Gilteritinib in Combination With Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy and as Maintenance Therapy: A Phase IB Study in Patients With Newly Diagnosed AML

PURPOSE

Gilteritinib is a type 1 FLT3 inhibitor active as monotherapy for relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutated AML. We investigated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of gilteritinib incorporated into intensive induction and consolidation chemotherapy, and as maintenance therapy for adult patients with newly diagnosed, non-favorable-risk AML.

METHODS

In this phase IB study (2215-CL-0103; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02236013), 103 participants were screened and 80 were allocated to treatment. The study was divided into four parts: dose escalation, dose expansion, investigation of alternate anthracycline and gilteritinib schedule, and continuous gilteritinib during consolidation.

RESULTS

After dose escalation, 120 mg gilteritinib once daily was chosen for further study. There were 58 participants evaluable for response at this dose, 36 of whom harbored FLT3 mutations. For participants with FLT3-mutated AML, the composite complete response (CRc) rate was 89% (83% were conventional complete responses), all achieved after a single induction cycle. The median overall survival time was 46.1 months. Gilteritinib was well-tolerated in this context although the median time to count recovery during induction was approximately 40 days. Longer time-to-count recovery was associated with higher trough levels of gilteritinib, which, in turn, were associated with azole use. The recommended regimen is gilteritinib at a dose of 120 mg once daily from days 4 to 17 or 8 to 21 of a 7 + 3 induction with either idarubicin or daunorubicin and from day 1 continuously with high-dose cytarabine consolidation. Maintenance therapy with gilteritinib was well-tolerated.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrated the safety and tolerability of gilteritinib incorporated into an induction and consolidation chemotherapy regimen, and as single-agent maintenance therapy for patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutant AML. The data herein provide an important framework for the design of randomized trials comparing gilteritinib with other FLT3 inhibitors.

Olutasidenib (FT-2102) induces durable complete remissions in patients with relapsed or refractory IDH1-mutated AML

Olutasidenib (FT-2102) is a potent, selective, oral, small-molecule inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1). Overall, 153 IDH1 inhibitor-naive patients with mIDH1R132 relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) received olutasidenib monotherapy 150 mg twice daily in the pivotal cohort of this study. The median age of participants was 71 years (range, 32-87 years) and the median number of prior regimens received by patients was 2 (1-7). The rate of complete remission (CR) plus CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) was 35%, and the overall response rate was 48%. Response rates were similar in patients who had, and who had not, received prior venetoclax. With 55% of patients censored at the time of data cut-off, the median duration of CR/CRh was 25.9 months. The median duration of overall response was 11.7 months, and the median overall survival was 11.6 months. Of 86 patients who were transfusion dependent at baseline, a 56-day transfusion independence was achieved in 29 (34%), which included patients in all response groups. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events (≥10%) were febrile neutropenia and anemia (n = 31; 20% each), thrombocytopenia (n = 25; 16%), and neutropenia (n = 20; 13%). Differentiation syndrome adverse events of special interest occurred in 22 (14%) patients, with 14 (9%) grade ≥3 and 1 fatal case reported. Overall, olutasidenib induced durable remissions and transfusion independence with a well-characterized and manageable side effect profile. The observed efficacy represents a therapeutic advance in this molecularly defined, poor-prognostic population of patients with mIDH1 R/R AML. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02719574.

A Transcriptome-Based Precision Oncology Platform for Patient-Therapy Alignment in a Diverse Set of Treatment-Resistant Malignancies

Predicting in vivo response to antineoplastics remains an elusive challenge. We performed a first-of-kind evaluation of two transcriptome-based precision cancer medicine methodologies to predict tumor sensitivity to a comprehensive repertoire of clinically relevant oncology drugs, whose mechanism of action we experimentally assessed in cognate cell lines. We enrolled patients with histologically distinct, poor-prognosis malignancies who had progressed on multiple therapies, and developed low-passage, patient-derived xenograft models that were used to validate 35 patient-specific drug predictions. Both OncoTarget, which identifies high-affinity inhibitors of individual master regulator (MR) proteins, and OncoTreat, which identifies drugs that invert the transcriptional activity of hyperconnected MR modules, produced highly significant 30-day disease control rates (68% and 91%, respectively). Moreover, of 18 OncoTreat-predicted drugs, 15 induced the predicted MR-module activity inversion in vivo. Predicted drugs significantly outperformed antineoplastic drugs selected as unpredicted controls, suggesting these methods may substantively complement existing precision cancer medicine approaches, as also illustrated by a case study.

SIGNIFICANCE

Complementary precision cancer medicine paradigms are needed to broaden the clinical benefit realized through genetic profiling and immunotherapy. In this first-in-class application, we introduce two transcriptome-based tumor-agnostic systems biology tools to predict drug response in vivo. OncoTarget and OncoTreat are scalable for the design of basket and umbrella clinical trials. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1275.

Magrolimab in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Final Results of a Phase Ib Study

PURPOSE

Magrolimab is a monoclonal antibody that blocks cluster of differentiation 47, a don't-eat-me signal overexpressed on cancer cells. Cluster of differentiation 47 blockade by magrolimab promotes macrophage-mediated phagocytosis of tumor cells and is synergistic with azacitidine, which increases expression of eat-me signals. We report final phase Ib data in patients with untreated higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) treated with magrolimab and azacitidine (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03248479).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated Revised International Prognostic Scoring System intermediate-/high-/very high-risk MDS received magrolimab intravenously as a priming dose (1 mg/kg) followed by ramp-up to a 30 mg/kg once-weekly or once-every-2-week maintenance dose. Azacitidine 75 mg/m2 was administered intravenously/subcutaneously once daily on days 1-7 of each 28-day cycle. Primary end points were safety/tolerability and complete remission (CR) rate.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were treated. Revised International Prognostic Scoring System risk was intermediate/high/very high in 27%, 52%, and 21%, respectively. Fifty-nine (62%) had poor-risk cytogenetics and 25 (26%) had TP53 mutation. The most common treatment-emergent adverse effects included constipation (68%), thrombocytopenia (55%), and anemia (52%). Median hemoglobin change from baseline to first postdose assessment was -0.7 g/dL (range, -3.1 to +2.4). CR rate and overall response rate were 33% and 75%, respectively. Median time to response, duration of CR, duration of overall response, and progression-free survival were 1.9, 11.1, 9.8, and 11.6 months, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached with 17.1-month follow-up. In TP53-mutant patients, 40% achieved CR with median OS of 16.3 months. Thirty-four patients (36%) had allogeneic stem-cell transplant with 77% 2-year OS.

CONCLUSION

Magrolimab + azacitidine was well tolerated with promising efficacy in patients with untreated higher-risk MDS, including those with TP53 mutations. A phase III trial of magrolimab/placebo + azacitidine is ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04313881 [ENHANCE]).

Targeting RARA overexpression with tamibarotene, a potent and selective RARα agonist, is a novel approach in AML

A superenhancer at the retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARA) gene is associated with RARA mRNA overexpression in ∼30% of non-acute promyelocytic leukemia acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and in ∼50% of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). RARA overexpression is an actionable target for treatment with tamibarotene, an oral potent and selective RARα agonist. Sensitivity to the RARα agonist tamibarotene was demonstrated in RARA-high but not RARA-low preclinical AML models. The combination of oral tamibarotene plus azacitidine was evaluated in a phase 2 clinical study in 51 newly diagnosed unfit patients with AML identified as RARA-positive (n = 22) or RARA-negative (n = 29) for RARA mRNA overexpression in peripheral blasts using a blood-based biomarker test. In 18 response-evaluable RARA-positive patients, complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery rate was 61%, CR rate was 50%, and time to initial composite CR was rapid at 1.2 months. Transfusion independence was attained by 72% of RARA-positive patients. In contrast, 28 response-evaluable RARA-negative patients had response rates that were consistent with azacitidine monotherapy. Tamibarotene in combination with azacitidine was well tolerated. The majority of nonhematologic adverse events were low grade and hematologic adverse events were comparable to single-agent azacitidine, demonstrating that there was no additional myelosuppression when tamibarotene was combined with azacitidine. These results support further evaluation of tamibarotene-based treatment strategies in patients with AML or MDS with RARA overexpression to provide a targeted approach with the goal of improving patient outcomes. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02807558.

Magrolimab in combination with azacitidine for untreated higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS): 5F9005 phase 1b study results

7017

Background: Magrolimab is a monoclonal antibody that blocks CD47, a “don’t eat me” signal overexpressed on cancer cells. CD47 blockade by magrolimab induces macrophage-mediated phagocytosis of tumor cells and is synergistic with azacitidine (AZA) via upregulation of “eat me” signals. Here we report final Phase 1b data in patients (pts) with untreated HR-MDS (NCT03248479). Methods: Pts with previously untreated intermediate-/high-/very high-risk MDS per IPSS-R received magrolimab IV as a priming dose (1 mg/kg) followed by ramp-up to a 30 mg/kg weekly or Q2W maintenance dose. AZA 75 mg/m2 was administered IV or SC on Days 1–7 of each 28-day cycle. Primary endpoints were safety/tolerability and complete remission (CR) rate. Results: 95 pts (median age 69 years [range 28, 91]) were treated. IPSS-R risk was intermediate, high, or very high in 27%, 52%, and 21%, respectively. MDS was therapy-related in 22%; 26% (n=25) had a TP53 mutation and 62% had poor-risk cytogenetics (27% complex). Median (range) number of cycles was 6 (1, 27). The most common TEAEs included constipation (68%), thrombocytopenia (55%), anemia (52%), neutropenia (47%), nausea (46%), and diarrhea (44%). The most common Grade 3/4 TEAEs included anemia (47%), neutropenia (46%), thrombocytopenia (46%), and WBC count decreased (30%). 6 pts discontinued treatment due to AEs. 60-day mortality was 2%. Median Hb change from baseline (BL) at first post-dose sample was –0.7 g/dL (range –3.1, +2.4). CR and objective response (OR) rates were 33% and 75% with 31% of evaluable OR pts with abnormal cytogenetics at BL having cytogenetic CR. Median time to first OR, duration of CR (DCR), duration of OR, and PFS were 1.9, 11.1, 9.8, and 11.6 mos. OS rates at 12 and 24 mos were 75% and 52%, respectively (median NR with 17.1 mos follow-up for OS). For patients evaluated with sequential WES with a VAF cutoff of 5%, 3 of 3 pts with TP53 mutation who achieved CR had TP53 VAF <5% by C5D1. Favorable outcomes were observed in both TP53 mutant (40% CR, median OS 16.3 months) and wildtype pts (31% CR, median OS NR; Table). Conclusions: Magrolimab+AZA was well tolerated with promising efficacy in pts with untreated HR-MDS including those with TP53-mut and TP53-wt disease. A Phase 3 trial of magrolimab/placebo+AZA (ENHANCE: NCT04313881) is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03248479. [Table: see text]

Rapidly adapting the clinical research environment at an NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center to the COVID-19 pandemic

e13534

Background: In March 2020, responding to COVID-19, the Columbia University Institutional Review Board (IRB) mandated all research pause in-person activities except studies “offering the potential for direct benefit” to patients. New enrollment was also paused. Columbia University Irving Medical Center concurrently mandated all non-essential employees work remotely, and all feasible patient visits transition to telehealth. The clinical research infrastructure at the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center (HICCC) was required to adapt its operations in response. Methods: The HICCC convened an executive committee (EC), consisting of multi-disciplinary leadership, canvassed peer institutions, and engaged the IRB Executive Director (ED), Chief of Infectious Disease, a bioethicist, and others ad hoc. Results: The IRB ED agreed with the EC that all approved interventional therapeutic clinical trials for cancer (n = 554) offered the potential for direct benefit to patients. The EC established an “Emergency Preparedness” standard operating procedure (SOP) with input from the IRB and HICCC Protocol Review & Monitoring and Data & Safety Monitoring Committees. This SOP required assessment of each protocol for risks/benefit, transition to remote processes when possible, and referenced the Code of Federal Regulations allowing changes to a research plan without prospective IRB-approval if “necessary to eliminate apparent immediate hazard”. For new subjects, the EC created a process for enrollment as exceptions to the research pause requiring written justification by the PI that included risk-mitigation strategies and approval by the EC. 116 patients were accrued under this process. All external monitoring and auditing was transitioned to remote. Finally, 25% of research nurses and 10% of coordinators were redeployed to other short-staffed areas of the medical center. After 3 months, the IRB lifted the research pause in tranches, and the EC charged its Disease Based Teams with prioritizing trials to reopen. Accrual nadired at 30% of pre-pandemic levels in June 2020, which fully recovered by March 2021. Conclusions: A centralized research infrastructure working closely with established institutional committees was critical for the unprecedented yet effective and rapid ramp down/up of clinical trials. After 1-year, accrual recovered to pre-pandemic levels, leveraging new processes such as electronic consent, telehealth, and remote work for staff.

Treatment of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia with the Targeted Alpha-Particle Nano-Generator Actinium-225-Lintuzumab

PURPOSE

The anti-CD33 antibody lintuzumab has modest activity against acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To increase its potency, lintuzumab was conjugated to actinium-225 (225Ac), a radionuclide yielding 4 α-particles. This first-in-human, phase I trial was conducted to determine the safety, pharmacology, and biological activity of 225Ac-lintuzumab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients (median age, 64 years; range, 45-80) with relapsed or refractory AML received a single infusion of 225Ac-lintuzumab at activities of 18.5-148 kBq/kg.

RESULTS

The maximum tolerated dose was 111 kBq/kg. Dose-limiting toxicities included myelosuppression lasting &gt; 35 days in one patient receiving 148 kBq/kg and death from sepsis in two patients treated with 111 and 148 kBq/kg. Myelosuppression was the most common toxicity. Significant extramedullary toxicities were limited to transient grade 3 liver function abnormalities. Pharmacokinetics were determined by gamma counting serial whole blood, plasma, and urine samples at energy windows for the 225Ac daughters, francium-221 and bismuth-213. Two-phase elimination kinetics were seen with mean plasma t1/2-α and t1/2-β of 1.9 and 38 hours, respectively. Peripheral blood blasts were eliminated in 10 of 16 evaluable patients (63%) but only at doses of {greater than or equal to} 37 kBq/kg. Bone marrow blasts were reduced in 10 of 15 evaluable patients (67%), including 3 patients with marrow blasts {less than or equal to} 5% and 1 patient with a morphologic leukemia-free state.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapy for AML with the targeted α-particle generator 225Ac-lintuzumab was feasible with an acceptable safety profile. Elimination of circulating blasts or reductions in marrow blasts were observed across all dose levels.

Comparison of dose modification strategies to address expected hematologic toxicities in treatment-naïve higher-risk (HR) MDS patients treated with venetoclax + azacitidine

7041

Background: Venetoclax (Ven) is a selective, potent BCL-2 inhibitor. Ven + azacitidine (Aza) were associated with a combined complete remission (CR)/marrow CR (mCR) rate of 79% in a phase 1b study of patients (pts) with HR-MDS. Here we compared two different dose modification strategies to manage expected hematologic toxicities in two safety expansion cohorts with similar follow-up periods. Methods: Pts ≥18y diagnosed with treatment-naïve IPSS intermediate-2 or high-risk MDS with ECOG ≤2 were enrolled. Aza 75 mg/m2 (iv or subQ daily) was administered for 7 days (d) and Ven was administered at 400 mg for 14d in each 28d cycle. In both cohorts, dose modification during Cycle 1 was not recommended; dose modifications in subsequent cycles were prescribed for AEs. In Safety Expansion Cohort 1 (SE1), either Aza or Ven were initially reduced according to investigator’s choice for significant neutrophil or platelet toxicity. Dose reductions per protocol were 33% for Aza and 50% for Ven (for 14d each cycle). In subsequent cycles, Ven duration could be shortened to 9d of each cycle. In Safety Expansion Cohort 2 (SE2), dose modification guidelines recommended stepwise reductions, first in Aza dose (first to 50 mg/m2, then 36 mg/m2) and subsequently in Ven duration to 7d of each cycle (Ven 400 mg). The impact of each dose modification strategy on safety and efficacy in SE1 vs SE2 was compared. Worsening of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) grades from baseline (BL) was analyzed by cycle. Responses were evaluated using IWG 2006 criteria. Analyses included all pts who received ≥1 dose of study drug. Results: We compared 22 pts in SE1 and 21 pts in SE2 with median (range) follow-up of 7.5 (1.0–8.9) and 7.9 (1.8–10.1) mos, respectively. A similar frequency of ≥ G3 hematologic TEAEs (approx %) were reported in SE1 and SE2, respectively, including anemia (14% and 33%), febrile neutropenia (46% and 48%), leukopenia (36% and 19%), neutropenia (55% and 48%) and thrombocytopenia (32% and 38%). Infections (59% and 38%) were more frequent in SE1 than SE2. In a longitudinal analysis, there were more TEAE grade increases from BL to Cycle 1 in SE2 vs SE1. This could be accounted by pts in SE1 and SE2 having unbalanced susceptibility to AEs at BL, as SE1 and SE2 pts received identical Aza + Ven doses in Cycle 1. Response rates were identical: 86% of pts in both SE1 and SE2 had CR or mCR. For pts with mCR, hematologic improvement occurred in 50% of SE1 and 46% of SE2 pts. Conclusions: No obvious hematologic differences were observed when reducing Aza before Ven (SE2) in MDS compared to investigator’s choice (SE1). Both approaches had a similar acceptable safety profile without compromising efficacy for pts with HR-MDS. Clinical trial information: NCT02942290. [Table: see text]

NPM1 and FLT3-TKD mutations are enriched in patients with leukemia cutis

Leukemia cutis (LC) is a dermatologic manifestation of leukemia. Its clinical implications for the patient and the biological mechanism behind the manifestation of LC are unknown. The oncology community is increasingly utilizing mutations to classify a number of malignancies to prognosticate outcomes and to choose targeted therapies. A single-center, retrospective analysis of dermatopathology cases with a diagnosis of leukemia cutis was performed. Patients with genetic testing using the Columbia Combined Cancer Panel (a targeted sequencing protocol of 467 genes) or Genoptix (targeted sequencing protocol of 44 genes) were identified. The frequency of the presence of genetic mutations in LC patients was compared to AML patients from the COSMIC (Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer) database. Twenty nine cases were confirmed to have leukemia cutis, 22 of which had acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Genetic testing was available in 11 patients. Twelve different mutations were observed with particular enrichment for NPM1 and FLT3-TKD. Our original hypothesis was that patients with LC would display a distinct mutation profile. Ultimately, the distribution of mutations observed in our cohort of LC patients largely reflects the mutational profile seen in AML patients in general.

Longer-term RBC transfusion reduction in the phase III MEDALIST study of luspatercept in patients (pts) with lower-risk MDS with ring sideroblasts (RS)

7518

Background: MEDALIST (NCT02631070) is a randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled, phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of luspatercept, a first-in-class erythroid maturation agent, in pts with anemia due to lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) with RS (Fenaux & Platzbecker et al. NEJM. 2020;382:140-51). Methods: Pts were aged ≥ 18 years; had IPSS-R-defined Very low-, Low-, or Intermediate-risk MDS with RS; were refractory, intolerant, or unlikely to respond to ESAs; and required RBC transfusions (≥ 2 units/8 weeks in the 16 weeks prior to randomization). 229 pts were randomized 2:1 to luspatercept (1.0 mg/kg, titration to 1.75 mg/kg) or PBO subcutaneously every 3 weeks. This analysis evaluates long-term transfusion burden reduction with luspatercept in all pts in the MEDALIST trial. Results: As of July 1, 2019, 77/153 (50.3%) and 11/76 (14.5%) pts in the luspatercept and PBO arms, respectively, achieved ≥ 50% RBC transfusion burden reduction for ≥ 24 weeks ( P < 0.0001). The median longest single response episode was 131.6 weeks with luspatercept, and not estimable with PBO due to pts stopping treatment. In Weeks 9–24, mean change from baseline in RBC units transfused was −3.0 (95% CI −3.9, −2.1) vs +0.4 (95% CI −0.6, 1.4) in the luspatercept vs PBO arms. In Weeks 33–48, mean change in RBC units transfused in the luspatercept arm was −4.9 (95% CI −5.9, −3.9). In Weeks 1–24, mean number of transfusion visits was 5.9 vs 9.5 in the luspatercept vs PBO arms. Risk of recurrent transfusion visits in Weeks 1–24 for luspatercept vs PBO was 0.699 (95% CI 0.597, 0.819; P < 0.0001). Mean number (least squares [LS] mean) of RBC units transfused/48 weeks during Weeks 1–48 was 22.89 (23.28) vs 35.98 (35.20) in luspatercept vs PBO arms (LS mean difference −11.92 [95% CI −15.55, −8.28]; P < 0.0001). The mean number (LS mean) of RBC transfusion events over 48 weeks was 12.95 (13.14) vs 19.54 (19.15) in the luspatercept vs PBO arms (LS mean difference −6.00 [95% CI −8.16, −3.85]; P < 0.0001). LS mean change from baseline in serum ferritin was −2.7 µg/L vs +226.5 µg/L in luspatercept vs PBO (LS mean difference −229.1 µg/L; P = 0.0024) in Weeks 9–24; and −72.0 µg/L vs +247.4 µg/L in Weeks 33–48 (LS mean difference −319.5 µg/L; P = 0.0294). In Weeks 1–24, 38/127 (29.9%) vs 5/65 (7.7%) pts ( P = 0.0005) achieved major HI-E response per IWG 2018 criteria in luspatercept vs PBO arms, respectively. Conclusions: Luspatercept demonstrated clinical efficacy in pts with LR-MDS with RS and was associated with significant reductions in RBC transfusions (≥ 50%) and serum ferritin. Clinical trial information: NCT02631070 .

Clinical benefit of luspatercept in patients (pts) with lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) and high transfusion burden in the phase III MEDALIST study

7554

Background: Anemic pts with LR-MDS and high baseline RBC transfusion burden (HTB) have very few treatment options and constitute a pt population with significant clinical unmet need. In this secondary analysis of the MEDALIST trial (NCT02631070), we sought to evaluate the clinical benefit of luspatercept in this pt population. Methods: MEDALIST is a randomized, placebo (PBO)-controlled, phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of luspatercept in pts with anemia due to LR-MDS with ring sideroblasts (RS) (Fenaux & Platzbecker et al. NEJM. 2020;382:140-51). Pts were aged ≥ 18 years; had IPSS-R-defined Very low-, Low-, or Intermediate-risk MDS with RS; were refractory, intolerant, or unlikely to respond to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (serum erythropoietin > 200 U/L); and had anemia requiring regular RBC transfusions (≥ 2 units/8 weeks in the 16 weeks prior to randomization). 229 pts were randomized 2:1 to luspatercept (starting dose 1.0 mg/kg; titration up to 1.75 mg/kg allowed) or PBO subcutaneously every 3 weeks. HTB was defined as ≥ 6 RBC units transfused/8 weeks. Results: 153 pts were randomized to luspatercept and 76 to PBO. As of July 1, 2019, 23/66 (34.8%) and 12/66 (18.2%) HTB pts receiving luspatercept achieved a ≥ 50% and ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in RBC transfusion burden over ≥ 24 weeks, respectively, vs 3/33 (9.1%; P = 0.0063) and 1/33 (3.0%; P = 0.0363) pts receiving PBO. 6/66 (9.1%) luspatercept-treated HTB pts and 1/33 (3.0%) PBO-treated HTB pt achieved RBC-transfusion independence (TI) ≥ 8 weeks in Weeks 1–24 ( P = 0.2699). The median (range) time to achieve RBC-TI with luspatercept was 50.0 days (1.0–100.0) and median (range) duration of RBC-TI in the luspatercept arm was 42.6 weeks (8.4–81.1). Mean number of transfusion events in Weeks 1–24 was 9.2 in the luspatercept arm vs 12.4 in the PBO arm (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.794 [0.660–0.956]). 65/66 (98.5%) luspatercept- and 29/33 (87.9%) PBO-treated HTB pts reported ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE); 11/66 (16.7%) and 3/33 (9.1%) pts, respectively, reported ≥ 1 TEAE leading to discontinuation. 28/66 (42.4%) luspatercept- and 15/33 (45.5%) PBO-treated pts reported ≥ 1 serious AE. Incidence of grade 3–4 TEAEs in HTB pts was similar between arms (53.0% luspatercept vs 54.5% PBO). Conclusions: Luspatercept treatment resulted in clinically significant reductions in transfusion burden and reduced number of transfusion events in HTB pts with LR-MDS with RS, with an acceptable safety profile consistent with the overall population. Clinical trial information: NCT02631070 .

Rewriting the rules for care of MDS and AML patients in the time of COVID-19

The care of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been radically altered by COVID-19, especially in New York City, the epicenter of the pandemic. Here we summarize how telemedicine, virtual visits, delayed transfusions, and chemotherapy, preferably selecting self-administered medications and visits by home healthcare workers, are employed to minimize exposure of our high-risk population of patients to the virus. The unique challenges of transplants during the pandemic and the consequences of an abrupt halt in all non-essential research activities are described. Not all the changes forced by COVID-19 are detrimental.

Luspatercept in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

BACKGROUND

Patients with anemia and lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes in whom erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy is not effective generally become dependent on red-cell transfusions. Luspatercept, a recombinant fusion protein that binds transforming growth factor β superfamily ligands to reduce SMAD2 and SMAD3 signaling, showed promising results in a phase 2 study.

METHODS

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with very-low-risk, low-risk, or intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (defined according to the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System) with ring sideroblasts who had been receiving regular red-cell transfusions to receive either luspatercept (at a dose of 1.0 up to 1.75 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo, administered subcutaneously every 3 weeks. The primary end point was transfusion independence for 8 weeks or longer during weeks 1 through 24, and the key secondary end point was transfusion independence for 12 weeks or longer, assessed during both weeks 1 through 24 and weeks 1 through 48.

RESULTS

Of the 229 patients enrolled, 153 were randomly assigned to receive luspatercept and 76 to receive placebo; the baseline characteristics of the patients were balanced. Transfusion independence for 8 weeks or longer was observed in 38% of the patients in the luspatercept group, as compared with 13% of those in the placebo group (P<0.001). A higher percentage of patients in the luspatercept group than in the placebo group met the key secondary end point (28% vs. 8% for weeks 1 through 24, and 33% vs. 12% for weeks 1 through 48; P<0.001 for both comparisons). The most common luspatercept-associated adverse events (of any grade) included fatigue, diarrhea, asthenia, nausea, and dizziness. The incidence of adverse events decreased over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Luspatercept reduced the severity of anemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts who had been receiving regular red-cell transfusions and who had disease that was refractory to or unlikely to respond to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents or who had discontinued such agents owing to an adverse event. (Funded by Celgene and Acceleron Pharma; MEDALIST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02631070; EudraCT number, 2015-003454-41.).

Targeted Alpha-Particle Therapy for Hematologic Malignancies

The short range and high linear energy transfer of α-particles offer the potential for efficient tumor killing while sparing normal bystander cells. Hematologic malignancies are ideally suited to targeted α-particle therapy (TAT) due to easy accessibility of malignant cells in blood, bone marrow, lymph nodes, and spleen as well as their radiosensitivity. Most clinical trials using α-particle therapy for hematologic malignancies have focused on acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, preclinical studies have shown activity against other diseases such as non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma. To date, the short-lived radionuclide bismuth-213 (²¹³Bi) and its parent actinium-225 (²²⁵Ac) have been used clinically, but trials with astatinie-211 (²¹¹At) have recently begun, and thorium-227 (²²⁷Th) has shown promising preclinical results. Lintuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the cell surface antigen CD33, which is expressed on the vast majority of AML cells. Initial studies showed that ²¹³Bi-labeled lintuzumab had antileukemic activity and could produce remissions after partial cytoreduction with cytarabine. An initial phase I trial demonstrated that a single infusion of ²²⁵Ac-lintuzumab could be given safely at doses upto 111 kBq/kg with antileukemic activity across all dose levels. A second phase I study showed that fractionated-dose ²²⁵Ac-lintuzumab could be safely combined with low-dose cytarabine and produced objective responses in 28% of older patients with untreated AML. In a phase II study, treatment with ²²⁵Ac-lintuzumab monotherapy for a similar patient population resulted in remission in 69% of patients receiving two fractions of 74 kBq/kg and 22% of patients receiving two 55.5-kBq/kg fractions. Additionally, TAT may be useful in intensifying antileukemic therapy prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation, and pretargeting strategies offer the possibility for improved tumor-to-normal organ dose ratios.

Targeted Alpha-Particle Therapy for Hematologic Malignancies

INTRODUCTION

The short range and high linear energy transfer of α-particles offer the potential for efficient tumor killing while sparing surrounding normal cells. Hematologic malignancies are ideally suited to targeted α-therapy because of easy accessibility of malignant cells in blood and bone marrow and their radiosensitivity.

METHODS

A series of clinical trials were conducted to assess the safety and antileukemic effects of lintuzumab, an anti-CD33 antibody, labeled with the α-emitters bismuth-213 (²¹³Bi) and actinium-225 (²²⁵Ac) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

RESULTS

Initial studies showed that ²¹³Bi-lintuzumab had antileukemic activity and could produce remissions after partial cytoreduction with cytarabine. A phase I trial demonstrated that a single infusion of ²²⁵Ac-lintuzumab could be given safely at doses up to 111 kBq/kg with antileukemic activity at all dose levels studied. A second phase I study showed that 28% of older patients with untreated AML had objective responses after receiving fractionated-dose ²²⁵Ac-lintuzumab and low-dose cytarabine. A phase II study of ²²⁵Ac-lintuzumab monotherapy in this population produced remissions in 69% of patients receiving two fractions of 74 kBq/kg and 22% of patients receiving two 55.5-kBq/kg fractions.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies with ²¹³Bi-lintuzumab provided proof of principle for systemically administered α-particle therapy. ²²⁵Ac-lintuzumab was active against advanced AML and produced remissions in older patients with untreated AML in combination with low-dose cytarabine and as a single agent. These studies provide the rationale for development of ²²⁵Ac-lintuzumab in combination with a variety of agents in AML and in other hematologic malignancies such as myelodysplastic syndrome and multiple myeloma.

Phase 2 trial of a multivalent WT1 peptide vaccine (galinpepimut-S) in acute myeloid leukemia

A National Cancer Institute consensus study on prioritization of cancer antigens ranked the Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) protein as the top immunotherapy target in cancer. We previously reported a pilot study of a multivalent WT1 peptide vaccine (galinpepimut-S) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. We have now conducted a phase 2 study investigating this vaccine in adults with AML in first complete remission (CR1). Patients received 6 vaccinations administered over 10 weeks with the potential to receive 6 additional monthly doses if they remained in CR1. Immune responses (IRs) were evaluated after the 6th and 12th vaccinations by CD4+ T-cell proliferation, CD8+ T-cell interferon-γ secretion (enzyme-linked immunospot), or the CD8-relevant WT1 peptide major histocompatibility complex tetramer assay (HLA-A*02 patients only). Twenty-two patients (7 males; median age, 64 years) were treated. Fourteen patients (64%) completed ≥6 vaccinations, and 9 (41%) received all 12 vaccine doses. Fifteen patients (68%) relapsed, and 10 (46%) died. The vaccine was well tolerated, with the most common toxicities being grade 1/2 injection site reactions (46%), fatigue (32%), and skin induration (32%). Median disease-free survival from CR1 was 16.9 months, whereas the overall survival from diagnosis has not yet been reached but is estimated to be ≥67.6 months. Nine of 14 tested patients (64%) had an IR in ≥1 assay (CD4 or CD8). These results indicated that the WT1 vaccine was well tolerated, stimulated a specific IR, and was associated with survival in excess of 5 years in this cohort of patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01266083.

Sotatercept with long-term extension for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a phase 2, dose-ranging trial

BACKGROUND

Myelodysplastic syndromes are characterised by ineffective erythropoiesis leading to anaemia. Sotatercept (ACE-011) is a novel activin receptor type IIA fusion protein that acts as a ligand trap to neutralise negative regulators of late-stage erythropoiesis. The aim of the study was to establish a safe and effective dose of sotatercept for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

METHODS

This open-label, multicentre, dose-ranging, phase 2 trial took place at 11 treatment centres in the USA and France. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had International Prognostic Scoring System-defined low-risk or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, had anaemia requiring red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and were ineligible for, or refractory to, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). Patients were not eligible if they had chromosome 5q deletion myelodysplastic syndromes without documented failure of lenalidomide. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 0·1 or 0·3 mg/kg sotatercept subcutaneously, using a permuted-block method with stratification for serum erythropoietin concentration and transfusion burden. Patients were assigned to 0·5, 1·0, and 2·0 mg/kg groups in a non-randomised fashion. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved haematological improvement-erythroid (HI-E), according to International Working Group 2006 criteria. Efficacy and safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01736683 and at EU Clinical Trials Register, number 2012-002601-22, and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 5, 2012, and July 22, 2015, 74 patients were enrolled into the study (seven to receive 0·1 mg/kg sotatercept, six to 0·3 mg/kg, 21 to 0·5 mg/kg, 35 to 1·0 mg/kg, and five to 2·0 mg/kg). 36 (49%; 95% CI 38-60) of 74 patients achieved HI-E; 29 (47%; 95% CI 35-59) of 62 patients with a high transfusion burden achieved HI-E (RBC-transfusion reduction from baseline of 4 or more units for at least 56 days), and seven (58%; 95% CI 32-81) of 12 patients with a low transfusion burden achieved HI-E (haemoglobin increase of 1·5 g/dL or more sustained for at least 56 days in the absence of transfusions). The most commonly reported adverse events were fatigue in 19 (26%) of 74 patients and peripheral oedema in 18 (24%) of 74 patients. Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 25 (34%) of 74 patients; four (5%) patients had grade 3-4 TEAEs that were considered to be treatment related. The most common grade 3-4 TEAEs were lipase increase and anaemia, which each occurred in three (4%) of 74 patients. 17 (23%) of 74 patients had at least one serious TEAE, and one patient died from a treatment-emergent subdural haematoma due to a fall.

INTERPRETATION

Sotatercept, a novel activin-receptor fusion protein, was well tolerated and effective for the treatment of anaemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes in whom previous ESA treatment had failed. Treatment with sotatercept could be beneficial for these patients who have few available treatment options.

FUNDING

Celgene Corporation.

Selective inhibition of FLT3 by gilteritinib in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia: a multicentre, first-in-human, open-label, phase 1-2 study

Background

Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutations are common in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and are associated with rapid relapse and short survival. In relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML, the clinical benefit of FLT3 inhibitors has been limited by rapid generation of resistance mutations, especially FLT3-D835. Gilteritinib is a potent, highly selective oral FLT3/AXL inhibitor with preclinical activity against FLT3-ITD and FLT3-D835 mutations. The aim of this Phase 1/2 study was to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) effects of gilteritinib in FLT3 mutation-positive (FLT3^mut+) R/R AML.

Methods

This ongoing pharmacodynamic-driven Phase 1/2 trial (NCT02014558) enrolled subjects from October 2013 to August 2015 who were aged ≥18 years and were either refractory to induction therapy or had relapsed after achieving remission with prior therapy. Subjects were enrolled in one of seven dose-escalation or dose-expansion cohorts that were assigned to receive once-daily doses of oral gilteritinib (20, 40, 80, 120, 200, 300, or 450 mg). Cohort expansion was based on safety/tolerability, FLT3 inhibition in correlative assays, and antileukemic activity; the 120 and 200 mg dose cohorts were further expanded to include FLT3^mut+ patients only. Safety and tolerability, and PK effects were the primary endpoints; antileukemic response was the main secondary endpoint. Safety and tolerability were assessed by monitoring dose-limiting toxicities and treatment-emergent adverse events, and safety assessments (eg, clinical laboratory evaluations, electrocardiograms) in the Safety Analysis Set.

Findings

A total of 252 adults with R/R AML, including 58 with wild-type FLT3 and 194 with FLT3 mutations (FLT3-ITD, n=162; FLT3-D835, n=16; FLT3-ITD and -D835, n=13; other, n=3), received oral gilteritinib (20–450 mg) once daily in one of seven dose-escalation (n=23) or dose-expansion (n=229) cohorts. Gilteritinib was well tolerated in this heavily pretreated population; Grade 3 diarrhea and hepatic transaminase elevation limited dosing above 300 mg/d. The most common Grade 3/4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (39%; n=97/252), anemia (24%; n=61/252), thromobocytopenia (13%; n=33/252), sepsis (11%; n=28/252), and pneumonia (11%; n=27/252). Serious adverse events in ≥5% of patients were febrile neutropenia (31%; n=78/252), progressive disease (17%; n=43/252), sepsis (14%; n=36/252), pneumonia (11%; n=27/252), and acute renal failure (10%; n=25/252), pyrexia (8%; n=21/252), bacteremia (6%; n=14/252), and respiratory failure (6%; n=14/252). Gilteritinib demonstrated consistent, potent inhibition of FLT3 phosphorylation at doses ≥80 mg/d in correlative assays. While responses were observed across all dose levels regardless of FLT3 mutation status (overall response rate [ORR]=40%), response rate was improved in FLT3^mut+ patients at doses ≥80 mg/d (ORR=52%). Among patients with FLT3-ITD, the additional presence of FLT3-D835 did not alter response rate; patients with only FLT3-D835 responded less frequently.

Interpretation

Gilteritinib had a favorable safety profile and generated potent FLT3 inhibition leading to high rates of antileukemic responses in patients with FLT3^mut+ R/R AML. These findings confirm that FLT3 is a high-value target in R/R AML and that long-term success of therapeutic FLT3 inhibition in AML is optimized by agents with potent, selective, and sustained activity against FLT3-ITD mutations and FLT3 tyrosine kinase domain mutations.

Funding

This study was funded by Astellas Pharma, Inc., by a National Cancer Institute Leukemia Specialized Program of Research Excellence grant (CA100632) awarded to Drs Mark Levis and Jorge Cortes, and by Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro awarded to Professor Giovanni Martinelli.

A biomarker-directed phase 2 trial of SY-1425, a selective retinoic acid receptor alpha agonist, in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)

TPS7071

Background: SY-1425 (tamibarotene) is an orally available, synthetic retinoid approved in Japan for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) APL. SY-1425 is a more potent and selective retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARα) agonist with improved pharmacologic properties compared to all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) including increased half-life and lack of metabolism by CYP26A1 resulting in extended relative exposures. SY-1425 binding to RARα relieves pathogenic repression of myeloid differentiation. Super-enhancers associated with RARA and upregulation of RARA expression correlate with increased sensitivity to SY-1425 in vitro and predict for response to SY-1425 with induced differentiation and reduced proliferation in RARA-high PDX AML models, but not in RARA-low models. SY-1425 also induces the RARα target gene DHRS3 in RARA-high AML cell lines. This study is designed to demonstrate pharmacodynamic (PD) and clinical effects of SY-1425 in non-APL AML and MDS patients (pts) positive for the RARA super-enhancer associated biomarker or exploratory RARA pathway biomarker, IRF8. Methods: This study is enrolling pts with R/R AML, R/R higher-risk MDS, newly-diagnosed AML ≥60 yrs unlikely to respond to or tolerate standard therapy, and transfusion dependent lower-risk MDS pts without del 5q who are unlikely to respond to or have failed ESAs. Pts must be biomarker positive based on centralized testing of tumor cells from blood. All pts receive SY-1425 at 6 mg/m2/day PO with continuous twice daily dosing. Primary objectives are to characterize the activity of SY-1425 by ORR in AML and higher-risk MDS pts or transfusion independence in lower-risk MDS pts. Secondary objectives include event-free and relapse-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, hematologic improvement and safety. PD evaluation includes induction of DHRS3 and expression of myeloid differentiation markers. Target enrollment is 80 pts. This trial opened in September 2016. Through a protocol amendment, SY-1425 treatment in combination with azacitidine will also be evaluated. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02807558.

Prospective international validation of the Quality of Life in Myelodysplasia Scale (QUALMS)

Disease-specific measures of quality of life can improve assessment of disease-related symptoms and psychosocial sequelae. We report on the development and validation of the Quality of Life in Myelodysplasia Scale (QUALMS), a 38-item assessment tool for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). In 2014-2015, a multi-center cohort of patients with myelodysplasia completed the QUALMS, as well as the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Anemia Scale (FACT-An); a second administration was undertaken three to six months later. A total of 255 patients from the United States, Canada and Italy participated. Median age was 72 years, 56.1% were men, and the International Prognostic Scoring System distribution was 40.4% low, 42.0% intermediate-1, 13.3% intermediate-2 and 2.3% high. QUALMS scores ranged from 24 to 99 (higher scores are better), with a mean of 67.2 [standard deviation (SD)=15.2]. The measure was internally consistent (α=0.92), and moderately correlated with the multi-item QLQ-C30 scales and the FACT-An (r=-0.65 to 0.79; all P<0.001). Patients with hemoglobin of 8 g/dL or under scored lower than those with hemoglobin over 10 g/dL (61.8 vs 71.1; P<0.001), and transfusion-dependent patients scored lower than transfusion-independent patients (62.4 vs 69.7; P<0.01). Principal components analysis revealed "physical burden", "benefit-finding", and "emotional burden" subscales. There was good overall test-retest reliability among those with stable hemoglobin (r=0.81), and significant changes for patients hospitalized or with infections between administrations (both P<0.01). These data suggest the QUALMS is a valuable tool for assessing MDS-specific quality of life in the modern treatment era.

Targeted alpha-particle immunotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia

Because alpha-particles have a shorter range and a higher linear energy transfer (LET) compared with beta-particles, targeted alpha-particle immunotherapy offers the potential for more efficient tumor cell killing while sparing surrounding normal cells. To date, clinical studies of alpha-particle immunotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have focused on the myeloid cell surface antigen CD33 as a target using the humanized monoclonal antibody lintuzumab. An initial phase I study demonstrated the safety, feasibility, and antileukemic effects of bismuth-213 ((213)Bi)-labeled lintuzumab. In a subsequent study, (213)Bi-lintuzumab produced remissions in some patients with AML after partial cytoreduction with cytarabine, suggesting the utility of targeted alpha-particle therapy for small-volume disease. The widespread use of (213)Bi, however, is limited by its short half-life. Therefore, a second-generation construct containing actinium-225 ((225)Ac), a radiometal that generates four alpha-particle emissions, was developed. A phase I trial demonstrated that (225)Ac-lintuzumab is safe at doses of 3 μCi/kg or less and has antileukemic activity across all dose levels studied. Fractionated-dose (225)Ac-lintuzumab in combination with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) is now under investigation for the management of older patients with untreated AML in a multicenter trial. Preclinical studies using (213)Bi- and astatine-211 ((211)At)-labeled anti-CD45 antibodies have shown that alpha-particle immunotherapy may be useful as part conditioning before hematopoietic cell transplantation. The use of novel pretargeting strategies may further improve target-to-normal organ dose ratios.

Measuring quality of life in chronic hematologic malignancy: The QUALMS-1

263

Background: Disease-specific measures of quality of life (QoL) allow for assessment of disease-specific symptoms and psycho-social factors, an especially important endeavor for patients with chronic hematologic malignancies. We aimed to determine if disease-specific QoL could be measured for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, and what underlying constructs would inform such a measure. Methods: We previously reported on the development of the QUALMS-1, a 33-item QoL tool for MDS patients. 124 MDS patients completed the QUALMS-1 and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). Chart review was conducted to collect disease characteristics, lab tests, treatments, transfusions, and use of growth factors. Participants were recruited from MDS centers across the USA, Canada and Italy. QUALMS-1 items were scored on a scale ranging from 1 “Never” to 5 “Always”, with 4 reverse-scored items. Items were averaged to create a preliminary total scale score, with higher scores indicating poorer MDS-specific QoL. Results: Mean total scores on the QUALMS-1 ranged from 1.0 - 3.9. The measure had excellent internal consistency reliability (α=.92) and was moderately correlated with the QLQ-C30’s global health, physical functioning, role functioning, emotional health, cognitive functioning, social functioning, fatigue, nausea and pain measures (r range from 0.34 – 0.65, all p <.01). Patients with Hg <= 10 showed a small but consistent higher QUALMS-1 score (M = 2.5; SD =.59) than those with Hg >10 (M = 2.1; SD =.54; p =.03). Preliminary analyses suggested that four latent factors underlie the QUALMS-1, corresponding to the following subscales: physical burden, disease information and uncertainty, emotional burden, and disease-related positives. Conclusions: Our data suggest that the QUALMS-1 is internally consistent and has construct validity in patients with MDS. The measure provides a unique assessment of disease information and uncertainty, as well as disease-related positives. These are psychosocial constructs that may be particular to chronic hematologic malignancies such as MDS and are not well-assessed by generic or cancer-related measures.

Radioimmunotherapy for hematopoietic cell transplantation

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) represents an attractive strategy to deliver radiation selectively to tumor and other target organs while minimizing toxicity to normal tissues. RIT with β-particle-emitting isotopes targeting CD33, CD45 and CD66 can potentially allow intensification of conditioning before hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in leukemia. Similarly, RIT directed against CD20 has shown promise in the setting of autologous and allogeneic HCT for B-cell lymphomas. α-particle immunotherapy with isotopes such as bismuth-213, actinium-225 and astatinine-211 offers the possibility of more selective and efficient killing of target cells while sparing the surrounding normal cells. Pretargeting strategies may further improve target:normal organ dose ratios. While RIT has demonstrated significant antitumor activity, ultimately, randomized studies will be required to determine if conditioning regimens that include this therapeutic modality can improve patient outcomes after HCT.

Emerging new approaches for the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia

The introduction of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) in the late 1980s combined with anthracycline-based chemotherapy has revolutionized the prognosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with more than 90% complete response rates and cure rates of approximately 80%. The subsequent advent of arsenic trioxide (ATO) in 1990s and progress in the treatment of APL have changed its course from a highly fatal to a highly curable disease. Despite the dramatic improvement in clinical outcome of APL, treatment failure still occurs due most often to early death. Relapse has become increasingly less frequent, most commonly occurring in patients with high-risk disease. A major focus of research for the past decade has been to develop risk-adapted and rationally targeted nonchemotherapy treatment strategies to reduce treatment-related morbidity and mortality to low- and intermediate-risk or older patients while targeting more intensive or alternative therapy to those patients at most risk of relapse. In this review, emerging new approaches to APL treatment with special emhasis on strategies to reduce early deaths, risk-adapted therapy during induction, consolidation and maintenance, as well as an overview of current and future clinical trials in APL will be discussed.

Targeted Alpha-Particle Immunotherapy with Bismuth-213 and Actinium-225 for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Lintuzumab, a humanized anti-CD33 antibody, targets myeloid leukemia cells and has modest activity against acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To increase the antibody's potency yet avoid nonspecific cytotoxicity seen with β-emitting isotopes, lintuzumab was conjugated to the α-emitters bismuth-213 (213Bi) and actinium-225 (225Ac). The 46-minute half-life of 213Bi limits its widespread use. Therefore, 225Ac was also conjugated to various antibodies using DOTA-SCN. We conducted a phase I trial of 213Bi-lintuzumab and subsequently administered cytarabine with 213Bi-lintuzumab in a phase I/II study. The toxicity and biological activity of 225Ac-linutuzumab in patients with relapsed/refractory AML in a phase I dose-escalation trial was determined. An initial phase I trial demonstrated the feasibility, safety and antileukemic activity of 213Bi-lintuzumab. 213Bi-lintuzumab produced responses in 24% of AML patients receiving doses ≥ 37 MBq/kg after partial cytoreduction with cytarabine. 225Ac-labeled immunoconjugates killed in vitro at doses at least 1,000 times lower than 213Bi analogs. Eighteen patients with relapsed/refractory AML received 18.5 to 148 kBq/kg of 225Ac-lintuzumab in a phase I study. Dose-limiting toxicities were myelosuppression lasting >35 days in one patient and death due to sepsis in two patients. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 111 KBg/kg. Bone marrow blast reductions were seen across all dose levels. Targeted α- particle immunotherapy with 213Bi- and 225Ac-lintuzumab is safe, has significant antileukemic effects, and can produce remissions after partial cytoreduction.

How to cite this article

Jurcic JG. Targeted Alpha-Particle Immunotherapy with Bismuth-213 and Actinium-225 for Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Postgrad Med Edu Res 2013;47(1): 14-17.

Randomized phase IIb study of low-dose cytarabine and lintuzumab versus low-dose cytarabine and placebo in older adults with untreated acute myeloid leukemia

Improving outcomes in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia remains a formidable challenge. Lintuzumab (SGN-33; HuM195) is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against CD33, which is expressed on the majority of myeloblasts in acute myeloid leukemia. The primary objective of this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was to determine whether addition of lintuzumab to low-dose cytarabine would increase overall survival in adults aged 60 years and over with untreated acute myeloid leukemia. Randomization was stratified by age, previous hematologic disorder, and performance status. All patients received cytarabine (20 mg subcutaneously twice daily) on Days 1-10 of each 28-day cycle. Patients received lintuzumab (600 mg) or placebo intravenously once weekly in Cycle 1 and once every other week in Cycles 2-12. A total of 211 patients (107 lintuzumab, 104 placebo) were randomized. Median age was 70 years (range 60-90). Survival was not significantly prolonged with lintuzumab treatment (hazard ratio 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-1.28; P=0.7585). Median survival was similar between treatment arms (4.7 months lintuzumab vs. 5.1 months placebo) and in the subgroup of patients with high-risk cytogenetics (4.5 months). Infusion-related reactions, predominantly Grades 1-2, occurred more commonly in the lintuzumab arm (51% vs. 7% placebo); no other clinically significant difference in safety was noted. These results confirm that lintuzumab in combination with low-dose cytarabine did not prolong survival and that low-dose cytarabine remains a valid comparator for trials of non-intensive therapies in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia, regardless of cytogenetic profile.

Safety and efficacy of dose escalated liposomal amphotericin B in adult leukemia patients with refractory invasive fungal infections: A single institution report

6613

Background: Leukemia patients are at risk for invasive fungal infections(IFI). Empiric therapy of suspected IFI is begun due to fever despite appropriate antibiotics during neutropenia or infiltrates on chest CT. Liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) is used for empiric anti-fungal therapy at 3-5 mg/kg. Data is lacking on the efficacy of L-AmB dose escalation in patients with CT progression and clinical decline. Methods: Patients who received 10 mg/kg of L-AmB from 2002-11. They were required to be ≥18 years old and escalated from 5 to 10 mg/kg L-Amb for at least 7 doses. Patient information was collected from pharmacy and medical records. Successful treatment was defined as resolution of fever at least 1 week after high dose L-AmB and/or improvement or stability on chest CT. Renal and hepatic toxicity was assessed. Clinical remission was defined as recovery of a normal neutrophil count. IRB approval was obtained for this study. Results: 58 patients were evaluated. At the time of presumed or probable IFI, 19 had completed induction therapy, 5 had received supportive therapy, and 34 had received 2 or more cycles of therapy. High dose L-AmB was begun for CT findings and fever, CT findings only, and fever only in 14, 26, and 17 patients, respectively. Patients received a median of 15 doses of high dose L-AmB, and all received concomitant therapy with an echinocandin except two: 1 received nothing and 1 received voriconazole. Treatment success was seen in 28 (48%) patients. Twenty-nine (50%) patients were alive at 12 weeks and 10 (17%) patients proceded to BMT. Only 11 (39%) of the responding patients achieved a clinical remission. All patients received IV hydration and electrolyte repletion. Six patients had a grade 2 increase in serum creatinine and 10 patients developed grade 2 or 3 hepatic toxicity. There were no grade 4 adverse events. Conclusions: Although it has been reported that L-AmB at 10mg/kg was inferior to 3 mg/kg in untreated patients, our study supports a safe dose escalation strategy to 10mg/kg in treating progressive presumed or probable IFI and should be considered a clinical alternative for these high risk patients.

A new paradigm in CLL: Minimizing toxicity by using the minimum effective dose (MED) of lenalidomide for older patients with CLL

6609

Background: While CIT has proven active for younger patients with CLL; studies from Germany and MDACC with fludarabine or fludarabine- based regimens did not benefit the patient over the age of 65 or 70. As the median age of diagnosis is 72, the development of safe, active therapies for older patients is an unmet need in CLL. Lenalidomide is an active drug in CLL. The current clinical trial was designed to assess whether low-dose continuous lenalidomide therapy can provide long-term disease control with minimum toxicity in patients older than 65. Methods: Patients initiate lenalidomide at 2.5mg daily (28-day cycle) and only dose escalate for progressive disease (POD). Results: 18 patients have been enrolled: 12 men and 6 women, med age 70 (range 65-84) with Rai-intermediate (7 pts) or high-risk (11 pts; 61%) disease; med WBC 50.5 (6.7-326.3), HGB 10.3 (8.9-13.9), PLT 121 (44-215), β-2 microglobulin 4.9 (3.0-10.2). 16 (89%) patients had chromosomal abnormalities: 3 with 13q, 6 with tris 12, 3 with 11q, and 4 with 17p. 13 (72%) patients have unmutated IGHV. 5 (28%) patients were previously untreated; 13 (72%) had prior therapy (range 1-5; med 2). Median dose of lenalidomide is 2.5mg (range 2.5mg-10mg); median no. cycles is 7 (range 1-28). 11 patients (61%) are still on therapy (7 previously treated): 6 at 2.5mg; 4 at 5mg, and 1 at 10mg. 7 have discontinued therapy: 1 for ITP; 3 for POD including one with Richter’s, 2 for desquamating rash; and 1 withdrew consent. Only 2 patients had tumor lysis and 10 had tumor flare (8 given steroids briefly). In these older patients on long-term continuous treatment, therapy has been generally well tolerated. There have been no deaths on study. Pneumonia developed in 4 patients (3 of these had prior therapy). 1 patient with history of atrial fibrillation developed DVT/PE. Main hematologic toxicity is neutropenia seen in 11 patients but transient. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and anemia was seen in 5 and 0 patients, respectively. Conclusions: Low-dose continuous lenalidomide therapy iappears to be well-tolerated and may offer long term disease control in some patients with CLL. Additional accrual and longer follow-up will be required to further assess the utility of this strategy.

Induction and postremission strategies in acute myeloid leukemia: state of the art and future directions

Although the past decade has brought improvements in the treatment of AML, particularly for younger individuals, most patients succumb to the disease. With current induction therapy, most patients achieve remission, but the optimal strategy for post-remission therapy is unclear. Refinements to risk classification systems that incorporate additional molecular markers may better guide physicians in recommendations for postremission therapy. The prognosis for older patients with AML remains uniformly poor, because only a minority can benefit from intensive chemotherapy and novel HCT strategies. Despite active investigation, no standard of care has emerged for patients who are not suitable candidates for standard induction therapy. The development of less toxic, more effective therapies for this population is sorely needed. Advances in molecular genetics, immunology, and the biology of normal and malignant hematopoiesis pathogenesis have led to an improved understanding of the pathogenesis of AML and to the discovery of potential therapeutic targets. Until a greater proportion of individuals with AML attain long-term survival, patients should routinely be referred to cancer centers and enrolled in investigational studies.

What happened to anti-CD33 therapy for acute myeloid leukemia?

CD33, a 67-kDa glycoprotein expressed on the majority of myeloid leukemia cells as well as on normal myeloid and monocytic precursors, has been an attractive target for monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based therapy of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Lintuzumab, an unconjugated, humanized anti-CD33 mAb, has modest single-agent activity against AML but failed to improve patient outcomes in two randomized trials when combined with conventional chemotherapy. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin, an anti-CD33 mAb conjugated to the antitumor antibiotic calicheamicin, improved survival in a subset of AML patients when combined with standard chemotherapy, but safety concerns led to US marketing withdrawal. The activity of these agents confirms that CD33 remains a viable therapeutic target for AML. Strategies to improve the results of mAb-based therapies for AML include antibody engineering to enhance effector function, use of alternative drugs and chemical linkers to develop safer and more effective drug conjugates, and radioimmunotherapeutic approaches.

Ab therapy of AML: native anti-CD33 Ab and drug conjugates

MAb have become an important treatment modality in cancer therapy.Genetically engineered chimeric and humanized Ab have demonstrated activity against a variety of tumors. While the humanized anti-CD33MAb lintuzumab has only modest single-agent activity against overt AML, it can eliminate minimal residual disease detectable by reverse transcription-PCR in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Targeted chemotherapy with the anti−CD33−calicheamicin construct gemtuzumab ozogamicin has produced remissions in patients with relapsed AML and appears promising when used in combination with standard chemotherapy in the treatment of newly diagnosed AML.

Sequential cytarabine and alpha-particle immunotherapy with bismuth-213-lintuzumab (HuM195) for acute myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE

Lintuzumab (HuM195), a humanized anti-CD33 antibody, targets myeloid leukemia cells and has modest single-agent activity against acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To increase the potency of the antibody without the nonspecific cytotoxicity associated with β-emitters, the α-particle-emitting radionuclide bismuth-213 ((213)Bi) was conjugated to lintuzumab. This phase I/II trial was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and antileukemic effects of (213)Bi-lintuzumab, the first targeted α-emitter, after partially cytoreductive chemotherapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Thirty-one patients with newly diagnosed (n = 13) or relapsed/refractory (n = 18) AML (median age, 67 years; range, 37-80) were treated with cytarabine (200 mg/m(2)/d) for 5 days followed by (213)Bi-lintuzumab (18.5-46.25 MBq/kg).

RESULTS

The MTD of (213)Bi-lintuzumab was 37 MB/kg; myelosuppression lasting >35 days was dose limiting. Extramedullary toxicities were primarily limited to grade ≤2 events, including infusion-related reactions. Transient grade 3/4 liver function abnormalities were seen in five patients (16%). Treatment-related deaths occurred in 2 of 21 (10%) patients who received the MTD. Significant reductions in marrow blasts were seen at all dose levels. The median response duration was 6 months (range, 2-12). Biodistribution and pharmacokinetic studies suggested that saturation of available CD33 sites by (213)Bi-lintuzumab was achieved after partial cytoreduction with cytarabine.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential administration of cytarabine and (213)Bi-lintuzumab is tolerable and can produce remissions in patients with AML.

Complete remissions observed in acute myeloid leukemia following prolonged exposure to lintuzumab: a phase 1 trial

A multi-institutional, phase 1 dose-escalation trial of lintuzumab (humanized anti-CD33 antibody; SGN-33, HuM195) was performed in patients with CD33-positive myeloid malignancies. In this study, higher doses than previously tested and prolonged duration of treatment for responding patients were evaluated. Over the dose range of 1.5-8 mg/kg/week, lintuzumab was well tolerated, and a maximum tolerated dose was not defined. The most common adverse event was transient chills with the initial lintuzumab infusion (39%). Responses were observed in 7 of 17 patients with acute myeloid leukemia: morphologic complete remission (n = 4), partial remission (n = 2), and morphologic leukemia-free state (n = 1). Of 14 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative diseases, 1 patient had major hematologic improvement and 9 patients had stable disease. In contrast to aggressive conventional chemotherapy, lintuzumab was administered in an ambulatory clinic setting with acceptable toxicity.

Sequential therapy with fludarabine, high-dose cyclophosphamide, and rituximab in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia produces high-quality responses: molecular remissions predict for durable complete responses

PURPOSE

Modern combination strategies are active in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) but can have significant myelosuppression and immunosuppression that may require dose attenuation for safety. We explored a sequential treatment strategy to allow safe delivery of active agents at full doses. Previously, we studied sequential therapy with fludarabine followed by cyclophosphamide (F-->C). In that study, cyclophosphamide consolidation improved the frequency of complete response (CR) four-fold. Subsequently, rituximab was added to this regimen (F-->C-->R).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-six previously untreated CLL patients received therapy with fludarabine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 through 5 every 4 weeks for six cycles, followed by consolidation with cyclophosphamide 3,000 mg/m(2) administered every 3 weeks for three cycles, followed by consolidation with weekly rituximab 375 mg/m(2) for four cycles. Evaluation for minimal residual disease included flow cytometry and a highly sensitive clonotypic polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The median age was 59 years (range, 37 to 71 years), 61% of patients had high-risk disease, and 58% had unmutated IgV(H) genes.

RESULTS

There were 32 responses (89%), including 22 CRs (61%). Consolidation with cyclophosphamide improved responses in 13 patients (36%); nine patients (25%) further improved their response with rituximab. Twenty patients (56%) achieved flow cytometric CRs, and 12 patients (33%) achieved a molecular CR (PCR negative). Patients achieving molecular CRs had an excellent prognosis with a plateau in the response duration curve, and 90% remain in clinical CR at 5 years. For the entire group, 5-year survival rate is 71% compared with a rate of 48% with our prior F-->C regimen (P = .10).

CONCLUSION

Sequential therapy with F-->C-->R yields improvement in quality of response, with many patients achieving a PCR-negative state.