Thromboembolic events in gastric cancer: high incidence in patients receiving irinotecan- and bevacizumab-based therapy

The factors affecting the survivability of malignant cancer patients with deep vein thrombosis among subjects with gynecologic and non-gynecologic cancer: An ambispective cohort study

Background

Gynecologic cancer is a significant public health concern worldwide, with three of the top ten most common cancers affecting women. The increasing incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and the disproportionately poor outcomes in cancer patients necessitates urgent intervention. This study aimed to analyze the factors affecting the survivability of cancer patients with DVT, especially among gynecologic and non-gynecologic cancers.

Methods

An ambispective cohort study was conducted among gynecologic and non-gynecologic cancer patients with DVT, from January 2011 until August 2013. All subjects were observed for three months. The presence of DVT was confirmed using Doppler ultrasound. The analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The statistical significance was determined using the log-rank/Mantel-Cox test.

Results

Among 223 cancer subjects with DVT, 61.4% of the subjects developed short-term mortality. In the overall group, the survival time was significantly lower in subjects who developed immobilization status (p-value <0.001), advanced cancer stages (p-value <0.045), and infection status (p-value <0.001). In the gynecologic cancer group, the survival time was significantly lower in subjects who developed immobilization (p-value 0.007) and infection status (p-value 0.021). In the non-gynecologic cancer group, the survival time was significantly lower in subjects who developed immobilization (p-value 0.008), infection (p-value 0.002), undergo cancer surgery (p-value 0.024), and received high-risk systemic therapy (p-value 0.048). Additionally, the most common infection was pneumonia (29.6%).

Conclusions

Both gynecologic and non-gynecologic cancer patients who experienced DVT developed a high short-term mortality. Our finding of immobility, infection, advanced cancer stages, systemic therapy, and cancer surgery as risk factors that affect the survivability highlights the necessity of administering secondary prophylaxis as a standard procedure in clinical practice.

Patterns and predictors of thromboembolic events among patients with gastric cancer

Patients with gastric cancer are at higher risk for venous thromboembolic events (VTE). Majority of such patients are treated in ambulatory settings where thromboprophylaxis is not routinely offered. In this study, we report on VTE rates and search for predictors that may help identify patients at higher risk to justify VTE-prophylaxis in ambulatory settings. Patients with pathologically-confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma were retrospectively reviewed for VTE detected by imaging studies. Clinical and pathological features known to increase the risk of VTE were studied. Khorana risk assessment model was applied on patients receiving chemotherapy. A total of 671 patients; median age 55 years, were recruited. VTE were diagnosed in 150 (22.4%) patients, including 42 (28.0%) pulmonary embolism and 18 (12.0%) upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Majority (> 80%) developed VTE while in ambulatory settings and none had been on thromboprophylaxis. Rate was higher (27.1%) among 365 patients with metastatic compared to 16.7% among 306 patients with nonmetastatic disease, p = 0.001. Patients with metastatic disease who received multiple lines of chemotherapy (n = 85) had significantly higher rate of VTE compared to those who received a single line; 48.2% versus 19.4%, p < 0.001. Among the whole group, Khorana risk score, age, gender, smoking and obesity had no impact on VTE rates. Patients with metastatic gastric cancer, especially when treated with multiple lines of chemotherapy, are at a significantly higher risk of VTE. Khorana risk score had no impact on VTE rates. Thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients with metastatic gastric cancer worth studying.

Pharmacological cancer treatment and venous thromboembolism risk

Risk factors for cancer-associated thrombosis are commonly divided into three categories: patient-, cancer-, and treatment-related factors. Currently, different types of drugs are used in cancer treatment. Chemotherapy has been identified as an independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, it should be noted, that the risk of VTE is not consistent among all cytotoxic agents. In addition, different supportive care drugs, such as erythropoiesis stimulating agents or granulocyte colony stimulating factors, and hormonotherapy have been associated to an increased risk of VTE. Immunotherapy and molecular-targeted therapies have significantly changed the treatment of cancer over the past decade. The main subtypes include tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, small molecules, and immunomodulatory agents. The relationship between VTE and targeted therapies remains largely unknown.

From First Line to Sequential Treatment in the Management of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

The current management of patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) is based on systemic chemotherapy. The results of the MPACT and PRODIGE clinical trials have demonstrated that the combination of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine (GEM) as well as FOLFIRINOX regimen result in improvement in overall survival when compared to GEM alone. Treatment guidelines now recommend either one of these two regimens as first line treatment for fit patients with mPDAC. Because no head-to-head comparison between the two regimens exists, the selection of one versus the other is based on clinical criteria. The design and eligibility criteria of these two clinical trials are dissimilar, making the results of the MPACT trial more applicable to the general population of patients with mPDAC. In addition, the combination of nab-paclitaxel and GEM is better tolerated and easier to administer in clinical practice than FOLFIRINOX. Furthermore, when the regimens are studied in comparable patient populations the efficacy results are very similar. Nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5FU has recently demonstrated a significant increase in efficacy rates after a GEM-based treatment. Importantly, treatment of mPDAC should now be considered as a continuum care for patients who are fit, with second and even third line treatments. Different sequential treatment algorithms are proposed based on available data. In retrospective studies, patients who were managed with GEM-based regimens followed by fluoropyrimidine-based regimens appear to have the most favorable outcome.

Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Regulatory Mechanisms and Emerging Directions

Venous thrombosis is a common complication in cancer patients, and some cancer chemotherapies are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. The regulatory mechanisms that control thrombus formation and subsequent resolution in patients with cancer, however, are incompletely understood, and novel treatments for cancer-associated thrombosis may arise from a better understanding of such mechanisms. In this chapter, pathways that regulate cancer-associated thrombus formation are outlined, and the effects of anti-angiogenic cancer chemotherapies on venous thrombus resolution are highlighted. Potentially pro-thrombotic effects of anti-angiogenic agents are important considerations when managing the complications of venous thrombosis in cancer patients.

Venous thromboembolism and lung cancer: a review

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication of malignancies and epidemiological studies suggest that lung cancer belonged to the group of malignancies with the highest incidence rates of VTE. Risk factors for VTE in lung cancer patients are adenocarcinoma, NSCLC in comparison with SCLC, advanced disease, pneumonectomy, chemotherapy including antiangiogenic therapy. Other risk factors are pretreatment platelet counts and increased release of TF-positive microparticles. Elevated D-dimer levels do not necessarily indicate an increased risk of VTE but have been shown to be predictive for a worse clinical outcome in lung cancer patients. Mechanisms responsible for the increase in venous thrombosis in patients with lung cancer are not understood.

Currently no biomarker is recognized as a predictor for VTE in lung cancer patients.

Although several clinical trials have reported the efficacy of antithrombotic prophylaxis in patients with lung cancer who are receiving chemotherapy, further trials are needed to assess the clinical benefit since these patients are at an increased risk of developing a thromboembolism.

A phase 2, single-arm study of ramucirumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with disease progression on or intolerance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND

Multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have antitumor activity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Resistance to these agents develops frequently, and their use is often limited by intolerance. Ramucirumab is a recombinant human monoclonal antibody directed against human vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. For this study, the authors investigated the clinical efficacy and safety of ramucirumab in patients with TKI-resistant/intolerant mRCC.

METHODS

In this single-arm phase 2 trial, patients received ramucirumab 8 mg/kg every 2 weeks until they developed disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the best objective response rate (ORR); additional endpoints included the disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), the median duration of overall response, and safety.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients with RCC received ramucirumab monotherapy. Prior TKI therapy included sunitinib (59% of patients), sunitinib and sorafenib (30.8% of patients), and sorafenib (10.3% of patients). The ORR was 5.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6%-17.3%). The 12-week DCR was 64.1% (95% CI, 47.2%-78.8%). The median PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI, 4.1-9.7 months), and the median overall survival was 24.8 months (95% CI, 18.9-32.6 months). Grade 3 or higher adverse events that occurred in ≥5% of patients included grade 3 hypertension (7.7%) and proteinuria (5.1%). There was 1 on-study death from multiorgan failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the study did not meet its primary endpoint of ≥15% ORR, ramucirumab was associated with evidence of antitumor activity in patients with TKI-resistant/intolerant mRCC. Ramucirumab was safe and well tolerated.

Cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab and ranibizumab for newly diagnosed neovascular macular degeneration

PURPOSE

We sought to determine the most cost-effective treatment for patients with newly diagnosed neovascular macular degeneration: monthly or as-needed bevacizumab injections, or monthly or as-needed ranibizumab injections.

DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Hypothetical cohort of 80-year-old patients with newly diagnosed neovascular macular degeneration.

METHODS

Using a mathematical model with a 20-year time horizon, we compared the incremental cost-effectiveness of treating a hypothetical cohort of 80-year-old patients with newly diagnosed neovascular macular degeneration using monthly bevacizumab, as-needed bevacizumab, monthly ranibizumab, or as-needed ranibizumab. Data came from the Comparison of Age-related macular degeneration Treatment Trial (CATT), the Medicare Fee Schedule, and the medical literature.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental costs per QALY gained.

RESULTS

Compared with as-needed bevacizumab, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of monthly bevacizumab is $24,2 357/QALY. Monthly ranibizumab gains an additional 0.02 QALYs versus monthly bevacizumab at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of >$10 million/QALY. As-needed ranibizumab was dominated by monthly bevacizumab, meaning it was more costly and less effective. In sensitivity analyses assuming a willingness to pay of $100,000/QALY, the annual risk of serious vascular events would have to be ≥2.5 times higher with bevacizumab than that observed in the CATT trial for as-needed ranibizumab to have an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of <$100,000/QALY. In another sensitivity analysis, even if every patient receiving bevacizumab experienced declining vision by 1 category (e.g., from 20/25-20/40 to 20/50-20/80) after 2 years but every patient receiving ranibizumab retained their vision level, as-needed ranibizumab would have an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $97,340/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

Even after considering the potential for differences in risks of serious adverse events and therapeutic effectiveness, bevacizumab confers considerably greater value than ranibizumab for the treatment of neovascular macular degeneration.

Serum levels of intravitreal bevacizumab after vitrectomy, lensectomy and non-surgical controls

PURPOSE

To determine serum level differences of intravitreally-placed bevacizumab after vitrectomy and lensectomy-vitrectomy and to compare these with non-operated eyes in a rabbit model.

METHODS

Five Dutch-belted rabbits underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), five rabbits underwent pars plana lensectomy (PPL) and five rabbits served as non-surgical controls. Twelve days following the surgical procedures, each operated eye underwent an intravitreal injection consisting of 1.25 mg/0.05 mL bevacizumab. Serum levels from each rabbit were drawn on days 2, 4, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28 and 35 and were measured with ELISA immunoassay.

RESULTS

The average peak serum concentration (Cmax) was highest for the PPL group (11.33 μg ± 3.48 mL), and was similar between the PPV (5.35 μg ± 2.69 mL) and non-surgical control groups (5.35 μg ± 0.69 mL). The average time to maximal plasma concentration (Tmax) in days was earliest for the PPL group (2.8 ± 0.47), followed by the PPV (5.6 ± 0.84) and non-surgical control groups (6.4 ± 0.71). The PPL group had higher serum levels than the other two groups until day 7 that was significant only at day 2 (p < 0.0001). After day 4, there were no significant differences or trends between any of the three groups. The half-life (T1/2) was fastest for the PPL group (1.41 ± 0.21 d) followed by the PPV (2.80 ± 3.35 d) and non-surgical control groups (6.69 ± 10.4 d).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum bevacizumab levels were initially elevated following lensectomy and vitrectomy compared to non-surgical eyes following intravitreal injection. The half-life of bevacizumab was prolonged in non-surgical eyes presumably due to a slower release from the vitreous cavity.

Unilateral renal artery stenosis with renal atrophy in a patient with metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma treated with sorafenib

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been recently introduced for treatment of different malignancies. Various cardiovascular toxicities have been reported with TKIs with hypertension being the most common adverse cardiovascular event. We report a case of a 60-year-old woman who developed left renal artery stenosis associated with renal atrophy in the context of metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma treated with sorafenib. Renal atrophy was noticed during serial imaging studies to monitor cancer therapy. Clinically, she was asymptomatic without significant change in blood pressure. The glomerular filtration rate dropped from 88 ml/min/1.73 m(2) at baseline to 56 ml/min/1.73 ml/min and partially recovered to 71 ml/min/1.73 m(2) after renal artery stenting. To our knowledge, this will be the first known case of renal artery stenosis associated with TKI use. Physicians may need to investigate the possibility of developing renal artery stenosis in patients with unexplained worsening in kidney functions while on TKIs.

Cost-effectiveness of various interventions for newly diagnosed diabetic macular edema

OBJECTIVE

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies have revolutionized the treatment of clinically significant diabetic macular edema (CSDME); yet these agents are expensive, and whether they are cost-effective is unclear. The purpose of this study is to determine the most cost-effective treatment option for patients with newly diagnosed CSDME: focal laser photocoagulation alone (L), focal laser plus intravitreal ranibizumab (L+R), focal laser plus intravitreal bevacizumab (L+B), or focal laser plus intravitreal triamcinolone (L+T) injections.

DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Hypothetical cohort of 57-year-old patients with newly diagnosed CSDME.

METHODS

By using a Markov model with a 25-year time horizon, we compared the incremental cost-effectiveness of treating patients with newly diagnosed CSDME using L, L+R, L+B, or L+T. Data came from the DRCRnet randomized controlled trial, the Medicare fee schedule, and the medical literature.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental costs per QALY gained.

RESULTS

Compared with L, the incremental cost-effectiveness of L+R and L+B was $89903/QALY and $11138/QALY, respectively. L+T was dominated by L. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that, at a willingness to pay (WTP) of $50000/QALY, L was approximately 70% likely to be the preferred therapy over L+R and L+T. However, at a WTP of $100000/QALY, more than 90% of the time, L+R therapy was the preferred therapy compared with L and L+T. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, L+B was found to be the preferred therapy over L and L+T for any WTP value >$10000/QALY. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the annual risk of cerebrovascular accident would have to be at least 1.5% higher with L+B than with L+R for L+R to be the preferred treatment. In another sensitivity analysis, if patients require <8 injections per year over the remainder of the 25-year time horizon, L+B would cost <$100000/QALY, whereas L+R would be cost-effective at a WTP of $100000/QALY if patients require fewer than 0.45 injections per year after year 2.

CONCLUSIONS

With bevacizumab and ranibizumab assumed to have equivalent effectiveness and similar safety profiles when used in the management of CSDME, bevacizumab therapy confers the greatest value among the different treatment options for CSDME.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Targeted therapy for esophagogastric cancers: a review

The incidence of esophagogastric cancers is increasing rapidly in the Western population. Despite better understanding of the biology and intense research in the treatment of these cancers, the long-term survival remains poor both in the locally advanced and metastatic settings. The addition of combined modality strategies has resulted in modest improvement in 5-year survival rates. A number of biologic agents targeting epidermal-derived growth factor receptor, vascular endothelial derived growth factor and its receptor, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) are being currently evaluated in Phase II and III clinical trials. Some of these, like trastuzumab, cetuximab, and bevacizumab, have shown promising results. This review provides a brief overview of the recent developments in biologic agents for the treatment of esophagogastric cancers.

Treating venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with cancer. Although much is known about the factors that contribute to VTE risk, pre-emptive therapy in high-risk populations is clearly indicated in only a few clinical situations. Low-molecular-weight heparin is still the recommended class of anticoagulants for cancer-associated VTE. Management of VTE in patients with renal failure, hemorrhagic brain metastases, thrombocytopenia and coagulopathy remains challenging with few safe and effective alternatives. Novel oral agents are currently being investigated and may play a role in the future in the treatment of cancer-associated VTE.

Semuloparin for thromboprophylaxis in patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism. Limited data support the clinical benefit of antithrombotic prophylaxis.

METHODS

In this double-blind, multicenter trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the ultra-low-molecular-weight heparin semuloparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer. Patients with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors who were beginning to receive a course of chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous semuloparin, 20 mg once daily, or placebo until there was a change of chemotherapy regimen. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of any symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, any nonfatal pulmonary embolism, and death related to venous thromboembolism. Clinically relevant bleeding (major and nonmajor) was the main safety outcome.

RESULTS

The median treatment duration was 3.5 months. Venous thromboembolism occurred in 20 of 1608 patients (1.2%) receiving semuloparin, as compared with 55 of 1604 (3.4%) receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21 to 0.60; P<0.001), with consistent efficacy among subgroups defined according to the origin and stage of cancer and the baseline risk of venous thromboembolism. The incidence of clinically relevant bleeding was 2.8% and 2.0% in the semuloparin and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.89 to 2.21). Major bleeding occurred in 19 of 1589 patients (1.2%) receiving semuloparin and 18 of 1583 (1.1%) receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.99). Incidences of all other adverse events were similar in the two study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Semuloparin reduces the incidence of thromboembolic events in patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer, with no apparent increase in major bleeding. (Funded by Sanofi; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00694382.).

The effect of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents on peripheral wound healing in a rabbit model

Purpose

To investigate the effect of intravitreal pegaptanib, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab on blood-vessel formation during cutaneous wound healing in a rabbit model and to compare this effect to placebo controls.

Methods

Forty New Zealand albino rabbits underwent full thickness cutaneous wounds using 6-mm dermatologic punch biopsies. The rabbits were assigned to four groups of ten, each receiving intravitreal injections of pegaptanib, bevacizumab, ranibizumab, or no injection (untreated controls). Five rabbits from each group underwent wound harvesting on day 7 and five from each group on day 14. The skin samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE), Masson’s trichrome (MT), and CD34 for vascular endothelial cells. Semiquantitative evaluation of HE- and MT-stained slides was performed by one pathologist. Quantitative assessment of mean neovascularization (MNV) scores was obtained from five contiguous biopsy margin 400× fields of CD34-stained sections by four independent observers.

Results

Week 1 MNV scores in CD-34 stained sections were: untreated controls: 11.51 ± 4.36; bevacizumab: 7.41 ± 2.82 (P = 0.013); ranibizumab: 8.71 ± 4.08 (P = 0.071); and pegaptanib: 10.15 ± 5.59 (P = 0.378). Week 2 MNV data were: untreated controls: 6.14 ± 2.25; bevacizumab: 7.25 ± 2.75 (P = 0.471); ranibizumab: 4.53 ± 3.12 (P = 0.297); and, pegaptanib: 6.35 ± 3.09 (P = 0.892). Interobserver variability using intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.961.

Conclusions

At week 1, all three anti-VEGF agents had suppressed MNV scores compared to controls. Although not statistically significant, there was an inhibitory trend, particularly with bevacizumab and ranibizumab. These effects were diminished at 2 weeks, reflecting a transition between the proliferative and remodeling phases of wound healing.

Novel immunotherapeutic strategies of gastric cancer treatment

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most common cancer and the second most frequent cause of cancer-related deaths, accounting for 10.4% of cancer deaths worldwide. Despite the improvements, estimated cure rates for patients with advanced stages remain poor, and in the metastatic setting, chemotherapy is the mainstay of palliative therapy and results in objective response rates (ORRs) of only 20-40% and median overall survivals (OS) of 8-10 months. Therefore, many investigators believe that the potential for making significant progress lies in understanding and exploiting the molecular biology of these tumors to investigate new therapeutic strategies to combat GC, such as specific immunotherapy. In this paper, we analyze the different approaches used for immune-based (especially dendritic and T cells) therapies to gastric cancer treatment and discuss the results obtained in preclinical models as in clinical trials.

Association of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 with pulmonary hypertension and haemolysis in sickle cell disease

The pathophysiology of pulmonary hypertension (PHT) in sickle cell disease (SCD) is probably multifactorial. Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFLT-1) is a member of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) family. By adhering to and inhibiting VEGF and placenta growth factor, it induces endothelial dysfunction. We sought to evaluate the association of sFLT-1 with clinical complications of SCD. We confirmed that sFLT-1 was significantly elevated in SCD patients compared to healthy, race-matched control subjects. The level of sFLT-1 was significantly higher in patients with PHT, but no association was observed between sFLT-1 and the frequency of acute pain episodes or history of acute chest syndrome. sFLT-1 was correlated with various measures of haemolysis, erythropoietin and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. By inducing endothelial dysfunction, sFLT-1 may contribute to the pathogenesis of SCD-associated PHT, although this effect does not appear to be independent of haemolysis.

Bevacizumab in combination with FOLFIRI chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: an assessment of safety and efficacy in the province of Newfoundland and Labrador

BACKGROUND

In 2005, bevacizumab was approved by Health Canada for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Newfoundland and Labrador was one of the first Canadian provinces to fund this agent in combination with FOLFIRI (irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin) chemotherapy. In this analysis, the entire provincial bevacizumab sample for the first 2 years was assessed for overall safety and efficacy.

METHODS

The medical records of 43 patients with mCRC who had received FOLFIRI with bevacizumab were identified and reviewed. The longitudinal data collection format that was adopted assessed occurrences of adverse events after each cycle of treatment. Toxicity outcomes such as gastrointestinal (GI) perforations, bleeding, diarrhea, myelosuppression, proteinuria, and venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) were collected and graded using the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. Time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Overall, the 43 study patients received 398 cycles of anticancer therapy (median: 6 cycles; range: 1-24 cycles). No gi perforations were identified. However, 4 bleeding events occurred (9.3%), 3 requiring permanent discontinuation of bevacizumab. Also, 6 grade 3 or 4 VTEs occurred (14.0%), 3 of which required a hospital admission. In addition, grades 3 and 4 diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, and proteinuria showed cumulative incidences of 11.6%, 2.3%, and 2.3% respectively. Median TTF was 6.3 months; median os was 24.4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab in combination with FOLFIRI appears to be well tolerated, and efficacy is consistent with trial reports. However, patients should be closely monitored to avoid potentially serious events such as bleeding and VTEs.

A clinical cardiology perspective of thrombophilias

Thrombophilias, an inherited and/or acquired predisposition to vascular thrombosis beyond hemostatic needs are common in cardiovascular medicine and include systemic disorders such as coronary atherosclerosis, atrial fibrillation, exogenous obesity, metabolic syndrome, collagen vascular disease, human immunodeficiency virus, blood replacement therapy and several commonly used medications. A contemporary approach to patients with suspected thrombophilias, in addition to a very selective investigation for gain-of-function and loss-of-function gene mutations affecting thromboresistance, must consider prevalent diseases and management decisions encountered regularly by cardiologists in clinical practice. An appropriate recognition of common disease states as thrombophilias will also stimulate platforms for much needed scientific investigation.

Thromboprophylaxis during chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancer

Venous thromboembolism is a common and potentially fatal complication in patients with advanced cancer. In these patients chemotherapy has been identified as an independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism. The annual incidence of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients who receive chemotherapy is estimated to be about 10%. This risk increases up to 15-20% depending on type and combination of anticancer agents. The occurrence of venous thromboembolic events in cancer patients is associated with a poor prognosis. The benefit of antithrombotic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients who receive chemotherapy has been recently evaluated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial (the PROTECHT study). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the low molecular weight heparin nadroparin in the prevention of venous and arterial thromboembolic events during chemotherapy. The results of the PROTECHT study demonstrated that nadroparin reduces by 50% the rate of thromboembolic events in ambulatory patients with metastatic or locally advanced cancer while they receiving chemotherapy. The antithrombotic effect was more evident in patients with lung and gastrointestinal cancer. In future studies the clinical benefit of antithrombotic prophylaxis should be evaluated in cancer patients at particularly high risk for thromboembolism.

Risk factors for developing a new venous thromboembolism in ambulatory patients with non-hematologic malignancies and impact on survival for gastroesophageal malignancies

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism(VTE) is a significant, common comorbidity of cancer patients associated with increased mortality. We evaluated the incidence and risk factors for developing a new VTE in ambulatory cancer patients while they were receiving therapy for advanced cancer. We also examined the affect of developing a new VTE on survival for patients with gastroesophageal malignancies.

METHODS

All patients with non-hematologic malignancies who were treated using investigator-initiated therapeutic protocols at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) from 2003 through to 2005 were identified for this cohort study. The occurrence of VTE was prospectively recorded in an actively managed clinical research database. Baseline laboratory parameters, treatment details and tumor type were correlated with VTE risk and patient survival.

RESULTS

115 out of 2120 patients being treated for advanced malignancy developed a new VTE (12.8 VTEs/100 person-years). In multivariate analysis, a diagnosis of gastroesophageal cancer (hazard ratio (HR), 2.76 (1.41-5.38); P=0.003), pancreatic cancer (HR, 2.26 (1.06-4.80); P=0.05), use of white cell growth factors (HR 1.69(1.09-2.64); P=0.02) and irinotecan therapy (HR, 1.89 (1.29-3.59); P=0.05) were independently associated with VTE development. Hemoglobin >10 g dL(-1) (HR, 0.52 (0.3-0.91); P=0.02) and albumin ≥ 4 g dL(-1) (HR, 0.61 (0.39-0.94); P=0.024) were associated with reduced VTE risk. The unadjusted HR for death among ambulatory gastroesophageal cancer patients with VTE is 0.89 (0.61-1.3), P=0.53. After adjusting for confounding risk factors associated with survival, the HR for death associated with VTE is 0.78 (0.5-1.2), P=0.25.

CONCLUSION

Upper gastrointestinal malignancies are independently associated with the development of a new VTE, implicating tumor biology in VTE development. Even after adjusting for prognostic factors, we were unable to demonstrate an adverse impact on survival due to the new development of VTE amongst patients with active gastroesophageal malignancy receiving therapy.

Epidemiology and pathophysiology of cancer-associated thrombosis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in patients with malignant disease. First recognised by Bouillard in 1823 and later described by Trousseau in 1844, multiple studies have since provided considerable evidence for a clinical association between VTE and cancer. Across all cancers, the risk for VTE is elevated 7-fold; in certain malignancies, the risk for VTE may be increased up to 28-fold. Venous thromboembolism is the second leading cause of death in patients with cancer; among survivors, complications commonly include recurrent VTE and post-thrombotic syndrome, and (more rarely) chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, which are costly, and have a profound impact on the patient's quality of life. Tumour cells can activate blood coagulation through multiple mechanisms, including production of procoagulant, fibrinolytic, and proaggregating activities, release of proinflammatory and proangiogenic cytokines, and interacting directly with host vascular and blood cells (e.g., endothelial cells, leukocytes, and platelets) through adhesion molecules. Increasing evidence suggests that elements of the haemostatic system also have a direct role in eliciting or enhancing angiogenesis, cell survival, and metastasis. Despite the problem posed by VTE in the setting of cancer, it is evident that a significant number of oncologists do not recognise the link between cancer, its treatment, and thrombogenesis. On 22 May 2009, a group of UK-based physicians met in London, UK, to evaluate recent data on cancer thrombosis. This article (1 of 4) briefly reviews key data on the epidemiology and pathophysiology of VTE as a context for a discussion and consensus statement developed by meeting attendees, on the implications of this information for UK clinical practice.

Thromboembolic events in patients with colorectal cancer receiving the combination of bevacizumab-based chemotherapy and erythropoietin stimulating agents

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the incidence of thromboembolic events (venous and arterial) increases when bevacizumab-based chemotherapy and erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESAs) are used in combination versus alone.

METHODS

A retrospective, pilot study of 79 colorectal cancer patients treated with chemotherapy were divided into 3 groups: bevacizumab (n = 28), ESA (n = 21), and bevacizumab plus ESA (n = 28). The primary end point was the incidence of thromboembolic events. Secondary endpoints included median time-to-event; effect of anticoagulation; and association with concurrent chemotherapy, baseline risk factors, hemoglobin, and performance status.

RESULTS

The incidence of thromboembolic events was 11% in the bevacizumab group, 23.8% in the ESA group, and 30% in the combination group (P = 0.194). The median time-to-event was 7.5, 3.5, and 2.5 months, respectively (P = 0.060). The 5 month difference in time-to-event between the bevacizumab group and combination group was significant (P = 0.045). When combining all patients, ESA treatment, prior venous thromboembolic event (VTE), obesity, cardiac disease, and use of exogenous hormones were strong predictors for thromboembolic events. Prior VTE was a strong predictor in those patients in the combination group.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of thromboembolic events was increased with the combination of bevacizumab plus ESA compared with either agent alone with chemotherapy. Median time-to-event in the combination group was significantly shorter compared with the bevacizumab group. Prior VTE, cardiac disease, obesity, and exogenous hormone use should be taken in consideration when using the combination of bevacizumab and ESAs.

Novel investigational drugs for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer still represents a leading cause of death worldwide. Several cytotoxic agents have demonstrated activity and combination regimens improve progression-free survival, overall survival and quality of life. Nevertheless, now there is no standard therapy for advanced gastric cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of new investigational agents.

METHODS

We analysed Phase I, II and III studies that evaluated tailored drugs directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the c-erbB2, the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), the matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR).

CONCLUSION

Data from Phase II trials indicate the potential of improved efficacy of chemotherapy when administered in combination with bevacizumab and cetuximab. Trastuzumab results are ongoing, while marimastat has not obtained clinical developments even if it has demonstrated to be an active drug in this setting of patients.

Malignancy and venous thrombosis in the critical care patient

Venous thromboembolic disease has significant clinical consequences. There are few data available to guide its management in the critically ill cancer patient, perhaps the most complex and challenging patient population encountered. Multiple interacting and often unique factors contribute to both the thrombotic and bleeding risk in such patients. Anticoagulants are effective for prophylaxis and treatment; heparins are the best-studied agents in this setting. Whether unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin is the most appropriate agent depends on the exact clinical situation. Prevention of venous thrombosis is a well-recognized health priority, but thromboprophylaxis remains underused, especially in some high-risk populations such as cancer patients. Enhanced recognition of the thrombotic risk factors and a better understanding of the risks and benefits of anticoagulant therapy are necessary to improve utilization, and much research is needed to address how to implement effective thromboprophylaxis strategies. Careful consideration of the patient's overall prognosis is necessary to develop safe, effective, and individualized approaches to treating thrombosis.

Esophagogastric cancer: targeted agents

Because of the poor prognosis for patients with locally advanced and metastatic esophageal, gastroesophageal junction and gastric cancers, increasing attention has focused on the integration of targeted agents into current therapies. The molecular targets of these agents include epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or its receptor, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and components and regulators of the cell cycle. In this review article, we briefly discuss pre-clinical data and the rationale for targeting these pathways and summarize the results of clinical trials to-date, including completed and ongoing phase III evaluations.

Venous thromboembolism in malignant gliomas

Malignant gliomas are associated with a very high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). While many clinical risk factors have previously been described in brain tumor patients, the risk of VTE associated with newer anti-angiogenic therapies such as bevacizumab in these patients remains unclear. When VTE occurs in this patient population, concern regarding the potential for intracranial hemorrhage complicates management decisions regarding anticoagulation, and these patients have a worse prognosis than their VTE-free counterparts. Risk stratification models identifying patients at high risk of developing VTE along with predictive plasma biomarkers may guide the selection of eligible patients for primary prevention with pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. Recent studies exploring disordered coagulation, such as increased expression of tissue factor (TF), and tumorigenic molecular signaling may help to explain the increased risk of VTE in patients with malignant gliomas.

Phase 1 study of the investigational, oral angiogenesis inhibitor motesanib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and pharmacokinetics of motesanib (AMG 706), a small-molecule antagonist of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and c-Kit in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

Patients were administered motesanib orally once daily (QD) at doses of 50, 100, and 125 mg QD. The total study duration for each patient consisted of three cycles of 28 days per cycle. The primary endpoints were the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), estimation of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and assessment of pharmacokinetic parameters of motesanib.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were enrolled and received motesanib. No DLTs were observed and, therefore, the MTD was not reached. Motesanib had acceptable toxicity at doses up to 125 mg QD. The pharmacokinetics of motesanib appears to be dose proportional. No objective responses per RECIST were observed. However, all 15 patients achieved stable disease, and five patients had durable (>24 weeks) stable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate that motesanib is tolerable in Japanese patients at doses up to 125 mg QD.

Thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin in medical patients with cancer

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication of cancer and cancer treatment and is associated with multiple clinical consequences, including recurrent VTE, bleeding, and an increase in the risk of death. Although the risks associated with VTE have been well recognized in surgical cancer patients, there is also considerable and increasing risk in medical cancer patients. VTE risk factors in medical cancer patients include the type and stage of cancer, major comorbid illnesses, current hospitalization, active chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and antiangiogenic agents. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are recommended commonly for the prevention of VTE in hospitalized cancer patients and in higher risk ambulatory cancer patients because of their favorable risk-to-benefit profile. These agents have demonstrated effectiveness in both the primary and secondary prevention of VTE in medical cancer patients. Extended-duration anticoagulant therapy is often recommended to reduce the risk of VTE recurrence in patients with cancer. LMWHs are often used for long-term prophylaxis because of a reduced need for coagulation monitoring, few major bleeding episodes, and once-daily dosing. Despite clinical and practical benefits, a substantial proportion of medical cancer patients do not receive VTE prophylaxis. To improve the appropriate prevention and treatment of VTE in cancer patients, guidelines have been published recently by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Widespread dissemination and application of these guidelines are encouraged to improve the appropriate use of these agents and to improve clinical outcomes in medical cancer patients at risk for VTE and its complications.

Nadroparin for the prevention of thromboembolic events in ambulatory patients with metastatic or locally advanced solid cancer receiving chemotherapy: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials are needed to assess the clinical benefit of antithrombotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer who are receiving chemotherapy, since these patients are at an increased risk of developing a thromboembolism. We did a trial to assess the clinical benefit of the low-molecular-weight heparin nadroparin for the prophylaxis of thromboembolic events in ambulatory patients receiving chemotherapy for metastatic or locally advanced solid cancer.

METHODS

Between October, 2003, and May, 2007, ambulatory patients with lung, gastrointestinal, pancreatic, breast, ovarian, or head and neck cancer were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive subcutaneous injections of nadroparin (3800 IU anti-Xa once a day, n=779) or placebo (n=387), in a 2:1 ratio. Study treatment was given for the duration of chemotherapy up to a maximum of 4 months. The primary study outcome was the composite of symptomatic venous or arterial thromboembolic events, as assessed by an independent adjudication committee. All randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were included in the efficacy and safety analyses (modified intention-to-treat population). The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT 00951574.

FINDINGS

1150 patients were included in the primary efficacy and safety analyses: 769 patients in the nadroparin group and 381 patients in the placebo group. 15 (2.0%) of 769 patients treated with nadroparin and 15 (3.9%) of 381 patients treated with placebo had a thromboembolic event (single-sided p=0.02). Five (0.7%) of 769 patients in the nadroparin group and no patients in the placebo group had a major bleeding event (two-sided p=0.18). The incidences of minor bleeding were 7.4% (57 of 769) with nadroparin and 7.9% (30 of 381) with placebo. There were 121 (15.7%) serious adverse events in the nadroparin goup and 67 (17.6%) serious adverse events in the placebo group.

INTERPRETATION

Nadroparin reduces the incidence of thromboembolic events in ambulatory patients with metastatic or locally advanced cancer who are receiving chemotherapy. Future studies should focus on patients who are at a high risk for thromboembolic events.

FUNDING

Italfarmaco SpA, Milan, Italy.

Low incidence of clinically apparent thromboembolism in Korean patients with multiple myeloma treated with thalidomide

The frequency of thromboembolic events (TE) in Caucasian patients with multiple myeloma (MM) receiving thalidomide as the initial treatment has been reported to be 10~58% without prophylactic anticoagulation. Korean MM patients treated with thalidomide were studied to determine the frequency of TE and associated risk factors. A retrospective medical record review of the Korean MM registry from 25 centers in Korea between 2003 and 2007 was performed. We assessed the incidence of arterial and venous TE and the associated clinical parameters. Three hundred and sixty MM patients (median age 61 years, range 32-88 years) received thalidomide treatment. Fourteen patients (3.9%) developed TE: 12 had venous and two had arterial locations. The sites for the venous TE included lungs (seven), lower extremities (four), upper extremities (one), and neck (one). Arterial TE developed in cerebral and peripheral arteries each. No single clinical parameter such as prerequisite for the metabolic syndrome, disease status, and treatment regimen were predictive for the development of TE. The frequency of TE in patients who received thalidomide as initial therapy (7/155) was not different from those who received thalidomide for progressive or relapsed disease (7/205, p = 0.592). The frequency of TE during thalidomide treatment in Korean patients with MM was low. No significant clinical factor was found to be a risk factor. The subgroup requiring thromboprophylaxis among the Korean patients with MM, receiving thalidomide, needs to be clarified.

Thrombotic events in patients with cancer receiving antiangiogenesis agents

Tumor-associated neoangiogenesis has recently become a suitable target for antineoplastic drug development. In this overview, we discuss specific drug-associated hemostatic complications, the already known pathogenetic mechanisms involved, and the effect of varying antithrombotic strategies. Multiple agents with angiogenic inhibitory capacity (thalidomide, lenalidomide, bevacizumab, sunitinib, sorafenib, and sirolimus) have obtained US Food and Drug Administration approval, and many others have entered clinical trials. Arterial and venous thromboembolism and hemorrhage have emerged as significant toxicities associated with the use of angiogenesis inhibitors. We present a detailed analysis of the literature on thrombotic complication of antiangiogenic drugs. Close attention to hemostatic complications during antiangiogenic treatment is warranted. Further studies are required to better understand the pathophysiologic mechanisms involved and to define a safe prophylactic strategy.

Multiple effects of bevacizumab in angiogenesis: implications for its use in age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

This study aimed to elucidate the precise effects of bevacizumab in all steps in the neovascularization process in endothelial cells.

METHODS

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were incubated with bevacizumab at concentrations within the clinically established range or with identical amounts of excipient. Cell cytotoxicity (evaluated by MTT assay), proliferation (by BrdU incorporation assay), apoptosis (by TUNEL assay), migration (by double-chamber assay) and vessel assembly in matrigel-coated plates were assessed in vitro. Mouse plug matrigel assays were performed to confirm in vitro results.

RESULTS

Incubation of HUVECs with bevacizumab did not present cytotoxicity. Concentrations comparable with those after intravitreal doses of bevacizumab significantly reduced proliferation and migration capacity, and increased apoptotic rates in these cells. In addition, bevacizumab led to a significant decrease in the assembly of capillary-like structures on matrigel assay in comparison with excipient-treated cells. Further substantiating these in vitro findings, bevacizumab also inhibited angiogenesis in a mouse plug matrigel assay, as evaluated by haemoglobin content levels.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that clinical doses of bevacizumab are able to prevent several steps of the angiogenic process. Bevacizumab is thus currently recommended for treating disorders that present augmented angiogenesis.

Understanding and managing the possible adverse effects associated with bevacizumab

PURPOSE

The adverse events associated with bevacizumab therapy are characterized, and the underlying pathophysiology, risk factors, frequency, and management of these events are described.

SUMMARY

The adverse events associated with bevacizumab include hypertension, proteinuria, thromboembolism, impaired wound healing, bleeding, perforation, reversible leukoencephalopathy syndrome, skin rash, and infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions. Patients should be monitored for these events throughout the course of bevacizumab therapy. Hypertension is by far the most common adverse event associated with bevacizumab. Blood pressure should be routinely monitored, and hypertension should be medically managed with antihypertensive drugs as deemed appropriate during bevacizumab therapy. Patients should be monitored for proteinuria every three to four weeks, and bevacizumab should be discontinued with persistent proteinuria of >2+. Thromboembolic events, impaired wound healing, bowel and nasal septum perforation, and bleeding share similar pathophysiology. Thromboembolic events should be managed in accordance with guidelines established by the American College of Chest Physicians, and bevacizumab should be discontinued for new life-threatening venous or arterial thromboembolism. To minimize the risk of bleeding or impaired wound healing, bevacizumab should be started at least four weeks after surgery or discontinued for at least six to eight weeks before elective surgery. The management of other adverse events is more anecdotal, with relatively few reports of their occurrence with bevacizumab.

CONCLUSION

Many of the potential serious complications of bevacizumab can be averted by close monitoring of patient-specific variables, which should be measured at baseline and then at predetermined intervals throughout the course of therapy to maximize patient safety.

Thrombosis associated with angiogenesis inhibitors

Recent advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of cancer have led to the introduction of a variety of biological agents with novel mechanisms of action into clinical trials and even into clinical practice. In particular, tumour-associated neoangiogenesis has become a major target for this new class of antineoplastic agents. Five anti-angiogenic agents (thalidomide, lenalidomide, bevacizumab, sunitinib, sorafenib) have already obtained US Food and Drug Administration approval for clinical use, and many others have entered clinical trials. Many new biological agents with anti-angiogenic properties appear to be associated with an increased risk for thrombosis and, paradoxically, bleeding. Although the mechanisms underlying the increased thromboembolic risk remain ill defined, the main hypothesis is that perturbation of tumour-associated endothelial cells can switch the endothelium from a naturally anticoagulant surface to a prothrombotic surface, thus mediating the activation of systemic coagulation in cancer patients, who are already more susceptible to thromboembolism due to their underlying disease. The toxicity profile differs between the anti-angiogenic agents. Thalidomide, lenalidomide, semaxibin (SU5416) and prinomastat have produced more venous thromboembolic complications, whereas bevacizumab, sunitinib, sorafenib and ZD6126 have been associated with a higher risk of arterial thromboembolism and, in particular, myocardial ischaemia. The observation of these vascular toxicities suggests the need to establish, in randomized clinical trials, the usefulness of thrombosis prophylaxis when anti-angiogenic agents are used in cancer patients, especially when associated with chemotherapy. In addition, careful reporting of haemostatic complications during treatment with new anti-angiogenic drugs is warranted.

Clinical outcomes and factors predicting development of venous thromboembolic complications in patients with advanced refractory cancer in a Phase I Clinic: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in patients with advanced cancer and may influence patient eligibility for clinical studies, quality of life, and survival. We reviewed the medical records of 220 consecutive patients seen in the Phase I Clinical Trials Program at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center to determine the frequency of VTE, associated characteristics, and clinical outcomes. Twenty-three (10.5%) patients presenting to the Phase I Clinic had a history of VTE; 26 (11.8%) patients subsequently developed VTE, with a median follow-up of 8.4 months. These included nine (39%) patients with and 17 (8.6%) without a history of VTE (P < 0.0001). The most common events were deep venous thromboses of the extremities and pulmonary emboli. The median survival of patients with and without a history of VTE was 4.7 and 10.9 months, respectively (P = 0.0002). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a history of VTE (P < 0.0001), pancreatic cancer (P = 0.007), and platelet count >440 x 10(9)/L (P = 0.026) predicted new VTE episodes. In conclusion, this retrospective analysis demonstrated that a history or new development of VTE was noted in 40 (18%) of 220 patients seen in our Phase I Clinic. A prognostic score that can be used to predict time to development of and frequency of VTE is proposed. Am. J. Hematol. 2009. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Thromboembolism in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer treated with anthracycline, platinum, and fluoropyrimidine combination chemotherapy: a report from the UK National Cancer Research Institute Upper Gastrointestinal Clinical Studies Group

PURPOSE

Data concerning the prevalence of and outcomes related to thromboembolic events (TEs) in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer who are undergoing chemotherapy are limited.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, exploratory analysis of TEs in a randomized, controlled trial of 964 patients recruited between 2000 and 2005 and treated with epirubicin/platinum/fluoropyrimidine combination chemotherapy for advanced/locally advanced gastroesophageal cancer. Regimens were epirubicin (E), cisplatin (C), fluorouracil (F; ECF); E, C, capecitabine (X; ECX); E, F, oxaliplatin (O; EOF); and EOX. Continuously infused F was administered via a central venous access device (CVAD) with 1 mg of warfarin for thromboprophylaxis. The principal outcome was the incidence of TEs (venous and arterial) in the whole treated patient cohort, according to chemotherapy, associated with CVADs and TE-related prognoses.

RESULTS

The incidences of any, of venous, and of arterial TEs among 964 treated patients were 12.1% (95% CI, 10.7 to 14.3), 10.1% (95% CI, 8.3 to 12.3), and 2.2% (95% CI, 1.4 to 3.4) respectively. There were fewer TEs in the O compared with the cisplatin groups (EOF/EOX v ECF/ECX: 7.6% v 15.1%; P = .0003). C was identified as a risk factor for TE in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.76; P = .001). There was no difference in the incidence of TEs for the F group compared with the capecitabine groups. The incidence of CVAD-related thrombosis was 7.0% (ECF/EOF arms). Overall survival was worse for patients who experienced TEs versus no TEs (median survival, 7.4 v 10.5 months; HR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.99; P = .043).

CONCLUSION

This analysis has prospectively quantified the incidence/pattern of TEs among patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer who were treated with four triplet regimens, has demonstrated a differential thrombogenic effect according to platinum use, and has noted a poorer outcome associated with TE during treatment. Chemotherapy-related TE should contribute to the risk/benefit assessment of treatment.

Hemostatic complications of angiogenesis inhibitors in cancer patients

Tumor vasculature and tumor-associated neo-angiogenesis have recently become major targets for rational drug design of antineoplastic agents. Five such agents with angiogenesis inhibiting activity (thalidomide, lenalidomide, bevacizumab, sunitinib, sorafenib) have already obtained US Food and Drug Administration approval for clinical use and many others have entered clinical trials. Vascular complications, including venous or arterial thromboembolism and hemorrhage, have emerged as relevant toxicities in several clinical trials with angiogenesis inhibitors. Given the well-known interplay between the blood clotting system, angiogenesis, and tumor growth, a better understanding of the impact of these new drugs on overall hemostatic balance is required. In this brief overview, we discuss the incidence of hemostatic complications, the likely pathogenetic mechanisms involved, and the critical need to establish in randomized clinical trials the usefulness of thrombosis prophylaxis to prevent these complications. Careful documentation of hemostatic complications during treatment with each of the new antiangiogenic drugs is warranted. Further studies are urgently required to better define the causal association of these new agents with hemostatic complications and to establish the best prophylactic strategy.