Identification of patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia who benefit from the addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin: results of the MRC AML15 trial

Breaking Boundaries: Immunotherapy for Myeloid Malignancies

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of myeloid oncologic diseases, particularly for patients resistant to chemotherapy or ineligible for allogeneic stem cell transplantation due to age or fitness constraints. As our understanding of the immunopathogenesis of myeloid malignancies expands, so too do the treatment options available to patients. Immunotherapy in myeloid malignancies, however, faces numerous challenges due to the dynamic nature of the disease, immune dysregulation, and the development of immune evasion mechanisms. This review outlines the progress made in the field of immunotherapy for myeloid malignancies, addresses its challenges, and provides insights into future directions in the field.

Real-world outcomes of intensive induction approaches in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia

Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) is characterized by the presence of inv(16)/t(16;16) or t(8;21) and is classified as a favorable risk by the 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines. The CD33-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), is commonly added to intensive chemotherapy (IC) in CBF-AML. We sought to compare outcomes in patients treated with IC with or without GO in CBF-AML. We included 200 patients with CBF-AML treated with IC across seven academic centers. Induction treatment regimens were categorized as IC alone, IC with GO, or IC with KIT inhibitor (dasatinib or midostaurin). Median follow-up for the whole cohort was 2.5 years. Three-year overall survival (OS) was 70% and 3-year event-free survival (EFS) was 51%. Patients treated with IC with GO experienced a 3-year EFS of 50% compared to those treated with IC alone who experienced a 3-year EFS of 47%, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.62). Similarly, those treated with IC with GO did not experience an improved OS compared to those treated with IC alone (p = 0.67). Patients treated with IC with KIT inhibitor experienced a significantly improved 3-year EFS of 85% compared to those with IC with or without GO (p = 0.04). We find in our study that there is no survival benefit in patients treated with IC with the addition of GO; improved EFS was seen in patients with CBF-AML treated with IC plus KIT inhibitors, consistent with outcomes noted in prospective studies utilizing this approach.

Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin and Stem Cell Mobilization for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Favorable Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), a CD33-targeting antibody drug conjugate, previously showed longer relapse-free survival when combined with induction chemotherapy in patients with favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this patient population, characterized by lower relapse risk as compared to other ELN risk groups, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can be used as consolidation strategy. However, there are limited data on the impact of GO on the peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization potential. We therefore retrospectively analyzed data from 54 AML patients with favorable-risk AML treated with (n = 17) or without (n = 37) GO during induction treatment. We observed no significant differences in the PBSC mobilization rate between patients treated with vs. without GO. The mobilization success in a first attempt directly following cycle 2 was 65% vs. 70% (p = 0.92); and the mobilization success in a subsequent second attempt after hematologic recovery and repeated stimulation procedure was 24% vs. 19% (p = 0.56). No significant impact on treatment outcome in terms of EFS (p = 0.31) or OS (p = 0.99) was observed. Thus, our results suggest that the addition of GO to induction regimens does not negatively impact PBSC mobilization in favorable-risk AML patients. To our best knowledge, this is the first study comparing the stem cell mobilization potential in favorable-risk AML patients treated with vs. without GO.

Immunotherapeutic targeting of surfaceome heterogeneity in AML

Immunotherapy remains underexploited in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) compared to other hematological malignancies. Currently, gemtuzumab ozogamicin is the only therapeutic antibody approved for this disease. Here, to identify potential targets for immunotherapeutic intervention, we analyze the surface proteome of 100 genetically diverse primary human AML specimens for the identification of cell surface proteins and conduct single-cell transcriptome analyses on a subset of these specimens to assess antigen expression at the sub-population level. Through this comprehensive effort, we successfully identify numerous antigens and markers preferentially expressed by primitive AML cells. Many identified antigens are targeted by therapeutic antibodies currently under clinical evaluation for various cancer types, highlighting the potential therapeutic value of the approach. Importantly, this initiative uncovers AML heterogeneity at the surfaceome level, identifies several antigens and potential primitive cell markers characterizing AML subgroups, and positions immunotherapy as a promising approach to target AML subgroup specificities.

AML treatment: conventional chemotherapy and emerging novel agents

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is driven by complex mutations and cytogenetic abnormalities with profound tumoral heterogeneity, making it challenging to treat. Ten years ago, the 5-year survival rate of patients with AML was only 29% with conventional chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. All attempts to improve conventional therapy over the previous 40 years had failed. Now, new genomic, immunological, and molecular insights have led to a renaissance in AML therapy. Improvements to standard chemotherapy and a wave of new targeted therapies have been developed. However, how best to incorporate these advances into frontline therapy and sequence them in relapse is not firmly established. In this review, we highlight current treatments of AML, targeted agents, and pioneering attempts to synthesize these developments into a rational standard of care (SoC).

Addition of single dose gemtuzumab ozogamicin to intensive induction chemotherapy in core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia

In a meta-analysis of 5 trials, the addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) to intensive induction chemotherapy led to a survival benefit in patients with core-binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Given the heterogeneous incorporation of GO in clinical trials, the ideal dose and schedule remains unclear. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis to compare outcomes of patients with CBF-AML treated with intensive induction chemotherapy, with or without a single dose of GO 3 mg/m2, during induction only. We included 87 patients (GO=32, control=55). The composite complete remission (cCR) rate was higher in the control group (93%) compared to the GO group (82%) (p<0.001). The rate of measurable residual disease (MRD) negative cCR, by flow cytometry, was similar between both groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of toxicity. The 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) for both groups was similar (71% vs 68%, p=0.5). The 3-year overall survival (OS) for the GO group was 68%, compared to 66% for the control group (p=0.9).In multivariable analysis, age and MRD positive status were risk factors for inferior outcomes. We find that survival of patients with CBF-AML is favorable in the real-world setting. The addition of single-dose GO, during induction, did not lead to a higher remission rate or survival benefit, when compared to intensive chemotherapy without GO. Further investigation into the incorporation of GO in the treatment algorithm for CBF-AML is needed.

Real-world treatment outcomes from a retrospective cohort of patients with acute myeloid leukemia from an urban safety net hospital

INTRODUCTION

While continual advancements in acute myeloid leukemia have augmented response rates and survival, outcomes in clinical trials may not correlate with real-world practice as trials may underrepresent individuals with comorbidities, decreased performance status, and older age. Additionally, clinical trials may underrepresent certain ethnicities, and disparities based on ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and insurance have been demonstrated in acute myeloid leukemia.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia who were treated at Harbor-UCLA from 2014 to 2022 to examine patient characteristics, management patterns, and outcomes in a safety net hospital setting.

RESULTS

The median age was 56 years old (range 18-84). In regards to risk stratification, 22%, 33%, and 41% had favorable, intermediate, and adverse risk acute myeloid leukemia, respectively. The most common induction regimens included 7 + 3 (55%), azacitidine (10%), azacitidine + venetoclax (7%), and 7 + 3 + midostaurin (7%). The complete remission rate was 51%. Among patients who received intensive induction chemotherapy, 15% underwent re-induction with a second cycle, 51% received consolidation therapy, and 5% received maintenance therapy with a targeted agent. Overall, 12% of patients received allogeneic stem cell transplant. Median overall survival was 12.2 months, and 5-year overall survival was 18%.

CONCLUSIONS

Suboptimal response rates and survival in this population may be related to low rates of re-induction and allogeneic transplant in addition to high rates of adverse cytogenetics, secondary acute myeloid leukemia, and supportive care only. Efforts to increase access to clinical trials, novel therapies, and transplants for diverse and underinsured populations are essential.

Fludarabine, Cytarabine, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor, and Idarubicin With Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin Improves Event-Free Survival in Younger Patients With Newly Diagnosed AML and Overall Survival in Patients With NPM1 and FLT3 Mutations

PURPOSE

To determine the optimal induction chemotherapy regimen for younger adults with newly diagnosed AML without known adverse risk cytogenetics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One thousand thirty-three patients were randomly assigned to intensified (fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and idarubicin [FLAG-Ida]) or standard (daunorubicin and Ara-C [DA]) induction chemotherapy, with one or two doses of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO). The primary end point was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

There was no difference in remission rate after two courses between FLAG-Ida + GO and DA + GO (complete remission [CR] + CR with incomplete hematologic recovery 93% v 91%) or in day 60 mortality (4.3% v 4.6%). There was no difference in OS (66% v 63%; P = .41); however, the risk of relapse was lower with FLAG-Ida + GO (24% v 41%; P < .001) and 3-year event-free survival was higher (57% v 45%; P < .001). In patients with an NPM1 mutation (30%), 3-year OS was significantly higher with FLAG-Ida + GO (82% v 64%; P = .005). NPM1 measurable residual disease (MRD) clearance was also greater, with 88% versus 77% becoming MRD-negative in peripheral blood after cycle 2 (P = .02). Three-year OS was also higher in patients with a FLT3 mutation (64% v 54%; P = .047). Fewer transplants were performed in patients receiving FLAG-Ida + GO (238 v 278; P = .02). There was no difference in outcome according to the number of GO doses, although NPM1 MRD clearance was higher with two doses in the DA arm. Patients with core binding factor AML treated with DA and one dose of GO had a 3-year OS of 96% with no survival benefit from FLAG-Ida + GO.

CONCLUSION

Overall, FLAG-Ida + GO significantly reduced relapse without improving OS. However, exploratory analyses show that patients with NPM1 and FLT3 mutations had substantial improvements in OS. By contrast, in patients with core binding factor AML, outcomes were excellent with DA + GO with no FLAG-Ida benefit.

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin for relapsed or primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia in children-the Polish Pediatric Leukemia and Lymphoma Study Group experience

Background

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), one of the first targeted drugs used in oncology, consists of an anti-cluster of differentiation 33 (CD33) monoclonal antibody bound to a derivative of cytotoxic calicheamicin. After the drug withdrawn in 2010 due to a significantly higher rate of early deaths, GO regained approval in 2017 for the treatment of newly diagnosed, refractory, or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adults and children over 15 years of age. The objective of the study was a retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, and GO toxicity profile in children with primary refractory or relapsed (R/R) AML treated in Poland from 2008 to 2022.

Methods

Data were collected through the Polish Registry of Acute Myeloid Leukemia. From January 2008 to December 2022, 35 children with R/R AML were treated with GO in seven centers of the Polish Pediatric Leukemia and Lymphoma Study Group.

Results

Most of the children (30 of 35) received only one GO cycle in combination with various chemotherapy cycles (IDA-FLA, DOXO-FLA, FLA, FLAG, and others). Eighteen children (51%) achieved complete remission (CR), 14 did not respond to treatment, and three progressed. GO therapy was followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in 18 children in CR. The 5-year overall survival (OS) after GO therapy was 37.1% ± 8.7% for the total cohort. There was a trend toward a superior outcome in patients with strong expression of CD33 expression (over 50% positive cells) compared with that in patients with lower expression of CD33 (OS, 41.2% ± 11.9% versus 27.8% ± 13.2%; p = 0.5; 5-year event-free survival, 35.4% ± 11.6% versus 25.7% ± 12.3%; p = 0.5, respectively). Children under 15 years have better outcome (OS, 34.9% ± 10.4% versus 30% ± 14.5%, p = 0.3). The most common adverse events were bone marrow aplasia, fever of unknown origin, infections, and elevated liver enzyme elevation. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome occurred in two children.

Conclusions

The use of GO in severely pretreated children, including those under 15 years of age, with previous failure of AML treatment is a feasible and effective bridging therapy to allo-HSCT with an acceptable toxicity profile.

Emerging and Future Targeted Therapies for Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Targeting the Leukemia Stem Cells

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a rare subtype of acute leukemia in the pediatric and adolescent population but causes disproportionate morbidity and mortality in this age group. Standard chemotherapeutic regimens for AML have changed very little in the past 3-4 decades, but the addition of targeted agents in recent years has led to improved survival in select subsets of patients as well as a better biological understanding of the disease. Currently, one key paradigm of bench-to-bedside practice in the context of adult AML is the focus on leukemia stem cell (LSC)-targeted therapies. Here, we review current and emerging immunotherapies and other targeted agents that are in clinical use for pediatric AML through the lens of what is known (and not known) about their LSC-targeting capability. Based on a growing understanding of pediatric LSC biology, we also briefly discuss potential future agents on the horizon.

Acute myeloid leukemia: challenges for diagnosis and treatment in Latin America

OBJECTIVE

to review the current diagnostic and therapeutic landscape of AML in Latin America as a reflection of other low- and middle-income countries and regions of the world. Encompassing both acute promyelocytic and non-promyelocytic disease types.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature and study registries concerning epidemiological features of patients with AML/APL treated in Latin America, as well as evaluated diagnostic and genetic stratification and patient fitness assessment challenges, the importance of early mortality and supportive care capacity, intensive and non-intensive chemotherapy alternatives, consolidation, and maintenance strategies including novel agents and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

RESULTS

Although most of the current technologies and treatment options are available in the region, a significant fraction of patients have only limited access to them. In addition, mortality in the first weeks from diagnosis is higher in the region compared to developed countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities in access to technologies, supportive care capacity, and availability of novel agents and HSCT hinder results in our region, reflecting barriers common to other LMICs. Recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease must be implemented through education, collaborative clinical research, and advocacy to improve outcomes.

A targetable pathway to eliminate TRA-1-60+/TRA-1-81+ chemoresistant cancer cells

Chemoresistance is a primary cause of treatment failure in pancreatic cancer. Identifying cell surface markers specifically expressed in chemoresistant cancer cells (CCCs) could facilitate targeted therapies to overcome chemoresistance. We performed an antibody-based screen and found that TRA-1-60 and TRA-1-81, two 'stemness' cell surface markers, are highly enriched in CCCs. Furthermore, TRA-1-60+/TRA-1-81+ cells are chemoresistant compared to TRA-1-60-/TRA-1-81- cells. Transcriptome profiling identified UGT1A10, shown to be both necessary and sufficient to maintain TRA-1-60/TRA-1-81 expression and chemoresistance. From a high-content chemical screen, we identified Cymarin, which downregulates UGT1A10, eliminates TRA-1-60/TRA-1-81 expression, and increases chemosensitivity both in vitro and in vivo. Finally, TRA-1-60/TRA-1-81 expression is highly specific in primary cancer tissue and positively correlated with chemoresistance and short survival, which highlights their potentiality for targeted therapy. Therefore, we discovered a novel CCC surface marker regulated by a pathway that promotes chemoresistance, as well as a leading drug candidate to target this pathway.

Fractionated vs single-dose gemtuzumab ozogamicin with determinants of benefit in older patients with AML: the UK NCRI AML18 trial

Addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) to induction chemotherapy improves outcomes in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but it is uncertain whether a fractionated schedule provides additional benefit to a single dose. We randomized 852 older adults (median age, 68-years) with AML/high-risk myelodysplasia to GO on day 1 (GO1) or on days 1 and 4 (GO2) of course 1 induction. The median follow-up period was 50.2 months. Although complete remission (CR) rates after course 1 did not significantly differ between arms (GO2, 63%; GO1, 57%; odds ratio [OR], 0.78; P = .08), there were significantly more patients who achieved CR with a measurable residual disease (MRD)<0.1% (50% vs 41%; OR, 0.72; P = .027). This differential MRD reduction with GO2 varied across molecular subtypes, being greatest for IDH mutations. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 29% for patients in the GO2 arm and 24% for those in the GO1 arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; P = .14). In a sensitivity analysis excluding patients found to have adverse cytogenetics or TP53 mutations, the 5-year OS was 33% for GO2 and 26% for GO1 (HR, 0.83; P = .045). In total, 228 (27%) patients received an allogeneic transplantation in first remission. Posttransplant OS was superior in the GO2 arm (HR, 0.67; P = .033); furthermore, the survival advantage from GO2 in the sensitivity analysis was lost when data of patients were censored at transplantation. In conclusion, GO2 was associated with a greater reduction in MRD and improved survival in older adults with nonadverse risk genetics. This benefit from GO2 was dependent on allogeneic transplantation to translate the better leukemia clearance into improved survival. This trial was registered at www.isrctn.com as #ISRCTN 31682779.

The core concepts of core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: Current considerations for prognosis and treatment

Core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF AML), defined by t(8;21) or inv(16), is a subset of favorable risk AML. Despite its association with a high complete remission rate after induction and relatively good prognosis overall compared with other subtypes of AML, relapse risk after induction chemotherapy remains high. Optimizing treatment planning to promote recurrence free survival and increase the likelihood of survival after relapse is imperative to improving outcomes. Recent areas of research have included evaluation of the role of gemtuzumab in induction and consolidation, the relative benefit of increased cycles of high dose cytarabine in consolidation, the utility of hypomethylating agents and kinase inhibitors, and the most appropriate timing of stem cell transplant. Surveillance with measurable residual disease testing is increasingly being utilized for monitoring disease in remission, and ongoing investigation seeks to determine how to use this tool for early identification of patients who would benefit from proceeding to transplant. In this review, we outline the current therapeutic approach from diagnosis to relapse while highlighting the active areas of investigation in each stage of treatment.

What Influences the Decision to Proceed to Transplant for Patients With AML in First Remission?

Although allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the backbone of curative treatment for the majority of fit adults diagnosed with AML, there is indeed a subset of patients for whom long-term remission may be achieved without transplantation. Remarkable changes in our knowledge of AML biology in recent years has transformed the landscape of diagnosis, management, and treatment of AML. Specifically, markedly increased understanding of molecular characteristics of AML, the expanded application of minimal/measurable residual diseases testing, and an increased armamentarium of leukemia-directed therapeutic agents have created a new paradigm for the medical care of patients with AML. An attempt is herein made to decipher the decision to proceed to transplant for patients with AML in first complete remission on the basis of the current best available evidence. The focus is on factors affecting the biology and treatment of AML itself, rather than on variables related to allo-HCT, an area characterized by significant advancements that have reduced overall therapy-related complications. This review seeks to focus on areas of particular complexity, while simultaneously providing clarity on how our current knowledge and treatment strategies may, or may not, influence the decision to pursue allo-HCT in patients with AML.

Sporadic and Familial Acute Myeloid Leukemia with CEBPA Mutations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

CCAAT enhancer binding protein A (CEBPA) gene mutation is one of the common genetic alterations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which can be associated with sporadic and familial AML.

RECENT FINDINGS

Due to the recent advances in molecular testing and the prognostic role of CEBPA mutation in AML, the definition for AML with CEBPA mutation (AML-CEBPA) has significantly changed. This review provides the rationale for the updates on classifications, and the impacts on laboratory evaluation and clinical management for sporadic and familial AML-CEBPA patients. In addition, minimal residual disease assessment post therapy to stratify disease risk and stem cell transplant in selected AML-CEBPA patients are discussed. Taken together, the recent progresses have shifted the definition, identification, and management of patients with AML-CEBPA.

Harnessing Immune Response in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Despite the results achieved with the evolution of conventional chemotherapy and the inclusion of targeted therapies in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), survival is still not satisfying, in particular in the setting of relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease or elderly/unfit patients. Among the most innovative therapeutic options, cellular therapy has shown great results in different hematological malignancies such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphomas, with several products already approved for clinical use. However, despite the great interest in also expanding the application of these new treatments to R/R AML, no product has been approved yet for clinical application. Furthermore, cellular therapy could indeed represent a powerful tool and an appealing alternative to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for ineligible patients. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the most recent clinical research exploring the effectiveness of cellular therapy in AML, moving from consolidated approaches such as post- transplant donor's lymphocytes infusion, to modern adoptive immunotherapies such as alloreactive NK cell infusions, engineered T and NK cells (CAR-T, CAR-NK) and novel platforms of T and NK cells engaging (i.e., BiTEs, DARTs and ANKETTM).

Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Current Trends, Challenges, and Strategies

BACKGROUND

In the past decade, there have been significant breakthroughs in immunotherapies for B-cell lymphoid malignancies and multiple myeloma, but progress has been much less for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Nevertheless, challenge begets innovation and several therapeutic strategies are under investigation.

SUMMARY

In this review, we review the state of the art in AML immunotherapy including CD33- and CD123-targeted agents, immune checkpoint inhibition, and adoptive cell therapy strategies. We also share conceptual frameworks for approaching the growing catalog of investigational AML immunotherapies and propose future directions for the field.

KEY MESSAGES

Immunotherapies for AML face significant challenges but novel strategies are in development.

LSC17 score complements genetics and measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia: an ALFA study

Whether the LSC17 gene expression can improve risk stratification in the context of next generation sequencing-based risk stratification and measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients with intensively treated AML has not been explored. We analyzed LSC17 in 504 adult patients prospectively treated in the ALFA-0702 trial. RUNX1 or TP53 mutations were associated with higher LSC1 scores while CEBPA and NPM1 mutations were associated with lower scores. Patients with high LSC17 scores had a lower rate of complete response (CR) in a multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 0.41; P = .0007), accounting for European LeukemiaNet 2022 (ELN22), age, and white blood cell count (WBC). LSC17-high status was associated with shorter overall survival (OS) (3-year OS: 70.0% vs 52.7% in patients with LSC17-low status; P < .0001). In a multivariable analysis considering ELN22, age, and WBC, patients with LSC17-high status had shorter disease-free survival (DFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.36; P = .048) than those with LSC17-low status. In 123 patients with NPM1-mutated AML in CR, LSC17-high status predicted poorer DFS (HR, 2.34; P = .01), independent of age, WBC, ELN22 risk, and NPM1-MRD. LSC-low status and negative NPM1-MRD identified a subset comprising 48% of patients with mutated NPM1 with a 3-year OS from CR of 93.1% compared with 60.7% in those with LSC17-high status and/or positive NPM1-MRD (P = .0001). Overall, LSC17 assessment refines genetic risk stratification in adult patients with AML treated intensively. Combined with MRD, LSC17 identifies a subset of patients with NPM1-mutated AML with excellent clinical outcome.

Curing childhood cancer the "Natural" Way: Nature as the source of chemotherapy agents

For many centuries, products of natural origin from plants, marine, microbes and soil micro-organisms have been studied by numerous researchers across the world to yield many of the chemotherapeutic agents we use in this modern era. There has been a tremendous gain in knowledge from various screening and separating techniques which led to the discovery of biologically active small molecules from natural products. Preclinical studies testing the antitumor activities of these agents against tumor cell lines and xenograft animal models were the gateway to the clinical trials in humans leading to the approval of these agents that are in clinical use today. This review summarizes how various chemotherapeutic agents were discovered from products of natural origin, their preclinical development, and their indications in both pediatric and adult oncology. Many of these natural products have contributed to the very high cure rates of both pediatric leukemias and solid tumors.

Intensive chemotherapy with or without gemtuzumab ozogamicin in patients with NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia (AMLSG 09-09): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukaemia with mutated NPM1 is associated with high CD33 expression and intermediate-risk cytogenetics. The aim of this study was to evaluate intensive chemotherapy with or without the anti-CD33 antibody-drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin in participants with newly diagnosed, NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia.

METHODS

This open-label, phase 3 trial was conducted at 56 hospitals in Germany and Austria. Eligible participants were 18 years or older and had newly diagnosed NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Participants were randomly assigned, using age as a stratification factor (18-60 years vs >60 years), 1:1 to the two treatment groups using allocation concealment; there was no masking of participants and investigators to treatment groups. Participants received two cycles of induction therapy (idarubicin, cytarabine, and etoposide) plus all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) followed by three consolidation cycles of high-dose cytarabine (or an intermediate dose for those older than 60 years) and ATRA, without or with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (3 mg/m2 administered intravenously on day 1 of induction cycles 1 and 2, and consolidation cycle 1). The primary endpoints were short-term event-free survival and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population (overall survival was added as a co-primary endpoint after amendment four of the protocol on Oct 13, 2013). The secondary endpoints were event-free survival with long-term follow-up, rates of complete remission, complete remission with partial haematological recovery (CRh), and complete remission with incomplete haematological recovery (CRi), cumulative incidences of relapse and death, and number of days in hospital. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00893399) and has been completed.

FINDINGS

Between May 12, 2010, and Sept 1, 2017, 600 participants were enrolled, of which 588 (315 women and 273 men) were randomly assigned (296 to the standard group and 292 to the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group). No difference was found in short-term event-free survival (short-term event-free survival at 6-month follow-up, 53% [95% CI 47-59] in the standard group and 58% [53-64] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·83; 95% CI 0·65-1·04; p=0·10) and overall survival between treatment groups (2-year overall survival, 69% [63-74] in the standard group and 73% [68-78] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group; 0·90; 0·70-1·16; p=0·43). There was no difference in complete remission or CRi rates (n=267 [90%] in the standard group vs n=251 [86%] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group; odds ratio [OR] 0·67; 95% CI 0·40-1·11; p=0·15) and complete remission or CRh rates (n=214 [72%] vs n=195 [67%]; OR 0·77; 0·54-1·10; p=0·18), whereas the complete remission rate was lower with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (n=172 [58%] vs n=136 [47%]; OR 0·63; 0·45-0·80; p=0·0068). Cumulative incidence of relapse was significantly reduced by gemtuzumab ozogamicin (2-year cumulative incidence of relapse, 37% [95% CI 31-43] in the standard group and 25% [20-30] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group; cause-specific HR 0·65; 0·49-0·86; p=0·0028), and there was no difference in the cumulative incidence of death (2-year cumulative incidence of death 6% [4-10] in the standard group and 7% [5-11] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group; HR 1·03; 0·59-1·81; p=0·91). There were no differences in the number of days in hospital across all cycles between treatment groups. The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (n=135 [47%] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group vs n=122 [41%] in the standard group), thrombocytopenia (n=261 [90%] vs n=265 [90%]), pneumonia (n=71 [25%] vs n=64 [22%]), sepsis (n=85 [29%] vs n=73 [25%]). Treatment-related deaths were documented in 25 participants (4%; n=8 [3%] in the standard group and n=17 [6%] in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group), mostly due to sepsis and infections.

INTERPRETATION

The primary endpoints of the trial of event-free survival and overall survival were not met. However, an anti-leukaemic efficacy of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in participants with NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia is shown by a significantly lower cumulative incidence of relapse rate, suggesting that the addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin might reduce the need for salvage therapy in these participants. The results from this study provide further evidence that gemtuzumab ozogamicin should be added in the standard of care treatment in adults with NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia.

FUNDING

Pfizer and Amgen.

Clinical status of induction therapy incorporating a hypomethylating agent for newly diagnosed adult acute myeloid leukemia compared to the standard 7+3 regimen

INTRODUCTION

Cytarabine and anthracycline combination therapy (7 + 3 regimen) is the standard care for induction chemotherapy in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although this intensive regimen achieves a high response rate, it is highly toxic, especially in elderly or frail patients. Hypomethylating agents approved initially for high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome had longer survival times than conventional care in elderly patients with newly diagnosed AML.

AREAS COVERED

We summarize the latest information regarding induction therapy using hypomethylating agents (azacitidine and decitabine) for newly diagnosed AML.

EXPERT OPINION

For untreated patients ineligible for an intensive regimen, a phase III trial exhibited the survival benefit of adding the highly selective BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax to azacitidine. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend azacitidine or decitabine plus venetoclax as an option for patients with poor-risk AML, including those with TP53 mutations and AML with the cytogenetic features of myelodysplastic syndrome. Future studies should evaluate positioning this combination as an induction therapy for younger patients eligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Without randomized trials, propensity score matching analysis suggested a comparable prognosis between azacitidine combination and intensive chemotherapy. Considering the feasibility of a doublet regimen incorporating azacitidine, a triplet regimen should be examined.

Multifunctional targetable liposomal drug delivery system in the management of leukemia: Potential, opportunities, and emerging strategies

The concern impeding the success of chemotherapy in leukemia treatment is descending efficacy of drugs because of multiple drug resistance (MDR). The previous failure of traditional treatment methods is primarily responsible for the present era of innovative agents to treat leukemia effectively. The treatment option is a chemotherapeutic agent in most available treatment strategies, which unfortunately leads to high unavoidable toxicities. As a result of the recent surge in marketed products, theranostic nanoparticles, i.e., multifunctional targetable liposomes (MFTL), have been approved for improved and more successful leukemia treatment that blends therapeutic and diagnostic characteristics. Since they broadly offer the required characteristics to get past the traditional/previous limitations, such as the absence of site-specific anti-cancer therapeutic delivery and ongoing real-time surveillance of the leukemia target sites while administering therapeutic activities. To prepare MFTL, suitable targeting ligands or tumor-specific antibodies are required to attach to the surface of the liposomes. This review exhaustively covered and summarized the liposomal-based formulation in leukemia treatment, emphasizing leukemia types; regulatory considerations, patents, and clinical portfolios to overcome clinical translation hurdles have all been explored.

Antibody-drug conjugate [ADC] treatment of leukaemia

Three ADCs: Mylotarg, Besponda and Lumoxiti have improved overall survival and event=free survival as well as reduced relapse in 3 types of Leukaemia: AML, ALL and HCL, respectively. Lessons from these three SOC successful ADCs should guide other new ADCs in addressing the ADC-related off target toxicity due to the cytotoxic payload that limits their therapeutic index by using the successful approach of administrating lower doses in a fractionated regimen over time in separate days of the cycle to reduce the severity and frequency of the ADC-related serious toxicities that include ocular damage, long-term peripheral neuropathy and hepatic toxicity etc.

Validation and refinement of the 2022 European LeukemiaNet genetic risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia

The revised 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) AML risk stratification system requires validation in large, homogeneously treated cohorts. We studied 1118 newly diagnosed AML patients (median age, 58 years; range, 18-86 years) who received cytarabine-based induction chemotherapy between 1999 and 2012 and compared ELN-2022 to the previous ELN-2017 risk classification. Key findings were validated in a cohort of 1160 mostly younger patients. ELN-2022 reclassified 15% of patients, 3% into more favorable, and 12% into more adverse risk groups. This was mainly driven by patients reclassified from intermediate- to adverse-risk based on additional myelodysplasia-related mutations being included as adverse-risk markers. These patients (n = 79) had significantly better outcomes than patients with other adverse-risk genotypes (5-year OS, 26% vs. 12%) and resembled the remaining intermediate-risk group. Overall, time-dependent ROC curves and Harrel's C-index controlling for age, sex, and AML type (de novo vs. sAML/tAML) show slightly worse prognostic discrimination of ELN-2022 compared to ELN-2017 for OS. Further refinement of ELN-2022 without including additional genetic markers is possible, in particular by recognizing TP53-mutated patients with complex karyotypes as "very adverse". In summary, the ELN-2022 risk classification identifies a larger group of adverse-risk patients at the cost of slightly reduced prognostic accuracy compared to ELN-2017.

Azacitidine Is Synergistically Lethal with XPO1 Inhibitor Selinexor in Acute Myeloid Leukemia by Targeting XPO1/eIF4E/c-MYC Signaling

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a high-mortality malignancy with poor outcomes. Azacitidine induces cell death and demonstrates treatment effectiveness against AML. Selinexor (KPT-330) exhibited significant benefits in combination with typical induction treatment for AML patients. Here, we explore the antitumor effect of KPT-330 combined with AZA in AML through CCK-8, flow cytometry, RT-qPCR, western blot, and RNA-seq. Our results showed that KPT-330 combined with AZA synergistically reduced cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in AML primary cells and cell lines. Compared to the control, the KPT-330 plus AZA down-regulates the expression of XPO1, eIF4E, and c-MYC in AML. Moreover, the knockdown of c-MYC could sensitize the synergy of the combination on suppression of cell proliferation and promotion of apoptosis in AML. Moreover, the expression of XPO1 and eIF4E was elevated in AML patient cohorts, respectively. XPO1 and elF4E overexpression was associated with poor prognosis. In summary, KPT-330 with AZA exerted synergistic effects by suppressing XPO1/eIF4E/c-MYC signaling, which provided preclinical evidence for further clinical application of the novel combination in AML.

Neue Therapieoptionen bei der Akuten Myeloischen Leukämie

BACKGROUND

While the "7+3" regimen of cytarabine + anthracycline has been the backbone of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment for four decades, several novel drugs have been approved in the past five years. Despite these promising novel therapeutic options, treatment of AML remains challenging, given the biologically heterogenous character of the disease.

AIM

This review provides an update on novel treatment strategies for AML.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This article is based on the current European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations and the DGHO «Onkopedia» guideline on AML treatment.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The treatment algorithm is based on patient-related and disease-specific factors, such as patient age and fitness as well as AML molecular profile. Younger patients considered fit for intensive chemotherapy receive 1-2 courses of induction therapy ("7+3" regimen, eg. cytarabine/daunorubicin, or CPX-351 for patients with myelodysplasia-related AML or therapy-related AML). For CD33+ patients or those with evidence of an FLT3 mutation "7+3" in combination with Gemtuzumab-Ozogamicin (GO) or Midostaurin is recommended, respectively. For consolidation, patients receive either high-dose chemotherapy (± GO/± Midostaurin) or undergo allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), based on ELN risk stratification. In some cases, maintenance therapy with oral azacytidine or FLT3 inhibitor is indicated. Patients experiencing relapse should receive chemotherapy-based re-induction therapy or, in case of an FLT3 mutation, Gilteritinib and subsequently undergo allogeneic HCT. For older patients or those considered unfit for intensive therapy, azacytidine in combination with Venetoclax is a promising novel treatment strategy. Although not yet approved by the European Medical Agency (EMA), for patients with IDH1IDH1 or IDH2 mutations treatment with the IDH1 and IDH2 inhibitors Ivosidenib and Enasidenib should be considered.

The increasingly blurred line between induction, consolidation and maintenance in acute myeloid leukaemia

Since the early 1970s, the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) has undergone a major transformation. Initially based on only two drugs, an anthracycline and cytosine arabinoside, the aim of therapy was to achieve a haematological response allowing patients to recover and go home. Back in those early days, cure was not a realistic expectation. Treatment was analogous to a heart attack; upon recovery and a short respite, recurrence and death inevitably followed. Over the subsequent decades, slow but remarkable progress was made such that a subgroup of young adults could become long-term survivors. This astonishing feat was achieved initially without the use of new drugs. Supportive care played a major role with the widespread availability of platelet transfusions and improved antimicrobial therapy, particularly antifungal. No less important was the better use of existing drugs and the development of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation. While initially the focus was on maximal tolerated therapy, an understanding of the immunologic role of allogeneic transplantation, better genetic characterization of the biology of the disease, advanced tools for detection of minimal disease as well as the recent development of new drugs changed the focus to a more refined approach targeting patients who are more likely to respond. Clearly, the historical paradigm where the term AML was generic and applicable to all patients requires a rethinking from the traditional therapeutic demarcations of therapy into phases of induction, consolidation and maintenance. These evolving new concepts and paradigm will be herein considered.

Acute myeloid leukemia: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a frequently fatal bone marrow stem cell cancer characterized by unbridled proliferation of malignant marrow stem cells with associated infection, anemia, and bleeding. An improved understanding of pathophysiology, improvements in measurement technology and at least 10 recently approved therapies have led to revamping the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic landscape of AML.

DIAGNOSIS

One updated and one new classification system were published in 2022, both emphasizing the integration of molecular analysis into daily practice. Differences between the International Consensus Classification and major revisions from the previous 2016 WHO system provide both challenges and opportunities for care and clinical research.

RISK ASSESSMENT AND MONITORING

The European Leukemia Net 2022 risk classification integrates knowledge from novel molecular findings and recent trial results, as well as emphasizing dynamic risk based on serial measurable residual disease assessment. However, how to leverage our burgeoning ability to measure a small number of potentially malignant myeloid cells into therapeutic decision making is controversial.

RISK ADAPTED THERAPY

The diagnostic and therapeutic complexity plus the availability of newly approved agents requires a nuanced therapeutic algorithm which should integrate patient goals of care, comorbidities, and disease characteristics including the specific mutational profile of the patient's AML. The framework we suggest only represents the beginning of the discussion.

Update on the role of gemtuzumab-ozogamicin in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia

Gemtuzumab-ozogamicin (GO) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) in which a monoclonal antibody targeting CD33 is covalently linked to the toxin calicheamicin. GO was initially approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of adult patients with CD33⁺ acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 2000. However, GO was recalled from the US market due to the lack of efficacy, and higher incidence of hepatotoxicities, including hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), observed in phase 3 SWOG-0106 study. Since then, several other phase 3 studies have evaluated the efficacy of GO in the frontline treatment of adult patients with AML using different GO doses and schedules. The pivotal study that led to the reconsideration of GO was the French ALFA-0701 study, which used a lower and fractionated dose of GO in combination with standard chemotherapy (SC). Patients treated with the GO combination had a significantly longer survival outcome. The modified schedule also improved the toxicity profile. A systematic review and meta-analysis of over 3000 patients treated in five phase 3 studies showed that adding GO to SC improved relapse-free and overall survival. Most importantly, 6 mg/m² dose of GO was associated with higher grade ⩾3 hepatoxicities and VOD than 3 mg/m². The survival benefit was significant in the favorable and intermediate cytogenetic risk groups. This led to the reapproval of GO in 2017 for the treatment of patients with CD33⁺ AML. Currently, several clinical trials are exploring the role of GO with various combinations and in eliminating the measurable residual disease in patients with CD33⁺ AML.

Targeting and Monitoring Acute Myeloid Leukaemia with Nucleophosmin-1 (NPM1) Mutation

Mutations in NPM1, also known as nucleophosmin-1, B23, NO38, or numatrin, are seen in approximately one-third of patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). A plethora of treatment strategies have been studied to determine the best possible approach to curing NPM1-mutated AML. Here, we introduce the structure and function of NPM1 and describe the application of minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring using molecular methods by means of quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), next-generation sequencing (NGS), and cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF) to target NPM1-mutated AML. Current drugs, now regarded as the standard of care for AML, as well as potential drugs still under development, will also be explored. This review will focus on the role of targeting aberrant NPM1 pathways such as BCL-2 and SYK; as well as epigenetic regulators (RNA polymerase), DNA intercalators (topoisomerase II), menin inhibitors, and hypomethylating agents. Aside from medication, the effects of stress on AML presentation have been reported, and some possible mechanisms outlined. Moreover, targeted strategies will be briefly discussed, not only for the prevention of abnormal trafficking and localisation of cytoplasmic NPM1 but also for the elimination of mutant NPM1 proteins. Lastly, the advancement of immunotherapy such as targeting CD33, CD123, and PD-1 will be mentioned.

Therapy-related core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia

Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) usually stems from exposure of the bone marrow to cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. t-AML is usually associated with poor overall survival, but occasionally t-AML can involve favorable-risk cytogenetics, including core binding factor AML (CBF-AML), which shows a recurrent chromosomal rearrangement with t(8;21) (q22;22) and 'inv(16) (p13.1;q22)/t(16;16)(p13.1;q22)', leading to 'RUNX1::RUNX1T1 and CBFB::MYH11' fusion genes, respectively. Therapy-related CBF-AML (t-CBF-AML) accounts for 5-15% of CBF-AML cases and tends to have better outcomes than t-AML with unfavorable cytogenetics. Although CBF-AML is sensitive to high-dose cytarabine, t-CBF-AML has worse overall survival than de novo CBF- AML. The objective of this review is to discuss the available data on the pathogenesis, mutations, and therapeutic options in patients with t-CBF-AML.

The clinical impact of the molecular landscape of acute myeloid leukemia

Research into the underlying pathogenic mechanisms of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has led to remarkable advances in our understanding of the disease. Mutations now allow us to explore the enormous diversity among cytogenetically defined subsets of AML, particularly the large subset of cytogenetically normal AML. Despite the progress in unraveling the tumor genome, only a small number of recurrent mutations have been incorporated into risk-stratification schemes and have been proven to be clinically relevant, targetable lesions. The current World Health Organization Classification of myeloid neoplasms and leukemia includes eight AML categories defined by recurrent genetic abnormalities as well as three categories defined by gene mutations. We here discuss the utility of molecular markers in AML in prognostication and treatment decision-making. New therapies based on targetable markers include IDH inhibitors (ivosidenib, enasidenib), venetoclax-based therapy, FLT3 inhibitors (midostaurin, gilteritinib, and quizartinib), gemtuzumab ozogamicin, magrolimab and menin inhibitors.

Resistance to targeted therapies in acute myeloid leukemia

The introduction of new targeted therapies to the treatment algorithm of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) offers new opportunities, but also presents new challenges. Patients diagnosed with AML receiving targeted therapies as part of lower intensity regimens will relapse inevitably due to primary or secondary resistance mechanisms. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the main mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies in AML. Resistance to FLT3 inhibitors is mainly mediated by on target mutations and dysregulation of downstream pathways. Switching the FLT3 inhibitor has a potential therapeutic benefit. During treatment with IDH inhibitors resistance can develop due to aberrant cell metabolism or secondary site IDH mutations. As a unique resistance mechanism the mutated IDH isotype may switch from IDH1 to IDH2 or vice versa. Resistance to gemtuzumab-ozogamicin is determined by the CD33 isotype and the degradation of the cytotoxin. The main mechanisms of resistance to venetoclax are the dysregulation of alternative pathways especially the upregulation of the BCL-2-analogues MCL-1 and BCL-XL or the induction of an aberrant cell metabolism. The introduction of therapies targeting immune processes will lead to new forms of therapy resistance. Knowing those mechanisms will help to develop strategies that can overcome resistance to treatment.

Antibody therapies for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia: exploring current and emerging therapeutic targets

INTRODUCTION

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common and deadly type of leukemia affecting adults. It is typically managed with rounds of non-targeted chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplants, but this is only possible in patients who can tolerate these harsh treatments and many are elderly and frail. With the identification of novel tumor-specific cell surface receptors, there is great conviction that targeted antibody therapies will soon become available for these patients.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we describe the current landscape of known target receptors for monospecific and bispecific antibody-based therapeutics for AML. Here, we characterize each of the receptors and targeted antibody-based therapeutics in development, illustrating the rational design behind each therapeutic compound. We then discuss the bispecific antibodies in development and how they improve immune surveillance of AML. For each therapeutic, we also summarize the available pre-clinical and clinical data, including data from discontinued trials.

EXPERT OPINION

One antibody-based therapeutic has already been approved for AML treatment, the CD33-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, gemtuzumab ozogamicin. Many more are currently in pre-clinical and clinical studies. These antibody-based therapeutics can perform tumor-specific, elaborate cytotoxic functions and there is growing confidence they will soon lead to personalized, safe AML treatment options that induce durable remissions.

Experimental drugs in clinical trials for acute myeloid leukemia: innovations, trends, and opportunities

INTRODUCTION

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by many cytogenetic and molecular alterations. Due to better knowledge of the molecular basis of AML, many targeted therapies have been introduced and registered, e.g. FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 inhibitors, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 mutation inhibitors, and Bcl-2 inhibitor. Despite that, the cure for AML remains an unmet clinical need in most patients.

AREAS COVERED

The review aims to present new, not yet registered drugs for AML. We searched the English literature for articles concerning AML, targeted drugs, menin inhibitors, DOT1L, BET, IDH inhibitors, FLT3, hedgehog inhibitors, Polo-like kinase inhibitors, RNA splicing, and immune therapies via PubMed. Publications from January 2000 to August 2022 were scrutinized. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references from the chosen articles and Google search. Conference proceedings from the previous 5 years of The American Society of Hematology, the European Hematology Association, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology were searched manually. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references.

EXPERT OPINION

For several years, the therapeutic approach in AML has become more individualized. Novel groups of drugs give hope for greater curability. High response rates have agents that restore the activity of the p53 protein. In addition, agents that work independently of a particular mutation seem promising for AML without any known mutation.

Treating CD33-Positive de novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Pediatric Patients: Focus on the Clinical Value of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin

Although survival in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has increased considerably over the past decades, refractory disease and relapse rates remain high. Refractory and relapsed disease are difficult to treat, with overall survival rates less than 40-50%. Preventing relapse should, therefore, be one of the highest priorities. Current conventional chemotherapy regimens are hard to intensify due to associated toxic complications, hence more effective therapies that do not increase toxicity are needed. A promising targeted agent is the CD33-directed antibody-drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO). Because CD33 is highly expressed on leukemic cells in the majority of AML patients, GO can be useful for a broad range of patients. Better relapse-free survival (RFS) after therapy including GO has been reported in several pediatric clinical trials; however, ambiguity about the clinical value of GO in newly diagnosed children remains. Treatment with GO in de novo AML patients aged ≥1 month, in combination with standard chemotherapy is approved in the United States, whereas in Europe, GO is only approved for newly diagnosed patients aged ≥15 years. In this review, we aimed to clarify the clinical value of GO for treatment of newly diagnosed pediatric AML patients. Based on current literature, GO seems to have additional value, in terms of RFS, and acceptable toxicity when used in addition to chemotherapy during initial treatment. Moreover, in KMT2A-rearranged patients, the clinical value of GO was even more evident. Also, we addressed predictors of response, being CD33 expression and SNPs, PgP-1 and Annexin A5. The near finalized intent-to-file clinical trial in the MyeChild consortium investigates whether fractionated dosing has additional value for pediatric AML, which may pave the way for a broader application of GO in pediatric AML.

Immune therapy: a new therapy for acute myeloid leukemia

Although complete remission could be achieved in about 60%-70% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients after conventional chemotherapy, relapse and the state of being refractory to treatment remain the main cause of death. In addition, there is a great need for less intensive regimens for all medically frail patients (both due to age/comorbidity and treatment-related). Immune therapy anticipates improved prognosis and reduced toxicities, which may offer novel therapeutic rationales. However, one of the major difficulties in developing immune therapies against AML is that the target antigens are also significantly expressed on healthy hematopoietic stem cells; B-cell malignancies are different because CD20/CD19/healthy B-cells are readily replaceable. Only the anti-CD33 antibody-drug conjugate gemtuzumab-ozogamicin is approved by the FDA for AML. Thus, drug development remains extremely active, although it is still in its infancy. This review summarizes the clinical results of immune therapeutic agents for AML, such as antibody-based drugs, chimeric antigen receptor therapy, checkpoint inhibitors, and vaccines.

Precision Medicine in Myeloid Malignancies: Hype or Hope?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We review how understanding the fitness and comorbidity burden of patients, and molecular landscape of underlying acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) at the time of diagnosis is now integral to treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

The upfront identification of patients' fitness and molecular profile facilitates selection of targeted and novel agents, enables risk stratification, allows consideration of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in high-risk patients, and provides treatment selection for older (age ≥ 75) or otherwise unfit patients who may not tolerate conventional treatment. The use of measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment improves outcome prediction and can also guide therapeutic strategies such as chemotherapy maintenance and transplant. In recent years, several novel drugs have received FDA approval for treating patients with AML with or without specific mutations. A doublet and triplet combination of molecular targeted and other novel treatments have resulted in high response rates in early trials. Following the initial success in AML, novel drugs are undergoing clinical trials in MDS. Unprecedented advances have been made in precision medicine approaches in AML and MDS. However, lack of durable responses and long-term disease control in many patients still present significant challenges, which can only be met, to some extent, with innovative combination strategies throughout the course of treatment from induction to consolidation and maintenance.

Retrospective comparison of survival and responses to Fludarabine, Cytarabine, GCSF (FLAG) in combination with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) or Idarubicin (IDA) in patients with newly diagnosed core binding factor (CBF) acute myelogenous leukemia: MD Anderson experience in 174 patients

Fludarabine, cytarabine, GCSF (FLAG)-based induction/consolidation results in high remission rates in core binding factor (CBF) acute myelogenous leukemia. We treated 174 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed CBF-AML in a prospective clinical trial of FLAG-based induction/consolidation in combination with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (FLAG-GO; N = 65) or in combination with idarubicin (FLAG-IDA; N = 109). The 5 year RFS in the FLAG-GO cohort was significantly better than the FLAG-IDA cohort, 78% versus 59%, respectively (p-value = .02). In multivariate analysis for RFS, age (p = .0001), FLAG-GO regimen (p = .04), 4 log reduction in CBF-related fusion transcript by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in bone marrow samples at end of consolidation therapy (p = .03), and additional cytogenetic abnormalities (p = .03) were significant variables. Lower age (p = .0001) and 3 log or more transcript reduction at end of induction (p = .04) were significant variables predicting for better overall survival (OS), while there was strong trend for better OS with FLAG-GO (p = .06) regimen. FLAG-GO regimen was superior in optimal disease specific fusion transcript reduction at end of induction (p = .002), mid-consolidation (p < .01), and end of consolidation (p < .001) therapy. Induction/consolidation with FLAG-GO regimen results in better clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed patients with CBF-AML compared to FLAG-IDA and achieves deeper molecular clearance by qPCR assessment of the fusion transcripts.

Treatment options for acute myeloid leukemia patients aged <60 years

Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has changed over the last few years, after the discovery of new drugs selectively targeting AML blasts. Although 3/7 remains the standard of care for most AML patients, several new targeted agents (such as FLT3 inhibitors, CPX-351, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, BCL-2 inhibitor, and oral azacitidine), either as single agents or combined with standard chemotherapy, are approaching clinical practice, starting a new era in AML management. Moreover, emerging evidence has demonstrated that high-risk AML patients might benefit from both allogeneic stem cell transplant and maintenance therapy, providing new opportunities, as well as new challenges, for treating clinicians. In this review, we summarize available data on first-line therapy in young AML patients focusing on targeted therapies, integrating established practice with new evidence, in the effort to outline the contours of a new therapeutic paradigm, that of a “total therapy”, which goes beyond obtaining complete remission.

Updates on the Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia is a heterogeneous disease defined by a large spectrum of genetic aberrations that are potential therapeutic targets. New targeted therapies have changed the landscape for a disease with poor outcomes. They are more effective than standard chemotherapy with a good safety profile. For "fit patients" in first-line, the combination of gemtuzumab ozogamicin or midostaurin with intensive chemotherapy or Vyxeos is now considered the "standard of care" for selected patients. On the other hand, for "unfit patients", azacitidine-venetoclax has been consolidated as a frontline treatment, while other combinations with magrolimab or ivosidenib are in development. Nevertheless, global survival results, especially in relapsed or refractory patients, remain unfavorable. New immunotherapies or targeted therapies, such as Menin inhibitors or sabatolimab, represent an opportunity in this situation. Future directions will probably come from combinations of different targeted therapies ("triplets") and maintenance strategies guided by measurable residual disease.

Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN

The 2010 and 2017 editions of the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations for diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adults are widely recognized among physicians and investigators. There have been major advances in our understanding of AML, including new knowledge about the molecular pathogenesis of AML, leading to an update of the disease classification, technological progress in genomic diagnostics and assessment of measurable residual disease, and the successful development of new therapeutic agents, such as FLT3, IDH1, IDH2, and BCL2 inhibitors. These advances have prompted this update that includes a revised ELN genetic risk classification, revised response criteria, and treatment recommendations.

Akute Myeloische Leukämien – Update 2022

Diagnostik Für die Risikostratifizierung und Therapie der akuten myeloischen Leukämie (AML) ist eine Klassifikation nach zytogenetischen und molekulargenetischen Merkmalen erforderlich. Die Panel-Sequenzierung mittels Next-Generation-Sequencing ist inzwischen in der initialen Diagnostik der AML Routine. Durch die Bestimmung der sogenannten messbaren Resterkrankung steht ein Werkzeug zur Verfügung, das auch innerhalb der kompletten Remission noch Abstufungen hinsichtlich der Tiefe des Ansprechens zulässt.

Therapie Die Therapie der AML ist in den letzten Jahren durch zahlreiche Neuzulassungen deutlich komplexer geworden. Die etablierte intensive Induktionstherapie mit Cytarabin und Anthracyclin wird inzwischen für bestimmte Patient*innen um zielgerichtete Substanzen wie das Antikörperkonjugat Gemtuzumab-Ozogamicin (GO) oder den FLT3-Inhibitor Midostaurin ergänzt. Insbesondere Patient*innen mit einer sekundären AML profitieren von der liposomalen Chemotherapie-Fixkombination CPX-351. Die Therapie mit der hypomethylierenden Substanz Azacitidin und dem BCL2-Inhibitor Venetoclax (Aza/Ven) hat sich als Standard für Patient*innen etabliert, die nicht fit genug für eine intensive Induktionstherapie sind. Bei dieser Therapie ist die Beachtung von Interaktionen mit CYP3A4-wirksamen Medikamenten besonders wichtig. Ob ältere Patienten*innen eher von einer intensiven Chemotherapie oder Aza/Ven profitieren, ist derzeit unklar.

Postremissionstherapie Auch in der Postremissionstherapie hat sich mit der (erneuten) Etablierung von Erhaltungstherapien viel verändert. So wird Midostaurin bei Patient*innen mit FLT3-Mutation eingesetzt oder der Multikinase-Inhibitor Sorafenib nach allogener Stammzell-Transplantation. Zudem steht für nicht allogen transplantierbare Patient*innen orales Azacitidin zur Verfügung.

Akute Promyelozyten-Leukämie Für die Therapie der APL erfolgt in den meisten Fällen eine „Chemotherapie-freie“ Behandlung mit All-trans-Retinsäure (ATRA) und Arsentrioxid (ATO). Bei hohem Risiko ist weiterhin die Kombination aus Chemotherapie und ATRA Standard.

No Evidence that CD33 rs12459419 Polymorphism Predicts Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin Response in Consolidation Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: Experience of the PETHEMA Group

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) is a conjugate of a monoclonal antibody and calicheamicin, which has been reapproved for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). AML patients with the CD33 rs12459419 CC genotype might benefit from the addition of GO to intensive treatment in contrast to patients with CT/TT genotypes. Nevertheless, contradictory results have been reported. We sought to shed light on the prediction of GO response in AML patients with rs12459419 polymorphism who were treated with GO in the consolidation (n = 70) or reinduction (n = 20) phase. The frequency distribution of the rs12459419 polymorphism in the complete cohort of patients was 44.4% (n = 40), 50% (n = 45), and 5.6% (n = 5) for CC, CT, and TT genotypes, respectively. Regarding the patients treated with GO for consolidation, we performed a Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival and relapse-free survival according to the rs12459419 polymorphism (CC vs. CT/TT patients) and genetic risk using the European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2010 risk score. We also carried out a Cox regression analysis for the prediction of overall survival, with age and ELN 2010 as covariates. We found no statistical significance in the univariate or multivariate analysis. Additionally, we performed a global Kaplan-Meier analysis for the patients treated with GO for reinduction and did not find significant differences; however, our cohort was too small to draw any conclusion from this analysis. The use of GO in consolidation treatment is included in the approval of the compound; however, evidence regarding its efficacy in this setting is lacking. Rs12459419 polymorphism could help in the selection of patients who might benefit from GO. Regrettably, in our cohort, the rs12459419 polymorphism does not seem to be an adequate tool for the selection of patients who might benefit from the addition of GO in consolidation cycles.