Optimal duration and timing of adjuvant chemotherapy after definitive surgery for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: ongoing lessons from the ESPAC-3 study

Effect of surgical approach on early return to intended oncologic therapy after resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although robotic pancreatectomy may facilitate an earlier functional recovery, the impact of a robotic pancreatectomy program during its early experience on the timing of return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT) after surgery is unknown.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we used propensity score matching with a 1:2 ratio to compare patients who underwent robotic or open surgery (distal pancreatectomy or pancreatoduodenectomy) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) during the first 3 years of our robotic pancreatectomy experience (January 2018-December 2021). Generalized estimating equations modeling was used to evaluate the effect of surgical approach on early RIOT, defined as adjuvant chemotherapy initiation within 8 weeks after surgery, and late RIOT, defined as initiation within 12 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

The matched cohort included 26 patients who underwent robotic pancreatectomy and 52 patients who underwent open pancreatectomy. Rates of receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were 96.2% and 78.9%, respectively. Rate of early RIOT in the robotic group (73.1% was higher than that in the open group (44.2%; P = 0.018). In multivariable analysis, a robotic approach was associated with early RIOT (odds ratio, 3.54; 95% confidence interval 1.08-11.62; P = 0.038). Surgical approach did not impact late RIOT (odds ratio, 3.21; 95% confidence interval 0.71-14.38; P = 0.128).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with open pancreatectomy, robotic pancreatectomy did not delay RIOT. In fact, odds of early RIOT were increased, which supports the oncological safety of our robotic pancreatectomy program during its implementation.

Short-term results of robot-assisted pancreatoduodeodenectomy: a retrospective cohort study of 146 patients operated in a high-volume center

BACKGROUND

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a challenging operation because of complex anatomy and difficult and multiple reconstructions. Robot-assisted PD (RPD) is a novel minimally invasive technique, providing equivalent oncological outcomes to open surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of a single high-volume center series.

METHODS

Patients who underwent RPD from 2014 to 2021 in a high-volume center were included. Patient and disease-specific data, operative details, postoperative complications including postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), length of stay (LOS) and long-term survival were recorded. Two groups were compared: Group 1: patients operated between 2014-2019 and Group 2 between 2020-2021.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-six patients had RPD on the study period (99 in Group 1 and 47 in Group 2). Operative time was 320 min (285-360), major complications were observed in 28% and clinically significant POPF in 20% of the cases. Conversion rate was 2.1%. LOS was 14 days (9-22). Postoperative mortality was 4.1%. Clinically significant POPF decreased from 24% in Group 1 to 11% in Group 2 (p = 0.05). LOS decreased from 16(11-26) days in Group 1 to 11(8-14) in Group 2 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

RPD is safe and feasible. Technique standardization led to better post-operative outcomes, encouraging the dissemination and implementation of the procedure.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: the latest on diagnosis, molecular profiling, and systemic treatments

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is currently the fourth leading cause of death in the United States and is expected to be ranked second in the next 10 years due to poor prognosis and a rising incidence. Distant metastatic PDAC is associated with the worst prognosis among the different phases of PDAC. The diagnostic options for PDAC are convenient and available for staging, tumor response evaluation, and management of resectable or borderline resectable PDAC. However, imaging is crucial in PDAC diagnosis, monitoring, resectability appraisal, and response evaluation. The advancement of medical technologies is evolving, hence the use of imaging in PDAC treatment options has grown as well as the utilization of ctDNA as a tumor marker. Treatment options for metastatic PDAC are minimal with the primary goal of therapy limited to symptom relief or palliation, especially in patients with low functional capacity at the point of diagnosis. Molecular profiling has shown promising potential solutions that would push the treatment boundaries for patients with PDAC. In this review, we will discuss the latest updates from evidence-based guidelines regarding diagnosis, therapy response evaluation, prognosis, and surveillance, as well as illustrating novel therapies that have been recently investigated for PDAC, in addition to discussing the molecular profiling advances in PDAC.

Clinical significance of postoperative complications after pancreatic surgery in time-to-complication and length of postoperative hospital stay: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

We retrospectively analyzed pancreatectomy patients and examined the occurrence rate and timing of postoperative complications (time-to-complication; TTC) and their impact on the length of postoperative hospital stay (POHS) to clarify their characteristics, provide appropriate postoperative management, and improve short-term outcomes in the future.

METHODS

A total of 227 patients, composed of 118 pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and 109 distal pancreatectomy (DP) cases, were analyzed. We examined the frequency of occurrence, TTC, and POHS of each type of postoperative complication, and these were analyzed for each surgical procedure. Complications of the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification Grade II or higher were considered clinically significant.

RESULTS

Clinically significant complications were observed in 70.3% and 36.7% of the patients with PD and DP, respectively. Complications occurred at a median of 10 days in patients with PD and 6 days in patients with DP. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) occurred approximately 7 days postoperatively in both groups. For the POHS, in cases without significant postoperative complications (CD ≤ I), it was approximately 22 days for PD and 11 days for DP. In contrast, when any complications occurred, POHS increased to 30 days for PD and 19 days for DP (each with additional 8 days), respectively. In particular, POPF prolonged the hospital stay by approximately 11 days for both procedures.

CONCLUSION

Each postoperative complication after pancreatectomy has its own characteristics in terms of the frequency of occurrence, TTC, and impact on POHS. A correct understanding of these factors will enable timely therapeutic intervention and improve short-term outcomes after pancreatectomy.

Neoadjuvant therapy for localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive tumor with poor prognosis and rising incidence globally. Multimodal therapy that includes surgical resection and chemotherapy with or without radiation offers the best chance for optimal outcomes. The development of established criteria for anatomic staging of local primary tumors into potentially resectable (PR), borderline resectable (BR), and locally advanced (LA) has greatly clarified the optimal treatment strategies. While upfront surgical resection was traditionally the recommended approach for localized PDAC, increasingly neoadjuvant therapy (NT) is recommended prior to surgery. Whereas NT can lead to downstaging that facilitates surgical resection for BR/LA cancers, NT also enhances patient selection for surgery, improves margin-negative resection rates, and increases the odds of completing multimodality therapy for all patients with PDAC. Herein, we review the rationale for NT for localized PDAC and summarize existing and ongoing literature.

Impact of time from diagnosis to chemotherapy on prognosis in advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Due to the aggressive nature and poor prognosis of advanced pancreatic cancer, prompt initiation of treatment is critical. We investigated the effect of the interval between cancer diagnosis and initiation of chemotherapy on survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-centre study, consecutive patients with advanced pancreatic cancer between April 2013 and March 2022 were analyzed. Data were extracted from the electronic medical records of patients who received chemotherapy for metastatic, locally advanced or resectable pancreatic cancer or who received chemotherapy due to either being intolerant of or declining surgery. We compared overall survival between two groups: the early waiting time group (waiting time ≤30 days from diagnosis to chemotherapy initiation) and the elective waiting time group (waiting time ≥31 days). Prognostic factors, including biliary drainage, were considered. The impact of waiting time on survival was assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses with Cox proportional hazard models. A 1:1 propensity score matching approach was used to balance bias, accounting for significant poor prognosis factors, age and sex.

RESULTS

The study involved 137 patients. Overall survival exhibited no statistically significant difference between the early and elective waiting time groups (207 and 261 days, P = 0.2518). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified poor performance status and metastasis presence as predictors of worse prognosis. This finding persisted post propensity score matching (275 and 222 days, P = 0.8223).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that initiating chemotherapy ˃30 days later does not significantly affect treatment efficacy compared to within 30 days of diagnosis.

Advances in Surgery and (Neo) Adjuvant Therapy in the Management of Pancreatic Cancer

A multimodality approach, which usually includes chemotherapy, surgery, and/or radiotherapy, is optimal for patients with localized pancreatic cancer. The timing and sequence of these interventions depend on anatomic resectability and the biological suitability of the tumor and the patient. Tumors with vascular involvement (ie, borderline resectable/locally advanced) require surgical reassessments after therapy and participation of surgeons familiar with advanced techniques. When indicated, venous reconstruction should be offered as standard of care because it has acceptable morbidity. Morbidity and mortality of pancreas surgery may be mitigated when surgery is performed at high-volume centers.

Very Early Recurrence After Curative Resection for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Proof of Concept for a "Biological R2 Definition"

PURPOSE

Very early recurrence after radical surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been poorly investigated. This study was designed to evaluate this group of patients who developed recurrence, within 12 weeks after surgery, defined as "biological R2 resections (bR2)."

METHODS

Data from patients who underwent surgical resection as upfront procedure or after neoadjuvant treatment for PDAC between 2015 and 2019 were analyzed. Disease-free, disease-specific survival, and independent predictors of early recurrence were examined. The same analysis was performed separately for upfront and neoadjuvant treated patients.

RESULTS

Of the 573 patients included in the study, 63 (11%) were classified as bR2. The rate of neoadjuvant treatment was similar in bR2 and in the remaining patients (44 vs. 42%, p = 0.78). After a median follow-up of 27 months, median DFS and DSS for the entire cohort were 17 and 43 months, respectively. Median DSS of bR2 group was 13 months. The only preoperative identifiable independent predictor of very early recurrence was body-tail site lesion, whereas all other were pathological: higher pT (8th classification), G3 differentiation, and high lymph node ratio. These predictors were confirmed for patients undergoing upfront surgery, whereas in the neoadjuvant group the only independent predictor was pT.

CONCLUSIONS

One of ten patients with "radical" resected PDAC relapses very early after surgery (bR2); hence, imaging must be routinely repeated within 12 weeks. Despite higher biological aggressiveness and worse pathology, this bR2 cluster eludes our preoperative examinations.

Meta-analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy versus no adjuvant chemotherapy for resected stage I pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate comparative outcomes of pancreatic cancer resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage I pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science and bibliographic reference lists were conducted. All comparative studies reporting outcomes of pancreatic cancer resection for stage I cancer with or without adjuvant chemotherapy were included, and their risk of bias was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions tool. Survival outcomes were analyzed using the hazard ratio and odds ratio for the time-to-event and dichotomous outcomes, respectively.

RESULTS

We included 6 comparative studies reporting a total of 6,874 patients with resected stage 1 pancreatic cancer, of whom 3,951 patients had no adjuvant chemotherapy, and the remaining 2,923 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with significantly higher overall survival (hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.62-0.82, P < .00001) and 2-year survival (65.1% vs 57.4%, odds ratio 1.99; 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.41, P = .04) compared to no use of adjuvant chemotherapy. However, there was no statistically significant difference in 1-year (86.8% vs 78.4%, odds ratio 1.60; 95% confidence interval 0.72-3.57, P = .25), 3-year (46.0% vs 44.0%, odds ratio 1.07; 95% confidence interval 0.90-1.29, P = .43), or 5-year survival (24.8% vs 23.3%, odds ratio 1.03; 95% confidence interval 0.80-1.33, P = .81) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Meta-analysis of best available evidence (level 2a with low to moderate certainty) demonstrates that adjuvant chemotherapy may confer survival benefits for stage I pancreatic cancer when compared to the use of surgery alone. Randomized control trials are required to escalate the level of evidence and confirm these findings with consideration of contemporary chemotherapy agents and regimens.

TRIANGLE operation, combined with adequate adjuvant chemotherapy, can improve the prognosis of pancreatic head cancer: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The TRIANGLE operation involves the removal of all tissues within the triangle bounded by the portal vein-superior mesenteric vein, celiac axis-common hepatic artery, and superior mesenteric artery to improve patient prognosis. Although previously promising in patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), data are limited regarding the long-term oncological outcomes of the TRIANGLE operation among resectable PDAC patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

AIM

To evaluate the safety of the TRIANGLE operation during PD and the prognosis in patients with resectable PDAC.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent PD for pancreatic head cancer between January 2017 and April 2023, with or without the TRIANGLE operation. Patients were divided into the PDTRIANGLE and PDnon-TRIANGLE groups. Surgical and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. Adequate adjuvant chemotherapy was defined as adjuvant chemotherapy ≥ 6 months.

RESULTS

The PDTRIANGLE and PDnon-TRIANGLE groups included 52 and 55 patients, respectively. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics or perioperative indexes between the two groups. Furthermore, the recurrence rate was lower in the PDTRIANGLE group than in the PDnon-TRIANGLE group (48.1% vs 81.8%, P < 0.001), and the local recurrence rate of PDAC decreased from 37.8% to 16.0%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that PDTRIANGLE (HR = 0.424; 95%CI: 0.256-0.702; P = 0.001), adequate adjuvant chemotherapy ≥ 6 months (HR = 0.370; 95%CI: 0.222-0.618; P < 0.001) and margin status (HR = 2.255; 95%CI: 1.252-4.064; P = 0.007) were found to be independent factors for the recurrence rate.

CONCLUSION

The TRIANGLE operation is safe for PDAC patients undergoing PD. Moreover, it reduces the local recurrence rate of PDAC and may improve survival in patients who receive adequate adjuvant chemotherapy.

Adjuvant chemotherapy omission after pancreatic cancer resection: a French nationwide study

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) improves the prognosis after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) resection. However, previous studies have shown that a large proportion of patients do not receive or complete AC. This national study examined the risk factors for the omission or interruption of AC.

METHODS

Data of all patients who underwent pancreatic surgery for PDAC in France between January 2012 and December 2017 were extracted from the French National Administrative Database. We considered "omission of adjuvant chemotherapy" (OAC) all patients who failed to receive any course of gemcitabine within 12 postoperative weeks and "interruption of AC" (IAC) was defined as less than 18 courses of AC.

RESULTS

A total of 11 599 patients were included in this study. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was the most common procedure (76.3%), and 31% of the patients experienced major postoperative complications. OACs and IACs affected 42% and 68% of the patients, respectively. Ultimately, only 18.6% of the cohort completed AC. Patients who underwent surgery in a high-volume centers were less affected by postoperative complications, with no impact on the likelihood of receiving AC. Multivariate analysis showed that age ≥ 80 years, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥ 4, and major complications were associated with OAC (OR = 2.19; CI95%[1.79-2.68]; OR = 1.75; CI95%[1.41-2.18] and OR = 2.37; CI95%[2.15-2.62] respectively). Moreover, age ≥ 80 years and CCI 2-3 or ≥ 4 were also independent risk factors for IAC (OR = 1.54, CI95%[1.1-2.15]; OR = 1.43, CI95%[1.21-1.68]; OR = 1.47, CI95%[1.02-2.12], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Sequence surgery followed by chemotherapy is associated with a high dropout rate, especially in octogenarian and comorbid patients.

The Role of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive malignancy. Recurrences are very high despite high-quality surgery necessitating adjuvant therapy. The evolution of adjuvant therapy took several decades and gradually evolved from single-agent chemotherapy to multi-agent chemotherapy. The two important agents that are active in pancreatic cancer are 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine, and with several combinations showing better results in the subsequent trials, the most recent trial PRODIGE 24 shows a median survival of 54.4 months. The role of neoadjuvant therapy is still evolving in resectable cancers. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy is not well defined due to controversial results from historical trials.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiation Improves Recurrence-free and Overall Survival in Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to analyze the outcomes of patients with resectable/borderline resectable PDAC who receive total neoadjuvant therapy vs upfront surgery.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Patients who were treated at a single institution from 2006 to 2021 were included. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included disease free survival (DFS), rates of lymph node positivity, and R0 resection. All survival analyses were performed with intention-to-treat.

RESULTS

26 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation (TNT), 28 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy only (NAC), and 168 received upfront surgery. Demographics were comparable across all three groups. Patients who received TNT or NAC had longer OS and DFS compared to the surgery first patients (P < .01). Patients who received TNT had a lymph node positivity rate of 0% at time of surgery compared to 5.3% and 13.3% in the NAC and surgery-first groups, respectively (P < .01). The rate of R0 resection did not differ between groups (P = .17).

CONCLUSION

Patients with resectable/borderline resectable PDAC who receive neoadjuvant therapy have longer OS and RFS relative to those who receive upfront surgery.

Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) compared with conventional pancreatic transection in distal pancreatectomy: study protocol for the randomised controlled CUSA-1 pilot trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains the most common and serious complication after distal pancreatectomy. Many attempts at lowering fistula rates have led to unrewarding insignificant results as still up to 30% of the patients suffer from clinically relevant POPF. Therefore, the development of new innovative methods and procedures is still a cornerstone of current surgical research.The cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) device is a well-known ultrasound-based parenchyma transection method, often used in liver and neurosurgery which has not yet been thoroughly investigated in pancreatic surgery, but the first results seem very promising.

METHODS

The CUSA-1 trial is a randomised controlled pilot trial with two parallel study groups. This single-centre trial is assessor and patient blinded. A total of 60 patients with an indication for open distal pancreatectomy will be intraoperatively randomised after informed consent. The patients will be randomly assigned to either the control group with conventional pancreas transection (scalpel or stapler) or the experimental group, with transection using the CUSA device. The primary safety endpoint of this trial will be postoperative complications ≥grade 3 according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The primary endpoint to investigate the effect will be the rate of POPF within 30 days postoperatively according to the ISGPS definition. Further perioperative outcomes, including postpancreatectomy haemorrhage, length of hospital stay and mortality will be analysed as secondary endpoints.

DISCUSSION

Based on the available literature, CUSA may have a beneficial effect on POPF occurrence after distal pancreatectomy. The rationale of the CUSA-1 pilot trial is to investigate the safety and feasibility of the CUSA device in elective open distal pancreatectomy compared with conventional dissection methods and gather the first data on the effect on POPF occurrence. This data will lay the groundwork for a future confirmatory multicentre randomised controlled trial.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The CUSA-1 trial protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Heidelberg (No. S-098/2022). Results will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal and summaries will be provided in lay language to study participants and their relatives.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS00027474.

ASO Practice Guidelines Series: Management of Resectable, Borderline Resectable, and Locally Advanced Pancreas Cancer

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an aggressive disease marked by high rates of both local and distant failure. In the minority of patients with potentially resectable disease, multimodal treatment paradigms have allowed for prolonged survival in an increasingly larger pool of well-selected patients. Therefore, it is critical for surgical oncologists to be abreast of current guideline recommendations for both surgical management and multimodal therapy for pancreas cancer. We discuss these guidelines, as well as the underlying data supporting these positions, to offer surgical oncologists a framework for managing patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Does CT overestimate extra-pancreatic perineural invasion in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy?

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of CT in the assessment of extra-pancreatic perineural invasion (EPNI) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 123 patients (66 men; median age, 66 years) with PDAC who underwent radical surgery and pancreatic protocol CT for assessing surgical resectability between September 2011 and March 2019. Among the 123 patients, 97 patients had received neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Two radiologists reviewed the CT images for evidence of EPNI using a 5-point scale (5 = definitely present, 4 = probably present, 3 = equivocally present, 2 = probably absent, and 1 = definitely absent). Diagnostic performance for assessing EPNI was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve for assessing EPNI were 98%, 30%, and 0.62 in all patients; 97%, 22%, and 0.59 in patients with neoadjuvant CRT; and 100%, 100%, and 1.00 in patients without neoadjuvant CRT, respectively. False-positive assessment of EPNI occurred in 23% of patients (n = 28/123), and 100% of these (n = 28/28) had received neoadjuvant CRT. There was moderate to substantial agreement between the readers (ĸ = 0.49-0.62).

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic protocol CT has better diagnostic performance for determination of EPNI in treatment naïve patients with PDAC and overestimation of EPNI is likely in patients who have received preoperative CRT.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Pancreatic protocol CT has better diagnostic performance for the detection of EPNI in treatment naïve patients compared to patients receiving neoadjuvant CRT.

C-Reactive Protein-to-Albumin Ratio to Predict Tolerability of S-1 as an Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer

Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) with S-1 after radical surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer (PC) has shown a significant survival advantage over surgery alone. Consequently, ensuring that patients receive a consistent, uninterrupted S-1 regimen is of paramount importance. This study aimed to investigate whether the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) could predict S-1 AC completion in PC patients without dropout due to adverse events (AEs). We retrospectively enrolled 95 patients who underwent radical pancreatectomy and S-1 AC for PC between January 2010 and December 2022. A statistical analysis was conducted to explore the correlation of predictive markers with S-1 completion, defined as continuous oral administration for 6 months. Among the 95 enrolled patients, 66 (69.5%) completed S-1, and 29 (30.5%) failed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed 0.05 as the optimal CAR threshold to predict S-1 completion. Univariate and multivariate analyses further validated that a CAR ≥ 0.05 was independently correlated with S-1 completion (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively). Furthermore, a significant association was established between a higher CAR at initiation of oral administration and acceptable recurrence-free and overall survival (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively). CAR ≥ 0.05 serves as a predictive marker for difficulty in completing S-1 treatment as AC for PC due to AEs.

Impact on Survival of Early Versus Late Initiation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Surgery: A Target Trial Emulation

BACKGROUND

We examined the impact of early (0-4 weeks after discharge) versus late (> 4-8 weeks after discharge) initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy on pancreatic adenocarcinoma survival.

METHODS

We used Danish population-based healthcare registries to emulate a hypothetical target trial using the clone-censor-weight approach. All eligible patients were cloned with one clone assigned to 'early initiation' and one clone assigned to 'late initiation'. Clones were censored when the assigned treatment was no longer compatible with the actual treatment. Informative censoring was addressed using inverse probability of censoring weighting.

RESULTS

We included 1491 patients in a hypothetical target trial, of whom 32.3% initiated chemotherapy within 0-4 weeks and 38.3% between > 4 and 8 weeks after discharge for pancreatic adenocarcinoma surgery; 206 (13.8%) initiated chemotherapy after > 8 weeks, and 232 (15.6%) did not initiate chemotherapy. Median overall survival was 30.4 and 29.9 months in late and early initiators, respectively. The absolute differences in OS, comparing late with early initiators, were 3.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] - 1.5%, 7.9%), - 0.7% (95% CI - 7.2%, 5.8%), and 3.2% (95% CI - 2.8%, 9.3%) at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Late initiators had a higher increase in albumin levels as well as higher pretreatment albumin values.

CONCLUSIONS

Postponement of adjuvant chemotherapy up to 8 weeks after discharge from pancreatic adenocarcinoma surgery is safe and may allow more patients to receive adjuvant therapy due to better recovery.

Improving the prognosis of pancreatic cancer: insights from epidemiology, genomic alterations, and therapeutic challenges

Pancreatic cancer, notorious for its late diagnosis and aggressive progression, poses a substantial challenge owing to scarce treatment alternatives. This review endeavors to furnish a holistic insight into pancreatic cancer, encompassing its epidemiology, genomic characterization, risk factors, diagnosis, therapeutic strategies, and treatment resistance mechanisms. We delve into identifying risk factors, including genetic predisposition and environmental exposures, and explore recent research advancements in precursor lesions and molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer. Additionally, we highlight the development and application of multi-omics approaches in pancreatic cancer research and discuss the latest combinations of pancreatic cancer biomarkers and their efficacy. We also dissect the primary mechanisms underlying treatment resistance in this malignancy, illustrating the latest therapeutic options and advancements in the field. Conclusively, we accentuate the urgent demand for more extensive research to enhance the prognosis for pancreatic cancer patients.

Big data and RCT's in surgical oncology: Impact on improving hepatopancreatobiliary cancer surgical care on the global stage

Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) are at the heart of "evidence-based" medicine. Conducting well-designed RCTs for surgical procedures is often challenged by inadequate recruitment accrual, blinding, or standardization of the surgical procedure, as well as lack of funding and evolution of the treatment strategy during the many years over which such trials are conducted. In addition, most clinical trials are performed in academic high-volume centers with highly selected patients, which may not necessarily reflect a "real-world" practice setting. Large databases provide easy and inexpensive access to data on a large and diverse patient population at a variety of treatment centers. Furthermore, large database studies provide the opportunity to answer questions that would be impossible or very arduous to answer using RCTs, including questions regarding health policy efficacy, trends in surgical practice, access to health care, the impact of hospital volume, and adherence to practice guidelines, as well as research questions regarding rare disease, infrequent surgical outcomes, and specific subpopulations. Prospective data registries may also allow for quality benchmarking and auditing. There are several high-quality RCTs providing evidence to support current practices in hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) oncology. Evidence from big data bridges the gap in several instances where RCTs are lacking. In this article, we review the evidence from RCTs and big data in HPB oncology identify the existing lacunae, and discuss the future directions of research in HPB oncology.

Effect of duration of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (6 versus 12 months) for resected pancreatic cancer: the multicenter clinical randomized phase II postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy S-1 (PACS-1) trial

BACKGROUND

Six-month adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 is standard care for resected pancreatic cancer in Japan; however, the optimal duration has not been established. We aimed to evaluate the impact of duration of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II study. Patients with histologically proven invasive pancreatic ductal carcinoma, pathological stage I-III, and no local residual or microscopic residual tumor were eligible. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 6- or 12-month adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1. The primary endpoint was 2-year overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and feasibility.

RESULTS

A total of 170 patients were randomized (85 per group); the full analysis set was 82 in both groups. Completion rates were 64.7% (6-month group) and 44.0% (12-month group). Two-year OS was 71.5% (6-month group) and 65.4% (12-month group) (hazard ratio (HR): 1.143; 80% confidence interval CI 0.841-1.553; P  =  0.5758). Two-year DFS was 46.4% (6-month group) and 44.9% (12-month group) (HR: 1.069; 95% CI 0.727-1.572; P = 0.6448). In patients who completed the regimen, 2-year DFS was 56.5% (6-month group) and 75.0% (12-month group) (HR: 0.586; 95% CI 0.310-1.105; P  = 0.0944). Frequent (≥ 5%) grade ≥ 3 adverse events comprised anorexia (10.5% in the 6-month group) and diarrhea (5.3% vs. 5.1%; 6- vs. 12-month group, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with resected pancreatic cancer, 12-month adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 was not superior to 6-month therapy regarding OS and DFS.

A Simple Overview of Pancreatic Cancer Treatment for Clinical Oncologists

Pancreatic cancer (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive solid tumors and is showing increasing incidence. The aim of our review is to provide practical help for all clinical oncologists and to summarize the current management of PDAC using a simple "ABC method" (A-anatomical resectability, B-biological resectability and C-clinical conditions). For anatomically resectable PDAC without any high-risk factors (biological or conditional), the actual standard of care is represented by surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The remaining PDAC patients should all be treated with initial systemic therapy, though the intent for each is different: for borderline resectable patients, the intent is neoadjuvant; for locally advanced patients, the intent is conversion; and for metastatic PDAC patients, the intent remains just palliative. The actual standard of care in first-line therapy is represented by two regimens: FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Recently, NALIRIFOX showed positive results over gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. There are limited data for maintenance therapy after first-line treatment, though 5-FU or FOLFIRI after initial FOLFIRINOX, and gemcitabine, after initial gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, might be considered. We also dedicate space to special rare conditions, such as PDAC with germline BRCA mutations, pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas, with few clinically relevant remarks.

Why the Treatment Sequence Matters: Interplay Between Chemotherapy Cycles Received, Cumulative Dose Intensity, and Survival in Resected Early-stage Pancreas Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To define the optimal threshold of perioperative chemotherapy completion and relative dose intensity (RDI) for patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

BACKGROUND

Many patients who undergo pancreatectomy for PDAC fail to initiate or complete recommended perioperative chemotherapy. The association between the amount of perioperative chemotherapy received and overall survival (OS) is not well-defined.

METHODS

Single-institution analysis of 225 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for stage I/II PDAC (2010-2021). Associations between OS, chemotherapy cycles completed, and RDI were analyzed.

RESULTS

Regardless of treatment sequence, completion of ≥67% of recommended cycles was associated with improved OS compared with no chemotherapy [median OS: 34.5 vs 18.1 months; hazard ratio (HR): 0.43; 95% CI: 0.25-0.74] and <67% of cycles (median OS: 17.9 months; HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.24-0.64). A near-linear relationship existed between cycles completed and the RDI received (β = 0.82). A median RDI of 56% corresponded to the completion of 67% of cycles. Receipt of ≥56% RDI was associated with improved OS compared with no chemotherapy (median OS: 35.5 vs 18.1 months; HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.23-0.84) and <56% RDI (median OS: 27.2 months; HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.20-0.96). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with increased odds of receiving ≥67% of recommended cycles (odds ratio: 2.94; 95% CI: 1.45-6.26) and ≥56% RDI (odds ratio: 4.47; 95% CI: 1.72-12.50).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PDAC who received ≥67% of recommended chemotherapy cycles or ≥56% cumulative RDI had improved OS. Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with increased odds of receiving ≥67% of cycles and ≥56% cumulative RDI and should be considered in all patients with resectable PDAC.

A new staging system for postoperative prognostication in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

The current TNM staging system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has revised the definitions of T and N categories as well as stage groups. However, studies validating these modifications have yielded inconsistent results. The existing TNM staging system in prognostic prediction remains unsatisfactory. The prognosis of PDAC is closely associated with pathological and biological factors. Herein, we propose a new staging system incorporating distant metastasis, postoperative serum levels of CA19-9 and CEA, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular involvement, and perineural invasion to enhance the accuracy of prognosis assessment. The proposed staging system exhibited a strong correlation with both overall survival and recurrence-free survival, effectively stratifying survival into five distinct tiers. Additionally, it had favorable discrimination and calibration. Thus, the proposed staging system demonstrates superior prognostic performance compared to the TNM staging system, and can serve as a valuable complementary tool to address the limitations of TNM staging in prognostication.

Impact of sarcopenia on S1 adjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis in pancreatic cancer patients

Although the importance of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) has been recognized in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients, there are few studies to address the underlying mechanisms of failure to complete AC. This study aims to investigate the relationship between nutritional state represented by sarcopenia and failure to complete AC in patients after curative-intent surgery for PC. This study included 110 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for potentially resectable pancreatic cancers with intention of adjuvant S-1. Sarcopenia was defined using the psoas muscle mass index with cutoff values of 6.36 cm2/m2 for men and 3.92 cm2/m2 for women, which were calculated with a 3-D volumetric software. The relation between sarcopenia and successful AC and long-term survival were investigated. Twenty-nine (26%) patients were diagnosed as having sarcopenia (Sarcopenia group). Sarcopenia group comprised significantly older patients than Non-sarcopenia group (72 vs. 67 years old, p = 0.0087). AC was successfully completed in 14 patients (48%) in Sarcopenia group compared to 72 patients (89%) in Non-sarcopenia group (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified age ≥ 70 years and sarcopenia as significant risk factors for failure of AC. Among patients ≥ 70 years old, rate of successful AC was significantly higher in sarcopenia groups than non-sarcopenia group (17% vs. 78%, p < 0.001). In conclusions, age and sarcopenia were critical risk factors for the failure of 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy. Among elderly patients, sarcopenia can predict the poor success rate of AC.

Serious complications of pancreatoduodenectomy correlate with lower rates of adjuvant chemotherapy: Results from the recurrence after Whipple's (RAW) study

INTRODUCTION

Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) can prolong overall survival (OS) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, fitness for AC may be influenced by postoperative recovery. We aimed to investigate if serious (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) postoperative complications affected AC rates, disease recurrence and OS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were extracted from the Recurrence After Whipple's (RAW) study (n = 1484), a retrospective study of PD outcomes (29 centres from eight countries). Patients who died within 90-days of PD were excluded. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare OS in those receiving or not receiving AC, and those with and without serious postoperative complications. The groups were then compared using univariable and multivariable tests.

RESULTS

Patients who commenced AC (vs no AC) had improved OS (median difference: (MD): 201 days), as did those who completed their planned course of AC (MD: 291 days, p < 0.0001). Those who commenced AC were younger (mean difference: 2.7 years, p = 0.0002), more often (preoperative) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II (74% vs 63%, p = 0.004) and had less often experienced a serious postoperative complication (10% vs 18%, p = 0.002). Patients who developed a serious postoperative complication were less often ASA grade I-II (52% vs 73%, p = 0.0004) and less often commenced AC (58% vs 74%, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

In our multicentre study of PD outcomes, PDAC patients who received AC had improved OS, and those who experienced a serious postoperative complication commenced AC less frequently. Selected high-risk patients may benefit from targeted preoperative optimisation and/or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Major Postoperative Complications Limit Adjuvant Therapy Administration in Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma or Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines for perioperative systemic therapy administration in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA) are evolving. Decisions regarding adjuvant therapy are influenced by postoperative morbidity, which is common after pancreatoduodenectomy. We evaluated whether postoperative complications are associated with receipt of adjuvant therapy after pancreatoduodenectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for PDAC or dCCA from 2015 to 2020 was conducted. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and postoperative variables were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 186 patients were included-145 with PDAC and 41 with dCCA. Postoperative complication rates were similar for both pathologies (61% and 66% for PDAC and dCCA, respectively). Major postoperative complications (MPCs), defined as Clavien-Dindo >3, occurred in 15% and 24% of PDAC and dCCA patients, respectively. Patients with MPCs received lower rates of adjuvant therapy administration, irrespective of primary tumor (PDAC: 21 vs. 72%, p = 0.008; dCCA: 20 vs. 58%, p = 0.065). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was worse for patients with PDAC who experienced an MPC [8 months (interquartile range [IQR] 1-15) vs. 23 months (IQR 19-27), p < 0.001] or who did not receive any perioperative systemic therapy [11 months (IQR 7-15) vs. 23 months (IQR 18-29), p = 0.038]. In patients with dCCA, 1-year RFS was worse for patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy (55 vs. 77%, p = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for either PDAC or dCCA and who experienced an MPC had lower rates of adjuvant therapy and worse RFS, suggesting that clinicians adopt a standard neoadjuvant systemic therapy strategy in patients with PDAC. Our results propose a paradigm shift towards preoperative systemic therapy in patients with dCCA.

Standard versus delayed initiation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for pancreatic cancer: a secondary analysis of a nationwide cohort by the Japan Pancreas Society

BACKGROUND

Based on the Japan Adjuvant Study Group of Pancreatic Cancer-01 results, S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy has been the standard in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients in Japan and elsewhere, initiated within 10 weeks after surgery. To assess the clinical impact of this timing, we conducted a secondary analysis of a nationwide survey by the Japan Pancreas Society.

METHODS

A total of 3361 patients were divided into two groups: 2681 (79.8%) initiating the therapy within 10 weeks after surgery (standard) and 680 (20.2%) after 10 weeks (delayed). We compared recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model with conditional landmark analysis between the groups. Results were verified by adjustment with inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis.

RESULTS

The median timing of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy initiation was 50 days (interquartile range: 38-66). In the standard group, 5-year RFS and OS rates were 32.3-48.7%, respectively, compared with 25.0-38.7% in the delayed group. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals were 0.84 (0.76-0.93) for RFS (p < 0.001) and 0.77 (0.69-0.87) for OS (p < 0.001). The IPTW analysis yielded 5-year RFS rates of 32.1% and 25.3% in the standard versus delayed group, respectively [HR = 0.86 (0.77-0.96), p < 0.001] and 5-year OS rates of 48.3% and 39.8%, respectively [HR = 0.81 (0.71-0.92), p < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Initiation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in resected PDAC patients within 10 weeks after surgery may offer survival benefit over later initiation.

The Implications of Treatment Delays in Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Cholangiocarcinoma Patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to understand factors associated with timing of adjuvant therapy for cholangiocarcinoma and the impact of delays on overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients with non-metastatic bile duct cancer from 2004 to 2015 were analyzed. Patients were included only if they underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (RT). Patients who underwent neoadjuvant or palliative treatments were excluded. Pearson's chi-squared test and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the distribution of demographic, clinical, and treatment factors. After propensity score matching with inverse probability of treatment weighting, OS was compared between patients initiating therapy past various time points using Kaplan Meier analyses and doubly robust estimation with multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

In total, 7,733 of 17,363 (45%) patients underwent adjuvant treatment. The median time to adjuvant therapy initiation was 59 days (interquartile range 45-78 days). Age over 65, black and Hispanic race, and treatment with RT alone were associated with later initiation of adjuvant treatment. Patients with larger tumors and high-grade disease were more likely to initiate treatment early. After propensity score weighting, there was an OS decrement to initiation of treatment beyond the median of 59 days after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified characteristics that are related to the timing of adjuvant therapy in patients with biliary cancers. There was an OS decrement associated with delays beyond the median time point of 59 days. This finding may be especially relevant given the treatment delays seen as a result of COVID-19.

A Delay in Adjuvant Therapy Is Associated With Worse Prognosis Only in Patients With Transitional Circulating Tumor Cells After Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to assess the association of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) with survival as a biomarker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) within the context of a delay in the initiation of adjuvant therapy.

BACKGROUND

Outcomes in patients with PDAC remain poor and are driven by aggressive systemic disease. Although systemic therapies improve survival in resected patients, factors such as a delay in the initiation of adjuvant therapy are associated with worse outcomes. CTCs have previously been shown to be predictive of survival.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on PDAC patients enrolled in the prospective CircuLating tUmor cellS in pancreaTic cancER trial (NCT02974764) on CTC-dynamics at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. CTCs were isolated based on size (isolation by size of epithelial tumor cells; Rarecells) and counted and characterized by subtype using immunofluorescence. The preoperative and postoperative blood samples were used to identify 2 CTC types: epithelial CTCs (eCTCs), expressing pancytokeratin, and transitional CTCs (trCTCs), expressing both pancytokeratin and vimentin. Patients who received adjuvant therapy were compared with those who did not. A delay in the receipt of adjuvant therapy was defined as the initiation of therapy ≥8 weeks after surgical resection. Clinicopathologic features, CTCs characteristics, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 101 patients included in the study, 43 (42.5%) experienced a delay in initiation and 20 (19.8%) did not receive adjuvant therapy. On multivariable analysis, the presence of trCTCs ( P =0.002) and the absence of adjuvant therapy ( P =0.032) were associated with worse recurrence-free survival (RFS). Postoperative trCTC were associated with poorer RFS, both in patients with a delay in initiation (12.4 vs 17.9 mo, P =0.004) or no administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (3.4 vs NR, P =0.016). However, it was not associated with RFS in patients with timely initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy ( P =0.293).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative trCTCs positivity is associated with poorer RFS only in patients who either experience a delay in initiation or no receipt of adjuvant therapy. This study suggests that a delay in the initiation of adjuvant therapy could potentially provide residual systemic disease (trCTCs) a window of opportunity to recover from the surgical insult. Future studies are required to validate these findings and explore the underlying mechanisms involved.

[Exocrine pancreatic cancer - what is new in the update of the S3 guideline?]

In 2020, worldwide 495,773 people were diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and 466,003 patients died from pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer ranks 13th among cancer diagnosis and is the 7th most common cause of cancer-related deaths 1.In Germany, each year approximately 10,000 people develop pancreatic cancer and around the same number of patients die from this disease 2. The relative 5-year survival rate is only 10%. The majority of patients die within the year of diagnosis.Incidence and mortality of pancreatic cancer have continuously increased over the recent years. There are multiple reasons for this finding: pancreatic cancer occurs more frequently in older patients which leads to a higher incidence in an aging society. There are no effective screening and early detection measures for sporadic pancreatic cancer. Therefore, the majority of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage where the tumor is no longer amenable to curative treatment. Furthermore, the majority of pancreatic cancers is per se likely to constitute a disseminated disease, even if initial imaging suggests a localized, surgically amenable disease. This is reflected by the high rate of early metastases and the small number of patients with long-term survival after surgery with curative intent.The S3 guideline exocrine pancreatic cancer aims to present the available evidence on epidemiology, molecular alterations, diagnostics, surgical and non-surgical treatment as well as palliative measures in order to support all those involved in the treatment of this tumor and to improve the care of patients.To better address this need, the S3 guideline was updated again in 2022 and also changed to a living guideline with regular updates to further improve the timeliness of the guideline.

Personalized RNA neoantigen vaccines stimulate T cells in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is lethal in 88% of patients1, yet harbours mutation-derived T cell neoantigens that are suitable for vaccines 2,3. Here in a phase I trial of adjuvant autogene cevumeran, an individualized neoantigen vaccine based on uridine mRNA-lipoplex nanoparticles, we synthesized mRNA neoantigen vaccines in real time from surgically resected PDAC tumours. After surgery, we sequentially administered atezolizumab (an anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy), autogene cevumeran (a maximum of 20 neoantigens per patient) and a modified version of a four-drug chemotherapy regimen (mFOLFIRINOX, comprising folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin). The end points included vaccine-induced neoantigen-specific T cells by high-threshold assays, 18-month recurrence-free survival and oncologic feasibility. We treated 16 patients with atezolizumab and autogene cevumeran, then 15 patients with mFOLFIRINOX. Autogene cevumeran was administered within 3 days of benchmarked times, was tolerable and induced de novo high-magnitude neoantigen-specific T cells in 8 out of 16 patients, with half targeting more than one vaccine neoantigen. Using a new mathematical strategy to track T cell clones (CloneTrack) and functional assays, we found that vaccine-expanded T cells comprised up to 10% of all blood T cells, re-expanded with a vaccine booster and included long-lived polyfunctional neoantigen-specific effector CD8+ T cells. At 18-month median follow-up, patients with vaccine-expanded T cells (responders) had a longer median recurrence-free survival (not reached) compared with patients without vaccine-expanded T cells (non-responders; 13.4 months, P = 0.003). Differences in the immune fitness of the patients did not confound this correlation, as responders and non-responders mounted equivalent immunity to a concurrent unrelated mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Thus, adjuvant atezolizumab, autogene cevumeran and mFOLFIRINOX induces substantial T cell activity that may correlate with delayed PDAC recurrence.

Impact of network treatment in patients with resected pancreatic cancer on use and timing of chemotherapy and survival

BACKGROUND

Centralization of pancreatic cancer surgery aims to improve postoperative outcomes. Consequently, patients with pancreatic cancer may undergo pancreatic surgery in an expert centre and adjuvant chemotherapy in a local hospital (network treatment). The aim of this study was to assess whether network treatment has an impact on time to chemotherapy, failure to complete adjuvant chemotherapy, and survival. Second, whether these parameters varied between pancreatic networks was studied.

METHODS

This retrospective study included all patients diagnosed with non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreatic surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, registered in the Netherlands Cancer Registry (2015-2020). Time to chemotherapy was defined as the time between surgery and the start of adjuvant chemotherapy. Completion of adjuvant chemotherapy was defined as the receipt of 12 cycles of FOLFIRINOX or six cycles of gemcitabine. Analysis was performed with linear mixed models and multilevel logistic regression models. Cox regression analyses were performed for survival.

RESULTS

In total, 1074 patients were included. Network treatment was observed in 468 patients (43.6 per cent) and was not associated with longer time to chemotherapy (0.77 days, standard error (s.e.) 1.14, P = 0.501), failure to complete adjuvant chemotherapy (odds ratio (OR) = 1.140, 95 per cent c.i. 0.86 to 1.52, P = 0.349), and overall survival (hazards ratio (HR) = 1.04, 95 per cent c.i. 0.88 to 1.22, P = 0.640). Significant variation between the networks was observed for time to chemotherapy (range 40.5-63 days, P < 0.0001) and completion of adjuvant chemotherapy (range 19-52 per cent, P = 0.030). Adjusted for case mix, time to chemotherapy significantly differed between networks.

CONCLUSION

In this nationwide analysis, network treatment in patients with resected pancreatic cancer was not associated with longer time to chemotherapy, failure to complete adjuvant chemotherapy, and worse survival. Significant variation between pancreatic cancer networks was found for time to chemotherapy.

The Potential Role of Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Microscopically Positive (R1) Surgical Margins after Resection of Cholangiocarcinoma

(1) Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with dismal prognosis and the role of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in high-risk resected patients is unclear. (2) Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of BTC patients who received curative intent surgery with microscopically positive resection margins (R1) and adjuvant chemoradioradiotherapy (CCRT) or chemotherapy (CHT) from January 2001 to December 201. (3) Results: Out of 65 patients who underwent R1 resection, 26 received adjuvant CHT and 39 adjuvant CCRT. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the CHT and CHRT groups was 13.2 and 26.8 months, respectively (p = 0.41). Median overall survival (OS) was higher in the CHRT group (41.9 months) as compared to the CHT group (32.2 months), but the difference was not statistically significant (HR 0.88; p = 0.7). A promising trend in favor of CHRT was observed in N0 patients. Finally, no statistically significant differences were observed between patients undergoing adjuvant CHRT after R1 resection and patients treated with chemotherapy alone after R0 surgery. (4) Conclusions: Our study did not show a significant survival benefit with adjuvant CHRT over CHT alone in BTC patients with positive resection margins, while a promising trend was observed.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic upon pancreatic cancer treatment (CONTACT Study): a UK national observational cohort study

INTRODUCTION

CONTACT is a national multidisciplinary study assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic upon diagnostic and treatment pathways among patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

The treatment of consecutive patients with newly diagnosed PDAC from a pre-COVID-19 pandemic cohort (07/01/2019-03/03/2019) were compared to a cohort diagnosed during the first wave of the UK pandemic ('COVID' cohort, 16/03/2020-10/05/2020), with 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Among 984 patients (pre-COVID: n = 483, COVID: n = 501), the COVID cohort was less likely to receive staging investigations other than CT scanning (29.5% vs. 37.2%, p = 0.010). Among patients treated with curative intent, there was a reduction in the proportion of patients recommended surgery (54.5% vs. 76.6%, p = 0.001) and increase in the proportion recommended upfront chemotherapy (45.5% vs. 23.4%, p = 0.002). Among patients on a non-curative pathway, fewer patients were recommended (47.4% vs. 57.3%, p = 0.004) or received palliative anti-cancer therapy (20.5% vs. 26.5%, p = 0.045). Ultimately, fewer patients in the COVID cohort underwent surgical resection (6.4% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.036), whilst more patients received no anti-cancer treatment (69.3% vs. 59.2% p = 0.009). Despite these differences, there was no difference in median overall survival between the COVID and pre-COVID cohorts, (3.5 (IQR 2.8-4.1) vs. 4.4 (IQR 3.6-5.2) months, p = 0.093).

CONCLUSION

Pathways for patients with PDAC were significantly disrupted during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, with fewer patients receiving standard treatments. However, no significant impact on survival was discerned.

Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer

Patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are best treated with surgical resection of the primary tumour and systemic chemotherapy, which provides considerably longer overall survival (OS) durations than either modality alone. Regardless, most patients will have disease relapse owing to micrometastatic disease. Although currently a matter of some debate, considerable research interest has been focused on the role of neoadjuvant therapy for all forms of resectable PDAC. Whilst adjuvant combination chemotherapy remains the standard of care for patients with resectable PDAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy seems to improve OS without necessarily increasing the resection rate in those with borderline-resectable disease. Furthermore, around 20% of patients with unresectable non-metastatic PDAC might undergo resection following 4-6 months of induction combination chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy, even in the absence of a clear radiological response, leading to improved OS outcomes in this group. Distinct molecular and biological responses to different types of therapies need to be better understood in order to enable the optimal sequencing of specific treatment modalities to further improve OS. In this Review, we describe current treatment strategies for the various clinical stages of PDAC and discuss developments that are likely to determine the optimal sequence of multimodality therapies by integrating the fundamental clinical and molecular features of the cancer.

Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal bile duct cancer: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis of outcomes

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) has been extended to periampullary cancers, but the oncologic outcome of MIPD for distal bile duct cancer (DBDC) has not been confirmed yet.

METHODS

Patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for DBDC of stage I-IIb from 2015 to 2019 at a tertiary referral center were identified and divided into open PD (OPD) and MIPD groups, the latter including laparoscopic and robotic procedures. Survival was compared between the two groups after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using predetermined factors, and exploratory mediation analysis was performed using surgery-derived outcomes.

RESULTS

MIPD (n = 81) group had more female patients (46.9% vs 31.6%, p = 0.011) and longer operation time (366.2 min vs. 279.1 min, p < 0.001) than the OPD (n = 288) group before IPTW. Otherwise, intraoperative and immediate postoperative outcomes were comparable between the two groups. In oncologic outcomes, MIPD group showed comparable 3-year overall survival (78.2% vs 75.0%, p = 0.062) and recurrence-free survival (51.2% vs 53.4%, p = 0.871) rates with OPD group before IPTW, and MIPD was not related with survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-1.26, p = 0.18) and recurrence (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.67-1.53, p = 0.949) after IPTW with consideration of potential mediators. Sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching also showed similar results for survival (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.32-1.44, p = 0.312) and recurrence (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.67-1.88, p = 0.653).

CONCLUSION

MIPD and OPD groups showed similar postoperative and oncologic outcomes. MIPD could be a considerable treatment option without oncological compromise in high-volume centers.

Time to treatment initiation and its impact on real-world survival in metastatic colorectal cancer and pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Given the dearth of data regarding the time to treatment initiation (TTI) in the palliative setting, and its impact on survival outcomes, we sought to determine TTI in a real-world cohort of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) patients and evaluate the impact of TTI on real-world survival outcomes.

METHODS

We collected survival and treatment data for mCRC and mPC from the Flatiron Health electronic health records (EHR) derived database. We divided TTI into 3 categories: < 2 weeks, 2-< 4 weeks, and 4-8 weeks, from diagnosis to first-line therapy. Outcome measures were median TTI, real-world overall survival (RW-OS) based on TTI categories by Kaplan-Meier method, and impact of TTI on survival using cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Among 7108 and 3231 patients with mCRC and mPC treated within 8 weeks of diagnosis, the median TTI were 28 days and 20 days. Median RW-OS for mCRC was 24 months; 26.9 months versus 22.6 and 18.05 months in the 4-8-week, 2-< 4 week (control) and < 2-week groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). For mPC, median RW-OS was 8 months, without significant difference in RW-OS among the groups (p = 0.05). The 4-8-week group was associated with lower hazard of death (HR 0.782, 95% CI 0.73-0.84, p < 0.0001) and the < 2-week group was associated with a higher hazard of death (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.15-1.38, p < 0.0001) in mCRC. The 4-8-week group was associated with lower hazard of death for mPC (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.8-0.97, p = 0.0094).

CONCLUSION

In a real-world cohort of patients treated within 8 weeks of diagnosis, and with the limitations of a retrospective study, later TTI did not have a negative impact on survival outcomes in mCRC and mPC.

Current Treatment of Potentially Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Medical Oncologist's Perspective

Pancreatic cancer has traditionally been associated with a dismal prognosis, even in early stages of the disease. In recent years, the introduction of newer generation chemotherapy regimens in the adjuvant setting has improved the survival of patients treated with upfront resection. However, there are multiple theoretical advantages to deliver early systemic therapy in patients with localized pancreatic cancer. So far, the evidence supports the use of neoadjuvant therapy for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. The benefit of this treatment sequence for patients with resectable disease remains elusive. In this review, we summarize the data on adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer and describe which evidence backs the use of neoadjuvant therapy. Additionally, we address important issues faced in clinical practice when treating patients with localized pancreatic cancer.

Serious complications of pancreatoduodenectomy correlate with lower rates of adjuvant chemotherapy: Would high-risk patients benefit from neoadjuvant therapy?

INTRODUCTION

Patients who suffer a serious complication of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) may have their adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) delayed or omitted as a result. We aimed to investigate whether PD complications affected AC rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all PD patients with histologically-confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (2006-2015) was performed; 90-day mortality patients were excluded. Patients who commenced AC were compared to those who did not (morbidity rates and survival) and patients who developed selected postoperative complications were compared to those who did not (AC rates and survival).

RESULTS

157 patients were included and 90-day mortality was 3.8%. Of the remaining patients, 102 (68.5%) received AC (AC data unavailable for two patients). Survival was longer in the AC group (p = 0.004). AC patients had less frequently experienced a postoperative chest infection (8.82% vs 34.0%, p = 0.0003) or a postoperative complication which was Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥ II (29.4% vs 57.4%, p = 0.0019) or ≥ III (6.86% vs 21.3%, p = 0.023). Patients who experienced a postoperative chest infection (36.0% vs 75.0%, p = 0.0003) or a postoperative complication which was CD grade ≥ II (48.9% vs 73.1%, p = 0.0099) or ≥ III (29.4% vs 70.3%, p = 0.0018) less frequently commenced AC.

CONCLUSION

Patients who received AC had less frequently experienced a serious postoperative complication. Efforts should be made to preoperatively identify those who are high-risk for a serious complication as this cohort may benefit from neoadjuvant therapy.

Pretreatment Nutritional Status in Combination with Inflammation Affects Chemotherapy Interruption in Women with Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Discontinuing chemotherapy worsens cancer prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between nutritional status at the start of chemotherapy and chemotherapy discontinuation in patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study. One hundred and forty-six patients to whom weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin were administered as postoperative chemotherapy were included. Six courses in 21-day cycles were defined as complete treatment. As nutritional indicators, body mass index, weight change rate, serum albumin, total lymphocyte count, prognostic nutritional index, and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) were compared between complete and incomplete treatment groups. Patients were divided into two groups according to CAR. The number of chemotherapy cycles was compared between these two groups. A Cox proportional hazard model was used for covariate adjustment.

RESULTS

Several indicators differed between complete and incomplete treatment groups, and among the indicators, CAR had the highest discriminatory ability. The number of chemotherapy cycles was shorter in the high CAR group than in the low CAR group. A high CAR was associated with chemotherapy interruption even after adjusting for covariates.

CONCLUSION

Based on CAR, nutritional status before chemotherapy is suggested to be associated with the risk of chemotherapy discontinuation.

Association of Textbook Outcome and Surgical Case Volume with Long-Term Survival in Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection for Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

Current literature has identified textbook outcome (TO) as a quality metric after cancer surgery. We studied whether TO after pancreatic resection has a stronger association with long-term survival than individual hospital case volume.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2010 to 2015 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Hospitals were stratified by volume (low less than 6, medium 6 to 19, and high 20 cases or more per year), and overall survival data were abstracted. We defined TO as adequate lymph node count, negative margins, length of stay less than the 75th percentile, appropriate systemic therapy, timely systemic therapy, and without a mortality event or readmission within 30 days. The association of TO and case volume was assessed using a multivariable Cox regression model for survival.

RESULTS

Overall, 7270 patients underwent surgery, with 30.7%, 48.7%, and 20.6% performed at low-, medium-, and high-volume hospitals, respectively. Patients treated at low-volume hospitals were more likely to be Black, be uninsured or on Medicaid, have higher Charlson comorbidity scores, and be less likely to achieve TO (23.4% TO achievement vs 37.5% achievement at high-volume hospitals). However, high hospital volume was no longer associated with overall survival once TO was added to the multivariable model stratified by volume status. Achievement of TO corresponded to a 31% decrease in mortality (hazard ratio 0.69; p < 0.001), independent of hospital volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved long-term survival after pancreatic resection was associated with TO rather than high hospital volume. Quality improvement efforts focused on TO criteria have the potential to improve outcomes irrespective of case volume.

Supervised Exercise Therapy and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective, Single-Arm, Phase II Open-Label, Nonrandomized, Historically Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Improvement of the completion rate of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is a key to obtaining favorable prognosis in patients who undergo macroscopically curative pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

This study is a prospective single-center phase II trial that aimed to examine whether a supervised exercise therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma improved the completion rate of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in the development of a tolerable and effective exercise plan for patients undergoing adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were included in the study. The completion rate of S-1 therapy, the primary endpoint, was 93%, which exceeded the threshold completion rate of 53% (p < 0.001). As secondary endpoints, the relative dose intensity of S-1 was 100.0 [95.9 to 100.0] (median [interquartile range]), the median recurrence-free survival was 20.4 months, and the median overall survival was not reached, confirming the safety of the protocol treatment. Regarding frailty status, there was significant decrease in the Kihon checklist score (p = 0.002) and significant increase in G8 questionnaire score (p < 0.001), indicating that exercise therapy reduced frailty. There were no incidences of serious adverse events except for 1 case of grade 3 febrile neutropenia. The differences between before/after therapy (between 6 months/baseline) of mean muscle mass, mean body fat mass, mean body fat percentage, and mean controlling nutrition status score were 1.52 (p < 0.001), -1.18 (p = 0.007), -2.47 (p < 0.001), and -0.59 (p = 0.006), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy combined with supervised exercise therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was confirmed to improve the completion rate of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy.

Five-Year Outcomes of FOLFIRINOX vs Gemcitabine as Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Early results at 3 years from the PRODIGE 24/Canadian Cancer Trials Group PA6 randomized clinical trial showed survival benefits with adjuvant treatment with modified FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; mature data are now available.

Objective

To report 5-year outcomes and explore prognostic factors for overall survival.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This open-label, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 77 hospitals in France and Canada and included patients aged 18 to 79 years with histologically confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who had undergone complete macroscopic (R0/R1) resection within 3 to 12 weeks before randomization. Patients were included from April 16, 2012, through October 3, 2016. The cutoff date for this analysis was June 28, 2021.

Interventions

A total of 493 patients were randomized (1:1) to receive treatment with modified FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2 of body surface area; irinotecan, 150-180 mg/m2; leucovorin, 400 mg/m2; and fluorouracil, 2400 mg/m2, every 2 weeks) or gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks) as adjuvant therapy for 24 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, metastasis-free survival, and cancer-specific survival. Prognostic factors for overall survival were determined.

Results

Of the 493 patients, 216 (43.8%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 62.0 (8.9) years. At a median of 69.7 months' follow-up, 367 disease-free survival events were observed. In patients receiving chemotherapy with modified FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine, median disease-free survival was 21.4 months (95% CI, 17.5-26.7) vs 12.8 months (95% CI, 11.6-15.2) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.82; P < .001) and 5-year disease-free survival was 26.1% vs 19.0%; median overall survival was 53.5 months (95% CI, 43.5-58.4) vs 35.5 months (95% CI, 30.1-40.3) (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54-0.85; P = .001), and 5-year overall survival was 43.2% vs 31.4%; median metastasis-free survival was 29.4 months (95% CI, 21.4-40.1) vs 17.7 months (95% CI, 14.0-21.2) (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.80; P < .001); and median cancer-specific survival was 54.7 months (95% CI, 45.8-68.4) vs 36.3 months (95% CI, 30.5-43.9) (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51-0.82; P < .001). Multivariable analysis identified modified FOLFIRINOX, age, tumor grade, tumor staging, and larger-volume center as significant favorable prognostic factors for overall survival. Shorter relapse delay was an adverse prognostic factor.

Conclusions and Relevance

The final 5-year results from the PRODIGE 24/Canadian Cancer Trials Group PA6 randomized clinical trial indicate that adjuvant treatment with modified FOLFIRINOX yields significantly longer survival than gemcitabine in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Trial Registration

EudraCT: 2011-002026-52; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01526135.

Long-term outcomes of standard versus extended lymphadenectomy in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A Chinese multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The value of extended lymphadenectomy in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) has been discussed by five randomized controlled studies. However, the limitations in the studies made their conclusions not sufficiently reliable.

OBJECTIVES

This multi-center randomized controlled study was designed to clarify the efficacy of extended lymphadenectomy in PD for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

From December 2016 to October 2018, 170 consecutive patients undergoing PD were enrolled and randomized to standard or extended lymphadenectomy for the treatment of PDAC from three high-volume institutions in China. Demographic, pathological characteristics and survival data of these patients were collected and analyzed. No neoadjuvant treatment was performed. The primary endpoint was the 3-year overall survival.

RESULTS

For all patients, the 3-year survival rate was 25.88%. There was no between-group difference in 3-year survival rate (27.16% vs 24.72% p=0.717). The median survival time for the standard group was 18 months, while for the extended group it was 15 months. The demographic and pathological characteristics were similar between groups. More positive lymph nodes could be found in the extended group (2.34 ± 3.46 vs 1.41 ± 2.12, p=0.035), which led to nodule stage migration. All patients received chemotherapy. But patients in extended group were more likely to fail in completion of all-cycles chemotherapy before recurrence (31.46% vs 17.28%, p=0.032). Incomplete chemotherapy before recurrence, higher N status and abnormal CA125 were independent risk factors for 1-year survival (p<0.001, 95% CI 0.076-0.368; p=0.017, 95% CI 1.113-3.021; p=0.021, 95% CI 1.136-4.960, respectively), which was higher in the standard group (75.31% vs 58.43%, p=0.020).

CONCLUSION

The extended lymphadenectomy in PD did not improve the long-term survival in patients with PDAC. Patients with extended lymphadenectomy had a worse 1-year overall survival. However, the nodule stage migration facilitated by the extended lymphadenectomy contributed to the precise tumor staging.

Resection of pancreatic adenocarcinomas with synchronous liver metastases: A retrospective study of prognostic factors for survival

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the results of synchronous liver resection for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and to identify prognostic factors for overall survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from patients who underwent the synchronous resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with liver metastases. Cox analyses were used to identify factors prognostic of overall survival.

RESULTS

Of the 92 patients included in this study, preoperative chemotherapy was administered to 52 patients. The median overall survival was 18.26 months (95% confidence interval: 14.7-22.7) (from diagnosis) and 12.68 months (95% confidence interval: 9.5-15.57) from surgery; overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 70%, 10%, and 0%, respectively. Twenty-eight patients (30.4%) had median overall survival >18 months after surgery. The median overall survival from diagnosis was longer in patients undergoing preoperative treatment (22.7 vs 13.8 months; P = .01) but similar after surgery (12.6 vs 13.8 months; P = .86). Multivariate Cox analysis found CA19-9 levels <500 kU/L (hazard ratio: 0.35; 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.70; P = .003), R0 resection (hazard ratio: 0.46; 95% confidence interval: 0.24-0.88; P = .020), and adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio: 0.39; 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.88; P = .024) as independent prognostic factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Survival after resection of oligometastatic liver disease remains limited, reflecting the dismal prognosis of metastatic disease even after aggressive treatment. Preresection CA19-9 serum levels represent a useful tool for patient selection, and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy has a major impact on overall survival. Large comparative studies with exclusive chemotherapy are needed to validate this approach and to identify optimal candidates.

Therapeutic efficacy of dose-reduced adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 in patients with pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment in Asia for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The relative dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy influences survival in pancreatic cancer but does not precisely reflect treatment schedule modifications. We investigated the effects of total dose intensity of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy on the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer and the permissible dose reduction.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical resection during 2011-2019 for pancreatic cancer were selected. We determined the total dose intensity cut-off value that predicted tumor recurrence within 2 years postoperatively using receiver operating characteristic curves and compared the outcomes between the high and low total dose intensity groups.

RESULTS

Patients with total dose intensity ≥ 62.5% (n = 53) showed significantly better overall survival than those with total dose intensity < 62.5% (n = 16) (median survival time: 53.3 vs. 20.2 months, P < 0.001). The median survival of patients without adjuvant chemotherapy (total dose intensity = 0, n = 28) was 24.8 months. Univariate analysis identified lymphatic involvement (P = 0.035), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.034), and total dose intensity (P < 0.001) as factors affecting survival. On multivariate analysis, total dose intensity (P < 0.001) was an independent predictor of worse survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintaining a total dose intensity of at least 60% in S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy seems important to achieve a long postoperative survival in patients with pancreatic cancer.