Randomized open-label phase II study of decitabine in patients with low- or intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

Altered RNA export by SF3B1 mutants confers sensitivity to nuclear export inhibition

SF3B1 mutations frequently occur in cancer yet lack targeted therapies. Clinical trials of XPO1 inhibitors, selinexor and eltanexor, in high-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) revealed responders were enriched with SF3B1 mutations. Given that XPO1 (Exportin-1) is a nuclear exporter responsible for the export of proteins and multiple RNA species, this led to the hypothesis that SF3B1-mutant cells are sensitive to XPO1 inhibition, potentially due to altered splicing. Subsequent RNA sequencing after XPO1 inhibition in SF3B1 wildtype and mutant cells showed increased nuclear retention of RNA transcripts and increased alternative splicing in the SF3B1 mutant cells particularly of genes that impact apoptotic pathways. To identify novel drug combinations that synergize with XPO1 inhibition, a forward genetic screen was performed with eltanexor treatment implicating anti-apoptotic targets BCL2 and BCLXL, which were validated by functional testing in vitro and in vivo. These targets were tested in vivo using Sf3b1K700E conditional knock-in mice, which showed that the combination of eltanexor and venetoclax (BCL2 inhibitor) had a preferential sensitivity for SF3B1 mutant cells without excessive toxicity. In this study, we unveil the mechanisms underlying sensitization to XPO1 inhibition in SF3B1-mutant MDS and preclinically rationalize the combination of eltanexor and venetoclax for high-risk MDS.

Treatment of Anemia in Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome

OPINION STATEMENT

A majority of patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) will present with or develop anemia. Anemia in MDS is associated with decreased quality of life and may correlate with decreased progression-free survival and overall survival. In this state of the art review we summarize current risk stratification approaches to identify lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS), the natural history of the disease, and meaningful clinical endpoints. The treatment landscape of LR-MDS with anemia is also rapidly evolving; we review the role of supportive care, erythropoietin stimulating agents, lenalidomide, luspatercept, hypomethylating agents (HMAs), and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) in the management of LR-MDS with anemia. In patients with deletion 5q (del5q) syndrome lenalidomide has both efficacy and durability of response. For patients without del5q who need treatment, the management approach is impacted by serum erythropoietin (EPO) level, SF3B1 mutation status, and ring sideroblast status. Given the data from the Phase III COMMANDS trial, we utilize luspatercept in those with SF3B1 mutation or ring sideroblasts that have an EPO level < 500 U/L; in patients without an SF3B1 mutation or ring sideroblasts there is equipoise between luspatercept and use of an erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA). For patients who have an EPO level ≥ 500 U/L or have been previously treated there is not a clear standard of care. For those without previous luspatercept exposure it can be considered particularly if there is an SF3B1 mutation or the presence of ring sideroblasts. Other options include HMAs or IST; the Phase III IMERGE trial supports the efficacy of the telomerase inhibitor imetelstat in this setting and this may become a standard option in the future as well.

Clinical decision-making and treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes

ABSTRACT

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) constitute a profoundly heterogeneous myeloid malignancy with a common origin in the hemopoietic stem cell compartment. Consequently, patient management and treatment are as heterogeneous. Decision-making includes identifying risk, symptoms, and options for an individual and conducting a risk-benefit analysis. The only potential cure is allogeneic stem cell transplantation, and albeit the fraction of patients with MDS who undergo transplant increase over time because of better management and increased donor availability, a majority are not eligible for this intervention. Current challenges encompass to decrease the relapse risk, the main cause of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation failure. Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) constitute firstline treatment for higher-risk MDSs. Combinations with other drugs as firstline treatment has, to date, not proven more efficacious than monotherapy, although combinations approved for acute myeloid leukemia, including venetoclax, are under evaluation and often used as rescue treatment. The treatment goal for lower-risk MDS is to improve cytopenia, mainly anemia, quality of life, and, possibly, overall survival. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) constitute firstline treatment for anemia and have better and more durable responses if initiated before the onset of a permanent transfusion need. Treatment in case of ESA failure or ineligibility should be tailored to the main disease mechanism: immunosuppression for hypoplastic MDS without high-risk genetics, lenalidomide for low-risk del(5q) MDS, and luspatercept for MDS with ring sideroblasts. Approved therapeutic options are still scarcer for MDS than for most other hematologic malignancies. Better tools to match disease biology with treatment, that is, applied precision medicines are needed to improve patient outcome.

Why do we not have more drugs approved for MDS? A critical viewpoint on novel drug development in MDS

Approval of new agents to treat higher risk (HR) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) has stalled since the approval of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi). In addition, the options for patients with lower risk (LR) MDS who have high transfusion needs and do not harbor ring sideroblasts or 5q- syndrome are limited. Here, we review the current treatment landscape in MDS and identify areas of unmet need, such as treatment after failure of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents or DNMTis, TP53-mutated disease, and MDS with potentially targetable mutations. We discuss how our understanding of MDS pathogenesis can inform therapy development, including treating HR-MDS similarly to AML and pursuing therapies to address splicing factor mutations and dysregulated inflammation. We then bring a critical lens to current methodology of MDS studies and propose solutions to improve the efficiency and yield of these clinical trials, including using the most meaningful response metrics and expanding enrollment.

What's Next after Hypomethylating Agents Failure in Myeloid Neoplasms? A Rational Approach

Hypomethylating agents (HMA) such as azacitidine and decitabine are a mainstay in the current management of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as either single agents or in multidrug combinations. Resistance to HMA is not uncommon, and it can result due to several tumor cellular adaptations. Several clinical and genomic factors have been identified as predictors of HMA resistance. However, the management of MDS/AML patients after the failure of HMA remains challenging in the absence of standardized guidelines. Indeed, this is an area of active research with several potential therapeutic agents currently under development, some of which have demonstrated therapeutic potential in early clinical trials, especially in cases with particular mutational characteristics. Here, we review the latest findings and give a rational approach for such a challenging scenario.

Current Therapeutic Landscape in Lower Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

OPINION STATEMENT

Lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes are typically characterized by an indolent disease course with a relatively low risk of transformation into acute myeloid leukemia. These patients are classically identified using the revised International Prognostic Scoring System and most likely its molecular version in the near future which may change the paradigm of treatment. The overall goals of care are symptomatic control to reduce transfusion requirements and improve quality of life. Symptomatic anemia is the most common indication to initiate disease-specific therapies after the optimization of supportive measures. Currently, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents remain the standard upfront therapy for anemia, and patients with del(5q) cytogenetic changes can benefit from lenalidomide monotherapy. Other therapeutic options after failure of upfront treatment include luspatercept, hypomethylating agents, and immunosuppressive therapies after taking into account of individualized disease features. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant is the only potentially curative option and is usually reserved for medically fit patients with severe symptomatic cytopenias who failed all standard options and/or the disease is progressing toward higher risk categories. Fortunately, novel investigational therapies are rapidly emerging by targeting different biological processes contributing to MDS pathogenesis, and eligible patients should be managed in clinical trials if available.

Hypomethylating agents for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia: Past discoveries and future directions

Azacitidine and decitabine are hypomethylating agents that have dose-dependent epigenetic and cytotoxic effects and are widely used in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this review, we discuss the path to regulatory approval of azacitidine and decitabine, highlighting the substantial efforts that have been made to optimize the dosing schedule and administration of these drugs, including the development of new, oral formulations of both agents. We also review novel combination strategies that are being investigated in ongoing clinical trials for patients with MDS and AML, as well as efforts to expand the current indications of these agents.

Thrombocytopenia in Patients With Myelofibrosis: A Practical Management Guide

Patients with myelofibrosis (MF) frequently develop thrombocytopenia as a consequence of bone marrow fibrosis, splenic sequestration, and myelosuppression from an inflammatory microenvironmental milieu. Thrombocytopenia occurs frequently at diagnosis, worsens with disease progression, is an independent adverse prognostic factor, and limits effective dosing of JAK2 inhibitors. Recently, pacritinib was approved for patients with MF and extreme thrombocytopenia. However, this JAK2/IRAK1 inhibitor is not primarily used to attain improvement in platelet count. In this narrative review, we discuss strategies to specifically address thrombocytopenia in MF patients including immunomodulatory drugs, synthetic androgens, hypomethylating agents and splenectomy, all of which have only modest efficacy in alleviating thrombocytopenia. We also detail transfusion approaches, including diagnostic and therapeutic consideration for platelet transfusion refractoriness. We end by discussing novel therapies, including TGFβ traps and recombinant pentraxin-2, which may increase platelet counts in MF patients. Despite recent therapeutic advancements in MF, there remains a near paucity of agents that can effectively alleviate thrombocytopenia.

The genetics of myelodysplastic syndromes and the opportunities for tailored treatments

Genomic instability, microenvironmental aberrations, and somatic mutations contribute to the phenotype of myelodysplastic syndrome and the risk for transformation to AML. Genes involved in RNA splicing, DNA methylation, histone modification, the cohesin complex, transcription, DNA damage response pathway, signal transduction and other pathways constitute recurrent mutational targets in MDS. RNA-splicing and DNA methylation mutations seem to occur early and are reported as driver mutations in over 50% of MDS patients. The improved understanding of the molecular landscape of MDS has led to better disease and risk classification, leading to novel therapeutic opportunities. Based on these findings, novel agents are currently under preclinical and clinical development and expected to improve the clinical outcome of patients with MDS in the upcoming years. This review provides a comprehensive update of the normal gene function as well as the impact of mutations in the pathogenesis, deregulation, diagnosis, and prognosis of MDS, focuses on the most recent advances of the genetic basis of myelodysplastic syndromes and their clinical relevance, and the latest targeted therapeutic approaches including investigational and approved agents for MDS.

A Novel CpG Methylation Risk Indicator for Predicting Prognosis in Bladder Cancer

Purpose

Bladder cancer (BLCA) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. In a large proportion of BLCA patients, disease recurs and/or progress after resection, which remains a major clinical issue in BLCA management. Therefore, it is vital to identify prognostic biomarkers for treatment stratification. We investigated the efficiency of CpG methylation for the potential to be a prognostic biomarker for patients with BLCA.

Patients and Methods

Overall, 357 BLCA patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were randomly separated into the training and internal validation cohorts. Least absolute shrinkage and selector operation (LASSO) and support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) were used to select candidate CpGs and build the methylation risk score model, which was validated for its prognostic value in the validation cohort by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Hazard curves were generated to reveal the risk nodes throughout the follow-up. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was used to reveal the potential biological pathways associated with the methylation model. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and western blotting were performed to verify the expression level of the methylated genes.

Results

After incorporating the CpGs obtained by the two algorithms, CpG methylation of eight genes corresponding to TNFAIP8L3, KRTDAP, APC, ZC3H3, COL9A2, SLCO4A1, POU3F3, and ADARB2 were prominent candidate predictors in establishing a methylation risk score for BLCA (MRSB), which was used to divide the patients into high- and low-risk progression groups (p < 0.001). The effectiveness of the MRSB was validated in the internal cohort (p < 0.001). In the MRSB high-risk group, the hazard curve exhibited an initial wide, high peak within 10 months after treatment, whereas some gentle peaks around 2 years were noted. Furthermore, a nomogram comprising MRSB, age, sex, and tumor clinical stage was developed to predict the individual progression risk, and it performed well. Survival analysis implicated the effectiveness of MRSB, which remains significant in all the subgroup analysis based on the clinical features. A functional analysis of MRSB and the corresponding genes revealed potential pathways affecting tumor progression. Validation of quantitative real-time PCR and western blotting revealed that TNFAIP8L3 was upregulated in the BLCA tissues.

Conclusion

We developed the MRSB, an eight-gene-based methylation signature, which has great potential to be used to predict the post-surgery progression risk of BLCA.

Current Therapy of the Patients with MDS: Walking towards Personalized Therapy

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, dysplasia and peripheral cytopenias. Nowadays, MDS therapy is selected based on risk. The goals of therapy are different in low-risk and high-risk patients. In low-risk MDS, the goal is to decrease transfusion needs and to increase the quality of life. Currently, available drugs for newly diagnosed low-risk MDS include growth factor support, lenalidomide and immunosuppressive therapy. Additionally, luspatercept has recently been added to treat patients with MDS with ring sideroblasts, who are not candidates or have lost the response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Treatment of high-risk patients is aimed to improve survival. To date, the only currently approved treatments are hypomethylating agents and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, the future for MDS patients is promising. In recent years, we are witnessing the emergence of multiple treatment combinations based on hypomethylating agents (pevonedistat, magrolimab, eprenetapopt, venetoclax) that have proven to be effective in MDS, even those with high-risk factors. Furthermore, the approval in the US of an oral hypomethylating agent opens the door to exclusively oral combinations for these patients and their consequent impact on the quality of life of these patients. Relapsed and refractory patients remain an unmet clinical need. We need more drugs and clinical trials for this profile of patients who have a dismal prognosis.

Clinical effectiveness of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors and lenalidomide in older patients with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts: a population-based study in the United States

Existing studies regarding the role of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi) and lenalidomide in refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts (RARS) are limited. Using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-medicare database, we assembled a population-based cohort of older adults diagnosed with non-del(5q) lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes during 2007-2015. Of 2167 patients, 30% had RARS. About 16% of RARS and non- ring sideroblasts (RS) patients received DNMTi. RARS patients were more likely to receive lenalidomide (11.1% vs. 7.1%, p < 0.01). Among patients who were transfusion-dependent at treatment initiation, 55.6% of those treated with DNMTi only and 42.5% treated with lenalidomide only achieved red blood cell transfusion independence (RBC-TI) for a median duration of 21 and 12 weeks, respectively. RS status did not impact rate of RBC-TI. RARS patients had a significantly better survival, and the median survival of RARS patients varied by treatment group. In this population-based study of older RARS patients, DNMTi and lenalidomide were clinically active.

High-dose regimens of hypomethylating agents promote transfusion independence in IPSS lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a meta-analysis of prospective studies

The hypomethylating agents (HMAs) azacytidine (AZA) and decitabine (DAC) are usually administered after the failure of erythropoietin-stimulating agents for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS). However, it is unclear whether one of these HMAs has superior efficacy and safety. This was investigated in the present study by means of a meta-analysis of prospective studies published between January 1990 and July 2020 in PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases; 19 studies with 1076 patients were included in the final analysis. The transfusion independence (TI) rate (66.7% [95% confidence interval: 41.7%-87.4%]) was higher with AZA 75 mg/m²/day for 7 days than with other regimens (all p<0.025). The proportion of patients with intermediate-1 risk influenced overall survival (p<0.05). There were no differences in treatment response, survival, and adverse event rates between patients treated with AZA (75 mg/m²/day for 5 days) and DAC (20 mg/m²/day for 3 days), although the latter group had a higher rate of grade 3/4 anemia (15.8% vs 0.0%; p<0.0001) and lower rate of diarrhea/constipation (6.9% vs 25.0%; p=0.002). Thus, both HMAs at high doses achieved reasonable response and TI rates with acceptable side effects, but did not prolong the overall survival in LR-MDS patients.

Lower-dose decitabine improves clinical response compared with best supportive care in lower-risk MDS patients: a prospective, multicenter phase 2 study

Purpose: To explore the efficacy and safety of lower-dose decitabine in patients with lower-risk MDS, a prospective multicenter phase II study was conducted to compare decitabine with the best supportive care (BSC).

Methods: Patients diagnosed with lower-risk MDS from September 2013 to August 2018 were assigned to the decitabine group or the BSC group. Decitabine (12 mg/m²/day) was administered over 1 hour/day for 5 consecutive days in a 4-week cycle. BSC, including growth factors, transfusion, thalidomide, lenalidomide, and immunosuppressive agents were given consecutively. The endpoints included the proportion of patients who achieved overall response (OR) in the first 2 or 3 courses, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: A total of recruited 82 patients were analyzed. In the decitabine group, 65.9% (27/41) achieved OR after 2 or 3 cycles of treatment, compared with 22.0% (9/41) in the BSC group (p <0.01). Besides, 44.0% (11/25) in the decitabine group became independent of RBC/Platelets transfusion, compared with 27.8% (5/18) in the BSC group. Patients with gene mutation and treated with decitabine achieved a higher OR rate, compared with those without gene mutation [72.0% (18/25) vs 11.5% (3/26), p <0.01]. There was no significant difference in the median EFS between the decitabine and BSC groups (20.6 vs 14.3 months respectively, p = 0.665). In the decitabine group, the most significant adverse events were infections of any grades or neutropenic fever (46.3%, 19/41) and one patient (4.2%) died of acute cerebral infarction within 6 weeks of treatment.

Conclusion: Lower-dose decitabine demonstrated promising clinical response with acceptable toxicity profiles in patients with low- and intermediate 1-risk MDS. A higher response rate to decitabine was observed in patients with mutated genes. Therefore, lower-dose decitabine can be advocated for patients with low-risk MDS and mutated genes.

A novel cell-free DNA methylation-based model improves the early detection of colorectal cancer

Screening for early‐stage disease is vital for reducing colorectal cancer (CRC)‐related mortality. Methylation of circulating tumor DNA has been previously used for various types of cancer screening. A novel cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) methylation‐based model which can improve the early detection of CRC is warranted. For our study, we collected 313 tissue and 577 plasma samples from patients with CRC, advanced adenoma (AA), non‐AA and healthy controls. After quality control, 187 tissue DNA samples (91 non‐malignant tissue from CRC patients, 26 AA and 70 CRC) and 489 plasma cfDNA samples were selected for targeted DNA methylation sequencing. We further developed a cfDNA methylation model based on 11 methylation biomarkers for CRC detection in the training cohort (area under curve [AUC] = 0.90 (0.85–0.94]) and verified the model in the validation cohort (AUC = 0.92 [0.88–0.96]). The cfDNA methylation model robustly detected patients pre‐diagnosed with early‐stage CRC (AUC = 0.90 [0.86–0.95]) or AA (AUC = 0.85 [0.78–0.91]). Here we established and validated a non‐invasive cfDNA methylation model based on 11 DNA methylation biomarkers for the detection of early‐stage CRC and AA. The utilization of the model in clinical practice may contribute to the early diagnosis of CRC.

Evaluation of Reduced-Dose Decitabine and Azacitidine for Treating Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Retrospective Study

Background

Hypomethylating agents (HMA) are considered the first-line therapy for high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, as the efficacy and safety of rational dosing regimens are lacking, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of reduced-dose azacitidine (AZA) vs. decitabine (DAC) in adult MDS patients.

Material/Methods

This retrospective study was conducted at the Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, for hospitalized MDS patients diagnosed (WHO 2008 classification criteria) from May 2006 to February 2020. These AZA- and DCA-naive patients treated with AZA 100 mg/(m²·day) for 5 days to 7 days or DAC 20 mg/(m²·day) for 3 days to 4 days, or 20 mg/(m²·day) 1 day/week for 3 weeks/month were assessed for treatment responses and adverse events.

Results

Of the 158 enrolled MDS patients, 120 and 38 patients were administered reduced-dose DAC and AZA, respectively. All the patients received a median of 2 treatment cycles. The overall response rates (ORR) were 50.0% and 73.3% in the AZA and DAC groups, respectively (P=0.007). The percentage of platelet transfusion dependence in the AZA group was lower than the DAC group (P=0.026). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that the DAC treatment was a significant factor for improved responses (OR 2.928; 95% CI 1.267–6.896; P=0.012), and the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was a predictor of the ORR (OR 0.725; 95% CI 0.558–0.898; P=0.008). Neutropenia (P=0.016) and infection (P=0.032) incidences were higher in the DAC group.

Conclusions

The reduced-dose DAC group demonstrated a better response than the AZA group in MDS patients with different prognostic risks. The patients’ pre-treatment ANC was a significant factor associated with the ORR.

Molecular Pathogenesis and Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal hematological disorders arising from hematopoietic stem cells that have accumulated various genetic abnormalities. MDS are heterogeneous in nature but uniformly characterized by chronic and progressive cytopenia from ineffective hematopoiesis, dysplasia in single or multiple lineages, and transformation to acute leukemia in a subset of patients. The genomic landscape revealed by next-generation sequencing has provided a comprehensive picture of the molecular pathways involved in MDS pathogenesis. Recurrent mutational targets in MDS are the genes involved in RNA splicing, DNA methylation, histone modification, transcription, signal transduction, cohesin complex and DNA repair. Sequential acquisition of mutations in these sets of genes serves as a driver for the initiation, clonal evolution and progression of MDS. Based on these findings, novel agents targeting driver mutations of MDS are currently under development and expected to improve the clinical outcome of MDS in the coming decades.

Epigenetic signature predicts overall survival clear cell renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Recently, increasing study have found that DNA methylation plays an important role in tumor, including clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

METHODS

We used the DNA methylation dataset of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database to construct a 31-CpG-based signature which could accurately predict the overall survival of ccRCC. Meanwhile, we constructed a nomogram to predict the prognosis of patients with ccRCC.

RESULT

Through LASSO Cox regression analysis, we obtained the 31-CpG-based epigenetic signature which were significantly related to the prognosis of ccRCC. According to the epigenetic signature, patients were divided into two groups with high and low risk, and the predictive value of the epigenetic signature was verified by other two sets. In the training set, hazard ratio (HR) = 13.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 8.0-21.2, P < 0.0001; testing set: HR = 4.1, CI 2.2-7.7, P < 0.0001; entire set: HR = 7.2, CI 4.9-10.6, P < 0.0001, Moreover, combined with clinical indicators, the prediction of 5-year survival of ccRCC reached an AUC of 0.871.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study constructed a 31-CpG-based epigenetic signature that could accurately predicted overall survival of ccRCC and staging progression of ccRCC. At the same time, we constructed a nomogram, which may facilitate the prediction of prognosis for patients with ccRCC.

Myelodysplastic syndromes: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a very heterogeneous group of myeloid disorders characterized by peripheral blood cytopenias and increased risk of transformation to acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Myelodysplastic syndromes occur more frequently in older males and in individuals with prior exposure to cytotoxic therapy.

DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis of MDS is based on morphological evidence of dysplasia upon visual examination of a bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. Information obtained from additional studies such as karyotype, flow cytometry and molecular genetics is usually complementary and may help refine diagnosis.

RISK-STRATIFICATION

Prognosis of patients with MDS can be calculated using a number of scoring systems. In general, all these scoring systems include analysis of peripheral cytopenias, percentage of blasts in the bone marrow and cytogenetic characteristics. The most commonly accepted system is the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R). Somatic mutations can help define prognosis and therapy.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Therapy is selected based on risk, transfusion needs, percent of bone marrow blasts, cytogenetic and mutational profiles, comorbidities, potential for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) and prior exposure to hypomethylating agents (HMA). Goals of therapy are different in lower-risk patients than in higher-risk individuals and in those with HMA failure. In lower-risk MDS, the goal is to decrease transfusion needs and transformation to higher risk disease or AML, as well as to improve survival. In higher-risk disease, the goal is to prolong survival. In 2020, we witnessed an explosion of new agents and investigational approaches. Current available therapies include growth factor support, lenalidomide, HMAs, intensive chemotherapy and alloSCT. Novel therapeutics approved in 2020 are luspatercept and the oral HMA ASTX727. At the present time, there are no approved interventions for patients with progressive or refractory disease particularly after HMA-based therapy. Options include participation in a clinical trial, cytarabine-based therapy or alloSCT.

Very-low-dose decitabine treatment for patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: a retrospective analysis of thirteen cases

Decitabine is a hypomethylating drug that is used to treat myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) at a recommended dose and schedule (20 mg/m² per day, for 5 consecutive days). However, due to its relatively high incidence of side effects and its effects on neoplastic cells, many studies have begun to explore the clinical application of a low dose of decitabine for treating MDS. In this retrospective study, we examined the effects of a very-low-dose decitabine schedule for treating MDS. A total of 13 patients diagnosed with de novo MDS received a schedule of intravenous decitabine administration at 6 mg/m² per day for 7 days, repeated every 4 weeks. The complete response rate was 30.8%, and the overall response rate was 69.2%. In patients with complete remission, the median time to granulocyte recovery greater than 0.5 × 10⁹/L during complete remission (CR) was 15 days. In patients with remission, the median time to granulocyte recovery greater than 0.5 × 10⁹/L was 10.5 days. The 1-year survival rate was 72.7% and the median survival was 28.0 months. In summary, we demonstrated that a very-low-dose decitabine schedule has an appreciable response and survival rate, as well as appreciable tolerance and medical compliance for treating MDS.

Content validity of patient-reported outcomes for use in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

BACKGROUND

The lower-risk (low and intermediate-1 risk based on IPSS) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) has a negative impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) instruments, which are used to collect patients' HRQoL data, should have established content validity in the target population to ensure that the instrument is comprehensive and comprehensible. The present study was conducted to evaluate the content validity of the Quality of Life in Myelodysplasia Scale (QUALMS) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) PRO instruments in patients with lower-risk MDS.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional, qualitative study, 16 patients aged ≥18 years with lower-risk MDS, who were RBC transfusion dependent, literate and fluent in US-English were interviewed. Interviews were semi-structured comprising of two parts: concept elicitation (CE) explored symptoms and impacts important to patients, and cognitive debriefing (CD) assessed understanding and relevance of the QUALMS and FACT-An. A conceptual model was developed, which was used to map the concepts that emerged during CE onto the QUALMS and FACT-An to assess concept coverage and suitability of the instruments.

RESULTS

The median age of participants was 67.5 years (range: 51-91), with half being female (n = 8). Nine (56.2%) participants had intermediate-1-risk MDS and 10 (62.5%) were relapsed or refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent treatment. Fatigue/tiredness (100.0%), shortness of breath (87.5%), weakness (81.2%), and low energy (75.0%) were reported most commonly and were the most bothersome symptoms as well. Of seven high-level HRQoL domains identified, activities of daily living (n = 16, 100.0%), physical functioning (n = 15, 93.8%), emotional wellbeing (n = 13, 81.3%), social functioning (n = 12, 75.0%), sleep disturbance (n = 9, 56.3%), and impact on work (n = 9, 56.3%) were the most commonly reported. For CD, the QUALMS and FACT-An were found to be mostly relevant and very well understood; response options were easy to use, and recall period was appropriate.

CONCLUSION

Both QUALMS and FACT-An demonstrated a strong face and content validity in patients with lower-risk MDS, suggesting that these instruments are appropriate for assessing HRQoL in this population.

Representation of therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome in clinical trials over the past 20 years

Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (t-MDS), defined as MDS occurring after previous exposure to chemotherapy or radiotherapy, constitutes 10% to 20% of all MDS diagnoses. t-MDS patients tend to have higher-risk disease and worse outcomes than de novo MDS patients and are often excluded from therapeutic clinical trials. To explore this further, we extracted clinical trials across all status types registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from 1999 to 2018 studying untreated MDS patients. Using these specific search criteria, we analyzed 317 therapeutic MDS trials based on study status, therapeutic indication, eligibility criteria, and sponsor type to examine if these factors influenced t-MDS patient inclusion. Only 18 studies (5.7%) accrued 231 t-MDS patients in total, representing 3.2% of the total accrued MDS trial patient population. Fewer t-MDS patients were accrued in therapeutic trials sponsored by pharmaceutical sponsors vs nonpharmaceutical sponsors (2.8% vs 4.0%; P = .0073). This pattern of exclusion continues in actively enrolling trials; only 5 (10%) of 49 studies specifically mention the inclusion of t-MDS patients in their eligibility criteria. Our results indicate that therapeutic MDS trials seem to exclude t-MDS patients, rendering study results less applicable to this subset of MDS patients, who often have poor outcomes. Our study emphasizes the importance of the recent focus by National Cancer Institute cooperative groups and societies to broaden eligibility criteria for all patients.

Myelodysplastic syndromes: moving towards personalized management

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) share their origin in the hematopoietic stem cell but have otherwise very heterogeneous biological and genetic characteristics. Clinical features are dominated by cytopenia and a substantial risk for progression to acute myeloid leukemia. According to the World Health Organization, MDS is defined by cytopenia, bone marrow dysplasia and certain karyotypic abnormalities. The understanding of disease pathogenesis has undergone major development with the implementation of next-generation sequencing and a closer integration of morphology, cytogenetics and molecular genetics is currently paving the way for improved classification and prognostication. True precision medicine is still in the future for MDS and the development of novel therapeutic compounds with a propensity to markedly change patients' outcome lags behind that for many other blood cancers. Treatment of higher-risk MDS is dominated by monotherapy with hypomethylating agents but novel combinations are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. Agents that stimulate erythropoiesis continue to be first-line treatment for the anemia of lower-risk MDS but luspatercept has shown promise as second-line therapy for sideroblastic MDS and lenalidomide is an established second-line treatment for del(5q) lower-risk MDS. The only potentially curative option for MDS is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, until recently associated with a relatively high risk of transplant-related mortality and relapse. However, recent studies show increased cure rates due to better tools to target the malignant clone with less toxicity. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current status of the clinical evaluation, biology and therapeutic interventions for this spectrum of disorders.

Myelodysplastic syndromes: a review of therapeutic progress over the past 10 years

INTRODUCTION

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) represent a range of bone marrow disorders, with patients affected by cytopenias and risk of progression to AML. There are limited therapeutic options available for patients, including hypomethylating agents (azacitidine/decitabine), growth factor support, lenalidomide, and allogeneic stem cell transplant.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of the progress made over the past decade for emerging therapies for lower- and higher-risk MDS (MDS-HR). We also cover advances in prognostication, supportive care, and use of allogeneic SCT in MDS.

EXPERT OPINION

While there have been no FDA-approved therapies for MDS in the past decade, we anticipate the approval of luspatercept based on results from the MEDALIST trial for patients with lower-risk MDS (MDS-LR) and ringed sideroblasts who have failed or are ineligible for erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs). With growing knowledge of the biologic and molecular mechanisms underlying MDS, it is anticipated that new therapies will be approved in the coming years.

Novel combinations to improve hematopoiesis in myelodysplastic syndrome

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) represents a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic disorders, which is characterized by cytopenias in the peripheral blood and bone marrow dysplasia due to ineffective hematopoiesis. Patients with MDS have an increased risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although the molecular basis of MDS is heterogeneous, several studies demonstrated the significant contribution of the dysregulated immune system in accelerating MDS progression. The immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment is shown to induce tolerance of MDS blasts, which may result in a further accumulation of genetic aberrations and lead to the disease progression. Increasing evidence shows an expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), a population of inflammation-associated immature cells, in patients with MDS. Interestingly, the increased MDSC populations are shown to be correlated with a risk of disease progression in MDS. In addition, MDS is highly prevalent in aged individuals with non-hematology co-morbidities who are fragile for chemotherapy. Increasing research effort is devoting to identify novel agents to specific targeting of the MDSC population for MDS treatment.

Treatment of Acquired Sideroblastic Anemias

Sideroblastic anemias are a heterogeneous group of disorders unified by the presence of abnormal erythroid precursors with perinuclear mitochondrial iron deposition in the bone marrow. Based on etiology, they are classified into clonal and nonclonal. Clonal sideroblastic anemias refer to myeloid neoplasms with ring sideroblasts (RS) and frequently have somatic perturbations in the SF3B1 gene. Anemia is a major cause of morbidity in patients, and restoration of effective erythropoiesis is a major treatment goal. Morbidity includes transfusion and disease-related complications. This article focuses on treatment of acquired sideroblastic anemias and highlights areas of future investigation.

Comparison between 5-day decitabine and 7-day azacitidine for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with poor prognostic features: a retrospective multicentre cohort study

Numerous studies have analysed the clinical efficacies of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, reports that compare the two HMAs, decitabine and azacitidine, in patients with lower-risk (low and intermediate-1) MDS are limited. We compared 5-day decitabine and 7-day azacitidine regimens in terms of treatment responses, survival outcomes, and adverse events in patients with lower-risk MDS with poor prognostic features. The overall response rates (ORRs) were 67.2% and 44.0% in the patients treated with decitabine and azacitidine, respectively (P = 0.014). While the median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly better in the patients treated with decitabine than in those treated with azacitidine (P = 0.019), no significant differences in event-free and overall survival rates were observed between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that compared with azacitidine treatment, decitabine treatment is significantly associated with a higher ORR (P = 0.026) and longer PFS (P = 0.037). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of grade 3 or higher haematologic adverse events in response to the two HMAs. In conclusion, in lower-risk MDS, especially with poor prognostic features, ORR and PFS were significantly better with 5-day decitabine treatment than with 7-day azacitidine treatment, with comparable safety.

Lowering the boom on lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

Lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes are defined using prognostic scoring systems that incorporate data on bone marrow blast percentage, degree and numbers of cytopenias, and cytogenetic abnormalities. Increasingly, these are incorporating molecular abnormalities to further refine risk. Therapy is geared toward predominating cytopenias, with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents luspatercept and lenalidomide used to ameliorate anemia, romiplostim and eltrombopag tackling thrombocytopenia, and hypomethylating agents and antithymocyte globulin palliating pancytopenia. Newer agents on the horizon are abrogating the downstream sequelae of specific molecular mutations. One challenge for the future is in further modifying response criteria to align with improvements that are clinically meaningful to patients.

Clinical update on hypomethylating agents

Hypomethylating agents (HMAs), azacitidine and decitabine, are standards of care in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and in acute myeloid leukemia patients ineligible for intensive therapy. Over the last 10 years, research efforts have sought to better understand their mechanism of action, both at the molecular and cellular level. These efforts have yet to robustly identify biomarkers for these agents. The clinical activity of HMAs in myeloid neoplasms has been firmly established now but still remains of limited magnitude. Besides optimized use at different stages of the disease, most of the expected clinical progress with HMAs will come from the development of second-generation compounds orally available and/or with improved pharmacokinetics, and from the search, so far mostly empirical, of HMA-based synergistic drug combinations.

Treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome in the era of next-generation sequencing

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is rapidly changing the clinical care of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). NGS can be used for various applications: (i) in the diagnostic process to discriminate between MDS and other diseases such as aplastic anaemia, myeloproliferative disorders and idiopathic cytopenias; (ii) for classification, for example, where the presence of SF3B1 mutation is one criterion for the ring sideroblast anaemia subgroups in the World Health Organization 2016 classification; (iii) for identification of patients suitable for targeted therapy (e.g. IDH1/2 inhibitors); (iv) for prognostication, for example, where specific mutations (e.g. TP53 and RUNX1) are associated with inferior prognosis, whereas others (e.g. SF3B1) are associated with superior prognosis; and (v) to monitor patients for progression or treatment failure. Most commonly, targeted sequencing for genes (normally 50-100 genes) reported to be recurrently mutated in myeloid disease is used. At present, NGS is rarely incorporated into clinical guidelines although an increasing number of studies have demonstrated the benefit of using NGS in the clinical management of MDS patients.

[A preliminary study on the outcome of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome by low-dose decitabine]

目的

评价小剂量地西他滨治疗较低危骨髓增生异常综合征（MDS）患者的初步疗效及安全性，探讨MDS相关基因突变的临床意义。

方法

纳入浙江省4所医院收治的62例较低危MDS患者，治疗分2组，地西他滨组（地西他滨12 mg·m⁻²·d⁻¹，连续5 d）和支持治疗组，检测与MDS预后相关的15项基因突变情况。比较两组患者的总体有效率（ORR）和无进展生存（PFS）时间，分析其与基因突变的相关性。

结果

62例患者中，可评估患者51例，其中地西他滨组24例，支持治疗组27例。与支持治疗组相比，地西他滨组的ORR（66.7%对29.6%，χ²=6.996，P=0.008）和中位PFS时间显著改善（未达到对13.7个月，P=0.037）。51例患者中20例（39.2%）检测到基因突变阳性，其中4例患者单纯SF3B1阳性，均在支持治疗组。与基因突变阴性患者相比，16例基因突变阳性（除单纯SF3B1阳性）患者中位PFS时间显著缩短（9.2个月对18.5个月，P=0.008），其中地西他滨组8例患者中6例有效，支持治疗组无一例（0/8）有效。地西他滨治疗期间主要不良反应为3~4级粒细胞减少（45.8%），3~4级感染发生率为33.3%（8/24）。

结论

该研究小系列患者的初步结果表明应用小剂量地西他滨治疗较低危MDS患者可能有效，对于基因突变患者也可获益，且患者耐受，值得临床试验进一步明确其临床意义。

Prognostic Significance of Platelet Recovery in Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Severe Thrombocytopenia

Severe thrombocytopenia is a serious condition that frequently arises in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and is associated with poor prognosis. Few studies have investigated the prognostic significance of platelet recovery in patients with MDS having thrombocytopenia. We retrospectively analyzed 117 patients with de novo MDS complicated with thrombocytopenia (platelet count [PLT] < 100 × 10⁹/L). Patients received decitabine treatment (schedule A) or decitabine followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT; schedule B). Severe thrombocytopenia (PLT < 20 × 10⁹/L), identified in 31 (26.5%) patients, was associated with poor survival. The PLT increased significantly after decitabine treatment in the 2 groups. Patients with thrombocytopenia treated with schedule B showed a superior prognosis compared to those treated with schedule A. On analysis of overall survival by platelet response in patients with severe thrombocytopenia, a significant survival advantage was observed in patients who achieved a platelet response, who would further benefit from allo-HSCT following decitabine therapy. The results indicate a potentially favorable prognostic impact of platelet response achieved with decitabine. Patients with MDS having severe thrombocytopenia may benefit from the effective recovery of platelets and further allo-HSCT following decitabine therapy.

Phase I study of ruxolitinib in previously treated patients with low or intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome with evidence of NF-kB activation

Therapeutic options for patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who have failed prior therapies are limited particularly after hypomethylating agent. Several studies have indicated that deregulation of innate immunity signaling is critical in the pathogenesis of MDS. This process involves Toll-like receptor stimulation, cytokine overexpression, and nuclear factor-kB (NF-kB) activation. Since ruxolitinib, a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, suppresses NF-kB expression, we conducted a phase 1 dose-escalation study to determine the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in previously treated lower-risk MDS patients with evidence of NF-kB activation. Nineteen patients, 8 with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and 11 with MDS, were enrolled. No dose limiting toxicity was observed and the maximum tolerated dose was 20 mg twice daily. Responses were restricted to MDS patients with an overall response rate of 22% [hematological improvement in platelets (HI-P) = 2, hematological improvement in erythrocytes (HI-E) = 1, partial cytogenetic response (PCyR) = 1]. Of these patients, 2 relapsed (HI-P and PCyR) and 2 continue to be in HI-P and HI-E, respectively, with ongoing therapy. Meaningful improvement in bone marrow dysplasia was only seen in a patient who achieved HI-E. Phosphorylated p65 (pp65) decreased in 6 of 15 patients (40%) including the 2 patients with continued response to treatment and increased in a patient who relapsed after a short-lived HI-P. This suggests potential correlation between reduction in pp65 expression and response duration. In conclusion, ruxolitinib was well-tolerated in previously treated lower-risk MDS patients with evidence of NF-kB activation and resulted in low but significant frequency of responses. (NCT01895842).

Incidence and risk of hematologic toxicities with hypomethylating agents in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukopenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are believed to have reliable efficacy in treating myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Meanwhile, the adverse events of HMAs have become an increasing concern. There is, however, no systematic meta-analysis available to evaluate overall hematologic toxicities for HMAs. In this meta-analysis, we aim to determine the risk of hematologic toxicities in patients treated with HMAs.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Clinical Trials. gov databases incepted to February 2018. All phase II and III trials meeting the inclusion criteria included adequate safety data. We calculated the relative risk (RR) of high-grade hematologic toxicities (HTEs) with corresponding 95% CI using Review Manager. The incidences of HTEs were also evaluated by R. Heterogeneity was calculated and reported mainly via I analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 2337 MDS or AML patients from 14 studies were identified in this meta-analysis. The overall incidences of high-grade hematologic toxicities in patients who received HMAs were: 27% of the patients with anemia, 45% with neutropenia, 38% with thrombocytopenia, and 25% with febrile neutropenia, respectively. There was a significantly increased RR of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia using HMAs, in comparison with conventional care regimens (CCR) based on the drug type (decitabine vs azacitidine).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the use of HMAs are associated with an increased risk of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in MDS or AML patients, and our results also demonstrate that HMAs exposure does not significantly increase the risk of high-grade anemia, leukopenia, or febrile neutropenia compared with CCR.

Sotatercept with long-term extension for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a phase 2, dose-ranging trial

BACKGROUND

Myelodysplastic syndromes are characterised by ineffective erythropoiesis leading to anaemia. Sotatercept (ACE-011) is a novel activin receptor type IIA fusion protein that acts as a ligand trap to neutralise negative regulators of late-stage erythropoiesis. The aim of the study was to establish a safe and effective dose of sotatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

METHODS

This open-label, multicentre, dose-ranging, phase 2 trial took place at 11 treatment centres in the USA and France. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had International Prognostic Scoring System-defined low-risk or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, had anaemia requiring red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and were ineligible for, or refractory to, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). Patients were not eligible if they had chromosome 5q deletion myelodysplastic syndromes without documented failure of lenalidomide. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 0·1 or 0·3 mg/kg sotatercept subcutaneously, using a permuted-block method with stratification for serum erythropoietin concentration and transfusion burden. Patients were assigned to 0·5, 1·0, and 2·0 mg/kg groups in a non-randomised fashion. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved haematological improvement-erythroid (HI-E), according to International Working Group 2006 criteria. Efficacy and safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01736683 and at EU Clinical Trials Register, number 2012-002601-22, and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 5, 2012, and July 22, 2015, 74 patients were enrolled into the study (seven to receive 0·1 mg/kg sotatercept, six to 0·3 mg/kg, 21 to 0·5 mg/kg, 35 to 1·0 mg/kg, and five to 2·0 mg/kg). 36 (49%; 95% CI 38-60) of 74 patients achieved HI-E; 29 (47%; 95% CI 35-59) of 62 patients with a high transfusion burden achieved HI-E (RBC-transfusion reduction from baseline of 4 or more units for at least 56 days), and seven (58%; 95% CI 32-81) of 12 patients with a low transfusion burden achieved HI-E (haemoglobin increase of 1·5 g/dL or more sustained for at least 56 days in the absence of transfusions). The most commonly reported adverse events were fatigue in 19 (26%) of 74 patients and peripheral oedema in 18 (24%) of 74 patients. Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 25 (34%) of 74 patients; four (5%) patients had grade 3-4 TEAEs that were considered to be treatment related. The most common grade 3-4 TEAEs were lipase increase and anaemia, which each occurred in three (4%) of 74 patients. 17 (23%) of 74 patients had at least one serious TEAE, and one patient died from a treatment-emergent subdural haematoma due to a fall.

INTERPRETATION

Sotatercept, a novel activin-receptor fusion protein, was well tolerated and effective for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes in whom previous ESA treatment had failed. Treatment with sotatercept could be beneficial for these patients who have few available treatment options.

FUNDING

Celgene Corporation.

Myelodysplastic syndromes: 2018 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a very heterogeneous group of myeloid disorders characterized by peripheral blood cytopenias and increased risk of transformation to acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). MDS occurs more frequently in older males and in individuals with prior exposure to cytotoxic therapy.

DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis of MDS is based on morphological evidence of dysplasia upon visual examination of a bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. Information obtained from additional studies such as karyotype, flow cytometry or molecular genetics is usually complementary and may help refine diagnosis.

RISK-STRATIFICATION

Prognosis of patients with MDS can be calculated using a number of scoring systems. In general, all these scoring systems include analysis of peripheral cytopenias, percentage of blasts in the bone marrow and cytogenetic characteristics. The most commonly used system is probably the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS). IPSS is now replaced by the revised IPSS-R score. Although not systematically incorporated into new validated prognostic systems, somatic mutations can help define prognosis and should be considered as new prognostic factors.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Therapy is selected based on risk, transfusion needs, percent of bone marrow blasts and cytogenetic and mutational profiles. Goals of therapy are different in lower risk patients than in higher risk. In lower risk, the goal is to decrease transfusion needs and transformation to higher risk disease or AML, as well as to improve survival. In higher risk, the goal is to prolong survival. Current available therapies include growth factor support, lenalidomide, hypomethylating agents, intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The use of lenalidomide has significant clinical activity in patients with lower risk disease, anemia and a chromosome 5 alteration. 5-azacitidine and decitabine have activity in both lower and higher-risk MDS. 5-azacitidine has been shown to improve survival in higher risk MDS. A number of new molecular lesions have been described in MDS that may serve as new therapeutic targets or aid in the selection of currently available agents. Additional supportive care measures may include the use of prophylactic antibiotics and iron chelation.

MANAGEMENT OF PROGRESSIVE OR REFRACTORY DISEASE

At the present time there are no approved interventions for patients with progressive or refractory disease particularly after hypomethylating based therapy. Options include participation in a clinical trial or cytarabine based therapy and stem cell transplantation.

MAGE-A11 is activated through TFCP2/ZEB1 binding sites de-methylation as well as histone modification and facilitates ESCC tumor growth

Recently, we have reported that the product of Melanoma Antigens Genes (MAGE) family member MAGE-A11 is an independent poor prognostic marker for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the reason how MAGE-A11 is activated in ESCC progression still remains unclear. In the current study, we demonstrated that DNA methylation and the subsequent histone posttranslational modifications play crucial roles in the regulation of MAGE-A11 in ESCC progression. We found that the methylation rate of TFCP2/ZEB1 binding site on MAGE-A11 promoter in ESCC tissues and cells is higher than the normal esophageal epithelial tissues and cells. Transcription factors TFCP2 and ZEB1 directly bind MAGE-A11 promoter and regulate the endogenous MAGE-A11 expression in a methylation-dependent manner in ESCC cells. Following MAGE-A11 promoter methylation, the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 was found to bind the methylated MAGE-A11 promoter to mediate histone deactylation by recruiting HDAC1 and HDAC2. Simultaneously, histone inactivation marks including H3K27me3 as well as H3K9me3 were increased, whereas histone activation mark H3K4me3 was decreased. HDAC inhibitor Trichostatin A (TSA) increased DNA methylase inhibitor Decitabine (DAC)-induced MAGE-A11 expression. siRNA-mediated knockdown of histone methltransferase EZH2 or DZNep (a EZH2 inhibitor) treatment increased DAC-induced MAGE-A11 expression. Our results indicate that MAGE-A11 is activated through DNA demethylation, histone acetylation and histone methylation in ESCC, and its activation promotes ESCC tumor growth.

Very-Low-Dose Decitabine Is Effective in Treating Intermediate- or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Nowadays, the regular recommended dose of decitabine for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is 20 mg/m2/day for 5 consecutive days with a relatively high incidence of treatment-related morbidities and costs. In this study, a retrospective and multicenter analysis was performed to explore the very-low-dose decitabine schedule for the treatment of patients with IPSS intermediate- or high-risk MDS. A total of 31 newly diagnosed MDS cases from 14 hospitals in Beijing received decitabine monotherapy (decitabine 6 mg/m2/day intravenously for 7 consecutive days, repeated every 4 weeks). With a medium follow-up of 4 months, 10 patients achieved complete remission (32.3%), 8 (25.8%) partial remission, and 3 (9.7%) hematological improvement. The overall response rate (ORR) was 67.7%. Rates of 21.7% for severe infections and 11.6% for severe bleedings were observed among all courses. The median cost of each course was USD 5,300, 3,000, 2,900, and 2,000, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified bone marrow blast cells ≥10% and a Charlson comorbidity index ≥1 as 2 independent factors for efficacy. In conclusion, very-low-dose decitabine showed relatively good efficacy, good tolerance, and low medical cost in the treatment of intermediate- or high-risk MDS. Elderly patients with more than 1 complication or patients with a higher proportion of blast cells may be the most suitable candidates for this regimen.

A comparison of therapeutic dosages of decitabine in treating myelodysplastic syndrome: a meta-analysis

Decitabine is used to treat myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of different dosing regimens of decitabine in treating intermediate and/or high-risk MDS. Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched up to October 23, 2015. Randomized controlled trials, prospective, cohort, and case series studies were included. Fifteen studies were included with a total of 1378 patients. The decitabine 100 mg/m²/course dosing regimen had a greater overall response rate than the 60-75 mg/m²/course (51 vs. 25%; P = 0.003). It also had higher complete response rate compared with the 135 mg/m²/course regimen (24.2 vs.13.7%; P = 0.016). The three dosing regimens were similar with respect to bone marrow complete response and partial response and hematologic improvement (P values > 0.05). Decitabine 135 mg/m²/course regimen had similar hematologic improvement as best supportive care (P = 0.066). The incidence of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, infections, and anemia was similar across treatment groups (range, 31 to 38%; P values ≥ 0.899). The 100 mg/m²/course decitabine regimen showed benefit with respect to overall response rate compared with the 60-75 mg/m²/course regimen, as well as greater improvement in complete response rate compared with the 135 mg/m²/course regimen. All three dosing regimens had similar frequency of adverse events.

Benefits of hypomethylating therapy in IPSS lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients: A retrospective multicenter case series study

We retrospectively analyzed the results of hypomethylating therapy in 586 patients (azacitidine in 423 and decitabine in 163) with International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The patients were reclassified with newer scoring systems (revised IPSS [R-IPSS], revised WHO classification-based Prognostic Scoring System [R-WPSS], and Lower Risk Prognostic Scoring System [LR-PSS]), and 21.8-38.4% of patients had high or very high risk features by the newer scoring systems. Median overall survival (OS) was 27.3 months and newer scoring systems well stratified the patients in terms of OS (R-IPSS, P=0.001; R-WPSS, P<0.001; LR-PSS, P<0.001). Hematologic improvement (HI) was observed in 279 patients (47.6%). OS differed by the achievement of HI (39.4% vs. 36.2%, P=0.067). The differences were significant only in patients of intermediate or high risk group by LR-PSS (P=0.034) or R-IPSS (P=0.018). In summary, IPSS lower-risk MDS included a broad range of prognosis, and hypomethylating therapy induced HI in approximately half of the patients. Achievement of HI was associated with longer survival, especially in patients with intermediate or high risk features by newer scoring systems. Hypomethylating therapy seems to have potential benefits in IPSS lower-risk MDS.

Randomized phase 2 study of low-dose decitabine vs low-dose azacitidine in lower-risk MDS and MDS/MPN

Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) improve survival in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) but are less well-studied in lower-risk disease. We compared the safety and efficacy of low-dose decitabine vs low-dose azacitidine in this group of patients. Adults with low- or intermediate 1-risk MDS or MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), including chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, according to the International Prognostic Scoring System, were randomly assigned using a Bayesian adaptive design to receive either azacitidine 75 mg/m² intravenously/subcutaneously daily or decitabine 20 mg/m² intravenously daily for 3 consecutive days on a 28-day cycle. The primary outcome was overall response rate (ORR). Between November 2012 and February 2016, 113 patients were treated: 40 (35%) with azacitidine and 73 (65%) with decitabine. The median age was 70 years; 81% of patients were intermediate 1-risk patients. The median number of cycles received was 9. The ORRs were 70% and 49% (P = .03) for patients treated with decitabine and azacitidine, respectively. Thirty-two percent of patients treated with decitabine became transfusion independent compared with 16% of patients treated with azacitidine (P = .2). Cytogenetic response rates were 61% and 25% (P = .02), respectively. With a median follow-up of 20 months, the overall median event-free survival was 18 months: 20 and 13 months for patients treated with decitabine and azacitidine, respectively (P = .1). Treatment was well tolerated, with a 6-week mortality rate of 0%. The use of low-dose HMAs is safe and effective in patients with lower-risk MDS and MDS/MPN. Their effect on the natural history of lower-risk disease needs to be further studied. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT01720225).