Open-label, phase II, multicenter, randomized study of the efficacy and safety of two dose levels of Pertuzumab, a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 dimerization inhibitor, in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer

Utility of human epidermal growth factor 2 heterogeneity as a prognostic factor in triple-negative breast cancer

In some cases of human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer, including triple-negative breast cancer, HER2 expression is sporadically and strongly upregulated, a condition known as HER2 heterogeneity. We investigated the clinicopathological features of patients with HER2 heterogeneity in triple-negative breast cancers treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Thirty-nine patients with triple-negative breast cancer who had undergone preoperative chemotherapy participated in this study. To assess for HER2 heterogeneity, we used dual in situ hybridization slides. We evaluated the association between HER2 heterogeneity and clinicopathological factors such as rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) and of recurrence-free survival. Of the 39 patients, 15 (38.5%) had cancers with HER2 heterogeneity. The pCR rates were 13.3% among patients with HER2 heterogeneity and 20.8% among those with HER2 nonheterogeneity, but the difference was not significant. The recurrence-free survival rate was significantly lower in patients with HER2 heterogeneity than in those without (P = 0.025). HER2 heterogeneity is a significant predictor of poor prognosis in patients with triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Tailoring Neoadjuvant Therapy in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Early Breast Cancer: Recent Advances and Strategies

Neoadjuvant HER2 Therapy: Beyond one-size-fits-all.

Relationship between HER2-low status and efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors in advanced breast cancer: a real-world study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer (BC) is a new entity considered a biologically distinct subtype from HER2-zero BC. However, the importance of HER2 low expression on the activity of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) remains unclear.

METHODS/MATERIALS

We conducted a single-center retrospective study including hormone receptor-positive (HR +) /HER2- metastatic BC (mBC) patients treated with CDK4/6i plus endocrine treatment (ET) as first-line therapy. Clinical outcomes were analyzed according to HER2 expression.

RESULTS

258 women were analyzed with a median follow-up of 25.4 months; 39.9% had HER2 low, and 60.1% had HER2 zero BC. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) in the HER2-low group was 27.6 months compared with 44.3 months in the HER2-zero group (p = 0.341). In patients receiving ribociclib, the mPFS in the HER2-low group was 24.2 months compared with 53.1 months in the HER2-zero group (multivariate-adjusted HR: 1.981, 95 Cl 1.094-3.586; p = 0.024). The survival probabilities at 24, 36 and 48 months for the HER2 low and HER2 zero groups were 82%, 69%, 69% and 83%, 75% and 69%, respectively (p = 0.336). Objective response rate (p = 0.179) and disease control rate (p = 0.338) did not significantly differ between HER-2-low and HER-2-zero groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The mPFS in the Her2-zero group was almost twice that of the Her2-low group, but the difference was not statistically significant. mPFS was significantly longer in the HER2-zero group compared to the HER2-low group in patients receiving ribociclib. More prospective studies are needed to understand the actual consequences of this biomarker.

HER2-Low Breast Cancer: Now and in the Future

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, and its subtypes are characterized by hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression status. "HER2-low" tumors, which exhibit a low level of HER2 expression (immunohistochemistry 1+ or 2+ without gene amplification), were conventionally considered not amenable to anti-HER2 targeting agents based on the results of a phase III trial of trastuzumab. However, this perspective is being challenged by the emergence of novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates, such as trastuzumab-deruxtecan. These innovative therapies have demonstrated remarkable efficacy against HER2-low breast cancer, shedding new light on a previously overlooked category of breast cancer. Such promising results highlight the need for in-depth investigations of the biology and prognostic implications of HER2-low tumors. In this review, we comprehensively summarize the current evidence surrounding this topic and highlight areas that warrant further exploration and research in the future.

HER2 evaluation for clinical decision making in human solid tumours: pearls and pitfalls

The significant clinical benefits of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapeutic agents have revolutionized the clinical treatment landscape in a variety of human solid tumours. Accordingly, accurate evaluation of HER2 status in these different tumour types is critical for clinical decision making to select appropriate patients who may benefit from life-saving HER2-targeted therapies. HER2 biomarker scoring criteria is different in different organ systems, and close adherence to the corresponding HER2 biomarker testing guidelines and their updates, if available, is essential for accurate evaluation. In addition, knowing the unusual patterns of HER2 expression is also important to avoid inaccurate evaluation. In this review, we discuss the key considerations when evaluating HER2 status in solid tumours for clinical decision making, including tissue handling and preparation for HER2 biomarker testing, as well as pathologist's readout of HER2 testing results in breast carcinomas, gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas, colorectal adenocarcinomas, gynaecologic carcinomas, and non-small cell lung carcinomas.

Analytical and clinical validation of PATHWAY Anti-HER-2/neu (4B5) antibody to assess HER2-low status for trastuzumab deruxtecan treatment in breast cancer

In DESTINY-Breast04 (DB-04), safety and efficacy of HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in previously treated HER2-low unresectable/metastatic breast cancer were established. This manuscript describes the analytical validation of PATHWAY Anti-HER2/neu (4B5) Rabbit Monoclonal Primary Antibody (PATHWAY HER2 (4B5)) to assess HER2-low status and its clinical performance in DB-04. Preanalytical processing and tissue staining parameters were evaluated to determine their impact on HER2 scoring. The recommended antibody staining procedure provided the optimal tumor staining, and deviations in cell conditioning and/or antibody incubation times resulted in unacceptable negative control staining and/or HER2-low status changes. Comparisons between antibody lots, kit lots, instruments, and day-to-day runs showed overall percent agreements (OPAs) exceeding 97.9%. Inter-laboratory reproducibility showed OPAs of ≥97.4% for all study endpoints. PATHWAY HER2 (4B5) was utilized in DB-04 for patient selection using 1340 tumor samples (59.0% metastatic, 40.7% primary, (0.3% missing data); 74.3% biopsy, 25.7% resection/excisions). Overall, 77.6% (823/1060) of samples were HER2-low by both central and local testing, with the level of concordance differing by sample region of origin and collection date. In DB-04, the efficacy of T-DXd over chemotherapy of physician's choice was consistent, regardless of the characteristics of the sample used (primary or metastatic, archival, or newly collected, biopsy or excision/resection). These results demonstrate that PATHWAY HER2 (4B5) is precise and reproducible for scoring HER2-low status and can be used with multiple breast cancer sample types for reliably identifying patients whose tumors have HER2-low expression and are likely to derive clinical benefit from T-DXd.

Association between human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status, namely low and zero expression, and prognosis in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a single-center retrospective study

Background

The recently developed anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy has substantially improved the prognosis of HER2-positive breast cancer. The DESTINY-Breast04 trial results showed that trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) significantly prolonged the survival of patients with HER2-low breast cancer, thus presenting a paradigm shift in anti-HER2 therapy. This may facilitate a change in the treatment strategy for HER2-low breast cancer. However, the implication of HER2-low in hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer is unclear. In this retrospective study, we aimed to reveal the association between HER2 status, namely HER2-low and HER2-zero, and prognosis in HR-positive breast cancer.

Methods

We collected the data of 247 patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer (159 with HER2-low and 88 with HER2-zero breast cancer) who underwent surgery. Patients were divided into HER2-low and HER2-zero groups. Univariate analysis was performed to evaluate the baseline characteristics using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher's exact test. Survival analysis of the HER2-low and HER2-zero groups was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

The median observation period was 2,706 days, and the median period until recurrence was 1,380 days; 25 patients (10%) had recurrences. Age (P=0.004) and menopausal status (P=0.04) were significant variables in the univariate analysis of baseline characteristics. In the subgroup analysis of luminal A- and B-like breast cancers, there was a significant difference in overall survival (OS) only in patients with luminal A-like breast cancer, but relapse-free survival (RFS) of the HER2-low luminal B-like cancer subgroups tended to be relatively short.

Conclusions

We inferred that the HER2-low and HER2-zero statuses do not affect the RFS and OS of patients with ER-positive breast cancer. The prognostic significance of HER2-low or HER2-zero status in luminal A- and B-like breast cancers might differ, and a new treatment strategy is required for the HER2-low subgroup.

Survival outcomes in HER2-low versus HER2-zero breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The survival outcomes in HER2-low versus HER2-zero breast cancer (BC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) remain unclear. The meta-analysis was conducted to summarize current evidence about the survival outcomes in HER2-low versus HER2-zero BC.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search in PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify relevant studies.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies with 53,714 patients were included. Overall, 34,037 patients (63.37%) were HER2-low, and 19,677 patients (36.63%) were HER2-zero. Patients with HER2-low tumors had a significantly lower pathological complete response (pCR) rate than patients with HER2-zero tumors, regardless of the hormone receptor status. Compared with HER2-zero breast cancer, the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of HER2-low BC were longer in the overall cohort (HR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.61-0.85; P < 0.0001; HR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.75-0.92; P = 0.0002); however, no differences were observed in terms of OS and DFS between HER2-low and HER2-zero BC in the HR-negative group. In the HR-positive group, HER2-low status had no significant impact on OS, while significantly associated with increased DFS (HR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.76-0.96; P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that although HER2-low BC has a poor response to NACT, it is correlated with favorable OS and DFS after NACT in the overall cohort as well as longer DFS in the HR-positive group.

Effect of HER2-low expression on neoadjuvant efficacy in operable breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of HER2-low expression (HER2-low) and HER2-zero expression (HER2-0) on the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and survival of patients following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients were followed up. Patients were divided into HER2-0 (immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 0 (IHC0)) and HER2-low (IHC1+ or IHC2+/in situ hybridization non-amplified (ISH-)) groups according to the IHC detection of puncture tissues. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the clinical characteristics, pCR rate and DFS were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were 24 (27.9%) cases with HER2-0 and 62 (72.1%) cases with HER2-low. Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) patients accounted for 77.4% of the HER2-low group, which was higher than 70.8% in the HER2-0 group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.524). There were statistical differences in the pT and pN stages between HER2-low and HER2-0 subgroups in the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) group after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The HER2-low subgroup had an earlier T stage (p = 0.009), and the ratio of N0 to N1 in the HER2-low and HER2-0 subgroups was 92.9% and 71.4%, respectively (p = 0.037). The Ki-67 index and median PR value were significantly lower in the HER2-low group after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.002, p = 0.018). The HER2 IHC score was altered in the HER2-low group, and the HER-2 (2+) score changed significantly (p = 0.002). Seventy-eight patients with complete immunohistochemical data were analyzed. The discordance rate of the IHC score of HER2 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 38.5%, and eight patients with HER2-low showed HER2-0 status, with a discordance rate of 10.3%. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, The pCR rate was significantly lower in the HER2-low group compared with that in the HER2-0 group (4.8% vs. 8.3%; p = 0.914), but the recurrence and metastasis rates were lower in the HER2-low group (9.7% vs. 20.8%; p = 0.165). There were no differences in DFS between the two groups at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months (p = 0.076; p = 0.518; p = 0.245; p = 0.406). The subgroup analysis demonstrated no significant difference in DFS between HER2-low and HER2-0 subgroups in the HR + and TNBC groups (p = 0.141, p = 0.637).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study indicates that HER2-low has no significant effect on neoadjuvant efficacy in operable breast cancer. There were no statistical differences in clinical characteristics, pCR rate, and DFS between the HER2-low and the HER2-0 groups. There was no evidence that a HER2-low status constitutes a unique biological subtype, suggesting that more clinical data might be needed to verify these observations.

Open questions, current challenges, and future perspectives in targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low breast cancer

Approximately 60% of traditionally defined human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancers express low levels of HER2 [HER2-low; defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or IHC 2+/in situ hybridization (ISH)-]. HER2-low breast cancers encompass a large percentage of both hormone receptor-positive (up to 85%) and triple-negative (up to 63%) breast cancers. The DESTINY-Breast04 trial established that HER2-low tumors are targetable, leading to the approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) as the first HER2-directed therapy for the treatment of HER2-low breast cancer in the United States and Europe. This change in the clinical landscape results in a number of questions and challenges-including those related to HER2 assessment and patient identification-and highlights the need for careful assessment of HER2 expression to identify patients eligible for T-DXd. This review provides context for understanding how to identify patients with HER2-low breast cancer with respect to sample types, scoring and reporting HER2 status, and testing methods and assays. It also discusses management of important T-DXd-related adverse events. Available evidence supports the efficacy of T-DXd in patients with any history of IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH- scores; however, future research may further refine the population who could benefit from T-DXd or other HER2-directed therapies and identify novel methods for patient identification. Because HER2 expression can change with disease progression or treatment, and variability exists in scoring and interpretation of HER2 status, careful re-evaluation in certain scenarios may help to identify more patients who may benefit from T-DXd.

Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan in treating human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low/positive advanced breast cancer:A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

A novel antibody-drug conjugate, trastuzumab deruxtecan is a combination of a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeting antibody and DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor used to treat HER2-low/positive advanced breast cancer. To determine its safety and efficacy in treating HER2-low/positive advanced breast cancer, we performed a meta-analysis of several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) including DESTINY-Breast02 (NCT03523585), DESTINY-Breast03 (NCT03529110), and DESTINY-Breast04 (NCT03734029).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for RCTs on the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan that were published before May 2023. The efficacy endpoints included median progressive-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), overall response rate (ORR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR). The safety endpoints included treatment-related adverse events. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 software. To ensure transparency, this study was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews website (CRD42023414170).

RESULTS

Three RCTs involving 1689 patients were included. Compared with physician-recommended and conventional treatments, trastuzumab deruxtecan exhibited statistically significant improvements in PFS, ORR, and CBR. The median OS and DOR failed to be combined; however, the analyzed studies showed that they were longer. The incidence of adverse events was generally higher with trastuzumab deruxtecan than with physician-recommended or conventional treatments.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that trastuzumab deruxtecan is more effective in treating HER2-low/positive advanced breast cancer than physician-recommended or conventional treatments. However, trastuzumab deruxtecan-related adverse drug reactions should be closely monitored because of its higher incidence of adverse events.

Targeting HER2 heterogeneity in breast and gastrointestinal cancers

About 20% of breast and gastric cancers and 3% of colorectal carcinomas overexpress the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and are sensitive to HER2-directed agents. The expression of HER2 may differ within the same tumoral lesion (spatial intralesional heterogeneity), from different tumor locations (spatial interlesional heterogeneity), and throughout treatments (temporal heterogeneity). Spatial and temporal heterogeneity may impact on response and resistance to HER2-targeting agents and its prevalence and predictive role changes across HER2-overexpressing solid tumors. Therefore, the definition and the characterization of HER2 heterogeneity pose many challenges and its implementation as a reproducible predictive biomarker would help in guiding treatment modulation.

Impact of HER2-low status for patients with early-stage breast cancer and non-pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a National Cancer Database Analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate potential differences in pathological complete response (pCR) rates and overall survival (OS) between HER2-low and HER2-zero patients with early-stage hormone receptor (HR)-positive and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting.

METHODS

We identified early-stage invasive HER2-negative BC patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 in the National Cancer Database. HER2-low was defined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or 2+ with negative in situ hybridization, and HER2-zero by IHC0. All the methods were applied separately in the HR-positive and TNBC cohorts. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association of HER2 status with pCR (i.e. ypT0/Tis and ypN0). Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were applied to estimate the association of HER2 status with OS. Inverse probability weighting and/or multivariable regression were applied to all analyses.

RESULTS

For HR-positive patients, 70.9% (n = 17,934) were HER2-low, whereas 51.1% (n = 10,238) of TNBC patients were HER2-low. For both HR-positive and TNBC cohorts, HER2-low status was significantly associated with lower pCR rates [HR-positive: 5.0% vs. 6.7%; weighted odds ratio (OR) = 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72-0.91), p < 0.001; TNBC: 21.6% vs. 24.4%; weighted OR = 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85-0.98), p = 0.007] and improved OS [HR-positive: weighted hazard ratio = 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.91), p < 0.001; TNBC: weighted hazard ratio = 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86-0.96), p < 0.001]. HER2-low status was associated with favorable OS among patients not achieving pCR [HR-positive: adjusted hazard ratio = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.89), p < 0.001; TNBC: adjusted hazard ratio = 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.94), p < 0.001], while no significant difference in OS was observed in patients who achieved pCR [HR-positive: adjusted hazard ratio = 1.00 (95% CI: 0.61-1.63), p > 0.99; TNBC: adjusted hazard ratio = 1.11 (95% CI: 0.85-1.45), p = 0.44].

CONCLUSION

In both early-stage HR-positive and TNBC patients, HER2-low status was associated with lower pCR rates. HER2-zero status might be considered an adverse prognostic factor for OS in patients not achieving pCR.

Monoclonal Antibodies and Antibody-drug Conjugates as Emerging Therapeutics for Breast Cancer Treatment

When breast cells divide and multiply out of control, it is called breast cancer. Symptoms include lump formation in the breast, a change in the texture or color of the breast, or a discharge from the nipple. Local or systemic therapy is frequently used to treat breast cancer. Surgical and radiation procedures limited to the affected area are examples of local management. There has been significant worldwide progress in the development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) since 1986, when the first therapeutic mAb, Orthoclone OKT3, became commercially available. mAbs can resist the expansion of cancer cells by inducing the destruction of cellular membranes, blocking immune system inhibitors, and preventing the formation of new blood vessels. mAbs can also target growth factor receptors. Understanding the molecular pathways involved in tumor growth and its microenvironment is crucial for developing effective targeted cancer therapeutics. Due to their unique properties, mAbs have a wide range of clinical applications. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are drugs that improve the therapeutic index by combining an antigen-specific antibody with a payload. This review focuses on the therapeutic applications, mechanistic insights, characteristics, safety aspects, and adverse events of mAbs like trastuzumab, bevacizumab, pertuzumab, ertumaxomab, and atezolizumab in breast cancer treatment. The creation of novel technologies utilizing modified antibodies, such as fragments, conjugates, and multi-specific antibodies, must be a central focus of future studies. This review will help scientists working on developing mAbs to treat cancers more effectively.

Novel HER-2 Targeted Therapies in Breast Cancer

Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER-2)-positive breast cancer represents 15-20% of all breast cancer subtypes and has an aggressive biological behavior with worse prognosis. The development of HER-2-targeted therapies has changed the disease's course, having a direct impact on survival rates and quality of life. Drug development of HER-2-targeting therapies is a prolific field, with numerous new therapeutic strategies showing survival benefits and gaining regulatory approval in recent years. Furthermore, the acknowledgement of the survival impact of HER-2-directed therapies on HER-2-low breast cancer has contributed even more to advances in the field. The present review aims to summarize the newly approved therapeutic strategies for HER-2-positive breast cancer and review the new and exploratory HER-2-targeted therapies currently under development.

An Analysis of Clinical and Pathologic Features, RecurIndex Genomic Profiles, and Survival Outcomes in HER2-Low Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

In recent years, breast cancer has become the most common cancer in the world, increasing women's health risks. Approximately 60% of breast cancers are categorized as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low tumors. Recently, antibody-drug conjugates have been found to have positive anticancer efficacy in patients with HER2-low breast cancer, but more studies are required to comprehend their clinical and molecular characteristics.

METHODS

In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the data of 165 early breast cancer patients with pT1-2N1M0 who had undergone the RecurIndex testing. To better understand HER2-low tumors, we investigated the RecurIndex genomic profiles, clinicopathologic features, and survival outcomes of breast cancers according to HER2 status.

RESULTS

First, there were significantly more hormone receptor (HR)-positive tumors, luminal-type tumors, and low Ki67 levels in the HER2-low than in the HER2-zero. Second, RI-LR (P = .0294) and RI-DR (P = .001) scores for HER2-low and HER2-zero were statistically significant. Third, within HER2-negative disease, HR-positive/HER2-low tumors showed highest ESR1, NFATC2IP, PTI1, ERBB2, and OBSL1 expressions. Fourth, results of the survival analysis showed that lower expression of HER2 was associated with improved relapse-free survival for HR-positive tumors, but not for HR-negative tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study highlights the unique features of HER2-low tumors in terms of their clinical characteristics as well as their gene expression profiles. HR status may influence the prognosis of patients with HER2-low expression, and patients with HR-positive/HER2-low expression may have a favorable outcome.

HER2 low expression breast cancer subtyping and their correlation with prognosis and immune landscape based on the histone modification related genes

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) plays an important role in diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer (BRCA). The histone modification has been found to be related to the progression of cancer. This study aimed to probe the low HER2 expression BRCA heterogeneity by histone modification genes. The BRCA data and cell lines were collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis and non-negative matrix factorization clustering were jointly applied to obtain BRCA clusters. The expression of hub histone modification gene was detected using western blot assay. The gene ontology term and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis were performed to reveal functional information. The overall survival analysis was performed using survival and survminer packages, and the immune landscape was mainly analyzed using CIBERSORT software. Totally 43 histone modification genes correlated with survival of BRCA patients with HER2 low expression were screened. Based on these 43 histone modification genes, the BRCA samples were classified into cluster1, cluster2 and cluster3. Histone modification gene NFKBIZ exhibited high expression, while RAD51 demonstrated low expression in low HER2 expression BRCA cell. Cluster1 exhibited the best prognosis, while cluster3 had the worse outcomes. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was remarkably increased in cluster3 group compared to cluster1 and cluster2. Moreover, the relative proportion of 16 immune cell infiltration and 8 immune checkpoint expression were remarkably differential among cluster1, cluster2 and cluster3, and the drug sensitivity exhibited difference among cluster1, cluster2 and cluster3 in BRCA patients with low HER2 expression. This study identified three HER2 low expression BRCA clusters with different characteristics based on histone modification genes. The TMB, immune cell infiltration, immune checkpoints and drug sensitivity were different among the three clusters.

Consensus on clinical diagnosis and medical treatment of HER2-low breast cancer (2022 edition)

Treatment of breast cancer with low expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2; HER2-low) has drawn much attention in recent years. With the proven therapeutic effect of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with HER2-low (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 1+, or IHC2+/in situ hybridization [ISH]-) breast cancer, HER2-low may become a new subtype of targeted therapy for breast cancer. The expert committee formulated this consensus based on the current clinical studies and clinical medication experience. The current consensus is the collaborative work of an interdisciplinary working group, including experts in the fields of pathology and oncology. The purpose of this consensus was to guide the clinical diagnosis and treatment of HER2-low breast cancer, thereby prolonging the overall survival of patients.

Integrated Molecular Characterization of HER2-Low Breast Cancer Using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)

Based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH), HER2-low breast cancers (BC) subtype-defined as IHC1+ or IHC2+/ISH- tumors-emerged and represent more than half of all BC. We evaluated the performance of NGS for integrated molecular characterization of HER2-low BC, including identification of actionable molecular targets, copy number variation (CNV), and microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis. Thirty-one BC specimens (11 HER2+, 10 HER2-, and 10 HER2-low) were routinely analyzed using IHC and ISH, and were selected and analyzed using NGS for gene mutations including ESR1, PIK3CA, AKT1, ERBB2, TP53, BRCA1, and BRCA2, CNV, and MSI. CNV values for the ERBB2 gene were significantly (p < 0.001) different between HER2+, and either HER2-low or HER2- tumors with mean values of 7.8 (SD = 6.8), 1.9 (SD = 0.3), and 2.0 (SD = 0.3), respectively. Using 3.25 as the cutoff value, 96.8% overall concordance of HER2 status was achieved between IHC and NGS compared to IHC and ISH. Using NGS, gene mutations and amplifications were detected in 68% (21/31) and 19% (6/31) of the cases, respectively. One case of MSI was detected in a HER2-negative and ISH unamplified case. Beside IHC, NGS allows the identification of HER2-low subtype simultaneously, with the detection of multiple actionable gene mutations being helpful for molecular board treatment selection.

Comprehensive genomic characterization of HER2-low and HER2-0 breast cancer

The molecular underpinnings of HER2-low and HER2-0 (IHC 0) breast tumors remain poorly defined. Using genomic findings from 1039 patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer undergoing next-generation sequencing from 7/2013-12/2020, we compare results between HER2-low (n = 487, 47%) and HER2-0 tumors (n = 552, 53%). A significantly higher number of ERBB2 alleles (median copy count: 2.05) are observed among HER2-low tumors compared to HER2-0 (median copy count: 1.79; P = 2.36e-6), with HER2-0 tumors harboring a higher rate of ERBB2 hemideletions (31.1% vs. 14.5%). No other genomic alteration reaches significance after accounting for multiple hypothesis testing, and no significant differences in tumor mutational burden are observed between HER2-low and HER2-0 tumors (median: 7.26 mutations/megabase vs. 7.60 mutations/megabase, p = 0.24). Here, we show that the genomic landscape of HER2-low and HER2-0 tumors does not differ significantly, apart from a higher ERBB2 copy count among HER2-low tumors, and a higher rate of ERBB2 hemideletions in HER2-0 tumors.

Pathological complete response, category change, and prognostic significance of HER2-low breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant treatment: a multicenter analysis of 2489 cases

BACKGROUND

HER2-low breast cancers (BC) show a good response to novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in advanced setting. Nevertheless, little is known about the response, category change, and prognosis of HER2-low BC receiving neoadjuvant treatment (NAT).

METHODS

Consecutive invasive BC patients who underwent ≥ 4 cycles of NAT and surgery from January 2009 to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. HER2-low was defined as IHC 1+ or 2+ and FISH negative. Concordance rates of HER2 and other biomarkers were analyzed by Kappa test. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to assess the recurrence-free interval (RFI) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 2489 patients were included, of whom 1023 (41.1%) had HER2-low tumors. HER2-low patients had a higher ER positivity rate than HER2-0 patients (78.5% vs. 63.6%, P < 0.001), and a similar breast pathological complete response (pCR) rate (20.6% vs. 21.8%, P = 0.617). Among non-pCR cases, 39.5% of HER2-0 tumors changed to HER2-low, and 14.3% of HER2-low tumors changed to HER2-0 after NAT. Low concordance rates of HER2-low status were found in both ER-positive (Kappa = 0.368) and ER-negative (Kappa = 0.444) patients. Primary HER2-low patients had a significantly better RFI than HER2-0 patients (P = 0.014), especially among ER-positive subset (P = 0.016). Moreover, HER2-low category change was associated with RFI in ER-positive subset (adjusted P = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with HER2-0 patients, HER2-low patients had a high proportion of ER-positive tumor and a similar pCR rate, which were related with better prognosis, especially in residual cases after NAT. A remarkable instability of HER2-low status was found between the primary and residual tumor, indicating re-testing HER2 status after NAT in the new era of anti-HER2 ADCs therapy.

A review of treatment options in HER2-low breast cancer and proposed treatment sequencing algorithm

The expansion of the spectrum of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-status to HER2-low, defined as HER2 expression of 1+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or 2+ by IHC without gene amplification, has made a major impact in the field of oncology. The HER2-low expression has emerged as a targetable biomarker, and anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan has shown significant survival benefit in pretreated metastatic HER2-low breast cancer (BC). With these recent data, the treatment algorithm for hormone receptor-positive and triple-negative BC needs to be reconsidered, as approximately half of these BCs are HER2-low. Although there are different therapeutic agents for hormone receptor-positive and hormone receptor-negative HER2-low BCs, there is no consensus regarding the sequencing of these agents. In this article, the treatment options for HER2-low BC are enumerated and a treatment sequencing algorithm based on the current clinical evidence proposed.

The efficacy of trastuzumab-deruxtecan for the treatment of patients with advanced HER2-low breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Until recently, the available human receptor epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) targeted agents were ineffective for treating patients with HER2-low expressing breast cancer (defined as immunohistochemical expression of 1+ or 2+ without amplification). The development of novel and potent HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugates, affective at treating HER2-low expressing breast cancers, have changed the way we think about HER2-low expression and expanded the treatment options for many patients with advanced disease.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we summarize the current management of HER2-low breast cancer and commonly encountered challenges such as treatment sequencing and toxicity management.

EXPERT OPINION

trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is a treatment option for patients with advanced, HER2-low breast cancer, irrespective of the hormone receptor status. The current optimal place in treatment algorithms is after the first line of chemotherapy, both in HR-positive and triple-negative breast cancer; however, other agents are available in this setting and risks and benefits for each should be considered in shared decision making. Up to 10-15% of patients receiving T-DXd develop interstitial lung disease. Patient and clinician education are key to safely implement T-DXd in clinical practice.

ESMO expert consensus statements (ECS) on the definition, diagnosis, and management of HER2-low breast cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer has recently emerged as a targetable subset of breast tumors, based on the evidence from clinical trials of novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates. This evolution has raised several biological and clinical questions, warranting the establishment of consensus to optimally treat patients with HER2-low breast tumors. Between 2022 and 2023, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process focused on HER2-low breast cancer. The consensus included a multidisciplinary panel of 32 leading experts in the management of breast cancer from nine different countries. The aim of the consensus was to develop statements on topics that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. The main topics identified for discussion were (i) biology of HER2-low breast cancer; (ii) pathologic diagnosis of HER2-low breast cancer; (iii) clinical management of HER2-low metastatic breast cancer; and (iv) clinical trial design for HER2-low breast cancer. The expert panel was divided into four working groups to address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above. A review of the relevant scientific literature was conducted in advance. Consensus statements were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This article presents the developed statements, including findings from the expert panel discussions, expert opinion, and a summary of evidence supporting each statement.

HER2-low breast cancer: evolution of HER2 expression from primary tumor to distant metastases

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer (BC) with low human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression is attracting much attention due to the breakthrough progress of novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates. HER2 expression is examined in patients with HER2-low BC and their distant metastases in this study, so as to further clarify the dynamic characteristics of HER2 low status in the process of disease progression.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with HER2 low breast cancer (defined as IHC1+ or IHC2+/ISH-) between 2012 and 2021 were included in this study. We evaluated HER2 expression of primary sites and metastatic sites, compared the impact of different clinicopathological parameters on HER2 status of metastases and compared the overall survival and disease-free survival of patients with different HER2 status in metastases.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients were included. All HER2 IHC scores were confirmed and the consistent rate with the original pathological report was 81.1%. 27.6% of the patients showed different HER2 status in metastases. The HER2 discordance rate differed among different metastatic sites (p = 0.040). The higher the T stage of the primary BC, the higher the rate of HER2 discordance was observed (p = 0.042). For the specimen type of metastasis, HER2 discordant rate was higher in surgical specimen than biopsy (p = 0.050). No difference of HER2 discordance rate was found between HER2-1+ and HER2-2+ patients. But comparing HER2 IHC score, HER2-2+ patients were less likely to have consistent metastatic HER2 levels than HER2-1+ patients (p = 0.006). No difference in survival outcomes was observed between patients with different HER2 status in metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a possibility of HER2 expression alteration in the metastases of HER2-low breast cancer. And the rate of altered HER2 low expression was different among different metastatic sites, different T stages of primary BC and specimen type of metastasis. No prognostic significance was observed.

Antibody-drug conjugates: the evolving field of targeted chemotherapy for breast cancer treatment

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a class of antineoplastic agents whose structure is composed of three main components: a monoclonal antibody (mAB) targeting a specific target antigen, a cytotoxic payload, and a linker binding the antibody to the payload. By combining the specificity of mABs with the high potency of the payloads, ADCs constitute a smart drug delivery system with improved therapeutic index. After recognition and binding of the mAB to its target surface antigen, ADCs are internalized by endocytosis by the tumor cell, releasing the payloads into the cytoplasm, where they exert their cytotoxic activity, eventually leading to cell death. The composition of some of the new ADCs confers additional functional properties that allow expanding their activity to neighboring cells not expressing the target antigen, constituting a valuable strategy to overcome tumor heterogeneity. Some of these 'off-target effects', such as the bystander effect, are possibly the mechanism underlying the antitumor activity demonstrated in patients with low expression of the target antigens, which represents an important paradigm shift in anticancer targeted therapy. Three ADCs are currently approved for the treatment of breast cancer (BC); two anti-HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) ADCs (trastuzumab emtansine and trastuzumab deruxtecan); and one Trop-2-targeted ADC (sacituzumab govitecan). Based on the unprecedented efficacy data demonstrated by these agents, ADCs have been incorporated as part of standard regimens for all subtypes of advanced BC, as well as for high-risk early HER2-positive BC. Despite the remarkable advances, several hurdles still remain to overcome, including the development of reliable biomarkers for patient selection, prevention, and management of potentially severe toxicities, ADC resistance mechanisms, post-ADC resistance patterns, and optimal treatment sequencing and combinations. In this review, we will summarize the currently available evidence related to the use of these agents, as well as explore the current landscape of ADC development for BC treatment.

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes provides recent survival information for early-stage HER2-low-positive breast cancer: a large cohort retrospective study

Purpose

It has been reported that breast cancer (BC) with low expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) might be a distinct subtype of BC. However, the prognostic effect of low HER2 expression on BC patients remains controversial. We aim to conduct this single-institution retrospective analysis to assess HER2-low-positive BC outcomes in Chinese women and the prognostic role of TILs in HER2-low-positive early-stage BC.

Method

We retrospectively enrolled 1,763 BC patients treated in a single institution from 2017 to 2018. TILs are regarded as continuous variables and are divided into low TILs (≤10%) and high TILs (>10%) for statistical analysis. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to test the associations between TILs and disease-free survival (DFS) with adjustment for clinicopathologic characteristics.

Result

High TIL levels (>10%) were associated with tumor size (>2 cm, p = 0.042), age at diagnosis (p = 0.005), Ki-67 index (>25%; p <0.001), HR (hormone receptor) status (positive, p <0.001), advanced pathological stage (p = 0.043), subtype (p <0.001), and HER2 status (p <0.001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that no significant difference in DFS (p = 0.83) could be found between HER2-positive, HER2-low-positive, and HER2-0 BC. The DFS of HER2-low-positive BC and HER2-nonamplified BC with high levels of TILs was statistically better than that of patients with low levels of TILs (p = 0.015; p = 0.047). In HER2-low-positive BC patients with high TIL levels (>10%), DFS was significantly improved in both the univariate (HR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.87, P = 0.018) and multivariate (HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.95, P = 0.035) Cox models. For further subgroup analysis, HR (+)/HER2-low-positive BC with high TIL (>10%) levels was associated with improved DFS in both the univariate (HR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.19-0.90, P = 0.025) and multivariate (HR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.93, P = 0.032) Cox models. The HR (-)/HER2-0 BC with high TIL (>10%) level was not statistically significant in the univariate Cox model, but it was statistically significant in the multivariate (HR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.28-0.96, P = 0.045) Cox model.

Conclusion

Among early-stage BC, no significant survival difference could be found between the HER2-positive, HER2-low-positive, and HER2-0 cohorts. High levels of TILs were significantly associated with improved DFS in HER2-low-positive patients, especially in the HR (+)/HER2-low-positive subtype.

The effect of low HER2 expression on treatment outcomes in metastatic hormone receptor positive breast cancer patients treated with a combination of a CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy: A multicentric retrospective study

BACKGROUND

CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy have significantly improved treatment outcomes for metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer patients. However, the impact of low HER2 expression on treatment response and progression-free survival (PFS) remains unclear.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included 204 HR+ breast cancer patients treated with a combination of CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy. HER2-zero disease was detected in 138 (68%) and HER2-low disease in 66 (32%) patients. Treatment-related characteristics and clinical outcomes were analyzed, with a median follow-up of 22 months.

RESULTS

The objective response rate (ORR) was 72.7% in the HER2 low group and 66.6% in the HER2 zero group (p = 0.54). Median PFS was not significantly different between the HER2-low and HER2 zero groups (19 months vs.18 months, p = 0.89), although there was a trend toward longer PFS in the HER2-low group for first-line treatment (24 months progression-free survival rate 63% vs 49%). In recurrent disease, the median PFS was 25 months in the HER2-low group and 12 months in the HER2-zero group (p = 0.08), while in de novo metastatic disease, the median PFS was 18 months in the HER2-low group and 27 months in the HER2-zero group (p = 0.16). The order of CDK4/6 inhibitor use and the presence of visceral metastasis were identified as independent variables affecting PFS.

CONCLUSION

Low HER2 expression did not significantly impact treatment response or PFS in HR+ breast cancer patients treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy. Because of the conflicting results in the literature, further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the clinical significance of HER2 expression in HR+ breast cancer.

Targeting HER2-low in metastatic breast cancer: an evolving treatment paradigm

The results of the Phase III DESTINY-Breast04 trial of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) are leading to a shift in both the classification and treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer. In this trial, T-DXd was associated with a substantial survival benefit among patients with hormone receptor-positive and hormone receptor-negative disease and low expression of HER2, a biomarker previously considered unactionable in this treatment setting. Herein, we discuss the evolving therapeutic pathway for HER2-low disease, ongoing clinical trials, and the potential challenges and evidence gaps arising with treatment of this patient population.

Role of Molecular Targeted Therapeutic Drugs in Treatment of Breast Cancer: A Review Article

Breast cancer is a multifactor, multistage, and heterogeneous disease. Systemic treatment of breast cancer has changed significantly over the last decade. With a better knowledge of the pathogenesis, researchers and scientists have discovered numerous signaling pathways and synonymous therapeutic targets in breast cancer. Because of the molecular nature of breast cancer, which makes it difficult to understand, previous attempts to treat or prevent it have failed. However, recent decades have provided effective therapeutic targets for treatment. In this review, literature or information on various targeted therapy for breast cancer is discussed. English language articles were explored in numerous directory or databases like PubMed, Web of Sciences, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and Scopus. The important keywords used for searching databases are "Breast cancer," "Targeted therapy in breast cancer," "Therapeutic drugs in breast cancer," and "Molecular targets in breast cancer."

Cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low metastatic breast cancer

Background

Results from DESTINY-Breast04 trial revealed that trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) improved both progression-free survival and overall survival for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, the economic impact of this practice remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of T-DXd on HER2-low mBC from the viewpoint of U.S. payers.

Methods

Using the clinical data from the DESTINY-Breast04 trial, a three-state Markov model was created to assess the economic and health effects of T-DXd versus chemotherapy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and willingness-to-pay threshold were determined and compared. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were used to measure parameter uncertainty.

Results

In the overall HER2-low population, T-DXd provided additional 0.47 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an increased cost of $149,222 compared with chemotherapy, yielding an ICER of $317,494/QALY. The ICER was $353,903/QALY in the hormone receptor (HR)-positive subgroup, which decreased to $259,825/QALY in the HR-negative subgroup. The sensitivity analysis found that T-DXd would not be cost-effective in the base-case. The expected cost of T-DXd will be less than $4,281/cycle ($11.33/mg) or $1,903/cycle ($5.03/mg) to achieve a 50 or 90% cost-benefit probability, respectively.

Conclusions

T-DXd provides significant health benefit for patients with HER2-low mBC compared with chemotherapy but is unlikely to be cost-effective in the United States.

HER2-Low Breast Cancer-Diagnostic Challenges and Opportunities for Insights from Ongoing Studies: A Podcast

Breast cancer has been traditionally classified as either human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive or HER2-negative based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) scoring and/or gene amplification. HER2-positive breast cancer (defined as IHC 3+ or IHC 2+ and in situ hybridization [ISH]+) is routinely treated with HER2-targeted therapies, while HER2-negative breast cancer (defined as IHC 0, IHC 1+, or IHC 2+/ISH-) was not previously eligible for HER2-targeted therapy. Some tumors traditionally defined as HER2-negative express low levels of HER2 (i.e., HER2-low breast cancer, defined as IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-). Recently reported results from the DESTINY-Breast04 trial demonstrated that the HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) improved survival in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic HER2-low breast cancer, leading to the approval of T-DXd in the US and EU for patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-low breast cancer after prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting or disease recurrence within 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy. As the first HER2-targeted therapy approved for the treatment of HER2-low breast cancer, this represents a change in the clinical landscape and presents new challenges, including identifying patients with HER2-low breast cancer. In this podcast, we discuss the strengths and limitations of current methodologies for classifying HER2 expression and future research that will help refine the identification of patients expected to benefit from HER2-targeted therapy, such as T‑DXd or other antibody-drug conjugates. Although current methodologies are not optimized to identify all patients with HER2-low breast cancer who may potentially benefit from HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates, they are likely to identify many. Ongoing studies-including the DESTINY-Breast06 trial evaluating T-DXd in patients with HER2-low breast cancer and those with tumors expressing very low levels of HER2 (IHC > 0 to < 1+)-will provide insights that may improve the identification of patient populations expected to benefit from HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates. Supplementary file1 (MP4 123466 KB).

Survival differences between HER2-0 and HER2-low-expressing breast cancer - A meta-analysis of early breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

HER2-low (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) breast cancer takes up 40-50% in all breast cancer subtypes. The survival difference between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancers remain uncertain. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare survival outcome of the two subtypes and to explore the impact of hormone receptor status.

METHODS

A comprehensive medical literature search was performed by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries up to August 2022. We included observational studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The results of individual studies were pooled by random-effects models using Stata 16.0. Seventeen articles with a total of 78984 breast cancer patients were included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We observed a statistically significant association between low HER2 expression and better breast cancer survival outcomes (OS: HR: 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.75, 0.90; DFS/RFS: HR: 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.75, 0.91). In a subgroup analysis, we found that HER2-low patients had better survival outcomes relative to hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients (OS: HR: 0.87; 95% confidence interval: 0.81, 0.93; DFS/RFS: HR: 0.91; 95% confidence interval: 0.85, 0.96). Similarly, in triple-negative breast cancer patients, we also observed a positive association between HER2 low expression and better survival (OS: HR: 0.85; 95% confidence interval: 0.71, 0.98; DFS/RFS: HR: 0.85; 95% confidence interval: 0.74, 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that HER2-low breast cancer had better survival outcomes compared to HER2 negative breast cancer in patients with early stage breast cancer, regardless of hormone receptor status.

REGISTRATION

This meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022335704) on June 10, 2022.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

Can Patients with HER2-Low Breast Cancer Benefit from Anti-HER2 Therapies? A Review

Breast cancer (BC) poses a severe threat to the health of women worldwide. Currently, different therapeutic regimens are used for BC according to the pathological classification of HER2-positive or HER2-negative. Clinical reports of HER2-low expression indicate that the condition is HER2-negative, which was ineligible for HER2-targeted therapy. In contrast to HER2-zero tumors, however, HER2-low BC is a heterogeneous disease with unique genetic characteristics, prognoses, and different therapeutic responses. Clinical efficacy has been demonstrated by numerous potent and innovative anti-HER2 medications, particularly antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Certain ADCs, including T-DXd, have demonstrated good efficacy in some trials either used alone or in conjunction with other medications. To enhance outcomes in individuals with HER2-low BC, immunotherapy and other treatments are frequently combined with HER2-targeted therapy. There are also alternative strategies that target both HER2 and HER3 or other antigenic sites. We hope more individuals with HER2-low BC will benefit from more precise treatment regimens in the future. This article provides a review of existing research and clinical trials.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Prognosis of ERBB2-Low Breast Cancer Among Patients in the National Cancer Database

Importance

Given conflicting results regarding the prognosis of erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2; formerly HER2 or HER2/neu)-low breast cancer, a large-scale, nationally applicable comparison of ERBB2-low vs ERBB2-negative breast cancer is needed.

Objective

To investigate whether ERBB2-low breast cancer is a clinically distinct subtype in terms of epidemiological characteristics, prognosis, and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Design/Participants/Setting

This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Cancer Database, including 1 136 016 patients in the US diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019, who had ERBB2-negative disease and had immunohistochemistry results available. ERBB2-low tumors were classified as having an immunohistochemistry score of 1+, or 2+ with a negative in situ hybridization test. Data were analyzed from November 1, 2021, through November 30, 2022.

Exposures

Standard therapy according to routine clinical practice.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), reported as adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs), and pathologic complete response, reported as adjusted odds ratios (aORs), for ERBB2-negative vs ERBB2-low breast cancer, controlling for age, sex, race and ethnicity, Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index score, treatment facility type, tumor grade, tumor histology, hormone receptor status, and cancer stage.

Results

The study identified 1 136 016 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.4 [13.1] years; 99.1% female; 78.6% non-Hispanic White), of whom 392 246 (34.5%) were diagnosed with ERBB2-negative and 743 770 (65.5%) with ERBB2-low breast cancer. The mean (SD) age of the ERBB2-negative group was 62.1 (13.2) years and 62.5 (13.0) years for the ERBB2-low group. Higher estrogen receptor expression was associated with increased rates of ERBB2-low disease (aOR, 1.15 per 10% increase). Compared with non-Hispanic White patients, of whom 66.1% were diagnosed with ERBB2-low breast cancer, fewer non-Hispanic Black (62.8%) and Hispanic (61.0%) patients had ERBB2-low disease, although in non-Hispanic Black patients this was mediated by differences in rates of triple-negative disease and other confounders. A slightly lower rate of pathologic complete response was seen in patients with ERBB2-low disease vs patients with ERBB2-negative disease on multivariable analysis (aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86-0.92; P < .001). ERBB2-low status was also associated with small improvements in OS for stage III (aHR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.89-0.96; P < .001) and stage IV (aHR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87-0.96; P < .001) triple-negative breast cancer, although this amounted to only a 2.0% (stage III) and 0.4% (stage IV) increase in 5-year OS.

Conclusions and Relevance

This large-scale retrospective cohort analysis found minimal prognostic differences between ERBB2-low and ERBB2-negative breast cancer. These findings suggest that, moving forward, outcomes in ERBB2-low breast cancer will be driven by ERBB2-directed antibody-drug conjugates, rather than intrinsic differences in biological characteristics associated with low-level ERBB2 expression. These findings do not support the classification of ERBB2-low breast cancer as a unique disease entity.

Bioinformatics combined with clinical data to analyze clinical characteristics and prognosis in patients with HER2 low expression breast cancer

Background

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a landmark protein in determining the targeted treatment of breast cancer (BC). However, the latest research shows that different intensity of HER2 protein expression levels in BC leads to different clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis, especially in HER2 low expression patients. Therefore, this study intends to analyze and compare the clinicopathologic features and prognosis of BC patients with low and zero HER2 expression from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and the data collected by our center.

Methods

First, the BC dataset was downloaded from TCGA database, including 345 eligible and with complete clinical information BC patients, to compare the difference between HER2 low expression groups and HER2 zero expression groups and their correlation with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression. Then, the clinicopathological data and follow-up of 405 patients with HER2 low expression and HER2 zero expression diagnosed with BC admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities (YJMU) from January 2017 to December 2021 were collected to verify the consistency of the results of the two data sets.

Results

Both the clinical samples and the TCGA data showed that the ER and PR rates were higher in the HER2 low expression group compared with the HER2 zero expression group. There were no significant differences in tumor size, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and disease-free survival (DFS). In addition, the data analysis of 405 clinical samples also showed that the HER2 low expression group had a lower 3-year recurrence or metastasis rate compared with the HER2 zero expression group.

Conclusions

Compared with HER2 zero expression, HER2 low patients express more ER and PR, and have less short-term recurrence and metastasis, but there is no obvious difference in DFS between the two groups.

Biology and Treatment of HER2-Low Breast Cancer

Current guidelines recommend a dichotomous classification of HER2 as either positive or negative, to guide clinicians in treatment decisions. Until now, only patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) had been demonstrated to derive clinical benefit from anti-HER2 therapies. However, novel ADCs have recently emerged, with activity in the large population of patients with HER2-low-expressing BC. Although it remains unclear whether HER2-low BC represents a distinct entity, given the therapeutic implication its crucial to accurately distinguish HER2-low from HER2-0 BC. Efforts are needed to standardize HER2 testing in BC and to introduce more sensitive assays to better discriminate HER2 levels.

How I treat HER2-low advanced breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Targeting low levels of human receptor epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) expression has reshaped the treatment paradigm for half of the patients with advanced breast cancer. HER2-low is currently defined as a HER2 immunohistochemical expression of 1+ or 2+ without amplification by in-situ hybridization. Until recently, HER2-targeted agents were ineffective in treating patients with HER2-low disease.

AREAS COVERED

In this narrative review, we summarize the current management of HER2-low breast cancer. We highlight the findings of the DESTINY-Breast 04 phase 3 trial, which confirmed the efficacy of trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) for the treatment of patients with advanced, pretreated HER2-low breast cancer. We also discuss how to implement this new treatment option in treatment algorithms of hormone receptor (HR)-positive and triple-negative tumors, as well as how to optimally manage selected toxicities of T-DXd.

EXPERT OPINION

T-DXd is currently the standard of care for patients with advanced, pretreated, HER2-low breast cancer. Based on the design of the DESTINY-Breast04 trial, the current optimal place in treatment algorithms is after the first line of chemotherapy, both in HR-positive and triple-negative breast cancer. Up to 10-15% of the patients receiving T-DXd are expected to develop interstitial lung disease, which in 1-2% of the cases can be fatal. Adequate monitoring and prompt management are required to minimize the impact of ILD and to safely implement T-DXd in clinical practice.

Novel markers in breast pathology

Breast pathology is an ever-expanding database of information which includes markers, or biomarkers, that detect or help treat the disease as prognostic or predictive information. This review focuses on these aspects of biomarkers which are grounded in immunohistochemistry, liquid biopsies and next-generation sequencing.

Innovative Therapeutic Approaches for Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor, has been described in about 15-20% of breast cancer (BC) and is associated with poor outcomes. Trastuzumab is the first anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody (mAB) that blocks receptor activity but it also activates immune response against cancer cells, thus, revolutionizing the prognosis of patients with HER2-positive BC. Over the years, new therapies have been developed, including other mAbs and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that required multimodal approaches with chemotherapy to optimize their anticancer activity. This chapter gives a comprehensive overview of the last advancements including new approaches and future combinations, which seem to be very promising in overcoming resistance to the traditional anti-HER2 treatments. A modern therapeutic algorithm should include treatment options based on tumour patterns and a patient-centred approach. A proper patient's selection is crucial to derive maximal benefits from a treatment strategy and emerging biomarkers should be integrated along with the HER2 status, which is currently the only validated biomarker in the context of HER2-positive disease. These biomarkers might include molecular features with reported prognostic/predictive significance, such as phosphatidylinositol 3' -kinase (PI3K) or mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1), and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), which all affect prognosis and response to treatments.

Current Biological, Pathological and Clinical Landscape of HER2-Low Breast Cancer

HER2-low breast cancer (BC) is a newly defined subset of HER2-negative BC that has HER2 immunohistochemical (IHC) score of 1+ or score of 2+/in situ hybridization (ISH) negative phenotype. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated significant clinical benefits of novel HER2 directing antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in treating this group of tumors. Trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-Dxd), a HER2-directing ADC was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as the first targeted therapy to treat HER2-low BC. However, HER2-low BC is still not well characterized clinically and pathologically. This review aims to update the current biological, pathological and clinical landscape of HER2-low BC based on the English literature published in the past two years and to propose the future directions on clinical management, pathology practice, and translational research in this subset of BC. We hope it would help better understand the tumor biology of HER2-low BC and the current efforts for identifying and treating this newly recognized targetable group of BC.

Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancer

Novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a) showed its effect in previously-treated HER2-low metastatic breast cancer, suggesting a promising future in HER2-low breast cancer. We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathological data of 325 patients with stage I-III HER2 negative breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2016 to June 2021. In general, 91 patients (28.0%) were HER2-zero, and 234 patients (72.0%) were HER2-low. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate of the entire cohort was 17.3%. The pCR rate was 16.7% in HER2-low group, and 18.9% in HER2-zero group, showing no significant difference. Patients with HER2-low tumors had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than patients with HER2-zero tumors. ER status was the affecting factor of OS in HER2-low patients in both univariate and multivariate analysis. In conclusion, evidence for HER2-low BC as a distinct entity is insufficient, and more efforts are needed to standardize the scoring of HER2-low breast cancer.

HER2-Low Breast Cancer: Where Are We?

Background

Breast cancer is traditionally classified into three clinical subtypes based on hormone receptor and HER2 status (i.e., luminal-like, HER2-positive, and triple negative). Each subtype has distinct clinical-pathological and molecular characteristics and requires tailored treatments. Recent research efforts have been focusing on a new classification, identifying the so-called "HER2-low" category, including tumors characterized by a low level of HER2 expression (immunohistochemistry score 1+ or 2+ without in situ hybridization amplification). Emerging evidence shows that patients with HER2-low tumors can derive benefit from selected anti-HER2 therapies. This represents a major advancement in the field of breast oncology, where a broader proportion of patients with breast cancer can ultimately benefit from new effective targeted treatment strategies.

Summary

The antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan has proven impressive efficacy in patients with HER2-low breast cancer, and several other drugs are currently under investigation in this subset of patients. Additional investigation is needed to address open issues that exist in this field, including appropriate pathological assessment of HER2-low status, clarification of its prognostic implications, and global access to newly approved drugs.

Key Message

Our review aims to summarize the available evidence regarding HER2-low breast cancer, illustrating the current challenges that are being addressed and the future perspectives in this exciting new field.

HER2 amplification by next-generation sequencing to identify HER2-positive invasive breast cancer with negative HER2 immunohistochemistry

Background

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast carcinomas due to HER2 amplification are associated with aggressive behavior and a poor prognosis. Anti-HER2-targeted therapies are widely used to treat HER2-positive breast carcinomas with excellent outcomes. Accurate identification of HER2 amplification status in breast carcinomas is of important diagnostic and treatment value. Currently, HER2 amplification status is routinely determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing. This study will review our past HER2 data to determine and characterize discordant results between HER2 IHC and FISH. It will also determine a potential impact of HER2 amplification status by next-generation sequencing (NGS) on these patients.

Methods

We reviewed a total of 4884 breast carcinomas with coexisting HER2 IHC and HER2 FISH performed at our institution from 2010 to 2022. 57 cases also had a Next-Generation-Sequencing-based (NGS) gene panel performed. Given the advances in biostatic analysis pipelines, NGS methods were utilized to provide results on HER2 amplification status along with somatic mutations.

Results

While the majority (ranging from 98.5% with IHC score of 0 and 93.1% with IHC score of 1 +) of 4884 breast carcinomas had concordant results from HER2 IHC and HER2 FISH testing, a small percentage of patients (ranging from 1.5% in those with IHC score of 0, to 6.9% with IHC score of 1 +) had discordant results, with negative HER2 IHC and positive HER2 FISH results. These patients could be reported as HER2-negative breast carcinomas if only HER2 IHC testing has been performed according to a current cost-effective HER2 test strategy. 57 patients had HER2 amplification status determined by NGS, and all patients had concordant results between HER2 NGS and FISH tests. A HER2-amplified breast carcinoma by NGS had a negative IHC and a positive HER2 FISH result. This case was classified as a HER2-positive breast carcinoma, had anti-HER2-targeted therapy, and achieved a complete clinical response.

Conclusions

A small percentage of HER2-positive breast carcinomas are unidentified because of a negative HER2 IHC based on our current cost-effective HER2 test strategy. It is not feasible and affordable in routine clinical practice to perform HER2 FISH for the cases with negative HER2 IHC (IHC score 0 and 1 +). Therefore, NGS assays capable of simultaneously detecting both somatic mutations and HER2 amplification could provide a more comprehensive genetic profiling for breast carcinomas in a clinical setting. Identification of HER2 amplification by NGS in HER2-positive breast carcinomas with negative HER2 IHC results is important since these cases are concealed by our current cost-effective HER2 test strategy with IHC first (for all cases) and FISH reflex (only for cases with IHC score of 2 +), and would offer the opportunity for potentially beneficial anti-HER2-targeted therapies for these patients.

A round table discussion: clinical landscape of trastuzumab deruxtecan in breast cancer: a retrospective and prospective view

The treatment landscape of breast cancer has been greatly changed by the innovative targeting therapies. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) with a representative of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) are the most successful ones. The revolutionary next-generation design of ADC transformed to the unprecedented clinical data. The DESTINY-BREAST01 and DESTINY-BREAST03 trials have changed the standard of care for HER2-positve metastatic breast cancer (MBC). At the same time the clinical data of T-DXd in HER2-postive patients with brain metastasis (BM) is numerously gaining and challenging the current treatment concept for central nerve system (CNS) involved disease. The DESTINY-BREAST series trials have quickly expanded to first-line (1L) and early setting of breast cancer. The newly reported positive result of DESTINY-BREAST04 trial has also opening the door of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low era. The breast cancer experts are facing a world of massive data and rapidly changing. Therefore, round table discussion meeting is a great way to share the information and options of among oncologists. This time, the breast cancer experts in China gathered to discuss the important clinical advances of T-DXd and its impact to clinical practice. The meeting minutes were recorded and organized as the review article. This would provide insights to better understanding of the current data and shape the further research directions of breast cancer.

HER2-Low Status Does Not Affect Survival Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Undergoing First-Line Treatment with Endocrine Therapy plus Palbociclib: Results of a Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Approximately 45–50% of breast cancers (BCs) have a HER2 immunohistochemical score of 1+ or 2+ with negative in situ hybridization, defining the “HER2-low BC” subtype. No anti-HER2 agents are currently approved for this subgroup in Europe, where treatment is still determined by HR expression status. In this study, we investigated the prognostic significance of HER2-low status in HR+/HER2- metastatic BC (MBC) patients treated with endocrine therapy (ET) plus palbociclib as first line. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including 252 consecutive HR+/HER2- MBC patients who received first-line ET plus palbociclib at six Italian Oncology Units between March 2016 and June 2021. The chi-square test was used to assess differences in the distribution of clinical and pathological variables between the HER-0 and HER2-low subgroups. Survival outcomes, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and the log-rank test was performed to estimate the differences between the curves. Results: A total of 165 patients were included in the analysis: 94 (57%) and 71 (43%) patients had HER2-0 and HER2-low disease, respectively. The median age at treatment start was 64 years. No correlation between patients and tumor characteristics and HER2 status was found. Median PFS (mPFS) for the entire study cohort was 20 months (95% CI,18–25 months), while median OS (mOS) was not reached at the time of analysis. No statistically significant differences, in terms of PFS (p = 0.20) and OS (p = 0.1), were observed between HER2-low and HER2-0 subgroups. Conclusions: In our analysis, HR+ MBC patients with low HER2 expression who received first-line treatment with ET plus Palbociclib reported no statistically different survival outcomes compared to HER2-0 patients. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the clinical role of HER2 expression level.

An Overview of Clinical Development of Agents for Metastatic or Advanced Breast Cancer Without ERBB2 Amplification (HER2-Low)

Importance

Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2; formerly HER2 [human epidermal growth factor receptor 2]) is an important prognostic and predictive factor in breast cancer. Anti-ERBB2 therapies have improved outcomes in ERBB2-positive breast cancer. However, based on current definitions, tumors with low ERBB2 expression are included in the ERBB2-negative subtype, and therefore, are ineligible for anti-ERBB2 therapies; patients with ERBB2-low (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 1 positive [+] or IHC 2+/in situ hybridization [ISH] negative [-]) tumors account for up to approximately 50% of breast cancer cases. Although the prognostic role of ERBB2-low needs to be defined, ERBB2 offers a potential therapeutic target in these patients.

Observations

Most breast cancer tumors have some ERBB2 expression, with ERBB2-low being more common in hormone receptor-positive than in hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. Although an early clinical study failed to demonstrate benefit of adjuvant trastuzumab for ERBB2-low disease, several novel anti-ERBB2 therapies have shown efficacy in ERBB2-low breast cancer, including the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan in a phase 3 trial, and trastuzumab duocarmazine and the bispecific antibody zenocutuzumab in early-phase studies. Although reports are conflicting, some differences in biology and patient outcomes have been found between ERBB2-low and ERBB2 IHC-0 breast cancer. Currently, no established guidelines exist for scoring ERBB2-low expression in breast cancer because the focus has been on binary classification as ERBB2-positive or ERBB2-negative. Additional interpretive cutoffs may be needed to select patients for treatment with effective agents in ERBB2-low breast cancer, along with standardized laboratory quality assurance programs to ensure consistent patient identification for eligibility for ERBB2-low targeting agents.

Conclusions and Relevance

This review suggests that ERBB2-low may be a distinct, clinically relevant breast cancer entity warranting reassessment of traditional diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms. Ongoing clinical trials and further investigations may provide optimized strategies for diagnosing and treating ERBB2-low breast cancer, including reproducible, consistent definitions to identify patients in this diagnostic category and demonstration of benefits of emerging therapies.

Targeted Approaches to HER2-Low Breast Cancer: Current Practice and Future Directions

Simple Summary

HER2-low breast cancer (BC) accounts for more than half of breast cancer patients. Anti-HER2 therapy has been ineffective in HER2-low BC, for which palliative chemotherapy is the main treatment modality. The definitive efficacy of T-Dxd in HER2-low BC breaks previous treatment strategies, which will redefine HER2-low and thus reshape anti-HER2 therapy. This review summarizes detection technologies and novel agents for HER2-low BC, and explores their possible role in future clinics, to provide ideas for the diagnosis and treatment of HER2-low BC.

Abstract

HER2-low breast cancer (BC) has a poor prognosis, making the development of more suitable treatment an unmet clinical need. While chemotherapy is the main method of treatment for HER2-low BC, not all patients benefit from it. Antineoplastic therapy without chemotherapy has shown promise in clinical trials and is being explored further. As quantitative detection techniques become more advanced, they assist in better defining the expression level of HER2 and in guiding the development of targeted therapies, which include directly targeting HER2 receptors on the cell surface, targeting HER2-related intracellular signaling pathways and targeting the immune microenvironment. A new anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugate called T-DM1 has been successfully tested and found to be highly effective in clinical trials. With this progress, it could eventually be transformed from a disease without a defined therapeutic target into a disease with a defined therapeutic molecular target. Furthermore, efforts are being made to compare the sequencing and combination of chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and HER2-targeted therapy to improve prognosis to customize the subtype of HER2 low expression precision treatment regimens. In this review, we summarize the current and upcoming treatment strategies, to achieve accurate management of HER2-low BC.