Preoperative chemoradiotherapy using concurrent capecitabine and irinotecan in magnetic resonance imaging-defined locally advanced rectal cancer: impact on long-term clinical outcomes

Combination of irinotecan silicasome nanoparticles with radiation therapy sensitizes immunotherapy by modulating the activation of the cGAS/STING pathway for colorectal cancer

Our previous clinical trial (Identifier: NCT02605265) revealed that addition of irinotecan (IRIN) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer could improve the curative effect. However, the adverse effects caused by IRIN limited the wide application of IRIN chemoradiotherapy. This study aimed to explore the mechanism under the synergistic effects of IRIN plus radiation therapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells and optimization of IRIN delivery via a silicasome nanocarrier in vivo. Our results revealed that compared with single IRIN or radiation treatment, IRIN combined with radiation therapy remarkably activated the intracellular cGAS/STING pathway, and promoted the expression levels of major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Further, a silicasome (mesoporous silica nanoparticle coated with lipid bilayer) nanocarrier was utilized to improve the delivery of IRIN with enhanced efficacy and reduced side effects. In the MC38 CRC syngeneic tumor model, IRIN silicasome combined with radiation therapy demonstrated a greater antitumor efficacy than free IRIN plus radiation therapy. Flow cytometry showed the increased number of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and dendritic cells (DCs) in tumor in the IRIN silicasome plus radiation group. The immunofluorescence staining further confirmed the activated immune microenvironment with the elevated interferon-γ (IFN-γ) deposition. Besides, the antitumor effect of IRIN silicasome plus radiation therapy was synergistically enhanced by anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. These findings indicated that the combination of IRIN silicasome with radiation therapy could sensitize immunotherapy by manipulating the cGAS/STING pathway serving as a new strategy for CRC treatment.

Radiotherapy in the preoperative neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer

Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are effective treatments for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and can significantly improve the likelihood of R0 resection. Radiotherapy can be used as a local treatment to reduce the size of the tumor, improve the success rate of surgery and reduce the residual cancer cells after surgery. Early chemotherapy can also downgrade the tumor and eliminate micrometastases throughout the body, reducing the risk of recurrence and metastasis. The advent of neoadjuvant concurrent radiotherapy (nCRT) and total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) has brought substantial clinical benefits to patients with LARC. Even so, given increasing demand for organ preservation and quality of life and the disease becoming increasingly younger in its incidence profile, there is a need to further explore new neoadjuvant treatment options to further improve tumor remission rates and provide other opportunities for patients to choose watch-and-wait (W&W) strategies that avoid surgery. Targeted drugs and immunologic agents (ICIs) have shown good efficacy in patients with advanced rectal cancer but have not been commonly used in neoadjuvant therapy for patients with LARC. In this paper, we review several aspects of neoadjuvant therapy, including radiation therapy and chemotherapy drugs, immune drugs and targeted drugs used in combination with neoadjuvant therapy, with the aim of providing direction and thoughtful perspectives for LARC clinical treatment and research trials.

Radiosensitizing Effects of Irinotecan versus Oxaliplatin Alone and in Combination with 5-Fluorouracil on Human Colorectal Cancer Cells

To date, oxaliplatin and irinotecan are used in combination with 5-flourouracil (5-FU) for metastatic colorectal cancer. In this study it was tested whether oxaliplatin and irinotecan and their combinations with 5-FU have an enhanced effect when treated simultaneously with ionizing radiation. In addition, it should be compared whether one combination therapy is more effective than the other. Colorectal cancer cells (HT-29) were treated with irinotecan or oxaliplatin, both alone and in combination with 5-FU, and subsequently irradiated. The cell growth, metabolic activity and proliferation of cells were investigated, and the clonogenic survival was determined. Furthermore, the assessment of radiation-induced DNA damage and the influence of the drugs and their combinations on DNA damage repair was investigated. Treatment with irinotecan or oxaliplatin in combination with 5-FU inhibited proliferation and metabolic activity as well as clonogenic survival and the DNA damage repair capacity of the tumor cells. The comparison of oxaliplatin and irinotecan with simultaneous irradiation showed the same effect of both drugs. When oxaliplatin or irinotecan was combined with 5-FU, tumor cell survival was significantly lower than with monotherapy; however, there was no superiority of either combination regimen. Our results have shown that the combination of 5-FU and irinotecan is as effective as the combination of 5-FU with oxaliplatin. Therefore, our data support the use of FOLFIRI as a radiosensitizer.

Drug Repositioning Based on the Reversal of Gene Expression Signatures Identifies TOP2A as a Therapeutic Target for Rectal Cancer

Rectal cancer is a common disease with high mortality rates and limited therapeutic options. Here we combined the gene expression signatures of rectal cancer patients with the reverse drug-induced gene-expression profiles to identify drug repositioning candidates for cancer therapy. Among the predicted repurposable drugs, topoisomerase II inhibitors (doxorubicin, teniposide, idarubicin, mitoxantrone, and epirubicin) presented a high potential to reverse rectal cancer gene expression signatures. We showed that these drugs effectively reduced the growth of colorectal cancer cell lines closely representing rectal cancer signatures. We also found a clear correlation between topoisomerase 2A (TOP2A) gene copy number or expression levels with the sensitivity to topoisomerase II inhibitors. Furthermore, CRISPR-Cas9 and shRNA screenings confirmed that loss-of-function of the TOP2A has the highest efficacy in reducing cellular proliferation. Finally, we observed significant TOP2A copy number gains and increased expression in independent cohorts of rectal cancer patients. These findings can be translated into clinical practice to evaluate TOP2A status for targeted and personalized therapies based on topoisomerase II inhibitors in rectal cancer patients.

Adding Adjuvants to Fluoropyrimidine-based Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: An Option Worthy of Serious Consideration

The application of fluoropyrimidine-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (Fu-nCRT) of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has become a common therapeutic regimen. In order to improve the efficacy and enable more patients to benefit from this treatment, an accumulation of studies have been carried out on the auxiliary use of other drugs with Fu-nCRT. However, due to specific challenges and the potential opportunities that coexist in this field, a more reasonable approach to the mode of treatment remains to be explored. In this review, we have summarized the results of the studies on the combination of Fu-nCRT with cytotoxic drugs, anti-tumor angiogenesis, and anti-EGFR agents, as well as the status of the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the neoadjuvant therapy of LARC patients.

Recent advances in (chemo-)radiation therapy for rectal cancer: a comprehensive review

The role of radiation therapy in the treatment of (colo)-rectal cancer has changed dramatically over the past decades. Introduced with the aim of reducing the high rates of local recurrences after conventional surgery, major developments in imaging, surgical technique, systemic therapy and radiation delivery have now created a much more complex environment leading to a more personalized approach. Functional aspects including reduction of acute or late treatment-related side effects, sphincter or even organ-preservation and the unsolved problem of still high distant failure rates have become more important while local recurrence rates can be kept low in the vast majority of patients. This review summarizes the actual role of radiation therapy in different subgroups of patients with rectal cancer, including the current standard approach in different subgroups as well as recent developments focusing on neoadjuvant treatment intensification and/or non-operative treatment approaches aiming at organ-preservation.

Multicenter, Randomized, Phase III Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Capecitabine and Irinotecan Guided by UGT1A1 Status in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Differentiating the irinotecan dose on the basis of the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) genotype improves the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. In this study, we further investigated preoperative irinotecan combined with capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Impact of preoperative chemoradiotherapy using concurrent S-1 and CPT-11 on long-term clinical outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens using a second drug for locally advanced rectal cancer are still under clinical investigation.

AIM

To investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy using tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1) plus irinotecan (CPT-11).

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study of 82 patients who underwent radical surgery for rectal cancer after chemoradiotherapy with S-1 (80 mg/m²/d), CPT-11 (60 mg/m²/d), and radiation (total 45 Gy) between 2009 and 2016. The median follow-up was 51 mo (range: 17–116 mo).

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients (35.4%) had T3 or T4 rectal cancer with mesorectal fascia invasion, 36 (43.9%) had extramural vascular invasion, 24 (29.8%) had N2 rectal cancer and eight (9.8%) had lateral lymph node swelling. The relative dose intensity was 90.1% for S-1 and 92.9% for CPT-11. Seventy-nine patients (96.3%) underwent R0 resection. With regard to pathological response, 13 patients (15.9%) had a pathological complete response and 52 (63.4%) a good response (tumor regression grade 2/3). The 5-year local recurrence-free survival, relapse-free survival and overall survival rates were 90.1%, 72.5% and 91.3%, respectively. We analyzed the risk factors for local recurrence-free survival by Cox regression analysis and none were detected. Previously described risk factors such as T4 stage, mesorectal fascia invasion or lateral lymph node swelling were not detected as negative factors for local recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated good compliance and favorable tumor regression in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative S-1 and CPT-11.

The Impact of Chemotherapy Completion on the Efficacy of Irinotecan in the Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: An Expanded Analysis of the CinClare Phase III Trial

BACKGROUND

This study explored the impact of chemotherapy completion on irinotecan efficacy in preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (T3/4 and/or LN+) receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were enrolled. All received preoperative pelvic radiotherapy concurrently with capecitabine and irinotecan, followed by a course of XELIRI and surgery. Patients were divided into low- and high-completion groups based on their cycles of concurrent irinotecan (1-3 or 4-5). Tumor response was compared. Significant risk factors for low completion were investigated by logistic regression modeling then a predictive nomogram was built.

RESULTS

Overall, 371 patients were enrolled, with 102 patients from CinClare phase III trial (NCT02605265). Proportions of patients with low and high completion were 38.8% and 61.2%, respectively. In the general population, the complete tumor response rates (combining sustained clinical complete response and pathologic complete response) were 21.5% and 33.6% in the low- and high-completion groups, respectively (P = .02), which were 24.2% versus 43.5% in the CinClare group (P = .08). The pathologic complete response rates were 19.4% and 26.1%, respectively (P = .19). A predictive nomogram was established and 3 different risk groups (low, intermediate, and high risk) were identified, with high completion rates of 29.2%, 50.0%, and 68.9%, respectively (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Our analysis suggested higher completion of concurrent irinotecan was associated with better tumor response for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with UGT1A1∗1∗1 or UGT1A1∗1∗28 phenotypes in the neoadjuvant setting, and at least 4 cycles was recommended.

Novel phase I trial design to evaluate the addition of cediranib or selumetinib to preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: the DREAMtherapy trial

BACKGROUND

The DREAMtherapy (Dual REctal Angiogenesis MEK inhibition radiotherapy) trial is a novel intertwined design whereby two tyrosine kinase inhibitors (cediranib and selumetinib) were independently evaluated with rectal chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in an efficient manner to limit the extended follow-up period often required for radiotherapy studies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cediranib or selumetinib was commenced 10 days before and then continued with RT (45 Gy/25#/5 wks) and capecitabine (825 mg/m2 twice a day (BID)). When three patients in the cediranib 15-mg once daily (OD) cohort were in the surveillance period, recruitment to the selumetinib cohort commenced. This alternating schedule was followed throughout. Three cediranib (15, 20 and 30 mg OD) and two selumetinib cohorts (50 and 75 mg BID) were planned. Circulating and imaging biomarkers of inflammation/angiogenesis were evaluated.

RESULTS

In case of cediranib, dose-limiting diarrhoea, fatigue and skin reactions were seen in the 30-mg OD cohort, and therefore, 20 mg OD was defined as the maximum tolerated dose. Forty-one percent patients achieved a clinical or pathological complete response (7/17), and 53% (9/17) had an excellent clinical or pathological response (ECPR). Significantly lower level of pre-treatment plasma tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) was found in patients who had an ECPR. In case of selumetinib, the 50-mg BID cohort was poorly tolerated (fatigue and diarrhoea); a reduced dose cohort of 75-mg OD was opened which was also poorly tolerated, and further recruitment was abandoned. Of the 12 patients treated, two attained an ECPR (17%).

CONCLUSIONS

This novel intertwined trial design is an effective way to independently investigate multiple agents with radiotherapy. The combination of cediranib with CRT was well tolerated with encouraging efficacy. TNFα emerged as a potential predictive biomarker of response and warrants further evaluation.

Effect of Responsiveness of Lymph Nodes to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Rectal Cancer on Prognosis After Radical Resection

BACKGROUND

The influence of lymph node (LN) response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) has not been well evaluated for prognosis and additional use of adjuvant treatment after PCRT in rectal cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic effect of LN regression grade (LRG) in rectal cancer after PCRT and radical resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2008 to 2011, 389 patients with rectal cancer treated with PCRT followed by radical resection were identified. The pathologic LRG (pLRG) score was determined on the basis of the proportion of tumor cells and fibrosis. The sum of the pLRG of each evaluated LN was used as the final LRG score, LRG-sum. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the association of LRG-sum and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

The distribution of LRG-sum was significantly associated with tumor regression grade of the primary tumor (P < .001). LRG-sum showed different values even in patients with the same number of metastatic LNs. LRG-sum was confirmed as the most relevant associated factor among LN-related variables with RFS along with ypT stage in multivariate analysis. Patients were categorized according to the cutoff points of LRG-sum distribution: LRG1 (LRG-sum 0 to ≤3), LRG2 (LRG-sum 3 to ≤21), and LRG3 (LRG-sum >21). RFS showed a significant difference according to LRG group (P < .001) and showed more effective difference in RFS in the same ypN stage subgroup on the basis of the number of metastatic LNs.

CONCLUSION

LRG was a prognostic factor of oncologic outcomes of rectal cancer. LN response to PCRT might help in prognostication and determination of treatments after PCRT.

Phase I study of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with sequential oxaliplatin and irinotecan with S-1 for locally advanced rectal cancer

The present study designed a novel preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with sequential oxaliplatin and irinotecan with S-1 for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This phase I study evaluated the maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose (RD) of oxaliplatin following irinotecan with S-1. Patients with clinical stage T3 or 4 or involvement of the regional nodes and no evidence of distant metastases were treated with fixed doses of S-1 (80 mg/m²/day) on days 1-5, 8-12, 15-19, 22-27 and 29-33, and irinotecan (40 mg/m²/day) on days 1 and 8, followed by oxaliplatin on days 22 and 29. The dose of oxaliplatin was initially 40 mg/m² (level 1) with a predefined dose escalation schedule. The radiation dose was 1.8 Gy/fraction to a total dose of 45 Gy. A total of 9 patients were enrolled in the present study and 7 patients completely received CRT with this study protocol. The maximum tolerated dose for oxaliplatin was 50 mg/m² (level 2). Three of four patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 diarrhea) in oxaliplatin phase of level 2 dose. The RD of oxaliplatin was 40 mg/m² (level 1 dose). In addition, 2 patients had pathological CR (28.5%). Novel preoperative CRT with sequential oxaliplatin and irinotecan with S-1 for LARC resulted in acceptable toxicity and promising efficacy. However, the RD of oxaliplatin was lower than in previous CRT studies that combined oxaliplatin with S-1. To administer higher oxaliplatin, we have planned a phase I trial of preoperative CRT with sequential oxaliplatin followed by irinotecan with S-1 for LARC.

Does total regression of primary rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy represent "no tumor" status?

Purpose

Insistence that total regression of primary tumor would not represent long-term oncologic outcomes has been raised. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of these patients after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) and radical surgery and to evaluate the associated risk factors.

Methods

We included 189 patients with rectal cancer who showed total regression of the primary tumor after PCRT, followed by radical resection, between 2001 and 2012. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the results were compared with 77 patients with Tis rectal cancer who received only radical resection. Factors associated with RFS were evaluated using Cox regression analysis.

Results

Sphincter-saving resection was performed for 146 patients (77.2%). Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 168 patients (88.9%). During the follow-up period, recurrence occurred in 17 patients (9%). The 5-year RFS was 91.3%, which was significantly lower than that of patients with Tis rectal cancer without PCRT (P = 0.005). In univariate analysis, preoperative CEA and histologic differentiation were associated with RFS. However, no factors were found to be associated with RFS.

Conclusion

RFS was lower in patients with total regression of primary rectal cancer after PCRT than in those with Tis rectal cancer without PCRT, and it would not be considered as the same entity with early rectal cancer or "disappeared tumor" status.

UGT1A1 polymorphisms in rectal cancer associated with the efficacy and toxicity of preoperative chemoradiotherapy using irinotecan

The purpose of the present study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of preoperative chemoradiotherapy using irinotecan against locally advanced lower rectal cancer according to UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) polymorphisms. Between 2009 and 2016, 46 patients with resectable rectal cancer (T3-T4, N0-N2, M0) received preoperative chemoradiotherapy consisting of 80 mg/m2 per day tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1; days 1-5, 8-12, 22-26, and 29-33), 60 mg/m2 per day irinotecan (days 1, 8, 22, and 29), and 45 Gy radiation (1.8 Gy/day, 5 days per week for 5 weeks). Six to eight weeks after completing chemoradiotherapy, total mesorectal excision was carried out. Patients with UGT1A1 polymorphisms were divided into WT (n = 26), heterozygous (n = 15), and homozygous (n = 5) groups, the latter including double heterozygosities. We evaluated associations between clinical characteristics, including UGT1A1 polymorphisms, and chemoradiotherapy efficacy and toxicity. Incidence rates of grade 3+ neutropenia and diarrhea were 17.0% and 30.4%, respectively. Relative dose intensity was 89.3%. Pathological complete response rate (grade 3) was 26.1%, and the good response (grade 2/3) rate was 84.8%. UGT1A1 polymorphisms were significantly associated with neutropenia and pathological good responses, but not with diarrhea. UGT1A1 polymorphism was the only predictive factor for pathological good responses. Our results indicate that UGT1A1 polymorphism is a predictive factor to determine the clinical efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy and hematological toxicity induced by chemoradiotherapy using irinotecan in locally advanced rectal cancer patients.

Systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

With the well established shift to neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, there is increasing focus on the use of radiosensitizers to improve the efficacy and tolerability of radiotherapy. There currently exist few randomized data exploring novel radiosensitizers to improve response and it is unclear what the clinical endpoints of such trials should be.

METHODS

A qualitative systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines using preset search criteria across the PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases from 1990 to 2017. Additional results were generated from the reference lists of included papers.

RESULTS

A total of 123 papers were identified, of which 37 were included; a further 60 articles were obtained from additional referencing to give a total of 97 articles. Neoadjuvant radiosensitization for locally advanced rectal cancer using fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy remains the standard of treatment. The oral derivative capecitabine has practical advantages over 5-fluorouracil, with equal efficacy, but the addition of a second chemotherapeutic agent has yet to show a consistent significant efficacy benefit in randomized clinical assessment. Preclinical and early-phase trials are progressing with promising novel agents, such as small molecular inhibitors and nanoparticles.

CONCLUSION

Despite extensive research and promising preclinical studies, a definite further agent in addition to fluoropyrimidines that consistently improves response rate has yet to be found.

Phase I/II Study of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy With TEGAFIRI for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer; however, the optimal chemotherapy sequence to administer simultaneously with radiotherapy remains unclear. We conducted a phase I/II study to test a new regimen, TEGAFIRI (combination tegafur, uracil [UFT], leucovorin [LV], irinotecan), for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 22 patients with locally advanced lower rectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled in the present study. The radiation dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. UFT (300 mg/m²/d) and LV (75 mg/body weight/d) were administered orally 3 times daily. Irinotecan was administered as an intravenous infusion at 3 escalating dose levels. The initial dose was 50 mg/m² (level 1; n = 7), the intermediate was 70 mg/m² (level 2; n = 8), and the maximum was 80 mg/m² (level 3; n = 7). The drug was administered on days 1, 15, 29, and 43.

RESULTS

Dose-limiting toxicity was not observed at any dosing level. The most frequent adverse event was leukopenia (50%), followed by diarrhea (45.5%), anal pain (31.8%), and neutropenia (27.3%). All were well-managed with the appropriate drugs. The total pathologic complete response rate was 22.7%, and the proportion of good responders was 28.6%, 50%, and 71.4% at levels 1, 2, and 3, respectively. None of the patients experienced local recurrence. The 5-year relapse-free and overall survival rates were 80.4% and 80.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

TEGAFIRI is a promising CRT regimen that results in marked tumor regression and good local control. Moreover, its adverse events are well-tolerated.

Is the pathological regression level of metastatic lymph nodes associated with oncologic outcomes following preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer?

Purpose

The oncologic impact of the lymph node (LN) regression level after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) has not been thoroughly evaluated. Hence, this study aimed to examine whether the regression level of metastatic LNs following PCRT is associated with oncologic outcomes in rectal cancer.

Results

The optimal number of cut points for LRG sum was determined to be three. The three LRG groups demonstrated different distributions according to the ypT and ypN stages (p < 0.001 for both). However, the distribution of the LRG groups was not associated with the TRG of the primary tumor (p = 0.527). The RFS significantly differed according to the LRG groups (p = 0.001). Moreover, the differences in RFS remained when the LRG groups were analyzed within each separate ypN stage. The LRG group was confirmed as a factor associated with RFS in the multivariate analysis (p=0.018), while the ypN stage was not (p=0.4).

Patients and Methods

We analyzed the outcomes of 142 rectal cancer patients diagnosed with ypN1 disease after PCRT followed by radical resection. The pathological responses of the primary tumor and LNs to PCRT were evaluated using the tumor regression grade (TRG) and LN regression grade (LRG), respectively. The impact of LRG on recurrence-free survival (RFS) was analyzed. The K-adaptive partitioning for survival data method was applied to determine the optimal number of cut points for the LRG-sum and the optimal number of subgroups.

Conclusion

The LRG as an indicator of response to PCRT should be considered as a prognostic determinant in rectal cancer patients. Future large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine, irinotecan and cetuximab in rectal cancer: significance of pre-treatment and post-resection RAS mutations

BACKGROUND

The influence of EGFR pathway mutations on cetuximab-containing rectal cancer preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) is uncertain.

METHODS

In a prospective phase II trial (EXCITE), patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined non-metastatic rectal adenocarinoma threatening/involving the surgical resection plane received pelvic radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine, irinotecan and cetuximab. Resection was recommended 8 weeks later. The primary endpoint was histopathologically clear (R0) resection margin. Pre-planned retrospective DNA pyrosequencing (PS) and next generation sequencing (NGS) of KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA and BRAF was performed on the pre-treatment biopsy and resected specimen.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients were recruited and 76 underwent surgery, with R0 resection in 67 (82%, 90%CI: 73-88%) (four patients with clinical complete response declined surgery). Twenty-four patients (30%) had an excellent clinical or pathological response (ECPR). Using NGS 24 (46%) of 52 matched biopsies/resections were discrepant: ten patients (19%) gained 13 new resection mutations compared to biopsy (12 KRAS, one PIK3CA) and 18 (35%) lost 22 mutations (15 KRAS, 7 PIK3CA). Tumours only ever testing RAS wild-type had significantly greater ECPR than tumours with either biopsy or resection RAS mutations (14/29 [48%] vs 10/51 [20%], P=0.008), with a trend towards increased overall survival (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.05-1.03, P=0.055).

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen was feasible and the primary study endpoint was met. For the first time using pre-operative rectal CRT, emergence of clinically important new resection mutations is described, likely reflecting intratumoural heterogeneity manifesting either as treatment-driven selective clonal expansion or a geographical biopsy sampling miss.

Targeted agents in GI radiotherapy: Clinical efficacy and side effects

Approximately 50% of all patients with cancer receive radiotherapy (RT) at some point during their treatment. Despite the advent of modern imaging and advances in planning and delivering highly-conformal and precise RT, further dose escalation to improve clinical outcome is often limited by the potential side-effects to adjacent tissues. Addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy (CRT) has led to significant clinical improvements in many gastrointestinal malignancies but at the expense of increased toxicity as most chemotherapy drugs lack specificity. Targeted agents modulate specific biological pathways and can potentially enhance RT efficacy. However, so far, the majority of clinical studies incorporating targeted agents into RT and CRT have produced disappointing results in gastrointestinal malignancies. Also, we lack validated biomarkers and methods for monitoring and predicting the efficacy of these agents when combined with RT/CRT. In the present article, we will review the most important targeted therapies, and examine the efficacy and toxicity of these agents when combined with RT/CRT in gastrointestinal malignancies. The shortcomings as well as future challenges and perspectives for the successful use of these compounds with RT/CRT in future trials will also be outlined.

Drug Combinations in Preoperative Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer

Preoperative radiotherapy has an accepted role in reducing the risk of local recurrence in locally advanced resectable rectal cancer, particularly when the circumferential resection margin is breached or threatened, according to magnetic resonance imaging. Fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation can obtain a significant down-sizing response and a curative resection can then be achieved. Approximately, 20% of the patients can also obtain a pathological complete response, which is associated with less local recurrences and increased survival. Patients who achieve a sustained complete clinical response may also avoid radical surgery. In unresectable or borderline resectable tumors, around 20% of the patients still fail to achieve a sufficient down-staging response with the current chemoradiation schedules. Hence, investigators have aspired to increase pathological complete response rates, aiming to improve curative resection rates, enhance survival, and potentially avoid mutilating surgery. However, adding additional cytotoxic or biological agents have not produced dramatic improvements in outcome and often led to excess surgical morbidity and higher levels of acute toxicity, which effects on compliance and in the global efficacy of chemoradiation.

Optimal therapy for resectable rectal cancer

A lot can be gained by improving our understanding of the optimal sequence of existing therapies in rectal cancer, with the more difficult task of balancing the morbidity of recurrence with the morbidity of prescribed therapies that are particularly toxic owing to tumour location. This review aims to highlight a recent shift in treatment strategies in the opposite direction, with a focus on earlier, more intense systemic treatments with reduced local therapies. Understanding the rationale for and evidence to support this shift will help identify gaps, shape future trials, and ultimately answer the question of whether this is indeed the right path to follow with regards to maintaining local control rates and long-term outcomes for patients, and improving distal disease control and local treatment-related morbidities without compromising quality of life.

Clinical and cellular roles for TDP1 and TOP1 in modulating colorectal cancer response to irinotecan

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the world. Despite surgery, up to 50% of patients relapse with incurable disease. First-line chemotherapy uses the topoisomerase 1 (TOP1) poison irinotecan, which triggers cell death by trapping TOP1 on DNA. The removal of TOP1 peptide from TOP1-DNA breaks is conducted by tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1). Despite putative roles for TDP1 and TOP1 in colorectal cancer, their role in cellular and clinical responses to TOP1-targeting therapies remains unclear. Here, we show varying expression levels of TOP1 and TDP1 polypeptides in multiple colorectal cancer cell lines and in clinical colorectal cancer samples. TDP1 overexpression or TOP1 depletion is protective. Conversely, TDP1 depletion increases DNA-strand breakage and hypersensitivity to irinotecan in a TOP1-dependent manner, presenting a potential therapeutic opportunity in colorectal cancer. TDP1 protein levels correlate well with mRNA and with TDP1 catalytic activity. However, no correlation is observed between inherent TDP1 or TOP1 levels alone and irinotecan sensitivity, pointing at their limited utility as predictive biomarkers in colorectal cancer. These findings establish TDP1 as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of colorectal cancer and question the validity of TOP1 or TDP1 on their own as predictive biomarkers for irinotecan response.

How can we determine the best neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimen for rectal cancer?

SUMMARY 

The current management of patients with clinically defined ‘locally advanced rectal cancer’ often involves fluoropyrimidine-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision. The focus remains primarily on reducing local recurrence, and improving survival, with organ preservation an increasing target. The best neoadjuvant CRT is the most effective regimen, balanced against the tolerability and late functional consequences, which should be selected for the individual according to their individual risk of local and distant recurrence. Hence, what makes the best neoadjuvant treatment depends on the activity and toxicity of the particular schedule, the aims of treatment, the individual disease characteristics and the individual patient pharmacogenomics. Current research efforts focus on enhancing the efficacy of CRT by integrating additional cytotoxics and biologically targeted agents.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy using concurrent S-1 and irinotecan in rectal cancer: impact on long-term clinical outcomes and prognostic factors

PURPOSE

To assess the long-term outcomes of patients with rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NCRT) with concurrent S-1 and irinotecan (S-1/irinotecan) therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The study group consisted of 115 patients with clinical stage T3 or T4 rectal cancer. Patients received pelvic radiation therapy (45 Gy) plus concurrent oral S-1/irinotecan. The median follow-up was 60 months.

RESULTS

Grade 3 adverse effects occurred in 7 patients (6%), and the completion rate of NCRT was 87%. All 115 patients (100%) were able to undergo R0 surgical resection. Twenty-eight patients (24%) had a pathological complete response (ypCR). At 60 months, the local recurrence-free survival was 93%, disease-free survival (DFS) was 79%, and overall survival (OS) was 80%. On multivariate analysis with a proportional hazards model, ypN2 was the only independent prognostic factor for DFS (P=.0019) and OS (P=.0064) in the study group as a whole. Multivariate analysis was additionally performed for the subgroup of 106 patients with ypN0/1 disease, who had a DFS rate of 85.3%. Both ypT (P=.0065) and tumor location (P=.003) were independent predictors of DFS. A combination of these factors was very strongly related to high risk of recurrence (P<.0001), which occurred most commonly in the lung.

CONCLUSIONS

NCRT with concurrent S-1/irinotecan produced high response rates and excellent long-term survival, with acceptable adverse effects in patients with rectal cancer. ypN2 is a strong predictor of dismal outcomes, and a combination of ypT and tumor location can identify high-risk patients among those with ypN0/1 disease.

Current controversies in neoadjuvant chemoradiation of rectal cancer

Total mesorectal excision with preoperative radiation and chemotherapy provide the lowest local recurrence rates for rectal cancer. Timing of surgery after preoperative chemoradiation is being increased to optimize tumor downstaging. In cases of complete clinical response from chemoradiation, permissive observation without resection is being investigated. Significant anorectal dysfunction results from low anterior resection and radiation. Good prognostic tumor characteristics are being investigated with the aim of selecting cases for whom preoperative radiation may be avoided. Preoperative and postoperative radiation provides improved local cancer control for superficial cancers removed by local excision.

Topoisomerase I inhibition in colorectal cancer: biomarkers and therapeutic targets

The topoisomerase I (Top 1) poison irinotecan is an important component of the modern treatment of colorectal cancer. By stabilising Top 1-DNA complexes, irinotecan generates Top 1-linked DNA single-strand breaks that can evolve into double-strand breaks and ultimately cause cell death. However, cancer cells may overcome cell killing by releasing the stalled topoisomerase from DNA termini, thereby reducing the efficacy of Top 1 poisons in clinics. Thus, understanding the DNA repair mechanisms involved in the repair of Top 1-mediated DNA damage provides a useful tool to identify potential biomarkers that predict response to this class of chemotherapy. Furthermore, targeting these pathways could enhance the therapeutic benefits of Top 1 poisons. In this review, we describe the cellular mechanisms and consequences of targeting Top 1 activity in cells. We summarise preclinical data and discuss the potential clinical utility of small-molecule inhibitors of the key proteins.

Neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer: actual status

Neoadjuvant (preoperative) concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has become a standard treatment of locally advanced rectal adenocarcinomas. The clinical stages II (cT3-4, N0, M0) and III (cT1-4, N+, M0) according to International Union Against Cancer (IUCC) are concerned. It can reduce tumor volume and subsequently lead to an increase in complete resections (R0 resections), shows less toxicity, and improves local control rate. The aim of this review is to summarize actual approaches, main problems, and discrepancies in the treatment of locally advanced rectal adenocarcinomas.

[Chemotherapy and rectal cancer]

Chemotherapy does not increase the survival time of patients treated for rectal cancer. Chemotherapy given concomitantly to radiotherapy and combined before or after radiation significantly reduces the risk of local recurrence. The sterilization of the tumour (complete pathological response) by chemotherapy is a favourable prognostic factor. New trials on optimisation of pathological complete response rates are based on using drugs effective on metastatic colorectal cancer, given prior to chemoradiotherapy and followed by a resection at least 8 weeks after the end of the radiotherapy. The level of evidence for postoperative chemotherapy is low due to lack of specific study. The indication of postoperative chemotherapy depends on the disease extent after preoperative treatment.