1
|
Puhaindran ME, Lim AYT. Tumors of the Brachial Plexus: A Critical Analysis Review. JBJS Rev 2024; 12:01874474-202406000-00001. [PMID: 38875357 PMCID: PMC11175764 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.24.00019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
» Tumors of the brachial plexus are uncommon and can present as a mass, with or without neurological symptoms. At times, asymptomatic tumors are also picked up incidentally when imaging is performed for other reasons.» Magnetic resonance imaging is the main imaging modality used to evaluate tumors of the brachial plexus. Other imaging modalities can be used as required.» Benign tumors that are asymptomatic should be observed. Excision can be considered for those that are found to be growing over time.» Biopsies of tumors of the brachial plexus are associated with the risk of nerve injury. Despite this, they should be performed for tumors that are suspected to be malignant before starting definitive treatment.» For malignant tumors, treatment decisions should be discussed at multidisciplinary tumor boards, and include both the oncology and peripheral nerve surgical team, musculoskeletal radiology, neuroradiology, and general radiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Edward Puhaindran
- Department of Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Aymeric Yu Tang Lim
- Department of Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roohani S, Wiltink LM, Kaul D, Spałek MJ, Haas RL. Update on Dosing and Fractionation for Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy for Localized Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:543-555. [PMID: 38478330 PMCID: PMC10997691 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01188-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) over 5-6 weeks with daily doses of 1.8-2.0 Gy to a total dose of 50-50.4 Gy is standard of care for localized high-grade soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities and trunk wall. One exception is myxoid liposarcomas where the phase II DOREMY trial applying a preoperative dose of 36 Gy in 2 Gy fractions (3-4 weeks treatment) has achieved excellent local control rates of 100% after a median follow-up of 25 months.Hypofractionated preoperative RT has been investigated in a number of phase II single-arm studies suggesting that daily doses of 2.75-8 Gy over 1-3 weeks can achieve similar oncological outcomes to conventional neoadjuvant RT. Prospective data with direct head-to-head comparison to conventional neoadjuvant RT investigating oncological outcomes and toxicity profiles is eagerly awaited.For the entire group of retroperitoneal sarcomas, RT is not the standard of care. The randomized multi-center STRASS trial did not find a benefit in abdominal recurrence-free survival by the addition of preoperative RT. However, for the largest histological subgroup of well-differentiated and grades I and II dedifferentiated liposarcomas, the STRASS trial and the post-hoc propensity-matched STREXIT analysis have identified a possible benefit in survival by preoperative RT. These patients deserve to be informed about the pros and cons of preoperative RT while the longer follow-up data from the STRASS trial is awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyer Roohani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
- BIH Charité Junior Clinician Scientist Program, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Lisette M Wiltink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mateusz Jacek Spałek
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Radiotherapy I, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Rick L Haas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ewongwo A, Oladipo ED, Hui C, Avedian RS, Steffner RJ, Mohler DG, Kalbasi A, Chin AL, Million L, Hiniker SM, Moding EJ. Patterns of Local Recurrence and Risk of Skin Recurrence in Soft Tissue Sarcomas After Surgical Resection. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:e62-e67. [PMID: 37804883 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although there is a theoretical risk of skin seeding during surgical resection of soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), current consensus guidelines recommend against routine use of bolus during radiation therapy (RT). However, the risk of skin recurrence has not been systematically assessed. We aimed to assess the patterns of local recurrence (LR) in patients with STS treated with surgery with or without RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS We performed a retrospective analysis of adults with STSs evaluated at our institution between 2007 and 2021. For patients who developed LR, the depth was evaluated. Progression-free survival and overall survival were analyzed from time of first LR using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cumulative incidence of distant metastasis was calculated with competing risk analysis from date of LR. RESULTS Of the 206 patients evaluated, 20 had LR (9.7%). Among patients with LR, 5 patients (25.0%) were treated with surgery alone and 15 patients (75.0%) with surgery and RT. In patients treated with RT, 46.7% had preoperative RT, 53.3% had postoperative RT, and bolus was used in 46.7%. Surgical margins were close (<1 mm) in 4 patients (20.0%) and positive in 10 patients (50.0%). LR occurred in the deep subfascial tissue in 9 patients (45%), subcutaneous tissue in 10 patients (50.0%), and skin in 1 patient (5.0%). The patient with a skin recurrence was treated with surgery alone, and the tumor involved the skin at presentation. In patients treated with RT, LR occurred within the RT field in 13 patients (86.7%). At 1 year after LR, progression-free survival was 70.3%, overall survival was 81.7%, and cumulative incidence of distant metastasis was 5.9%. CONCLUSIONS Skin recurrences were rare after surgical resection of STSs and only occurred in a tumor that involved the skin at initial presentation. These findings support current recommendations against routine use of bolus in STSs not involving the skin at presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnes Ewongwo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Eniola D Oladipo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Caressa Hui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Raffi S Avedian
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Robert J Steffner
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - David G Mohler
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Anusha Kalbasi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Alexander L Chin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Lynn Million
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Susan M Hiniker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Everett J Moding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roohani S, Claßen NM, Ehret F, Jarosch A, Dziodzio T, Flörcken A, Märdian S, Zips D, Kaul D. The role of radiotherapy in the management of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: a single-center retrospective cohort study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:17739-17747. [PMID: 37924493 PMCID: PMC10725397 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05449-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study sought to investigate the role of radiotherapy (RT) in addition to surgery for oncological outcomes in patients with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST). METHODS In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, histopathologically confirmed MPNST were analyzed. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with LC, OS, and DMFS. RESULTS We included 57 patients with a median follow-up of 20.0 months. Most MPNSTs were located deeply (87.5%), were larger than 5 cm (55.8%), and had high-grade histology (78.7%). Seventeen patients received surgery only, and 25 patients received surgery and pre- or postoperative RT. Median LC, OS, and DMFS after surgery only were 8.7, 25.5, and 22.0 months; after surgery with RT, the median LC was not reached, while the median OS and DMFS were 111.5 and 69.9 months. Multivariable Cox regression of LC revealed a negative influence of patients presenting with local disease recurrence compared to patients presenting with an initial primary diagnosis of localized MPNST (hazard ratio: 8.86, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS The addition of RT to wide surgical excision appears to have a beneficial effect on LC. Local disease recurrence at presentation is an adverse prognostic factor for developing subsequent local recurrences. Future clinical and translational studies are warranted to identify molecular targets and find effective perioperative combination therapies with RT to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyer Roohani
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité (Junior) Clinician Scientist Program, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Noa Marie Claßen
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Ehret
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Armin Jarosch
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Germany
| | - Tomasz Dziodzio
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité (Junior) Clinician Scientist Program, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne Flörcken
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Germany
| | - Sven Märdian
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hanslik N, Bourgier C, Thezenas S, Carrère S, Firmin N, Riou O, Azria D, Llacer-Moscardo C. [Predictive factors assessment of pathological response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy of soft tissue sarcomas]. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:689-697. [PMID: 37813717 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Conserving surgery combined with radiotherapy in presence of local recurrence risk factors is standard treatment of soft tissue sarcomas, a group of rare and heterogeneous tumours. Radiotherapy is performed before or after surgery. In neoadjuvant setting, late radiation-induced toxicity is reduced and pathological response to radiotherapy could be achieved. A complete pathological response to radiotherapy has recently been shown to predict better survival. Our study aims at identifying predictive factors of pathological response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy (clinical, radiological or histological) of soft tissue sarcomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS Clinical, imaging (MRI: perilesional oedema, necrosis, tumour heterogeneity, vasculonervous relationships) and pathological (pathological subtype, tumour grade, anticipated/obtained resection quality) data were retrospectively collected. Tumour response (imaging and pathological), patient outcome, acute and late radiation-induced toxicity, predictive factors of pathological response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy were studied. The 2-test or exact-Fisher test (qualitative variables) and by Student's t-test or Kruskal-Wallis test (quantitative variables) were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS From April 2017 to April 2021, neoadjuvant radiotherapy (50Gy in 25 fractions) followed by surgical excision was performed to 36 consecutive patients with liposarcomas (n=17/36), or undifferentiated sarcomas (n=8/36). MRI response was complete in 1 patient, partial in 9 patients (n=9/36, 25%), stable in 21 patients (n=21/36, 58%) or in progression in 5 patients (n=5/36, 14%). Pathological response was observed in 22 patients (61%). No grade 3-4 acute radiation-induced toxicity was observed. Regarding late toxicity, 28% of patients had grade 1-2 oedema (n=10/36), 39% had a grade 1 fibrosis (n=14/36), and 30% grade 1 pain (n=11/36). No predictive factors of response to radiotherapy was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant radiotherapy is well-tolerated. No clinical, radiological or pathological predictive factors was identified for radiotherapy tumour response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Hanslik
- Fédération universitaire d'oncologie radiothérapie, ICM, institut régional du cancer Montpellier, rue Croix-Verte, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France
| | - C Bourgier
- Fédération universitaire d'oncologie radiothérapie, ICM, institut régional du cancer Montpellier, rue Croix-Verte, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France; IRCM, institut de recherche en cancérologie de Montpellier, Inserm U1194, université de Montpellier, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France
| | - S Thezenas
- Unité de biostatistiques, ICM, institut régional du cancer Montpellier, rue Croix-Verte, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France
| | - S Carrère
- Service de chirurgie, ICM, institut régional du cancer Montpellier, rue Croix-Verte, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France
| | - N Firmin
- Département d'oncologie, ICM, institut régional du Cancer Montpellier, rue Croix-Verte, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France
| | - O Riou
- Fédération universitaire d'oncologie radiothérapie, ICM, institut régional du cancer Montpellier, rue Croix-Verte, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France
| | - D Azria
- Fédération universitaire d'oncologie radiothérapie, ICM, institut régional du cancer Montpellier, rue Croix-Verte, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France; IRCM, institut de recherche en cancérologie de Montpellier, Inserm U1194, université de Montpellier, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France
| | - C Llacer-Moscardo
- Fédération universitaire d'oncologie radiothérapie, ICM, institut régional du cancer Montpellier, rue Croix-Verte, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Simões R, Augustin Y, Gulliford S, Dehbi HM, Hoskin P, Miles E, Harrington K, Miah AB. Toxicity, normal tissue and dose-volume planning parameters for radiotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities: A systematic review of the literature. Radiother Oncol 2023; 186:109739. [PMID: 37315584 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities (STSE) are left with high incidence of toxicities after Radiotherapy (RT). Understanding the normal tissue dose relationship with the development of long-term toxicities may enable better RT planning in order to reduce treatment toxicities for STSE. This systematic review of the literature aims at reporting the incidence of acute and late toxicities and identifying RT delineation guidance the normal tissues structures and dose-volume parameters for STSE. METHODS A literature search of PUBMED-MEDLINE for studies that reported data on RT toxicity outcomes, delineation guidelines and dose-volume parameters for STSE from 2000 to 2022. Data has been tabulated and reported. RESULTS Thirty of 586 papers were selected after exclusion criteria. External beam RT prescriptions ranged from 30 to 72 Gy. The majority of studies reported the use of Intensity Modulated RT (IMRT) (27%). Neo-adjuvant RT was used in 40%. The highest long-term toxicities were subcutaneous and lymphoedema, reported when delivering 3DCRT. IMRT had a lower incidence of toxicities. Normal tissue outlining such as weight-bearing bones, skin and subcutaneous tissue, corridor and neurovascular bundle was recommended in 6 studies. Nine studies recommended the use of dose-volume constraints, but only one recommended evidence-based dose-volume constraints. CONCLUSION Although the literature is replete with toxicity reports, there is a lack of evidence-based guidance on normal tissue and dose-volume parameters and strategies to reduce the normal tissues irradiation when optimising RT plans for STSE are poor compared to other tumour sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Simões
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA) group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK; University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | | | - Sarah Gulliford
- University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; University College London, London, UK.
| | | | - Peter Hoskin
- Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA) group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK; University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Elizabeth Miles
- Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA) group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK.
| | - Kevin Harrington
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
| | - Aisha B Miah
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Laughlin BS, Golafshar M, Prince M, Liu W, Kutyreff CJ, Ahmed SK, Vern Gross TZ, Haddock M, Petersen I, DeWees TA, Ashman JB. Dosimetric comparison between proton beam therapy, intensity modulated radiation therapy, and 3D conformal therapy for soft tissue extremity sarcoma. Acta Oncol 2023:1-7. [PMID: 37154167 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2209267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES Proton beam therapy (PBT) may provide a dosimetric advantage in sparing soft tissue and bone for selected patients with extremity soft sarcoma (eSTS). We compared PBT with photons plans generated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). MATERIALS/METHODS Seventeen patients previously treated with pencil beam scanning PBT were included in this study. Of these patients, 14 treated with pre-operative 50 Gy in 25 fractions were analyzed. IMRT and 3D-CRT plans were created to compare against the original PBT plans. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) indices were evaluated amongst PBT, IMRT, and 3D plans. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests were used to get the statistical significance. A p value smaller than .05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS For the clinical target volume (CTV), D2%, D95%, D98%, Dmin, Dmax, and V50Gy, were assessed. Dmin, D1%, Dmax, Dmean, V1Gy, V5Gy, and V50Gy were evaluated for the adjacent soft tissue. D1%, Dmax, Dmean, and V35-50% were evaluated for bone. All plans met CTV target coverage. The PBT plans delivered less dose to soft tissue and bone. The mean dose to the soft tissue was 2 Gy, 11 Gy, and 13 Gy for PBT, IMRT, and 3D, respectively (p < .001). The mean dose to adjacent bone was 15 Gy, 26 Gy, and 28 Gy for PBT, IMRT, and 3D, respectively (p = .022). CONCLUSION PBT plans for selected patients with eSTS demonstrated improved sparing of circumferential soft tissue and adjacent bone compared to IMRT and 3D-CRT. Further evaluation will determine if this improved dosimetry correlates with reduced toxicity and improved quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael Golafshar
- Department of Quanitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Matthew Prince
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Safia K Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Michael Haddock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ivy Petersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Department of Quanitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lu YJ, Chen CC, Chen SH, Lin CH, Lin YT, Lin CH, Hsu CC. Incidence and Risk Factors for Extremity Osteoradionecrosis after Limb-Sparing Surgery and Adjuvant Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15082339. [PMID: 37190268 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a major complication after radiotherapy. Most studies on ORN have focused on patients with mandibular lesions, with few studies including patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS). We included 198 patients with extremity STS who underwent limb-sparing surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy between 2004 and 2017. The incidence rate of extremity ORN was 3.5% (7/198), with most lesions (6/7) located in the lower extremities. The mean follow-up time was 62 months. Clinical presentations included chronic ulcers, soft tissue necrosis, sinus discharge, bone nonunion, and pathological fractures. Compared with the non-ORN group, the ORN group had a significantly higher total radiation dose (68 Gy vs. 64 Gy, p = 0.048) and greater use of intraoperative periosteal stripping (p = 0.008). Repeat surgeries and subsequent soft tissue reconstruction or limb amputation were performed as treatments. The risk and management of ORN in patients with extremity STS was ignored previously. Because the disease is complex and affects both clinicians and patients, careful surveillance should be undertaken.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun-Jui Lu
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Chieh Chen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Heng Chen
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Hung Lin
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Te Lin
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Hung Lin
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Chen Hsu
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zeh RD, Konieczkowski D, Shen C, Tsilimigras DI, Kim A, Grignol VP, Contreras CM, Welliver M, Tsung A, Pawlik TM, Pollock RE, Beane JD. Prognostic factors in patients receiving surgery and radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma: A machine-learning analysis. Surgery 2023; 173:640-644. [PMID: 36369098 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.08.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The addition of radiation therapy to surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma remains controversial. Improved patient selection may help identify optimal candidates for multimodality treatment. The aim of this analysis was to define prognostic factors among patients who receive radiation therapy and surgery to aid in patient selection for multimodal therapy. METHODS Patients who received radiation therapy and underwent curative-intent resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma between 2004 and 2016 were identified from a national cohort in the United States (National Cancer Database). A machine-based classification and regression tree model was used to generate similar groups of patients relative to overall survival based on preoperative factors. RESULTS A total of 1,443 patients received radiation therapy in addition to surgery. Median age was 61 years old and 55.0% were female. Most patients (66%) received care at an academic or integrated network cancer program. With a median follow-up of 84 months, receipt of radiation therapy was not associated with improved overall survival (P = .81). Classification and regression tree analysis revealed a significant association between overall survival and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage group, age, tumor histology, and Charlson comorbidity score. Application of these parameters via machine learning stratified patients into 5 cohorts with distinct survival outcomes. In the most favorable cohort (Cohort 1: American Joint Committee on Cancer stage group ≤II, age ≤61, histology including fibrosarcoma, well differentiated liposarcoma, myxoid liposarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma), the 5-year overall survival was 81.7% and median overall survival was not reached; in the least favorable cohort (Cohort 6: American Joint Committee on Cancer stage group >II, age >68) where the 5-year survival was 41.3% and median overall survival was 45.2 months (P < .001 versus Cohort 1). CONCLUSION In the absence of a defined survival benefit, patients with advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer stage group, older age, and medical comorbidities have relatively unfavorable overall survival after combined modality therapy and therefore stand the least to gain from the addition of radiation therapy to surgery. In contrast, younger patients with good performance status and retroperitoneal sarcoma histologies with a higher propensity for local recurrence may have the greatest opportunity to benefit from radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan D Zeh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - David Konieczkowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Chengli Shen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Diamantis I Tsilimigras
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Alex Kim
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Valerie P Grignol
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Carlo M Contreras
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Meng Welliver
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Allan Tsung
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Raphael E Pollock
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Joal D Beane
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, James Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hatoum GF, Temple HT, Garcia SA, Zheng Y, Kfoury F, Kinley J, Wu X. Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy with Interdigitated High-Dose LRT for Voluminous High-Grade Soft-Tissue Sarcoma. Cancer Manag Res 2023; 15:113-122. [PMID: 36776730 PMCID: PMC9910204 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s393934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To report a case of large extremity soft tissue sarcoma (2933 cc), safely treated with a novel approach of interdigitating high-dose LATTICE radiation therapy (LRT) with standard radiation therapy as a neoadjuvant treatment to surgery. Patients and Methods Four sessions of high-dose LRT were delivered in a weekly interval, interdigitated with standard radiation therapy. The LRT plan consisted of 15 high-dose vertices receiving a dose >12 Gy per session, with 2-3 Gy to the peripheral margin of the tumor. The patient underwent surgical excision 2 months after the new regimen of induction radiation therapy. Results and Discussion The patient tolerated the radiation therapy regimen well. The post-operative assessment revealed a negative surgical margin and over 95% necrosis of the total tumor volume. The post-surgical wound complication was mitigated by outpatient wound care. Interdigitating multiple sessions of high-dose LATTICE radiation treatments with standard neoadjuvant radiation therapy as a neoadjuvant therapy for soft tissue sarcoma was feasible and did not incur additional toxicity in this clinical case. A phase-I/II trial will be conducted to further evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of the new treatment strategy with the intent to increase the rate of pathologic necrosis, which has been shown to positively correlate with the overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georges F Hatoum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HCA Florida JFK Medical Center Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Lake Worth, FL, USA
| | - H Thomas Temple
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Silvio A Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HCA Florida JFK Medical Center Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Lake Worth, FL, USA
| | - Yi Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HCA Florida JFK Medical Center Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Lake Worth, FL, USA,Department of Research and Development, Executive Medical Physics Associates, North Miami Beach, FL, USA
| | - Fouad Kfoury
- Pharmacy Department, South Miami Hospital, South Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jill Kinley
- Department of Clinical Research, HCA Florida JFK Medical Center, Atlantis, FL, USA
| | - Xiaodong Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HCA Florida JFK Medical Center Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Lake Worth, FL, USA,Department of Research and Development, Executive Medical Physics Associates, North Miami Beach, FL, USA,Correspondence: Xiaodong Wu, Executive Medical Physics Associates, 19470 NE 22nd Road, North Miami Beach, FL, 33179, USA, Tel +1 305 775 0333, Email
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
van Praag VM, Fiocco M, Bleckman RF, van Houdt WJ, Haas RLM, Verhoef C, Grunhagen DJ, van Ginkel RJ, Bonenkamp JJ, van de Sande MAJ. The oncological outcomes of isolated limb perfusion and neo-adjuvant radiotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma patients - A nationwide multicenter study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:339-344. [PMID: 36085118 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with locally extensive high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas (eSTS) are often presented in multidisciplinary teams to decide between ablative surgery (amputation) or limb-salvage surgery supplemented with either neo-adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or induction isolated limb perfusion (ILP). In The Netherlands, ILP typically aims to reduce the size of tumors that would otherwise be considered irresectable, whereas neo-adjuvant RT aims mainly at improving local control and reducing morbidity of required marginal margins. This study presents a 15-year nationwide cohort to describe the oncological outcomes of both pre-operative treatment strategies. METHODS All consecutive patients with locally extensive primary high-grade eSTS surgically treated between 2000 and 2015 at five tertiary sarcoma centers that received neo-adjuvant ILP or RT were included. 169 patients met the inclusion criteria (89 ILP, 80 RT). Median follow-up was 7.3 years. RESULTS Limb salvage was achieved in 84% of cases in the ILP group (80% for patients with amputation indication) and 96% of cases in the RT group. 5-Year overall survival was 47% in the ILP group, 69% in the RT group. 5-Year local recurrence rate was 14% in the ILP group, 10% in the RT group. Distant metastasis rate was 55% in the ILP group, 36% in the RT group. CONCLUSION We find oncological outcomes and limb salvage rates in line with existing literature for both treatment modalities. Whether the tumor was locally advanced with an indication for induction therapy to prevent amputation or morbid surgery appeared to be the main determinant in choosing between neo-adjuvant ILP or RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V M van Praag
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - M Fiocco
- Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, Niels Bohrweg 1, 2333 CA, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Section Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - R F Bleckman
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - W J van Houdt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R L M Haas
- Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, and the LUMC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - C Verhoef
- Erasmus MC-Cancer Institute, Department of Surgical Oncology, 's Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D J Grunhagen
- Erasmus MC-Cancer Institute, Department of Surgical Oncology, 's Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R J van Ginkel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - J J Bonenkamp
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Surgical Oncology, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - M A J van de Sande
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Traweek RS, Martin AN, Rajkot NF, Guadagnolo BA, Bishop AJ, Lazar AJ, Keung EZ, Torres KE, Hunt KK, Feig BW, Roland CL, Scally CP. Re-excision After Unplanned Excision of Soft Tissue Sarcoma is Associated with High Morbidity and Limited Pathologic Identification of Residual Disease. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:480-489. [PMID: 36085392 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12359-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with unplanned excision (UPE) of trunk and extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) present a significant management challenge for sarcoma specialists. Oncologic re-resection has been considered standard practice after UPE with positive or uncertain margins. A strategy of active surveillance or "watch and wait" has been suggested as a safe alternative to routine re-excision. In this context, the current study sought to evaluate short-term outcomes and morbidity after re-resection to better understand the risks and benefits of this treatment strategy. METHODS A retrospective, single-institution study reviewed patients undergoing oncologic re-resection after UPE of an STS during a 5-year period (2015-2020), excluding those with evidence of gross residual disease. Short-term clinical outcomes were evaluated together with final pathologic findings. RESULTS The review identified 67 patients undergoing re-resection after UPE of an STS. Of these 67 patients, 45 (67%) were treated with a combination of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and surgery. Plastic surgery was involved for reconstruction in 49 cases (73%). The rate of wound complications after re-resection was 45 % (n = 30), with 15 % (n = 10) of the patients experiencing a major wound complication. Radiation therapy and plastic surgery involvement were independently associated with wound complications. Notably, 45 patients (67%) had no evidence of residual disease in the re-resection specimen, whereas 13 patients (19 %) had microscopic disease, and 9 patients (13%) had indeterminate pathology. CONCLUSION Given the morbidity of re-resection and limited identification of residual disease, treatment plans and discussions with patients should outline the expected pathologic findings and morbidity of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond S Traweek
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Allison N Martin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nikita F Rajkot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - B Ashleigh Guadagnolo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Andrew J Bishop
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Keila E Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Barry W Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christopher P Scally
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Low rate of function-limiting side effects with high-dose adjuvant radiotherapy in high-grade soft tissue extremity sarcomas: a retrospective single-center analysis over 10 years. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022:10.1007/s00432-022-04423-1. [PMID: 36287264 PMCID: PMC9607852 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04423-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Over the years, radiotherapy has been established as a tool to improve local control for high-grade sarcomas. Although the European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines has taken notice of a shift toward a neoadjuvant radiotherapy approach, the American Society for Radiation Oncology guidelines clearly favor a neoadjuvant approach, citing debilitating long-term adverse effects when radiotherapy is applied postoperatively. In this study, we examined these irradiation-associated adverse events for adjuvant radiotherapy and focused on the prognostic factors for disease outcome, including local control. Methods In this retrospective study, data for 106 patients with extremity soft-tissue sarcomas diagnosed between 1997 and 2021, of which 40 received adjuvant radiotherapy, were collected from the clinical and radiological information systems of a high-volume sarcoma treatment center. These data were then analyzed for radiation-associated side effects as well as predictive factors for overall survival, disease-free survival, local control, and surgical complications. Results Radiotherapy was beneficial to patients improving local control, especially for high-grade sarcomas, even when those were resected with negative margins. Side effects due to radiotherapy occurred in 87.5% of the patients, and these effects primarily included radiation dermatitis in 67.5%; however, only 40.0% had any adverse event of ≥ grade 2 according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Long-term function-limiting side effects occurred in 45.0% of the patients; 10% exhibited ≥ grade 2 function-limiting adverse events. Greater time between surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy was beneficial for the patients, whereas joint infiltrating sarcomas were associated with more severe long term, function-limiting adverse events. 28.3% of the patients experienced a recurrence at any location (median time 18.35 months) and in 16% the recurrence was local (median time 16.11 months), resulting in 1, 3, and 5 year disease-free survival rates of 74.1, 58.9, and 38.5% and local control rates of 78.7, 61.6, and 42.8% were observed, respectively. Conclusion Recurrences may be avoided with high-dose radiation, especially for high-grade G2 and G3 sarcomas, even after complete R0 resection. This resulted in a low rate of severe long-term function-limiting adverse events. Thus, adjuvant radiotherapy should be seriously considered when planning patient treatment, especially when treating patients that present with high-grade sarcomas. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-04423-1.
Collapse
|
14
|
Roohani S, Ehret F, Kobus M, Flörcken A, Märdian S, Striefler JK, Rau D, Öllinger R, Jarosch A, Budach V, Kaul D. Preoperative hypofractionated radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas: a systematic review. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:159. [PMID: 36104789 PMCID: PMC9472188 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02072-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a diverse group of rare malignant tumors. Currently, five to six weeks of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) combined with surgery constitute the mainstay of therapy for localized high-grade sarcomas (G2–G3). Growing evidence suggests that shortening preoperative RT courses by hypofractionation neither increases toxicity rates nor impairs oncological outcomes. Instead, shortening RT courses may improve therapy adherence, raise cost-effectiveness, and provide more treatment opportunities for a wider range of patients. Presumed higher rates of adverse effects and worse outcomes are concerns about hypofractionated RT (HFRT) for STS. This systematic review summarizes the current evidence on preoperative HFRT for the treatment of STS and discusses toxicity and oncological outcomes compared to normofractionated RT.
Methods We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials describing outcomes for preoperative HFRT in the management of STS using PubMed, the Cochrane library, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, and Ovid Medline. We followed the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Trials on retroperitoneal sarcomas, postoperative RT, and hyperthermia were excluded. Articles published until November 30th, 2021, were included. Results Initial search yielded 94 articles. After removal of duplicate and ineligible articles, 13 articles qualified for analysis. Eight phase II trials and five retrospective analyses were reviewed. Most trials applied 5 × 5 Gy preoperatively in patients with high-grade STS. HFRT courses did not show increased rates of adverse events compared to historical trials of normofractionated RT. Toxicity rates were mostly comparable or lower than in trials of normofractionated RT. Moreover, HFRT achieved comparable local control rates with shorter duration of therapy. Currently, more than 15 prospective studies on HFRT + / − chemotherapy are ongoing. Conclusions Retrospective data and phase II trials suggest preoperative HFRT to be a reasonable treatment modality for STS. Oncological outcomes and toxicity profiles were favorable. To date, our knowledge is mostly derived from phase II data. No randomized phase III trial comparing normofractionated and HFRT in STS has been published yet. Multiple ongoing phase II trials applying HFRT to investigate acute and late toxicity will hopefully bring forth valuable findings. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02072-9.
Collapse
|
15
|
Laughlin BS, Golafshar MA, Lin K, Goulding K, Roesler K, Vern-Gross T, Seetharam M, Zaniletti I, Ashman JB. Long-term experience with intraoperative electron radiation therapy boost in extremity sarcoma. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:1279-1287. [PMID: 35856506 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS), we describe outcomes of preoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), limb-sparing surgery (LSS), and intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT). METHODS One hundred and eighteen patients with eSTS treated between October 17, 2002 and July 28, 2021 were identified. EBRT was delivered preoperatively followed by LSS and IOERT. RESULTS The median follow-up was 24.9 months. The presentation was primary in 102 (94%) patients and recurrent in 6 (6%) patients. Tumor location was lower extremity in 82 (76%) patients and upper extremity in 26 (24%) patients. Stage distribution was as follows: 3 (3%) IA, 24 (22%) IB, 31 (29%) II, 24 (22%) IIIA, and 25 (23%) IIIB. Final surgical margins were negative in 96 (89%) patients. The 5-year local control, failure-free survival, and overall survival were 94%, 75%, and 64%, respectively. Univariate analysis identified age >50, lower extremity, and higher grade as significant negative prognostic factors for overall survival. Grade 3 fracture or osteoradionecrosis requiring surgical fixation, neuropathy, and lymphedema occurred in 7 (6%), 1 (1%), and 0 patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study represents one of the largest series using preoperative EBRT, LSS, and IOERT for eSTS, with high local control and a low rate of late severe toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brady S Laughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Michael A Golafshar
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Keldon Lin
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Krista Goulding
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Tamara Vern-Gross
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Mahesh Seetharam
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Isabella Zaniletti
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Jonathan B Ashman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Laughlin BS, Golafshar MA, Ahmed S, Prince M, Anderson JD, Vern-Gross T, Seetharam M, Goulding K, Petersen I, DeWees T, Ashman JB. Early Experience Using Proton Beam Therapy for Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Multicenter Study. Int J Part Ther 2022; 9:1-11. [PMID: 35774491 PMCID: PMC9238125 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-21-00037.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Proton beam therapy (PBT) may provide an advantage when planning well-selected patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS), specifically for large, anatomically challenging cases. We analyzed our early experience with PBT on toxicity and outcomes.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective study was performed for eSTS treated between June 2016 and October 2020 with pencil beam scanning PBT at 2 institutions. Diagnostic, treatment, and toxicity characteristics were gathered from baseline to last follow-up or death. Wound complications were defined as secondary operations for wound repair (debridement, drainage, skin graft, and muscle flap) or nonoperative management requiring hospitalization. Statistical analysis was performed with R software.
Results
Twenty consecutive patients with a median age 51.5 years (range, 19–78 years) were included. Median follow-up was 13.7 months (range, 1.7–48.1 months). Tumor presentation was primary (n = 17) or recurrent after prior combined modality therapy (n = 3). Tumor location was either lower extremity (n = 16) or upper extremity (n = 4). Radiation was delivered preoperatively in most patients (n = 18). Median pretreatment tumor size was 7.9 cm (range, 1.3 –30.0 cm). The 1-year locoregional control was 100%. Four patients (20%) had developed metastatic disease by end of follow-up. Maximum toxicity for acute dermatitis was grade 2 in 8 patients (40%) and grade 3 in 3 patients (15%). After preoperative radiation and surgical resection, acute wound complications occurred in 6 patients (35%). Tumor size was larger in patients with acute wound complications compared with those without (medians 16 cm, range [12–30.0 cm] vs 6.3 cm, [1.3–14.4 cm], P = .003).
Conclusion
PBT for well selected eSTS cases demonstrated excellent local control and similar acute wound complication rate comparable to historic controls. Long-term follow-up and further dosimetric analyses will provide further insight into potential advantages of PBT in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Safia Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew Prince
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Mahesh Seetharam
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Krista Goulding
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Ivy Petersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Todd DeWees
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhang M, Crago A, Yoon SS, Singer S, Alektiar K. Radiation Therapy in Primary Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Superficial Trunk. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:2316-2323. [PMID: 34652567 PMCID: PMC9487906 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10927-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite anatomical differences, truncal soft tissue sarcomas (STS) often are grouped with extremity sarcomas. We evaluated the clinical outcome of patients with truncal STS who underwent gross total resection (GTR) and radiation therapy (RT), with special emphasis on those treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS From January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2018, 64 patients received GTR and RT, where 48 patients were male, 35 patients were aged ≤ 60 years, and 48 patients had tumors ≤ 10 cm. Sixty-two tumors were high grade, 36 were in the chest wall, 7 in the abdominal wall, and 21 were paraspinal. During surgery, 7 received mesh reconstruction, and 6 received flap closure. R0 resection was achieved in 53 patients. Thirteen patients received chemotherapy. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 57 months, the 5-year actuarial local control (LC) was 71%. In the IMRT subset (50/64, 78%), the 5-year LC for the chest/abdominal wall was 84%, and 69% for the paraspinal subsite. Grade 2+ radiation dermatitis was seen in 21 of 64 (33%) patients, 5 of 64 (8%) developed noninfectious wound complications, 5 of 64 (8%) developed infectious wound complications, and 1 of 64 (2%) developed grade 2 chest wall pain. No additional grade 2+ late toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS Based on this study, achieving LC in truncal STS treated with GTR and RT remains challenging even with IMRT (5-year LC: 78%). While the use of IMRT was more promising for tumors of the chest/abdominal wall with 5-year LC of 84%, it was 69% for those located in the paraspinal subsite, indicating a need for further improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minsi Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Aimee Crago
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Sam S Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Samuel Singer
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Kaled Alektiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kubicek GJ, Kim TW, Gutowski CJ, Kaden M, Eastwick G, Khrizman P, Xu Q, Lackman R. Preoperative Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: Results of Phase 2 Study. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100855. [PMID: 35387414 PMCID: PMC8977847 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Preoperative radiation followed by surgical resection is a standard treatment for soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). We report on 2 consecutive, phase 2, single-arm studies evaluating 5 fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatments followed by surgical resection for STS (clinical trails.gov NCT02706171). Methods and Materials A total of 16 patients were treated with preoperative SBRT. Tumor size in the greatest dimension was a median 6.7 cm (maximum: 14 cm) and the majority of STS were in the extremities. SBRT consisted of 35 to 40 Gy in 5 fractions every other day. Results Median follow-up time was 1719 days (4.7 years). Grade ≥3 acute toxicity occurred in 1 patient (grade 3 skin changes). Fifteen patients proceeded with surgical resection. Three patients had a wound complication after surgery, 1 patient had grade ≥3 late toxicity (grade 4 requiring surgical intervention). There was 1 local recurrence and 5 distant recurrences. Conclusions Long-term follow-up on SBRT for STS found acceptable control and toxicity rates, and warrants further evaluation.
Collapse
|
19
|
González-Viguera J, Reynés-Llompart G, Lozano A. Outcomes and computed tomography radiomic features extraction in soft tissue sarcomas treated with neoadjuvant radiation therapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2021; 26:804-813. [PMID: 34760315 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2021.0092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of the study was to evaluate the management, toxicity and treatment responses of patients treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NART) for soft tissue sarcomas (STS) and to analyse the potential of radiomic features extracted from computed tomography (CT) scans. Materials and methods This is a retrospective and exploratory study with patients treated between 2006 and 2019. Acute and chronic toxicities are evaluated. Local progression free survival (LPFS), distant progression free survival (DPFS) and overall survival (OS) are analysed. Radiomic features are obtained. Results A total of 25 patients were included. Median follow-up is 24 months. Complications in surgical wound healing were observed in 20% of patients, chronic fibrosis was documented as grade 1 (12%) and grade 2 (12%) without grade 3 events and chronic lymphedema as grade 1 (8%) and grade 2 (20%) without grade 3 events. Survival variables were LPFS 76%, DPFS 62% and OS 67.2% at 2-year follow-up. CT radiomics features were associated significantly with local control (GLCM-correlation), systemic control (HUmin, HUpeak, volume, GLCM-correlation and GLZLM-GLNU) and OS (GLZLM-SZE). Conclusions STS treated with NART in our centre associate with an OS and toxicity comparable to other series. CT radiomic features have a prognosis potential in STS risk stratification. The results of our study may serve as a motivation for future prospective studies with a greater number of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gabriel Reynés-Llompart
- Catalan Institute of Oncology, Medical Physics and Radiological Protection Service, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Alicia Lozano
- Catalan Institute of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Salerno KE, Alektiar KM, Baldini EH, Bedi M, Bishop AJ, Bradfield L, Chung P, DeLaney TF, Folpe A, Kane JM, Li XA, Petersen I, Powell J, Stolten M, Thorpe S, Trent JC, Voermans M, Guadagnolo BA. Radiation Therapy for Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Adults: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 11:339-351. [PMID: 34326023 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations addressing the indications for radiation therapy (RT), sequencing of local therapies, and appropriate dose and planning techniques for management of primary, operable, localized, soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in adults. METHODS The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 5 key questions focused on the use of RT for management of STS. These questions included indications for RT for STS of the extremity and superficial trunk; considerations for sequencing of RT with respect to surgery, dose of RT, appropriate treatment volumes and techniques; and the role of RT in management of retroperitoneal sarcoma. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength. RESULTS Multidisciplinary evaluation and decision making are recommended for all cases of STS. RT is recommended for patients in whom there is increased risk of local recurrence of resected STS, particularly if close or microscopically positive margins are anticipated or have occurred. When RT is indicated, preoperative RT is strongly recommended over postoperative RT. Postoperative RT is conditionally recommended in specific clinical circumstances (eg, uncontrolled pain or bleeding) or when the risk of wound complications outweighs that of late toxicity from RT. Routine use of RT in addition to oncologic resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma is conditionally not recommended. When RT is used for retroperitoneal sarcoma, preoperative RT is recommended, whereas postoperative RT is not recommended. CONCLUSIONS Based on currently published data, the American Society for Radiation Oncology task force has proposed evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of RT for STS in adults. Future studies will ascertain whether alterations in dosing and sequencing may optimize outcomes and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kilian E Salerno
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
| | - Kaled M Alektiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York
| | - Elizabeth H Baldini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Manpreet Bedi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Andrew J Bishop
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Lisa Bradfield
- American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Peter Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thomas F DeLaney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew Folpe
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - John M Kane
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - X Allen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Ivy Petersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - John Powell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Michael Stolten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Steven Thorpe
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
| | - Jonathan C Trent
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida
| | - Maria Voermans
- Froedtert & Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Femoral fracture in primary soft-tissue sarcoma of the thigh treated with radiation therapy: indications for prophylactic intramedullary nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021; 141:1277-1282. [PMID: 32705383 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03544-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Post-radiation fractures of the femur (PRF) are difficult to treat and are associated with a high risk of delayed union and non-union. We report a series of patients affected by soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the thigh, treated with limb-sparing surgery and perioperative radiotherapy (RT), to analyse post-radiotherapy femur fracture (FF) rate and its management. MATERIAL AND METHODS 547 patients treated with surgery and RT for a deep primary STS of the thigh were included. "Periosteal stripping" and "bone tangential resection" were performed in case of tumor invasion. In the case of complete bone involvement, the patient received its complete resection and econstruction. RESULTS Twenty-three (4.3%) patients underwent surgical procedures involving periosteum and cortical bone. In 11 (2.0%) patients a bone resection was required because of massive bone involvement. Six out of these 11 (54.5%) patients developed major complications (infection and aseptic loosening). At the time of STS excision, 11 patients (2.0%) underwent prophylactic intramedullary nailing (PIN). PRF occurred in 15 patients (3.0%) at a median follow up of 52 months (range 3-151). Among patients who developed PRF, three were treated with a prosthesis (no complications) and eight nailing (7/8, 87.5% did not heal and developed a non-union). CONCLUSIONS Given the potentially devastating complication of a PRF, PIN should be considered. We suggest prophylactic IM nail in patients at higher risk the time of STS excision. In other cases, IM nail can be postponed in the following years considering the prognosis.
Collapse
|
22
|
Navarro F, Dapper H, Asadpour R, Knebel C, Spraker MB, Schwarze V, Schaub SK, Mayr NA, Specht K, Woodruff HC, Lambin P, Gersing AS, Nyflot MJ, Menze BH, Combs SE, Peeken JC. Development and External Validation of Deep-Learning-Based Tumor Grading Models in Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Patients Using MR Imaging. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:2866. [PMID: 34201251 PMCID: PMC8227009 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13122866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with soft-tissue sarcomas, tumor grading constitutes a decisive factor to determine the best treatment decision. Tumor grading is obtained by pathological work-up after focal biopsies. Deep learning (DL)-based imaging analysis may pose an alternative way to characterize STS tissue. In this work, we sought to non-invasively differentiate tumor grading into low-grade (G1) and high-grade (G2/G3) STS using DL techniques based on MR-imaging. METHODS Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-saturated (T1FSGd) MRI sequences and fat-saturated T2-weighted (T2FS) sequences were collected from two independent retrospective cohorts (training: 148 patients, testing: 158 patients). Tumor grading was determined following the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group in pre-therapeutic biopsies. DL models were developed using transfer learning based on the DenseNet 161 architecture. RESULTS The T1FSGd and T2FS-based DL models achieved area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.75 and 0.76 on the test cohort, respectively. T1FSGd achieved the best F1-score of all models (0.90). The T2FS-based DL model was able to significantly risk-stratify for overall survival. Attention maps revealed relevant features within the tumor volume and in border regions. CONCLUSIONS MRI-based DL models are capable of predicting tumor grading with good reproducibility in external validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Navarro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (F.N.); (H.D.); (R.A.); (S.E.C.)
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Boltzmannstr. 3, 85748 Garching, Germany;
- TranslaTUM—Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, Einsteinstraße 25, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Hendrik Dapper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (F.N.); (H.D.); (R.A.); (S.E.C.)
| | - Rebecca Asadpour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (F.N.); (H.D.); (R.A.); (S.E.C.)
| | - Carolin Knebel
- Department of Orthopedics and Sports Orthopedics, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany;
| | - Matthew B. Spraker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, 4511 Forest Park Ave, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA;
| | - Vincent Schwarze
- Department of Radiology, Grosshadern Campus, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (V.S.); (A.S.G.)
| | - Stephanie K. Schaub
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, 356043, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; (S.K.S.); (N.A.M.); (M.J.N.)
| | - Nina A. Mayr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, 356043, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; (S.K.S.); (N.A.M.); (M.J.N.)
| | - Katja Specht
- Department of Pathology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Trogerstr. 18, 81675 Munich, Germany;
| | - Henry C. Woodruff
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands; (H.C.W.); (P.L.)
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Imaging, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Philippe Lambin
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands; (H.C.W.); (P.L.)
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Imaging, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra S. Gersing
- Department of Radiology, Grosshadern Campus, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (V.S.); (A.S.G.)
- Department of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Matthew J. Nyflot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, 356043, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; (S.K.S.); (N.A.M.); (M.J.N.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| | - Bjoern H. Menze
- Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Boltzmannstr. 3, 85748 Garching, Germany;
- Department for Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (F.N.); (H.D.); (R.A.); (S.E.C.)
- Department for Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1, 85764 Munich, Germany
| | - Jan C. Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (F.N.); (H.D.); (R.A.); (S.E.C.)
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Imaging, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Ingolstaedter Landstr. 1, 85764 Munich, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site, 85764 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cammelli S, Cortesi A, Buwenge M, Zamagni A, Ferioli M, Ghigi G, Romeo A, Morganti AG. The role of radiotherapy in adult soft tissues sarcoma of the extremities. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY 2021; 31:1583-1596. [PMID: 33954820 PMCID: PMC8702420 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-02990-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Local management of adult soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities has evolved over the past decades. Until the 1970s, radical surgery (amputations) was the standard therapeutic procedure resulting in significant physical and psychological morbidity for the patients. In the present era, limb sparing surgery combined with radiotherapy represents the current standard of care for high grade and > 5 cm STSs. This approach guarantees high local control rate and function preservation. The aim of this paper is to summarize the current evidence for RT in STSs of the extremities. Outcomes, technical details (techniques, timing, dose, volumes of treatment) and the emerging role of RT in the management of oligometastatic disease will be analysed. Finally, results of the recent clinical trials testing new scenarios in RT of STSs will be described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Cammelli
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy. .,Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Annalisa Cortesi
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alice Zamagni
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Martina Ferioli
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Ghigi
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Antonino Romeo
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Alessio G Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Peeken JC, Neumann J, Asadpour R, Leonhardt Y, Moreira JR, Hippe DS, Klymenko O, Foreman SC, von Schacky CE, Spraker MB, Schaub SK, Dapper H, Knebel C, Mayr NA, Woodruff HC, Lambin P, Nyflot MJ, Gersing AS, Combs SE. Prognostic Assessment in High-Grade Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Patients: A Comparison of Semantic Image Analysis and Radiomics. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1929. [PMID: 33923697 PMCID: PMC8073388 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities, the treatment decision is currently regularly based on tumor grading and size. The imaging-based analysis may pose an alternative way to stratify patients' risk. In this work, we compared the value of MRI-based radiomics with expert-derived semantic imaging features for the prediction of overall survival (OS). METHODS Fat-saturated T2-weighted sequences (T2FS) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-saturated (T1FSGd) sequences were collected from two independent retrospective cohorts (training: 108 patients; testing: 71 patients). After preprocessing, 105 radiomic features were extracted. Semantic imaging features were determined by three independent radiologists. Three machine learning techniques (elastic net regression (ENR), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and random survival forest) were compared to predict OS. RESULTS ENR models achieved the best predictive performance. Histologies and clinical staging differed significantly between both cohorts. The semantic prognostic model achieved a predictive performance with a C-index of 0.58 within the test set. This was worse compared to a clinical staging system (C-index: 0.61) and the radiomic models (C-indices: T1FSGd: 0.64, T2FS: 0.63). Both radiomic models achieved significant patient stratification. CONCLUSIONS T2FS and T1FSGd-based radiomic models outperformed semantic imaging features for prognostic assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan C. Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (R.A.); (O.K.); (H.D.); (S.E.C.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 München, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; (H.C.W.); (P.L.)
| | - Jan Neumann
- Department of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.N.); (Y.L.); (J.R.M.); (S.C.F.); (C.E.v.S.); (A.S.G.)
| | - Rebecca Asadpour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (R.A.); (O.K.); (H.D.); (S.E.C.)
| | - Yannik Leonhardt
- Department of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.N.); (Y.L.); (J.R.M.); (S.C.F.); (C.E.v.S.); (A.S.G.)
| | - Joao R. Moreira
- Department of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.N.); (Y.L.); (J.R.M.); (S.C.F.); (C.E.v.S.); (A.S.G.)
| | - Daniel S. Hippe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; (D.S.H.); (S.K.S.); (N.A.M.); (M.J.N.)
| | - Olena Klymenko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (R.A.); (O.K.); (H.D.); (S.E.C.)
| | - Sarah C. Foreman
- Department of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.N.); (Y.L.); (J.R.M.); (S.C.F.); (C.E.v.S.); (A.S.G.)
| | - Claudio E. von Schacky
- Department of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.N.); (Y.L.); (J.R.M.); (S.C.F.); (C.E.v.S.); (A.S.G.)
| | - Matthew B. Spraker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA;
| | - Stephanie K. Schaub
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; (D.S.H.); (S.K.S.); (N.A.M.); (M.J.N.)
| | - Hendrik Dapper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (R.A.); (O.K.); (H.D.); (S.E.C.)
| | - Carolin Knebel
- Department of Orthopedics and Sports Orthopedics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany;
| | - Nina A. Mayr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; (D.S.H.); (S.K.S.); (N.A.M.); (M.J.N.)
| | - Henry C. Woodruff
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; (H.C.W.); (P.L.)
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Imaging, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Philippe Lambin
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; (H.C.W.); (P.L.)
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Imaging, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Matthew J. Nyflot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; (D.S.H.); (S.K.S.); (N.A.M.); (M.J.N.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Alexandra S. Gersing
- Department of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 81675 Munich, Germany; (J.N.); (Y.L.); (J.R.M.); (S.C.F.); (C.E.v.S.); (A.S.G.)
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany; (R.A.); (O.K.); (H.D.); (S.E.C.)
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 München, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Soft-tissue Sarcoma of the Hand: Patient Characteristics, Treatment, and Oncologic Outcomes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2021; 29:e297-e307. [PMID: 32932303 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-20-00434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to describe patient characteristics, treatment, and oncologic outcomes of soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) of the hand. METHODS Sixty-nine STSs of the hand in adult patients treated at a tertiary referral center were retrospectively included. We describe patient and tumor characteristics along with oncologic outcomes. RESULTS Epithelioid sarcoma (23%) was the most common histologic subtype, followed by synovial sarcoma (15%). Of all tumors, 17 (25%) were grade I, 22 (32%) were grade II, and 30 (44%) were grade III. The 5-year disease-free survival for epithelioid sarcomas was 75% with a disease survival of 100%, along with a metastatic rate of 15%. Of the patients with a synovial sarcoma, 40% developed metastases, and the 5-year disease-free survival was 68% and the 5-year disease survival was 73%. CONCLUSION Hand STSs are aggressive tumors with a high metastatic potential. Even with adequate oncologic treatment, long-term clinical follow-up (10 years) in these tumors is advised. The treating surgical oncologist should not be deceived by their smaller size.
Collapse
|
26
|
Fiorentino A, Gregucci F, Desideri I, Fiore M, Marino L, Errico A, Di Rito A, Borghetti P, Franco P, Greto D, Donato V. Radiation treatment for adult rare cancers: Oldest and newest indication. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 159:103228. [PMID: 33508447 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Aim of this analysis is to review the role of RT in the management of several rare tumors for adult patients. METHODS Collection data regarding RT and rare tumors was made by Pubmed. RESULTS For mucosal melanomas, RT is prescribed, being associated with lower local recurrence rate. For trachea tumors, RT was used as adjuvant or salvage treatment for unresectable disease. For pNET, RT can be a suitable option for post-surgical or unresectable/borderline. For bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumors the role of adjuvant treatments is uncertain. For hepatobiliary and ovarian malignancy, stereotactic body RT (SBRT) is a promising approach. For soft tissue sarcoma, perioperative treatments are indicated, and a growing role of SBRT in oligometastatic disease is recognized. For endocrine tumors, adjuvant RT has demonstrated benefits through reducing recurrence risk. CONCLUSION The radiotherapy is a frequent indication in adult rare cancers; thus the role of Radiation Oncologist must not be neglected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alba Fiorentino
- Radiation Oncology Department, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Fabiana Gregucci
- Radiation Oncology Department, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy.
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Section of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Italy
| | - Michele Fiore
- Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenza Marino
- Radiation Oncology Department, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, Misterbianco, Catania, Italy
| | - Angelo Errico
- Radiotherapy Oncology Department, R. Dimiccoli Hospital, Barletta, Italy
| | - Alessia Di Rito
- Radiotherapy Oncology Department, IRCCS "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Paolo Borghetti
- Radiation Oncology Department University and Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Daniela Greto
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Section of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Italy
| | - Vittorio Donato
- Radiation Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Chander S, Ngan C, Choong PFM. Management of Metastatic Sarcoma. Sarcoma 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-9414-4_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
28
|
Llacer-Moscardo C, Terlizzi M, Bonvalot S, Le Loarer F, Carrère S, Tetrau R, D'ascoli A, Lerouge D, Le Péchoux C, Thariat J. Pre- or postoperative radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer Radiother 2020; 24:501-512. [PMID: 32807685 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Sarcomas are rare tumours arising from mesenchymal tissue. A multimodal management in an expert centre combining surgery and radiotherapy is the current standard of care for localized soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities, to enable limb-sparing strategies. The delivery of pre- radiotherapy or postoperative radiotherapy offers similar local control and survival rates but the toxicity profile is quite different: preoperative radiotherapy increases the risk of wound complications and postoperative radiotherapy affects long-term functional outcomes. While postoperative radiotherapy has long been the rule, especially in Europe, technical improvements with image-guided- and intensity-modulated radiotherapy associated with a better management of postoperative wounds has tended to change practices with more frequent preoperative radiotherapy. More recently the possibilities of a hypofractionated regimen or potentiation by nanoparticles to increase the therapeutic index plead in favour of a preoperative delivery of radiotherapy. The aim of this paper is to report pros and cons of pre- and post-operative radiotherapy for soft-tissue sarcomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Llacer-Moscardo
- Radiation Oncology Department, institut du cancer de Montpellier (ICM), 208, avenue des Apothicaires, parc Euromédecine, 34298 Montpellier cedex 5, France.
| | - M Terlizzi
- Radiation Oncology Department, hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, 1, avenue Magellan, 33600 Pessac, France
| | - S Bonvalot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - F Le Loarer
- Department of Pathology, institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, CS 61283, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France
| | - S Carrère
- Department of Surgical Oncology, institut du cancer de Montpellier (ICM), 208, avenue des Apothicaires, parc Euromédecine, 34298 Montpellier cedex 5, France
| | - R Tetrau
- Radiology Department, institut du cancer de Montpellier (ICM), 208, avenue des Apothicaires, parc Euromédecine, 34298 Montpellier cedex 5, France
| | - A D'ascoli
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Surgery, hôpital Pasteur 2, Institut universitaire locomoteur et sports (IULS), 30, voie Romaine, 06000 Nice, France
| | - D Lerouge
- Radiation Oncology Department, centre François-Baclesse, 3, avenue General-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Association Advance Resource Centre for Hadrontherapy in Europe (Archade), 3, avenue General-Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - C Le Péchoux
- Radiation Oncology Department, Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif cedex, France
| | - J Thariat
- Radiation Oncology Department, centre François-Baclesse, 3, avenue General-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Association Advance Resource Centre for Hadrontherapy in Europe (Archade), 3, avenue General-Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy-Related Wound Morbidity in Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Perspectives for Radioprotective Agents. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12082258. [PMID: 32806601 PMCID: PMC7465163 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Historically, patients with localized soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities would undergo limb amputation. It was subsequently determined that the addition of radiation therapy (RT) delivered prior to (neoadjuvant) or after (adjuvant) a limb-sparing surgical resection yielded equivalent survival outcomes to amputation in appropriate patients. Generally, neoadjuvant radiation offers decreased volume and dose of high-intensity radiation to normal tissue and increased chance of achieving negative surgical margins-but also increases wound healing complications when compared to adjuvant radiotherapy. This review elaborates on the current neoadjuvant/adjuvant RT approaches, wound healing complications in STS, and the potential application of novel radioprotective agents to minimize radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity.
Collapse
|
30
|
Koseła-Paterczyk H, Spałek M, Borkowska A, Teterycz P, Wągrodzki M, Szumera-Ciećkiewicz A, Morysiński T, Castaneda-Wysocka P, Cieszanowski A, Zdzienicki M, Goryń T, Rutkowski P. Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Myxoid Liposarcomas of Extremities or Trunk Wall: Results of a Single-Arm Prospective Clinical Trial. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9082471. [PMID: 32752185 PMCID: PMC7464815 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9082471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Myxoid liposarcoma (MLPS) has been reported to be more radiosensitive compared with other soft tissue sarcomas. The main objective of the study was to assess the efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) in the preoperative setting in patients with locally advanced primary MLPS. Methods: Single-arm prospective exploratory clinical trial enrolled MLPS patients for preoperative 5 × 5 Gy RT with delayed surgery. The endpoints of the study were the rate of early wound healing complications and 5-year local control rate. Results: 29 patients (pts) were included, all had tumors located on the lower limb. The median maximum size of the tumor was 13 cm (IQR 10–15 cm). Early RT tolerance was good. Postoperative wound complications occurred in 11 pts (37.9%), late complications concerned 13.8% of patients. A total of 27 patients were included for the efficacy analyses. The pathological features of response to RT were detected in all analyzed surgical specimens. In 25 patients R0 margins were achieved, two patients had an R1 resection. None of the patients had local recurrence. Conclusion: Preoperative hypofractionated RT with a prolonged gap between RT and surgery is a feasible method of the management of MLPS, providing a good local control and low rates of treatment toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Koseła-Paterczyk
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (A.B.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (M.Z.); (T.G.); (P.R.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Mateusz Spałek
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (A.B.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (M.Z.); (T.G.); (P.R.)
| | - Aneta Borkowska
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (A.B.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (M.Z.); (T.G.); (P.R.)
| | - Paweł Teterycz
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (A.B.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (M.Z.); (T.G.); (P.R.)
| | - Michał Wągrodzki
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.W.); (A.S.-C.)
| | - Anna Szumera-Ciećkiewicz
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.W.); (A.S.-C.)
- Diagnostic Hematology Department, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Tadeusz Morysiński
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (A.B.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (M.Z.); (T.G.); (P.R.)
| | - Patrycja Castaneda-Wysocka
- Department of Radiology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (P.C.-W.); (A.C.)
| | - Andrzej Cieszanowski
- Department of Radiology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (P.C.-W.); (A.C.)
| | - Marcin Zdzienicki
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (A.B.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (M.Z.); (T.G.); (P.R.)
| | - Tomasz Goryń
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (A.B.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (M.Z.); (T.G.); (P.R.)
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (A.B.); (P.T.); (T.M.); (M.Z.); (T.G.); (P.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gamboa AC, Gronchi A, Cardona K. Soft-tissue sarcoma in adults: An update on the current state of histiotype-specific management in an era of personalized medicine. CA Cancer J Clin 2020; 70:200-229. [PMID: 32275330 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 262] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumors that account for 1% of all adult malignancies, with over 100 different histologic subtypes occurring predominately in the trunk, extremity, and retroperitoneum. This low incidence is further complicated by their variable presentation, behavior, and long-term outcomes, which emphasize the importance of centralized care in specialized centers with a multidisciplinary team approach. In the last decade, there has been an effort to improve the quality of care for patients with STS based on anatomic site and histology, and multiple ongoing clinical trials are focusing on tailoring therapy to histologic subtype. This report summarizes the latest evidence guiding the histiotype-specific management of extremity/truncal and retroperitoneal STS with regard to surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana C Gamboa
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Alessandro Gronchi
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Kenneth Cardona
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kalbasi A, Kamrava M, Chu FI, Telesca D, Van Dams R, Yang Y, Ruan D, Nelson SD, Dry SM, Hernandez J, Chmielowski B, Singh AS, Bukata SV, Bernthal NM, Steinberg ML, Weidhaas JB, Eilber FC. A Phase II Trial of 5-Day Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy for Patients with High-Risk Primary Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:1829-1836. [PMID: 32054730 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-3524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2019] [Revised: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In a single-institution phase II study, we evaluated the safety of a 5-day dose-equivalent neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) regimen for high-risk primary soft tissue sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received neoadjuvant RT alone (30 Gy in five fractions) to the primary tumor with standard margins. The primary endpoint was grade ≥2 late-radiation toxicity. Major wound complications, local recurrences, and distant metastases were also examined. In exploratory analysis, we evaluated germline biomarkers for wound toxicity and the effects of the study on treatment utilization. RESULTS Over 2 years, 52 patients were enrolled with median follow-up of 29 months. Seven of 44 evaluable patients (16%) developed grade ≥2 late toxicity. Major wound complications occurred in 16 of 50 patients (32%); a signature defined by 19 germline SNPs in miRNA-binding sites of immune and DNA damage response genes, in addition to lower extremity tumor location, demonstrated strong predictive performance for major wound complications. Compared with the preceding 2-year period, the number of patients treated with neoadjuvant RT alone at our institution increased 3-fold, with a concomitant increase in the catchment area. CONCLUSIONS A shorter 5-day neoadjuvant RT regimen results in favorable rates of wound complications and grade ≥2 toxicity after 2-year follow-up. Five-day RT significantly increased utilization of neoadjuvant RT at our high-volume sarcoma center. With further validation, a putative germline biomarker for wound complications may guide safer RT utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anusha Kalbasi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California. .,Division of Surgical-Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,University of California Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center Sarcoma Program, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Fang-I Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California
| | - Donatello Telesca
- Department of Biostatistics, University of California Los Angeles Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ritchell Van Dams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California
| | - Yingli Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California
| | - Dan Ruan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California
| | - Scott D Nelson
- University of California Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center Sarcoma Program, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Pathology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sarah M Dry
- University of California Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center Sarcoma Program, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Pathology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jackie Hernandez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California
| | - Bartosz Chmielowski
- University of California Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center Sarcoma Program, Los Angeles, California.,Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Arun S Singh
- Division of Surgical-Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,University of California Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center Sarcoma Program, Los Angeles, California.,Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Susan V Bukata
- University of California Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center Sarcoma Program, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Nicholas M Bernthal
- University of California Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center Sarcoma Program, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michael L Steinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California.,University of California Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center Sarcoma Program, Los Angeles, California
| | - Joanne B Weidhaas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California.,University of California Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center Sarcoma Program, Los Angeles, California
| | - Fritz C Eilber
- Division of Surgical-Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. .,University of California Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center Sarcoma Program, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Di Brina L, Fogliata A, Navarria P, D'Agostino G, Franzese C, Franceschini D, De Rose F, Comito T, Bertuzzi A, Marrari A, Colombo P, Quagliuolo V, Santoro A, Scorsetti M. Adjuvant volumetric modulated arc therapy compared to 3D conformal radiation therapy for newly diagnosed soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities: outcome and toxicity evaluation. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20190252. [PMID: 31322910 PMCID: PMC6774597 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2019] [Revised: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of adjuvant volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in terms of toxicity and local control (LC) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities. METHODS From 2004 to 2016, 109 patients were treated, initially using 3DCRT and subsequently with VMAT. Clinical outcome was evaluated by contrast-enhanced MRI, thoracic and abdominal CT 3 months after treatments and then every 6 months. Toxicity was evaluated with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scale v. 4.3. RESULTS Patients presented Stage III soft tissue sarcoma disease (77%), localized tumor (95%) at the lower extremity (87%), adipocytic histotype (46%). Surgical resection was performed in all patients, followed by adjuvant 3DCRT in 38, and VMAT in 71. The median total dose was 66 Gy/33 fractions (range 60-70 Gy;25-35 fractions). More successful bone sparing was recorded using VMAT (p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 61 months, 93 and 58 months for 3DCRT and VMAT group, respectively. The 2- and 5 year LC were 95.3±2.1%, and 87.4±3.4% for the whole cohort, 92.0±4.5%, 82.9±6.4% for 3DCRT, 97.1±2.0%, 89.6±4.1% for VMAT (p = 0.150). On univariate and multivariate analysis the factors recorded as conditioning LC were the status of the surgical resection margins (p = 0.028) and the total dose delivered (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION The availability of modern radiotherapy technique permit a better conformity on the target with maximum sparing of normal tissue and acceptable side-effects. VMAT is a safe and feasible treatment with limited rate of toxicity, compared to 3DCRT. Results on LC of VMAT are encouraging. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities can benefit from the use of VMAT, with a reduction of the high dose to bones to avoid radiation osteonecrosis. An adequate total dose of at least 66 Gy and a radical surgical margin allow a good local control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Di Brina
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | - Antonella Fogliata
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | - Giuseppe D'Agostino
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | - Davide Franceschini
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | - Fiorenza De Rose
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | - Tiziana Comito
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | - Alexia Bertuzzi
- Medical Oncology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | - Andrea Marrari
- Medical Oncology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | - Piergiuseppe Colombo
- Pahtology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center – IRCCS-, Rozzano - Milano – Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ortiz González I, Morera Cano D, Roncero Sánchez R, Mateos Salvador P, Valencia Blanco L, Vidal Borrás M, Aymar Salís N, Gadea Quinteiro J, Jiménez Jiménez E, Gelabert JF, Pardo Masferrer J. Dosimetric comparison of volumetric-arc therapy versus sliding window intensity-modulated radiotherapy in postoperative treatment for primary soft tissue sarcoma of the thigh. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2019; 15:371-376. [PMID: 31321885 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 06/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
AIM Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has demonstrated improved local control in extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) after limb-sparing surgery compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy. Our purpose was to evaluate sliding-window IMRT (SW-IMRT) and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) in planning target volume (PTV) coverage and dose to organs-at-risk (OAR). METHODS Sixteen patients undergoing postoperative RT for lower extremity STS were included. For each patient, one VMAT plan and one SW-IMRT plan were proposed. Both were evaluated using cumulative dose-volume histogram data for OAR and PTVs. Prescribed dose was 66 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) to PTV1 and 56 Gy (1.69 Gy/fraction) to PTV2. OARs contoured were femur, neurovascular bundle, minimum tissue corridor, normal tissue outside PTV2, joint and genitalia. T-Student test was performed. RESULTS Eleven male (69%) and five female patients (31%) were analyzed. Mean age was 60 years. Both techniques showed optimal target coverage, conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI). VMAT PTV2 CI was 1.13 (mean) ± 0.08 (standard deviation) versus 1.19 ± 0.10 SW-IMRT PTV2 CI (P < 0.05). VMAT PTV1 HI was 0.09 ± 0.01 versus 0.08 ± 0.01 SW-IMRT PTV1 HI (P < 0.05). Regarding OARs, VMAT delivered lower dose to femur, genitalia, normal tissue outside PTV2 and joints. SW-IMRT spared tissue corridor mean dose (10.4 Gy ± 6.8 Gy) versus (14.7 ± 6.5 Gy) VMAT (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Both techniques achieved great conformity, homogeneity and coverage of PTV. VMAT produced lower dose to OARS and SW-IMRT was superior in sparing dose to normal-tissue-corridor, which could reduce risk of lymphedema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Ortiz González
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Daniel Morera Cano
- Medical Physics Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Raquel Roncero Sánchez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | | | - Meritxell Vidal Borrás
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Neus Aymar Salís
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Jon Gadea Quinteiro
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Esther Jiménez Jiménez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain
| | - Joan Font Gelabert
- Medical Physics Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - José Pardo Masferrer
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.,Institut d'Investigació Sanitaria de Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.,Hospital General de Catalunya Quironsalud, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Duran-Moreno J, Kontogeorgakos V, Koumarianou A. Soft tissue sarcomas of the upper extremities: Maximizing treatment opportunities and outcomes. Oncol Lett 2019; 18:2179-2191. [PMID: 31404317 PMCID: PMC6676724 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.10575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumors; they do not even equate to 1% of all malignant tumor cases. One-fifth of all STS occur in the upper extremities, where epithelioid sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, clear cell sarcoma and malignant fibrohistiocytoma are the most frequent subtypes. Surgical resection is the cornerstone of treatment. However, accomplishment of optimal oncological and functional results of STS of the upper extremities may represent a challenge for hand surgeons, due to the complex anatomy. In several cases, preoperative therapies are needed to facilitate tumor resection and improve the oncological outcome. Oligometastatic disease may also be a challenging scenario as curative strategies can be applied. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are commonly used for this purpose albeit with conflicting evidence. Novel drug combinations have also been approved in the metastatic setting, further improving the quality of life and survival of eligible patients. Thus, prior to any approach, every case should be individually discussed in sarcoma centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards. The aim of the present review was to gather the multidisciplinary experiences of the available therapeutic strategies for STS of the upper extremities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Duran-Moreno
- Hematology Oncology Unit, Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, 'Attikon' University General Hospital, Athens 12462, Greece
| | - Vasileios Kontogeorgakos
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 'Attikon' University General Hospital, Athens 12462, Greece
| | - Anna Koumarianou
- Hematology Oncology Unit, Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, 'Attikon' University General Hospital, Athens 12462, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Peeken JC, Bernhofer M, Spraker MB, Pfeiffer D, Devecka M, Thamer A, Shouman MA, Ott A, Nüsslin F, Mayr NA, Rost B, Nyflot MJ, Combs SE. CT-based radiomic features predict tumor grading and have prognostic value in patients with soft tissue sarcomas treated with neoadjuvant radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 2019; 135:187-196. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Revised: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 01/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
37
|
Vickers AJ, Thiruthaneeswaran N, Coyle C, Manoharan P, Wylie J, Kershaw L, Choudhury A, Mcwilliam A. Does magnetic resonance imaging improve soft tissue sarcoma contouring for radiotherapy? BJR Open 2019; 1:20180022. [PMID: 33178916 PMCID: PMC7592468 DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20180022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Revised: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a rare, heterogeneous tumour group. Radiotherapy improves local control. CT is used to plan radiotherapy, but has poor soft tissue definition. MRI has superior soft tissue definition. Contour variation amongst oncologists is an important factor in treatment failure. This study is the first to directly compare STS tumour contouring using CT vs MRI. Methods: Planning CT and T2 weighted MR images of eight patients with STS were distributed to four oncologists. Gross tumour volume was contoured on both imaging modalities using in-house software. Images were recontoured 6 weeks later. The mean distance to agreement (DTA), standard deviation of the DTA, dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and contour volume were calculated for each oncologist and compared to a median contour volume. Results for CT and MRI were compared using a pairwise Student's t-test. Results: When comparing MRI to CT, tumour volumes were significantly smaller, with a difference of 21.4 cm3 across all patients (p = 0.008). There was not a statistically significant difference in the mean distance to agreement or dice similarity coefficient, but the standard deviation of the DTA showed a statistically significant improvement ( p = 0.04). For intraobserver variation, there was no statistically significant improvement using MRI vs CT. Conclusion: Oncologists contour smaller tumour volumes using MRI, with reduced interobserver variation. Improving the reliability and consistency of contouring is needed for improved quality assurance. Advances in knowledge: With further experience, the use of MRI in STS radiotherapy planning may reduce variation between oncologists and contribute to improved local control and reduced treatment toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander John Vickers
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Catherine Coyle
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Prakash Manoharan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - James Wylie
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Benefit of Radiotherapy in Extraskeletal Myxoid Chondrosarcoma: A Propensity Score Weighted Population-based Analysis of the SEER Database. Am J Clin Oncol 2019; 41:674-680. [PMID: 27819877 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (EMC) is a rare malignancy for which the role of radiotherapy is not well-defined. We examine the effect of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) on cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with localized EMC, in a propensity score weighted, population-based analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1973 to 2012) was queried for cases of localized EMC arising from soft connective tissues of the trunk and extremities treated with surgery and/or EBRT. Inverse probability treatment weighting was utilized, with survival analysis by weighted Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank testing. The primary endpoint was CSS. RESULTS One hundred seventy-two patients were identified, diagnosed from 2004 to 2012. Ninety-four percent and 32% of 156 assessable patients underwent surgery and EBRT, respectively. By inverse probability treatment weighting, balancing covariates of age group, sex, race, grade, T stage, N stage, receipt of surgery, and anatomic site, we observed CSS of 97% versus 85% and 94% versus 85% in patients receiving EBRT versus no EBRT, at 3 and 5 years, respectively, at median follow-up of 33 months, P=0.01. A trend toward an overall survival benefit associated with EBRT was noted, P=0.06. Further adjusting for type of resection performed, CSS benefit persisted, 97% versus 85% at 3 years and 94% versus 85% at 5 years, P=0.02, with trend toward an overall survival benefit, P=0.08. CONCLUSIONS The receipt of EBRT is associated with a CSS benefit in localized EMC. Aggressive local therapy, including EBRT, should be considered in these patients.
Collapse
|
39
|
Wang J, Song Y, Liu X, Jin J, Wang W, Yu Z, Liu Y, Li N, Fang H, Ren H, Tang Y, Tang Y, Chen B, Lu N, Qi S, Wang S, Li Y. Comparison of outcome and toxicity of postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy with two-dimensional radiotherapy in patients with soft tissue sarcoma of extremities and trunk. Cancer Med 2019; 8:902-909. [PMID: 30740916 PMCID: PMC6434203 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2018] [Revised: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the survival outcomes and late toxicities of postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with two-dimensional radiotherapy (2D-RT) for patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of extremities and trunk. METHODS 274 consecutive patients with nonmetastatic STS of extremities and trunk treated with postoperative IMRT (n = 187) and 2D-RT (n = 87) were analyzed. Survival was calculated by using Kaplan-Meier method. Independent prognostic factors were identified using Cox stepwise regression analysis for variables with a P-value <0.1 in univariate analysis. RESULTS With a median follow-up time of 58.1 months, 30 local recurrences, 66 distant metastases, and 40 deaths occurred. Compared to 2D-RT group, the IMRT group had higher 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (91.1% vs 80.8%; P = 0.029), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (80.0% vs 69.7%; P = 0.048), disease-free survival (DFS) (75.2% vs 59.2%; P = 0.021), and overall survival (OS) (90.2% vs 81.0%; P = 0.029). Multivariate analysis showed IMRT was an independent favorable factor for LRFS, DMFS, DFS, and OS. For late toxicities, the patients in IMRT group enjoyed lower incidences of ≥Grade 2 joint stiffness (3.9% vs 12.3%; P = 0.041) and ≥Grade 3 fractures (0.0% vs 3.4%; P = 0.25) than those in 2D-RT group. ≥Grade 2 Edema was similar between these two groups (4.8% vs 9.2%; P = 0.183). CONCLUSIONS When compared with conventional techniques, postoperative IMRT seems to provide better LRFS, DMFS, DFS, and OS and less late toxicities in patients with STS of extremities and trunk, which should be offered as a preferred treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianyang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yongwen Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xinfan Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Weihu Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zihao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yueping Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ning Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hua Ren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ningning Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shunan Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shulian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yexiong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Sari SY, Yazici G, Gultekin M, Hurmuz P, Gurkaynak M, Ozyigit G. Sarcoma. Radiat Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-97145-2_8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
41
|
Wagh Y, Menon A, Mody B, Agashe VM, Agarwal M. Radiation-Induced Wound Infections in Operated Soft Tissue Sarcomas: An Unbelievable Challenge in a Series of Five Cases. J Orthop Case Rep 2019; 10:30-34. [PMID: 32547975 DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2019.v10.i01.1626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The standard modality for the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas is a wide excision followed by radiation therapy either in the form of external beam radiation or brachytherapy. Radiation therapy thus is an integral part of management and limb salvage in these cases. This, however, subjects the irradiated tissue to a greater risk for necrosis and local infection. This study suggests a protocol to manage these infections. A multimodal approach to these problems is important. Studies have shown that the use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in non-healing wounds significantly reduces edema by removing excessive fluid from the wound bed as well as facilitating removal of the infective pathogen after an aggressive wound debridement. The author has judiciously used NPWT in each of these patients with encouraging results. With no well-defined guidelines to manage radiation-induced wound infections, this retrospective study gives an overview and protocol for a systematic approach. Case Report This is a retrospective series of five cases managed between January 2014 and December 2016. All were men with a mean age of 30.6 years with a mean follow-up of 27 months. We analyzed their demographic, clinical data, history, wound locations, primary diagnosis on histopathology, organisms isolated on culture, surgical details, antibiotics administered, and special interventions such as skin flaps or grafting and clinical outcome.Of the five, three patients received exclusive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and two were given intralesional brachytherapy and EBRT. Three received additional chemotherapy. 7/9 isolated organisms were multidrug-resistant mean 5.4 cycles of NPWT after aggressive debridement was needed to achieve healthy granulation tissue bed. Wounds were closed at median 31.5 days (three split-thickness split skin grafting, one local rotation flap, and one healing with secondary intention). We had two mortalities secondary to metastasis. Conclusion We recommend aggressive debridement, prolonged use of NPWT in infected irradiated wounds, and appropriate antibiotics with soft tissue cover by a multidisciplinary team to achieve good results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yash Wagh
- Department of Orthopedics, PD Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mahim, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Aditya Menon
- Department of Orthopedics, PD Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mahim, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Bimal Mody
- Department of Orthopedics, PD Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mahim, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vikas M Agashe
- Department of Orthopedics, PD Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mahim, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.,DepartmentofOrthopedics, Agashe's Maternity and Surgical Nursing Home, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Manish Agarwal
- Department of Orthopedics, PD Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mahim, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Pollock RE, Payne JE, Rogers AD, Smith SM, Iwenofu OH, Valerio IL, Zomerlei TA, Howard JH, Dornbos D, Galgano MA, Goulart C, Mendel E, Miller ED, Xu-Welliver M, Martin DD, Haglund KE, Bupathi M, Chen JL, Yeager ND. Multidisciplinary sarcoma care. Curr Probl Surg 2018; 55:517-580. [PMID: 30526918 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2018.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael E Pollock
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.
| | - Jason E Payne
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Alan D Rogers
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Stephen M Smith
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - O Hans Iwenofu
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Ian L Valerio
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | - David Dornbos
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | - Ehud Mendel
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Eric D Miller
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | - Karl E Haglund
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - James L Chen
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Nicholas D Yeager
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lansu J, Groenewegen J, van Coevorden F, van Houdt W, van Akkooi ACJ, van Boven H, van de Sande M, Verheij M, Haas RL. Time dependent dynamics of wound complications after preoperative radiotherapy in Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018; 45:684-690. [PMID: 30316565 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2018] [Revised: 09/03/2018] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS The purpose of the study was to investigate the time dependent dynamics of wound complications and local control after preoperative radiotherapy (RT) in Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas (ESTS). PATIENTS & METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, all patients treated for an extremity sarcoma with pre-operative radiotherapy followed by surgery were identified from a prospectively maintained database. A wound complication (WC) was defined as any local complication of the surgical area requiring intervention, hospital readmission or significant extension of the initial admission period. RESULTS A total of 191 preoperatively irradiated ESTS patients were included in this study. WC was seen in 31% of the patients (n = 60). WC started after a median time of 25 days from surgery, with a median duration of 76 days. Adiposity, smoking and a lower extremity or superficial tumor localization were significantly correlated with an increased WC rate. Risk factors for a duration of WC ≥ 120 days are early development of WC (≤21 days after surgery) and smoking. Local control rates after 1, 3 and 5 years were 99%, 93% and 93%, respectively. CONCLUSION Approximately one-third of patients selected for preoperative RT develops a WC, typically in smoking, adipose patients with superficial tumor localizations in the lower extremity. Based upon the well-established superior long-term functional outcome, maintained excellent local control rates and the temporary nature of the WC issue, preoperative RT remains our preferred treatment. Although, in patients at high risk of WC, post-operative RT might be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jules Lansu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Jan Groenewegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Frits van Coevorden
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Winan van Houdt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Hester van Boven
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Marcel Verheij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Rick L Haas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, LUMC, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Preoperative IMRT for soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk: low rate of wound complications. CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE 2018. [DOI: 10.1097/bco.0000000000000665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
45
|
Sargos P, Charleux T, Haas R, Michot A, Llacer C, Moureau-Zabotto L, Vogin G, Le Péchoux C, Verry C, Ducassou A, Delannes M, Mervoyer A, Wiazzane N, Thariat J, Sunyach M, Benchalal M, Laredo J, Kind M, Gillon P, Kantor G. Pre- and postoperative radiotherapy for extremity soft tissue sarcoma: Evaluation of inter-observer target volume contouring variability among French sarcoma group radiation oncologists. Cancer Radiother 2018; 22:131-139. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2017] [Revised: 08/24/2017] [Accepted: 09/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
46
|
Does an Algorithmic Approach to Using Brachytherapy and External Beam Radiation Result in Good Function, Local Control Rates, and Low Morbidity in Patients With Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476:634-644. [PMID: 29443850 PMCID: PMC6260030 DOI: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) are two modalities used in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma. Previous work at our institution showed early complications and outcomes for patients treated with HDR-BT, EBRT, or a combination of both radiation therapy modalities. As the general indications for each of these approaches to radiation therapy differ, it is important to evaluate the use of each in an algorithmic way, reflecting how they are used in contemporary practice at sites that use these treatments. QUESTION/PURPOSES: (1) To determine the proportions of intermediate- and long-term complications associated with the use of brachytherapy in the treatment of primary high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas; (2), to characterize the long-term morbidity of the three radiation treatment groups using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/ European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/EORTC) Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Scheme; (3) to determine whether treatment with HDR-BT, EBRT, and HDR-BT+EBRT therapy, in combination with limb-salvage surgery, results in acceptable local control in this high-risk group of sarcomas. METHODS We retrospectively studied data from 171 patients with a diagnosis of high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma treated with limb-sparing surgery and radiation therapy between 1990 and 2012 at our institution, with a mean followup of 72 months. Of the 171 patients, 33 (20%) were treated with HDR-BT, 128 (75%) with EBRT, and 10 (6%) with HDR-BT+EBRT. We excluded 265 patients with soft tissue sarcomas owing to axial tumor location, previous radiation to the affected extremity, incomplete patient records, patients receiving primary amputation, recurrent tumors, pediatric patients, low- and intermediate-grade tumors, and rhabdoid histology. Fifteen patients (9%) were lost to followup for any reason including died of disease or other causes during the first 12 months postoperatively. This included four patients who received HDR-BT (12%), 11 who received EBRT (9%), and none who received HDR-BT+EBRT (0%) with less than 12 months followup. Determination of radiation therapy technique for each patient was individualized in a multidisciplinary forum of sarcoma specialists. Anticipated close or positive surgical margins and a low likelihood of complex soft tissue procedures were factors that encouraged use of brachytherapy, whereas the anticipated need for secondary procedures and/or soft tissue coverage encouraged use of EBRT alone. Combination therapy was used when the treatment volume exceeded the treatment field of the brachytherapy catheters or when the catheters were used to boost a close or positive surgical margin. Local recurrence, complications, and morbidity outcomes scores (RTOG) were calculated based on chart review. Between-group comparisons pertaining to the proportion of patients experiencing complications, morbidity outcomes scores, and local recurrence rates were not performed because of dissimilarities among the patients in each group at baseline. RESULTS The HDR-BT treatment group showed a high incidence of intermediate-term complications, with the three most common being: deep infection (33%, 11 of 33); dehiscence and delayed wound healing (24%, eight of 33); and seroma and hematoma (21%, seven of 33). The EBRT group showed a high incidence of intermediate- and long-term complications with the three most common being: chronic radiation dermatitis (35%, 45 of 128); fibrosis (27%, 35 of 128); and chronic pain and neuritis (13%, 16 of 128). The RTOG scores for each treatment group were: HDR-BT 0.8 ± SD 1.2; EBRT 1.9 ± 2.0; and HDR-BT+EBRT 1.7 ± 1.7. Overall, 142 of 169 (84%) patients were free from local recurrence: 27 (82%) in the HDR-BT group, 108 (86%) in the EBRT group, and seven (70%) in the combination therapy group. CONCLUSIONS In this single-institution study, an algorithmic approach to using HDR-BT and EBRT in the treatment of patients with high-grade soft tissue sarcomas can yield acceptable complication rates, good morbidity outcome scores, and a high degree of local control. Based on these results, we believe HDR-BT is best for patients with an anticipated close margin, a positive surgical margin, and for patients who are unlikely to receive a complex soft tissue procedure. Conversely, if a secondary procedure and/or soft tissue coverage are likely to be used, EBRT alone may be reasonable. Finally, combination therapy might be considered when the treatment volume exceeded the treatment field capacity for HDR-BT or when the catheters were used to boost a close or positive surgical margin. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, therapeutic study.
Collapse
|
47
|
Swinscoe JA, Dickie CI, Ireland RH. Immobilization and image-guidance methods for radiation therapy of limb extremity soft tissue sarcomas: Results of a multi-institutional survey. Med Dosim 2018; 43:377-382. [DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2017.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2017] [Revised: 10/21/2017] [Accepted: 12/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
48
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Preoperative radiation followed by surgical resection is a standard treatment for soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). The conventional method of radiation is 5 weeks to approximately 50 Gy. We report on our initial experience and phase II single-arm study assessing 5 fractions of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), followed by surgical resection for STS. METHODS Thirteen patients and 14 tumors were treated with preoperative SBRT; tumors were mostly poorly differentiated (5) or myxoid (5) and were located on the leg (10), arm (2) or groin (2). The median tumor size in greatest dimension was 7.6 cm (maximum 16 cm). Twelve patients received 35 Gy in 5 fractions; for 2 deeper tumors the dose was 40 Gy in 5 fractions. Ten patients were administered 0.5 cm bolus to improve the dose. Gross tumor volume was expanded 0.5 cm radially and 3 cm along the tissue plane. Treatment was to an isodose line (median 81%) and was delivered every other day. Maximum dose to the skin was 46 Gy (median 41 Gy). RESULTS The median follow-up period was 279 days. Surgical resection occurred a median of 37 days after completion of SBRT. Four patients had acute toxicity consisting of 2 grade 2 and 2 grade 3 skin reactions; all cases of skin toxicity resolved by the time of surgery. Percent tumor necrosis ranged from 10% to 95% (median 60%). All patients had negative margins. Planned vacuum-assisted wound closure was used in 4 patients; there were no other major wound complications. There was 1 local recurrence and 7 distant recurrences. CONCLUSION This is the initial experience of radiosurgery for preoperative treatment of STSs. We have found this to be well tolerated, convenient for the patients, and a much shorter treatment course, allowing patients to undergo surgery and subsequent chemotherapy quicker. Surgical complications and control rates are satisfactory. The initial results are encouraging for further investigation.
Collapse
|
49
|
Abouarab MH, Salem IL, Degheidy MM, Henn D, Hirche C, Eweida A, Uhl M, Kneser U, Kremer T. Therapeutic options and postoperative wound complications after extremity soft tissue sarcoma resection and postoperative external beam radiotherapy. Int Wound J 2017; 15:148-158. [PMID: 29205902 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2017] [Accepted: 10/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas occur most commonly in the lower and upper extremities. The standard treatment is limb salvage surgery combined with radiotherapy. Postoperative radiotherapy is associated with wound complications. This systematic review aims to summarise the available evidence and review the literature of the last 10 years regarding postoperative wound complications in patients who had limb salvage surgical excision followed by direct closure vs flap coverage together with postoperative radiotherapy and to define the optimal timeframe for adjuvant radiotherapy after soft tissue sarcomas resection and flap reconstruction. A literature search was performed using PubMed. The following keywords were searched: limb salvage, limb-sparing, flaps, radiation therapy, radiation, irradiation, adjuvant radiotherapy, postoperative radiotherapy, radiation effects, wound healing, surgical wound infection, surgical wound dehiscence, wound healing, soft tissue sarcoma and neoplasms. In total, 1045 papers were retrieved. Thirty-seven articles were finally selected after screening of abstracts and applying dates and language filters and inclusion and exclusion criteria. Plastic surgery provides a vast number of reconstructive flap procedures that are directly linked to decreasing wound complications, especially with the expectant postoperative radiotherapy. This adjuvant radiotherapy is better administered in the first 3-6 weeks after reconstruction to allow timely wound healing and avoid local recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed H Abouarab
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Burns, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt.,Department of Hand, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Iman L Salem
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Burns, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Magdy M Degheidy
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Burns, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Dominic Henn
- Department of Hand, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Hirche
- Department of Hand, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ahmad Eweida
- Department of Hand, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Head, Neck and Endocrine Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Matthias Uhl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Kneser
- Department of Hand, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Kremer
- Department of Hand, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Nesseler JP, Salleron J, Rios M, Nickers P, Marchal F, Brocard F, Peiffert D, Vogin G. A retrospective cohort study to assess adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) compared to adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of grade 2 and 3 extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Radiother Oncol 2017; 125:160-167. [PMID: 28951009 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.08.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2017] [Revised: 08/09/2017] [Accepted: 08/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) as treatment of grade 2 and 3 (G2-3) localized extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STS) by comparing CCRT with standard adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). PATIENTS AND METHODS This monocentric retrospective study included non-pediatric patients (>16years) treated by adjuvant RT with or without chemotherapy (CT) after conservative resection of non-recurrent G2-3 extremity STS. RESULTS A total of 80 patients were treated between 1990 and 2012: 51 by RT and 29 by CCRT. Of the 29 CCRT patients, 25 received doxorubicin monotherapy (75mg/m2/3weeks). The CCRT group contained a greater proportion of grade 3 extremity STS (p<0.001). Median follow up was 68months (9-284). Multivariate analysis revealed greater local control in the CCRT group (1 local recurrence vs 8 in the RT group; HR=0.082, 95% CI 0.011-0.321) and incomplete resection as the major risk factor of local recurrence (HR=25.2, 95% CI 4.767-133.226). The two groups exhibited no differences in distant failure-free survival (HR=1.469, 95% CI 0.668-3.228), disease-free survival (HR=1.096, 95% CI 0.519-2.315) or overall survival (HR=1.378, 95% CI 0.498-3.814). Grade 3 was an adverse prognostic factor for overall survival (HR=3.11, 95% CI 1.04-9.32). Our analyses also revealed that CCRT tended to increase the risk of both grade ≥3 acute dermatitis (14 events vs 6 in the RT group; OR=6.99, 95% CI 2.28-21.47) and grade ≥2 late toxicity (6 events vs 3 in the RT group; p=0.0572). CONCLUSION CCRT could improve local control as part of a limb-preservation strategy. However, with a limited number of patients, CCRT showed no improvement in either distant control or survival and increased toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Philippe Nesseler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France.
| | - Julia Salleron
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Management, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | - Maria Rios
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | - Philippe Nickers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Esch-Sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Frederic Marchal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | - Fabien Brocard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Polyclinique de Gentilly, Nancy, France
| | - Didier Peiffert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | - Guillaume Vogin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France; UMR 7365 CNRS Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|