Efficacy of sunitinib and sorafenib in metastatic papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

ALK-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (ALK-RCC): Evaluation of histomorphological and immunohistochemical features by analysis of 276 renal cell carcinoma cases in Turkey

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement-associated renal cell carcinoma (ALK-RCC) is characterized by ALK fusion at chromosome 2p23. It has recently been included as a recognized entity with the 5th edition of the WHO classification urinary and male genital tumor. However, our knowledge about ALK-RCC is limited due to the small number of reported cases. In our study, we aimed to contribute the histomorphological and immunohistochemical features of ALK-rearranged renal cell carcinoma cases. We reviewed 276 cases diagnosed as RCC in order to detect ALKRCCs.We used immunohistochemistry to screen ALK rearrangement and then confirmed the ALK rearrangement by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method. ALK was immunohistochemically positive in 8 of 276 cases. ALK rearrangement was detected by FISH in 3 of 8 cases. These cases were previously diagnosed as clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CRCC), papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC), and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC). Their histomorphological findings were diverse, and all three cases exhibited different immunohistochemical findings. Survival of these patients ranged between 6 and 24 months. ALK immunohistochemical findings were also different in each case as perinuclear, weak cytoplasmic, and membranous.ALK RCCs appear to be very rare tumors with heterogeneous histomorphological and immunohistochemical features. Although immunohistochemistry may be useful to detect ALK positivity, genetic evaluation is required to confirm the diagnosis. With identifying ALK-RCCs, ALK inhibitors, which are currently used in the treatment of lung adenocarcinomas, can be used as a targeted therapy option in ALK-RCCs.

Socioeconomic determinants of racial disparities in survival outcomes among patients with renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Racially driven outcomes in cancer are challenging to study. Studies evaluating the impact of race in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) outcomes are inconsistent and unable to disentangle socioeconomic disparities from inherent biological differences. We therefore seek to investigate socioeconomic determinants of racial disparities with respect to overall survival (OS) when comparing Black and White patients with RCC.

METHODS

We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients diagnosed with RCC between 2004 and 2017 with complete clinicodemographic data. Patients were examined across various stages (all, cT1aN0M0, and cM1) and subtypes (all, clear cell, or papillary). We performed Cox proportional hazards regression with adjustment for socioeconomic and disease factors.

RESULTS

There were 386,589 patients with RCC, of whom 46,507 (12.0%) were Black. Black patients were generally younger, had more comorbid conditions, less likely to be insured, in a lower income quartile, had lower rates of high school completion, were more likely to have papillary RCC histology, and more likely to be diagnosed at a lower stage of RCC than their white counterparts. By stage, Black patients demonstrated a 16% (any stage), 22.5% (small renal mass [SRM]), and 15% (metastatic) higher risk of mortality than White patients. Survival differences were also evident in histology-specific subanalyses. Socioeconomic factors played a larger role in predicting OS among patients with SRMs than in patients with metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Black patients with RCC demonstrate worse survival outcomes compared to White patients across all stages. Socioeconomic disparities between races play a significant role in influencing survival in RCC.

An Overview of Systemic Targeted Therapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma, with a Focus on Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma and Brain Metastases

The most commonly diagnosed malignancy of the urinary system is represented by renal cell carcinoma. Various subvariants of RCC were described, with a clear-cell type prevailing in about 85% of all RCC tumors. Patients with metastases from renal cell carcinoma did not have many effective therapies until the end of the 1980s, as long as hormonal therapy and chemotherapy were the only options available. The outcomes were unsatisfactory due to the poor effectiveness of the available therapeutic options, but then interferon-alpha and interleukin-2 showed treatment effectiveness, providing benefits but only for less than half of the patients. However, it was not until 2004 that targeted therapies emerged, prolonging the survival rate. Currently, new technologies and strategies are being developed to improve the actual efficacy of available treatments and their prognostic aspects. This article summarizes the mechanisms of action, importance, benefits, adverse events of special interest, and efficacy of immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, with a focus on brain metastases.

Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Review of Prospective Clinical Trials

OPINION STATEMENT

PRCC is a unique histologic entity compared to other forms of renal cell carcinoma, harboring distinct molecular drivers. The WHO 2022 classification is further emphasizing the molecular biology by making molecular classifications of PRCC subclassifications and discontinuing the morphologic type 1 and type 2 classification system. We agree with this functional classification system and encourage all future clinical trials to only include patients with similar diagnosis instead of conducting basket trials (including all nccRCC together) which limits the scientific value of those conclusions. Based on recent disease-specific clinical trial (S1500, PAPMET), the current standard of care for patients with treatment naïve PRCC is cabozantinib. Prospective clinical trials clearly establish that immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has meaningful activity in PRCC. The data to date include only single-arm clinical trials of combination immune therapy. Despite the positive and encouraging results, we need validation through randomized studies because of the overestimation of effect size seen in single-arm trials. These randomized trials are currently underway and enrolling. We strongly encourage all physicians to support these studies and enroll patients with PRCC to these trials in order to continue improving the standard of care.

Identification of Five Tumor Antigens for Development and Two Immune Subtypes for Personalized Medicine of mRNA Vaccines in Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma

Increasing evidence has revealed the promise of mRNA-type cancer vaccines as a new direction for cancer immune treatment in several solid tumors, however, its application in papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify potential tumor antigens and robust immune subtypes for the development and appropriate use of anti-PRCC mRNA vaccines, respectively. Raw sequencing data and clinical information of PRCC patients were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The cBioPortal was utilized for the visualization and comparison of genetic alterations. The TIMER was used to assess the correlation between preliminary tumor antigens and the abundance of infiltrated antigen presenting cells (APCs). Immune subtypes were determined by the consensus clustering algorithm, and clinical and molecular discrepancies were further explored for a deeper understanding of immune subtypes. Five tumor antigens, including ALOX15B, HS3ST2, PIGR, ZMYND15 and LIMK1, were identified for PRCC, which were correlated with patients' prognoses and infiltration levels of APCs. Two immune subtypes (IS1 and IS2) were disclosed with obviously distinct clinical and molecular characteristics. Compared with IS2, IS1 exhibited a significantly immune-suppressive phenotype, which largely weakened the efficacy of the mRNA vaccine. Overall, our study provides some insights for the design of anti-PRCC mRNA vaccines and, more importantly, the selection of suitable patients to be vaccinated.

Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced CT scans can distinguish between clear cell and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma in different imaging protocols

Introduction

This study aimed to construct a radiomics-based machine learning (ML) model for differentiation between non-clear cell and clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC) that is robust against institutional imaging protocols and scanners.

Materials and methods

Preoperative unenhanced (UN), corticomedullary (CM), and excretory (EX) phase CT scans from 209 patients diagnosed with RCCs were retrospectively collected. After the three-dimensional segmentation, 107 radiomics features (RFs) were extracted from the tumor volumes in each contrast phase. For the ML analysis, the cases were randomly split into training and test sets with a 3:1 ratio. Highly correlated RFs were filtered out based on Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r > 0.95). Intraclass correlation coefficient analysis was used to select RFs with excellent reproducibility (ICC ≥ 0.90). The most predictive RFs were selected by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). A support vector machine algorithm-based binary classifier (SVC) was constructed to predict tumor types and its performance was evaluated based-on receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. The “Kidney Tumor Segmentation 2019” (KiTS19) publicly available dataset was used during external validation of the model. The performance of the SVC was also compared with an expert radiologist’s.

Results

The training set consisted of 121 ccRCCs and 38 non-ccRCCs, while the independent internal test set contained 40 ccRCCs and 13 non-ccRCCs. For external validation, 50 ccRCCs and 23 non-ccRCCs were identified from the KiTS19 dataset with the available UN, CM, and EX phase CTs. After filtering out the highly correlated and poorly reproducible features, the LASSO algorithm selected 10 CM phase RFs that were then used for model construction. During external validation, the SVC achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) value, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.83, 0.78, 0.80, and 0.74, respectively. UN and/or EX phase RFs did not further increase the model’s performance. Meanwhile, in the same comparison, the expert radiologist achieved similar performance with an AUC of 0.77, an accuracy of 0.79, a sensitivity of 0.84, and a specificity of 0.69.

Conclusion

Radiomics analysis of CM phase CT scans combined with ML can achieve comparable performance with an expert radiologist in differentiating ccRCCs from non-ccRCCs.

A novel nomogram and risk classification system predicting the overall survival of patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy: A population-based study

Background

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is the largest histologic subtype of non-clear-cell RCC. To date, there is no reliable nomogram to predict the prognosis of patients with pRCC after nephrectomy. We aimed to first establish an effective nomogram to predict the overall survival (OS) of patients with pRCC after nephrectomy.

Methods

A total of 3,528 eligible patients with pRCC after nephrectomy were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015. The patients were randomized into the training cohort (n = 2,472) and the validation cohort (n = 1,056) at a 7:3 ratio. In total, 122 real-world samples from our institute (titled the AHMU-pRCC cohort) were used as the external validation cohort. Univariate and subsequent multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify OS-related prognostic factors, which were further used to establish a prognostic nomogram for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS probabilities. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated by using the concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

Multivariate Cox analysis showed that age, race, marital status, TNM stage, tumor size, and surgery were significant OS-related prognostic factors. A prognostic model consisting of these clinical parameters was developed and virtualized by a nomogram. High C-index and area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of the nomogram at 1, 3, and 5 years were found in the training, validation, and AHMU-pRCC cohorts. The calibration plot and DCA also showed that the nomogram had a satisfactory clinical application value. A risk classification system was established to risk-stratify patients with pRCC.

Conclusion

Based on a large cohort from the public SEER database, a reliable nomogram predicting the OS of patients with pRCC after nephrectomy was constructed, which could optimize the survival assessment and clinical treatment.

Characterizing Tumor Thrombus Arising from Non–Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Background

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can exhibit a unique vascular tropism that enables tumor thrombus extension into the inferior vena cava (IVC). While most RCC subtypes that form tumor thrombi are of clear cell (cc) histology, non–clear cell (ncc) subtypes can also exhibit this unique growth pattern.

Objective

To characterize clinicopathologic differences and survival outcomes among patients with IVC tumor thrombus arising from ccRCC versus nccRCC.

Design, setting, and participants

Patients diagnosed with IVC tumor thrombus secondary to RCC in our institutional experience from 2003 to 2021 were identified.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Clinicopathologic characteristics were compared by histology. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes including recurrence-free (RFS), overall (OS), and cancer-specific (CSS) survival were assessed using multivariable Cox regression analyses.

Results and limitations

The analyzed cohort included 103 patients (82 ccRCC and 21 nccRCC). There were no significant differences in baseline demographic parameters. Patients with nccRCC were more likely to have regional lymph node involvement (42.9% vs 20.7%, p = 0.037). No differences in perioperative outcomes, IVC resection, or IVC reconstruction were observed between groups. The median follow-up time was 30 mo. The median RFS was 30 (nccRCC) versus 53 (ccRCC) mo (p = 0.1). There was no significant difference in OS or CSS. This study was limited by its small sample size.

Conclusions

Patients with IVC tumor thrombus arising from ccRCC and nccRCC exhibit similar perioperative and oncologic outcomes. While surgical appropriateness was not impacted by histologic subtype, multimodal strategies are needed to improve outcomes for patients with tumor thrombus.

Patient summary

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can uniquely invade vasculature and form a tumor thrombus. This study examined the difference in outcomes of patients with tumor thrombus based on RCC subtype (clear cell vs non–clear cell). We found that patients exhibited similar surgical and survival outcomes regardless of RCC type.

Major heritable renal cell carcinoma syndromes: novel treatment options and future perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of diagnosis, genetic abnormalities, clinical signs and treatment options for the major heritable renal cell carcinoma (RCC) syndromes.

RECENT FINDINGS

RCC in major hereditary syndromes are disorders which are typically autosomal dominant. They predispose patients to early onset of RCC and may exhibit other extrarenal manifestations. Early recognition of these diseases allows correct screening at appropriate ages as well as early detection of RCC. Moreover, expedient identification may optimize the management of extra renal manifestations as well as allow for genetic testing and screening of at-risk relatives.

SUMMARY

The risk of RCC in these major heritable syndromes is higher than sporadic disease. They occur at earlier age groups and can be multifocal or bilateral. Tumours are observed until at least 3 cm before any intervention, while nephron sparing surgery is widely considered as the treatment of choice except for hereditary leiomyomatosis with renal cell cancer, of which radical nephrectomy is treatment of choice. Intervention should be timeous as there is a highly reported incidence of early metastasis. Molecular therapies have been used in the setting of patients with metastasis, some of which show favourable outcomes.

Acute pyelonephritis revealing a rare renal collision tumor of papillary and chromophobe cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid features

A 59-year-old male patient was admitted to the emergency room with febrile right flank pain. The computed tomography scan and the magnetic resonance imaging had objectified lesion image occupying the upper half of the right kidney, measuring 82 mm, suggesting an infectious origin without excluding the infected tumor. He was put under antibiotics. A percutaneous biopsy revealed renal cell carcinoma with suppurative tumor necrosis. He underwent a right radical nephrectomy. The histopathological study revealed a collision tumor of papillary, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and sarcomatoid dedifferentiation. It is the second case reported in English literature to date.

Systematic Review of Treatment of Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Background: Metastatic and unresectable non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma comprises more than a quarter of kidney cancers but does not have standardized treatment. Non-clear renal carcinoma consists of a variety of diverse histologic subtypes, including papillary, chromophobe, collecting duct, translocation, and medullary histologies, many of which carry a poor prognosis. Many prospective clinical trials exclude these kidney cancers, and for most clinical trials of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma, only a small number of patients are enrolled. Objective: To perform a systematic review of recently published and currently enrolling prospective clinical trials for advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Methods: A systematic search of Pubmed and MEDLINE (Ovid) was conducted as per PRISMA guidelines to identify recent prospective clinical trials in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. To ensure a thorough search, terms not only included non-clear cell renal carcinoma but also molecular subtypes. A review of currently enrolling clinical trials was conducted on Clinicaltrials.gov and the EU Clinical Trials Register as well. Results: A total of 33 prospective clinical trials with published results and 10 currently enrolling clinicals trials were identified. About half (48.5%) of these studies were reported in 2020 or 2021, and 36.4% were in the first-line setting. Treatments investigated in these trials included mTOR inhibitors, VEGF- and MET-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and combinatorial strategies. Outcomes from these data revealed a wide range of response rate and progression free survival, favoring TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors -based combination regimens. Conclusions: Novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies have changed the landscape of treatment for advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Combination regimens may provide even further clinical benefit and warrant further investigation in larger, randomized prospective clinical trials.

How to individualise oncological treatment of patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using gene sequencing and Patient-Reported Outcomes: INDIGO study protocol (Preprint)

Background

No phase 3 studies have yet been conducted for patients with non–clear cell (CC) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) exclusively due to the rare occurrence of the disease and the heterogenicity in tumor morphology. Consequently, there is no evidence of the optimal treatment, and new approaches are needed. One approach is individualizing treatment based on the gene sequencing of tumor tissue. Additionally, recent studies involving the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of patients treated for metastatic cancer have shown significant benefits for quality of life, median overall survival, and overall survival. The use of gene sequencing and PROs can be of great importance to patients with rare cancer types, including patients with non-CC RCC, and should be investigated in clinical trials, especially for cases where evidence based on phase 3 studies is difficult to obtain.

Objective

We describe the INDIGO study, in which patients, based on gene analyses, will be allocated into 4 treatment arms containing 14 treatments and use electronic PROs. We aim to improve the treatment of patients with non-CC RCC. The end points in the study will be the overall response rate (complete and partial) in the total patient population, which will be based on the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) version 1.1 criteria, and the time to treatment failure.

Methods

INDIGO is a prospective phase 2 trial, and 30 patients will be enrolled. The patients will receive systemic treatment based on genetic analyses of their tumor tissue. All patients will receive electronic questionnaires in a dedicated app—a questionnaire regarding symptoms and side effects and another regarding health-related quality of life. Depending on the treatment regimen, the patients will be seen by a medical doctor every third, fourth, or sixth week, and the effect of the systemic treatment will be evaluated every 6 weeks via a computed tomography scan. The study has been approved by the Danish Medicines Agency and the National Committee on Health Research Ethics (approval number: H-19041833), complies with good clinical practice guidelines, follows the General Data Protection Regulation, and is registered at the Capital Region of Denmark.

Results

Recruitment started in March 2020, and at the time of submitting this paper (June 2022), a total of 9 patients have been enrolled.

Conclusions

We aim to explore methods for improving the treatment outcomes of patients with non-CC RCC, and the INDIGO study will contribute further data on personalized medicine for rare types of RCC and provide new knowledge on the active use of electronic PROs.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04644432, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04644432 ; European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database 2019-001316-38, https://tinyurl.com/2p8mb4aw

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/36632

Pathology and systemic therapy of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: an overview

Introduction: Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) represents a highly heterogenous group of kidney cancer entities. As most clinical trials predominantly include patients with clear cell RCC (ccRCC), nccRCC treatment guidelines are mainly extrapolated from recommendations in ccRCC. Here, we review and elucidate current data on the pathologic classification and treatment of nccRCC.Areas covered: This article gives an overview of the WHO classification of RCC, showing the histological diversity of nccRCC and focusing particularly on entities first characterized since 2016, their specific molecular behavior and their role as indicators for hereditary cancer syndromes. In this context, we discuss the available data on nccRCC treatment oprtions such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors.Expert opinion: Although nccRCCs are relatively uncommon, entities of this type account for a subgroup of up to 20-25% of all RCCs. Advances in histopathology and molecular genetics, together with evidence gained from retrospective and prospective clinical data, have improved understanding of these tumors in recent years. Nevertheless, selective trials of current and novel therapies including new targeted agents in patients with nccRCC are urgently needed to further improve treatment guidelines.

Characteristics and Treatment Challenges of Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas (RCC) comprise several rare and poorly described diseases, often characterized by bad prognosis and with no standard treatments available. The gap in their clinical management is linked to the poor molecular characterization in handling the treatment of non clear-cell RCC with untailored therapies. Due to their rarity, non-clear RCC are in fact under-represented in prospective randomized trials. Thus, treatment choices are based on extrapolating results from clear cell RCC trials, retrospective data, or case reports. Over the last two decades, various options have been considered as the mainstay for the treatment of metastatic RCC (mRCC), including angiogenesis inhibitors, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors, other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), as well as MET inhibitors and mammalian targeting of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. More recently, the therapeutic armamentarium has been enriched with immunotherapy, alone or in combination with targeted agents that have been shown to significantly improve outcomes of mRCC patients, if compared to TKI single-agent. It has been widely proven that non-clear cell RCC is a morphologically and clinically distinct entity from its clear cell counterpart but more knowledge about its biology is certainly needed. Histology-specific collaborative trials are in fact now emerging to investigate different treatments for non-clear cell RCC. This review summarizes pathogenetic mechanisms of non-clear cell RCC, the evolution of treatment paradigms over the last few decades, with a focus on immunotherapy-based trials, and future potential treatment options.

The Molecular Characteristics of Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: What's the Story Morning Glory?

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas are a miscellaneous group of tumors that include different histological subtypes, each one characterized by peculiarity in terms of genetic alteration, clinical behavior, prognosis, and treatment response. Because of their low incidence and poor enrollment in clinical trials, alongside their heterogeneity, additional efforts are required to better unveil the pathogenetic mechanisms and, consequently, to improve the treatment algorithm. Nowadays, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mTOR and MET inhibitors, and even cisplatin-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy are potential weapons that are still under evaluation in this setting. Various biomarkers have been evaluated for detecting progression and monitoring renal cell carcinoma, but more studies are necessary to improve this field. In this review, we provide an overview on the molecular characteristics of this group of tumors and the recently published trials, giving an insight into what might become the future therapeutic standard in this complex world of non-clear cell kidney cancers.

A challenging frontier - the genomics and therapeutics of nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As molecular profiling of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) continues to elucidate novel targets for nonclear cell histologies, understanding the landscape of these targets is of utmost importance. In this review, we highlight the genomic landscape of nonclear cell RCC and its implications for current and future systemic therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several genomic studies have described the mutational burden among nonclear cell histologies. These studies have highlighted the importance of MET in papillary RCC and led to several clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of MET inhibitors for papillary RCC. The success of immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as ipilimumab and nivolumab, in clear cell RCC has led to ongoing trials evaluating these novel therapeutics in nonclear cell RCC.

SUMMARY

Genomic profiling has allowed for the evaluation of novel targets for nonclear cell RCC. This evolving therapeutic landscape is being explored in promising, ongoing trials that have the potential for changing how nonclear cell RCC is managed.

Comprehensive review of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is the third most common type of RCC with distinct biology compared to other kidney cancer subtypes. The heterogeneity between the RCC subtypes is associated with noticeable differences in tumor aggressiveness and risk for the development of metastatic disease. ChRCC is characterized by chromosomal aneuploidy, TP53, PTEN, and mitochondrial gene mutations. Though the therapeutic landscape of clear cell RCC (ccRCC) has significantly evolved over the past decade, limited progress has been seen in chRCC due to its infrequent incidence. In fact, the therapeutic approach for chRCC is often extrapolated from ccRCC treatments or studies that combine several forms of nccRCC subtypes. In the new era of genetic profiling of tumors and targeted therapeutics, this review describes the epidemiology, pathology, molecular characteristics, and current management with ongoing clinical trials for chRCC.

Broad spectrum mutational analysis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma using next-generation sequencing

BACKGROUND

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) is a rare subtype of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Due to its rarity, its molecular characterization as well as therapeutic targets are still not fully understood.

METHODS

We performed a next-generation sequencing analysis using the platform Ion PGM System on 20 retrospectively collected ChRCC cases with the aim of identify molecular biomarkers with potential prognostic value or that could have therapeutic implications.

RESULTS

We identified mutation onTP53, SMARCB1, RB1 and JAK3. The most frequently altered gene was TP53 (6/20, 30 % of cases). SMARCB1 mutation was found in 3 (15 %) patients and in all cases the mutational variant was p.T72 K, with known pathogenenic meaning. One (5%) patient presented a pathogenetic mutation of RB1. JAK3 was mutated in 1 (5%) patient and this mutation resulted to have uncertain pathogenetic significance.

CONCLUSION

ChRCC is a rare disease still not fully molecularly characterized. Next-generation sequencing analysis could be useful to identify potential mutation with prognostic value or that could be potential therapeutic targets.

Treatment outcomes of metastatic nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma: A single institution retrospective analysis

Introduction:

Nonclear cell (NCC) metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is a biologically heterogeneous entity. We report the outcomes of NCC mRCC treated with first-line vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors at our institute. This is first such report from India.

Methods:

This is a retrospective analysis of the 40 consecutive patients of NCC mRCC treated between January 2013 and June 2015 in routine clinical practice at our institute. The primary endpoint analyzed was overall survival (OS) with respect to the type of first-line treatment and tumor histology.

Results:

The most common histological subtype was papillary in 25 patients (62.5%) followed by sarcomatoid in six (15%), chromophobe in 5 (12.5%), translocation-associated in one patient, and other nonspecified in three patients. First-line treatment was sorafenib in 14 (35%), sunitinib in 9 (22.5%), pazopanib in 8 (20%), everolimus in seven (17.5%), and best-supportive care (BSC) in two (5%) patients. Partial response, stable disease, and progression was observed in six (15%), 13 (32.5%), and nine (22.5%) cases, respectively, as the best response to first-line treatment. The median OS was 11.7 months and median event-free survival was 6.1 months in the whole cohort. The median OS in months for different first-line treatments were as follows: sorafenib (16.2), sunitinib (11.7), pazopanib (not reached, mean-23.9 ± 6.0), everolimus (4.1) and BSC (0.6) and for different histological subtypes were as follows: papillary (9.8), chromophobe (not reached, mean-30.3 ± 8.4), sarcomatoid (4.1), and others (7.9).

Conclusions:

Chromophobe histology has a better outcome compared to other histological subtypes, and anti-VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitors are preferable first-line agents compared to mTOR inhibitors.

Individualizing Systemic Therapies in First Line Treatment and beyond for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

Therapeutic options for treating advanced renal cell cancer (RCC) are rapidly evolving. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-directed therapy, predominantly VEGF receptor (VEGFr) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) had been the most effective first line treatment since 2005 irrespective of International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk stratification. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have recently changed the treatment paradigm for advanced RCC particularly as the first-line systemic treatment modality. The combination of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab provides better disease control and long-term outcomes compared with the anti-VEGFr TKI Sunitinib for IMDC intermediate- to poor-risk patients and we now have the option of using ICI with TKI upfront for all IMDC risk groups. This poses a challenge for physicians, both to select the most suitable first line regimen and the most suitable subsequent therapy given the lack of data about sequencing in this setting. This treatment landscape is expected to become more complex with the emerging treatment options. Moreover, these therapeutic options cannot be generalized as significant variability exists between individual's disease biologies and their physiologies for handling treatment adverse effects. Notable efforts are being made to identify promising predictive biomarkers ranging from neo-antigen load to gene expression profiling. These biomarkers need prospective validation to justify their utility in clinical practice and in treatment decision making. This review article discusses various clinicopathological characteristics that should be carefully evaluated to help select appropriate treatment and discusses the current status of biomarker-based selection.

Advanced Non-Clear Cell Kidney Cancer: In Search of Rational Treatment Approaches

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) accounts for approximately 25% of RCC diagnoses. Although broadly labeled as "nccRCC," they comprised a host of histologies that include papillary, chromophobe, unclassified, and others. Moreover, these histological variants are further subclassified on the basis of genomic profiling, thereby highlighting nccRCC to be anything but a homogenous cohort of RCC. The heterogeneity of nccRCC has proved challenging in developing therapeutics for this population. Although ccRCC therapeutic data have been commonly extrapolated for the treatment of nccRCC, the overall poor outcome of these patients highlights an unmet need. In an era of precision medicine, genomic analysis, and predictive biomarkers, novel approach to drug design and development is necessary to optimize treatment outcomes in nccRCC patients. Herein, we provide an overview of the nccRCC histologies, clinical trial data, and future opportunities for treatment options and development in nccRCC.

Bone metastasis is associated with poor prognosis in metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma patients treated with first agent angiogenesis inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (papRCC) is a rare (10%-15%) subtype of renal cancer. Few prognostic biomarkers have been described in metastatic papRCC (m-papRCC) patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs). We aimed to study the prognostic impact of bone metastases (BM) on response rate, progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS) in patients with m-papRCC treated with first agent VEGFR-TKIs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicentric, retrospective analysis of patient records was conducted. BM were detected by computed tomography and/or bone scintigraphy. The International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) score was calculated at start of first agent VEGFR-TKI treatment.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients were included. Best objective response was partial response in 20%, stable disease in 60% and early progressive disease in 20% of patients. Median PFS (mPFS) was 6.0 months and median OS (mOS) 14.0 months after start of first agent VEGFR-TKI. The IMDC score correlated with mOS: 77.5 months in good, 17.0 months in intermediate and 8.0 months in poor risk patients (P = 0.002). Patients with BM had a poorer outcome compared to patients without BM: mPFS was 4.0 vs. 7.0 months (P = 0.006) and mOS 7.5 vs. 19.0 months (P = 0.002). On bivariate analysis, the presence of BM was independently associated with PFS (P = 0.02) and OS (P = 0.049), independent of the IMDC risk groups.

CONCLUSION

In m-papRCC patients treated with first agent VEGFR-TKIs, the presence of BM is an unfavorable prognostic factor, associated with shorter PFS and OS.

Evolving treatment paradigm in metastatic non clear cell renal cell carcinoma

The treatment landscape for renal cell cancer (RCC) has evolved tremendously over the last two decades. Treatment algorithms have shifted from the highly toxic drugs with marginal benefit to better tolerated and more effective targeted therapy drugs. The latter include tyrosine kinase inhibitors, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, MET inhibitors and, more recently, immunotherapy drugs alone and in various combinations. The majority of treatment algorithms for non-clear cell carcinoma have been based on extrapolating results from clear cell RCC trials and retrospective reviews. However, now that we understand that non-clear cell RCC is morphologically and clinically distinct from its clear cell counterpart, several collaborative clinical trials are underway for non-clear cell RCC. This review will delve into the historical aspects of treating non-clear cell RCC and the evolution of treatment paradigms over the last few decades with a focus on immunotherapy based trials.

Current State of Systemic Therapies for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Due to the rapidly changing field of kidney cancer therapeutics, addressing the state of the art systemic therapy regimens, and sequencing with cytoreductive nephrectomy are the primary focus of this review. We will also discuss the role of biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets in the management of renal cell carcinoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

The management of metastatic renal cell cancer has undergone a paradigm shift with immune checkpoint inhibitors being used in the frontline setting. Over the last 4 years, programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors as well as programmed cell death ligand-1 inhibitors have become available in various combinations with cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). These drugs have improved outcomes in patients with renal cell cancer and more work is being done to refine these targets as well as discover newer ones. Despite the availability of several new treatment options, some questions that still need to be addressed in the management of kidney cancer include the sequencing of treatment options, treatment of patients who progress on immune checkpoint inhibitors, and role of biomarkers to ascertain the best treatment options to minimize costs and improve outcomes.

Systemic therapy for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) subtype accounts for almost 5% of total RCC cases. It carries the best prognosis among the rest of RCC types. However, patients with metastatic chRCC disease have worse prognosis than patients with advanced clear cell RCC. Furthermore, available data regarding systemic therapy for chRCC patients are scarce and confusing.

AIM

The aim of this systematic review is to search for and critically appraise studies that investigate the results of systemic therapies in patients diagnosed with metastatic chRCC disease.

METHODS

Search strategy included PUBMED, CENTRAL, clinicaltrials.gov databases, and abstracts of major conferences with a focus on urologic oncology (till March 2019). Studies investigating patients that were treated with systemic therapy for advanced chRCC disease were included. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival and objective response rate. Secondary outcome was overall survival. Screening of available studies was carried out by 2 groups of reviewers, as well as the quality assessment of the included studies.

RESULTS

The systematic search yielded 369 studies, of which 15 studies (2 randomized control trials and 13 cohort studies), involving 183 patients, met the eligibility criteria. The 2 randomized control trials that directly compared sunitinib vs. everolimus, suggested an advantage for sunitinib without being statistically significant. Furthermore, sunitinib seems to be superior than sorafenib at least in terms of objective response rate. Regarding mTOR inhibitors, they may have a role in a specific subset of chRCC patients, that needs to be further explored. Finally, as far as immunotherapy is concerned, available data suggest that chRCC seems to be resistant to recent immune check point inhibitors, since just a few tumor responses were observed with the administered immunotherapy regiments.

CONCLUSION

The optimum therapy for metastatic chRCC is still missing, as results from ongoing trials are awaited. More studies, of high quality and adequate sample size, that will be based on the specific biology of chRCC, have to be carried out in order to identify the best treatment.

Magnusson N. Drug-Induced Hypertension Caused by Multikinase Inhibitors (Sorafenib, Sunitinib, Lenvatinib and Axitinib) in Renal Cell Carcinoma Treatment

This paper reviews current treatments for renal cell carcinoma/cancer (RCC) with the multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) sorafenib, sunitinib, lenvatinib and axitinib. Furthermore, it compares these drugs regarding progression-free survival, overall survival and adverse effects (AE), with a focus on hypertension. Sorafenib and sunitinib, which are included in international clinical guidelines as first- and second-line therapy in metastatic RCC, are now being challenged by new-generation drugs like lenvatinib and axitinib. These drugs have shown significant clinical benefits for patients with RCC, but all four induce a variety of AEs. Hypertension is one of the most common AEs related to MKI treatment. Comparing sorafenib, sunitinib and lenvatinib revealed that sorafenib and sunitinib had the same efficacy, but sorafenib was safer to use. Lenvatinib showed better efficacy than sorafenib but worse safety. No trials have yet been completed that compare lenvatinib with sunitinib. Although axitinib promotes slightly higher hypertension rates compared to sunitinib, the overall discontinuation rate and cardiovascular complications are favourable. Although the mean rate of patients who develop hypertension is similar for each drug, some trials have shown large differences, which could indicate that lifestyle and/or genetic factors play an additional role.

Myoferlin silencing inhibits VEGFR2-mediated proliferation of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Recently, ramucirumab, a drug that targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), was clinically approved; therefore, we evaluated VEGFR2 expression and its predictive roles in tumor progression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC). Since we do not have many options for treating aggressive renal cell carcinoma patients, the application of anti-VEGFR2 therapy might be useful. Myoferlin (MYOF) is a 230 kDa transmembrane multi-C2-domain protein that contributes to plasma membrane repair, fusion, and endocytosis and is overexpressed in several invasive cancer cell lines, including breast, pancreas, and malignant melanoma. It forms a complex with VEGFR2 to inhibit VEGFR2 degradation. In this study, a total of 152 patients who had undergone nephrectomy for CCRCC were enrolled. Based on tissue microarray (TMA) blocks, the positive intensity and high proportion of MYOF showed a statistically significant correlation with the negative intensity (p < 0.001) and low proportion (p < 0.001) of VEGFR2, respectively. In addition, Fuhrman’s nuclear grade ≥3 showed a significant correlation with VEGFR2 expression. In multivariate analysis, CCRCC patients with positive MYOF and negative VEGFR2 expression demonstrated poor clinical outcomes. We confirmed that positive MYOF expression and negative VEGFR2 expression were positively correlated in this CCRCC population. Knocking down MYOF in Caki-1 cells resulted in the downregulation of VEGFR2 at both mRNA and protein levels. Wound healing assays revealed that the loss of MYOF in Caki-1 cells decreased cell confluence compared to that in control cells. We demonstrated that MYOF influences cellular proliferation of the metastatic CCRCC cell line by regulating VEGFR2 degradation. Combined therapies targeting the MYOF and VEGFR2 pathways might be effective against metastatic CCRCC to increase patient survival.

Papillary renal cell carcinoma: what is missing in research? A case report and a review of literature

The incidence of renal cell carcinomas in adults ranges has been increasing over the past decades in both men and women. Once the incidence was 2.9%, now is reported to have increased to 3%–5% with male predominance according to the most recent reports of cancer statistics. The disease typically describes a group of different histopathological subtypes; the most common is clear cell carcinoma which accounts for 70%–80% of the diagnosed cases, while papillary renal cell carcinoma and chromophobe types represent 20% and 5%, respectively. In 1996, the renal cell carcinomas Heidelberg classification was introduced by Delahunt et al. It divides renal cell tumors into benign and malignant parenchymal neoplasms, excluding Wilm’s tumor and secondary metastases and limiting each subcategory to the most commonly documented genetic abnormalities, if applicable. In this report, we discuss a case of metastatic type I papillary renal cell carcinoma treated with the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor sunitinib and showing marked long-term clinical response. Through this case, we highlight the importance of re-classifying papillary renal cell carcinoma subtypes to prioritize the clinical management of these cases.

PYCR1 is Associated with Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma Progression

Objective

We aimed to determine the function of pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase 1 (PYCR1) on progression of papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) and related mechanism.

Methods

The TCGA database provided us expression profiles of PYCR1 and overall survival rates. Small interfering RNA (siRNA) was used to knockdown PYCR1; quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and western blotting were conducted to identify the expression levels of mRNA and protein. The cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) and colony formation assays were used to explore cell viability in Ketr-3 cells. The migration and invasion of Ketr-3 cells were investigated by transwell assays.

Results

We found that PYCR1 was over-expressed in PRCC tissues and cells, causing poor outcomes. Moreover, reduction of PYCR1 played a negative role on cell proliferation, migration and invasion in tumor cells. The important Akt/mTOR pathway proteins, phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt) and phosphorylated mTOR (p-mTOR), also showed lower levels compared with control groups.

Conclusion

These findings showed that disordered expression of PYCR1 could modulate PRCC progression through the Akt/mTOR pathway, implying a theoretical basis for PYCR1 as a potential therapeutic target in future clinical PRCC treatment.

Efficacy and safety of perioperative appliance of sunitinib in patients with metastatic or advanced renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of the perioperative use of sunitinib in patients with metastatic and advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched authenticated databases for related clinical studies. The baseline characteristics, parameters concerning the efficacy and safety of the perioperative use of sunitinib were extracted for subsequent comprehensive analysis. The parameters which reflected the efficacy and safety as overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), occurrence rate of all-grade and grade ≥3 adverse effects (AEs) were carefully pooled using comprehensive meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We finally recruited 411 patients from 14 eligible studies. We found proteinuria (75.0%, 95% CI 62.1%-84.6%), anemia (71.6%, 95% CI 60.9%-80.3%), athesia (60.0%, 95% CI 40.3%-77.0%), pause symptoms (59.2%, 95% CI 49.2%-68.4%), arterial hypertension (53.1%, 95% CI 43.2%-62.7%), and thrombocytopenia (52.5%, 95% CI 44.8%-60.0%) to be the most common all-grade AEs. And arterial hypertension, athesia, cutaneous toxicity, hypophosphatemia, leukopenia, pain, pause syndrome, renal dysfunction, and thrombocytopenia were the most common types of grade ≥3 AEs. In addition, objective response rate (ORR) of sunitinib to both the original and metastatic tumor sites increased with the use of sunitinib, so did the OS and PFS.

CONCLUSION

Common all-grade and grade ≥3 AEs were carefully monitored. The perioperative use of sunitinib showed superior ORR, OS, and PFS rates. Nevertheless, more studies are required to further verify these findings.

The use of cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The systemic options for managing metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have expanded considerably over the past decade. Initially limited to cytokines, clinicians may now choose from several classes of targeted therapies and, most recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors. Areas covered: In this review, we discuss the role and timing of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and its evolution starting with cytokines, and then alongside the emergence of targeted therapy and novel immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Patient selection remains the most critical determinant in offering CN, and the anticipated survival benefits of CN must be weighed against the surgical morbidity and potential delay to receipt of systemic therapies. Expert opinion: Proper patient selection is key for decision-making in mRCC. Prospective data is urgently needed to define the role of CN in the contemporary immunotherapy era, with greater personalization of prognostic models.

A literature analysis on anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy (anti-VEGF) using a bibliometric approach

We performed the current study to assess the citation performance of research works on anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. We searched Web of Science (WoS) to identify relevant publications and analyze them with reference to their publication year, journal title, citation count, WoS category, and article type. The bibliometric software (VOSviewer) was used for citation analyses of countries and journals and to generate a term map that visualizes the recurring terms appearing in the titles and abstracts of published articles. The literature search resulted in 7364 articles, with a mean citation count of 26.2. Over half of them (50.2%) were published during the past 5 years. Original articles constituted the majority (67.8%). The publications were mainly classified into WoS categories of ophthalmology (43.2%) and oncology (20.6%). The most prolific ophthalmology and cancer journals were Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (7.3%) and Cancer Research (1.4%), respectively. The correlation between journal impact factor and citation count was weak to moderate (for journals with impact factor up to 5 and 10, respectively), and open-access articles had significantly more citations than non-open-access articles (p < 0.001). The frequently targeted tumors by anti-VEGF therapy included metastatic colorectal cancer (196; 49.2 citations per article (CPA)), breast cancers (167; 37.2 CPA), and renal cell carcinoma (122; 38.2 CPA). The frequently targeted eye pathologies were age-related macular degeneration (828; 18.2 CPA), diabetic macular edema (466; 10.8 CPA), and diabetic retinopathy (358; 31.9 CPA). These results indicate that anti-VEGF therapy has a wide range of applications and its publications are highly cited.

Comparative STAT3-Regulated Gene Expression Profile in Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes

Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are heterogeneous and can be further classified into three major subtypes including clear cell, papillary and chromophobe. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is commonly hyperactive in many cancers and is associated with cancer cell proliferation, invasion, migration, and angiogenesis. In renal cell carcinoma, increased STAT3 activation is associated with increased metastasis and worse survival outcomes, but clinical trials targeting the STAT3 signaling pathway have shown varying levels of success in different RCC subtypes. Using RNA-seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we compared expression of 32 STAT3 regulated genes in 3 RCC subtypes. Our results indicate that STAT3 activation plays the most significant role in clear cell RCC relative to the other subtypes, as half of the evaluated genes were upregulated in this subtype. MMP9, BIRC5, and BCL2 were upregulated and FOS was downregulated in all three subtypes. Several genes including VEGFA, VIM, MYC, ITGB4, ICAM1, MMP1, CCND1, STMN1, TWIST1, and PIM2 had variable expression in RCC subtypes and are potential therapeutic targets for personalized medicine.

Long-term efficacy of crizotinib in a metastatic papillary renal carcinoma with MET amplification: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is the 2nd most frequent histological type of kidney cancer and accounts for approximately 15% of all renal cell carcinoma. It has a poorer prognosis than clear cell RCC (ccRCC) with a lack of standard treatments.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report the case of a 51 year old man with a metastatic pRCC (hepatic dome and left colonic peritoneal carcinomatosis) progressive after sunitinib, with a MET amplification. The patient was enrolled in the UNICANCER-sponsored AcSé crizotinib trial (NCT02034981), designed to give an access to crizotinib for patients with tumors harboring a genomic alteration on one of the biological targets of the drug. With 2nd line crizotinib (250 mg twice/day), the patient had a very good tolerance, a partial response in the target lesions using RECIST 1.1, and a 19 months' clinical efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

In metastatic pRCC with a MET amplification, crizotinib maybe a potential met-inhibitory therapeutic option.

Efficacy of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation may vary with clear cell renal cell cancer histologic subtype

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study is to determine if clear cell renal cell cancer (RCC) subtype predicts efficacy in percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation of RCC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients who underwent percutaneous RF ablation for histologically proven RCC subtypes were retrospectively reviewed. Group comparisons were done using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine factors impacting primary, secondary, and total technique effectiveness. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

One hundred pathologically proven RCC lesions in 84 patients were analyzed. The median (mean) follow-up was 24 (27) months (range 1-106 months). Overall RF ablation primary, secondary and total technique effectiveness was 86%, 9%, and 95%, respectively. Clear cell subtype demonstrated worse treatment efficacy with primary, secondary, and total technique effectiveness of 42/55 (76.4%), 8/55 (14.5%), and 50/55 (90.9%), respectively. Non-clear cell subtypes had primary, secondary, and total technique effectiveness of 44/45(97.8%), 1/45 (2.2%), 45/45 (100%), respectively. The difference in primary (p = 0.002), secondary (p = 0.032), and total (p = 0.038) technique effectiveness between the two groups was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Clear cell RCC was a novel predictor of primary, secondary, and total technique efficacy in the percutaneous RF ablation of clear cell RCC.

Pazopanib for the Treatment of Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase II Study

PURPOSE

The optimal treatment strategy for patients with metastatic non-clear cell type renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) remains unclear. Although several inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor have recently shown efficacy against nccRCC, the clinical benefit of pazopanib in nccRCC has not been analyzed. We therefore designed a single-arm, open-label, phase II study to determine the efficacy and safety of pazopanib in patients with nccRCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patientswith locally advanced or metastatic nccRCC, exceptfor collecting duct or sarcomatoid type, received 800 mg/day of pazopanib daily until progression of disease or intolerable toxicity. One cyclewas defined as 4weeks and tumorresponsewas evaluated every two cycles. The primary objective was overall response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

A total of 29 eligible patients were enrolled at nine centers in Korea from December 2012 and September 2014. The median age of the patients was 58 years (range, 27 to 76 years) and 21 patients (72%) were male. Regarding histology type, 19 patients had papillary, three had chromophobe, two had unclassified and five had unknown non-clear cell type. Of 28 evaluable patients, eight achieved a confirmed partial response with ORR of 28%. The median progression-free survival was 16.5 months (95% confidence interval, 10.9 to 22.1) and median overall survival was not reached. Sixteen patients (55%) experienced treatment-related toxicity of grade 3 or more, but most adverse events were overcome through dose reduction and delay.

CONCLUSION

In this prospective phase II study, pazopanib demonstrated promising activity and tolerable safety profile in patients with metastatic nccRCC.

Hypoxic 3D in vitro culture models reveal distinct resistance processes to TKIs in renal cancer cells

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of hypoxia on axitinib and sorafenib-treated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cells. Hypoxia is a crucial factor influencing transcription process via protein modulation, which was shown i.e. in pancreatic cancer. Until now, hypoxia has been defined as associated with poorer outcome and inducing chemotherapy resistance in solid tumors. The unique phenomenon of pseudo-hypoxia connected with vhl mutation was observed in clear-cell, but not in papillary RCC, and the treatment of this subtype of cancer is still challenging. Despite the introduction of new antiangiogenic targeted therapies (inter alia tyrosine kinase inhibitors, TKIs), patients still develop both primary and acquired resistance. Overcoming resistance to TKIs, also in papillary RCC, may be possible by finding significantly modified protein expression. To do this, hypoxic 3D in vitro models must be developed to mimic both molecular pathways typical for low oxygen tension and cell-cell dynamics in tumor-like spatial structures.

RESULTS

Clear-cell and papillary renal cell carcinoma (cc and pRCC) cell lines were used in the study to determine the impact of hypoxia on primary drug resistance phenomenon previously observed in papillary, but not in ccRCC. Resistance was confirmed in monolayer culture and in 3D models in soft agar and suspension culture. Human papillary kidney cancer stem-like cells (HKCSCs) cultured in hypoxia developed resistance to sorafenib, while when cultured in normoxia resistance to axitinib has developed. Flow cytometry revealed that hypoxia decreased proliferation rates in all investigated RCC cells. In HKCSCs, there was an increase of quiescent cells (Ki67-) and percentage of cells arrested in S phase. It also appeared that map2k1 and eif4b protein expression is altered in papillary RCC resistant to tested drugs at different oxygen tensions. Also, HKCSCs did not express vegfr-1, braf nor c-kit, TKIs target receptors, which were present in ccRCC cells sensitive to TKI treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm that low oxygen tension affects RCC cells. Hypoxia facilitates induction of sorafenib resistance in pRCC and induces map2k1 overexpression, while normoxic axitinib-resistant cells up-regulated eif4b. Further studies may determine if map2k1 or eif4b proteins play a role in pRCC resistance to TKIs. It is also of interest to establish if other than vegfr-1, braf, c-kit receptors can serve as potential molecular targets for more effective anti-RCC strategies.

Simple Determination of Plasma Ponatinib Concentration Using HPLC

Ponatinib, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor marketed in 2016, is a key drug used for treating chronic myeloid leukemia and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. This study aimed to develop a simple method for determining plasma ponatinib concentration. The analysis required extraction of a 400-µL sample of plasma and precipitation of proteins using an Oasis HLB cartridge. Ponatinib and bosutinib, which is used as an internal standard, were separated by HPLC using a mobile phase of acetonitrile : 0.037 mol/L KH₂PO₄ (pH 4.5) (39 : 61, v/v) on a Capcell Pack C18 MG II (25×4.6 mm) monitored at 250 nm, with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. This assay method was then used for determining plasma ponatinib concentration in a 42-year-old man treated with ponatinib at 15 mg/d. The calibration curve was found to be linear for the plasma concentration range of 5-250 ng/mL with a regression coefficient (r²) of 0.9999. The coefficients of intra-day and inter-day validation under these concentrations were 2.1-6.0 and 4.5-8.0%, respectively. The assay accuracy was -1.5-9.0%, and the recovery was greater than 86%. The plasma concentration of the patient at 2.5 and 3 h after 15 mg ponatinib administration was 43.6 and 49.3 ng/mL, respectively. This method of HPLC equipped with UV detection for determining plasma ponatinib concentration has several advantages, such as simplicity and applicability to routine therapeutic drug monitoring at hospital laboratories.

Systemic Therapy for Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Treatment options for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) have evolved markedly over the past decade, with multiple targeted therapies approved for the disease. In contrast, little improvement has been made in the management of metastatic non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC). Non-clear cell disease is an umbrella term that encompasses multiple biologically distinct entities, including but not limited to papillary, chromophobe, and sarcomatoid RCC. To date, prospective studies have largely explored treatments for ccRCC (e.g., VEGF- and mTOR-directed therapies) in trials that aggregate non-clear cell histologies. However, the studies do not acknowledge the varying biology of each non-clear cell subtype. Emerging studies in nccRCC should examine individual histologies and apply biologically relevant therapies. An example of this is SWOG 1500, a randomized phase II study that will compare a VEGF-inhibitor to one of three MET-directed therapies in patients with metastatic papillary RCC. Until the biologic diversity of nccRCC is appreciated, outcomes are likely to remain dismal.