Randomized Phase III Study of Surgery Alone or Surgery Plus Preoperative Cisplatin and Gemcitabine in Stages IB to IIIA Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Comparative Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy versus Conventional Comparator Treatments in Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to estimate the relative efficacy of neoadjuvant nivolumab in combination with chemotherapy (neoNIVO + CT) compared to relevant treatments amongst resectable non-metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (rNSCLC) patients.

METHODS

Treatment comparisons were based on a network meta-analysis (NMA) using randomized clinical trial data identified via systematic literature review (SLR). The outcomes of interest were event-free survival (EFS) and pathological complete response (pCR). NeoNIVO + CT was compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCT), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neoCRT), adjuvant chemotherapy (adjCT), and surgery alone (S). Due to the potential for effect modification by stage, all-stage and stage-specific networks were considered. Fixed-effect (FE) and random-effects Bayesian NMA models were run (EFS = hazard ratios [HR]; pCR = odds ratios [OR]; 95% credible intervals [CrI]).

RESULTS

Sixty-one RCTs were identified (base case = 9 RCTs [n = 1978 patients]). In the all-stages FE model, neoNIVO + CT had statistically significant EFS improvements relative to neoCT (HR = 0.68 [95% CrI: 0.49, 0.94]), S (0.59 [0.42, 0.82]), adjCT (0.66 [0.45, 0.96]), but not relative to neoCRT (HR = 0.77 [0.52, 1.16]). NeoNIVO + CT (5 RCTs) had statistically significant higher odds of pCR relative to neoCT (OR = 12.53 [5.60, 33.82]) and neoCRT (7.15 [2.31, 24.34]). Stage-specific model findings were consistent.

CONCLUSIONS

This NMA signals improved EFS and/or pCR of neoNIVO + CT relative to comparators among patients with rNSCLC.

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Pathological Responses and Prognosis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has variable efficacy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet reliable noninvasive predictive markers are lacking. This study aimed to develop a radiomics model predicting pathological complete response and postneoadjuvant chemotherapy survival in NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective data collection involved 130 patients with NSCLC who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. Patients were randomly divided into training and independent testing sets. Nine radiomics features from prechemotherapy computed tomography (CT) images were extracted from intratumoral and peritumoral regions. An auto-encoder model was constructed, and its performance was evaluated. X-tile software classified patients into high and low-risk groups based on their predicted probabilities. survival of patients in different risk groups and the role of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were examined.

RESULTS

The model demonstrated area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.874 (training set) and 0.876 (testing set). The larger the area under curve (AUC), the better the model performance. Calibration curve and decision curve analysis indicated excellent model calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = .763, the higher the P-value, the better the model fit) and potential clinical applicability. Survival analysis revealed significant differences in overall survival (P = .011) and disease-free survival (P = .017) between different risk groups. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved survival in the low-risk group (P = .041) but not high-risk group (P = 0.56).

CONCLUSION

This study represents the first successful prediction of pathological complete response achievement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for NSCLC, as well as the patients' survival, utilizing intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics features.

The Emerging Role of Immunotherapy in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite surgical resection, long-term survival of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains poor. Adjuvant chemotherapy, the standard of care for locally advanced NSCLC, provides a marginal 5.4% benefit in survival. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown a significant survival benefit in some patients with advanced NSCLC and are being evaluated for perioperative use in resectable NSCLC.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search using the PubMed online database to identify clinical trials of immunotherapy in resectable NSCLC and studies analyzing biomarkers and immune priming strategies.

RESULTS

Building on previous phase I and II trials, randomized phase III trials have shown efficacy of neoadjuvant nivolumab, perioperative pembrolizumab, adjuvant atezolizumab, and adjuvant pembrolizumab in the treatment of NSCLC with improvement of event-free/disease-free survival of 24% to 42%, leading to United States Food and Drug Administration approval of these drugs in the treatment of resectable NSCLC. Three additional phase III trials have also recently reported the use of immunotherapy both before and after surgery, with pathologic complete response rates of 17% to 25%, significantly better than chemotherapy alone. Perioperative ICI therapy has comparable perioperative morbidity to chemotherapy alone and does not impair surgical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative immunotherapy, in combination with chemotherapy, is safe and improves outcomes in patients with resectable NSCLC. Questions regarding patient selection, the need for adjuvant ICI therapy after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, and the duration of perioperative immunotherapy remain to be answered by future trials.

Pathological response in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy are needed to provide earlier treatment outcome indicators and accelerate drug approval. This study's main objectives were to investigate the association among pathological complete response, major pathological response, event-free survival and overall survival and to determine whether treatment effects on pathological complete response and event-free survival correlate with treatment effects on overall survival.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic literature review was conducted to identify neoadjuvant studies in resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Analysis at the patient level using frequentist and Bayesian random effects (hazard ratio [HR] for overall survival or event-free survival by pathological complete response or major pathological response status, yes vs no) and at the trial level using weighted least squares regressions (hazard ratio for overall survival or event-free survival vs pathological complete response, by treatment arm) were performed.

RESULTS

In both meta-analyses, pathological complete response yielded favorable overall survival compared with no pathological complete response (frequentist, 20 studies and 6530 patients: HR = 0.49, 95% confidence interval = 0.42 to 0.57; Bayesian, 19 studies and 5988 patients: HR = 0.48, 95% probability interval = 0.43 to 0.55) and similarly for major pathological response (frequentist, 12 studies and 1193 patients: HR = 0.36, 95% confidence interval = 0.29 to 0.44; Bayesian, 11 studies and 1018 patients: HR = 0.33, 95% probability interval = 0.26 to 0.42). Across subgroups, estimates consistently showed better overall survival or event-free survival in pathological complete response or major pathological response compared with no pathological complete response or no major pathological response. Trial-level analyses showed a moderate to strong correlation between event-free survival and overall survival hazard ratios (R2 = 0.7159) but did not show a correlation between treatment effects on pathological complete response and overall survival or event-free survival.

CONCLUSION

There was a strong and consistent association between pathological response and survival and a moderate to strong correlation between event-free survival and overall survival following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

Molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of tumour suppressor genes in lung cancer

Tumour suppressor genes play a cardinal role in the development of a large array of human cancers, including lung cancer, which is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers worldwide. Therefore, extensive studies have been committed to deciphering the underlying mechanisms of alterations of tumour suppressor genes in governing tumourigenesis, as well as resistance to cancer therapies. In spite of the encouraging clinical outcomes demonstrated by lung cancer patients on initial treatment, the subsequent unresponsiveness to first-line treatments manifested by virtually all the patients is inherently a contentious issue. In light of the aforementioned concerns, this review compiles the current knowledge on the molecular mechanisms of some of the tumour suppressor genes implicated in lung cancer that are either frequently mutated and/or are located on the chromosomal arms having high LOH rates (1p, 3p, 9p, 10q, 13q, and 17p). Our study identifies specific genomic loci prone to LOH, revealing a recurrent pattern in lung cancer cases. These loci, including 3p14.2 (FHIT), 9p21.3 (p16INK4a), 10q23 (PTEN), 17p13 (TP53), exhibit a higher susceptibility to LOH due to environmental factors such as exposure to DNA-damaging agents (carcinogens in cigarette smoke) and genetic factors such as chromosomal instability, genetic mutations, DNA replication errors, and genetic predisposition. Furthermore, this review summarizes the current treatment landscape and advancements for lung cancers, including the challenges and endeavours to overcome it. This review envisages inspired researchers to embark on a journey of discovery to add to the list of what was known in hopes of prompting the development of effective therapeutic strategies for lung cancer.

New systemic treatment paradigms in resectable non-small cell lung cancer and variations in patient access across Europe

The treatment landscape of resectable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is set to change significantly due to encouraging results from randomized trials evaluating neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy, as well as adjuvant targeted therapy. As of January 2024, marketing authorization has been granted for four new indications in Europe, and regulatory approvals for other study regimens are expected. Because cost-effectiveness and reimbursement criteria for novel treatments often differ between European countries, access to emerging developments may lead to inequalities due to variations in recommended and available lung cancer care throughout Europe. This Series paper (i) highlights the clinical studies reshaping the treatment landscape in resectable early-stage NSCLC, (ii) compares and contrasts approaches taken by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for drug approval to that taken by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and (iii) evaluates the differences in access to emerging treatments from an availability perspective across European countries.

Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer in Japanese patients from CheckMate 816

In the open-label, phase III CheckMate 816 study (NCT02998528), neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy demonstrated statistically significant improvements in event-free survival (EFS) and pathological complete response (pCR) versus chemotherapy alone in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here we report efficacy and safety outcomes in the Japanese subpopulation. Patients with stage IB-IIIA, resectable NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone for three cycles before undergoing definitive surgery within 6 weeks of completing neoadjuvant treatment. The primary end-points (EFS and pCR) and safety were assessed in patients enrolled at 16 centers in Japan. Of the Japanese patients randomized, 93.9% (31/33) in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy arm and 82.9% (29/35) in the chemotherapy arm underwent surgery. At 21.5 months' minimum follow-up, median EFS was 30.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.8-not reached [NR]) with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus 19.6 months (95% CI, 8.5-NR) with chemotherapy; hazard ratio, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.30-1.24). The pCR rate was 30.3% (95% CI, 15.6-48.7) versus 5.7% (95% CI, 0.7-19.2), respectively; odds ratio, 7.17 (95% CI, 1.44-35.85). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 59.4% versus 42.9% of patients, respectively, with no new safety signals identified. Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy resulted in longer EFS and a higher pCR rate versus chemotherapy alone in Japanese patients, consistent with findings in the global population. These data support nivolumab plus chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment option in Japanese patients with resectable NSCLC.

Neoadjuvant therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: basis, promise, and challenges

Introduction

Survival rates for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain poor despite the decade-long established standard of surgical resection and systemic adjuvant therapy. Realizing this, researchers are exploring novel therapeutic targets and deploying neoadjuvant therapies to predict and improve clinical and pathological outcomes in lung cancer patients. Neoadjuvant therapy is also increasingly being used to downstage disease to allow for resection with a curative intent. In this review, we aim to summarize the current and developing landscape of using neoadjuvant therapy in the management of NSCLC.

Methods

The PubMed.gov and the ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched on 15 January 2023, to identify published research studies and trials relevant to this review. One hundred and seven published articles and seventeen ongoing clinical trials were selected, and relevant findings and information was reviewed.

Results & Discussion

Neoadjuvant therapy, proven through clinical trials and meta-analyses, exhibits safety and efficacy comparable to or sometimes surpassing adjuvant therapy. By attacking micro-metastases early and reducing tumor burden, it allows for effective downstaging of disease, allowing for curative surgical resection attempts. Research into neoadjuvant therapy has necessitated the development of surrogate endpoints such as major pathologic response (MPR) and pathologic complete response (pCR) allowing for shorter duration clinical trials. Novel chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy agents are being tested at a furious rate, paving the way for a future of personalized systemic therapy in NSCLC. However, challenges remain that prevent further mainstream adoption of preoperative (Neoadjuvant) therapy. These include the risk of delaying curative surgical resection in scenarios of adverse events or treatment resistance. Also, the predictive value of surrogate markers of disease cure still needs robust verification. Finally, the body of published data is still limited compared to adjuvant therapy. Addressing these concerns with more large scale randomized controlled trials is needed.

Canadian Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Operable Stage II/III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a Modified Delphi Process

The treatment paradigm for patients with stage II/III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rapidly evolving. We performed a modified Delphi process culminating at the Early-stage Lung cancer International eXpert Retreat (ELIXR23) meeting held in Montreal, Canada, in June 2023. Participants included medical and radiation oncologists, thoracic surgeons and pathologists from across Quebec. Statements relating to diagnosis and treatment paradigms in the preoperative, operative and postoperative time periods were generated and modified until all held a high level of consensus. These statements are aimed to help guide clinicians involved in the treatment of patients with stage II/III NSCLC.

PET/CT based cross-modal deep learning signature to predict occult nodal metastasis in lung cancer

Occult nodal metastasis (ONM) plays a significant role in comprehensive treatments of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aims to develop a deep learning signature based on positron emission tomography/computed tomography to predict ONM of clinical stage N0 NSCLC. An internal cohort (n = 1911) is included to construct the deep learning nodal metastasis signature (DLNMS). Subsequently, an external cohort (n = 355) and a prospective cohort (n = 999) are utilized to fully validate the predictive performances of the DLNMS. Here, we show areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the DLNMS for occult N1 prediction are 0.958, 0.879 and 0.914 in the validation set, external cohort and prospective cohort, respectively, and for occult N2 prediction are 0.942, 0.875 and 0.919, respectively, which are significantly better than the single-modal deep learning models, clinical model and physicians. This study demonstrates that the DLNMS harbors the potential to predict ONM of clinical stage N0 NSCLC.

[Prevention, Diagnosis, Therapy, and Follow-up of Lung Cancer - Interdisciplinary Guideline of the German Respiratory Society and the German Cancer Society - Abridged Version]

The current S3 Lung Cancer Guidelines are edited with fundamental changes to the previous edition based on the dynamic influx of information to this field:The recommendations include de novo a mandatory case presentation for all patients with lung cancer in a multidisciplinary tumor board before initiation of treatment, furthermore CT-Screening for asymptomatic patients at risk (after federal approval), recommendations for incidental lung nodule management , molecular testing of all NSCLC independent of subtypes, EGFR-mutations in resectable early stage lung cancer in relapsed or recurrent disease, adjuvant TKI-therapy in the presence of common EGFR-mutations, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in resected lung cancer with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, obligatory evaluation of PD-L1-status, consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition after radiochemotherapy in patients with PD-L1-pos. tumor, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition in patients withPD-L1 ≥ 50% stage IIIA and treatment options in PD-L1 ≥ 50% tumors independent of PD-L1status and targeted therapy and treatment option immune chemotherapy in first line SCLC patients.Based on the current dynamic status of information in this field and the turnaround time required to implement new options, a transformation to a "living guideline" was proposed.

Neoadjuvant therapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stages I-III were previously predominantly treated with surgery and chemotherapy. With the advent of Checkmate-816, neoadjuvant nivolumab and chemotherapy was FDA approved for the treatment of resectable NSCLC. There are several ongoing trials evaluating other neoadjuvant combinations of chemotherapy and immunotherapy as well as targeted therapies towards driver mutations. Here, we review previous clinical trials and discuss current ongoing trials' potential benefits and challenges.

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer

Only a minority of lung cancers are resectable at diagnosis, and many of these will eventually relapse. Adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting has a modest survival advantage, and there is significant need for new approaches to improve cure rates. Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy has transformed the prognosis for advanced lung cancer, and is increasingly being used in the neoadjuvant setting alone, or in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. While this has demonstrated convincing improvements in event-free survival and pathologic response, questions remain over optimal duration of therapy, predictive and prognostic biomarkers, response assessment and combination with other modalities. In addition, these results must be considered in the context of recent positive studies of adjuvant immunotherapy. Here, we summarise preclinical context and clinical trials in this space, discuss areas of controversy and pitfalls, and consider future challenges.

Organ preservation strategies after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has shown a good therapeutic effect on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which also opens up the possibility of applying organ preservation strategies. This study investigated the feasibility of modified surgery after potent neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in central type NSCLC.

METHODS

In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, patients with central type NSCLC who received 2-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy between January 2019 and June 2022 at Air Force Medical University Tangdu Hospital and Peking University People's Hospital were eligible. Patients were divided into modified and nonmodified groups according to the extent of surgery, after which, the safety and long-term prognosis of surgery were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were enrolled. Of 36 (42.9%) patients who underwent modified surgery, 21 patients underwent lobectomy, 12 patients underwent lobectomy with bronchoplasty, 2 patients underwent sleeve lobectomy, and 1 patient underwent bilobectomy. The modification rate for the initially estimated pneumonectomy, sleeve lobectomy, and bilobectomy was 48.6, 44.8, and 30%, respectively. Grades II-V postoperative complications were found in 5 (13.9%) patients in the modified group and 17 (35.4%) patients in the nonmodified group (relative risk, 0.393; 95% CI, 0.016-0.963; P =0.026). No significant difference was observed regarding the surgical approach, operative duration, blood loss, or R0 resection rate. The 2-year local recurrence rate was 3.7% (95% CI, 0.004-0.175) and 5.2% (95% CI, 0.012-0.168) in the modified group and nonmodified group, respectively. The 1-year PFS rate of modified and nonmodified groups was 97.1% (95% CI, 83.7-99.8) and 86.9% (95% CI, 73.4-94.4), respectively, while 2-year PFS were 89.8% (95% CI, 74.1-96.9) and 71.8% (95% CI, 56.7-83.4), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Applying organ preservation strategies, that is, undergoing modified surgery after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, is feasible for selected central type NSCLC patients with favorable safety and long-term survival.

Lobe-specific analysis of perioperative chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

Perioperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy decreases the risk of death over surgery alone and is a standard of care. Here, we examined perioperative chemotherapy indications for stage IB-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients according to lobe-specific analysis.

METHODS

Resectable NSCLC patients with stage IB-III who received perioperative chemotherapy with and without radiotherapy after lung resection were identified from the SEER database. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to reduce the inherent bias of retrospective studies. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used to assess the differences in overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The study enrolled 23,844 patients before PSM. The perioperative chemotherapy group had better OS than the nonperioperative chemotherapy group in stage IB-III NSCLC patients before and after PSM. However, subgroup analysis according to stage demonstrated that perioperative chemotherapy did not markedly benefit patients with stage IB. Furthermore, lobar subgroup analysis did not show survival advantages in primary tumors located in either the right middle lobe in stages II and III NSCLC or the right lower lobe in stage III NSCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

Lobe-specific perioperative chemotherapy is recommended in NSCLC patients. For stage IB NSCLC, right middle lobe NSCLC from stage IB-III and right lower lobe NSCLC from stage III, perioperative chemotherapy might not confer survival benefits.

Advances in efficacy prediction and monitoring of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has become mainstream in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The idea of harnessing the immune system to fight cancer is fast developing. Neoadjuvant treatment in NSCLC is undergoing unprecedented change. Chemo-immunotherapy combinations not only seem to achieve population-wide treating coverage irrespective of PD-L1 expression but also enable achieving a pathological complete response (pCR). Despite these recent advancements in neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy, not all patients respond favorably to treatment with ICIs plus chemo and may even suffer from severe immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). Similar to selection for target therapy, identifying patients most likely to benefit from chemo-immunotherapy may be valuable. Recently, several prognostic and predictive factors associated with the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in NSCLC, such as tumor-intrinsic biomarkers, tumor microenvironment biomarkers, liquid biopsies, microbiota, metabolic profiles, and clinical characteristics, have been described. However, a specific and sensitive biomarker remains to be identified. Recently, the construction of prediction models for ICI therapy using novel tools, such as multi-omics factors, proteomic tests, host immune classifiers, and machine learning algorithms, has gained attention. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the different positive prognostic and predictive factors in treating preoperative patients with ICIs, highlight the recent advances made in the efficacy prediction of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and provide an outlook for joint predictors.

Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor following complete surgical resection in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene are one of the most common targetable oncogenic drivers of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that selectively inhibits EGFR-TKI sensitizing (ex19del or L858R) and T790M mutations and has superior CNS penetration. Osimertinib is approved in EGFR mutant stage IB-IIIA NSCLC following complete tumor resection.

AREAS COVERED

This review opinion article summarizes the pivotal studies that led to the approval of current adjuvant therapies in NSCLC with the primary focus on EGFR-TKI osimertinib and outlines the future strategies in the era of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and emerging novel roles of EGFR targeting therapies. The literature search has been performed using PubMed, Food and Drug Administration website, and Google search.

EXPERT OPINION

Osimertinib showed significant and clinically meaningful disease-free survival benefit compared to placebo in EGFR mutant stage IB-IIIA NSCLC following complete tumor resection. Whether this will lead to improvement in overall survival and the optimal length of treatment remain open questions and are much-debated topic in the lung cancer field.

Emerging evidence and treatment paradigm of non-small cell lung cancer

Research on biomarker-driven therapy and immune check-point blockade in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rapidly evolving. The width and depth of clinical trials have also dramatically improved in an unprecedented speed. The personalized treatment paradigm evolved every year. In this review, we summarize the promising agents that have shifted the treatment paradigm for NSCLC patients across all stages, including targeted therapy and immunotherapy using checkpoint inhibitors. Based on recent evidence, we propose treatment algorithms for NSCLC and propose several unsolved clinical issues, which are being explored in ongoing clinical trials. The results of these trials are likely to impact future clinical practice.

Role of circulating-tumor DNA in the early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma as a predictive biomarker

Lung cancer is one of the most common solid malignancies. Tissue biopsy is the standard method for accurately diagnosing lung and many other malignancies over decades. However, molecular profiling of tumors leads to establishing a new horizon in the field of precision medicine, which has now entered the mainstream in clinical practice. In this context, a minimally invasive complementary method has been proposed as a liquid biopsy (LB) which is a blood-based test that is gaining popularity as it provides the opportunity to test genotypes in a unique, less invasive manner. Circulating tumor cells (CTC) captivating the Circulating-tumor DNA (Ct-DNA) are often present in the blood of lung cancer patients and are the fundamental concept behind LB. There are multiple clinical uses of Ct-DNA, including its role in prognostic and therapeutic purposes. The treatment of lung cancer has drastically evolved over time. Therefore, this review article mainly focuses on the current literature on circulating tumor DNA and its clinical implications and future goals in non-small cell lung cancer.

Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Overview of Treatment Options

Lung cancer is the second-most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The most common histological type is non-small-cell lung cancer, accounting for 85% of all lung cancer cases. About one out of three new cases of non-small-cell lung cancer are diagnosed at a locally advanced stage—mainly stage III—consisting of a widely heterogeneous group of patients presenting significant differences in terms of tumor volume, local diffusion, and lymph nodal involvement. Stage III NSCLC therapy is based on the pivotal role of multimodal treatment, including surgery, radiotherapy, and a wide-ranging option of systemic treatments. Radical surgery is indicated in the case of hilar lymphnodal involvement or single station mediastinal ipsilateral involvement, possibly after neoadjuvant chemotherapy; the best appropriate treatment for multistation mediastinal lymph node involvement still represents a matter of debate. Although the main scope of treatments in this setting is potentially curative, the overall survival rates are still poor, ranging from 36% to 26% and 13% in stages IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC, respectively. The aim of this article is to provide an up-to-date, comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art treatments for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

Erlotinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin as neoadjuvant treatment of stage IIIA-N2 EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: final overall survival analysis of the EMERGING-CTONG 1103 randomised phase II trial

EMERGING-CTONG 1103 showed improved progression-free survival (PFS) with neoadjuvant erlotinib vs. chemotherapy for patients harbouring EGFR sensibility mutations and R0 resected stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (NCT01407822). Herein, we report the final results. Recruited patients were randomly allocated 1:1 to the erlotinib group (150 mg/day orally; neoadjuvant phase for 42 days and adjuvant phase to 12 months) or to the GC group (gemcitabine 1250 mg/m² plus cisplatin 75 mg/m² intravenously; 2 cycles in neoadjuvant phase and 2 cycles in adjuvant phase). Objective response rate (ORR), complete pathologic response (pCR), PFS, and overall survival (OS) were assessed along with safety. Post hoc analysis was performed for subsequent treatments after disease recurrence. Among investigated 72 patients (erlotinib, n = 37; GC, n = 35), the median follow-up was 62.5 months. The median OS was 42.2 months (erlotinib) and 36.9 months (GC) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-1.47; p = 0.513). The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 58.6% and 40.8% with erlotinib and 55.9% and 27.6% with GC (p_3-y = 0.819, p_5-y = 0.252). Subsequent treatment was administered in 71.9% and 81.8% of patients receiving erlotinib and GC, respectively; targeted therapy contributed mostly to OS (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.18-0.70). After disease progression, the ORR was 53.3%, and the median PFS was 10.9 months during the EGFR-TKI rechallenge. During postoperative therapy, grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) were 13.5% in the erlotinib group and 29.4% in the GC group. No serious adverse events were observed. Erlotinib exhibited clinical feasibility for resectable IIIA-N2 NSCLC over chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.

Tumour-pleura relationship on CT is a risk factor for occult lymph node metastasis in peripheral clinical stage IA solid adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether the tumour-pleura relationship on computed tomography (CT) is a risk factor for occult lymph node metastasis (OLNM) in peripheral clinical stage IA solid adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 232 patients were included in the study. The tumour-pleura relationship was divided into four types: type 1, the tumour was unrelated to the pleura; type 2, the tumour was not in contact with the pleura, and one or more linear or striated pleural tags were visible; type 3, the tumour was not in contact with the pleura, and one or more linear or striated pleural tags with soft tissue component at the pleural end were visible; and type 4, the tumour was in contact with the pleura. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify the predictive factors, including the tumour-pleura relationship, clinical factors, conventional CT findings, and pathology-reported visceral pleural invasion, for OLNM.

RESULTS

Type 3 and 4 tumour-pleura relationships were more likely to have visceral pleural invasion than type 1 and 2 tumour-pleura relationships (p < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that the type 3 or 4 tumour-pleura relationship (OR: 3.261, p = 0.026), carcinoembryonic antigen level (OR: 3.361, p = 0.006), cytokeratin 19 fragments level (OR: 2.539, p = 0.025), and mediastinal window tumour size (OR: 1.078, p = 0.020) were predictive factors for OLNM.

CONCLUSIONS

The type 3 or 4 tumour-pleura relationship is correlated with a greater risk of OLNM in peripheral clinical stage IA solid adenocarcinoma.

KEY POINTS

• The tumour-pleura relationship on CT is a risk factor for occult lymph node metastasis in peripheral clinical stage IA solid adenocarcinoma. • Other risk factors for OLNM include CEA level, CYFRA level, and mediastinal window tumour size. • Pathology-reported visceral pleural invasion is not a risk factor for OLNM.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibition has pushed the treatment paradigm for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) toward neoadjuvant therapy. A growing number of promising trials have examined the utility of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, both alone and in combination with other modalities such as radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy. The phase II LCMC3 and NEOSTAR trials demonstrated a role for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in inducing meaningful pathologic responses, and another phase II trial established the feasibility of combining neoadjuvant durvalumab with RT. Significant interest in neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy resulted in the conduct of multiple successful phase II trials including the Columbia trial, NADIM, SAKK 16/14, and NADIM II. Across these trials, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy led to high rates of pathologic response and improved surgical outcomes without compromising surgical timing or feasibility. CheckMate-816, which was a randomized phase III trial studying neoadjuvant nivolumab in addition to chemotherapy, definitively established a benefit for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone for resectable NSCLC. Despite the growing literature and success of these trials, several outstanding questions remain, including the relationship between pathologic response and patient survival, the role of biomarkers such as programmed death ligand 1 and circulating tumor DNA in determining patient selection and treatment course, and the utility of additional adjuvant therapies. Longer follow-up of CheckMate-816 and other ongoing phase III trials may help address these questions. Ultimately, the complexity of managing resectable NSCLC highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to patient care.

Effectiveness of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients: Real-world data of a retrospective, dual-center study

Background

Studying the application of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) in the real world and evaluating its effectiveness and safety in comparison with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) are critically important.

Methods

This study included the II-IIIB stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving NCT with or without PD-1 inhibitors and undergoing surgery after neoadjuvant treatments between January 2019 to August 2022. The clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.

Results

A total of 66 patients receiving NICT and 101 patients receiving NCT were included in this study. As compared to NCT, NICT showed similar safety while not increasing the surgical difficulty. The ORR in the NICT and NCT groups was 74.2% and 53.5%, respectively, P = 0.009. A total of 44 patients (66.7%) in the NICT group and 21 patients (20.8%) in the NCT group showed major pathology response (MPR) (P <0.001). The pathology complete response (pCR) rate was also significantly higher in NICT group than that in NCT group (45.5% vs. 10.9%, P <0.001). After Propensity Score Matching (PSM), 42 pairs of patients were included in the analysis. The results showed no significant difference in the ORR between the two groups (52.3% vs. 43.2%, P = 0.118), and the proportions of MPR (76.2%) and pCR (50.0%) in NICT group were significantly higher than those of MPR (11.9%) and pCR (4.7%) in the NCT group (P <0.001). The patients with driver mutations might also benefit from NICT.

Conclusions

As compared to NCT, the NICT could significantly increase the proportions of patients with pCR and MPR without increasing the operation-related bleeding and operation time.

Malignant neoplasm of the bronchi and lung: Russian clinical guidelines

удалить

Neoadjuvant atezolizumab for resectable non-small cell lung cancer: an open-label, single-arm phase II trial

In an ongoing, open-label, single-arm phase II study ( NCT02927301 ), 181 patients with untreated, resectable, stage IB-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer received two doses of neoadjuvant atezolizumab monotherapy. The primary end point was major pathological response (MPR; ≤10% viable malignant cells) in resected tumors without EGFR or ALK alterations. Of the 143 patients in the primary end point analysis, the MPR was 20% (95% confidence interval, 14-28%). With a minimum duration of follow-up of 3 years, the 3-year survival rate of 80% was encouraging. The most common adverse events during the neoadjuvant phase were fatigue (39%, 71 of 181) and procedural pain (29%, 53 of 181), along with expected immune-related toxicities; there were no unexpected safety signals. In exploratory analyses, MPR was predicted using the pre-treatment peripheral blood immunophenotype based on 14 immune cell subsets. Immune cell subsets predictive of MPR in the peripheral blood were also identified in the tumor microenvironment and were associated with MPR. This study of neoadjuvant atezolizumab in a large cohort of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer was safe and met its primary end point of MPR ≥ 15%. Data from this single-arm, non-randomized trial suggest that profiles of innate immune cells in pre-treatment peripheral blood may predict pathological response after neoadjuvant atezolizumab, but additional studies are needed to determine whether these profiles can inform patient selection and new therapeutic approaches.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

Background

It remains uncertain whether neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (nICI) is superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) in resectable non-small cell lung cancer. In addition, there are outstanding questions for nICI such as the ideal treatment mode and predictors.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and scientific meetings were searched for eligible single-arm or multi-arm trials until 31 December 2021. The primary outcomes of interest were major pathological response (MPR) and pathological complete response (pCR). The random-effect model was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Twenty-four trials of nICI (n = 1,043) and 29 trials of nCT (n = 2,337) were identified. nICI combination therapy was associated with higher MPR (63.2%, 95% CI: 54.2%–72.1%) and pCR (35.3%, 95% CI: 27.4%–43.3%) rates compared to nCT (16.2%, 95% CI: 7.5%–25.0%, P &lt; 0.001 and 5.5%, 95% CI: 3.5%–7.5%, P &lt; 0.001) and nICI monotherapy (23.3%, 95% CI: 12.7%–33.8%, P &lt; 0.001, and 6.5%, 95% CI: 1.7%–11.2%, P &lt; 0.001). As for safety, nICI monotherapy had the best tolerability; nICI combination showed a similar surgical resection rate and higher R0 resection rate compared to nCT. PD-1 inhibitor and high PD-L1 expression (≥1% or ≥50%) were correlated with higher MPR and pCR rates compared to PD-L1 inhibitor and PD-L1 expression &lt;1%.

Conclusions

nICI combination therapy is associated with higher MPR and pCR rates compared to nCT and nICI monotherapy. PD-1 inhibitor seems to be superior to PD-L1 inhibitor. PD-L1 status appears to be predictive of MPR and pCR for patients receiving nICI.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=278661, CRD42021278661.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy for Local Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in a Patient with a History of Breast Cancer: A Case Report

Durvalumab consolidation therapy is the standard treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with surgically unresectable stage IIIA (N2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery could reduce locoregional and distant recurrence and improve the survival rate for surgically resectable NSCLC. However, the value of neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced potentially resectable NSCLC remains controversial. Herein, we report a locally advanced potentially resectable NSCLC case with a history of breast cancer who achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR) after preoperative treatment with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy. A 50-year-old woman developed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (left lower lobe of the lung, stage IIIA-N2) after two years of chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy following a diagnosis of HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. Surgical resection was attempted despite an MDT classification as unamenable to curative surgical resection. After two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with anti-PD1 immunotherapy, the tumor significantly shrank, then the patient underwent a left lower lobectomy. Complete resection with negative margins (R0 resection) was achieved in the patient. The patient experienced grade 1–2 adverse effects and no grade 3 or worse adverse effects occurred. Cardiotoxicity did not occur in the patient despite prior anti-HER2 treatment for breast cancer. Our case study contributes to the existing evidence on the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in locally advanced unresectable NSCLC. Furthermore, future studies are needed to determine which patients can benefit from immunoadjuvant therapy and the duration and course of preoperative and postoperative immunotherapy.

The optimal neoadjuvant regimen for nonsmall cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and complications of different neoadjuvant to determine the optimal regimens for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

A systematic search of the Web of Science, and PubMed databases was conducted through June 3, 2021, reporting a comparison of chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and immunotherapy.

RESULTS

Of 3462 studies, 25 were considered for evidence synthesis. 1035 patients who received chemotherapy or radiotherapy before surgery did not prolong the overall survival (OS) compared with 1038 patients who received surgery alone (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13, 95% CI 1·00-1·28, P = 0·05). 1192 patients received chemoradiotherapy and 864 patients received chemotherapy or radiotherapy; chemoradiotherapy prolonged the OS compared with chemotherapy (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0·29 to 0.95, P = .03). Compared with 110 patients who received other therapy, 93 patients who received immunotherapy had prolonged the OS (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1·08-2·25, P = .02). Chemoradiotherapy increased the pathological response rate (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1·33-2·12, P < .0001), and grade 3 and 4 adverse effects were not increased (HR 5.90, 95% CI 0.88 to 39.60, P = .007). Immunotherapy increased the pathological response (HR 2.79, 95% CI 1·71-4·54, P < .0001), with no significant effects on grades 3 and 4 adverse(HR 0.71, 95% CI 0·19-2·64, P = .61).

CONCLUSION

Our data showed that chemotherapy may prolong OS and PFS, but not statistically significant; however, the combination of chemotherapy and radiation did show an advantage, and immunotherapy may be also the choice for neoadjuvant therapy.

Genomics Analysis and Nomogram Risk Prediction of Occult Lymph Node Metastasis in Non-Predominant Micropapillary Component of Lung Adenocarcinoma Measuring ≤ 3 cm

Background

The efficacy of sublobar resection and selective lymph node dissection is gradually being accepted by thoracic surgeons for patients within early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, there are still some NSCLC patients develop lymphatic metastasis at clinical T1 stage. Lung adenocarcinoma with a micropapillary (MP) component poses a higher risk of lymph node metastasis and recurrence even when the MP component is not predominant. Our study aimed to explore the genetic features and occult lymph node metastasis (OLNM) risk factors in patients with a non-predominant micropapillary component (NP-MPC) in a large of patient’s cohort with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma.

Methods

Between January 2019 and December 2021, 6418 patients who underwent complete resection for primary lung adenocarcinoma at the Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. In our study, 442 patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma with NP-MPC with a tumor size ≤3 cm were included. Genetic alterations were analyzed using amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR). Abnormal protein expression of gene mutations was validated using immunohistochemistry. A nomogram risk model based on clinicopathological parameters was developed to predict OLNM. This model was invalidated using the calibration plot and concordance index.

Results

In our retrospective cohort, the incidence rate of the micropapillary component was 11.17%, and OLNM was observed in 20.13% of the patients in our study. ARMS-PCR suggested that EGFR exon 19 del was the most frequent alteration in NP-MCP patients compared with other gene mutations (frequency: 21.2%, P<0.001). Patients harboring exon 19 del showed significantly higher risk of OLNM (P< 0.001). A nomogram was developed based on five risk parameters, which showed good calibration and reliable discrimination ability (C-index = 0.84) for evaluating OLNM risk.

Conclusions.

Intense expression of EGFR exon 19 del characterizes lung adenocarcinoma in patients with NP-MCP and it’s a potential risk factor for OLNM. We firstly established a nomogram based on age, CYFRA21-1 level, tumor size, micropapillary and solid composition, that was effective in predicting OLNM among NP-MCP of lung adenocarcinoma measuring ≤ 3 cm.

Feasibility of double sleeve lobectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study intends to appraise the feasibility of double sleeve lobectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in central non-small-cell lung cancer with bronchovascular aggression.

METHODS

This retrospective study included non-small-cell lung cancer patients who received double sleeve lobectomy from January 2014 to June 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and the non-neoadjuvant chemotherapy group. Demographic data and perioperative outcomes were compared between these 2 groups.

RESULTS

Of the 110 patients who received double sleeve lobectomy during this period, 35 patients (31.8%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Compared with the non-neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were associated with younger age (P = 0.026), smaller pathologic tumour size (P = 0.005), higher forced expiratory volume in 1 s (P = 0.007), higher forced expiratory volume in 1 s of predicted value (P = 0.005) and higher clinical stage (P < 0.001). In the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, 18 patients (51.4%) attained a partial response and 17 patients (48.6%) achieved stable disease. The postoperative hospital stays (P = 0.042) and chest tube drainage duration (P = 0.030) were longer in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and other perioperative performances were similar between these 2 groups. No statistically significant difference was reported in postoperative complications and mortality between these 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The intraoperative performance and postoperative outcomes of double sleeve lobectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy were similar to direct surgery, indicating that double sleeve lobectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is feasible and safe in central lung cancer involving both the pulmonary artery and bronchus.

Rationale for Combing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Medically Inoperable Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

The rate of recurrence remains high for lymph node negative early-stage non-small cell lung cancer that are over 2–3 cm in size following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). This is due to the increased incidence of out-of-field failures, which warrants the addition of systemic therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a class of immunotherapy, may induce a strong distant therapeutic effect known as the “abscopal” effect. This makes them a very suitable class of drugs to be combined with SBRT when treating early lung cancer with high-risk features, such as larger tumor size. In this review, we discuss the rationale and evidence for doing so.

Abstract

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been widely adopted as an alternative to lobar resection in medically inoperable patients with lymph-node negative (N0) early-stage (ES) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Excellent in-field local control has been consistently achieved with SBRT in ES NSCLC ≤ 3 cm in size. However, the out-of-field control following SBRT remains suboptimal. The rate of recurrence, especially distant recurrence remains high for larger tumors. Additional systemic therapy is warranted in N0 ES NSCLC that is larger in size. Radiation has been shown to have immunomodulatory effects on cancer, which is most prominent with higher fractional doses. Strong synergistic effects are observed when immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are combined with radiation doses in SBRT’s dose range. Unlike chemotherapy, ICIs can potentiate a strong systemic response outside of the irradiated field when combined with SBRT. Together with their less toxic nature, ICIs represent a very suitable class of systemic agents to be combined with SBRT when treating ES NSCLC with high-risk features, such as larger tumor size. In this review, we describe the rationale and emerging evidence, as well as ongoing investigations in this area.

A narrative review of deep learning applications in lung cancer research: from screening to prognostication

Background and Objective

Deep learning (DL) algorithms have been developed for various tasks, including lung nodule detection on chest radiographs or lung cancer computed tomography screening, potential candidate selection in lung cancer screening, malignancy prediction for indeterminate pulmonary nodules, lung cancer staging, treatment response prediction, prognostication, and prediction of genetic mutations in lung cancer. Furthermore, these DL algorithms have been applied in various clinical settings in order for them to be generalized in real-world clinical practice. Multiple DL algorithms have been corroborated to be on par with experts or current clinical prediction models for several specific tasks. However, no article has yet comprehensively reviewed DL algorithms dedicated to lung cancer research. This narrative review presents an overview of the literature dealing with DL techniques applied in lung cancer research and briefly summarizes the results according to the DL algorithms’ clinical use cases.

Methods

we performed a narrative review by searching the Embase and OVID-MEDLINE databases for articles published in English from October, 2016 until September, 2021 and reviewing the bibliographies of key references to identify important literature related to DL in lung cancer research. The background, development, results, and clinical implications of each DL algorithm are briefly discussed. Lastly, we end this review article by highlighting future directions in lung cancer research using DL techniques.

Key Content and Findings

DL algorithms have been introduced to show comparable or higher performance than human experts in various clinical settings. Specifically, they have been actively applied to detect lung nodules in chest radiographs or computed tomography (CT) examinations, optimize candidate selection for lung cancer screening (LCS), predict the malignancy of lung nodules, stage lung cancer, and predict treatment response, patients’ prognoses, and genetic mutations in lung cancers.

Conclusions

DL algorithms have corroborated their potential value for various tasks, ranging from lung cancer screening to prognostication of lung cancer patients. Future research is warranted for the clinical application of these algorithms in daily clinical practice and verification of their real-world clinical usefulness.

Research article: Three-year Follow-up of Neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor (Sintilimab) in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors have been proved to be feasible and efficacy in multiple cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). But few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of PD-1 inhibitor as neoadjuvant therapy with a long-term follow-up. Here, in this phase 1b study with a 3-year follow-up, we reported the clinical outcomes of patients who received the PD-1 inhibitor as neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Two doses of sintilimab (intravenously, 200 mg) were used for patients with stage IA-IIIB NSCLC (registration number: ChiCTR-OIC-17013726). Then surgery was performed within 29 to 43 days after the first dose. And all patients underwent positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) at enrollment and before surgery to evaluate tumor metabolism after administration of PD-1 inhibitor. We also evaluated the expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) as an exploratory analysis in 32 eligible patients. Safety was the primary endpoint. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), event survival (EFS), and major pathologic response (MPR) were the key secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

With the mean 37.8 months follow-up, 3-year OS rates were 88.5% and the 3-year DFS rate was 75.0% among patients who underwent R0 resection. In patients with positive PD-L1 expression, 3-year OS and DFS rates were 95.5% and 81.8%, respectively. Eight patients had recurrent tumors, including local recurrence, lung metastasis, brain metastasis and bone metastasis. Patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1% had more favorable clinical outcomes than the other subgroup (HR, 0.275; 95% CI, 0.078 to 0.976). No more new adverse events (AEs) have occurred in the 3-year follow-up since we first reported them in the former publication.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to report the long-term survival probability of NSCLC patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors as the neoadjuvant treatment. The three-year follow-up revealed that patients with positive PD-L1 expression and high tumor mutation burden have favorable clinical outcomes.

Current Surgical Indications for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

The management strategy for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been transformed by our improved understanding of the cancer biology and concomitant development of novel systemic therapies. Complete surgical resection of NSCLC continues to offer the best chance for cure or local and regional disease control, and with improvements in minimally invasive techniques and enhanced recovery, the morbidity associated with surgical resection has been reduced. Patient-centered multi-disciplinary discussions that consider surgical therapy are associated with improved outcomes. Provided with promising novel therapeutic modalities including immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without chemotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, and targeted systemic therapies, indications for surgery continue to evolve and have expanded to include selected patients with advanced and metastatic disease.

Abstract

With recent strides made within the field of thoracic oncology, the management of NSCLC is evolving rapidly. Careful patient selection and timing of multi-modality therapy to permit the optimization of therapeutic benefit must be pursued. While chemotherapy and radiotherapy continue to have a role in the management of lung cancer, surgical therapy remains an essential component of lung cancer treatment in early, locally and regionally advanced, as well as in selected, cases of metastatic disease. Recent and most impactful advances in the treatment of lung cancer relate to the advent of immunotherapy and targeted therapy, molecular profiling, and predictive biomarker discovery. Many of these systemic therapies are a part of the standard of care in metastatic NSCLC, and their indications are expanding towards surgically operable lung cancer to improve survival outcomes. Numerous completed and ongoing clinical trials in the surgically operable NSCLC speak to the interest and importance of the multi-modality therapy even in earlier stages of NSCLC. In this review, we focus on the current standard of care indications for surgical therapy in stage I-IV NSCLC as well as on the anticipated future direction of multi-disciplinary lung cancer therapy.

Management of Early-Stage Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Consensus Statement of the Lung cancer Consortium

BACKGROUND

Management of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) has evolved over the last few years especially in terms of work-up and the use of systemic therapy. This consensus statement was developed to present updated guidelines for the management of this disease.

METHODS

Multidisciplinary team (MDT) of lung cancer experts convened to discuss a set of pertinent questions with importance relevance to the management of ES-NSCLC. ES-NSCLC includes stages I, II and resected stage III. The experts included consultants in chest imaging, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, and medical oncology. Questions were discussed in virtual meetings and then a written manuscript with supporting evidence was drafted, reviewed, and approved by the team members.

RESULTS

The Consensus Statement included 9 questions addressing work-up and management of ES-NSCLC. Background information and literature review were presented for each question followed by specific recommendations to address the questions by oncology providers. The Statement was endorsed by various oncology societies in the Gulf region.

CONCLUSION

The Consensus Statement serves as a guide for thoracic MDT members in the management of ES-NSCLC. Adaptation of these to the local setting is dictated usually by available resources and expertise, however, all efforts should be excreted to provide the optimal care to all patients whenever possible.

Neoadjuvant Sintilimab and Chemotherapy for Resectable Stage IIIA Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Evidence of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell-lung-cancer remains investigational and requires prospective validation. This phase II trial (ChiCTR1900023758) aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor, sintilimab, in addition to chemotherapy in the management of resectable stage IIIA non-small-cell-lung-cancer.

METHODS

Eligible patients received two to four 21-day-cycles of neoadjuvant therapy: sintilimab (200mg) and carboplatin (area under the curve5) on day1, gemcitabine (1000mg/m²) on day1 and day8 for squamous-cell-carcinoma or pemetrexed (500mg/m²) on day1 for adenocarcinoma and non-small-cell-lung-cancer-not otherwise specified. The primary endpoints were adverse events and major pathological response. The secondary endpoint was disease-free-survival at 1 year.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were enrolled, and 23 (46%) achieved partial response after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. Four (8%) patients experienced grade 3-5 adverse events. Thirty patients received surgery, none of whom experienced treatment-related-surgery-delays, and 13 (13/30, 43.3%) patients achieved major pathological response (viable tumor ≤10%). With a median follow-up of 13.6 months, 85.3% of patients were disease-free at 1 year (N=50).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant sintilimab with platinum-containing dual-agent chemotherapy was feasible and safe for patients with resectable stage IIIA non-small-cell-lung-cancer.

Lung cancer with PET/CT-defined occult nodal metastasis yields favourable prognosis and benefits from adjuvant therapy: a multicentre study

PURPOSE

To investigate the surgical prognosis and efficacy of adjuvant therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with occult lymph node metastasis (ONM) defined by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT).

METHODS

A total of 3537 NSCLC patients receiving surgical resection were included in this study. The prognosis between patients with ONM and evident nodal metastasis, ONM patients with and without adjuvant therapy was compared, respectively.

RESULTS

ONM was associated with significantly better prognosis than evident nodal metastasis whether for patients with N1 (5-year OS: 56.8% versus 52.3%, adjusted p value = 0.267; 5-year RFS: 44.7% versus 33.2%, adjusted p value = 0.031) or N2 metastasis (5-year OS: 42.8% versus 32.3%, adjusted p value = 0.010; 5-year RFS: 31.3% versus 21.6%, adjusted p value = 0.025). In ONM population, patients receiving adjuvant therapy yielded better prognosis comparing to those without adjuvant therapy (5-year OS: 50.1% versus 33.5%, adjusted p value < 0.001; 5-year RFS: 38.4% versus 22.1%, adjusted p value < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ONM defined by PET/CT identifies a unique clinical subtype of lung cancer, ONM is a favorable prognostic factor whether for pathological N1 or N2 NSCLC and adjuvant therapy could provide additional survival benefits for ONM patients.

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NANE-LC): a study protocol of prospective, single-arm, multicenter, phase II study

Background

Previous studies have shown that neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy in patients with stage IB–IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) significantly improved the major pathological response (MPR) and the pathological complete response (pCR) rates. However, high-level evidence-based medical data confirming this effect are still lacking. In addition, there is an urgent need to develop an appropriate strategy to predict the benefit for patients receiving ICIs. In this study, we describe an ongoing study on the effect of neoadjuvant therapy with camrelizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin on stage IB–IIIA NSCLC patients. The aim of this study is to establish a multiomics artificial intelligence system for predicting neoadjuvant therapy efficacy and assisting decision-making.

Methods

This prospective, single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial will enroll a total of 40 patients who will undergo surgery after three cycles of neoadjuvant therapy with camrelizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin. The MPR rate is the primary endpoint, while the rates of pCR, complete resection, objective response, disease-free survival (DFS), adverse events (AEs), and quality of life (QOL) are secondary endpoints. Exploratory endpoints will serve to establish a multiomics artificial intelligence system for neoadjuvant therapy effect prediction and decision-making assistance based on radiomics, metabolism, genetic, and clinic-pathological characteristics and to explore the mechanisms of drug resistance.

Discussion

The efficacy of ICIs is influenced by many factors, including patient’s driver genes and smoking status. Thus, further subgroup analysis is needed. This study will indicate if our new multiomics artificial intelligence system constitutes a valid strategy for neoadjuvant therapy effect prediction and decision-making assistance in the context of neoadjuvant camrelizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin treatment for patients with stage IB–IIIA NSCLC.

Trial Registration

This trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identification number: NCT04541251).

Short-term outcome of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Previously reported results have shown promising efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, no randomized control trials comparing neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chemotherapy have yet been reported. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the superiority of neoadjuvant immunotherapy compared with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable NSCLC in terms of short-term clinical outcomes and surgical outcomes.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the ClinicalTrials.gov database, Web of Science, and abstracts derived from multiple major cancer meetings up to March 1, 2020. Short-term clinical outcomes (including objective response rate [ORR], major pathologic response, and pathologic complete response [pCR]) and surgical outcomes (including surgical resection rate and R0 resection rate) were reported. Data were summarized as the estimated pooled value of each evaluated index. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed using standard methods.

Results

This systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 trials on neoadjuvant immunotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for NSCLC included 1795 patients. Patients who received Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors (NeoIO) alone (13.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.0%-19.3%) had the lowest ORR compared with those who received NeoIO plus chemotherapy (CT) (62.5%; 95% CI, 54.4%-70.0%) or CT alone (41.6%; 95% CI, 36.8%-46.7%) (NeoIO vs CT, P < .001; NeoIO + CT vs CT, P < .001). Receipt of NeoIO + CT (36.2%; 95% CI, 19.2%-57.6%) was associated with an elevated pCR rate compared with receipt of NeoIO alone (10.6%; 95% CI, 6.5%-16.9%; P < .001) or standard CT (7.5%; 95% CI, 5.7%-9.8%; P < .001). Neoadjuvant CT (87.2%; 95% CI, 74.9%-94.0%) was associated with a lower R0 resection rate compared with NeoIO alone (92.7%; 95% CI, 83.4%-97.0%; P = .360) or NeoIO + CT (91.6%; 95% CI, 84.3%-95.7%; P = .409). Meta-regression showed that a higher proportion of stage III patients was correlated with decreased surgical resection and R0 resection rates, whereas no impact was observed with neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Conclusions

Current data suggest that compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, immunotherapy-based regimens may provide superior pathological response along with a higher rate of complete resection. Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be a more favorable clinical option. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to provide long-term results of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for localized NSCLC and help guide clinical practice.

Current status and future perspectives on immunotherapy in neoadjuvant therapy of resectable non-small cell lung cancer

Resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is defined as stage I-II, and some locally advanced (stage III) tumor. Despite the associated relatively high recurrence rates after surgery, surgical treatment remains the standard treatment for patients with early-stage NSCLC. At present, neoadjuvant therapy is becoming an increasingly popular therapeutic strategy for resectable NSCLC. However, studies have reported that neoadjuvant chemotherapy only slightly improves recurrence rates, making it inadequate for extending patient survival. The significant survival benefits of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC have greatly stimulated researchers' interests in applying immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for treating early-stage resectable NSCLC. A few recent phase II radomized clinical trials suggested that ICIs yield better major pathologic response (MPR) rates than neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, demonstrating their potential as alternatives to the existing fixed therapy pattern for early-stage NSCLC. Most initial studies regarding neoadjuvant immunotherapy selected MPR and pathologic complete response (pCR) as primary or secondary endpoints, leading to a significant reduction in the time and cost of research and development compared with the use of overall survival time and median survival time as endpoints. Meanwhile, to confirm these benefits, more phase III clinical trials are being conducted, and there is a growing demand for research on related problems, including the screening of population, formulation of treatment strategies, duration and course of immunotherapy, influence of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on the safety of surgery, standardization of treatment effect evaluation and pathologic evaluation, and ways to effectively identify pseudoprogression and avoid resultant misjudgment in surgery and adjuvant therapy.

Important Surgical and Clinical End Points in Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Trials in Resectable NSCLC

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy may improve outcomes in patients with resectable NSCLC and is being evaluated in phase 2 and 3 studies. Nevertheless, preoperative treatment postpones resection; the potential for increased surgical complexity and greater intra- and postoperative morbidity and mortality is an additional consideration. In studies primarily designed to evaluate efficacy, the impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on surgery is based on parameters that are poorly defined and reported differently between studies. Defining and reporting common end points among trials would improve understanding and facilitate cross-comparison of different immunotherapy regimens and may facilitate wider adoption of induction therapies by surgeons and oncologists. We propose several surgical end points and related metrics for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable NSCLC. These include the periods from screening to treatment initiation and from last neoadjuvant dose to surgery; reporting of the allowable window for surgery to preclude masking delays caused by induction treatment-related toxicity; complete resection (R0) rate; preoperative downstaging; a standardized list of immune-related adverse events and associated delay to surgery; preoperative attrition; postoperative attrition before adjuvant therapy; and postoperative 30- and 90-day mortality and morbidity rates. Intraoperative end points (blood loss, duration, and type of surgery) and our proposed system of grading complexity based on lymphadenopathy and fibrosis would allow quantitation of technical difficulty and quality of oncologic resection. In conclusion, the standardization, reporting, and prospective inclusion of these end points in study protocols would provide a comparative overview of the impact of different neoadjuvant immunotherapy regimens on surgery and ultimately clinical oncologic outcomes in resectable NSCLC.

Advances in systemic therapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer related mortality worldwide. Despite numerous advances in treatments over the past decade, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains an incurable disease for most patients. The optimal treatment for all patients with locally advanced, but surgically resectable, NSCLC contains at least chemoradiation. Trimodality treatment with surgical resection has been a subject of debate for decades. For patients with unresectable or inoperable locally advanced disease, the incorporation of immunotherapy consolidation after chemoradiation has defined a new standard of care. For decades, the standard of care treatment for advanced stage NSCLC included only cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, with the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy, the landscape of treatment has rapidly evolved. This review discusses the integration of these innovative therapies in the management of patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC.

Revisiting neoadjuvant therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer

Despite the rapidly evolving treatment landscape in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), developments in neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments have been nascent by comparison. Establishing overall survival benefit in the early-stage setting has been challenging because of the need for large trials and long-term survival data. Encouraged by improved treatment outcomes with a biomarker-driven approach in advanced NSCLC, and recognising the need to improve survival outcomes in early-stage NSCLC, there has been renewed interest in revisiting neoadjuvant strategies. Multiple neoadjuvant trials with targeted therapy and immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, have yielded unique insights into traditional response parameters, such as the discordance between RECIST response and pathological response, and expanded opportunities for biomarker discovery. With further standardisation of trial endpoints across studies, coupled with the implementation of novel technologies including radiomics and digital pathology, individual risk-stratified neoadjuvant treatment approaches are poised to make a striking impact on the outcomes of early-stage NSCLC.

Aneuploid Circulating Tumor Cells as a Predictor of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose

This study aimed to explore the potential application of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in predicting the therapeutic effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Using integrated subtraction enrichment and immunostaining-fluorescence in situ hybridization, the serial CTCs of patients with NSCLC were detected in 7.5 mL of blood at baseline and after two cycles of cisplatin-based NAC, and all aneuploidies of chromosome 8 were examined in the enriched CTCs. Tumor responses were evaluated radiologically with serial chest computed tomography (CT) using the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors and microscopically using the tumor cell necrosis rate (TCNR) of the resected specimen after NAC.

Results

After two cycles of cisplatin-based NAC, 89% (8/9) of the patients with radiological partial response to NAC had reduced CTC numbers, while 73% (8/11) of the patients with stable disease exhibited increased CTC numbers (P = 0.0098). On pathological examination, 90% (9/10) of patients with a TCNR lower than 30% had >1 CTC post-NAC, while 80% (4/5) of patients with a TCNR higher than 30% had ≤1 CTC post-NAC (P = 0.017). In aneuploidy analysis, the positive rate (CTC > 0) of triploid CTCs was found to have increased after NAC, in contrast with the tetraploid and multiploid CTCs. Furthermore, tetraploid and multiploid CTCs were found to be significantly downregulated in the patients with partial response to NAC.

Conclusion

The correlations of aneuploid CTCs with both radiological and pathological responses in patients with NSCLC who received NAC were summarized, and the findings indicate that enumerating and karyotyping aneuploid CTCs can serve as a surrogate marker for disease monitoring in NSCLC.

Deep Learning for Prediction of N2 Metastasis and Survival for Clinical Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background Preoperative mediastinal staging is crucial for the optimal management of clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Purpose To develop a deep learning signature for N2 metastasis prediction and prognosis stratification in clinical stage I NSCLC. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study conducted from May 2020 to October 2020 in a population with clinical stage I NSCLC, an internal cohort was adopted to establish a deep learning signature. Subsequently, the predictive efficacy and biologic basis of the proposed signature were investigated in an external cohort. A multicenter diagnostic trial (registration number: ChiCTR2000041310) was also performed to evaluate its clinical utility. Finally, on the basis of the N2 risk scores, the instructive significance of the signature in prognostic stratification was explored. The diagnostic efficiency was quantified with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and the survival outcomes were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results A total of 3096 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 60 years ± 9; 1703 men) were included in the study. The proposed signature achieved AUCs of 0.82, 0.81, and 0.81 in an internal test set (n = 266), external test cohort (n = 133), and prospective test cohort (n = 300), respectively. In addition, higher deep learning scores were associated with a lower frequency of EGFR mutation (P = .04), higher rate of ALK fusion (P = .02), and more activation of pathways of tumor proliferation (P < .001). Furthermore, in the internal test set and external cohort, higher deep learning scores were predictive of poorer overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.9; 95% CI: 1.2, 6.9; P = .02) and recurrence-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.2; 95% CI: 1.4, 7.4; P = .007). Conclusion The deep learning signature could accurately predict N2 disease and stratify prognosis in clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Park and Lee in this issue.

Neoadjuvant Therapy in Lung Cancer: What Is Most Important: Objective Response Rate or Major Pathological Response?

Lung cancer is the most fatal and frequently diagnosed malignant tumor. Neoadjuvant therapy is a promising approach for prolonging survival and increasing the chance of cure rates for patients with potentially resectable disease. Currently, many therapeutic alternatives, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, are continually being explored to enrich the content of neoadjuvant therapy. However, neoadjuvant therapy remains to have no unified evaluation standards. Overall survival (OS) is the "gold standard" for evaluating the clinical benefit of cancer treatment, but it needs years for a reliable evaluation. Hence, researchers need to identify surrogate endpoints that can predict OS accurately and reliably without long follow-up periods. In this review, we describe the research progress of different neoadjuvant therapies and explore their response evaluation, aiming to identify stronger predictors of OS.

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review

Background

The neoadjuvant use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is currently an area of active ongoing research. The place of neoadjuvant ICIs in the treatment guidelines needs to be determined. We carried out a systematic review of published data on neoadjuvant ICIs in resectable NSCLC to study its efficacy and safety.

Patients and methods

A literature search was carried out using the MEDLINE (PubMed) and Embase databases to retrieve articles and conference abstracts of clinical trials measuring the efficacy [major pathological response (MPR) and pathological complete response (pCR)] and safety (failure to undergo resection, surgical delay, treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) grade ≥3) of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable NSCLC until July 2021.

Results

Nineteen studies with a total of 1066 patients were included in this systematic review. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy was associated with improved pathological response rates, especially in combination with chemotherapy. Using mono ICI, dual therapy–ICI, chemoradiation–ICI, radiotherapy–ICI, and chemo–ICI, the MPR rates were 0%-45%, 50%, 73%, 53%, and 27%-86%, respectively. Regarding pCR, the rates were 7%-16%, 33%-38%, 27%, 27%, and 9%-63%, respectively. Safety endpoints using monotherapy–ICI, dual therapy–ICI, chemoradiation–ICI, radiotherapy–ICI, and chemo–ICI showed a failure to undergo resection in 0%-17%, 19%-33%, 8%, 13%, and 0%-46%, respectively. The trAEs grade ≥3 rates were 0%-20%, 10%-33%, 7%, 23%, and 0%-67%, respectively.

Conclusion

In patients with resectable NSCLC stage, neoadjuvant immunotherapy can improve pathological response rates with acceptable toxicity. Further research is needed to identify patients who may benefit most from this approach, and adequately powered trials to establish clinically meaningful benefits are awaited.

•

Neoadjuvant strategies involving immunotherapy are currently being investigated in NSCLC.

•

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy was associated with improvement in pathological response rates.

•

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy can be safe and feasible with acceptable surgical delay and trAEs.

•

Further research is needed to identify patients benefiting most from these approaches.

Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy in Patients with Resectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Worldwide, lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer morbidity and mortality. Despite a trend towards an escalating diagnosis of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), overall survival (OS) in patients with resectable NSCLC remains poor. The incorporation of chemotherapy into the neoadjuvant setting has improved disease-free survival (DFS), time to distant recurrence, and OS. Furthermore, the incorporation of immunotherapy and the combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy have improved pathological responses, which seems to be associated with increased survival. Therefore, immunotherapy represents a paradigm shift in treating resectable NSCLC. However, validation in large randomized trials is mandatory and a longer postoperative follow-up period is required. Additionally, neoadjuvant therapy trials offer an exceptional environment for testing predictive biomarkers. PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB) are the most helpful tools for predicting the likelihood of response with immunotherapy in metastatic NSCLC. However, in the neoadjuvant setting, PD-L1 expression and TMB have had opposite results until now. Recently, the immune profiling and some immune-related genes also appear to be involved in the prognosis and response to immunotherapy in NSCLC. Further prospective studies are needed to derive definitive conclusions.