1
|
Siwakoti K, Harmon C, Al-Obaidi M, Basu A, Williams GR. Association of frailty with health-related quality of life and survival among older adults with prostate cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2024:101812. [PMID: 38902148 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Krishmita Siwakoti
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | - Christian Harmon
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Mustafa Al-Obaidi
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Arnab Basu
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Grant R Williams
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thai ST, Lund JL, Poole C, Buse JB, Stürmer T, Harmon CA, Al-Obaidi M, Williams GR. Skeletal muscle density performance for screening frailty in older adults with cancer and the impact of diabetes: The CARE Registry. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101815. [PMID: 38896951 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Skeletal muscle density (SMD) measurements from imaging scans identify myosteatosis and could screen patients for geriatric assessment. We assessed SMD performance as a screening tool to identify older adults with cancer likely to be frail and who could benefit from in-depth assessment; we compared performance by sex and diabetes status. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed patients in the Cancer & Aging Resilience Evaluation (CARE) Registry. Frailty and diabetes were captured using a patient-reported geriatric assessment (CARE tool). Frailty was defined using CARE frailty index (CARE-FI) based on principles of deficit accumulation. SMD was calculated from computed tomography scans (L3 vertebrae). Analyses were conducted by sex and diabetes status. Scatterplots and linear regression described crude associations between SMD and frailty score. Classification performance (frail vs. non-frail) was analyzed with (1) area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and confidence intervals (CIs); and (2) sensitivity/specificity for sex-specific SMD quartile cut-offs (Q1, median, Q3). Performance was compared between patients with and without diabetes using differences and estimated CIs (2000 bootstrap replicates). We additionally calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+, LR-). RESULTS The analytic cohort included 872 patients (39% female, median age 68 years, 27% with diabetes) with predominately stage III/IV gastrointestinal cancer; >60% planning to initiate first-line chemotherapy. SMD was negatively associated with frailty score; models were best fit in male patients with diabetes. AUC estimates for female (range: 0.58-0.62) and male (0.58-0.68) patients were low. Q3 cut-offs had high sensitivity (range: 0.76-0.89), but poor specificity (0.25-0.34). Diabetes did not impact estimates for female patients. Male patients with diabetes had greater sensitivity estimates compared to those without (sensitivity differences: 0.23 [0.07, 0.38], 0.08 [-0.07, 0.24], and 0.11 [0.00, 0.22] for Q1, median, Q3, respectively). LR estimates were most notable for male patients with diabetes (LR+ = 2.92, Q1 cut-off; LR- = 0.46, Q3 cut-off). DISCUSSION Using SMD alone to screen older patients for geriatric assessment requires improvement. High-sensitivity cut-off points could miss 11-24% of patients with frailty, and many non-frail patients may be flagged. Screening with SMD is practical but work is needed to understand clinical andresource impacts of different cut-off points. Future research should evaluate performance with additional clinical data and in subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydney T Thai
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Jennifer L Lund
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Charles Poole
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - John B Buse
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Til Stürmer
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Christian A Harmon
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Mustafa Al-Obaidi
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Grant R Williams
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sugiyama M, Nishijima TF, Kasagi Y, Uehara H, Yoshida D, Nagai T, Koga N, Kimura Y, Morita M, Toh Y. Impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment on treatment strategies and complications in older adults with colorectal cancer considering surgery. J Surg Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38881197 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 06/01/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in customizing care for elderly cancer patients, specifically focusing on colorectal cancer. The research compared treatment strategies and outcomes in older adults considered for surgery before and after the initiation of a Geriatric Oncology Service (GOS). METHODS Conducting a comparative study, two cohorts of consecutive colorectal cancer patients aged 75 or older were examined: the control group (n = 156) and the GOS group (n = 158). Upon the treating surgeon's GOS consultation request, a geriatrician and an oncologist performed CGA, guiding treatment decisions and perioperative interventions. Postoperative complications were compared using propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS In the GOS group, 91% (n = 116) underwent CGA consultations, influencing decisions to forego surgery in 12 patients. After PSM for surgical cases (controls n = 146, GOS n = 146), each group comprised 128 patients. Perioperative physical therapy and pharmacist referrals were more frequent in the GOS group. The GOS group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications (22%) compared to the control group (33%) (p = 0.0496). CONCLUSION Patients undergoing colorectal surgery post-GOS implementation experienced a notable reduction in postoperative complications, highlighting the positive impact of personalized geriatric assessment on surgical outcomes in the elderly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiko Sugiyama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, NHO Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tomohiro F Nishijima
- Geriatric Oncology Service, NHO Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Medical Oncology, NHO Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yuta Kasagi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, NHO Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hideo Uehara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, NHO Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, NHO Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Daisuke Yoshida
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, NHO Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oita, Japan
| | - Taichiro Nagai
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, NHO Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Naomichi Koga
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, NHO Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yasue Kimura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, NHO Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masaru Morita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, NHO Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yasushi Toh
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, NHO Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Arbour C, Lapierre A, Hjeij D, Bilodeau K. Do All Patients Benefit From the Soothing Properties of a Conversational Nursing Intervention to Reduce Symptom Burden During Outpatient Chemotherapy?: A Multimethod Secondary Analysis. Cancer Nurs 2024:00002820-990000000-00259. [PMID: 38865610 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Soothing conversation (SC) is particularly promising for symptom management during outpatient chemotherapy. However, we know little about the profile of patients who are most likely to benefit from this intervention. OBJECTIVE To gain a better understanding of the profile of patients most likely to benefit from SC to reduce symptom burden during outpatient chemotherapy. METHODS We performed a multimethod secondary analysis of 2 data sets: the first gathered during a quantitative pilot trial investigating the impact of SC on patients' symptom fluctuations during chemotherapy perfusion (n = 24); the second derived from qualitative interviews about nurses' experiences with SC in this context (n = 6). RESULTS Secondary quantitative analysis suggests that symptom control with SC is more effective in older patients, reporting lower education, widowed status, work incapacity, advanced cancer, and undergoing chemotherapy perfusion for less than 1 hour. According to nurses' interviews, SC could best benefit patients (1) prone to anxiety and fear, (2) with unalleviated pain, (3) who are unaccompanied during treatment, and contrary to what was shown with quantitative data, (4) undergoing longer perfusion duration. CONCLUSION Although this study provides valuable insights, much work remains to be done to fully understand the factors that predispose patients to respond positively to SC during outpatient chemotherapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This study extends previous research on the effectiveness of SC for symptom management during outpatient chemotherapy by comparing nurses' experience with the intervention to patients' results. Results could be used to inform the assignment and delivery of supportive communication-based interventions during chemotherapy protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Arbour
- Author Affiliations: Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (Drs Arbour and Lapierre and Mrs Hjeij); Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal (Drs Arbour, Lapierre, and Bilodeau); Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, CIUSSS de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (Dr Bilodeau), Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jensen-Battaglia M, Sohn MB, Consagra W, Wang Y, Zhang Z, LoCastro M, Davis J, Buettner K, Mortaz S, El-Jawahri AR, Loh KP. Trajectories of physical well-being among adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv 2024; 8:2612-2621. [PMID: 38429079 PMCID: PMC11157208 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) often undergo physical decline leading to negative outcomes. Identification of distinct trajectories may help guide clinical decision-making and supportive care interventions. We built group-based trajectory models (GBTM) to find trajectories of change in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Physical Well-Being (FACT-PWB) subscale (up to 5 time points over 0 to 200 days of follow-up) using data from adults with newly diagnosed AML in 4 supportive care studies. We also estimated the association of baseline characteristics (age, marital status, education, AML risk, baseline FACT-PWB, depression, and anxiety) with group membership. Among 343 patients with ≥2 FACT-PWB scores, mean age was 69.6 years (standard deviation, 12.1); most had intermediate-risk AML (n = 178 [51.8%]), received intensive treatment (n = 244 [71.1%]), and died during follow-up (n = 199 [58.0%]). The GBTM with 4 distinct trajectories showed the best fit. The largest group (n = 153 [45.0%]) showed slight improvement, whereas the smallest (n = 8 [2.4%]) experienced early decline with later improvement. Baseline FACT-PWB was the only characteristic statistically significantly associated with group membership. Adults with AML show distinct trajectories of physical well-being, and many experience some decline. Exploring trajectories of self-reported and objective physical function may inform decision-making and interventions. These trials were registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02975869, #NCT03310918, and #NCT03372291.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marielle Jensen-Battaglia
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Michael B. Sohn
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - William Consagra
- Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ying Wang
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Zhihong Zhang
- University of Rochester School of Nursing, Rochester, NY
| | - Marissa LoCastro
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Jenae Davis
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Katheryn Buettner
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Soroush Mortaz
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Areej R. El-Jawahri
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Maumus M, Roussin F, Daulange A, Ouerk Y, Larnaudie R, Vayre L, Streicher C. [Older patients and injectable anticancer drug: Feasibility study of the implementation of pharmaceutical interviews in oncogeriatrics in a hospital center]. Bull Cancer 2024:S0007-4551(24)00125-5. [PMID: 38866628 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In our establishment, pharmaceutical interviews in oncogeriatrics have been developed to reduce drug iatrogenesis. The target patients were older patients (≥65years) with polypharmacy and/or identified at risk of frailty (G8≤14), starting an injectable cancer protocol. METHODS The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of implementing pharmaceutical interviews in oncogeriatrics over a period of six months. RESULTS In total, 30 patients benefited from a pharmaceutical interview in oncogeriatrics (median age 76 years; 21 patients with G8≤14). Two-thirds of the patients met other interveners during patient care, 4 of whom after referral by the pharmacist. As for medication reviews: 93% of patients required pharmaceutical intervention (average of 3.5 per patient). The majority proposed therapeutic follow-ups and discontinuations of treatment. According to their evaluation by a pharmacist/oncologist pair, 97% of pharmaceutical interventions would have a positive clinical impact, of which 13 % a major clinical impact. The main drug classes concerned by the pharmaceutical interventions were analgesics, drugs used in diabetes and psycholeptics. Among the four pharmaceutical interventions with major clinical impact, nine proposed the optimization of analgesic treatment. DISCUSSION The implementation of these interviews allowed us to initiate the creation of a care pathway dedicated to older patients identified as fragile. The pharmaceutical care offered appear to provide added value in the care of these patients. Organizational changes are necessary to promote multidisciplinarity and improve our practices in oncogeriatrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon Maumus
- Pharmacie à usage intérieur, centre hospitalier de Brive La Gaillarde, 1, boulevard du Dr Verlhac, 19100 Brive La Gaillarde, France.
| | - Fanny Roussin
- Pharmacie à usage intérieur, centre hospitalier de Brive La Gaillarde, 1, boulevard du Dr Verlhac, 19100 Brive La Gaillarde, France
| | - Annick Daulange
- Pharmacie à usage intérieur, centre hospitalier de Brive La Gaillarde, 1, boulevard du Dr Verlhac, 19100 Brive La Gaillarde, France
| | - Yanis Ouerk
- Pôle de cancérologie, centre hospitalier de Brive La Gaillarde, 1, boulevard du Dr Verlhac, 19100 Brive La Gaillarde, France
| | - Régine Larnaudie
- Pharmacie à usage intérieur, centre hospitalier de Brive La Gaillarde, 1, boulevard du Dr Verlhac, 19100 Brive La Gaillarde, France
| | - Laure Vayre
- Pôle de cancérologie, centre hospitalier de Brive La Gaillarde, 1, boulevard du Dr Verlhac, 19100 Brive La Gaillarde, France
| | - Caroline Streicher
- Pharmacie à usage intérieur, centre hospitalier de Brive La Gaillarde, 1, boulevard du Dr Verlhac, 19100 Brive La Gaillarde, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Slaaen M, Røyset IM, Saltvedt I, Grønberg BH, Halsteinli V, Døhl Ø, Vossius C, Kirkevold Ø, Bergh S, Rostoft S, Oldervoll L, Bye A, Melby L, Røsstad T, Eriksen GF, Sollid MIV, Rolfson D, Šaltytė Benth J. Geriatric assessment with management for older patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy: a cluster-randomised controlled pilot study. BMC Med 2024; 22:232. [PMID: 38853251 PMCID: PMC11163782 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03446-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Geriatric assessment and management (GAM) improve outcomes in older patients with cancer treated with surgery or chemotherapy. It is unclear whether GAM may provide better function and quality of life (QoL), or be cost-effective, in a radiotherapy (RT) setting. METHODS In this Norwegian cluster-randomised controlled pilot study, we assessed the impact of a GAM intervention involving specialist and primary health services. It was initiated in-hospital at the start of RT by assessing somatic and mental health, function, and social situation, followed by individually adapted management plans and systematic follow-up in the municipalities until 8 weeks after the end of RT, managed by municipal nurses as patients' care coordinators. Thirty-two municipal/city districts were 1:1 randomised to intervention or conventional care. Patients with cancer ≥ 65 years, referred for RT, were enrolled irrespective of cancer type, treatment intent, and frailty status, and followed the allocation of their residential district. The primary outcome was physical function measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (QLQ-C30). Secondary outcomes were overall quality of life (QoL), physical performance, use and costs of health services. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. Study registration at ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03881137. RESULTS We included 178 patients, 89 in each group with comparable age (mean 74.1), sex (female 38.2%), and Edmonton Frail Scale scores (mean 3.4 [scale 0-17], scores 0-3 [fit] in 57%). More intervention patients received curative RT (76.4 vs 61.8%), had higher irradiation doses (mean 54.1 vs 45.5 Gy), and longer lasting RT (mean 4.4 vs 3.6 weeks). The primary outcome was completed by 91% (intervention) vs 88% (control) of patients. No significant differences between groups on predefined outcomes were observed. GAM costs represented 3% of health service costs for the intervention group during the study period. CONCLUSIONS In this heterogeneous cohort of older patients receiving RT, the majority was fit. We found no impact of the intervention on patient-centred outcomes or the cost of health services. Targeting a more homogeneous group of only pre-frail and frail patients is strongly recommended in future studies needed to clarify the role and organisation of GAM in RT settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marit Slaaen
- The Research Centre for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Box 68, 2312, Ottestad, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Pb 1171 Blindern, Oslo, 0318, Norway
| | - Inga Marie Røyset
- The Research Centre for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Box 68, 2312, Ottestad, Norway.
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), N-7491, Trondheim, Norway.
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Clinic of Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Box 3250 Torgarden , Trondheim, NO-7006, Norway.
| | - Ingvild Saltvedt
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), N-7491, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Clinic of Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Box 3250 Torgarden , Trondheim, NO-7006, Norway
| | - Bjørn Henning Grønberg
- Department of Oncology, St. Olav Hospital, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Box 3250 Torgarden , Trondheim, NO-7006, Norway
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Vidar Halsteinli
- Regional Center for Health Care Improvement, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Box 3250 Torgarden , Trondheim, NO-7006, Norway
| | - Øystein Døhl
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), N-7491, Trondheim, Norway
- Trondheim Municipality, Trondheim Kommune, Postboks , Trondheim, Norway
| | - Corinna Vossius
- The Research Centre for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Box 68, 2312, Ottestad, Norway
- Centre for Age-Related Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Øyvind Kirkevold
- The Research Centre for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Box 68, 2312, Ottestad, Norway
- Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Postboks , Tønsberg, 2136, 3103, Norway
- Department of Health Sciences in Gjøvik, NTNU, Box 191, N-2802, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Sverre Bergh
- The Research Centre for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Box 68, 2312, Ottestad, Norway
- Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Postboks , Tønsberg, 2136, 3103, Norway
| | - Siri Rostoft
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Pb 1171 Blindern, Oslo, 0318, Norway
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Pb , Nydalen, Norway
| | - Line Oldervoll
- Center for Crisis Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, 7807, 5020, Bergen, PB, Norway
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, 8905, 7491, Trondheim, PB, Norway
| | - Asta Bye
- Oslo Metropolitan University (Oslomet), Postboks 4, St. Olavs Plass, 0130, Oslo, Norway
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Oncology, University of Oslo, and, Oslo University Hospital, Nydalen, Norway
| | - Line Melby
- Department of Health Sciences in Gjøvik, NTNU, Box 191, N-2802, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Tove Røsstad
- Trondheim Municipality, Trondheim Kommune, Postboks , Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, 8905, 7491, Trondheim, PB, Norway
| | - Guro Falk Eriksen
- The Research Centre for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Box 68, 2312, Ottestad, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Pb 1171 Blindern, Oslo, 0318, Norway
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hamar Hospital, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Skolegata 32, 2318, Hamar, Norway
| | - May Ingvild Volungholen Sollid
- The Research Centre for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Box 68, 2312, Ottestad, Norway
- Department of Health Sciences in Gjøvik, NTNU, Box 191, N-2802, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Darryl Rolfson
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Clinical Sciences Building, University of Alberta, 1-19811350 83 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P4, Canada
| | - Jūratė Šaltytė Benth
- The Research Centre for Age-Related Functional Decline and Disease, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Box 68, 2312, Ottestad, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Campus Ahus, P.O.Box 1171, 0318, Blindern, Norway
- Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, P.O.Box 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Uchiyama M, Miyazaki M, Hayashi T, Shimokawa M, Nakano T, Kakimoto H, Takaki S, Fukue H, Inoue T, Inoue R, Mashima K, Kawata S, Sumi Y, Igarashi Y, Kamimura H, Imakyure O, Matsuo K. Assessing the ability of the Cancer and Aging Research Group tool to predict chemotherapy toxicity in older Japanese patients: A prospective observational study. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101814. [PMID: 38851083 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Revised: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) prediction tool was designed in the United States to predict grade ≥ 3 chemotherapy-related adverse events (CRAE) in older patients. However, its usefulness among Japanese people, who have different sensitivities to anticancer drugs and life expectancy, remains unknown. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the utility of the CARG tool for predicting severe CRAE in older Japanese patients with cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with solid tumors aged 65 years and older who commenced anticancer drug regimens from April 2018 to October 2020 were divided into three groups (low, medium, and high-risk) based on their CARG risk scores. Toxicity was prospectively observed by a pharmacist. The primary objective was to evaluate the correlation between the incidence of grade ≥ 3 CRAE and the CARG risk score. The secondary objective was to evaluate hematological and non-hematological toxicities. CRAE incidence was compared among the three groups using a closed testing procedure: (1) Cochran-Armitage test for trend and (2) chi-square test for paired comparison. RESULTS The patients (N = 165) had a median age of 71 years (range: 65-89 years). CRAE in patients divided into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups, based on CARG risk scores, were 39%, 55%, and 82%, respectively (low vs high; p < 0.001, medium vs high; p < 0.01). The incidence of severe hematologic toxicity was 37%, 35%, and 50% in the low-, medium-, and high-risk groups, respectively; the incidence of severe non-hematologic toxicity was 15%, 36%, and 65%, respectively (low vs medium; p < 0.01, low vs high; p < 0.001, and medium vs high; p < 0.01). DISCUSSION To our knowledge, this is the first prospective observational study to validate the CARG prediction tool in older Japanese patients with cancer. The CARG risk score may be effective in predicting the development of non-hematologic toxicities. These results should be considered when administering chemotherapy to older Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masanobu Uchiyama
- Department of Oncology and Infectious Disease Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Fukuoka University, 8-19-1 Nanakuma Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan; Department of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Hospital; 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan.
| | - Motoyasu Miyazaki
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Health Care Management, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Fukuoka University, 8-19-1 Nanakuma Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan; Department of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, 1-1-1 Zokumyoin, Chikushino-shi, Fukuoka 818-8502, Japan
| | - Toshinobu Hayashi
- Department of Emergency and Disaster Medical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Fukuoka University, Japan
| | - Mototsugu Shimokawa
- Department of Biostatistics, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Minamiogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan
| | - Takafumi Nakano
- Department of Oncology and Infectious Disease Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Fukuoka University, 8-19-1 Nanakuma Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan; Department of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Hospital; 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan
| | - Hideki Kakimoto
- Department of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, 1-1-1 Zokumyoin, Chikushino-shi, Fukuoka 818-8502, Japan
| | - Satoko Takaki
- Department of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, 1-1-1 Zokumyoin, Chikushino-shi, Fukuoka 818-8502, Japan
| | - Haruka Fukue
- Department of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, 1-1-1 Zokumyoin, Chikushino-shi, Fukuoka 818-8502, Japan
| | - Takafumi Inoue
- Department of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Hospital; 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan
| | - Ryuichi Inoue
- Department of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Hospital; 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan
| | - Kouta Mashima
- Department of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Hospital; 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kawata
- Department of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Hospital; 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Sumi
- Department of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Hospital; 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan
| | - Yasuaki Igarashi
- Department of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Hospital; 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Kamimura
- Department of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Hospital; 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan; Department of Pharmaceutical and Health Care Management, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Fukuoka University, 8-19-1 Nanakuma Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan
| | - Osamu Imakyure
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Health Care Management, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Fukuoka University, 8-19-1 Nanakuma Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan; Department of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, 1-1-1 Zokumyoin, Chikushino-shi, Fukuoka 818-8502, Japan
| | - Koichi Matsuo
- Department of Oncology and Infectious Disease Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Fukuoka University, 8-19-1 Nanakuma Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan; Department of Pharmacy, Fukuoka University Hospital; 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Karnakis T, de Souza PMR, Kanaji AL, Chinaglia L, Bezerra MR, Almeida OLS. The role of geriatric oncology in the care of older people with cancer: some evidence from Brazil and the world. REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA (1992) 2024; 70:e2024S118. [PMID: 38865538 PMCID: PMC11164271 DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.2024s118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Theodora Karnakis
- Universidade de São Paulo, Cancer Institute of the State of São Paulo – São Paulo (SP), Brazil
- Teaching and Research Institute, Sírio-Libanês Hospital – São Paulo (SP), Brazil
- Brazilian Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Geriatric Oncology Commission – Brazil
- São Paulo Medical School, Laboratory of Medical Investigation in Aging (LIM 66) – São Paulo (SP), Brazil
| | - Polianna Mara Rodrigues de Souza
- Brazilian Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Geriatric Oncology Commission – Brazil
- Albert Einstein Israelite Hospital – São Paulo (SP), Brazil
| | - Ana Lumi Kanaji
- Teaching and Research Institute, Sírio-Libanês Hospital – São Paulo (SP), Brazil
- Brazilian Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Geriatric Oncology Commission – Brazil
| | - Lessandra Chinaglia
- Brazilian Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Geriatric Oncology Commission – Brazil
- Oncology Center of Prevent Senior – São Paulo (SP), Brazil
| | - Mirella Rebello Bezerra
- Brazilian Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Geriatric Oncology Commission – Brazil
- Institute of Integral Medicine Professor Fernando Figueira – Recife (PE), Brazil
| | - Olga Laura Sena Almeida
- Universidade de São Paulo, Cancer Institute of the State of São Paulo – São Paulo (SP), Brazil
- Brazilian Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Geriatric Oncology Commission – Brazil
- São Paulo Medical School, Laboratory of Medical Investigation in Aging (LIM 66) – São Paulo (SP), Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fowler ME, Harmon C, Tucker A, Sharafeldin N, Oates G, Baker E, Nassel A, Giri S, Williams GR. The association between social vulnerability and geriatric assessment impairments among older adults with gastrointestinal cancers-The CARE Registry. Cancer 2024. [PMID: 38824657 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older adults comprise the majority of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. Geriatric assessments (GAs) are recommended for older adults with cancer in part to detect aging-related impairments (e.g., frailty) associated with early mortality. Social factors like social vulnerability may also influence aging-related impairments. However, the association between social vulnerability and aging outcomes among older adults with cancer is understudied. METHODS The authors included 908 older adults aged 60 years and older who were recently diagnosed with GI cancer undergoing GA at their first prechemotherapy visit to the University of Alabama at Birmingham oncology clinic. The primary exposure of interest was the social vulnerability index (SVI). Outcomes were frailty (frail vs. robust/prefrail) and total number of GA impairments (range, 0-13). The authors examined the association between SVI and outcomes using Poisson regression with robust variance estimation and generalized estimating equations. RESULTS The median age at GA was 69 years (interquartile range, 64-75 years), 58.2% of patients were male, 22.6% were non-Hispanic Black, 29.1% had colorectal cancer, 28.2% had pancreatic cancer, and 70.3% had stage III/IV disease. Adjusting for age, sex, cancer type, and disease stage, each decile increase in the SVI was associated with an 8% higher prevalence of frailty (prevalence ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.11) and a 4% higher average count of total GA impairments (risk ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.06). The results were attenuated after further adjustment for race and education. CONCLUSIONS Greater social vulnerability was associated with a higher prevalence of frailty and an increasing average number of GA impairments among older adults with GI cancers before systemic treatment. Intervening on social vulnerability may be a target for improving the risk of frailty and GA impairments, but associations of race and education should be further evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mackenzie E Fowler
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Christian Harmon
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
- Crestwood Medical Center, Huntsville, Alabama, USA
| | - Abigail Tucker
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Noha Sharafeldin
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Gabriela Oates
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Elizabeth Baker
- Department of Sociology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Ariann Nassel
- School of Public Health, Lister Hill Center for Health Policy, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Smith Giri
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Grant R Williams
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
- DCH Health System, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Walsh DJ, O'Driscoll M, Sahm LJ, Meagher AM, Doblas P, McGowan E, Smith-Lehane G, Hannan M, Goggin C, Buckley C, Horgan AM. Ageing-related considerations for medication used in supportive care in cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101760. [PMID: 38556399 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies have shown that a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) prior to a patient commencing systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) results in improved quality of life outcomes and is associated with a decreased risk of grade 3-5 toxicity; however, data are lacking in relation to adverse drug events (ADE) associated with supportive care medications. Supportive care medications are prescribed as prophylactic agents in a SACT regimen, for management of treatment related toxicity and for symptoms caused by the disease itself. While necessary, the commencement of SACT and supportive medications may cause, or exacerbate, a significant drug burden in older patients, some of whom may have existing comorbidities. For many medications, older adults are underrepresented in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling studies. In this article we will review ageing-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, as well as how these changes may impact supportive care medications. Additional considerations for prescribing these medications in older adults with cancer, such as polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medications, drug-drug interactions, and anticholinergic burden, as well as ageing-related considerations and recommendations for supportive care medications commonly used in older adults with cancer are also reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren J Walsh
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Oncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
| | - Michelle O'Driscoll
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Laura J Sahm
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; Department of Pharmacy, Mercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, Cork. Ireland
| | - Anne Marie Meagher
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Oncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland
| | - Pedro Doblas
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Oncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland
| | - Eimear McGowan
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Oncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland
| | - Gráinne Smith-Lehane
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Oncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland
| | - Michelle Hannan
- Oncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland
| | - Caitríona Goggin
- Oncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland
| | - Carol Buckley
- Oncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland
| | - Anne M Horgan
- Oncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kyi K, Consagra W, Culakova E, Berkhof L, Janelsins M, Conlin A, Bearden J, Berenberg J, Canin B, Mohile S, Magnuson A. Comparing Mini-Cog and Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration test for evaluating cognition in older patients with advanced cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101764. [PMID: 38616158 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin Kyi
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, New York, USA
| | - William Consagra
- Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eva Culakova
- Department of Surgery, Supportive Care in Cancer Unit, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY,USA
| | - Lucia Berkhof
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Michelle Janelsins
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Alison Conlin
- Pacific Cancer Research Consortium, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - James Bearden
- Upstate Carolina Consortium Community Oncology Research Program, Spartanburg, SC, USA
| | | | - Beverly Canin
- CARinG SCOREBoard, Cancer and Aging Research Group, USA
| | - Supriya Mohile
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Allison Magnuson
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Obama K, Fujimori M, Boku N, Matsuoka A, Mori K, Okizaki A, Miyaji T, Okamura M, Majima Y, Goto S, Shimazu T, Uchitomi Y. Shared decision-making support program for older patients with advanced cancer using a question prompt list and geriatric assessment: A pilot randomized controlled trial. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101778. [PMID: 38704911 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Older patients with cancer are less likely to express their treatment preferences than younger patients. Question prompt lists (QPLs) facilitate communication between patients and physicians. Geriatric assessment (GA) is recommended when older patients with cancer make treatment decisions. This study estimated the effect size of a shared decision-making (SDM) support program combining QPLs with GA in terms of patients' subjective evaluation of the SDM process for a future definitive randomized controlled trial. We also evaluated the number and quality of aging-related communication during consultations, and feasibility and acceptability of the study for exploratory purposes. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a pilot study with randomized allocation and blind evaluation. Patients aged 65 years or older at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, scheduled to discuss the changes of their treatment, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the SDM support program or usual care. This program consisted of 30-60 min of face-to-face coaching, with QPLs and GA provided before the coaching. As the primary endpoint, the decisional conflict scores given by the patients immediately after the consultation were compared between the two groups. For the secondary endpoints, the number and quality of aging-related communications during the consultations were assessed by evaluators (blinded) using audio-recordings. Adherence, burden, and usefulness were assessed for evaluating feasibility and acceptability of the SDM support program. RESULTS Forty patients were enrolled. All patients completed the GA questionnaire, for which 70% did not require any individual assistance. Answering the questionnaires took approximately 11 min. The decisional conflict scores were mean [standard deviation (SD)]: 19.3 [10.8] vs. 18.0 [11.1] (effect size: Cohen's d = 0.12) for the SDM support program and usual care groups, respectively. The number of aging-related communications during the consultation for the new treatment was higher in the SDM support program group than the usual care (mean [SD]: 3.3 [1.2] vs. 2.2 [1.5], effect size: cohen's d = 1.32). Patients felt that the SDM support program was useful but not burdensome or difficult. DISCUSSION The SDM support program was considered useful and feasible for older patients and able to facilitate communication regarding aging-related concerns. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER The study protocol was registered on September 23, 2020, in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000041867).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyoko Obama
- Division of Survivorship Research, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Maiko Fujimori
- Division of Survivorship Research, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Narikazu Boku
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ayumu Matsuoka
- Division of Survivorship Research, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keita Mori
- Department of Biostatistics, Clinical Research Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Ayumi Okizaki
- Innovation Center for Supportive, Palliative, and Psychosocial Care, National Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tempei Miyaji
- Division of Survivorship Research, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan; Innovation Center for Supportive, Palliative, and Psychosocial Care, National Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masako Okamura
- Division of Survivorship Research, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Majima
- NPO Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Japan, Sodegaura, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shinichi Goto
- Division of Survivorship Research, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taichi Shimazu
- Division of Survivorship Research, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Uchitomi
- Division of Survivorship Research, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan; Innovation Center for Supportive, Palliative, and Psychosocial Care, National Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Singhal S, Wang Y, Qin Z, Peterson DR, Dunne RF, Culakova E, Hopkins JO, Melnyk N, Onitilo A, Targia V, Mohile S, Loh KP. Nutritional impairment, psychological health and quality of life among older adults with advanced cancer: A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7348. [PMID: 38898664 PMCID: PMC11187162 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nutritional impairment is associated with treatment toxicity and worse overall survival in patients with cancer. We aimed to (1) evaluate the association of nutritional impairment with psychological health and quality of life (QOL) and (2) examine which measures of nutrition had the strongest association with psychological health and QOL among older adults receiving cancer treatment with palliative intent. METHODS This secondary analysis was performed on baseline data from a nationwide cluster randomized clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02107443; PI: Mohile). Adults age ≥70 with advanced cancer and ≥1 geriatric assessment (GA) impairment were enrolled from 2014 to 2017. In line with geriatric oncology standards, we defined nutritional impairment as Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF) ≤11, body mass index (BMI) <21 kg/m2, or >10% involuntary weight loss in the past 6 months. We conducted multivariable linear regressions to evaluate the association of nutritional impairment with each measure of psychological health and QOL: Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15, range 0-15), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7, range 0-21), NCCN Distress Thermometer (NCCN DT, range 0-10), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G, range 0-108). Analyses were adjusted for patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and GA. RESULTS Among 541 patients, the mean age was 77 (range 70-96) and 60% had nutritional impairment. Mean baseline scores: GDS-15 3.1 (SD 2.7), GAD-7 2.9 (SD 4.0), NCCN DT 2.9 (SD 2.7), and FACT-G 80 (SD 15). In the adjusted model, compared to those with no nutritional impairment, older adults with nutritional impairment had greater depression (β = 0.79, 95% CI 0.36-1.23) and anxiety severity (β = 0.86, 95% CI 0.19-1.53), and worse QOL (β = -6.31, 95% CI -8.62 to -4.00). Of the measures of nutrition, MNA-SF ≤11 demonstrated the strongest associations with depression, anxiety, distress, and QOL. CONCLUSION Nutritional impairment is associated with impaired psychological health and worse QOL. Clinicians should use the MNA-SF to screen older adults for nutritional impairment and offer tailored supportive interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surbhi Singhal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of MedicineUniversity of California DavisSacramentoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Public Health SciencesUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Zhaoyang Qin
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational BiologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Derick R. Peterson
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational BiologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Richard F. Dunne
- Division of Hematology and OncologyJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Eva Culakova
- Department of Surgery, Supportive Care in Cancer UnitUniversity of RochesterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Judith O. Hopkins
- Novant Health Cancer Institute/Southeast Clinical Oncology Research ConsortiumWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Natalia Melnyk
- Delaware/Christiana Care NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP)NewarkDelawareUSA
| | | | - Valerie Targia
- Stakeholders for the Care and Research of Oncology Elders (SCOREBoard) Advisory CommitteeDuarteUSA
| | - Supriya Mohile
- Division of Hematology and OncologyJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- Division of Hematology and OncologyJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Burton C, Allen P, Herrera AF. Paradigm Shifts in Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment: From Frontline Therapies to Relapsed Disease. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2024; 44:e433502. [PMID: 38728605 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_433502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
Combination chemotherapy with or without radiation has served as the primary therapeutic option for classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), leading to durable remission in a majority of patients with early- and advanced-stage cHL. Patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) cHL could still be cured with salvage chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) and the anti-PD-1-blocking antibodies, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, are highly effective treatments for cHL and have revolutionized the management of the disease. Recent studies incorporating BV and PD-1 blockade into salvage therapy for RR cHL and into frontline treatment regimens have changed the cHL treatment paradigm. The novel agents are also useful in the treatment of older patients who have poor outcomes with traditional therapy. This manuscript will review current strategies for approaching the management of previously untreated, RR, and challenging populations with cHL, including how to incorporate the novel agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathy Burton
- Department of Haematology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Pamela Allen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Alex F Herrera
- Division of Lymphoma, Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yajima S, Masuda H. The significance of G8 and other geriatric assessments in urologic cancer management: A comprehensive review. Int J Urol 2024; 31:607-615. [PMID: 38402450 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
In urologic oncology, which often involves older patients, it is important to consider how to manage their care appropriately. Geriatric assessment (GA) is a method that can address the specific needs of older cancer patients. The GA encompasses various assessment domains, but these domains exhibit variations across the literature. Some of the common items include functional ability, nutrition, comorbidities, cognitive ability, psychosocial disorders, polypharmacy, social and financial support, falls/imbalance, and vision/hearing. Despite the diversity of domains, there is limited consensus on reliable measurement methods. This review discusses the role of GA in managing urologic cancer in unique scenarios, such as those necessitating temporary or permanent urinary catheters or stomas due to urinary diversion. A comprehensive GA is time and human-resource-intensive in real-world clinical practice. Hence, simpler tools such as the Geriatric-8 (G8), capable of identifying high-risk patients requiring a detailed GA, are also under investigation in various contexts. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review on the G8. Our findings indicate that patients with low G8 scores encounter difficulties with stoma self-care after urinary diversion and have higher risks of urinary tract infections and ileus after radical cystectomy. The utilization of G8 as a screening tool for urologic cancer patients may facilitate the delivery of appropriate and personalized treatment and care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shugo Yajima
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Masuda
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cardoso F, Paluch-Shimon S, Schumacher-Wulf E, Matos L, Gelmon K, Aapro MS, Bajpai J, Barrios CH, Bergh J, Bergsten-Nordström E, Biganzoli L, Cardoso MJ, Carey LA, Mac Gregor MC, Chidebe R, Cortés J, Curigliano G, Dent RA, El Saghir NS, Eniu A, Fallowfield L, Francis PA, Franco Millan SX, Gilchrist J, Gligorov J, Gradishar WJ, Haidinger R, Harbeck N, Hu X, Kaur R, Kiely B, Kim SB, Koppikar S, Kuper-Hommel MJJ, Lecouvet FE, Mason G, Mertz SA, Mueller V, Myerson C, Neciosup S, Offersen BV, Ohno S, Pagani O, Partridge AH, Penault-Llorca F, Prat A, Rugo HS, Senkus E, Sledge GW, Swain SM, Thomssen C, Vorobiof DA, Vuylsteke P, Wiseman T, Xu B, Costa A, Norton L, Winer EP. 6th and 7th International consensus guidelines for the management of advanced breast cancer (ABC guidelines 6 and 7). Breast 2024; 76:103756. [PMID: 38896983 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
This manuscript describes the Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) international consensus guidelines updated at the last two ABC international consensus conferences (ABC 6 in 2021, virtual, and ABC 7 in 2023, in Lisbon, Portugal), organized by the ABC Global Alliance. It provides the main recommendations on how to best manage patients with advanced breast cancer (inoperable locally advanced or metastatic), of all breast cancer subtypes, as well as palliative and supportive care. These guidelines are based on available evidence or on expert opinion when a higher level of evidence is lacking. Each guideline is accompanied by the level of evidence (LoE), grade of recommendation (GoR) and percentage of consensus reached at the consensus conferences. Updated diagnostic and treatment algorithms are also provided. The guidelines represent the best management options for patients living with ABC globally, assuming accessibility to all available therapies. Their adaptation (i.e. resource-stratified guidelines) is often needed in settings where access to care is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation, and ABC Global Alliance, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Shani Paluch-Shimon
- Hadassah University Hospital - Sharett Institute of Oncology, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | - Leonor Matos
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Karen Gelmon
- BC Cancer Agency, Department of Medical Oncology, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Matti S Aapro
- Cancer Center, Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland
| | | | - Carlos H Barrios
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Grupo Oncoclínicas, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Jonas Bergh
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Laura Biganzoli
- Department of Oncology, Hospital of Prato - Azienda USL Toscana Centro Prato, Italy and European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA), Italy
| | - Maria João Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre/Champalimaud Foundation and Lisbon University, Faculty of Medicine, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Lisa A Carey
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Mariana Chavez Mac Gregor
- Health Services Research, Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Houston, USA
| | | | - Javier Cortés
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Madrid and Barcelona, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Nagi S El Saghir
- NK Basile Cancer Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Alexandru Eniu
- Hôpital Riviera-Chablais, Vaud-Valais Rennaz, Switzerland and European School of Oncology (ESO), United Kingdom
| | - Lesley Fallowfield
- Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Prudence A Francis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | - Joseph Gligorov
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Est APHP Tenon, University Paris VI, Nice/St Paul Guidelines, Paris, France
| | - William J Gradishar
- Northwestern Medicine, Illinois, USA and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), USA
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Centre, University of Munich, Munich and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, Kommission Mamma (AGO Guidelines), Germany
| | - Xichun Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Ranjit Kaur
- Breast Cancer Welfare Association, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
| | - Belinda Kiely
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney Medical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sung-Bae Kim
- Asan Medical Centre, Department of Oncology, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Smruti Koppikar
- Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Bombay Hospital Institute of Medical Sciences, Asian Cancer Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Marion J J Kuper-Hommel
- Te Whatu Ora Waikato, Midland Regional Cancer Centre, NZ ABC Guidelines, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Frédéric E Lecouvet
- Department of Radiology, Institut Roi Albert II and Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ginny Mason
- Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation, West Lafayette, USA
| | - Shirley A Mertz
- MBC US Alliance and Metastatic Breast Cancer Network US, Inverness, USA
| | - Volkmar Mueller
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, Kommission Mamma (AGO Guidelines), Germany
| | | | - Silvia Neciosup
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, Lima, ABC Latin America Guidelines, Peru
| | - Birgitte V Offersen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), Denmark
| | - Shinji Ohno
- Breast Oncology Centre, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Olivia Pagani
- Hôpital Riviera-Chablais, Vaud-Valais Rennaz, Switzerland
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology and Division of Breast Oncology, Boston, USA and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), USA
| | - Frédérique Penault-Llorca
- Centre Jean Perrin, Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, U1240 Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques, F-63000, Clermont Ferrand, Nice/St Paul Guidelines, France
| | - Aleix Prat
- Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hope S Rugo
- Breast Oncology and Clinical Trials Education, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, USA
| | - Elzbieta Senkus
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - George W Sledge
- Division of Oncology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - Sandra M Swain
- Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and MedStar Health, Washington DC, USA
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale) and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, Kommission Mamma (AGO Guidelines), Germany
| | | | - Peter Vuylsteke
- University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana and CHU UCL Namur Hospital, UCLouvain, Belgium
| | - Theresa Wiseman
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, University of Southampton, United Kingdom and European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS), United Kingdom
| | - Binghe Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Alberto Costa
- European School of Oncology, Milan, Italy and Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Larry Norton
- Breast Cancer Programs, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kamaraju S, McKoy J, Williams GR, Gilmore N, Minami C, Bylow K, Rajalingam H, Cortina CS, Beckert A, Stolley M, Bullock D, Kurzrock R, Jatoi A. An Annual Symposium on Disparities in Milwaukee, WI, with a 2023 Focus on Older Adults with Cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 2024:10.1007/s11912-024-01525-6. [PMID: 38801612 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01525-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Cancer-related inequities are prevalent in Wisconsin, with lower survival rates for breast, colorectal, and lung cancer patients from marginalized communities. This manuscript describes the ongoing efforts at the Medical College of Wisconsin and potential pathways of community engagement to promote education and awareness in reducing inequities in cancer care. RECENT FINDINGS While some cancer inequities are related to aggressive disease biology, health-related social risks may be addressed through community-academic partnerships via an open dialogue between the community members and academic faculty. To develop potential pathways of community-academic partnerships, an annual Cancer Disparities Symposium concept evolved as a pragmatic and sustainable model in an interactive learning environment. In this manuscript, we describe the programmatic development and execution of the annual Cancer Disparities Symposium, followed by highlights from this year's meeting focused on geriatric oncology as discussed by the speakers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sailaja Kamaraju
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8800 W. Doyne Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
| | - June McKoy
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | - Christina Minami
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kathryn Bylow
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8800 W. Doyne Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | | | - Chandler S Cortina
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8800 W. Doyne Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Angela Beckert
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8800 W. Doyne Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Melinda Stolley
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8800 W. Doyne Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Dan Bullock
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8800 W. Doyne Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
- Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8800 W. Doyne Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Aminah Jatoi
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tan D, Chan JY, Wudhikarn K, Wong RSM, Poon L, Norasetthada L, Huang TC, Tse E. Unmet Needs in the First-Line Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: Expert Recommendations From the Asia-Pacific Region With a Focus on the Challenging Subtypes. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2024:S2152-2650(24)00184-8. [PMID: 38853026 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2024.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, accounting for around 30-60% of all cases. The management of DLBCL in Asia has several unmet needs due to the diversity of the population, the heterogeneity of local clinical guidelines for DLBCL and the wide disparity in resources and healthcare systems across different regions. Rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (RCHOP) is widely recognized as the standard first-line treatment for DLBCL; however, alternative regimens are required to improve patient outcomes in challenging subtypes, such as patients with high International Prognostic Index scores, old/frail patients, and patients with double-hit and double-expressor DLBCL or concurrent central nervous system disease. This review article draws from the expertise of practicing hematologists/oncologists in the region, with the aim of integrating data from current scientific evidence to address the unmet needs and unique socioeconomic challenges faced by challenging high risk patient groups in the Asia-Pacific region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daryl Tan
- Clinic for Lymphoma, Myeloma and Blood Disorders, Mount Elizabeth Novena Hospital, Singapore.
| | | | - Kitsada Wudhikarn
- Division of Hematology and Center of Excellence in Translational Hematology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Raymond Siu Ming Wong
- Sir Y.K. Pao Centre for Cancer & Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Limei Poon
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lalita Norasetthada
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Tai-Chung Huang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Eric Tse
- Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Yunye MAO, Shu SHENG, An WANG, Jinzhao ZHAI, Xiangwei GE, Di LU, Jinliang WANG. [Current Status and Prospect of PD-1/PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy
in Elderly Patients with Advanced NSCLC]. ZHONGGUO FEI AI ZA ZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF LUNG CANCER 2024; 27:367-375. [PMID: 38880924 PMCID: PMC11183317 DOI: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.106.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
The incidence of cancer is closely correlated with age, as 75% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are aged at least 65 years. The availability of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has altered the available NSCLC therapeutic pattern. Limited studies on elderly patients have demonstrated that ICIs as monotherapy provide substantial benefits for patients aged 65-75 years, showing no significant difference compared to younger patients. This benefit is also observed in combination with immune-combined chemotherapy or radiotherapy. For individuals older than 75 years, the survival effect was not evident, though. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with ICIs alone were similar in incidence across age categories. Immune-combination chemotherapy resulted in a higher incidence of irAEs than chemotherapy alone, and patients ≥75 years of age were more likely to experience higher-grade irAEs. Besides the fact that immunosenescence in older patients influences the immune milieu in a multifaceted manner, which in turn impacts the effectiveness of immunotherapy, the prognosis is also influenced by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score, among other factors. For certain individuals aged ≥75 years or in poor physical health, immunotherapy combined with low-intensity chemotherapy has emerged as a viable treatment option. However, there are fewer related studies, so there should be a conscious effort to increase the number of elderly patients enrolled in the trial and a comprehensive assessment to explore individualized treatment options. To provide additional references and guidance for immunotherapy in elderly NSCLC patients and to propose new therapeutic perspectives in combination with their characteristics, this review aims to summarize and analyze the pertinent studies on the application of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in these patients.
.
Collapse
|
21
|
Bouleftour W, Tinquaut F, Lafaie L. Chemotherapy Primary Dose Reduction in Older Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort. Cancer Invest 2024; 42:416-424. [PMID: 38785096 DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2024.2357166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Primary dose reduction (PDR) in the first course of chemotherapy is an empirical practice, commonly used in older population. Patients over 70 years old receiving a first course of chemotherapy for a solid tumor were enrolled. A total of 179 patients were included. Standard dose was used in 69.8% of patients, while 30.2% received PDR of chemotherapy. Only 29.6% received a standardized geriatric assessment. Patients receiving standard doses presented 83.2% of toxicities, while 68% of toxicities were reported in patients receiving PDR. The toxicity rate was significantly decreased in patients treated with reduced first-cycle dose of chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wafa Bouleftour
- Institut de Cancérologie et d'Hématologie Universitaire de Saint-Étienne, CHU de Saint Etienne, Saint Etienne, France
| | - Fabien Tinquaut
- Service de Santé Publique et d'Information Médicale, CHU de Saint Etienne, Saint Etienne, France
| | - Ludovic Lafaie
- Département de Gérontologie Clinique, CHU de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Guven DC, Martinez-Cannon BA, Testa GD, Martins JC, Velasco RN, Kalsi T, Gomes F. Immunotherapy use in older adults with cancer with frailty: A young SIOG review paper. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101742. [PMID: 38472009 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became a treatment option in most tumor types and improved survival in patients with cancer in the last decade. Older patients with cancer are underrepresented in the pivotal clinical trials with ICIs. Older patients with cancer often have significant comorbidities and geriatric syndromes like frailty, which can complicate cancer care and treatment decisions. Frailty is among the most prevalent geriatric syndromes in patients with cancer and could lead to inferior survival and a higher risk of complications in patients treated with chemotherapy. However, the effect of frailty on the efficacy and safety of ICIs is understudied. This review focuses on the available evidence regarding the association between frailty and ICI efficacy and safety. Although the survival benefits of ICIs have generally been shown to be independent of age, the available real-world data has generally suggested higher rates of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and treatment discontinuation in older patients. While international organizations recommend conducting a comprehensive geriatric assessment CGA to assess and address frailty before the start of anti-cancer therapies, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or higher is frequently used in clinical practice as synonymous with frailty, albeit with significant limitations. The available data has generally demonstrated diminished ICI efficacy in patients with an ECOG 2 or higher compared to patients with better performance status, while the incidence of high-grade irAEs were similar. Whilst evidence regarding outcomes with ICI in older patients and in those with sub-optimal performance status is growing, there is very limited data specifically evaluating the role of frailty with ICIs. These studies found a shortened overall survival, yet no evidence of a lower response rate to ICIs. These patients experienced more AEs, but they did not necessarily have a higher incidence of irAEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deniz Can Guven
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Health Sciences University, Elazig City Hospital, Elazig, Turkey.
| | | | - Giuseppe Dario Testa
- Division of Geriatric and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Florence and Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50139 Florence, Italy
| | | | - Rogelio N Velasco
- Clinical Trial and Research Division, Philippine Heart Center, Quezon City, Philippines
| | - Tania Kalsi
- Department of Ageing and Health, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Fabio Gomes
- Medical Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sattar S, Haase KR, Puts M, Iddrisu M, Chalchal H, Souied O, Alibhai SMH, Ahmed S. Oncology care providers' perceptions and anticipated barriers regarding the use of geriatric assessment in routine clinic practice: A mixed-methods study. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101768. [PMID: 38626515 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Geriatric assessment (GA) is currently not a standard of cancer care across Canada. In the Canadian province of Saskatchewan, there are no known formal geriatric teams in outpatient oncology settings. Therefore, it is not known whether, how, and to what extent GA is performed in oncology clinics, or what supports are needed to carry out a GA. The objective of this study was to explore Saskatchewan oncology care providers' knowledge, perceptions, and practices regarding GA, and their perceived barriers to implementing formal GA. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this mixed-methods study, oncology physicians and nurses within the Saskatchewan Cancer Agency (SCA) were invited to participate in an anonymous survey and individual open-ended interview. Quantitative survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics; free-text responses provided in the survey were summarized. Data from interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS A total of 19 physicians and 30 clinic nurses participated in the survey (response rate: 24% [physicians] and 38.0% [nurses]). In terms of cancer treatment and management, the majority (74% of physicians and 62% of nurses) stated considerations for older adults are different than younger patients. More than half (53% of physicians and 58% of nurses) reported making treatment and management decisions primarily based on judgement versus validated tools. For physicians whose practices involve prescribing chemotherapy (16/19), 75% rarely or never use validated tools (e.g., CARG, CRASH) to assess risk of chemotoxicity for older patients. Lack of time and supporting staff and feeling unsure as to where to refer older patients for help or follow-up were the most commonly voiced anticipated barriers to implementing GA. Two physicians and six nurses (n = 8) participated in the open-ended interviews. Main themes included: (1) tension between knowing the importance of GA versus capacity and (2) buy-in. DISCUSSION Our findings review barriers and opportunities for implementing GA in oncology care in Saskatchewan and provides foundational knowledge to inform efforts to promote personalized medicine and to optimize cancer care for older adults with cancer in this region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Schroder Sattar
- College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
| | - Kristen R Haase
- Faculty of Applied Science, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Martine Puts
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mohammed Iddrisu
- College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Haji Chalchal
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada; Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Canada
| | - Osama Souied
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada; Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Canada
| | - Shabbir M H Alibhai
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 6 Queen's Park Crescent West, 3/F, Toronto, ON M5S 3H2, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Ste. 425, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Shahid Ahmed
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada; Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Melucci AD, Loria A, Aquina CT, McDonald G, Schymura MJ, Schiralli MP, Cupertino A, Temple LK, Ramsdale E, Fleming FJ. New Onset Geriatric Syndromes and One-year Outcomes Following Elective Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery. Ann Surg 2024; 279:781-788. [PMID: 37782132 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether older adults who develop geriatric syndromes following elective gastrointestinal surgery have poorer 1-year outcomes. BACKGROUND Within 10 years, 70% of all cancers will occur in older adults ≥65 years old. The rise in older adults requiring major surgery has brought attention to age-related complications termed geriatric syndromes. However, whether postoperative geriatric syndromes are associated with long-term outcomes is unclear. METHODS A population-based retrospective cohort study using the New York State Cancer Registry and the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System was performed including patients >55 years with pathologic stage I-III esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, colon, or rectal cancer who underwent elective resection between 2004 and 2018. Those aged 55 to 64 served as the reference group. The exposure of interest was a geriatric syndrome [fracture, fall, delirium, pressure ulcer, depression, malnutrition, failure to thrive, dehydration, or incontinence (urinary/fecal)] during the surgical admission. Patients with any geriatric syndrome within 1 year of surgery were excluded. Outcomes included incident geriatric syndrome, 1-year days alive and out of the hospital, and 1-year all-cause mortality. RESULTS In this study, 37,998 patients with a median age of 71 years without a prior geriatric syndrome were included. Of those 65 years or more, 6.4% developed a geriatric syndrome. Factors associated with an incident geriatric syndrome were age, alcohol/tobacco use, comorbidities, neoadjuvant therapy, ostomies, open surgery, and upper gastrointestinal cancers. An incident geriatric syndrome was associated with a 43% higher risk of 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.60). For those aged 65+ discharged alive and not to hospice, a geriatric syndrome was associated with significantly fewer days alive and out of hospital (322 vs 346 days, P < 0.0001). There was an indirect relationship between the number of geriatric syndromes and 1-year mortality and days alive and out of the hospital after adjusting for surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS Given the increase in older adults requiring major surgical intervention, and the establishment of geriatric surgery accreditation programs, these data suggest that morbidity and mortality metrics should be adjusted to accommodate the independent relationship between geriatric syndromes and long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexa D Melucci
- Surgical Health Outcomes and Research Enterprise, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Anthony Loria
- Surgical Health Outcomes and Research Enterprise, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Christopher T Aquina
- Surgical Health Outcomes and Research Enterprise, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
- Surgical Health Outcomes Consortium, Digestive Health and Surgery Institute, Advent Health Orlando, Orlando, FL
| | - Gabriela McDonald
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
| | - Maria J Schymura
- New York State Cancer Registry, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY
| | | | - AnaPaula Cupertino
- Surgical Health Outcomes and Research Enterprise, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Larissa K Temple
- Surgical Health Outcomes and Research Enterprise, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Erika Ramsdale
- Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Fergal J Fleming
- Surgical Health Outcomes and Research Enterprise, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Conti C, Paillaud E, Laurent M, Poisson J, Boudou-Rouquette P, Frelaut M, Gay P, Canovas J, Caillet P, Mebarki S, Broussier A, Canouï-Poitrine F. Prognostic impact of neurocognitive disorders in older patients with cancer: the ELCAPA prospective cohort study. J Nutr Health Aging 2024; 28:100215. [PMID: 38518539 DOI: 10.1016/j.jnha.2024.100215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the prognostic value of neurocognitive disorder (NCD) for 12 month-overall mortality in patients aged 70 or more with a solid cancer. DESIGN prospective, observational, multicenter cohort. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS We analyzed data from the ELCAPA longitudinal multicenter observational cohort of patients aged 70 or over, referred for a geriatric assessment (GA) before a new cancer treatment modality between January 31st, 2007, and December 29th, 2017. We defined the baseline NCD in four classes: no NCD, mild NCD, moderate NCD, and major NCD, based on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, memory complaint, and the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) score. STATISTICAL METHODS We compared the baseline characteristics of patients according to NCD classes, globally and by pairs (with Bonferroni' correction). Prognosis value of NCD classes were analysed by using univariable and then multivariable 12 month survival analysis with age as time-variable and with and without adjustement for the treatment strategy (curative, palliative or exclusive supportive care). RESULTS 2784 patients with solid-cancer were included, with a median [interquartile range] age of 82 [78;86]. 36% of the patients were free of NCD, 34% had a mild NCD, 17% had a moderate NCD, and 13% had a major NCD. We identified the following independent prognostic factors for 12 month-overall mortality: NCD (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] for a major NCD = 1.54 [1.19-1.98] (p < 0.001), type of cancer, metastatic status, inpatient consultation, poor general health (assessed as the level of fatigue and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status [ECOG-PS]), greater weight loss, palliative treatment, and exclusive supportive care. Additional adjustment for the treatment strategy did not greatly change the strength of the association of a major NCD with 12 month-overall mortality (HR [95%CI] = 1.78 [1.39-2.29] (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that the presence of a major NCD has direct prognostic value (independently of other geriatric factors, the type of cancer and the treatment strategy) in older patients with a solid cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Conti
- AP-HP, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Department of Geriatrics, F-75015 Paris, France; Université Paris-Est, Inserm, 7376- IMRB, F-94000 Créteil, France.
| | - Elena Paillaud
- AP-HP, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Department of Geriatrics, F-75015 Paris, France; Université Paris-Est, Inserm, 7376- IMRB, F-94000 Créteil, France
| | - Marie Laurent
- Université Paris-Est, Inserm, 7376- IMRB, F-94000 Créteil, France; AP-HP, Hopital Henri-Mondor, Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, F-94010 Creteil, France
| | - Johanne Poisson
- AP-HP, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Department of Geriatrics, F-75015 Paris, France; Université Paris-Cité, Center for Research on Inflammation, Inserm U1149, F-75018 Paris, France
| | | | | | - Pierre Gay
- AP-HP, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Department of Geriatrics, F-75015 Paris, France
| | - Johanna Canovas
- AP-HP, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Department of Geriatrics, F-75015 Paris, France
| | - Philippe Caillet
- AP-HP, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Department of Geriatrics, F-75015 Paris, France; Université Paris-Est, Inserm, 7376- IMRB, F-94000 Créteil, France
| | - Soraya Mebarki
- AP-HP, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Department of Geriatrics, F-75015 Paris, France
| | - Amaury Broussier
- Université Paris-Est, Inserm, 7376- IMRB, F-94000 Créteil, France; AP-HP, Hôpitaux Henri-Mondor/Emile Roux, Department of Geriatrics, F-94456 Limeil-Brevannes, F-94000 Créteil, France
| | - Florence Canouï-Poitrine
- Université Paris-Est, Inserm, 7376- IMRB, F-94000 Créteil, France; AP-HP, Hopital Henri-Mondor, Public Health Departement, F-94010 Creteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pergolotti M, Wood KC, Hidde M, Kendig TD, Ronnen EA, Giri S, Williams GR. Geriatric assessment-identified impairments and frailty in adults with cancer younger than 65: An opportunity to optimize oncology care. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101751. [PMID: 38569461 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Frailty, a state of increased vulnerability to stressors due to aging or treatment-related accelerated aging, is associated with declines in physical, cognitive and/or social functioning, and quality of life for cancer survivors. For survivors aged <65 years, little is known about frailty status and associated impairments to inform intervention. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of frailty and contributing geriatric assessment (GA)-identified impairments in adults aged <65 versus ≥65 years with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study is a secondary analysis of clinical trial data (NCT04852575). Participants were starting a new line of systemic therapy at a community-based oncology private practice. Before starting treatment, participants completed an online patient-reported GA and the Physical Activity (PA) Vital Sign questionnaire. Frailty score and category were derived from GA using a validated deficit accumulation model: frail (>0.35), pre-frail (0.2-0.35), or robust (0-0.2). PA mins/week were calculated, and participants were coded as either meeting/not-meeting guidelines (≥90 min/week). We used Spearman (ρ) correlation to examine the association between age and frailty score and chi-squared/Fisher's-exact or ANOVA/Kruskal-Wallis statistic to compare frailty and PA outcomes between age groups. RESULTS Participants (n = 96) were predominantly female (62%), Caucasian (68%), beginning first-line systemic therapy (69%), and 1.75 months post-diagnosis (median). Most had stage III to IV disease (66%). Common cancer types included breast (34%), gastrointestinal (23%), and hematologic (15%). Among participants <65, 46.8% were frail or pre-frail compared to 38.7% of those ≥65. There was no association between age and frailty score (ρ = 0.01, p = 0.91). Between age groups, there was no significant difference in frailty score (p = 0.95), the prevalence of frailty (p = 0.68), number of GA impairments (p = 0.33), or the proportion meeting PA guidelines (p = 0.72). However, older adults had more comorbid conditions (p = 0.03) and younger adults had non-significant but clinically relevant differences in functional ability, falls, and PA level. DISCUSSION In our cohort, the prevalence of frailty was similar among adults with cancer <65 when compared to those older than 65, however, types of GA impairments differed. These results suggest GA and the associated frailty index could be useful to identify needs for intervention and inform clinical decisions during cancer treatment regardless of age. Additional research is needed to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mackenzi Pergolotti
- ReVital Cancer Rehabilitation, Select Medical, Mechanicsburg, PA, United States of America; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Kelley C Wood
- ReVital Cancer Rehabilitation, Select Medical, Mechanicsburg, PA, United States of America.
| | - Mary Hidde
- ReVital Cancer Rehabilitation, Select Medical, Mechanicsburg, PA, United States of America; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America
| | - Tiffany D Kendig
- ReVital Cancer Rehabilitation, Select Medical, Mechanicsburg, PA, United States of America
| | - Ellen A Ronnen
- Astera Cancer Care, East Brunswick, NJ, United States of America
| | - Smith Giri
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Grant R Williams
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mazarakis NK, Robinson SD, Sinha P, Koutsarnakis C, Komaitis S, Stranjalis G, Short SC, Chumas P, Giamas G. Management of glioblastoma in elderly patients: A review of the literature. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100761. [PMID: 38500668 PMCID: PMC10945210 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
High grade gliomas are the most common primary aggressive brain tumours with a very poor prognosis and a median survival of less than 2 years. The standard management protocol of newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients involves surgery followed by radiotherapy, chemotherapy in the form of temozolomide and further adjuvant temozolomide. The recent advances in molecular profiling of high-grade gliomas have further enhanced our understanding of the disease. Although the management of glioblastoma is standardised in newly diagnosed adult patients there is a lot of debate regarding the best treatment approach for the newly diagnosed elderly glioblastoma patients. In this review article we attempt to summarise the findings regarding surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and their combination in order to offer the best possible management modality for this group of patients. Elderly patients 65-70 with an excellent functional level could be considered as candidates for the standards treatment consisting of surgery, standard radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide. Similarly, elderly patients above 70 with good functional status could receive the above with the exception of receiving a shorter course of radiotherapy instead of standard. In elderly GBM patients with poorer functional status and MGMT promoter methylation temozolomide chemotherapy can be considered. For elderly patients who cannot tolerate chemotherapy, hypofractionated radiotherapy is an option. In contrast to the younger adult patients, it seems that a careful individualised approach is a key element in deciding the best treatment options for this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nektarios K. Mazarakis
- Royal Sussex County Hospital, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Eastern Rd, Brighton BN2 5BE, UK
- School of Medicine RCSI, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Stephen D. Robinson
- Royal Sussex County Hospital, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Eastern Rd, Brighton BN2 5BE, UK
- Department of Biochemistry and Biomedicine, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK
| | - Priyank Sinha
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, LS1 3EX, UK
| | | | - Spyridon Komaitis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Evaggelismos Hospital, Ipsilantou 45-47, Athens, Greece
| | - George Stranjalis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Evaggelismos Hospital, Ipsilantou 45-47, Athens, Greece
| | - Susan C. Short
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s Wellcome Trust Brenner Building St James’s University Hospital Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Paul Chumas
- School of Medicine RCSI, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Georgios Giamas
- Department of Biochemistry and Biomedicine, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Walsh DJ, O'Driscoll M, Horgan AM, Tabb E, Hannan M, Morris C, Sahm LJ. Hospitalisation and adverse drug events in a geriatric oncology setting: A systematic review of the literature. Res Social Adm Pharm 2024:S1551-7411(24)00155-4. [PMID: 38705819 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Geriatric Oncology is a specialty where a multidisciplinary approach can address the unmet needs of older adults with cancer. Older adults are at increased risk of adverse drug events (ADE) due to age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, increasing treatment complexity, and medication burden. OBJECTIVES To review the literature to determine the incidence of unplanned hospitalisation due to ADE for all medications, both systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) and non-SACT medications. METHODS A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. The search included the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase. A manual search of Scopus was then performed. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. RESULTS Overall, three studies were included. One observational study reported 19 % of unplanned hospital admissions due to ADE in patients aged ≥70 years with cancer. The first retrospective study reported 24 % of unplanned hospital admissions are due to ADE in patients aged ≥70 years with cancer, and the second retrospective study reported 26 % of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors had an unplanned hospital admission due to an ADE. CONCLUSION There is a paucity of studies assessing unplanned hospitalisation due to ADE in older adults with cancer. Future studies are needed and should account for the reporting of potential ADE relative to supportive care, ancillary medications, and indeed chronic medications used to treat long-standing comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren J Walsh
- University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
| | - Michelle O'Driscoll
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | | | - Eoin Tabb
- University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland
| | | | | | - Laura J Sahm
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; Department of Pharmacy, Mercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rottenberg Y, Cooper L, Rose AJ. Geriatric assessment tools for older patients with cancer: Are they screening tools, or something else? J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101752. [PMID: 38561311 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Yakir Rottenberg
- The Department of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
| | - Lisa Cooper
- Geriatric Medicine, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, and the Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Adam J Rose
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hadassah Medical Organization, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Dale W, Katheria V, Kim H, Fakih M, Chung VM, Lim D, Mortimer J, Cabrera Chien L, Charles K, Roberts E, Vazquez J, Moreno J, Lee T, Fernandes Dos Santos Hughes S, Sedrak MS, Sun CL, Li D. Outcome prioritization and preferences among older adults with cancer starting chemotherapy in a randomized clinical trial. Cancer 2024. [PMID: 38630903 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2024] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Older adults with cancer facing competing treatments must prioritize between various outcomes. This study assessed health outcome prioritization among older adults with cancer starting chemotherapy. METHODS Secondary analysis of a randomized trial addressing vulnerabilities in older adults with cancer. Patients completed three validated outcome prioritization tools: 1) Health Outcomes Tool: prioritizes outcomes (survival, independence, symptoms) using a visual analog scale; 2) Now vs. Later Tool: rates the importance of quality of life at three times-today versus 1 or 5 years in the future; and 3) Attitude Scale: rates agreement with outcome-related statements. The authors measured the proportion of patients prioritizing various outcomes and evaluated their characteristics. RESULTS A total of 219 patients (median [range] age 71 [65-88], 68% with metastatic disease) were included. On the Health Outcomes Tool, 60.7% prioritized survival over other outcomes. Having localized disease was associated with choosing survival as top priority. On the Now vs. Later Tool, 50% gave equal importance to current versus future quality of life. On the Attitude Scale, 53.4% disagreed with the statement "the most important thing to me is living as long as I can, no matter what my quality of life is"; and 82.2% agreed with the statement "it is more important to me to maintain my thinking ability than to live as long as possible". CONCLUSION Although survival was the top priority for most participants, some older individuals with cancer prioritize other outcomes, such as cognition and function. Clinicians should elicit patient-defined priorities and include them in decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis
- Center for Cancer and Aging, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
- Department of Geriatrics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - William Dale
- Center for Cancer and Aging, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Vani Katheria
- Center for Cancer and Aging, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Heeyoung Kim
- Center for Cancer and Aging, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Marwan Fakih
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Vincent M Chung
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Dean Lim
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Joanne Mortimer
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | | | | | - Elsa Roberts
- Center for Cancer and Aging, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Jessica Vazquez
- Center for Cancer and Aging, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Jeanine Moreno
- Center for Cancer and Aging, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Ty Lee
- Center for Cancer and Aging, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | | | - Mina S Sedrak
- Center for Cancer and Aging, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
- Department of Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Can-Lan Sun
- Center for Cancer and Aging, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Daneng Li
- Center for Cancer and Aging, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ishii R, Ohkoshi A, Katori Y. Treatment of elderly patients with head and neck cancer in an aging society: Focus on geriatric assessment and surgical treatment. Auris Nasus Larynx 2024; 51:647-658. [PMID: 38631257 DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2024.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Previous studies of the treatment of elderly head and neck cancer (HNC) patients were very limited and sometimes controversial. Although conclusions differ across various reports, it is often concluded that advanced chronological age does not directly affect prognosis, but that comorbidities and declines in physical and cognitive functions promote the occurrence of adverse events, especially with surgical treatment. Geriatric assessment (GA) and its screening tools are keys to help us understand overall health status and problems, predict life expectancy and treatment tolerance, and to influence treatment choices and interventions to improve treatment compliance. In addition, personal beliefs and values play a large role in determining policies for HNC treatment for elderly patients, and a multidisciplinary approach is important to support this. In this review, past research on HNC in older adults is presented, and the current evidence is explained, focusing on the management of elderly HNC patients, with an emphasis on the existing reports on each treatment stage and modality, especially the surgical procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryo Ishii
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
| | - Akira Ohkoshi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Yukio Katori
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sánchez-Dávila JN, Verástegui EL, Peña-Nieves A, Allende-Pérez SR. Integration of the geriatric palliative care in oncological care of elderly patient with cancer. Palliat Support Care 2024:1-9. [PMID: 38621672 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951524000294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this article is to describe the profile of the population attended to by the palliative geriatrics clinic and to evaluate the symptomatic control derived from the care provided. METHODS During 2017 a model based on a holistic approach was implemented, in this model the team geriatric palliative care plays a fundamental role by being part of the palliative care team and functioning as a liaison with the oncology team and other required services. We outlined the profile of 100 patients aged 70 and older seen between 2017 and 2019 at our geriatric palliative care clinic. Descriptive statistics were used. In addition, the symptoms and the care clinic model effect on the symptomatic control were analyzed, as well as the complexity of patients in palliative care with IDC-Pal. RESULTS The patients median age was 83.5 years. Patients were classified by type of management: 47% within the supportive care group and 53% with palliative care only; 58% had metastatic disease and 84% presented at least 1 comorbidity. Frailty was observed in 78% and a Karnofsky scale of 60 or less was observed in 59% of the overall population. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS Elderly cancer patients have a complex profile and may have multiple needs. Integrating geriatric palliative care can help to provide better and personalized care along with symptomatic control. Further studies are required to establish the ideal care model for these patients. Importantly, a personalized treatment with a geriatric palliative care specialist is a key element.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emma L Verástegui
- Palliative Care Service, National Cancer Institute, Ciudad de México, México
| | - Adriana Peña-Nieves
- Palliative Care Service, National Cancer Institute, Ciudad de México, México
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rees MJ, Kumar S. High-risk multiple myeloma: Redefining genetic, clinical, and functional high-risk disease in the era of molecular medicine and immunotherapy. Am J Hematol 2024. [PMID: 38613829 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) exhibits significant heterogeneity in its presentation, genetics, and treatment response. Despite therapeutic advances, some patients continue to relapse early (ER, <18-months) and rapidly cycle through therapies. Myriad prognostic factors have been identified and incorporated into risk stratification models; however, these produce discordant, often three-tiered outputs that fail to identify many patients destined for ER. Treatment strategies are increasingly focused on disease biology and trials enriched for high-risk (HR)MM, but consensus on the minimum required testing and a succinct, specific, and clinically meaningful definition for HRMM remains elusive. We review the risk-factors, definitions, and future directions for HRMM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Rees
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Shaji Kumar
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lane H, Saunders R, Crookes K, Ang SGM, Bulsara C, Bulsara MK, Ewens B, Gallagher O, Gullick K, Haydon S, Hughes J, Nguyen KH, Seaman K, Etherton-Beer C. Prevalence of frailty and pain in hospitalised cancer patients: implications for older adult care. Intern Med J 2024; 54:671-674. [PMID: 38450876 DOI: 10.1111/imj.16351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
A hospital-wide point prevalence study investigated frailty and pain in patients with a cancer-related admission. Modifiable factors associated with frailty in people with cancer were determined through logistic regression. Forty-eight patients (19%) with cancer-related admissions were 2.65 times more likely to be frail and 2.12 more likely to have moderate pain. Frailty and pain were highly prevalent among cancer-related admissions, reinforcing the need for frailty screening and importance of pain assessment for patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Lane
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Rosemary Saunders
- Centre for Research in Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kate Crookes
- Centre for Research in Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Seng G M Ang
- Centre for Research in Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Caroline Bulsara
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Max K Bulsara
- Institute for Health Research, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Beverley Ewens
- Centre for Research in Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Olivia Gallagher
- Centre for Research in Aged Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Karen Gullick
- Hollywood Private Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sue Haydon
- Hollywood Private Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jeff Hughes
- Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- PainChek Ltd, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kim-Huong Nguyen
- Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Karla Seaman
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Haider I, Pond GR, Cameron R, Aljama M, Kouroukis TC, Wong K, Fiala MA, Wildes TM, Mian H. A structured oral chemotherapy teaching tool to improve adherence in adults with multiple myeloma: A pilot randomized controlled trial. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101735. [PMID: 38460399 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many of the newer treatments for adults with newly-diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) are orally administered. Adherence is a challenge, and little is known about strategies to optimize adherence. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-seven patients initiating orally-administered anti-myeloma therapy were enrolled and randomized in a pilot study to receive either standard of care teaching or the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Oral agent Teaching Tool (MOATT), a structured teaching tool. Adherence was measured electronically with a Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) cap. Optimal adherence was defined as an adherence rate of ≥90% over the six months study duration. Patients completed surveys regarding cancer therapy satisfaction and self-efficacy for medication management at one month and six months following the initiation of treatment in both arms. RESULTS The mean adherence of patients over six months was 86.9%; 43.9% of the cohort were classified as non-adherent using the 90% threshold of adherence. Mean adherence was similar among standard of care teaching (87.9%) versus the MOATT intervention tool (85.6%) as was cancer therapy satisfaction and self-efficacy for medication management. DISCUSSION In our pilot, the MOATT tool was not found to be feasible or acceptable. There were no preliminary differences noted between standard of care teaching versus the structured MOATT teaching tool with regards to overall adherence rates, cancer therapy satisfaction, or self-efficacy in medication management. Overall adherence rates were suboptimal in our study. Future research should work to identify aspects of educational interventions which are effective, and investigate different strategies which can be used to supplement patient education and potentially optimize medication adherence in patients with MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imran Haider
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Gregory R Pond
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ruthanne Cameron
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Mohammed Aljama
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Tom C Kouroukis
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Kirk Wong
- Cancer Centre Pharmacy, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Mark A Fiala
- Division of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, USA
| | - Tanya M Wildes
- Department of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center/ Nebraska Medicine, USA
| | - Hira Mian
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Daviu Cobián C, Oreskov JO, Blaakaer J, Jespersen E, Jørgensen TL, Ryg J, Herrstedt J, Høgdall C, Lund CM, Seibæk L, Vinther A, Ekmann-Gade AW, Schnack TH. Impact of FRAilty screening and Geriatric assessment and INtervention in older patients with epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A multicenter randomized clinical trial protocol (FRAGINOC). J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101713. [PMID: 38326125 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radical surgery combined with chemotherapy is the only potential curative treatment of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). However, 43% of older Danish patients with EOC are not referred to surgery due to frailty, age, or fear of complications. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has demonstrated ability to reduce frailty in older patients, but there is a knowledge gap regarding its effect before or during treatment in older adults with EOC. This protocol presents a randomized controlled trial (RCT), which evaluates the effect of CGA-based interventions including individualized physical exercise therapy in older adults with EOC during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). MATERIALS AND METHODS This RCT will include patients aged ≥70 years with primary EOC referred to NACT. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to intervention or standard of care, along with neoadjuvant antineoplastic treatment. Stratification for performance status and center of inclusion will be performed. In the intervention arm, a geriatrician will perform CGA and corresponding geriatric interventions and patients will undergo an individualized home-based exercise program managed by a physiotherapist. All patients will be evaluated with Geriatric-8, modified Geriatric-8, clinical frailty scale, and physical tests at randomization. Predictive values (positive/negative) will be evaluated for CGA detected impairments. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients referred to interval debulking surgery (IDS). Secondary endpoints include the proportion who complete oncological treatment, improvements in physical tests, quality of life measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life questionnaires at inclusion, after three cycles of chemotherapy, and at end of chemotherapy treatment. Furthermore, the association between results of geriatric screening tests, CGA, and physical tests with complication rate and progression free survival will be examined. The primary outcome will be analyzed with logistic regression in the intention-to-treat population. Power calculations reveal the need to enroll 216 patients. DISCUSSION The present study examines whether CGA-based interventions including individualized physical exercise can increase the referral rate for potential curative IDS in older patients with EOC. If successful, this will result in more patients undergoing surgery and completing chemotherapy, preventing complications, and ultimately improving quality of life and survival. The study setup may establish the basis for direct clinical implementation if proven effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Daviu Cobián
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
| | - Jakob O Oreskov
- Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Jan Blaakaer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Eva Jespersen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Trine L Jørgensen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Jesper Ryg
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Jørn Herrstedt
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Claus Høgdall
- Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Cecilia M Lund
- Department of Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Denmark
| | - Lene Seibæk
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anders Vinther
- Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark; Hospital Secretariat and Communications, Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Anne Weng Ekmann-Gade
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Tine H Schnack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Fowler ME, Harmon C, Sharafeldin N, Baker E, Oates G, Nassel A, Clausing D, Giri S, Williams GR. The association between food access and frailty among older adults with gastrointestinal malignancies-The CARE Registry. Cancer 2024; 130:1083-1091. [PMID: 38059840 PMCID: PMC10939932 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Food access is associated with higher gastrointestinal (GI) cancer mortality; however, its association with frailty, which is a predictor of premature mortality among older adults with cancer, is less understood. METHODS The authors included 880 adults aged 60 years and older who were recently diagnosed with GI cancers and were undergoing self-reported geriatric assessment at their first prechemotherapy visit to the University of Alabama at Birmingham oncology clinic. Food access was measured using the 2019 US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service designation low-income, low-access (LILA), classifying census tracts based on income and/or access to food stores at various distances. The primary outcome was frailty on the CARE (Cancer and Aging Resilience Evaluation) Frailty Index, a composite of the proportion of impaired geriatric assessment measures. The authors examined the LILA-frailty association with modified Poisson regression accounting for census-tract clustering. RESULTS The median patient age was 69 years, 58.1% were men, 22.5% were non-Hispanic Black, 29.2% had colorectal cancer, 28.0% had pancreatic cancer, 70.1% presented with stage III/IV disease, and 34.9% were frail. A higher proportion in LILA areas were non-Hispanic Black (44.1% vs. 10.8%; p < .001) and had less education (high school or less: 48.1% vs. 37.9%; p = .020). Adjusting for age, race and ethnicity, sex, cancer type and stage, and education, an LILA designation was associated with 58% greater odds of worsening frailty status (95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.12). An analysis of LILA subcategories revealed that associations were maintained across all LILA measures. CONCLUSIONS Poor food access was associated with a greater risk of frailty among newly diagnosed older adults with GI cancers before they received systemic treatment. Intervening on local food access, particularly in LILA areas, may be a target for improving rates of frailty and promoting health equity in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mackenzie E. Fowler
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Christian Harmon
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Noha Sharafeldin
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Elizabeth Baker
- Department of Sociology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Gabriela Oates
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Ariann Nassel
- Lister Hill Center for Health Policy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Daniel Clausing
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Smith Giri
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Grant R. Williams
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- DCH Health System, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Guo S, Monginot S, Jin R, Alibhai SMH, Norman R. Improving timeliness to initial assessment in a geriatric oncology clinic: A quality improvement project. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101707. [PMID: 38326124 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Selynne Guo
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada.
| | - Susie Monginot
- Department of Nursing, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Rana Jin
- Department of Nursing, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Shabbir M H Alibhai
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network/Sinai Health System, Canada; University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Richard Norman
- University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Health Network/Sinai Health System, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rühle A, Weymann M, Behrens M, Marschner S, Haderlein M, Fabian A, Senger C, Dickstein DR, Kraft J, von der Grün J, Chen E, Aquino-Michaels T, Domschikowski J, Bickel A, Altay-Langguth A, Kalinauskaite G, Lewitzki V, Bonomi M, Blakaj DM, Jhawar SR, Baliga S, Barve R, Ferentinos K, Zamboglou C, Schnellhardt S, Haehl E, Spohn SKB, Kuhnt T, Zöller D, Guckenberger M, Budach V, Belka C, Bakst R, Mayer A, Schmidberger H, Grosu AL, Balermpas P, Stromberger C, Nicolay NH. A Multicenter Evaluation of Different Chemotherapy Regimens in Older Adults With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Definitive Chemoradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1282-1293. [PMID: 37914144 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The number of older adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is increasing, and treatment of these patients is challenging. Although cisplatin-based chemotherapy concomitantly with radiation therapy is considered the standard regimen for patients with locoregionally advanced HNSCC, there is substantial real-world heterogeneity regarding concomitant chemotherapy in older patients with HNSCC. METHODS AND MATERIALS The SENIOR study is an international multicenter cohort study including older patients (≥65 years) with HNSCC treated with definitive radiation therapy at 13 academic centers in the United States and Europe. Patients with concomitant chemoradiation were analyzed regarding overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) via Kaplan-Meier analyses. Fine-Gray competing risk regressions were performed regarding the incidence of locoregional failures and distant metastases. RESULTS Six hundred ninety-seven patients with a median age of 71 years were included in this analysis. Single-agent cisplatin was the most common chemotherapy regimen (n = 310; 44%), followed by cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (n = 137; 20%), carboplatin (n = 73; 10%), and mitomycin C plus 5-fluorouracil (n = 64; 9%). Carboplatin-based regimens were associated with diminished PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39 [1.03-1.89]; P < .05) and a higher incidence of locoregional failures (subdistribution HR, 1.54 [1.00-2.38]; P = .05) compared with single-agent cisplatin, whereas OS (HR, 1.15 [0.80-1.65]; P = .46) was comparable. There were no oncological differences between single-agent and multiagent cisplatin regimens (all P > .05). The median cumulative dose of cisplatin was 180 mg/m2 (IQR, 120-200 mg/m2). Cumulative cisplatin doses ≥200 mg/m2 were associated with increased OS (HR, 0.71 [0.53-0.95]; P = .02), increased PFS (HR, 0.66 [0.51-0.87]; P = .003), and lower incidence of locoregional failures (subdistribution HR, 0.50 [0.31-0.80]; P = .004). Higher cumulative cisplatin doses remained an independent prognostic variable in the multivariate regression analysis for OS (HR, 0.996 [0.993-0.999]; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS Single-agent cisplatin can be considered in the standard chemotherapy regimen for older patients with HNSCC who can tolerate cisplatin. Cumulative cisplatin doses are prognostically relevant in older patients with HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Maria Weymann
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Max Behrens
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Marschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marlen Haderlein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Fabian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel R Dickstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Johannes Kraft
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jens von der Grün
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eric Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Todd Aquino-Michaels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Justus Domschikowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Amanda Bickel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alev Altay-Langguth
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Victor Lewitzki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marcelo Bonomi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Dukagjin M Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sachin R Jhawar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Rahul Barve
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Konstantinos Ferentinos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University of Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University of Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Sören Schnellhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany
| | - Erik Haehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Kuhnt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Daniela Zöller
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Richard Bakst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ioffe D, Bhatia-Patel SC, Gandhi S, Hamad EA, Dotan E. Cardiovascular Concerns, Cancer Treatment, and Biological and Chronological Aging in Cancer: JACC Family Series. JACC CardioOncol 2024; 6:143-158. [PMID: 38774000 PMCID: PMC11103051 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2024.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer are leading causes of death globally, particularly among the rapidly growing population of older adults (OAs). CVD is a leading cause of mortality among cancer survivors, often accelerated by cancer treatments associated with short- or long-term cardiotoxicity. Moreover, there is a dynamic relationship among CVD, cancer, and aging, characterized by shared risk factors and biological hallmarks, that plays an important role in caring for OAs, optimizing treatment approaches, and developing preventive strategies. Assessment of geriatric domains (eg, functional status, comorbidities, cognition, polypharmacy, nutritional status, social support, psychological well-being) is critical to individualizing treatment of OAs with cancer. The authors discuss considerations in caring for an aging population with cancer, including methods for the assessment of OAs with CVD and/or cardiovascular risk factors planned for cancer therapy. Multidisciplinary care is critical in optimizing patient outcomes and maintaining quality of life in this growing vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Ioffe
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Sakshi Gandhi
- Department of Medicine, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Eman A. Hamad
- Department of Medicine, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Efrat Dotan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lin RJ, Dahi PB, Korc-Grodzicki B, Shahrokni A, Jakubowski AA, Giralt SA. Transplantation and Cellular Therapy for Older Adults-The MSK Approach. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2024; 19:82-91. [PMID: 38332462 PMCID: PMC11126330 DOI: 10.1007/s11899-024-00725-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Hematologic malignances more commonly affect older individuals and often present with advanced, higher risk disease than younger patients. Allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation is well-established treatment modalities with curative potential following either frontline treatments for these diseases or salvage therapy in the relapsed or refractory setting. More recently, novel cellular immunotherapy such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has been shown to lead to high response rate and durable remission in many patients with advanced blood cancers. RECENT FINDINGS Given unique characteristics of older patients, how best to deliver these higher-intensity and time sensitive treatment modalities for them remains challenging. Moreover, their short-term and potential long-term impact on their functional status, cognitive status, and quality of life may be significant considerations for many older patients. All these issues contributed to the lack of access and significant underutilization of these potential curative treatment strategies. In this review, we present up to date evidence to support potential benefits of transplantation and cellular therapy for older adults, their steady improving outcomes, and most importantly, highlight the use of geriatric assessment to help select appropriate older patients and optimize them prior to and following transplantation and cellular therapy. We specifically describe our approach at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and encouraging early results from its implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Lin
- Adult Blood and Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
- David H. Koch Center for Cancer Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 530 E 74th Street, Room 21-142, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
| | - Parastoo B Dahi
- Adult Blood and Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki
- Geriatrics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Armin Shahrokni
- Geriatrics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Ann A Jakubowski
- Adult Blood and Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Sergio A Giralt
- Adult Blood and Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Alibhai SMH, Puts M, Jin R, Godhwani K, Antonio M, Abdallah S, Feng G, Krzyzanowska MK, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Papadopoulos E, Mach C, Nasiri F, Sridhar SS, Glicksman R, Moody L, Bender J, Clarke H, Matthew A, McIntosh D, Klass W, Emmenegger U. TOward a comPrehensive supportive Care intervention for Older men with metastatic Prostate cancer (TOPCOP3): A pilot randomized controlled trial and process evaluation. J Geriatr Oncol 2024:101750. [PMID: 38521641 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current management of metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) includes androgen receptor axis-targeted therapy (ARATs), which is associated with substantial toxicity in older adults. Geriatric assessment and management and remote symptom monitoring have been shown to reduce toxicity and improve quality of life in patients undergoing chemotherapy, but their efficacy in patients being treated with ARATs has not been explored. The purpose of this study is to examine whether these interventions, alone or in combination, can improve treatment tolerability and quality of life (QOL) for older adults with metastatic prostate cancer on ARATs. MATERIALS AND METHODS TOPCOP3 is a multi-centre, factorial pilot clinical trial coupled with an embedded process evaluation. The study includes four treatment arms: geriatric assessment and management (GA + M); remote symptom monitoring (RSM); geriatric assessment and management plus remote symptom monitoring; and usual care and will be followed for six months. The aim is to recruit 168 patients between two cancer centres in Toronto, Canada. Eligible participants will be randomized equally via REDCap. Participants in all arms will complete a comprehensive baseline assessment upon enrollment following the Geriatric Core dataset, as well as follow-up assessments at 1.5, 3, 4.5, and 6 months. The co-primary outcomes will be grade 3-5 toxicity and QOL. Toxicities will be graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. QOL will be measured by patient self-reporting using the EuroQol 5 dimensions of health questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include fatigue, insomnia, and depression. Finally, four process evaluation outcomes will also be observed, namely feasibility, fidelity, and acceptability, along with implementation barriers and facilitators. DISCUSSION Data will be collected to observe the effects of GA + M and RSM on QOL and toxicities experienced by older adults receiving ARATs for metastatic prostate cancer. Data will also be collected to help the design and conduct of a definitive multicentre phase III randomized controlled trial. This study will extend supportive care interventions for older adults with cancer into new areas and inform the design of larger trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT05582772).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shabbir M H Alibhai
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Martine Puts
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rana Jin
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kian Godhwani
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maryjo Antonio
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Soha Abdallah
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gregory Feng
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Monika K Krzyzanowska
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis
- Department of Geriatrics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Calvin Mach
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ferozah Nasiri
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Glicksman
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Lesley Moody
- Varian Medical Systems, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Jacqueline Bender
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hance Clarke
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Matthew
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Urban Emmenegger
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ji J, Bae M, Sun CL, Wildes TM, Freedman RA, Magnuson A, O’Connor T, Moy B, Klepin HD, Chapman AE, Tew WP, Dotan E, Fenton MA, Kim H, Katheria V, Gross CP, Cohen HJ, Muss HB, Sedrak MS. Falls prechemotherapy and toxicity-related hospitalization during adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in older women: Results from the prospective multicenter HOPE trial. Cancer 2024; 130:936-946. [PMID: 37962093 PMCID: PMC10922500 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older women with breast cancer frequently experience toxicity-related hospitalizations during adjuvant chemotherapy. Although the geriatric assessment can identify those at risk, its use in clinic remains limited. One simple, low-cost marker of vulnerability in older persons is fall history. Here, the authors examined whether falls prechemotherapy can identify older women at risk for toxicity-related hospitalization during adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. METHODS In a prospective study of women >65 years old with stage I-III breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, the authors assessed baseline falls in the past 6 months as a categorical variable: no fall, one fall, and more than one fall. The primary end point was incident hospitalization during chemotherapy attributable to toxicity. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between falls and toxicity-related hospitalization, adjusting for sociodemographic, disease, and geriatric covariates. RESULTS Of the 497 participants, 60 (12.1%) reported falling before chemotherapy, and 114 (22.9%) had one or more toxicity-related hospitalizations. After adjusting for sociodemographic, disease, and geriatric characteristics, women who fell more than once within 6 months before chemotherapy had greater odds of being hospitalized from toxicity during chemotherapy compared to women who did not fall (50.0% vs. 20.8% experienced toxicity-related hospitalization, odds ratio, 4.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.66-11.54, p = .003). CONCLUSIONS In this cohort of older women with early breast cancer, women who experienced more than one fall before chemotherapy had an over 4-fold increased risk of toxicity-related hospitalization during chemotherapy, independent of sociodemographic, disease, and geriatric factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingran Ji
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Marie Bae
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Can-Lan Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Tanya M. Wildes
- Division of Hematology/ Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center/Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Rachel A. Freedman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Allison Magnuson
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Tracey O’Connor
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Beverly Moy
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Heidi D. Klepin
- Department of Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Andrew E. Chapman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center/Jefferson Health, PA
| | - William P. Tew
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Efrat Dotan
- Department of Hematology Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Heeyoung Kim
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Vani Katheria
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Cary P. Gross
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Harvey J. Cohen
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Hyman B. Muss
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Mina S. Sedrak
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
- Department of Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bostel T, Nikolaidou E, Wollschläger D, Mayer A, Kaufmann J, Hopprich A, Rühle A, Grosu AL, Debus J, Fottner C, Moehler M, Grimminger P, Schmidberger H, Nicolay NH. Multicenter analysis on the value of standard (chemo)radiotherapy in elderly patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:28. [PMID: 38433231 PMCID: PMC10910868 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02414-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the tolerability and oncological results of chemoradiation in elderly patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. METHODS This multi-center retrospective analysis included 86 elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (median age 73 years; range 65-92 years) treated with definitive or neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy. The treatment was performed at 3 large comprehensive cancer centers in Germany from 2006 to 2020. Locoregional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-associated toxicities according to CTCAE criteria v5.0 were analyzed, and parameters potentially relevant to patient outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS Thirty-three patients (38%) were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery, while the remaining patients received definitive (chemo)radiation. The delivery of radiotherapy without dose reduction was possible in 80 patients (93%). In 66 patients (77%), concomitant chemotherapy was initially prescribed; however, during the course of therapy, 48% of patients (n = 32) required chemotherapy de-escalation due to treatment-related toxicities and comorbidities. Twenty-nine patients (34%) experienced higher-grade acute toxicities and 14 patients (16%) higher-grade late toxicities. The 2-year LRC, DMFS, PFS, and OS amounted to 72%, 49%, 46%, and 52%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery was shown to be associated with significantly better PFS (p = 0.006), DMFS (p = 0.006), and OS (p = 0.004) compared with all non-surgical treatments (pooled definitive radiotherapy and chemoradiation). No such advantage was seen over definitive chemoradiation. The majority of patients with neoadjuvant therapy received standard chemoradiotherapy without dose reduction (n = 24/33, 73%). In contrast, concurrent chemotherapy was only possible in 62% of patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy (n = 33/53), and most of these patients required dose-reduction or modification of chemotherapy (n = 23/33, 70%). CONCLUSIONS In our analysis, omission of chemotherapy or adjustment of chemotherapy dose during definitive radiotherapy was necessary for the overwhelming majority of elderly esophageal cancer patients not eligible for surgery, and hence resulted in reduced PFS and OS. Therefore, optimization of non-surgical approaches and the identification of potential predictive factors for safe administration of concurrent chemotherapy in elderly patients with (gastro)esophageal adenocarcinoma is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Radiological Institute Dr. Von Essen, Koblenz, Germany.
| | - Eirini Nikolaidou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Wollschläger
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Arnulf Mayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Justus Kaufmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anne Hopprich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Fottner
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Moehler
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Grimminger
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (Dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils Henrik Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
- Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Moreno-Carmona MR, Serra-Prat M, Riera SA, Estrada O, Ferro T, Querol R. Effect of frailty on postoperative complications, mortality, and survival in older patients with non-metastatic colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101639. [PMID: 37806888 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION New evidence has emerged on the impact of frailty on prognosis in colon cancer, but the findings are not always consistent and conclusive. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effect of frailty on postoperative complications and mortality in patients with non-metastatic colon cancer (CC) aged 65 years and older. MATERIALS AND METHODS We systematically searched for original studies published in the PubMed and Web of Science databases up to June 2021. Two independent reviewers selected the studies and extracted predefined data. A meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model to assess the effect of frailty on 30-day, 3- to 6-month and 1-year mortality, survival, and postoperative complications. RESULTS The search yielded 313 articles, of which 14 were included in this systematic review. The meta-analysis showed an effect for frailty on 30-day, 3- to 6-month, and 1-year mortality with respective pooled odds ratios (ORs) of 3.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53-8.79, p = 0.004), 8.73 (95% CI 4.03-18.94, p < 0.0001), and 3.99 (95% CI 2.12-7.52, p < 0.0001). Frailty also had an effect on survival, with a pooled hazard ratio of 2.99 (95% CI 1.70-5.25. p < 0.0001), and on overall and severe postoperative complications with pooled ORs of 2.34 (95% CI 1.75-3.15; p < 0.0001) and 2.43 (95% CI 1.72-3.43; p < 0.0001), respectively. DISCUSSION Frailty in older patients with CC is a risk factor for postoperative complications and mortality in the short term (30 days), medium term (3-6 months), and long term (1 year).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mª Rosario Moreno-Carmona
- Department of Oncology, Hospital de Mataró, Consorci Sanitari del Maresme, 08304 Mataró, Catalunya, Spain.
| | - Mateu Serra-Prat
- Research Unit, Fundació Salut del Consorci Sanitari del Maresme (Mataró), Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Stephanie A Riera
- Gastrointestinal Motility Laboratory, Hospital de Mataró, Consorci Sanitari del Maresme, 08304 Mataró, Catalunya, Spain; Department of Surgery and Morphological Sciences, University Autonomous of Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Oscar Estrada
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of Mataró, Consorci Sanitari del Maresme, 08304 Mataró, Catalunya, Spain.
| | - Tarsila Ferro
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Duran i Reynals. Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), 08908 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalunya, Spain.
| | - Rosa Querol
- Department of Oncology, Consorci Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí de Sabadell, 08208 Sabadell, Catalunya, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Cooper L, Orgad R, Levi Y, Shmilovitch H, Feferman Y, Solomon D, Kashtan H. Esophageal cancer in octogenarians: Should esophagectomy be done? J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101710. [PMID: 38281389 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Esophagectomy is the treatment of choice for esophageal cancer. In octogenarians data is conflicting. We evaluated postoperative outcomes and long-term survival of octogenarians and their younger counterparts. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database including consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy at a large referral, academic center between 2012 and 2021. Subgroups were designed according to age (<70, 70-79, and ≥ 80). RESULTS A total of 359 patients underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, 223 (62%) aged <70, 107 (30%) aged 70-79 and 29 (8%) aged ≥80. Octogenarians had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] scores (p = 0.001), and fewer received neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.04). Octogenarians experienced more major complications (P < 0.001) with significantly higher 30-day mortality rate (P = 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, major complications were associated with higher risk of being discharged to a rehabilitation center (odds ratio [OR] 14.839, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.921-44.747, p < 0.001) while age was not. Overall survival was reduced in octogenarians, with a 50th percentile survival of 10 months compared to 32 and 26 months in patients age < 70 and 70-79, respectively (p = 0.014). In a multivariable analysis, age ≥ 80 (hazard ratio [HR] 4.478 95% CI 2.151-9.322, p < 0.001), cancer stage (HR 1.545, 95% CI 1.095-2.179, p = 0.013), and postoperative major complications (HR 2.705 95% CI 1.913-3.823, p < 0.001) were independently associated with reduced survival. DISCUSSION Our study showed that octogenarians had significantly higher postoperative major complications compared to younger age groups. Overall survival was significantly reduced in these patients, probably due to an increased rate of perioperative mortality. Better patient selection and preparation may improve postoperative outcomes and increase long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Cooper
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel..
| | - Ran Orgad
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yochai Levi
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Hila Shmilovitch
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yael Feferman
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Daniel Solomon
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Hanoch Kashtan
- Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Jensen CE, Deal AM, Nyrop KA, Logan M, Mangieri NJ, Strayhorn MD, Miller J, Muss HB, Lichtman EI, Rubinstein SM, Tuchman SA. Geriatric assessment-guided interventions for older adults with multiple myeloma: A feasibility and acceptability study. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101680. [PMID: 38104482 PMCID: PMC10922464 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Geriatric assessment (GA)-guided supportive care programs have been successful in improving treatment outcomes for older adults with solid-organ cancers. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a GA-guided supportive care program among older adults treated for multiple myeloma (MM). MATERIALS AND METHODS The study utilized an existing registry of adults with plasma cell disorders at the University of North Carolina. Patients with MM, aged 60 or older, and having a GA-identified deficit in one or more problem area were offered referrals to supportive care resources during routine visits. Problem areas included physical function deficits, polypharmacy, and anxiety or depression. Patients with physical function deficits were offered referral to physical therapy (PT), those with polypharmacy to an Oncology Clinical Pharmacist Practitioner (CPP), and those with mental health symptoms to the Comprehensive Cancer Support Program (CCSP). RESULTS Of the 58 individuals identified as having at least one deficit on the GA, PT was the most commonly identified relevant resource (79%), followed by CPP visits (57%). Among individuals that were offered referral(s) to at least one new supportive care resource, the acceptance rate was 50%. Referral acceptance rates were highest among those recommended for a CPP visit (55% of those approached) and lowest for CCSP (0%). DISCUSSION The study examined the feasibility and acceptability of a referral program for supportive care resources among older adults with MM who have deficits on GA. The most commonly identified deficit was physical functioning, followed by polypharmacy and mental health. The study found that physical interventions and referrals to CPPs were the most accepted interventions. However, the low proportion of patients who accepted physical therapy referrals indicates the need for tailored and more personalized approaches. Further research is needed to explore the feasibility and impact of supportive care referral programs for older adults with MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher E Jensen
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Physicians Office Building, CB# 7305, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Kirsten A Nyrop
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Physicians Office Building, CB# 7305, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Maya Logan
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Nicholas J Mangieri
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Martha D Strayhorn
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Jordan Miller
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Hyman B Muss
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Physicians Office Building, CB# 7305, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Eben I Lichtman
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Physicians Office Building, CB# 7305, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Samuel M Rubinstein
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Physicians Office Building, CB# 7305, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Sascha A Tuchman
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Physicians Office Building, CB# 7305, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Diekmann B, Timmerman M, Hempenius L, van Roon E, Franken B, Hoogendoorn M. New treatment opportunities for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia and the increasing importance of frailty assessment - An oncogeriatric perspective. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101631. [PMID: 37783588 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
With the introduction of targeted chemotherapy drugs, a new age of treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has begun. The promotion of the azacitidine+venetoclax combination regimen to first line of treatment in patients deemed ineligible for intensive chemotherapy marks the first of many novel combination regimens becoming part of national treatment guidelines. We review recent phase II and III clinical trials and conclude that these novel regimens offer significant increases in response rates, remission rates, and overall survival. The incidence of adverse events, the accrued time toxicity, and the healthcare costs, however, are increasing as well. Compared with clinical trials, older patients in the real world frequently present with an inferior baseline health status, which is associated with an increased risk of experiencing side effects. The key to reaping the maximum benefit of the new agents and their combination regimens therefore lies in sufficient attention being given to a patients' preexisting comorbidities, potential frailty, and quality of life. A systematic collaboration between hemato-oncologists and geriatricians can be a potent first step towards addressing the increased treatment intensity patients with AML experience under the novel regimens. In this narrative review article we provide an overview of recent and ongoing clinical trials, highlight encountered adverse events, discuss frailty assessment options, and outline an oncogeriatic care path for older patients with AML.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benno Diekmann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Henry Dunantweg 2, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands; Unit of Pharmacotherapy, Epidemiology and Economics, Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, Groningen, the Netherlands; MCL Academy, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
| | - Marjolijn Timmerman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands; Department of Geriatric Care, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Henry Dunantweg 2, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth Hempenius
- Department of Geriatric Care, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Henry Dunantweg 2, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Eric van Roon
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Henry Dunantweg 2, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands; Unit of Pharmacotherapy, Epidemiology and Economics, Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, Groningen, the Netherlands; MCL Academy, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Franken
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Mels Hoogendoorn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Takei S, Kawachi H, Yamada T, Tamiya M, Negi Y, Goto Y, Nakao A, Shiotsu S, Tanimura K, Takeda T, Okada A, Harada T, Date K, Chihara Y, Hasegawa I, Tamiya N, Katayama Y, Nishioka N, Morimoto K, Iwasaku M, Tokuda S, Kijima T, Takayama K. Prognostic impact of clinical factors for immune checkpoint inhibitor with or without chemotherapy in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1348034. [PMID: 38464519 PMCID: PMC10920331 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1348034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The proportion of older patients diagnosed with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been increasing. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy (MONO) and combination therapy of ICI and chemotherapy (COMBO) are standard treatments for patients with NSCLC and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion scores (TPS) ≥ 50%. However, evidence from the clinical trials specifically for older patients is limited. Thus, it is unclear which older patients benefit more from COMBO than MONO. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 199 older NSCLC patients of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-1 and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% who were treated with MONO or COMBO. We analyzed the association between treatment outcomes and baseline patient characteristics in each group, using propensity score matching. Results Of the 199 patients, 131 received MONO, and 68 received COMBO. The median overall survival (OS; MONO: 25.2 vs. COMBO: 42.2 months, P = 0.116) and median progression-free survival (PFS; 10.9 vs. 11.8 months, P = 0.231) did not significantly differ between MONO and COMBO group. In the MONO group, OS was significantly shorter in patients without smoking history compared to those with smoking history [HR for smoking history against non-smoking history: 0.36 (95% CI: 0.16-0.78), P = 0.010]. In the COMBO group, OS was significantly shorter in patients with PS 1 than those with PS 0 [HR for PS 0 against PS 1: 3.84 (95% CI: 1.44-10.20), P = 0.007] and for patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SQ) compared to non-squamous cell carcinoma (non-SQ) [HR for SQ against non-SQ: 0.17 (95% CI: 0.06-0.44), P < 0.001]. For patients with ECOG PS 0 (OS: 26.1 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0031, PFS: 6.5 vs. 21.7 months, P = 0.0436) or non-SQ (OS: 23.8 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0038, PFS: 10.9 vs. 17.3 months, P = 0.0383), PFS and OS were significantly longer in the COMBO group. Conclusions ECOG PS and histological type should be considered when choosing MONO or COMBO treatment in older patients with NSCLC and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shota Takei
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hayato Kawachi
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tadaaki Yamada
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Motohiro Tamiya
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshiki Negi
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Hematology, School of Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Goto
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Akira Nakao
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Nanakuma, Japan
| | - Shinsuke Shiotsu
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Keiko Tanimura
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daini Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takayuki Takeda
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daini Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Asuka Okada
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saiseikai Suita Hospital, Suita, Japan
| | - Taishi Harada
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, Fukuchiyama, Japan
| | - Koji Date
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Kyoto Chubu Medical Center, Nantan, Japan
| | - Yusuke Chihara
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Uji-Tokushukai Medical Center, Uji, Japan
| | - Isao Hasegawa
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saiseikai Shigaken Hospital, Rittou, Japan
| | - Nobuyo Tamiya
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuki Katayama
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Naoya Nishioka
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kenji Morimoto
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masahiro Iwasaku
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinsaku Tokuda
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Kijima
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Hematology, School of Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Koichi Takayama
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ushimaru Y, Nagano S, Nishikawa K, Kawabata R, Takeoka T, Kitagawa A, Ohara N, Tomihara H, Maeda S, Imazato M, Noura S, Miyamoto A. A comprehensive study on non-cancer-related mortality risk factors in elderly gastric cancer patients post-curative surgery. BMC Gastroenterol 2024; 24:78. [PMID: 38373885 PMCID: PMC10875761 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03170-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increasing incidence of gastric cancer in the elderly underscores the need for an in-depth understanding of the challenges and risks associated with surgical interventions in this demographic. This study aims to investigate the risk factors and prognostic indicators for non-cancer-related mortality following curative surgery in elderly gastric cancer patients. METHODS This retrospective analysis examined 684 patients with pathological Stage I-III gastric cancer who underwent curative resection between January 2012 and December 2021. The study focused on patients aged 70 years and above, evaluating various clinical and pathological variables. Univariate analysis was utilized to identify potential risk factors with to non-cancer-related mortality and to access prognostic outcomes. RESULTS Out of the initial 684 patients, 244 elderly patients were included in the analysis, with 33 succumbing to non-cancer-related causes. Univariate analysis identified advanced age (≥ 80 years), low body mass index (BMI) (< 18.5), high Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and the presence of overall surgical complications as significant potential risk factors for non-cancer related mortality. These factors also correlated with poorer overall survival and prognosis. The most common cause of non-cancer-related deaths were respiratory issues and heart failure. CONCLUSION In elderly gastric cancer patients, managing advanced age, low BMI, high CCI, and minimizing postoperative complications are essential for reducing non-cancer-related mortality following curative surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Ushimaru
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan.
| | - Shinnosuke Nagano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Nishikawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Ryohei Kawabata
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Tomohira Takeoka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Akihiro Kitagawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Nobuyoshi Ohara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Hideo Tomihara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Sakae Maeda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Mitsunobu Imazato
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Shingo Noura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| | - Atsushi Miyamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, 1-1-1 Ebaraji-Cho, Nishi-Ku, Sakai City, Osaka, 593-8304, Japan
| |
Collapse
|