMID: 16761928 DOI: 10.1586/14737140.6.6.849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Patients with all stages of primary breast cancer are at continuing risk of relapse following 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy, even in the absence of lymph node involvement. Tamoxifen has been the standard therapy for reducing risk of recurrence, although more than 50% of relapses and deaths occur after completion of tamoxifen. Tamoxifen use is associated with an increased risk of serious side effects, and extended use beyond 5 years may have a negative impact on disease-free survival. Extended adjuvant letrozole therapy confers a significant benefit in relapse-free survival. The approval of letrozole for this indication in the USA and in many European countries introduces a new, safe and effective treatment for disease-free patients seeking to reduce their long-term risk of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Michael Dixon
- Edinburgh Breast Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Azrad M, Demark-Wahnefried W. The association between adiposity and breast cancer recurrence and survival: A review of the recent literature. Curr Nutr Rep 2013; 3:9-15. [PMID: 24533234 DOI: 10.1007/s13668-013-0068-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Breast Cancer (BC) is the most common and second deadliest malignancy among American women. Many factors contribute to BC prognosis but a key modifiable lifestyle factor is body weight. In this review, we update the reader on the association between adiposity and poor BC outcomes. We summarize the findings from studies that show obesity to be a risk factor for BC recurrence and reduced survival, including research that shows that treatment with aromatase inhibitors in hormone-receptor positive BC survivors who are obese may not be as effective as in normal weight women. In addition, we summarize the findings from studies that show that obesity-induced changes in glucose metabolism, type-2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome contribute to negative outcomes in BC survivors. Given the evidence, there is a critical need to determine whether weight loss can improve outcomes in BC survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Azrad
- Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), 1824 6th Avenue, 310B Wallace Tumor Institute, Birmingham, AL 35294
| | - Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
- Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), 1824 6th Avenue, 310B Wallace Tumor Institute, Birmingham, AL 35294 ; UAB Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1824 6th Avenue, 310D Wallace Tumor Institute, Birmingham, AL 35294
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Breast cancer follow-up strategies in randomized phase III adjuvant clinical trials: a systematic review. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH : CR 2013; 32:89. [PMID: 24438135 PMCID: PMC3828573 DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-32-89] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2013] [Accepted: 11/07/2013] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
The effectiveness of different breast cancer follow-up procedures to decrease breast cancer mortality are still an object of debate, even if intensive follow-up by imaging modalities is not recommended by international guidelines since 1997. We conducted a systematic review of surveillance procedures utilized, in the last ten years, in phase III randomized trials (RCTs) of adjuvant treatments in early stage breast cancer with disease free survival as primary endpoint of the study, in order to verify if a similar variance exists in the scientific world. Follow-up modalities were reported in 66 RCTs, and among them, minimal and intensive approaches were equally represented, each being followed by 33 (50%) trials. The minimal surveillance regimen is preferred by international and North American RCTs (P = 0.001) and by trials involving more than one country (P = 0.004), with no relationship with the number of participating centers (P = 0.173), with pharmaceutical industry sponsorship (P = 0.80) and with trials enrolling > 1000 patients (P = 0.14). At multivariate regression analysis, only geographic location of the trial was predictive for a distinct follow-up methodology (P = 0.008): Western European (P = 0.004) and East Asian studies (P = 0.010) use intensive follow-up procedures with a significantly higher frequency than international RCTs, while no differences have been detected between North American and international RCTs. Stratifying the studies according to the date of beginning of patients enrollment, before or after 1998, in more recent RCTs the minimal approach is more frequently followed by international and North American RCTs (P = 0.01), by trials involving more than one country (P = 0.01) and with more than 50 participating centers (P = 0.02). It would be highly desirable that in the near future breast cancer follow-up procedures will be homogeneous in RCTs and everyday clinical settings.
Collapse
|
20
|
Dubsky P, Brase JC, Jakesz R, Rudas M, Singer CF, Greil R, Dietze O, Luisser I, Klug E, Sedivy R, Bachner M, Mayr D, Schmidt M, Gehrmann MC, Petry C, Weber KE, Fisch K, Kronenwett R, Gnant M, Filipits M. The EndoPredict score provides prognostic information on late distant metastases in ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2013; 109:2959-64. [PMID: 24157828 PMCID: PMC3859949 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 236] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2013] [Revised: 09/25/2013] [Accepted: 10/01/2013] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: ER+/HER2− breast cancers have a proclivity for late recurrence. A personalised estimate of relapse risk after 5 years of endocrine treatment can improve patient selection for extended hormonal therapy. Methods: A total of 1702 postmenopausal ER+/HER2− breast cancer patients from two adjuvant phase III trials (ABCSG6, ABCSG8) treated with 5 years of endocrine therapy participated in this study. The multigene test EndoPredict (EP) and the EPclin score (which combines EP with tumour size and nodal status) were predefined in independent training cohorts. All patients were retrospectively assigned to risk categories based on gene expression and on clinical parameters. The primary end point was distant metastasis (DM). Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used in an early (0–5 years) and late time interval (>5 years post diagnosis). Results: EP is a significant, independent, prognostic parameter in the early and late time interval. The expression levels of proliferative and ER signalling genes contribute differentially to the underlying biology of early and late DM. The EPclin stratified 64% of patients at risk after 5 years into a low-risk subgroup with an absolute 1.8% of late DM at 10 years of follow-up. Conclusion: The EP test provides additional prognostic information for the identification of early and late DM beyond what can be achieved by combining the commonly used clinical parameters. The EPclin reliably identified a subgroup of patients who have an excellent long-term prognosis after 5 years of endocrine therapy. The side effects of extended therapy should be weighed against this projected outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Dubsky
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gnant M, Pfeiler G, Stöger H, Mlineritsch B, Fitzal F, Balic M, Kwasny W, Seifert M, Stierer M, Dubsky P, Greil R, Steger G, Samonigg H, Fesl C, Jakesz R. The predictive impact of body mass index on the efficacy of extended adjuvant endocrine treatment with anastrozole in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer: an analysis of the randomised ABCSG-6a trial. Br J Cancer 2013; 109:589-96. [PMID: 23868011 PMCID: PMC3738117 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2013] [Revised: 06/10/2013] [Accepted: 06/22/2013] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated whether body mass index (BMI) can be used as a predictive parameter indicating patients who benefit from extended aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment. METHODS The ABCSG-6a trial re-randomised event-free postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive patients from the ABCSG-6 trial to receive either 3 additional years of endocrine therapy using anastrozole vs nil. In this retrospective analysis, we investigated the prognostic and predictive impact of BMI on disease outcome and safety. RESULTS In all, 634 patients (177 normal weight, 307 overweight, and 150 obese) patients were included in this analysis. Normal weight patients with additional 3 years of anastrozole halved their risk of disease recurrence (disease-free survival (DFS) HR 0.48; P=0.02) and death (HR 0.45; P=0.06) and had only a fifth of the risk of distant metastases (HR 0.22; P=0.05) compared with normal weight patients without any further treatment. In contrast, overweight+obese patients derived no benefit from additional 3 years of anastrozole (DFS HR 0.93; P=0.68; distant recurrence-free survival HR 0.91; P=0.78; and OS HR 0.9; P=0.68). The possible predictive impact of BMI on extended endocrine treatment could be strengthened by a Cox regression interaction model between BMI and treatment (P=0.07). CONCLUSION Body mass index may be used to predict outcome benefit of extended AI treatment in patients with receptor-positive breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Gnant
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Efficacy of tamoxifen ± aminoglutethimide in normal weight and overweight postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: an analysis of 1509 patients of the ABCSG-06 trial. Br J Cancer 2013; 108:1408-14. [PMID: 23511562 PMCID: PMC3629426 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: There exists evidence that body mass index (BMI) impacts on the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in patients with breast cancer. The relationship between BMI and the efficacy of tamoxifen is conflicting. We investigated the impact of BMI on the efficacy of single tamoxifen and tamoxifen plus an aromatase inhibitor in the well-defined prospective study population of the ABCSG-06 trial. Methods: ABCSG-06 investigated the efficacy of tamoxifen vs tamoxifen plus aminoglutethimide in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Taking BMI at baseline, patients were classified as normal weight (BMI=18.5–24.9 kg m−2), overweight (BMI=25–29.9 kg m−2), and obese (30 kg m−2) according to WHO criteria. Results: Overweight+obese patients had an increased risk for distant recurrences (hazard ratio (HR): 1.51; Cox P=0·018) and a worse overall survival (OS; HR: 1·49; Cox P=0·052) compared with normal weight patients. Analysing patients treated with single tamoxifen only, no difference between overweight+obese patients and normal weight patients regarding distant recurrence-free survival (HR: 1.35; Cox P=0·24) and OS (HR: 0.99; Cox P=0·97) could be observed. In contrast, in the group of patients treated with the combination of tamoxifen plus aminoglutethimide, overweight+obese patients had an increased risk for distant recurrences (1.67; Cox P=0·03) and a worse OS (1.47; Cox P=0·11) compared with normal weight patients. Conclusion: BMI impacts on the efficacy of aromatase inhibitor-based treatment but not single tamoxifen.
Collapse
|
23
|
Dubsky P, Filipits M, Jakesz R, Rudas M, Singer CF, Greil R, Dietze O, Luisser I, Klug E, Sedivy R, Bachner M, Mayr D, Schmidt M, Gehrmann MC, Petry C, Weber KE, Kronenwett R, Brase JC, Gnant M. EndoPredict improves the prognostic classification derived from common clinical guidelines in ER-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2012; 24:640-7. [PMID: 23035151 PMCID: PMC3574544 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In early estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, the decision to administer chemotherapy is largely based on prognostic criteria. The combined molecular/clinical EndoPredict test (EPclin) has been validated to accurately assess prognosis in this population. In this study, the clinical relevance of EPclin in relation to well-established clinical guidelines is assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS We assigned risk groups to 1702 ER-positive/HER2-negative postmenopausal women from two large phase III trials treated only with endocrine therapy. Prognosis was assigned according to National Comprehensive Cancer Center Network-, German S3-, St Gallen guidelines and the EPclin. Prognostic groups were compared using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS After 10 years, absolute risk reductions (ARR) between the high- and low-risk groups ranged from 6.9% to 11.2% if assigned according to guidelines. It was at 18.7% for EPclin. EPclin reassigned 58%-61% of women classified as high-/intermediate-risk (according to clinical guidelines) to low risk. Women reclassified to low risk showed a 5% rate of distant metastasis at 10 years. CONCLUSION The EPclin score is able to predict favorable prognosis in a majority of patients that clinical guidelines would assign to intermediate or high risk. EPclin may reduce the indications for chemotherapy in ER-positive postmenopausal women with a limited number of clinical risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Dubsky
- Departments of Surgery, Medical University Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tausch C, Taucher S, Dubsky P, Seifert M, Reitsamer R, Kwasny W, Jakesz R, Fitzal F, Filipcic L, Fridrik M, Greil R, Gnant M. Prognostic value of number of removed lymph nodes, number of involved lymph nodes, and lymph node ratio in 7502 breast cancer patients enrolled onto trials of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG). Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 19:1808-17. [PMID: 22207051 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-2189-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2011] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The number of removed axillary lymph nodes and the ratio of involved to removed lymph nodes are described as independent prognostic factors beside the absolute number of involved lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. The correlation between these factors and prognosis were investigated in trials of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG). METHODS This retrospective analysis is based on the data of 7052 patients with endocrine-responsive breast cancer who were randomized in four trials of the ABCSG in the years 1990-2006 and underwent axillary lymph node dissection. The prognostic value of number of removed nodes (NRN), number of involved nodes (NIN), and ratio of involved to removed nodes (lymph node ratio, LNR) concerning recurrence-free survival and overall survival was analyzed. RESULTS A total of 2718 patients had node-positive disease. No correlation was found between NRN and prognosis. Increasing NIN and LNR were significantly associated with worse recurrence-free survival and overall survival in univariate and multivariate analyses (P < .001). Only in the subgroup of patients with one to three positive lymph nodes and treated with mastectomy (n = 728) was LNR an additional prognostic factor in univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS For breast cancer patients stringently medicated in the framework of prospective adjuvant clinical trials and requiring a mandatory minimum of removed nodes, NRN does not influence prognosis, and LNR is not superior to NIN as prognostic factor. In patients with one to three positive lymph nodes and mastectomy, LNR could play a role as an additional prognostic factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Tausch
- Department of Surgery, Brust-Zentrum, Seefeldstrasse 214, 8008, Zürich, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Filipits M, Rudas M, Jakesz R, Dubsky P, Fitzal F, Singer CF, Dietze O, Greil R, Jelen A, Sevelda P, Freibauer C, Müller V, Jänicke F, Schmidt M, Kölbl H, Rody A, Kaufmann M, Schroth W, Brauch H, Schwab M, Fritz P, Weber KE, Feder IS, Hennig G, Kronenwett R, Gehrmann M, Gnant M. A new molecular predictor of distant recurrence in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer adds independent information to conventional clinical risk factors. Clin Cancer Res 2011; 17:6012-20. [PMID: 21807638 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-0926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 465] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE According to current guidelines, molecular tests predicting the outcome of breast cancer patients can be used to assist in making treatment decisions after consideration of conventional markers. We developed and validated a gene expression signature predicting the likelihood of distant recurrence in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN RNA levels assessed by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue were used to calculate a risk score (Endopredict, EP) consisting of eight cancer-related and three reference genes. EP was combined with nodal status and tumor size into a comprehensive risk score, EPclin. Both prespecified risk scores including cutoff values to determine a risk group for each patient (low and high) were validated independently in patients from two large randomized phase III trials [Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG)-6: n = 378, ABCSG-8: n = 1,324]. RESULTS In both validation cohorts, continuous EP was an independent predictor of distant recurrence in multivariate analysis (ABCSG-6: P = 0.010, ABCSG-8: P < 0.001). Combining Adjuvant!Online, quantitative ER, Ki67, and treatment with EP yielded a prognostic power significantly superior to the clinicopathologic factors alone [c-indices: 0.764 vs. 0.750, P = 0.024 (ABCSG-6) and 0.726 vs. 0.701, P = 0.003 (ABCSG-8)]. EPclin had c-indices of 0.788 and 0.732 and resulted in 10-year distant recurrence rates of 4% and 4% in EPclin low-risk and 28% and 22% in EPclin high-risk patients in ABCSG-6 (P < 0.001) and ABCSG-8 (P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The multigene EP risk score provided additional prognostic information to the risk of distant recurrence of breast cancer patients, independent from clinicopathologic parameters. The EPclin score outperformed all conventional clinicopathologic risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Filipits
- Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nabholtz JMA. Long-term safety of aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of breast cancer. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2011; 4:189-204. [PMID: 18728707 PMCID: PMC2503653 DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s1566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Following promising data for metastatic breast cancer in terms of efficacy and safety profile, third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AI), anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane, underwent a full development in early setting. If recent results consistently show the superiority of these agents over tamoxifen, the therapeutic strategies of AIs in adjuvant setting are still debated. Beyond the choice of clinical strategy, the long duration of exposure to AI in adjuvant setting required a full determination of the long-term toxicity profile of these agents. While all three AIs have either favorable (decreased incidence of hot flashes, gynecologic and thromboembolic side-effects) or unfavorable (skeletal complications, arthralgia, musculoskeletal pain, sexual dysfunction) class adverse events, some variability between AIs has been reported in side-effects as well as gastrointestinal, urogenital, neurologic, and visual disturbances, confirming the lack of interchangeability between the three AIs. The overall therapeutic index of AIs appears today superior to that of tamoxifen with proven improved efficacy and better toxicity profile. This review will explore the results from the available adjuvant AIs trials with a particular emphasis on safety profiles, quality of life, and therapeutic index, helping to define the present role of AIs in the adjuvant management of postmenopausal patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
|
27
|
Neue Entwicklungen in der endokrinen Therapie des prämenopausalen Mammakarzinoms. GYNAKOLOGISCHE ENDOKRINOLOGIE 2010. [DOI: 10.1007/s10304-009-0335-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
28
|
Josefsson ML, Leinster SJ. Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen as adjuvant hormonal therapy for oestrogen sensitive early breast cancer in post-menopausal women: meta-analyses of monotherapy, sequenced therapy and extended therapy. Breast 2010; 19:76-83. [PMID: 20096578 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2009.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2009] [Revised: 12/21/2009] [Accepted: 12/22/2009] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Adjuvant tamoxifen reduces relapses and prolongs survival in patients with oestrogen sensitive breast cancer. Development of resistance is however common. Tamoxifen can be given for a maximum of five years; although the risk of recurrences remains high after this period. This review examines nine randomised controlled trials including 28,632 women, which studied aromatase inhibitors (AIs) as an alternative to tamoxifen in three treatment settings: monotherapy (instead of tamoxifen), sequenced therapy (tamoxifen is switched to an AI) and extended therapy (following adjuvant tamoxifen). Disease free survival was significantly improved for monotherapy (HR 0.89, [95% CI 0.83-0.96] p = 0.002) and sequenced therapy (HR 0.72, [0.63-0.83] p < 0.00001). There was no difference in overall survival for monotherapy (HR 0.94, [0.82-1.08] p = 0.39) or extended therapy (HR 0.86 [0.79-1.16] p = 0.67). Importantly, overall survival was prolonged for patients who switched from tamoxifen to AI therapy (HR 0.78 95%CI 0.68-0.91, p = 0.001).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette L Josefsson
- School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Filipits M, Rudas M, Heinzl H, Jakesz R, Kubista E, Lax S, Schippinger W, Dietze O, Greil R, Stiglbauer W, Kwasny W, Nader A, Stierer M, Gnant MFX. Low p27 expression predicts early relapse and death in postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15:5888-94. [PMID: 19723645 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-0728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Previously, we have shown that p27 may be a potential predictive biomarker for the selection of premenopausal women with early-stage hormone-responsive breast cancer for adjuvant endocrine therapy. The purpose of the present study was to assess the clinical relevance of p27 expression in postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients who were treated with adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We determined the expression of p27 by immunohistochemistry in the surgical specimens of breast carcinoma patients who had been enrolled in Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Trial 06 and received tamoxifen for 5 years. Early relapse and death within the first 5 years of follow-up were analyzed using Cox models adjusted for clinical and pathologic factors. RESULTS p27 expression was high (>70% p27-positive tumor cells) in 252 of 483 (52%) tumor specimens and was associated with favorable outcome of the patients. Women with high p27 expression had a significantly longer disease-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio for relapse, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.42; P < 0.001) and overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio for death, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.72; P = 0.002) as compared with women with low p27 expression. CONCLUSION Low p27 expression independently predicts early relapse and death in postmenopausal women with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who received adjuvant tamoxifen for 5 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Filipits
- Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Borschkegasse 8a, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Nabholtz JM, Mouret-Reynier MA, Durando X, Van Praagh I, Al-Sukhun S, Ferriere JP, Chollet P. Comparative review of anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane in the management of early breast cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2009; 10:1435-47. [DOI: 10.1517/14656560902953738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
31
|
Abstract
Recurrence risk after initial treatment of breast cancer is a major concern for patients. Although tamoxifen therapy has been shown to be effective in preventing recurrences and cancer-related deaths, recurrences continue to be an issue for patients after the 5-year therapy period. Until recently, there were no therapeutic options available for risk reduction in the period after the first 5 years of tamoxifen (the extended adjuvant setting). The introduction of the aromatase inhibitors (AIs), which have a different mechanism of action than tamoxifen, has provided an option for postmenopausal women seeking to extend their adjuvant hormonal treatment. The Canadian-led MA.17 trial specifically addressed this issue, and the results showed a clear, significant benefit of letrozole, improving disease-free survival over placebo among postmenopausal women who already had 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment. Because of the favorable results observed in the first interim analysis, the trial was unblinded, the patients treated with placebo were offered letrozole, and subsequently, letrozole became approved for the extended adjuvant indication. Recent analyses from MA.17 and other trials, such as the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group 6a and National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-33, confirm the beneficial effect of extending adjuvant hormonal therapy with an AI and identify a large group of patients who could benefit from this therapeutic option. Recent post-unblinding analyses from the MA.17 trial have also shown that there is a benefit for patients to initiate late extended adjuvant letrozole therapy, even after a prolonged period off tamoxifen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Cianfrocca
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Nabholtz J. Aromatase inhibitors in the management of early breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008; 34:1199-207. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2007] [Accepted: 02/13/2008] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
33
|
Doggrell SA. Is long-term adjuvant treatment of breast cancer with anastrozole indicated? Expert Opin Pharmacother 2008; 9:1619-22. [PMID: 18518790 DOI: 10.1517/14656566.9.9.1619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tamoxifen is the established adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer. OBJECTIVE To determine whether the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole should replace tamoxifen as the adjuvant treatment in this cancer. METHODS Two recent trials of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment were evaluated. RESULTS/CONCLUSION The Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial showed that 5 years of adjuvant therapy with anastrozole reduced recurrence of breast cancer to a greater extent than did tamoxifen. The Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) Trial 6a showed that after 5 years of adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen more benefit was achieved by continuing with adjuvant anastrozole for 3 years than no further treatment. Although the long-term adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor positive breast cancer with anastrozole is indicated, questions remain as to how long the adjuvant treatment with anastrozole should continue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheila A Doggrell
- RMIT University, School of Medical Sciences, Discipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tharmanathan P, Calvert M, Hampton J, Freemantle N. The use of interim data and Data Monitoring Committee recommendations in randomized controlled trial reports: frequency, implications and potential sources of bias. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008; 8:12. [PMID: 18366697 PMCID: PMC2279143 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2007] [Accepted: 03/20/2008] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Interim analysis of accumulating trial data is important to protect participant safety during randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data Monitoring Committees (DMCs) often undertake such analyses, but their widening role may lead to extended use of interim analysis or recommendations that could potentially bias trial results. Methods Systematic search of eight major publications: Annals of Internal Medicine, BMJ, Circulation, CID, JAMA, JCO, Lancet and NEJM, including all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) between June 2000 and May 2005 to identify RCTs that reported use of interim analysis, with or without DMC involvement. Recommendations made by the DMC or based on interim analysis were identified and potential sources of bias assessed. Independent double data extraction was performed on all included trials. Results We identified 1772 RCTs, of which 470 (27%; 470/1772) reported the use of a DMC and a further 116 (7%; 116/1772) trials reported some form of interim analysis without explicit mention of a DMC. There were 28 trials (24 with a formal DMC), randomizing a total of 79396 participants, identified as recommending changes to the trial that may have lead to biased results. In most of these, some form of sample size re-estimation was recommended with four trials also reporting changes to trial endpoints. The review relied on information reported in the primary publications and methods papers relating to the trials, higher rates of use may have occurred but not been reported. Conclusion The reported use of interim analysis and DMCs in clinical trials has been increasing in recent years. It is reassuring that in most cases recommendations were made in the interest of participant safety. However, in practice, recommendations that may lead to potentially biased trial results are being made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puvan Tharmanathan
- Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Rudas M, Lehnert M, Huynh A, Jakesz R, Singer C, Lax S, Schippinger W, Dietze O, Greil R, Stiglbauer W, Kwasny W, Grill R, Stierer M, Gnant MFX, Filipits M. Cyclin D1 expression in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen-based therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2008; 14:1767-74. [PMID: 18347178 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-4122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of our study was to determine the clinical relevance of cyclin D1 expression in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients who were treated with tamoxifen-based therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We assessed expression of cyclin D1 in surgical specimens of breast carcinoma by means of immunohistochemistry. Patients had been enrolled in either Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) Trial 05 or ABCSG Trial 06 and received tamoxifen as part of their adjuvant treatment. Overall survival and relapse-free survival were analyzed with Cox models adjusted for clinical and pathologic factors. RESULTS Cyclin D1 was expressed in 140 of 253 (55%) tumors of ABCSG Trial 05 and in 569 of 948 (60%) tumors of ABCSG Trial 06. Expression of cyclin D1 was associated with poor outcome in both cohorts. Overall survival was significantly shorter in patients with cyclin D1-positive tumors compared with patients with cyclin D1-negative tumors [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for death (ABCSG Trial 05), 2.47; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.08-5.63; P = 0.03; adjusted HR for death (ABCSG Trial 06), 1.78; 95% CI, 1.36-2.34; P < 0.0001]. Relapse-free survival was also shorter in patients with cyclin D1-positive tumors than in patients with cyclin D1-negative tumors [adjusted HR for relapse (ABCSG Trial 05), 2.73; 95% CI, 1.50-4.96; P = 0.001; adjusted HR for relapse (ABCSG Trial 06), 1.52; 95% CI, 1.14-2.04; P = 0.005]. CONCLUSION Cyclin D1 expression is an independent poor prognostic factor in women with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who received adjuvant tamoxifen-based therapy.
Collapse
|
36
|
Jakesz R, Greil R, Gnant M, Schmid M, Kwasny W, Kubista E, Mlineritsch B, Tausch C, Stierer M, Hofbauer F, Renner K, Dadak C, Rücklinger E, Samonigg H. Extended adjuvant therapy with anastrozole among postmenopausal breast cancer patients: results from the randomized Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Trial 6a. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99:1845-53. [PMID: 18073378 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djm246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 220] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trial data have shown that among breast cancer patients who were disease free after 5 years of adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen, further extended treatment with the nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor letrozole reduces breast cancer recurrence. We examined the efficacy and tolerability of extended adjuvant therapy with another aromatase inhibitor, anastrozole, for 3 years among women who had completed 5 years of adjuvant therapy. METHODS Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) Trial 6a is an extension of ABCSG Trial 6, in which hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal patients received 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, with or without the aromatase inhibitor aminoglutethimide, for the first 2 years of therapy. For ABCSG Trial 6a, patients who were disease free at the end of Trial 6 were randomly assigned to receive either 3 years of anastrozole or no further treatment. Efficacy data were analyzed with the use of a Cox proportional hazards regression model with two-sided P values and Kaplan-Meier curves, and tolerability data were estimated using logistic regression analysis with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS ABCSG Trial 6a included 856 patients. At a median follow-up of 62.3 months, women who received anastrozole (n = 387) had a statistically significantly reduced risk of recurrence (locoregional recurrence, contralateral breast cancer, or distant metastasis) compared with women who received no further treatment (n = 469; hazard ratio = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.40 to 0.96, P = .031). Anastrozole was well tolerated, and no unexpected adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS These data confirm the benefit of extending adjuvant tamoxifen therapy beyond 5 years with anastrozole compared with no further treatment. Further research is required to define the optimum length of extended adjuvant therapy and to investigate the possibility of tailoring this period to suit different disease types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raimund Jakesz
- Department of Surgery, Vienna Medical University, Vienna General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna A-1090, Austria.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Prowell TM, Stearns V. Extended Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer How Much Is Enough? J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99:1825-7. [DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djm264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
38
|
Aromatase inhibitors: past, present and future in breast cancer therapy. Med Oncol 2007; 25:113-24. [PMID: 17973095 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-007-9019-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2007] [Accepted: 10/09/2007] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Estrogen has been implicated in promoting breast cancer in a majority of women. Endocrine therapy controlling estrogen production has been the guiding principle in treating breast cancer for more than a century. A greater understanding of this disease at a molecular level has led to the development of molecules that inhibit estrogen production by inhibiting the aromatase enzyme, that is the primary source of estrogen in postmenopausal women. This review examines the evolution of aromatase inhibitor (AI) based therapies over the past three decades. The third generation aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane), which have been found to be extremely specific and effective in an adjuvant/neoadjuvant/extended adjuvant setting are discussed from a biochemical and clinical perspective. A comprehensive discussion of the past, present, and future of aromatase inhibitors is conducted in this review.
Collapse
|
39
|
Increasing protection after tamoxifen: insights from the extended adjuvant aromatase inhibitor trials. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2007; 134:7-17. [DOI: 10.1007/s00432-007-0324-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2007] [Accepted: 09/25/2007] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
40
|
Abstract
Endocrine therapy is a mainstay for the many women who develop in situ or invasive steroid receptor-positive breast cancer. The use of tamoxifen has reduced mortality in such women. Recently estrogen deprivation strategies have come under scrutiny. Here the use of aromatase inhibitors for treatment of postmenopausal endocrine-responsive breast cancer in the metastatic, adjuvant, and preoperative settings is reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Briest
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Miller WR, Bartlett JMS, Canney P, Verrill M. Hormonal therapy for postmenopausal breast cancer: the science of sequencing. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006; 103:149-60. [PMID: 17039263 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-006-9369-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2006] [Accepted: 08/07/2006] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Oestrogens play important roles in the natural history of breast cancer. Consequently, therapies have been developed to reduce oestrogen levels or to block signalling through oestrogen receptors (ER). These therapies include tamoxifen, selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and selective oestrogen receptor downregulators (SERDs). All have proven clinical efficacy in postmenopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer and can be effective in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, and in the management of advanced disease. This range of endocrine therapies offers the opportunity for prolonging benefit from treatment and delaying tumour recurrence/progression by combining the different classes of drugs or by using them sequentially. Evaluation of the potential clinical benefits of concomitant or sequential endocrine therapies should be based on considerations of efficacy and safety profiles, mechanisms of action/resistance and effects on tumour biology. Evidence from preclinical models and from randomized clinical trials in patients with postmenopausal breast cancer suggests that concomitant endocrine therapies are no more effective than AIs alone. However, using AIs either as initial therapy or sequentially after tamoxifen appears to produce more benefits beyond the use of tamoxifen alone.Currently, there are no proven algorithms for the planned, sequential use of the full range of endocrine therapies, particularly for the majority of patients who present with early breast cancer. Prospective, randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the best use of therapies in particular settings, taking into account the spectrum of molecular phenotypes in different tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William R Miller
- Breast Unit, Western General Hospital, Paderewski Building, Edinburgh , EH4 2XU, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
Results from multiple clinical trials involving aromatase inhibitors have added to the knowledge base relating to endocrine therapy of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. In the extended adjuvant setting, data from the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group 6a trial showed an advantage for anastrozole following 5 years of tamoxifen treatment, consistent with the more robust MA.17 trial that examined letrozole versus placebo following 5 years of tamoxifen treatment. The combined analysis of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group 8 trial and the German Arimidex Nolvadex 95 trial, plus the Italian Tamoxifen Anastrozole trial, have shown the advantage of switching to anastrozole over continuing the tamoxifen to complete the full 5 years of adjuvant therapy. These trials support the previously reported larger and double-blind Intergroup Exemestane Study. The Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination trial now has data out to 68 months of median follow-up showing the maintenance of a significant advantage of anastrozole over tamoxifen for disease-free survival. In this initial treatment setting, the Breast International Group 1-98 trial recently showed a significant advantage for letrozole over tamoxifen. The current debate is centered on whether the optimal strategy is to give an aromatase inhibitor initially or after several years of tamoxifen treatment. Multiple important questions remain, including the predictive value of molecular markers such as progesterone receptor, the optimal duration of aromatase inhibitor therapy, the long-term adverse effects, and the relative efficacy and toxicity of the different aromatase inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James N Ingle
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MH 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Endocrine therapy remains a cornerstone of systemic therapy for breast cancer even though it was first introduced more than a century ago. In the past three decades a large number of randomized trials involving several tens of thousands of patients have been performed to determine the role of endocrine therapy in the adjuvant setting. The results of these studies indicate that hormonal therapy should be considered the standard adjuvant systemic treatment for the majority of patients with invasive breast cancer irrespective of age, menopausal status or tumour stage. This chapter aims to describe the "state of the art" relative to the use of adjuvant endocrine therapy with special focus on a number of salient issues, including: (i) the role of ovarian ablation and luteinising hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues among pre-menopausal patients; (ii) optimal duration of tamoxifen; (iii) adjuvant therapy with third-generation, selective aromatase inhibitors; (iv) predictive biomarkers; (v) side-effects; (vi) combination endocrine therapy; (vii) future development of endocrine therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars E Rutqvist
- Karolinska Institute and Huddinge University Hospital, Södersjukhuset, SE-181 86 Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|